SOHR: Unknown drones bomb a prison in northern Syria

Syria receives reports of a strange incident in the north of the country. The notorious organization SOHR (Syrian Observatory for Human Rights) claims the activity of unknown unmanned aerial vehicles in the north of the country.

In the materials of the mentioned structure, it is stated that unknown shock Drones attacked the Al-Maasara prison in the northern part of Aleppo province. The prison is located near the settlement Aazaz. For a while, it was controlled by Kurdish armed groups and the US military. It contained, according to publications in the Arab press, militants of the terrorist organization ISIS (*banned in the Russian Federation). Until now (for several months) the prison was under the control of the Turkish armed contingent. The building is almost completely destroyed.

Who could bomb the prison with the terrorists left there?

According to SOHR, the attack was carried out by American drones or UAVs of another state that is part of the so-called American coalition.

If this is true, then it can be assumed that the strike was a kind of attempt to “cover the tracks” - to liquidate those Ishilovites and other prisoners in Al-Ma'assar who could tell about the contacts of American intelligence services - similar to those that showed themselves in Iraq, after which Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi appeared “born”, declaring himself the leader of ISIS *.

SOHR has its own point of view on this subject. It looks as follows: prisoners were tortured in prison, and therefore decided to hide these facts.

It must be recalled that for several days the same “human rights observatory” issued material about an alleged fight between US and Russian military personnel in northern Syria. The Russian Ministry of Defense called this material fake (false).

Comments

[Thrifty]

To bomb a building is not to destroy the terrorists who are there. Most likely, they bombed so that the Ishilovites could escape from prison!

[maidan.izrailovich]

To bomb a building is not to destroy the terrorists who are there. Most likely, they bombed so that the Ishilovites could escape from prison!

While there is no accurate information, then any version has a place to be.
I will support the SOHR version.
It could be the Americans. They have the richest experience in using shock drones. A possible goal is the destruction of the barmalei. Perhaps among the prisoners there are (were) those who know a lot. They used drones, not military aircraft for privacy reasons.

[Professor]

Quote: maidan.izrailovich

They used drones, not military aircraft for privacy reasons.

I wonder how this organization was able to find out the type of aircraft with which this sanatorium was attacked?

[Rostislav]

So it's a pocket-sized mouthpiece. This whole "laboratory" is one little man found in London. More explanations are required, where did he get the info from?

[Shurik70]

If the area is controlled by the Turks, you should wait for the OFFICIAL message of the Turks.
And do not discuss the message of the fake agency.

[Thrall]

Quote: Thrifty

To bomb a building is not to destroy the terrorists who are there. Most likely, they bombed so that the Ishilovites could escape from prison!

Yeah, considering that this, for example, is a solitary confinement in a Turkish Igilov prison

[cost]

According to the latest data, 8 people died. it is quite probable that it is the Turks themselves who cover up the traces of their "work" with prisoners. Threw a couple of grenades into cameras and dumped them on drones

[Paranoid50]

Quote: Rich

They threw a couple of grenades at the cameras and dumped them on drones.

Well, apparently, their grenades are not weak :

The building is almost completely destroyed.

[Ramzaj99]

Quote: professor

I wonder how this organization was able to find out the type of aircraft with which this sanatorium was attacked?

But why actually ?? Only two countries can work there with shock drones. USA and Israel. And that’s it !! Or did the Turks bomb the prison which they themselves guard ??)))

[Professor]

Quote: Ramzaj99

Quote: professor

I wonder how this organization was able to find out the type of aircraft with which this sanatorium was attacked?

But why actually ?? Only two countries can work there with shock drones. USA and Israel. And that’s it !! Or did the Turks bomb the prison which they themselves guard ??)))

How did they know that these were drones, and not say long-range bombers or KR?

[Ramzaj99]

Quote: professor

How did they know that these were drones, and not say long-range bombers or KR?

Well, probably a warring country already by ear can easily determine an air raid. Even if they shot back very far, you can still hear.
And the damage from the warhead of the drone’s ammunition and the penetration of the Raman will also distinguish between the deaf-mute, the painfully different weight categories.

[bessmertniy]

It is strange that these unidentified drones do not go astray. If they cannot be identified, then in principle they can be knocked down by any of the parties that control the territory. There are not even attempts to shoot down.

[Professor]

Quote: Ramzaj99

Well, probably a warring country already by ear can easily determine an air raid. Even if they shot back very far, you can still hear.

No, not heard. Planning bombs drop dozens of kilometers from the target. The media is not heard. Drones are by definition low noise. They cannot be heard at high altitude.

Quote: Ramzaj99

And the damage from the warhead of the drone’s ammunition and the penetration of the Raman will also distinguish between the deaf-mute, the painfully different weight categories.

For instance? Do warhead and warhead bombs have different physical principles?

Quote: novobranets

The cruise missile disappears, it leaves a lot of body and engine parts after the explosion, many of which are numbered. Easy to track.

This is if she was shot down or did not fly. When hitting the target from the CD, little remains and this "little" had to be found. Have they already searched everything there?

Quote: novobranets

But the dalnyak is quite possible, so as not to leave stone on stone from the jail you need decent ammunition (unless, of course, the prison was not from sticks and ... manure, which is unlikely), and the UAVs do not differ in a solid payload.

This is if the chel was torn off the face of the Earth, and not just destroyed.

[Ramzaj99]

Quote: professor

For instance? Do warhead and warhead bombs have different physical principles?

A drone warhead is a maximum of tens of kilograms of explosives, and a missile defense is hundreds. There is a difference?)

[Professor]

Quote: Ramzaj99

Quote: professor

For instance? Do warhead and warhead bombs have different physical principles?

A drone warhead is a maximum of tens of kilograms of explosives, and a missile defense is hundreds. There is a difference?)

It depends on which CD.

[novobranets]

Quote: professor

were these drones, and not say long-range bombers or KR?

The cruise missile disappears, it leaves a lot of body and engine parts after the explosion, many of which are numbered. Easy to track. But the dalnyak is quite possible, so as not to leave stone in stone from the jail, decent ammunition is needed (unless, of course, the prison was not out of sticks ... of manure, which is unlikely), and UAVs do not differ in solid payload.

[rotmistr60]

SOHR (Syrian Observatory for Human Rights)

No questions. Those who actively supported the fakes of the "White Helmets", hates the legitimate Syrian government, broadcasting from the London basement only what is beneficial to the British special services will hardly tell the truth. This is strange

the attack was carried out by American drones or UAVs of another state that is part of the so-called American coalition

which does not fit, as they say, with the "editorial policy" of this organization.

[maidan.izrailovich]

which does not fit, as they say, with the "editorial policy" of this organization.

Or maybe they specially voiced the truth. So that later it’s easier to lie.

[Siberia 75]

Quote: rotmistr60

which does not fit, as they say, with the "editorial policy" of this organization.

SOHR (Syrian Observatory for Human Rights) is a venal animal without honor and conscience, and such creatures smell when it is necessary to betray the former owners. It is evident that they felt something.

[bouncyhunter]

Gene!

Quote: rotmistr60

does not fit at all, as they say, with the "editorial policy" of this organization

Very fit: they presented mattresses and others like them fighters with ISIS.
But in fact, all the barmaley were taken out of prison and only then they kicked at her.

[cost]

According to the London-based SOHR (Syrian Observatory for Human Rights), the UAV of the Western coalition operating under the leadership of the United States was hit.
The report said that as a result of the strike, the prison building was completely destroyed. Information on
SOHR writes that the prison held Islamic State militants and civilians. According to human rights activists, torture was used during interrogations of inmates at Al-Maasara prison.

For this request, SOHR would not have to look for a new rental apartment

[bouncyhunter]

Quote: Rich

For this request, SOHR would not have to look for a new rental apartment

What for ? The name will change.
Dima

[cost]

Happy, Pasha
Create a new account? Nick change or avatar

[knn54]

Do not be surprised if the "prisoners" end up in Libya. In the parts of the PNS.
And "someone". ONCE AGAIN, I used the UAV in conditions close to combat.

[Tarasios]

mdia, drones are becoming an increasingly formidable force ... And to launch many models, airfields are not needed at all, at best a mobile launch platform. So - stealth and surprise. The ideal weapon of terrorists. I don’t think that around the nuclear power plants or chemical plants there are air defense systems that can work on such small goals :(

[kolkulon]

Yes, the United States wanted to spit on the fact that someone could tell something.

[Professor]

If this is true, then it can be assumed that the strike was a kind of attempt to “cover the tracks” - to liquidate those Ishilovites and other prisoners in Al-Ma'assar who could tell about the contacts of American intelligence services - similar to those that showed themselves in Iraq, after which Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi appeared “born”, declaring himself the leader of ISIS *.

That is, when the Russian Federation destroys the Ishilovites, then it sweeps tracks?

Who is the author of this "article"?

[Volodin]

first

Quote: professor

Who is the author of this "article"?

VO News Department
Second

Quote: professor

That is, when the Russian Federation destroys the Ishilovites, then it sweeps tracks?

Give an example when the Russian Federation bombed prisons с prisoners in them igilovtsev. Your smiley eloquently reveals the essence of your question

[Professor]

Quote: Volodin

first
Quote: professor
Who is the author of this "article"?

VO News Department

The "newsroom" is not the author. This opus has a specific author.

Quote: Volodin

Give an example when the Russian Federation bombed prisons with Ishilov’s prisoners. Your smiley eloquently reveals the essence of your question

Every time the Russian Federation destroys the Ishilovites, it sweeps tracks. So according to the logic of the author.

[Pessimist22]

Either the Yankees or their vassals are Jews.

[Dynamic systems]

New 9/11 on a small scale? And what kind of big eyes the "observatory" has ...

[igorlvov]

amnesty has come

[Miron]

Could try to hide traces of torture and murder of our