The deadlines for completing state tests of the “network-centric” T-90M “Breakthrough” tank are announced

It became known about the final stage of state trials of the Russian tank T-90M "Breakthrough". Information about this with the departmental publication "Red Star" was shared by Alexei Krivoruchko - Deputy Minister of Defense of the country.

According to Alexei Krivoruchko, tests of the T-90M Breakthrough tank are planned to be completed before the end of 2019. Accordingly, after this, upgraded versions of the tanks will begin to enter the troops.

The modernization of the tank touched several directions at once. Firstly, we are talking about an engine whose power exceeds the performance of the previous version of the tank of the T-90 line. Secondly, the tank is equipped with a tower, which has fundamental differences from the serial version. Also, the T-90M “Breakthrough” has a multi-channel sight. It allows the crew to effectively monitor the situation in terms of target detection at any time of the day or night.

Also, the tank is turned, in fact, into a network-centric unit. The T-90M “Breakthrough” implements the principle of real-time data exchange with other combat vehicles that are currently on the battlefield. This allows you to quickly make decisions, tell the crews of other tanks about outgoing threats, and perform joint maneuvers to increase the effectiveness of the battle.

It is noted that the T-90M has a certain kind of community with the T-14 Armata. We are talking about special coatings for the armor of these tanks. It is made in a variant that prevents slipping (we are talking about a rough surface that prevents the slipping of army shoes).

Comments

[knn54]

It is clear that not "Merkava" is ONLY data exchange ...

[Basarev]

What are the Merkavs exchanging?

[brr1]

Matzoi? Or shekels?

[Nick]

Quote: Basarev

What are the Merkavs exchanging?

Notes, via pigeon mail.

[Reklastik]

But high immunity to electromagnetic interference)))

[Nick]

Quote: Reklastik

But high immunity to electromagnetic interference)))

Smiled. Offset

[svp67]

Quote: knn54

It is clear that not "Merkava" is ONLY data exchange ...

Just for the sake of this, making a system is "not worth the trouble". Most likely it will be used in the combat control system of subunits and units ... something like a Combat Information Control System and this in light of the creation of a whole series of robotic equipment, including from old tanks

We are talking about special coatings for the armor of these tanks. It is made in a variant that prevents slipping (we are talking about a rough surface that prevents the slipping of army shoes).

And also it doesn’t glare and does not reflect well on the laser, and if it is also taught by radio waves to absorb and dissipate heat ... there will be no price.

[Paul Siebert]

I remember that in the movie "Tankers" of the mid-30s, enemies (they look like Germans) climb onto the armor of our stuck BT-5.
Their soles of boots do not slip on Russian armor either.
They shout: "Russians, surrender!"
They put the barrel of a rifle into the viewing hole and shoot.
One, two, three ...
The tank commander does not stand up and rumbles in response:
"Give up? There is no such word in Russian!"
And then he takes a sledgehammer and at gunpoint with all the dope - broads!
A German with a black eye flies head over heels from a tank, and a cunning commander pulls a special armored gag by the chain and closes the treacherous hole.
So special equipment from our tankers appeared even then ...

[svp67]

Quote: Paul Siebert

So special equipment from our tankers appeared even then ...

Like their opponents, in the form of a log stuck between the rollers

[Paul Siebert]

Respect, Seryozha! You know our classics!

[Mordvin 3]

Quote: svp67

And also it does not glare and the laser does not reflect well

Probably covered with anti-gravel.

[⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣Geo]

Quote: svp67

Just for the sake of this, making a system is "not worth the trouble". Most likely it will be used in the combat control system of subunits and units ... something like the Combat Information Control System

This is already a question of the nature of the information and the structure of its processing. But the exchange is going on, which is obvious, all the same, only information.

[bk316]

It is clear that not "Merkava" is ONLY data exchange ...

I thought what kind of nonsense I put a minus.
I also thought decided a delicate humor set a plus.

[Thrifty]

Well, there is one general type of reactive armor, the ability to use the same weapon as on the T14. .... there is a lot in common, but "network centricity" in our time is also an opportunity to avoid unnecessary losses on the battlefield. ..

[75 Sergey]

Interestingly, they are network-centric individually or the exchange goes through a single center, i.e. if this switching unit fails, will the network remain?
And on these data exchange channels it is impossible to detect every unit of the network and strike at them?

[Thrifty]

75Sergey - they should sort of integrate all military equipment into a single information field. And about the interception by radio signal, it can be much easier and using a drone to find them!

[75 Sergey]

So I understand the center should not be, i.e. each unit is itself a center, and when connected between them, an information field is obtained that everyone with access uses?
Ammunition can be launched through this channel, the channel can be brought to unity, it doesn’t even need to be detected visually, by the type of missile guidance along the radar beam.

[Svetlana]

Network centricity implies the absence of a center. This means that even two objects can create a "network" for data exchange.
This is just like a home computer network: Two computers create a network in a couple of clicks.

If, from the side, you enter the network and if the network contains GLONAS data, then yes you can hit network objects. The problem is just to enter. Don't get it easy.

[rotkiv04]

In fairness, there are a couple of clicks you can do, the system should be stable in any conditions, but the essence remains the same

[Nick]

Quote: 75Sergey

And on these data exchange channels it is impossible to detect every unit of the network and strike at them?

It is theoretically possible to detect, but firstly, the target is moving, and secondly, something about modulation of frequencies according to a certain algorithm was said there. That is, if the frequency at which data is exchanged is constantly changing, according to an algorithm unknown to enemies, then it is almost impossible to detect sources, due to the inability to tune to their frequency, because she is fickle.

[Aristarkh Lyudvigovich]

Secondly, the tank is equipped with a tower, which has fundamental differences from the serial version.

Yes, it seems that the T-90M has the same T-90 tower, but it was added a box with ammunition and an additional case with mounted armor, but this is the same old tower ....

[PIXY_117]

Do not break the worlds of fermented patriots. For them, the tank shelving in the stern of the tower is an innovative development, what can we say about everything else.

[Aristarkh Lyudvigovich]

I would like to hear arguments from them, but where there. Comparison of the welded tower T-90M with the welded tower T-90A

[Mestny]

Go to yours, Public. To the site for juvenile breeders.

[svp67]

Quote: PIXY_117

This is all you need to know about the majority of the audience of this public.

Well, yes, especially considering that you are from this audience ...

[K-612-O]

Well, she’s not the same if another gun is put

[PIXY_117]

There are no guns from Armata there, even googled for a start.

[svp67]

Quote: PIXY_117

There are no guns from Armata there, even googled for a start.

Now it’s not, but this does not mean that at some point it will appear there, and even as a result of modernization

[⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣Geo]

Quote: Aristarkh Ludwigovich

I would like arguments

Do you want to argue about the integrity of the listed differences? Well, it's pointless to argue here, through the post you write something like: "For me adherence to principles is ...", which will be nothing more than your subjective perception of the term "fundamental differences", about which it is stupid to argue, due to it subjectivity.

[svp67]

Quote: PIXY_117

For them, a tank rack in the stern of the tower

Buck rack in the stern of the tower ??????????? This is where you got this from? Or have you heard a beautiful word and decided to insert it here? What is being poured into this tank?
Here are examples of tank racks:
T-44, fuel tank, rack - for unitary shells

Here is a tank rack for storing and transporting shells and charges for a 125 mm gun

[PIXY_117]

Mat part was pulled up for a start, and then they would interfere in the dispute. And is there a second automatic loader in your dreams? Any questions?

[svp67]

Quote: PIXY_117

Mat part was pulled up for a start, and then they would interfere in the dispute.

What self-critical you are ... Here it is EXPERIENCY to learn the materiel. What you show is not a tank rack, but just an external ammunition.
And do not meddle in those issues that do not understand the word AT ALL

[PIXY_117]

Well, well, well, what is the difference between the rack tank, from what I have given as you say "external ammunition rack"? What's in yours, what's in my case, the BC of the second stage is stored. I repeat the question, what is the difference?

[svp67]

Quote: PIXY_117

Well, well, well, what is the difference between the rack tank, from what I have given as you say "external ammunition rack"?

You do not know how to read, I wrote to you. A tank rack, because it’s called so, on the one hand it’s a LHC, that is, a tank filled with some kind of liquid, in our tanks it’s fuel, in some foreign tanks they pour coolant in them or a special fire extinguishing composition, and on the other hand it’s ammunition rack

Quote: PIXY_117

What is in yours, what in my case is stored second-stage BC.

What and where PERSONALLY you store there, I DO NOT KNOW. But in this case, on the T-90M tank it’s just an ammunition storage unit stored in an external tower feed box. And at any time they can be removed from there and installed by a crazy AZ, with the next modernization of the type of ob.640

Or about. 292

[Dart2027]

Quote: Aristarkh Ludwigovich

Yes, like the T-90M has the same T-90 tower

AND? The article talks about the "stuffing" of the tank, and not about its appearance.

[Boris Chernikov]

I’ll tell you a secret .. the t-90 and t-90A have different towers ..

[svp67]

Quote: Boris Chernikov

I’ll tell you a secret .. the t-90 and t-90A have different towers ..

I’ll tell you more. T-90M has a different tower.

[Boris Chernikov]

Are you talking about a crazy niche with shells? Yes, I know, but in fact it is being redone from the standard T-90A tower

[svp67]

Quote: Boris Chernikov

Are you talking about a crazy niche with shells?

Not only, there are still changes

Quote: Boris Chernikov

Yes, I know, but in fact it is being redone from the standard T-90A tower

You say that they are no longer identical

[Boris Chernikov]

are not identical, this is when it is necessary to produce a completely new tower in the factory, immediately the tower from T-90A is taken as a base, standard and its modernization is carried out

[Svetlana]

The dates for the completion of state tests have been announced .... it is planned to be completed by the end of 2019. Accordingly, after that, the upgraded versions of the tanks will begin to enter the troops.

They MAY begin to enter the troops ONLY if the trials prove successful. By itself, the end of the test does not give a guarantee of entry into the troops.

[Den717]

Well, and the war (global) is not tomorrow. There is a normal process of generating ideas and introducing new technologies.

[Yrec]

So the "reverse unification" of the systems from the T-14 to the T-90, which I spoke about, has gone, if the armored capsule with the crew is also tucked into the T-90, the T-14 will no longer be needed in the troops for the medium term. Although I got excited with the armored capsule

[rotkiv04]

Another prodigy, and Armata bald sunk into oblivion?

[dmmyak40]

Did you personally see the hearse?

[rotkiv04]

Yes, I’m just for Armata

[Mestny]

Why are you understandable.
Only Armata has nothing to do with it.

[Aleks2048]

You are not? Where did you carry it?

[Professor]

We are talking about special coatings for the armor of these tanks. It is made in a variant that prevents slipping (we are talking about a rough surface that prevents the slipping of army shoes).

Shalom Merkava.

PS
Why did they wait for decades and did not do it earlier? Where is the concern for the integrity of the fighters?

[Maki Avellevich]

Yes, the shoes on this cover do not slip, but how many scratched limbs and fates have these surfaces seen ...

[Professor]

Quote: Maki Avellevich

Yes, the shoes on this cover do not slip, but how many scratched limbs and fates have these surfaces seen ...

A better scratched ass than a broken leg, arm, or spine.

The next step is to use Israeli non-combustible coveralls, gloves and masks.

[Maki Avellevich]

Quote: Professor

A better scratched ass than a broken leg, arm, or spine.

No questions. it’s just when the first time I climbed onto the merkava I was very scratched, it was remembered in bright colors. then he ceased to envy the Shireners and said thanks to fate for a place in his own infantry.

[Freedim]

Quote: Professor

A better scratched ass than a broken leg, arm, or spine.

If a fighter blows off such armor with a shock wave of some kind of land mine, then only a helmet will reach the ground :)

[Uncle Izya]

Schyas professor from Shabak rushed surrendered military secret)))

[cat Rusich]

The rough surface attracts dirt. Are there any methods and methods for cleaning the tanks? Commander - won't you torture tankers with cleaning tanks? It’s just interesting how such an "innovation" will manifest itself in the usual part with conscripts.

[Maki Avellevich]

Quote: cat Rusich

A rough surface attracts dirt. Are methods and methods of washing tanks provided?

outside cleaning the tank is not a problem. Try winter to clean the dirt from the shoes inside.
Aghgia have a rest

[mister-red]

I understood correctly - is it Israeli nanotechnology?

[Professor]

Quote: mister-red

I understood correctly - is it Israeli nanotechnology?

nanotechnology?

[PIXY_117]

Quote: Yrec

So the "reverse unification" of the systems from the T-14 to the T-90, which I spoke about, has gone, if the armored capsule with the crew is also tucked into the T-90, the T-14 will no longer be needed in the troops for the medium term. Although I got excited with the armored capsule

What a unification with the T-14, go down from heaven. They have nothing in common, 2 different cars in everything.

[Vadim237]

Unless the ammunition is 125 mm machine guns, the communication system is well and coverage, and the massive entry into the T 14 troops by the end of 2027 will take place - too expensive and complex tank turned out to be almost 300 million rubles per unit. So, the Moscow Region decided to modernize all T 90s, but the appearance of KAZ intercepting grenade launcher shots and ATGMs on them should not be expected.

[Zaurbek]

Ammunition is unlikely ..... until the 2a82 gun is adapted to the T90 ....

[Well done]

To be honest, the word "network-centric" scares me. It seems to me that in the heat of battle, there is no time for network centricity, although I am not a tanker.

[MrFox]

Network centricity is just a fashionable replacement for the usual word "communication network", which implies the rapid exchange of information between each and every one. It is believed that in the presence of a communication network, due to the rapid exchange of intelligence and data on their resources, the effectiveness of the battle increases by about two times. Roughly speaking, one tank goes like two.

Except for tank radio stations, there is no network centricity at all.

[Tavrik]

We like to use the word "network centricity" as a trump card. Usually boiling down to digital radio stations. But this is not a replacement for "communication network". A communication network is essentially a network of radio stations that have the same frequencies, types of signals, anti-jamming codes, etc. physical specifications. You can take a tangent and say into it: "Volga", "Volga", I am "Cutter", I see a tank, we are all finished! "But this is only the basis for a data network.
A data network is a network of routers that can be built into radio stations or be separate devices. These things do not "know" anything about signals-frequencies-codes, but they are "able" to collect IP packets from signals received over different radio and wire channels, "read" their headers and decide what to do with them: or output to their AWPs for processing or relaying to other recipients. To do this, routers create route tables. If the main channel is lost, they switch to other routes. Those. they work with logical characteristics.
Well, the top of the pyramid - AWPs with special software, included in the ACS and allowing you to exchange all kinds of data: commands, cartography, navigation marks, files, etc. Those. something that creates "situational awareness", when information recognized by one "friend" becomes available to everyone, which allows you to choose the best option for the entire unit, in addition, to receive data from, for example, intelligence units, incl. UAV.
Only the presence of all three components - communication networks, PD networks, and automated control systems - makes it possible to talk about network centricity. Everything else is "from the evil one."

[Antidote]

If there is radiation, then you can identify the position, and intercept the signal, drown it. Only for the war with the Papuans, it will not go against a highly developed adversary © (all obkhuyuschee American radio circuits)

[PIXY_117]

Quote: Professor

We are talking about special coatings for the armor of these tanks. It is made in a variant that prevents slipping (we are talking about a rough surface that prevents the slipping of army shoes).

Shalom Merkava.

PS
Why did they wait for decades and did not do it earlier? Where is the concern for the integrity of the fighters?

Expensive. There is nothing to think about comfort.
Women still give birth.

[Mestny]

Are you still here?
Run to your Svidomo.

[Voyager]

This issue has been resolved in Armat's cars with regular solutions. Learn the materiel.

[Elturisto]

In your case, it would be better if women did not give birth at all ...

[Arthur 85]

Yes, slipping a boot, this is a pancake, the most important thing. When I said about special coating, I thought about the reflection of the rangefinder beam, about the eternal non-aging of the metal, and finally, about the magic material that destroys BOPs and cumulative shells.

[TOR2]

Apparently, the work begun back in 2009 is moving forward slowly, but it was precisely then that the task was set to create a remote control system for the tank. Such machines could operate with and without a crew. The use of sectoral antennas will provide a stable connection with the inside of the network into which a group of tanks + a control vehicle are integrated, for example, based on the T-15.

[Vanches]

All the same grill for the crew, only the initials are new

[Vadim237]

Well, in comparison with the previous ones, this protection is much better from second-generation RPG and ATGM rounds from BOPS, but it will not help against anti-tank systems and kamikaze drones, and there are more and more such weapons in the world every year.

[PIXY_117]

Quote: Mestny

Go to yours, Public. To the site for juvenile breeders.

On the topic, say what, or how, apart from hammered stamps about "skakuas", there is nothing to say?

[Protos]

Quote: Basarev

What are the Merkavs exchanging?

Hummus and matzo!
Kosher data exchange channel (images of meat and milk are transmitted at different frequencies)

[Vladimir SHajkin]

Breakthrough is good

[mister-red]

Quote: PIXY_117

Women still give birth.

I hope to know that the phrase is fake? And the fact that repeating fake words is bad manners?

[Zaurbek]

I think that the truth is somewhere in the middle with the tower. 50% of the T90M tanks will be redone from the old T90 during modernization. Will the new and upgraded T90Ms have the same towers? That is the question.