Trump threatened to “quickly and powerfully” hit 52 targets in Iran


US President Donald Trump has threatened that the US is ready to strike at 52 Iranian targets, many of which are of value to Iran and the culture of this country. This could happen if Tehran attacks the United States or the Americans.


This entry was made by trump on his Twitter. He wrote:

Blows on these targets and on Iran itself will be very powerful and will be delivered very quickly. The US no longer wants threats!

According to the president, 52 facilities were selected by the number of American hostages held about two years after the capture of the United States Embassy in Tehran in 1979.

Trump’s fears about Iran’s possible aggression are linked to the recent killing of Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Kassem Suleimani and several other high-ranking military and politicians in Iraq. Then, on January 3, the Americans fired at a convoy near the Baghdad International Airport. The instruction to destroy Suleymani was personally given by Donald Trump.



After that, the supreme leader of Iran and the former commander of the IRGC called for revenge for the shelling.

Just in case, the US authorities recommended that their citizens in Iraq leave this country.
Photos used:
US Air Force Central Command
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

205 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. The comment was deleted.
    1. Same lech 5 January 2020 10: 26 New
      • 16
      • 7
      +9
      Blows on these targets and on Iran itself will be very powerful and will be delivered very quickly. The US no longer wants threats!

      It would be nice to arrange the delivery of S-400 to the Iranians (for hard currency, of course) ... a defensive and quite effective weapon against air attack facilities of the USA and Israel.
      1. donavi49 5 January 2020 10: 35 New
        • 32
        • 7
        +25
        Equipment without specialists - scrap metal.

        They have an S-300. However, few. In general, their air defense is rather weak. That's honest. Hoki rapiers = crush. Again, I do not rule out surprises with the Standards, even completely made in Iran. This is an American SAM and SAM.

        Beeches old + new Torahs + S-300 - very few. Plus, they did not collect a positional area, but spread it in a thin layer. One position of the same S-300 at Tehran, the second at the nuclear power plant, the third at the rocket plant. This is only from what is known.

        Their crafts Bavar373 and others are very debatable.

        No air force.

        However, working with wheels. When at sea 1 aug. On the other side, it’s good if 100-120 attack planes in the region are assembled (but more and more every day). In principle, there are chances to shoot back massively by all PTRCs. Even the ground forces to engage.

        If Trump collected 2-3 AUGs, he surpassed 400-500 aircraft. As was the case in Iraq. There, at least some centralized resistance to the air attack would have ended on the first day.
        1. Same lech 5 January 2020 10: 40 New
          • 19
          • 4
          +15
          With the Kremlin’s political will, the Americans can make a big deal ... Vietnam’s experience, taking into account the local flavor of the people of Iran, can be used at the present stage of history ... if the ayatollah can be made Russia's allies, it’s only a competent organization to resist US aggression.
          1. Rostislav 5 January 2020 11: 06 New
            • 10
            • 1
            +9
            The experience of Vietnam is not applicable here. On the ground, they will not climb into Iran, if anything happens, then exclusively bombing and missiles.
          2. Spart55 5 January 2020 11: 32 New
            • 9
            • 1
            +8
            What kind of trouble could it be if one AUG starts working from the Mediterranean Sea in case of exacerbation, and the other from the Indian Ocean?
            And what is stopping this ocean from dropping a bunch of destroyers and submarines from the Kyrgyz Republic?
            Iran even theoretically has no chance. At least with the S-300, at least with the S-400. Quantity will crush quality.
            Another thing - the words of trump should be divided by 10. The famous balabol.
            1. Servisinzhener 5 January 2020 11: 57 New
              • 7
              • 1
              +6
              I doubt very much that there will be a large percentage of attacks performed by AUG aircraft, as from the Mediterranean, Red and Arabian Sea the way in one direction will be much more than 1000 km. Rather, most of the strikes will come from land airports in Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Iraq and Afghanistan.
              1. hrych 5 January 2020 12: 35 New
                • 8
                • 1
                +7
                The Hussites successfully beat on the bases of the Saudis, and even the Iranians are wailing, so are wacking both Qatar and Saudi Arabia ...
                1. Starover_Z 5 January 2020 17: 24 New
                  • 0
                  • 1
                  -1
                  Quote: hrych
                  The Hussites successfully beat on the bases of the Saudis, and even the Iranians are wailing, so are wacking both Qatar and Saudi Arabia ...

                  So Iran seems to have RTOs. When approaching the AUG and attacking ground targets, hit the carrier groups of ships! They can’t help but hit and knock at least something ....
              2. Rostislav 5 January 2020 14: 14 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                Hardly. Saudis are not substituted because of the amers, otherwise Iran will quickly reset their oil production. Qatar is similar. If from Afghanistan only.
            2. hrych 5 January 2020 12: 34 New
              • 7
              • 0
              +7
              Quote: Spart55
              Iran even theoretically has no chance. At least with the S-300, at least with the S-400.

              But there is an opportunity to bomb tactical missiles at enemy airfields, there is an opportunity to attack the AUG. Why is it that Iran will only fight back, and not deliver counter-strikes. Iran is a mountainous country, there is a doctrine for the preservation of tactical means, mobile complexes, a network of dungeons, false targets, etc. There are submarines to give change in the Persian Gulf.
            3. another RUSICH 6 January 2020 00: 59 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              It is not necessary to talk about air defense here, but about the possibility of Tran sinking the US Navy.
              Not with a stick you need to fight, but with the one who holds it.
              Iran would have the Bastions, not an extra c300 ...
          3. antivirus 5 January 2020 11: 45 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            did not have time to get to the Holy Land - bombed in response
          4. Normal 5 January 2020 11: 46 New
            • 32
            • 19
            +13
            What are you talking about, buddy?) If you put together all the information on what happened, then I can’t justly do justice to Trump and that’s why.
            The Supreme Leader of Iran did not approve of Suleymani’s plans and asked him to abstain for a while and continue consultations on a number of issues related to this topic.
            But the crux of the matter is that an attack on an American base was already committed on December 27, as a result of which it died, drum roll is a civilian, it seems a construction contractor, after which a decision was made to destroy the general. One US citizen and what a strong-willed, and most importantly lightning-fast decision. This is how a country that wants to have weight should act, be called a superpower and harness even because of one dead citizen.
            Now let's draw a parallel. In Syria, an airplane crashes due to the vile / cunning actions of Israeli pilots, on board of which there were numerous officers of advisers. And our guarantor has expressed 1001 concerns. Well, a little did not make contact with Netanhu, but then nevertheless cordially met several times in Sochi !!!! Same thing in Turkey: a knife in the back and all that, tomatoes. And now he was the sidekick and put it on his downed pilot. These are the things brother does.
            Therefore, throw out of your head the will of the Kremlin. They will not fight with those where they keep their grandmothers, where they have real estate, where they rest, and their children get an education. And for you and me, like cattle, they periodically throw in info about new avant-gardes, Sarmatians, Armats, and so on.
            Until recently, I was ready to idolize him. But in recent years, he fell heavily in my eyes, in his endless "preoccupations."
            1. hrych 5 January 2020 12: 16 New
              • 16
              • 5
              +11
              Well started ...

              Firstly, in Turkey, the diversion eliminated the color of the flight personnel of the army aviation. Secondly, the caste that ruled 100 years because of a coup disrupted by our intelligence was destroyed, well, etc. Nowadays, the main meat of NATO with the largest army after the USA is already, as it were, not in NATO.
              In Israel ... this is how the Asadites shot down our plane. Provocation, non-provocation, but since the oak-headed ally, what to do. Measures have been taken against Israel, too. Think and remember the other day. It’s not always worth starting a war, even for good reason. Trump is in the process of impeachment and the election campaign. And so forced to act. Suleimani also began to take a lot upon himself when we shuganuli Americans from Syria and the same Iran designated a place in Syria, or rather we allow Israel to strike at the Iranians (let us because it is our cow). So in Iraq, Suleimani hurried. There, by the way, the Americans were brought out of Syria and grandfather began to spoil our raspberries. Well, I rested. In Iraq, we have Qurna and contracts, and the Iranians are situational allies. Therefore, everything is correct, we are on the sidelines, and the Israelis and Americans are doing the work for us. Geopolitics however. Now we still need to clean Idlib. We’ll clean it up, then we'll talk. And Haftar tripped on Tripoli when we were on Idlib. Turks are in shock, but what to do ...
            2. Astronaut 5 January 2020 14: 04 New
              • 5
              • 1
              +4
              that an attack on an American base was already committed on December 27, as a result of which he died

              You a priori made Suleimani guilty of this terrorist attack, but where is your evidence, other than US charges?
              1. Normal 5 January 2020 14: 55 New
                • 4
                • 6
                -2
                I don't give a damn about Suleymani. In general, all the Middle Eastern countries are fighting permanently one way or another. Therefore, I am not interested in looking for who is right there and who is to blame. Situationally, they can be beneficial for us, then the situation changes and we calmly allow Israeli aviation to strike at Iranian military depots. I am generally silent about Iraq, as well as about Libya, Lebanon, etc. I pointed out that when it came to the fact that there was an attack on the mattress base and the civilian died, it was decided to remove the Iranian leader. It is clear that this can be pulled by the ears, but the fact itself exists. And then he looked around at the examples from our side. Some concerns. And only on the sidelines of the State Duma (mat mat mat mat) there isn’t but some bureaucrat who, in order to curry favor and light up his existence, will threateningly show his fi and tell how this or that "partner" will be instantly destroyed .... and that's all you see. Krylov’s fable comes to mind: "and Vaska is listening and eating."
            3. DarkMatter 5 January 2020 14: 33 New
              • 9
              • 1
              +8
              But the crux of the matter is that an attack on an American base was already committed on December 27, as a result of which it died, drum roll is a civilian, it seems a construction contractor, after which a decision was made to destroy the general. One US citizen and what a strong-willed, and most importantly lightning-fast decision.

              The United States kills every day, or keeps in bestial conditions, US citizens in the United States and does not get completely upset about this, and all the more so no lightning decisions are made about this.
              They did what they wanted to do, and the reason can always be found if desired, and if not found, then invent how the United States often does.
              So do not praise the killers here.
              1. Normal 5 January 2020 14: 48 New
                • 4
                • 5
                -1
                Here, for my part, only a comparison of the fact that one country can launch a missile strike in the death of one of its civilians, and the other, to my deep regret, has been showing constant concern. You must be able to read in context. To whom I addressed my text. Instead of pulling out a separate phrase and not trying to juggle it in a conversation with an opponent. I myself will give odds in this case. Read the whole text and, most importantly, understand it precisely because of what it was typed in such a tone. I do not care about the United States or Iran. Neither of them excites me. What matters to me is how my country will react when its soldiers and citizens are killed. Have a nice day!
            4. Usher 5 January 2020 15: 48 New
              • 3
              • 3
              0
              laughing ridiculously, especially about "harnessing lightning fast" laughing
            5. The comment was deleted.
              1. Normal 6 January 2020 09: 30 New
                • 1
                • 1
                0
                For example, do you like the doctrine that our country will only respond to a potential nuclear strike against us? But for example, I don’t want to live with such an understanding that they will first pick us up, and I will be proud to understand that the answer will fly to the enemy. That doesn’t smile at me like that. But mattresses easily declared to the whole world that they could be the first to deliver a preventive strike in any country.
                Of course, I don’t want a war, because in my right mind, but I am for punishing the insolent people who test weakly.
                There are a bunch of examples from the past, from the country in which I was born (USSR), how to act if that.
                1. Astronaut 6 January 2020 12: 35 New
                  • 0
                  • 1
                  -1
                  In this aspect, I agree with you, maybe at first you didn’t convey your idea very clearly.
                2. another RUSICH 6 January 2020 22: 42 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  You yourself contradict, for "punish" exactly means an answer.
                  And after the exchange of nuclear weapons, it will not matter who started the first. So there’s no difference, but shutting up your mouth when talking with Americans about politics, reminding them of their doctrine, in response to their objection that, Hiroshima, it’s been a long time ago and that it’s not so, is quite real.
                  In general, it’s important not what you state, but your real ability to respond.
          5. gurzuf 5 January 2020 11: 49 New
            • 2
            • 10
            -8
            Sarmatian on duty, and Satan for rent to Iran. wink
          6. Sailor 5 January 2020 17: 04 New
            • 1
            • 1
            0
            Or for not supplying these “models” of air defense to take away Ukraine.
        2. Vadmir 5 January 2020 12: 17 New
          • 2
          • 2
          0
          Beeches old + new Torahs + S-300 - very few. Plus, they did not collect a positional area, but spread it in a thin layer.
          And yet they exist, which means they won’t use aviation, these 52 goals will hit a couple of hundred Tomahawks - effectively and without casualties, among the pilots, just what Trump needs before the election.
          In principle, there are chances to shoot back massively by all PTRCs.
          Where? In Israel, who did not attack? For the bases in Qatar and the SA that didn’t attack? If they do, then Trump will win. The only option for Iran is a retaliatory strike against the US fleet, but with what?
          1. Astronaut 5 January 2020 14: 07 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            In Israel, who did not attack?

            Iran is always to blame for Iran!
            1. Sailor 5 January 2020 17: 06 New
              • 4
              • 1
              +3
              But like Israel!
        3. Evil Booth 5 January 2020 12: 54 New
          • 0
          • 3
          -3
          tongue then the Hussites again and again lay out the vidosiki of the fragments f15 and f16 and no one blundered that this is a linden. heaped a bunch of blah. there are not enough tori there are as many as 30 pieces and in general there is a big country where to shoot. all the US bases around 15-25 thousand frags Iran instantly shares zero with all 3 out.
          1. Charik 6 January 2020 20: 08 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            meaningless set of letters
            1. Evil Booth 8 January 2020 08: 22 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              crying shout in the Pentagon demanding from the Saudi grandmother
        4. Stalllker 5 January 2020 16: 06 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          And what prevents carriers from destroying, for me, the Persians have enough missiles, and the patriots are "hole"
        5. Vadim237 5 January 2020 17: 22 New
          • 0
          • 2
          -2
          They have thousands of MANPADS, but PGIs the same dofig cruise missiles knocked into light.
      2. Terentich 5 January 2020 10: 39 New
        • 14
        • 27
        -13
        Quote: The same Lech
        S-400 (for hard currency, of course) ... weapons are defensive and quite effective against air attack tools of the United States and Israel.

        Syria has not supplied “effective” shells and c300, and what is the result? Syria was bombed and bombed by everyone. hi
        1. Same lech 5 January 2020 10: 44 New
          • 16
          • 6
          +10
          Syria is bombed only by two aggressive states of the USA and Israel.
          While they are taking advantage of the relative weakness of Syria, the tormented long-term war with terrorists sent from CIA training centers.
          Iran is a little different country and its approaches to resistance against the aggression of the United States and Israel should be different ... taking into account the experience of the attacks of the air forces of these countries on Syria.
          1. Terentich 5 January 2020 10: 55 New
            • 15
            • 22
            -7
            Quote: The same Lech
            Syria bombed by only two aggressive states

            Syria is being bombed by a coalition of 60 states, and that is not Turkey.
            Quote: The same Lech
            Iran is a little different country

            Yeah .. and Iraq is a slightly different country, and Syria and Libya .. Only the result is the same for everyone.
            1. Same lech 5 January 2020 11: 10 New
              • 11
              • 3
              +8
              Syria is bombed by a coalition of 60 states

              Yah smile belay ... no Estonia or Poland ... wow what a coalition ... one Big Lord and his whole harem of minions.
        2. dvina71 5 January 2020 11: 41 New
          • 4
          • 3
          +1
          Quote: Terentich
          Syria was bombed and bombed by everyone.

          They don’t bomb, but chatter .. The last attempt to bomb 70 cr ... ended up in the fact that they all fell into one, no longer working, research complex.
          1. Servisinzhener 5 January 2020 12: 01 New
            • 2
            • 1
            +1
            Moreover, according to their statements, the number of missiles clearly exceeding what is necessary in order to break up this concrete box.
        3. another RUSICH 6 January 2020 01: 15 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          In order to state this, one must absolutely not understand what air defense is.
          Hope further on the “child prodigy”, but only, I’m afraid, you will never wait for such a weapon so that, chik, all planes with missiles will fall.
          Alas. Have not come up yet.
          So at least you can get on top of the shell with armor, it will not help, without a deep layered air defense system with high-quality prepared calculations, which in Syria have never been
      3. Mutno 5 January 2020 10: 56 New
        • 7
        • 7
        0
        Quote: The same Lech
        It would be nice to arrange the delivery of S-400 to the Iranians (for hard currency, of course) ... a defensive and quite effective weapon against air attack facilities of the USA and Israel.

        They tried for how many years, because they knew that this would end ..
        Ah Russia, if Iran is gouged, it will be on our conscience .. soldier
        1. Same lech 5 January 2020 11: 01 New
          • 16
          • 4
          +12
          if Iran is gouged, it will be on our conscience ..

          It will be much worse for our country what .
          after destroying Iran, the Americans subsequently organize the invasion of a large army of thousands of terrorists of their own manufacture on our territory from a southern direction where we do not have serious protection ... it is simply strategically necessary to assist Iran in the fight against the United States.
          1. The comment was deleted.
        2. abvgdeika 5 January 2020 11: 29 New
          • 3
          • 5
          -2
          Meehan hi and relax
          1. Mutno 5 January 2020 12: 58 New
            • 1
            • 1
            0
            Quote: abvgdeika
            Meehan hi and relax

            With you relax here hehe
        3. K-50 5 January 2020 11: 41 New
          • 3
          • 3
          0
          Quote: Mutno
          Ah Russia, if Iran is gouged, it will be on our conscience ..

          Sfigli? belay
          We have neither a military alliance with them, nor an agreement on mutual assistance. There is an agreement on military-technical assistance, but it does not provide for an “admission” for a partner during the war.
          So that's all for the diplomats. sad
          1. Mutno 5 January 2020 13: 02 New
            • 5
            • 4
            +1
            Quote: K-50
            Quote: Mutno
            Ah Russia, if Iran is gouged, it will be on our conscience ..

            Sfigli? belay
            We have neither a military alliance with them, nor an agreement on mutual assistance. There is an agreement on military-technical assistance, but it does not provide for an “admission” for a partner during the war.
            So that's all for the diplomats. sad

            And Jewish lawyers internationalists .. wassat crying
            We know we know .... We don’t have time to pay from the budget to all sorts of nonsense. If only we would not offend anyone!
      4. Alex Nevs 5 January 2020 11: 02 New
        • 3
        • 1
        +2
        But didn’t I talk about Indirectly Forcing All to acquire C400. Only through "own cones." And the more they fill "their cones" - the more they will gain. And while independent countries can maintain the integrity of their own powers - otherwise ala Libya.
      5. Thrifty 5 January 2020 11: 14 New
        • 4
        • 5
        -1
        Trump completely off the chain! That look will unleash, at least, a regional war!
        1. dvina71 5 January 2020 11: 46 New
          • 4
          • 0
          +4
          Quote: Thrifty
          Trump completely off the chain!

          Nope ... the election. Everything that Trump is doing now is exclusively in the context of the upcoming elections. Moreover, the financial elites choose US presidents ... and from this point of view, he does everything right.
      6. Servisinzhener 5 January 2020 11: 48 New
        • 1
        • 2
        -1
        No less than air defense systems there, modern radars are needed in the quantity necessary for a round-the-clock airspace survey.
      7. Zaurbek 5 January 2020 19: 19 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        ..... and a couple of Su35C squadrons and the general and pilots .... Then, sanctions will be lifted from Iran and the Iranians will flee to the United States to spend thawed dollars!
      8. mu1972 6 January 2020 00: 30 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        it would be nice to immediately hit the sucking states! already these incomprehensible territories have hooked the whole world!
    2. Pessimist22 5 January 2020 10: 26 New
      • 12
      • 2
      +10
      It is impossible not to answer this way, but to answer, to give rise to an attack, in short, the situation is not simple for Iran.
      1. Same lech 5 January 2020 10: 32 New
        • 10
        • 2
        +8
        in short, the situation is not simple for Iran.

        The situation is just simple ... now Iran has a reason to return to developing its own atomic bomb ... the US threatens Iran with bombing ... Iran has the right to defend itself in every possible way ... Great Eun can help him.
        1. Grits 5 January 2020 10: 40 New
          • 4
          • 4
          0
          Quote: The same Lech
          .Now Iran has a reason to return again to the development of its atomic bomb ..

          If you have time.
          1. Same lech 5 January 2020 10: 47 New
            • 7
            • 3
            +4
            They want to have time to live ... Eun managed to. smile
          2. Sky strike fighter 5 January 2020 10: 47 New
            • 4
            • 2
            +2
            Quote: Gritsa
            Quote: The same Lech
            .Now Iran has a reason to return again to the development of its atomic bomb ..

            If you have time.

            It is said that Iran managed to acquire Soviet nuclear warheads in Kazakhstan in the 90s, just as it acquired the Soviet X-55s in Ukraine, on the basis of which it created its Soma CD. Yes, and that it is a big problem to buy nuclear warheads from the DPRK. What is holding back this DPRK? Nothing.
            1. Vladimir_6 5 January 2020 13: 30 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Quote: Sky Strike fighter
              And what a big problem to buy from the same DPRK nuclear warheads.

              Perhaps it is not a problem to buy, but by what transport, and by what route to deliver?
          3. abvgdeika 5 January 2020 11: 31 New
            • 1
            • 5
            -4
            It's too late!!!!
        2. Terentich 5 January 2020 10: 41 New
          • 4
          • 4
          0
          Quote: The same Lech
          Iran now has reason to return to developing its atomic bomb again

          Did he stop developing it for even a second? wassat
          1. Same lech 5 January 2020 10: 48 New
            • 8
            • 1
            +7
            I hope not ... now in the world the only guarantee against attack and aggression by the United States is the possession of its own nuclear arsenal.
        3. Mountain shooter 5 January 2020 10: 48 New
          • 8
          • 4
          +4
          Quote: The same Lech

          The situation is just simple ... now Iran has a reason to return again to developing its own atomic bomb ... The US threatens Iran with bombing ...

          To make a nuclear bomb to Iran - there may not be enough time ... The situation has become extremely acute. Air defense is very weak in Iran. And the red-haired clown is completely overwhelmed ... Kills anyone he wants ...
      2. Alex Nevs 5 January 2020 11: 03 New
        • 3
        • 1
        +2
        The mattress can provoke a provocation, and then it will have an Official Occasion of Robbery (Democratize).
  2. The leader of the Redskins 5 January 2020 10: 23 New
    • 7
    • 2
    +5
    From B 52 to 52 !. A pun with some kind of tautology turns out ...
    1. Gray brother 5 January 2020 10: 40 New
      • 4
      • 2
      +2
      Quote: Leader of the Redskins
      From B 52 to 52 !. A pun with some kind of tautology turns out ...

      The analogies are traced:
    2. Vadmir 5 January 2020 12: 25 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      From B 52 to 52 !.
      For the B-52 to appear there, it is necessary to hammer Iran into the Stone Age for several months, first with the Tomahawks, then with cruise missiles with F-18 and F-16, then with bombs from them, and then B-52. Only this will most likely not happen.
      1. Vadim237 5 January 2020 17: 27 New
        • 0
        • 1
        -1
        B 52 can carry cruise missiles.
      2. Vitaly gusin 5 January 2020 23: 05 New
        • 0
        • 1
        -1
        Quote: Vadmir
        hammer Iran in the stone age,

        There is another weapon for this.
  3. svp67 5 January 2020 10: 24 New
    • 23
    • 0
    +23
    US President Donald Trump has threatened that the US is ready to strike at 52 Iranian targets, many of which are of value to Iran and the culture of this country.
    Excuse me, I understand the attacks on military facilities, on state and economic facilities, but ON CULTURAL ??????? !!!!!!! There are many of them THOUSAND YEARS. They have not been Iranian for a long time, but global ... It’s "gentlemen" gentlemen, and it is you who are "non-humans." Or maybe you decided to destroy the Khomeini Mausoleum?
    1. donavi49 5 January 2020 10: 28 New
      • 7
      • 6
      +1
      According to the Sunnis - especially the currents from the Kingdom, sectarian Shiite mosques defame Islam itself. Therefore, everything is ok. Overseer - if anything, please the most devoted and wealthy vassal.

      Yes, and the vassal itself will probably connect. Forces F-15 and DongFenov3 in Tehran.
      1. Same lech 5 January 2020 10: 34 New
        • 7
        • 0
        +7
        Which kingdom?
        Saudis or something ...? these are far worse than the Persians ... thugs have not yet climbed out of the dark Middle Ages.
        1. donavi49 5 January 2020 10: 37 New
          • 3
          • 1
          +2
          I agree. But they were able to cram into their beloved Arabian wife. Therefore, they approx. Even cutting off the heads of journalists with a global scandal is jamming and getting away with it.
          1. alex007i 5 January 2020 10: 56 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            But they were able to cram into their beloved Arabian wife.

            They did not stuff, they were stuffed.
      2. svp67 5 January 2020 10: 35 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: donavi49
        According to the Sunnis - especially the currents from the Kingdom, sectarian Shiite mosques defame Islam itself.

        Unlike Christianity, where each movement has its own style of Temples, in Islam everything is much simpler and more complicated, the Temples themselves seem to say little about who they belong to, the main thing is "filling", that is, who is preaching there. And somehow they especially do not have prejudices. Hagia Sophia in Constantinople quietly turned into a mosque
        1. donavi49 5 January 2020 10: 39 New
          • 4
          • 3
          +1
          Yes. But Persian shrines are nothing to them and even dangerous. In this they are similar to the IG by the way. And when the latter attacked Sammara - with key Shiite shrines in Iraq, the Saudis, and other Sunnis, clearly encouraged the IS. Even the Americans did not bomb them.
    2. Grits 5 January 2020 10: 31 New
      • 20
      • 2
      +18
      Quote: svp67
      They have long been not Iranian, but world-wide ... This is "by the gentlemen" gentlemen, and it is you who are "inhuman"

      And these barbarians do not care about the cultural values ​​of peoples. After all, they themselves do not have a normal history of the country, much less culture and any kind of historical cultural objects and values. According to the savage principle - we don’t - neither will others.
      The Americans, unlike all other peoples of the world do not even have ... folk tales. This once again proves the moral and cultural inferiority of this ugly entity called the United States.
      1. Alex Nevs 5 January 2020 11: 06 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        And our stupid clogging up our Great and Mighty overseas garbage slang. I look at such stupid children. Know and apply everywhere -Two big differences.
      2. Van 16 5 January 2020 11: 29 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        "After all, they themselves have no normal history of the country, much less culture .."
        Well, why, they are the creators of the greatest achievements of culture - baseball, hamburgers and cola. It seems to me that for them it is sacred. smile
      3. sabakina 5 January 2020 11: 44 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Gritsa, why not? There are four presidents hollowed out in the rock. And this one, like him, HOLLYWOOD More precisely, the letters on the slope. And as you know from the movies, if the letters GOLLYWOOD begin to crumble on a slope, then translating into Russian:
      4. Kerensky 5 January 2020 12: 28 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        The Americans, unlike all other peoples of the world do not even have ... folk tales.

        Alexander.
        I do not agree. I personally read about how one comrade drilled wells, but did not find oil. Then he took out wells from the groundsawed them and sold on the holes for the posts !!!
        And there is a whole book of such tales ...
      5. SirCyrill 6 January 2020 19: 07 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        "The Americans, unlike all other peoples of the world do not even have ... folk tales" - in fact, there are many. It is your problem that you do not know about them.

        This once again proves the moral and cultural inferiority of this ugly entity called the United States.
        - So far, it is you who demonstrate moral and cultural inferiority.
        1. Grits 6 January 2020 19: 14 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: SirCyrill
          - actually there are many.

          If I’m so ignorant, then enlighten me, please, about the presence of such tales. What are they called when they appeared and where they were published, where they can be found and purchased. It is very interesting, what can the fabulous people of a country that is 300 years old come up with there.
          Here Kerensky wrote above that he knows one such tale. About an oil well. Naturally, what else should Americans make up ...
          1. SirCyrill 6 January 2020 19: 59 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            What is the name of
            - please, for example:
            Perpetual motion in the sunny sea
            Virgin Hercules
            A sip of wine for the snake
            Johnny apple seed
            Female power and male power
            Gold in the stove
            Cowboy Coffee
            Mosquitoes, bears and bison
            Little jean and big white cat
            Little Black Zambo
            Alien science will not bring the bear to good
            New suit
            One pair of four satin blue satin slippers
            Deacon's girlfriend
            Why does the possum brother have a bare tail
            Goodbye Leander!
            Seven Fables
            Three goats Earl and the evil troll
            Guess who?
            Cunning rabbit

            "Tales of Uncle Remus" is the collective name of a number of tales by the American writer Joel Harris, based on the folklore of slaves of the southern states of the USA.

            And you can buy the book "American Tales and Legends" - translators and compilers Shereshevskaya N., Vashchenko A., Gurvits M. M. Rech Publishing House, 2016.

            All this is very easy to find in about 10 minutes. Another point that you did not even bother to search. It is understandable - it does not fit with your concept of "uncultured Americans."
    3. Terentich 5 January 2020 10: 46 New
      • 7
      • 20
      -13
      Quote: svp67
      but FOR CULTURAL

      Nobody even stuttered there, read the original statement by Trump, this is already a gag from VO. It is strange that you still have not learned to recognize the initiative of the site. hi
      1. donavi49 5 January 2020 10: 55 New
        • 12
        • 2
        +10
        we have targeted 52 Iranian sites (representing the 52 American hostages taken by Iran many years ago), some at a very high level & important to Iran & the Iranian culture, and those targets, and Iran itself, WILL BE HIT VERY FAST AND VERY HARD. The USA wants no more threats!

        Iranian culture
      2. svp67 5 January 2020 11: 04 New
        • 8
        • 0
        +8
        Quote: Terentich
        this is a gag from VO.

        Yes, what are you saying ....
        This is RIA Novosti
        Earlier, US President Donald Trump promised to deliver a “quick and powerful blow” to 52 targets in Iran, including objects of Iranian culture, if the Americans are attacked.

        So, in this particular case, VO faithfully reprinted the message from the central news agency of Russia
        Quote: Terentich
        read the original Trump statement

        Know with PLEASURE. And especially for you, I have highlighted something there, read and do not say more nonsense, and even if someone can pay you for it
        .... targeted 52 Iranian sites (representing the 52 American hostages taken by Iran many years ago), some at a very high level & important to Iran & the Iranian culture, and those targets, and Iran itself, WILL BE HIT VERY FAST AND VERY HARD. The USA wants no more threats!
        1. Terentich 5 January 2020 11: 09 New
          • 4
          • 4
          0
          I checked Trump on Twitter, I admit I was wrong. It's just not customary to hear this from official lips.
          1. svp67 5 January 2020 11: 15 New
            • 4
            • 0
            +4
            Quote: Terentich
            It's just not customary to hear this from official lips.

            Here I am in SHOCK. To fight the ANCIENT CULTURAL VALUES, this is already a real "crusade" of some sort ...
            1. Karen 5 January 2020 12: 17 New
              • 2
              • 1
              +1
              Quote: svp67
              To fight the ANCIENT CULTURAL VALUES, this is already a real "crusade" of some sort ...

              One people fought against Persian culture, one and a half thousand years before the crusaders ... He emphasized more than once ... There is no doubt which geisha of which particular nationality purposefully drunk young Alexander and affectionately whispered in their ears to order their soldiers to burn the beautiful Persepolis ( what he later regretted all his life) ... I think that the geisha was from Trump's genealogical roots, and Trumpushka absorbed thoughts against the Persians with his mother’s milk ...
          2. dvina71 5 January 2020 11: 53 New
            • 1
            • 1
            0
            Quote: Terentich
            It's just not customary to hear this from official lips.

            Of course .. elves cannot afford this ...
          3. gurzuf 5 January 2020 12: 01 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Come on???!!! Not familiar !!! A test tube with washing powder alone cost how many human lives! Not familiar to him!
    4. businessv 5 January 2020 11: 12 New
      • 8
      • 0
      +8
      Quote: svp67
      Excuse me, I understand the attacks on military facilities, on state and economic facilities, but ON CULTURAL ??????? !!!!!!! There are many of the bottom of THOUSAND YEARS. They have long been not Iranian, but global ...

      Here, colleague, now everyone around the world must understand for themselves why and with whose submission the Ishilovites pulled the Palmyra world heritage! And also who is their real owner and sponsor!
      1. K-50 5 January 2020 11: 54 New
        • 5
        • 1
        +4
        Quote: businessv
        now everyone in the whole world must understand for themselves why and with whose filing the igilovites pulled the world heritage of Palmyra

        So when they bombed Iraq under Saddam, they also plundered and stole everything. They are naughty.
        The very ones, two nations of pirates, killers and thieves. negative
    5. sabakina 5 January 2020 11: 26 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Quote: svp67
      ] Forgive me, I understand the attacks on military facilities, on state and economic, but ON CULTURAL ??????? !!!!!!! There are many of them THOUSAND YEARS. They have not been Iranian for a long time, but global ... It’s "gentlemen" gentlemen, and it is you who are "nonhumans."
      Sergey, I completely agree!

      UNESCO? And what about UNESCO! Head in the sand and slurred grumbling about the inadmissibility of such acts ...
      1. svp67 5 January 2020 11: 30 New
        • 4
        • 1
        +3
        Quote: sabakina
        UNESCO? And what about UNESCO!

        To paraphrase Comrade Stalin: “How many divisions does UNESCO have?”
    6. Avior 5 January 2020 11: 36 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Trump's honestly
      They attacked us, & we hit back. If they attack again, which I would strongly advise them not to do, we will hit them harder than they have ever been hit before!

      The United States just spent Two Trillion Dollars on Military Equipment. We are the biggest and by far the BEST in the World! If Iran attacks an American Base, or any American, we will be sending some of that brand new beautiful equipment their way ... and without hesitation!


      https://mobile.twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1213684819537932293
      1. Evil Booth 5 January 2020 13: 02 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        wassat already tapped https://mobile.twitter.com/darngoood/status/1213685003059486720
      2. asv363 5 January 2020 14: 25 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1213593975732527112
    7. SirCyrill 6 January 2020 19: 04 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      So many cultural objects in combination are administrative and military.
    8. Charik 6 January 2020 20: 16 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      In Iraq, Syria bombed millennia-old objects of cultural heritage and not ju-ju
  4. Victor_B 5 January 2020 10: 26 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    It would be interesting to see the B-52 in the sky of Iran.
    But it will not be so. For the B-52 will simply strike with "axes" (or whatever they drag) without entering the air defense zone.
    But the B-2 only carries free-falling bombs.
    That would fill up!
    Well, in reality, they will release several hundred sea-based “axes”.
    Just oversaturated air defense capabilities.
    1. dvina71 5 January 2020 11: 57 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: Victor_B
      Just oversaturated air defense capabilities.

      There are several difficulties .. First .. Iranian air defense throughout the 90s, Russian specialists were closely engaged. Do not forget the presence of IRAN 1l222 .. emnip 6 sets.
      Second .. Iran, not Iraq .. It will not work to comply with the low-altitude flight profile of the Kyrgyz Republic. Either the mountains fly around, I think these routes are sealed with air defense systems. Or over the mountains ...
      In general, not everything is so simple .. I think the Americans don’t start without a golden donkey ..
      1. SirCyrill 6 January 2020 20: 13 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Second .. Iran, not Iraq ..
        - sure sure. They also spoke about Iraq in 2003 - they say that this is not Yugoslavia. And the truth is not Yugoslavia - they bombed it longer.
        1. dvina71 6 January 2020 20: 45 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: SirCyrill
          And the truth is not Yugoslavia

          And really .. Iran is about like Serbia ..
          Nifiga is not the desert of Iraq .. Mountainous terrain .. And the air defense of Serbs .., in its infancy, not a little fun there .. Iran's air defense in such conditions has not a bad chance to fight back.
          1. SirCyrill 6 January 2020 20: 51 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            And the air defense of Serbs .., in its infancy, not a little fun there ..


            In March 2008, the Ministry of Defense of Serbia reported updated data on NATO losses, according to which during the operation they were destroyed two aircraft, at least 9 UAVs and 45 NATO cruise missiles.

            Well just go nuts how much fun. Very menacing.
            1. dvina71 6 January 2020 20: 57 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Quote: SirCyrill
              Well just go nuts how much fun.

              Given what and what they resisted this success ..
              1. SirCyrill 6 January 2020 21: 02 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                [quote Considering what [/ quote] - Soviet air defense systems modernized in the 70s.

                and why
                - American weapons, also developed in the 70-80s.

                And no, this is not a success.
                1. dvina71 6 January 2020 21: 08 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Oh, how are you .. upgraded and developed into one basket got .. I have no desire to delve into Serbian topics. Iranian air defense is more powerful and more diverse on the order of the Serbian .. this is a fact. Geology there also plays for Iran .. Iran’s easy attack will not be an easy walk. Except for the "golden donkey" ..
                  1. SirCyrill 6 January 2020 21: 27 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    ..modernized and developed into one basket hit ..
                    - so what? It is quite comparable.

                    An easy walk will not attack Iran.
                    - Yes Yes Yes. They said that about Iraq too. About the same Iraq, which Iran at one time with its "powerful and diverse" air defense and mountains almost put on its knees.
                    1. dvina71 6 January 2020 21: 47 New
                      • 0
                      • 0
                      0
                      Quote: SirCyrill
                      It is quite comparable.

                      First-generation air defense systems and aviation 3rd plus cr..ag..comparable ,.
                      Quote: SirCyrill
                      About the same Iraq, which Iran at one time with its "powerful and diverse" air defense and mountains almost put on its knees.

                      In those days, Iran’s air defense .. well, how can I say ... it was almost gone ... YES and about "on your knees" .. it’s got excited .. these are Iranian troops 40 km from Baghdad ..
    2. Vladimir_6 5 January 2020 13: 52 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Victor_B
      Just oversaturated air defense capabilities.

      There, after all, besides air defense, EW facilities were mentioned.
      "Vessels passing through the Strait of Hormuz and the Persian Gulf report interference with their GPS satellite navigation system, and the United States believes that Iran is responsible for this."
      https://detaly.co.il/iran-obvinyayut-v-narushenii-raboty-sistemy-gps-v-persidskom-zalive/
  5. K-50 5 January 2020 10: 27 New
    • 11
    • 2
    +9
    The instruction to destroy Suleymani was personally given by Donald Trump.

    The red-haired clown has become stupefied from his own greatness, since he is trying to decide who lives and who does not
    And if they do the same for the mattresses, the screech begins immediately. negative
    1. cniza 5 January 2020 12: 25 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      He framed himself, now his internal enemies have someone to blame for dumping Trump's murder.
  6. solzh 5 January 2020 10: 29 New
    • 6
    • 1
    +5
    One gets the impression that Trump deliberately escalates the situation in order to start negotiations with Iran, just as he had with the DPRK at one time. I do not think that Trump is a sick girl to start a war with Iran. Although I could be wrong ...
    1. Alex Nevs 5 January 2020 11: 08 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Marx, Lenin - and sooner or later, but it will be "full head." Imperialism is climbing, not stopping.
      1. cniza 5 January 2020 12: 23 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: solzh
        Although I could be wrong ...


        You are not mistaken, this is his tactics, but he can play too much, this is not a business project.
    2. Butchcassidy 5 January 2020 17: 13 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Kim Jong-un demonstrated how to act in this case. And the American AUG hanged off the coast of Korea and sailed home.
  7. Grits 5 January 2020 10: 37 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    The most unpleasant thing is that they really can. The forces of the Pindo stanets are enough to roll Iran into ruins. No matter how Iranian generals boast of their courage and a good army, they cannot oppose anything. They don’t have normal air defense - and this is the very first and huge minus of Iran’s defense against such a sophisticated and arrogant aggressor as the United States. Americans have long realized that getting involved in a fight on earth is extremely foolish for them. Moreover, the experience of Korea, Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan prompted them to draw up such actions. But they can throw cruise missiles from ships. And then iron everything else with aviation. Having good experience again - Yugoslavia.
    1. Same lech 5 January 2020 10: 51 New
      • 4
      • 1
      +3
      But they can throw cruise missiles from ships. And then iron everything else with aviation. Having good experience again - Yugoslavia.

      If Russia helps Iran with modern means and air defense specialists, then this adventure will cost the Americans dearly
      1. Sky strike fighter 5 January 2020 11: 22 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        But has Iran just recently, when it struck the oil fields of Saudi Arabia, not shown what it is capable of? Do you think Iran will only fight back? Yes, and the United States will not pull up a ground operation in Iran. Only attacks from the Kyrgyz Republic. And you won’t win the war. Syria has been fired at remotely for many years, and the effect is near zero. Yes, and Iran is full of BRMD and the Kyrgyz Republic.
      2. Grits 5 January 2020 11: 59 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: The same Lech
        If Russia helps Iran with modern means and air defense specialists, then this adventure will cost the Americans dearly

        For Iran, this is the only way out. Come to Russia with a request for help with air defense systems. But time is running out - they are needed now. We can’t do it quickly. except to share the old ones. I think the S-300s remained in the warehouses, which are being replaced by the S-400 gradually. Probably enough has remained "Os" and the old "Buk". Although the best for them is Shell. To place on all critical objects to reflect Tomogavkov. If you bombard each object with a bunch of Tomogavks in order to oversaturate the capabilities of air defense, then no Tomogavks will be enough. And without them, the war will end immediately.
      3. Butchcassidy 5 January 2020 17: 09 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        I think that if Moscow lends a helping hand to Tehran amid calls for example from the Foreign Ministry, it is entirely possible that strategic bombers will register for 50 years in Hamadan.
    2. JonnyT 5 January 2020 11: 51 New
      • 3
      • 2
      +1
      Iran does not have air defense, but there is an opportunity to wipe Israel, the Saudis from the face of the earth, and destroy all US bases in the district, and block the bay. Will the USA accept such an unprofitable exchange ??? No, of course not, but in the future Israel will be merged, like the whole BV. So we are waiting for an escalation in Ukraine, Karabakh. The United States, at most, is capable of targeted attacks on the IRGC on the periphery. And all these tweets, menacing cheeks on the eve of the election campaign
      1. cniza 5 January 2020 12: 21 New
        • 3
        • 1
        +2
        Quote: JonnyT
        So we are waiting for an escalation in Ukraine, Karabakh.


        I would also add Moldova, Georgia and especially Central Asia ...
      2. Vitaly gusin 5 January 2020 23: 11 New
        • 0
        • 1
        -1
        Quote: JonnyT
        scream from the face of the earth Israel

        Please, in more detail.
        1. JonnyT 6 January 2020 11: 45 New
          • 0
          • 2
          -2
          Iran has a nuclear surprise specially for Israel - thanks to Gorbachev with his restructuring and reductions in nuclear arsenals. There is a fairly modern carrier (not like water pipes filled with gunpowder from hezbals) so that they may well smell like that they would take the God-chosen ones with them to the guri
    3. Sky strike fighter 5 January 2020 12: 03 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      The most unpleasant thing is that they really can. The forces of the Pindo stanets are enough to roll Iran into ruins.

      Now the United States has 60 bayonets scattered throughout the region, the same amount as until recently in the Greater Idlib alone among the greens. Is that enough?
      No matter how Iranian generals boast of their courage and a good army, they cannot oppose anything.

      That is, the numerous Iranian BRMD and the Kyrgyz Republic do not count?
      They don’t have normal air defense - and this is the very first and huge minus of Iran’s defense against such a sophisticated and arrogant aggressor as the United States.

      But does the USA have normal air defense? An attack on Saudi Arabia showed the Patriots' "effectiveness" in all its glory.
      Americans have long realized that getting involved in a fight on earth is extremely foolish for them. Moreover, the experience of Korea, Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan prompted them to draw up such actions.

      War on earth has always been and will be. This is the only way to win.
      But they can throw cruise missiles from ships. And then iron everything else with aviation. Having good experience again - Yugoslavia.

      And the experience of Syria, which the KR has been bombarding for so many years, and things are still there? Iran knows how to shoot drones, like planes.
    4. Butchcassidy 5 January 2020 17: 11 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      The United States will not be able to carry out such actions without consequences at home. Trump acts in his own way - to run over and then bargain. But here he went too far - no one will let Kassem Suleimani’s murder on the brakes.
  8. Bear040 5 January 2020 10: 41 New
    • 5
    • 1
    +4
    It’s time for the United States to stop poking its long nose into foreign countries, otherwise it will be pinched by detonating a miniature nuclear bomb opposite the Pentagon, and those who are willing to sacrifice themselves for this need not look for a long time in the countries offended by the USA, there are many of them
    1. donavi49 5 January 2020 10: 47 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Well, in the meantime, the United States drives meat in a constant stream to BV.
      26th detachment of marines (well, it's like a regiment of airborne forces, only from marines)



      And 82 is still being thrown

      1. Same lech 5 January 2020 10: 52 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        So the year of the Rat began ... or else it will be. what
      2. Grits 5 January 2020 12: 01 New
        • 8
        • 0
        +8
        Quote: donavi49
        And 82 is still being thrown

        They can go back like this.
        1. Evil Booth 5 January 2020 13: 04 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          I suspect that not a tag https://cs6.pikabu.ru/post_img/big/2014/03/04/11/1393953237_1780035545.JPG
      3. Evil Booth 5 January 2020 13: 03 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        no a burnt donut clearly has increased buoyancy relative to pale-faced
    2. Sky strike fighter 5 January 2020 10: 51 New
      • 11
      • 1
      +10
      Well, the US behavior also surprises me. The killing of Suleimani actually opened Pandora's box, legitimizing lawlessness. Or does Trump think that he is immortal?
      1. cniza 5 January 2020 12: 17 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        So they always did this, just not everyone can answer them.
  9. Gray brother 5 January 2020 10: 45 New
    • 15
    • 0
    +15
    The American Fuhrer threatens to strike at civilian targets. For a terrorist state, this is normal.
    1. Sky strike fighter 5 January 2020 11: 36 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Feeling deja vu. We all saw it somewhere. Like 17 years ago, before March 2003. But this time, everything is much worse for the United States.
      1. Gray brother 5 January 2020 11: 42 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        Quote: Sky Strike fighter
        much worse for the USA.

        That is yes. The Americans apparently decided to get hooked up wherever possible.
        1. cniza 5 January 2020 12: 16 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          So they get upset that something should burst.
    2. Grits 5 January 2020 12: 03 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: Gray Brother
      The American Fuhrer threatens to strike at civilian targets. For a terrorist state, this is normal.

      But many comrades from the promised country called my posts nonsense, when I said that this is the real state terrorism
      1. Gray brother 5 January 2020 12: 14 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: Gritsa
        this is real state terrorism

        They are the US satellite - this is also the norm for them, they are also terrorists.
  10. Krasnodar 5 January 2020 10: 48 New
    • 11
    • 20
    -9
    And again clouds gathered over the heads of the freedom-loving ayatollahs tied with a turban. Peaceful KIIR men leave the factories for the production of shahid belts for the girls of Gaza oppressed by the illegal Zionist education and with stern, laconic bearded ranks are drawn to air defense installations. The leaders of the country attach brooches with a dove of peace to their black dresses tearing at the bald eagle of American imperialism. The pathetic red-haired clown, this agent of the Lesser Shaitan, did not have long to mock the freedom-loving Basij - Iranian F-14s will soon find themselves over the squalid white building of the District of Columbia, which costs 20 green in Zhukovka, at the peak of demand for Rublevskaya real estate ...
    1. Same lech 5 January 2020 10: 54 New
      • 15
      • 1
      +14
      But how Israel rubs its dirty hands in anticipation of a US attack on Iran ...
      Israel’s blue dream to crush Iran with the wrong hands and lives ... scoundrels.
      1. Krasnodar 5 January 2020 11: 03 New
        • 10
        • 17
        -7
        The dirty hands of the Zionists, who trained the thugs of the depressed Shah’s regime during the shameless Iranian women wearing short skirts, tremble with the inevitable retaliation of the formidable Guardians of the Islamic Revolution, who have proved their fighting
        qualities in the capture of imperialist diplomats in Tehran. The vile plans of Ivanka Kushner and Barbara Streisand will be frustrated by the consolidation of the IRGC, Basij and the army!
        Py. Sy - Zionist scoundrels are preparing for the noble blow of retaliation against the ayatol in their peaceful people.
        1. Same lech 5 January 2020 11: 07 New
          • 6
          • 0
          +6
          Long live a free and independent Iran !!! smile

          Well, it’s necessary how Trump excited everyone smile and supporters and opponents of both Zionists and Iran ... here is an example of a born provocateur ... the main thing is to get into a fight so that as many people as possible get into it ... I recognize the signs of Gapon's priest.
          1. Krasnodar 5 January 2020 11: 10 New
            • 11
            • 12
            -1
            Trump is still that bug - on the threshold of bankruptcy in his young years he convinced lenders to continue to sponsor a failed project in advance - he eventually became a billionaire laughing
        2. businessv 5 January 2020 11: 19 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: Krasnodar
          The vile plans of Ivanka Kushner and Barbara Streisand will be frustrated by the consolidation of the IRGC, Basij and the army!

          Enough to mock you, colleague, the first post was enough for your eyes, the second is already a farce. Indeed, in fact, a world-wide, large dictate is struggling with a small, regional dictate, and everyone understands this.
          1. Krasnodar 5 January 2020 11: 22 New
            • 8
            • 14
            -6
            Quite right - the shah kept pace, and Khomeini went to the bank for the sake of obtaining monarchy assets. I just love the reinforced concrete syllable of the Soviet press, so whenever possible I write something like that))
            1. SirCyrill 6 January 2020 20: 33 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              And write more! I always laugh when I read))
        3. K-50 5 January 2020 12: 02 New
          • 2
          • 1
          +1
          Quote: Krasnodar
          at the time of shameless Iranian women wearing short skirts

          Well, considering that the Jews a hundred years ago were selling their daughters in brothels in Turkey, Latin America and other countries, then wearing short skirts is not the worst. request lol
          1. Krasnodar 5 January 2020 12: 11 New
            • 9
            • 4
            +5
            I can tell in detail the ethnic composition of the brothels of Israel lol
            1. K-50 5 January 2020 12: 27 New
              • 4
              • 0
              +4
              Quote: Krasnodar
              I can tell in detail the ethnic composition of the brothels of Israel lol

              You confuse the desire to go to work, albeit such. Women who prefer to work on their backs have always had enough. I pointed out that Jewish parents sold their daughters for this.
              As the saying goes: feel the difference.
              Not a single normal family, as if living in starvation, did not sell their daughters.
              Yes, there were all sorts of life circumstances. but they didn’t fall before this. request
              1. Krasnodar 5 January 2020 12: 31 New
                • 8
                • 5
                +3
                What kind of daughters did they sell in a brothel? laughing The only case I know of is the “marriage agency scandal” at the beginning of the 20th century. "Grooms" came to make brides in Odessa and the surrounding area, mainly from the United States. The girls who were going to prepare for the wedding were handed over to brothels. That's all there was to sell daughters, etc. - just nonsense
              2. Evil Booth 5 January 2020 13: 05 New
                • 0
                • 4
                -4
                hi in ancient Egypt during the construction of the pyramids the royal daughter cost 1 night 1 stone
              3. SirCyrill 6 January 2020 20: 45 New
                • 1
                • 1
                0
                Not a single normal family, as if living in starvation, did not sell their daughters.
                “Ah, of course, because the Russians are highly spiritual, not like some Jews there.”

                Well, the reality was somewhat different. I didn’t find about daughters, but my wives were “rented” for a sweet soul. I think that they also passed their daughters.

                In the 2th century, Patriarch Filaret denounced the servants of the fact that, going to distant service, they often laid wives to their comrades and instead of interest gave them the right to use their wives laid with them. If the debtor did not redeem his wife on time, then the lender sold her for fornication to another, another third, etc. About how our ancestors traded their wives, the following description gives the concept: “When,” says Petreus, “poor and petty nobles or townspeople will go to extremes and they won't have money, they wander around the back streets and see if there are any rich fellows and, offering them their wives for fornication, they take 3 thalers from them, depending on the beauty and the favors of the wife. The husband always goes outside the door and guards so that no one interferes with them. "
    2. Grits 5 January 2020 12: 07 New
      • 10
      • 1
      +9
      Offering you to change the nickname Krasnodar to Tel Aviv. it will be more honest. And the name of the Russian city will not get dirty with your flat jokes.
      1. Krasnodar 5 January 2020 12: 14 New
        • 8
        • 9
        -1
        I can advise you to change your nickname to Islamic Jihad - just an organization controlled by the late Suleymani with headquarters in Damascus - and Slavic Gritsa is not the topic))
        1. SirCyrill 6 January 2020 21: 04 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Yes, here every second "patriot" in his anti-American zeal somehow quickly forgot that these very Iranians, whom they love so much, fought on the side of the Mujahideen in the 80s.

          Their logic is strange.
          1. Krasnodar 6 January 2020 21: 07 New
            • 6
            • 0
            +6
            People do not like America - sho zrobit laughing
            But shedding tears on a bearded half-bandyuk - half-majadhead - is already too much ..
    3. IGOR GORDEEV 5 January 2020 13: 02 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Krasnodar
      And again clouds gathered over the heads of the freedom-loving ayatollahs tied with a turban.

      It is hardly believed that peace and prosperity will come after the bombing of Iran (the United States showed this on the example of Iraq). A chain reaction is possible when the region breaks out and even more terrorist rabble divorces ... For the United States, war is an economic and political engine, but Israel is not behind the “seven” seas and, as it were, the costs of chaos have not turned out to be too big.
      1. Krasnodar 5 January 2020 13: 05 New
        • 7
        • 3
        +4
        Probably yes. Will be considerable.
  11. knn54 5 January 2020 10: 50 New
    • 6
    • 1
    +5
    The destruction of CULTURAL values ​​is called vandalism or (in modern language) -TERRORISM. From this began IG and Co., "worthy" students of the Yankees and Zionists
    1. cniza 5 January 2020 12: 14 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      So, who raised and raised ISIS?
  12. rocket757 5 January 2020 11: 03 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    Trump wants to win the election. Obvious and probable.
    1. cniza 5 January 2020 12: 12 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      It is clear, but now he has begun to make strategic mistakes. His internal enemies can bang him, make it easier for them, and lay the blame on Iran. Trump now needs to take great care of his safety.
      1. rocket757 5 January 2020 13: 30 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        A difficult question of domestic policy.
        If you look carefully, nobody like Trump is visible to them!
        1. cniza 5 January 2020 13: 31 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          That is so, he is a smart and dangerous enemy.
      2. businessv 6 January 2020 13: 10 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: cniza
        Trump now needs to take great care of his safety.

        There, the whole team around the clock is preoccupied with its safety, this is an order, but providing a team of psychiatrists would not hurt!
        1. cniza 6 January 2020 20: 49 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          I'm afraid that not everything is as rosy as you imagine, but he does not need a psychiatrist.
  13. G. Georgiev 5 January 2020 11: 08 New
    • 7
    • 4
    +3
    American weapons are helpless when using Russian electronic warfare systems even at long distances. They can also turn off GPS through the Tirada-2C system. Let the Russians show who dominates there.
    1. rocket757 5 January 2020 11: 18 New
      • 5
      • 1
      +4
      Americans are not suckers. Their scientific and industrial potential is great. They make weapons effective in any scenario, against any opponent.
      If they intended to go against a well-armed, equipped army, they would start to make military systems with the necessary parameters.
      With the modern development of military equipment, the means of attack clearly dominate! It is harder to defend, ROAD !!! Because how to fight off a large number of cheap weapons, it’s much more expensive, and the means of protection, very expensive, you can have not so much ....
      It turns out, as always, either vigorous arguments, or your own "tanks" at the "airfields" of the enemy!
      1. cniza 5 January 2020 12: 10 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: rocket757

        It turns out, as always, either vigorous arguments, or your own "tanks" at the "airfields" of the enemy!


        Unfortunately, there are almost no other options.
        1. rocket757 5 January 2020 13: 27 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: cniza
          Unfortunately, there are almost no other options.

          The option of mutual disarmament has not yet been considered.
          1. cniza 5 January 2020 13: 29 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            As strange as it sounds, it is not beneficial to anyone ...
      2. K-50 5 January 2020 12: 20 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: rocket757
        Americans are not suckers. If they intended to go against a well-armed, equipped army, they would start to make military systems with the necessary parameters.

        That is, in your opinion, the Russian Armed Forces do not belong to a well-armed, equipped army?
        Against whom then did they not make weapons? Are the aliens involved? belay lol
        1. rocket757 5 January 2020 13: 25 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          A military conflict with Russia is currently impossible for the FSA, for objective reasons. You can refer to the words of Trump, quoted recently - Russia is a country that can destroy the United States, the ONLY. And nothing can prevent this if such a moment comes.
          It’s impossible to calm down on this, everything must be done so that Russia always has such an opportunity ..... to destroy any aggressor.
      3. businessv 6 January 2020 13: 12 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: rocket757
        or your "tanks" at the "airfields" of the enemy!

        This is for sure, and even better, the complete absence of enemy airfields.
        1. rocket757 6 January 2020 14: 27 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: businessv
          Quote: rocket757
          or your "tanks" at the "airfields" of the enemy!

          This is for sure, and even better, the complete absence of enemy airfields.

          Better, there is no doubt .... only when it comes to this, it is not at all clear.
  14. Sergst 5 January 2020 11: 13 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Mountain Shooter

    To make a nuclear bomb to Iran - there may not be enough time ... The situation has become extremely acute. Air defense is very weak in Iran. And the red-haired clown is completely overwhelmed ... Kills anyone he wants ...

    But do not you confuse Trump's words about the desire to bomb with the desire to do it?
  15. The comment was deleted.
    1. Butchcassidy 5 January 2020 17: 05 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Why can't we? Have you been bitten by Ukrainians?
  16. Zomanus 5 January 2020 11: 36 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    Ah well done !!!)))
    He does what he wants and still threatens those who dare to answer.
    And the coolest thing is, all these UNs just swallowed and are waiting.
    And if Iran gives an answer, then the UN will immediately condemn aggression against the States and condemn, yes. And maybe even immediately give permission for a retaliatory strike, such as protection.
    But Trump will wait, and if Iran just gets washed, then Trump will continue to knit everyone and everything.
    1. cniza 5 January 2020 12: 07 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Iran can not answer, but only how and where?
  17. parusnik 5 January 2020 11: 43 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Blows on these targets and on Iran itself will be very powerful and will be delivered very quickly. The US no longer wants threats!
    .By Iran bombing. "Generals" will come to power. And again, Iran is in harness with the United States. This is the worst option. Russia will express concern. The best option, Russia urgently, convene the UN Security Council on this situation ... Not much fervor will cool ...
    1. cniza 5 January 2020 12: 06 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      The United States spits on the UN, but this must be done.
    2. businessv 6 January 2020 13: 16 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: parusnik
      . The best option, Russia urgently, to convene the UN Security Council on the current situation ... Not much fervor will cool ...

      So China, Iran and Russia recently held a joint naval exercise, who cares, or who has cooled down? And the UN certainly can neither stop nor condemn anyone. Where is the headquarters? And it should be in a neutral country.
  18. Mutno 5 January 2020 11: 50 New
    • 3
    • 3
    0
    Iran this time, Israel-the United States is too tough .. Break off the teeth!
    Iran of the USSR helped in the 41st, now we are obliged to help them soldier
    1. cniza 5 January 2020 12: 05 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      We do not owe anything to anyone, but most likely we will help.
      1. Mutno 5 January 2020 12: 44 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: cniza
        We do not owe anything to anyone, but most likely we will help.

        We’ll help. But it’ll be too late .. I’m looking here, some “comrades” giggle en masse ..
        What a shame it all .. negative
        1. cniza 5 January 2020 12: 51 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Everything is complicated there, we don’t know much, but our specialists (in air defense) have been there since the last century ...
        2. cniza 5 January 2020 13: 24 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: Mutno

          We’ll help. But it’ll be too late .. I’m looking here, some “comrades” giggle en masse ..
          What a shame it all .. negative


          Read this article, very informative and there is something to think about:

          https://topwar.ru/166407-zachem-tramp-ubil-sulejmani-i-pochemu-jeto-vazhno-dlja-nas.html
    2. Krasnodar 5 January 2020 13: 18 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      Quote: Mutno
      Iran this time, Israel-the United States is too tough .. Break off the teeth!
      Iran of the USSR helped in the 41st, now we are obliged to help them soldier

      Iran???? How did you help? During the Soviet-British capture of pro-Nazi Iran, 40 Red Army soldiers were killed under control.
  19. DPN
    DPN 5 January 2020 11: 51 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    There are no competitors yet, so they can calmly kick. The USSR was gone and the scribe came. The world was on its knees.
  20. axiles100682 5 January 2020 11: 59 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Why not Iran answer semmetrically? Valnut a couple of three American officers. There are a lot of them in the BV, you can find the means. Special forces to use.
  21. rocket757 5 January 2020 12: 00 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Direct, serious fighting no one needs ....
    Minke whale attacks on Iran, pirate attacks, an element of tactics to change power in an objectionable country.
    Nothing new, basically. Economic pressure, plus provocative gangster actions / provocations.
    This tactic is still in priority with such a small enemy as Iran.
    Nothing has been determined yet. We will see.
  22. cniza 5 January 2020 12: 03 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Just in case, the US authorities recommended that their citizens in Iraq leave this country.


    Americans will be beaten around the world, including the United States itself.
  23. RUS96 5 January 2020 12: 12 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: The same Lech
    With the political will of the Kremlin

    We don’t need Trump to crap before the elections. That’s why there won’t be any 2nd Vietnam. Now everyone is putting pressure on Iran so that he wouldn’t do anything in return. Including us. In the long run, they will offer to buy different air defense level.
  24. Vitaly Tsymbal 5 January 2020 12: 20 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    I don’t think that Iran is so weak both in the military and in the political system, if it were different, then the Americans would have long “built democracy there”. Iran in 1978 (when the operation of the American special forces failed) and Iran in 2020 are two different states. I think that today Tehran also set goals, and not only in the Middle East region. Shiites are influential in western Afghanistan (Herat, Shindand) .... other “gifts for US citizens” may be prepared, but the fact that the US is stronger than Iran is not an indicator of successful military operations. If Russia does not speak on any side (although "quietly" will be on the side of Israel), then China may "quietly" speak on the side of Iran. And waging a war “across the oceans” is rather economically “hard”. Moreover, Sunnis “under the guise” may begin to “spoil” Americans and Jews ...
  25. huntsman650 5 January 2020 13: 03 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    On the whole, minke whales spit all in one place. No one else can afford such impudence (
  26. Kerensky 5 January 2020 13: 21 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Air Force, Air Defense, KR ... They will roll it out - they will not roll it ... But for some reason everyone is silent about the Strait. So, they bypassed .. I’ve looked at Marinin’s traffic, there it’s possible to pay for it in an hour from the shore ..
    Will Liberia and Panama be offended? So everyone knows to whom the sides actually belong ....
  27. Sergey M. Karasev 5 January 2020 13: 49 New
    • 1
    • 3
    -2
    For Americans, there is another unpleasant consequence of a strike on Iran.
    Shiite units controlled by Tehran easily and naturally block all ground communications of the US group in Idlib. Yes, and she herself (as well as the US contingent in Iraq) will very quickly see the sky with a sheepskin because of constant attacks and shelling. Oil export from Idlib becomes impossible. -> The presence of American troops in Idlib is unnecessary. -> They finally leave Syria
  28. VLADIMIR VLADIVOSTOK 5 January 2020 14: 04 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    They scared a hedgehog with a bare ass. The USA wants to arrange jihad on its territory. Iranians will raise the green banner.
  29. Butchcassidy 5 January 2020 17: 04 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    I do not think that threats from Washington will affect Iranians. If Trump thinks that Iran could just endure the assassination of Kassem Suleimani and not answer, then he is deeply mistaken. Without revenge, Iran will not be able to save face. And to save face is everything in the Middle East and Asia.

    And the level of response will be consistent with the figure of Kassem Suleimani. Probably the goals of revenge will be ambassadors at least.
  30. Old26 5 January 2020 18: 16 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Quote: donavi49
    In principle, there are chances to shoot back massively by all PTRCs.

    Iran has no chance to massively shoot all PTRCs. Iran has taken the path of building North Korean missile forces. A large number of missiles with a fairly limited number of launchers. As an example. The IRGC has a Shahab-1/2 missile brigade (12-18 launchers) with a total number of missiles of the order of 200-300. The same goes for other systems. The same Fateh-110 complex - 18 launchers and about 600 missiles for them. The same goes for other missiles. So do not shoot back in bulk. The first, second volley can still be done, but then it is extremely unlikely ...

    Quote: hrych
    The Hussites successfully beat on the bases of the Saudis, and even the Iranians are wailing, so are wacking both Qatar and Saudi Arabia ...

    The word thrashed is not very true. Saudi launches were, but not massive. They simply don’t have so many rockets to hit the Saudis. In addition, unlike the Yemenis, who operate on the principle of "let it go and washed off," everything is different with Iran. The Saudis can strike Iran with their medium-range missiles. Moreover, the enterprises of the military-industrial complex, military bases. So the answer will be. And unlike Iran, the Saudis or Qatar will recover. There is money and equipment will be sold. But no one will sell anything to Iran.

    Quote: Terentich
    Quote: The same Lech
    Iran now has reason to return to developing its atomic bomb again

    Did he stop developing it for even a second? wassat

    Stopped. Since 2015. And only in the past, 2019 work resumed. But this is a matter of many months and years. In order to reach the level of creation of weapons-grade materials, Iran will need at least 10 months ...

    Quote: dvina71
    Quote: Victor_B
    Just oversaturated air defense capabilities.

    There are several difficulties .. First .. Iranian air defense throughout the 90s, Russian specialists were closely engaged. Do not forget the presence of IRAN 1l222 .. emnip 6 sets.
    Second .. Iran, not Iraq .. It will not work to comply with the low-altitude flight profile of the Kyrgyz Republic. Either the mountains fly around, I think these routes are sealed with air defense systems. Or over the mountains ...
    In general, not everything is so simple .. I think the Americans don’t start without a golden donkey ..

    Air defense in the 90th was carried out by Russian specialists. But at least a quarter century has passed. What specific air defense did they do? In the 90s, Iran had the main air defense system of the American “Hawk” and the Chinese HQ-2 (a clone of our S-75 complex). The radar systems delivered in recent years have certainly increased Iran’s air defense capabilities, but not so much as to talk about powerful air defense. Saturate, they will saturate it. The Americans showed perfectly what they can do with the air defense system as an example of the war in Iraq in the early 90's. The systems were so oversaturated with interference that the radar did not show anything at all. The same thing will happen in Iran. Shooting radars will die, and the presence of good jamming-proof Russian radars will not solve anything. Plus the massive use of anti-radar missiles, plus missile traps for the glut of air defense systems ...
    A low-altitude flight profile will indeed be difficult to maintain. But no one will massively use CD in areas with dense air defense until these air defense systems are neutralized
    Plus and donkey with gold can not be discarded ...

    Quote: Servisinzhener
    No less than air defense systems there, modern radars are needed in the quantity necessary for a round-the-clock airspace survey.

    The Iranians have some modern radars. But the point is in them, if the radar of the SAM itself (firing) will be clogged with interference?

    Quote: Sky Strike fighter
    But has Iran just recently, when it struck the oil fields of Saudi Arabia, not shown what it is capable of? Do you think Iran will only fight back? Yes, and the United States will not pull up a ground operation in Iran. Only attacks from the Kyrgyz Republic. And you won’t win the war. Syria has been fired at remotely for many years, and the effect is near zero. Yes, and Iran is full of BRMD and the Kyrgyz Republic.

    Not shown. The launch of 6-10 drones or cruise missiles using the frankly "dumb" Saudi air defense system is not an indicator of what Iran can do.
    No one is talking about the land operation yet. And it is unlikely to be. But with a contactless war, the United States will be able to bomb Iran, if not in the Stone Age, then at least neutralize its potential as a state.
    Syria bombarded for several years? As far as I remember there were only three cases.
    Iran has a lot of ballistic missile systems, but very few launchers themselves.

    Quote: Gritsa
    Quote: The same Lech
    If Russia helps Iran with modern means and air defense specialists, then this adventure will cost the Americans dearly

    For Iran, this is the only way out. Come to Russia with a request for help with air defense systems. But time is running out - they are needed now. We can’t do it quickly. except to share the old ones. I think the S-300s remained in the warehouses, which are being replaced by the S-400 gradually. Probably enough has remained "Os" and the old "Buk". Although the best for them is Shell. To place on all critical objects to reflect Tomogavkov. If you bombard each object with a bunch of Tomogavks in order to oversaturate the capabilities of air defense, then no Tomogavks will be enough. And without them, the war will end immediately.

    And will they want to go to the "infidels" for help? We can and will be able to supply them with the old complexes, that's just staff training - about six months.
    To put "Wasps" is generally beyond understanding. They have a shell (they took part of the supply to Syria, because they paid for the delivery). But to place 2 dozen "Carapace" around fifty objects - that will give. They will bring down a couple of Tomahawks before they are neutralized ...
    And there is no need to oversaturate the PVO capabilities with the Tomahawks. There are also missile traps, fairly simple and cheap, and anti-radar. Just imagine that there are 10 such trap missiles, plus a pair of anti-radar missiles, going to the Shell. And that’s all. "Shell" faucets

    Quote: JonnyT
    Iran does not have air defense, but there is an opportunity to wipe Israel, the Saudis from the face of the earth, and destroy all US bases in the district, and block the bay. Will the USA accept such an unprofitable exchange ??? No, of course not, but in the future Israel will be merged, like the whole BV. So we are waiting for an escalation in Ukraine, Karabakh. The United States, at most, is capable of targeted attacks on the IRGC on the periphery. And all these tweets, menacing cheeks on the eve of the election campaign

    There is air defense, but it is very diverse and rather low-power. It is extremely difficult to wipe Israel off the face of the earth, since, according to experts, Israeli missile defense systems can intercept up to 75 targets. And so many missiles capable of reaching Israel Iran is not able to simultaneously launch ...
    Iranians will not be able to destroy all US bases either. Unless only the first salvo can achieve the goals. Then the hunt will begin for the launchers. They can block the bay by mining it. But they will be able to block the sea channels, can tankers pass near the territory of the same Oman - HZ ... But then there is a double-edged sword. Gulf countries have pipelines extending beyond the Gulf. They can continue to pump oil through them, although not to such an extent. But Iran will "shoot itself in the foot", as they block the strait and block
  31. Old26 5 January 2020 18: 16 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Quote: Sky Strike fighter
    The most unpleasant thing is that they really can. The forces of the Pindo stanets are enough to roll Iran into ruins.

    Now the United States has 60 bayonets scattered throughout the region, the same amount as until recently in the Greater Idlib alone among the greens. Is that enough?

    And it is unlikely that the Americans are going to conduct large-scale ground operations. maximum may be local landings. That's enough for this. Yes, for sure, and even toss bayonets

    Quote: Sky Strike fighter
    No matter how Iranian generals boast of their courage and a good army, they cannot oppose anything.

    That is, the numerous Iranian BRMD and the Kyrgyz Republic do not count?

    Numerous rockets are. There are no numerous launchers. The Iranians have about three hundred Fateh-110s for Iranians, and only one brigade of launchers - 18 pieces (according to the open directories of 2018). And what's the point in these 300 missiles, if they can launch at the same time 18. Okay, they will be able to launch another second and third volley. What next?

    Quote: Sky Strike fighter
    They don’t have normal air defense - and this is the very first and huge minus of Iran’s defense against such a sophisticated and arrogant aggressor as the United States.

    But does the USA have normal air defense? An attack on Saudi Arabia showed the Patriots' "effectiveness" in all its glory.

    And was there US air defense involved, or were the US air defense systems used? This, sorry, are two big differences. It’s the same as comparing the training of the USSR Air Defense Forces with the Egyptian Air Defense Forces (or Syrians) who shot white light with a minimum of enemy aircraft shot down. Still those warriors. Give such a side-handed S-400, and with it, they will miss all the targets ...

    Quote: Sky Strike fighter
    Americans have long realized that getting involved in a fight on earth is extremely foolish for them. Moreover, the experience of Korea, Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan prompted them to draw up such actions.

    War on earth has always been and will be. This is the only way to win.

    Not always. It is enough to bring the country into a state of devastation and the country itself will collapse. Take the same Yugoslavia. And there were no landings, but in fact the Americans won this war. Yugoslavia, and specifically Serbia as an independent country did not become.
    They were unlucky with Korea and Vietnam because of the support of the USSR and China. They torn Iraq apart, though they did it on their own head, removing the counterweight to Iran. In Afghanistan, they were stuck for a very long time. The experience of the USSR did not teach them anything ...
    So you can beat the bomb too

    Quote: Sky Strike fighter
    But they can throw cruise missiles from ships. And then iron everything else with aviation. Having good experience again - Yugoslavia.

    And the experience of Syria, which the KR has been bombarding for so many years, and things are still there? Iran knows how to shoot drones, like planes.

    Syria experience. Do not tell me chronologically how many times in all these years, Americans bombarded Syria with cruise missiles. Over the seven years of the civil war, how many times? Fifty, one hundred, or maybe those same 3-4 cases that were ??? And drones. Are they unbreakable or what? They are even easier to shoot down than manned aircraft

    Quote: Mutno
    Iran this time, Israel-the United States is too tough .. Break off the teeth!
    Iran of the USSR helped in the 41st, now we are obliged to help them soldier

    Are you obligated? Then go ahead. In the draft board, a request to send to Iran as a volunteer to fight American imperialism.
    Russia NOTHING Iran should not. And nothing we NOT OBLIGATED делать
  32. Charik 6 January 2020 19: 57 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    ........ sos stupid