Helicopters Ka-52 and AH-64D Apache are shown on the deck of UDC "Mistral" of the Egyptian Navy during exercises

63

The Egyptian Navy demonstrated maneuvers using a landing ship of the Mistral type. This is one of those ships, which at one time was supposed to be part of the Naval fleet Russia on the basis of a contract signed with Paris. As you know, the previous president of France, F. Hollande, banned the supply of Mistral UDC to the Russian Federation, supporting the anti-Russian sanctions regime.

Subsequently, Russia received compensation in the region of 1 billion euros, and Paris ships were sold to Egypt.



Egypt, in its turn, forming the Mistral air wing, ordered Russia to order Ka-52 helicopters. Now it is these helicopters that are used in the maneuvers of the Egyptian Navy. Frames using Russian-made helicopters are shown on Egyptian television channels.

It is worth noting that in addition to the Russian Ka-52s, the Egyptian Navy uses the American Apache as part of the helicopter carrier wing Gamal Abdel Nasser (and this is the former Vladivostok). Also for the landing operation, helicopters SN-47C Chinook are used.



The footage shows how the American AH-64D Apache side by side with the Russian Ka-52, being a helicopter deck group aviation Egyptian naval forces. This is the first case of such a neighborhood.

Conducting exercises with the landing was carried out under the cover of army air defense equipment.

At one stage of the maneuvers, the landing platforms delivered armored vehicles equipped with machine guns to the shore. The landing force immediately entered the battle with a conditional enemy.

The command of the Egyptian forces does not hide the fact that the exercises with landing and the use of attack helicopters are aimed at demonstrating to foreign countries their readiness to defend the interests of Egypt in neighboring Libya. First of all, this is a signal from Turkey, which intends to send its military contingent to Libya to assist the army of Fayez Sarraj.

    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    63 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. 0
      5 January 2020 17: 47
      Without air cover or even a powerful air defense squadron, this is nothing more than a sacrificial lamb.
      1. +15
        5 January 2020 17: 55
        Will cover where they go. The main thing is that Egypt has it, and our only "Kuznetsov" is undergoing overhaul. And it's not clear yet, maybe they will write it off for scrap. I keep quiet about the prospects of carrier-based aviation.
        1. +18
          5 January 2020 18: 02
          Well, here is not the only Kuznetsov. Normal DBKshki die.

          Orsk - 51 years old noted and died.



          The diesel engine of the main power plant is out of order. I had to call a tug and drag home.
          1. +9
            5 January 2020 18: 31
            Yeah, old man, his architecture is the late 50s, "Striped flight" is immediately remembered.

            This is not, of course, about the location of the MCO and the add-on.
          2. +5
            5 January 2020 18: 37
            Quote: donavi49
            Orsk - 51 years old noted and died.

            Well, let's not be so categorical, maybe for now it's just a "heart attack" ...))) Maybe even "mother mechanics" are leaving him ...
        2. 0
          5 January 2020 19: 26
          so Egypt will sell us this "Vladivostok" with the Apaches "for stability in the eastern Mediterranean.
          and Orsk -Chita need to be changed by something
          1. +1
            5 January 2020 23: 56
            Quote: antivirus
            so Egypt will sell us this "Vladivostok" with the Apaches "

            A "end-use agreement" is ALWAYS issued for such machinery and equipment, where the seller restricts the buyer to transfer the property to third parties and / or to the area of ​​use of this property.
      2. 0
        5 January 2020 18: 20
        There was some kind of F-16 flickering, indicating air cover
      3. +3
        5 January 2020 18: 32
        I wonder how the Egyptians manage to exploit such a large and complex barn? Or is there a French crew?
        1. +9
          5 January 2020 19: 15
          The Egyptians are also people, and also trained (albeit difficult to learn).
          1. +2
            5 January 2020 19: 30
            Quote: Kleber
            The Egyptians are also people, and also trained (albeit difficult to learn).

            they say the ancients ...
            1. +4
              6 January 2020 00: 32
              These are what the Egyptians are now, not at all ancient.
              These are Arabs.
              And those that were previously Egyptians were yellow-haired. Who does not believe, look at the murals of the Josser Pyramid (the oldest of all) - there are murals and painted bas-reliefs.
              And the Arabs learn with difficulty.
              With difficulty, but trained.
        2. +1
          6 January 2020 18: 55
          I give a guarantee, there half of the generals who followed the maneuvers were trained in the union.
      4. The comment was deleted.
      5. +1
        5 January 2020 20: 03
        The evangers are standing on the deck. What is not air defense laughing
        1. 0
          6 January 2020 11: 07
          That's right, there are two AN / TWQ-1 Avenger complexes based on the Humvee on the UDC deck.
    2. 0
      5 January 2020 17: 52
      I don’t know what this Apache is worth, but it looks like a vile insect.
      1. +2
        5 January 2020 18: 05
        I don’t know what this Apache is worth, but it looks like a vile insect.

        The taste and color, as they say. Someone likes Apache, someone Alligator, and someone Night Hunter.
        1. +14
          5 January 2020 19: 11
          I don’t know what this Apache is worth, but it looks like a vile insect.

          maybe so, but only in fact the best attack helicopter in the world, ours, unfortunately, are very behind in avionics and weapons, and in reliability too
          1. +5
            5 January 2020 20: 22
            Quote: _Ugene_
            I don’t know what this Apache is worth, but it looks like a vile insect.

            maybe so, but only in fact the best attack helicopter in the world, ours, unfortunately, are very behind in avionics and weapons, and in reliability too

            Who compared where and when? Virtually - does not count. It should be like this: completed the task / did not. Other - advertising husk.
            1. +2
              5 January 2020 21: 59
              Quote: Doliva63
              It should be like this: completed the task / did not complete. Other - advertising husk.

              Not as an advertisement, but the Swedish comparison in real conditions of the Mi-28 & AN-64 is interesting ... I will not suggest, but some sources claim that -28 successfully completed only 18 tasks against 2 ..., well, the price is down twice. This of course happened a long time ago, but I think that -28 has not lost its main properties ...
            2. +1
              5 January 2020 22: 30
              if you carefully read the existing info on this technique, and not just listen to propaganda, then there are no questions left, and the buyer votes in rubles, or rather in dollars
        2. 0
          5 January 2020 20: 18
          Quote: Jack O'Neill
          I don’t know what this Apache is worth, but it looks like a vile insect.

          The taste and color, as they say. Someone likes Apache, someone Alligator, and someone Night Hunter.

          And for me - Mi-8. Although a supporter of coaxial, but the "eight" is a well-deserved beauty! Just in fact. drinks )
      2. +10
        5 January 2020 19: 33
        Quote: Doliva63
        I don’t know what this Apache is worth, but it looks like a vile insect.

        I do not like Americans, but I have to admit that the "Apache" is more perfect than ours ...
    3. +5
      5 January 2020 17: 53
      The command of the Egyptian forces does not hide the fact that the exercises with landing and the use of attack helicopters are aimed at demonstrating to foreign countries their readiness to defend the interests of Egypt in neighboring Libya.
      Tied in Libya a bundle worse than the Syrian
      1. +1
        5 January 2020 18: 29
        Egypt, emnip, supports Haftar, and Turkey stands for Sarajah. Oh, Suleiman will tear. I bit a batch - I climbed into Syria, the Kurds again, got naughty with Hamas, graters with Israel, a gas pipeline, Cyprus, Greece ... And I also climbed into Libya. And there is Egypt!
        1. +2
          5 January 2020 18: 45
          Quote: Abbot
          . I bit a batch - I climbed into Syria, the Kurds again, got naughty with Hamas, graters with Israel, a gas pipeline, Cyprus, Greece ... And I also climbed into Libya. And there is Egypt!

          This is called "spreading influence" in the power variant.
          Oh, tear
          It is possible, but great Turkic dreams oblige.
          1. -1
            5 January 2020 20: 20
            Quote: Aerodrome
            Quote: Doliva63
            I don’t know what this Apache is worth, but it looks like a vile insect.

            I do not like Americans, but I have to admit that the "Apache" is more perfect than ours ...

            and for enemies, was needed as "aybolit"? I am also for the "Apache" I am sorry to admit it, but it seems that we have problems with "Serdyukov" in the helicopter industry ... sarcasm ... it seems not only there.
            1. 0
              5 January 2020 20: 31
              Quote: Dead Day
              Quote: Aerodrome
              Quote: Doliva63
              I don’t know what this Apache is worth, but it looks like a vile insect.

              I do not like Americans, but I have to admit that the "Apache" is more perfect than ours ...

              and for enemies, was needed as "aybolit"? I am also for the "Apache" I am sorry to admit it, but it seems that we have problems with "Serdyukov" in the helicopter industry ... sarcasm ... it seems not only there.

              before him we had problems in helicopters. but now it seems to multiply ....
    4. +3
      5 January 2020 17: 54
      First of all, this is a signal from Turkey, which intends to send its military contingent to Libya to assist the army of Fayez Sarraj.
      Absolutely on the side which turntables will give Erdogan a beard. The main thing is that the result is.
      The proximity of Russian and American turntables on the same deck is the cost of military trade. Sometimes this does not happen. Weapons certainly have a nationality, but more important is the hardness of the hand holding a sword and a clear head controlling it. So you can quite successfully purchase at different bazaars, if your forge is not.
      1. 0
        5 January 2020 19: 44
        If you have money, you can buy everything, but what about spare parts in a combat situation?
      2. -1
        5 January 2020 20: 32
        Quote: Thunderbolt
        First of all, this is a signal from Turkey, which intends to send its military contingent to Libya to assist the army of Fayez Sarraj.
        Absolutely on the side which turntables will give Erdogan a beard. The main thing is that the result is.
        The proximity of Russian and American turntables on the same deck is the cost of military trade. Sometimes this does not happen. Weapons certainly have a nationality, but more important is the hardness of the hand holding a sword and a clear head controlling it. So you can quite successfully purchase at different bazaars, if your forge is not.

        cool ... then buy a reputation.
        1. 0
          6 January 2020 00: 52
          consumer versus marketing nothing
      3. 0
        5 January 2020 20: 38
        Quote: Thunderbolt
        Weapons certainly have a nationality, but more important is the hardness of the hand holding a sword and a clear head controlling it.

        And in our sad times, clauses in the contract are even more important, against whom, when, you can apply it and who owes you your right to sign and authorize it.

        And then you will find yourself in the pose of the Argentines in which none of the purchased French missiles exploded when hit. But there’s no type in the contract of the right to shoot the British .. laughing
        1. 0
          5 January 2020 22: 32
          Quote: Saxahorse
          And then you will find yourself in the pose of the Argentines in which none of the purchased French missiles exploded when hit.

          An interesting point. When it was?
          1. 0
            6 January 2020 00: 05
            Apparently it means the war over the Falkland Islands, but I don't remember any big shit about the missiles there. Here is the fact that there were few such missiles (anti-ship missiles), yes, but the fact that they "did not explode" I don’t remember, but on the other hand, I didn’t look for such information.
        2. mvg
          +2
          6 January 2020 00: 52
          none of the purchased french missiles exploded on hit

          And Atlantis himself drown?
        3. +3
          6 January 2020 01: 57
          Exosets regularly exploded and drowned English ships, although not always the ones they were aimed at. And the American bombs did not explode. If they had exploded from the English squadron, there would have been nothing really left.
          1. -1
            6 January 2020 21: 51
            Quote: Pavel57
            Exosets regularly exploded and drowned English ships

            They claim that the Exocet warheads never exploded. For the destruction of both the destroyers and Atlantis, there was enough residual rocket fuel, in fact the ships died from fires.
            On May 4, 1982, the Exoset rocket from an Argentine attack aircraft sank the British destroyer URO Sheffield of type 42. The missile, which hit the ship’s hull, did not explode, but caused a fire that easily spread over the destroyer’s superstructure and resulted in the death of the ship.
            1. 0
              6 January 2020 23: 24
              But the 20% of the detonated ammunition was more than enough to destroy six ships of the British squadron!
              - the destroyer "Sheffield" - burned down from unexploded PKR "Exochet";
              - the destroyer "Coventry" - died under the bombs of Argentine stormtroopers;
              - the frigate "Ardent" - numerous hits of aerial bombs, explosion of ammunition cellars;
              - frigate "Antilup" - two unexploded bombs, detonation when attempting to mine;
              - air transport “Atlantic Conveyor” - simultaneous entry of two Exocset anti-ship missiles;
              - the previously mentioned landing ship "Sir Galahad" - the damage was so severe that the British had to flood the ship into the Atlantic


              Apparently, 3 more missiles did not hit the target. Since there were only 6 aviation missiles.

              Having spent a reserve of anti-ship "Exosets" of airborne, the Argentines went on to improvise. From the old destroyer Segui, local craftsmen removed and reprogrammed two Ship-based Exosets - both missiles were transported by plane to the Falkland Islands, where they were secretly deployed to the coast waiting for British ships. Targeting was issued by the army mobile radar RASIT.

              12 June 1982 of the year under fire from the coast hit the destroyer "Glemmorgan" - the first missile missed, the second struck on the upper deck near the helipad and exploded, forming a 5-meter hole. The fragments and products of the explosion penetrated into the helicopter hangar, where at that time there was a fully fueled helicopter. The fire raged for four hours, 14 sailors died in the fight against fire. The next day, with the help of the shipmaster, the destroyer managed to regain limited combat capability.


              https://topwar.ru/25339-gibel-korabley-epizody-folklendskoy-voyny.html
              1. 0
                7 January 2020 01: 50
                Quote: Pavel57
                Apparently, 3 more missiles did not hit the target. Since there were only 6 aviation missiles.

                Three out of six missiles hit, two more Exocet missiles were shot down by the Sea Wulf air defense system, another was carried away by passive jamming delivered in time from the frigate Plymouth.

                I remember these stories from V. Dotsenko's book "Fleets in local conflicts in the second half of the XX century". It mentions a huge number of high-tech weapon failures. In addition to missiles, you can, for example, recall the Argentine submarine "San Luis" three times overshooting the most modern guided torpedoes of American and German production from 10000 meters, 4600 meters and 2800 meters.
                1. 0
                  8 January 2020 12: 22
                  The Falklands showed that any weapon is not absolutely- RCC can be shot down and taken away from the target by interference. And old bombs don't explode.
                  1. 0
                    9 January 2020 00: 11
                    Quote: Pavel57
                    Falklands showed that any weapon is not absolutely

                    Not only the Falklands, but in WWII the Germans realized only a year later that almost all of their torpedoes did not explode :) However, stepping on the same rake after 40 years is also cool. :)

                    By the way, I read about the "destroyer" Glamorgan "", it looks like some eyewitness came up with details about the missile that struck the deck laughing In general, she, too, did not explode, like the two that fell into Atlantis. :) In other sources, they say simply about getting the destroyer into the stern and a very strong fire.

                    By the way, the article by Kaptsov about the Falklands that you cited from 2013 looks very frivolous.
    5. 0
      5 January 2020 18: 28
      The most colorful there is a frigate with a rusty side! belay see it for wear, they drive it, since there is not enough time to paint as needed. ..
      1. -1
        5 January 2020 20: 36
        Quote: Thrifty
        The most colorful there is a frigate with a rusty side! see it for wear, they drive it, since there is not enough time to paint as needed.

        LLC very high rating of combat readiness! fellow
    6. +1
      5 January 2020 18: 36
      On the deck, this is of course interesting, it is clear that the Apache does not have an overhead radar, but it would be more interesting for me to look at the hangar ...
      1. -1
        5 January 2020 20: 34
        Quote: svp67
        On the deck, this is of course interesting, it is clear that the Apache does not have an overhead radar, but it would be more interesting for me to look at the hangar ...

        go Sergey ... drinks
        1. 0
          6 January 2020 05: 57
          Quote: Aerodrome
          go Sergey ...

          If I had the opportunity, I would love to walk along its ramps and decks, I would remember youth
          1. 0
            6 January 2020 05: 58
            Quote: svp67
            Quote: Aerodrome
            go Sergey ...

            If I had the opportunity, I would love to walk along its ramps and decks, I would remember youth
            did you serve on the mistral, sir?
            1. 0
              6 January 2020 06: 09
              Quote: Dead Day
              did you serve on the mistral, sir?

              No, on duty, "went" as a "passenger on our BDK"
    7. 0
      5 January 2020 19: 21
      Quote: Vladimir_2U
      Without air cover or even a powerful air defense squadron, this is nothing more than a sacrificial lamb.

      On bezryby and RIM-116 air defense.
      1. +1
        5 January 2020 20: 01
        So there it is clearly visible that on the deck of the M-998 Avenger stand laughing
        Even Kuznetsova recalls with his gifts.
        1. 0
          5 January 2020 20: 08
          what Yes ... so to speak, the last frontier! Well, well, it’s very convenient, for example, if the attack is on the other side, you can quickly drive up to the other side and hit with an entire arsenal wassat
    8. -1
      5 January 2020 19: 42
      The Egyptians should have called the helicopter carrier "General Taburetkin". The title would be epic.
    9. -5
      5 January 2020 19: 55
      Quote: _Ugene_
      maybe so, but only in fact the best attack helicopter in the world, ours, unfortunately, are very behind in avionics and weapons, and in reliability too

      fellow I read the wiki?
    10. -2
      5 January 2020 19: 56
      Quote: Chaldon48
      If you have money, you can buy everything, but what about spare parts in a combat situation?

      why do they need a subject? Well, for the purpose? to drop a landing party from the chinook on guadeloupe?
    11. -1
      5 January 2020 20: 14
      Wow, the regionals are rattling their muscles. The main thing then will be reconciled as always Russia.
    12. -3
      5 January 2020 20: 14
      Quote: Aerodrome
      Quote: Doliva63
      I don’t know what this Apache is worth, but it looks like a vile insect.

      I do not like Americans, but I have to admit that the "Apache" is more perfect than ours ...

      Apache - the development of the 70s, what is the perfection?
      1. +1
        5 January 2020 22: 52
        Quote: Doliva63
        Quote: Aerodrome
        Quote: Doliva63
        I don’t know what this Apache is worth, but it looks like a vile insect.

        I do not like Americans, but I have to admit that the "Apache" is more perfect than ours ...

        Apache - the development of the 70s, what is the perfection?

        ====
        2020, and the device is still in the top of the best
    13. 0
      5 January 2020 20: 40
      Somehow, everything is not briskly happening with them. In the program I serve the Soviet Union, everything looked more cheerful.
    14. +2
      5 January 2020 21: 08
      suddenly the fleet of Egypt gained weight)))
    15. 0
      5 January 2020 22: 57
      "mistrals" would not interfere, but they will spray a billion, or have already sprayed on different
    16. -1
      6 January 2020 17: 52
      Quote: Doliva63
      ... Who compared where and when? ...

      So the Americans themselves wrote that their helicopters are the best in the world ... Well, that means it's true ...
    17. -1
      6 January 2020 17: 54
      Quote: Victorio
      ..
      2020, and the device is still in the top of the best

      C'mon. A well-selling one, such as is often used, such as childhood illnesses, according to the Americans, has been eliminated, well, NATO is obliged to buy Apaches, as well as other US allies, because the USA said that this is the best helicopter.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"