US attacks again: media report new air strikes in Iraq


A day after the assassination of Iranian General Suleymani near Baghdad, a new airstrike was launched. As suggested by a number of sources, the U.S. Air Force struck.


According to several media reports, including the Sky News Arabia channel, on the night of January XNUMX, air strikes were carried out on the cars of the leaders of the so-called pro-Iranian militia.

It is reported that the attack occurred near Baghdad, twenty-seven kilometers north of the city. According to media reports, at the moment there are at least six dead, three more are in critical condition.

According to Iraq’s state television, al-Hashd al-Shaabi leaders rode in the attacked vehicles. It is also noted that the attack was carried out by the US Air Force.

The militias themselves say that cars with doctors were bombarded from the air (we are talking about a “medical convoy”). In addition, the Shiite militia refutes media information about the death of any commanders.

Recall that a day earlier in the area of ​​Baghdad airport, General Kassem Suleimani, deputy commander of the militia of the aforementioned Al-Hashd al-Shaabi Abu Mahdi al-Muandis, and ten other people died as a result of an American drone strike.

US authorities have not yet made any statements regarding the incident.

But there are unofficial comments. Newsweek Magazine, citing a statement by a Pentagon spokesman, revealed details of the airstrikes on the night of today.

A "high probability" source claimed death as a result of an attack by Shubul al-Zayedi, the commander of the "Imam Ali Battalions." These units are related to the Al-Hashd al-Shaabi militia.

Other leaders of the militias who could have died from air strikes were named: R. al-Karaoui and H. al-Jazari. The latter commands the Khorasani Brigade.


The media associated with the militias, however, deny the death of Shiite commanders and claim that the Americans hit the cars with doctors. For example, Al-Mayadin Channel (Lebanon) insists that al-Zayedi is safe and sound.

A statement from the US military has just appeared.

Miles Keggins, a colonel in charge of public relations at the coalition headquarters in Iraq, categorically rejects information about airstrikes distributed by regional and other media.

He denies the involvement of the U.S. Air Force in the indicated missile attack on the convoy. Mr. Keggins succinctly said that

"The coalition has not launched air strikes against targets in the area of ​​the Taji camp north of Baghdad in recent days."
Photos used:
alarabiya.net
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

117 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Positiv 4 January 2020 09: 31 New
    • 7
    • 8
    -1
    Decided to intimidate? Oh well..
    Stop gentlemen !!!!!!
    1. private person 4 January 2020 09: 47 New
      • 21
      • 6
      +15
      Decided to intimidate? Oh well..

      This is not intimidation, but a demonstration of our superiority, we did it and no one decides to us. The USA, using the example of the Middle East, shows its vassals what will happen to them if they want to shake their rights.
      1. bessmertniy 4 January 2020 09: 58 New
        • 10
        • 4
        +6
        The Americans are trying to decapitate the Shiite pro-Iranian militia. It is hoped that without leadership these structures will crumble.
        1. Olgovich 4 January 2020 10: 39 New
          • 16
          • 7
          +9
          Quote: bessmertniy
          pro-Iranian militia. It is hoped that without leadership these structures will crumble.

          This is a voluntary association. Therefore, it cannot crumble. Will nominate new leaders.
          1. maidan.izrailovich 4 January 2020 12: 07 New
            • 3
            • 3
            0
            This is a voluntary association.

            Yes, and on a religious basis. Among them are quite a few fanatics. These can hardly be intimidated. Only if you harden even more.
            1. Alex777 4 January 2020 13: 46 New
              • 7
              • 2
              +5
              Since the Yankees otmazatsya from striking, it means that there were really doctors in the convoy. And no change came out.
        2. private person 4 January 2020 10: 42 New
          • 2
          • 3
          -1
          Americans are trying to decapitate the Shiite pro-Iranian militia

          Americans who need to beheaded, they always have their own interests above all else. At this stage, the Shiite pro-Iranian militia is a victim, and in the future, everything can change.
      2. Positiv 4 January 2020 10: 01 New
        • 18
        • 10
        +8
        Quote: private person
        This is not intimidation, but a demonstration of our superiority, we did it and no one decides to us. USA by example

        The United States is just saving Israel again from the wrath of the Arabs of the BV and in general ..
        Here the hedgehog is clear! And this is a bunch in Israel, about the "Holocaust" .. Everything is thought out!
        It will be difficult for Putin there .. Again he will have to cover the Jews?
        It would be better for him not to go there .. hi
        1. atalef 4 January 2020 10: 11 New
          • 7
          • 21
          -14
          Quote: Pozitiv
          US just once again saves Israel from the wrath of the Arabs

          laughing
          what kind of Arabs is it?
          We have been cooperating with Arab countries against Iran for a long time
          Quote: Pozitiv
          And this is a bunch in Israel, about the "Holocaust" .. Everything is thought out!

          wink
          Quote: Pozitiv
          It will be difficult for Putin there .. Again he will have to cover the Jews?

          why only to Putin?
          Where are the Medvedevs and Shoigu?
          1. Positiv 4 January 2020 11: 21 New
            • 5
            • 4
            +1
            Quote: atalef
            what kind of Arabs is it?
            We have been cooperating with Arab countries against Iran for a long time

            We know how you collaborate on the principle of "divide and conquer .."
            Quote: atalef
            why only to Putin?
            Where are the Medvedevs and Shoigu?

            Everyone giggles in Israel and scoffs. Oh well
            Wait someday for the answer to the full and your dome will not save ..
          2. The comment was deleted.
        2. point3d 5 January 2020 01: 11 New
          • 2
          • 1
          +1
          Hey, "man," and you read what Pompeo tweeted about talking with Lavrov about liquidations. So, Russia knew, everything was agreed and everything began to be cleaned up.
      3. tihonmarine 4 January 2020 10: 38 New
        • 8
        • 4
        +4
        Quote: private person
        The USA, using the example of the Middle East, shows its vassals what will happen to them if they want to shake their rights.

        The United States does not show vassals, but those who oppose them, what consequences await all. This is no longer a show of force, but pure state terrorism. They showed their power and superiority, and that every leader of any country can be so eliminated.
        1. private person 4 January 2020 11: 08 New
          • 4
          • 3
          +1
          The US does not show vassals, but those who oppose them

          So in the open, no one is opposing them, at best they express concern. Exceptions Iran and North. Korea, which the United States turned into a rogue, imposed sanctions and forced others to support them.
        2. DymOk_v_dYmke 4 January 2020 13: 02 New
          • 3
          • 1
          +2
          Quote: tihonmarine
          The United States does not show vassals, but those who oppose them, what consequences await all. This is no longer a show of force, but pure state terrorism. They showed their power and superiority, and that every leader of any country can be so eliminated.

          The United States set an example of the fact that it is possible to "wet" the objectionable leaders of other states in the territory of the third. At least one, at least in bulk (in Davos, for example).
      4. orionvitt 4 January 2020 11: 32 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: private person
        This is not intimidation, but a demonstration of one’s superiority.

        But a demonstration of superiority in the form of a murder is not an attempt to intimidate?
        1. tihonmarine 4 January 2020 11: 59 New
          • 2
          • 3
          -1
          Quote: orionvitt
          But a demonstration of superiority in the form of a murder is not an attempt to intimidate?

          One and the same, only more sophisticated.
    2. atalef 4 January 2020 10: 00 New
      • 11
      • 15
      -4
      Quote: Pozitiv
      Decided to intimidate? Oh well..
      Stop gentlemen !!!!!!

      Otherwise what?
      1. Binder 4 January 2020 10: 05 New
        • 16
        • 18
        -2
        Otherwise, they will be damned in all Shiite mosques - it’s terrible to be scary! laughing
        1. Dmitry Vinner 4 January 2020 11: 10 New
          • 6
          • 2
          +4
          But in the Sunni praise.
      2. tihonmarine 4 January 2020 10: 39 New
        • 8
        • 7
        +1
        Quote: atalef
        Otherwise what?

        And nobody will ask you. You now sit and blow your nose in a rag.
        1. atalef 4 January 2020 10: 45 New
          • 8
          • 10
          -2
          Quote: tihonmarine
          Quote: atalef
          Otherwise what?

          And nobody will ask you. You now sit and blow your nose in a rag.

          The planes flew tonight, which is quite unusual for Shabbat.
          It is reported that the attack occurred near Baghdad, twenty-seven kilometers north of the city. According to media reports, at the moment there are at least six dead, three more are in critical condition.

          wink
          He denies the involvement of the U.S. Air Force in the indicated missile attack on the convoy. Mr. Keggins succinctly said that

          "The coalition has not launched air strikes against targets in the area of ​​the Taji camp north of Baghdad in recent days."

          laughing
          1. Krasnodar 4 January 2020 11: 09 New
            • 12
            • 6
            +6
            Heretics, wrecker, violated the holiness of the Sabbath! Shabes Koydesh - Holy Saturday! Fly, you know ...
            1. atalef 4 January 2020 11: 18 New
              • 4
              • 9
              -5
              Quote: Krasnodar
              Heretics, wrecker, violated the holiness of the Sabbath!

              You can only wet the coffee bag on Shabbat.
              Shiites are heretics in Islam.
      3. Positiv 4 January 2020 11: 22 New
        • 1
        • 4
        -3
        Quote: atalef
        Quote: Pozitiv
        Decided to intimidate? Oh well..
        Stop gentlemen !!!!!!

        Otherwise what?

        Oh wei as usual hehe
      4. Nyrobsky 4 January 2020 12: 59 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: atalef
        Quote: Pozitiv
        Decided to intimidate? Oh well..
        Stop gentlemen !!!!!!

        Otherwise what?

        It makes no sense to vang, we will find out soon. One thing can be said with full confidence, this will not end in good.
        1. atalef 4 January 2020 13: 06 New
          • 3
          • 5
          -2
          Quote: Nyrobsky
          Quote: atalef
          Quote: Pozitiv
          Decided to intimidate? Oh well..
          Stop gentlemen !!!!!!

          Otherwise what?

          It’s pointless to carry find out soon. One thing can be said with full confidence, this will not end in good.

          1. Nyrobsky 4 January 2020 13: 15 New
            • 6
            • 3
            +3
            I see that you are in a good mood demonstrating irony and optimism, being confident that Iran will silently swallow this pill. There is no “respected" optimist of today - this is nothing but a poorly informed pessimist and soon you will have the opportunity to see this. hi
      5. Scoun 5 January 2020 11: 27 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: atalef
        Quote: Pozitiv
        Decided to intimidate? Oh well..
        Stop gentlemen !!!!!!

        Otherwise what?

        I remembered an ancient joke.
        Two brothers / friends scoff at the third, constantly kicks and slaps in the back. In general, the third could not stand it, howl yelling with clenched fists - well, you got me! So they got it that if you don’t stop and behave differently, I will do it to you!
        Brothers with fear, what will you do !?
        The younger, with his arms akimbo, answers - and I will hide!

        I why it was remembered, many forum users as children throw words, threats, but usually children’s.
        I think many people know the picture, the children fought, one blew, is crying, 30 meters away from the opponent and begins to threaten the “Swede” - so I will catch you! You will get such a puppy from me!
        PS.
        As the GDP said, if you can’t avoid fights, you must beat first.
  2. Retvizan 8 4 January 2020 09: 39 New
    • 30
    • 2
    +28
    Russia is saved from such tricks, only the presence of nuclear weapons.
    The fate of Iraq and Yugoslavia is very instructive.
    As it turned out, you can kick Iran.
    Impunity breeds permissiveness!
    1. tihonmarine 4 January 2020 10: 43 New
      • 8
      • 6
      +2
      Quote: Retvizan 8
      The fate of Iraq and Yugoslavia is very instructive.
      As it turned out, you can kick Iran.

      Yeah, they got to Iran for more than 10 years, and finally decided. I always thought that the US military has more intelligence than politicians. Wrong in their minds, as much as in Hillary.
      1. DRM
        DRM 4 January 2020 13: 26 New
        • 2
        • 2
        0
        Quote: tihonmarine
        Quote: Retvizan 8
        The fate of Iraq and Yugoslavia is very instructive.
        As it turned out, you can kick Iran.

        Yeah, they got to Iran for more than 10 years, and finally decided. I always thought that the US military has more intelligence than politicians. Wrong in their minds, as much as in Hillary.

        So after all, the order was given personally by Trump-pam-pamp. What does the "mind of the military."
        1. madsollo 5 January 2020 06: 13 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          That's just the decision was made on the basis of data and analytics provided by the military and intelligence ... The warriors justified the low probability of an "answer" by announcing 52 targets in Iran, so Trampushka only rolled the American flag and tweeted - there is nothing to say ...
    2. Nyrobsky 4 January 2020 13: 07 New
      • 3
      • 2
      +1
      Quote: Retvizan 8
      As it turned out, you can kick Iran.
      Impunity breeds permissiveness!

      You can kick it, but before you do this, you need to think carefully about the consequences. Most likely, the word “impunity” does not fit the event. The United States will receive a response on any. How will the exchange of "courtesies" end? is another question.
    3. Grits 4 January 2020 13: 21 New
      • 3
      • 3
      0
      Quote: Retvizan 8
      Russia is saved from such tricks, only the presence of nuclear weapons.
      The fate of Iraq and Yugoslavia is very instructive.
      As it turned out, you can kick Iran.
      Impunity breeds permissiveness!

      As practice shows, a solid, deeply layered air defense and anti-ship missile systems on the coast can also save from attacks by the United States, besides nuclear weapons.
  3. Binder 4 January 2020 09: 39 New
    • 14
    • 37
    -23
    Trump has opened the season of hunting for the leaders of Shiite terror. Good luck and success, Donald! good
    1. Ingvar 72 4 January 2020 09: 51 New
      • 27
      • 4
      +23
      Quote: Bindyuzhnik
      Good luck and success, Donald!

      I wish the United States to receive an adequate response to the destruction of government officials of another state.
      1. Binder 4 January 2020 09: 54 New
        • 10
        • 32
        -22
        Quote: Ingvar 72
        I wish the USA

        Your right. That's just the probability that this donation will come true is zero.
        1. tihonmarine 4 January 2020 10: 48 New
          • 6
          • 3
          +3
          Quote: Bindyuzhnik
          That's just the probability that this donation will come true is zero.

          I just wrote below that a large number of ordinary people will suffer. Is it not clear that this freed up the hands of all terrorists and the answers will fly to the United States and other countries and to your country.
        2. Astronaut 4 January 2020 13: 20 New
          • 3
          • 1
          +2
          That's just the probability that this donation will come true is zero.

          What are you, but did the World Trade Center and the Pentagon collapse in 2001 from the wind?
      2. tihonmarine 4 January 2020 10: 45 New
        • 4
        • 2
        +2
        Quote: Ingvar 72
        I wish the United States to receive an adequate response to the destruction of government officials of another state.

        But answers will receive ordinary people, and to a lesser extent gos.litsa.
    2. Olgovich 4 January 2020 10: 49 New
      • 13
      • 8
      +5
      Quote: Bindyuzhnik
      Trump has opened the season of hunting for the leaders of Shiite terror. Good luck and success, Donald!

      Examples of terror are a lot of USA.
      Give examples of the "terror" of Iran.

      By the way, where the United States "fought" with terror, terrorists become ..... ORDER more, and civilians, by MILLION less:: Iraq with ISIS and Afghanistan, to help you.

      Before the invasion of Iraq, there were NO ISIS ....

      The Albanian breeding ground for terrorists, drug dealers, traffickers in people and organs - also created by the United States.

      Etc.

      Shaw, the log from an eye is not picked out?
      1. tihonmarine 4 January 2020 11: 44 New
        • 8
        • 2
        +6
        Quote: Olgovich
        Shaw, the log from an eye is not picked out?

        Yes, he doesn’t want to see him, in the brains only "We with the whales are always right." While the fire has not come to your house, you are a hero, and when the house is on fire, “Help the people”, and everyone looks and was silent. Bindyuzhniki and scrap drivers do not think about it.
        1. madsollo 5 January 2020 06: 20 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Even when their house burns down they will think: “which goat did it and others don’t extinguish ...”, so the shack will burn out, and everyone will be to blame, well, except for “bendyuzhnikov” ...
      2. Binder 4 January 2020 19: 38 New
        • 1
        • 7
        -6
        Quote: Olgovich
        Give examples of the "terror" of Iran.

        Mil-man, yes, there are no such examples. Each Hamas rocket from Gaza fired at Israeli kindergartens and schools was created with Iranian money.
        And the Persians themselves were noted in this bloody field - on March 17, 1992 they blew up a car stuffed with explosives near the building of the Israeli Embassy in Buenos Aires, 29 dead, 242 people were injured. And in 1994 there, in Buenos Aires, an Iranian suicide bomber blew up the building of the Jewish cultural center - 85 dead, more than 300 were injured.
        Did I satisfy your curiosity?
        1. Olgovich 5 January 2020 06: 58 New
          • 0
          • 2
          -2
          Quote: Bindyuzhnik
          Mil-man, yes, there are no such examples. Each Hamas rocket from Gaza fired at Israeli kindergartens and schools was created with Iranian money.

          Dear, stick such "evidence", yeah.
          Quote: Bindyuzhnik
          And the Persians themselves were noted in this bloody field - on March 17, 1992 they blew up a car stuffed with explosives near the building of the Israeli Embassy in Buenos Aires, 29 dead,

          Wow, why not the 17th century?

          After 1992, the United States killed far more than a million people in their terrorist wars, NOT agreed by the Security Council.
          Quote: Bindyuzhnik
          Did I satisfy your curiosity?

          No, of course: WHERE are the terrorist acts for which the Iranian was killed, a liar?
    3. RitaNik 4 January 2020 12: 20 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Quote: Bindyuzhnik
      Trump has opened the season of hunting for the leaders of Shiite terror. Good luck and success, Donald! good

      You got the wrong address: Trump doesn't read VO. Send wishes personally to Trump. Perhaps he will appreciate you and also make you pleased.
    4. Grits 4 January 2020 13: 23 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      Quote: Bindyuzhnik
      Trump has opened the season of hunting for the leaders of Shiite terror.

      And what is Shiite terror? enlighten us, be kind. And how is it different from Sunni and Zionist?
  4. Aleks2048 4 January 2020 09: 41 New
    • 3
    • 3
    0
    It seems to me that if Iran answers, the answer will be more likely in the field of terrorism than even a very limited explicit military conflict with the United States, even at some large oil fields or large transportation hubs. From terrorism, the choice is not rich ... hardly anything like the September 11 attacks, rather the killing of politicians or their relatives.
    1. Pup1 4 January 2020 09: 58 New
      • 4
      • 14
      -10
      Such a conversation will be held with the terrorists ... Donald himself admitted .... it’s not like ... it’s got ... it’s not the secret service ... but the president and the country are playing this role ... which is so it has been known for a long time ... however, as it has long been clear about European democracy ... controlled puppets ... no questions ...
      1. Evil Booth 4 January 2020 10: 38 New
        • 2
        • 2
        0
        Obama is a terrorist number 1 keenas such a comedy about a doll drachuklu as 2 homosexuals Obama and Benladen leaving the dawn of nuclear fungi. So in social networks khalilaykli will not lie!
      2. tihonmarine 4 January 2020 10: 53 New
        • 2
        • 3
        -1
        Quote: Pup1
        With terrorists ... such a conversation will be held.

        You are a naive child. Yes, they don’t care about the words of Donik’s cuckoo, they don’t even hear them. You forgot the terrorist attacks in Germany, the Netherlands and throughout Europe, and no one saved them, "Neither Trump, nor God and Hero."
    2. Rostislav 4 January 2020 10: 22 New
      • 18
      • 1
      +17
      And how to evaluate the actions of the Americans, at their choice of killing officials, and just people, in another country to which war has not been declared? Terrorism elevated to the rank of state policy.
    3. ximkim 4 January 2020 10: 31 New
      • 0
      • 3
      -3
      [/ quote] From terrorism, the choice is not rich ... hardly something like the September 11 attacks, rather the killing of politicians or their relatives. [quote]
      This will definitely not happen, this is rightly the right loop for Iran (the path of the terrorist). What do we have? Everything happened on the territory of Iraq! The best answer is the withdrawal of NATO troops from Iraq. Only for this, it is necessary to combine the efforts of Iran and Iraq., But, I think, this is impossible for several reasons.
      1. tihonmarine 4 January 2020 10: 58 New
        • 0
        • 2
        -2
        Quote: ximkim
        This will definitely not happen, this is rightly the right loop for Iran (the path of the terrorist). What do we have?

        And it has the fact that under this "bench" terrorists of all stripes around the world will begin to act, and the consequences for their actions will be blamed on Iran. T troops in Iraq will only increase, but not withdraw.
        1. ximkim 4 January 2020 11: 24 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          [/ quote] But it has the fact that under this "bench" terrorists of all stripes around the world will begin to act, and the consequences for their actions will be blamed on Iran
          This will not happen, since it will be necessary (let's take the NATO countries as an example) to recognize Iran as a country of a source of terrorism, and Iran will need to proceed to such actions for this. My answer was about otvetka from Iran.
          This will definitely not happen, this is rightly the right loop for Iran (the path of the terrorist). What do we have? Everything happened on the territory of Iraq! The best answer is the withdrawal of NATO forces from Iraq. Only for this, it is necessary to combine the efforts of Iran and Iraq., But I think this is impossible for several reasons. [Quote]
        2. madsollo 5 January 2020 06: 27 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          This is precisely what leads to! There is too much oil in that region - it is necessary to protect it!
    4. Praetorian4 4 January 2020 10: 32 New
      • 11
      • 1
      +10
      Objectively speaking, the assassination of a US general is an undisguised terrorist act. Otherwise, what?
  5. Valery Valery 4 January 2020 09: 43 New
    • 13
    • 1
    +12
    Remember: 1993, Rangers Day, Somalia. Only something like this can stop American outrage ...
    1. private person 4 January 2020 10: 47 New
      • 1
      • 3
      -2
      Remember: 1993, Rangers Day, Somalia.

      Amerikosy took this into account and they are more trying not to carry out ground operations, but to destroy whole cities more and more from the air.
      1. tihonmarine 4 January 2020 11: 51 New
        • 0
        • 3
        -3
        Quote: private person
        Amerikosy took this into account and they are more trying not to carry out ground operations, but to destroy whole cities more and more from the air.

        Well, this is not new, have you forgotten the history of "star raids" on Germany, Japan, Korea, Vietnam, apply napalm. These are the most brutal murders of the 20th and 21st centuries.
        1. point3d 5 January 2020 01: 20 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          Why is it not surprising to even read regrets about the bombing of Nazi Germany during the Second World War from you like you?
          1. madsollo 5 January 2020 06: 34 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Since Dresden had no strategic significance for the offensive! For hundreds of thousands of civilians - several thousand military men and then mostly rear ones, take an interest in what bombs and how the city was located on the line of attack of Soviet, not American troops! Well, for fun, at least ...
      2. Grits 4 January 2020 13: 31 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        Quote: private person
        Amerikosy took this into account and they are more trying not to carry out ground operations, but to destroy whole cities more and more from the air.

        All right. Therefore, only good air defense will save countries from American state terrorism. Some countries have already understood this and have begun to act in this direction.
  6. askort154 4 January 2020 09: 44 New
    • 11
    • 0
    +11
    Miles Keggins, a colonel in charge of public relations at the coalition headquarters in Iraq, categorically rejects information about airstrikes distributed by regional and other media.

    Well, if not the USA, then Israel, under your roof. There are no other options for BV. yes
    1. Binder 4 January 2020 10: 10 New
      • 7
      • 17
      -10
      Quote: askort154
      Well, if not the USA, then Israel

      If Israel, then this is even greater joy for me! good
      1. aszzz888 4 January 2020 10: 17 New
        • 7
        • 1
        +6
        Bindyuzhnik (Miron) Today, 10:10
        -2
        Quote: askort154
        Well, if not the USA, then Israel

        If Israel, then this is even greater joy for me! good
        Who would doubt that...
        1. Binder 4 January 2020 10: 19 New
          • 4
          • 18
          -14
          Quote: aszzz888
          Who would doubt that..

          When you are understood and not doubted, it’s nice ...
      2. tihonmarine 4 January 2020 11: 04 New
        • 2
        • 4
        -2
        Quote: Bindyuzhnik
        If Israel, then this is even greater joy for me!

        Wow how emboldened. I recall the bard of my time, Vladimir Vysotsky, and I will quote a verse from his song (and I apologize to you) "There is no bolder fighter in the world than a frightened Jew ...." It’s you who are brave, while Donik covers you, and if you don’t feel like singing “About the Lights That Do Not Shine”.
        1. Krasnodar 4 January 2020 11: 14 New
          • 5
          • 3
          +2
          Quote: tihonmarine
          Quote: Bindyuzhnik
          If Israel, then this is even greater joy for me!

          Wow how emboldened. I recall the bard of my time, Vladimir Vysotsky, and I will quote a verse from his song (and I apologize to you) "There is no bolder fighter in the world than a frightened Jew ...." It’s you who are brave, while Donik covers you, and if you don’t feel like singing “About the Lights That Do Not Shine”.

          In the 67th, Americans
          they didn’t cover (more precisely, they covered Jordan with Iraq) - but they, like, got hold of territories laughing
          1. tihonmarine 4 January 2020 11: 56 New
            • 1
            • 3
            -2
            Quote: Krasnodar
            In the 67th, Americans
            they didn’t cover (more precisely, they covered Jordan with Iraq) - but they, like, got hold of territories

            I don’t argue who can doubt it, you are just a peasant, and you admit that your country is a conqueror. And all your actions come from this.
        2. Binder 4 January 2020 21: 17 New
          • 2
          • 7
          -5
          Something with your memory, Mr. Good. These verses were not written by V. Vysotsky at all, who himself was 50% Jewish and never renounced his origin, but a certain K. Belyaev, who before Vysotsky as before Kiev in a known manner. Anyway, whoever crows about frightened Jews, only not Russians who courageously pay tribute to Chechen shepherds. bully
          1. tihonmarine 4 January 2020 21: 51 New
            • 0
            • 4
            -4
            Quote: Bindyuzhnik
            It was not V. Vysotsky who wrote these poems, who himself was 50% Jewish and never renounced his origin,

            And where does the nationality, the conversation is people. There are good people. There are bad people. There are no others.
            1. Binder 4 January 2020 22: 11 New
              • 2
              • 4
              -2
              Quote: tihonmarine
              There are good people. There are bad people. There are no others.

              It is true that the good man V. Vysotsky did not write these verses. hi
      3. Grits 4 January 2020 13: 36 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        Quote: Bindyuzhnik
        If Israel, then this is even greater joy for me!

        What rejoice, sick? What are Hezbollah’s massive missiles sprinkling onto your head now, landmines in your cities will begin to explode and a real opportunity to grab a powerful racket (possibly even with a dirty bomb) seriously? I am shocked by such brainlessness.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. point3d 5 January 2020 01: 33 New
              • 1
              • 1
              0
              But what did Jesus say in Hebrew, does it really bother you?
              1. Connor MacLeod 5 January 2020 03: 43 New
                • 1
                • 1
                0
                The Savior spoke Aramaic, not Hebrew. Well, in Greek yet ...
                1. point3d 5 January 2020 06: 11 New
                  • 1
                  • 1
                  0
                  Amazingly, did you even read the New Testament? How can one be born to a Jewish mother, have a Jewish name, be circumcised as a Jew, as a Jew went to the Temple, but don’t speak Hebrew, which contains all the texts of the Torah and communicate with Jewish Jewish teachers?
                  Well you would say about Latin, yes, the language of the Roman Empire was known to all educated people, Aramaic was also a spoken language among ordinary people. But the Greeks ... By the way, are you aware that the Greeks at that time went to the temples to Zeus and Apollo?
                  1. Connor MacLeod 5 January 2020 06: 35 New
                    • 1
                    • 0
                    +1
                    Quote: point3d
                    Amazingly, did you even read the new testament? How can one be born to a Jewish mother, have a Jewish name, be circumcised as a Jew, as a Jew went to the Temple, but don’t speak Hebrew, which contains all the texts of the Torah and communicate with Jewish Jewish teachers?

                    I am simply stating a scientific fact. Based on a linguistic analysis of the New Testament, it was established that the Savior and the Holy Apostles communicated among themselves in Aramaic. It is possible that in Hebrew he was also a little bald ...

                    Quote: point3d
                    Well you would say about Latin, yes, the language of the Roman Empire was known to all educated people, Aramaic was also a spoken language among ordinary people. But the Greeks ... By the way, are you aware that the Greeks at that time went to the temples to Zeus and Apollo?

                    Maybe in Latin I knew a few words. But in general, the New Testament is written in Greek. The ligva franca in the eastern part of the Roman Empire since the times of Hellenism was Greek, as well as the Aramaic from the time of the Achaemenid Empire.
            2. The comment was deleted.
          2. madsollo 5 January 2020 06: 46 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Bindyuzhnik not only for Nick! But the type of Troll? I will be glad if your joy is long - I am not for violence and not a “wang”, but the fact that without even greater efforts of diplomats, to put it mildly, a fact will not do! And your joy is “fragrant” sincerely only because you live not even in that region, but much further.
    2. Rostislav 4 January 2020 10: 24 New
      • 4
      • 1
      +3
      There is. They hit me at the doctors and now they are rebuking me, I'm not me, and the hut is not mine.
    3. Grits 4 January 2020 13: 33 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Quote: askort154
      Well, if not the USA, then Israel, under your roof. No other options for BV

      The only difference is that the Americans boast of it, and the Jews are silent in a rag.
  7. parusnik 4 January 2020 09: 59 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    Iraq, the US colony, in fact, they want to do something ... until the Iraqis realize this and engage in squabbles among themselves, such US behavior will become commonplace ..
    1. atalef 4 January 2020 10: 05 New
      • 4
      • 15
      -11
      Quote: parusnik
      Iraq, the US colony, in fact, they want and do something.

      Iran does what it wants in Iraq
      Quote: parusnik
      .. until the Iraqis realize this

      aware of
      On October 1, anti-government protests against poverty, unemployment and corruption began in Iraq, which quickly grew into demonstrations against the Iranian "protectorate."
      1. sabakina 4 January 2020 10: 31 New
        • 13
        • 0
        +13
        atalef, so in your opinion, the protectorate of Iran is to blame for poverty, unemployment and corruption? And the United States was not around here? And if Iran is to blame for everything, what vegetable were smashed from the US embassy?
        1. atalef 4 January 2020 10: 37 New
          • 4
          • 11
          -7
          Quote: sabakina
          atalef, so in your opinion, the protectorate of Iran is to blame for poverty, unemployment and corruption?

          where in poverty?
          Quote: sabakina
          And the United States was not around here?

          Well, the United States stands nearby everywhere, so Obama even pisses in elevators.

          Quote: sabakina
          And if Iran is to blame for everything, what vegetable were smashed from the US embassy?

          Well, who and for what they tried to defeat is understandable, but for what them?
          If nothing to do with
          Iraqi authorities tighten security in the country's southern provinces after the attack and arson of the Iranian consulate in Najaf. According to Al Arabiya, increased measures were taken in Basra and Karbala, where Iranian consular missions are also located.
          1. sabakina 4 January 2020 10: 51 New
            • 4
            • 0
            +4
            Quote: atalef
            where in poverty?

            On October 1, anti-government protests against poverty, unemployment and corruption began in Iraq, which quickly grew into demonstrations against the Iranian "protectorate."
            Excuse me, is this your post or mine?
            1. atalef 4 January 2020 11: 00 New
              • 2
              • 4
              -2
              Quote: sabakina
              Quote: atalef
              where in poverty?

              On October 1, anti-government protests against poverty, unemployment and corruption began in Iraq, which quickly grew into demonstrations against the Iranian "protectorate."
              Excuse me, is this your post or mine?

              And where does the United States?
      2. parusnik 4 January 2020 10: 31 New
        • 8
        • 0
        +8
        Iran does what it wants in Iraq
        ... Iraq’s oil fields, under Iran’s control, are Iranian military bases located in Iraq? ... Yes, Iran supports “its” Shiite Iraqi groups, the USA supports “its own” .. This indicates the lack of national unity in Iraq ..
        October 1, anti-government protests against poverty, unemployment and corruption began in Iraq, which quickly grew into demonstrations against the Iranian "protectorate"
        .
        Recall that at the end of last year, the American embassy in Baghdad held protests. The American attack on the Kataib Hezbollah camp caused popular anger. The furious crowd tried to storm the diplomatic mission; the Americans responded with tear gas. To protect the embassy, ​​an additional seven hundred and fifty military personnel were dispatched.
      3. tihonmarine 4 January 2020 11: 07 New
        • 2
        • 3
        -1
        Quote: atalef
        Iran does what it wants in Iraq

        And the Americans, what are they doing in Iraq, or are they giving cookies to children?
  8. GRIGORIY76 4 January 2020 10: 04 New
    • 2
    • 4
    -2
    I do not understand. Do they eliminate terrorists?
  9. Jack O'Neill 4 January 2020 10: 06 New
    • 7
    • 12
    -5
    Shabl Az-Zaydi is the leader of the pro-Iranian Shiite militia. The Americans march over Iran seriously after the attack on the American base.

    Leftmost.
    1. tihonmarine 4 January 2020 11: 23 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Quote: Jack O'Neill
      The Americans march over Iran seriously after the attack on the American base.

      Another question is whether Iran made an attack, all these again are just striped words. They needed any excuse to attack Iran, and they found it, now Iran will get all the "bumps", is it right or not. Any American attack on independent states always began with a fake. If anyone forgot, remember Yugoslavia first.
      1. Grits 4 January 2020 13: 51 New
        • 2
        • 2
        0
        Quote: tihonmarine
        Any American attack on independent states always began with a fake. If anyone forgot, remember Yugoslavia first.

        Oh, yes, these comrades are masters of provocation for starting wars. You can also recall:
        - 1998 - explosion on the battleship "Maine"
        - 1915 - the sinking of the passenger ship "Lusitania"
        - 1941 - "invitation" to Japan to attack Pearl Harble
        - 1964 - the attack of the "Vietnamese" on the US ships in the Gulf of Tonkin
        - 2001 - it is not yet known who blew the twin towers
        - 2003 - Power tube
  10. aszzz888 4 January 2020 10: 16 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1

    Miles Keggins, a colonel in charge of public relations at the coalition headquarters in Iraq, categorically rejects information about airstrikes distributed by regional and other media.

    Who to believe ?! request
  11. Evil Booth 4 January 2020 10: 33 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    Let me remind you that there is already a law that the US playing their currency to the detriment of the US economy will be punished even by military means and the nuclear doctrine allows. there is the Voice of Germany there it is shown that there were already interstate courts and the EU fined countries for potential damage to the right companies .... there were arrests of billions from depositors in banks of Japan at the request of the United States from Iranian depositors and other nishtyaki gopnichestva. soldier kremlebot changes the Internet coupon to a hedgehog (s).
  12. Thrifty 4 January 2020 10: 35 New
    • 5
    • 2
    +3
    What is this? "Heroic killers" of the civilian population suddenly gave the back, and disown their criminal actions? It seems that the joint really came out - with - they bombed the wrong column, seeing that they screwed up, the Yankees decided to show their true snout using the "do-cancer" method!
  13. rocket757 4 January 2020 10: 42 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    A dangerous "game", only self-confident can judge such.
    It’s just interesting to see how things will develop further .... in principle, nothing global is expected.
    1. Krasnodar 4 January 2020 11: 15 New
      • 6
      • 1
      +5
      If the Iranians hit Saudi oil again, it will be good)).
      1. atalef 4 January 2020 11: 21 New
        • 2
        • 4
        -2
        Quote: Krasnodar
        If the Iranians hit Saudi oil again, it will be good)).

        I think they will not hit, the confrontation has reached a higher rung, and may run into the otvetka.
        Only the Saudis have something to recover, and no one will sell equipment to Iran.
        1. Krasnodar 4 January 2020 11: 24 New
          • 8
          • 3
          +5
          We will see. It also seems to me that all Iranian threats are just la-la, on the other hand - in the current situation, ayatolam should not lose face - in their country they are all less popular
          1. atalef 4 January 2020 11: 36 New
            • 4
            • 3
            +1
            Quote: Krasnodar
            It also seems to me that all Iranian threats are just la-la

            I think so too.
            With the threat of a real conflict (given the decline in popularity in Iran itself) - give up.
            Quote: Krasnodar
            on the other hand, in the current situation, ayatolam should not lose face

            better to lose face than life.
            1. rocket757 4 January 2020 13: 02 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              All events are developing in a certain direction. The fact that this direction is given by minke whales does not please.
      2. Grits 4 January 2020 13: 57 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        Quote: Krasnodar
        If the Iranians hit Saudi oil again, it will be good

        Why is Iran so openly exposed? In contrast to the impudence of the Americans, who are no longer hiding behind anything. Iran has Hussites for this in Yemen. Which, as it turned out, are very qualitatively fighting against the Saudis, armed to the teeth with American super weapons. And to fight them is useless. These are partisans - no tomahawks will be enough. And there are no goals for Tomahawks in Yemen, because there is practically no infrastructure
        1. Krasnodar 4 January 2020 14: 12 New
          • 7
          • 1
          +6
          That's right. Through Husi.
  14. Ros 56 4 January 2020 11: 29 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    We’ll see, I think, striped ones will more than once wipe off. East is not dumb Europe
    1. atalef 4 January 2020 11: 39 New
      • 3
      • 4
      -1
      Quote: Ros 56
      We’ll see, I think, striped ones will more than once wipe off. East is not dumb Europe

      yes
    2. Vitaly gusin 4 January 2020 11: 45 New
      • 3
      • 2
      +1
      Quote: Ros 56
      East is not dumb Europe

      Please announce the entire list of the EAST.
      1. Ros 56 4 January 2020 12: 00 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        Buy a geographic atlas, bast shoes, you will see everything there, unless of course you can read.
        1. Vitaly gusin 4 January 2020 12: 42 New
          • 2
          • 2
          0
          Quote: Ros 56
          купиbast shoe

          bast shoes - low shoes common in Eastern Europe and was widely used in rural areas until the 1930s,
          Weaving bast shoes was on Of Russia occupation farmers
          Since leather shoes have always been expensive, the poor walked in bast shoes resulting in steel bast shoes symbolize poverty, low origin,
          So don’t put the Jews in your bast shoes. tongue
          In the Talmud (Shabbat, 129a) it says: “A Jew is obliged to sell even tiles from the roof of his house, but buy yourself a pair of good shoes».
          But to the uneducated and the poor, and for this Wickedness to which you relate, just in size, as you say:
          "ON THE SUN AND A HAT" laughing
        2. atalef 4 January 2020 13: 09 New
          • 3
          • 1
          +2
          Quote: Ros 56
          Buy a geographic atlas, bast shoes, you will see everything there, unless of course you can read.

          Iran is in the Middle East
          Geographer Fucking (fucking is a surname) wink
  15. Servisinzhener 4 January 2020 12: 55 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    I would like to know that all the recent events in the confrontation between Iran and the USA is Trump’s idea to get out of impeachment, as Clinton did in his time. Or a planned provocation of democrats. In order to provoke Trump to a blow to which Iran cannot fail to respond. And the answer will be a pretext for a war in which there is a good chance that Trump will not succeed in the elections.
    And in my opinion we will soon find out the answer.
    1. Grits 4 January 2020 14: 06 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      Quote: Servisinzhener
      And the answer will be a pretext for a war in which there is a good chance that Trump will not succeed in the elections.

      In order to stay in power, each new American president unleashes a new war in the world. And he doesn’t care that thousands of people will die. Including his compatriots. Spit that economies will incur enormous costs. Spit that flowering countries will disappear and the number of terrorists and bandits will increase. The main thing is to stay in your throne for another 4 years, to eat hearty and sleep sweetly, as well as to point your own with a commanding finger. Incredible, but obvious - all these cataclysms in the world for the pleasure of just one single person in the world.
      In this way, we can state that the USA is a state that brings death, destruction and chaos all over the world and to all peoples. And their president is the main source of world evil.
  16. Shahno 4 January 2020 13: 09 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Quote: Nyrobsky
    Quote: atalef
    Quote: Pozitiv
    Decided to intimidate? Oh well..
    Stop gentlemen !!!!!!

    Otherwise what?

    It makes no sense to vang, we will find out soon. One thing can be said with full confidence, this will not end in good.

    For everyone again and again.
    Like this-
    "دره اشک".
  17. Guazdilla 4 January 2020 13: 25 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    The ashes of the plan Pax Romana.

    Cataphracts from the edge,
    Cutting a little bit,
    Crassus at Karrah punished
    Cohorts dooming to collapse.

    Xeros in Xerxes
    Reincarnate
    Rally together
    Parthians, Syrians.
  18. Old26 4 January 2020 15: 06 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Quote: Pozitiv
    US just once again saves Israel from the wrath of the Arabs of BV

    This is from what? Israel has a peace treaty with Egypt, I don’t know with Jordan, but most likely too. Of the Arab countries surrounding Israel, there remains only Syria, which God forbid to deal with its problems, but Saudi Arabia, which, in which case, could become an ally of Israel in the fight against Iran. So from whom are they covering?

    Quote: tihonmarine
    Yeah, they got to Iran for more than 10 years, and finally decided. I always thought that the US military has more intelligence than politicians. Wrong in their minds, as much as in Hillary.

    Yes, it’s more a decision of politicians and Trump personally than a decision and opinion of the military.

    Quote: Gritsa
    Quote: Retvizan 8
    Russia is saved from such tricks, only the presence of nuclear weapons.
    The fate of Iraq and Yugoslavia is very instructive.
    As it turned out, you can kick Iran.
    Impunity breeds permissiveness!

    As practice shows, a solid, deeply layered air defense and anti-ship missile systems on the coast can also save from attacks by the United States, besides nuclear weapons.

    But not one, not a second. Neither nuclear weapons nor deeply layered air defense. There are anti-ship missiles, but again, without air defense cover they will be taken out.
    And the presence of nuclear weapons is not a fact that can protect the country from attacks by the United States. Rather, the quantity and ability to strike back at enemy territory.

    Quote: Rostislav
    And how to evaluate the actions of the Americans, at their choice of killing officials, and just people, in another country to which war has not been declared? Terrorism elevated to the rank of state policy.

    There is such a term - "State terrorism". He can come here. But any event can always be considered on the other hand, have a different interpretation. It's like a medal. There are two sides.
    You can of course be viewed from the perspective of "There are two opinions: Mine and wrong." There are always double standards.
    On our Russian side, this is an act of state terrorism, when, by order of the leader of one country, one of the top leaders of the second country is killed in the territory of the third. But there is, after all, the opinion of America itself. There are a very significant number of organizations and groups in the world to which the definition of "terrorist" fits. Only here, different countries have different lists. In our list (the list of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation), organizations such as Hamas, Hezbollah, the IRGC are not terrorist. Our government has, albeit not diplomatic relations, with the first two, but nonetheless. We consider the IRGC as part of the armed forces of Iran. They occupy a place in the structure of the Iranian armed forces, something similar to the explosives (Rosguard). Remotely, but approximately.
    But the United States and Israel have the same Hamas, Hezbollah is on the lists of terrorist organizations (I don’t know if the IRGC is listed in Israel as a terrorist organization), but among Americans this structure refers to MOT). Therefore, from the point of view of the United States, they did not commit an act of state terrorism, but struck a blow at the leadership of two terrorist organizations ...
    Alas, our world has never been one-color or even two-color. It is diverse and double standards have always been, are and will be. Alas, but this is a given

    Quote: Valery Valery
    Remember: 1993, Rangers Day, Somalia. Only something like this can stop American outrage ...

    And stopped? Yes, a rainy day for the US Army, but no more. It could be and could have been stopped if this had happened regularly, almost daily, in different parts of the world, and not once every quarter century ...

    Quote: atalef
    Iran is in the Middle East

    Still probably sooner in the Middle East?
  19. KJIETyc 4 January 2020 22: 24 New
    • 0
    • 3
    -3
    Quote: Old26
    Quote: Pozitiv
    US just once again saves Israel from the wrath of the Arabs of BV

    This is from what? Israel has a peace treaty with Egypt, I don’t know with Jordan, but most likely too. Of the Arab countries surrounding Israel, there remains only Syria, which God forbid to deal with its problems, but Saudi Arabia, which, in which case, could become an ally of Israel in the fight against Iran. So from whom are they covering?

    Quote: tihonmarine
    Yeah, they got to Iran for more than 10 years, and finally decided. I always thought that the US military has more intelligence than politicians. Wrong in their minds, as much as in Hillary.

    Yes, it’s more a decision of politicians and Trump personally than a decision and opinion of the military.

    Quote: Gritsa
    Quote: Retvizan 8
    Russia is saved from such tricks, only the presence of nuclear weapons.
    The fate of Iraq and Yugoslavia is very instructive.
    As it turned out, you can kick Iran.
    Impunity breeds permissiveness!

    As practice shows, a solid, deeply layered air defense and anti-ship missile systems on the coast can also save from attacks by the United States, besides nuclear weapons.

    But not one, not a second. Neither nuclear weapons nor deeply layered air defense. There are anti-ship missiles, but again, without air defense cover they will be taken out.
    And the presence of nuclear weapons is not a fact that can protect the country from attacks by the United States. Rather, the quantity and ability to strike back at enemy territory.

    Quote: Rostislav
    And how to evaluate the actions of the Americans, at their choice of killing officials, and just people, in another country to which war has not been declared? Terrorism elevated to the rank of state policy.

    There is such a term - "State terrorism". He can come here. But any event can always be considered on the other hand, have a different interpretation. It's like a medal. There are two sides.
    You can of course be viewed from the perspective of "There are two opinions: Mine and wrong." There are always double standards.
    On our Russian side, this is an act of state terrorism, when, by order of the leader of one country, one of the top leaders of the second country is killed in the territory of the third. But there is, after all, the opinion of America itself. There are a very significant number of organizations and groups in the world to which the definition of "terrorist" fits. Only here, different countries have different lists. In our list (the list of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation), organizations such as Hamas, Hezbollah, the IRGC are not terrorist. Our government has, albeit not diplomatic relations, with the first two, but nonetheless. We consider the IRGC as part of the armed forces of Iran. They occupy a place in the structure of the Iranian armed forces, something similar to the explosives (Rosguard). Remotely, but approximately.
    But the United States and Israel have the same Hamas, Hezbollah is on the lists of terrorist organizations (I don’t know if the IRGC is listed in Israel as a terrorist organization), but among Americans this structure refers to MOT). Therefore, from the point of view of the United States, they did not commit an act of state terrorism, but struck a blow at the leadership of two terrorist organizations ...
    Alas, our world has never been one-color or even two-color. It is diverse and double standards have always been, are and will be. Alas, but this is a given

    Quote: Valery Valery
    Remember: 1993, Rangers Day, Somalia. Only something like this can stop American outrage ...

    And stopped? Yes, a rainy day for the US Army, but no more. It could be and could have been stopped if this had happened regularly, almost daily, in different parts of the world, and not once every quarter century ...

    Quote: atalef
    Iran is in the Middle East

    Still probably sooner in the Middle East?

    Yeah, we’ve already passed, the USSR declared your beloved Americans the axis of evil, etc. With this approach, tomorrow your mother will be declared a terrorist, and your family, for example, will be thrown a grenade in the window. What did the UN do, which has now become useless? That there wouldn’t be such clever lynchmen who, you know, brand different owners of resources and dissenters with terrorists. And about who the terrorist is, so count the number of Americans killed in the last 28 years of military campaigns. To terrorists before them (to the USA) oh how far.
  20. Guru 5 January 2020 07: 35 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    A source of "high probability" said
    Oh, these sources.