Possible answer: Elimination of the IRGC general may lead to the appearance of Iranian nuclear weapons


The world media is discussing the possible development of events after the American strike on the car with the commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard. “Military Review” provides a small overview of the assumptions that experts in different countries of the world are building about the prospects for this event.


A major German publication, FAZ, released material entitled Three Scripts for Counterattack. In it, the editor of the politics department Rainer Hermann writes that the spiritual leader of Iran, Ayatollah Khamenei, has already promised "severe harsh retribution of the United States for acts of aggression."

Hermann writes that so far, Iran has tried to avoid a direct military confrontation with the United States, as well as the United States with Iran. But now the situation can go a different way.
From an article by Rainer Hermann:

Iran can mobilize its militias against American partners and allies in several countries in the Middle East. These are Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in the Gaza Strip, Shiite police units in Iraq and pro-Iranian units in Syria. For example, if they attack targets in Saudi Arabia or the United Arab Emirates, the United States will need to provide assistance (based on agreements). But then the Arab states will also have to wake up from their lethargy.

Another option that the author considers in FAZ is the use of drones. An example is the strike on Saudi Aramco facilities in Saudi Arabia. Iran is accused of striking in the West, although Iran denies any involvement.

Hermann:

With these blows, Iran “cut off” half of the oil production in Saudi Arabia, which corresponds to approximately 5% of global demand.

The German expert writes that if the attack is repeated, then Riyadh may turn to the Russian Federation with a request to urgently deliver S-400 systems. At the same time, Riyadh will ask the United States not to impose CAATSA sanctions against him, since the complexes are required "immediately to protect against Iran." And the United States, as the author writes, is unlikely to have an argument for objection to this.

Another possible Iranian move that Western media is writing about: blocking the Strait of Hormuz. This will lead to an unprecedented 70st century oil shortage and skyrocketing prices for "black gold". At the same time, it may even be beneficial for Trump, because then dozens of American companies engaged in the production of shale hydrocarbons will come out of oblivion. At prices above $ 80 per barrel, shale oil production becomes profitable, and at prices of XNUMX and above it will bring extra profit.

Experts in East Asian countries, responding to information about threats from Iran by retaliatory measures against the United States, believe that Tehran’s toughest reaction will be the final suspension from any obligations under a nuclear deal.

This could ultimately lead to Iran’s creation of its own nuclear weapons. In turn, if the United States does not prevent this, such a result will be a complete failure of American policy and Trump's fatal strategic mistake: eliminating the IRGC general can generate what the Iran and the United States most fear about the Iranian nuclear bomb.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

276 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. svp67 3 January 2020 18: 31 New
    • 27
    • 5
    +22
    So I understand that everything "interesting" is yet to come ...
    1. SRC P-15 3 January 2020 18: 36 New
      • 25
      • 5
      +20
      The German expert writes that if the attack is repeated, then Riyadh may turn to the Russian Federation with a request to urgently deliver S-400 systems

      Yeah, but in Russia, the S-400 complexes stand directly and are waiting for Riyadh to ask them. But nothing that there is not a weak queue for them?
      1. svp67 3 January 2020 18: 39 New
        • 12
        • 2
        +10
        Quote: SRC P-15
        Yeah, but in Russia, the S-400 complexes stand directly and are waiting for Riyadh to ask them. But nothing that there is not a weak queue for them?

        In history, there are enough cases when, at a BIG request and a double, or even triple price, the producer country supplied complexes from its Armed Forces. But here I think that if Riad turns to us, then the matter will not be quick. While our specialists will study the situation there, while the Saudis will be trained, enough time will pass. Faster they will appear "Shell"
        1. SRC P-15 3 January 2020 18: 41 New
          • 5
          • 2
          +3
          Quote: svp67
          Faster they will appear "Shell"

          And they already have “Armor”, as far as I know.
          1. Shurik70 3 January 2020 19: 50 New
            • 12
            • 9
            +3
            If Iran makes an atomic bomb, Israel will get the US to attack Iran. The Jewish lobby in the USA is very strong. And the atomic bomb is a piece product, you can’t quickly get them stuck on the conveyor. Maximum, a couple of pieces will be at the beginning of the war. And it is likely that Israel will know where they are, and the war will begin with a blow to the area.
            Iran will not test its atomic bomb. Although he will be threatened to do so.
            The most appropriate answer is blood for blood. That is, to increase support for the Hussites, Hezbollah. Yes, and conduct a "counterterrorism operation" on the territory of the United States.
            Reconciliation is more active with Iraq (although they fought for a long time, but now the enemy is common, we must put up with it)
            1. Robertocalos 3 January 2020 20: 31 New
              • 13
              • 47
              -34
              Israel does not need to "achieve" anything. He independently rolls the plants. It has already been so. Religious fanatics of nuclear weapons did not have enough.
              1. Connor MacLeod 3 January 2020 20: 36 New
                • 44
                • 9
                +35
                Quote: Robertocalos
                Religious fanatics of nuclear weapons did not have enough.

                And who is the Israelis? laughing laughing laughing
                1. The comment was deleted.
                  1. Barmaleyka 3 January 2020 21: 16 New
                    • 21
                    • 2
                    +19
                    Quote: Robertocalos
                    The only Europeans in BV.

                    Well, actually, they and the Arabs of the same field are apples, but in the bathhouse they’re all for one ...
                    1. Robertocalos 3 January 2020 21: 19 New
                      • 11
                      • 28
                      -17
                      It's not about blood, it's about brains.
                  2. il-z 3 January 2020 21: 31 New
                    • 8
                    • 1
                    +7
                    Write to the Crusaders ...
                  3. Victorio 3 January 2020 22: 50 New
                    • 9
                    • 0
                    +9
                    Quote: Robertocalos
                    The only Europeans in BV. But with the eggs.

                    ===
                    Israel is Asia. the second is true, fanatics with eggs
                  4. VLADIMIR VLADIVOSTOK 4 January 2020 02: 23 New
                    • 10
                    • 2
                    +8
                    This is a poor people in the past, wandering in the desert. Only Stalin made Israel a country. Out of gratitude, they oppress the people of Palestine. Palestine was already when Israel was created. In short, the nomadic people are like gypsies who have received the status of a state.
                    1. classik46 4 January 2020 06: 36 New
                      • 8
                      • 1
                      +7
                      And no one will tell how the Jews at one time killed Palestinian families in order to settle in their homes.
                    2. Alex Justice 4 January 2020 09: 34 New
                      • 6
                      • 0
                      +6
                      These are formerly poor people wandering in the desert

                      Jews hodgepodge from Arabs. For a long time they were enslaved to the Persians, where they composed the torus. Rather, it is a sect, not a nationality.
                      1. Chaldon48 4 January 2020 11: 37 New
                        • 2
                        • 0
                        +2
                        It is not so important where they were before, it is important that they are now and are gradually turning into a detonator on a platoon for a Middle Eastern boiba
                  5. Sarmat Sanych 4 January 2020 03: 45 New
                    • 4
                    • 3
                    +1
                    Robertocalos, what the hell are you "Europeans"laughing, the usual ever-aching tribe, wandering for centuries until the Union on a silver platter gave the country and statehood.
              2. Foxnova 3 January 2020 21: 22 New
                • 5
                • 2
                +3
                Pakistan norms live
                1. Robertocalos 3 January 2020 21: 55 New
                  • 3
                  • 15
                  -12
                  Was Osama taken out of there?
              3. Jager 4 January 2020 15: 03 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                Pakistan laughs softly around the corner from this phrase
              4. Otshelnik 4 January 2020 15: 57 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                And what kind of fanatics are you? They are heavenly angels in comparison with you, the Zionist fascists!
            2. Binder 3 January 2020 20: 48 New
              • 4
              • 25
              -21
              Quote: Shurik70
              If Iran makes an atomic bomb,

              Who will allow him? lol
              1. Barmaleyka 3 January 2020 21: 13 New
                • 9
                • 3
                +6
                Quote: Bindyuzhnik
                Who will allow him?

                what can Jews not be Arabs ?!
                no one will ask you this
                1. The comment was deleted.
                  1. Steen 3 January 2020 21: 43 New
                    • 24
                    • 7
                    +17
                    Listen, monkey and remember, Iranians are Persians. And you are a complete Troll who mows under a Jew.
                    1. The comment was deleted.
                      1. Sarmat Sanych 4 January 2020 03: 47 New
                        • 2
                        • 3
                        -1
                        Robertocalos, you don’t change the traditions of dipping yourself in filth, file and come back
                    2. The comment was deleted.
                    3. Binder 4 January 2020 06: 52 New
                      • 0
                      • 7
                      -7
                      You show courage exclusively in virtual communication, in real life I would have taught you decent behavior.
                    4. aszzz888 4 January 2020 09: 36 New
                      • 1
                      • 0
                      +1
                      Steen (Ruslan) Yesterday, 21:43
                      +13
                      Listen, monkey and remember, Iranians are Persians. And you are a complete Troll who mows under a Jew.

                      Ruslan, please do not feed the troll. It will sprinkle with bile, and itself will die.
                  2. Barmaleyka 3 January 2020 22: 36 New
                    • 4
                    • 3
                    +1
                    Quote: Robertocalos
                    Monkeys therefore do not give grenades.

                    for the sake of truth, you just picked up an article from the floor
                    enough courage to call yourself a full name with an address, etc.?!
                    1. Robertocalos 3 January 2020 22: 57 New
                      • 6
                      • 21
                      -15
                      Has it started to knock already?) Forward. I know how to use the Russian language without obvious insults, so - by.
                      1. Barmaleyka 3 January 2020 23: 00 New
                        • 7
                        • 2
                        +5
                        God be with you, whoever pays you who needs you, but it’s terrible to be called, and the insult was direct and concrete
                      2. Robertocalos 3 January 2020 23: 11 New
                        • 1
                        • 20
                        -19
                        I don’t understand who I don’t imagine, a lot of honor. Who offended, let him try to ask, justified.
                      3. The comment was deleted.
                      4. Barmaleyka 3 January 2020 23: 26 New
                        • 6
                        • 1
                        +5
                        well, if you don’t know how to answer for the bazaar, then keep your mouth shut
                      5. Robertocalos 3 January 2020 23: 27 New
                        • 1
                        • 13
                        -12
                        Who asks that?
                      6. Barmaleyka 3 January 2020 23: 38 New
                        • 7
                        • 1
                        +6
                        Я
                        you violated the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation if you are so brave then write similar on your own behalf without hiding behind a nickname, if on it there is enough spirit sit quietly
                  3. Sarmat Sanych 4 January 2020 03: 56 New
                    • 6
                    • 4
                    +2
                    Robertocalos, listen to someone selected, wash your footcloths and then crawl out to decent people. Write N I'll call you back to explain who you are and what you are. If in Moscow, I’ll come to you myself and you will personally tell me about the “guri”, “brains” and “monkeys”.
        2. Altai72 3 January 2020 22: 11 New
          • 9
          • 2
          +7
          Iranians are actually not Arabs, but Persians.
          1. Barmaleyka 3 January 2020 22: 38 New
            • 4
            • 2
            +2
            and in BV only Iranians and Jews live ?!
          2. Robertocalos 3 January 2020 23: 02 New
            • 5
            • 17
            -12
            In Iran, in general, the Persians - a little more than half, if cleanliness. But it was not from that. OMN fanatics are not allowed. Their gurus are waiting, and their children are waiting for normal people. Home, alive and healthy.
            1. meandr51 4 January 2020 21: 24 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              Well, if WMD fanatics can’t, then you must urgently take it from Israel and the United States. And leave Kim. He hasn’t bombed anyone yet.
          3. SovAr238A 4 January 2020 01: 13 New
            • 5
            • 8
            -3
            Quote: Altai72
            Iranians are actually not Arabs, but Persians.

            when it was?
            2000 years ago?
            you still find pure Slavs ...
            The first tribe went to the second - all the men were slaughtered, the women were all changed.
            Who was born?
            After 50 years, the third tribe slaughtered the first and all the women were razed.
            who was born
            After another 40, the second tribe slaughtered the third.

            What is the result?

            Those who think about the purity of blood should be burned for utter stupidity. For stupid.
            1. IS-80_RVGK2 4 January 2020 02: 13 New
              • 2
              • 1
              +1
              You have a very philistine view of historical processes. So you are little different in this respect from adherents of pure blood.
        3. Binder 3 January 2020 22: 19 New
          • 5
          • 19
          -14
          Firstly, the Iranians are never Arabs, and secondly, we will not allow them.
          1. Barmaleyka 3 January 2020 22: 39 New
            • 15
            • 3
            +12
            thirdly, you and the Arabs are one and the same; in the fourth, what are you chosen by God to decide who can and who cannot ?!
            fifth, the resolver will fall off, once again you are bold and alive while the mattresses are behind
            1. Robertocalos 3 January 2020 23: 04 New
              • 5
              • 19
              -14
              Yes, yes, these are the mattresses that won three wars with a superior enemy many times over.
              1. Barmaleyka 3 January 2020 23: 35 New
                • 4
                • 2
                +2
                it’s good to fight when the back is propped up, and not always the Jews won
      2. VLADIMIR VLADIVOSTOK 4 January 2020 02: 27 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        And who did Kim Jong-un ask? It is beneficial for the Americans to arrange a war. This is a business. They will not fight.
    2. Barmaleyka 3 January 2020 21: 12 New
      • 8
      • 5
      +3
      Quote: Shurik70
      Iran will not test its atomic bomb. Although he will be threatened to do so.

      they’ll just conduct “tests” on the spot right away, and for Jews and two bombs above the roof
      1. Binder 3 January 2020 22: 23 New
        • 3
        • 21
        -18
        Quote: Barmaleyka
        just do the “tests” right away

        Here I agree - these Persyuk prodigies will explode right in the storage areas and the problem of the "Iranian atom" will be solved at once.
        1. Barmaleyka 3 January 2020 22: 40 New
          • 9
          • 5
          +4
          don’t be afraid to deliver it, and the funny thing is, as soon as such a prospect looms up for you and others like you to rush to Russia
          1. Robertocalos 3 January 2020 23: 06 New
            • 2
            • 19
            -17
            And you, I see, are extremists. Articles are not afraid?)
            1. Barmaleyka 3 January 2020 23: 27 New
              • 5
              • 2
              +3
              an example of a call for extremism in the studio, or again, jump off, please?
              1. The comment was deleted.
              2. Barmaleyka 3 January 2020 23: 37 New
                • 6
                • 0
                +6
                Are you sick ?!
                can not distinguish analytical reasoning from appeals? !!!
                in case of danger and the presence of nuclear weapons in Iran, it can actually use it, and with a sufficiently powerful combat unit, two air explosions will really be enough for Israel
                in which part of the text is the call? !!!
              3. SovAr238A 4 January 2020 01: 17 New
                • 2
                • 13
                -11
                Quote: Barmaleyka
                Are you sick ?!
                can not distinguish analytical reasoning from appeals? !!!
                in case of danger and the presence of nuclear weapons in Iran, it can actually use it, and with a sufficiently powerful combat unit, two air explosions will really be enough for Israel
                in which part of the text is the call? !!!

                And you are spectacle ... cobra spectacle ... From the word point
              4. Barmaleyka 4 January 2020 08: 14 New
                • 2
                • 0
                +2
                Quote: SovAr238A
                And you are spectacle ... cobra spectacle ... From the word point

                ??
                drink valerian, then throw yourself at people
  • SovAr238A 4 January 2020 01: 16 New
    • 2
    • 9
    -7
    Quote: Barmaleyka
    Quote: Shurik70
    Iran will not test its atomic bomb. Although he will be threatened to do so.

    they’ll just conduct “tests” on the spot right away, and for Jews and two bombs above the roof


    Will they conduct something in their village?
    They all surrendered their little uranium reserves to Europeans and Russia ...
  • Sergey Averchenkov 3 January 2020 22: 47 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    What the hell piece? How many nuclear charges does Russia have ?, how many do the USA have? Take an interest.
  • Vadim237 3 January 2020 22: 53 New
    • 5
    • 4
    +1
    And Iran most likely already did it - the DPRK is always at the second end of the wire.
    1. meandr51 4 January 2020 21: 26 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Ostretsov constantly claims that Iran has a bomb.
  • SovAr238A 4 January 2020 01: 09 New
    • 1
    • 6
    -5
    Quote: Shurik70

    Reconciliation is more active with Iraq (although they fought for a long time, but now the enemy is common, we must put up with it)

    IRAAN was one of the first to divide IRAQ on religious grounds.
    Hussein uprooted all dissent trying to make Iraq a united nation, sparing neither Kurds nor Shiites. neither Sunnis, nor Alawites.
    Which by the way, no one forgave him.
    That is the first with the overthrow of Hussein. what Iran did was start the war of the Shiites of Iraq with all other Iraqi religions.
  • dirk182 4 January 2020 03: 23 New
    • 5
    • 4
    +1
    Nothing of the kind will happen. Iran is torn apart by internal problems and everyone understands this. But we would have to think about how easily the Americans turned everything. The decision, development and operation took about 3 days. Without big words. Just done. And if ours again make statements that "it’s not possible, this violates the norms of international law ..." This Lavrov with his international law, which actually died. Then the next such victims may be generals in Syria. We saw that the USA has those. equipment and political will. The right of the strong. Who would not say that. That is the whole point of our time.
  • D16
    D16 3 January 2020 22: 06 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    And they already have “Armor”, as far as I know.

    You are wrong. The carapace was developed with money from the UAE. Saudia has nothing to do with this.
  • abrakadabre 3 January 2020 19: 19 New
    • 8
    • 2
    +6
    when, at a BIG request, at a double or even a triple price, the producer country supplied complexes from its Armed Forces.
    From its armed forces it is impossible to supply complexes with an export version. And the delivery of the “for oneself” option is almost equivalent to the abolition of one’s own air defense.
    1. svp67 3 January 2020 19: 21 New
      • 5
      • 1
      +4
      Quote: abrakadabre
      From its armed forces it is impossible to supply complexes with an export version. And the delivery of the “for oneself” option is almost equivalent to the abolition of one’s own air defense.

      Modern complexes are modular and replacing one module with another is not a big problem.
  • bar
    bar 3 January 2020 19: 44 New
    • 3
    • 3
    0
    While our specialists will study the situation there, while the Saudis will be trained ...

    It is useless to train the Saudis. They must also have been trained to use the "patriots," and what's the point.
    If the S-400 will be delivered there, then most likely with our own calculations.
  • Boris Kolesnichenko 4 January 2020 00: 04 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The shells are just the same, most likely, but only if the latest versions - they were imprisoned for drones, and even in control - there even a schoolboy will cope. And the C400 only needs to train specialists in good for a year, and it will be a little expensive to shoot with C400 on drones.
  • DPN
    DPN 3 January 2020 22: 06 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    The market will judge everything, who will give more.
  • SovAr238A 4 January 2020 01: 05 New
    • 1
    • 3
    -2
    Quote: SRC P-15
    But nothing that there is not a weak queue for them?

    What is the turn?
  • YOUR 4 January 2020 03: 13 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Just a question?
    Judging by your numerous comments on this subject, you are sleeping and see how Russia is selling weapons, which are short in the army.
    We have only 27 regiments armed with S-400, 54 air defense systems. None of the regiments have a complete set - 8 SAMs. I don’t understand why we should sell. Explain.
  • Black_Vatnik 3 January 2020 18: 39 New
    • 8
    • 2
    +6
    I believe that the recent rally at the US Embassy in Baghdad was not just a gesture of the population ... Americans sensed something, since they decided to take such a step. Well, plus the "small victorious war" before the election - it is very in the spirit of Amer’s presidents. The “liquidation” of Al Baghdadi did not have the desired effect in the media, since the ears of the photographer behind the “terrorist number 1” were visible to the naked eye. But the killing of an official is more interesting.
    1. svp67 3 January 2020 18: 41 New
      • 4
      • 2
      +2
      Quote: Black_Jacket
      I believe that the recent rally at the US Embassy in Baghdad was not just a gesture of the population ...

      Yes, on their part there was an act against the execution of their people.
    2. Rostislav Bely 3 January 2020 18: 55 New
      • 10
      • 5
      +5
      Or maybe you need a successful attempt on Trump?
      1. vorobey 3 January 2020 19: 05 New
        • 6
        • 3
        +3
        Quote: Rostislav White
        Or maybe you need a successful attempt on Trump?


        Is Putin again to blame? sanctions again?
        1. Tersky 3 January 2020 19: 35 New
          • 6
          • 3
          +3
          Quote: vorobey
          Is Putin again to blame? sanctions again?

          And who else. Fate .... fellow Russia and him, the hegemon formally designated "all-too-so-so-so." Hi Migratory! Sanya, I am glad to see you again in VO !!!
          1. Ruslan67 3 January 2020 19: 57 New
            • 3
            • 2
            +1
            Quote: Tersky
            And who else. Fate .... fellow Russia and its hegemon officially appointed,

            I just didn’t take into account that he was ... below the belt where he had a skullcap sad
            Vitya drinks During the holidays did not chop the wattle with a saber? But it’s worth understanding am to interfere laughing
            1. Tersky 3 January 2020 20: 01 New
              • 4
              • 1
              +3
              Quote: Ruslan67
              During the holidays did not chop the wattle with a saber?

              Hello to the representative of the muzzle-sliding squad! Not no , but why not wave, I burned him to barbecue, and does not interfere, and with benefit for business good . Happy Ruslan! ! drinks !
              1. Ruslan67 3 January 2020 20: 04 New
                • 3
                • 2
                +1
                Quote: Tersky
                , but why not wave, I burned him to barbecue, and does not interfere, and with benefit for business

                And the wife is so happy that the chickens fled fellow lol
        2. Evil543 3 January 2020 22: 30 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          What people!
          And when in the states? To each president a little war hi
          Trump has not yet unleashed a single one.
          1. businessv 3 January 2020 23: 08 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: Evil543
            Trump has not yet unleashed a single one.

            So until this morning it was, now - in doubt.
          2. Rostislav Bely 4 January 2020 00: 17 New
            • 1
            • 1
            0
            I think that the stamp about a small victorious war should be thrown into the wreck ... there are many more complicated routes and although it loses the course for Iran, it will lose the information and reputation equally - it will not be able to undertake the same in the near future - it’s just a war, but it won’t will do it - it’s not for nothing that the states have reconciled with the Taliban and so on - I don’t think that this is a primitive action for raising oil prices - though? (Recently, the joint exercise was Iran with Russia and China - but no one canceled the Strait of Malacca syndrome)
        3. Rostislav Bely 4 January 2020 00: 24 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          Yes, you forget about the WTO and the rules of world trade, they were buried long ago by sanctions without UN sanction))) - this is carrot for a donkey, a way to overcome its stubbornness
          look for an analogy in the assassination attempt on Hitler
        4. Svarog51 4 January 2020 10: 59 New
          • 6
          • 1
          +5
          Nothing! Sober up! "In the New Year all dreams come true!" Happy New Year to Sanya! And you today with a personal - so that was all! drinks drinks drinks
          There is no war! yes
      2. Black_Vatnik 3 January 2020 19: 06 New
        • 5
        • 2
        +3
        AND? Trump is a manager. You do not think that the largest economy and army in the world has been entrusted to Trump?)
        1. Rostislav Bely 4 January 2020 00: 02 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          You do not think that the largest economy and army in the world has been entrusted to Trump?)

          as an option to prevent civil war in the states (when they talk about illegitimacy for too long - it starts to materialize) - it plays on contradictions, or ...
      3. STORM 12 4 January 2020 01: 56 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        can...........
    3. Ramzaj99 3 January 2020 19: 43 New
      • 4
      • 5
      -1
      Quote: Black_Jacket
      Americans sensed something, since they decided to take such a step.

      Everything is as always - "He knew too much."
      More recently, this general was an ally of the United States and fought with the Kurds against ISIS and disagreeable US groups. He sponsored and actively communicated with curators from the USA, was aware of the cash and arms flows coming to Syria.
      After fulfilling his mission, he was recognized as a terrorist along with the "guardians of Islam." And now it’s been eliminated. Allies in the United States need to think about it. Too often, the States began to "throw" their allies.
      1. svp67 3 January 2020 20: 32 New
        • 8
        • 3
        +5
        Quote: Ramzaj99
        More recently, this general was an ally of the United States.

        This general, since the Islamic Revolution, could not have been an ally of the United States
        1. Ramzaj99 4 January 2020 10: 14 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: svp67
          This general, since the Islamic Revolution, could not have been an ally of the United States

          This is east. Not so happens there.
    4. To be or not to be 3 January 2020 22: 42 New
      • 10
      • 0
      +10
      And what could be expected from the USA?
      WHAT?
      You forgot how they hunted Saddam Hussein and how they hung him ... by what court did they judge ??
      Have you forgotten how they destroyed the leader of Libya, Muammar Mohammed Abdel Salam Hamid Abu Menyar al-Gaddafi? .... And how rejoiced sitting in the white house and watching his atrocious murder ..
      ..And we are told that this is democracy .. that it is freedom
      The freedom to kill with impunity ??? Weak?
      The freedom to drive countries into blood and destruction?
      Sorry. But this is all called differently ....
    5. SovAr238A 4 January 2020 01: 34 New
      • 1
      • 8
      -7
      Quote: Black_Jacket
      I believe that the recent rally at the US Embassy in Baghdad was not just a gesture of the population ... Americans sensed something, since they decided to take such a step. Well, plus the "small victorious war" before the election - it is very in the spirit of Amer’s presidents. The “liquidation” of Al Baghdadi did not have the desired effect in the media, since the ears of the photographer behind the “terrorist number 1” were visible to the naked eye. But the killing of an official is more interesting.


      And the fact that the Americans just made it clear to Iran. what did he play?
      no? it doesn’t work out in your head?

      General who controlled all the anti-American attacks. operations, etc.
      Which culprit including attacks on the base and the embassy.
      Producer.
      who invented everything, organized everything and realized everything.

      Why shouldn't it be destroyed?
      Especially. this director himself came to the territory of a foreign state. to personally manage everything.

      what prevents to destroy it?
      just that he is the general of Iran?
      But he is a jackal general.
      And by American standards, must be destroyed.

      And if our people in Syria had luck and they would have destroyed the general of the UAE / Qatar / Turkey, who sponsors all these Islamic groupings, trains them, directs them - what would you say about his destruction by the Russian air forces?
  • Pytnik 3 January 2020 18: 47 New
    • 10
    • 4
    +6
    Preparations for launching ballistic missiles have been observed in Iran.

    According to information sources, Iran has begun preparations for the launch of ballistic missiles. This is evidenced by the abnormal activity at the launch sites, as well as the presence in the country's airspace of a large number of fighters, which may indicate that in the next 24 hours Iran could strike a massive blow at the location of American military bases and facilities throughout the Middle East.
    Read more at: http://avia.pro/news/v-irane-zamechena-podgotovka-k-pusku-ballistchieskih-raket
    1. svp67 3 January 2020 18: 51 New
      • 13
      • 16
      -3
      Quote: Pytnik
      According to information sources, Iran has begun preparations for the launch of ballistic missiles.

      When they didn’t do this, at the time of the destruction of their passenger Boeing and if they strike now, this will be their end. In the struggle between the USA and Iran, I bet on the USA. They "roll out" Iran according to the "Yugoslav" model
      1. figwam 3 January 2020 18: 55 New
        • 8
        • 5
        +3
        Quote: svp67
        I bet on the USA. They "roll out" Iran according to the "Yugoslav" model

        They won’t succeed ...
        1. svp67 3 January 2020 18: 57 New
          • 8
          • 6
          +2
          Quote: figvam
          They won’t succeed ...

          Alas, the forces are too unequal. And having no allies, Iran is doomed
          1. vorobey 3 January 2020 19: 14 New
            • 8
            • 7
            +1
            Quote: svp67
            And having no allies, Iran is doomed


            the treaty between the USSR and Iran of 1920 is in force ... The Iranians only suspended its effect
            1. svp67 3 January 2020 19: 16 New
              • 7
              • 3
              +4
              Quote: vorobey
              the treaty between the USSR and Iran of 1920 is in force ... The Iranians only suspended its effect

              I repeat once again that UN sanctions apply to Iran, which Russia supported. And in this situation, how we will act is difficult to say
              1. vorobey 3 January 2020 19: 36 New
                • 7
                • 2
                +5
                Quote: svp67
                Quote: vorobey
                the treaty between the USSR and Iran of 1920 is in force ... The Iranians only suspended its effect

                I repeat once again that UN sanctions apply to Iran, which Russia supported. And in this situation, how we will act is difficult to say


                the appearance of another player with a nuclear club in this region does not suit anyone .. therefore, a compromise on the renunciation of nuclear weapons in exchange for military assistance will be convenient for everyone .. and the UN will close its eyes as well as on American tricks
                1. svp67 3 January 2020 19: 42 New
                  • 3
                  • 2
                  +1
                  Quote: vorobey
                  and the UN will close its eyes as well as American tricks

                  Given who is in the Security Council, everything will remain as before ...
                  one thing seems to me that Iran will not go to a direct confrontation, but they will have enough opportunities and forces to act “by other means”.
                  1. vorobey 3 January 2020 19: 58 New
                    • 5
                    • 3
                    +2
                    Quote: svp67
                    here for actions "by other means" they have enough opportunities and forces.


                    Is Israel responsible for everything? wassat wassat by principle, you are closer and it’s unlikely that they’ll climb into the cabin for you ..

                    By the way, lifting the moratorium from the contract is one of the painful steps ...
                    1. svp67 3 January 2020 20: 04 New
                      • 4
                      • 2
                      +2
                      Quote: vorobey
                      Is Israel responsible for everything?

                      Yes, the list is extensive. The same Saudi Arabia with its oil fields.
                      And of course, all the US PMCs that are currently doing "dark things" there
                    2. vorobey 3 January 2020 20: 13 New
                      • 4
                      • 2
                      +2
                      Quote: svp67
                      Yes, the list is extensive. The same Saudi Arabia with its oil fields.


                      three years ago, mine someone predicted oil at 200 US rubles
                    3. svp67 3 January 2020 20: 17 New
                      • 3
                      • 2
                      +1
                      Quote: vorobey
                      three years ago, mine someone predicted oil at 200 US rubles

                      You want to say that you decided to speed things up ...
                    4. vorobey 3 January 2020 20: 40 New
                      • 4
                      • 1
                      +3
                      Quote: svp67
                      Quote: vorobey
                      three years ago, mine someone predicted oil at 200 US rubles

                      You want to say that you decided to speed things up ...

                      No, just sorting the chain like that. in Venezuela, it didn’t take control to take, some of the OPEC countries are in ruins and chaos, some still have a voice, Qatar and Ecuador left OPEC. Iran, bypassing sanctions, still sells oil, and if this triangle burns, then we can talk about eliminating OPEC and then we can forget about controlling and regulating oil prices, because the United States is already in first place in oil production in the world. and most importantly, China and Europe will suffer from high prices. and then you can repeat the trick with the USSR
        2. TAMBU 3 January 2020 19: 36 New
          • 5
          • 4
          +1
          Considering the price of oil and its importance for Russian capital, it is not difficult to predict how we will act ... we will express condemnation and perhaps even ... no, condemnation will end ...
        3. IS-80_RVGK2 4 January 2020 00: 31 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          Let's merge Iran? Do we need this?
      2. boss 3 January 2020 21: 34 New
        • 0
        • 2
        -2
        yeah, and now that they’re turned on?
        No, this feint will not roll, enough have suffered.
        maximum sale of weapons.
        Well, if volunteers rush straight?
      3. Altai72 3 January 2020 22: 17 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        Well, where do you see the USSR?
        1. Vadim237 3 January 2020 22: 54 New
          • 1
          • 2
          -1
          In a dream, the USSR is clearly visible.
        2. vorobey 4 January 2020 01: 45 New
          • 2
          • 3
          -1
          Quote: Altai72
          Well, where do you see the USSR?


          if you remember that the RF is the assignee of the USSR
  • Black_Vatnik 3 January 2020 18: 58 New
    • 13
    • 8
    +5
    Or everything will be limited to "small" exchanges. Trump before the election is least of all necessary for trains from the other end of the globe to arrive with coffins. There will be no Yugoslav model because:
    1. The experience of Yugoslavia is taken into account.
    2. Iran has a more or less modern air defense. And over 10 million bayonets.
    3. China is behind Iran and Russia is likely to stand.
    4. Iran will not reach the United States, but with a margin will reach Israel ... everyone understands this.
    I do not pretend to the truth in the last resort, I write my thoughts. For Iran, "eating" such a slap in the face is even worse than answering aloud ... this is not forgiving in principle.
    1. svp67 3 January 2020 19: 01 New
      • 8
      • 4
      +4
      Quote: Black_Jacket
      Trump before the election is least of all necessary for trains from the other end of the globe to arrive with coffins.

      The United States now has the strength to slaughter Iran with missile and air strikes for a long time without introducing ground forces. And in Iran itself there are many separatist movements. The US will simply drive Iran into the "Stone Age", and then support its collapse into several states
      1. Black_Vatnik 3 January 2020 19: 04 New
        • 8
        • 6
        +2
        The United States was 15-20 years late with this. They cannot destroy Iran as safely as they did with Iraq. Times are not the same. Russia is not that, China is not that. From Russia to Iran through the Caucasus surpass, this is so, by the way.
        1. svp67 3 January 2020 19: 07 New
          • 8
          • 5
          +3
          Quote: Black_Jacket
          From Russia to Iran through the Caucasus surpass, this is so, by the way.

          But nothing that Russia and China voted at the UN for sanctions against Iran, namely for the supply of weapons. And they have not been canceled.
          For us, the strengthening of Iran is also "not korosho" ...
          1. Black_Vatnik 3 January 2020 19: 09 New
            • 11
            • 5
            +6
            Strengthening Iran is not as scary for us as the transformation of Iran into a walk-field with igilas, al-Qaeda and other Boko-harams. I repeat, from Russia to Iran one can lend a hand through Azerbaijan.
            1. svp67 3 January 2020 19: 12 New
              • 9
              • 4
              +5
              Quote: Black_Jacket
              I repeat, from Russia to Iran one can lend a hand through Azerbaijan.

              Everything is possible. It is possible to reach Ukraine in general with a “finger”, but no more ...
              1. Black_Vatnik 3 January 2020 19: 14 New
                • 7
                • 4
                +3
                It seemed to me, or are you now comparing a Chubat Bandera with an Islamist beaten off to the head? A completely different scale of threat, a completely different level of danger.
                1. svp67 3 January 2020 19: 17 New
                  • 9
                  • 3
                  +6
                  Quote: Black_Jacket
                  It seemed to me, or are you now comparing a Chubat Bandera with an Islamist beaten off to the head?

                  I do not compare, I specifically put an equal sign. For Russia, they are both dangerous
                2. TAMBU 3 January 2020 19: 38 New
                  • 2
                  • 4
                  -2
                  Well, here who beat off the whole head - this is a moot point ... as for me they are equal
                3. Black_Vatnik 3 January 2020 20: 06 New
                  • 14
                  • 7
                  +7
                  Banderlogs are for the most part cowardly and flawed Natsik. When the Nazis wanted to make them look like military formations, it turned out that they could not fight at a word at all and were only fit to burn peaceful villages, kill women and the elderly. Islamists on martyrs fly at checkpoints, blow themselves up at subway airports, etc. etc. And ideology is set there very strongly. Do not compare louse with hornet.
                4. svp67 3 January 2020 20: 09 New
                  • 5
                  • 5
                  0
                  Quote: Black_Jacket
                  When the Nazis wanted to make them look like military formations, it turned out that they could not fight at a word at all and were only fit to burn peaceful villages, kill women and the elderly.

                  Sorry, but the Nachtigall is still a parable in the languages ​​of our military. And he was formed from them. And now the situation has changed a lot, among the supporters of Bandera there are many people from Belarus and Russia
                5. TAMBU 3 January 2020 20: 45 New
                  • 2
                  • 2
                  0
                  And when did it burn villages, kill children, women and the elderly became a nicer pastime than the explosion of a military or infrastructure facility? Contradict yourself ...
                6. Black_Vatnik 3 January 2020 20: 55 New
                  • 5
                  • 4
                  +1
                  No, I do not contradict. It is strange that you do not trace the difference. I don’t want to go to the checkpoint in a car filled with explosives, I need some kind of rod inside (even if in this case this rod is the result of a brainwashed), and to drive unarmed children and women into the house and burn it, courage is not needed, for the woman and child will not give change. Do you know many cases when Bandera bombed themselves in the subway, etc.? The question is rhetorical.
                7. svp67 3 January 2020 21: 09 New
                  • 2
                  • 1
                  +1
                  Quote: Black_Jacket
                  In order to call at a checkpoint in a car filled with explosives, I really need some kind of rod inside (even if in this case this rod is the result of a brainwashed), and to drive unarmed children and women into the house and burn it, courage is not needed, for the woman and child will not give change. Do you know many cases when Bandera bombed themselves in the subway, etc.?

                  Nevertheless, their ideology has now torn away not only part of the territory from us, but part of the population, which was originally Russian from birth. And wait, if this "infection" is not smothered again, then it is quite possible to expect the appearance of suicide bombers in our territory.
                  In Ukraine, there are already quite a lot of young "cubs"
                8. TAMBU 3 January 2020 21: 18 New
                  • 3
                  • 3
                  0
                  our dialogue is not about which one of them is morally cooler, but about which one of them has a more broken head. We live by burning a crowd of people ... that screams in a language that is well understood by you, you know you need to have a first-class brown slush in your head ... about the same as those who enter the checkpoint at dynamite ... so there is no difference between them. And some enemies and others.
                9. Black_Vatnik 3 January 2020 21: 27 New
                  • 1
                  • 3
                  -2
                  Well then go back to the beginning, there you will find my reasoning about who is more dangerous. The experience of recent years will give a clear answer to these considerations.
                10. TAMBU 3 January 2020 22: 00 New
                  • 3
                  • 3
                  0
                  It seemed to me, or are you now comparing a Chubat Bandera with an Islamist beaten off to the head? A completely different scale of threat, a completely different level of danger.

                  Whose experience and how much is “last years” should give me an answer to your own reasoning? Let me explain: usually in the process of reasoning the answer is formed, since they are conceived for the answer. In general, comparing the level of threat between the arsonists of the villages and the martyrs is somehow not correct ... for the farmer in the Kuban, so probably the Natsiks are Ukrainian both more real and more terrible, but for the soldier at the checkpoint, they definitely wanted to say something ... ? If we compare, then they are one and the same and are called by one word - the enemy, and the reasoning which of them is more repulsed and which is less - will lead to Kolya from Urengoy, ultimately ...
  • abrakadabre 3 January 2020 19: 24 New
    • 6
    • 2
    +4
    from Russia to Iran one can lend a hand through Azerbaijan.
    Until Iran, you do not need to pull your hand through the mountains. It is much more efficient to pull cargo barges across the Caspian Sea.
  • Uncle Izya 3 January 2020 20: 51 New
    • 5
    • 2
    +3
    This does not apply to defensive weapons, and on October 20, sanctions for the supply of weapons expire and Russia and China may not support the extension
    1. Sergey M. Karasev 5 January 2020 14: 32 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Uncle Izya
      This does not apply to defensive weapons, and on October 20, sanctions for the supply of weapons expire and Russia and China may not support the extension

      By October 20, I think everything will be decided.
  • Vitaly gusin 3 January 2020 19: 09 New
    • 3
    • 11
    -8
    Quote: Black_Jacket
    4. Iran will not reach the United States, but with a margin will reach Israel ... everyone understands this.

    Please in more detail, especially in reserve.
  • maden.usmanow 3 January 2020 19: 42 New
    • 5
    • 10
    -5
    What are 10 million bayonets?
    Well, do not write nonsense.
    1. Black_Vatnik 3 January 2020 20: 14 New
      • 9
      • 6
      +3
      If you take the regular troops, the IRGC and Basij, then in the region of 10 million it will work out.
  • Saxahorse 3 January 2020 20: 20 New
    • 5
    • 15
    -10
    Quote: Black_Jacket
    3. China is behind Iran and Russia is likely to stand.

    Between Israel and Iran, today's Russia will always choose Israel. Iran is not deceived about such an ally.
    1. IS-80_RVGK2 4 January 2020 00: 45 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      A very bold statement. I think between Israel and Iran, the Russian Federation will choose its interests. laughing
  • SovAr238A 4 January 2020 01: 41 New
    • 1
    • 7
    -6
    Quote: Black_Jacket
    Or everything will be limited to "small" exchanges. Trump before the election is least of all necessary for trains from the other end of the globe to arrive with coffins. There will be no Yugoslav model because:
    1. The experience of Yugoslavia is taken into account.
    2. Iran has a more or less modern air defense. And over 10 million bayonets.
    3. China is behind Iran and Russia is likely to stand.
    4. Iran will not reach the United States, but with a margin will reach Israel ... everyone understands this.
    I do not pretend to the truth in the last resort, I write my thoughts. For Iran, "eating" such a slap in the face is even worse than answering aloud ... this is not forgiving in principle.


    Iran will collapse after 300 KR ...
    No one will stand up for Iran.
    Neither China nor the Russian Federation.
    Modern air defense in Iran is not in principle.
    He will not reach Israel - he has no air force from the word at all.
    10 million bayonets? Why not 50 million?

    And half of the Arabs / Persians will not fight in principle.
    They just do not know how to fight. They are only capable of riots. which in no way makes Arabs / Persians / Muslims fighters.

    No one and no way to call. Iran is a bubble that works only on its sponsored factions.
    And if he gives them an order to all leave, then they will roll him out and clean up the groups.
    And there will be nothing left of the ayatollahs, and their pathos.
    Govnostrana. Bubble.
    1. Russian jacket 4 January 2020 04: 29 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Hmm ... Just rolls over brutality of statements. Especially about the foreigners ... Beautifully said. Great justification for the new Holocaust. Only not for the Jews, but for the Persians. In general, VO has recently turned into something like "Medusa" and others. Shame ....
    2. Uncle Izya 5 January 2020 20: 33 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Why did you decide that?
      Russia and China will supply weapons vryatli Russia and China want Amer bases on their borders
  • yfast 3 January 2020 19: 17 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    Well, the United States is shy just to kill a few million Iranians, the world will not understand. The end will be a little short.
    1. svp67 3 January 2020 19: 49 New
      • 6
      • 2
      +4
      Quote: yfast
      Well, the United States is shy just to kill some millions of Iranians

      There may be Iranians, but there are "terrorists" ...
      Quote: yfast
      the world will not understand.

      Most of the world doesn’t give a damn about what’s going on there, except that oil prices will fly up. And they will see and tell what Hollywood will show them
  • Local from the Volga 3 January 2020 19: 22 New
    • 5
    • 3
    +2
    Do you want crowds of martyrs in New York and Tel Aviv?
    1. svp67 3 January 2020 19: 50 New
      • 5
      • 5
      0
      Quote: Local from the Volga
      Do you want crowds of martyrs in New York and Tel Aviv?

      In New York it’s possible, but in Tel Aviv it’s unlikely that there can be loners, but there will definitely not be a crowd
  • g1v2 3 January 2020 19: 53 New
    • 11
    • 3
    +8
    Yugoslav will not work. Persians are now much more monolithic. And they are unlikely to surrender as quickly as the Serbs. Again, the technological level of the Iranian military-industrial complex is higher than that of then Yugoslavia. The Persians are accustomed to sanctions and it is unlikely that the Americans will be able to drop their standard of living on the Maidan.
    The United States, of course, can defeat Iran, but it just won’t. The advantage of mattresses is that they can use the Saudis, Israel and their allies in the database. None of the lower forces in the region have enough ground forces. So - there will be an exchange of blows. I think the Persians are ready for him. And without a ground invasion, war is unlikely to be fast.
    In principle, we can try to benefit. If the Persians defeat the At Tanf base, then no one will be surprised. Again, if they block the movement of mattresses into Syria and back. It is possible that the Americans may decide to evacuate their people from Syria, so as not to make them a target.
    1. svp67 3 January 2020 20: 31 New
      • 9
      • 4
      +5
      Quote: g1v2
      Persians are now much more monolithic.

      Sorry, but more recently in Tehran there were strong unrest, which the IRGC suppressed with difficulty. In addition there
      Iranian Azerbaijan, where separatist sentiments are strong. Since March 2002, the leader of the South Azerbaijan separatists, former professor of Tabriz University Mahmudali Chekhrani, has been hiding in Baku. In the past, the Iranian leadership’s attempts to extradite Chekhragan have failed
      Kurdish separatism
      Baloch separatism
      Arab separatism
      Talysh separatism
      Masenderan separatism
      Lurian separatism
      Gilan separatism
      Bakhtiar separatism
      Lak separatism
      Turkmen separatism
      Iran is full of contradictions.
      1. g1v2 3 January 2020 20: 49 New
        • 8
        • 2
        +6
        Well, the Americans can organize the unrest - there, even in the PRC, they succeeded. But under the conditions of an external threat, they are unlikely to be able to rock Iran. And of these separatisms, most exist in the form of conversations. The IRGC has long learned to speak with Kurds. Epic with Kirkuk witness to this. Of course, Azeri in Iran seems to live more than in Azerbaijan, but I don’t remember any speeches, not chatter of the intelligentsia over the past 20 years. If Chekhragani posed any danger, the IRGC would have got it. I don’t remember any really serious separatist actions in Iran over the past 20 years.
        In general, most of these separatists are not dangerous. We had a bunch of them all over the country. In order to turn them into something serious, you need an organizational center, systematic work, resources and weapons. Again, the IRGC is quite capable of paying off any of their performances.
        But on the contrary, the IRGC is quite capable of arranging its counterparts on hot days. Hezbollah to Israel, the Hussites and the Shiite underground to the Saudis. Shiite militias in Iraq - American bases in it.
        We will see. Again, it is worth taking into account the American election. Of course, a small war before the election may be useful to Trump, but a full-blown conflict will not play in his favor.
      2. Uncle Izya 5 January 2020 20: 40 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Yes, it remains only to wonder how he could resist, the USSR could not
  • Nyrobsky 3 January 2020 19: 55 New
    • 7
    • 4
    +3
    Quote: svp67
    Quote: Pytnik
    According to information sources, Iran has begun preparations for the launch of ballistic missiles.

    When they didn’t do this, at the time of the destruction of their passenger Boeing and if they strike now, this will be their end. In the struggle between the USA and Iran, I bet on the USA. They "roll out" Iran according to the "Yugoslav" model

    No, they can destroy the country, but to win ... This is debatable. They haven’t echoed the Taliban for 19 years, despite the fact that it has no aviation, no fleet, no missiles, no air defense.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. IS-80_RVGK2 4 January 2020 00: 50 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Are you sure that they generally need a victory over the Taliban?
      1. Nyrobsky 4 January 2020 11: 09 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
        Are you sure that they generally need a victory over the Taliban?
        The victory of the Americans in Afghanistan today is not a question at all. This topic can only be considered in the context of the defeat of the Americans. Nowadays, mattresses are more concerned with how to get on skis and get out of Afghanistan with the least military and reputation losses. If until recently they were close to being able to negotiate with the Taliban, now, after the assassination of Suleymani, it is not at all a fact that the Iranians will let them do it on their terms and will probably use their ties with the Taliban so that the mattresses suffer the greatest losses. The fact that in 2019, in Afghanistan, the Americans lost only 20 soldiers, will seem to them flowers. Would sit at home
        1. Uncle Izya 5 January 2020 20: 41 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Well America overseas problems will begin in Central Asia and Russia
          1. Nyrobsky 5 January 2020 21: 04 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: Uncle Izya
            Well America overseas problems will begin in Central Asia and Russia

            You are probably hinting that the Taliban and the Ishilovites will trample within your specified limits? There are two points. The first is that the Taliban leadership at one time made a statement that it has no interests in the North outside of Afghanistan and the second is that the Ishilovites for the Taliban are the same invaders who, if the Americans leave, they will clean up very quickly. There are from 3 to 4 thousand pieces. The US-Igil incubator that they prepared in Afghanistan for the purposes you indicated will be closed.
    3. Michael HORNET 4 January 2020 14: 20 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      But how can one “win” if one does not set such a task at all?
      What the USSR, what the USA DON'T PUT "the task of defeating"
      Hence the logical result
  • vorobey 3 January 2020 19: 08 New
    • 6
    • 4
    +2
    Quote: Pytnik
    Iran could strike a massive blow at the location of US military bases and facilities throughout the Middle East.


    Well then, after some time, we will have to take a turn at the military registration and enlistment offices .. the shock wave will reach us too.
  • SovAr238A 4 January 2020 01: 36 New
    • 0
    • 4
    -4
    Quote: Pytnik
    may indicate that over the next 24 hours, Iran could strike a massive blow at the location of US military bases and facilities throughout the Middle East.


    It testifies only to that. that Iran is preparing for a big pipets ...
    He will fly so that he just breaks up.
  • aszzz888 4 January 2020 09: 44 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Pytnik (alexey) Yesterday, 18:47 ... that over the next 24 hours, Iran could strike a massive blow at the location of US military bases and facilities throughout the Middle East.

    And this will be the 3rd world.
  • Alex Nevs 3 January 2020 18: 50 New
    • 4
    • 3
    +1
    The bubble will either burst inside the Mattress or burst out. Outside, opponents oppose the mattress that has stained.
  • Gnefredov 3 January 2020 18: 54 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    Spouse in St. Petersburg, asked you to "plus". Plus.
    He is logged in there on a smartphone, but he reads everything.
  • Uncle Izya 3 January 2020 20: 49 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Well, it’s unlikely that Trump will not want extreme before the elections on the nose.
    1. aszzz888 4 January 2020 09: 48 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Uncle Izzy (Ruslan) Yesterday, 20:49
      0
      Well, it’s unlikely that Trump will not want extreme before the elections on the nose.

      Western media are strenuously making amendments to the fact that the order for rocket attacks was given by EXACTLY trump. I think this is not in vain?
  • YOUR 4 January 2020 03: 10 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    I would like to avoid these interesting events.
  • Reklastik 4 January 2020 13: 53 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Of course, thermonuclear power plants, life up to 200 years, landing on Mars))) But what about the consequences - have you ever heard of the elimination of American generals / military for their actions, well, at least the same Iranian military? Me not. They will say, diplomats will exchange notes and everything will be as before, even better) I would be surprised if I made a mistake.
  • GKS 2111 3 January 2020 18: 31 New
    • 5
    • 2
    +3
    the elimination of the IRGC General is capable of generating what the Iranian nuclear bomb most feared in Iran and the United States and in Israel.
    This is called pulling a tiger by a mustache.
  • Livonetc 3 January 2020 18: 32 New
    • 8
    • 4
    +4
    Trump is building his image of a hawk before the election.
    To the whole world do not care.
    It's nothing personal.
    The old mattress tradition
  • Thrifty 3 January 2020 18: 32 New
    • 2
    • 4
    -2
    I would not be amazed if the same Pakistanis, for example, sold or helped to create nuclear weapons to the Persians! And the Yankee tambourine will easily fly! The United States is overseas, but the region has the same Saudi Arabia, the USA’s chain dog, and “turning off” the Arabian dynasty by shooting members of the Karolev’s family is also a strong move against US politics in the region.
  • KVU-NSVD 3 January 2020 18: 34 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    At the same time, Riyadh will ask the United States not to impose CAATSA sanctions against him, since the complexes are required "immediately to protect against Iran." And the United States, as the author writes
    And here we have the good news to sell, although, knowing the Arabs .. it is better not to get involved initially ..
  • Aaron Zawi 3 January 2020 18: 36 New
    • 11
    • 18
    -7
    Everything is quite convincingly written, but with the last paragraph I allow myself to disagree. Iran has been moving towards the creation of nuclear weapons for more than ten years. And the death of Suleymani in no way affects this. The only thing that holds Iran back is technological and economic problems.
    1. Thrifty 3 January 2020 18: 40 New
      • 8
      • 5
      +3
      Aron, between us, has long been rumored that the Saudis simply bought nuclear weapons from Islamobad. And why not the Persians in that bazaar stock up on nuclear warheads, at least? Moreover, the Persians have been making rockets themselves for a long time already.
      1. Russian jacket 4 January 2020 04: 35 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        I agree with you, but with one amendment. Only technological. When necessary, some rulers spit on the economy. And technologies, albeit with a creak and overpayment, will appear sooner or later. But I’m more interested in Netanyahu’s reaction. He supported the murder, but will he again tear to Moscow, as happened? hi
    2. krillon 3 January 2020 18: 55 New
      • 12
      • 3
      +9
      But nuclear weapons have appeared in you too. At China, Pakistan, North Korea. Yes, not in one day, but nonetheless. In fact, Iran is pushing to acquire them. And this is another reality. And there is nothing good in this, they will pass the nerves, start throwing bombs, and there the others will not remain on the sidelines. The Americans are far away, you have to rake. In Hiroshima did not understand where the peaceful, where the military ..
    3. tihonmarine 3 January 2020 19: 22 New
      • 10
      • 3
      +7
      Quote: Aaron Zawi
      Everything is quite convincingly written, but with the last paragraph I allow myself to disagree.

      You can write whatever you want, convince everyone and everyone, but one thing I will say to you is "The situation is nowhere worse, and it needs to be put out." And you are now not in a very enviable position. I always thought that your people are sane, but I look and brings you.
      1. Sky strike fighter 3 January 2020 19: 37 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        Preparations for launching ballistic missiles have been observed in Iran.

        According to information sources, Iran has begun preparations for the launch of ballistic missiles. This is evidenced by the abnormal activity at the launch sites, as well as the presence in the country's airspace of a large number of fighters, which may indicate that in the next 24 hours Iran could strike a massive blow at the location of American military bases and facilities throughout the Middle East.

        http://avia.pro/news/v-irane-zamechena-podgotovka-k-pusku-ballistchieskih-raket?utm_referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fzen.yandex.com
        Is a new Alia coming? It seems that here the whole region will explode.
    4. The comment was deleted.
  • megadeth 3 January 2020 18: 38 New
    • 9
    • 10
    -1
    The US is acting, and we are always worried ... Iran will not be able to do the FSA ... nothing.
    1. classik46 3 January 2020 20: 32 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      hezbollah has a lot of missiles, they have already lowered Israel and continue to lower it, and even the vaunted American aviation doesn’t help Jews very much
    2. Vadim237 3 January 2020 22: 58 New
      • 4
      • 2
      +2
      Iran is armed with thousands of OTRK and BRRS missiles, as well as cruise missiles and kamikaze tactical drones - all US military bases within a radius of 2000 kilometers will be lightweight.
    3. Michael HORNET 4 January 2020 14: 24 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Yes, you go, sign up as a volunteer in the local Iranian SS - IRGC, what is the sofa to sit out?
  • demo 3 January 2020 18: 38 New
    • 11
    • 3
    +8
    All right said the German edition of FAZ.
    Just forgot something else.
    Americans walk on the ground. In different countries. And most of them are unguarded.
    And I won’t be surprised if in the next day or two a couple of three Americans, who are not quite simple, give their soul to God.
    Or maybe Brussels will be shocked by explosions of martyrs-mobiles?
    I am silent about Israel.

    Only this country could do so, hoping for the intercession of the Americans.
    1. aszzz888 4 January 2020 09: 51 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      demo (Van) Yesterday, 18:38
      +8
      All right said the German edition of FAZ.
      Just forgot something else.
      Americans walk on the ground. In different countries. And most of them are unguarded.
      And I won’t be surprised if in the next day or two a couple of three Americans, who are not quite simple, give their soul to God.
      Or maybe Brussels will be shocked by explosions of martyrs-mobiles?
      I am silent about Israel.

      Only this country could do so, hoping for the intercession of the Americans.
      Unfortunately, the mericatos will take this as a declaration of war.
      1. demo 4 January 2020 13: 58 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        And here we go.
        Let's look at how the Iranians will quickly begin to act.
        Let's look at how Americans will perceive this.
  • NF68 3 January 2020 18: 42 New
    • 9
    • 3
    +6
    In Iran, even without this, using the example of North Korea, they have long understood that the presence of nuclear weapons quickly cools even hotheads from the United States.
  • Chingachguk 3 January 2020 18: 45 New
    • 14
    • 10
    +4
    It seems that the mattresses have jumped .... To be a bomb! And it, the bomb, will be made specifically for comrades from the USA ..... The finger will constantly hang over the button ...... I think if that, many will contribute to the fact that the United States ceases to exist as a gigimon. By and large, mattresses are more than Hitler shit all !!!!!
    1. Alex Nevs 3 January 2020 18: 52 New
      • 10
      • 3
      +7
      Hitler "has a rest" in comparison with a mattress with spots.
  • Sars 3 January 2020 18: 45 New
    • 3
    • 3
    0
    The Pakistani military officially promised nuclear weapons to Iranians in the event of US or Israeli aggression.
    1. Thrifty 3 January 2020 18: 49 New
      • 4
      • 2
      +2
      It is possible that it has already been there for a long time!
  • 7,62h54 3 January 2020 18: 50 New
    • 6
    • 3
    +3
    Somehow Israel remained on the sidelines. You can’t sit behind the wall.
  • Bshkaus 3 January 2020 18: 50 New
    • 6
    • 3
    +3
    To be honest, I would also be very offended by the Persians.
    Of course, I understand everything, there is politics, the US national interests, etc., but it’s absolutely so frank to go out of control - it’s no longer in any way.
    And on the account of the nuclear program, I recalled today how a series of “accidents” with nuclear scientists took place in Iran about ten years ago, because then, too, in a strange way, car accidents or bricks fell on my head once a week, because of which Iran lost key specialists .
  • Retvizan 8 3 January 2020 18: 50 New
    • 9
    • 4
    +5
    Something modern world, not childish kamatozit!
    And they blame Russia, Iran, etc.
    But in fact there are conflicts everywhere, where the States launched their tentacles, Ukraine, Venezuela, Iraq, Syria, Hong Kong, Afghanistan, etc.
  • megadeth 3 January 2020 18: 51 New
    • 7
    • 21
    -14
    As usual, they will punish Russian pensioners.
  • cniza 3 January 2020 18: 56 New
    • 6
    • 2
    +4
    the elimination of the IRGC General is capable of generating what the Iranian nuclear bomb most feared in Iran and the United States and in Israel.


    Naturally, this is the only way to protect Iran.
    1. abrakadabre 3 January 2020 19: 30 New
      • 2
      • 2
      0
      Naturally, this is the only way to protect Iran.
      Only in a compartment with one or another likeness of the Perimeter system. Not important, automatic or organizationally distributed. Otherwise, they may also decapitate the link making the decision on the nuclear response.
      1. cniza 3 January 2020 20: 31 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        If they could have done it, they can only in third countries, as shown.
  • Andrei from Chelyabinsk 3 January 2020 19: 20 New
    • 20
    • 5
    +15
    I apologize for being rude, but did the star-striated ones get completely insane ?! On the territory of a third state to eliminate a high official of a foreign country? And do not even try to portray repentance (like: the special agent was mistaken, they planned to kill the superterrorist, but they killed the general, our condolences to the family and friends, etc.) ?!
    M-d ... What can I say? If the Lord wants to punish anyone, he destroys the mind.
    1. Seaflame 3 January 2020 19: 28 New
      • 5
      • 3
      +2
      There, recently, the attack was on an Amer military base; an Amer soldier was killed. They (the Americans) claim that this happened with the support of the IRGC.
    2. svp67 3 January 2020 19: 30 New
      • 3
      • 2
      +1
      Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
      On the territory of a third state to eliminate a high official of a foreign country?

      In the United States, the IRGC, and even more so, its special forces are included in the list of terrorist organizations, so for the United States it is the elimination of a terrorist.
      Since April 16, 2019, the United States has officially considered the Iranian militant organization, the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps, a terrorist organization.

      And you were not surprised that in the September 11 terrorist attack, an American court “spotted” the “Iranian footprint” and awarded a fine of about $ 10,5 billion to a group of American insurance companies and relatives of the victims
    3. tihonmarine 3 January 2020 19: 42 New
      • 2
      • 2
      0
      Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
      M-d ... What can I say? If the Lord wants to punish anyone, he destroys the mind.

      The situation is overwhelming, trash.
    4. Evil543 3 January 2020 23: 39 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      This Skripal can be blamed for us, but they are exceptional, they can do anything. Sarcasm
    5. Michael HORNET 4 January 2020 14: 29 New
      • 0
      • 2
      -2
      And why are these crocodile tears? Declare immediately your love for the clerical fascist regime of Iran, what are these reservations for? Imagine that it was with the help of a drone that the Russian Federation eliminated, for example, the head of the Right Sector, which appeared on the territory of the DPR. Will you also shed tears and stigmatize?
  • nznz 3 January 2020 19: 24 New
    • 5
    • 2
    +3
    bomb to be. this is the only way.
  • Seaflame 3 January 2020 19: 27 New
    • 5
    • 3
    +2
    The appearance of ayatola’s nuclear weapons with its ideas of a “holy” war and “infidels” is definitely not necessary for anyone in the world!
  • Basarev 3 January 2020 19: 36 New
    • 2
    • 8
    -6
    If Iran has a bomb, then it will simply be arranged for another Opera operation, without waiting for the appearance of carriers. And at the same time they will remember all the other tricks and will not forgive anything.
  • gorenina91 3 January 2020 19: 56 New
    • 3
    • 3
    0
    Elimination of the IRGC general may lead to the appearance of Iranian nuclear weapons


    - If only China will help Iran in this matter ...
    -Although it is unlikely ... -China needs only Iranian hydrocarbons .. and he doesn’t give a damn about everything ...- like the Iranians themselves ... -Even if an armed mess suddenly breaks out in Iran itself .. here China will stay away ... -as well as in Venezuela ...
  • Connor MacLeod 3 January 2020 19: 57 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    If it gets hot, the main thing is to stay away for as long as possible so that the Chinese fit in ...
    1. Vadim237 3 January 2020 23: 02 New
      • 0
      • 2
      -2
      But the Chinese will not fit in - they need to deal with the riots in Hong Kong.
  • Kerensky 3 January 2020 20: 05 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    ... blocking the Strait of Hormuz.

    The most likely scenario. You can always "turn on the back", if with a minimum number of victims.
    And then what is it:
    At the same time, it can even be beneficial for Trump,

    "Don't throw me in a thorn bush!"
  • rocket757 3 January 2020 20: 09 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    Theoretically, steep porridge is brewed. Let's see if she spills out into the practical plane. Everything is very dumb.
  • MelkorAintGood 3 January 2020 20: 10 New
    • 5
    • 13
    -8
    Better tell me why on this site Iranian terrorists are publicly supported, who in addition are radical Islamic fanatics? May the United States continue this sacred mission, we better
    1. The comment was deleted.
  • classik46 3 January 2020 20: 13 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    It seems to me that here you need to look at the conflict in another plane. Everything is in YAO, the Americans limit the number of countries that can use it. Firstly, Israel, no matter how hard it tries to talk, it’s not there. Secondly, even Japs close to the US body , they replaced Fukushima, and they really wanted to grow a baton. Thirdly, even the Turks kebabs were taken out of the base. Not to mention Libya and Iraq. sho it is clear that they do not have everything with yao smoothly. France seems to be trying to amb a new life and his cr yao, but it is also quietly rasshatyvayut.Vpolne logical that they would eventually drove Iran.
    1. Connor MacLeod 3 January 2020 20: 25 New
      • 3
      • 2
      +1
      Quote: classik46
      It's all about yao, the Americans limit the number of countries capable of applying it.

      The number of countries possessing nuclear weapons is not limited to the United States, but to the Non-Proliferation Treaty ...

      Quote: classik46
      Firstly, Israel, no matter how hard it tries to talk about it, doesn’t have it.

      Have you ever heard of Mordechai Vanunu?
      1. classik46 3 January 2020 21: 20 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        Well, when Israel uses nuclear weapons, then it will be seen.
  • Gennady Fomkin 3 January 2020 20: 13 New
    • 10
    • 3
    +7
    US actions are destabilizing the situation in the Middle East. And the Trump administration clearly did not take into account that Iran is not Syria, in which they frolic with impunity for more than a year. Suleymani, by the way, is considered in his homeland the “father of victories” over ISIS * terrorists in Syria. A terrorist organization created, armed, and funded by the Americans.

    Trump’s order to liquidate General Suleymani in Tehran was perceived as an attack on Iran. Even Israel, whose insolence knows no bounds, did not dare to swindle at this. It is likely that Trump is thus preparing for the upcoming elections, planning to organize his “victorious war” and move on to a second term. A stupid undertaking and obviously a failure.

    All that the Americans have achieved is angered Iran’s supreme leader Ali Khamenei, who promised to avenge the States for the assassination of the general. President Rouhani has confirmed that the Americans will pay for it.
  • Prisoner 3 January 2020 20: 19 New
    • 3
    • 3
    0
    The red-headed pontorez decided to play for future elections. So now the amers will have to walk and look around. They will not forgive the general.
  • Gennady Fomkin 3 January 2020 20: 22 New
    • 4
    • 4
    0
    All movement will begin after the election of trump. I represent what numerous delegations of business circles of Europe, Southeast Asia and other hydrocarbon buyers will rush to Iran to hold the Persians in their hands and prevent an escalation of the situation. Those who started this provocation miscalculated. The world has become very pragmatic and such an incident of Belli will not reach its goal.
    1. Kronos 3 January 2020 20: 24 New
      • 7
      • 5
      +2
      Fomkin’s, as always, so that the USA doesn’t do it, then lose
      1. Gennady Fomkin 3 January 2020 20: 27 New
        • 4
        • 3
        +1
        They got into my shit head over heels without me. laughing
    2. Sergey M. Karasev 5 January 2020 14: 50 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      All movement will begin after the election of trump.

      Why should the Persians wait for the US election? Revenge, of course, is a dish that is served cold, but how until the fall to explain the lack of action without the risk of losing face?
  • Gennady Fomkin 3 January 2020 20: 23 New
    • 1
    • 3
    -2
    They say Iran has some kind of submarine. And what are they armed with? laughing
  • Yang yangov 3 January 2020 20: 29 New
    • 10
    • 2
    +8
    if the Iranians "pacify" forever Bibi and Trump .. I think few people in the world will be upset)
  • Gennady Fomkin 3 January 2020 20: 30 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    Iranian Defense Minister on the killing of Suleimani: "We will take revenge on all who are involved"

    Iranian Defense Minister Amir Khatami said Friday, January 3, that the response to the assassination in Baghdad, General Kassema Suleimani, will be “crushing revenge,” Reuters and IRNA news agency reported.

    "We will avenge everyone who is involved in his murder and is responsible for him," Khatami said. laughing
  • Gennady Fomkin 3 January 2020 20: 31 New
    • 3
    • 4
    -1
    Be that as it may, the Persians are making n ...... very nervous. Indeed, in fact, they are not ready for war, and aircraft carriers and tomahawks will last only for a week, after which the undercut American infantry in Iraq and Syria will have to be transported for a lot of money laughing
    1. Kronos 3 January 2020 20: 33 New
      • 4
      • 8
      -4
      Yes, you are completely out of touch with reality
  • Old26 3 January 2020 20: 37 New
    • 5
    • 3
    +2
    Quote: Chingachguk
    Bomb to be!

    Five years later - maybe. But not tomorrow or the day after tomorrow. Iranians must either restore the number of old-type centrifuges (IR-1), or start mass production of newer centrifuges. but in any case it’s not a single month’s business, and maybe not even one year’s

    Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
    I apologize for being rude, but did the star-striated ones get completely insane ?! On the territory of a third state to eliminate a high official of a foreign country? And do not even try to portray repentance (like: the special agent was mistaken, they planned to kill the superterrorist, but they killed the general, our condolences to the family and friends, etc.) ?!
    M-d ... What can I say? If the Lord wants to punish anyone, he destroys the mind.

    What to do, Andrey. If there remains one superpower in the world, then complexes of permissiveness begin to manifest in it. And most often sober voices are not heard. Although of course God forbid if it begins. Moreover, the countries of the region will begin to participate in this fire.

    Quote: Basarev
    If Iran has a bomb, then it will simply be arranged for another Opera operation, without waiting for the appearance of carriers. And at the same time they will remember all the other tricks and will not forgive anything.

    "Opera" makes sense if there is no bomb yet. If there is a bomb (God forbid that this is not), then they already have carriers
    1. Connor MacLeod 3 January 2020 20: 45 New
      • 1
      • 2
      -1
      Quote: Old26
      Five years later - maybe. But not tomorrow or the day after tomorrow. Iranians must either restore the number of old-type centrifuges (IR-1), or start mass production of newer centrifuges. but in any case it’s not a single month’s business, and maybe not even one year’s

      Well, a "dirty" bomb (radiological in common people) they can do very quickly.
  • Gennady Fomkin 3 January 2020 20: 48 New
    • 1
    • 3
    -2
    Quote: Kronos
    Yes, you are completely out of touch with reality

    Judging by you, you live parallel reality laughing
  • Old26 3 January 2020 20: 50 New
    • 7
    • 5
    +2
    Quote: Gennady Fomkin
    Be that as it may, the Persians are making n ...... very nervous. Indeed, in fact, they are not ready for war, and aircraft carriers and tomahawks will last only for a week, after which the undercut American infantry in Iraq and Syria will have to be transported for a lot of money laughing

    And how long is Iran enough, start a serious mess? Or again, how during the Iranian-Iraqi boys will be sent to minefields? The Americans have enough “Tomahawks”. At least Iran. It’s not a problem to bring aircraft carriers to the entrance to the Gulf of Oman and gradually advance as the Iranian anti-ship missiles are destroyed in the Strait of Hormuz. Yes, and there are allies for the coalition
    The Iranian army is large, but equipped with a mass of various weapons, which does not add strength to its potential. And non-contact methods, the Americans will break it. In a month, two or three - but they’ll break it. Or there will be the same generals as in Iraq during the last war.
    Aviation is a hodgepodge of the mid-80s, and often not modernized. The fleet is a few ships of the frigate and destroyer type, which, let them protect themselves. There are a lot of "mosquito fleets", but TTXs are extremely low. The only thing that the neighbors will get is from Iran’s missiles. At the first stage. Then the hunt for launchers will begin. And taking into account the fact that the number of launchers is limited and many times smaller than the number of missiles (North Korean missile forces construction scheme), sweeping missiles will not last long. Moreover, a limited number of missile systems will shoot to Israel ...
    1. classik46 3 January 2020 21: 17 New
      • 4
      • 1
      +3
      Well, how's it going in Yemen, like a lot of people gathered, but the cards are still not beaten? Well, or what about the Middle East NATO? Or is it better with a hezbollah? Otherwise, the Jews, even with the vaunted American kr and aviation, can’t beat everything. They fled from Lebanon, throwing a stoked Merkava like guano.
  • Old26 3 January 2020 20: 53 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Quote: Connor MacLeod
    Quote: Old26
    Five years later - maybe. But not tomorrow or the day after tomorrow. Iranians must either restore the number of old-type centrifuges (IR-1), or start mass production of newer centrifuges. but in any case it’s not a single month’s business, and maybe not even one year’s

    Well, a "dirty" bomb (radiological in common people) they can do very quickly.

    They can. But it will still need to be delivered to the goal. Iran has almost no aircraft capable of delivering it to its target. The superiority of aviation in the neighboring is multiple. Use a rocket for delivery, so the MS is very small, plus what kind of blasting method to use?
    1. Sergey M. Karasev 5 January 2020 15: 05 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      They can. But it will still need to be delivered to the goal. Iran has almost no aircraft capable of delivering it to its target. The superiority of aviation in the neighboring is multiple. Use a rocket for delivery, so the MS is very small, plus what kind of blasting method to use?

      But a cargo ship under the Panamanian flag will dock in Haifa. And what about the fact that a month before that he was in Abadan, although this is not necessary. And explode, obscuring isotopes of half of Israel. and that’s it ... And no regular delivery vehicles are needed.
      You can also blow up a container or a truck. Goal for fiction is cunning. bully
      1. Sergey M. Karasev 5 January 2020 18: 09 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Minus, you have to understand, for telling the Persians the idea of ​​delivering a dirty bomb to the target? And then they, oh, without me would not have guessed! Or because the idea is unrealizable? Well, enlighten where I am mistaken than to minus from under the silence!
        1. Golovan Jack 5 January 2020 18: 35 New
          • 2
          • 3
          -1
          Quote: Sergey Karasev
          the idea is unrealizable

          Your "idea" is stupid initially. The Security Council in Israel works much better than you can imagine. I know examples of this, firsthand.
          1. Sergey M. Karasev 5 January 2020 18: 48 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            I also know, but after all, there’s a trickle on an old woman. 100% guarantee is given only by God. And in the US, is SB equally effective?
            By the way? And how can you remotely determine the presence of a "dirty bomb" in a lead shell under the bottom of a vessel?
            1. Golovan Jack 5 January 2020 18: 52 New
              • 2
              • 2
              0
              Quote: Sergey Karasev
              And how can you determine remotely the presence of a "dirty bomb" ...

              About the same as, for example, the fact that a person trying to enter Israel with a "clean" passport, a month ago, was, say, in the OAU.

              So see? wink
              1. Sergey M. Karasev 5 January 2020 19: 04 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Not quite.
                Mossad is able to track the routes of absolutely every ship in the world since its construction. So what? And if Iranian combat swimmers stick a "dirty bomb" to the bottom of a regular scheduled ferry from Cyprus directly to the open sea? They have subversive submarines. And they can do it right in the Cyprus harbor. There, the control of the water area is not the same as in Haifa.
                1. Golovan Jack 5 January 2020 19: 07 New
                  • 2
                  • 4
                  -2
                  Quote: Sergey Karasev
                  Not quite

                  Bad. request
                  1. Sergey M. Karasev 5 January 2020 19: 12 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    The bad thing is that you write half-hints at all or nothing.
                    Is it not fate to express your arguments more clearly?
                    Or are they really not there, but admitting yourself wrong is also not fate? winked
                    1. Golovan Jack 5 January 2020 19: 18 New
                      • 2
                      • 6
                      -4
                      Quote: Sergey Karasev
                      Is it not fate to express your arguments more clearly?

                      I do not see the point. You are bored, and hunting is scratching your tongue ... well, scratch it. Without me.

                      Quote: Sergey Karasev
                      to admit his wrong is also not fate?

                      Practice is the criterion of truth. How many "dirty bombs" have already been exploded in Haifa? That's right ... not a single one. Sapienti sat.
                      1. Sergey M. Karasev 5 January 2020 19: 29 New
                        • 1
                        • 0
                        +1
                        How many "dirty bombs" have already been exploded in Haifa?

                        "Everything ever happens for the first time" (c)
                        Well, the Palestinian barmalei did not pick up the right amount of radionuclides. And families live in their neighborhood. And Iran is far away, but with isotopes easier there.
                        I do not see the point. You are bored, and hunting is scratching your tongue ... well, scratch it. Without me.

                        And why then tried to write something, if in fact they still did not write anything? Boredom? So which of us is bored?
                        Drain counted! good
                      2. Golovan Jack 5 January 2020 19: 36 New
                        • 2
                        • 7
                        -5
                        Quote: Sergey Karasev
                        Drain counted

                        Shkolota.
                      3. Sergey M. Karasev 5 January 2020 19: 41 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        Shkolota.

                        You, citizen, take a look at my avatar first. Am I too old for a student? So the insult is not counted wassat
                      4. Golovan Jack 5 January 2020 19: 45 New
                        • 2
                        • 2
                        0
                        Quote: Sergey Karasev
                        Am I too old for a student?

                        I would say - even a superstar laughing

                        But the fact that you are portraying here - age has nothing to do. It is rather a state of mind request

                        Quote: Sergey Karasev
                        insult is not counted

                        This is not an insult, it is a statement of fact.
                      5. Sergey M. Karasev 5 January 2020 19: 48 New
                        • 1
                        • 1
                        0
                        That is, in essence, you have nothing to say, so you turned to the individual. Do you think it colors you?
                      6. Golovan Jack 5 January 2020 20: 02 New
                        • 2
                        • 4
                        -2
                        Quote: Sergey Karasev
                        essentially nothing to tell you

                        Everything has already been told to you, “in essence”: your children's conjectures in the existing reality unrealizable.

                        Your "personality" does not interest me in the slightest degree. Leave already stop
                      7. Sergey M. Karasev 5 January 2020 20: 08 New
                        • 1
                        • 1
                        0
                        Yes, not a damn thing is said, not one distinct explanations! I’m not your close friend and your hints of something they don’t tell me anything! Do not want to properly explain, and do not! I see no further sense in correspondence.
                        Goodbye stop
  • Old26 3 January 2020 20: 58 New
    • 4
    • 4
    0
    Quote: Gennady Fomkin
    They got into my shit head over heels without me. laughing

    They have three old Soviet boats of project 877. And several dozen mini-boats, which are armed with 1-2 torpedoes. With very little autonomy. And if the Americans do not immediately climb into the bay, and they are hardly stupid enough to do this, then forcing these boats to leave the base once, they can put a big and fat cross on them. especially considering where such a base is located.
    The Americans will provide control over the airspace, and after that the destruction of such boats as the "mosquito fleet" will be a matter of time.
    1. Liam 3 January 2020 21: 04 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Quote: Old26
      . And if the Americans do not immediately climb into the bay, and they are hardly stupid enough to do this, then by forcing these boats to leave the base once, they can put a big and fat cross on them

      Why such difficulties? The doctor forbade the Americans to smash all this gay stuff to smash right on the base and not arrange all these strategies?
    2. Vadim237 3 January 2020 23: 12 New
      • 3
      • 2
      +1
      The United States will have to prepare for such a long time pumping up its bases in the region with equipment and people - Irin will not miss such preparations for sure how many Iran has no launchers, but it is known for certain that some of them are hidden under mountain ranges, and their own air defense does not stand still .
    3. KCA
      KCA 4 January 2020 05: 49 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      In Yemen, somehow it didn’t work out very well against the mosquito fleet, just by some miracle USS "Cole" didn’t go to the bottom
  • Old26 3 January 2020 21: 00 New
    • 4
    • 2
    +2
    Quote: Connor MacLeod
    Have you ever heard of Mordechai Vanunu?

    It is unlikely that he heard about such a person laughing
  • Old26 3 January 2020 21: 09 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    Quote: Liam
    Why such difficulties? The doctor forbade the Americans to smash all this gay stuff to smash right on the base and not arrange all these strategies?

    Well this is easier said than done. After all, the same mosquito fleet is concentrated not on one Navy. Therefore, to destroy it with one or two missiles will not work. Unless they will be with YABG. But the United States does not have such Tomahawks. And cruise missiles with nuclear warheads on strategic bombers ... It is unlikely that the Americans will use them first. They will try to delay their use or arrange such a grand provocation that no one would say anything against when they use tactical charges against Iran. But I hope that this will not come to this ...
    1. Liam 3 January 2020 21: 20 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Quote: Old26
      After all, the same mosquito fleet is concentrated not on one Navy. Therefore, to destroy it with one or two missiles will not work

      Do you have infa that the United States is strained with the Kyrgyz Republic? Why with one or two missiles and not hundreds of the other like they always did?

      Quote: Old26
      Unless they will be with YABG

      Be afraid of God .. I understand that the holidays and in general on this site are all thrown YABG and when the traffic light switches to red .. but the measure you need to know all the same
  • Zaurbek 3 January 2020 21: 26 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    I think it’s easier ... someone can start to deliver ATGMs and MANPADS to Afghanistan and other places where the US ears stick out. And there are many such places. It will not be expensive and tangible. And all this Iran itself produces. And the clones of Tou and CORNET and Arrows 2.
  • Old26 3 January 2020 21: 32 New
    • 4
    • 2
    +2
    Quote: Liam
    Do you have infa that the United States is strained with the Kyrgyz Republic? Why with one or two missiles and not hundreds of the other like they always did?

    Kamrad! It is unlikely that the target of Tomahawk-style cruise missiles will be the mosquito fleet of Iran. Americans have no strains with the Kyrgyz Republic. Someone wrote here that they have strains with the Tomahawks, but not me. The mosquito fleet is already dispersed over several bases, and in times of tension, it will generally "dissolve" over a dozen bases, parking lots, and piers. After all, a boat with two anti-ship missiles with a flight range of 15 km is not a destroyer that just can’t be put in any place. Therefore, the most likely situation is when the Americans have to "chase" the mosquitoes by aircraft (airplanes or helicopters). You can strike at the base not with 1-2 missiles, but with a dozen. That's just what the effect of such a blow will be. That's the question. Of course, for some time both the mosquito fleet and the coastal anti-ship missiles will be knocked out, but not immediately. The primary goal will still be Iran’s air defense ...
  • Old26 3 January 2020 21: 34 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    Quote: Liam
    Be afraid of God .. I understand that the holidays and in general on this site are all thrown YABG and when the traffic light switches to red .. but the measure you need to know all the same

    As you may have noticed, I am not at all in favor of the use of nuclear weapons in this region. But to destroy the base with 1-2 missiles is possible only if they are with a special unit. And fortunately the United States has very few such missiles and they are mainly on the B-52. I don’t really imagine the situation when the B-52 goes hunting for a missile boat in Iran
    1. Avior 3 January 2020 21: 55 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      If the Americans have air superiority, the mosquito fleet will not last long, they will knock it out as they go out to sea by helicopters
  • Sunstorm 3 January 2020 21: 59 New
    • 2
    • 6
    -4
    maybe .. and maybe not, gypsies, ai nane, nane?
    Ah yes Experts.
    If you have not declared war and have not dealt a blow so far, then everything has already been decided and the bidding is just going on.
    And about nuclear weapons, well, ok? And what does that change? The Americans are so afraid of attacking Iran. What do Iranians brandishing nuclear weapons attack Israel? No. No one in their right mind would use nuclear weapons to attack. Although stop ... Yugoslavia is depleted uranium, Hiroshima and Nagasaki are "baby" and "fat" ... And all these plans for the use of low-power charges ... But I also said "no one in their right mind."
  • 1536 3 January 2020 22: 09 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    The atomic bomb does not save terror and terrorists. Today, terrorism of individual states and groups of states united in certain military blocs is the main threat to peace and human security.
    1. Old Michael 4 January 2020 00: 55 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Dear 1536!
      As in the famous joke, "my thought is even more the same as yours!".
      But this is bad luck: a defective practice has developed in the VO - regardless of the arguments, the conclusion must be chewed; joke, irony, sarcasm - denote explicitly in plain text; philosophical reasoning - brighten up with a remark "well, I have already taken lightly on my chest." Otherwise, a handful of minuses is guaranteed ...
  • Dima_Anlim 3 January 2020 22: 12 New
    • 6
    • 1
    +5
    The United States is going to directly escalate the conflict with Iran - this was precisely the reason for this provocation with the assassination of a general. Its task is to provoke Iranian authorities to some kind of military stupidity in the region against the United States. Then the United States and Israel will launch large-scale missile attacks on Iran, its military and industrial infrastructure, bases, ports, warehouses and command centers. No direct invasion of the country. This is exactly the scenario the United States has chosen and are preparing for it. Eliminate Iran from the political and military scene once and for all. Who supported the United States in killing an Iranian general? Israel is the first on the list. From here and all the movements.
    1. Vadim237 3 January 2020 23: 16 New
      • 1
      • 2
      -1
      Neither the United States nor Israel will have enough striking power, since there are not enough resources for this at the moment, Iran is not Syria.
  • donavi49 3 January 2020 22: 23 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    Meanwhile, the Americans are going to solve the issue of the presence of Shiites in Iraq - radically. Pompeo said the following goals are ready:
    Announces US to designate Iranian proxy force Asa'ib Ahl al-Haq in Iraq and its leaders, Qays and Laith al-Khazali as terrorists.

    I wonder if they will survive until the weekend, or is it soaked at night?
    1. asv363 3 January 2020 23: 59 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: donavi49
      Pompeo stated

      This inadequate man managed to say that the Iraqis rejoiced at the killing of Suleimani.
      1. Kronos 4 January 2020 00: 49 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Well, given the wars of Iraq with Iran and that Suleimani participated in them, it’s quite possible
  • Jack O'Neill 3 January 2020 22: 24 New
    • 4
    • 8
    -4
    I don’t get tired of reading comments on VO.)
    Many people really think that Iranians should respond equally to the States. Sorry what?
    Why do not many see the difference between the US and Iran? As they like to write here - "Pug and Elephant".
    Iran can’t do anything in this situation at all, because if it gets haywire, they will simply bite it. Too different forces between the USA and Iran. It is the same that a girl of about 15 will go to bullish on Valuev.
  • Pavel57 3 January 2020 22: 52 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Perhaps this is a multi-step, we see only part of the game.
  • cat Rusich 3 January 2020 23: 23 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Iran’s answer (read by the IRGC) will most likely not be open. Just "someone" UAVs (flying, floating ...) will attack citizens or objects of the United States, probably even around the world ...
    1. Michael HORNET 4 January 2020 14: 49 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Dada, but what will prevent the USA from declaring Iran responsible for this, regardless of the presence or absence of evidence