Iran appealed to UN Security Council on the assassination of General Suleymani

118

The Iranian leadership took the initiative in the UN to consider the issue of the assassination of General Suleymani at the Security Council of this international organization. We are talking about the liquidation in Iraq of the commander of the Al-Quds division, Kassem Suleimani. This statement was made by the official representative of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Iran Abbas Mousavi. At today's briefing, he announced the following:

The Iranian Foreign Ministry has already initiated political, legal and international measures, including at the UN Security Council level.

The day before yesterday, the US military eliminated General Kassem Suleimani, as well as the deputy commander of the pro-Iranian Shiite group, Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, in Iraq.



Then followed a speech by the supreme leader of Iran, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, in which he threatened retaliation to the organizers of the murder.

Now, official Tehran is demanding that the UN Security Council condemn the American operation, the main purpose of which was the elimination of a senior Iranian military during a visit to Iraq.

It is worth recalling that the United States, as a permanent member of the UN Security Council, has a “veto” right, which, of course, Washington will take advantage of if the issue comes to consideration.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    118 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. -3
      5 January 2020 18: 15
      Well, that's revenge !!
      1. +22
        5 January 2020 18: 18
        "Iraqi parliament voted to terminate the agreement with the coalition on the orbit with IS and for the withdrawal of foreign troops from the country" - News of the last hour.
        You wait, it's silly to get all the cards right away.
        1. -21
          5 January 2020 18: 23
          Quote: Black_Jacket
          "Iraqi parliament voted to terminate the agreement with the coalition on the orbit with IS and to withdraw foreign troops from the country"

          Do not give out what is desired, as valid.
          1. +19
            5 January 2020 18: 26
            What exactly am I giving out as valid? I did not come up with this news)

            https://ria.ru/20200105/1563130890.html
            1. +6
              5 January 2020 18: 49
              Quote: tihonmarine
              Quote: Black_Jacket
              "Iraqi parliament voted to terminate the agreement with the coalition on the orbit with IS and to withdraw foreign troops from the country"

              Do not give out what is desired, as valid.


              But this is the election promise of candidate Trump, it seems he will fulfill it.
              1. -3
                5 January 2020 20: 03
                And then what will be the revenge of Iran? Is it that enemy soldiers will return home after completing all tasks?
                1. +10
                  5 January 2020 20: 32
                  And where does the revenge of Iran? Take your time Iran knows how to withstand a pause.
                  1. +6
                    5 January 2020 23: 10
                    Iran wants to know WHO will support it in this initiative.
                    He knows the US will veto. Just a very convenient "litmus test" - who is for.
                    Yes, and simply can not silently bear this insult.
                    Actions, of course, will be. And there will be a lot of blood in this action. But then. So far, diplomacy.
                    1. +1
                      6 January 2020 09: 12
                      All normal countries think so, but everyone plays their games ...
                  2. 0
                    6 January 2020 09: 46
                    Quote: cniza
                    And where does the revenge of Iran? Take your time Iran knows how to withstand a pause.

                    There will be nothing serious, perhaps they will try to attack the oil bases of the SA again, they will not get away a second time, they have their own vulnerable infrastructure, in short, Iran has a thin intestine. By the way, this murder can be regarded as revenge for the attack of drones on the oil facilities of Saudi Arabia, it is very similar to the work of Suleymani
                2. +4
                  5 January 2020 21: 27
                  Quote: Morrrow
                  And then what will be the revenge of Iran?
                  Revenge is served cold. Immediately wave a rolling pin or a bat, this is the lot of a cook or a banditagan, but here you need to think in order to deliver such a blow that will cause maximum damage.
                  Quote: Morrrow
                  Is it that enemy soldiers will return home after completing all tasks?
                  Yeah. And probably many in zinc.
                3. +1
                  6 January 2020 05: 58
                  And then what will be the revenge of Iran? Is it that enemy soldiers will return home after completing all tasks?


                  Do not look at the situation superficially, if the Yankees succeed in driving out BV, some will be very sad.
              2. +5
                6 January 2020 00: 01
                The Americans themselves create a precedent when it is possible to destroy an undesirable figure, while not bearing any responsibility! Or is it possible ONLY AMERICANS ???????? belay
                1. +1
                  6 January 2020 06: 59
                  The Americans themselves create a precedent when it is possible to destroy an undesirable figure, while not bearing any responsibility!

                  It depends. They tried to kill pensioner Skripal, and the noise was in the world, as if the war had begun, the diplomats were recalled.
            2. 0
              5 January 2020 21: 58
              Quote: Black_Jacket
              What exactly am I giving out as valid? I did not come up with this news)

              Everyone knows the news, but it's not about the news. But in reality. Did you believe that after the statement by Iraq, the US will withdraw the troops with a fright? Do not withdraw.
              1. -2
                6 January 2020 02: 32
                About zinc is yours. So far in zinc supergenral Suleymani
                1. 0
                  6 January 2020 03: 17
                  They’ll even fly in zinc if they don’t clean for good. Recall American casualties during the Iraq War? It's only the beginning...
                  1. -4
                    6 January 2020 03: 37
                    And who told you that the Americans will fight according to the Iraqi scenario, and not according to the Japanese, for example. What will Iran do if dozens of Tridents and Minutemen launch the nuclear war with it?
                    1. +2
                      6 January 2020 03: 52
                      They will not start, because then the Israelis will move in spacesuits across their radioactive desert. Iran can already make a "dirty" bomb.
                      1. 0
                        6 January 2020 16: 15
                        Something the Japanese did not go in spacesuits. Hydrogen bombs are a great weapon, environmentally friendly.
              2. 0
                6 January 2020 11: 15
                Quote: tihonmarine
                Did you believe that after the statement by Iraq, the US will withdraw the troops with a fright? Do not withdraw.

                So that's great! It will be a great example to other states wishing to deploy American bases on their territory. There, the Poles on their knees beg, for example. Although for the proud Poles the lesson will not go to good lol
        2. +5
          5 January 2020 18: 28
          The normal answer! They left Syria, they expose from Iraq, it remains only to merge Afghanistan ...

          https://tass.ru/mezhdunarodnaya-panorama/7468627
        3. +4
          5 January 2020 18: 28
          Quote: Black_Jacket
          "Iraqi parliament voted to terminate the agreement with the coalition on the orbit with IS and to withdraw foreign troops from the country"

          It’s written correctly in this article.
          This decision of the Iraqi parliament can be considered an attempt to declare that Iraq sees himself independent state.
          1. +7
            5 January 2020 18: 29
            Today's official Baghdad is much more dependent on Iran than on the United States.
            1. +6
              5 January 2020 18: 47
              What if the Americans foresaw the result of the Shiite government’s vote, and the assassination of Sulejmani is simply an act of retaliation and impotent rage towards Iran that has completely outplayed the United States in Iraq?
              1. -8
                5 January 2020 20: 05
                What is the replay? The Americans did not pretend to be Iraq. They performed certain tasks there.
                1. +5
                  5 January 2020 21: 50
                  Quote: Morrrow
                  What is the replay? The Americans did not pretend to be Iraq. They performed there specific tasks.

                  ==========
                  Exactly! "definite tasks" for the complete subordination of Iraq and the seizure of the country by the oil industry !! ..... And so - nothing personal ... Just "BUSINESS"! .....
                  1. -3
                    6 January 2020 02: 32
                    The defeat of the IG. There were no others
                2. 0
                  5 January 2020 22: 05
                  Quote: Morrrow
                  The Americans did not pretend to be Iraq. They performed certain tasks there.

                  They came to drink a coffee, sunbathe on the sand, eat felafil.
                3. +1
                  6 January 2020 03: 08
                  The replay is that the Iraqi Parliament unanimously voted for the withdrawal of troops. 170/0 Americans lost TOTALLY!
              2. +1
                5 January 2020 21: 47
                Quote: Connor Macleod
                and the assassination of Suleimani is simply an act of retaliation and powerless rage towards Iran outright outplaying the United States in Iraq?

                =========
                The way it is!!! good Terrorism (including "state") is nothing more than a product of "impotent anger" !!!
      2. +19
        5 January 2020 18: 20
        It’s worthless ... the USA has long scored all the rules .. and the UN after the collapse of the USSR is a worthless organization ..
        1. +3
          5 January 2020 19: 25
          Israel and the United States withdrew from the UN Human Rights Committee.
          And such a Person. As Suleimani in Iran is not and most likely will not be.
        2. +4
          5 January 2020 22: 08
          Quote: Svarog
          and the United Nations after the collapse of the USSR worthless organization ..

          And before the collapse, it also did not really prove itself.
      3. 0
        5 January 2020 18: 23
        Quote: 8200
        Well, that's revenge !!

        oh don't rush ....
        1. -4
          5 January 2020 18: 28
          What if the US does not veto and the UN condemns the "dastardly murder" of the general? Iran will be able to sell it beautifully for internal use and nullify the problem. Surely the diplomats are already discussing the solution of the problem through their own channels.
          1. -5
            5 January 2020 18: 33
            And how can the UN condemn this?
            In the United States, the IRGC is officially listed as a terrorist organization. Formally, the States destroyed the terrorist.
            What side can the UN approach here?
            1. +10
              5 January 2020 18: 51
              This is in the USA, but the UN did not.
            2. +6
              5 January 2020 19: 27
              Formally, the UN did not add the IRGC to the lists of terrorists. The UN Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial Executions, Agnes Callamard, has already spoken out, but something like that. The Security Council will not accept anything, it's over - there is a magic veto. But the United States will again have a soaked reputation.
      4. +8
        5 January 2020 18: 41
        In Africa, they burned a plane and a couple of US Air Force helicopters, maybe everything is just beginning ???
      5. +2
        5 January 2020 19: 16
        Quote: 8200
        Well, that's revenge !!

        If you do not respond
        We will write in Sporloto
        (c) V. Vysotsky
      6. +2
        5 January 2020 21: 25
        Quote: 8200
        Well, that's revenge !!

        =======
        It’s interesting, but WHAT will the Yankees "yell" if THEIR high-ranking officials (diplomats and military) start to "blame" all over the world !!! ???? request fool
        1. 0
          6 January 2020 08: 16
          And they will begin to bring down. Since it is too disappointing for Muslims, the Americans have eliminated the Iranian military that they do not like. Other offenses will be recalled. negative
    2. +3
      5 January 2020 18: 15
      At least it's stupid. Of course they will veto, but time goes by ...
      1. +6
        5 January 2020 19: 01
        Quote: Kerensky
        At least it's stupid. Of course they will veto, but time goes by ...

        These are all diplomatic tricks, in my opinion. So that later Iran could declare that they used all the opportunities. Safety net. Now the UN will scratch turnips, although everything seems to be clear.
        1. -12
          5 January 2020 21: 21
          Quote: Mordvin 3
          These are all diplomatic tricks, in my opinion.

          owls right. stocks will come later. such as blowing up a civilian building in Argentina, this is Iranian style.
          1. +9
            6 January 2020 00: 10
            This is an Israeli style. Do not palm off your shit under others, and then blame the unwanted
          2. The comment was deleted.
            1. +1
              6 January 2020 07: 41
              Quote: Alex Justice
              The actions of Jewish terrorists were not limited to the territory of Palestine; they blew up the British Embassy in Rome [9]. Among the most high-profile attacks of that time, an explosion at the Tsar David Hotel, an explosion at the Semiramis Hotel, the abduction and murder of two sergeants in the British Army,

              I won’t bother with the lists, you can find them yourself if you want, just give one quote from Lenin’s times of your civil war:

              I temporarily advise you to appoint your bosses and shoot conspirators and hesitant, without asking anyone and not allowing idiotic red tape.

              Lenin V.I. Full Sobr. Op. T. 50 S. 165

              ps note this is action against his people, so whose cow would moo.
        2. 0
          5 January 2020 22: 54
          These are all diplomatic tricks, in my opinion. So that later Iran could declare that they used all the opportunities.

          Iranian leadership takes initiative in UN to consider issue

          Vladimir Well, they will appoint them at the end of April ...
          1. 0
            6 January 2020 05: 59
            Quote: Kerensky
            Vladimir Well, they will appoint them at the end of April ...

            As they say, guns are the last argument of kings. In the meantime, let the diplomats work as far as they can.
    3. +1
      5 January 2020 18: 16
      The UN is not Sportloto, and it is necessary to "write" there, but there will not be much sense.
      1. +4
        5 January 2020 18: 26
        Quote: Vladimir_2U
        The UN is not Sportloto, and it is necessary to "write" there, but there will not be much sense.

        and so as not to bomb as a "powderpowel"? no ... they are going the right way, learned, well done. I hope the states too ... will not seem a little ... I really hope.
    4. +5
      5 January 2020 18: 20
      If this is the notorious response, then they are at least meaningless. Well, they parrot a couple of countries at their own peril and risk of the United States and Trump; to a killed general from such an act this would not seem a worthy answer to the crime of the United States and Trump! The answer should be such that the Yankees no longer threaten, at least, the same Iran! Only tough and brutal military actions against American criminals, only coffins, going in a continuous stream to the USA - this is the real answer to the murder.
      1. 0
        5 January 2020 18: 42
        Quote: Thrifty
        If this is the notorious response, then they are at least meaningless. Well, they parrot a couple of countries at their own peril and risk of the United States and Trump; to a killed general from such an act this would not seem a worthy answer to the crime of the United States and Trump! The answer should be such that the Yankees no longer threaten, at least, the same Iran! Only tough and brutal military actions against American criminals, only coffins, going in a continuous stream to the USA - this is the real answer to the murder.
        and how do you represent? What can Iran do? the usa is easy to throw them with tomahawks and the house leads in Iran and the Russian Federation will again have a house on the border! Iran needs to act with such an elephant from an ambush and not directly attack the bases otherwise from Iran, as it is not sad, it will not lag behind, there will not be a mess like in Syria, Libya, etc., and most importantly, ordinary people will suffer the most
      2. -4
        5 January 2020 20: 06
        The United States is a nuclear power with hundreds of ICBMs and thousands of warheads. Do you want Iran to disappear from the map of the earth?
        1. 0
          6 January 2020 08: 19
          The use of nuclear weapons against a non-nuclear power is a political collapse of the US leadership. Therefore, in the event of a war with Iran, the United States will be forced to adhere to the use of effective, but not nuclear weapons.
          1. 0
            6 January 2020 16: 11
            What is a political collapse? Is this captivity near Sedan? Or the capture of Paris in 1940?
    5. +6
      5 January 2020 18: 21
      That in the Security Council, that in Sportloto, no sense. Although Sportloto is cheaper.
    6. The comment was deleted.
      1. +3
        5 January 2020 18: 28
        Iran, I am for you! Yes
        1. -1
          5 January 2020 20: 07
          Quote: Aerodrome
          Iran, I am for you!

          A RESOLUTION AGREED WITH SOFA?
    7. -1
      5 January 2020 18: 29
      Somehow I did not expect a current move from Iran.
    8. +2
      5 January 2020 18: 29
      The United States showed the whole world who without nuclear weapons is the target for them when they want then they will kill! current Iran to do sorties in direct confrontation with Iran not to stop not to defeat nothing to do not even do something but temporarily the United States will break through the defense
    9. +10
      5 January 2020 18: 30
      Well, now that formidable UN will impose severe sanctions against the United States)
      1. +9
        5 January 2020 18: 40
        Well, Iran sailed to the campaign - not really what I wanted. Immediately negotiators.

        Iran declared readiness for talks with US on nuclear deal

        Official Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Abbas Mousavi after the assassination of the United States by Iranian General Kassem Suleimani said Tehran does not refuse negotiations with Washington within the 5 + 1 group.

        “This condition regarding our relations with the USA and discussion of the nuclear deal remains. However, it is necessary to answer what happened, ”RIA Novosti quoted him as saying.

        He also said that the Iranian side does not seek war with the United States, but is ready for any circumstances.

        He noted that Iran will respond to the death of Suleymani. At the same time, Tehran intends to make a decision that will make the US regret, but will not lead to war.


        Under the decision, I’ll wang what thread of CMM will crash into the convoy of Americans and this will be the revenge.
        1. +3
          6 January 2020 00: 12
          Iran has already left this treaty. Your information is incorrect. Is it an Israeli source?
    10. +3
      5 January 2020 18: 39
      ... "Iran appealed to the UN Security Council" ...
      It’s even funny!
      Oh, now probably the world community of Americans will scold, but it will be embarrassing and they won’t do it anymore!
    11. -2
      5 January 2020 18: 44
      Quote: donavi49
      Well, Iran sailed to the campaign - not really what I wanted. Immediately negotiators.

      Iran declared readiness for talks with US on nuclear deal

      Official Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Abbas Mousavi after the assassination of the United States by Iranian General Kassem Suleimani said Tehran does not refuse negotiations with Washington within the 5 + 1 group.

      “This condition regarding our relations with the USA and discussion of the nuclear deal remains. However, it is necessary to answer what happened, ”RIA Novosti quoted him as saying.

      He also said that the Iranian side does not seek war with the United States, but is ready for any circumstances.

      He noted that Iran will respond to the death of Suleymani. At the same time, Tehran intends to make a decision that will make the US regret, but will not lead to war.


      Under the decision, I’ll wang what thread of CMM will crash into the convoy of Americans and this will be the revenge.

      Perhaps someone knows that the average person does not know. After the liquidation, the Iranians immediately began negotiations. Question?
      1. +1
        5 January 2020 21: 40
        Quote: Shahno
        Perhaps someone knows that the average person does not know. After the liquidation, the Iranians immediately began negotiations. Question?

        Everything is a bit wrong:

        Iran announces last stage of reductions in JCPOA commitments
        https://ru.irna.ir/news/83622461/

        Tehran, January 5th. IRNA - The Iranian government in a statement on Sunday announced the waiver of the last key limitation in the nuclear deal regarding the number of centrifuges.

        "In a fifth step in reducing its commitments, Iran is abandoning the last of the key practical constraints in the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) on the number of centrifuges," the Iranian government said in a statement.

        The news has just been published and is marked "News is being added".
    12. +2
      5 January 2020 19: 13
      Then followed a speech by the supreme leader of Iran, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, in which he threatened retaliation to the organizers of the murder.


      This is where we have to start, and all these political curtsies are just noodles on the ears of gullible ones.
      1. -3
        5 January 2020 20: 08
        Vengeance against a nuclear power is fraught - you can see nuclear mushrooms under the window
        1. +1
          5 January 2020 20: 36
          The Americans will never use nuclear weapons, they will simply be afraid of accidents that can provoke a blow already against them. When the British launched a rocket (without a warhead) from a submarine, it already flew in the opposite direction.
          1. -4
            5 January 2020 20: 52
            And in the military doctrine it is written about a preventive nuclear strike. What can be accidents? Those. Hirsimu and Nagasaki were not afraid to erase, but then suddenly they were afraid?
            1. 0
              5 January 2020 20: 58
              I wrote for a reason: "already will not apply. "
              1. -1
                5 January 2020 20: 58
                What will stop them?
    13. +1
      5 January 2020 19: 33
      Yes, just tomatoes will not be delivered to the states!, That’s the whole answer.
    14. The comment was deleted.
      1. 0
        5 January 2020 20: 00
        Yes, the 80-million state, in a sign of jihad against the United States, posted jihad flags at all cathedral mosques, think ...
        1. -5
          5 January 2020 20: 09
          The Japanese did not have Hirostma and Nagasaki. How many cities are the Iranians willing to sacrifice?
          1. +3
            5 January 2020 20: 13
            Iran easily reaches Jerusalem, and - it also has not only a peaceful atom.
            1. -7
              5 January 2020 20: 15
              Iran does not have as many ICBMs as Americans do. and nuclear weapons either. Otherwise, they would have used it, because suffer terrible losses in Syria and Iraq.
              1. +1
                5 January 2020 20: 22
                Do you seriously think that they are starting a nuclear war near by the only country in the world that can wipe them to dust?
                1. -1
                  5 January 2020 20: 24
                  They have it written in the military doctrine. And in the UN charter there is no ban on the use of nuclear weapons for self-defense.
                  1. +3
                    5 January 2020 21: 01
                    One cannot blindly believe what is written in doctrines.
                    1. -2
                      5 January 2020 21: 02
                      What should be believed? What is written in the comments and on the fence?
                  2. 0
                    5 January 2020 22: 18
                    Quote: Morrrow
                    And the UN Charter does not prohibit the use of nuclear weapons for self-defense.

                    Yes, everyone has long forgotten about this Charter.
      2. +1
        6 January 2020 00: 13
        In any case, you also need to be eliminated, you are the same terrorist. And then let them figure it out, is it true or not
    15. +5
      5 January 2020 19: 55
      Murder without trial is a murder. Trump woke up on the 2nd day, after the holidays, with a sore head and a bad mood, let him think I'll kill someone .. And he killed.

      On the good, just such issues should be considered by the same international tribunal in The Hague. However, it is hard to believe that European mongrel even risk dodging the word.
      1. -3
        5 January 2020 20: 09
        What about the attack on the embassy?
        1. +6
          5 January 2020 20: 14
          Quote: Morrrow
          What about the attack on the embassy?

          And the murder of an official public and political figure in another country is that? Do not like it - catch, judge and hang. If you can.

          And so it’s possible to impudently all. The lists are open, there are many more holidays. Once they get away with it, they will openly kill. And there Fidel is ancient, and Maduro is harmful, and Erdogan is uninhabited, and Putin is grumbling and even Xi Zi Ping is stubborn in negotiations.

          Polish fighters, by the way, have been staring at our board number 1 for a long time .. Psheks will shoot at the green card without hesitation.
          1. -6
            5 January 2020 20: 18
            This is retribution for attacking the embassy. Suleimani thought the immortal and Trump were weak. It turned out wrong. Who is to blame for him?
            1. +6
              5 January 2020 20: 27
              Quote: Morrrow
              Trump is a wimp. It turned out wrong.

              Did the Lord God suddenly delegate Trump his authority? Does anyone have witnesses? The tablets there are fiery? Or just someone completely insolent from impunity?

              I repeat what I said. Murder without trial is the murder. Get away this time, they will kill for each holiday.
              1. -3
                5 January 2020 20: 53
                And who gave the authority to kill Heydrich? Ben Ldaen, al-Baghdadi and others? They do not judge in the war.
                1. -1
                  5 January 2020 21: 15
                  Quote: Morrrow
                  And who gave the authority to kill Heydrich? Ben Ldaen, Al Baghdadi and others?

                  Even the US cops who slapped a "nigga" just because they didn't like it, are being tried and how. According to American laws, this is the minimum for life. Because not all states have abolished the death penalty. This is just for those who imagined themselves to be a god ..
                  1. -8
                    5 January 2020 21: 16
                    Terrorists are soaked in the toilet
                    1. +1
                      5 January 2020 21: 17
                      Quote: Morrrow
                      Terrorists are soaked in the toilet

                      Judged first. And then they urinate, up to the loss of the ability to float.
                    2. +3
                      6 January 2020 00: 15
                      That's why don’t go to the toilet. Go for yourself :)
          2. -2
            5 January 2020 22: 25
            Fidel Alejandro Castro Rus - August 13, 1926 - November 25, 2016, the United States was late - Fidel went to eternity on his feet.
        2. -4
          5 January 2020 20: 23
          If this is the US embassy, ​​then they will not get used to it all over the world.
      2. -6
        5 January 2020 21: 19
        And who judged Dudaev, Maskhadov, Basaev?
      3. -2
        5 January 2020 22: 23
        Quote: Saxahorse
        However, it is hard to believe that European mongrel even risk dodging the word.

        When he leaves the presidency, they may be summoned to court, but released "on recognizance not to leave."
    16. +1
      5 January 2020 20: 21
      Quote: opuonmed
      The United States showed the whole world who without nuclear weapons is the target for them when they want then they will kill! current Iran to do sorties in direct confrontation with Iran not to stop not to defeat nothing to do not even do something but temporarily the United States will break through the defense

      Terrorist states do not care who they kill, as long as they spread fear among the people. Those who hinder them the most in other countries - go to the slaughter in the forefront. Imagine for a minute that tomorrow one of our generals will also arrive at the airport in Damascus or Baghdad, or Tripoli, or Kabul at the hour before dawn, and in the same way the United States will lift a UAV into the air and strike this motorcade. How can the government respond? A nuclear strike on Washington? .. The legend is fresh, but hard to believe. This is what is terrible about state terrorism, that it is very difficult, sometimes impossible, to respond to such terrorist attacks, even for those who have nuclear weapons in full, necessary for a retaliatory strike, but a direct, open strike, and not from behind a corner, at night ... to hope that in the end these "avengers" will annoy the public so much, first of all in the USA itself, that a worthy ending will befall them.
      1. 0
        6 January 2020 01: 34
        yes why can’t you be so direct, you need to work thinner
    17. +2
      5 January 2020 20: 40
      This is not bad, even if the Americans at the UN fight back and use the veto! In general, they simply “got overboard”, in World politics, because of such fortunes and wars, they started, though the country was crushed here by the same Americans, but still ..
    18. -2
      5 January 2020 20: 51
      This is what the political and military incentive looks like ... It seems like you want, but you can’t. The same thing happened with our downed bomber in Syria.
    19. 0
      5 January 2020 20: 51
      the United States, as a permanent member of the UN Security Council, has a "veto" right, which, of course, Washington will use if the issue comes to consideration. [b] [
      ... They will certainly take advantage ... But if this question is raised more than once ...
    20. 0
      5 January 2020 21: 01
      What does the UN respond to in light of recent events?
    21. -3
      5 January 2020 21: 17
      and isha one thing shas Iran will not do anything and the usa will do without nuclear countries that it wants from impunity
    22. +2
      5 January 2020 22: 02
      Previously, they were commenting on the Military Review professionally, not all of course, but it was interesting to read. And now ... it would be better if they didn’t write anything, didn’t clog the air. The units remained.
      1. -1
        6 January 2020 01: 36
        Well, not the gods comment on descending from Ararat, comments reflect the audience
    23. +1
      5 January 2020 22: 05
      Quote: Vitaly Gusin
      Quote: Aerodrome
      Iran, I am for you!

      A RESOLUTION AGREED WITH SOFA?

      Aha))) Super ... laughed)))
    24. -2
      5 January 2020 22: 51
      Has Suleimani arrived in Iraq on an official visit or as a tourist?
    25. +1
      5 January 2020 22: 59
      There is an example from our North Korean comrades of how to bend the United States. And Iran is already very close to having nuclear weapons. Although the United States is far away, there are a bunch of American bases and Israel nearby. So the Iranians will not rush with serious "revenge", but they will rush to create nuclear weapons, and then delivery vehicles to ...
    26. +2
      6 January 2020 00: 16
      Here on the branch, it seems, some sort of gathering of the Israelis. Wherever you look everywhere they are
      1. 0
        6 January 2020 00: 50
        What does nationality have to do with it? Speak specifically, name at least a structure that crap, it’s the same as blaming the Russians for the actions of the government of R.F.
    27. +1
      6 January 2020 01: 51
      The UN has already rotted through and through. Little can be achieved through this organization. In general, only power decides. The Americans wanted and eliminated because they could. But Iran cannot.
    28. 0
      6 January 2020 02: 33
      Kapets. They would still complain in Sportloto ...
      The UN will only be able to advise not to escalate, but simply reconcile with the US attacks.
      The only thing is if Iran wants to go through all the possibilities of legal punishment of the States.
      But if the legal possibilities do not work ...
    29. -1
      6 January 2020 09: 35
      The United States itself gave Iran a go-ahead, and to all other countries on whose territories they arbitrarily set up bases and carry shit democracy! As soon as the United States uses the VETO right once again at the UN, this will mean that the USA is a country of terrorist and they must be soaked wherever you meet. The USA drove itself into a corner with its outrage! Now everything will come back to them ...... I think many of those countries that while they vote as America tells them to, actually rub their hands under the table and are only glad that the mattresses are driving themselves into the anus.
    30. -3
      6 January 2020 11: 29
      The Iranian elite (generals of scientists and politicians) have long been shot methodically and cynically ...
      Of course, you need to contact the UN, but this is purely an official
      Recently, Iran-China-Russia exercises took place .. Maybe next time it will be more ambitious to hold and then the UN will speak differently? It is necessary to do something urgently .. The country is simply driven into a house and slaughter ..
      Can in Syria conduct exercises close to military exercises, even in the sky?
    31. 0
      7 January 2020 16: 16
      US provokes Iran to give rise to war. Iran is responsible for the information company. Bravo. Revenge is a cold dish.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"