Official Tehran: We have nothing to do with the crash of the Ukrainian liner

Official Tehran: We have nothing to do with the crash of the Ukrainian liner

Iranian sources provide details of the disaster with a Ukrainian plane at Tehran's airport. Earlier, Military Review reported that the Boeing 737 airliner of the Ukrainian airline UIA (Ukrainian International Airlines), flying from the capital of Iran to Kiev, crashed immediately after taking off a few kilometers west of Tehran's main airborne airport Imam Khomeini.


It became known that there were 169 people on board the aircraft, of which 9 were crew members. According to the latest information, all crew members and passengers were killed.

The Iranian television channel Al-Aalam reports that, according to the country's leadership, Iran has nothing to do with the crash of the Ukrainian airliner.

It should be noted that the fall of Boeing737 occurred several hours after the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps attacked US military bases on Iraqi territory.

It is noteworthy that most air carriers suspended their flights in the airspace of Iran and Iraq immediately after reports of a missile strike on US bases. But the leadership of the Ukrainian airline did not take such a step.

So far, the main version regarding the causes of the disaster is called the technical malfunction of the aircraft.
Photos used:
UIA Aviation Company
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

156 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. The comment was deleted.
    1. alavrin 8 January 2020 08: 33 New
      • 7
      • 10
      -3
      Ukrainian scumbags like Poroshenko or Klimkin there, I have no doubt they will.
      1. Thrall 8 January 2020 08: 47 New
        • 26
        • 9
        +17
        Ukrainian citizens, like the rest of Ukraine, are just expendables for the United States.
      2. Pivot 8 January 2020 09: 07 New
        • 27
        • 7
        +20
        Note a single troll did not say that the Boeing 737 was an unsuccessful aircraft and it was a mistake to mass-produce it.
        1. Avior 8 January 2020 10: 22 New
          • 5
          • 1
          +4
          UIA has other Boeings, not 737max, but 737ng, types 737-800 and 737-900, there were no complaints about them
          1. Pivot 8 January 2020 10: 58 New
            • 17
            • 7
            +10
            What difference does it make if it stinks dry for a week
            1. Avior 8 January 2020 11: 26 New
              • 4
              • 1
              +3
              Would.
              But the same would happen if it was a Boeing 737mah, there are also many complaints against it
        2. Nick 8 January 2020 11: 22 New
          • 6
          • 5
          +1
          Quote: Pivot
          Note a single troll did not say that the Boeing 737 was an unsuccessful aircraft and it was a mistake to mass-produce it.

          For this is not paid. They were paid only blasphemy for everything Russian. hi
        3. The comment was deleted.
        4. Achilles 8 January 2020 14: 37 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          According to preliminary information
      3. georggy 8 January 2020 10: 06 New
        • 7
        • 6
        +1
        I agree with you, they work according to the Malaysian Boeing scheme.
        Everything is planned in advance.
        1. bayard 8 January 2020 18: 24 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Most likely electronic warfare or through a remote access system.
          Or maybe they just jammed the communication channels, and there are mountains around Tehran, there planes regularly beat about them.
          1. georggy 9 January 2020 13: 48 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Honestly, the information coming from the media gives me the impression that this is a terrorist attack.
            Well, again, the Russian rocket witch hunt. Right now, a howl will rush around the world.
            1. bayard 9 January 2020 13: 59 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              The Iranian side posted photos of the wreckage.
              On them are traces of the damaging elements.
              At the same time, the Iranians said that an American drone was discovered on the eve of the air defense systems in that area, which most likely struck, suggesting to hit the plane with the leadership of Iran.
              This is the Iranian version.
              The Iranian air defense did not work, and the Ukrainian plane took off from Tehran and could not be accepted for the attacking side.

              It seems that this is a provocation from the neocons of the United States, in order to prevent Trump from escalating and provoking a war.

              Debris and destructive elements will tell you everything.
              And I hope the investigation will not be dealt with by the Dutch. winked A joke.
              1. georggy 9 January 2020 14: 34 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                I agree with you.
                although jokes have already begun that this was a planned terrorist attack against Zelensky who was resting in Oman.
                1. bayard 9 January 2020 15: 19 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  This is really a planned terrorist attack and they donated to those (by plane) who do not mind.
                  Ukraine is not a pity.
                  But there will be a lot of stench. And most likely they will pull Ukraine into a coalition against Iran.
      4. 4ekist 8 January 2020 12: 32 New
        • 4
        • 3
        +1
        I recall what comments the Ukrainian media and various scumbag bloggers poured out when the Tu-154 crashed in Sochi. I will not comment on anything, people are sorry. There are investigative
        authorities, let them understand, but not Dutch.
      5. Maz
        Maz 8 January 2020 13: 00 New
        • 1
        • 5
        -4
        It’s a pity you can’t swear at the Sumerians.
    2. Russian Moldavian 8 January 2020 08: 33 New
      • 5
      • 2
      +3
      Are you definitely "Good"? I look at you fun, joke
      1. Machito 8 January 2020 10: 01 New
        • 9
        • 3
        +6
        Condolences to the family and friends of the dead brothers.
        1. URAL72 8 January 2020 10: 19 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          The passengers on board were mostly Iranian citizens.
          1. Piramidon 8 January 2020 11: 43 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: URAL72
            The passengers on board were mostly Iranian citizens.

            I wonder what they forgot in Kiev?
            1. URAL72 8 January 2020 13: 08 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              Many have studied in Ukraine since Soviet times, and are studying now. Many have settled and have seiyi both there and there. Ukrspecials are working in Iran, for example, the An-140 program, nuclear plants were also built with the involvement of Ukrainian engineers and workers.
          2. georggy 9 January 2020 14: 52 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            And 63 Canadian citizens
    3. The comment was deleted.
      1. SRC P-15 8 January 2020 08: 54 New
        • 17
        • 3
        +14
        Quote: Finches
        But, to be honest, it’s no laughing matter ...

        Just some deja vu. And again, Ukraine ...
        1. Terenin 8 January 2020 10: 46 New
          • 14
          • 0
          +14
          Quote: SRC P-15
          Quote: Finches
          But, to be honest, it’s no laughing matter ...

          Just some deja vu. And again, Ukraine ...

          Well, on the eve of the same, the US Federal Aviation Administration clearly prescribed its airlines to ban flights over the territories of Iran, Iraq, as well as over the Persian and Ottoman bays.
          Is there anything in Ukraine? Or there, each pilot is his own analyst ...
          1. novel66 8 January 2020 11: 15 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Hi hello hi denyuzhka, denyuzhka solves everything ... others do not fly - it means you have a full board, well, and you're lucky, maybe
            1. NIKN 8 January 2020 13: 07 New
              • 3
              • 0
              +3
              Roma hello! hi Well, as always, my personal opinion ... It’s too early to draw conclusions on life, but judging by the scatter of the wreckage, the plane exploded in the air, of course, the probability of aircraft failure, but somehow within reason. Since the altitude is 2400, the engines are already operating at their nominal values ​​(explosion of the engine is unlikely to be well), and a banal fire with correctly executed threat procedures will also bring little disaster ... Well, something like that for now, the rest is speculation.
              Condolences to the families of the victims.
              1. novel66 8 January 2020 14: 58 New
                • 4
                • 0
                +4
                Kolya, hello, have not seen each other for a long time! your opinion however, the opinion of the pros, you must listen!
          2. Chaldon48 8 January 2020 11: 52 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            And why Ukraine needs management, all issues are resolved through the American embassy.
            1. Terenin 8 January 2020 12: 03 New
              • 6
              • 2
              +4
              Quote: Chaldon48
              And why Ukraine needs management, all issues are resolved through the American embassy.

              they have holidays on schedule winked

      2. rich 8 January 2020 09: 24 New
        • 12
        • 1
        +11
        my condolences to family members and relatives of the victims
        1. Dmitry Donskoy 8 January 2020 10: 59 New
          • 2
          • 7
          -5
          And which is typical, again the plane of the Russian President was nearby (flew to Syria). Doesn’t it suggest any thoughts? request
          1. Monster_Fat 8 January 2020 11: 31 New
            • 8
            • 1
            +7
            Go to the “Censor” - you won’t find any “thoughts” there, but howl is terrible - “Iranian mercenaries of Moscow”, “Putin flew into Syria for a reason” - to personally shoot at “MEU” from the “gebist revolver”, well and all that ... just before you go to this Kaklyatsky site, drink something antiemetic. yes
            1. Dmitry Donskoy 8 January 2020 11: 48 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              No thanks. I won’t read. Nerves are more expensive. hi
            2. 4ekist 8 January 2020 17: 53 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Why go to their Censor, read this nonsense of the modeled.
          2. Piramidon 8 January 2020 11: 53 New
            • 4
            • 1
            +3
            Quote: Dmitry Donskoy
            And which is typical, again the plane of the Russian President was nearby (flew to Syria). Doesn’t it suggest any thoughts? request

            Do not try to pull an owl on the globe. Putin flew to Syria the day before this disaster.
  2. tihonmarine 8 January 2020 08: 33 New
    • 5
    • 2
    +3
    It is noteworthy that most carriers suspended their flights in the airspace of Iran and Iraq immediately after reports of a missile strike on US bases
    Began !
  3. ML-334 8 January 2020 08: 34 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    Because of some trifle, pennies are not the first to lose, after all.
  4. prodd 8 January 2020 08: 34 New
    • 7
    • 48
    -41
    Cemil, all companies canceled flights.
    Omar, I see the goal.
    This is the Americans!
    Omar, pli!
    1. Vyacheslav Viktorovich 8 January 2020 08: 47 New
      • 7
      • 48
      -41
      Most likely, somehow it was. As always in such cases, the civilian was shot down by mistake, and it was probably Iran with less integrated air defense information systems in every possible way.
      1. Terenin 8 January 2020 10: 52 New
        • 12
        • 1
        +11
        Quote: Vyacheslav Viktorovich
        This is the Americans!
        Omar, pli!

        Quote: Vyacheslav Viktorovich
        Most likely, somehow it was.

        Problem "fighters", just the Americans and forbade their airlines to fly where "Omar - a nightmare and Vyacheslav Viktorovich" fired angry
        1. Vyacheslav Viktorovich 8 January 2020 10: 55 New
          • 3
          • 11
          -8
          Quote: Terenin
          just Americans and banned their airlines flights
          I did not claim that the Iranian squadrons hoped to bring down a plane of the American airline. They could mistakenly confuse civil with military, this is my version.
          1. Terenin 8 January 2020 11: 44 New
            • 8
            • 0
            +8
            Quote: Vyacheslav Viktorovich
            Quote: Terenin
            just Americans and banned their airlines flights
            I did not claim that the Iranian squadrons hoped to bring down a plane of the American airline. They could mistakenly confuse civil with military, this is my version.

            Vyacheslav, if you would immediately answer trolling with this post
            Quote: prodd
            Omar, I see the goal.
            This is the Americans!
            Omar, pli!

            then this could be mistaken for the version ...
      2. NKT
        NKT 8 January 2020 10: 53 New
        • 3
        • 1
        +2
        Hinting at the Americans, how did they hit an Iranian civilian plane in 1988?
        1. prodd 8 January 2020 23: 25 New
          • 1
          • 2
          -1
          Hints that the anti-aircraft again entrusted with air defense in Syria and the Donbass.
  5. Udav kaa 8 January 2020 08: 37 New
    • 5
    • 2
    +3
    My condolences of course .. But something here is not clean!
  6. iuocsfyu 8 January 2020 08: 40 New
    • 3
    • 30
    -27
    According to the country's leadership, Iran has nothing to do with the crash of the Ukrainian airliner
    - what else remains for them.


    https://twitter.com/isna_farsi/status/1214756225293979648

    - Judging by the video, the plane was far away, it was not visible. So the dude heard an explosion, saw a flash, and only then managed to turn on the camera on a smartphone. It’s less likely to hear the engine fire or to see it without knowing what and where it flies in the night than to hear the explosion of an air defense missile (I hear well from the iron dome how the explosion of even a small rocket is heard in the sky).
    This is only my judgment, but everything looks so, unsightly for Iran.
    1. Servisinzhener 8 January 2020 13: 49 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      The version looks crazy. It is clear that Iran is an enemy for Israel. But they are not driven by villains from Hollywood action movies. Who do evil for the sake of the process.
  7. U-58 8 January 2020 08: 43 New
    • 17
    • 2
    +15
    So, January 8th, 08:40 Moscow time.
    We open Flightradar and see that in the airspace of Iran fly three dozen civilian aircraft, over Iraq, 16 aircraft, incl. large wide-bodied
    1. alavrin 8 January 2020 08: 45 New
      • 1
      • 10
      -9
      But this is criminal negligence. Apparently, the Ukrainian experience has not taught anything.
      1. U-58 8 January 2020 08: 47 New
        • 4
        • 3
        +1
        And what, in fact, is experience?
        Where is Ukraine and where is Iran?
        There is no criminal data yet ..
        1. alavrin 8 January 2020 08: 54 New
          • 5
          • 6
          -1
          Moreover, this is a potential risk for civilian aircraft. And by the way, Polish airlines, as soon as this mess began, banned the flight of their ships there.
          1. alavrin 8 January 2020 10: 00 New
            • 0
            • 1
            -1
            Yes, and an hour ago it was done, American.
  8. RussianRoulette 8 January 2020 08: 45 New
    • 2
    • 8
    -6
    This is how one should firmly believe in friendship with amers in order to decide on the take-off of a civilian ship in the current situation!
  9. machinistvl 8 January 2020 08: 46 New
    • 2
    • 18
    -16
    Judging by the video, the operator knew what would happen next. Otherwise, what's the point of shooting a take-off plane, and even in the dark.
    1. iuocsfyu 8 January 2020 08: 50 New
      • 4
      • 6
      -2
      Quote: machinistvl
      Judging by the video, the cameraman knew what would happen next. Otherwise, what's the point of shooting a take-off plane, and even in the dark.

      On the contrary, I didn’t know. Therefore, the onset of a fire or flash or the sound of an explosion in the air is not visible. I saw or heard something, and only then looked there and turned on the camera.

      https://twitter.com/isna_farsi/status/1214756225293979648
      1. machinistvl 8 January 2020 09: 08 New
        • 2
        • 10
        -8
        What did you hear? It is clear that he most likely knew what would happen next.
      2. Piramidon 8 January 2020 12: 03 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        Quote: iuocsfyu
        I saw or heard something, and only then looked there and turned on the camera.

        The beginning of the video is an airplane in flight (headlights) and only then an explosion.
        1. Abudante 8 January 2020 12: 52 New
          • 1
          • 2
          -1
          Use glasses. It's not the headlights, it's a burning engine
          1. Piramidon 8 January 2020 17: 45 New
            • 1
            • 1
            0
            Quote: Abudante
            Use glasses.

            You may have some special glasses that can be seen at a luminous point by a burning engine
  10. Vitaly Tsymbal 8 January 2020 08: 56 New
    • 12
    • 9
    +3
    So the fake war began (even in VO) ... Now the State Department’s minions will form the opinion that Iran (like another member of the “axis of evil”) is being shot down by peacefully flying American Boeings. And there is no other way to explain the plane crash ??? After all, American aircraft are the most reliable in the world ....
    1. Vyacheslav Viktorovich 8 January 2020 09: 05 New
      • 6
      • 10
      -4
      Aircraft from time to time beat from technical problems, but a technical problem that arose precisely in that part of the Earth where the military operation began, exactly on the day when the military operation began? An unlikely coincidence. Planes fly tens of thousands (literally) all 365 days a year, what is the probability of coincidence?
      1. Vitaly Tsymbal 8 January 2020 09: 20 New
        • 8
        • 1
        +7
        Well, well ... and also to "randomness" you can add "Ukrainian beech pattern" and "readiness of the Dutch prosecutor's office" ... I won’t be surprised !!! I would be surprised that everyone, before the publication of more accurate information, did not speak out .... if only because Iran’s air defense is probably in readiness No. 1 since the death of the Iranian general and to distinguish the civilian side from the military side, following the schedule and corridor, Iranian Fenders know how to distinguish. But fake fighters have already begun to fight "for the brains" of people from the first seconds, as the information arrived ....
        1. Vyacheslav Viktorovich 8 January 2020 09: 27 New
          • 3
          • 11
          -8
          Quote: Vitaliy Tsymbal
          distinguish between civilian and military board, following the schedule and the corridor, Iranian air defense personnel know how to distinguish
          And milling machines are able to distinguish a rotating mill from a non-rotating, but still lose their fingers. There is no more ridiculous and implausible assumption than that it is unusual for a person to make mistakes.
          1. Vitaly Tsymbal 8 January 2020 09: 46 New
            • 10
            • 1
            +9
            Dear Vyacheslav Viktorovich! I didn’t write about human errors (although I admit that a failure could have occurred in the Iranian air defense system), I mean that this catastrophe is an occasion to impose a certain attitude on Iran to people and to block US actions - not Iran eliminated the US headquarters, and not Iran crossed the line of the reconnaissance war into an army war ... But here, in VO, judging by the minuses put to me, "the fake fighters on duty are sitting !!!!
            1. Vyacheslav Viktorovich 8 January 2020 09: 57 New
              • 2
              • 9
              -7
              Quote: Vitaliy Tsymbal
              I'm talking about the fact that this catastrophe is an occasion to impose on people a certain attitude towards Iran and to block off US actions
              This reasoning is a logical error called https://ru.rationalwiki.org/wiki/After_Argument
              1. Vitaly Tsymbal 8 January 2020 10: 07 New
                • 3
                • 2
                +1
                Dear Vyacheslav Viktorovich! What I wrote above is not reasoning (if you adhere to the science of Logic), but a conclusion based on facts, but you can’t imagine the facts ... therefore you are either mistaken or manipulated ...
                1. Vyacheslav Viktorovich 8 January 2020 10: 46 New
                  • 2
                  • 8
                  -6
                  Quote: Vitaliy Tsymbal
                  What I wrote above is not reasoning (if you adhere to the science of Logic), but a conclusion based on facts

                  Well, I pointed out a logical error in this reasoning / inference (as you call it, inference is part of the reasoning). If a plane shot down by Iran can be used for anti-Iranian PR, this does not mean that the statement that Iran shot down a plane is a fake.
      2. mark2 8 January 2020 09: 51 New
        • 2
        • 2
        0
        . An unlikely coincidence. Planes fly in tens of thousands (literally) all 365 days a year,


        Comments and tweets are made daily by millions. But what would your comment be on the day of the attack on the US base and the fall of the Bandera plane ... Coincidence? I don’t think so!
        1. Vyacheslav Viktorovich 8 January 2020 09: 56 New
          • 2
          • 6
          -4
          Quote: mark2
          Comments and tweets are made daily by millions. But what would your comment be on the day of the attack on the US base and the fall of the Bandera plane ... Coincidence? I don’t think so!
          Your analogy would work if civilian planes fell a few pieces a day. And so (from the point of view of logic) the analogy is not only not a proof, but also your analogy is not an analogy.
          1. mark2 8 January 2020 10: 01 New
            • 3
            • 4
            -1
            So they fall very often. It’s just that the news reflects the fall of certain types of aircraft. And then there is Bandera, and even in Iran, with which Russia has some business.
            1. Vyacheslav Viktorovich 8 January 2020 10: 05 New
              • 2
              • 4
              -2
              Quote: mark2
              So they fall very often. It’s just that the news reflects the fall of certain types of aircraft.
              We are interested in the fall of the main liners, they are always reflected in the news, and very widely.
              1. Cat Kuzya 8 January 2020 12: 38 New
                • 2
                • 1
                +1
                Again, the ill-fated Boeing 737 .... They showed literally "yesterday" the Boeing company workshops and parking lots clogged with this model, like, some countries refused to sign contracts for this model of an airliner concluded with Boeing. It seems that now the Boeing has completely flown with this model, where will they put everything built? Really for scrap?
                1. Cat Kuzya 8 January 2020 15: 28 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  And here, they write that on the wreckage of the plane there are holes from the striking elements of the SAM:
                  http://in24.org/world/38198?utm_source=warfiles.ru
  11. Mountain shooter 8 January 2020 09: 14 New
    • 6
    • 1
    +5
    Now they’ll figure out how to tie Iran to this disaster ... If you haven’t prepared the version already. They won’t find a rocket, they’ll come up with a bomb ... But somehow, the coincidence is too incredible. As soon as a mess, so a civilian liner ... For the charge of "bloody Mordor." One training manual?
    1. Nick 8 January 2020 11: 27 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      Now they’ll figure out how to tie Iran to this disaster ... If you haven’t prepared the version already. They will not find a rocket, they will come up with a bomb

      And the rocket will certainly be Russian
  12. Thrifty 8 January 2020 09: 14 New
    • 4
    • 2
    +2
    The plane is a difficult thing, failures and breakdowns are inevitable, so I just once again express my condolences to the families and friends of the victims. ...
  13. rocket757 8 January 2020 09: 16 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    There will be an investigation, there will be relevant conclusions ... Just wait for the results.
  14. aszzz888 8 January 2020 09: 21 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    It became known that there were 169 people on board the aircraft, of which 9 were crew members. According to the latest information, all crew members and passengers were killed.

    Condolences to the relatives of the victims. Surely there are, and someone is our relatives.
  15. Dude 8 January 2020 09: 25 New
    • 8
    • 7
    +1
    Hohlotrolls divorced too much on VO, as I look, judging by the very first comments ... Admins do not catch mice.

    And on the topic of the article I want to say only one thing - condolences to the families and friends of the victims ...
  16. svp67 8 January 2020 09: 28 New
    • 6
    • 2
    +4
    The Iranian television channel Al-Aalam reports that, according to the country's leadership, Iran has nothing to do with the crash of the Ukrainian airliner.
    This position has always surprised me. How does it have nothing to do with it?
    Why did he take off the airfield? Whose specialists carried out pre-flight maintenance and supervised the take-off? But did he refuel there? But in the end, on whose territory is he now?
    1. Genry 8 January 2020 09: 39 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      It has to do with flight, as it was organized.
      By accident - no.
      1. svp67 8 January 2020 09: 44 New
        • 3
        • 2
        +1
        Quote: Genry
        By accident - no.

        To the catastrophe and this is the commission will establish. And if the plane was refueling there and when checking the fuel it turns out that it is not air-conditioned, and if the dispatcher was “smart”, the technician forgot to remove the “cap” from the pressure tube or what kind of clamp ... Before the conclusions of the commission, there’s nothing to say
        1. Genry 8 January 2020 09: 58 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: svp67
          if the plane was refueling there and when checking the fuel it turns out that it is not air-conditioned, and if the dispatcher was “smart”, the technician forgot to remove the “cap” from the pressure pipe or which clamp ...

          What is the Iranian government doing ???
          1. svp67 8 January 2020 10: 24 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Quote: Genry
            What is the Iranian government doing ???

            I’m not sure that Iranian ministers are specifically doing this, yet it seems to me that they have enough trained specialists for this. But the flight is INTERNATIONAL, and therefore the settlement is now proceeding at the intergovernmental level, where each side is trying to prove its innocence and will doubt that of its colleagues. Since, according to the results of the trial, it is necessary to decide who will pay for all this, in the literal sense for the plane, and compensation for the relatives of the victims.
            1. Avior 8 January 2020 10: 37 New
              • 3
              • 0
              +3
              I think the insurance will pay, and only then it can demand from the culprit
        2. Mordvin 3 8 January 2020 10: 15 New
          • 1
          • 2
          -1
          Quote: svp67
          this will establish the commission.

          I doubt that there will be any commission.
          1. svp67 8 January 2020 10: 19 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: mordvin xnumx
            I doubt that there will be any commission.

            It will be in Iran’s interests, otherwise multimillion fines and compensations will have to be paid
            1. Mordvin 3 8 January 2020 10: 29 New
              • 1
              • 1
              0
              Quote: svp67
              It will be in Iran’s interests, otherwise multimillion fines and compensations will have to be paid

              I mean, if the Americans start fucking Iran ... request
              1. svp67 8 January 2020 10: 34 New
                • 2
                • 0
                +2
                Quote: mordvin xnumx
                I mean, if the Americans start fucking Iran ...

                And here, really INTERESTING ... Well, let's see. Americans, it is not surprisingly the same, are interested in the work of this commission, their Boeing is now in a “peak” and urgent urgency must be averted from it ...
  17. 7,62h54 8 January 2020 09: 31 New
    • 2
    • 3
    -1
    Americans remotely disconnected
    1. Genry 8 January 2020 09: 43 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: 7,62x54
      Americans remotely disconnected

      There, the engine caught fire and exploded. Could precisely thrust on the beyond the limit to cut.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. Genry 8 January 2020 13: 09 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: Vadim237
          you don’t cut the thrust on the plane through the satellite - the black box records all the parameters.

          Do not cut down and maximize what is fraught with fire and on take-off is not a crime.
          By the way, the video shows that the engine did not turn off (fuel was supplied) and was not extinguished by the fire extinguishing system until the explosion.
  18. Irek 8 January 2020 09: 47 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Tyanivsrak has already blamed us.
  19. CommanderDIVA 8 January 2020 10: 04 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Condolences to the families of the victims
  20. Moskovit 8 January 2020 10: 06 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    Iran needs this catastrophe the least. Before blaming Iran’s air defense, one would need to know the age of the aircraft, whether there were any incidents or technical problems with it. It will immediately become clear.
    For example:
    The average age of UIA aircraft by aircraft families: Boeing 737 Classic - 22,33 years, Boeing 737 Next Generation - 8,4 years, Embraer 190 - 5,4 years, Boeing 767-300ER - 26 years, Boeing 777-200ER - 15,67 , XNUMX years old.

    And let's say the average age of Aeroflot aircraft is 4.3 years. Although this did not save from the tragedy in Sheremetyevo ... And on the other hand, landing on a corn field.
    1. maden.usmanow 8 January 2020 10: 31 New
      • 1
      • 7
      -6
      Iran needs this catastrophe the least.

      In your opinion, the Iranian leadership is personally sitting behind the air defense calculations? During rocket attacks from Iran, a Boeing falls in Iran, such coincidences are not accidental. Need a disaster, not needed, what's the difference if a plane is shot down? Kapets is simple.
      1. Moskovit 8 January 2020 11: 00 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        In a few hours? Already the Iranians shot down, you confirmed? 130 out of 189 people are Iranians. Note.
      2. Servisinzhener 8 January 2020 13: 56 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Well, yes, rocket fire in your lead directly from Tehran. And during it one of the missiles hooked the plane.
        Both in OTRK and in SAM missiles. But there are nuances ...
    2. Avior 8 January 2020 10: 33 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      You need to look at a specific instance of the aircraft, the average is about nothing
      8,4 is generally a small age for an airplane
    3. Looking for 8 January 2020 15: 35 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      the aircraft was manufactured in 2016 and was obtained directly from the United States. (FROM THE FACTORY) The operational form was carried out on January 6, 2020, so that a technical malfunction is unlikely. For a rocket, the height is small (2.4 km). As a rule, it is problematic to use the rocket at such altitudes the flight time is short. it is impossible to adjust the trajectory. but the explosion of the n-th device on board, I think. the most suitable version.
  21. Paul Siebert 8 January 2020 10: 12 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Aggravation of situations in the regions always “attracts” aircraft crashes.
    So it was on the Sinai Peninsula and during the Iran-Iraq war and in the Donbass.
    Sorry for innocent people.
    Let the earth rest in peace.
  22. Aliken 8 January 2020 10: 17 New
    • 1
    • 5
    -4
    Kiev intentionally substituted itself in order not to leave the agenda, clowns demand attention to themselves, albeit at the cost of the passengers' lives.
  23. ibn.shamai 8 January 2020 10: 24 New
    • 0
    • 7
    -7
    In favor of the owners, the forelocks killed 169 patriots! Right now they’ll raise a high that the liner was shot down by an Iranian rocket! Americans will certainly express full support and condemn the "terrorist" regime of Iran! and start the bombing!
    1. igorlvov 8 January 2020 10: 31 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Most of the passengers of the Ukrainian plane crashed in Tehran were Iranian citizens
      1. Avior 8 January 2020 10: 35 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        I was surprised when I found out that there is a direct flight Kiev-Tehran
      2. ibn.shamai 8 January 2020 10: 46 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Whoever the meaning is, remains the same, try to accuse Iran of ter. act and declare the regime terrorist!
  24. maden.usmanow 8 January 2020 10: 36 New
    • 3
    • 11
    -8
    Approximate level of discussion:
    The Iranians had nothing to do with it, and the Americans cut off the plane. It’s not profitable for the Iranians, so the plane will not fall, because the rocket flashed through it. Or the Ukrainians themselves blew up a Boeing
    .

    Yes, what's going on here at all. Where is common sense. Hedgehog understandably, the Iranians shot down, there are no such coincidences. Where is the objectivity.
    1. Paranoid50 8 January 2020 10: 55 New
      • 9
      • 0
      +9
      Quote: maden.usmanow
      what is going on here at all.

      Yes, the circus, the circus - and here is the confirmation:
      Quote: maden.usmanow
      I’m understandable, it’s the Iranians who shot down

      Another morning in the arena. yes
    2. Servisinzhener 8 January 2020 13: 57 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      For what purpose were they shot down?
    3. mamonthful 8 January 2020 23: 47 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      a Russian plane crashed into Sinai without any “downs”
  25. jekasimf 8 January 2020 10: 36 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    Hmm. If the Sukhoi-Superjet or another Russian-made aircraft crashed, now all progressive mankind would beat in ecstasy. And if there were Russian citizens on board, then there would be a national holiday in Ukraine ...
    And it looks very much like a setup.
    My condolences to the relatives of the victims.
  26. Mixanson 8 January 2020 10: 37 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    My condolences to the relatives of the victims ..!
    I don’t feel it all cleanly ... Remember Donbass! Do they work by templates?
    1. ul_vitalii 8 January 2020 11: 20 New
      • 8
      • 1
      +7
      It is possible, and 73 Canadians on board seem to be natives of Lviv.
      1. Mixanson 8 January 2020 11: 44 New
        • 1
        • 2
        -1
        Quote: ul_vitalii
        It is possible, and 73 Canadians on board seem to be natives of Lviv.

        They came to shoot ..?
        1. ul_vitalii 8 January 2020 12: 03 New
          • 8
          • 1
          +7
          But who will understand these restless, try to track them.
  27. igorlvov 8 January 2020 10: 38 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    aboard the fallen liner were:

    Iranian citizens - 71
    Canadian citizens - 73
    Swedish citizens - 8
    Afghan citizens - 6
    German citizens - 4
    UK citizens - 3
    Ukrainian citizens - 2 passengers and the entire crew (9 people).
    1. igorlvov 8 January 2020 10: 42 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      but Iran’s data
      Iran’s emergency department head said there were 147 Iranian citizens and 32 foreigners aboard the crashed Boeing
      1. Avior 8 January 2020 11: 29 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Did Canadian citizens actually have dual citizenship?
        so many Canadians flew ....
        1. Looking for 8 January 2020 15: 37 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          so it is. most Canadians are of Iranian descent.
    2. Mavrikiy 8 January 2020 11: 49 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Quote: igorlvov
      Canadian citizens - 73
      Instructors for the APU? repeat
      1. Mixanson 8 January 2020 12: 26 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        Quote: Mavrikiy
        Quote: igorlvov
        Canadian citizens - 73
        Instructors for the APU? repeat

        Obviously not tourists .. Sniper trained to see hi
        1. Vadim237 8 January 2020 12: 49 New
          • 1
          • 6
          -5
          Or maybe this is a business delegation on trade partnerships between Ukraine, Canada and Iran.
          1. Mixanson 8 January 2020 13: 06 New
            • 1
            • 3
            -2
            Quote: Vadim237
            Or maybe this is a business delegation on trade partnerships between Ukraine, Canada and Iran.

            Well, yes, Iran is all in sanctions .. Supplies of fat? laughing
            1. Vadim237 8 January 2020 16: 02 New
              • 0
              • 4
              -4
              Only weapons cannot be delivered to Iran - everything else is possible. And Iran’s GDP of $ 180 billion is free trade with most countries.
  28. Andrey NM 8 January 2020 10: 39 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Coincidences ... Complete coincidences.
    For some reason, a conference room with striped flags appears. Agenda: we need a reason to influence Iran. What are the suggestions? I mean, suggestions? There is a well-developed scheme, well, why are we wasting time here, you just need to bang a civilian plane. How? Oh, these are all the details, let the performers think it. And if you don’t? How not to ride? Always rolled, but here it doesn’t? There and in September 2001, and in 2014. What if other countries ask questions? Oh, who will it be? Well, let's say that there is no democracy, there are terrorists ... There! Let's say that they did it! Let them make excuses. First time, perhaps? Where to get the plane? Sure, not a problem. The candidates themselves are already offering, they say that they have decent experience in this matter. Civilians? Victims? Oh, how many of them are there? Well this is not ours. What a trifle. So, well, everyone decided. Yes, look there, in the training manual change the name of the country everywhere, do not confuse, otherwise enter another country, and there will be no oil. Or we will send an aircraft carrier there, but they have no access to the coast. Well, do not pin up? Would you like to send to the coast of Belarus? Well ... That's it, let's get to jobs.

    But passengers are to blame for what? Could really be technical problems. Who is easier on this? Almost 150 lives can not be returned.
    1. maden.usmanow 8 January 2020 10: 42 New
      • 6
      • 11
      -5
      Before the shelling, Iran puts air defense on alertaxiom
      After the shelling, when air defense calculations on combat duty in the zone Iranian Air Defense Boeing falls.
      But of course the Americans are to blame. Yep
      1. Mavrikiy 8 January 2020 11: 52 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        Quote: maden.usmanow
        But of course the Americans are to blame. Yep

        You are right, as always. Ku Bon?
        Iran to bring down a Boeing, how to get yourself a stone in your shoe. request
        1. Fishery 8 January 2020 19: 34 New
          • 2
          • 1
          +1
          In the case of the crash of a passenger plane of Ukraine’s International Airlines near Tehran’s airport, the priority version should be hit by a missile or terrorist attack. Vadim Lukashevich, an aviation expert, a former employee of the Sukhoi Design Bureau, told about this on the air of "Present Time". A recording of his entry has been posted on the channel’s Twitter.
          1. Mavrikiy 8 January 2020 23: 11 New
            • 0
            • 1
            -1
            Quote: Tonya
            In the event of the crash of a passenger plane of Ukraine’s International Airlines near Tehran’s airport, the priority version should be hit by a missile or terrorist attack. Vadim Lukashevich, an aviation expert, a former employee of the Sukhoi Design Bureau, told about this on the air of “Present Time”.
            Expert V. Lukashevich seems to be a liberal, and for him there is nothing nicer than a terrorist attack and missile defense. request angry The expert expressed this opinion on the air of Ekho Moskvy radio station. Echo experts? And in a nuthouse, what is worse? request
            1. Fishery 8 January 2020 23: 47 New
              • 2
              • 1
              +1
              but if there would be a communist or a member of the party united Russia)))) what would change? look at the conclusions, if Iran gives the boxes, the attack well substitutes Iran by the way.
              1. Mavrikiy 9 January 2020 00: 58 New
                • 0
                • 2
                -2
                It is better to be friends with the head than to repeat the opinion of the ukropeteks. They already trynd that Russians are sitting at the remote control of Iran’s missiles. And remember the Boeing of Donbass.
                1. Fishery 9 January 2020 14: 05 New
                  • 2
                  • 2
                  0
                  with the Boeing in the Donbass the whole world already understands)))) apparently only you have questions)
              2. Mavrikiy 9 January 2020 10: 40 New
                • 0
                • 1
                -1
                “That is why the version of a terrorist attack or the destruction of an aircraft by a rocket should be one of the highest priorities,” Lukashevich said. It is reported by Rambler. Next: https://news.rambler.ru/incidents/43466416/?utm_content=news_media&utm_medium=read_more&utm_source=copylink
                Who is expert Lukashevich? Liberal ... omno.
                Vadim Lukashevich - an expert from Kiev, equating the Soviet Union with fascist Germany
                https://maxpark.com/community/politic/content/3182448
                request Here is an opinion about your source on the sites. repeat
  29. gorunov 8 January 2020 10: 46 New
    • 1
    • 5
    -4
    Go fell under the hand, becoming a victim of the use of electronic warfare
  30. Ros 56 8 January 2020 11: 17 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    If there is a technical malfunction, then there are many options for whom to blame.
  31. Avior 8 January 2020 11: 39 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    There is one more nuance about which, it seems, no one has written yet. Boeing was the UIA, one of the main owners is Ukrainian oligarch Igor Kolomoisky, the company is part of the Privat group.
    Co-owner of UIA, he is the general director of the company - Aron Mayberg.
  32. Mavrikiy 8 January 2020 11: 47 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    It is noteworthy that most air carriers suspended their flights in the airspace of Iran and Iraq immediately after reports of a missile strike on US bases. But the leadership of the Ukrainian airline did not take such a step.
    Actually, such a decision had to be made immediately after the death of the general.
  33. Avior 8 January 2020 12: 02 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Well, on the eve of the same, the US Federal Aviation Administration clearly prescribed its airlines to ban flights over the territories of Iran, Iraq, as well as over the Persian and Ottoman bays

    I don’t know how American, and how many of them flew there in general in Iran (they probably flew over the Gulfs and Iraq), but it is full of planes both flew and flies, that over Iran, that over the bays
  34. Laksamana besar 8 January 2020 12: 16 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    History repeats, crash = Donbass-2.
  35. Krasnodar 8 January 2020 13: 41 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    Condolences to the relatives of the victims!
  36. frizzy 8 January 2020 13: 42 New
    • 1
    • 5
    -4
    The hunt went aboard room 1. VVP was there at that time. Samlet was shot down by Iran. Let them answer !!!
  37. iouris 8 January 2020 14: 15 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Not "... technical malfunction of the aircraft", but the failure of equipment (engine). Is a non-technical aircraft malfunction possible?
    I wonder if any of the prominent rocket scientists were flying on the liner?
  38. 0x0
    0x0 8 January 2020 14: 37 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The condolences are close to the dead. I feel sorry for people. And it is Iran that is blamed, and at the same time, possibly Russia (if not Putin personally). Although it sounds too much like a pre-planned provocation.
  39. Fishery 8 January 2020 19: 11 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    I wonder why Iran does not give black boxes?
    1. iouris 8 January 2020 19: 27 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      The plane belongs to the Ukrainian carrier, and the accident took place in Iran. Investigation of the causes of the accident is carried out by authorized national authorities in the field of safety in air transport with the participation of representatives of the developer and representatives of international bodies. For a comprehensive review of the reasons, several subcommissions are created (organization of flight operations, engineering and aviation support, ground support for flights, meteorological support, medical) that give their conclusions. The investigation period is usually within one month. The results and conclusions of the commission will be published in the open press. Do not rush the specialists, they still may not even have time to get to work. Analysis of the information that is registered on board is mandatory and underlies the conclusions of the commission.
      1. Fishery 8 January 2020 19: 28 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        Iran does not have experts of this kind, they themselves spoke.
        1. iouris 8 January 2020 19: 31 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Just don’t worry. Specialists will help them. There are many who wish. In the same Kiev.
          1. Fishery 8 January 2020 20: 01 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            )) I'm definitely not worried, but Iran, yes)
  40. iouris 8 January 2020 19: 29 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    It seems that the liner still shot down (not from a slingshot).
    1. The comment was deleted.
  41. Shahno 8 January 2020 19: 40 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: iouris
    It seems that the liner still shot down (not from a slingshot).

    Maybe they shot down. In such a mess, only pros can look for the right solutions ...
    1. mamonthful 8 January 2020 23: 33 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      so that the plane crashes, you do not need to shoot it down.
      Enough a pound of explosives in the luggage compartment.
  42. mamonthful 8 January 2020 23: 23 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    My humble hypothesis is a private rally of some Iranian patriots who have connections in the airport staff. They decided to take revenge on Canada (Canadians made up a significant number of passengers), brought the bomb on board, as in the Sinai case with the Russian side.

    Fools, of course, only set up their country, which is now surely accused of shooting down a civilian airliner.

    HIMSELF the plane in the air will not catch fire and will never fall apart.
    1. iouris 9 January 2020 23: 31 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: mamonthful
      The hypothesis is a private rally of some Iranian patriots who have connections in the airport staff. We decided to take revenge on Canada

      Not true. The same Iranians (Aryans) flew, but only with Canadian passports. A bomb would damage the fuselage, and then the engine was burning.
      Quote: mamonthful
      HIMSELF the plane in the air will not catch fire and will never fall apart.

      Eeeee ... I understand everything: engine thrust, lift .... But iron!
  43. Tavi 9 January 2020 12: 32 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Is a version of remote intervention in aircraft control possible?
    for example, engine failure leading to fire. + disconnection so that they could not report an emergency on an airplane.
    1. iouris 9 January 2020 23: 34 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Tavi
      Is a version of remote intervention in aircraft control possible?

      Not only possible, but also very likely. After 2001, the possibility of remote intervention in passenger aircraft control was incorporated in the software. And maybe in all cars ... Hto knows him. And yak zhezh. That's why you need to develop your own technology. But the government does not think so.
  44. Gogia 9 January 2020 17: 18 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    We have some kind of administrator on the site appeared - ban all. Hto he is not so limited ... b by chance?
    Here's a moronic article on AVIA.PRO from where the Kyev robots got excited ...
    http://avia.pro/news/ukrainskiy-boeing-737-v-irane-sbit-zrk-tor-m1-oblomki-rakety-uzhe-obnaruzheny?utm_source=pulse_mail_ru&utm_referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fpulse.mail
    This is what the search in the picture gave


    Here is the source of the photo
    https://twitter.com/breakingavnews/status/1214988917046468608?s=21
    Those who read twitter feed down will see that, in general, no one is approving a rocket option.