Russian nuclear power plants set a record for generation


It became known about the record set by Russian nuclear power plants. Including thanks to the new capacities of Russian nuclear power plants put into commercial operation in 2019, almost 209 billion kWh of electricity was generated, some of which was exported.


The record holders for 2019 were the Balakovo, Rostov and Kalinin NPPs.

Taking into account new indicators, an increase in the share of nuclear energy in the total electricity generation of the Russian Federation is observed. These indicators as of January 1, 2020 make up 19%.

Earlier, a new power unit (7th) was commissioned at Novovoronezh NPP.

It is noteworthy that this situation is established against the background of the European policy on the abandonment of nuclear power plants. We are talking about the implementation of the project of the so-called "green energy", in which alternative energy sources (wind stations, etc.) are put at the forefront.

For all this, the closure of the same nuclear power plants in Germany now leads to certain consequences: Germany is not getting the proper volumes of electric energy, primarily for its industry. In this regard, German experts predict the likelihood of purchases of electric energy outside the country. This fact causes irritation among the major industrialists of Germany, stating that this is how EU legislation does everything to strike a blow at German industry.
Photos used:
NNPP
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

114 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Kibl 1 January 2020 18: 22 New
    • 11
    • 1
    +10
    Yes, and let them close their nuclear power plants, Russia is better, in addition to oil and gas, it will be possible to sell electricity.
    1. Gardamir 1 January 2020 18: 35 New
      • 3
      • 5
      -2
      electricity.
      Speaking of electricity, today I’m fantasizing about whether to make a rifle on electricity, it turns out everything has been invented before us.
      https://hightech.plus/2018/10/13/izobretena-elektrovintovka-kotoraya-strelyaet-odnovremenno-pyatyu-pulyami
      1. Servisinzhener 1 January 2020 20: 04 New
        • 3
        • 1
        +2
        The ideas of building Hausgans and Railgans have been known for a long time, but there are subtleties in implementation. Which did not allow to put the railgun on Zumwalt.
    2. svp67 1 January 2020 18: 45 New
      • 6
      • 3
      +3
      Quote: KIBL
      Russia is better, in addition to oil and gas, it will be possible to sell electricity.

      In connection with the almost complete destruction of its industry, Ukraine now has the opportunity. It can export part of its generation
      1. nikon7717 1 January 2020 19: 02 New
        • 2
        • 5
        -3
        Olympic slogan Faster! Higher! Stronger! In every way they do not allow to exercise at the Olympics and sports in competitions. It seems that the authorities understood that for its fair implementation in sports, it is first necessary to implement this slogan in the economy and the military sphere.
      2. rich 1 January 2020 19: 09 New
        • 21
        • 7
        +14
        Russian nuclear power plants set a record for generation

        Nevermind. From this, the tariffs have not become less.
        1. svp67 1 January 2020 19: 11 New
          • 23
          • 6
          +17
          Quote: Rich
          Nevermind

          No, it speaks of that. that industry is booming. As the most important consumer of electricity. And this includes wages and employment. So something like this ...
          1. novel66 1 January 2020 22: 12 New
            • 6
            • 0
            +6
            lit Uglich highway, in the Moscow region
          2. eklmn 2 January 2020 00: 22 New
            • 3
            • 13
            -10
            “No, that says it. that industry is booming. As the most important consumer of electricity. ”
            No, this indicates the inefficiency of electrical equipment that consumes much more kW than a similar foreign one.
            I typed on Google “Electrical power of Russian machine tools and foreign analogues.” I got dozens of websites of various Russian companies manufacturing various machine tools (and this is good!) And many sites combine phrases like “... has no analogues in the world ..., in terms of energy consumption as the best foreign analogues or surpass them ...” (you can believe it, but you can not!)
            1. svp67 2 January 2020 03: 54 New
              • 6
              • 0
              +6
              Quote: eklmn
              No, this indicates the inefficiency of electrical equipment that consumes much more kW than a similar foreign one.

              This suggests that you are not aware that new equipment is often imported equipment manufactured in Europe and America and I do not think that it is worse in these indicators of what works abroad.
        2. Simargl 4 January 2020 15: 59 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: Rich
          From this, the tariffs did not become less.
          But they did not take off. Do you know what happens with a deficit?
      3. Ru_Na 2 January 2020 00: 19 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        It can’t, the state of Ukrainian nuclear power plants is sad, their resources are running out, renewal and modernization cost a lot of money, which Kiev does not have, and there is no question of building a new nuclear power plant, so Ukraine will soon be left without nuclear power plants and Good old CHPPs will generate energy.
        1. svp67 2 January 2020 03: 54 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: Ru_Na
          It will not, the state of Ukrainian nuclear power plants is sad, their resources are already running out,

          Alas, they can. Yes, but they’ve got some more time.
      4. Astronaut 2 January 2020 02: 30 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        now Ukraine has such an opportunity

        If before their nuclear power plants do not explode (
    3. minus 1 January 2020 18: 52 New
      • 17
      • 4
      +13
      First, let an adequate price be made domestically !!! Then you can sell it .... I would gladly set up an electric boiler .... It’s only aluminum factories that they use for free .... From daily shifts I drive up to the city, visibility in winter drops to 500 meters. Everything is in smoke from coal-fired heating boilers! I don’t need 22 kopecks for SAZ or 40 kopecks for China and Mongolia a year ago .... At least sell for a ruble, I agree!
      1. NEXUS 1 January 2020 21: 22 New
        • 16
        • 6
        +10
        Quote: Minus
        First, let an adequate price be made domestically !!!

        So I’m sitting thinking, why is it gas, water, electricity that is constantly getting more expensive? Or was it all produced some 50 years ago in a cheaper way? Or maybe water, gas are some other way, so prices are rising? Or maybe atomic energy systems were not invented for more energy?
        But the price of gas, water, electricity, gasoline is rising. I think that people have this as they want, littering their brains about crises, the rise in price of life, etc.?
        1. novel66 1 January 2020 22: 14 New
          • 4
          • 3
          +1
          they do so, everyone wants to live well, and without making efforts!
        2. ProkletyiPirat 1 January 2020 22: 30 New
          • 2
          • 2
          0
          Quote: NEXUS
          Quote: Minus
          First, let an adequate price be made domestically !!!

          So I’m sitting thinking, why is it gas, water, electricity that is constantly getting more expensive? Or was it all produced some 50 years ago in a cheaper way? Or maybe water, gas are some other way, so prices are rising? Or maybe atomic energy systems were not invented for more energy?
          But the price of gas, water, electricity, gasoline is rising. I think that people have this as they want, littering their brains about crises, the rise in price of life, etc.?

          Well, somewhere in some ways it may become rubbish, but in the field of infrastructure supplies, the price rises because before the infrastructure was paid not by the consumer, but by someone else, mainly large factories and the state (the Soviet slogan "public goods for the means of production") . And now all this is gradually being transferred to consumers. The only problem is that this shifting is not always reasonably organized.
          1. NEXUS 1 January 2020 23: 39 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: ProkletyiPirat
            The only problem is that this shifting is not always reasonably organized.

            The problem is that, logically, everything should get cheaper, and not sickly. And this applies not only to the bowels of the earth, but also to products and goods for life. On every corner they talk about the transfer of industrial capacities to countries where labor is cheaper, but nothing is cheaper anywhere from the word at all.
            This is arranged by the way reasonable for those who have profits from this. We are all loaded with taxes for gas, electricity, and so on, and at the same time, excuse me, they are spoiling the head of the average person about crises, shifting something there to consumers, to the jumps in the dollar, oil, etc. But in fact, everything is very banal to disgrace. You know how magicians do when they divert the viewer's attention from one hand, and voila ... the card disappeared from the hand.
            And as a result, the average person does not even think about why for some reason he once paid 7 kopecks per liter for gas, and now he pays 30 rubles. Why does the payment for water increase? Why do gas tariffs rise? Why, are they driving us from Mars to our homes?
            And I'm sorry, what is this for example a telephone, for example, at a cost of 3 dollars, for some reason, the output costs 200-300-500 dollars? Start telling me about pricing for goods? And who forms this price?

            And at the same time, all of us, sorry, are being bullied by banks, loans, mortgages, etc.
            1. ProkletyiPirat 2 January 2020 01: 10 New
              • 6
              • 2
              +4
              Quote: NEXUS
              And at the same time, all of us, sorry, are being bullied by banks, loans, mortgages, etc.

              Listen to you around you continuous conspiracy theories, can it be time to heal? although it’s better not to start a holiar because "if you have paranoia this does not mean that you are not being watched."

              Quote: NEXUS
              And as a result, the average person does not even think about why for some reason he once paid 7 kopecks per liter for gas, and now he pays 30 rubles.

              And the truth is why so? as I already said, before someone gave money for the construction of an oil refinery, and then you bought its products for a penny, and you were a “happy neighbor” who did not give money but got gas for a penny, but such happiness cannot last forever, especially if “happy neighbors” are becoming more and more, and at some point the one who gave money to the refinery stopped doing all this, there may be many reasons, from stupidly tired to bankrupt, and now the moment has come when the refinery needs to change some of the equipment or in general to rebuild everything, or to build something else additional, the same storage depots, and there is a lot of money. But here one doesn’t even have to go far for an example, such "money givers" were large transport units from public transport to construction and agricultural, and this is not counting the local authorities.

              You can also bring an example of how, due to car sales, the cost of new housing is growing, if you do not understand then I mean that where some large concrete plant managed before, today you have to build a lot of middle ones, due to traffic jams. (By the way, this also applies to the imitation of products in stores)

              With all this, I want you to understand, by itself "giving money" in the sense of take and share, in the sense of "public goods for the means of production" is not something bad, like something good, just such activity leads to distortions in the economy and it is very difficult to track these distortions, and it is almost impossible to prevent. Well, how to track and prevent a housing problem caused by the construction of a heating main 60 years after its construction? Or how to track and prevent the economic suicide of the city due to the allocation of areas for residential construction?

              ps In general, on a sim, I propose to close this offtopic, because the topic is vast and multifaceted, and for most people sitting here it will be important to ponder, cry about “everything is lost”, reproach someone and it will be banal to understand the essence, even for ourselves .
              1. Paranoid50 2 January 2020 06: 55 New
                • 2
                • 1
                +1
                Quote: ProkletyiPirat
                we will not start a holiar because "if you have paranoia this does not mean that you are not being watched."

                Holy truth. yes hi
              2. NEXUS 2 January 2020 10: 42 New
                • 1
                • 1
                0
                Quote: ProkletyiPirat
                Listen to you around you continuous conspiracy theories, can it be time to heal?

                Dear, where does the conspiracy theory? Maybe you have paranoia and through the post you see talk of a world conspiracy?
                Quote: ProkletyiPirat
                With all this, I want you to understand that “giving money” in the sense of “take away and divide”, in the sense of “public goods for the means of production” is not something bad,

                This is the case when the opponent did not understand anything from my post. At the same time he made a bunch of abstruse offers, and as my neighbor says, I'm sorry, this is more like farting in an empty basin. In other words, I tell you about Ivan, and you tell me about Thomas.
            2. Lexus 2 January 2020 01: 56 New
              • 4
              • 0
              +4
              Andrey, are you this?
              Thank you, I began to read your comments again. hi
      2. Simargl 4 January 2020 16: 01 New
        • 0
        • 1
        -1
        Quote: Minus
        I don’t need 22 kopecks for either SAZ or 40 kopecks for China and Mongolia a year ago .... At least sell for a ruble, I agree!
        Well, declare consumption 100GW ++
  2. Nikolay Ivanov_5 1 January 2020 18: 27 New
    • 4
    • 4
    0
    When will the myth of the so-called "green energy" be destroyed? https://eenergy.media/2017/03/08/massovoe-razvitie-vetroenergetiki-mozhet-nanesti-sereznyj-vred-planete/ or https://masterok.livejournal.com/5434816.html
    1. Reptiloid 1 January 2020 19: 20 New
      • 5
      • 3
      +2
      Quote: Nikolai Ivanov_5
      When will the myth about ..... "green energy" be destroyed .....
      Too many heat up this myth, many actors participate in this performance. So Greta Tunberg became the Person of the Year. This green energy ---- lying through and through.
      1. rocket757 1 January 2020 19: 37 New
        • 6
        • 2
        +4
        Quote: Reptiloid
        This green energy ---- lying through and through

        A bit wrong. At this level of renewable (green) energy technology development, it cannot become anything but an auxiliary one.
        Then, when the technology reaches a level of profitability, reliability, stability .... then it can work out.
        1. Nikolay Ivanov_5 1 January 2020 19: 54 New
          • 2
          • 4
          -2
          Brad!

          Then, when the technology reaches a level of profitability, reliability, stability .... then it can work out.

          Power plants with wind generators cause enormous environmental damage, and what a dirty production and subsequent disposal of spent solar panels for the same supposedly clean and environmentally friendly stations.
          1. rocket757 1 January 2020 20: 00 New
            • 5
            • 2
            +3
            only windmills and nothing more? Then the "breadth" of your knowledge on the topic of alternative energy is clear.
            By the way, what part of human activity benefits the nature of the planet? Tell me.
            1. Nikolay Ivanov_5 1 January 2020 20: 02 New
              • 0
              • 3
              -3
              https://eenergy.media/2017/03/08/massovoe-razvitie-vetroenergetiki-mozhet-nanesti-sereznyj-vred-planete/
            2. Nikolay Ivanov_5 1 January 2020 20: 08 New
              • 2
              • 2
              0
              There are no absolutely environmentally friendly and safe technologies. Today, a person still needs to learn a lot to reduce its environmental impact.
              1. rocket757 1 January 2020 20: 27 New
                • 2
                • 3
                -1
                Quote: Nikolai Ivanov_5
                There are no absolutely environmentally friendly and safe technologies. Today, a person still needs to learn a lot to reduce its environmental impact.

                I agree! Alternative energy MAY BECOME part of the process of maintaining cleanliness and order on the planet. One of many ....
                This task is long, but it will have to be done. if you want to keep the planet in good condition.
                Everything must be done wisely.
                By the way, nuclear energy has serious prospects to remain the main source of electricity for a very long time. If, again, do everything wisely!
                1. Nikolay Ivanov_5 1 January 2020 20: 33 New
                  • 2
                  • 2
                  0
                  awareness of the problem is the first step to solving it
                  1. rocket757 1 January 2020 20: 48 New
                    • 3
                    • 2
                    +1
                    Quote: Nikolai Ivanov_5
                    awareness of the problem is the first step to solving it

                    "hussar swoops", thoughtless following of the "frantic Greta" only hurts a good, necessary business ...
                    1. Nikolay Ivanov_5 1 January 2020 20: 54 New
                      • 2
                      • 4
                      -2
                      Oh, these radical fighters for nature. There is a lot of scream, but no sense.
                      1. rocket757 1 January 2020 21: 00 New
                        • 2
                        • 1
                        +1
                        There is no sense! Greta sailed on an expensive yacht across the Atlantic .... apologists, leaders of "green" associations, have not become poor, for some time now.
                      2. Reptiloid 1 January 2020 21: 27 New
                        • 6
                        • 2
                        +4
                        Quote: rocket757
                        There is no sense! Greta sailed on an expensive yacht across the Atlantic .... apologists, leaders of "green" associations, have not become poor, for some time now.

                        Greta against airplanes ---- non-environmental. An existing diesel engine was "sealed" on a yacht, journey ---- 20 days. 5 sailors served. When they delivered the greta ---- flew home on an environmentally unsafe airplane. At the end of the stay, the other 5 sailors will fly in an environmentally unsafe airplane and go back to the war. Instead of 2 tickets, you are warming up for a plane ---- 10 tickets for sailors. laughing
                        Also, the production of yachts and environmentally friendly and environmentally unsafe plastic. That’s all negative
        2. Simargl 4 January 2020 16: 10 New
          • 0
          • 1
          -1
          Quote: Nikolai Ivanov_5
          Power plants with wind powerоramie causes enormous damage to the environment
          I read about it ...
          Insects stick to tons on the blades.
          There are statistics on birds. There are such numbers - if you distribute trunks to people and allow them to shoot purely "for pleasure" of birds - windmills will hardly surpass.
          And these are direct killings of animals when they break on the blades.
          What about indirect harm from noise?
      2. Reptiloid 1 January 2020 19: 59 New
        • 7
        • 1
        +6
        Quote: rocket757
        Quote: Reptiloid
        This green energy ---- lying through and through

        A bit wrong. At this level of renewable (green) energy technology development, it cannot become anything but an auxiliary one.
        Then, when the technology reaches a level of profitability, reliability, stability .... then it can work out.

        The lie is that the arrival of Greta at the UN would not have been possible without the development of technology. Had roots in the forest and berries and nuts to collect, given its veganism and this under ?????
        I know that you have Victor, there are solar panels, but for most of the territories of Russia this is unacceptable.
        Stolen childhood --- from starving Africans. Somehow Greta doesn’t know about them ....
        1. rocket757 1 January 2020 20: 10 New
          • 4
          • 1
          +3
          All the current fuss with the frantic Greta, it would be complete bullshit, if for this case the serious, cunning guys do not want to have serious money.
          As always, look for someone profitable.
          Ecology must be protected, but not with such debates b by extreme methods.
        2. Simargl 4 January 2020 16: 15 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: Reptiloid
          Stolen childhood --- from starving Africans.
          That's for sure! She's absolutely right about a stolen childhood. Only by virtue of development does not quite understands who stole from whom.
          Africans, for the most part, are themselves to blame.
      3. ProkletyiPirat 1 January 2020 23: 15 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: rocket757
        Quote: Reptiloid
        This green energy ---- lying through and through

        A bit wrong. At this level of renewable (green) energy technology development, it cannot become anything but an auxiliary.
        Then, when the technology reaches a level of profitability, reliability, stability .... then it can work out.

        Well, you, too, turned out "a little wrong", the problem is not that "they spend money on this greenfinch" but that "on this greenfinch wrong spend money ", for example, building windmills but it’s forbidden to build accumulative PSPPs because" there is private property and you are forbidden to flood it ", well, or they will build windmills and even PSPPs for them, but at the same time they will forbid building a consumer plant due to which the project will pay off, and all because the “plant will pollute the atmosphere.” Well, or the most common instead of getting hydrocarbons at the expense of superprofits and investing them in the development of technologies important for greenfinch (superconductors, hydrogen generators, super / super-capacitors) , they (the “Europeans”) invest money in the greenfinch itself, and then they are surprised “what does it not work for?” And there are a lot of such insanities, and all of them are powdered, bred, advertised, public relations and social campaigns in which are truly innovative projects.
        1. rocket757 2 January 2020 10: 45 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          I wanted to write in detail, the Internet is buggy!
          1. rocket757 2 January 2020 10: 46 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Most likely the question is more complicated than we can imagine.
            1. ProkletyiPirat 2 January 2020 12: 47 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              yes no, it’s not, everything fits into a few points
              1) EU countries either have no energy resources (hydrocarbons) at all, or are ridiculously small, but consumption is high.
              2) Buying on foreign markets is unrealistic because there is nothing to offer, except for technology, but you can sell them once, and heating is needed every winter.
              3) It is unrealistic to seize new energy resources, because other countries will not give, at least at the expense of earnings on "liberators from the colonial dictatorship"
              4)Scientists have calculated that green renewable energy in the EU is orders of magnitude greater than today's consumption. (this is true even on the basis of technology of the 90s)
              5) The EU rushed to implement the greenfinch dreaming of diversifying energy supplies, and ideally reaching self-sufficiency.
              6)A bunch of "businessmen" began to breed and lobby in the EU for the allocation of preferences for themselves
              7) Well, and a side effect in the form of the collapse of really useful projects against the background of "businessmen".
              By the way, regarding item “7”, it’s like I read an article by a Russian scientist who left for the EU to develop hydrogen energy in general and hydrogen generators in particular, so there are very funny stories about how they combine with lobbyists and give them part of the money for in another way, don’t knock out grants, and at the same time 70% of the time and money they spend on riveting pseudo-scientific public relations garbage to close grants (grants are given for this hydrogen-garbage, but not for hydrogen generators).
              1. rocket757 2 January 2020 12: 52 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                The energy cycle in the world!
                All kinds of Wishlist often stumble on objective reality.
  3. rocket757 1 January 2020 19: 38 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    Quote: Nikolai Ivanov_5
    When the myth of the so-called “green energy” will be destroyed

    Her time has not come yet. For objective reasons.
    1. Reptiloid 1 January 2020 20: 20 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Quote: rocket757
      ..... Her time has not come yet. For objective reasons.
      What GDP said this year, in the fall, at the Second Global Summit on Production and Industrialization (GMIS) in Yekaterinburg. Namely, the consequences for the environment, new problems that will appear.
      1. rocket757 1 January 2020 20: 42 New
        • 3
        • 2
        +1
        Now, what is happening on the "green front" can hardly be called normal .... the thing is necessary, in principle, but it is not done wisely!
        1. Reptiloid 1 January 2020 20: 49 New
          • 3
          • 1
          +2
          Quote: rocket757
          Now, what is happening on the "green front" can hardly be called normal .... the thing is necessary, in principle, but it is not done wisely!

          especially about negative garbage
          1. rocket757 1 January 2020 20: 54 New
            • 2
            • 1
            +1
            Quote: Reptiloid
            especially about trash

            A painful topic and nowhere until the end, until it is resolved ...
            1. Reptiloid 1 January 2020 21: 12 New
              • 2
              • 1
              +1
              I once read that under the USSR the task was precisely of further processing, and not storage.
              Quote: rocket757
              Quote: Reptiloid
              especially about trash

              A painful topic and nowhere until the end, until it is resolved ...
              1. rocket757 1 January 2020 21: 24 New
                • 2
                • 1
                +1
                Quote: Reptiloid
                I once read that under the USSR the task was precisely of further processing, and not storage.

                The main problem with garbage, SHARE IT! The work is dirty, low paid .... in short not ah, in all respects.
                1. Reptiloid 2 January 2020 19: 18 New
                  • 1
                  • 1
                  0
                  Good evening, Victor! hi I read most of the comments. The impression that Greta negative among us and puts cons to all
                  1. rocket757 2 January 2020 20: 41 New
                    • 1
                    • 0
                    +1
                    There are the same ones that have become withered and cunning, well wise identities .... one red feature is worth it! worth a lot.
                    1. Reptiloid 3 January 2020 02: 12 New
                      • 2
                      • 0
                      +2
                      Quote: rocket757
                      There are the same ones that have become withered and cunning, well wise identities .... one red feature is worth it! worth a lot.

                      laughing wassat Do you think the redhead is also minus here?
                    2. Mordvin 3 3 January 2020 02: 43 New
                      • 1
                      • 1
                      0
                      Quote: Reptiloid
                      Do you think the redhead is also minus here?

                    3. Reptiloid 3 January 2020 10: 03 New
                      • 0
                      • 0
                      0
                      [quote = Mordvin 3] [quote = Reptiloid] Do you think the redhead is also minus here? [/ Quote] [/ quote] Now there is no doubt! Negative ....
                  2. rocket757 3 January 2020 07: 27 New
                    • 1
                    • 0
                    +1
                    Quote: Reptiloid
                    Do you think the redhead is also minus here?

                    Any "work" is paid. Those who are interested and who have money pays ......
                    It all fits together!
                  3. Reptiloid 3 January 2020 10: 08 New
                    • 1
                    • 0
                    +1
                    Quote: rocket757
                    .... Any "work" is paid. It pays the one who is interested and who has money ...... Everything fits!
                    For this article, the cons are accurately paid.
                  4. rocket757 3 January 2020 10: 27 New
                    • 1
                    • 0
                    +1
                    Maybe so. They play for a long time, because they did not succeed in a snap, all that they wanted. No du-r-nor dense "play" against us.
                  5. Reptiloid 3 January 2020 10: 32 New
                    • 1
                    • 0
                    +1
                    And we, on the other hand, will be completely ““ mesensing ”“ “playing” “ laughing just not enough time.
                    Quote: rocket757
                    Maybe so. They play for a long time, because they did not succeed in a snap, all that they wanted. No du-r-nor dense "play" against us.
                  6. rocket757 3 January 2020 10: 40 New
                    • 1
                    • 0
                    +1
                    And who REALLY wants to realize that the game is going on in large, albeit with such, as it were, small, hidden methods?
                    Conversations MANY, real opposition is not visible. They rumble back and forth, invented all kinds of "lightning" .... almost everything turns out by ours. A generation of amateurs, losers on the subject of ideology! This is a deliberate loss in the long run. Everything is based on people brought up in the Land of Soviets! But this is not forever, of course!
                  7. Reptiloid 3 January 2020 10: 55 New
                    • 1
                    • 0
                    +1
                    As you know, Victor, we have no ideology in law.
                    However, the vacant place immediately tries to take someone else.
                    Quote: rocket757
                    And who REALLY wants to realize that the game is going on in large, albeit with such, as it were, small, hidden methods?
                    Conversations MANY, real opposition is not visible. They rumble back and forth, invented all kinds of "lightning" .... almost everything turns out by ours. A generation of amateurs, twosomes on the subject of ideology! ....!

                    They are not doubles, no, they are trying to shove them out of the way. The ideology of 10% of the population ---- === foreign bourgeois, openly "" shy ", although the words slip more and more often. This ideology cannot be accepted by the rest of the population, this is a contradiction for them, they try to pretend, but- - an insoluble contradiction.
  • Mountain shooter 1 January 2020 18: 31 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Few, few nuclear power plants. Up to half would bring. It's a pity to burn fossil fuel in the furnaces.
    1. Piramidon 1 January 2020 19: 02 New
      • 6
      • 5
      +1
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      It's a pity to burn fossil fuel in the furnaces.

      Uranus is also a fossil.
      1. rocket757 1 January 2020 19: 41 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        Quote: Piramidon
        Uranus is also a fossil

        And also finite. We need more advanced technologies of nuclear, another type of energy. On another raw material.
        We look forward to further development of technology.
        1. Mountain shooter 1 January 2020 20: 02 New
          • 6
          • 1
          +5
          So there is already such a technology. Fast neutron reactors. Which of the 238 uranium produce plutonium, excellently "burning" in slow neutron reactors. And Russia launched 800 megawatt, the most powerful in the world. And they cook a millionaire. There you can also “burn off” “hot isotopes” by reducing the activity of the waste very much ...
        2. Reptiloid 1 January 2020 20: 07 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          As for the green Bill Gates, something ...... I read other articles that there is no desired result, in short.
          Again, you have to, because of you, Victor, look for .... laughing that would be exactly ....
          1. rocket757 1 January 2020 20: 36 New
            • 1
            • 2
            -1
            It is interesting when a person learns to extract energy from an "atom" (this is conditional) directly, this will be a BREAKTHROUGH in the energy sector !!! In the meantime, we have to use a complex (reactor + turbine + generator), indirect method.
            WAITING S.
            1. Reptiloid 1 January 2020 20: 44 New
              • 2
              • 2
              0
              All green shares are aimed at that, so that no growth and development would happen
              Quote: rocket757
              .... a person will learn how to extract energy from an "atom" (this is conditional) directly, this will be a BREAKTHROUGH in the energy sector !!! In the meantime, we have to use a complex (reactor + turbine + generator), indirect method.
              so that these dreams do not come true
              1. rocket757 1 January 2020 20: 52 New
                • 2
                • 1
                +1
                Quote: Reptiloid
                All green shares are aimed at that, so that no growth and development would happen

                Everything is also ambiguous there ... especially when they mix in such a thing, someone’s financial interests, then really oh!
                Quote: Reptiloid
                so that these dreams do not come true

                Dreams Come True! They have been working on this topic for a long time. We are waiting for the results.
                1. Reptiloid 1 January 2020 21: 32 New
                  • 2
                  • 1
                  +1
                  Quote: rocket757
                  ..... Everything is also ambiguous there ... especially when they mix in such a thing, someone’s financial interests, then completely oh! ......
                  well, about Russia it’s clear ---- to brand as the intruder
  • svp67 1 January 2020 18: 43 New
    • 5
    • 1
    +4
    It is noteworthy that this situation is established against the background of the European policy on the abandonment of nuclear power plants.

    Yes yes, this is especially evident in France
    1. bouncyhunter 1 January 2020 20: 00 New
      • 6
      • 2
      +4
      Seryoga, hello and with the coming! hi drinks
      Quote: svp67
      this is especially evident in France

      But I remembered Lithuania from Ignalina NPP ... wink
      1. svp67 1 January 2020 20: 32 New
        • 4
        • 1
        +3
        Quote: bouncyhunter
        Seryoga, hello and with the coming!

        Hello Pasha. hi You and all the squabblers also twice, HAPPY
        Quote: bouncyhunter
        But I remembered Lithuania from Ignalina NPP ...

        And they from your nuclear power plant almost every day remember you. So that your feelings are MUTUAL.
        And with us look the time of what beauties has come. This is when severe frosts, then at night "light poles" are visible ... Beautiful
        1. bouncyhunter 1 January 2020 20: 38 New
          • 4
          • 2
          +2
          Quote: svp67
          And they from you at your nuclear power plant almost every day remember

          So it is - envy. yes
          Quote: svp67
          Handsomely

          Not that word ! good
          1. svp67 1 January 2020 21: 07 New
            • 2
            • 1
            +1
            Quote: bouncyhunter
            So it is - envy.

            Let me go. They did not save their own, now let them envy.
            1. bouncyhunter 1 January 2020 21: 11 New
              • 4
              • 2
              +2
              Quote: svp67
              Do not save your

              I would say - profiled. For the sake of the EU. And now they are trying to bite themselves by the elbow.
              1. svp67 1 January 2020 21: 27 New
                • 1
                • 1
                0
                Quote: bouncyhunter
                And now they are trying to bite themselves by the elbow.

                Yes you are there, I don’t know what you are showing them there ...
                1. bouncyhunter 1 January 2020 21: 42 New
                  • 5
                  • 2
                  +3
                  The point is not what we show them and what they see, but that we must grunt against. yes
  • fa2998 1 January 2020 18: 53 New
    • 3
    • 12
    -9
    Quote: KIBL
    Yes, and let them close their nuclear power plants, Russia is better, in addition to oil and gas, it will be possible to sell electricity.

    A profit for the export of electricity, as now for oil and gas, will receive a narrow circle of "persons." And ordinary Russians, a constant increase in tariffs.
    When they launched the Rostov NPP, they said in the area of ​​prices per kilowatt, figs will fall. hi
    1. minus 1 January 2020 19: 03 New
      • 3
      • 5
      -2
      Well, yes, they’ll fall, ohh .... Here you live in a zone of possible flooding from the SSHES and nothing, they don’t do any discounts))) Some 10 years ago I managed to watch a movie with the signature board of SSHES, horror !!!! A huge number of leaks and cracks, flooded technological tunnels .... The appalling state of water wells .... Maybe they strengthened of course .... They made a bypass channel .... But it does not get any easier.
      1. minus 1 January 2020 19: 11 New
        • 3
        • 4
        -1
        I’m lying, in 2007 he watched the film. Even before the accident.
    2. svp67 1 January 2020 19: 14 New
      • 4
      • 2
      +2
      Quote: fa2998
      When they launched the Rostov NPP, they said in the area of ​​prices per kilowatt, figs will fall.

      If we have a SINGLE network, starting or stopping power units affects the prices for industry more.
    3. Tersky 2 January 2020 18: 55 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: fa2998
      .A ordinary Russians, a constant increase in tariffs.

      What would you understand was what the tariff is for the population. Industrial and non-industrial enterprises, institutions of all levels of budgets, agricultural producers, and private entrepreneurs pay extra for ordinary citizens. This is the so-called cross-subsidization that was used back in Soviet times, but exactly the opposite. Those. The population paid 4 kopecks per kWh, while the enterprises paid 1 kopeck. what reduced the cost of the final product. Today, the tariff for the same ipeshnik is around 8 rubles (for the population of the village within 3,3 rubles, for the city of 4,6) for the first price category (there are only six) with the voltage level of LV, but it has a difference in tariff from the buyer , selling a particular product at a higher price of the goods from the purchase. Those. thereby the population pays the difference in price per kWh. upon purchase of this or that product. For industrial enterprises such as ASO el. Energy is sold at a rate for power; the higher it is, the lower the tariff. In fact, the same wholesale, and wholesale is always cheaper than retail. The lower the tariff, the cheaper the final product that is bought in bulk and sold already with a wrap in retail.
  • Gennady Fomkin 1 January 2020 18: 59 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    Hochetsstsa wave intimate Germans covering one and a half gigpvatnik permanently. Green dreams to them! laughing
  • abrakadabre 1 January 2020 19: 09 New
    • 5
    • 3
    +2
    We are talking about the implementation of the project of the so-called "green energy", in which alternative energy sources (wind stations, etc.) are put at the forefront.
    1. Sergey Averchenkov 1 January 2020 20: 31 New
      • 3
      • 2
      +1
      You will laugh ... but I really drown with wood. Do not believe? Come to me.
      1. abrakadabre 1 January 2020 21: 13 New
        • 2
        • 2
        0
        You will laugh ... but I really drown with wood. Do not believe? Come to me.
        What have you got to do with it? It's about alternatively gifted Europe. You drown whatever you want or the more handy hi
        When they publish an article about the analysis of our realities, then we will watch your heating under a microscope.
        1. Sergey Averchenkov 1 January 2020 21: 16 New
          • 2
          • 2
          0
          Well, what about me? Just where. And I really drown with wood. Well, you may not believe me, but I really drown with wood ...
  • knn54 1 January 2020 19: 14 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    And whatever tariffs set a world record.
  • evgen1221 1 January 2020 19: 20 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Here they will start to buy from us also electricity in large quantities, the same graters will begin discounts of deflections and kiddies like with gas.
  • Gennady Fomkin 1 January 2020 19: 41 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    The Germans will bask under one blanket, a cunning fertility policy. laughingThere will be a scandal if the ideas are not green! laughing
  • Gennady Fomkin 1 January 2020 19: 44 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    Nyap, in three years the Germans will close all nuclear power plants according to the plan. The strategy "neighbors will throw across the border uh when the greens again get around." Green dreams to them. laughing
  • 75 Sergey 1 January 2020 20: 20 New
    • 0
    • 4
    -4
    Germany is stimulating the withdrawal of energy-intensive (mostly dirty) industries outside its territory, hence the rejection of nuclear power plants, and wants the people to work more with their heads and not with their hands.
  • gridasov 1 January 2020 20: 23 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    The stupidity is that it is necessary to talk not about records, but about a systemic increase in generation in accordance with growing needs.
    1. abrakadabre 1 January 2020 21: 17 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      talk not about records, but about a systemic increase in generation in accordance with growing needs.
      And timely modernization / updating of existing generating capacities.
      1. gridasov 1 January 2020 21: 34 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        A person has a perverted understanding of fundamentally important processes. It’s not necessary to upgrade endlessly, but simply to use different levels of energy reproduction. But apparently we are going to this, because tension is already critical
  • eklmn 1 January 2020 20: 46 New
    • 2
    • 5
    -3
    “With all this, the closure of the same nuclear power plants in Germany now leads to certain consequences: Germany is not getting the proper volumes of electric energy, primarily for its industry. In this regard, German experts predict the likelihood of purchases of electric energy outside the country. This fact causes irritation among large industrialists of Germany ”
    The downward trend in electricity consumption from coal / gas / oil / atom is aggressively fast. If this trend continues in 140 countries until 2050 (30 years, not so long), then 50% of electricity consumption in these countries will be renewable, i.e. windmills / sun / batteries.
    In the footnote below there is a good picture showing a sharp decline in coal / gas / oil consumption.
    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-06-18/the-world-will-get-half-its-power-from-wind-and-solar-by-2050
    2020 2050
    coal 35% 11%
    gas 23% 19%
    atom 10% 6%
    hydro 16% 12%
    resumed 12% 50%

    So German industrialists can only grumble. They will have to switch to more advanced technologies with less electricity consumption. And not only them ...
  • tarakan 1 January 2020 20: 55 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    It’s time in psychiatry to introduce the term "gretenism"
  • Victor March 47 1 January 2020 20: 58 New
    • 4
    • 4
    0
    Quote: Rich
    Russian nuclear power plants set a record for generation

    Nevermind. From this, the tariffs have not become less.

    If you were very little educated, you would understand the following: the price of 4 kopecks per cubic meter of gas in the USSR was an insurmountable obstacle to the country's gasification. There is not a single madman to entangle the country with hundreds of thousands of kilometers of pipes in order to receive infrastructure that will NEVER pay off. That is why they extended one or two pipes to the West and drove billions of cubic meters there, and we continue now. Already not one, two, but .....
    You yourself will understand what is written here, or help?



    Do you think that someday there will be a bright and clean future in our cities and villages in this current state of affairs?
    1. Nikolai Korovin 1 January 2020 23: 33 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      Gas reserves, unfortunately, are also not inexhaustible, as was said at the 70th CPSU Congress on the natural resources of the USSR as a whole. Although more, probably, than uranium (of course, except for Kazakhstan). “You can also heat bank notes” - true, D.I. Mendeleev said this about oil, but also applies to gas. There is no alternative to solar energy. It is also necessary to increase the efficiency of elements on silicon (chalcopyrites will be expensive) and the storage capacity. Graphene and its modifications. On lithium, we are not particularly far away. It is quite small, it is difficult to isolate in its pure form. The thermonuclear reminds a story about the emir, Khoja Nasreddin and donkey. Money is buried, but there is no return to the network. Even if the product of temperature and pressure as in the Sun is achieved, it is not a fact that this will lead to any acceptable efficiency (at least in the foreseeable future). So - we will support the domestic manufacturer, we will buy local solar-powered lighting sources that are already being produced! Serve in good conditions for a long time. A silicon-solar calculator made in the 20s has disappeared somewhere. About XNUMX years ago, he still worked for himself.
      1. Vadim237 2 January 2020 13: 00 New
        • 0
        • 3
        -3
        Oil and gas on earth will never end, since it is the same process of the cycle in nature, as well as water. Only hydrogen and helium fly into space.
    2. Svetlana 1 January 2020 23: 33 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      If you were very little educated, you would understand the following: the price of 4 kopecks per cubic meter of gas in the USSR was an insurmountable obstacle to the country's gasification.

      Approaching the economy of the Union from the point of view of the economy of capitalism, and this is your approach, you make a mistake. Tar in the USSR were of secondary importance.
      1. Vadim237 2 January 2020 13: 02 New
        • 1
        • 2
        -1
        For this, the resources were of primary importance since everyone was in short supply, and at the expense of the USSR’s money, air was needed like air and was chasing it.
  • Victor March 47 1 January 2020 21: 12 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Quote: eklmn
    So German industrialists can only grumble. They will have to switch to more advanced technologies with less electricity consumption. And not only them ...

    Any perfection comes to an end. Sooner or later. Having BIG energy prices ALWAYS, they have already taken such steps, because, after all, it’s not the USSR with its gas prices 4 kopeks per cubic meter, 2 kopeks per kilowatt hour, a liter of gasoline is cheaper than soda, 7 rubles per ton of steel sheet, and did not learn how to save By digging and merging into ditches, so as not to cut the limits, they always saved and already have technologies that ALREADY PRACTICALLY .... You probably know that AT THE BEGINNING OF WORKS ON ECONOMY, the growth in efficiency is huge, but in the end it becomes small and expensive. Give an example of a Watt locomotive? The second design differed from the first in the huge growth of everything. But the last design was different from the penultimate thousandths of a percent of improvements, and a huge cost. A good way out is the removal of energy-intensive industries abroad. But, now, will such a feint help the ecology of the Earth as a whole?
  • Nikolai Korovin 1 January 2020 23: 21 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Of course, nuclear energy has many very significant drawbacks. Disposal is not easy and in any case unsafe for people directly involved in this. I can say how a person who worked for three years with radioactive isotopes of different classes — both short-lived and long-lived, including a transuranium (Americium 243). But at this stage, in the presence of a large amount of uranium from various sources, by the way, and plutonium is being produced, nuclear energy is beneficial for Russia. But, of course, the share of solar energy in Russia (currently 0.1% of the installed capacity of power plants) needs to be increased, despite its current disadvantage. Slowly. At least 0,05% per year to begin with. Increase efficiency (there are developments), increase the capacity of drives. In addition, of course, new power lines to regions with increased insolation compared to other ones will be needed. But nuclear energy will be relevant for Russia for another 30 years. Of course, if a large number of followers of Greta Tunberg do not appear, which is extremely undesirable.
    1. Simargl 4 January 2020 16: 36 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Quote: Nikolai Korovin
      But, of course, the share of solar energy in Russia (currently 0.1% of the installed capacity of power plants) needs to be increased, despite its current disadvantage.
      Sown areas to reduce? Wow!
      Solar energy is good not where the sun is, but where the land cannot be used for another economy (forestry, water, agriculture).
      And our territory is almost 100% forest, water, fields.
  • Tests 1 January 2020 23: 26 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    In December 2019, the SEVMASH delegation was at the next forum of power engineers in St. Petersburg, they represented the 2nd (floating) block of the Kislogubskaya TPP that SEVMASH built in mid-2000. Everyone gasped, but SEVMASH did not sign a single contract for the manufacture of a block of the tidal power station. There is not a single new project of the most environmentally friendly power plants implemented in Russia over the 19 years of the 21st century: neither in the Arkhangelsk region, nor in the Murmansk, nor in the Kamchatka Territory, only the Kislogubskaya PES in the Murmansk Region was resuscitated. RusHydro has no money for the construction of a power plant in the Russian Federation ... I’m glad that Rosatom has money for the Leningrad NPP and the Novovoronezh station.
  • Svetlana 1 January 2020 23: 27 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: Rich
    Russian nuclear power plants set a record for generation

    Nevermind. From this, the tariffs have not become less.

    Under capitalism, the fact that someone produced more of a product never meant that it would become cheaper. Especially if it is a monopolist.
    1. Simargl 4 January 2020 23: 27 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Svetlana
      Under capitalism, the fact that someone produced more of a product never meant that it would become cheaper. Especially if it is a monopolist.
      Under capitalism, even if it is a monopolist, there are three ways not to discount the price: find markets, destroy overproduction, or send it to a drive (like wine).
  • tovarich-andrey.62goncharov 1 January 2020 23: 38 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Class! Now the cost of a kilowatt-hour for us, Vyshnevolochan (it is 25 km. From KNPP), will be much cheaper! It's a shame, gentlemen, comrades ... Choke! And I’ll do the left count to your joy to console you ...
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Archivist Vasya 9 January 2020 18: 10 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    For the future nuclear power plants! The risk is present of course, but it is minimal even when working with RBMK-1000.