The development of new types of weapons for the Su-57 fighter has been announced

47


The General Director of the United Aircraft Corporation (UAC), Yuri Slyusar, announced that it is planned to create new types of weapons for the new Russian fifth-generation fighter Su-57.



At the moment, tests are underway at the second stage engine, which will equip the aircraft. According to the head of the UAC, the fighter will be able to carry more types of weapons than with the engines of the first stage. Moreover, armaments of both existing and under development. The combat vehicle will be able to perform new functions and solve new tasks, so its testing will continue.

As for the crash of the Su-57 fighter in the Khabarovsk Territory, this bitter experience will be studied, taken into account and used. This is one of the tasks of the accident investigation. Yuri Slyusar noted that during the testing process such incidents are not excluded, because before putting the machine into operation it undergoes tough, complex and intensive tests.

The CEO added:

These aircraft have already flown several thousand hours of flight. Unfortunately, even with equipment of this level, accidents sometimes occur.

But most importantly, said Slyusar, that the pilot, who had an accident, remained alive.

Earlier it was reported that in the future, Su-57 fighters plan to arm the Dagger with hypersonic missiles. The question is whether these missiles will be completely identical to those that are currently used on the MiG-31, or whether we are talking about a special modification “for the Su-57,” is not specified at the moment.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    47 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. 0
      December 30 2019
      Well, let the dagger missiles, and the possibilities of nuclear performance. feel
      1. -8
        December 30 2019
        Quote: Mavrikiy
        Well, let the dagger missiles, and the possibilities of nuclear performance.

        We’ll give the daggers to the Special Forces Special Forces. And the latest weapons for the Su - 57 are already described in American publications, 2 years ago. Shooting without turning into the rear hemisphere. Horror. Complete dominance in the air. The ratio of one Su-57 to five Penguins. Well, according to the available information.
        There is a question. The chicken does not doze into Sailat turns its Orliks. Three IGLs will kill Our superiority. But we have air defense and we deployed some cheat. in the Middle East, the United States chicken wasn’t clacking: Syria, Iran, Egypt - C300. Turkey - С400, with further cooperation on missile defense of the Turkish Republic
        1. +7
          December 30 2019
          Mark already, see.
      2. 0
        December 30 2019
        Quote: Mavrikiy
        Well, let the dagger missiles, and the possibilities of nuclear performance. feel

        But what about the stealth and maneuverability of the Su-57? The dagger has considerable dimensions and weight, so this will decide the Su-57 of his trump cards. I am more interested in the fate of the air-based GZUR and the possibility of launching it from the Su-57.
        1. +2
          December 30 2019
          Quote: Sky Strike fighter
          But what about the stealth and maneuverability of the Su-57?

          as well as the F-35 with "stealth" when it is armed
          cruise missiles Storm Shadow and AGM-158 JASSM,
          fool
          if what, then
          X-47M2 "Dagger"
          Maximum range of destruction of the complex (taking into account the combat radius of the carrier aircraft):
          MiG-31K - more than 2000 km, own a little less than 1500 km and about 1500 km without carrier PTB, the largest practical range of the carrier without cargo - 5400 km.
          Tu-22M3 - about 3000 km
          The maximum range of the rocket (without the combat radius of the carrier) is at least 1000 km.

          Why do you need some kind of "stealth" at a launch range of 1000 km, to the target (even if the line of attack is 300 km)?
          1. How do you spot 300 km? (eye or vang will?)
          2. How can you "get" the carrier? (slingshot, fart, or?)
          1. -1
            December 30 2019
            Do you think the target for the Dagger will be right on the border?
            And will there be no air defense lines along the way?
            1. +2
              December 30 2019
              The launch range of the "Dagger" is outside the AUG air defense.
            2. +3
              December 30 2019
              Quote: maden.usmanow
              Do you think the target for the Dagger will be right on the border?

              For especially gifted concerned. repeat:
              Quote: opus
              launch range of 1000km, to the target ( let the line of attack 300 km)

              show me
              Quote: opus
              1. Than detect 300 km? (eye or vang will?)
              2. Than "get" the carrier? (slingshot, fart, or?)


              Quote: maden.usmanow
              And will there be no air defense lines along the way?

              LTX SU-57
              practical range
              at a supersonic cruising (afterburning) speed: from 63% of fuel: 1200 km
              With the X-47M2 even smaller.
              What air defense should be from the starting point, to reach the target?
              \ according to your version, it is necessary to start from the Kaliningrad base in order to hit an object in London?
              Tady yes, then I pass and the air defense will be and the boundaries
          2. -3
            December 30 2019
            Quote: opus
            as well as the F-35 with "stealth" when it is armed
            cruise missiles Storm Shadow and AGM-158 JASSM,
            fool

            And you crawled with missiles: Storm Shadow and AGM-158 JASSM. On the penguin. To the paramilitary, which cuts the whole sky. I personally do not care. It is said 100 km from the border is safe for Nato. We, the carriers of these missiles were taught to destroy without much cruelty hi
            1. +1
              December 30 2019
              Quote: Tusv
              And you crawled with missiles: Storm Shadow and AGM-158 JASSM

              why should I?
              You did not see what it was about? and what and what have I written?
              Let me recommend: go back to basics and read for new, but sober head.
              Quote: Tusv
              We, the carriers of these missiles were taught to destroy without much cruelty

              yes sho you
              -AGM-158 JASSM in fact since 2004 on the balance sheet
              -Storm Shadow since 2003
              -F-35 in operation
              In the US Air Force on August 2, 2016
              At the U.S. Navy - February 28, 2019
              When was it "taught to destroy" that?
              1. -1
                December 30 2019
                Quote: opus
                Let me recommend: go back to basics and read for new, but sober

                You were on duty on the border of the USSR? I am, but you are not. Believe me, the border from the military is distinguished by just a hundred kilometers from the natural. Count it up. Nato in Us from the 12 mile zone will begin to shoot.
                Etozh zhezh stick your theory somewhere in the rumble. Paramilitary don't like it
                1. +2
                  December 30 2019
                  Quote: Tusv
                  You were on duty on the border of the USSR?

                  me yes. Ialoveni. Moldavian SSR, 1990
                  Quote: Tusv
                  I yes

                  I don’t know, with such an aplomb
                  Quote: Tusv
                  Count it up.

                  figured, the topic of discussion is not relevant
                  Quote: Tusv
                  Etozh zhezh stick your theory somewhere in the rumble. Paramilitary don't like it

                  Sooner, the holidays started early, better to breathe the air
                  1. -2
                    December 30 2019
                    Quote: opus
                    me yes. Ialoveni. Moldavian SSR, 1990

                    Hmm. During the Soviet era. Excuse this deep rear. That is why you don’t know how they destroy and why Our flyers cheat “unprofessionally” for just a hundredth, but this is not in dollars, but in kilometers from the border hi
                    1. +2
                      December 30 2019
                      Quote: Tusv
                      Sorry this is the deep rear.

                      sure. Goofs from the General Staff of the USSR Ministry of Defense did not guess the 275th Guards. zrbr, 8th division S-200D "Angara" to place where the thread is in Khulo or Akhalitsa, and isho better in Kyustendil (sadness that they were not in the OVD)
                      Quote: Tusv
                      Because you don’t know how to destroy and for what

                      uh huh. "destroy"
                      having musk in his pocket does not scream about it on the streets, for the smell of musk gives itself away

                      1. -2
                        December 30 2019
                        Quote: opus
                        place where the thread is in Khulo or Akhalitsa, and isho is better in Kyustendil (sad that there wasn’t

                        Well Duc, place your troops in your coat, and ours work differently hi
                        A month "on the bedside table", and the second month on the database - take off your pants and shout hurray. We see everything
          3. 0
            December 30 2019
            as well as the F-35 with "stealth" when it is armed
            cruise missiles Storm Shadow and AGM-158 JASSM,

            To do this, the Su-57 has an X-59MK2 arsenal (analogous to the KR Storm Shadow and AGM-158 JASSM), which are located inside the Su-57 fuselage. Leave the bikes about the Dagger and Su-57 as its carrier marking New Year ahead of time to reporters. Or you already started celebrating drinks ? Happy New Year !!! As you know, the main thing is to start celebrating something.
            fool

            And it’s you in vain. Or didn’t you have a hangover?
            1. +2
              December 30 2019
              Quote: Sky Strike fighter
              For this, the Su-57 has in the arsenal of the Kh-59MK2

              it is about a bunch of "Su-57 and" Dagger "" about it. The F-35 also has something, the Storm Shadow acre and the AGM-158 JASSM.
              Quote: Sky Strike fighter
              7.And leave the tales of the Dagger and Su-57 as its carrier

              I would not be categorical.
              Purely "on the knee"
              1.

              2.


              completely and the geometry and chassis and "mon" allows.
              Quote: Sky Strike fighter
              Or you already started celebrating

              niii. do not give barbarians.
              MSC tollerasty such - a gift before the new year "made" $ 297 demurrage fantasized.
              I’ll start tomorrow, after the visit pool
    2. -1
      December 30 2019
      The latest electronics model involves new rockets.
      Well, open architecture!
      This chip is worth a lot!
      Therefore, as in any PC computer, stick any new piece of hardware and put drivers for it.
      Well, then the same rake. Including obsolescence of the brain.
      1. 0
        December 30 2019
        Quote: Victor_B
        The latest electronics model involves new rockets.

        Or something else, on "other physical principles"
        1. -9
          December 30 2019
          Quote: svp67
          Or something else, on "other physical principles"

          Anything from a slingshot with a super scope to a blaster.
          The main thing is BLUE, do not spare the Orthodox electrical tape! laughing
          1. +3
            December 30 2019
            Quote: Victor_B
            The main thing is BLUE, do not spare the Orthodox electrical tape!

            We have enough of it for EVERYONE .. so we will "wind" that the year will not "unwind"
            1. +11
              December 30 2019
              Actually, what about Orthodoxy ...
              Maybe the devil makes me sad, but look at all these priestly chants and sprinkles of holy water with the NUCLEAR, your mother, rockets, as well as the latest and monstrously complex technique! ..
              This is above my mind!
              1. +3
                December 30 2019
                Quote: Victor_B
                This is above my mind!

                Questions of faith, like questions of blood ... the most difficult
              2. +2
                December 30 2019
                And the astronauts? This is an ordinary circus and the development of dough. They don’t arrange costumed balls for free. After the temple for a billion there is nothing to be surprised.
            2. +1
              December 30 2019
              wound sounds ambiguous!
              1. +1
                December 30 2019
                Quote: novel xnumx
                wound sounds ambiguous!

                In both senses, I do not recommend there is no one to contact with our "blue duct tape" ...
      2. -4
        December 30 2019
        Quote: Victor_B
        The latest electronics model involves new rockets.
        Well, open architecture!

        Open architecture, for whom? For our fleet? Su-57, Su-35 thoroughbred stallions of air supremacy. Su - 30 according to the American classification F / B. Su-34 is so fast Fighting / Bomber / Attack. (One hundred pounds without analogue.)
        I repeat, for whom unification is needed. This zhezh rabid grandmother shove unshoved and it should somehow shoot.
        Well, if I were a military representative and they gave me gigabax on my paw, then it would have shot immediately hi
    3. +1
      December 30 2019
      Well, why can’t you do it right away, and then beat in the chest, saying it wasn’t easy? No, some successes around with tongues without bones.
      1. -1
        December 30 2019
        Development still does not have time to break into the idea stage, but everyone already knows everything, and even it is not interesting - there is no surprise.
    4. +2
      December 30 2019
      As for the crash of the Su-57 fighter in the Khabarovsk Territory, this bitter experience will be studied, taken into account and used.


      the crash during the tests of the new model of the fighter is practically the norm, with the SU-27 when testing before being put into service there were much more accidents. But many prefer to forget about it.
      1. -6
        December 30 2019
        One thing to test, and another thing to control flights in the process of handing over the aircraft to the customer, tell us when it was lost at the Su-27 plant, intended for delivery in part, and what kind of aircraft was it?
        1. -3
          December 30 2019
          Quote: Hexenmeister
          and another thing is control flights in the process of handing over the aircraft to the customer


          the fallen SU-57 was with a second-stage engine, and this engine will still be tested for more than one year before it is put on production aircraft that will be sent to the troops.
          In the coming years, the SU-57 with the engine of the first stage is supplied to the army and will be delivered.
          1. -2
            December 30 2019
            Quote:
            Recall, the aforementioned Su-57 (T-50), the first aircraft that was supposed to be transferred to the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation before the end of 2019, crashed on December 24 near Khabarovsk. The pilot ejected.
            Untested aircraft with engines of some stages there are not transferred to the Ministry of Defense, but are tested in designated areas.
            Well, minusers, I repeat the question: "When was the first Su-27 intended for transfer to the troops lost at the plant?"
          2. 0
            December 30 2019
            So it seems like two versions of what happened. According to the first, during the flight there were problems with the engine of the first stage - AL-41F1. The second version is a pilot error.
          3. -1
            December 30 2019
            Well, so it means that they’ll transfer him to the troops. Or that engine of the second stage. In any case, they lied, as they usually do.
        2. -2
          December 30 2019
          About the 27th I will not say, but the seven are the very first and blurted out. In general, I want to remind you that the eroplan is actually heavier than air, it’s abnormal for him to fly, but it’s just a mess :)! The pilot is safe, the rest is nonsense.
    5. -2
      December 30 2019
      but I don’t understand why the missile penetration into planes is still not 100%? put in a rocket a computer a la raspberry pi, a camera and preferably 4 wide-angle ... and write a program with the tensor flow neuroprocess. to learn to distinguish between an object and a plane. well, even if at the final stage the trajectory is guided by the neuroprocess ... it’s worth a penny, but it really flies into the window (if you teach the object window) ... and no heat traps and anti-missile maneuvers will help ... what's the problem?
      1. +2
        December 30 2019
        Quote: Last centurion
        but I don’t understand why the missile penetration into planes is still not 100%? put in a rocket a computer a la raspberry pi, a camera and preferably 4 wide-angle ... and write a program with the tensor flow neuroprocess. to learn to distinguish between an object and a plane. well, even if at the final stage the trajectory is guided by the neuroprocess ... it’s worth a penny, but it really flies into the window (if you teach the object window) ... and no heat traps and anti-missile maneuvers will help ... what's the problem?

        Three counter-questions - from what distance the rocket's brains will see and identify the target on the TV picture, how much it will take to react and physically perform the pre-aiming maneuver at this distance, at supersonic speeds and possibly converging courses, and where are the guarantees that the computer on the TV picture will not confuse the aircraft ( it happens that the enemy flies on the same type of aircraft, and a friendly aircraft may not have a friend or foe) So a tele-picture, as a means of guidance not for air combat and the corresponding speeds and possible circumstances, location guidance and (or) heat is more reliable.
        1. -4
          December 30 2019
          well, okay, suppose our microelectronics is not very good in terms of speed ... suppose at high angular velocities of the rocket's turn relative to the target. but the camera here is the periphery, here the center is a non-process. you can analyze IR signatures, sounds from submarines under water, etc. for example, to separate the IR signatures of fighter traps from the engine. As for the cameras ... - well, let's say "Dagger" about a sedentary object ... for example, an aircraft carrier. Aircraft carriers, we already have 0.5. And here you can, for example, in a certain part. For example, to the catapult zone to paralyze takeoff from this barge
          1. 0
            December 30 2019
            Quote: Last centurion
            - Well, let's say "Dagger" about a sedentary object ... for example, about an aircraft carrier.

            Quite a reasonable idea, in contrast to the air defense missile launch that you proposed. Again a counter-question - are you sure that there is no such option on the Dagger?
            And here it is possible for example in a certain part. For example, in the catapult zone to paralyze the take-off from this barge
            In order to paralyze an aircraft carrier as a combat unit, it’s enough just to get some sort of a broadsman on the flight deck, although of course it’s better in the catapult - then certainly in the base and for a long time ..
            1. -1
              December 30 2019
              no, I'm not sure, I don't know how it's implemented. I just dabble in electronics. to recognize an object "cat" at a distance of 25 meters from a dog and an aircraft carrier from a destroyer under suppression conditions are probably different things. but visually, an aircraft carrier is an aircraft carrier and a destroyer is a destroyer and a tank is a tank (if not an inflatable one), even though you cover it by radio frequencies somehow ... and I know that with guidance accuracy we have not very good warhead deflection of 150 meters. so he suggested ... the method of koto / dog separation :) so to speak, a way to recognize the take-off from an aircraft carrier on approach to it ...
    6. +2
      December 30 2019
      Tired of this Yuri Slyusar. If he announces something, then this is a simple PR so that he will not be kicked out now.
    7. +3
      December 30 2019
      Regarding the crash of the plane. I recommend recalling the sad experience of commissioning the MIG-31x. When the machine turned over unexpectedly during a flight at low altitude, and the pilot didn’t have time to eject or the parachute didn’t work out. I had to look for a reason for a long time. Found, fixed. And the MIG-31 in its class became the best aircraft ... And this aircraft will be finalized. I have no doubt.
      1. 0
        December 30 2019
        Tell me the truth! The car will definitely be finalized, there are simply no other options !!!
    8. -3
      December 30 2019
      Quote: svp67
      Quote: Victor_B
      This is above my mind!

      Questions of faith, like questions of blood ... the most difficult

      In this case, this is not faith, but obscurantism.
    9. +2
      December 30 2019
      Is there again someone who drank too much? Which dagger on the Su-57? Foldable or what? He’s barely fit under the 31st.
    10. 0
      December 31 2019
      Will the second stage engine be installed on the Hunter?

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"