Iran strikes at US military bases


The US Department of Defense claims that Tehran has struck at military facilities held by the United States in Iraq.


According to a Pentagon spokesman, in total, more than ten missiles were fired, the purpose of which was two military bases located in Assad and Erbil, where US troops are located.

As stated in the official statement, Washington had information about the upcoming attack, and therefore brought the military personnel there on high alert. It is claimed that the damage caused by the attack is currently being assessed.

We will take all necessary measures to defend and protect US personnel, partners and allies in the region.

- explained the representative of the Pentagon.


Iranian ballistic missile launches

From Israel there are reports of bringing the troops to a state of maximum readiness.

According to CNN, White House head Donald Trump plans to address the nation. Now he is holding a meeting with the heads of relevant departments in connection with the missile strike of Iran.

According to the Iranian Press TV, the attack is the Corps of Guardians of the Islamic Revolution, which has already stated its readiness to give "more crushing answers." Operation “Martyr Suleymani” is currently underway.
Photos used:
https://novostipmr.com
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

268 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Rusik.S 8 January 2020 04: 48 New
    • 66
    • 4
    +62
    In the last topic, someone wrote that Iran will not do anything, they say they will burn the maximum flags and calm down. And it turned out like that. He also threatened the American allies (Saudis, Qatars, etc.).
    1. Russian Moldavian 8 January 2020 04: 55 New
      • 42
      • 0
      +42
      After the completion of the funeral of Suleimani, Iran moved from threat to action.
      American bases in Iraq were fired by ballistic missiles. Several dozen rockets were launched.
      The Pentagon said the attacks were on American bases Ain al-Assad and Erbil. Attacks on the Taj Camp were also reported.
      There is no reliable information about the victims and destruction.
      After striking, the Iranian president posted the flag of Iran on his Twitter.
      It is also reported that the second wave followed the first wave of missiles.
      The Shiite police in Iraq announced the start of Operation Overwhelming Response.
      6 aircraft took off from the UAE air base. Iran fighters are already in the air.
      The IRGC states that as soon as the US strikes Iran, Iran will attack targets in Israel.

      This is the latest news https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=6&v=AIqceFxCIvo&feature=emb_logo
      1. Rostislav Bely 8 January 2020 05: 03 New
        • 10
        • 1
        +9
        already from Syria begin to be evacuated, pulled together to the border with Iraq
        1. Tatyana 8 January 2020 05: 44 New
          • 21
          • 4
          +17
          In order to predict something for the future, you still need to decide on the main participants in the Suleymani murder as subjects of politics.
          There are 3 main versions of the reason for the killing of Suleimani. Choose any!

          1. Version of the political scientist Igor Panarin. The blow was dealt by the "Clintonim" = "deep state". Namely, the former CIA director Brennan, who still runs the CIA department against Iran. Contractor Michael D * Andrea is the recently appointed Chief of the SPECIAL Sector for Iran with the call sign "The Dark Prince."
          Technically, Israeli intelligence services tracked Suleimani’s movement, brought him to British intelligence, and the CIA struck. And Trump himself was in a state of perplexity and “shock” from surprise - and as a result, he took over everything.
          The main goal of the “deep state” is if the US Democrats fail to impeach Trump, then eliminate Trump physically. as was done with Kennedy, but at the hands of the ethnic Iranians themselves, of whom about 2 million live in the United States.
          And, probably, the CIA is already searching for the Iranian Lee Harvey Osald in the USA! ”
          TOTAL The provocation - the murder of Suleymani - was carried out by the Clinton clan and directed against Trump himself with the goal of his physical destruction.

          2. Version of the "Community of US Veterans." The customer and organizer of this crime is Israel, and specifically, Netanyahu. Moreover, in favor of this version, it is precisely the fact that on December 25.12.2019, 27, Israeli media have already disseminated information that Suleymani died during the Israeli strike on Damascus. However, after this, on December XNUMX, the Iranian news agency reported that Suleymani was alive.
          It is believed that Trump just went about Netanyahu and struck this blow. By the way, in Israel, elections are also coming soon, and Netanyahu, against whom criminal cases have been instituted, is ready to do anything to disrupt the elections in Israel.

          3. The third version.The murder started by Trump himself and his supporters, in order, contrary to logic, to divert attention from the attempt to impeach Trump, launched by the Democrats; raise your rating - and win the 2020 presidential election.
          1. Rostislav Bely 8 January 2020 05: 47 New
            • 20
            • 3
            +17
            a day ago, Bagdasarov on this topic already said:
            “If I were the chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Iran or the commander of the IRGC, I would emphasize striking at the American presence in Iraq, with the task of completely expelling the American forces. It would be a colossal loss (moral, political, military - whatever) for the Americans, who at one time snatched several trillion dollars, from one and a half to two trillion dollars, into the Iraqi adventure, officially lost five thousand people, in fact, much more ” , - he wrote in his Telegram channel.
            1. Tatyana 8 January 2020 06: 17 New
              • 10
              • 1
              +9
              Quote: Rostislav White
              a day ago, Bagdasarov on this topic already said:
              “If I were the chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Iran or the commander of the IRGC, I would emphasize striking at the American presence in Iraq, with the task of completely expelling the American forces. It would be a colossal loss (moral, political, military - whatever) for the Americans, who at one time snatched several trillion dollars, from one and a half to two trillion dollars, into the Iraqi adventure, officially lost five thousand people, in fact, much more ” , - he wrote in his Telegram channel.

              In this case, Trump will no longer be the president of the United States! Namely.
              Either Trump will be impeached, or they will also kill him!
              1. Zoldat_A 8 January 2020 06: 52 New
                • 5
                • 0
                +5
                Quote: Tatiana
                Either Trump will be impeached, or they will also kill him!

                Do they get used to it? At Kennedy, the technology was run in ...
                1. krot 8 January 2020 12: 46 New
                  • 11
                  • 1
                  +10
                  Well done Iranians! I was waiting for which country would tire of enduring all the bullying and killing by the United States. Now Trump will think next time what to say and what to do. Yes, and any Anglo-Saxon warriors are sucks .. Viva Iran!
                  And many on the site said that Iran has a small intestine, I suspect that they are Sumerians.)
                  1. Zoldat_A 8 January 2020 16: 10 New
                    • 5
                    • 0
                    +5
                    Quote: krot
                    Well done Iranians! I was waiting for which country would get tired of enduring all the bullying and killing by the United States.

                    If it were we - World War III on a silver platter. And so ...

                    American children in American schools are taught that they won the Second World War. So they were afraid of the Third being afraid of them? ......
              2. nPuBaTuP 8 January 2020 07: 02 New
                • 6
                • 0
                +6
                Either Trump will be impeached, or they will also kill him!

                Or there is a third version :))
                Trump is re-elected for a second term hi
                1. Tatyana 8 January 2020 07: 29 New
                  • 4
                  • 0
                  +4
                  Quote: nPuBaTuP
                  Either Trump will be impeached, or they will also kill him!
                  Or there is a third version :))
                  Trump is re-elected for a second term hi

                  Generally U.S. Congress opposes Trump declaring war on Iran without the consent of U.S. Congress members. This worked to impeach Trump.
                  And on the other hand, if military operations in Iraq between Iran and the US go too far, then, as you know, they do not change the horses at the crossing. It may turn out that you are right. Trump may be re-elected for a 2nd term.
                  However, everything will depend on who, how and with what "processes" to the desired opinion of these congressmen regarding the recognition of the legitimacy of declaring US war on Iran.
              3. hydrox 8 January 2020 07: 42 New
                • 3
                • 2
                +1
                It seems that the world will not suffer, if Trump loses :: Donik has already done enough to catch the world and take a little rest from it.
                I must say that Donya shook the foundations of global peace enough not to talk about repairs anymore :: it's time to talk about perestroika (let's say, about redevelopment of relations)
            2. jovanni 8 January 2020 21: 41 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Give Semyon Arkadevich as the successor to the commander!
          2. Zoldat_A 8 January 2020 06: 36 New
            • 10
            • 2
            +8
            Vietnam 2.0 or World 3 ...?
            1. Tatyana 8 January 2020 06: 44 New
              • 11
              • 0
              +11
              Hello, Alexey! Glad to see you!
              !
              Quote: Zoldat_A
              Vietnam 2.0 or World 3 ...?

              It is unlikely that just “Vietnam 2” .. The murder of Suleimani is regarded as a challenge to the entire Muslim world from the United States, Britain and Israel.
              And this is pulling more on TMV.
              1. Zoldat_A 8 January 2020 07: 39 New
                • 5
                • 0
                +5
                [quote = Tatyana] Hardly just “Vietnam 2” .. The murder of Suleymani is regarded as a challenge to the entire Muslim world from the United States, Britain and Israel. [/ quote]
                For the world - as they say in the States, "WW3". For America -

                [/ quote] As of mid-2008, there were 58 Americans who died, died from wounds and diseases, went missing (this figure is gradually increasing after the end of the war, since it includes military personnel who died years and even decades after the consequences of the fighting wounds). Of these, 220 people were lost as a result of the enemy’s actions, and 47 people were non-combat losses (died in traffic accidents, in incidents with weapons, died from illnesses, committed suicide) As of mid-434, dead, died from wounds and illnesses 10 Americans were missing (this figure is gradually increasing after the end of the war, as it includes military personnel who died years and even decades from the effects of military injuries). Of these, 786 people were lost as a result of the enemy’s actions, and 2008 people were non-combat losses (died in traffic accidents, in incidents with weapons, died from illnesses, committed suicide) -Wikipedia] [/ quote]
                There are not so many in Iraq yet. In Afghanistan, we have already caught up with ours.

                How many plastic crates does America need to calm down?
                1. Kondratko 8 January 2020 11: 27 New
                  • 3
                  • 0
                  +3
                  How many plastic crates does America need to calm down?

                  - Probably most of the previously made for their own needs:
                  "Why do Americans need 500000 plastic coffins?"
                  https://topwar.ru/9410-zachem-amerikancam-500000-plastikovyh-grobov.html
              2. hydrox 8 January 2020 07: 52 New
                • 2
                • 1
                +1
                Perhaps TMT does not fit into the amer-Muslim relations (the rest of the world is no less tired of Trump than Muslims, but this is not a reason to trump Quartet (oh, as I understand the ayatoll !!)).
                But from time to time it would be necessary to throw a straitjacket on it and tie it to the bed for the duration of haloperidol (exchange rate in small doses once a quarter) - you look, and the imperative will change if not by humility, then at least by obedience! laughing
              3. bar
                bar 8 January 2020 08: 21 New
                • 5
                • 0
                +5
                The killing of Suleimani is regarded as a challenge to the entire Muslim world from the United States, Britain and Israel.
                And this is pulling more on TMV.

                Do not exaggerate. "The whole Muslim world" are those spiders in the bank. In reality, Iran’s Shiites have minimal support in the east, so the “Muslim world” represented by the Saudis or Qatar will also be for the striped. But Vietnam could pull on the second, although it is also unlikely. It is unlikely that Trump's adventure will be supported in the United States itself.
            2. GELEZNII_KAPUT 8 January 2020 08: 50 New
              • 2
              • 1
              +1
              Quote: Zoldat_A
              Vietnam 2.0 or World 3 ...?

              It looks more like the 3rd world is moving into the hot phase ...
            3. mark2 8 January 2020 09: 07 New
              • 9
              • 2
              +7
              Neither one nor the other.
              The Americans will soon try to negotiate with Iran. And Ayatollah will suddenly become a great guy like Eun.
              Because the fleet cannot be pulled in time. While they will tighten, Iran, if not pissed off, will destroy the nearby military bases. And the Hebrews will get what they run into for a long time.
            4. Dude 8 January 2020 10: 06 New
              • 0
              • 1
              -1
              Quote: Zoldat_A
              Vietnam 2.0 or World 3 ...?

              Think WW III
          3. nPuBaTuP 8 January 2020 06: 59 New
            • 4
            • 0
            +4
            Good morning Tatyana love
            All your versions are viable, and as I think there are still many versions ..... And they can also inspire confidence .....
            But in connection with Iran’s attacks, everyone doesn’t care about these versions ... THE FIGHT has begun and who will be right and who will be blamed (if this does not lead to a global carnage) after ....
            According to all versions, Trump has already taken responsibility for himself and the United States ..... so that Iran and all Shiites have appeared, if it can be called the "national idea" ... Donald Fedorovich just ..., blurted out, - 52 objects in sight ..... man said, man did
            That is, the return line will arrive unambiguously ..... Trump is unlikely to wash and get off the conversation ....
            So the morning may turn out to be not entirely good
            1. Tatyana 8 January 2020 07: 04 New
              • 5
              • 0
              +5
              Greetings. you, Nikolai! hi
              Definitely - this is a war! The only question is how, when and how it will end.
              1. nPuBaTuP 8 January 2020 07: 14 New
                • 4
                • 1
                +3
                As Vladimir wrote a little lower, there are two options .... long-term sweeping or ground operation ... or maybe as an option, our descendants will consider this date as the beginning of the Third World ... See for yourself, the Sultan has soaped itself into Libya. In any situation, the Strait of Hormuz will be closed. Ukraine is smoldering. Syria and Yemen are smoking. In Latinos, too, graters among themselves ....
              2. Zoldat_A 8 January 2020 07: 45 New
                • 9
                • 1
                +8
                Quote: Tatiana
                Greetings. you, Nikolai! hi
                Definitely - this is a war! The only question is how, when and how it will end.

                I hope that our "big caps" have enough intelligence to fight not with boys, but with missiles ...
                1. Tatyana 8 January 2020 08: 24 New
                  • 3
                  • 0
                  +3
                  Quote: Zoldat_A
                  I hope that our "big caps" have enough intelligence to fight not with boys, but with missiles ...

                  Oh, as they say, your words to God, ears in the ears!
                  May God hear this and may it be so!
                2. ABM
                  ABM 8 January 2020 08: 44 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  And us for what?
                  1. Zoldat_A 8 January 2020 08: 49 New
                    • 8
                    • 1
                    +7
                    Quote: ABM
                    And us for what?

                    Do you think that the Third World War - whoever and wherever it started - will do without ours?

                    Whoever starts the war - Russia ends them. Too bad the graves. But, it is clear that the price is RUSSIAN.
                    1. ABM
                      ABM 8 January 2020 09: 00 New
                      • 1
                      • 2
                      -1
                      Ours under no circumstances will fit into this war. I bet you. Good to invent. World War I perfectly finished.
                      1. Zoldat_A 8 January 2020 09: 07 New
                        • 5
                        • 0
                        +5
                        Quote: ABM
                        Ours under no circumstances will fit into this war.

                        Your words, yes to God in ears ...

                        Have to get involved. No empire has ever fought on its own. Draw everyone they can.

                        Again the grave. We will survive, we are strong.
                      2. ABM
                        ABM 8 January 2020 09: 51 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        Yes, this is not a war. While tankers go along the Strait of Hormuz
                      3. region58 8 January 2020 15: 07 New
                        • 2
                        • 1
                        +1
                        Quote: Zoldat_A
                        Have to

                        Definitely. Immediate southern borders. If you want, you don’t want, but you have to.
                    2. Vadim237 8 January 2020 11: 51 New
                      • 2
                      • 1
                      +1
                      I can bet that Russia will help Iran with weapons and intelligence.
                    3. ABM
                      ABM 8 January 2020 12: 04 New
                      • 0
                      • 5
                      -5
                      why's that? sense to help Iran? so that they capitulate in a month, and not in two weeks? well, if tankers will sink ...
                    4. Vadim237 8 January 2020 16: 13 New
                      • 2
                      • 2
                      0
                      What does he capitulate to - before the American raids? The US ground operation will be too tough for Iran to be four times larger than Iraq in terms of area and population and terrain there is quite complicated: deserts, hills, mountains, forest belts, gorges, all American bases within a radius of 2000 kilometers under the gun of Iran’s cruise missile and cruise missile drones , and their air defense recently proved to be capable of shooting down high-altitude strategic reconnaissance drones. And the attack today showed that the Amer’s air defense in the region is an empty place.
                    5. ABM
                      ABM 8 January 2020 16: 28 New
                      • 0
                      • 2
                      -2
                      Yes, they have these missiles ... they are under sanctions, aviation - antediluvian F-14s and ancient, like Mr. Mammoth, F-4 and F-5, about a hundred pieces from this whole zoo fly. With air defense the same story. Oprichniki their local - "Corps of the Guardians of the Islamic Revolution" - is only to frighten their opponents, as we have the Russian Guard ...
                    6. Vadim237 8 January 2020 20: 59 New
                      • 1
                      • 3
                      -2
                      They have these missiles — thousands and an embargo that only applies to arms sales, Iran’s GDP of 180 billion a year is free trade with dozens of countries of the world — they have been developing and making rockets for 20 years already, and they have close ties with the DPRK.
                3. classik46 8 January 2020 16: 39 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  Russia, China, India, Azerbaijanis are now actively muddying infrastructure projects including railway transportation bypassing any straits. In addition, Iran is the cornerstone in the stability of the Caspian, Caucasus and BV. Again, an observer and participant in all kinds of SCO, BRICS, etc. Organizations. Without it, everything that was previously achieved in Syria will simply lose its meaning, because we have gained a foothold and we are not there without the help of Iran and its mercenaries. After all, this is the Shiite axis that the Americans are so afraid of with the British and Israel (Iran-Iraq-Syria-Lebanon ). Yes, and an alliance with the Iranians opens up Iraq and the opportunity to influence the price of oil.
              3. Zoldat_A 8 January 2020 15: 50 New
                • 3
                • 0
                +3
                Quote: Vadim237
                I can bet that Russia will help Iran with weapons and intelligence.

                The most interesting thing is that some 40 years ago it was the other way around.

                In life what ....
  • Tamparu 8 January 2020 11: 03 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    And how about two more versions, a little crazy ....
    1). In the murder of Suleymani, not only SASHA and Israel are “covered up”, but also other world players. Maybe he crossed the road for someone? Such may be in Iran itself ...
    2. (5). Suleimani is not killed. They killed someone else ... And then you can twist a bunch of versions ...
    Sincerely, hi
    1. Tatyana 8 January 2020 11: 39 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      I don’t know anything about the 4th option.
      And about the 5th option. Killed really Sulejmani. He is identified by his ring on the hand of the slain.
      1. Tamparu 8 January 2020 11: 47 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Can't a ring be put on another person’s hand? And I do not think that it was difficult to find a person among Muslims who would voluntarily go for it ....
        But there was no other evidence that this was really Sulejmani in the media ....
        Something like this....
        1. Tatyana 8 January 2020 11: 52 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          There was a photo on the Internet - I saw him. A hand on the elbow with a ring on the finger is well preserved, practically not damaged.
          And they are also looking for a possible "mole" surrounded by Suleimani, and this version is also being checked. But nothing is heard about the results of this search.
          1. Tamparu 8 January 2020 12: 17 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            The hand on the elbow of a person is almost the same for everyone, if you do not dive deeply, making anthropometric measurements ... And if there are no additional distinctive features (scar, mole, etc.), then it will be very difficult to prove that he is that person , and not another .. Is that just a fingerprint ...
            Regarding the "mole" ... if there is one ... Then he is not alone, it is unequivocal ... And, if they are found, we will never know about this ...
            Yours faithfully, hi
    2. jovanni 8 January 2020 21: 38 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: TampaRU
      Suleimani is not killed. They killed someone else ... And then you can twist a bunch of versions ...

      Yeah, Elvis is alive. Foreve !!!
      1. Tamparu 8 January 2020 21: 54 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Jovanni (Evgenevgen) Today, 21: 38

        0

        Quote: TampaRU
        Suleimani is not killed. They killed someone else ... And then you can twist a bunch of versions ...

        Yeah, Elvis is alive. Foreve !!!

        Good evening... hi
        You know, but the irony in this case is not very appropriate ... At all times, the fate of countries and millions of people is driven by a small handful of people, one of the tools of which is the special services ... And Sulejmani "steered" one of them, respectively, knew the rules of existence inside them and, therefore, couldn’t so easily substitute ... Therefore, I have such doubts about this event ...
        But, this is my subjective opinion ....
        Sincerely, hi
        1. jovanni 8 January 2020 22: 22 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          And good evening to you. Well, yes, apparently you are right about the irony. And what about framed, not framed, it happens. There, the GRU organization is in no way inferior to the "guards" in authority, how many leaders have lost strange enough. Deputy Ivanov, generally drowned in Syria swimming. Even drones were not needed ... However, this is also subjective.
          Sincerely hi
  • Mavrikiy 8 January 2020 13: 18 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Quote: Tatiana
    3. Third version. The killing was started by Trump himself and his supporters, in order, contrary to logic, to divert attention from the attempt to impeach Trump, launched by the Democrats; raise your rating - and win the 2020 presidential election

    If it's Trump, then it's the other way around. Trump promised to withdraw troops from the BV and made attempts, but the Clintonites and the Pentagon sabotaged. If Iran strikes at all bases, the US Armed Forces will be removed from the BV and Trump will fulfill the election promises.
    . Raise your rating
    Raise the rating of the arrival of the coffins ..... what are you talking about? request
    1. Tatyana 8 January 2020 19: 30 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Mavrikiy
      Raise the rating of the arrival of the coffins ..... what are you talking about?

      Firstly, this is on my version. And not my versions at all. I just listed the 3 most common versions of the reasons for the killing of Iranian General Suleimani, which revolve in circulation. It’s just that I, from a distance, presented them to the participants for discussion, without imposing my own opinion on anyone.

      My opinion. I am sure that the ears of Israel in the murder of Sulejmani are EXACTLY !.

      And secondly. In the 3rd version there is already a reservation to which you did not pay attention.
      contrary to logic
      In other words, including contrary to Trump's campaign promises. Or vice versa, according to decisive military actions to instill American-Israeli nationalist Zionists in the form of a lightning war, force the enemy into peace.
      Few such politicians?
      Zelensky, for example. He said one thing, but the real alignment of political forces in the country makes him follow Bandera’s lead and make a “good” mine with a bad game.
  • bayard 8 January 2020 16: 48 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Of course, the first version is the most realistic, but I think that in reality we observed a combination of the first two options. That is, the Clinton clan, in coordination with Netanyahu, prepared and carried out this operation, and Trump was given arguments by both the US intelligence services and Israel.
    But this is no longer important, the war seems to have already begun.
  • lucul 8 January 2020 05: 52 New
    • 1
    • 12
    -11
    After the completion of the funeral of Suleimani, Iran moved from threat to action.

    It looks like a fake - other media - are silent.
    1. Russian Moldavian 8 January 2020 05: 53 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Unfortunately the truth recourse
  • SSR
    SSR 8 January 2020 06: 30 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Quote: Russian Moldovans
    After striking, the Iranian president posted the flag of Iran on his Twitter.

    And also in the official message, with disrespect and with a small letter, but how exactly noticed.

    «We warn the great Satan, the vicious American regime that any further aggression will meet a more painful and brutal reaction, ”the text reads.

    It’s interesting, but they called the “small” one?))
    1. atalef 8 January 2020 08: 35 New
      • 3
      • 5
      -2
      Quote: SSR

      “We warn the great Satan, the vicious American regime that any further aggression will meet a more painful and brutal reaction,” the text reads.

      words separately - deeds - separately. not iron point
      laughing
      A US military source told CNN that the US military received an “early warning” about an Iranian missile attack.
      The officer said that base personnel had been evacuated to bunkers in advance.
      The Iranian military spokesman also said that contrary to earlier statements, there are no casualties among the Iraqi military at the attacked bases.

      Trump will not warn fellow
      1. SSR
        SSR 8 January 2020 10: 11 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: atalef
        words separately - deeds - separately. not iron point

        Come on. They acted according to etiquette, reported that they were attacking, not everyone was like Hitler to become like.
        Quote: atalef
        Trump will not warn

        That's right.
        For all this, however, many small countries are surprised by Iran, and you also understand this very well. There are Canadians, sharp as diarrhea in words and in fact turned out to be quick.)))
  • Ramzaj99 8 January 2020 10: 06 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: Russian Moldovans
    After striking, the Iranian president posted the flag of Iran on his Twitter.

    It turns out he also has a sense of humor)) Trump troll)))
  • YOUR 8 January 2020 11: 52 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    13 missiles were launched.
    The picture shows the launch of the S-75 air defense missile system, from which what was the ballistic missile made of?
  • CERBERFOL 8 January 2020 05: 46 New
    • 10
    • 2
    +8
    Iran was ahead of the curve. Anyway, striped can no longer be stopped. Not only did the US kill the general, they immediately began to prepare for the attack. Surely aug to Iran dug. If that starts, Israel will be the most important bully
    1. Maki Avellevich 8 January 2020 06: 49 New
      • 10
      • 5
      +5
      Quote: CERBERFOL
      Surely aug to Iran dug. If that starts, Israel will be the most important bully

      aircraft carriers David the Great and Izzy the First are already sailing to Iran.
      1. Thrifty 8 January 2020 07: 18 New
        • 13
        • 2
        +11
        Maki Avellevich hi -first, only the fictitious masses are floating, and secondly, your Aaianos people have become tight-rumored to have caught pace for reefs lol
      2. classik46 8 January 2020 07: 27 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        On one such aircraft carrier of personnel 4-6k, if American mothers drown it, they will raise such a howl that the war will be waged. In principle, America is still raging with anti-war rallies.
      3. hydrox 8 January 2020 08: 06 New
        • 3
        • 6
        -3
        You see, "Marshal Ustinov" is already there ...
        Whether he flanks through the Mediterranean or enters the Persian Gulf - this great mystery is ...
        But I think that a couple of Iran’s air bases are ready to receive a regiment or other Tu-22M3M and the same number of Su-35s ...
        What the Bears will be doing at this time is unknown to the shirnarmasses.
        1. hydrox 8 January 2020 10: 31 New
          • 6
          • 0
          +6
          You look at how liberoids do not like it when someone somewhere suddenly decided to impede the US terrorist democracy - the rating immediately went wrong!
          For reference: the Tu-22M3M really has a nuclear core, which really turns the entire AUG into a cloud of steam - and this is the X-102. laughing
          1. region58 8 January 2020 15: 04 New
            • 1
            • 1
            0
            Quote: hydrox
            the whole AUG is turned into a cloud of steam

            Can be more? Well, there: the power of the warhead, the radius of the destruction, from what distance it is supposed to launch, who will give the target designation, the radius of the AWACS AUG, the radius of the AUG itself, well, and other mutoten? And then, you see, at headquarters all heads were broken in search of counteraction to the AUG.
            PS I hope the picture is familiar?

            The distance between the ships is hundreds of kilometers.
            Agree, this is a bit unlike a beautiful hiking order:
            1. hydrox 8 January 2020 15: 22 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Yes brother, problem ...
              First, for your headquarters, you need to bring fresh sand into the sandboxes - then we'll see HOW creativity will behave ... laughing
              1. region58 8 January 2020 18: 12 New
                • 2
                • 1
                +1
                Quote: hydrox
                Yes brother, problem ...

                Nothing. Will you share your hats? Throw the adversaries ... yes
                1. hydrox 8 January 2020 18: 30 New
                  • 2
                  • 0
                  +2
                  Obligatory! But first, we’ll draw up a network-centric legend, and a little silently think “over her beast!”
                  Oh, mining HERE
                  pancake
                  did not wait
                  We need
                  Go home! " laughing
            2. CERBERFOL 8 January 2020 20: 57 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Power 100 gigatons. Targeting from the Star Destroyer, a strike is delivered from the orbit of the Moon by the Death Star
              1. region58 8 January 2020 21: 02 New
                • 2
                • 1
                +1
                Quote: CERBERFOL
                strike from the orbit of the moon by the Death Star

                No, the Death Star bullets to others:
                Armament:
                Central guide superlaser, heavy duty. Rate of fire of the first station - 1 shot per day, second - 1 shot in 3 minutes;
                8 high-precision superlasers (are components of the main superlaser);
                5 laser batteries;
                5 heavy laser batteries;
                25 laser guns;
                25 ion cannons;
                936 capture beam generators / spotlights
                wassat
    2. Zoldat_A 8 January 2020 07: 49 New
      • 7
      • 0
      +7
      Quote: CERBERFOL
      Iran was ahead of the curve. Anyway, striped can no longer be stopped.

      Iran, unfortunately, did not take the lead. He, unlike the United States, could keep parity. It was the States, who were lousy in the bathhouse, who were eager for a war with Iran - Iraq became fewer. That will run into Vietnam 2.0 or WW3
      1. hydrox 8 January 2020 15: 44 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Yes, 45 years have passed since the end of the Second Indochina War, and the United States has already forgotten the anti-militant speeches of its population, actions of disobedience and rallies of indignation, and will again overthrow it to fight on a new level. And it seems to them that they have become many times stronger, more modern, more deadly, more perfect ...
        But they forgot that losses will begin only when the infantry conquers space, without which there is never a victory in a war, no matter how obvious this victory is. And then again the coffins will go under the star-striped flags, the hatred for Pr-vu will rise again, the protests and rallies of disobedience will begin again - all this has already happened and the US government thinks that this can be avoided.
        No, this is already incorrigible, because it grows at the genetic level.
        1. Zoldat_A 8 January 2020 16: 16 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          Quote: hydrox
          it seems to them that they have become many times stronger, more modern, more deadly, more perfect ...

          It is interesting that it seems to every aspirant to world domination.

          Only Russia convinces them of the opposite.
          Quote: hydrox
          coffins again will go under star-striped flags, hatred for Pr-vu will rise again, protests and disobedience rallies will start again - all this has already happened and America’s leadership thinks that this can be avoided.
          No, this is already incorrigible, because it grows at the genetic level.

          They don’t even look at their star-striped ass ...
          1. hydrox 8 January 2020 16: 28 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            Do not you think that red-striped is a genetic sign - traces of physical impact when the mind was pounded through the back of the cyrillic ring, you see, they’ve beat so hard that after 200 years dope appears on the state flag laughing .
        2. Zoldat_A 15 January 2020 01: 13 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: hydrox
          45 years have passed since the end of the Second Indochina War, and the United States has already forgotten the anti-militant speeches of its population, insubordination actions and rallies of indignation, and it will again overthrow it to fight at a new level

          They forgot to watch their own pseudo-documentary film Threads (1984) - it tells THEIR SAME, to which America’s attempts to protect ALIEN oil, which they consider the United States as democratic, lead to. 310 megatons only to the United Kingdom ...

          And THIS 1984, year, CARL !!!!!

          Recomend for everybody.
      2. hydrox 15 January 2020 05: 10 New
        • 0
        • 1
        -1
        It’s clear they’ll run into: so we won’t stand aside: it’s clear that our weapons are more perfect and they will suffer such damage that even arrange a Marshall plan for them, but on the other hand, what the hell out of a wood saber against a crowbar - we’ll probably get enough for us, but we’ll make at least one enemy disabled (in the sense of statehood, we won’t think that it’s very difficult to do this: see what happens when they are led by the Yankees -Adult will take over the Donbass)
  • smile 8 January 2020 06: 13 New
    • 26
    • 3
    +23
    Rusik.S (Ruslan
    They had no choice.
    Rather, the Americans did not leave him to them.
    Given the mentality and rhetoric.
    When the Turks shot down our plane and killed one of the pilots, ours mixed hundreds of Turkoman with rubble, burned thousands of carpenters along with the carriers, including the Turks. Etc. etc., and the statement about tomatoes here looked like idleness, although, of course, here they were pressed with money.
    The Turks received as they did not receive from anyone over the past seventy years ..
    But we did it ... uh ... well, like the north wind - it is known where - it seems that it doesn’t exist ... without big words. And it just ... is ... :)))))
    We had a field for maneuver, because there was no extremely rigid rhetoric .. well, there were still nuances ...
    Iran will not succeed. For different reasons.
    It was already quite difficult for Iran to defend its interests in the region.
    (I don’t even want to try to discuss these very interests of theirs, since they do not always coincide with ours.)
    Now Iran will have no easier time. To put it mildly.
    Hands will be untied at all.
    If the American current leadership, which - the left leg does not know. what the right leg is doing, but all together they condemn the head, in which indeed, any winds walk, it’s not completely crazy - they will not invade Iran.
    Begin to hammer with combined strokes.
    Israel, most likely, also join the aviation and missile component.
    Gouging Iran seriously enough, they can. But not to the end.
    Win without a land operation - no.
    But the ground operation for them - as one of my five-year-old acquaintances says - zop. Unless, of course, they bought the power part of the Iranian leadership as much as they did in Iraq.
    And on the other hand, Iran will also be able to inflict quite limited damage on them. Which will not affect anything. .
    The direct losses that Iran can inflict are entirely uncritical for its main enemies.
    Yes, mostly satellite satellites will pay.
    In any case, Israel will benefit - they are any weakening (and war is always weakening) of a single country, from the neighbors, which they perceive as a potential serious threat - for the good.
    Even if a certain number of Israelis perish, Israel and its leadership will not care. Regardless of who and how much they pile in Iran and receive it themselves. Moreover, they will receive clearly less ..
    So it goes.
    I don’t know if the Iranians will go to block the Gulf of Hormuz - in any case, it will not give them anything but moral satisfaction - Iran will not be able to seriously catch its two main (according to their statements) enemies. No way.
    a certain amount of losses - yes. Even not especially important - which - which is several hundred. that several thousand - and the United States and Israel - do not care. They will survive how they survived the strange loss in an hour of almost three thousand people who knows. Unless, of course, the Americans lose their minds and climb to the field now. But they are not fools, they will not climb. They will hammer for years, like Iraq, and then do the same with it - it is clear how. Although, of course, in this situation, a complete arms embargo is unlikely to succeed.
    A certain amount of material damage - yes.
    seriously put the letter ЗУ - no. No way.
    So it goes.
    But I want to make a mistake and see that those who unleash a conflict will pay for it.
    1. Skarpzd 8 January 2020 06: 21 New
      • 1
      • 2
      -1
      I completely agree.
    2. Maalkavianin 8 January 2020 08: 21 New
      • 3
      • 9
      -6
      In my opinion there was no information anywhere that thousands of Turkoman and bulkheads mixed with rubble mixed ours. As far as I remember, they shot off somewhere in the neighboring bushes, where these same Turkmens were supposedly once and all.
      1. smile 8 January 2020 12: 54 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Maalkavianin
        Hello.
        You are mistaken, Miklos.
        For a long time, the positions of precisely those comrades were targeted purposefully, both by air and by massive missile and artillery attacks on our guidance.
        If it weren’t for the plane, they wouldn’t be slaughtered like that - then ISIS was still alive, banned in all sane countries, the destruction of which was the main focus.
        And you can’t but know about the columns of burnt down cobblers. Our aircraft and the Turks, who fell under the blows, were littering with photos and a video about their sad fate would all be thrown.
        When a person is mistaken, this is not scary, and not bad. We are all mistaken.
        But when a person deliberately lies, it’s bad.
        Thank you for attention.
        1. Maalkavianin 8 January 2020 13: 43 New
          • 0
          • 1
          -1
          If as you say, then I am only glad that Turkey did not get off with just some tomatoes. Judging just by the publications of that time.
          1. Nikolai Grek 8 January 2020 22: 50 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            Quote: Malkavianin
            If as you say, then I am only glad that Turkey did not get off with just some tomatoes. Judging just by the publications of that time.

            “Ironed” for 8 hours: in the crash zone of the Su-24, three leaders of the IS militants were destroyed

            https://www.vesti.ru/doc.html?id=2691457&cid=520
  • Thrifty 8 January 2020 06: 57 New
    • 9
    • 2
    +7
    Few rockets fired! The United States needs to be crushed like cockroaches!
    1. hydrox 8 January 2020 08: 15 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      Please do not forget that Iran is not so rich that it can measure hundreds of missiles: for him, piece by piece, it’s already ruin.
      1. Skarpzd 8 January 2020 08: 23 New
        • 3
        • 2
        +1
        there are a lot of people who do not understand this from the word at all.
  • Obi-Wan Kenobi 8 January 2020 07: 15 New
    • 7
    • 3
    +4
    Iran, and not only him, now does not seem enough.
    The Americans achieved their goal - provoked a war. The imperialist aggressors are bad.
    All this will not end in good ...
  • Bar2 8 January 2020 08: 13 New
    • 9
    • 3
    +6
    successes to you soldiers of Islam, America is the country of victorious Satanism, beat them.
  • Ramzay121 8 January 2020 09: 18 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    Thus, he finally condemned himself.
  • Win1945 8 January 2020 09: 19 New
    • 1
    • 3
    -2
    Only a Russian girl can do nothing. Iranian authorities from another test.
  • megadeth 8 January 2020 10: 51 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    I agree with you, I was one of them ... But somehow it all looks strange. Persian missiles followed a ballistic trajectory (emphasized Persian), even for the Patriot an easy target. All FSA Armed Forces in the Middle East, at least in the SSBG since January 3. It looks like a contract ... Nevertheless, we are in the forefront, on this show ..
  • NEXUS 8 January 2020 13: 06 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    Quote: Rusik.S
    In the last topic, someone wrote that Iran will not do anything, they say they will burn the maximum flags and calm down.

    Iran, I think, would not have done if it had not received support for this act from one of the main players, the Russian Federation and China. In fact, striking at US bases is a declaration of war on the hegemons. But such steps are simply not taken from the ceiling. I am sure that Iran will not stop at this blow. And therefore, I won’t be surprised if our and Chinese equipment in very substantial quantities appear very quickly in Iran.
  • Tahtvjd2868 8 January 2020 04: 49 New
    • 9
    • 41
    -32
    This is the end of Iran as an independent state. Trump now has carte blanche for EVERYTHING.
    1. Rostislav Bely 8 January 2020 05: 01 New
      • 13
      • 4
      +9
      trump impeachment ...
    2. maidan.izrailovich 8 January 2020 05: 04 New
      • 13
      • 13
      0
      This is the end of Iran ...

      Now the fate of Iran depends on Russia.
      If we support, as Vietnam in due time, then Iran will have good chances of victory.
      If not supported, then no options. Iran will certainly last longer than Iraq or Libya, but the US military and economic power will still outweigh.
      ps Russia is simply obliged to support Iran.
      1. Skarpzd 8 January 2020 05: 19 New
        • 15
        • 11
        +4
        I don’t quite understand why we need to support Iran. allies? well no. Yes, and how to support it? the military? do we need it? resources? so they themselves have nothing to spare. and too much is not observed at all. unless from all sorts of political sites? it's possible. but we won’t find much weight and support there.
        1. Victor_B 8 January 2020 05: 24 New
          • 23
          • 7
          +16
          Quote: Skarpzd
          I don’t quite understand why we need to support Iran. allies?

          The enemy of my enemy is my friend!
          It is possible / necessary to support Iran simply against the USA!
          Iran does not have a lot of striking means against the USA.
          I suppose they won’t be able to drown AB or Burke.
          As a result, they will be given their air defense, simply by crushing the number of missiles, and then they will be in the air as in Yugoslavia.
          For months!
          1. ProkletyiPirat 8 January 2020 06: 08 New
            • 11
            • 8
            +3
            Quote: Victor_B
            The enemy of my enemy is my friend!

            And let's prove that this statement is false ?! Now the USA has an ISIS enemy, according to your logic, since they are US enemies, then we are allies? but for us they are enemies too! therefore your statement is false, and therefore Iran is not a "friend" to us, although it is not an enemy to us either.
            1. Victor_B 8 January 2020 06: 31 New
              • 4
              • 5
              -1
              Quote: ProkletyiPirat
              the USA has an enemy ISIS

              Was ...
              Declared.
              Enraged by the Frankenstein generated by them. They were forced to crumble, but somehow specifically - up to the evacuation of these barmalei from the environment with their helicopters.
            2. igorbrsv 8 January 2020 06: 44 New
              • 9
              • 3
              +6
              Igil for usa is a friend, not an enemy
            3. Dart2027 8 January 2020 06: 47 New
              • 7
              • 0
              +7
              Quote: ProkletyiPirat
              the USA has an enemy ISIS

              Yeah ... Such an enemy that until our VKS did not take action from the bombing of the United States there was no sense at all.
            4. hydrox 8 January 2020 08: 34 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              You yourself would not use false statements: indeed, ISIS is our enemy, but the enemy is clinical (i.e., without options). And for the USA, ISIS are situational enemies, very often the States became a roof for barmales, and at times - even rescue angels, taking them out by helicopters to Idlib and where else to “resurfacing”.
              Or take the Kurds :: now these are Amer slaves in the extraction of Syrian oil in Der ez-Zora by feudal methods in favor of the Amers, but at the right time the Americans are shedding, leaving the Kurds in the form of thieves in the oil fields - and here the Syrians will not miss their chance and let the Kurds smoke - "goodbye autonomy!"
              But I hope you didn’t forget that Iran was a friend of Syria (as well as the fact that Putin was on an unannounced visit to the SAR yesterday (I wonder what he flew there with?), And should he meet with his grandmother on Saturday)?
            5. alexddd 8 January 2020 11: 31 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              ISIS is not an enemy of the United States but a child.
        2. SSR
          SSR 8 January 2020 06: 14 New
          • 10
          • 1
          +9
          Quote: Skarpzd
          I don’t quite understand why we need to support Iran. allies?

          +
          Quote: Victor_B
          The enemy of my enemy is my friend!

          There, the Israelis are excited about the Sheburshat, they expect a gesheft, but in such a situation? As for me, Russia should remain in the role of Arbiter and Mitrotvorets, and let the Egyptians, Turks, Persians, Arabs balance the forces in the region among themselves. In especially zealous ones, until the yushka flows under the nose, they will not calm down.
          PS.
          China may begin to supply weapons, purely for combat verification of air defense systems, other systems, through the paths of Pakistan.
        3. _Sergei_ 8 January 2020 06: 26 New
          • 5
          • 1
          +4
          Just by the saying "the enemy of my enemy is friend." Maybe a temporary friend, but a friend.
        4. smile 8 January 2020 06: 46 New
          • 7
          • 2
          +5
          Skarpzd (Eugene Kuzbass)
          Sorry, I do not quite agree.
          We can support them. And we have so many resources. that in any global war itself we won’t have time to spend, even if we try hard ... :)))
          But you are right in another way - why do we need this? There is no meaning for our country.
          Just weakening our adversary, who has long formally called us the enemy?
          To some extent, yes.
          But precisely - "to some extent", no more.
          I am sure that our leadership has a completely pragmatic position and we won’t get to “fraternal help”. And over the past decade and a half, our leadership has proved this.
          Of course, we had jambs - it’s clear where. In places it hurts and offends. But in general, from the point of view of the state of Russia, everything was done correctly.
          Although, of course, sometimes, here and there, sometimes :)))) we should have responded more timely.
          1. Skarpzd 8 January 2020 06: 49 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            So I’m actually talking about this))
            1. smile 8 January 2020 07: 00 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Skarpzd
              And so I totally agreed with you.
              But I vigilantly re-read your and my comments .... :))) and yes, I made sure that I agree. :))))
              But I found one disagreement! —About the resources. :)))) Forgive me, graphomaniac. :))))
              1. Skarpzd 8 January 2020 07: 22 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                I don’t mind. have your opinion. there is mine. and honestly I would like my opinion to be erroneous.
          2. hydrox 8 January 2020 09: 16 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: smile
            But in general, from the point of view of the state of Russia, everything was done correctly.


            So after all, if "as a whole", then it should be "from the point of view of the people" (but not the state-va !!!).
            Actually, according to the Constitution, the people are the source of power, and it is he who must determine the social orientation of the ACTIONS and FUNCTIONS of the state, and not anyone from the outside ... sad
        5. fraders 8 January 2020 08: 19 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Iran needs to be supported so that Amer airbases do not appear there, which then cannot be bought back :)
        6. ABM
          ABM 8 January 2020 08: 48 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          If Iran blocks the straits, the price of oil will rise! According to the recalculation formula - for gas too
      2. nPuBaTuP 8 January 2020 07: 17 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        Now the fate of Iran depends on Russia ......
        Russia is simply obliged to support Iran.

        Oh, I don’t want to .... but this mess will not pass us by request
      3. Obi-Wan Kenobi 8 January 2020 07: 25 New
        • 3
        • 6
        -3
        Now the fate of Iran depends on Russia.
        If we support, as Vietnam in due time, then Iran will have good chances of victory.

        How do we support it? Bare back scare the Americans?
        We will support in Ukraine, in Syria we will support, we will support our oligarchs, who else to support? And most importantly, what and who will pay for it?
        “Where is the money Zin?” - as V.S. Vysotsky said.
        There is more hope for help from China, Turkey, maybe even Pakistan ...
        1. hydrox 8 January 2020 09: 20 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          And let me find out, for what reason did you need to support the Russian oligarchs?
          Of course, it’s yours, but they already own 80% of the cost of the Russian state, where do they seem to have more? laughing
      4. Bar2 8 January 2020 08: 14 New
        • 6
        • 15
        -9
        Quote: maidan.izrailovich
        Russia is simply obliged to support Iran.

        Russia then supports Iran, but Mr. Putin, he has a difficult situation, remember how Putin betrayed Donbas? I'm afraid the same thing will happen now.
        1. Tersky 8 January 2020 09: 08 New
          • 5
          • 2
          +3
          Quote: Bar2
          Remember how Putin betrayed Donbas?

          I do not remember request , and not just me. Can you share with the people in detail - when, how to whom and for how much? I read this (I apologize for the comparison) nonsense and understand, one hope is for Elon Mask, who will nevertheless transfer such "guardians" to Mars. But, apparently, he is a swindler and this will not happen.
          1. Bar2 8 January 2020 09: 13 New
            • 5
            • 9
            -4
            Quote: Tersky
            I don’t remember, and not just me.


            why such a short memory? But the thing was just that in the year 14. Putin did not want to send troops in Donbas, and then there would be no bloody war, but he did not introduce a war between the Russians and Bandera, and you already forgot about it.
            1. Tersky 8 January 2020 09: 30 New
              • 10
              • 3
              +7
              Quote: Bar2
              Putin did not want to send troops Donbas and then there would be no bloody war, but did not introduce

              Holidays are over, stop hungover.
              1. alexddd 8 January 2020 11: 36 New
                • 2
                • 1
                +1
                To be more precise, the president asked permission of the Federation Council to send troops into Ukraine. Federation Council allowed. The President did not exercise this right. Maybe for the better.
      5. mark2 8 January 2020 09: 20 New
        • 2
        • 2
        0
        This is how Russian support for Iran will help break the economic power of the United States, which are located overseas?
        Only a direct attack on decision centers can shake something.
      6. sniperino 8 January 2020 10: 51 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: maidan.izrailovich
        Russia is simply obliged to support Iran
        In theory, Iran should be supported by Russia, Turkey and China, because, after Iran is excluded from the list of the main players in the BV, these countries are next in line.
    3. Vladimir_2U 8 January 2020 05: 06 New
      • 13
      • 1
      +12
      Quote: Tahtvjd2868
      Trump now has carte blanche for EVERYTHING.

      Iran, however, also.
      1. Rostislav Bely 8 January 2020 05: 10 New
        • 5
        • 4
        +1
        cool trumpets trumpets - posted the Iranian flag on Twitter ...
      2. Skarpzd 8 January 2020 05: 22 New
        • 2
        • 7
        -5
        there’s maybe a carte blanche .... only there would still be OMP for it whatever the means of delivery and intercontinental .... while there is no threat of continental AI - they do not care
    4. Same lech 8 January 2020 05: 11 New
      • 15
      • 1
      +14
      And if this is not the end of Iran, but the end of Trump ... suddenly the war will take a protracted character ... and Trump has elections on the nose ... and the American voter will take and vote for Sanders ... who is categorically against the attack on Iran.
      So don’t say gop until you jump over.
      It’s easy to start a war, but God knows how it will end ...
      could Hitler attacking the USSR suggest that he would have to shoot himself in the end?
      1. Rostislav Bely 8 January 2020 05: 16 New
        • 18
        • 1
        +17
        Several airplanes were destroyed at the airbase mattresses (air defense for them does not work as standard)
        1. Same lech 8 January 2020 05: 24 New
          • 8
          • 0
          +8
          It is logical to expect a response from the United States ... heh heh, then again an Iranian response ... well, and how then to stop Trump's provocation leading the world straight into the abyss. what
          1. Rostislav Bely 8 January 2020 05: 27 New
            • 3
            • 7
            -4
            You can’t put an ax in the ass for every camel, the navel will become a glass - with a massive attack of “carts” it will not be good for someone
            1. Vladimir_2U 8 January 2020 05: 34 New
              • 13
              • 0
              +13
              The ax must be written in quotation marks !!!
              Quote: Rostislav White
              You can’t put an ax in the ass for every camel
              At first I thought that you were a connoisseur of Arabic proverbs and sayings! laughing
              1. Rostislav Bely 8 January 2020 05: 38 New
                • 7
                • 1
                +6
                tomahawk is an ax, and Zarathushtra is translated as an old camel
        2. ABM
          ABM 8 January 2020 09: 03 New
          • 3
          • 1
          +2
          Ballistic missiles, difficult to intercept
          1. Rostislav Bely 8 January 2020 10: 57 New
            • 2
            • 1
            +1
            not everyone understood your sarcasm))))
          2. sniperino 8 January 2020 11: 14 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: ABM
            Ballistic missiles, difficult to intercept
            Amer’s air defense confidently only works on lighting missiles?
            1. region58 8 January 2020 18: 24 New
              • 2
              • 1
              +1
              Quote: sniperino
              only works on lighting rockets?

              And what about the rest then? They are not visible. wassat
              1. sniperino 9 January 2020 12: 34 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                Quote: region58
                They are not visible
                And all because without a parachute they fly too fast. You can impose sanctions for exceeding not only range but also speed ... or impose? In general, there is a reason to impose.
        3. mark2 8 January 2020 09: 26 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          And by the way, yes. Then the people as soon as they got hungry, watering the domestic C300 and C400 yesterday after an article on the teachings of air defense mattresses of supposedly C300 systems. And why is this not heard of US air defense? And do they even have that? I’ve strained my memory here, and I didn’t remember a single case when the US air defense was working against a missile attack.
      2. Grits 8 January 2020 06: 19 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        Quote: The same Lech
        And if this is not the end of Iran but the end to Trump ... suddenly the war will take a protracted character

        It will be able to acquire such a character only if Iran’s air defense is able to efficiently bring down American missiles, and even better — airplanes. At least the way Syria’s air defense did when Trump decided to scare them. In this case, Trump’s “beautiful and smart rockets” can simply end faster than cheaper ones than Tomogawks, anti-aircraft missiles. After all, a similar situation was already in Yugoslavia, when Milosevic surrendered already at that moment when the NATovtsy had practically nothing to shell the country with.
        1. hydrox 8 January 2020 09: 34 New
          • 1
          • 3
          -2
          Iran has some kind of air defense, but there is (I won’t be surprised that the S-400 was also cluttered with a battalion), so an attack by air is unlikely, because the Toporov mb missiles will be launched. blocked by "Ustinov" (somewhere there he is, and it is better for him not to fall into the field of action of the AUG).
          But I think that Ustinov will always be between the AUG and Iran (only how is he alone there?)
        2. Nikolai Grek 8 January 2020 21: 26 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: Gritsa
          if Iran’s air defense is effective enough

          judging by recent events, Iran needs to break closer to the territory of the mericatos and pull a couple of missiles .... because the Amer’s air defense / missile defense is extremely ineffective, the victory is guaranteed !!! request soldier
      3. hydrox 8 January 2020 09: 24 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        There simply cannot be a lingering character: no one at all is interested in prolonging the conflict, all the more so since Donika is now being pressed so hard that he should let him not flatten! angry
    5. Nikolai Grek 8 January 2020 05: 25 New
      • 14
      • 0
      +14
      Quote: Tahtvjd2868
      Trump now has carte blanche for EVERYTHING.

      they themselves are ... and the allies in the region have the same ... the Hussites in sneakers are driving the Saudis, who spend hundreds of billions on the "military" !!! wassat what is the end of independent Iran? fool as if Iran were not gouging a couple of states-litter of the Americans !!! laughing
      1. Tahtvjd2868 8 January 2020 07: 14 New
        • 0
        • 2
        -2
        Correctly set emoticons - they knock on their empty heads .. Remember my koment a month later
      2. alexddd 8 January 2020 11: 52 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        He opened here a nisys map of the Middle East. The territory of Iran as five territories of Germany is 1 thousand sq. Km against 648 thousand sq. Km. The terrain is mountainous. I think that strategic warehouses and command posts are deep in the mountains. Iran will withstand even a nuclear strike. Now is the era of the territories. Try to throw cruise or other missiles onto such an area. According to probability theory, damage tends to zero as the territory tends to increase. Navy is not enough, yes. But remembering our heroes (for example, A. Marinescu), you realize that with three diesel-electric submarines you can sink a couple of troughs, which are aircraft carriers and other enemy ships. And when they hit Iran, sleeping agents in aggressor states may wake up. I think they will go along the way as with the DPRK, they will begin to make peace. And the satellite countries in the Middle East of the United States will easily sacrifice if it reaches the slaughter. There G. Kissinger has long been broadcasting about 357 .....
  • Hexagon 8 January 2020 04: 50 New
    • 11
    • 0
    +11
    Hmm ... It didn’t work for Marvelous with the Russian Federation and Ukraine - they carried out a backup plan with Iran. The peddlers of democracy damn it.
  • svp67 8 January 2020 04: 52 New
    • 20
    • 1
    +19
    Well? "The soul rushed to paradise ..." Trump has been looking for someone to fight with for so long that he seems to have found ...
    1. Same lech 8 January 2020 05: 27 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Trump has been looking for someone to fight with for so long that he seems to have found ...

      A pig got into a shit from a year of a pig, and there rats from a year of a rat ... biting and furious ... here you go what
    2. SSR
      SSR 8 January 2020 05: 41 New
      • 6
      • 2
      +4
      Quote: svp67
      Well? "The soul rushed to paradise ..." Trump has been looking for someone to fight with for so long that he seems to have found ...

      They have such a tradition, each president must take part in the war, dip his hands in blood, such an initiative is such a ghoul
      PS.
      What’s there Wang vanga, fire from heaven in the Middle East?
      1. Edmond dantes 8 January 2020 09: 39 New
        • 0
        • 1
        -1
        Nostradamus predicted that the TMV would begin in the east.
    3. hydrox 8 January 2020 09: 40 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      Found something found, but found a bunch of adventures, it seems, not only on his own, but also on the same and his state-va - will also get! yes
  • Pessimist22 8 January 2020 04: 53 New
    • 3
    • 6
    -3
    Here comes the war ...
    1. Skarpzd 8 January 2020 05: 06 New
      • 5
      • 11
      -6
      it seems like that. and it’s bad that Iran has practically no chance to inflict unacceptable damage on staff with allies. crush only due to resource potential.
      1. Same lech 8 January 2020 05: 14 New
        • 7
        • 2
        +5
        Yah smile ... like the Iranians give up ... American soldier a little bunch of you.
        1. rich 8 January 2020 12: 44 New
          • 1
          • 2
          -1
          Idol trump king Leonid of the "300 Spartans" Especially for him with Israeli money Ukraine released a remake yes
      2. Nikolai Grek 8 January 2020 05: 29 New
        • 8
        • 2
        +6
        Quote: Skarpzd
        crush only due to resource potential

        what kind of potential is this ??? what a couple of hundreds of NATO worthless saldafon ??? or the likeness of the “great” Saudi warriors ?? !!! wassat
        1. Skarpzd 8 January 2020 05: 39 New
          • 5
          • 7
          -2
          I’m unfamiliar with NATO’s mobile plans. but I think they are slightly more than a couple of hundreds of worthless (and are they worthless?) soldiers. and the potential ... well, for example - NATO members can make up for the loss of a military aircraft very, very quickly. even a couple of dozen aircraft. and pilots of these aircraft. and ammunition. Is Iran capable of this?
          1. Nikolai Grek 8 January 2020 05: 44 New
            • 14
            • 3
            +11
            Quote: Skarpzd
            Are they worthless?)

            at least study their activities in Afghanistan and Iraq, compare with the stated goals, time and money spent, and understand that nothing is worthless !!! wassat


            Quote: Skarpzd
            and the potential ... well, for example - NATO members can make up for the loss of a military aircraft very, very quickly. even a couple of dozen aircraft. and pilots of these aircraft. and ammunition.

            what continue to believe in fairy tales about the omnipotence of Euroamericos !!! wink laughing
            1. Skarpzd 8 January 2020 05: 51 New
              • 7
              • 3
              +4
              someone talked about omnipotence? Where? Now about the declared goals in Afghanistan and Iraq. statements are just words. who knows what they say. in fact in Afghanistan instability. close to our borders. Does it benefit us? drug trafficking which in our direction adds joy to us? I don’t think so. Iraq is even easier-control of free oil who benefit? us or the states? Well, something like this ..... but statements about bringing democracy to the Middle East and so on blah blah blah ... someone else believes in them?
              1. Nikolai Grek 8 January 2020 05: 57 New
                • 4
                • 2
                +2
                Quote: Skarpzd
                someone else believes in them?

                Well, you believe in the potential that Iran will demolish ... you see, someone believes in what you voiced !! wassat laughing
                1. Skarpzd 8 January 2020 06: 02 New
                  • 6
                  • 4
                  +2
                  what's the difference in what i believe or don't believe? since the middle of the 20th century, in all wars, the victory (well, or stays with its own) is primarily the economy. then logistics. and then the training and motivation of the armed forces.
                  1. Nikolai Grek 8 January 2020 06: 09 New
                    • 7
                    • 1
                    +6
                    Quote: Skarpzd
                    what's the difference in what i believe or don't believe? since the middle of the 20th century, in all wars, the victory (well, or stays with its own) is primarily the economy. then logistics. and then the training and motivation of the armed forces.

                    these are all tales in favor of the poor ... look do not experience the shock of a collision with reality !!! laughing
                    Quote: Skarpzd
                    since the middle of the 20th century, in all wars, the victory (well, or stays with its own) is primarily the economy.

                    it seems that you specifically decided to manipulate and took precisely this period of time, excluding the WWII and WWII from it, because it is their example that crushes your beliefs to pieces ... especially on the example of the greatest economy of Nazi Germany and the results for it after these wars !! recourse
                    PS ... by the way, do not forget that the second half of the 20th century has long passed and right now no one will fight with that tactics and strategy !!! one rocket with a thermonuclear charge will send your entire economy, logistics, training and motivation to hell !!! wassat
                    1. Skarpzd 8 January 2020 06: 14 New
                      • 4
                      • 3
                      +1
                      interesting ... which of us is in reality ... give at least one example when a country with a backward economy and lack of weapons of mass destruction and, most importantly, delivery vehicles can resist NATO or the states
                      1. Same lech 8 January 2020 06: 20 New
                        • 5
                        • 0
                        +5
                        Yes, please ... Vietnam.
                      2. Skarpzd 8 January 2020 06: 38 New
                        • 3
                        • 1
                        +2
                        Quote: The same Lech
                        Yes, please ... Vietnam.

                        Well, Vietnam is a great winner of the states. please remind: who fought on the side of Vietnam? Whose weapons did Vietnam fight? whose economy pulled this war for Vietnam? and most importantly, which country was destroyed at the end of the Vietnam War? Are human and state losses comparable?
                      3. sniperino 8 January 2020 12: 12 New
                        • 2
                        • 0
                        +2
                        Quote: Skarpzd
                        who fought on the side of vietnam?
                        Our military specialists, but not the USSR, with all its potential, which, together with Vietnam, were approximately equal to the enemy. It is not correct to use this example as an argument in support of the thesis about the predominant role of the economy in the outcome of wars after WWII. The arms race, if it does not kill the economy, then makes it stronger. Cuba has a much weaker economy than the United States, but Cuba did not become their "backyard" even after the collapse of the USSR. Although, no one will deny the important role of the economy. US policy has been the cause of protests even within the country.
                  2. Nikolai Grek 8 January 2020 06: 22 New
                    • 5
                    • 1
                    +4
                    Quote: Skarpzd
                    interesting ... which of us is in reality ... give at least one example when a country with a backward economy and lack of weapons of mass destruction and, most importantly, delivery vehicles can resist NATO or the states

                    at least Syria ... but I think you are again using some manipulative techniques !!! there were many wars what happened when the Euroamers in bulk or alone really fought with other countries ??? I already wrote above that the Hussites in sneakers are chasing the homies of your Amerikos, and all of you Taldychite !!! wink

                    PS ... there I edited the comment, you read and continue so don’t be wrong !!! bully
                  3. Skarpzd 8 January 2020 06: 44 New
                    • 2
                    • 2
                    0
                    oh how do you like to hang up labels))) I've already found American homies))) and yes, what about Syria? I did not understand honestly. Barmaleev whether Syria independently hammering? something she didn’t do very well before Russian intervention. or wrong?
                  4. Nikolai Grek 8 January 2020 20: 44 New
                    • 2
                    • 0
                    +2
                    Quote: Skarpzd
                    oh how do you like to hang up labels))) I've already found American homies))) and yes, what about Syria? I did not understand honestly. Barmaleev whether Syria independently hammering? something she didn’t do very well before Russian intervention. or wrong?

                    Well, so the mericatos and with the intervention of their homies can’t do anything anywhere !!! wink
            2. Skarpzd 8 January 2020 06: 31 New
              • 3
              • 2
              +1
              [/ Quote]
              it seems that you specifically decided to manipulate and took precisely this period of time, excluding the WWII and WWII from it, because it is their example that crushes your beliefs to pieces ... especially on the example of the greatest economy of Nazi Germany and the results for it after these wars !! recourse
              PS ... by the way, do not forget that the second half of the 20th century has long passed and right now no one will fight with that tactics and strategy !!! one rocket with a thermonuclear charge will send your entire economy, logistics, training and motivation to hell !!! wassat[/ Quote]
              But what did the economy and production not play any role in WWI? she cho ... the lack of cannon shells and generally armament in the Russian army how did it help us? Yes, and the second world how is it different? You said correctly - the united European economy directed by Hitler against us what? seemed to us a little? how much blood was spilled before the evacuated plants started up? until the economy was put on a war footing? Or do you think that they threw slippers? and by the way about tactics and strategy, you again correctly said. Americans will not go hand to hand. why not. missiles and bombs will be at war. they have already done this more than once. and with what quite successfully. Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya, continue? and yes ... Iran has a fusion and delivery vehicles to the USA ??? did not know...
              1. rich 8 January 2020 08: 35 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                Against the backdrop of such events, a Boeing 737 passenger plane with 167 passengers and 13 crew members on board crashed two minutes after taking off from the Imam Khomeini International Airport in Tehran. The liner belongs to Ukraine’s International Airlines (owner - oligarch Igor Kolomoisky). The cause of the crash was a technical malfunction.
              2. hydrox 8 January 2020 09: 51 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                But the question was not asked: to whom it can be so indifferent (and it hurts the Ukrainians and the Persians!) That it was the UKRAINIAN plane that crashed upon departure from TEHRAN. Who could have made such a trick, and for what purpose? sad
              3. rich 8 January 2020 09: 55 New
                • 1
                • 1
                0
                I didn’t ask. Tell me
              4. hydrox 8 January 2020 10: 08 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                I can’t :: I’m racking my brains - it’s not at the right time against the background of really scary events :: it’s not at all a fact that at least half a liter of common sense should be found in each of the five interested parties (in fact, twice as much and on each side may not be of one interest).
                So I say - it is not sewn into the general canvas ...
          2. alexddd 8 January 2020 12: 04 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            How in Donbasey they want to distract the eyes of the public with falling planes .... They are stupid (as Zadornov said). Methods do not change. What for? If it works. So think whose aircraft it is. No one seriously thinks that at such a tense moment, suddenly the engine of the plane caught fire? The version with the plane was used up. Now civilian ships can still sink ... Tankers with oil will bomb several pieces, they will say that Iran. The media all of them know how to scream loudly and will be for the whole world. They will flood the Persian Gulf with oil ... I think it will be so.
    2. Edmond dantes 8 January 2020 09: 43 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Tell this to the French and British who merged with the Germans in WWII.
  • ProkletyiPirat 8 January 2020 06: 20 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: Skarpzd
    and it’s bad that Iran has practically no chance to inflict unacceptable damage on staff with allies.

    Eeee no, as they say "there would be a desire, but there is a way" For example, it is possible to supply anti-ship and / or ballistic missiles to opponents of the United States and its allies. And the benefit can be obtained in the form of a capture of hydrocarbon deposits in the local water area. Or for example, it is possible to arrange shipments of anti-ship missiles to Panamanian terrorists to attack US ships, or at least to blackmail American companies.
    1. ML-334 8 January 2020 06: 36 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      It seems to me that the whole of Europe, under attack, was accepted by refugees.
  • classik46 8 January 2020 07: 57 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Iran is a mountainous region, basically, to start a war with it means to get bogged down worse than Afghanistan, I don’t even think that NATO will support (Erdogan has not been supported before). America except Israel will help, because the Bibi regime is inadequate, and it has bothered us with Europe ( the only western country where apartheid is supported at the state level).
  • Sergey Pavlov 8 January 2020 04: 55 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    It smelled fried. Ehh, I hope Pandora's box is not open yet.
  • Vladimir_2U 8 January 2020 05: 05 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    As there was a wish on VO so that the Amertsians would be stuck with all ends in the Middle East, it seems that the wish comes true.
    1. maidan.izrailovich 8 January 2020 05: 28 New
      • 15
      • 2
      +13
      As there was a wish on VO so that the Amertsians would be stuck with all ends in the Middle East, it seems that the wish comes true.

      So the Americans got stuck in BV anyway. After it failed to quickly finish Syria. And two countries did not let them do it. These are Russia and Iran.
      And now it becomes clear that Putin’s visit to Syria is not accidental. Surely our people knew about the impending blow. And against the background of this, Putin makes it clear to our allies in Syria that Russia will not stop halfway. And it will be in business until victory.
      Let’s hand over Iran, we’ll be left face to face with the USA. Syria and Venezuela do not count. Iran cannot be surrendered. .
      1. Vladimir_2U 8 January 2020 05: 35 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Somehow they were not convincingly stuck, now they won’t be able to get off.
    2. Grits 8 January 2020 06: 28 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Quote: Vladimir_2U
      As there was a wish on VO so that the Amertsians would be stuck with all ends in the Middle East, it seems that the wish comes true.

      There are wishes. That's just amerikatos not fools and took into account the experience of past mistakes. There will be no ground operation. They will first carry out the air defense of Iran, then the rest of the military infrastructure. Then civilian. And when Iran turns into a likeness of Afghanistan at the end of the 20th century, they will declare a complete victory. And all this will be done remotely - missiles and aircraft.
      1. Vladimir_2U 8 January 2020 06: 41 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        All the same, Iran has more opportunities, unlike Afghanistan.
        1. Grits 8 January 2020 06: 44 New
          • 0
          • 3
          -3
          Quote: Vladimir_2U
          All the same, Iran has more opportunities, unlike Afghanistan.

          This is for now. But if the Americans have a bite of the bit, then it could well turn into a semblance of Afghanistan
          1. Vladimir_2U 8 January 2020 06: 53 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Maybe it can’t, Iran’s air defense is all the same, plus the ability and, what is very important, the determination to strike at American bases. So with impunity, but not the fact that it is effective, the Americans will be able to hit only with “axes” very far away, the rest is “fraught with sideways going out”. )))
            1. Grits 8 January 2020 14: 24 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Quote: Vladimir_2U
              Maybe it can’t, Iran’s air defense is all the same, plus the ability and, what is very important, the determination to strike at American bases. So with impunity, but not the fact that it is effective, the Americans will be able to hit only with “axes” very far away, the rest is “fraught with sideways going out”.

              I would like to believe in it
      2. hydrox 8 January 2020 10: 15 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        Quote: Gritsa
        And all this will be done remotely - missiles and aircraft.

        Yes, this is a modern war :: so there may be no one between Iran and Amer’s AUG, but RUSSIAN KUG and just at the tip of the combat radius of AUG aviation — how will the Americans behave? request
  • Van 16 8 January 2020 05: 07 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    Harshly new year begins ..
    1. Andrey Zhdanov-Nedilko 8 January 2020 13: 28 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      The year of the rat is always like that ...
  • Kleber 8 January 2020 05: 17 New
    • 9
    • 2
    +7
    White House head Donald Trump plans to address the nation.


    When the US president addresses the nation, American soldiers always die. So the war will be very bloody.
    1. parusnik 8 January 2020 09: 20 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      So the war will be very bloody.
      ... Yes, the Persian Gulf is painfully narrow
  • seregin-s1 8 January 2020 05: 26 New
    • 9
    • 0
    +9
    I was wrong in saying that Iran would limit itself to a nuclear deal. The Persians answered for the words. Let's see how the US allies will behave.
    1. Grits 8 January 2020 06: 30 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Quote: seregin-s1
      I was wrong in saying that Iran would limit itself to a nuclear deal

      Plus for honesty.
      1. hydrox 8 January 2020 10: 17 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        And to you - for justice.
    2. GELEZNII_KAPUT 8 January 2020 10: 08 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: seregin-s1
      I was wrong in saying that Iran would limit itself to a nuclear deal. The Persians answered for the words. Let's see how the US allies will behave.

      Those who are not as hot as they should should get on the skis soon! bully
  • Gennady Fomkin 8 January 2020 05: 30 New
    • 1
    • 3
    -2
    Quote: Victor_B
    Quote: Skarpzd
    I don’t quite understand why we need to support Iran. allies?

    The enemy of my enemy is my friend!
    It is possible / necessary to support Iran simply against the USA!
    Iran does not have a lot of striking means against the USA.
    I suppose they won’t be able to drown AB or Burke.
    As a result, they will be given their air defense, simply by crushing the number of missiles, and then they will be in the air as in Yugoslavia.
    For months!

    The flight of strategists in our direction is already the basis

    Moreover, immediately a complete blow wassat
  • tolmachiev51 8 January 2020 05: 37 New
    • 0
    • 8
    -8
    And the Iranians know about this attack!? It seems that the missiles were branded "made in USA" !!!! Pure water provocation.
    1. Rostislav Bely 8 January 2020 05: 51 New
      • 8
      • 1
      +7
      Good morning - the Iranian president has already trumped Trump on Twitter - posted the Iranian Flag ...
      Speaker of the US House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi appealed to the presidential administration Donald Trump to stop the provocation against Iran. The speaker wrote about this on her Twitter page.
      Pelosi noted that the US should ensure the security of the military and demand from Iran to stop the violence.
      “America and the whole world cannot afford war,” the speaker wrote.
      Earlier it was reported that several US military installations in Iraq were attacked by the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) of Iran.
      1. nPuBaTuP 8 January 2020 07: 34 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Iranian President Troll Trump Already

        Speaker of the US House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi appealed to the presidential administration Donald Trump to stop the provocation against Iran.

        Troll well too ...
        If Trump is blown away, a flock of such Pelosi will tear him apart ....
  • malyvalv 8 January 2020 05: 56 New
    • 5
    • 3
    +2
    It seems the Americans did play a provocation in the style of Pearl Harbor. With the sanctions did not work. Now there is legitimacy within the United States for the bombing of Iran, the destruction of infrastructure, factories, bridges, etc.
    1. Gunxnumx 8 January 2020 07: 53 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      I agree with you. The warriors need war as air. In the USA there is Moloch, represented by the military-industrial complex, around and in whose interests all politics revolves. The Americans think that they will brew the world war again, improve their affairs, warm their hands and safely sit overseas, having come to a divide, among the winners, at the end.
      1. GELEZNII_KAPUT 8 January 2020 10: 11 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Gun70
        I agree with you. The warriors need war as air. In the USA there is Moloch, represented by the military-industrial complex, around and in whose interests all politics revolves. The Americans think that they will brew the world war again, improve their affairs, warm their hands and safely sit overseas, having come to a divide, among the winners, at the end.

        Yes, they do not need war, they do not have health, it's over ...
  • Skarpzd 8 January 2020 06: 10 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: Victor_B
    Quote: Skarpzd
    I don’t quite understand why we need to support Iran. allies?

    The enemy of my enemy is my friend !!

    eh ... if everything was so simple.
  • Karaul14 8 January 2020 06: 11 New
    • 2
    • 15
    -13
    When Iran shot down an American drone, Trump at the last moment canceled the attack on Iran, as he said that the casualties and the drone are an unequal exchange. Subsequently, the dismissed Bolton lamented this, accusing Trump of incompetence, in which now Iran would regard this as a weakness. It turns out that Bolton was right and Iran subsequently organized an attack on the US Embassy in Iraq. As a result, Trump had to go to a severe aggravation - the murder of Suleimani, who was just in Baghdad in order to coordinate actions. Trump needed to listen to more experienced comrades - the same Bolton and Mattis, they would have shook hands with Iran, would have shown that they were ready for the conflict to begin and this would not have happened. Now the States will have to respond with military aggression, otherwise there will be a loss of face and image of the United States. The answer will be in the near future, and this will not be a ban on the import of tomatoes, I still do not know how the USA will answer, but I have no doubt that the answer will be decent.
    1. malyvalv 8 January 2020 06: 25 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      A bit wrong. The loss of a drone was not enough to destroy the infrastructure of Iran. It would look very disproportionate. But now it is possible. Actually, this was the purpose of the murder of Suleymani. Since it was obvious that the sanctions did not work and Iran did not want to go to the terms of the United States on a nuclear deal. But Israel is worried and worried. Yes, and the Saudis, too, help Iran Hussites zadolbal already.
    2. Karaul14 8 January 2020 06: 40 New
      • 1
      • 9
      -8
      I understand that many are shocked when they see a version that is completely distinguishable from the one accepted here as a carbon copy.
      1. Paranoid50 8 January 2020 09: 53 New
        • 3
        • 1
        +2
        Quote: Karaul14
        many are in shock

        belayWhy? laughing Another very fresh clown delivers a lot to many, of which it happens here weekly before dope, yeah. fellow However, both appear and fall off. yes
    3. Igoresha 8 January 2020 13: 00 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Iran subsequently organized an attack on the US Embassy in Iraq
      where does infa come from Iran? are there any injured or just danced on camera in front of the fence and game over
  • Dikson 8 January 2020 06: 38 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    A nuclear warhead will fly to attack Israel in Iran .. that’s why I have such suspicions .. Again, Trump is able to give such an order in order to minimize human losses .. And the war will end immediately .. Americans are definitely not going to lose strategic bombers, and Iran alone cannot be defeated ..
    1. SSR
      SSR 8 January 2020 07: 19 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Dikson
      To attack Israel, a nuclear warhead will fly to Iran .. that’s why I have such suspicions ..

      And I have such a feeling.
      PS.
      But there is a feeling that this will be the beginning of some end. There will be so many “sects” in the world against the demon who delivered a nuclear strike that it will be a complete ahtung.
      1. Dikson 8 January 2020 08: 58 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        The sectarians will be crushed separately ... But the effect will be from such a blow -Mama don’t cry .. At once the Arabs will shut up and peace will reign in the Middle East ..
        1. SSR
          SSR 8 January 2020 10: 21 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: Dikson
          At once the Arabs will shut up

          Arabs who are silent in Europe? Or are Muslims in Europe?
          1. Dikson 8 January 2020 10: 31 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            They keep silent. They will get off easily and keep silent. Because you want to live. And after a nuclear explosion in the Persian Gulf, do you know how shale oil and gas will trample ?! When Yugoslavia Derbanil everyone was silent? Libya? Iraq? Americans do not care about Europe in essence .. If unrest starts in Europe, America is far away .. Well, at the UN they can condemn .. scold .. scold .. sigh and pohorut .. They will be thrown off for humanitarian aid .. And that’s all. From the dollar will not go anywhere ..
            1. SSR
              SSR 8 January 2020 11: 51 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Quote: Dikson
              And after a nuclear explosion in the Persian Gulf, do you know how shale oil and gas will trample ?!

              I am glad that you are not the Minister of Defense of Israel.
              You have a real pinch in your head as you think to put out a fire with gasoline.
              1. Dikson 8 January 2020 12: 13 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                I wouldn’t like to be the Minister of Defense of Israel for any kind of carving .. What’s the big deal? Do you doubt that Israel will answer that way? But will he have a choice? Arabs .. Persians .. will not be silent .. Of course they will not .. They will vote, yell, run and crush each other at the funeral .. then they will burn a little American and Israeli flags and calm down, they will go on to perform the evening prayer .. There will be no partisan war against the United States in the Middle East. even after loud statements .. You have probably heard many times about the shelling and attempted attacks on Khmeimim, right? And why is it interesting that we do not hear about such attacks on American bases in the same Syria, in Iraq, in Japan, the same, finally? Does the great Arab fighting spirit work only against Russians and Jews? Something and the Bedouins were militant for the colonel, too, all, as one, did not die .. Today, like yesterday, who is stronger is right. You can talk about the impeachment of Trump, about some other things, but even because of a nuclear strike on Iran, the third world war will not begin. Chaos and epilepsy of the world economy - yes .. But there is no global war.
    2. GELEZNII_KAPUT 8 January 2020 10: 13 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Dikson
      A nuclear warhead will fly to attack Israel in Iran .. that’s why I have such suspicions .. Again, Trump is able to give such an order in order to minimize human losses .. And the war will end immediately .. Americans are definitely not going to lose strategic bombers, and Iran alone cannot be defeated ..

      It could even be ...
  • Skarpzd 8 January 2020 06: 40 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    Quote: Zoldat_A
    Vietnam 2.0 or World 3 ...?

    Americans are not stupid. ground operations (at least on their own) there is no need to carry out them. will be pecking at a distance. they are not the first time.
  • Zomanus 8 January 2020 06: 50 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    In, it began. Now condemnation from the UN will follow.
    And if the UN does not immediately give permission for the bombing of Iran ... then Trump will not care.
  • Skarpzd 8 January 2020 06: 55 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: ProkletyiPirat
    Quote: Skarpzd
    and it’s bad that Iran has practically no chance to inflict unacceptable damage on staff with allies.

    Eeee no, as they say "there would be a desire, but there is a way" For example, it is possible to supply anti-ship and / or ballistic missiles to opponents of the United States and its allies. And the benefit can be obtained in the form of a capture of hydrocarbon deposits in the local water area. Or for example, it is possible to arrange shipments of anti-ship missiles to Panamanian terrorists to attack US ships, or at least to blackmail American companies.

    I would like to ... but no, Russia will never (hopefully) go for the dissemination of such technologies. at least by the fact that someday it may turn against us.
  • Alevil 8 January 2020 07: 21 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Our leadership would be resolved, like the Iranian one ... Now is the time to crave for the Bandera scum.
  • Dimon71 8 January 2020 07: 30 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    At night, Iran strikes at am and in the morning the Hohlyad Boeing falls over Tehran. I think the connection is obvious
  • Skarpzd 8 January 2020 07: 38 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    Quote: Dimon71
    At night, Iran strikes at am and in the morning the Hohlyad Boeing falls over Tehran. I think the connection is obvious

    and where is this connection? is there infa?
  • Tank jacket 8 January 2020 07: 56 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    CNN-fake
  • Kerensky 8 January 2020 07: 57 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Everyone has already forgotten that Pompeo offered to distribute something a little with them and end there? What are airbases and a dozen rockets? Well blot out a couple of shovels of concrete on the runway, well, a couple of mixers.
    Victims being clarified? Do not make me laugh! Immediately after any shelling, roll call is carried out in any unit. And reporting to the journalists without casualties is not at all in the face - the editor himself will kill.
    While there are no victims among US soldiers, and Iraqis have suffered on the towers ... Negotiated?
  • AsmyppoL 8 January 2020 08: 00 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    For me, a very sad event ....
    In many NATO command and control systems, the opponents of the alliance were Iran, the Russian Federation and the People's Republic of China ...
    Conflicts allegedly began in the Baltic states and in the zone of interests of Iran. The destruction of the famous Iranian General is similar to the provocation of the American special services, which deliberately framed the impulsive American President. A retaliatory strike against American bases showed me that the Iranian government fell for this provocation ... The same as the defeat of the American Pacific Fleet, only in much smaller volumes ... As if we had not come to the beginning of the third world ...
    God grant that this does not happen!
  • opuonmed 8 January 2020 08: 04 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    I hope it’s smart enough for the United States not to answer, and what’s the shelling in which no one died
  • Strashila 8 January 2020 08: 19 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Of course, I could be wrong, but in the picture the launch of a ground-to-air missile.
    Or the Iranians began to use them to strike ground targets.
  • parusnik 8 January 2020 08: 20 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Interestingly, the news does not say about the death toll ... The Iranians hurried ... There is still a nuance in which direction the "carts" of the Barmalean deficiencies are turned, what position will Turkey, NATO member and US ally take ... Europe’s position, before that remained silent ... after the assassination of Suleimani ... Yes, and the United States needs a Congress permit to wage war ... And most importantly, many have their own interests in Iran ... Europe is sucks, it is held hostage by Arab immigrants, a second front ..
  • thinker 8 January 2020 08: 23 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Russian Moldovans
    After completing the funeral of Suleimani ...

    Yesterday, because of the crush postponed. This morning, the ceremony was resumed.
  • georggy 8 January 2020 08: 24 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    And there is nobody to help, in this good deed.
  • Udav kaa 8 January 2020 08: 25 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    All the same, Israel pitted the United States with Iran ..
  • Air force 8 January 2020 08: 40 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    The mess starts comic, why did Trump even agree to the blow? Of course, you might think that impeachment would be avoided, but he didn’t actually threaten him, and after an authorized strike against the general and the ensuing consequences, impeachment may also threaten. For some reason, it seems that this is just another stupid thing about both trump and its strategists, plus misinformation (like nothing will happen, everything is under control, let's hit, we’ll increase ratings, Iran will wipe off, sources told us that after this attack, Iran is covered and etc. Well, like, as with Russia, "the economy to shreds") well, or is it a game of democrats against trump, feed him a "disinformation" and instill the need to deliver this blow, thereby putting an impeachment into practice. Of course, it is possible that the trump, according to the old American tradition, begins its “victorious war” before the elections, which is stupid even more than a blow to the general. PS It strains in this situation that trump likes to raise rates, Iran replied, the trump needs to be raised, and then Putin V.V. flew into Syria on Tuesday, thereby showing that Russia steers in the Middle East, it is in control and is not afraid of Russian attacks, and before arriving to the coast of Syria Marshal Ustinov was sent, then the passenger Boeing in Iran falls (what they will blame Iran, Iran can counteract the fact that it’s not the Americans to first shoot down civilian planes), here the Canadians also urgently gathered home from Iraq, in general, the tramp needs to be answered, but the answer can lead to war, or leave Iraq, but then face loss and the howl that “Akela missed”, and Israel, too, is worried not childishly, although they pretend that they are on the drum and they are strong no matter how, but if the hegemon floats home, the time will come to worry, though they will hope that Putin B .AT. It will not give them a grudge and will “ruin” the situation, but this will further undermine the US position in the region. Bottom line: the trump needs to be answered, and taking into account the fact that they are almost all who are in power in the US are not adequate, this is annoying.
    1. alexddd 8 January 2020 12: 24 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      A sound analysis of the situation. Everything to the point.
  • Tank hard 8 January 2020 08: 48 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    One thing can be said, the leadership of Iran does not forgive the killing of its soldiers.
  • Jarserge 8 January 2020 08: 50 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    There is no need to rush, no rush. Everything is still muddy and incomprehensible, more like propaganda fakes.
  • Kapkan 8 January 2020 08: 52 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    I don’t understand only, but what, the USA does not have any air defense systems such as Shell, Thor .... Well, or at least the understanding that air defense should be covered? Or are they so self-confident that they’re definitely not attacking us and we don’t need such systems ..
    Some strange ...
    1. ABM
      ABM 8 January 2020 09: 07 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Ballistic missiles with their trajectory fall from above, falling into the zone of effective destruction of such complexes at the last moment. It’s almost impossible to bring down
    2. Paranoid50 8 January 2020 09: 58 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: Kapkan
      the United States does not have any air defense systems such as Shell, Thor ....

      No and not foreseen. And in general, in terms of military air defense, they have a failure. As for the air defense of the object, then for all occasions they have a capricious "Patriot".
      1. Kapkan 8 January 2020 11: 03 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Then I don’t understand their hatred statements. These people are either on the verge of insanity, or a bluff from poker is their EVERYTHING, or they really do not understand anything in hostilities. what
        1. Paranoid50 8 January 2020 11: 37 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          Quote: Kapkan
          their capricious statements are not clear.

          The current situation was influenced by many factors, military and political, internal and external - we observe the result. yes
          1. Kapkan 8 January 2020 11: 55 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            By the way, they also have these Phalanx Volcanoes or whatever ... six-barreled guns ... Or are they only on ships?
            1. Paranoid50 8 January 2020 12: 03 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              Quote: Kapkan
              are they only on ships?

              There are also land, C-RAM:

              But, as they say, the lobby is useless ... laughing
              1. Kapkan 8 January 2020 12: 06 New
                • 2
                • 0
                +2
                lol Well, yes, the obsolete garbage is apparently ... Our shilka 100 years ago created a cloud of bullets to increase the likelihood of defeat, but this thing is too accurate judging by the video.
  • Adimius38 8 January 2020 08: 57 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    25 years ago there was a film about nostradamus that predicts the beginning of the third world because of Iran, the prophecy comes true
    1. Vadim237 8 January 2020 11: 57 New
      • 2
      • 2
      0
      This nastrodamus - crap with the third world war, because of Iran no one will start it.
  • ivanec 8 January 2020 09: 00 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Meanwhile, in Iran, they made 2 tests of underground vigorous gifts for friends *
    1. asv363 8 January 2020 12: 48 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Ivan, are you talking about 2 earthquakes?
  • latgalec 8 January 2020 10: 28 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The question is different, to buy pasta with buckwheat or not ....
    1. Nick 8 January 2020 11: 06 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: latgalec
      The question is different, to buy pasta with buckwheat or not ....

      Definitely. Still salt, matches, canned food, kerosene. You can have coffee grain, - the excellent currency was in Moscow during the Great Patriotic War.
    2. Andrey Zhdanov-Nedilko 8 January 2020 13: 33 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Dry crackers and buy matches, salt, vodka!
  • Nick 8 January 2020 11: 01 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Started! Next is Israel. Then everywhere ...
  • Stas 2rep 8 January 2020 11: 03 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Rushed oblique into the sorrel.
  • Old warrior 8 January 2020 11: 07 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Well done! They are responsible for the bazaar. Ours would have such a determination.
  • seregatara1969 8 January 2020 11: 09 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    and the photo was only with air defense missiles?
    1. agond 8 January 2020 12: 24 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      In Iran (as well as in North Korea) they have long been fond of the construction of underground structures, and this may affect the duration of the military conflict
  • Old26 8 January 2020 11: 51 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    Quote: nPuBaTuP
    Either Trump will be impeached, or they will also kill him!

    Or there is a third version :))
    Trump is re-elected for a second term hi

    This is the fourth version. The first three were voiced by Tatyana. Moreover, IMHO they smell more of conspiracy theories than they have real data

    Quote: hydrox
    You see, "Marshal Ustinov" is already there ...
    Whether he flanks through the Mediterranean or enters the Persian Gulf - this great mystery is ...
    But I think that a couple of Iran’s air bases are ready to receive a regiment or other Tu-22M3M and the same number of Su-35s ...
    What the Bears will be doing at this time is unknown to the shirnarmasses.

    Quote: hydrox
    Iran has some kind of air defense, but there is (I won’t be surprised that the S-400 was also cluttered with a battalion), so an attack by air is unlikely, because the Toporov mb missiles will be launched. blocked by "Ustinov" (somewhere there he is, and it is better for him not to fall into the field of action of the AUG).
    But I think that Ustinov will always be between the AUG and Iran (only how is he alone there?)

    Of course, I understand the post-holiday syndrome, but ... your "wet dreams" go against the realities of this world. It seems that you look at the world through pink glasses?
    There the Persians are already ready to accept the regiment or another TU-22M3M, which in this reality now exists in the amount of 1-3 copies. SU-35 is also a regiment or two. But we were not interested in whether the Russian Ministry of Defense was going to do this or not. The S-400 battalion cluttered there in Iran. They haven’t delivered everything to Turkey yet, but is Iran already a battalion? And the calculation on it is Russian or Persian? If Persian, then it turns supermen. Not learning ready to use.
    Marshal Ustinov is already blocking your Axes. And the fact that he is anchored in the Bosphorus after he collided with a pier and was towed by three tugboats to the anchorage is probably unknown to you. He "burns napalm" in the Persian Gulf ....
    Damn, are you tired of carrying the blizzard?

    Quote: Strashila
    Of course, I could be wrong, but in the picture the launch of a ground-to-air missile.
    Or the Iranians began to use them to strike ground targets.

    Pictured is the Iranian Tondar-69 rocket. Created by the Chinese under the 8610 program based on the HQ-2 anti-aircraft missile (a clone of the Russian S-75 air defense system)

    Quote: ivanec
    Meanwhile, in Iran, they made 2 tests of underground vigorous gifts for friends *

    And the material as these "nuclear gifts" was used for the livelihoods of camels, most likely ...
    1. Dikson 8 January 2020 12: 23 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      About the kiss of Marshall with the pier. Where does this infa come from? Your conclusion, based on the analysis of available photos? So after embarrassment, the commander of the ship can command the remainder of the service as a boat in the Arctic ..
  • Sarkazm 8 January 2020 12: 07 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    There is a genius on the expanses of tyrnet, an expert on everything and everything El Murid, who is also Nesmeyan. Articles for tracing paper, it is noticeable that different people write, the author only retells in his own words. Just the other day, I was talking nonsense after the Iranian leadership announced the military nature of the response, made fun and grimaced, blocked comments, explaining to the idiot that Iran, aka Persia, is one of the most ancient civilizations, the USA, Europe, and we were not even in its infancy the state when Persia was already mature. That the blow will and will not be behind the proxy.
    The conclusion of the genius after the Iranians hit the US bases, quote: “Attack.
    I'm on the train, so it's hard to keep track of what is happening. But I can only say that I definitely did not expect Iran’s decision. The degree of his frostbite and adventurism rolls over ... " I sang and sang to grief, sold for a pair of silver pieces, but for the time being wearing patriotic masks, it just doesn’t reach the point that a normal man whose mother insulted an ambal will not think about the size, size of the coffin for an ambal and the forest’s overtake by the undertaker, but act in defense of the sacred.
    Contrary to popular belief, everyone was not, but became slaves. Even our tyrnet heroes, apparently believing that Iran should act as if by some instruction from a fable about a policewoman in the US: “If you are raped, relax and try to have fun ...”. It doesn’t occur to them that a “woman” will bite off her nose, lip, tear her throat with her teeth, and would rather die in dishonor than death ...
    Slave psychology gave through to many “analysts” and it is beneficial for amers to support such a logic and type of thinking, slavish in essence. They will have to answer, and they will certainly answer, and they are stronger than Iran, and are able to raze it to the ground, BUT the blow took place, and the publicly fat American smug cat got a kick for the same thing.
  • Bare 8 January 2020 12: 22 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    US navel will tear apart the Islamic world.
  • Dima_Anlim 8 January 2020 12: 25 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    Already there is evidence that not a single American soldier was hit by an Iranian missile attack. But there are affected Iraqis. Super "Iran retaliation" - it is ....
  • bbss 8 January 2020 12: 30 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    In the photo, the launch of the S-75 air defense complex missile.
  • Old26 8 January 2020 13: 01 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    Quote: Dikson
    About the kiss of Marshall with the pier. Where does this infa come from? Your conclusion, based on the analysis of available photos? So after embarrassment, the commander of the ship can command the remainder of the service as a boat in the Arctic ..

    Eugene! Hammer in any search engine the question of the whereabouts of "Marshal Ustinov." The information will give out enough and not only text, but also video towing it by Turkish tugs. So this is not my conclusion ...

    Quote: Bere
    US navel will tear apart the Islamic world.

    Alexei! don't count on it. Moreover, the Islamic world is also not monolithic. And surrounded by Iran, most of them are not their Shia religionists, but Sunites. And how everything turns out to be hard to say

    Quote: bbss
    In the photo, the launch of the S-75 air defense complex missile.

    In the photo, the launch of the Tondar-69 Iranian ballistic missile of the ground-to-ground class
  • Zoldat_A 8 January 2020 15: 52 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    [quote = Zoldat_A] [quote = Vadim237] I bet that Russia will help Iran with weapons and intelligence data. [/ quote]
    The most interesting thing is that some 40 years ago it was the other way around.

    In life what ....

    And more recently, Gaddafi with his tent went to visit someone ...
    And the Most Democratic Country of the World in the person of its President welcomed the recently recently elected President Assad ...

    And now the Most Democratic Country of the World suddenly engages in state terrorism itself.

    Suddenly...

    Where are we going, dear comrades? Obviously not to communism ...
  • eklmn 8 January 2020 17: 02 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    News without Google, fresh, from Amersky TV today:
    “Iranian troops fired more than a dozen ballistic missiles against two military bases in Iraq and stated that at least 80 US soldiers were killed. The US military said it is still evaluating the result. ”
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_east/iran-live-updates/2020/01/08/c835c218-31a0-11ea-9313-6cba89b1b9fb_story.html
    Iranians said Carl, Iranians, about 80 killed.

    Amer news on TV today:
    Trump is still silent about the devastation (he will appear on TV soon), but says that the Americans are all intact. Iraqi media say there are no casualties among Iraqis. Amer military - Iran missed.
    Iranian media - “we launched rockets in the direction of amer bases to prove our abilities. They didn’t want to cause human damage, otherwise the war would have started. ”
    Maybe Amer’s air defense didn’t work, because calculated that rockets fly by.
    In short, after Trump’s appearance on TV, I’ll give a message ....
    1. www3 8 January 2020 17: 14 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      there are video launches)
      statements of loss are)
      video and photo hit no! )))
      again, all the film in the camera down? everything is as it should be in Africa - there is an attack, there is a photo of the fire at the base.!