U.S. deployed B-52H bombers closer to Iran


The United States deployed B-52 strategic bombers closer to Iran. We are talking about six American strategists. It is reported by Fox News.


According to available information, six bombers flew from the Barksdale air base in Louisiana, USA, and landed on Diego Garcia Island in the Indian Ocean. The new base of American strategists is located at a distance of about 3700 kilometers from the southern border of Iran.

At the same time, the United States issued a warning to commercial courts in connection with threats from Iran in the Middle East.

Persian Gulf, Strait of Hormuz, Gulf of Oman, Arabian Sea, Red Sea, Gulf of Aden and Indian Ocean - a threat to commercial vessels from Iran and its puppets

- The US Maritime Administration said in a statement.

Iran previously said it had prepared 13 scenarios of revenge for the United States for the assassination of General Kassem Suleimani. This was announced on Tuesday by the secretary of the Iranian Supreme Security Council, Ali Shamkhani. He stated that "the weakest scenario could be for the United States historical a nightmare. "

If American soldiers do not voluntarily leave our region, we will make sure that their bodies are removed in a horizontal position

- Shahmani's statement is quoted by the media.

However, there is no information regarding the details of the prepared scripts themselves.

Recall that General Kassem Suleimani and the deputy head of the Iraqi Shiite militia Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis died on the night of January 3 during an air strike near the airport of Baghdad. US President Donald Trump, who ordered the liquidation of the general, said earlier that the strike was "for peace." He also accused Suleimani of involvement in organizing an attack on the diplomatic mission in Baghdad on December 31.

In addition, Trump has already warned Iran that the United States is ready to strike at 52 targets in the country, some of which are of cultural and historical significance.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

210 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Sergey39 7 January 2020 15: 37 New
    • 22
    • 22
    0
    Targets for checking Iranian air defense / missile defense arrived for joint exercises.
    1. RUSS 7 January 2020 15: 41 New
      • 30
      • 24
      +6
      Quote: Sergey39
      Targets for checking Iranian air defense / missile defense arrived for joint exercises.

      Many Iranian air defense systems will fail when US planes are still at airfields.
      The murder of Suleymani is a test of Iran for lice, pecking at the provocation and that’s all, kirdyk to Iran.
      1. Grandfather 7 January 2020 16: 03 New
        • 16
        • 6
        +10
        Quote: RUSS
        peck at the provocation and all kirdyk Iran.

        they can take someone with them.
        1. RUSS 7 January 2020 16: 09 New
          • 12
          • 19
          -7
          Quote: Dead Day
          Quote: RUSS
          peck at the provocation and all kirdyk Iran.

          they can take someone with them.

          There is nothing to “grab”, and even if they want to pick up the very Israel, then they’ll remove the atomic bomb over Iran
          1. RUSS 7 January 2020 16: 21 New
            • 6
            • 13
            -7
            Quote: RUSS
            remove

            Hit *
          2. Hog
            Hog 7 January 2020 18: 02 New
            • 3
            • 4
            -1
            Quote: RUSS
            Quote: Dead Day
            Quote: RUSS
            peck at the provocation and all kirdyk Iran.

            they can take someone with them.

            There is nothing to “grab”, and even if they want to pick up the very Israel, then they’ll remove the atomic bomb over Iran

            And someone doubts that Iran does not have it (and they will not use it)?
            1. Bukhalov 8 January 2020 10: 35 New
              • 3
              • 1
              +2
              I have no doubt that Iran .... has no atomic bomb. Not an iota.
        2. Greenwood 7 January 2020 17: 21 New
          • 5
          • 0
          +5
          Quote: Dead Day
          they can take someone with them.
          Maybe some Qatar or Saudis, but hardly anyone will care.
          1. RUSS 7 January 2020 17: 28 New
            • 1
            • 7
            -6
            Quote: Greenwood
            Unless some Qatar

            A lot of Iranians live in Qatar, I'm not sure that they will fall under the distribution from Iran
            1. Greenwood 7 January 2020 17: 31 New
              • 7
              • 0
              +7
              Well, of course they can live there. They live in Europe (those who fled in 1979). But how mentally they relate to Iran. Does the Ayatollah regime consider them traitors ?!
              But the main thing is not that. The main thing is that Qatar has the largest US Air Force base in the Middle East - El Udeid. Good target.
      2. Ross xnumx 7 January 2020 16: 08 New
        • 35
        • 11
        +24
        Quote: RUSS
        The murder of Suleymani is a test of Iran for lice, pecking at the provocation and that’s all, kirdyk to Iran.

        Some strange checks for “lice” - to announce to the whole world about the destruction of 52 targets in the territory of a sovereign country “in the name of peace”, to adjust the fleet, to overtake the bombers and wait - will bite, will not bite Iran’s provocation ... 
        The Americans themselves have already shown for verification that lice do not go on them, they just live there. A sort of excellent maneuver off the coast of the DPRK ... And how intensely they guarded the Russian Tu-160 near Venezuela ...
        The war against Iran will spur countries such as China and Russia to consider expanded options for confronting possible aggressions from "everywhere shitting partners" .
        It is not necessary to consider aggression against Iran as a certain inevitable struggle against evil. Here we need to think about who will become the next "objectionable"  to the American establishment. And think fast, without any illusory hopes.
        1. RUSS 7 January 2020 16: 24 New
          • 6
          • 23
          -17
          Quote: ROSS 42
          The war against Iran will spur countries such as China and Russia to consider expanded options for confronting possible aggressions from "everywhere shitting partners" .

          There is no need to compare Iran with Russia and China, especially since Russia and China even have a “military doctrine and strategy” without Iran, and they will not review anything.
          Quote: ROSS 42
          To consider aggression against Iran as some kind of inevitable struggle against evil is not necessary

          Well, it depends on who and how
          1. Ross xnumx 7 January 2020 16: 30 New
            • 15
            • 6
            +9
            Quote: RUSS
            There is no need to compare Iran with Russia and China, especially since Russia and China even have a “military doctrine and strategy” without Iran, and they will not review anything.

            Excuse me generously ... hi I completely forgot. One will sit on the banks of the Yangtze, and the other will look at the Moscow River - wait until the "corpse of a partner" appears there  ...
            good Right doctrine, most importantly, rare ... repeat
            1. RUSS 7 January 2020 16: 39 New
              • 9
              • 11
              -2
              Quote: ROSS 42
              Excuse me generously ... I completely forgot something. One will sit on the banks of the Yangtze, and the other will look at the Moscow River - wait until the "corpse of a partner" appears there  ...
              Right doctrine, most importantly, rare ...

              Iran is not a nuclear power, and that’s it. It’s being seized like Iraq, Serbia, etc. Nothing new
              1. Kleber 7 January 2020 16: 54 New
                • 23
                • 3
                +20
                Yeltsin leaked Serbia. For which the earth is glassy to him.
                1. RUSS 7 January 2020 17: 03 New
                  • 9
                  • 16
                  -7
                  Quote: Kleber
                  Yeltsin leaked Serbia. For which the earth is glassy to him.

                  Afghanistan, Grenada, Libya, Somalia, Iraq, Panama, we also leaked the United States?
              2. Ross xnumx 7 January 2020 16: 59 New
                • 25
                • 1
                +24
                Quote: RUSS
                Iran is not a nuclear power, and that’s it. They’re saying like Iraq, Serbia. etc.

                "Etc."  is Cuba, Vietnam, North Korea, Afghanistan, Vensuela ...
                In the goiter, the breath does not "pull" ? Iran is a mountainous country. It is possible to destroy statehood there, but at the same time one must have excellent health and "nine cat lives" .
                Something tells me that a blitzkrieg with a Russian neighbor in the Caspian will not work ...
                1. RUSS 7 January 2020 17: 05 New
                  • 3
                  • 19
                  -16
                  Quote: ROSS 42
                  etc. " is Cuba, Vietnam, DPRK, Afghanistan, Vensuela ...

                  The USA will start, and Israel, the Saudis will finish.
                  1. Guru 7 January 2020 21: 36 New
                    • 7
                    • 0
                    +7
                    The USA will start, and Israel, the Saudis will finish.
                    Aha laughing in Yemen, the Saudis have already finished laughing lol And Israel is sitting at the side of Hezbollah.
                2. Greenwood 7 January 2020 17: 23 New
                  • 8
                  • 2
                  +6
                  Quote: ROSS 42
                  It is possible to destroy statehood there, but at the same time one must have excellent health and "nine cat lives" .
                  So Trump did not seem to talk about the destruction of statehood. He spoke of 52 strategic goals for which they would strike, and that’s all. And what will happen to Iran after that, in what state will its statehood be, Trump and the Pentagon do not care much.
                  1. RUSS 7 January 2020 17: 45 New
                    • 3
                    • 11
                    -8
                    Quote: Greenwood
                    And what will happen to Iran after that, in what state will its statehood be, Trump and the Pentagon do not care much.

                    That's what it is about
                    1. shahor 7 January 2020 20: 35 New
                      • 2
                      • 2
                      0
                      Quote: RUSS
                      That's what it is about

                      I think so too. No one will conduct military operations in Iran. If something methodically and leisurely they drive Iran into the Stone Age with attacks from the air, gradually destroying air defense, and then industrial facilities, port infrastructures, and power plants. But I don’t think it will come to that. Ayatollahs themselves are not enemies, cursed, as it should, and will move off the topic.
                3. Storekeeper 7 January 2020 18: 43 New
                  • 4
                  • 4
                  0
                  They said that about Iraq, about the soldiers of Saddam, and as a result, neither Saddam nor his soldiers nor anything, but there is an occupation of Iraq. And warriors of light do not want to leave from there. The Yankees will bomb Iran in the 19th century and that’s it. On earth do not climb will regret their warriors of light.
                  1. Vadim237 7 January 2020 23: 48 New
                    • 2
                    • 1
                    +1
                    And 4500 killed US soldiers, as well as 15000 wounded.
                  2. Gorjelin 9 January 2020 08: 49 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    They said that about Iraq, about the soldiers of Saddam, and as a result, neither Saddam nor his soldiers nor what is there, but there is an occupation of Iraq

                    usa then usa now - two big differences
              3. classik46 7 January 2020 18: 19 New
                • 2
                • 0
                +2
                He has plutonium bombs, dirty. The deal forbids enriching uranium because it is clean, but any country with nuclear plants can make a dirty bomb.
      3. Nyrobsky 7 January 2020 16: 23 New
        • 24
        • 4
        +20
        Quote: RUSS
        peck at the provocation and all kirdyk Iran.

        Yeah. They cannot deal with the Taliban for 19 years, despite the fact that the Taliban have neither air defense, nor the air force, nor armor, etc. They invited “mattresses” to the negotiating table with “Kalash” and an old “shaitan pipe”, but Iran will have much wider opportunities.
        1. Ross xnumx 7 January 2020 16: 31 New
          • 14
          • 2
          +12
          Quote: Nyrobsky
          and Iran’s opportunities will be much wider.

          Especially in mountainous terrain ...
        2. RUSS 7 January 2020 16: 43 New
          • 4
          • 13
          -9
          Quote: Nyrobsky
          Yeah. They can’t cope with the Taliban for 19 years,

          I’m not sure what will be the occupation of Iran, and accordingly the land war as with the Taliban.
          The tasks in Iran are different; there will likely be an operation like in Yugoslavia
          1. GELEZNII_KAPUT 7 January 2020 18: 14 New
            • 5
            • 3
            +2
            Quote: RUSS
            I’m not sure what will be the occupation of Iran, and accordingly the land war as with the Taliban.
            The tasks in Iran are different; there will likely be an operation like in Yugoslavia

            As in Yugoslavia it will not be, they will be wet all over the Middle East, and this is already noticeable with the naked eye.
          2. poquello 7 January 2020 18: 24 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: RUSS
            Quote: Nyrobsky
            Yeah. They can’t cope with the Taliban for 19 years,

            I’m not sure what will be the occupation of Iran, and accordingly the land war as with the Taliban.
            The tasks in Iran are different; there will likely be an operation like in Yugoslavia

            will not, or rather try, of course they can)))))
          3. Nyrobsky 7 January 2020 21: 58 New
            • 4
            • 0
            +4
            Quote: RUSS
            The tasks in Iran are different; there will likely be an operation like in Yugoslavia

            Not true. Yugoslavia was a union of peoples (Croats, Serbs, Montenegrins, Albanians ...), and Iran, for the most part, is monolithic and it is problematic for mattresses to play on the idea that we’ll “come upon the Serbs” here and “support the Muslims” there. There are not so many cracks in Iran in which one could drive as many wedges as in Yugoslavia, but to democratize and unite the people to counter the aggressor in the presence of a common external threat to all, it is very possible what mattresses have achieved. The people unite against mattresses regardless of religious preferences.
            Quote: RUSS
            I’m not sure what will be the occupation of Iran, and accordingly the land war as with the Taliban

            And rightly so that they are not sure. The ground operation will turn into a second Vietnam unambiguously and with the same result, the mattresses will have to leave this territory with shame and heavy losses. The mere crushing of life support facilities and other infrastructure, in which mattresses have clearly succeeded, does not mean the crushing of the state and does not lead to the victory being achieved. All recent US operations against countries subjected to their aggression did not end with such an indicator as improving the lives of citizens and led to the same result - the people plunged into "democracy" want one thing for the mattresses to be removed.
            1. Maki Avellevich 8 January 2020 21: 02 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Quote: Nyrobsky
              Not true. Yugoslavia was a union of peoples (Croats, Serbs, Montenegrins, Albanians ...), and Iran for the most part is monolithic

              monolithic than Yugoslavia but 40% are not Persians
              1. Nyrobsky 8 January 2020 21: 07 New
                • 2
                • 0
                +2
                Quote: Maki Avellevich
                Quote: Nyrobsky
                Not true. Yugoslavia was a union of peoples (Croats, Serbs, Montenegrins, Albanians ...), and Iran mostly monolithic

                monolithic than Yugoslavia but 40% are not Persians
                So I, Maki Avellyevich, didn’t say that Iran is 100% Persian, but wrote - mostlythat actually you graphically confirmed hi
        3. Altai72 7 January 2020 17: 32 New
          • 4
          • 0
          +4
          [/ quote] With the Taliban 19 years can not cope [quote]

          With such entities as the Taliban, Al Qaeda, An Nusra, the same Kods (sometimes mistakenly called Al-Quds) is not profitable to cope with. This gives an occasion to be there. Do you really think that the Taliban with their "Kalash" and "Shaitan pipes" actually dictate the conditions to the Americans? For all this, separate institutions have been created and exist, and these entities are not at all uncontrollable.
          1. Nyrobsky 7 January 2020 23: 42 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: Altai72
            With such entities as the Taliban, Al Qaeda, An Nusra, the same Kods (sometimes mistakenly called Al-Quds) is not profitable to cope with. This gives an occasion to stay there. Do you really think that the Taliban with their "Kalash" and "Shaitan trumpets" actually condition the Americans?
            In 2001, it was as you say. Now the Taliban are dictating it. Mattresses declaring the Taliban a terrorist organization eventually sat down with him at the negotiating table in Qatar. If they were successful in the fight against him, then this would never have happened. Coordinating with the "terrorists" the conditions for their withdrawal, they ran into the fact that at the final stage of concluding the agreement, the Taliban refused to sign, which in turn means that the mattresses are not dictating, but the Taliban do not agree. They already know that they won and realizing that the mattresses need to go out if not with victory, then at least with signs of saving face, they demanded a good rollback in terms of non-interference in the post-war political system of Afghanistan. Everything seemed to be close to reaching an agreement, but now, after the assassination of Suleymani, no one knows how the card will fall, since the influence of the IRGC in Afghanistan is not weak either.
        4. ALEX_SHTURMAN 8 January 2020 03: 32 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Who told you that they want to cope with the Taliban, they are there for something else, the weapons of the dollar and the United States are a sluggish war and chaos around the world, except for the United States.
      4. Dinic 7 January 2020 17: 12 New
        • 8
        • 1
        +7
        And if you do not bite, but spit, then you can press further.
        It is impossible to ignore pokes from the USA - there are many examples of this.
        1. RUSS 7 January 2020 17: 30 New
          • 3
          • 12
          -9
          Quote: Dinich
          It is impossible to ignore pokes from the USA - there are many examples of this.

          I propose the introduction of sanctions against the United States.
          1. shahor 7 January 2020 20: 40 New
            • 2
            • 2
            0
            Quote: RUSS
            I propose the introduction of sanctions against the United States.

            Late, dear! Already entered. The entrance to Russia was closed to many senators, their assets (real estate, accounts, etc.). arrested in Russia. Crying and groaning are over the Capitol!
      5. classik46 7 January 2020 17: 32 New
        • 9
        • 2
        +7
        Yes, it’s not kirdyk to him, Iran is too big to fall. It simply will not be allowed to fall apart - more migrants, multiple fanatics and terrorists including in America, diasporas in Jordan, Saudi Arabia are all potential terrorists. America itself will puppet if oil it will become dangerous to mine in BV.
      6. eagle owl 7 January 2020 18: 05 New
        • 1
        • 2
        -1
        No, you are mistaken - and specifically. You just think about this. PAX Amerikana ends there. where did it arise! Iran. Ukraine ... Kim Rocket. They are at one point, and calling her is “Neunas Point”.
        Now think - you, with such a point ...
        Many Iranian air defense systems will disable

        winked
        The main thing is that there should be no corpses with a mattress flag. All the rest is neunas. They didn’t even see the war — they DO NOT KNOW it!
      7. poquello 7 January 2020 18: 09 New
        • 7
        • 0
        +7
        Quote: RUSS
        The murder of Suleymani is a test of Iran for lice, pecking at the provocation and that’s all, kirdyk to Iran.

        this is a test of the world for lice, not Iran
      8. Comrade Michael 7 January 2020 18: 13 New
        • 7
        • 4
        +3
        What are you doing American propaganda under our flag and the name Russ?
        1. Guru 7 January 2020 21: 43 New
          • 5
          • 2
          +3
          What are you doing American propaganda under our flag and the name Russ?
          This is an ordinary troll. There are a lot of them lol
    2. andrewkor 7 January 2020 15: 42 New
      • 20
      • 3
      +17
      These rarities will never go into the zone of non-suppressed air defense. Vietnam taught. Will be Axes from a distance bullet.
      1. Sergey39 7 January 2020 15: 44 New
        • 0
        • 11
        -11
        The B-52 is a bomber.
        1. Grandfather 7 January 2020 16: 04 New
          • 17
          • 1
          +16
          Quote: Sergey39
          The B-52 is a bomber.

          Sergey is a name.
          1. Finn 7 January 2020 17: 08 New
            • 8
            • 0
            +8
            No it's a cocktail
          2. Mavrikiy 7 January 2020 17: 08 New
            • 0
            • 2
            -2
            Quote: Dead Day
            Quote: Sergey39
            The B-52 is a bomber.
            (respect)
            Sergey is a name.
            (question)
            Although, respecting the enemy is dearer to yourself.
        2. poquello 7 January 2020 18: 34 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          Quote: Sergey39
          The B-52 is a bomber.

          yes bomb
        3. Guru 7 January 2020 21: 44 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          The B-52 is a bomber.
          Do you think that axes are only sea and ground based?
      2. hydrox 7 January 2020 17: 06 New
        • 6
        • 3
        +3
        Armament - 20 KR AGM-86V with a range of 1200 or 2400, at a speed of 800 - nothing interesting, all products are 100% amazing.
        Is this again an intimidation operation like in the ATS?
        1. akarfoxhound 7 January 2020 18: 13 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          When launched "from the water", the AGM-86 range becomes as much as 750 km :). And then everything becomes not so inaccessible
    3. Nemo 7 January 2020 15: 43 New
      • 7
      • 12
      -5
      Here the 3rd world can begin, and you are all heckahs, but khahankahs.
      1. Only Iran has no missile defense system at all.
      2. And why should bombers enter Iranian airspace? Launched rockets and went to his base.
      1. Sergey39 7 January 2020 15: 45 New
        • 3
        • 10
        -7
        What about the S-300?
        1. Grandfather 7 January 2020 15: 58 New
          • 10
          • 7
          +3
          yes ... Diego Garcia is not Hmeimim ...
          a dream is not a service ... winked
        2. Grandfather 7 January 2020 16: 06 New
          • 10
          • 3
          +7
          Quote: Sergey39
          What about the S-300?

          oversleep, Comrade Lieutenant Colonel.
        3. Finn 7 January 2020 17: 11 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Regiment s300 + Iranian copies. 52 fu35 are going to crush the regiment, then b52. 52 pieces are not enough.
        4. shahor 7 January 2020 20: 48 New
          • 2
          • 2
          0
          Quote: Sergey39
          What about the S-300?

          The S-300 is an air defense system developed yet ... well, you know. At the beginning of 2000 was quite imagined. Today, let's be honest, not really. Yes, and studied by all who ... would not have to. And Iran has few of them. Life expectancy of Iranian air defense during a massive attack from the air - day 3.
          1. Dave36 7 January 2020 22: 37 New
            • 1
            • 1
            0
            Day no more
          2. kventinasd 8 January 2020 01: 56 New
            • 1
            • 2
            -1
            Quote: shahor
            Life expectancy of Iranian air defense during a massive attack from the air - day 3.

            The life spans of Amer’s bases, which Iran has in their sights, are about the same. Once again, let the Petriots check their own. lol
      2. Terentich 7 January 2020 15: 52 New
        • 13
        • 10
        +3
        Quote: Nemo
        Here may begin 3 world

        Unless in your imagination. No one from Iran will get involved in a conflict with the United States, the instinct of self-preservation has not yet been canceled. wassat
        1. RUSS 7 January 2020 15: 58 New
          • 6
          • 15
          -9
          Quote: Terentich
          Quote: Nemo
          Here may begin 3 world

          Unless in your imagination. No one from Iran will get involved in a conflict with the United States, the instinct of self-preservation has not yet been canceled. wassat

          Moreover, together with the USA there will be Israel and part of the Arab countries.
        2. carstorm 11 7 January 2020 16: 00 New
          • 17
          • 2
          +15
          It is not that simple. Of course, Iran will not go on the attack stupidly due to the fact that it will not be exported. but you can take revenge in various ways and then the states will begin. Iran, if it is now dying, the leadership will lose the army because they will not forgive them for it. having attacked Iran, the states will start, if not a third world war, then precisely such a force regional conflict that few people can predict the consequences. it is a loathsome stupid decision to kill the general, so maybe now the dominoes begin to lay down that then it can no longer be stopped. so that you grin in vain.
        3. MstislavHrabr 7 January 2020 16: 07 New
          • 11
          • 6
          +5
          Iranians will not get involved. First, the Americans will withdraw their troops from Iraq, as well as the embassy and the citizens (they’re already leaving, rejoice) and thus protect them from a possible “answer”, and then deliver a bomb and missile strike on Iran’s infrastructure sending this country into the Stone Age without industry and electricity. What "promotions" to justify this blow will be made will see. What can Iran’s army and navy do without infrastructure ?! Well, if my forecast is not confirmed ...
          1. Grandfather 7 January 2020 17: 04 New
            • 4
            • 2
            +2
            Quote: MstislavHrabr
            First, the Americans will withdraw their troops from Iraq,

            yeah ... running ...
          2. Greenwood 7 January 2020 18: 06 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            Quote: MstislavHrabr
            Americans will withdraw their troops from Iraq
            Trump said that first let Iraq pay a billion dollars, which was invested in the construction of the US base, and then the Americans may (!!!) think about the exit.
        4. Voyager 7 January 2020 16: 34 New
          • 7
          • 1
          +6
          I have been talking with several Iranians for a long time, and based on what I hear from them, I can say that I have bad news for you. They not only want immediate punishment (especially to Israel, and not to the USA), even at the cost of their lives, but they also sincerely hope that we will harness for them. Blessed is he who believes, of course, but the trouble is that if the trouble begins, it is not known how other countries will behave, including us. And what does such a large-scale conflict come across for the whole geopolitical world.

          In addition, there are those who think more or less sensibly from a tactical point of view and understand that it is better not to get involved, but most strongly believe in Iran’s ability to instantly destroy Israel, and that they will do it so quickly that there will be no one to answer. And my suggestive questions with specifics such as “how exactly, with what, what weapon and how many of these weapons in general” are immediately banal phrases that I know nothing about Iran and their culture.
      3. dvina71 7 January 2020 15: 55 New
        • 8
        • 2
        +6
        Quote: Nemo
        Only Iran has no missile defense system at all.

        Why such a conclusion?
        1. hydrox 7 January 2020 17: 17 New
          • 2
          • 1
          +1
          Never mind their illiteracy - youth plays in one place.
          Yes, this is not a weapon against Iran (I’m not talking about the vigorous loaf) ... but to miss one and a half tons of TNT in Qum - the Iranians will not forgive this for their army ...
          The whole question is only whether the existing outfit of air defense forces can withstand 120 AGM-86V or will they overcome this line?
      4. RUSS 7 January 2020 15: 57 New
        • 4
        • 7
        -3
        Quote: Nemo
        Here the 3rd world can begin, and you are all heckahs, but khahankahs.

        Why on earth? More details please
        1. Kleber 7 January 2020 16: 07 New
          • 4
          • 13
          -9
          B-52 can be bombed with YaB. From the south of the Caspian Sea, Iran, from the north of Russia ... the wind can in fact drive radioactive dust to the north.
          1. Greenwood 7 January 2020 17: 26 New
            • 4
            • 2
            +2
            Quote: Kleber
            From the south of the Caspian Sea, Iran, from the north of Russia ... the wind can in fact drive radioactive dust to the north.
            This is not a reason to shoot nuclear missiles in the United States.
            1. Kleber 7 January 2020 17: 30 New
              • 3
              • 3
              0
              Those. according to your logic, can Russia be blasted in Mexico, thereby polluting the United States with radioactive dust and the USA will not be blasted in response to Russia?
              1. Greenwood 7 January 2020 17: 36 New
                • 5
                • 3
                +2
                And here is my logic? It doesn’t work like that. Russia and Mexico have nothing to share, they are not in a state of long-standing hostility, and Russia has not built for many years from Mexico the image of universal evil that must be destroyed.

                To extrapolate relations between the USA (and Israel) with Iran to any other two abstract countries is stupidity. Bordered by paranoia.
                1. Kleber 7 January 2020 17: 38 New
                  • 2
                  • 2
                  0
                  They took the answer the other way. I would like to hear from you exactly on the question asked.
                  1. Greenwood 7 January 2020 17: 56 New
                    • 7
                    • 2
                    +5
                    Ok, I answer.
                    Attacks by Russian ICBMs on the territory of Mexico will NOT lead to contamination of even neighboring American regions with radioactive particles. The radiation exposure will be point and will be local in nature at the places of the bombing. In the end, some grandiose pollution in Hiroshima and Nagasaki did not happen. There, the shocking wave was not the radiation.
                    Further. Radioactive particle contamination can only occur if it enters the only Laguna Verde nuclear power plant in Mexico. There is already an environmental disaster on the whole American continent. But this is not a reason in hysteria to open a nuclear suitcase.
                    In both cases, the motives for Russia's actions are unclear. If Russia speaks out on the world stage about its behavior, it is likely that there will be no blow from the United States. But there will be global public condemnation. Russia will become a rogue country, all its assets abroad will be seized, it will fall under colossal sanctions, it will be limited the possibility of trade, it will be disconnected from the SWIFT system, all agreements and contracts with it will be terminated, it will be excluded from any major international political, economic and social events, etc.
                    Most likely (missile strike 90%) there will be no missile strike on Russia, since the trajectory of the missiles can be calculated, and there is no US threat. And the Americans are not fools.
                    Similarly from our side. Although we are still adding the traditional softness of our Foreign Ministry, which alas is limited only by concerns, trying not to go into open hostility towards the West. To a large extent, this can be explained by the continuing dependence of our economy on foreign investment and technology.
                    1. Kleber 7 January 2020 17: 59 New
                      • 0
                      • 0
                      0
                      Thank you, this is exactly the answer I expected from you.
        2. Mastrer 7 January 2020 20: 28 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          There is no need to consider the conflict in Iran separately from the whole planet; it does not exist in a vacuum. As one friend of mine said, if the third world war begins in the next 5 years, then it will begin in Iran.

          And here it doesn’t even matter if Iran, Russia, China or someone else fit into Iran. The population of Iran is 80 million people, and it is unlikely that all of them are eager to fight with the states - this will provoke a new wave of refugees, before which the previous waves, for example, easy emigration. And they will not run to Turkey or to the Russian Federation, but to the warmed up old Europe. A couple of millions of refugees will finally finish off the social breathable, which will cause a political and economic crisis which has not been seen since the time of the French Revolution.

          And when a crisis rages in Europe, gentlemen like Napoleon or Hitler begin to appear there, with all the consequences ...
      5. Brturin 7 January 2020 16: 44 New
        • 5
        • 5
        0
        Quote: Nemo
        1. Only Iran has no missile defense system at all.

        Syria in April 2017 - From the statement of the official representative of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation Igor Konashenkov: - April 7, from 3.42 to 3.56 Moscow time from the Mediterranean Sea in the area of ​​about. Crete from two destroyers of the US naval forces (Ross and Porter) was struck by a massive missile strike with 59 Tomahawk cruise missiles at the Syrian air base Al-Shairat (Homs province). According to Russian means of objective control, only 23 missiles flew to the Syrian air base. The place of impact of the remaining 36 cruise missiles is unknown. https://topwar.ru/112925-mo-rf-36-tomagavkov-ne-dostigli-celi.html
        1. Oleg83 7 January 2020 20: 52 New
          • 0
          • 1
          -1
          Quote: BrTurin
          Quote: Nemo
          1. Only Iran has no missile defense system at all.

          Syria in April 2017 - From the statement of the official representative of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation Igor Konashenkov: - April 7, from 3.42 to 3.56 Moscow time from the Mediterranean Sea in the area of ​​about. Crete from two destroyers of the US naval forces (Ross and Porter) was struck by a massive missile strike with 59 Tomahawk cruise missiles at the Syrian air base Al-Shairat (Homs province). According to Russian means of objective control, only 23 missiles flew to the Syrian air base. The site of the fall of the remaining 36 cruise missiles is unknown. https://topwar.ru/112925-mo-rf-36-tomagavkov-ne-dostigli-celi.html

          Still searching and not finding? This is rocket
          1. Brturin 7 January 2020 21: 38 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: oleg83
            This is rocket

            Such here - “excellent, new and smart”, only a year later again - “According to the available information, 103 cruise missiles were used, including the Tomahawk sea-based missiles, as well as guided GBU-38 bombs from V-1B aircraft, airplanes F-15, F-16 used air-to-ground missiles - Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation.
            Earlier it was reported how many missiles were intercepted by Syrian air defense for each of the attacked targets: Duvali airfield - 4 out of 4, Dumeir airfield - 12 out of 12, Bley airfield - 18 out of 18, Shairat airfield - 12 out of 12, Mezze airfield (unused) - 5 out of 9, Homs airfield - 13 out of 16 (no major damage), settlements of Bars and Geramani - 7 out of 30. https://topwar.ru/139854-vse-celi-porazheny-pentagon-otchitalsya-ob-udare-po -sirii.html
            And on the account of what they are looking for and will not find, the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Russia showed reporters the wreckage of cruise missiles launched in Syria by the United States, Britain and France https://topwar.ru/140518-siriyskie-pvo-ne-promazali-genshtab-predstavil -oblomki-sbityh-raket-koalicii.html. So if you go back to the beginning “Only Iran has no missile defense system at all” - if the Syrians managed to shoot down, then really the Iranians are not able to do this, the question is not absence, but effectiveness ....
      6. Altai72 7 January 2020 21: 28 New
        • 1
        • 4
        -3
        Immediately to intercept.
    4. Finches 7 January 2020 16: 00 New
      • 15
      • 9
      +6
      War is inevitable! For JSC "USA" there are no red lines and such a crime that cannot be committed for your own profit. The fire in the Middle East will undoubtedly strengthen income within the United States and will raise the standard of living, and, accordingly, the rating of Trump and his accomplices before the election! But the main thing is the superprofits that the war promises! This is just the essence of imperialism! It’s not for nothing that the SP-2 sanction, then the assassination of a respected general in Iran, are links in one chain! Russia can not be taken into account - this is not the USSR and it is difficult for us today to oppose the United States in the Middle East, except for Zakharova in a miniskirt! They will give us to Syria, no matter how much they scream - perhaps there are already such agreements and, oddly enough, a fire in the Middle East is also beneficial to us! Or rather, not to us, the Russian people, but to the oligarchs - oil will go up! And these are the super-profits of Sechin and Co. and other languid sons of our modern Fatherland, who will take them to where? Right in the banks on Wall Street - and America's benefit again!
      1. RUSS 7 January 2020 16: 29 New
        • 4
        • 8
        -4
        Quote: Finches
        War is inevitable!

        Whoever "raises" money on this, oil prices will rise, but Russia, like Iraq, will shout something at the UN and everything on it, as before, Operation Desert Storm, during which Iraqi forces were defeated by the international coalition troops, became a turning point in the history of international relations. The victory over Saddam Hussein made the United States an undeniable mentor in the Middle East, while their traditional opponent, the USSR, abandoned its traditional course and did not support the Iraqi leader.
      2. Grandfather 7 January 2020 17: 07 New
        • 5
        • 1
        +4
        Quote: Finches
        The fire in the Middle East will undoubtedly strengthen income within the United States and will raise the standard of living, and, accordingly, the rating of Trump and his accomplices before the election! But the main thing is the superprofits that the war promises!

        Is Russia also benefiting from a war? oil is already growing!
      3. PN
        PN 7 January 2020 17: 45 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        You are wrong, the rise in oil prices is not profitable for us. As soon as the price rises, the owners of shale oil will revive immediately and begin to squeeze us out of the markets with new sanctions.
        1. Finches 7 January 2020 17: 46 New
          • 4
          • 0
          +4
          With the production of shale oil, the same is not so simple!
      4. classik46 7 January 2020 17: 46 New
        • 4
        • 3
        +1
        Perhaps there’s some kind of agreement: Lavrov recently went to see Trump before the murder of Suleimani. It’s already been proved that the Russian oligarchic money pulled Trump from bankruptcy. It’s stupid to deny it. Plus the recent gas negotiations with Ukraine, it’s too fast for Ukrainians caved in under the agreement for 5 years. Then Gazprom and Russia could be imposed the most enslaving conditions, nevertheless they gave Vitrienko the go-ahead and did not persist (most likely the same in the agreement scheme). And recently Gazprom again sold its shares in an unknown direction (see part of the same agreement). Sanctions are purely preserving the face, moreover, with all these European energy packages, Moscow itself has agreed to a voluntary rejection of the instrument of influence.
      5. kventinasd 8 January 2020 02: 30 New
        • 0
        • 1
        -1
        Quote: Finches
        They will give us to Syria, no matter how much they scream - perhaps there are already such agreements and, oddly enough, a fire in the Middle East is also beneficial to us!

        Nonsense. Syria is practically free from amers and other hangers-on and no one is negotiating with them, if the Americans would like to take Damascus, they would have done it a long time ago, but they were liquidated, considering that it was not worth messing with a strong enemy in the form of Russia. But how many brave statements there were before that Assad must leave. Now everyone has calmed down and does not even think in this region to oppose the Russian VKS to something, because they know that the answer will arrive faster than their aircraft carriers will swim. Now the war between the United States and Iran, Russia is not beneficial in any situation, primarily because we do not need a geopolitical adversary in the Caspian.
    5. Zaurbek 7 January 2020 16: 50 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      This is exactly what will destroy the infrastructure when the air defense will no longer work.
    6. Mavrikiy 7 January 2020 17: 01 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      Quote: Sergey39
      Targets for checking Iranian air defense / missile defense arrived for joint exercises.

      Only the targets need to be ignited on the ground. request
    7. Sky strike fighter 7 January 2020 17: 28 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Quote: Sergey39
      Targets for checking Iranian air defense / missile defense arrived for joint exercises.

      Then it’s better to target for the BRMD, because now it is a static ground target. How about a preventive strike on the star-striped? wink
    8. Bar2 7 January 2020 17: 41 New
      • 5
      • 2
      +3
      Well, let's check the S-300 ...
      1. Sky strike fighter 7 January 2020 18: 01 New
        • 3
        • 1
        +2
        Interesting? And then the Saudis Patriots recently checked the Hussites. They say that r ...., well, you understand.
      2. cniza 7 January 2020 18: 12 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        They would have better shots, and so the S-300 itself may be ineffective.
    9. maidan.izrailovich 7 January 2020 17: 59 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Targets for checking Iranian air defense / missile defense arrived for joint exercises.

      I would like that too. Whatever it was.
      But it will not be so.
      Why did the US lose in Vietnam? The courage and courage of the Vietnamese is not enough for this. Behind Vietnam were the USSR and China.
      If nobody helps Iran and Iraq, then they simply have no chance.
      And for the United States there is absolutely no need to fully occupy these countries. It is enough just to maintain chaos in these territories with rocket attacks and bombing.
    10. TermNachTer 7 January 2020 18: 42 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      They do not have to enter the Iranian air defense coverage area, they can shoot with "tomahawks" from a distance of 1000 km.
    11. Vadivak 7 January 2020 19: 55 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Quote: Sergey39
      Targets for checking Iranian air defense / missile defense arrived for joint exercises.

      B-52 will release tomahawks without entering the air defense defeat zone
    12. Karaul73 7 January 2020 21: 20 New
      • 0
      • 2
      -2
      Where did Iran get missile defense from? You have not confused the country. Yes, Iran is strong, but not enough to effectively confront the United States. In the case of kneading, the staff will be Tomahawks to drive them into the Stone Age. And in which case, they will not stop before using nuclear weapons.
  2. Lord of the Sith 7 January 2020 15: 40 New
    • 10
    • 3
    +7
    Here the most important thing for Iran is not to chop the shoulders, but to think over everything. Revenge is served cold as a dish.
    1. hydrox 7 January 2020 17: 21 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      This is no longer revenge :: the initiative today is on the side of the Yankees ...
      1. Lord of the Sith 7 January 2020 17: 25 New
        • 6
        • 3
        +3
        Iran has the strength and ability to put a tail on the Yankees. So here we are not talking about any initiative at all))
        The truth is Iran.
        1. maidan.izrailovich 7 January 2020 18: 04 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          The truth is Iran.

          Of course. The truth is for Iran.
          But here are the forces and means to confront the United States by oneself Iran does not.
          No, of course, Iran can do some damage ... but it will only further anger the US elite.
          1. Lord of the Sith 7 January 2020 18: 24 New
            • 5
            • 1
            +4
            And who said that Iran will be alone?))
            Moreover, they will not fight in the forehead, the dumb ones are dumb there.
            To deliver a lot of problems to the Yankees, the Persians have enough strength.
            1. Vadivak 7 January 2020 19: 56 New
              • 1
              • 1
              0
              Quote: Lord of the Sith
              And who said that Iran will be alone?))

              There are many Kalash tribes on his side.
        2. hydrox 7 January 2020 18: 59 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          And who in our world today is interested in "truth", especially since today it characterizes the moral and ethical superiority of the theocratic regime over the "developed democracy" of the United States (in fact, a complete analogue of terrorism) ...
  3. dzvero 7 January 2020 15: 41 New
    • 11
    • 2
    +9
    52 goals have been set; the exercises carry out 52 F-35 planes, now they tighten the B-52 ... astrology hit in mysticism or ali, chtoli?
    1. Kleber 7 January 2020 15: 53 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Yes, strange coincidences.
    2. Reserve officer 7 January 2020 16: 31 New
      • 11
      • 4
      +7
      And how many goals for sabotage groups are outlined in the United States? Now the head should hurt the most among the American intelligence services. Americans are all going to fight in the territories of other states. And at home, then everything will be calm?
  4. janeck 7 January 2020 15: 42 New
    • 7
    • 2
    +5
    take on a show off .. why should a strategist throw Iran’s outstretched arm ?? if they can safely operate from Fairford Airbase ..
    1. The Siberian barber 7 January 2020 15: 48 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      I also believe that this is a show of strength, rather
      1. Kleber 7 January 2020 15: 55 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        In this situation, any demonstration of power will easily turn into the use of force.
        1. kot423 7 January 2020 16: 12 New
          • 3
          • 6
          -3
          It won’t turn out,% 80 ... I gave a link in another topic that the sphincter mattresses were pressed to an indecently low level, when Iran secretly sent them through Qatar stupidly with proposals .... After that, there appeared infa about the withdrawal from Iraq, which was then refuted by the type, hushing up on the fact that it was “like drafts, and in general he is nobody, and does not solve anything, etc.”
          Link https://eadaily.com/en/news/2020/01/06/iran-otverg-kompromiss-so-storony-ssha-voyna-u-vorot-blizhnego-vostoka
    2. Sergey39 7 January 2020 15: 52 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Both options are possible here. Whether or not Trump will be able to defeat the Democrats in this matter.
      1. The Siberian barber 7 January 2020 15: 59 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        Yes!) Internal political clashes, on the other side of the planet, directly affect whether blood will be shed on the other.
        Unfortunately, this world is so shitty, now. And "break" definitely! It's a question of time
      2. Aleksandr21 7 January 2020 16: 24 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: Sergey39
        Both options are possible here. Whether or not Trump will be able to defeat the Democrats in this matter.


        Now, for sure, Trump does not have such support to begin military operations against Iran. Both in Congress and among allies, but there are two but that can make a difference. 1) This is a tough response from Iran (for example: a blow to American military bases in the region, or a major terrorist attack against the US military, a significant blow that will affect the image of the Americans). 2) This is the development of nuclear weapons by Iran, if the Iranians in this matter do not give a back one, then for them everything will end badly.

        "Tehran on January 5 officially announced the final withdrawal from the so-called nuclear deal - the Joint Comprehensive Action Plan (JCPOA) for the Iranian nuclear program.

        Thus, the Iranian nuclear program will not have any restrictions in terms of production, including enrichment capacity, percentage and amount of enriched uranium, as well as research in this area and further development of the program, ”the Iranian government said in a statement."
        1. RUSS 7 January 2020 16: 57 New
          • 3
          • 9
          -6
          Quote: Aleksandr21
          "Tehran on January 5 officially announced the final withdrawal from the so-called nuclear deal - the Joint Comprehensive Action Plan (JCPOA) for the Iranian nuclear program.

          We are waiting for the next Israeli air strikes on Iran
        2. classik46 7 January 2020 17: 56 New
          • 5
          • 2
          +3
          Iran cannot have nuclear weapons, it will stupidly lead to its unlimited distribution. Iran will receive it, Saudis, Turks, Egypt and other kebabs will immediately want to receive it.
    3. knn54 7 January 2020 16: 01 New
      • 1
      • 2
      -1
      A little expensive for show-offs. They can reach not only Central Asia, but also much further.
      The Germans also threatened the British, while sending troops to "rest" to the borders with the USSR.
    4. edmed 7 January 2020 16: 02 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Quote: Janek
      take on a show off .. why should a strategist throw Iran’s outstretched arm ??

      It’s terrible to catch up, it’s hot, other means and methods will be decided, and B-52, a cherry on the cake, who said “Meow”? Well, here's a "carpet" on top.
    5. tihonmarine 7 January 2020 16: 08 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: Janek
      take on a show off .. why should a strategist throw over Iran’s outstretched arm?

      Before the First World War, the Americans "drove" around the world ten "Dreadnought" painted white. So nothing is new. Only the Dreadnoughts were replaced with the B-52.
      1. Narak-zempo 7 January 2020 18: 20 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: tihonmarine
        Before the First World War, the Americans "drove" around the world ten "Dreadnought" painted white. So nothing is new. Only the Dreadnoughts were replaced with the B-52.

        For your information, the United States did not have a single dreadnought then. The "Big White Fleet" consisted of pre-dreadnought battleships.
        And yes, there were a great many people who wanted to rekindle the WWII even without overseas intervention. Many in Europe hands itched.
        1. tihonmarine 7 January 2020 19: 55 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: Narak-zempo
          For your information, the United States did not have a single dreadnought then. The "Big White Fleet" consisted of pre-dreadnought battleships.

          Maybe armadillos, long ago read. Yes, no role, anyway "gunboat diplomacy."
    6. maidan.izrailovich 7 January 2020 18: 12 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      .... if they can safely operate from Fairford Airbase ..

      They can. But not calm. First, with a bunch of countries to coordinate the flight over the territory of these countries. With Diego Garcia this is not necessary.
  5. Old26 7 January 2020 15: 53 New
    • 9
    • 0
    +9
    Quote: Lord of the Sith
    Here the most important thing for Iran is not to chop the shoulders, but to think over everything. Revenge is served cold as a dish.

    By the time this dish is cold (revenge), the number of variants of this revenge will exceed a hundred. Then it turns out that the dish is rotten ... Now Iran is in such a time pressure that it is unlikely that any of the options for revenge will be realized ...

    Quote: Janek
    take on a show off .. why should a strategist throw Iran’s outstretched arm ?? if they can safely operate from Fairford Airbase ..

    For what? For flexibility. It is one thing to fly 6,500 km in one direction only and to refuel on the way back, and quite another - at a distance of 3500-4000 km. And with Diego Garcia, Americans can just as easily operate. This air base is too tough for Iranians
    1. SNEAKY 7 January 2020 16: 04 New
      • 3
      • 2
      +1
      hi Announce the origins of all the current problems in the region, if not difficult of course. Well, are the ears of the United States everywhere. Are there few problems on their borders?
      The GRU ran away to retire to see. They would have built a circus on their continent so that at least half a century of silence for children ... I apologize for the nonsense.
  6. Mavrikiy 7 January 2020 15: 56 New
    • 0
    • 3
    -3
    The United States deployed B-52 strategic bombers closer to Iran. We are talking about six American strategists.
    It is clear that all objects and elements of the US Armed Forces will work in the interests of strategists. Hence the conclusion, strategists, goal number 1 for otvetki US. On about. D. Garcia missile defense is hardly present.
    1. hydrox 7 January 2020 17: 40 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Reasonable: the only question is what means of delivery the Persians have and how far their ICBMs (or RSDs) reach them.
  7. tihonmarine 7 January 2020 15: 57 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    Persian Gulf, Strait of Hormuz, Gulf of Oman, Arabian Sea, Red Sea, Gulf of Aden and Indian Ocean - a threat to commercial vessels from Iran and its puppets
    I would paraphrase a little "Threat to commercial vessels from the United States and its puppets."
  8. Terenin 7 January 2020 15: 58 New
    • 13
    • 1
    +12
    The United States deployed B-52 strategic bombers closer to Iran.

    I believe that now, during the period of the confrontation between the USA and Iran, it is more important for us to “politely” respond to the head of the Estonian Ministry of Internal Affairs M. Helme and their nationalist parliament, who stated, not a little, not a lot, that Tallinn has unresolved territorial claims against Russia.
    1. Rusland 7 January 2020 16: 08 New
      • 9
      • 3
      +6
      I agree, Gennady yes At the same time, pat them on the withers, scratch them behind the ear, look at their docked tail and ask this tail: they say it’s hard to see these gates below, to protect from flies? smile
      1. Terenin 7 January 2020 16: 20 New
        • 13
        • 1
        +12
        Quote: Rusland
        I agree, Gennady yes At the same time, pat them on the withers, scratch them behind the ear, look at their docked tail and ask this tail: they say it’s hard to see these gates below, to protect from flies? smile

        Yes, Vitaliy. This mess is the United States and Iran, it is closer to the historical event (moment), and these moments should not be missed, especially in territorial disputes (these are Israel, the same Dutch heights, Crimea, Abkhazia and South Ossetia ...). Those. took advantage, instantly, under certain circumstances and circumstances. And who overslept, that destiny - to grunt to the owner.
        1. Narak-zempo 7 January 2020 21: 00 New
          • 1
          • 2
          -1
          Quote: Terenin
          the same Dutch heights

          What are these? Near Amsterdam, perhaps, where are tolerant European tulips and ganjubas grown?
  9. Incomprehensible 7 January 2020 15: 59 New
    • 1
    • 8
    -7
    Russia redirected the Strategic Missile Forces and warned the United States not to joke ..

    What do you think, listen?
    A blow to the right should not serve as an excuse to substitute the left ... This also applies to Russia
    1. Kleber 7 January 2020 16: 20 New
      • 7
      • 0
      +7
      Quote: Incomprehensible
      warned the US not to joke ..


      The joke is certainly interesting, but the Strategic Missile Forces have been aimed right since the days of the USSR.
    2. Greenwood 7 January 2020 17: 38 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Quote: Incomprehensible
      Russia redirected Strategic Missile Forces
      I wonder where Russian ICBMs were aimed before. Really in Zimbabwe? belay
      1. Incomprehensible 7 January 2020 17: 55 New
        • 0
        • 3
        -3
        I wonder where Russian ICBMs were aimed before. Really in Zimbabwe?
        The joke is certainly interesting, but the Strategic Missile Forces have been aimed right since the days of the USSR.

        And where do you want, smart monitors and couch specialists?

        Such individuals are simply struck. Have read Wikipedia and now they all know ...
        1. Greenwood 7 January 2020 18: 12 New
          • 4
          • 0
          +4
          Quote: Incomprehensible
          Such individuals are simply struck.
          And why was the phrase “redirected”? Yeltsin smelled straight, he also “redirected” the rockets.
      2. Vadivak 7 January 2020 19: 58 New
        • 4
        • 1
        +3
        Quote: Greenwood
        I wonder where Russian ICBMs were aimed before. Really in Zimbabwe?

        To Voronezh
  10. cherkas.oe 7 January 2020 16: 03 New
    • 7
    • 1
    +6
    Too many emotions in the Persians, if you really want to twist the answer, you need to silently prepare and not buzz in all the holes. Let the "gigemons" soar - "where will they fly from ?." And Russia and the Chinese can cooperate and help the Persians at least with information.
    1. SNEAKY 7 January 2020 16: 21 New
      • 1
      • 3
      -2
      That's really anger at such comments. Why keep quiet? What can I do from under the silence. We directly and with all the "irons" consider some nonhumans. Although Islam, at least Christianity. Start driving the B-52 with the brave guys back home. Wives are waiting.
      ZY did not freeze a provocation) It's ridiculous already. Tomorrow the Vitebsk region or in the Khabarovsk Territory near a tiger cub will find an enemy for themselves.
    2. Kleber 7 January 2020 16: 23 New
      • 3
      • 2
      +1
      Quote: cherkas.oe
      Let the "gigemons" soar - "where will they fly from ?.

      But they can fly to where they do not wait. American cities are full of co-religionists.
      1. RUSS 7 January 2020 17: 09 New
        • 1
        • 9
        -8
        Quote: Kleber
        But they can fly to where they do not wait. American cities are full of co-religionists.

        In the United States, most Muslims are Sunni, while Iranians are Shiites, and many Sunnis are happy to watch the United States bomb Iran.
        1. Kleber 7 January 2020 17: 35 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Shiites in the United States are not few. And they will not be happy to watch.
    3. RUSS 7 January 2020 16: 31 New
      • 3
      • 6
      -3
      Quote: cherkas.oe
      Russia and the Chinese to cooperate and help the Persians at least with information.

      Why is this for Russia? China is clearly the case, it buys oil there, and why should we climb into this boil?
      1. Sky strike fighter 7 January 2020 17: 37 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        Do you follow the precepts of Benjamin Netanyahu not to get into the conflict between Iran and the USA? Our hut is on the edge? But Lukashenko openly supported the USA. Ally. What can you take from him?
      2. cherkas.oe 7 January 2020 18: 49 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Of course, China carries oil from Iran and of course we are better off buying it from us, but not the fact that they will start to buy it from us, and not from the Emirates or Saudis. But if ... the wasps about Iran beat the falcon with our help, then the profit for us will be unequivocal.
  11. Observer2014 7 January 2020 16: 18 New
    • 4
    • 5
    -1
    no Show off. Nope. Nothing will happen . repeat
    1. RUSS 7 January 2020 16: 32 New
      • 2
      • 6
      -4
      Quote: Observer2014
      no Show off. Nope. Nothing will happen . repeat

      Well, who knows, Iran is the last in the Middle East who is not under the United States, and in general a very convenient enemy.
      1. Kleber 7 January 2020 17: 09 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Is Syria already under the United States or is it not in the Middle East?
        1. Greenwood 7 January 2020 17: 40 New
          • 2
          • 1
          +1
          Syria is in a coma and in a civil war head over heels. She is clearly not up to the international showdown.
          1. Kleber 7 January 2020 17: 42 New
            • 1
            • 1
            0
            Syria is in a coma, but it was about the fact that Iran alone is not under the United States.
            1. Greenwood 7 January 2020 17: 59 New
              • 5
              • 1
              +4
              You cling to words and do not see the true meaning of what was said. Iran is the only state that poses at least some threat to US troops in the region, Israel and Europe. All sorts of Syria, Lebanon, Yemen, etc. it makes no sense to mention. If necessary, these countries will be razed to the ground and will not choke. There, Iraq also seems to be trying to pursue an independent policy. But in essence he is nothing now.
              1. Kleber 7 January 2020 18: 04 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                I do not cling to words. What you have said now more realistically reflects the picture than the words of the person who wrote it above under the nickname "RUSS".
  12. Shahno 7 January 2020 16: 20 New
    • 2
    • 3
    -1
    Quote: Old26
    Quote: Lord of the Sith
    Here the most important thing for Iran is not to chop the shoulders, but to think over everything. Revenge is served cold as a dish.

    By the time this dish is cold (revenge), the number of variants of this revenge will exceed a hundred. Then it turns out that the dish is rotten ... Now Iran is in such a time pressure that it is unlikely that any of the options for revenge will be realized ...

    Quote: Janek
    take on a show off .. why should a strategist throw Iran’s outstretched arm ?? if they can safely operate from Fairford Airbase ..

    For what? For flexibility. It is one thing to fly 6,500 km in one direction only and to refuel on the way back, and quite another - at a distance of 3500-4000 km. And with Diego Garcia, Americans can just as easily operate. This air base is too tough for Iranians

    In principle, the ideal option for strategists is Diego Garcia. If the goals are Iranian objects ...
  13. Old26 7 January 2020 16: 35 New
    • 5
    • 2
    +3
    Quote: Sergey39
    The B-52 is a bomber.

    AND? B-52H is the carrier of the Kyrgyz Republic. And he really will not go into Iran’s air defense coverage area until it is crushed
  14. Thrifty 7 January 2020 16: 37 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    In principle, the Persians can prepare for a meeting of "gifts" from the B52, and respond with rocket attacks on US bases in the region! And first of all, to start to nightmare those US bases that are in Syria, control oil fields.
  15. Old26 7 January 2020 16: 40 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Quote: dzvero
    52 goals have been set; the exercises carry out 52 F-35 planes, now they tighten the B-52 ... astrology hit in mysticism or ali, chtoli?

    Rather, we. We have not yet calculated how many F-35 pilots are involved.
  16. Alexander Lik 7 January 2020 16: 40 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Only the United States and its puppets pose a threat there.
  17. ximkim 7 January 2020 16: 40 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Observer2014
    no Show off. Nope. Nothing will happen . repeat

    Or maybe .. They will salt the Iranians so that they do business in anger, and then warning bombs with missiles ..
  18. gurzuf 7 January 2020 16: 45 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Quote: MstislavHrabr
    What can Iran’s army and navy do without infrastructure ?!

    In addition to the army and navy, there is September 11th.
  19. Livonetc 7 January 2020 16: 47 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Trump makes himself great and terrible.
    He will hit his chest with a hoof in the elections.
    "Tore Iran to shreds!"
    The real result will be like in Syria.
    Zilch.
    1. Kleber 7 January 2020 17: 06 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Trump is not Obama, for some reason I am sure that he will not beat himself in the chest.
  20. sergo1914 7 January 2020 16: 52 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    As an air defense jacket, I imagine, it is mentally natural, as people are now rubbing their hands, with different color epaulets. We are the first, no - we are. Who first got up - that and slippers.
    PS Here, on purpose, as a student, on May 9 I wanted to count the Soviet awards on the tunic of the head of the department. Few. To a reasonable question - why? Received an absolutely anti-Semitic response. I can not quote. Banned in FIG. One decent word was Jews. Although half the chest is for Vietnam and Korea. But the second half ... Oh, then comrade officers frolic ...
  21. Shahno 7 January 2020 16: 53 New
    • 3
    • 3
    0
    Quote: RUSS
    Quote: Nyrobsky
    Yeah. They can’t cope with the Taliban for 19 years,

    I’m not sure what will be the occupation of Iran, and accordingly the land war as with the Taliban.
    The tasks in Iran are different; there will likely be an operation like in Yugoslavia

    I dare to express an opinion. ..
    Without the IDF and our Air Force, well, our reconnaissance will not be any war. While our General Staff is not too enthusiastic about this.
    Well, in general terms.
  22. Klingon 7 January 2020 17: 02 New
    • 1
    • 3
    -2
    Quote: RUSS
    Quote: ROSS 42
    Excuse me generously ... I completely forgot something. One will sit on the banks of the Yangtze, and the other will look at the Moscow River - wait until the "corpse of a partner" appears there  ...
    Right doctrine, most importantly, rare ...

    Iran is not a nuclear power, and that’s it. It’s being seized like Iraq, Serbia, etc. Nothing new

    Vietnam is also a non-nuclear power, Afghanistan is also a non-nuclear power so how? shawala or choked?
    1. RUSS 7 January 2020 17: 19 New
      • 1
      • 6
      -5
      Quote: Klingon
      Vietnam is also a non-nuclear power, Afghanistan is also a non-nuclear power so how? shawala or choked?

      I repeat, perhaps there will be no ground operation, there will be an operation similar to the bombing of Yugoslavia.
      Or, as of recent, the operation "NATO Allied Defender" in Libya.
      1. cniza 7 January 2020 18: 03 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Yes, they will try to do everything remotely.
  23. Reserve buildbat 7 January 2020 17: 05 New
    • 5
    • 1
    +4
    “The Persian Gulf, the Strait of Hormuz, the Gulf of Oman, the Arabian Sea, the Red Sea, the Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean are a threat to commercial vessels from Iran and its puppets” - everything except the name of the country is true in this phrase. Not "Iran", but "USA".
    1. cniza 7 January 2020 18: 03 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      It is necessary to issue a statement.
  24. Nick Russ 7 January 2020 17: 06 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    In Iran, a sufficient number of missiles of various types to prevent the same B52 from even taking off from the airfield.
    As the GDP said: "If you can’t avoid a fight, then you need to beat first."
    1. Kronos 7 January 2020 17: 21 New
      • 0
      • 2
      -2
      As if the US does not have its own air defense
      1. Nick Russ 7 January 2020 17: 43 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Is that a leaky Patriot?
    2. RUSS 7 January 2020 17: 33 New
      • 0
      • 4
      -4
      Quote: Nick Russ
      As the GDP said: "If you can’t avoid a fight, then you need to beat first."

      If Iran strikes first, this is aggression, 99% of UN members will condemn this and support the United States not only morally.
      1. Nick Russ 7 January 2020 17: 44 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        If a fight is inevitable, then anyway, who and what will be judged there.
  25. Tank jacket 7 January 2020 17: 26 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Already go away once allowed a controlled leak of informationlaughing
    WASHINGTON, January 7. General Mark Milli, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the US Armed Forces, called the letter of the US military to the Iraqi army about the withdrawal of troops from the country a mistake.

    "This letter is a draft, it was not signed, it should not have been made public," said Millie, quoted by CNN.

    "The letter was written in unfortunate terms. It involves the withdrawal of (troops), this does not happen," added Milli.
  26. Finn 7 January 2020 17: 37 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: RUSS
    Quote: Nemo
    Here the 3rd world can begin, and you are all heckahs, but khahankahs.

    Why on earth? More details please

    And when did World War 2 begin? With crossing our border? I think earlier, when the Nazis conquered all of Europe, so here the 3rd world is already going on, we just do not participate in this yet. Nearly.
  27. Old26 7 January 2020 17: 43 New
    • 5
    • 2
    +3
    Quote: Klingon
    Vietnam is also a non-nuclear power, Afghanistan is also a non-nuclear power so how? shawala or choked?

    Well, we agreed with Vietnam on a peaceful one. And only after the negotiations were completed, the Viet Cong, with the help of the northerners, was able to take South Vietnam. Afghanistan? This country is not to fight there. The British spoke about this many decades ago. We, like the Americans, entered Afghanistan. But he cannot be defeated unless, of course, bombed with nuclear weapons.
    But in principle, in reality, with a serious mess, they give up, like Iraq and Yugoslavia. After all, the main thing for the United States is that there should not be such a player on the international scene as Iran. He will be weak - there will be no problems from him ...

    Quote: Mavrikiy
    The United States deployed B-52 strategic bombers closer to Iran. We are talking about six American strategists.

    It is clear that all objects and elements of the US Armed Forces will work in the interests of strategists. Hence the conclusion, strategists, goal number 1 for otvetki US. On about. D. Garcia missile defense is hardly present.

    Missile defense on Dioego Garcia? Yes, make a couple of “Arly Burkov” with “Aegis” - here you have the ABM. And as an answer, Diego Garcia is not good.

    Quote: Nick Russ
    In Iran, a sufficient number of missiles of various types to prevent the same B52 from even taking off from the airfield.
    As the GDP said: "If you can’t avoid a fight, then you need to beat first."

    Iran has no missiles of this range, no missiles and acceptable accuracy ... so they will take off quite calmly ...

    Quote: Thrifty
    In principle, the Persians can prepare for a meeting of "gifts" from the B52, and respond with rocket attacks on US bases in the region! And first of all, to start to nightmare those US bases that are in Syria, control oil fields.

    Of course they can answer. the first pair of salvos will be especially effective. After that, missile systems are unlikely to seriously threaten the bases. The minus of Iran, like North Korea is the structure of the missile forces (he has already written several times). Iran, like the DPRK, has a large number of missiles with a fairly small number of launchers. For example (offhand) Iran has a brigade equipped with Fateh-110 missiles. And this is only 18 starting EMNIP. And the meaning is that they have, according to various estimates, from 300 to 600 of these missiles, if only 18 launchers. The same with Shahab missiles. The brigade has 12 launchers and what's the point that they have about 100-200 missiles. How much time is needed to reload launchers and refuel rockets ... Therefore, the first, maximum second salvo will be spectacular. Then the hunt will start for the launchers ...

    Quote: Incomprehensible
    Russia redirected the Strategic Missile Forces and warned the United States not to joke ..

    What do you think, listen?
    A blow to the right should not serve as an excuse to substitute the left ... This also applies to Russia

    What is the deepest knowledge. They are so deeply hidden in you that it is not visible. And what, the Strategic Rocket Forces was previously aimed at Alpha Centauri, which is now redirected to the United States? And who are you talking about, speaking of the right and left cheek? It seems that the Americans do not stick on us. It's about Iran, and where does Russia? Or should it be a plug in every hole ???? Less to you for a stupid post
  28. Most kind 7 January 2020 17: 44 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    We are following
  29. Doctor 7 January 2020 17: 45 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    They know how to choose a place for bases. Almost the center of the Indian Ocean.
  30. RUSS 7 January 2020 17: 46 New
    • 0
    • 5
    -5
    Quote: classik46
    Iran is too big to fall. It’s just not allowed to fall apart.

    Iran is not mono-ethnic, so on the contrary, you can break it down
  31. Old26 7 January 2020 17: 57 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    Quote: RUSS
    Quote: cherkas.oe
    Russia and the Chinese to cooperate and help the Persians at least with information.

    Why is this for Russia? China is clearly the case, it buys oil there, and why should we climb into this boil?

    Maxim! The funny thing is that in terms of the amount of oil purchased, China comes first in Saudi Arabia, Russia in second, and Iraq in third. On the eighth - the United States. The amount of oil purchased in Iran in the middle of last year fell sharply from 400-500 thousand barrels per day at the beginning of last year to EMNIP 213 thousand in July.
    Yes, K; it concluded a strategic long-term agreement with Iran last year, but it should come into force either from this or from next year. It actually provides for very serious investments in Iran’s transport and oil industry (about $ 280 billion over 5 years). Moreover, Irna agreed to sell oil to China at a price of 12-20% less. Moreover, other preferences are offered to China, but this is in the future. Now there is nothing to protect China. And since Iran is not in first place in imported oil, I think China will find other ways to compensate for the loss of Iranian oil
    1. classik46 7 January 2020 18: 17 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      The increase in oil prices is disadvantageous for oil importers and profitable for exporters. China, as usual, will joke at the Iranians and condemn the Americans, will somehow affect the situation, especially in terms of force.
  32. cniza 7 January 2020 18: 01 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    If American soldiers do not voluntarily leave our region, we will make sure that their bodies are removed in a horizontal position


    Now, this is a good ultimatum.
    1. rocket757 7 January 2020 18: 40 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      It’s good that such times are that any ultimatum easily moves over the red line, then moves over the red-red line and so on.
      No conflict, if large, bypasses almost anyone.
      This is the world now.
      1. cniza 7 January 2020 21: 00 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        I would not want to, but it's not for us to decide ...
        1. rocket757 7 January 2020 21: 04 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: cniza
          I would not want to, but it's not for us to decide ...

          Suppose it’s not for us to decide, yet ... we would not have to participate yet, so Schaub on a large scale.
          1. cniza 7 January 2020 21: 09 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            And this is the most important thing, so that we would not be dragged in by large.
  33. rocket757 7 January 2020 18: 37 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    Without stripes on BV, a well-established, shtetl kneading, nothing more.
    Stripes kindle a large bonfire of war there.
    A simple conclusion, and who is our main barmaley all over the world ???
  34. Old26 7 January 2020 18: 40 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    Quote: Nick Russ
    Is that a leaky Patriot?

    Do not repeat the stupidities replicated by the media. Underestimating the enemy always ends badly ....
    Probably because the Patriots, as you say "full of holes" were bought by more countries than our S-300 and S-400 combined ...
    One should not draw conclusions about the system as a whole. I won’t be surprised that Saudi military and the S-400 could be full of holes in the squinty paws ...

    Quote: RUSS
    Quote: Nick Russ
    As the GDP said: "If you can’t avoid a fight, then you need to beat first."

    If Iran strikes first, this is aggression, 99% of UN members will condemn this and support the United States not only morally.

    Quote: Nick Russ
    If a fight is inevitable, then anyway, who and what will be judged there.

    Not at all. It’s not just about condemnation from the UN rostrum. Beat the first Iran Iran to put together a coalition, and under the auspices of the UN. As it was with Iraq. Independent Kuwait occupied foolishly Iraq and this allowed to create a coalition against Iraq, which, by the way, included Syria

    Quote: Sky Strike fighter
    Then it’s better to target for the BRMD, because now it is a static ground target. How about a preventive strike on the star-striped?

    But no way. "You have nothing against Kostya Saprykin" (c).
    That is, Iran does not have complexes that can not only get, but also hit the target with non-nuclear weapons
  35. TOR2 7 January 2020 18: 49 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: RUSS
    China is clearly the case, it buys oil there, and why should we climb into this boil?
    Mattress bases in the south of the Caspian Sea are clearly not happy with the Defense Ministry.
    Do not forget, the Iranian Constitution prohibits the deployment of any foreign troops in the country. So the Persians will do all the rough and dangerous work themselves. In the event of a conflict, Iran is quite capable of paralyzing shipping with anti-ship mines, as well as the destruction of the oil producing industries of some monarchies in the neighborhood. Here the fever of commodity markets is simply guaranteed. Alternatively, China will have to drive oil through the Caspian, so why don’t we make money on it.
  36. alex aircraft 7 January 2020 18: 56 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    One chatter. the Persians will not do anything to the Yankees. they will burn the flags, jump on the squares and that's all unfortunately ...
  37. kit88 7 January 2020 18: 56 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    And how is the issue of the return of the indigenous population to Fr. Diego Garcia illegally evicted by the Britons in the 60s? The ruling of the London court on this score seems to be there.
  38. semulgator 7 January 2020 19: 08 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    The creatures will bomb, like Yugoslavia.
  39. Old26 7 January 2020 20: 19 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: cherkas.oe
    Of course, China carries oil from Iran and of course we are better off buying it from us, but not the fact that they will start to buy it from us, and not from the Emirates or Saudis. But if ... the wasps about Iran beat the falcon with our help, then the profit for us will be unequivocal.

    Oleg! If we forget the question of oil imports by China, then it will give out a lot of materials, including and how much one buys from whom. In the first place, Saudi Arabia, in the second - Russia, in the third - Iraq. USA - in 8th place. Iran - somewhere in the 4th-7th place and last year, the amount of oil purchased in Iran by China decreased significantly.
  40. fa2998 7 January 2020 20: 23 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Quote: Sergey39
    Targets for checking Iranian air defense / missile defense arrived for joint exercises.

    Air defense / missile defense will be engaged in UAVs and invisibles, as well as Tomahawks. Yes, and bombers will be able to use weapons without entering the air defense zone. If Iran pecks at the provocation, it will be difficult to fight back.
    Of course there is a positive moment, in those places if the war is something, oil is getting more expensive. hi
    1. Guru 7 January 2020 21: 56 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Of course there is a positive moment, in those places if the war is something, oil is getting more expensive.
      But this is an interesting moment. wink Everyone remembers how the Husites from shit and sticks built drones and struck at the Saudis. Therefore, I can state - "If there is a real batch, then the consequences are UNPREDICTABLE" for both Iranians and Amers.
      But if the price of oil jumps a lot, I think we (Russia) will not be very offended. laughing fellow
    2. 75 Sergey 7 January 2020 23: 57 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Yes, sweetheart, now Iran is not enough, which depends, if the Americans decide, then do not care whether the provocation of Iran or not.
      Only Ya.O. while it guarantees immunity, and if you don’t have it, then democracy will come to you.
  41. 75 Sergey 7 January 2020 20: 35 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    If China harnesses to Iran, then there will be nothing.
    1. Vadim100 7 January 2020 23: 11 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      The Chinese are not climbing anywhere, so the economy is booming.
      1. 75 Sergey 7 January 2020 23: 53 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Well, yes, they constantly tried the force - Vietnam, Korea, the USSR, and now they have all gone crazy.
        1. Vadim100 8 January 2020 02: 10 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          So where is the Chinese army fighting now? Yes, they send missiles to the DPRK, but this is not a war.
  42. alexddd 7 January 2020 22: 44 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    But what about the agreement between Soviet Russia and Persia (Iran) of 1921. I found it on the Internet:
    Article 6. Both High Contracting Parties agree that if third parties try to carry out an aggressive policy on the territory of Persia by armed intervention or turn Persian territory into a base for military actions against Russia, if it threatens danger to the borders of the Russian Socialist Federative Soviet Republic or its allied powers, and if the Persian Government, after warning from the Russian Soviet Government, is not able to avert this danger itself, the Russian Soviet Government will have the right to send its troops into Persian territory in order to accept the necessary defense military measures. To eliminate this danger, the Russian Soviet government undertakes to immediately withdraw its troops from the borders of Persia.
    Or this contract is not valid. Or acts, but Russia is in no hurry to use it.
  43. Karabin 7 January 2020 23: 19 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Iran previously said it had prepared 13 scenarios of revenge for the United States for the assassination of General Kassem Suleimani. This was announced on Tuesday by the secretary of the Iranian Supreme Security Council, Ali Shamkhani. He said that "the weakest of the scenarios could be a historical nightmare for the United States."

    Scripts are written and horror voiced. It remains to scream in the streets, burn the mattress flag and spit on Trump's scarecrow. On this, the active part of revenge for the murdered general can be considered complete.
  44. eagle owl 7 January 2020 23: 51 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    https://afirsov.livejournal.com/514194.html
    lol
    Listen, peasants ... Well, there’s a lot of flyers and techies out there) Make a review on Boeings - it’s not there. About that tanker - a fairy tale. About 737 - max .... Even sadder. About the Dreamliner ... Well, I’ve given a reference, you ask who he is at all) Well, he’s talking about the Dreamer)))
  45. Zomanus 8 January 2020 01: 53 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    That’s all ... And now Iran will bomb any armed attack on US forces.
    And the world community will express ... what it usually expresses there.
    And the UN, as usual, will call for peace and mutual understanding, yes.
  46. Pavel57 8 January 2020 02: 56 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    In the event of a war with Iran, many benefits to the United States - oil will rise in price. Many competitors will be left without oil.
  47. Old26 8 January 2020 16: 15 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: Guru
    Everyone remembers how the Husites from shit and sticks built drones and struck at the Saudis.

    Strange, but I don’t remember. Hussites use Iranian drones and Iranian cruise missiles, rather than homemade