Japan considered sending soldiers to Guam in 1955

14

Japan in 1955 allowed the possibility of sending soldiers to the American island of Guam, to protect it "from external threats." About this writes The Japan Times, with reference to published diplomatic records.

It is reported that the discussion of this issue was raised in a conversation between then-Foreign Secretary Mamoru Shigemitsu and US Secretary of State John Foster Dulles.



Sending military for defense will be justified in accordance with the Constitution

Said Shigemitsu then.

His comments were voiced decades before Japan passed laws on national security in 2015, allowing the country to carry out collective self-defense in some cases.

In his meeting with Dulles in August 1955, Shigemitsu described the Japanese-US Security Treaty, which entered into force in April 1952 (was replaced by a new document in 1960), as an "incomplete" pact.

The Japanese Foreign Minister called on the United States to enter into negotiations to conclude a new security treaty that would ensure mutual defense throughout the Western Pacific.

Dulles then asked if Japan could conclude a mutual defense pact in accordance with the existing Constitution and whether Tokyo could protect the United States in the event of an attack on Guam.

Shigemitsu replied that both sides would discuss how to react when a similar situation arises.

Although Japan’s use of Japan’s military capabilities is limited to self-defense, Tokyo interprets it in such a way that it can discuss the use of its forces with the United States

- said the Foreign Minister of Japan.

Dulles replied that Mr. Shigemitsu's explanation of Japan's position was for him news, and he previously did not know that Tokyo was considering sending troops abroad under such conditions.
  • Ministry of Defense of Japan
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

14 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
  2. +1
    December 30 2019
    Well, Germany bombed Serbia in 1999. Why not even the Japs spread their wings, papa does.
  3. 0
    December 30 2019
    Although the use of Japan’s military capabilities is limited to self-defense, Tokyo interprets this in such a way that it can discuss the use of its troops with the United States.

    - said the Foreign Minister of Japan.

    As they want, they rule the Ipenes.
    1. +2
      December 30 2019
      The owner gives the go-ahead - why not go up? wink
      1. +1
        December 31 2019
        bouncyhunter (Pasha) Yesterday, 11: 01
        0
        The owner gives the go-ahead - why not go up? wink

        Yes, with such a "roof" Ipents can, and fingers like a fan. wink
    2. +1
      December 30 2019
      Fundamentally, if the Japanese self-defense forces are subordinate to the American command, then the Japanese constitution does not seem to be violated, and the Americans get a great opportunity to throw these forces into any hell if they suddenly think that either the United States or Japan is threatened by some kind of aggressive Kingdom Tonga. what feel hi
  4. 0
    December 30 2019
    "Japan is seeking the right to collective security in order to" create conditions for expansion. "
    DPRK media.
    A "small" change to the Constitution is collective security instead of collective self-defense ..
    And the self-defense army is turning into a FULL-PRESENT armed forces.
  5. +2
    December 30 2019
    And someone wanted in 1955 to drop troops on Guam so that they had to defend it with Japanese soldiers?
    Even interesting ....
    1. 0
      December 30 2019
      It is written, "Japan considered sending soldiers to Guam in 1955", In my opinion, in the 20th century it is the only country that TWICE considered sending troops to Guam laughing
      And there is one country that Guam would have to defend with Japanese soldiers ... is ... the USA feel
  6. +2
    December 30 2019
    And someone wanted in 1955 to drop troops on Guam so that they had to defend it with Japanese soldiers?
    Even interesting ....
  7. +1
    December 30 2019
    But I also wonder what kind of danger threatened Guam in 1955? From whom to protect, from us? So, we didn’t have a sane fleet at that time to threaten Guam. Or do I not know something?
    1. -1
      December 30 2019
      MB, were you afraid of the Chinese?
      1. 0
        December 30 2019
        So China then had no fleet at all.))
        1. 0
          December 30 2019
          And we have too few; he simply would not have sailed to Guam.
    2. 0
      December 31 2019
      Quote: Rakovor
      But I also wonder what kind of danger threatened Guam in 1955?

      In 1955, no one knew that the USSR and the PRC would quarrel, the DPRK would begin to lose in the economy of South Korea, the communists would lose in Indonesia and Malay, in India the communists in regional governments would show their failure, Mao instead of the normal development of the country, which had already frightened its speed not only the United States, but also Khrushchev, will start a big leap and cultural revolution. The United States was simply preparing in the year 1965-1970 to get a new Korean war and a war in Vietnam and Malaya with Korean and Vietnamese airliners of Myasishchev's jet aircraft in Japan, Guam, Australia.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"