Lockheed Martin announces record F-35 fighter release for 2019

Lockheed Martin announces record F-35 fighter release for 2019

The 134th and last built in 2019 by the F-35 Lightning II Corporation. Snapshot 30.12.2019/XNUMX/XNUMX


The American corporation Lockheed Martin reported for 2019 on all modifications of the fifth-generation F-35 military fighters built and handed over. According to the report, the corporation not only “exceeded” the plan, but also set a record, putting more than 100 of the latest aircraft in the American army and allies.

According to the report, in the 2019 calendar year, the corporation built at its factory in Fort Worth in Texas and delivered 134 fifth-generation fighter F-35 Lightning II of all modifications with a plan of 131 aircraft. In 2018, only 91 aircraft were delivered.

Of the aircraft delivered in 2019, 81 F-35 fighters were sent to the U.S. armed forces, 53 - to foreign customers. Of the 30 F-35s sent abroad, they were delivered to partners about the fifth-generation fighter program, 23 more to other countries through the American program of intergovernmental military sales Foreign Military Sales.

From the announced plans for 2020, it follows that this year Lockheed Martin plans to supply 141 F-35 aircraft, and continue to increase its production by 2023 inclusive.

Pl data blog bmpd, today in operation around the world are 490 F-35 aircraft of all modifications. Fighters have flown over 240 thousand hours.
Photos used:
Lockheed Martin
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

163 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. svp67 6 January 2020 09: 15 New
    • 18
    • 1
    +17
    According to the report, the corporation not only “exceeded” the plan, but also set a record, putting more than 100 of the latest aircraft in the American army and allies.
    Yeah ... "gained momentum." I’m afraid that when China or Russia enters this market, there will be no more buyers with their fifth generation of buyers, everyone will be overwhelmed with “Penguins”
    1. maden.usmanow 6 January 2020 09: 21 New
      • 12
      • 8
      +4
      1 engine + universal platform.
      1. sabakina 6 January 2020 10: 47 New
        • 2
        • 8
        -6
        Quote: maden.usmanow
        1 engine + universal platform.

        One engine, one bird ...
        1. Avior 6 January 2020 12: 32 New
          • 15
          • 1
          +14
          Have experience operating F-16
          no special problems are observed
          However, can you have other data with statistics?
          throw a link, read
    2. orionvitt 6 January 2020 09: 51 New
      • 11
      • 5
      +6
      Russia and China have a different market and rarely intersect with the American one. Especially in such high-tech areas. Independent potential buyers, the same SU-57, in the world can be counted on the fingers of one hand, while the Americans of their NATO allies oblige them to purchase the American one. This is not a Kalashnikov assault rifle for the natives.
      1. svp67 6 January 2020 10: 40 New
        • 10
        • 2
        +8
        Quote: orionvitt
        This is not a Kalashnikov assault rifle for the natives.

        Already it, in contrast to other types of weapons, "vparivat" is definitely not necessary ...
      2. Krasnoyarsk 6 January 2020 11: 52 New
        • 25
        • 8
        +17
        Quote: orionvitt
        ... while the Americans of their NATO allies oblige them to purchase the American.

        Well, who told you this - oblige?
        They buy it because it is good. No matter how he was criticized by local "experts".
        And looking at the performance of 134 cars in a year, thoughts come that they have professionals working there, and not effective managers like ours.
        1. Spart55 6 January 2020 13: 01 New
          • 13
          • 0
          +13
          In some ways, he is certainly good.
          But it also has some disadvantages. Which, by the way, no one hides in the same America.
          They criticize the 35th most of all with us.
          Not from a good life. But because we do not have anything similar.
          The 57th is probably not bad either. But while its merits are more highlighted in brochures, in laudatory odes in our media, in pictures and in computer graphics.
          He is not in the series, not in the troops. Several flights to Syria outside the combat situation do not change the situation.
          Whatever one may say, there is no real competition for the 35th today.
          This is partly also why they are buying it.
          1. arkadiyssk 6 January 2020 14: 36 New
            • 6
            • 2
            +4
            Well, what are the disadvantages? F-35A was created to replace the F-16 and completely surpasses it. The F-35B is much cooler than Harrier. Awesome drummer, which they were able to make and dangerous for classic fighters.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. Zaurbek 6 January 2020 12: 23 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Countries where they will not compete much.
    5. Astronaut 6 January 2020 12: 40 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Market is market, but own shirt is closer. It is more annoying that we cannot do so much for planes and helicopters.
  2. Professor 6 January 2020 09: 16 New
    • 34
    • 13
    +21
    Every 3 days the plane is off the assembly line. Not bad. good
    1. prior 6 January 2020 10: 02 New
      • 25
      • 6
      +19
      But our Foreign Ministry can best express "deep concern." Here!
    2. Udav kaa 6 January 2020 10: 51 New
      • 10
      • 17
      -7
      Quote: Professor
      Every 3 days the plane is off the assembly line. Not bad. good

      Katz offers to give up? laughing
      1. figwam 6 January 2020 10: 59 New
        • 8
        • 6
        +2
        Quote: Udav Kaa
        Katz offers to give up?

        Katz will never say how many airplanes his country produces per day, but he considers other people to be proud.
        1. Udav kaa 6 January 2020 11: 19 New
          • 7
          • 9
          -2
          Quote: figvam
          Quote: Udav Kaa
          Katz offers to give up?

          Katz will never say how many airplanes his country produces per day, but he considers other people to be proud.

          It’s in their blood to count strangers .. Okay, and we’ll deal with them soldier
          1. SirCyrill 6 January 2020 14: 53 New
            • 3
            • 5
            -2
            Will you figure it out from the sofa?)
      2. Bshkaus 6 January 2020 11: 37 New
        • 16
        • 2
        +14
        Katz offers to give up?

        Katz proposes not to engage in foolishness working as managers selling iPhones, but to go to study as engineers and designers, and then work in three shifts at the factory.
        In this situation, you still have to.
        1. Udav kaa 6 January 2020 11: 43 New
          • 6
          • 11
          -5
          Quote: Bshkaus
          Katz proposes not to engage in foolishness working as managers selling iPhones, but to go to study as engineers and designers, and then work in three shifts at the factory.

          On Katz? Yes, the whole world is already working .. laughing How many loans do you have?
          Quote: Bshkaus
          In this situation, you still have to.

          Already make and work .. Where to go, I want to live.
          Here you can only be outraged, and then not always already ..
          Here's what to do, and who is to blame? hi
          1. Bshkaus 6 January 2020 12: 07 New
            • 7
            • 5
            +2
            How many loans do you have?

            Fundamentally I live without them. The Korean car is 10 years old, has been working flawlessly unlike previous "special series" Lada cars, which have rotted over 5 years at a run of 60 thousand. I would be glad to change the car, but it does not give rise to part.
            Already make and work .. Where to go, I want to live

            That’s why I’m building a house not in Russia, but abroad, by swelling there everything that I earn, also without loans, is patriotic. seen enough of colleagues tightening their belts on mortgages. In this regard, I am free: accumulated - laid the foundation, accumulated - erected walls. Not all at once, but adequately. And what else to do? You correctly said: I want to live and so that the etsilopp had no right to beat me at night ... Never! ..
            1. Udav kaa 6 January 2020 12: 37 New
              • 4
              • 9
              -5
              Quote: Bshkaus
              I basically live without them

              And do not watch television too? laughing
              Quote: Bshkaus
              The Korean car is 10 years old, has been working flawlessly unlike previous "special series" Lada cars, which have rotted over 5 years at a run of 60 thousand. I would be glad to change the car, but it does not give rise to part.

              I have an UAZ, Niva was (often dreaming) .. sold On foot they advise me to go Eh edrit eat at the root ..

              Quote: Bshkaus
              That’s why I’m building a house not in Russia, but abroad, by swelling there everything that I’ll earn is not patriotic

              But Russia is understandable for you "ETA country"
              Well then it’s clear that in 10 -20 years you’ll write memoirs and shed tears ..?
              Well, God is your judge .. I do not want to talk with you! hi
              There are many clients here, to blame for the Motherland
              1. Bshkaus 6 January 2020 13: 16 New
                • 8
                • 3
                +5
                And don't watch television either

                Imagine - I’m not watching for about 7 years and I don’t suffer from the nightingale brain.
                I have UAZ

                If you are satisfied with the quality, am I happy for you?
                There are many customers here, to blame for the Motherland

                When a child in school is put in a deuce for an unfulfilled task, is it necessary to force him to do work on mistakes, or pat on the head "he is his own, beloved" leaving everything as it is?
                If we cannot maintain the same pace of production, then we must increase it, and not chew snot, or stop thinking of ourselves as a superpower because this status must be maintained not only with patriotic words, but also with real deeds, applying a huge amount of energy.
                1. Udav kaa 6 January 2020 13: 42 New
                  • 4
                  • 12
                  -8
                  Quote: Bshkaus
                  Imagine - I’m not watching for about 7 years and I don’t suffer from the nightingale brain.

                  I got what you mean laughing Good luck for the "hill to finish building" there I hope you will watch TV .. And everything else!
                  Quote: Bshkaus
                  When a child in school is put in a deuce for an unfulfilled task, is it necessary to force him to do work on mistakes, or pat on the head "he is his own, beloved" leaving everything as it is?

                  Aren't you afraid that they will be taken from you there for intolerance?
                  There, pedophiles can give it all away for a while ..
                  Then don't yell negative
                  1. SirCyrill 6 January 2020 14: 55 New
                    • 1
                    • 5
                    -4
                    There, pedophiles can give it all away for a while ..
                    - concrete evidence of this will be?
            2. Fishery 6 January 2020 15: 12 New
              • 2
              • 2
              0
              It’s a pity you can’t put more than one plus))))) I act in the same way)
        2. NordUral 6 January 2020 11: 57 New
          • 5
          • 0
          +5
          We'll have to, it's like giving a drink, if we have time, Bshkaus.
    3. dauria 6 January 2020 12: 54 New
      • 5
      • 3
      +2
      Every 3 days the plane is off the assembly line. Not bad.


      Oh no no no. The professor must understand that this is not a pace, but picking in the nose. He rivets the whole world from Australia to the Jews - and 11 cars a month. For comparison, not the easiest and cheapest MiG-31 was sculpted in the 84th at a single plant at a rate of 17 units per month. Apart from the MiG-21 bis to Indians and pots for housewives.
      It can be seen that there is not much money for those who want to have airplanes.
      And then, a bunch of ads just an ordinary airplane. Yes, he has a modern glider. Yes, it was built "according to the concepts" of modern wars like yours with Arabs and Persian bays. And that’s it. What will solve the case in Sino-American batch is a very controversial issue.
      1. Evgeny Goncharov (smoogg) 6 January 2020 15: 05 New
        • 2
        • 2
        0
        11 cars per month on LRIP. it pre-production production.
      2. Alf
        Alf 6 January 2020 17: 16 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: dauria
        For comparison, not the easiest and cheapest MiG-31 was sculpted in the 84th at a single plant at a rate of 17 units per month. Apart from the MiG-21 bis to Indians and pots for housewives.

        Then the country was different and the leadership was thinking about the country, and not about exporting "acquired by excessive labor." By the way, sanctions then also shone in all their glory.
        1. dauria 6 January 2020 19: 52 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Then the country was different

          Yes, I'm not talking about that, actually. And that 11 pieces a month is ridiculous. It would seem - they rushed forward, blinded such that they should change all, all the planes of the world for just such a thing. Just skim the cream while you can. But no, and the line of volunteers and money is not so huge for two quarters. And China is breathing in the back with its exact same Falcon.
          It seems that the vassals pondered and realized that by and large no super-duper airplane in a real batch would save the nifig. And most importantly - this will not be decided by a trifle like Germany and England, but someone in the shoulders is wider, taller and with a bigger salary.
          1. Alf
            Alf 6 January 2020 19: 56 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Quote: dauria
            It seems that the vassals pondered and realized that by and large no super-duper airplane in a real batch would save the nifig.

            “You look at these ceremonial ballerunas and understand that if something happens, you will have to fight not these dancers, but you, with a machine gun and a sweatshirt.” Vladislav Morozov. Fourth World.
          2. Evgeny Goncharov (smoogg) 6 January 2020 21: 13 New
            • 5
            • 1
            +4
            > 11 pieces per month is funny

            What comparable complexity and cost did the Russian Federation release at a pace of more than 2 pieces a YEAR, do not remind?
  3. bessmertniy 6 January 2020 09: 19 New
    • 6
    • 2
    +4
    Demand for this American aircraft seems to be growing. And it's annoying! repeat
    1. orionvitt 6 January 2020 09: 42 New
      • 12
      • 24
      -12
      Quote: bessmertniy
      Demand for this American aircraft is growing.

      Not a fig is not growing. It is "growing", vparivaya own air force and allies on the principle, "and if they do not take it, turn off the gas." And for themselves, they decide the question of resuming production of the "old man" F-15. Since it is much cheaper and in most cases much more effective than an expensive toy like F-35, with its congenital sores. Modern, advertised and sophisticated, not always better. In the meantime, Lockheed Martin gains superprofits, along with lobbyists from the Pentagon and Congress. No joke, the F-35 program has already reached the amount of 1.5 trillion green. (Trillion Carl). That's what I understand loot sawing.
      1. donavi49 6 January 2020 09: 48 New
        • 25
        • 3
        +22
        But they resume the production of a special old man in a special role - an air rocket battery. It carries the AIM-120 Air-Defense Forces like any other 3 aircraft combined.
        Plus the most powerful aviation radar.

        1. Fifth 6 January 2020 18: 18 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          Quote: donavi49
          Plus the most powerful aviation radar.

          Do not write fairy tales if you do not know the radar parameters and cannot compare - which is better ...
      2. voyaka uh 6 January 2020 09: 58 New
        • 21
        • 6
        +15
        "Since it (F-15) is much cheaper and in most cases much more efficient" ////
        ---
        1) F-15 is more expensive. F-35 The Pentagon buys at 80 million apiece (including the engine), and the next lot is already closed at 78 million.
        2) F-35 goes to replace the F-16, not F15.
        3) F-15 is effective as an interceptor and fighter of gaining air supremacy. Although in these roles it is already becoming obsolete.
        Therefore, a flying "battery" is made of it:
        20 long-range explosive missiles.
        1. orionvitt 6 January 2020 10: 07 New
          • 5
          • 16
          -11
          Quote: voyaka uh
          Therefore, a flying "battery" is made of it:
          20 long-range explosive missiles.

          Yes, let them do what they want, facts on the face. Resume the production of the aircraft 50 years ago, albeit the latest modifications. Is it casual? When almost everywhere they ticked themselves, the transition to the 5th generation, as a "symbol of time" and "technological power."
          1. voyaka uh 6 January 2020 10: 14 New
            • 15
            • 5
            +10
            This is due to the fact that the production of F-22 was discontinued. The Air Force has a total of 7 full squadrons of F-22.
            And they have to supplement their F-15.
            The Air Force is trying to keep 30 deployed and operational ready-made fighter squadrons. Now - 28 squadrons
        2. figwam 6 January 2020 11: 09 New
          • 4
          • 3
          +1
          Quote: voyaka uh
          The F-35 is replacing the F-16, not the F15.

          The F-35 was replaced as a single universal aircraft, if it were different, then fighter planes and attack aircraft would be developed in parallel, but they did one F-35 for themselves and the whole of NATO, as we can see, and now it’s moving from the fifth generation to verified fourth.
          1. voyaka uh 6 January 2020 11: 36 New
            • 11
            • 2
            +9
            "F-35 was replaced as a single universal aircraft" ////
            ----
            You misunderstood its versatility.
            F-35 replaces:
            1) F-16 in the air force
            2) F-18 in the Navy
            3) Harrier in Corus Marine Corps.
            This is done.
            It has never been stated anywhere that they are going to replace the F-15.
            The F-22 was replacing the F-15, but a complete replacement did not work due to the cessation of production of the F-22.
            1. figwam 6 January 2020 12: 23 New
              • 1
              • 5
              -4
              Quote: voyaka uh
              It has never been stated anywhere that they are going to replace the F-15.

              It was the United States that declared that the F-35 will replace the F-15, F-16 since their fleet is already outdated and must be decommissioned, and this is thousands of aircraft and only the release of thousands of f-35 could correct the situation.
              1. voyaka uh 6 January 2020 12: 26 New
                • 9
                • 3
                +6
                "stated that the F-35 will replace the F-15," ///
                ----
                Not true. Never claimed.
                Find at least one link.
                1. figwam 6 January 2020 12: 52 New
                  • 2
                  • 6
                  -4
                  Quote: voyaka uh
                  Find at least one link.

                  Why should I look for a link if it was stated 10 years ago, but I have a memory and I remember very well how the Americans explained it.
                  -We will have a platform for the use of smart weapons, and not vice versa, there will be no more “dog fights”, he went quietly, launched a rocket and left.
            2. Shteffan 6 January 2020 12: 56 New
              • 3
              • 0
              +3
              And also like A-10 they were going to replace them.
              1. voyaka uh 6 January 2020 14: 09 New
                • 5
                • 1
                +4
                In the background, behind the Beetle,
                gun from A-10.
                Can it be replaced with something? laughing
                1. Shteffan 6 January 2020 14: 27 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Well, some racket "surface".
                  1. Fifth 7 January 2020 04: 56 New
                    • 1
                    • 1
                    0
                    Quote: mvg
                    But Squirrel surpasses only in wordsotherwise they would not try to do AFAR. The most interesting radar is the Fu 35 and the Fu 15 which is new. And the Indians in terms of modernization for some reason are not considering squirrels, but France and Israel. And they say that Pakistan Fu 16 on radar superior H011 strongly.

                    mvg (Maxim), babble of an illiterate couch strategist and no more. For people like you:
                    1. Range for purposes with image intensifier = 1 m2 Radar H036 "Squirrel" Su-57 D = 400 km.
                    2. Range for purposes with image intensifier = 3 m2 Radar AN / APG-77 F-22 D = 300 km.
                    3. Range for purposes with image intensifier = 3 m2 Radar AN / APG-81 F-35 D = 300 km.
                    It is ugly to deliberately lie and spit on the H036 Squirrel Su-57 radar and immediately erase your bile with trickery - the N011 Bars radar, with completely different parameters. In a word - a lying dirty strategist and no more ... Teach the materiel along with the illiterate Russophobes who like you for the manuals of the US State Department!
                    1. Fifth 7 January 2020 05: 31 New
                      • 1
                      • 1
                      0
                      mvg (Maxim), I forgot - you don’t even know how to count by radar, because you won’t be able to compare, then for people like you:
                      2. Range for purposes with Image intensifier = 1 m2 Radar AN / APG-77 F-22 D = 227,964 km.
                      3. Range for purposes with Image intensifier = 1 m2 Radar AN / APG-81 F-35 D = 227,964 km.
                      Unobtrusive U.S. F-35 (F-22) aircraft will not be able to fly to the line of use of their long-range RVV-BD AIM-120 с D = 180 km and will be guaranteed shot down RVV-DB P-37M with a launch range of more D = 300 km. That's the whole deal. The range is given in the examples in free space.
                      1. 3danimal 9 January 2020 13: 26 New
                        • 1
                        • 1
                        0
                        And who recognizes the target and directs this missile, and how successfully will its GOS capture the inconspicuous target?
                        In addition, its maneuverability is somewhat worse than RVV-SD / MD.
                        On paper, you can succumb to yourself)
                      2. thanks 14 January 2020 01: 31 New
                        • 1
                        • 0
                        +1
                        Quote: 3danimal
                        And who recognizes the target and directs this missile, and how successfully will its GOS capture the inconspicuous target?
                        In addition, its maneuverability is somewhat worse than RVV-SD / MD.
                        On paper, you can succumb to yourself)

                        Is the F-35 a highly maneuverable target? Is it with a thrust ratio of T = 0,8? R-37M is easily and guaranteed to hit the F-35. GOS will capture the F-35 with EPR = 0,3 m2 at a distance of 19 km. (D = 40 km with EPR = 5 m2).
                      3. 3danimal 16 January 2020 10: 15 New
                        • 0
                        • 2
                        -2
                        According to pilots who piloted it, maneuverability is at the F-18 level. Why did you decide to lower her to the Hokai level? “Easy and guaranteed” - It looks like loading a pressure gauge) Let me remind you, life is always more complicated.
                        In addition, where did you get the figure of 0,3 square meters? (From the head?) And from what angle?
            3. 3danimal 9 January 2020 03: 58 New
              • 0
              • 1
              -1
              There were justifications for replacing the A-10. Drones will do part of the work, another part - F-35 with SMB
  • Yaro Polk 6 January 2020 09: 21 New
    • 3
    • 18
    -15
    Why release them. if it's Goose ..... marriage?
    1. mvg
      mvg 6 January 2020 10: 29 New
      • 32
      • 10
      +22
      Of course a piece of marriage. 500 pieces, 300 thousand flying hours, a couple pieces fell. Su 57 10 pcs, one burned out, one fell, another couple of emergency situations, the top of reliability. At the same time they fly on old proven engines and with rotten radar. Well, what is there? Of course, the American d..mo, so they will make 3000+ pcs.
      1. figwam 6 January 2020 11: 24 New
        • 6
        • 12
        -6
        Quote: mvg
        Of course a piece of marriage.

        F-35 burned more than once, two crashed, half of the issued aircraft do not fly because of the old software, constant emergency situations, read what the Japanese complained about.
        Quote: mvg
        and with rotten radar

        Radar H036 "Squirrel" rotten radar? It surpasses the F-22 and F-35 radar.
        1. mvg
          mvg 6 January 2020 11: 34 New
          • 11
          • 7
          +4
          half of the issued planes do not fly due to old software.

          You have already been answered to this nonsense that they would fly in any other country. For example, in Israel. Well, Squirrel surpasses only in words, otherwise they would not try to do AFAR. The most interesting radar is the Fu 35 and the Fu 15 which is new. And the Indians in terms of modernization for some reason are not considering squirrels, but France and Israel. And they say that Pakistani Fu 16 on radar superior H011 greatly.
          PS: Why should everyone fly in peacetime, consuming a motor and a glider resource?
          1. figwam 6 January 2020 11: 40 New
            • 6
            • 6
            0
            Quote: mvg
            Well, Squirrel surpasses only in words, otherwise they would not try to do AFAR.

            Yes, you and do not know that the radar N036 "Squirrel" is AFAR ?!)))
            1. mvg
              mvg 6 January 2020 11: 57 New
              • 8
              • 5
              +3
              PFAR, although they write that AFAR.
              https://vpk.name/library/f/h036.html
              But why then in the press, literally yesterday they wrote that he was not ready?
              1. figwam 6 January 2020 12: 05 New
                • 2
                • 5
                -3
                Quote: mvg
                But why then in the press, literally yesterday they wrote that he was not ready?

                I do not know what they write in the press, but even the last non-serial Su-57s fly with AFAR.
                1. mvg
                  mvg 6 January 2020 12: 43 New
                  • 7
                  • 2
                  +5
                  Well, answer a simple question, the states have been making afar since '86, invested space money in $ 35, the technology is traditionally higher, we couldn’t do it, and then again, after the requested 90 ... suddenly it’s ahead of the rest. Even China immediately began to put its avionics on its J 11s. Well, where is the logic? At the same time, France, China, England, Sweden have also had afar for a long time.
                  1. The comment was deleted.
                    1. mvg
                      mvg 6 January 2020 13: 16 New
                      • 7
                      • 3
                      +4
                      only we have hypersonic missiles

                      Did you see them? Do you have test results? The states had hypersound for a long time. X -51 since 2010 flies. They didn’t begin to develop. And we have already announced Petrel as round the world, and it flies for 8 seconds. All 4 tests failed.
                      I have only seen cartoons with Florida. And the Dagger, which is not RCC. Even Onyx could not be suspended under the Su-30, but the Indians could.
                      1. Tusv 6 January 2020 13: 33 New
                        • 3
                        • 2
                        +1
                        Quote: mvg
                        The states had hypersound for a long time. X -51 since 2010 flies.

                        Yeah, Invisible Hypersonic. One in the third second disappeared from the radar, the other in the fifteenth. "Firemen are looking for, Police are looking for, Photographers are looking for In our capital, They are looking for a long time, But they can’t find"
                        In 2010 at Popmee wildly neighing
                      2. mvg
                        mvg 6 January 2020 13: 42 New
                        • 4
                        • 2
                        +2
                        In 2010 at Popmee wildly neighing

                        What do you think will be the first to enter service? And in what quantity? China, USA or Zircon with Nakhimov? Really ...
                        // May 1, 2013, the United States conducted successful missile tests over the Pacific Ocean. [8] [9] It was launched from the side of the B-52 aircraft, flying from the Edwards air base, and reached an altitude of 18200 meters, where it developed a speed corresponding to Mach 5,1. The flight lasted for six minutes, during which the rocket flew a distance of 426 kilometers. This test flight was the longest and most successful of all conducted. //
                      3. Tusv 6 January 2020 14: 06 New
                        • 4
                        • 3
                        +1
                        Quote: mvg
                        It was launched from the side of the B-52 aircraft, flying from the Edwards air base, and reached an altitude of 18200 meters, where it developed a speed corresponding to Mach 5,1.

                        5.1 of the originally declared 12 MAX .. Ours about Zircon declared 6M. Zircon, according to US intelligence, flew 8M and hit the target hi
                      4. mvg
                        mvg 6 January 2020 14: 20 New
                        • 2
                        • 4
                        -2
                        declared 12 MAX

                        The wiki claims 6 with something M. Why have Zircon been tested? Its carriers? The United States has at least something theoretical than to bring down, and France, England ... and ours? What is the difference, 6 or 8M. We really only have Gorshkov with missile defense, Makarov will be soon, and behind the puddle 60 Berkov with SM-6 and Hokai, Deringa with Asters. The fort won't even see LASM.
                        When Zircon at least .. climbs in 885. drinks
                      5. Tusv 6 January 2020 14: 24 New
                        • 3
                        • 0
                        +3
                        Quote: mvg
                        Wiki claimed

                        So we’ll beat not according to the wiki and not even according to the passport, but according to brazen face real goals hi
                      6. Tusv 6 January 2020 14: 34 New
                        • 2
                        • 0
                        +2
                        Quote: mvg
                        will be soon, and beyond the puddle 60 Berkov with SM-6

                        Well, for the time being, they are mainly armed with SM-3 and that’s not all. Here you need to choose Axes or Standard Misil
                      7. Fifth 6 January 2020 17: 48 New
                        • 1
                        • 2
                        -1
                        mvg! Illiterate strategist, it's your rotten brains, not your rotten radar! Repeatedly to you and your illiterate buddies, I have repeatedly proved your ignorance in radar and not only ... Learn the materiel, the illiterate child and learn to count!
              2. Fifth 6 January 2020 17: 16 New
                • 1
                • 1
                0
                mvg! The child from Wikipedia, the US project was closed, could not cope with the problems of heating and not only.
              3. mvg
                mvg 6 January 2020 17: 41 New
                • 2
                • 5
                -3
                US project was closed

                and now they are working again. the rocket flies. do you think with a compromise they have worse than ours? they do the blades, the Valkyrie flew under 70 as far back as 3500 years, and now 2020, they won’t cope.
                the rocket flew 460 km.
                China is coping. do not consider them worse than us.
              4. Fifth 6 January 2020 17: 58 New
                • 0
                • 3
                -3
                mvg! Do not write your tales, child ... Lying is not good! Radar H035 "Squirrel" failed to spit on his baby talk, Tatar! Again, the Howard will run out to defend the child - received the last time for it!
              5. mvg
                mvg 6 January 2020 18: 09 New
                • 3
                • 4
                -1
                give a damn about your baby talk

                bother to choose expressions. no squirrels. there is, when a hundred pieces are made, customized by software, and not by Indian programmers. but what is now standing is experimental specimens and not a fact that they will immediately put it on.
                the facts that out of 10 pre-production aircraft, one burned out, works only according to statics, one crashed. several incidents. no TTX protein.
                believed in miracles in the sieve? that our god suddenly kissed our engineers? in the absence of element base and under sanctions?
                Urya is a patriot, Mlyn.
              6. Fifth 7 January 2020 05: 07 New
                • 1
                • 2
                -1
                Quote: mvg
                no TTX protein.
                believed in miracles in the sieve? hGod suddenly kissed our engineers? in the absence of element base and under sanctions?
                Urya is a patriot, Mlyn.

                mvg, hooray - Russophobe, no need to write false fabrications, a strategist from the couch, who does not know radar and electronics at all. Learn to count radar detection distances ... And do not write nonsense, Russophobe! And do not confuse Russian designers with yours!
              7. 3danimal 9 January 2020 04: 18 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Remember, there was another noble Russophobe, the Lefty was called. )
  • figwam 6 January 2020 13: 46 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    .
    Quote: mvg
    The states had hypersound for a long time. X -51 since 2010 flies. They just did not develop.

    )))
    Quote: mvg
    Did you see them?

    ))) Yes, you overslept everything here!
    On December 27, 2019, the Avngard complex was put into service, and in November, under the START treaty, the rocket was shown to the Americans.
    Quote: mvg
    And we have already announced Petrel

    The petrel is not a hypersonic missile, is it with it !?
  • mvg
    mvg 6 January 2020 13: 56 New
    • 9
    • 3
    +6
    Avngard complex put into service

    In service, this is when you have 3000 Tomogavks on 80 carriers, and not just one Vanguard on the “hundred” ... when 1000 more axes from the allies, and not 10 MiG-31K with a dozen Daggers .. this is “into service”. When Sarmat, at least 30 pieces stands on the database in the mine, and does not perform “throw” tests. When Mace does not have 30 percent of successful launches, but like Trident’s 150 in a row successful. This is normal, the rest are cartoons.
  • Tusv 6 January 2020 14: 20 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    Quote: mvg
    In service, this is when you have 3000 Tomogavks on 80 carriers, and not one Vanguard on the “hundred” ... when 1000 more axes from the allies, and not 10 MiG-31K with a dozen Daggers .. here it is “into service”

    It was smooth on paper, but missile defense was forgotten - ravines. To break through it, according to NATO, more than 6000 axes are needed, and the carrier must be very far and out of reach for the Mig-31, Tu-22M3. Ash is not enough, otherwise NATO would be completely sour, like yesterday’s smile Klebo
  • figwam 6 January 2020 14: 25 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: mvg
    In service, this is when you have 3000 Tomogawks on 80 carriers, and not just one Vanguard on the “hundred”

    The first Vanguard regiment was delivered; in 2020 the armament of the new complex will continue, which will reset all axes.
    Quote: mvg
    When Sarmat, at least 30 pieces are on the database in the mine

    Sarmat is in the process of testing, everything is going according to schedule, but for now they are setting YaRS.
    Quote: mvg
    When Mace doesn't have 30 percent of successful launches

    The mace became operational only in 2018, there are no statistics on launches yet, but the percentage of successful test launches out of 34, this is 27, which is 79%, and here you give false information.
  • Tusv 6 January 2020 14: 49 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: figvam
    The mace became operational only in 2018, there are no statistics on launches yet,

    Why not. Already in the past and the year before, they were shot by the Mace. 100%
  • figwam 6 January 2020 16: 00 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: Tusv
    Why not.

    Well, I mean, there isn’t a long series of launches of 5-10 years, there the statistics will be more real, and yes so far 100%
  • Tusv 6 January 2020 16: 05 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    But there is real volley fire. The result is 100%. Just because it’s bad to shoot during the development process doesn’t mean at all that the same thing will happen on the database
  • mvg
    mvg 6 January 2020 16: 51 New
    • 3
    • 6
    -3
    out of 34 it's 27

    do not invent, and, as one professor said, smaller press in the morning. Today a similar phrase was uttered by Meshcheryakov.
    normal, it's like in Operation Hippo, all 16 came out and flew away, and not "partially recognized as successful."
    we write a lot of things that are not true, and we shoot down the axes in batches, and all the targets are destroyed, and the Clubs fly exclusively to the East, and 4 at once, in a flock. and you watch the video and see that the boat sank after the second ..
  • figwam 6 January 2020 18: 16 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: mvg
    and you watch the video and see that the boat sank after the second ..

    Where did you sink? The boat when launching the Mace is under water at a depth of 50-55 meters)))
  • mvg
    mvg 6 January 2020 18: 25 New
    • 2
    • 3
    -1
    Where dipped

    1,51 see how the second comes out. The launch was recognized as partially successful.
  • figwam 6 January 2020 18: 35 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: mvg
    1,51 see how the second comes out. The launch was recognized as partially successful.

    The second comes out the same way as 1,3,4. The launch was recognized as successful. All targets at the training ground were hit precisely after this salvo. The rocket was put into service.
  • 3danimal 9 January 2020 04: 13 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Wrong, since the 80s, the USA has been making PFAR.
  • Fifth 6 January 2020 17: 30 New
    • 2
    • 3
    -1
    mvg! I lost my fear, insolent nonspecialist ... First, compare the detection range of the N036 Belka radar with AN / APG-81s AN / APG-77 and don’t write babble.
    1. mvg
      mvg 6 January 2020 18: 22 New
      • 4
      • 4
      0
      impudent underspecialist ..

      Petty, I have 2 towers. in prestigious universities. I'm a good spec. I have never had a problem in my whole life that I wouldn’t decide on work. at least in the specialty. and here, you, on the go vypshim and not brought up. so to put it mildly ... well, you understand ...
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. mvg
          mvg 6 January 2020 19: 09 New
          • 4
          • 4
          0
          i know radar

          remind me, I missed ... when did we get better on radar? moment instant15 and f-86? instant 21 and phantom? Mig-29 and f -15? maybe that's why 50 percent of the foreign is on the superjet, and since 91, not a single new engine for a citizen? in what period did you go around? or made a breakthrough during the sanctions period? on chinese electronics? well, from what moment are the best?
          why the Chinese, copying s-300 afar taken from the patriot? suddenly. why matrices were bought from the French, and electronics in China? and still pine, from Belarus, for example? and GOS 20 year old helfire to find happiness? maybe we write software better? Israel during this time added millions of lines to the Adira software.
          so where is that rubicon when they got around? always falling behind .. want to be happy !! let's be a connoisseur of radar. all fools, and we are on horseback!
          essentially tired of clicking the mouse.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. mvg
              mvg 6 January 2020 20: 33 New
              • 4
              • 3
              +1
              You are not a Russian, but an illiterate dirty liar!

              There is no electronics from the word at all. for electronics it’s better not to. Zelenograd did not work. engines, at least on corvettes, are doing 15 km from me. When did you see the “made in Russia” machines? last time? when were you at a military factory?
              therefore, carbon fiber until the last bought in Japan. What Russian software have you ever seen? or what OS is ready? Russian origin?
              calm down, special patriot! but for radar, I already wrote. that is why radars for the polymer have been made for 9 years. and the squirrel has not been mastered since 2008.
              maybe an alien was caught and made a seven-leap jump? and don’t drink like that anymore. a lot of.
              1. The comment was deleted.
              2. mvg
                mvg 7 January 2020 08: 00 New
                • 2
                • 1
                +1
                blatantly lie

                I explain as a last resort. just imagine, in Russia, as it is customary, the first time and immediately lacking an analogue in the world, well, we are not trifling with trifles. if the plane, then the best and cheap (su-35 18 million), only no one buys, China bought for personal gain. if the tank, then armata, too, no one needs, even their own. if the radar, then the best, like that, they took it and did it right away, the first time. think, before that they could not, the whole world is doing, but we do not need.
                but in fact, the Indians choose rafal and typhoon to the finals, 120 million each, not cheap su or a moment, but the best in the world. only they are not for sale. for some reason.
                we can make piece products, but not massively.
                squirrels with a range of 460 km per meter EPR, a beetle - and 160 km, only it is also absent, etc.
                a great connoisseur of radar, have you ever seen a chip (processor, logic, memory, video, audio) with the inscription Russia? I held thousands of them, Singapore, Malaysia, Congo, Israel .. but I did not see Russia. We will not make a smartphone, we have neither IPS matrices nor the risk of processors. There is Baikal with the performance of Intel's budget Atom
                and once again for the radar, Russia did anyone do AWACS? abroad? there is just afar.
                building rogue nations nuclear plants and everything. and selling oil, pumping gas.
                ps so just consider that we are still the best in everything, a fool, non-drinker and not thinking.
              3. The comment was deleted.
              4. mvg
                mvg 7 January 2020 20: 39 New
                • 2
                • 3
                -1
                You didn’t see the chips (processors, logic, memory, etc.)

                I have collected thousands of computers and multiprocessor servers, on all possible platforms. and repaired hundreds. I saw all the possible processes from 20086, to the senior xeon and ah 10 series. even those that are no longer there. from mmx to socket 7 through 2011. not for you to teach me that I do not know. rides of any level, hot swaps, database recovery. any possible OSes, otvin95 to Solaris and many versions of Unix.
                so you would shut up ...
                worked with a bunch of virtual machines from hyper-to virtual virtual boxing. distributed bd. and almost always alone.
                I repeat again, shut up. and I draw for a long time, because it is with the mouse
              5. The comment was deleted.
              6. mvg
                mvg 7 January 2020 21: 05 New
                • 2
                • 2
                0
                with inferiority complex

                I have everything. apartment, car, house, wife, son .. what to complex? laughing Turik you genchik. another wife, friends, work. sofa ... internet. Greek salad, pivasik. football is coming. zero zero so far ...
                you either speak on business, or at a known address, otherwise I don’t want to switch.
                yes, mind you, I bought or built everything myself
          2. mvg
            mvg 7 January 2020 20: 53 New
            • 2
            • 2
            0
            opus and others on VO

            you should at least have a little brain angry , you and the name corresponding to the gene ... correspond bully
          3. Gene585 7 January 2020 21: 11 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            mvg (Maxim), the opus is as illiterate as you ... Until now, Linnik cannot answer me the question:

            Quote: Truthfulness

            Quote: Sergey Linnik US missile defense system. Part 2. March 29, 2016


            Transportation of the AN / TPY-2 radar is possible by air and sea, as well as in towed form on public roads. At 1000 km warhead detection range and a scanning angle of 10-60 °, this station has a good resolution, sufficient to distinguish the target against the background of fragments of previously destroyed missiles and separated stages. According to Raytheon's advertising information, the AN / TPY-2 radar can be used not only in conjunction with the THAAD system, but also as part of other missile defense systems.



            Quote: Sergey Linnik Turkey's air defense radar: will they ensure the safety of air lines? December 9, 2019.



            The AN / TPY-2 mobile early warning missile radar deployed in Turkey is located at an altitude of 2000 m above sea level, and approximately 700 km from the border with Iran. According to information published by Raytheon Corporation, a radar operating in the frequency range 8,55-10 GHz is capable of fixing ballistic over the horizon targets at a distance of up to 4700 km.



            Dear author - Sergey Linnik! I want to know the truth in your contradictions. What is the true maximum range of the AN / TPY-2 radar?

            Author! I would also like to get an answer to this question! Or are you consciously avoiding this ?! And it was not necessary to erase this comment above in their own interests.
            Not easier to answer the question? - and not engage in flood below with opus, which showed complete ignorance in this matter earlier ... and complete ignorance of the radar!

            To be afraid of me like fire, because they do not know the radar, and can not answer the question. "Literate", such as you, mvg (Maxim) ...
          4. mvg
            mvg 7 January 2020 21: 24 New
            • 2
            • 2
            0
            Fear me like fire, because they do not know the radar, and can not answer the question. Literati like you

            Genik, there Russia with Scotland away on a match TV.
            you know, you are an unpleasant type, communication does not cause pleasure.
            for example, I had no problems at work, I didn’t even know about, so that I wouldn’t solve them, in one way or another. extreme including.
            Serega Linnik, Olya Chaffinch, Opus, Andrei from Chelyabinsk, Professor - the most literate in V. O. but you, how to say ... not really.
            and your question is stupid .... getting people is ugly.
            but for me .. I served an enterprise of 2000 people, 300 computers. a lot of banks, a bank of clients, office equipment .. and many others, city hall, Gazprom, social protection ... even on a database that you have not heard of.
            ps in general, you chose the wrong line of conduct with the linnik, since he sent you. sad
          5. Gene585 7 January 2020 21: 37 New
            • 0
            • 2
            -2
            Quote: mvg
            Serega Linnik, Olya Chaffinch, Opus, Andrei from Chelyabinsk, Professor - the most literate in V. O. but you, how to say ... not really.

            mvg (Maxim), I will repeat again - the "specialists" listed by you are completely illiterate in radar and not only - such as you ... And your complexes - you need to treat. Summarize - Internet talkers, writing material from foreign resources and not able to explain the meaning of what was written, without knowledge in this area.
          6. mvg
            mvg 7 January 2020 22: 01 New
            • 2
            • 2
            0
            illiterate in radar

            genik, with unpleasant! while I was drawing a letter with your mouse, the score was 3-0
            I got along with the protein, because there are no proteins with such parameters. at our Rosvooruzhenie line would be lined up !!!!
            Did you hear that someone asked us to modernize or build something! ?
            Even in Syria and Iran, Chinese radar.
            The Hindus invited France and China for their Su30 MKI.
            Mig 21 upgrade and that is not us. Jews.
            ps so what a fright, having nothing, we can make better America's radar? or France? we don’t even take avionics from China for 10 years?
            we have the only factory in percent, the same Baikal, is in Taiwan. technology 28 microns, and AMD and Intel 7 microns. it's 3 generations ago.
            28/22/14/7 ,,,,
            ps and the question of backfilling, maybe they don’t want to communicate ..? sleep now
            chaotic, well you understand.
          7. Gene585 8 January 2020 00: 14 New
            • 0
            • 2
            -2
            Quote: mvg
            I got along with the protein, because there are no proteins with such parameters. at our Rosvooruzhenie line would be lined up !!!!
            Did you hear that someone asked us to modernize or build something! ?
            Even in Syria and Iran, Chinese radar.

            mvg, Israeli Tatar, again baby talk - the secrecy of information (state secrets) has not been canceled by anyone in the world! And do not confuse Russia with Israel! Keep your children's tales and ignorance in the field of radar - leave it to yourself or tell your Israeli friends: the opus, the "professor of acidic cabbage soup" and other illiterate ... Teach the materiel and do not engage in flood!
          8. zyablik.olga 8 January 2020 11: 22 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            Maxim, respect yourself! Do not argue with this "stupid person." Nobody takes him seriously. All he can do is insult. Today-tomorrow he will inevitably once again be banned, and he is again “Sunday” to insult others. Mental pathology ... wassat
          9. mvg
            mvg 8 January 2020 11: 50 New
            • 2
            • 1
            +1
            Do not argue with this "stupid person"

            Ol, good morning. There were no disputes. See the text. hi So, the evening exchange of views, prevented, bastard, watch football .. wink
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Avior 6 January 2020 12: 40 New
    • 7
    • 3
    +4
    The radar N036 "Squirrel" is not yet commercially available, piece copies do not count, this is not a serial production
    Serially produced radar H035
    1. Fifth 6 January 2020 17: 38 New
      • 0
      • 3
      -3
      Avior! Strategist from Israel, as always stupid, learn the parameters of radar and do not confuse God's gift with an egg!
      1. The comment was deleted.
  • yfast 6 January 2020 15: 53 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    It is impossible to make their radar better at our worst elemental base. You can say anything but not do it.
    1. Fifth 6 January 2020 18: 09 New
      • 1
      • 4
      -3
      yfast! Before you write and argue, you need to know. In microwave electronics, we are not inferior to the United States, in the field of radar, we surpass them - they recognized it themselves ...
  • Bshkaus 6 January 2020 11: 40 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    At the same time they fly on old proven engines and with rotten radar

    I ask you not to express yourself!
    In a patriotic society it is customary to say "engine of the first stage"!
    1. mvg
      mvg 6 January 2020 11: 58 New
      • 4
      • 3
      +1
      first stage engine

      I'm from a virtual keyboard, it's hard to click ..)
      1. Yaro Polk 6 January 2020 14: 16 New
        • 3
        • 5
        -2
        American fake. no
  • NEXUS 6 January 2020 12: 54 New
    • 3
    • 3
    0
    Quote: mvg
    Su 57 10 pcs, one burned out, one fell, another couple of emergency situations, the top of reliability.

    These are prototypes, not serial ones ... no need to pull an owl on the globe, dear.
    Quote: mvg
    At the same time they fly on old proven engines and with rotten radar.

    Are you sure that with rotten radar or do you want to believe in it?
    Quote: mvg
    Of course, the American d..mo, so they will make 3000+ pcs.

    F-35 machine is highly specialized. Against a weak adversary who does not have a modern air force and air defense, he is not good enough for a word. But against countries such as Iran, for example, it is very suitable. Mattresses are not going to fight with a strong enemy, because they do not need a super-duper fighter. Their tactics are as simple as mooing, first crush the air defense and weak enemy air forces with axes and their own air forces, and after that you can bomb the territory with at least screw machines.
  • Winnie76 6 January 2020 16: 38 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: mvg
    At the same time they fly on old proven engines and with rotten radar.

    Do you think old good engines are good or bad?
    About the "rotten radar." Squirrel is a few antenna arrays distributed throughout the aircraft. In the nose, slats, tail, including the L range. Can you show at least one analogue from our partners?
  • Fifth 6 January 2020 17: 13 New
    • 1
    • 4
    -3
    mvg! Illiterate strategist, it's your rotten brains, not your rotten radar! Repeatedly to you and your illiterate buddies, I have repeatedly proved your ignorance in radar and not only ... Learn the materiel, the illiterate child and learn to count!
  • Vol4ara 6 January 2020 10: 32 New
    • 14
    • 3
    +11
    Quote: Yaro Polk
    Why release them. if it's Goose ..... marriage?

    It must then be that the piece of marriage is only in the Russian media, but how in reality ask the Israelis
  • kjhg 6 January 2020 10: 34 New
    • 28
    • 12
    +16
    Quote: Yaro Polk
    Why release them. if it's Goose ..... marriage?

    Because they are dumb. Is it not clear? The whole world is dumb, except for our "patriots". They cannot verify the real characteristics of the aircraft, its effectiveness. Only our "patriots" can do this, sitting on the couch, listening to the evening brains. By the end of the year they will have 540 F-35, not counting F-22, F-15, F-16, etc. But we will soon have 1 Su-57 aircraft without AFAR and with an engine from the Su-35. Unless, of course, they’ll kill him before the change. Then we will “show our mother Kuzkin” to them! And if they don’t understand, then we’re still filming cartoons so that they’re more afraid of the former! We will tell our people again that everything is getting better, defense is getting stronger, incomes are growing, life expectancy is increasing, the government and the president are working even more efficiently, Ukraine is about to fall apart, and Putin has outwitted everyone again. If they do not believe, then we will give them the data of the Federal State Statistics Service and the comments of “foreign citizens”. Those agents of the State Department who already do not believe and will begin to be indignant, we will put in jail according to new laws adopted in the interests of people.
    Life is getting better... fellow
    1. Tusv 6 January 2020 12: 52 New
      • 2
      • 2
      0
      Quote: kjhg
      But we will soon have 1 Su-57 aircraft without AFAR and with an engine from the Su-35.
      Judging by my beavan on the MAX. One Su-57 is equal to two Su-35s and four Su-30s. Beavan vibrated the same way, so the engines on them are different. By the way, on TV, they also said that other engines are on the Su-57. So, it’s nevertheless more correct to say that the engine of the first stage is there, as on the Penguin so far
    2. Fifth 7 January 2020 06: 27 New
      • 2
      • 2
      0
      Quote: kjhg
      The whole world is dumb, except for our "patriots". They cannot verify the real characteristics of the aircraft, its effectiveness. This can only be done by our "patriots", sitting on the couch, listening to the inferiority of the eternal brains. By the end of the year they will have 540 F-35, not counting F-22, F-15, F-16, etc. But we will soon have 1 Su-57 aircraft without AFAR and with an engine from Su-35.

      kjhg (Gargantua), do not write your ignorant babble, cheers - Russophobe! No need to spray your bile, leave your complex with you, couch fighter of the invisible front! A storyteller and not only ... If you can not check and count - this does not mean that others can not! Do not go in there - in which you do not understand, so as not to get into a mess!
  • The comment was deleted.
  • cniza 6 January 2020 09: 23 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    According to the report, the corporation not only “exceeded” the plan, but also set a record, putting more than 100 of the latest aircraft in the American army and allies.


    Of course, when to buy or not to buy, only you decide.
    1. voyaka uh 6 January 2020 10: 05 New
      • 7
      • 3
      +4
      Decides the command of the US Air Force.
      It is firm for the F-35. But the former Minister of Defense, who had previously worked in a Boeing, managed to push through a hundred F-15s, albeit in a strange version of a "flying battery", not a fighter gaining air supremacy.
      But this did not affect the general procurement plans of F-35.
  • Mountain shooter 6 January 2020 09: 26 New
    • 6
    • 9
    -3
    They unwound the car ... The conveyor is working. With such aggressive marketing, it’s not surprising that sales are growing ... Now, there would be data on the observability of these invisibilities by Russian systems ... Sales of our air defense systems would quickly begin to catch up with "their" sales wassat
    1. Durman_54 6 January 2020 09: 32 New
      • 28
      • 5
      +23
      Oh well. Air defense sales will be trampled only when the penguin is brought down by these air defense. And judging by the constant bombing of Syria - never.
      Chesslovo, the only reason why the penguin is despised at VO is f-35, and there are a lot of it. Unlike.
      1. maden.usmanow 6 January 2020 09: 43 New
        • 19
        • 8
        +11
        At VO despise any American weapons released after the 90s.
        1. Fifth 6 January 2020 22: 40 New
          • 1
          • 2
          -1
          maden.usmanow! Can you cite the data that the radar AN / APG-77 and AN / APG-81 surpass the radar H036 "Squirrel" Su-57 is hopeless? I can present to you the data that American radar systems are far behind.
          1. maden.usmanow 7 January 2020 08: 36 New
            • 1
            • 2
            -1
            I think American weapons are no better than the rest, but they are, and are in large numbers. These are not single samples.
      2. orionvitt 6 January 2020 09: 55 New
        • 7
        • 12
        -5
        Quote: Durman_54
        And judging by the constant bombing of Syria - never

        It’s just that Russia so far does not want to engage with Israel in a foreign conflict, it has its own agreements, and Israel is impudent (as always). And so, it seems to me, they would have been beaten for a long time.
        1. Zebra 6 January 2020 10: 21 New
          • 6
          • 4
          +2
          When it seems you yourself know what to do.
          1. orionvitt 7 January 2020 01: 15 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: Zebra
            When it seems you yourself know what to do.

            Literate literate?
      3. Tusv 6 January 2020 13: 17 New
        • 2
        • 3
        -1
        Quote: Durman_54
        Oh well. Air defense sales will be trampled only when the penguin is brought down by these air defense.

        It is known that the Israeli f-35 Adir was shot down by a bird. Sales of birds did not increase for some reason repeat
    2. Vol4ara 6 January 2020 10: 33 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      They unwound the car ... The conveyor is working. With such aggressive marketing, it’s not surprising that sales are growing ... Now, there would be data on the observability of these invisibilities by Russian systems ... Sales of our air defense systems would quickly begin to catch up with "their" sales wassat

      Or vice versa no one knows
    3. Bshkaus 6 January 2020 11: 46 New
      • 11
      • 0
      +11
      Sales of our air defense systems would quickly begin to catch up with "their" sales

      When our vaunted S-300/400 and Carapace "fill up" a couple of Israeli F-35s in one air raid, then sales will go uphill.
      In the meantime, Israel is turning Syria as it wants and where it wants.
      And now the question is in the studio, are our vaunted air defense systems really so good, or what is the use of them when those responsible for its use have impotence in deciding on the application?
  • Victoria-V 6 January 2020 09: 43 New
    • 7
    • 16
    -9
    SU-57 will still show itself!
    1. voyaka uh 6 January 2020 10: 00 New
      • 12
      • 3
      +9
      It is quite possible. good
      It is only necessary to bring it into series and complete the 2nd stage.
    2. Karaul73 6 January 2020 10: 23 New
      • 6
      • 8
      -2
      Has already shown in all its glory.
  • The popuas 6 January 2020 10: 02 New
    • 9
    • 3
    +6
    Well done ... what to say!
  • Adimius38 6 January 2020 10: 07 New
    • 14
    • 4
    +10
    Well, ours is up to export potential in comparison with the F-35 as cancer before Paris. Yes, what kind of export is there even if your own army cannot get the Su-57. You can’t argue with the facts. How many of these long-suffering Su-57 units were built ...... and half a thousand f-35s were built. And they continue to increase production further.
  • Kerensky 6 January 2020 10: 09 New
    • 2
    • 6
    -4
    But if he is so good, then there are many of them and it is not necessary. They will quickly destroy all enemies and stand idle.
    1. Zebra 6 January 2020 10: 20 New
      • 11
      • 3
      +8
      Are they guided by this logic not wanting to buy the Su-57?
      1. Kerensky 6 January 2020 10: 25 New
        • 5
        • 5
        0
        Are they guided by this logic not wanting to buy the Su-57?

        Su-57 is not ready yet. What is a first stage engine? They did it themselves, but the engine is still from Zaporozhets, so that it would ride between the shops under its own power ...
        1. Zebra 6 January 2020 10: 32 New
          • 9
          • 4
          +5
          At such a pace of development, it will be ready almost never, not under Putin most likely.
    2. novel66 6 January 2020 10: 24 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      no, they won’t, they can fight with themselves
  • Stirbjorn 6 January 2020 10: 53 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    Of the aircraft delivered in 2019, 81 F-35 fighters were sent to the U.S. armed forces, 53 - to foreign customers.
    Here you have the Fu-35 ... well done Yankees, what can I say, with such volumes you can easily take the Turks away.
  • Udav kaa 6 January 2020 10: 54 New
    • 5
    • 5
    0
    Well, they started singing, I watch nightingales for joy ..))) Guys are not celebrating until you yet! hi
  • askort154 6 January 2020 10: 57 New
    • 6
    • 6
    0
    According to the bmpd blog, to date, 490 F-35 aircraft of all modifications are in operation worldwide. Fighters have flown over 240 thousand hours.

    General statistics look "cool." And if you count the raid on a “scheduled aircraft” (such statistics are kept in aviation for each type of aircraft), then it turns out not “cool”, but very “liquid”. Only 3,7 hours in month on one plane. And the flight crew is even smaller, since one plane needs 2-3 pilots. yes
    1. Zebra 6 January 2020 11: 05 New
      • 9
      • 4
      +5
      You think as if all five hundred aircraft were built, entered the army, and began to fly simultaneously.
      1. askort154 6 January 2020 11: 14 New
        • 5
        • 3
        +2
        Zebra....You think as if all five hundred aircraft were built, entered the army, and began to fly simultaneously.

        I counted from the moment mass production began
        F-35 (2011), based on the figures given in Sathya, according to the methodology adopted in aviation, which is called “flying on a scheduled plane”. hi
        1. Zebra 6 January 2020 11: 17 New
          • 8
          • 5
          +3
          You counted as it suits you, such calculations are called "hospital average." I remind you that mass production unfolded about three years ago, before which individual copies flew.
          And judging by the rhetoric of aviation, you do not even have an indirect relationship.
          1. askort154 6 January 2020 11: 30 New
            • 4
            • 3
            +1
            Zebra.... And judging by the rhetoric about aviation, you don’t even have an indirect relationship

            Clear troll tongue ! Two hours ago I registered on this site, made 9 throws, got 932 minuses for them. You are not as old as I gave to heaven. no yes
            1. Zebra 6 January 2020 11: 38 New
              • 4
              • 3
              +1
              Clear troll tongue! Two hours ago I registered on this site, made 9 throws, got 932 minuses for them. You are not as old as I gave to heaven.
              Quote: askort154
              Clear troll tongue! Two hours ago I registered on this site, made 9 throws, got 932 minuses for them. You are not as old as I gave to heaven.

              Now, count the raid on the paylist for the Su-35. I'm waiting.
    2. Looking for 6 January 2020 17: 29 New
      • 1
      • 2
      -1
      Here are just western indicators customized to Soviet-Russian standards. The average flight time on an airplane is 490 hours.
  • Lord of the Sith 6 January 2020 11: 22 New
    • 5
    • 8
    -3
    Not such a tricky scheme as milking your partners (vassals).
    Tear off three skins from them to buy an expensive and not very reliable jet, and forcibly, putting them on the needle, they themselves build / modify old but reliable fu-15 \ 16.

    And fu-35 for vassals you never know what cunning electronics stuffed, for control)
    1. Zebra 6 January 2020 11: 27 New
      • 2
      • 3
      -1
      It seems that initially they planned to produce f-15s only for the National Guard, by which the f-35 was not assigned by status. And then Boeing's lobby pushed him into the army behind the beat.
    2. Evgeny Goncharov (smoogg) 6 January 2020 15: 11 New
      • 1
      • 2
      -1
      Envy is bad. You can do 5-ku in cooperation with LDNR.
  • Bshkaus 6 January 2020 11: 33 New
    • 5
    • 1
    +4
    Pl data blog bmpd, today in operation around the world are 490 F-35 aircraft of all modifications. Fighters have flown over 240 thousand hours.

    And according to Alexey Krivoruchko:
    In accordance with the terms of the current contract, during this and next year we expect to receive another 20 Su-35S fighters ”

    We would have their pace (((
  • lopuhan2006 6 January 2020 11: 34 New
    • 9
    • 2
    +7
    Quote: mvg
    Of course a piece of marriage. 500 pieces, 300 thousand flying hours, a couple pieces fell. Su 57 10 pcs, one burned out, one fell, another couple of emergency situations, the top of reliability. At the same time they fly on old proven engines and with rotten radar. Well, what is there? Of course, the American d..mo, so they will make 3000+ pcs.

    I wanted to write the same thing!) Someone else said about trampolines, so soon we will use them ourselves. F-15 see
    whether it’s old, and the Su-35 is new without AFAR. How free-running urya-patriots freeze. Can you pull logs out of your eyes? Yes, look around! For pind .. it’s not a problem to finish off the F-35, and then calmly go to the 6th generation. And that something tells me that we will still hang around with the fifth.
    1. Alf
      Alf 6 January 2020 17: 26 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: lopuhan2006
      And that something tells me that we will still hang around with the fifth.

      The day before yesterday already flashed info that Russia is starting to develop a sixth generation fighter. Maybe a fake.
  • Wolf 6 January 2020 12: 35 New
    • 0
    • 3
    -3
    THEY ARE READY FOR A GREAT WAR !!!
  • rocket757 6 January 2020 13: 05 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    There is nothing to argue about.
    Who did not have time, he laces in the tail .... For
  • Dzafdet 6 January 2020 15: 38 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    With each F-35, the customer should receive two boxes of condoms. 950 critical flaws for a production aircraft - this is unacceptable.
  • Looking for 6 January 2020 17: 21 New
    • 1
    • 3
    -2
    I advise all the captains to watch the documentary series War of the Factories. and imagine at least the future of Russia.
  • Aleks2000 6 January 2020 17: 27 New
    • 1
    • 4
    -3
    Our media cheers once again about ... were wrong ....
  • Looking for 6 January 2020 17: 34 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    Quote: Kerensky
    They will quickly destroy all enemies and stand idle.

    your irony is out of place. Then fit your ass hair.
  • lopuhan2006 6 January 2020 21: 07 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    Quote: Alf
    Quote: lopuhan2006
    And that something tells me that we will still hang around with the fifth.

    The day before yesterday already flashed info that Russia is starting to develop a sixth generation fighter. Maybe a fake.

    I am very sorry to state this, but there is not a single real premise of a cardinal change in the situation in industry for the creation of the 6th generation, because this is a completely different level. The whole world works in the USA. We are forced to achieve everything ourselves and the forces are not equal. And further the gap will widen. The fish rots from the head. Several generations have been brought up already without a goal, without ideas, without ideals that are planted on the needle of pseudo-values ​​and pseudo-prosperity. And the authorities are already the children of the nomenclature with such a "conscience." So the look into the future is very pessimistic.
    1. maden.usmanow 7 January 2020 08: 38 New
      • 3
      • 2
      +1
      Haha Blaming the new generation. Are they in power now? Are youth issuing laws, sitting in the government?
      Very funny
  • lopuhan2006 7 January 2020 15: 39 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    Quote: maden.usmanow
    Haha Blaming the new generation. Are they in power now? Are youth issuing laws, sitting in the government?
    Very funny

    Do you carefully read the text, or run along the tops? The children of the nomenclature are already quite old and quite already in power already (Mr. Rogozin and K can explain to you in more detail). And they did not grow up in an atmosphere of patriotism, I assure you) You are either a troll or a stupid one) And then and then it suits you .....