Resumed supplies of Russian oil to Belarus


On the evening of January 4, pumps were turned on and oil supply to the Belarussian refinery of Naftan OJSC was resumed. This was told to journalists by the deputy head of the Belneftekhim concern Vladimir Sizov.


He also added that the pumping volume will be added, and oil will also go to the Mozyr oil refinery. Sizov said that today, by the end of the day, six thousand tons of raw materials will be pumped.

As for the terms of oil supplies from Russia, the deputy chairman of Belneftekhim noted that they would be determined by the negotiation process. Naturally, the concern will strive to make them as profitable as possible for Minsk, in order to avoid a sharp increase in oil product prices for Belarusian consumers.

Sizov also considers it important to correctly calculate the necessary amount of raw materials supplied, so that the refineries of Belarus do not stand idle. He assumes that from January Minsk will resume shipping oil products abroad, but first of all, the products of oil refineries need to saturate the domestic market.

Regarding the transit of Russian oil through the territory of Belarus, the deputy chairman of Belneftekhim confirmed that it is operating normally, in full accordance with the agreements.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

133 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. gsev 5 January 2020 13: 47 New
    • 31
    • 15
    +16
    Conditions (price and volume of supplies) should be such that the sale of fuel for Ukrainian punishers becomes unprofitable for Lukashenko. This is the only way to compensate for the consequences of stopping the construction of the Nord Stream and the biased Stockholm arbitration.
    1. Finches 5 January 2020 14: 01 New
      • 32
      • 19
      +13
      Joseph Vissarionovich would have long ago solved the problem of fraternal peoples and Belarus and Ukraine! Yes, for this I would have to use the army for a start, but simple people, I’m sure, would have met a Russian soldier with flowers - Lukashenko would have been cut a plot near Rostov ... The top of Ukraine, the old and some others, of course, would have to be sent to the cutting area to Mordovia - there is a lot of blood on them! And the Empire of fraternal Slavic peoples would revive ... But, unfortunately, we cannot accept Ossetia, we can’t return the Donbass - how did it happen with Crimea? GDP in my opinion with Shoigu themselves is still shocked by their courage laughing
      1. Finches 5 January 2020 14: 46 New
        • 13
        • 8
        +5
        It’s interesting - ordinary brothers-Belarusians minus or officials, who, with the loss of artificial independence, will be asked from the feeder? Or ours - opponents of the revival of the Empire ?? laughing
        1. Terenin 5 January 2020 15: 55 New
          • 12
          • 1
          +11
          Quote: Finches
          It’s interesting - ordinary brothers-Belarusians minus or officials, who, with the loss of artificial independence, will be asked from the feeder? Or ours - opponents of the revival of the Empire ?? laughing

          Well, why !? In crucial matters and logical reasoning, cons are also an indicator of the correctness and seriousness of a post.
        2. Fantazer911 5 January 2020 19: 11 New
          • 6
          • 3
          +3
          You are really a fan of inciting Russophobia, I don’t understand. Belarusians didn’t give a damn about you, don’t speak for politicians and the like, people are not politicians, they are hungry for profit and you don’t have to mix everyone in one pile, you can minus it!
        3. antivirus 5 January 2020 22: 59 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          a good person is so distinguished, not by "sweets"
      2. carstorm 11 5 January 2020 14: 49 New
        • 19
        • 8
        +11
        about how. Do you need more blood again? common people would meet with flowers aha. something in Ukraine ordinary people are talking about something completely different. as for the Crimea, this strategic decision was one that could not be taken. and believe me, no matter how hard it may sound, Crimeans there were not the most important argument.
        1. Finches 5 January 2020 14: 52 New
          • 14
          • 8
          +6
          So what to do? The longer the disease starts, the more complicated the operation! That is, you are from defeatists! Over the centuries, our ancestors built the Great State on their blood, and here three small dykes broke everything in the Belovezhskaya Pushcha, and you reconciled .... Your right - but I do not! And in this case, not every patient understands that only after going through the pain of treatment will complete recovery hi
          1. carstorm 11 5 January 2020 15: 02 New
            • 8
            • 5
            +3
            what does the defeatist have to do with it? I live now and not 30 years ago in this country and in this world. Do not offer pain to my children. they did not know that time and they have nowhere to return. With these words, you probably want to take everything from them. ordinary egoism.
            1. Finches 5 January 2020 15: 10 New
              • 6
              • 11
              -5
              This is defeatism! What will disappear in your children - if Belarus becomes a full-fledged republic of Russia, as it was historically predetermined? Having left the USSR, Ukraine lost everything that it had and was mired in the internecine war and the rampant nationalism - a world that only Russia can bring to Ukraine, what will your children lose? And with what, but egoism does not smell here! There is a little great-power chauvinism, but healthy great-power chauvinism!
              1. carstorm 11 5 January 2020 15: 22 New
                • 6
                • 7
                -1
                what’s going to disappear from them?) you wanted to take everything back through the blood. Think whether our children need it or not. will not be evolutionarily opposed. but you offer these very children to drive blood. understand this you need. everyone who lived then needed. everyone who needs to remember. and to the young it’s all alien. it’s not their desire and there is no need for them to fight, do not understand why. I understand you, although I do not agree, but my children, for example, do not even understand why and for what. For my daughter, RB is a place where she is visiting sisters. She knows that this is another country and she lives in Russia. everything is very simple.
                1. Finches 5 January 2020 15: 28 New
                  • 6
                  • 9
                  -3
                  I do not think that in the case of Belarus it will come to blood ... By the nature of my service, I had to communicate with rather high-ranking officers of the Belorussian army in an informal setting, which allowed me to draw some conclusions! In the case of Ukraine, the problems will only be with the National Bats, but not very long, but here, unfortunately, we are missing time! However, special problems should also not arise! With Georgia, according to our tradition, we did not bring things to mind - we had to enter Tbilisi ... So you don’t worry - anyway, unfortunately, there is no main thing - political will!
                  And, with my critical attitude to the modern Russian army, young people think in it, fortunately not like you are ready to fulfill any order! Further, I had the honor to teach at the university and am very knowledgeable about the mood of our youth! hi
                  1. Oyo Sarkazmi 5 January 2020 15: 42 New
                    • 12
                    • 2
                    +10
                    Quote: Finches
                    I do not think that in the case of Belarus it will come to blood ...

                    It won’t get to the blood, but to the money - for sure. Especially with Ukraine, now 2 dozen Crimean bridges need to be swelled into it, so that they become in order, as in Russian Mukhosransk. Do we need it now?
                    Belarusians are still sitting on Russian subsidies, and they are cheating on Russia. They have oil at a preferential price, they APU diesel fuel at a preferential price. We give them complete freedom to truckers, ours is completely prohibited. Polish apples, salmon Norwegian smuggling. In general, it is time to accustom them to the real independence. And then they were lying near Russia, receiving promises of bread and butter.
                    1. Finches 5 January 2020 15: 44 New
                      • 1
                      • 5
                      -4
                      Money, yes! But it will be a payment for our common betrayal in 1991 and our Russian indecision in all subsequent ones!
                      1. Winnie76 5 January 2020 16: 26 New
                        • 3
                        • 2
                        +1
                        Quote: Finches
                        Money, yes! But it will be a payment for our common betrayal in 1991 and our Russian indecision in all subsequent ones!

                        Zyablitsev, our people do not really eat much. And if you also attach a country of 35 million, the standard of living will surely decline by a factor of two. Plus the costs of economic recovery - roads, nuclear power plants, bridges, etc. Plus a wide guerrilla movement inside.
                        What you offer is yet another turmoil and the end of the Russian Federation.
                      2. Finches 5 January 2020 16: 28 New
                        • 2
                        • 6
                        -4
                        And the ancestors were fools-they added new lands to Russia ....
                      3. Winnie76 5 January 2020 16: 47 New
                        • 6
                        • 0
                        +6
                        Quote: Finches
                        And the ancestors were fools - they added new lands to Russia

                        There was another time. Joining the territory meant moving flags on the map and building fortresses to protect the borders. It didn’t care about people.
                        Now if you want a loyal population - provide him with housing, infrastructure, jobs. Did not provide the required standard of living - get the stigma of the occupier, hissing around the corner, sabotage in the field, sabotage and murder. And at the first opportunity, this territory will run away.
                        A vivid example is the Baltic countries. Attached to the Second World War, invested in them, groomed and cherished, and what did they get?
                      4. anykin 5 January 2020 23: 37 New
                        • 1
                        • 0
                        +1
                        Quote: Finches
                        And the ancestors were fools-they added new lands to Russia ....

                        Attach and stick without joining are two different things.
              2. carstorm 11 5 January 2020 15: 57 New
                • 9
                • 3
                +6
                in the case of Ukraine, in your calculations, you make the main and most important critical mistake, considering that the National Battles will only make up complexity. tired of arguing on this topic but nonetheless. in order to deal with Ukraine, a group of at least 300000 people is needed to start the movement. this does not include reserves and echelons. no matter what the Ukrainian army is, it will respond to a full-scale invasion and foolishly underestimate the mobilization reserve. the length of the common border is 2295 km pancake. these areas must also be closed. It is necessary to strengthen the Russian Guard as it is necessary to ensure police functions when entering the rear. filter the population to identify all who are dangerous. build filtration camps throughout the course of the movement. etc. etc. this war will end with the collapse of the country because it will suck everything. This is not Georgia. it's the basics damn it. I’m generally silent about the fact that everything you want to free must also be kept.
                1. Finches 5 January 2020 16: 04 New
                  • 6
                  • 7
                  -1
                  You are utter nonsense! I apologize! And militarily, and politically and economically and humanly! If you don’t want restoration within the common borders and reunification of our peoples - just write it! Because who wants to seek opportunities, and who does not want to seek excuses! hi
                  1. carstorm 11 5 January 2020 16: 12 New
                    • 8
                    • 2
                    +6
                    I tell you how any military invasion of a state in which there is an army and 40 million people will take place. with which is a huge border. which has some kind of air defense and which our well-wishers simply flood with help. drawn into this conflict, the Russian Federation will lose everything even if it wins. and this is what everyone wants from us so that we cease to exist. I remind you that in small Finland we entered 4 armies. over 400000 people.
                  2. Alexga 5 January 2020 18: 55 New
                    • 6
                    • 2
                    +4
                    Interfering in your conversation. You can’t count on an invasion of Ukraine at all, bad job. Let me remind you that after the liberation of Ukraine during the Second World War, the Soviet Union took almost 15 years to restore order with the national underground. 15 years, having a huge repressive apparatus, the evictions of villages that supported this underground in Eastern Siberia, and an army that can destroy enemies. And now this is not. And how many weapons people have on their hands. It is easier to wait for the collapse of this unfinished, and then to see who is with us and who is against. True, Russia needs to change, its current state is completely unattractive, at least for me. There are too many questions for her, or rather, not for her, but for those who now rule Russia. But Russians and Belarusians in Belarus lived and live together. There are few scumbags, they love to demonstrate their Olezhek here, but this is a statistical error in terms of population.
            2. Dr. Sorge 5 January 2020 23: 05 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              Catch +. :)
        2. Spart55 5 January 2020 16: 08 New
          • 7
          • 3
          +4
          New Year's Eve is time to end.
          Not like your mistakes will continue.
          What does it mean "if Belarus becomes a full-fledged republic of Russia, as historically predetermined it was arranged"?
          Who and when defined Belarus as a republic of Russia?
          I dare to recall, dear, that at one time Belarus was part of the union state. But not to Russia, but to the USSR. Along with Russia, by the way. And with the 13th equal republics.
          You obviously confuse something, the most respectable.
          1. Finches 5 January 2020 16: 12 New
            • 5
            • 11
            -6
            White Russia has always been a part of Russia - whatever you call it! And if you do not want you to be identified by the troll - introduce yourself humanly, as an adult - here I am, for example, Evgeny Zyablitsev, St. Petersburg! hi Then you can conduct a dialogue - because you understand that your interlocutor is a normal and living person! And so, I apologize, some kind of horseradish from the hill will pop up and let's hang tags - who is this? Why? Why here ??
            1. Spart55 5 January 2020 16: 35 New
              • 7
              • 6
              +1
              Why do you flood?
              What does the shortcut and by.? Does this relate to Belarus? To the topic?
              Here I am then why you are. Read the news and listen to smart people in their discussion.
              But do not you think that if a person says stupidity, then it needs to be corrected? First of all, for the benefit of the same person?
              Dear Evgeny Zyablitsev!
              The fact that even before Tsar Gorokh some Russian autocrats called themselves tsars "Belyya and Malyya and other" still does not give you the right to arbitrarily include the state formation of Belarus into Russia.
              Once again, I highly recommend studying the history of the USSR. Then you may recall that the Union was formed on December 30, 1922. At the First Congress of Soviets, representatives of the RSFSR, the Ukrainian and Belarusian Soviet Socialist Republics, and also the Transcaucasian Federation signed the Declaration on the Formation of the USSR and the Union Treaty.
              Belarus entered the USSR on exactly the same political and territorial terms as the RSFSR. On equal terms.
              On what basis, after the collapse of the Union, you arbitrarily declare the territory of Belarus a part of the Russian Federation, apparently, it is known only to you.
              Even the president of the Russian Federation has not yet expressed his opinion on future relations between the Russian Federation and Belarus.
              1. Finches 5 January 2020 19: 54 New
                • 2
                • 5
                -3
                So I'm not the president! I don’t need diplomatic tact! This is my principled and civic position - there have never been such states as Belarus and Ukraine and should not be - all these are parts of Russia! Whether you like it or not! I have this position, you have a different one, well, for God's sake! hi Only you still appear, otherwise you are hiding behind a nickname!
                1. Spart55 5 January 2020 23: 31 New
                  • 3
                  • 1
                  +2
                  Nda ... It's hard to talk to a person who does not recognize logic.
                  Well, try again. Last.
                  Both Belarus and Ukraine were parts of the Soviet Union.
                  But not the RSFSR.
                  Is it really hard to understand?
                  On what grounds have you arrogated to yourself the right to declare the territory of Belarus a part of Russia? Who gave you that right?
                  So it’s not the point that you arbitrarily redraw the story.
                  The fact is that with your irresponsible statements you are trying to drive a wedge between the two countries, relations between which leave much to be desired.
                  VO is an authoritative resource. It is read including Belarusians. Do you think they are pleased that a certain Evgeny Zyablitsev has already decided everything for everyone and declared a sovereign state in essence, the federal district of Russia? Are you aware of your actions?
                  This is at a time when diplomats are trying to find a compromise solution that satisfies both sides and that take every opportunity to prevent an open confrontation.
                  It is not by chance that I mentioned the President of the Russian Federation. Unlike you, he perfectly understands the situation and therefore speaks out extremely carefully and carefully.
                  As for the nickname, this is a trend accepted on the Internet, and such a nickname is called a login. And everyone is free to choose at his discretion.
                  But even if I call myself Peter Ivanov, this will not stop me from once again urging you to take a very responsible and accurate approach to the wording. Remembering that the word is not a sparrow.
                2. Finches 5 January 2020 23: 38 New
                  • 1
                  • 5
                  -4
                  Your logic is understandable - and you don’t have to be Spinoza, so as not to understand it — the right to decide what borders and how people live as the people want only one country in the world — the USA! This is not visible with an armed gaze and runs a red line in all your judgments ... Unfortunately, our elites fell very tight in the 90s under the Americans, so you can continue to engage in casuistry of national treason, hiding behind the slogans of mercy! But there are more intelligent people — in Belarus, Ukraine, and Russia — so don’t worry, pro-American comrade, Russia will be reborn within its historical borders! hi
                3. Alexga 5 January 2020 23: 50 New
                  • 2
                  • 2
                  0
                  Man, well, you can’t! Since 2006, Belarus has been living without the US ambassador, and somehow it’s not bad.
                4. Finches 6 January 2020 00: 02 New
                  • 2
                  • 3
                  -1
                  It is possible, it is impossible - I expressed my opinion - Russia, Belarus, Ukraine and the steppes of Kazakhstan - this is one country! Historically - it was called the Russian Empire, the USSR ... All this should turn back! Who is against - that, for me personally, is the American litter! It is clear that this is just my opinion of no interest to anyone - I expressed it here, on the pages of VO more than once, and I will stick to it in the future!
                5. Alexga 6 January 2020 00: 17 New
                  • 3
                  • 1
                  +2
                  Everyone has their own opinion.
                6. Finches 6 January 2020 00: 32 New
                  • 0
                  • 3
                  -3
                  Naturally! Only there is a historically fair opinion, but there is an imposed from outside! Here you are, I'm sorry, he was imposed from outside - that living in separate national apartments is cool! But even if it’s naive, but in its wisdom, the ancient parable about the father, three brothers and a broom in a few straws surpasses all our judgments sounds very relevant today - only people in the pride of their elementary things do not want to see!
                7. Alexga 6 January 2020 08: 25 New
                  • 2
                  • 1
                  +1
                  I tell you about Thomas, and you tell me about Yerema! Well, modern Russia is not capable of a unifying role, from the word at all. This is an ordinary bourgeois state in which everything is decided by money. You read the local sayings of the local residents of the site. Of course, you can go to war against neighbors, not economic, as it is now, but real. True, it is unknown. Yes, I am Russian, living in Belarus, I do not want to go to modern Russia.
                8. Finches 6 January 2020 08: 34 New
                  • 0
                  • 1
                  -1
                  That's why tanks are needed !!
                9. Alexga 6 January 2020 09: 38 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  As our common ancestor on Lake Peipsi said there !?
                10. Finches 6 January 2020 09: 42 New
                  • 0
                  • 1
                  -1
                  The attempt is not torture! In this case, the end justifies the means! Destruction is always easier than rebuilding ... And the victims of justice are sometimes no less than those of destruction, unfortunately! But such is the dialectic of life!
  2. Spart55 6 January 2020 00: 34 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    And will you also establish these historical boundaries yourself?
    What borders do you choose?
    The borders of Kievan Rus X century?
    The borders of the Moscow principality of the XIV century?
    Or the reign of Vasily III and Ivan IV?
    Mikhail Romanov? Alexey? Peter I? Elizabeth Petrovna? Catherine II? Nicholas I? Alexander II? Nicholas II?
    Or are you nicer than the borders of the USSR? Russian Federation in 1991?
    Where is the starting point?
    Will it be determined personally by Evgeny Zyablitsev?
    But how much does he take upon himself?
    Is Senka a hat?
  3. Finches 6 January 2020 00: 37 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    Why am I - there are historical borders long before us ancestors folded together with you! The reference point can be determined through a general discussion! This is a technical question!
  • Win1945 5 January 2020 17: 40 New
    • 5
    • 7
    -2
    White Russia has always been a part of Russia - whatever you call it!
    Go teach history. Letters.
    1. Finches 5 January 2020 19: 51 New
      • 1
      • 3
      -2
      laughing Another, hamlo !! And already the sixth in two days - the sender to school - there’s some kind of epidemic! laughing
  • Dr. Sorge 5 January 2020 23: 06 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    The zmagars intensified. We thought it would not work with oil, it turns out in vain in the area ah 2 times we jumped before the New Year :)
  • Alexga 5 January 2020 18: 56 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    I dare to recall, dear, that at one time Belarus was part of the union state. But not to Russia, but to the USSR. Along with Russia, by the way.

    Absolutely correct remark.
    1. Finches 5 January 2020 19: 54 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      And even before it was part of the Russian Empire, so what?
      1. Alexga 5 January 2020 20: 06 New
        • 3
        • 3
        0
        From which century shall we take it? I understand that you are closer to the Russian Empire since the time of Nicholas 2, judging by the current symbols of the Russian Federation. But this is a very inglorious period of the state. After him, powerful states were created - the USSR. Can it be more fair to take this period?
        1. Finches 5 January 2020 20: 09 New
          • 4
          • 5
          -1
          Any period starting from the formation of Russian statehood since the times of Ivan III is closer to me! Good or bad, but the stage of the gradual formation of the Empire, then its transformation into the first state of workers and peasants, followed by transformation into the Red Empire and betrayal, and the collapse in 1991 to please the USA! That's the whole story! Now people who do not want the restoration of a powerful Slavic state consciously or unconsciously work in the hands of American interests! hi
        2. Alexga 5 January 2020 21: 09 New
          • 5
          • 2
          +3
          I will not argue, everyone has their own opinion, I agree with you that the Slavs should live in a single strong state, I’ll just clarify, the Eastern Slavs. You are likely under the Empire talking about the territories and peoples inhabiting them. I do not argue either. But on what ideas to unite them? Need some kind of ideology. But it is prohibited by the current Constitution. So, first you need to put the proper order in Mother Russia. And then the rest. Well, this is my personal opinion.
        3. Alexga 5 January 2020 21: 12 New
          • 3
          • 2
          +1
          And about American interests, this is primarily to the premiere with the company, and then to the Popular.
        4. Finches 5 January 2020 21: 15 New
          • 3
          • 1
          +2
          Well and good! I watch hockey finals, - Russia - Canada, at the Youth World Cup! And we were together - players from Belarus, Ukraine, even Kazakhstan would play ... So this will be an order of magnitude stronger team! Thank you for the dialogue, Happy New Year! hi
        5. Alexga 5 January 2020 21: 21 New
          • 3
          • 2
          +1
          Eugene, I wish victory for OUR RUSSIAN team, Recall 1974, 6-0 won against Canadians, the hall rose! It was cool. You have to repeat! Merry Christmas!
  • anykin 5 January 2020 23: 42 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: AlexGa
    But this is a very inglorious period of the state. After him, powerful states were created - the USSR.

    ... started importing grain.
  • antivirus 5 January 2020 23: 05 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    You can join NATO on equal terms, but in Eurasia - just bring your own to a common boiler.
    What does Belarus have for the country from Smolensk to Sakhalin?
    if you invest 10 billion dollars in the villages of the center of Russia-the Volga region where do you get Brest-Lithuanian cheese? -10 yards is 2 years of subsidies
  • Amin_vivec 5 January 2020 16: 26 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    Russia has been created and grown for centuries, and you say 30 years. 30 years is a lot for a person. And Russia is a young state, it still has to grow and grow))))
  • antivirus 5 January 2020 23: 01 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    antivirus 2 June 19, 2017 10:20 | Crimean border: 168 kilometers of torment arc
    As for the Crimeans, for them a visit to Ukraine is a difficult and sometimes very dangerous quest. Those who at one time renounced Ukrainian citizenship officially and handed in a “passport with a trident” have no options in principle.
    ON APRIL 16 D arrived 2 PEOPLE from Dzhankoy. BUY A MACHINE (ENGINE OVERHEATED)
    -what did before the referendum. how did you live?
    - nothing. any hunting cartridges bought


    ------------ They were going to kill them and the Crimeans were preparing
  • Spart55 5 January 2020 15: 31 New
    • 10
    • 5
    +5
    But doesn’t it seem to you that if some three dives managed to destroy the Great State, then it can be called great only with a big stretch?
    Here Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland regularly roll out some claims to England. But nothing, the great state of Great Britain lives and lives. And no three dives can destroy him.
    Catalonia has claims to Spain. So what? People decently and peacefully solve their problems in referenda and through law. No state collapse occurs.
    1. Finches 5 January 2020 15: 35 New
      • 2
      • 14
      -12
      Admins - do something with these trolls !! It is not possible to communicate with adequate people on a specific topic of the article !!!!
      1. Sergey49 5 January 2020 15: 53 New
        • 13
        • 7
        +6
        Are you adequate? Dreamer to fight with neighbors and grab the fellow countrymen with little blood. Here it is not necessary to call admins, but orderlies.
        1. Finches 5 January 2020 15: 54 New
          • 3
          • 9
          -6
          Not you, but you! This is for a start!
    2. Kleber 5 January 2020 20: 55 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      Quote: Spart55
      But nothing, the great state of Great Britain lives and lives.


      This great state is being bullied as a high-ranking EU official from dwarf Luxembourg wants when it comes to Brexit.
  • DymOk_v_dYmke 5 January 2020 17: 04 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    Quote: Finches
    Over the centuries, our ancestors built the Great State on their blood, and here three small dykes broke everything in the Belovezhskaya Pushcha, and you have reconciled .... Your right - but I do not! And in this case, not every patient understands that only after going through the pain of treatment will complete recovery

    You do not propose a cure. An erroneous diagnosis leads to incorrect procedures. It is necessary to treat the recurrent inflammation of capitalism. To varying degrees, but all the former republics of the USSR.
    Upon successful completion of treatment, they themselves will be reunited, because for this there will be a foundation that is not there now.
    PS Lukashenko was one of only three deputies of the Armed Forces who voted against the dissolution of the USSR.
  • Abbot 5 January 2020 14: 52 New
    • 14
    • 2
    +12
    Quote: Finches
    Joseph Vissarionovich would have long ago solved the problem of fraternal peoples and Belarus and Ukraine! Yes, for this I would have to use the army for a start, but simple people, I’m sure, would have met a Russian soldier with flowers — Lukashenko would have been cut a plot near Rostov.

    It seems to me that Joseph Vissarionovich would first of all solve issues in the Kremlin. And Lukashenko would not plant potatoes in Rostov, but someone else in Siberia felled the forest with his bare hands.
    1. Finches 5 January 2020 14: 54 New
      • 5
      • 6
      -1
      This is particular - Joseph Vissarionovich would not have allowed many to the Kremlin! laughing
  • Mikhalych 5 January 2020 15: 36 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    You think like Ernesto Che Guevara. He also thought that he would be met with flowers. To enter the army you need people to be ready. And I'm not sure of his readiness.
    soldier
    1. Finches 5 January 2020 16: 05 New
      • 3
      • 6
      -3
      And I’m sure that I’m half-hearted in Ukraine! hi The only thing is that I’m not for the whole of Ukraine — but exclusively for the left bank, but for all of White Russia!
  • Alexga 5 January 2020 15: 50 New
    • 8
    • 3
    +5
    Eugene, Joseph Vissarionovich in the first place would not have allowed the current mess in Russia. And then everyone would join themselves.
    1. Finches 5 January 2020 16: 11 New
      • 3
      • 2
      +1
      It is truth too!
  • Piramidon 5 January 2020 17: 13 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: Finches
    Joseph Vissarionovich would have long ago solved the problem of fraternal peoples and Belarus and Ukraine!

    Under Joseph Vissarionovich, such independent states would not have arisen.
    1. antivirus 5 January 2020 23: 09 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      such independent states would not have arisen.
      true imperialists would not allow - Vel Brit and Franz, everything in your pocket
  • Kleber 5 January 2020 20: 15 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    Quote: Finches
    Joseph Vissarionovich would have long ago solved the problem of fraternal peoples and Belarus and Ukraine! Yes, for this I would have to use the army to start, but ordinary people, I’m sure, would meet a Russian soldier with flowers - Lukashenko would have cut a plot near Rostov..


    Under Joseph Vissarionovich, Lukashenko would have cut a plot not near Rostov, but near Magadan .... and this is in the best case for him laughing
  • Karaul73 5 January 2020 22: 08 New
    • 0
    • 4
    -4
    Ah, dreams, dreams!
    Yes, you would be the first under Stalin to wear a worn tunic and send trenches to dig. Free, without evening beer and a combat sofa.
    1. Finches 5 January 2020 23: 21 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      If this comment is for me - then I already took off my tunic! 25 years old - no complaints! But I’m still in reserve and I can command a battalion - I’ll get up with pleasure in the ranks for the sake of such a thing!
  • Naive 5 January 2020 23: 22 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    He would immediately bring order to himself and there look and the fraternal and not very peoples themselves stretched ..
  • pl675 5 January 2020 14: 03 New
    • 4
    • 2
    +2
    Quote: gsev
    Conditions (price and volume of supplies) should be such that the sale of fuel for Ukrainian punishers becomes unprofitable for Lukashenko. This is the only way to compensate for the consequences of stopping the construction of the Nord Stream and the biased Stockholm arbitration.


    I belittle you, these dances with a tambourine (Belarus / oil / price) have been around for years.
    they haven’t even changed choreography since 2002.
    1. 210ox 5 January 2020 15: 04 New
      • 2
      • 5
      -3
      And constantly for the New Year .. But the Empire certainly must be opposed.
      1. Serega82 5 January 2020 16: 21 New
        • 3
        • 4
        -1
        Overeating mushrooms for the new year with an interesting effect? Still fixing?
  • AshiSolo 5 January 2020 14: 09 New
    • 21
    • 2
    +19
    Quote: gsev
    Conditions (price and volume of supplies) should be such that the sale of fuel for Ukrainian punishers becomes unprofitable for Lukashenko. This is the only way to compensate for the consequences of stopping the construction of the Nord Stream and the biased Stockholm arbitration.


    Are you kidding now or what?

    RIA News, August 9, 2019.

    “The import of diesel fuel into Ukraine in July amounted to 663 thousand tons, which is 20,5% higher than the volume of supplies last July (550 thousand tons). Deliveries from Russia amounted to 315,4 thousand tons, which was a record volume for the entire observation period ", - writes the publication.
    According to published data, from this volume Lukoil shipped 25,3 thousand tons to Ukraine to the Ukrenerji company. The remaining 290,1 ​​thousand tons came from Rosneft’s resource, supplied through the Samara – West Direction oil product pipeline system.
    Through a pipeline terminal in Gomel (Belarus), according to a mixed logistic scheme, 61,5 thousand tons of diesel fuel were delivered to Ukraine. The largest importers in this direction were Parallel, Gaztrim and Glusko. The remaining 228,6 thousand tons were delivered to the Ukrainian market through the terminals of Prikarpat Zapadtrans. "

    Is this to whom everything is delivered? Is there any kind of differentiation? Lukashenko strictly supplies tank fuel, and from the Russian Federation sell exclusively for grandmothers in the primus (diesel fuel, huh)?
    Open your eyes. The topic has long been discussed from all sides. There are no saints in politics.
    1. gsev 5 January 2020 15: 11 New
      • 2
      • 4
      -2
      Quote: AshiSolo
      Lukoil "shipped to Ukraine 25,3

      Probably the DPRK market is more capacious and Putin made a very big mistake by launching a sanctions dance against the DPRK to the tune of the United States. Each liter of diesel delivered to Ukraine costs DNR human blood and the disproportionately large consequences of shelling.
    2. Win1945 5 January 2020 17: 45 New
      • 1
      • 2
      -1
      at least one adequate person!
    3. Brturin 5 January 2020 23: 48 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: AshiSolo
      There are no saints in politics.

      Who argues with this - in January-November 2019, Ukraine imported 7,68 million tons of oil products (according to TNVED 2710 - gasolines, diesel fuel, fuel oil, jet fuel, etc.), which is 3,6% more than for the same period of 2018 (7,41 million tons). Fuel was imported from Belarus at $ 1,85 billion (share - 38,17%), Russia - at $ 1,71 billion (35,27%), Lithuania - at $ 556,5 million (11,49%).
  • Abbot 5 January 2020 14: 09 New
    • 13
    • 4
    +9
    Quote: gsev
    Conditions (price and volume of supplies) should be such that the sale of fuel for Ukrainian punishers becomes unprofitable for Lukashenko.

    To punitive lost fuel they need to block the western border, and not crush the Belarusian refineries. Bagdasarov’s idiotic babble about kerosene for APU is already a little tired. The electrons themselves - on, gas - on, and other commodity circulation, but do you see RB pour fuel directly into the fuel tanks of Ukrainian military equipment? Guys, that doesn't happen.
  • pl675 5 January 2020 14: 15 New
    • 7
    • 3
    +4
    Quote: gsev
    Conditions (price and volume of supplies) should be such that the sale of fuel for Ukrainian punishers becomes unprofitable for Lukashenko. This is the only way to compensate for the consequences of stopping the construction of the Nord Stream and the biased Stockholm arbitration.


    you, no one owes anything, be already a realist.
    this is not your slurry, THEY will sort it out themselves, and our opinion of you from the high bell tower is violet.
  • Krasnoyarsk 5 January 2020 16: 05 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    Quote: gsev

    Conditions (price and volume of supplies) should be such that the sale of fuel for Ukrainian punishers becomes unprofitable for Lukashenko.

    And what, in your opinion, are these conditions? In view of the lack of its oil, Ukraine will buy oil products from Belarus at any price, if only it would not be higher than the estimated Iranian, Iraqi and other Syrian oil products. So it will be beneficial father.
    The question is, as I see it from my cellar, to put it differently - we will give you oil as before, but on condition that - you will not sell oil products to Ukraine. Otherwise - I'm sorry, look for oil in BV, in America, Venezuela and other Kuwait.
    1. antivirus 5 January 2020 23: 14 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Sufficiently move Luka to Russian interests (reduce subsidies) without pushing him away
      HIGHLIGHTS - HOW TO DISPOSE OF THE FISHED IN THE KREMLIN
  • Win1945 5 January 2020 17: 52 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    Conditions (price and volume of supplies) should be such that the sale of fuel for Ukrainian punishers becomes unprofitable for Lukashenko. This is the only way to compensate for the consequences of stopping the construction of the Nord Stream and the biased Stockholm arbitration.

    LEARN the question. And then tell us all who supply 50% of solariums and gasoline to uraine. You can’t be like that ....
  • Mountain shooter 5 January 2020 13: 49 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    It's about $ 20 per ton! Per ton !!! 1200 p! Ruble per liter ... this is a disaster !!! laughing
  • Awakened-M 5 January 2020 14: 00 New
    • 4
    • 3
    +1
    And how many cries there were some .. Agreed. Everything is fine!
    1. cniza 5 January 2020 14: 53 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      We agreed only that the plants lasted a month and not jammed, which would be only one percent of the annual volume, and then we need to agree, now Russia is selling 17% cheaper than the market price, Minsk is not enough ...
      1. Kleber 5 January 2020 20: 22 New
        • 2
        • 2
        0
        And Minsk is always not enough. Accustomed to a freebie, now you can’t sell them to the market anymore.
        1. cniza 5 January 2020 20: 33 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          And we never sold at the market, but they want more ...
          1. Kleber 5 January 2020 20: 48 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            So it comes to the point that we will also pay extra.
            1. cniza 6 January 2020 09: 10 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              This is a dream of Ukrainians and it is contagious. lol
  • Pessimist22 5 January 2020 14: 00 New
    • 2
    • 3
    -1
    Patriots will mind.
  • KVU-NSVD 5 January 2020 14: 05 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Naturally, the concern will strive to make them as profitable as possible for Minsk, in order to avoid a sharp increase in oil product prices for Belarusian consumers.
    Ah, these sweet-sounding songs of gas sellers, everything is for the consumer ... however, let’s leave these crazy dreams .. And in fact, the news was renewed and good ..
    1. Naive 5 January 2020 23: 54 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      https://t.me/zapraukaby/663 почитайте о заботе о людях.
  • Ravil_Asnafovich 5 January 2020 14: 10 New
    • 5
    • 5
    0
    Unfortunately, we have to make concessions, and they will continue, but to us in Russia again pull the tug, paying from our own pockets.
  • Pevek 5 January 2020 14: 15 New
    • 5
    • 7
    -2
    So that the Old Man does not scream, but acts well. And he pressures the opposition, and he tries for the people, and with us the movement towards unification leads, albeit slowly very wink
    1. vitvit123 5 January 2020 20: 42 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      what is he slowly leading? let it join right away.
      1. Pevek 5 January 2020 20: 47 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        I have no real answer to this. I thought earlier that this is in order to prepare peoples and unite imperceptibly, already after the fact, but now, I think differently. The authorities completely do not want to let go of their hands. And unification can happen only then, he will leave, and he will bargain for himself, personally for himself. crying
        1. vitvit123 5 January 2020 20: 56 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          Thank you for the open answer. only it does not lead to unification, because the government does not want to lose, and until the last moment it will arouse antipathies against Russia among the Belarusians (which is clearly visible), so as not to unite. if you just play out, like Yanukovych ..
          1. Pevek 5 January 2020 21: 28 New
            • 4
            • 0
            +4
            Not only does it arouse antipathy. Look above, I wrote that I personally like Lukashenko’s actions, and the result: how many minuses were there? Six. Six people decided that it was impossible to admire the fact that Old Man was trying to get preferences from Russia, I didn’t like that he was trying to improve the life of the people, that he suppressed the protests.
            I also noticed that some Belarusian commentators have topics in their country mercilessly mined.. so, on both sides there are interested parties to disrupt the further rapprochement of the two fraternal peoples.
            And that's bad..
            1. vitvit123 6 January 2020 11: 53 New
              • 1
              • 1
              0
              I myself have a negative attitude towards Lukashenko and his politics. Because I would like him and the residents of Belarus to understand that all their good indicators and their entire existence, economic, is based only on preferential resources from Russia and on the open market of Russia. And they are silent in every possible way. He improves the life of the people at the expense of the Russian economy, this is not entirely honest. And the whole territory of the feet and hands of the GDP should be kissed, because the GDP feeds these 9,5 billion mouths. Or let them be part of Russia, then no one will consider subsidies, because we will live in one country or let them live without preferences from Russia, they are independent! Well, let them not forget that economically you also need to live on your own shisha.
  • cherkas.oe 5 January 2020 14: 18 New
    • 11
    • 4
    +7
    Quote: Finches
    how did it happen with Crimea? GDP in my opinion with Shoigu themselves is still shocked by their courage

    Yes, all subsequent actions of our elite confirm your assumptions.
    1. gsev 5 January 2020 15: 01 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: cherkas.oe
      Yes, all subsequent actions of our elite confirm your assumptions.

      The decisive annexation of Crimea saved the residents of Crimea from harassment of the SBU, shootings of the Armed Forces, but flirting with Poroshenko did not lead to anything good.
  • Woland 5 January 2020 14: 21 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    But interestingly, Russia has increased the export duty for a company supplying oil at dumping prices to Belarus, or again, “Oh, let it go ...”?
  • knn54 5 January 2020 14: 22 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    Cheaper than Russian oil can only be its own (Belarusian) oil ...
    1. cniza 5 January 2020 14: 56 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: knn54
      Cheaper than Russian oil can only be its own (Belarusian) oil ...


      Is she there? or poorly searched? will have to agree ...
  • prior 5 January 2020 14: 27 New
    • 21
    • 3
    +18
    I went out today.
    I went in to get a haircut - the haircut went up by 100 rubles.
    I went for milk - a liter went up by 10 rubles.
    So what? Nothing .... silence, as usual.
    We scold hahlov, Belarusians, but what have you become?
    Terpily, as there are terpils.
    1. Olis 5 January 2020 14: 55 New
      • 6
      • 5
      +1
      Quote: prior
      .
      We scold hahlov, Belarusians, but what have you become?
      Terpily, as there are terpils.

      Not just patience, but patience praising the gentleman and the king of the father .. These patience write WE when they talk about the projects of the oligarchy. For example, when it comes to contractors who were building gas pipelines of the oligarch Arkady Rotenberg, close to Russian President Vladimir Putin, as well as another Russian oligarch Timchenko and his family who took all the cream from this dabbler of folk money ...
      And that's not all !! These people suffered (for example, gsev (Vladimir Gusev) was punished by some Ukrainian punisher, I’m even embarrassed to imagine how this punisher captured Vladimir Gusev ....)))
      1. gsev 5 January 2020 15: 03 New
        • 1
        • 3
        -2
        Quote: Olis
        Not just terpils, but terpils praising the gentleman and the king the priest ..

        Patients who are afraid of sanctions and are ready to trade for the interests of Donetsk fellow citizens for Trump's promises.
        1. Olis 5 January 2020 15: 15 New
          • 7
          • 5
          +2
          Interests of fellow citizens ??? This is when billions of dollars are literally buried in the sea? Do you, dear gsev (Gusev Vladimir), someone asked whether this should be done and how to spend public money?
          Such fellow citizens must still be sought.
          WE will build a gas pipeline so that Khakhly IS FREEZED without our gas))
          But in the end, the poor patient again sits on the bottle,
          - Ukrainians never froze without gas ..
          -Russian oligarchs Timchenko and Rotenberg razedribany money on the construction of these grief projects and joyfully spend their hands))
          They especially read how this terila WRITES - WE BUILD !!! Hahaha !! We !!! Where is he and where are they)))
          1. gsev 5 January 2020 15: 36 New
            • 2
            • 3
            -1
            Quote: Olis
            WE will build a GAS PIPELINE so that Khakhly IS FREEZED without our gas

            The gas pipeline was built to have a backup route for gas sales. The Germans, Swiss and Danes played on the side of Ukraine. It is just necessary to limit energy supplies to the West and close dump-corridors in the form of Belarus and Ukraine. At present, China and the DPRK do not conflict with us. With them and develop trade. And so all the profits from trading widkt on the Stockholm arbitration.
            1. Olis 5 January 2020 15: 49 New
              • 2
              • 6
              -4
              WE have built!

              I'm under the table! Rzhunemagu!
              Gusev Vladimir, punished by Ukrainian punishers, knowing all the plans of the treacherous West ...
              I would like to ask YOU - when YOU (Vladimir Gusev) built the Inverted Stream along with Rotenberg, didn’t the bottle bother you?))
              Or sitting on a bottle did you build better?)))
    2. _Sergei_ 5 January 2020 15: 30 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      Grandchildren arrived, went for milk today. As it was 3,2% for 46 rubles, it remains.
      1. for
        for 5 January 2020 16: 28 New
        • 3
        • 2
        +1
        Quote: _Sergey_
        Grandchildren arrived, went for milk today. As it was 3,2% for 46 rubles, it remains.

        I went to the pharmacy today. Drops cost 360 rubles and they cost 470 rubles.
    3. ML-334 5 January 2020 17: 02 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Duration shook?
      1. Kleber 5 January 2020 20: 28 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        The language of the nineties entered the lexicon very firmly, and even in those who were not born in the 90s.
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. vitvit123 5 January 2020 20: 41 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      no one scolds them. I would like them to honestly say that their effective Lukonomy, only thanks (at the expense of) Russia and all.
  • polinet 5 January 2020 15: 01 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: knn54
    Cheaper than Russian oil can only be its own (Belarusian) oil ...

    there’s just no reason to get it, because will come out more expensive. Cheaper to buy.
  • polinet 5 January 2020 15: 05 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: Ravil_Asnafovich
    Unfortunately, we have to make concessions, and they will continue, but to us in Russia again pull the tug, paying from our own pockets.

    they will give oil, but only for life, there is no question of exporting any refined products (gasoline ...), and in the budget of the Republic of Belarus selling fuel and lubricants is 1/3 of the income. They will suffocate until everything agrees, all the more so since the elections are on the way, a Belarusian miracle will wither away without recharge.
  • Vasyan1971 5 January 2020 15: 18 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Naturally, the concern will strive to make them as profitable as possible for Minsk.

    Apparently, we are not talking about a mutually beneficial situation ... And if “so that they are the most profitable for” Moscow, the question arises, then the Old Man will have an apoplexy shock from indignation. Fraternal partnership, it is just that ...
  • Silvek76 5 January 2020 15: 40 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Fuel in the Republic of Belarus is getting more expensive every week, it will be even more expensive, A G L will agree with the Russian Federation, will throw off a penny and the people will pull along, the elections will be soon, this is a knight's move
  • georggy 5 January 2020 15: 40 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    But why?
    Lived up and dug again.
  • Igoresha 5 January 2020 16: 04 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    cute scolding - only amuse
  • ODERVIT 5 January 2020 16: 56 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    The fraternal people received another fraternal preference. Everything is old and predictable. One question before?
  • 75 Sergey 5 January 2020 17: 53 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    How unexpected!
  • Vadim1000 5 January 2020 19: 26 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    About 60% of fuel for Ukraine comes from the Russian Federation (oil to Belarusian refineries), thus, it can be said that the APU tanks are traveling from Russia to the fuel.
  • Operator 5 January 2020 21: 21 New
    • 2
    • 4
    -2
    Quote: Finches
    What to do?

    Reunite Belarus with Russia and fulfill the centuries-old aspirations of local residents: leave the Russians in Russia and deport Litvins to Europe.

    PS The same thing should be realized in Ukraine (with deportation of strangers) and Moldova (with deportation of Romanians).
  • The comment was deleted.
    1. Dr. Sorge 5 January 2020 23: 14 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      But we must not whine, but politicians should conduct the right policy towards Belarus. These are cultural and economic components. Common spiritual values ​​to revive.
      Otherwise, the Polish “world” will come and then Belarusians will have no place.
      1. Chingachguk 6 January 2020 09: 06 New
        • 0
        • 4
        -4
        You know, for example, I don’t give a damn about someone there in Belarus or not. Lukashenko has a rotten policy, and the majority of the population of Belarus support him. In Ukraine, it all started the same way. And we always try to understand everyone, not to be offended, feed, warm and reason. And the more they become pigs, the warmer and more comfortable they are, the more nasty things they do to us. I think it is necessary to change the policy, take everything that they gave, and throw it out of their yard at a crossroads. Let them walk there with outstretched hands, maybe then someone will come to someone, comrade and brother .....
  • GenNick 6 January 2020 00: 02 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    Quote: Finches
    If this comment is for me - then I already took off my tunic! 25 years old - no complaints! But I’m still in reserve and I can command a battalion - I’ll get up with pleasure in the ranks for the sake of such a thing!

    For 25 years to learn how to command a battalion? , cool, no words !!!
    Although your minister doesn’t know, a hundred is in a day on a belt, two in a kitchen ...
    1. GenNick 6 January 2020 00: 08 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      Mr. Zyablitsov !!!
      Accept my sincere condolences ...
      Canada-Russia 4: 3.
  • Cutter 6 January 2020 00: 33 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Finches
    It’s interesting - ordinary brothers-Belarusians minus or officials, who, with the loss of artificial independence, will be asked from the feeder? Or ours - opponents of the revival of the Empire ?? laughing

    Believe me, not ordinary Belarusians ...
  • GenNick 6 January 2020 12: 56 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: GenNick
    Mr. Zyablitsov !!!
    Accept my sincere condolences ...
    Canada-Russia 4: 3.

    Come from Canada minus .......