SOHR: Unknown drones bomb a prison in northern Syria


Syria receives reports of a strange incident in the north of the country. The notorious organization SOHR (Syrian Observatory for Human Rights) claims the activity of unknown unmanned aerial vehicles in the north of the country.


The materials of the said structure stated that unknown drone attackers attacked Al-Ma'asara prison in the northern part of Aleppo province. The prison is located in the area of ​​the village of Aazaz. For some time, it was controlled by Kurdish armed groups and the US military. According to publications in the Arab press, it contained the militants of the ISIS terrorist organization (* banned in the Russian Federation). Until now (for several months) the prison was under the control of the armed contingent of Turkey. The building is almost completely destroyed.

Who could bomb the prison with the terrorists left there?



According to SOHR, the attack was carried out by American drones or UAVs of another state that is part of the so-called American coalition.

If this is true, then it can be assumed that the strike was a kind of attempt to “cover the tracks” - to liquidate those Ishilovites and other prisoners in Al-Ma'assar who could tell about the contacts of American intelligence services - similar to those that showed themselves in Iraq, after which Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi appeared “born”, declaring himself the leader of ISIS *.

SOHR has its own point of view on this subject. It looks as follows: prisoners were tortured in prison, and therefore decided to hide these facts.

It must be recalled that for several days the same “human rights observatory” issued material about an alleged fight between US and Russian military personnel in northern Syria. The Russian Ministry of Defense called this material fake (false).
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

33 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Thrifty 29 December 2019 07: 22 New
    • 6
    • 3
    +3
    To bomb a building is not to destroy the terrorists who are there. Most likely, they bombed so that the Ishilovites could escape from prison!
    1. maidan.izrailovich 29 December 2019 07: 37 New
      • 2
      • 3
      -1
      To bomb a building is not to destroy the terrorists who are there. Most likely, they bombed so that the Ishilovites could escape from prison!

      While there is no accurate information, then any version has a place to be.
      I will support the SOHR version.
      It could be the Americans. They have the richest experience in using shock drones. A possible goal is the destruction of the barmalei. Perhaps among the prisoners there are (were) those who know a lot. They used drones, not military aircraft for privacy reasons.
      1. Professor 29 December 2019 07: 59 New
        • 11
        • 3
        +8
        Quote: maidan.izrailovich
        They used drones, not military aircraft for privacy reasons.

        I wonder how this organization was able to find out the type of aircraft with which this sanatorium was attacked? request
        1. Rostislav 29 December 2019 08: 57 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          So this is a pocket shout. This whole “laboratory” is one man found in London. More clarifications are required, where did he get the info from?
          1. Shurik70 29 December 2019 10: 11 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            If the area is controlled by the Turks, you should wait for the OFFICIAL message of the Turks.
            And do not discuss the message of the fake agency.
        2. Thrall 29 December 2019 08: 59 New
          • 3
          • 1
          +2
          Quote: Thrifty
          To bomb a building is not to destroy the terrorists who are there. Most likely, they bombed so that the Ishilovites could escape from prison!

          Yeah, considering that this, for example, is a solitary confinement in a Turkish Igilov prison smile
          1. rich 29 December 2019 09: 29 New
            • 3
            • 1
            +2
            According to the latest data, 8 people died. it is very likely that it is the Turks themselves who are sweeping the traces of their "work" with prisoners. They threw a couple of grenades at the cameras and dumped them on drones.
            1. Paranoid50 29 December 2019 09: 50 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Quote: Rich
              They threw a couple of grenades at the cameras and dumped them on drones.

              Well, apparently, their grenades are not weak fellow :
              The building is almost completely destroyed.
        3. Ramzaj99 29 December 2019 09: 03 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          Quote: Professor
          I wonder how this organization was able to find out the type of aircraft with which this sanatorium was attacked?

          But why actually ?? Only two countries can work there with shock drones. USA and Israel. And that’s it !! Or did the Turks bomb the prison which they themselves guard ??)))
          1. Professor 29 December 2019 09: 20 New
            • 6
            • 2
            +4
            Quote: Ramzaj99
            Quote: Professor
            I wonder how this organization was able to find out the type of aircraft with which this sanatorium was attacked?

            But why actually ?? Only two countries can work there with shock drones. USA and Israel. And that’s it !! Or did the Turks bomb the prison which they themselves guard ??)))

            How did they know that these were drones, and not say long-range bombers or KR?
            1. Ramzaj99 29 December 2019 09: 53 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Quote: Professor
              How did they know that these were drones, and not say long-range bombers or KR?

              Well, probably a warring country already by ear can easily determine an air raid. Even if they shot back very far, you can still hear.
              And the damage from the warhead of the drone’s ammunition and the penetration of the Raman will also distinguish between the deaf-mute, the painfully different weight categories.
              1. bessmertniy 29 December 2019 10: 28 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                It is strange that these unidentified drones do not go astray. If they cannot be identified, then in principle they can be knocked down by any of the parties that control the territory. There are not even attempts to shoot down. request
              2. Professor 29 December 2019 11: 16 New
                • 5
                • 1
                +4
                Quote: Ramzaj99
                Well, probably a warring country already by ear can easily determine an air raid. Even if they shot back very far, you can still hear.

                No, not heard. Planning bombs drop dozens of kilometers from the target. The media is not heard. Drones are by definition low noise. They cannot be heard at high altitude.

                Quote: Ramzaj99
                And the damage from the warhead of the drone’s ammunition and the penetration of the Raman will also distinguish between the deaf-mute, the painfully different weight categories.

                For instance? Do warhead and warhead bombs have different physical principles?

                Quote: novobranets
                The cruise missile disappears, it leaves a lot of body and engine parts after the explosion, many of which are numbered. Easy to track.

                This is if she was shot down or did not reach. When hit by a target from the Kyrgyz Republic, little remains and this "little" had to be found. Have they already searched everything there?

                Quote: novobranets
                But the dalnyak is quite possible, so as not to leave stone on stone from the jail you need decent ammunition (unless, of course, the prison was not from sticks and ... manure, which is unlikely), and the UAVs do not differ in a solid payload.

                This is if the chel was torn off the face of the Earth, and not just destroyed.
                1. Ramzaj99 29 December 2019 12: 19 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Quote: Professor
                  For instance? Do warhead and warhead bombs have different physical principles?

                  A drone warhead is a maximum of tens of kilograms of explosives, and a missile defense is hundreds. There is a difference?)
                  1. Professor 29 December 2019 13: 24 New
                    • 3
                    • 1
                    +2
                    Quote: Ramzaj99
                    Quote: Professor
                    For instance? Do warhead and warhead bombs have different physical principles?

                    A drone warhead is a maximum of tens of kilograms of explosives, and a missile defense is hundreds. There is a difference?)

                    It depends on which CD.
            2. novobranets 29 December 2019 10: 46 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Quote: Professor
              were these drones, and not say long-range bombers or KR?

              The cruise missile disappears, it leaves a lot of body and engine parts after the explosion, many of which are numbered. Easy to track. But the dalnyak is quite possible, so as not to leave stone in stone from the jail, decent ammunition is needed (unless, of course, the prison was not out of sticks repeat ... of manure, which is unlikely), and UAVs do not differ in solid payload.
  2. rotmistr60 29 December 2019 07: 32 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    SOHR (Syrian Observatory for Human Rights)
    No questions. Anyone who actively supported the fake "White Helmets", hates the legitimate Syrian government, broadcasts from the London basement only what is beneficial to the British secret services vryatli tell the truth. This is strange
    the attack was carried out by American drones or UAVs of another state that is part of the so-called American coalition
    which completely does not fit, as they say, with the "editorial policy" of this organization.
    1. maidan.izrailovich 29 December 2019 07: 47 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      which completely does not fit, as they say, with the "editorial policy" of this organization.

      Or maybe they specially voiced the truth. So that later it’s easier to lie.
    2. Siberia 75 29 December 2019 07: 50 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      Quote: rotmistr60
      which completely does not fit, as they say, with the "editorial policy" of this organization.

      SOHR (Syrian Observatory for Human Rights) is a venal animal without honor and conscience, and such creatures smell when it is necessary to betray the former owners. It is evident that they felt something.
    3. bouncyhunter 29 December 2019 08: 19 New
      • 4
      • 1
      +3
      Gene! hi
      Quote: rotmistr60
      completely does not fit, as they say, with the "editorial policy" of this organization

      Very fit: they presented mattresses and others like them fighters with ISIS. yes
      But in fact, all the barmaley were taken out of prison and only then they kicked at her.
      1. rich 29 December 2019 09: 23 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        According to the London-based SOHR (Syrian Observatory for Human Rights), the UAV of the Western coalition operating under the leadership of the United States was hit.
        The report said that as a result of the strike, the prison building was completely destroyed. Information on
        SOHR writes that Islamic State militants and civilians were held in this prison. According to human rights activists, torture was used during interrogation of prisoners in Al-Ma'asar prison.

        For this request, SOHR would not have to look for a new rental apartment
        1. bouncyhunter 29 December 2019 09: 26 New
          • 4
          • 0
          +4
          Quote: Rich
          For this request, SOHR would not have to look for a new rental apartment

          What for ? The name will change. wink
          Dima hi
          1. rich 29 December 2019 09: 35 New
            • 3
            • 1
            +2
            Happy, Pasha hi
            Create a new account? Nick change or avatar laughing
      2. knn54 29 December 2019 11: 29 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Do not be surprised if the "prisoners" are in Libya. In parts of the PNS.
        And "someone." ONCE AGAIN, it used UAVs in conditions close to combat.
  3. Tarasios 29 December 2019 07: 57 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    mdia, drones are becoming an increasingly formidable force ... And to launch many models, airfields are not needed at all, at best a mobile launch platform. So - stealth and surprise. The ideal weapon of terrorists. I don’t think that around the nuclear power plants or chemical plants there are air defense systems that can work on such small goals :(
  4. kolkulon 29 December 2019 07: 57 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Yes, the United States wanted to spit on the fact that someone could tell something.
  5. Professor 29 December 2019 07: 57 New
    • 7
    • 8
    -1
    If this is true, then it can be assumed that the strike was a kind of attempt to “cover the tracks” - to liquidate those Ishilovites and other prisoners in Al-Ma'assar who could tell about the contacts of American intelligence services - similar to those that showed themselves in Iraq, after which Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi appeared “born”, declaring himself the leader of ISIS *.

    That is, when the Russian Federation destroys the Ishilovites, then it sweeps tracks? fool

    Who is the author of this "article"?
    1. Volodin 29 December 2019 08: 02 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      first
      Quote: Professor
      Who is the author of this "article"?

      VO News Department
      Second
      Quote: Professor
      That is, when the Russian Federation destroys the Ishilovites, then it sweeps tracks?

      Give an example when the Russian Federation bombed prisons с prisoners in them igilovtsev. Your smiley eloquently reveals the essence of your question
      1. Professor 29 December 2019 09: 19 New
        • 5
        • 5
        0
        Quote: Volodin
        first
        Quote: Professor
        Who is the author of this "article"?

        VO News Department

        The News Department is not an author. This opus has a specific author.

        Quote: Volodin
        Give an example when the Russian Federation bombed prisons with Ishilov’s prisoners. Your smiley eloquently reveals the essence of your question

        Every time the Russian Federation destroys the Ishilovites, it sweeps tracks. So according to the logic of the author.
  6. Pessimist22 29 December 2019 07: 58 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    Either the Yankees or their vassals are Jews.
  7. Dynamic systems 29 December 2019 08: 59 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    New 9/11 on a small scale? And what a big eye at the "observatory" ...
  8. igorlvov 29 December 2019 09: 40 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    amnesty has come
  9. Miron 30 December 2019 12: 49 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    Could try to hide traces of torture and murder of our