The development of new types of weapons for the Su-57 fighter has been announced




The General Director of the United Aircraft Corporation (UAC), Yuri Slyusar, announced that it is planned to create new types of weapons for the new Russian fifth-generation fighter Su-57.

At the moment, tests are underway at the second stage engine, which will equip the aircraft. According to the head of the UAC, the fighter will be able to carry more types of weapons than with the engines of the first stage. Moreover, armaments of both existing and under development. The combat vehicle will be able to perform new functions and solve new tasks, so its testing will continue.

As for the crash of the Su-57 fighter in the Khabarovsk Territory, this bitter experience will be studied, taken into account and used. This is one of the tasks of the accident investigation. Yuri Slyusar noted that during the testing process such incidents are not excluded, because before putting the machine into operation it undergoes tough, complex and intensive tests.

The CEO added:

These aircraft have already flown several thousand hours of flight. Unfortunately, even with equipment of this level, accidents sometimes occur.

But most importantly, said Slyusar, that the pilot, who had an accident, remained alive.

Earlier it was reported that in the future, Su-57 fighters plan to arm the Dagger with hypersonic missiles. The question is whether these missiles will be completely identical to those that are currently used on the MiG-31, or whether we are talking about a special modification “for the Su-57,” is not specified at the moment.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

47 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Mavrikiy 30 December 2019 12: 33 New
    • 4
    • 4
    0
    Well, let the dagger missiles, and the possibilities of nuclear performance. repeat
    1. Tusv 30 December 2019 14: 05 New
      • 6
      • 14
      -8
      Quote: Mavrikiy
      Well, let the dagger missiles, and the possibilities of nuclear performance.

      We’ll give the daggers to the Special Forces Special Forces. And the latest weapons for the Su - 57 are already described in American publications, 2 years ago. Shooting without turning into the rear hemisphere. Horror. Complete dominance in the air. The ratio of one Su-57 to five Penguins. Well, according to the available information.
      There is a question. The chicken does not doze into Sailat turns its Orliks. Three IGLs will kill Our superiority. But we have air defense and we deployed some cheat. in the Middle East, the United States chicken wasn’t clacking: Syria, Iran, Egypt - C300. Turkey - С400, with further cooperation on missile defense of the Turkish Republic
      1. Robertocalos 30 December 2019 15: 23 New
        • 10
        • 3
        +7
        Mark already, see.
    2. Sky strike fighter 30 December 2019 14: 33 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Mavrikiy
      Well, let the dagger missiles, and the possibilities of nuclear performance. repeat

      But what about the stealth and maneuverability of the Su-57? The dagger has considerable dimensions and weight, so this will decide the Su-57 of his trump cards. I am more interested in the fate of the air-based GZUR and the possibility of launching it from the Su-57.
      1. opus 30 December 2019 15: 12 New
        • 7
        • 5
        +2
        Quote: Sky Strike fighter
        But what about the stealth and maneuverability of the Su-57?

        as well as the F-35 with "stealth" when it is armed
        cruise missiles Storm Shadow and AGM-158 JASSM,
        fool
        if what, then
        X-47M2 "Dagger"
        Maximum range of destruction of the complex (taking into account the combat radius of the carrier aircraft):
        MiG-31K - more than 2000 km, own a little less than 1500 km and about 1500 km without carrier PTB, the largest practical range of the carrier without cargo - 5400 km.
        Tu-22M3 - about 3000 km
        The maximum range of the rocket (without the combat radius of the carrier) is at least 1000 km.

        Why do you need at least a launch range of 1000 km, to the target (let the line of attack 300 km) some kind of crap "stealth"?
        1. How do you spot 300 km? (eye or vang will?)
        2. How do you get the media? (sling, fart, or?)
        1. maden.usmanow 30 December 2019 15: 19 New
          • 2
          • 3
          -1
          Do you think the target for the Dagger will be right on the border?
          And will there be no air defense lines along the way?
          1. ultra 30 December 2019 15: 26 New
            • 3
            • 1
            +2
            The launch range of the "Dagger" outside the AUG air defense is located.
          2. opus 30 December 2019 15: 26 New
            • 4
            • 1
            +3
            Quote: maden.usmanow
            Do you think the target for the Dagger will be right on the border?

            For especially gifted concerned. repeat:
            Quote: opus
            launch range of 1000km, to the target ( let the line of attack 300 km)

            show me
            Quote: opus
            1. Than detect 300 km? (eye or vang will?)
            2. Than "get" the media? (sling, fart, or?)


            Quote: maden.usmanow
            And will there be no air defense lines along the way?

            LTX SU-57
            practical range
            at a supersonic cruising (afterburning) speed: from 63% of fuel: 1200 km
            With the X-47M2 even smaller.
            What air defense should be from the starting point, to reach the target?
            \ according to your version, it is necessary to start from the Kaliningrad base in order to hit an object in London?
            Tady yes, then I pass and the air defense will be and the boundaries
        2. Tusv 30 December 2019 15: 38 New
          • 1
          • 4
          -3
          Quote: opus
          as well as the F-35 with "stealth" when it is armed
          cruise missiles Storm Shadow and AGM-158 JASSM,
          fool

          And you crawled with missiles: Storm Shadow and AGM-158 JASSM. On the penguin. To the paramilitary, which cuts the whole sky. I personally do not care. It is said 100 km from the border is safe for Nato. We, the carriers of these missiles were taught to destroy without much cruelty hi
          1. opus 30 December 2019 15: 43 New
            • 3
            • 2
            +1
            Quote: Tusv
            And you crawled with missiles: Storm Shadow and AGM-158 JASSM

            why should I?
            You did not see what it was about? and what and what have I written?
            Let me recommend: go back to basics and read for new, but sober head.
            Quote: Tusv
            We, the carriers of these missiles were taught to destroy without much cruelty

            yes sho you
            -AGM-158 JASSM in fact since 2004 on the balance sheet
            -Storm Shadow since 2003
            -F-35 in operation
            In the US Air Force on August 2, 2016
            At the U.S. Navy - February 28, 2019
            When is it "taught to destroy" then?
            1. Tusv 30 December 2019 15: 56 New
              • 2
              • 3
              -1
              Quote: opus
              Let me recommend: go back to basics and read for new, but sober

              You were on duty on the border of the USSR? I am, but you are not. Believe me, the border from the military is distinguished by just a hundred kilometers from the natural. Count it up. Nato in Us from the 12 mile zone will begin to shoot.
              Etozh zhezh stick your theory somewhere in the rumble. Paramilitary don't like it
              1. opus 30 December 2019 16: 43 New
                • 3
                • 1
                +2
                Quote: Tusv
                You were on duty on the border of the USSR?

                me yes. Ialoveni. Moldavian SSR, 1990
                Quote: Tusv
                I yes

                I don’t know, with such an aplomb
                Quote: Tusv
                Count it up.

                figured, the topic of discussion is not relevant
                Quote: Tusv
                Etozh zhezh stick your theory somewhere in the rumble. Paramilitary don't like it

                Sooner, the holidays started early, better to breathe the air
                1. Tusv 30 December 2019 16: 59 New
                  • 1
                  • 3
                  -2
                  Quote: opus
                  me yes. Ialoveni. Moldavian SSR, 1990

                  Hmm. In Soviet times. Sorry this is the deep rear. Because you don’t know how they destroy and for what Our flyers hooligan “unprofessionally” just for a heap, but this is not in dollars, but kilometers from the border hi
                  1. opus 30 December 2019 18: 57 New
                    • 2
                    • 0
                    +2
                    Quote: Tusv
                    Sorry this is the deep rear.

                    of course. Something from the General Staff of the USSR Ministry of Defense did not guess the 275th Guards. zrbr, 8th S-200D Angara division to place where the thread is in Khulo or Akhalitsa, but isho is better in Kyustendil (sad that they were not in the police department)
                    Quote: Tusv
                    Because you don’t know how to destroy and for what

                    Yeah. "destroy"
                    having musk in his pocket does not scream about it on the streets, for the smell of musk gives itself away

                    1. Tusv 30 December 2019 19: 05 New
                      • 0
                      • 2
                      -2
                      Quote: opus
                      place where the thread is in Khulo or Akhalitsa, and isho is better in Kyustendil (sad that there wasn’t

                      Well Duc, place your troops in your coat, and ours work differently hi
                      A month on the bedside table, and the second month on the database - take off your pants and shout cheers. We see everything
        3. Sky strike fighter 30 December 2019 20: 29 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          as well as the F-35 with "stealth" when it is armed
          cruise missiles Storm Shadow and AGM-158 JASSM,

          To do this, the Su-57 has an X-59MK2 arsenal (analogous to the KR Storm Shadow and AGM-158 JASSM), which are located inside the Su-57 fuselage. Leave the bikes about the Dagger and Su-57 as its carrier marking New Year ahead of time to reporters. Or you already started celebrating drinks ? Happy New Year !!! As you know, the main thing is to start celebrating something.
          fool

          And it’s you in vain. Or didn’t you have a hangover?
          1. opus 30 December 2019 20: 56 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Quote: Sky Strike fighter
            For this, the Su-57 has in the arsenal of the Kh-59MK2

            we are talking about a bunch of "Su-57 and" Dagger "" about her. The F-35 also has something, akromya Storm Shadow and AGM-158 JASSM.
            Quote: Sky Strike fighter
            7.And leave the tales of the Dagger and Su-57 as its carrier

            I would not be categorical.
            Purely "on the knee"
            1.

            2.


            quite and geometry and chassis and mon allows.
            Quote: Sky Strike fighter
            Or you already started celebrating

            niii. do not give barbarians.
            MSC Tollerasts such a gift before the New Year "made" $ 297 imagined demurrage.
            I’ll start tomorrow, after the visit pool
  2. Victor_B 30 December 2019 12: 36 New
    • 2
    • 3
    -1
    The latest electronics model involves new rockets.
    Well, open architecture!
    This chip is worth a lot!
    Therefore, as in any PC computer, stick any new piece of hardware and put drivers for it.
    Well, then the same rake. Including obsolescence of the brain.
    1. svp67 30 December 2019 12: 40 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Quote: Victor_B
      The latest electronics model involves new rockets.

      Or something else, on "other physical principles"
      1. Victor_B 30 December 2019 12: 43 New
        • 3
        • 12
        -9
        Quote: svp67
        Or something else, on "other physical principles"

        Anything from a slingshot with a super scope to a blaster.
        The main thing is BLUE, do not spare the Orthodox electrical tape! laughing
        1. svp67 30 December 2019 12: 48 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          Quote: Victor_B
          The main thing is BLUE, do not spare the Orthodox electrical tape!

          We have it enough for ALL .. so "wound" that the year is not "unwound"
          1. Victor_B 30 December 2019 12: 52 New
            • 21
            • 10
            +11
            Actually, what about Orthodoxy ...
            Maybe the devil makes me sad, but look at all these priestly chants and sprinkles of holy water with the NUCLEAR, your mother, rockets, as well as the latest and monstrously complex technique! ..
            This is above my mind!
            1. svp67 30 December 2019 12: 55 New
              • 4
              • 1
              +3
              Quote: Victor_B
              This is above my mind!

              Questions of faith, like questions of blood ... the most difficult
            2. Robertocalos 30 December 2019 15: 21 New
              • 3
              • 1
              +2
              And the astronauts? This is an ordinary circus and the development of dough. They don’t arrange costumed balls for free. After the temple for a billion there is nothing to be surprised.
          2. novel66 30 December 2019 12: 56 New
            • 3
            • 2
            +1
            wound sounds ambiguous!
            1. svp67 30 December 2019 13: 16 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Quote: novel xnumx
              wound sounds ambiguous!

              In both senses, I don’t recommend anyone to mess with our “blue electrical tape” ...
    2. Tusv 30 December 2019 14: 53 New
      • 0
      • 4
      -4
      Quote: Victor_B
      The latest electronics model involves new rockets.
      Well, open architecture!

      Open architecture, for whom? For our fleet? Su-57, Su-35 thoroughbred stallions of air supremacy. Su - 30 according to the American classification F / B. Su-34 is so fast Fighting / Bomber / Attack. (One hundred pounds without analogue.)
      I repeat, for whom unification is needed. This zhezh rabid grandmother shove unshoved and it should somehow shoot.
      Well, if I were a military representative and they gave me gigabax on my paw, then it would have shot immediately hi
  3. SNEAKY 30 December 2019 12: 38 New
    • 7
    • 6
    +1
    Well, why can’t you do it right away, and then beat in the chest, saying it wasn’t easy? No, some successes around with tongues without bones.
    1. bessmertniy 30 December 2019 13: 02 New
      • 1
      • 2
      -1
      Development still does not have time to break into the idea stage, but everyone already knows everything, and even it is not interesting - there is no surprise.
  4. lopvlad 30 December 2019 12: 44 New
    • 4
    • 2
    +2
    As for the crash of the Su-57 fighter in the Khabarovsk Territory, this bitter experience will be studied, taken into account and used.


    the crash during the tests of the new model of the fighter is practically the norm, with the SU-27 when testing before being put into service there were much more accidents. But many prefer to forget about it.
    1. Hexenmeister 30 December 2019 12: 51 New
      • 4
      • 10
      -6
      One thing to test, and another thing to control flights in the process of handing over the aircraft to the customer, tell us when it was lost at the Su-27 plant, intended for delivery in part, and what kind of aircraft was it?
      1. lopvlad 30 December 2019 13: 02 New
        • 4
        • 7
        -3
        Quote: Hexenmeister
        and another thing is control flights in the process of handing over the aircraft to the customer


        the fallen SU-57 was with a second-stage engine, and this engine will still be tested for more than one year before it is put on production aircraft that will be sent to the troops.
        In the coming years, the SU-57 with the engine of the first stage is supplied to the army and will be delivered.
        1. Hexenmeister 30 December 2019 13: 07 New
          • 5
          • 7
          -2
          Quote:
          Recall, the aforementioned Su-57 (T-50), the first aircraft that was supposed to be transferred to the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation before the end of 2019, crashed on December 24 near Khabarovsk. The pilot ejected.
          Untested aircraft with engines of some stages there are not transferred to the Ministry of Defense, but are tested in designated areas.
          Well, minusers, I repeat the question: "When was the first Su-27 designed to be transferred to the troops lost at the plant?"
        2. Victoria-V 30 December 2019 13: 35 New
          • 2
          • 2
          0
          So it seems like two versions of what happened. According to the first, during the flight there were problems with the engine of the first stage - AL-41F1. The second version is a pilot error.
        3. Robertocalos 30 December 2019 15: 19 New
          • 0
          • 1
          -1
          Well, so it means that they’ll transfer him to the troops. Or that engine of the second stage. In any case, they lied, as they usually do.
      2. Grossvater 30 December 2019 13: 47 New
        • 2
        • 4
        -2
        About the 27th I will not say, but the seven are the very first and blurted out. In general, I want to remind you that the eroplan is actually heavier than air, it’s abnormal for him to fly, but it’s just a mess :)! The pilot is safe, the rest is nonsense.
  5. Last centurion 30 December 2019 12: 58 New
    • 1
    • 3
    -2
    but I don’t understand why the missile penetration into planes is still not 100%? put in a rocket a computer a la raspberry pi, a camera and preferably 4 wide-angle ... and write a program with the tensor flow neuroprocess. to learn to distinguish between an object and a plane. well, even if at the final stage the trajectory is guided by the neuroprocess ... it’s worth a penny, but it really flies into the window (if you teach the object window) ... and no heat traps and anti-missile maneuvers will help ... what's the problem?
    1. KVU-NSVD 30 December 2019 13: 27 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: Last centurion
      but I don’t understand why the missile penetration into planes is still not 100%? put in a rocket a computer a la raspberry pi, a camera and preferably 4 wide-angle ... and write a program with the tensor flow neuroprocess. to learn to distinguish between an object and a plane. well, even if at the final stage the trajectory is guided by the neuroprocess ... it’s worth a penny, but it really flies into the window (if you teach the object window) ... and no heat traps and anti-missile maneuvers will help ... what's the problem?

      Three counter-questions - from what distance the brains of the rocket will see and identify the target on the TV picture, how much it will take for the reaction and the physical execution of the homing maneuver at this distance, at supersonic speeds and possibly converging courses, and where are the guarantees that the computer picture will not confuse the planes ( it happens that the enemy flies on the same type of apparatus, but the “friend or foe” may not even stand on a friendly airplane) So the picture as a means of guidance is not for air combat and its corresponding speeds and possible circumstances, guidance on location and (or) heat is more reliable.
      1. Last centurion 30 December 2019 13: 38 New
        • 0
        • 4
        -4
        Well, okay, suppose our microelectronics is not very responsive ... we assume at high angular velocities of the rocket’s turn relative to the target. but the camera here is the periphery, here the center is a non-process. you can analyze ik signatures, sounds from submarines under water, etc. for example, to separate the fighter trap signature from the engine. as for the cameras ... - well, let’s say “Dagger” about an inactive object ... for example, about an aircraft carrier. The aircraft carriers we already have 0.5. And here it is possible for example in a certain part. For example, in the catapult zone to paralyze the take-off from this barge
        1. KVU-NSVD 30 December 2019 14: 05 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: Last centurion
          - Well, let’s say “Dagger” about a sedentary object ... for example, about an aircraft carrier.

          Quite a reasonable idea, in contrast to the air defense missile launch that you proposed. Again a counter-question - are you sure that there is no such option on the Dagger?
          And here it is possible for example in a certain part. For example, in the catapult zone to paralyze the take-off from this barge
          In order to paralyze an aircraft carrier as a combat unit, it’s enough just to get some sort of a broadsman on the flight deck, although of course it’s better in the catapult - then certainly in the base and for a long time ..
          1. Last centurion 30 December 2019 14: 19 New
            • 0
            • 1
            -1
            No, I’m not sure, I don’t know how it is implemented. I just dabble in electronics. Recognizing the object “cat” at a distance of 25 meters from the dog and the aircraft carrier from the destroyer under the conditions of suppression are probably different things. but visually an aircraft carrier is an aircraft carrier and a destroyer is a destroyer and a tank is a tank (if not an inflatable one) even though you somehow cover it with radio frequencies ... and I know that with all the accuracy of guidance we don’t have a warhead deviation of 150 meters in everything. so he suggested ... the koto / dog separation method :) so to speak, a way to recognize the takeoff of an aircraft carrier on approaching it ...
  6. Victoria-V 30 December 2019 13: 18 New
    • 6
    • 4
    +2
    Tired of this Yuri Slyusar. If he announces something, then this is a simple PR so that he will not be kicked out now.
  7. Alexander X 30 December 2019 14: 11 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Regarding the crash of the plane. I recommend recalling the sad experience of commissioning the MIG-31x. When the machine turned over unexpectedly during a flight at low altitude, and the pilot didn’t have time to eject or the parachute didn’t work out. I had to look for a reason for a long time. Found, fixed. And the MIG-31 in its class became the best aircraft ... And this aircraft will be finalized. I have no doubt.
    1. Sergei 23 30 December 2019 15: 12 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Tell me the truth! The car will definitely be finalized, there are simply no other options !!!
  8. PIXY_117 30 December 2019 15: 06 New
    • 1
    • 4
    -3
    Quote: svp67
    Quote: Victor_B
    This is above my mind!

    Questions of faith, like questions of blood ... the most difficult

    In this case, this is not faith, but obscurantism.
  9. Robertocalos 30 December 2019 15: 15 New
    • 4
    • 2
    +2
    Is there again someone who drank too much? Which dagger on the Su-57? Foldable or what? He’s barely fit under the 31st.
  10. Silver Fox 31 December 2019 07: 07 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Will the engine of the second stage be put on the "Hunter"?