Large-scale F-35 exercises conducted in the USA with alleged development of Iran’s S-300 destruction

Against the background of the aggravation of the situation in connection with the elimination of the Iranian general, the USA conducted the most ambitious trainings in recent years with the participation of the latest F-35 fighters. We are talking about the maneuvers of the 388th and reserve 419th fighter regiments.

In total, 52 F-35A fighter jets were engaged in maneuvers at Hill Air Force Base in Utah. By chance or not, but the number of planes coincided with the number of objects in Iran, which Donald Trump threatened with blows the other day.

The US Air Force command notes that training at Hill Air Base is associated with tests on the effectiveness of technical personnel, coordination of actions of various aviation units in the performance of the assigned combat training mission, to practice the delivery of strikes against both ground and air targets. Separately, measures were worked out to inflict defeat on ground air defense systems of a simulated enemy.

Recall that the Iranian armed forces have Russian-made S-300 anti-aircraft missile systems, as well as their own Bavar-373 air defense systems, which are believed to have been created on the basis of the aforementioned S-300s.

Thus, a large-scale training involving 52 F-35A fighters in that part where attacks on air defense assets of the “conditional enemy” were practiced can be connected with practicing possible attacks on the S-300 and other Iranian systems. Given that Trump has several times threatened Iran with bombing of the country's cultural and architectural values, it can be assumed that this scenario is being worked out by the US Air Force.

Comments

[The leader of the Redskins]

By chance or not, ? Yes what accident there !!!

[knn54]

In the fall of 2018, in Ukraine, Israeli pilots on the F-15 S (4th generation) tested the S-300. The United States acquired the locator included in this complex.
According to preliminary data, the F-35 (after some modifications) can cope with the S-300.

[Thrifty]

Knn54-With which version of the C300? What versions of this complex of those that are in service with us are available in Ukraine? ??

[knn54]

Thrifty, and which in Syria, Iran? Obviously not the LAST version, but the export version. And the Yankees. Nevertheless, it is not in vain that they continue the teachings.

[Thrifty]

Knn54 - the difference between our C300 and those that are on u-kroin is huge! Ours will be newer and much better, because we care about technology, our modernization and Ukrainian-is heaven and earth! !!!!!!!

[krot]

Striped little September 11th? They want this to happen in every city ..

[3danimal]

What did you mean?
In addition, they made certain conclusions.

[Vadim237]

In Ukraine From 300 to the end of the 70s and the beginning of the 80s.

[polar fox]

Quote: Vadim237

In Ukraine From 300 to the end of the 70s and the beginning of the 80s

so they were put into service in the 80s ... in Ukraine earlier? than they did?

[askort154]

polar fox ...so they were put into service in the 80s ... in Ukraine earlier? than they did?

The first S-300 PT went on alert in 1979, and in 2011 it was discontinued. New versions of the S-300 PMU-1, S-300 PMU-2 Favorit, and the subsequent series, have not been delivered to Ukraine.

[voyaka uh]

And to place the S-400 in Hmeimim, near the sea, you think it was a smart idea?
Territorial waters - only 23 km.
You can fly up, "pull" the radar on alert and read the frequencies quite calmly.

[Genry]

Quote: voyaka uh

and read frequencies perfectly calmly

What frequencies? Frequencies were relevant for old-time radars, there was no frequency adjustment and digital signal signature ....

[voyaka uh]

"there was no frequency tuning and digital signature of the signal" ////
----
Any encrypted algorithm, when written, can be decrypted.
Now Cyber ​​is very popular.
Hundreds of firms are doing this.
Give them any long set of numbers, and in a couple of minutes (rarely hours) the software will write down all the possible patterns in this set.
----
Why is it now engaged in a quantum code? Because ordinary crack like nuts, playfully.

[Genry]

Quote: voyaka uh

Any encrypted algorithm, when written, can be decrypted.

Forgot about the time of endurance ... You have time to decrypt only until the return of the reflected signal.

[krot]

And to place the S-400 in Hmeimim, near the sea, you think it was a smart idea?

I think in the General Staff people are smarter than you think)

[aszzz888]

krot (Paul) Yesterday, 16: 50
+2
And to place the S-400 in Hmeimim, near the sea, you think it was a smart idea?

I think in the General Staff people are smarter than you think)

This is the General Staff sofa worker. USE is visible and audible to him. Because the blizzard and drives.

[3danimal]

And obviously smarter than in America, the same are all stupid)
Always come up with something new and additional information may come in handy.

[aszzz888]

voyaka uh (Alexey) Yesterday, 15:20 Any encrypted algorithm, when it is written, decipherable.

Especially when on the couch, and with "keyboard".

[Dzafdet]

What `s next ? Do you want EW in the nozzle? I think the General Staff is far from being fools. And where will the Americans fly to Iran? With an aircraft carrier? The Iranians will be able to drown him. Air refueling?
the barn gets off one or two ...

[Astronaut]

I think the General Staff is far from fools

You are wrong, all the geniuses of the strategy are sitting on the VO site

[Pup1]

They laughed .... don't smoke

[aszzz888]

voyaka uh (Alexey) Yesterday, 11: 52
+11
And to place the S-400 in Hmeimim, near the sea, you think it was a smart idea?
Territorial waters - only 23 km.
You can fly up, "pull" the radar on alert and read the frequencies completely calmlyabout.

Don’t shit raving, "calculator"!

[Alexey LK]

Quote: voyaka uh

And to place the S-400 in Hmeimim, near the sea, you think it was a smart idea?

And where, in your opinion, would it be a smart idea to place it, if not in Hmeimim? Really west of Damascus? Or maybe right on the Golan Heights?

[Vladimir_6]

Quote: knn54

According to preliminary data, the F-35 (after some modifications) can cope with the S-300.

This is by preliminary. And what will happen (if at all) on the actual - Allah knows him.

[3danimal]

With the S-300 can and F16 cope. Lossless (except for accidents).
The point is tactics.

[mmaxx]

What is in Ukraine, come on, it still works on lamps?

[Chaldon48]

What an accident, the shaitan beguiled them! Ah, the evil spirit is strong!

[tihonmarine]

Quote: Leader of the Redskins

By chance or not? What a coincidence!

"Gunboat diplomacy" is nothing new.

[Same lech]

It is just necessary to saturate Iran’s air defense with modern S-400s and train their officers in modern methods of war with the US and Israeli air forces.
This couple is the main enemy of Iran.

[Vol4ara]

Quote: The same Lech

It is just necessary to saturate Iran’s air defense with modern S-400s and train their officers in modern methods of war with the US and Israeli air forces.
This couple is the main enemy of Iran.

For whose money?

[kjhg]

Quote: Vol4ara

For whose money?

How for whose? For the money of Alexei of course. This is his suggestion. He can’t offer to saturate Iran’s air defense with my money and the money of my family. Moreover, Iran did not turn to Russia with requests for procurement of S-400. Money, they say, pity them. And the Chinese, Iran’s main friends and partners, are not in a hurry to harness for them. But Alexei does not mind. Generous man Alexei, kind. Maybe the Iranians will thank him for that. And then they will hit me in the back when it is not needed.

[Same lech]

But Alexei does not mind. Generous man Alexei, kind.

Well, why lie then ... you probably have not read my previous comments on this matter ... the Iranians will find both currency and oil in return.
Iranians will not hit in the back ... hit in the back like Jews.
The Iranians just supported our country on many issues of foreign policy, unlike Israel ... so no need to lie on my behalf.

[kjhg]

Quote: The same LYOKHA

Well, why lie then.

Yes, I did not lie, Alex. That was the irony. I understand that neither you nor I have and never will have that kind of money.

Quote: The same LYOKHA

Iranians will have both currency and oil in return

So much money is not found. Iran now has an extremely difficult financial situation. But it may well pay off with oil. It may still allow us to place our base somewhere closer to the Persian Gulf. But this is later when everything calms down. It is not in our interests to have a direct military clash with America over Iran. To help with weapons, information is YES. Directly get involved in the conflict - absolutely NO, sorry.

[Same lech]

To help with weapons, information is YES. Directly get involved in the conflict - absolutely NO, sorry.

This is exactly what I suggest.
Despite the fact that Iran, under the authority of an ayatollah, is not in our interests to throw Iran into the greedy mouth of the USA ... otherwise it will turn out like after the defeat of Iraq after which ISIS was formed on its territory ... whose members seek to settle in Russia ... that’s what I I’m more afraid.

[tihonmarine]

Quote: kjhg

Yes, I did not lie, Alex. That was the irony. I understand that neither you nor I have and never will have that kind of money.

Well, thank God at least we agreed on this.

[Vasyan1971]

Quote: kjhg

So much money is not found.

At the moment, the most important thing is time. And, as if the story with the purchase of Iraqi generals would not be repeated ...

[Bshkaus]

Iranians just supported our country on many foreign policy issues, unlike Israel

You tell the Tu-22 pilots when they were first allowed to land on Iranian airfields, and publicly refused the next day.

[Same lech]

Well, to remind you how Medvedev offended the Iranians in violation of the contract for the supply of S-300 under Israeli pressure ... Is this normal?

[Edik]

Quote: The same LYOKHA

S-300 under pressure from Israel

There was an embargo on the supply of arms to Iran from the UN! Alexei, you should know that.

[Same lech]

And who was pushing this decision to the UN ... the pro-Israeli loophole is Edik, you should also know.

[Shteffan]

The embargo was only about offensive weapons, you should have known that. The S-300 has defensive weapons. But DAM still bent under the Jews.

[mmaxx]

There was a big political and economic game. It is quite reasonable from the point of view of Russia. Iran is not our ally. Generally.

[Same lech]

For whose money?

Of course there is no money for money, you can pay with oil.

[Vol4ara]

Quote: The same LYOKHA

Of course there is no money for money, you can pay with oil.

We have enough of our own, it’s now more difficult to sell it for good money. Let them pay with gold or currency, what for do we need their oil?

[Edik]

Quote: The same LYOKHA

Of course there is no money for money, you can pay with oil.

Barter is good This is a departure from greenbacks.

[Antidote]

This requires eggs and time, the first is not in the Russian Federation, the second is in Iran.

[Sky strike fighter]

Quote: Antidote

This requires eggs and time, the first is not in the Russian Federation, the second is in Iran.

Tell the Pentagon. The rats ran from the ship.

The chief of staff of the US Department of Defense resigned.

Pentagon chief of staff Eric Chuning, amid a likely military conflict between the US and Iran, unexpectedly resigned. It is not known what exactly Chuning’s desire to leave his office is connected with, however, it is reported that serious disagreements with the position of Trump and Pompeo on the current situation in the Middle East are reported, as several unofficial sources report.

[Bshkaus]

Tell the Pentagon. The rats ran from the ship.

For example, I also drink tea from a cup, beer from a beer mug, whiskey glasses, and vodka in buckets.
I mean, for each task, its own tools are needed, and the head (Pentagon chief of staff) is primarily a person with a set of psychological features, and in the aggregate a tool. In peacetime, there are one task, for example, building up military capabilities, and one person will be better able to do this, in the threatened period it will be possible for another to develop competent plans, and, roughly speaking, an order to launch nuclear missiles can be issued by a person with completely different qualities that the first and second.
The task of the Pentagon has changed and the person who can best cope with it is put in charge. When there is a need to reconcile, believe me, they will immediately find a suitable "agreeable" candidate to replace the "hawk".

[Vol4ara]

Quote: Sky Strike fighter

Quote: Antidote

This requires eggs and time, the first is not in the Russian Federation, the second is in Iran.

Tell the Pentagon. The rats ran from the ship.

The chief of staff of the US Department of Defense resigned.

Pentagon chief of staff Eric Chuning, amid a likely military conflict between the US and Iran, unexpectedly resigned. It is not known what exactly Chuning’s desire to leave his office is connected with, however, it is reported that serious disagreements with the position of Trump and Pompeo on the current situation in the Middle East are reported, as several unofficial sources report.

Who is reporting?

I feel it as in the story with the khibins and su24, on which the khibins are not placed and by donald cook, from whom "however it was reported" almost half of the crew was written off to the shore. Everything turned out to be yellow-fresh bullshit

[Doliva63]

Quote: Sky Strike fighter

Quote: Antidote

This requires eggs and time, the first is not in the Russian Federation, the second is in Iran.

Tell the Pentagon. The rats ran from the ship.

The chief of staff of the US Department of Defense resigned.

Pentagon chief of staff Eric Chuning, amid a likely military conflict between the US and Iran, unexpectedly resigned. It is not known what exactly Chuning’s desire to leave his office is connected with, however, it is reported that serious disagreements with the position of Trump and Pompeo on the current situation in the Middle East are reported, as several unofficial sources report.

I wonder how "Chief of Staff of the Ministry of Defense" is translated?

[Private-K]

Quote: Sky Strike fighter

Pentagon chief of staff Eric Chuning, amid a likely military conflict between the US and Iran, unexpectedly resigned. It is not known what exactly Chuning’s desire to leave his office is connected with, however, it is reported that serious disagreements with the position of Trump and Pompeo on the current situation in the Middle East are reported, as several unofficial sources report.

To call Chuning's position as "chief of staff of the Pentagon" is to Russian-speaking readers misleading them. In fact, we are talking about the CHIEF OF THE OFFICE OF THE US Secretary of Defense. You cannot make a direct translation of terms.
Yes, he quits due to the situation of the intra-American struggle of global Clintonites and Trampist-Renaissance - Chunning is seen in Clintonism.

[YOUR]

In our country, the main air defense system in the VKS S-300. The S-400 is only 54 air defense systems, 27 regiments of two divisions, and you are so easy to return to Iran. They have already sent to Turkey. What else do you offer to give?

[Same lech]

and you are so easy to give to Iran

Do not give but sell ... do not replace my comment with your fiction ... offered to sell the GDP to the Turks SU-57 ... so the Persians can sell the S-400 and SU-57.

[Vadim237]

Iran primarily needs radars such as Gamma, as well as Armor and Torah.

[YOUR]

We need them in the first place, why do we need to give them to Iran?

[ML-334]

Try to unify with our air defense in Syria.

[Bshkaus]

Try to unify with our air defense in Syria.

We have already tried to bring the entire socialist world into a single system with our economy - the complete garbage came out: we ourselves were left without pants, but it’s not easy to remember the rest;)

[Edik]

Quote: Bshkaus

We have already tried to bring the entire socialist world into a single system with our economy - the complete garbage turned out: we ourselves were left without pants,

But the pants made of natural fabric remained, not like now!

[3danimal]

Empty words, nothing more to say on the merits?

[SovAr238A]

Quote: ML-334

Try to unify with our air defense in Syria.

for starters you would have to learn ... Well, or at least look. One time.

[LiSiCyn]

Quote: The same LYOKHA

It’s just necessary to saturate Iran’s air defense with modern S-400

Give your own? Or turkish? Again, what do you think, saturate? We can’t saturate our air defense.
"Strike at cultural objects" : How are the US different from the Taliban and Daesh? Some statues of Buddha destroyed. Other Palmyra. Level of course Or do they hope that the people of Iran, in order to preserve the shrines, will immediately throw off the power of Ayatollah?

[Same lech]

Give your own? Or turkish? Again, what do you think, saturate? We can’t saturate our air defense.

We don’t give but sell ... we saturate the world market with our weapons ... which the Americans are very afraid of.

[LiSiCyn]

Alexei, what difference do we give - we sell ... The question is where to get it? So far, only China and Turkey have been supplied and even more for review ...
Cover the enclave (Kaliningrad - Crimea) with the S-400 regiment, this is one thing. Covering Iran is another. Distances (areas) are different. Yes, and not enough time. Nobody will wait a year.

[Same lech]

Yes, and not enough time. Nobody will wait a year.

I agree ... this game was played out in the expectation of a lack of time ... let's see how things will develop further.

[Edik]

Quote: The same LYOKHA

let's see how events will develop further.

No one will openly water American bases, just like the United States will not bomb Iran! They will choke each other where possible and as possible.

[3danimal]

Opportunities for the volume of their production are limited. Do you propose reducing the rate of renewal of air defense in Russia?

[hydrox]

Already I thought that now the Jews with the Yankees will make a mess in the Israeli, but in the Jordanian sky - do not let Boh play too much and jump out to the lines of defeat of the Iranians - after all, it’s not far to 3 MV!
I read further - Utah :: lightly :: I think - you can play here even all year round, even with flights at night - no Russian electronic warfare will reach Utah !!

[3danimal]

Tell us how do you understand the term 3MB? Who will fight on the side of Iran? Maybe CA, or Emirates? Or Qatar? China? (Definitely not) Russia - the maximum advisers and weapons (which is also fraught with new restrictions).

[evgenii67]

Which S-400? Previously, you had to think. Time for training, deployment, it's all long.
For a long time the United States did not give a damn about all the norms, before they even covered themselves with "sheep's skin". If ours would have done something like that, they would have already shipped a bucket of sanctions. No weapon will guarantee Iran's security. Even if Russia and China sell them dozens of S-300 divisions, shells, etc. as soon as possible. A hundred planes and helicopters and a thousand tanks. If the amers have a real reason to slap, they will slap them. Therefore, it is also time to spit on all the norms and agreements and push the old Poplars at a symbolic price.

[cost]

But the "shells" would not hurt them to purchase, or Chinese "analogues"

[Ross xnumx]

Quote: evgenii67

Time for training, deployment, it's all long.

As for deliveries to Iran of the S-400 instead of the S-300 from Russia, the guarantor knows why he did not give the go-ahead after talking in Hebrew ...
Regarding Iranian air defense:
Iran created its own air defense system, better than the S-300, but slightly worse than the S-400

 Show / Hide text

So, the sky of Iran is locked. On August 22, the Bavar-373 anti-aircraft missile system (Vera-373) was solemnly presented in Iran. The numbers in the denomination mean the name of the prophet Mohammed in the number notation system of Ajad. Moreover, it became known that this latest development of the defense industry of the Islamic Republic has already taken up combat duty. According to the Iranian military, this air defense system surpasses the Russian-made S-300 complex in its tactical and technical characteristics, which has been in the arsenal of the Iranian Armed Forces for several years. According to the latest voiced data, the Bavar-373 is capable of detecting, intercepting and destroying approaching enemy targets flying at altitudes up to 65 kilometers. The system uses rockets with a maximum range of up to 300 kilometers.

Thus, Iran wiped its nose to everyone who claimed two or three years ago that the Islamic Republic was not able to create a similar S-300 complex in the next decade. It turned out that he was capable. Initially, the Iranians said that their offspring would "work" at heights of up to 27 km and at a distance of over 200 km. With such characteristics, the Bavar-373 could have been commissioned two years ago, but Iranian experts have found a way to significantly improve all the basic characteristics of the complex. They have mastered the basic principle of operation of long-range air defense systems, and now, we must assume that the next even more powerful model of the Bavar will appear soon.

Although the new air defense system is considered an analogue of the Russian S-300 in terms of detection of targets and their destruction, it is very different from the Russian air defense system in terms of the design of the launcher (“hot start” instead of “cold start” in the S-300), radars and missiles used . The complex is located on the Zafar truck chassis and is equipped with a phased array radar station that looks like a Russian 96L6. One of the radars used in the air defense system is Meraj (Ascent), which uses fuzzy logic methods to determine goals. The complex is able to detect up to 100 targets and hit six objects simultaneously. The effectiveness of hitting air targets, according to experts, this complex is about 85%. The complex has vertical rectangular launch containers. Bavar-373 will use an Iranian-made Sayyad-4 missile, which is contained in two rectangular launch containers.

At present, the Iranian army is armed with Raad, Mersad and Khordad-15 medium-range anti-aircraft missile systems manufactured in the country. In addition, on combat duty are foreign-made air defense systems. The most effective system for combating air targets to date in the arsenal of the Iranian Armed Forces was the Russian S-300PMU-2 “Favorite”, delivered in 2016. S-300 divisions cover airspace over the most important scientific and production centers, nuclear and military facilities of Iran in the area of ​​such cities as Bender Abbas, Bushehr, Isfahan and Tehran. In May of this year, S-300PMU-2 batteries were transferred to the Persian Gulf coast in order to counteract in the event of an attack by a US naval strike group led by the Avraam Lincoln aircraft carrier.

Thanks to the Bavar-373 air defense system, the Iranians will be able to create a deeper layered defense of their airspace, capable of intercepting air targets at low, medium and high altitudes. And even the enemy’s cruise missiles, which at the moment in the event of a massive attack can still break through Iran’s sky shield, are now unlikely to be able to do this.

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani said that the Bavar - 373 in its characteristics is much superior to the S-300, closer to the S-400, perhaps, it does not quite reach. The Chinese also praised the new Iranian air defense system very highly. Although they have some doubts that all the parts and equipment of Bavar-373 are 100% purely Iranian, but this, as they say, is due to jealousy, as They have long turned to face Iran and consider the Iranian market extremely promising.

More recently, the Federal Service for Military-Technical Cooperation (FSVTS) at the Army 2019 forum announced its readiness to supply the Triumph S-400 to Iran. But Iran S-400 is no longer needed. The saddest thing is that when in 2015 Vladimir Putin lifted the ban on S-300 deliveries to the Islamic Republic, the Iranians persistently asked for the S-400 instead of the S-300, and were ready to further resolve all emerging financial issues. Then Iran was corny denied this request. In fact, Iran began to intensify its own air defense systems as much as possible after Russia refused to supply S-300 for the first time in 2010. Now that it has already become known that Iran has achieved impressive success in the development of air defense systems, the Federal Security Council says that these systems are not at all subject to the restrictions imposed in 2015 by a UN Security Council resolution.

There is another well-known tale that the Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein allegedly also boasted of his military power, but his troops could not stand the American invasion of his country. But these critics forget about one significant difference between Iraq and Iran. Iran has its own military industry, and is quite advanced and powerful, independent of external supplies. In the Middle East and the entire Islamic world as a whole, only Israel has such an industry. So, if someone decides to attack Iran, he will get a protracted and bloody war at least.

The presented Bavar-373 anti-aircraft missile system significantly increased the security of Iranian airspace from enemy invasion, although Iranian missiles recently managed to do this without a new air defense system, destroying the latest sophisticated American drone that invaded the Iranian sky in the Khormozgan province.

[Sky strike fighter]

Here in detail about Iranian air defense.
https://rg.ru/2020/01/06/strazhi-neba-naskolko-silna-sistema-pvo-irana.html

[dzvero]

At Topvar, Sergey Linnik (aka bongo) published a series of reviews about Iran:
https://topwar.ru/116601-pvo-islamskoy-respubliki-iran-chast-5.html - ПВО (ето часть 5, в конце текста ссылки на предъидущие части)
https://topwar.ru/119911-raketnyy-potencial-islamskoy-respubliki-iran-chast-2.html - ракеты
https://topwar.ru/30817-iranskie-sredstva-kontrolya-vozdushnoy-obstanovki.html - радары
Details, informative, actually at a very high level.

[3danimal]

Following your logic, should the new Pershing appear at SSA? )
You reason ... too hot. As if assuming that it would be possible at any time to restart the situation. Real life is not a game.

[mvg]

modern methods of war with the US Air Force and Israel

whose Air Force possess such knowledge? positive? e.g. Syrian air defense

[Sky strike fighter]

Quote: The same Lech

It is just necessary to saturate Iran’s air defense with modern S-400s and train their officers in modern methods of war with the US and Israeli air forces.
This couple is the main enemy of Iran.

I'm not sure about Israel.

Israel refused to help the United States in any military operations against Iran.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, amid a serious escalation of the conflict between Iran and the United States, said that Tel Aviv not only did not take any part in the liquidation of the Iranian commander, but would not provide the United States with any assistance in the event of the unleashing of a military conflict.

http://avia.pro/news/izrail-ne-pustil-v-v-vozdushnoe-prostranstvo-strany-amerikanskie-samolyoty-s-voennymi?utm_referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fzen.yandex.com

Tell me more thanks that Israel did not bring down Amer’s planes, otherwise all sorts of star-striped provocateurs fly here, they want to bring war to the house.

[Vladimir_6]

Quote: Sky Strike fighter

Israel refused to help the United States in any military operations against Iran.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, amid a serious escalation of the conflict between Iran and the United States, said that Tel Aviv not only did not take any part in the liquidation of the Iranian commander, but would not provide the United States with any assistance in the event of the unleashing of a military conflict.

Boris Johnson also spoke out against participating in a military operation.
"The leader of the election race for the posts of the leader of the Conservative Party and British Prime Minister Boris Johnson ruled out the possibility of supporting the US military operation against Iran.
He said this during a debate with his opponent - Foreign Minister of the United Kingdom Jeremy Hunt.
If you asked me if I would support military action against Iran, if I become prime minister, then the answer is no, - TASS quotes Johnson. "

[Sky strike fighter]

The news is old, Johnson is already the Prime Minister. And recently he threatened Tomahawks to Iran from his submarines.

[Vladimir_6]

Quote: Sky Strike fighter

The news is old, Johnson is already the Prime Minister. And recently he threatened Tomahawks to Iran from his submarines.

Guilty, missed the latest news.

[Sky strike fighter]

I hope you do not find this nonsense.

JERUSALEM, January 7, 2020, 13:12 - REGNUM Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said his country should not be drawn into the conflict between the United States and Iran, Anadolu Ajansi reports on January 7.


Details: https://regnum.ru/news/polit/2823785.html
Any use of materials is allowed only if there is a hyperlink to REGNUM.

[ssergey1978]

Nonsense then do not smash. With what fright should Russia saturate with 400 Persians?

[3danimal]

Saturate at whose expense? Raise still retirement age?

[Zaurbek]

And where will they fly from?

[FenH]

Quote: Zaurbek (Zaur)

Zaurbek (Zaur) Today, 11:06 AM NEW
0
And where will they fly from?

CA and Jordan

[Zaurbek]

There Iran will get its BR. Worst of all CA will have.

[FenH]

Quote: Zaurbek

There Iran will get its BR. Worst of all CA will have.

This is Yes, especially if in parallel with Yemen prokashmarit
From fresh
The Pentagon plans to deploy an additional 200 troops and six B-52 bombers to the Middle East due to tensions with Iran. This was reported by the Wall Street Journal, citing representatives of the military department.
Meanwhile, CNN reported that the bombers will be deployed on the island of Diego Garcia (British overseas territory in the Indian Ocean). It is noted that this the location was chosen because of the location beyond the reach of Iranian missiles.

[Zaurbek]

Here it depends more on Iran .... there, and a bunch of tankers will fly and DRL and intelligence. In reach zone. If you sit and wait, they will surely crash. Or be afraid of the US bases to crash ....

[LiSiCyn]

Quote: FenH

This is Yes, especially if in parallel with Yemen prokashmarit

There was infa that yesterday already from the territory of Yemen, 3 missiles were launched in the SA. A spokesman for Khusitov said the attacks were on military facilities.

[LiSiCyn]

May from Israel. Or even Israel itself, without advertising ...

[Zaurbek]

If you recall the story of Iraq .... The Jews moved away from these matters. What for? Everything will be done by the USA. Maximum intelligence and intelligence.

[silver_roman]

The story with Iraq was being prepared for about a year, a huge number of troops were actively deployed by sea. Then it was clearly understood why this was done. Now, 6 B-52s and 200 people are more of a scare, etc. For a country like Iran, these are trifles. There are not enough forces in the Region to fully start a war with Iran.

[LiSiCyn]

Quote: silver_roman

There are not enough forces in the Region to fully start a war with Iran.

120 thousand people counted.

Quote: silver_roman

it is rather a deterrence

They will use aviation and "axes" to beat them, without ground operations.

[Zaurbek]

There is no such task, as there are no completely loyal countries neighboring Iran. To start action from there.

[SovAr238A]

Quote: silver_roman

The story with Iraq was being prepared for about a year, a huge number of troops were actively deployed by sea. Then it was clearly understood why this was done. Now, 6 B-52s and 200 people are more of a scare, etc. For a country like Iran, these are trifles. There are not enough forces in the Region to fully start a war with Iran.

not enough strength?

Iran has nothing.
No air force in sufficient numbers.
No air defense in sufficient quantities.
Only "PR rockets", "PR planes".
Iran cannot in fact defend itself even against Israel.

[Vadim237]

How do you know that Iran has no air defense - maybe they have already made these "Bavars" 100 divisions.

[SovAr238A]

Quote: Vadim237

How do you know that Iran has no air defense - maybe they have already made these "Bavars" 100 divisions.

Because. that they don’t have factories for the production of hundreds of Bavarian divisions.
No electronics.
There is no chemistry.
No metalworking.
There are no specialists.
no workers.
Because ours have been doing in recent years, the same way. as the Iranians did the last 40 years, they were engaged in PR parades, with PR weapons.

[mmaxx]

In general, unlike us, the Iranians have quite reasonably managed the money lately. Just developed education, science and industry. What we finally achieved, let's see.

[Mountain shooter]

Iran is NOT READY to repel a large-scale air attack. Air defense system - it should be a SYSTEM! And not individual areas that can be circumvented, or SUPPRESS, by supersaturating with the means of attack the capabilities of the system. One missile or a single aircraft can be shot down, and not even difficult ... And when are hundreds of missiles attacked?

[Terenin]

Quote: Mountain Shooter

Iran is NOT READY to repel a large-scale air attack. Air defense system - it should be a SYSTEM! And not individual areas that can be circumvented, or SUPPRESS, by supersaturating with the means of attack the capabilities of the system. One missile or a single aircraft can be shot down, and not even difficult ... And when are hundreds of missiles attacked?

I correctly understood that we need price tags for an air defense system, we urgently need to change it !?

[novel66]

it all depends on how it ends

[Zaurbek]

Without an air defense unit, the air defense system will not cope ...

[Livonetc]

We are waiting.
With any outcome of a planned strike on Iran, it will not be fatal for Iran.
And the results will also give a lot of material for further improvements to the air defense systems.

[SovAr238A]

Quote: Livonetc

We are waiting.
With any outcome of a planned strike on Iran, it will not be fatal for Iran.
And the results will also give a lot of material for further improvements to the air defense systems.

it all depends on how the special services are now driving Iran into the pre-Maidan.
If they can arrange various economic and other upheavals, then after the destruction of the objects of protection and the ayatollah, the probability of a new one. already secular revolution (anti-religious) - quite large.
There the people more than once and not five - rose against the ayatollahs.
Especially those. who remembers secular Iran.

[VLADIMIR VLADIVOSTOK]

The Americans decided to use kamikaze tactics. You can crush them with a number, but then it's good to look at their Air Force.

[Zaurbek]

They just bomb everything there in ruins ... they have experience and means.

[VLADIMIR VLADIVOSTOK]

The S-300 knocks everyone into ruin until the rockets run out. In an attack on Iran, the US will get jihad. Do they need it? Or they have lately beguiled the shores.

[Zaurbek]

Well, he will bring down part of the Kyrgyz Republic .... and part of it will cover. Then the F-35 will finish off all the radars over important cities and facilities. Then the B-52 will arrive with bunker bombs and hang over the country for a week.

[bars1]

Quote: The same LYOKHA

It is just necessary to saturate Iran’s air defense with modern S-400s and train their officers in modern methods of war with the US and Israeli air forces.

There will be no sense from this; the air defense systems fulfill an important but auxiliary role in relation to fighter aircraft. And with aviation, Iran has a complete seam. So the United States will roll Iran out without any problems.
In 1982, in the valley of the Bekaa River, Israel effectively destroyed the Syrian air defense system built according to Soviet patterns. So, Soviet / Russian specialists are still “teachers.” But I would like to hope that this is due to the curvature of the Syrians, although ...

[Zaurbek]

Since then, both the generation of air defense systems and the generation of fighters have changed. MIG29 and Su27, just adjusted for these wars and created.

[SovAr238A]

Quote: Zaurbek

Since then, both the generation of air defense systems and the generation of fighters have changed. MIG29 and Su27, just adjusted for these wars and created.

And the pilots, and the technicians?
If our teachings have the same goals - do not turn around. That indicators would not worsen. Therefore, all teachings are known in advance.
Ostentatiousness.

[Zaurbek]

I am not aware of our teachings ... I think you too. But in the USSR, the training of pilots was changed after the events in the BV. They introduced training at the Mary training ground with experienced pilots ....

[Thrifty]

The loss of at least a pair of f35 in the sky of Iran will close this military adventure with the release of f35! So, the Yankees can PR, but only in the United States, things will not come to a reconciliation! Most likely, they will hit massively with cruise missiles from ships!

[maden.usmanow]

Vietnam was lost 895 Phantoms, nobody closed anything.

[Thrifty]

They compared a mass production aircraft to the raw one, which had nowhere to go into battle in essence, the sky-ready f35 !!!

[maden.usmanow]

At that time, the Phantom was the newest aircraft, as the F 35 is now

[Amateur]

And one F-117 was shot down in Yugoslavia and the entire program was closed.

[maden.usmanow]

But did F 117 replace other fighters? F 35 has already been launched into the series, orders for 3 thousand boards, international cooperation. There is nothing to replace it with. The same F 35B is generally a unique dude.

[iuocsfyu]

Quote: Amateur

And one F-117 was shot down in Yugoslavia and the entire program was closed.

True, they later rolled out "closed" Iraq in 2003. For the entire operation, 4 wars and one combat loss. Of course they did.

[Tersky]

Quote: iuocsfyu

Quote: Amateur

And one F-117 was shot down in Yugoslavia and the entire program was closed.

True, they later rolled out "closed" Iraq in 2003. For the entire operation, 4 wars and one combat loss. Of course they did.

Read less wiki. "NATO Air Force: Concealment of the Truth About Losses"

[Amateur]

True, they later rolled out "closed" Iraq in 2003.

In 2003, the invasion of Iraq began. ...
In just 18 days, F-117 operations completed 82 sorties, dropping 98 bombs. This was the last operation in the Knightshock career.

The massive use of forces and means of air attack in the framework of an air offensive operation was carried out from 21.00:21 on March 23 to the end of the day on March 4. During VNO, two massive missile and air strikes (MRAU) were delivered. In just two days, aviation made about XNUMX thousand sorties.

US strategic bombers accounted for more than 500 sorties,

Итого: 82+4000+500=4582 самолетовылета. (82/4582)*100=1,78%
Iraq rolled out. But the F-117's share is 1,78% at best.

[Vlad5307]

Trump decided to show the superiority of the Fu-35 over the S-300 systems and thereby promote them (Fu-35) and push them to the vassals, who began to quietly sabotage their pushing by refusing or reducing their purchase. And also, on the eve of the elections, to show himself as a "man with eggs of steel", who for the sake of the greatness of the SGA is ready to demolish the whole world, but will start from the BV, where their positions are steadily deteriorating. Yes, the rise in oil prices, as a result of this adventure, will allow not to curtail the production of shale gas in the SGA.

[Ross xnumx]

Quote: Vlad5307

Trump decided to show the superiority of the Fu-35 over the S-300 systems and ... himself as a "man with steel eggs" who, for the sake of the greatness of the SGA, is ready to demolish the whole world,

He has already shown his “steel tricks” to Eun, and to Maduro, and to the whole world. Torgash is not a priori able to play in the boxing ring.
The reason for Trump's bragging with his willingness to tear "the whole world to pieces" is his lack of information. Sorry, but the received "some" military education does not give the right to imagine himself a strategist.
All US military tactics are based on the “invincibility” of mass missile attacks and aviation actions in the absence of enemy air defense systems ...
Are the United States ready for the mass cutting of its own citizens in all parts of the world? Or to the fact that 650 kilogram gifts will fly to them by chance (even if they are at the base or territory of the allied satellite)?
Are they ready for the fact that the Muslim world can be united by the figure of a soldier in the American uniform that is constantly looming on the horizon?
With mutual desire, even mammoths were hunted. Will it be that in the world there will be no people who do not want to kick the annoying aggressor? Are they ready to reap the benefits of their “democratic” seedlings?

[Kerensky]

Thus, a large-scale training involving 52 F-35A fighters in that part of it where attacks on air defense assets of the “conditional enemy” were practiced it is possible to bind with the development of possible attacks on the S-300 and other Iranian systems.

Such exercises are prepared strongly in advance and are recorded in the plans for the school year. A lot of approvals are underway. It is not necessary to "connect" everything with Iran.

[maden.usmanow]

Wow, the heat has gone. Against any war. But Vietnam was a giant leap in the development of Aviation.

[Bshkaus]

But Vietnam was a giant leap in the development of Aviation.

This is a consequence of any war. As soon as real air battles begin, not just divan ones, right away, all the miscalculations and shortcomings that were difficult to identify during the training (theoretical) operation begin to climb out of the cornucopia.
For the first downed planes, no less, and even more fierce battle between the designers begins in an attempt to improve and surpass the enemy in terms of performance characteristics.
Then the world comes and everything returns to normal, the tactics of air battles again turn into a theoretical plane until a new hedgehog.

[mark1]

It is necessary to transfer a pair of A-50U and 1 IL-78 in a place with crews to Iran, or even better, just patrol under some kind of agreement supposedly in the interests of the Russian Federation (they might be afraid to attack)

[Zaurbek]

Why and at whose expense?

[mark1]

1. Tests and combat experience.
2. Definitely not for yours.

[Zaurbek]

1. If Iran does not pay, then definitely, for mine.
2. To pay a lot ... it is necessary to equip to our level. Otherwise, one harms the image.
3. Iran has no money.

[sabakina]

Quote: Zaurbek

Why and at whose expense?

Dear, there are times when it’s useless to consider finances ... Or late ...

[Zaurbek]

It happens .... it’s clear with Syria, but not with Iran.

[sabakina]

I am not a geopolitician, .... but JV Stalin did not meet in vain precisely in Tehran ....

[Zaurbek]

He met only because half was occupied by the USSR, and the second half by Britain.

[Voyager]

Quote: mark1

A pair of A-50U and 1 IL-78 in a place with crews must be leased to Iran

Substitute a hit, okay, but our crews? This technique is a drop in the ocean, if you think that it can prevent a military conflict and even less in practice in case of hostilities.

[mark1]

Quote: Voyager

Substitute a hit, okay, but our crews?

Under the blow of what? He must not fly over the Persian Gulf.

[mmaxx]

We have something missing. They would still have our air defense. And our planes can simply fly just like that. Somewhere around.

[mark1]

Well, everything is so narrow! Of course for myself! And only for yourself!

[mmaxx]

For yourself - holy!

[Kleber]

Against the background of the aggravation of the situation in connection with the elimination of the Iranian general, the USA conducted the most ambitious trainings in recent years with the participation of the latest F-35 fighters. It's about maneuvers 388th and reserve 419th fighter regiments.

There are no air regiments in the structure of the US Air Force. They have an air wing.

[evgenii67]

For a long time the United States did not give a damn about all the norms, before they even covered themselves with "sheep's skin". If ours would have done something like that, they would have already shipped a bucket of sanctions. No weapon will guarantee Iran's security. Even if Russia and China sell them dozens of S-300 divisions, shells, etc. as soon as possible. A hundred planes and helicopters and a thousand tanks. If the amers have a real reason to slap, they will slap them. Therefore, it is also time to spit on all the norms and agreements and push the old Poplars at a symbolic price.

[silver_roman]

States as today's dominant Sax, and accordingly the predator cannot exist without the blood of others. They consume much more than they produce. They have long needed a sacrifice. Thanks to the destruction of Yugoslavia and the USSR itself, they stretched out long enough. But again, we need a sacred sacrifice. I will not be surprised if this whole thing comes to destabilize Iran and destroy its statehood.

[cniza]

Quote: silver_roman

I won’t be surprised if this whole thing comes to destabilize Iran and destroy its statehood.

Everything goes to this, but usually they gather a crowd for cover, will they succeed today?

[rocket757]

I suppose that to prepare from all sides.
Interestingly, the Persians will bring their air defense to mind. The question is not only about the appropriate quality of military equipment, because the human factor plays a very serious role there.
If you recall the previous incidents, there is not so smooth.

[cniza]

Quote: rocket757

If you recall the previous incidents, there is not so smooth.

This, as they say, is their weakest link ...

[sabakina]

Vitya, Merry Christmas! From childhood I remember: "All of a sudden, out of nowhere, it appeared ..." .... Well, then think for yourself what has appeared, otherwise the local counterintelligence is watching ...

[cniza]

Greetings! You too with the Happy Holiday of the Nativity of Christ!
It smells of war, a very big war, I would not want to.

[rocket757]

Greetings, happy holiday

Quote: cniza

That they, as they say, is the weakest link

And of very past experience, as I recall, the weak link was the staff, with the lack of ... yes, there wasn’t much that they lacked, which did not make them real specialists.
I don’t think that now something has changed for the better.

[cniza]

it can be assumed that this scenario is being worked out in the US Air Force.

Why guess? , you can firmly say that they work out.

[rocket757]

An army does not exist without scripts. Developing the best tactics, training a lot, a lot ... they have such a job.
Only in real life do these scenarios fly, it happens, to a goddamn grandmother ... well, very often, as many events have already shown.

[cniza]

Absolutely, we also work out different scenarios that our neighbors and not only may not like.

[rocket757]

It seems like the most dangerous scenario, it is to harbor the illusion that you can slightly, slightly, kick off a vigorous power and it will not answer in any way !!!
It would be better if no one thought and did not write such scenarios. Dangerous however.

[Reptiloid]

Quote: rocket757

It seems like the most dangerous scenario, it is to harbor the illusion that you can slightly, slightly, kick off a vigorous power and it will not answer in any way !!!
It would be better if no one thought and did not write such scenarios. Dangerous however.

And if you recall the times 100 years ago, ------ 1MB. After all, the participants had thoughts that everything would end very quickly, 3-4-6 months. .....

[rocket757]

The global conflict, now, may end even faster ....
How much fake time is there ???

[Region-25.rus]

"It seems to me that we are on the verge of a grandiose nix!" (from)

[Vadim1000]

So in Iran there are about 120 missiles of the S-300 complex, you can take out the radar with the help of a salvo launch (15 pieces will be enough) of the Tomahawk KR

[Zaurbek]

The only thing that could potentially save Iran from such threats is an invitation (following the example of Bahrain or Syria) of a foreign air base to the country. Or Chinese or ours. At his own expense to build a base, convenient supply. And invite an airbase or two. If the Iranians come to this with their brains, they will get a safe sky above their heads.
I see no other options.

[Old26]

Quote: Rich

But the "shells" would not hurt them to purchase, or Chinese "analogues"

They have an awn "carapace". They paid for their delivery to Syria in due time and about half went to them. According to open data, they now have about 10-12 of them.

Quote: ROSS 42

Iran created its own air defense system, better than the S-300, but slightly worse than the S-400

Of course better. To shoot down targets at altitudes up to 65 km (as in the material) all over the world with anti-aircraft missile systems can only the Iranians with their supercomplex "Bavar-373". Russia has mastered heights of 400-30 km with its newest serial S-35 complex, and the Persians have doubled.

Quote: FenH

It is noted that this place was chosen because of the location beyond the reach of Iranian missiles.

Nonsense CNN notes. The distance of 3500 km is unlikely any of the Iranian missiles can overcome even now. About 15 years ago, the North Koreans supplied Iran with seemingly 18 Musudan missiles with a similar range, but there is no answer to what happened to them. And to shoot at the airbase with missiles with conventional warheads, which have a CEP twice as large as the width of the airbase itself, is very effective.

Quote: Livonetc

We are waiting.
With any outcome of a planned strike on Iran, it will not be fatal for Iran.
And the results will also give a lot of material for further improvements to the air defense systems.

I am afraid that this conflict may become fatal for Iran. Yet Iran is a multinational country, and there are certainly tensions between certain ethnic groups. As long as there is no war, these frictions can be suppressed without harm to the state. And when will the country be "hammered in"? There is no guarantee that all these frictions will not develop into something more serious. And after the conflict, Iran will not have an air defense system. IT will have to be created from scratch, and not modified ...

Quote: VLADIMIR VLADIVOSTOK

The S-300 knocks everyone into ruin until the rockets run out. In an attack on Iran, the US will get jihad. Do they need it? Or they have lately beguiled the shores.

There is no need to make a "wunderwaffe" out of the S-300. A regimental set of 4 divisions is a drop in the ocean. Moreover, the divisions are "spread out" almost over the entire territory of Iran. One is guarding the nuclear power plant, one or two - at nuclear facilities, one - guards the capital. And that the division will knock down the dust if the number of targets that oversaturate the division falls on it. And not only tomahawks, but also booby-trapped missiles, anti-radar missiles? By the way, we should also prepare for the "negative" in relation to our complexes, which will appear en masse in the Western media.

Quote: Zaurbek

Well, he will bring down part of the Kyrgyz Republic .... and part of it will cover. Then the F-35 will finish off all the radars over important cities and facilities. Then the B-52 will arrive with bunker bombs and hang over the country for a week.

The Americans will repeat what they did to Iraq in the 90s, only at a higher technical level. First, they will suppress air defense with interference and missiles (traps and anti-radar), and then only cruise missiles will be launched. Or at least overnight. And if 30 years ago they were able to reach such levels of interference with radar facilities that they were able to completely score them, then over 30 years these abilities have clearly not deteriorated, although the radars have become more jam-resistant. But if you wish, you can also "score" ...

Quote: Thrifty

The loss of at least a pair of f35 in the sky of Iran will close this military adventure with the release of f35! So, the Yankees can PR, but only in the United States, things will not come to a reconciliation! Most likely, they will hit massively with cruise missiles from ships!

This was said in relation to the F-117 and in relation to other aircraft. EMNIP on TV pictures from the Gulf zone in the 90s also contained fragments of "117". However, the program did not close because of this loss, or because of the Yugoslav one. So it is with the F-35. The plane is initially created on the assumption that it can be shot down. Yes, dear, but if he shows himself well, the line for him will increase ...

Quote: Thrifty

They compared a mass production aircraft to the raw one, which had nowhere to go into battle in essence, the sky-ready f35 !!!

It is released in the amount of almost 500 pieces, has been in operation for almost 8 years in a dozen countries, and you still have it ready for use. Yes, operation is not without problems, but it will still be necessary to see how, with what problems, our 9 SU-57 will be operated. Do not think that everyone on a team buys from the United States what they ordered them to buy. Everyone has a head on their shoulders ... Of course, it's nice to think that the enemy has everything bad. But it is fraught ...

Quote: Amateur

And one F-117 was shot down in Yugoslavia and the entire program was closed.

Yeah. They shot down in 1999, and the program was closed in 2008. Just because of this. No need to "pull the owl on the globe." The closure of the program is by no means due to the death of one car in Yugoslavia. By that time, the Americans had already launched the F-22 Raptor into the series and it would not have been the best solution to keep far from the best aircraft in operation.

Quote: mark1

It is necessary to transfer a pair of A-50U and 1 IL-78 in a place with crews to Iran, or even better, just patrol under some kind of agreement supposedly in the interests of the Russian Federation (they might be afraid to attack)

Damn, well, people !!! Well, transfer the money, let them build a pair of A-50U and 1 IL-78 with your money and lease it? What a mania to "give" all the neighbors. One offers Topol, the second S-400, the third is now A-50U and Il-78. And not for their own money, but from the breadth of the soul. Who are the Iranians? Allies? Figs you, the maximum fellow travelers who have coincided goals in Syria. And here once against the US (A - so almost brothers. Why did these brothers-allies allow us to land on their territory only once and a couple of times were allowed to shoot from the Caspian Sea. Allies ... So they are waiting for to seize the Muslim republics of the former Soviet Union.
Contracts NO ONE. So here are the Persians IN SPAN

[Zaurbek]

And as soon as the sanctions were relaxed, they ran to the USA to spend them .....

[Adimius38]

Yes, not some S-300s will not help Iran in the event of a massive attack on Iran’s facilities by the United States, the difference in technology and capabilities of the armies is too huge. In a massive attack, in the first place, the United States will put so much interference that it drowns out completely, and they have enough forces and means for this, they will destroy all the air defense for the day, including the S-300. They’ll hit all major bases, airfields, headquarters, gaining control in the air and with impunity they will beat any armored vehicles and the accumulation of manpower. The old-fashioned war as it was in Iraq is the worst option for Iran. Iran needs a different approach, given the Iraqi experience, because any frontal collision is a 100% defeat of Iranian forces. Wall-to-wall tactics as it was in Iraq in a tank battle is a defeat, I am silent about outdated Iranian aviation, they fly on f-14s of the 70s. Vietnam will not work, there are no impenetrable jungle. But still, the ground forces of Iran are quite numerous and strong. With the land operation, an easy walk for the Americans definitely will not work, and there will be enough coffins for impeachment to the president

[askort154]

voyaka uh....And to place the S-400 in Hmeimim, near the sea, you think it was a smart idea?
Territorial waters - only 23 km.
You can fly up, "pull" the radar on alert and read the frequencies quite calmly.

Alexey, do not drive "naive". Such systems do not run for days in "combat mode".
And the S-400 was delivered to cover Khmeimim not only in the "neutral waters" zone, but throughout the entire depth of the Mediterranean Sea. And "reading frequencies" is the 20th century. Don't think so badly about the General Staff of the RF Ministry of Defense.

[voyaka uh]

You yourself come up with theses and you refute them with brilliance.
Did I write something about "days"?
Did I write something about "ONLY in the zone of neutral waters"?
Now it’s too late to discuss whether it WAS to place the S-400 in such ... not the most suitable place. What is done is done.

[senima56]

If the Americans really hit Iran and the S-300 does not fight back .... then it will be a big "fig" for our Rosoboronexport, and for the entire military-industrial complex!

[Adimius38]

Of course it won’t break off, but what did you think that the S-300 EXCELLENCE PERFECTION)))) the system is certainly good, but it will be stupidly thrown with anti-radar missiles to all this they will start jamming with REBs. Even if there is nothing to stifle her, well, she will not be able to repulse a massive missile strike stupidly drown. There must be reliable, deeply echeloned air defense and the S-300 itself also needs to be covered, all of this must have developed electronic warfare systems to counter the enemy, I doubt that Iran has it all. S-300 IN THIS CASE, well, it’s not my fault not equal with a large margin in favor of the enemy. I doubt that any Patriot will be able to hold out longer than the S-300 under the same conditions.

[Miron]

Nobody loves killers. Let them have F-100500-35 and the Lord kiss glowing on the pope.

[Anton Krajansky]

What would I like here, friends ... It is clear that the United States has more strength than Iran. But we all know about Iran’s forces only fragmentary information from open sources, and even those are mostly unreliable.

S-300, if memory serves, they have a regimental set. 128-192 rounds depending on the configuration (excluding reloading). There are some S-200, like there are "Buki", "Square", "Arrows", "Torah". There are American (60-70s) and Chinese air defense systems. Some SAM of our own production. In principle, if all this is used correctly, you can build a decent defense. Work on lionfish with medium air defense systems, protect S-300 ammunition, use it as a last resort and preferably on aircraft.

Of the modern aircraft, they seem to have a dozen Su-27s (they bought it at the beginning of the 29s, if memory serves). There are several dozen MiG-14s (presumably). Several dozen F-XNUMXs are old, but fully operational. The order of "Phantoms", and copies of these aircraft produced in Iran. It is not enough for an air battle with modern air forces, but it is in principle possible to support the air defense system.

Of course, in the event of a large-scale war, the United States will win. The question is what losses the Iranians will be able to inflict on the Americans, and what losses will be acceptable (or unacceptable) for the Americans.