Passenger plane crashed in Kazakhstan


From Kazakhstan, there are reports of the tragedy with the Alma-Ata - Nursultan flight operated by Bek Air. Kazakhstani media report a disaster with a passenger plane, which, according to preliminary data, killed seven people, dozens received injuries and injuries of varying severity. According to the latest data, about 100 people were on board.

Meanwhile, Kazakhstani bloggers and some local media outlets report that there are not dozens of victims, but only six. Among the victims there are children.

It is noted that a passenger plane crashed outside the airport of Alma-Ata during take-off, barely gaining several meters in height. According to other sources, the aircraft could not tear itself away from the runway and broke through a concrete fence. It is stated that the aircraft commander survived.

We are talking about the Fokker 100 aircraft with tail number F1007, serial - 11496. The aircraft can be called new. It began to be operated in 2013. In the reports of Kazakhstani sources, it is noted that the airborne was completely operational, which is reflected in his technical passport.

Photos appeared on the network with a crashed passenger plane made by blogger Denis Krivosheev. Judging by the frames, the plane made a collision with the building. At the same time, the plane turned into a heap of metal, the structure is partially destroyed.


A commission has been formed that finds out the causes of the disaster.
Photos used:
Facebook / Denis Krivosheyev
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

57 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Krasnodar 27 December 2019 06: 25 New
    • 27
    • 0
    +27
    Condolences to the families of the dead, a speedy recovery to the wounded!
    1. Obi-Wan Kenobi 27 December 2019 06: 57 New
      • 5
      • 5
      0
      Condolences to the families of the dead, a speedy recovery to the wounded!

      Join us!
      So you don’t know which is better?
      The location of the airport outside the city, but getting longer and inconvenient.
      Or in a city, like in Tashkent or Alma-Ata, getting faster and easier, but if it’s a disaster, then the consequences are terrible.
      Do you remember in the 90s, it seems in Irkutsk, the An-124 crashed on take-off to houses?
      1. Krasnodar 27 December 2019 07: 49 New
        • 12
        • 0
        +12
        Out of town is better
        1. 75 Sergey 27 December 2019 09: 00 New
          • 6
          • 1
          +5
          Any airport outside the city, sooner or later becomes in the city.
          Now the inhabitants of Mitino, Khimki and etc. They are outraged that planes fly above them, and who is to blame, that houses were built where they should not have been.
          1. Krasnodar 27 December 2019 09: 01 New
            • 10
            • 1
            +9
            I guess, yes. But this is a question of compliance with the rule of law, etc.
      2. Aviator_ 27 December 2019 08: 15 New
        • 6
        • 0
        +6
        With that AN-124, everything was different. He flew to Irkutsk from Vietnam, stood all night with empty tanks (there was no kerosene for immediate refueling), the condensate froze in the tanks, and when the AN was filled up and it took off, this condensate clogged all the fuel filters. Filters, of course, are heated, but this amount of snow is not designed. All 4 engines were cut off. Before the fall, one filter nevertheless melted, and the engine started, but it was too late.
        1. dmmyak40 27 December 2019 09: 22 New
          • 3
          • 1
          +2
          Quote: Simargl
          Quote: loki565
          Moreover, the Fokker 100 is a direct competitor to the superjet.
          Aircraft with this arrangement of engines are no longer produced. Not a competitor. If only the Tu-134 ...

          Are you joking? CRJ engines have such a scheme and are installed /
        2. dmmyak40 27 December 2019 10: 55 New
          • 4
          • 1
          +3
          During Soviet times, the Tu-134 crashed on takeoff. What turned out to be: the side stood for about a day in the parking lot with half-empty tanks with a big minus. In the morning, on assignment, we filled the traffic jams. When inspecting ice or snow on bearing planes, the PIC did not find it; Arctic processing was not carried out.
          During take-off almost immediately after the separation, one of the engines completely failed due to surging.
          During the investigation, it turned out that due to the temperature difference, the wing was very cold and the relatively warm kerosene began to form transparent ice on the wing skin. At the time of the PIC inspection he was not there. By the time of taxiing to the executive start, there was ice. After separation, the ice was torn off and hit in one of the engines with subsequent surging. As it turned out later on the simulation (they used dry peas, by the way), about 100 kg of ice fell into the dvigun!
    2. GKS 2111 27 December 2019 07: 36 New
      • 16
      • 0
      +16

      Sincere condolences to the relatives of the dead ..
  2. Victor_B 27 December 2019 06: 28 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    But what is it? ..
    Some sort of fall this year ...
    Still, the Kazakhs are not strangers to us.
    May God grant fewer victims and victims.
    Although, if the photo is real, then the number will grow steadily ...
    1. Victor_B 27 December 2019 06: 51 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      To my great regret, I am right ... I would be very glad to be a slanderer ...
  3. mark1 27 December 2019 06: 29 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    I join in condolences. And what kind of plane? A type?
    1. K-612-O 27 December 2019 06: 41 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Fokker 100, while they report about 7 dead of 95 people on board.
    2. ilimnoz 27 December 2019 06: 47 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      like Fokker 100
    3. Genry 27 December 2019 07: 34 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: mark1
      And what kind of plane? A type?

  4. Avior 27 December 2019 06: 39 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Someone instead of a holiday, on New Year's Day a tragedy came to the house sad
  5. aszzz888 27 December 2019 06: 51 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    We are talking about a plane with tail number F1007, serial - 11496.
    Condolences to the relatives of the victims. And whenever possible it is necessary to give MORE information regarding the aircraft itself, in particular the type or name of the company.
  6. aszzz888 27 December 2019 06: 54 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    From MK infa:
    As it was later specified in the Committee on Emergency Situations of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Kazakhstan, a passenger plane crashed after flying from Alma-Ata in the residential sector.

    "When a passenger plane taking off flight Almaty - Nur-Sultan" of Bek Air there was a fall in the residential sector, - informed in the department.
  7. loki565 27 December 2019 07: 06 New
    • 5
    • 2
    +3
    I join in condolences. Why is there no brand of airplane in the article? As a dry superjet crashed, it was inserted through each line and everybody was happy about the plane, but now it’s silent.
    1. K-612-O 27 December 2019 07: 11 New
      • 9
      • 0
      +9
      Fokker 100 airplane, the last one released in the 97th year, before the takeover by Airbass. But here you are right about our planes, the wave of feces rises immediately.
      1. loki565 27 December 2019 07: 20 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Fokker 100 airplane, the last one released in the 97th year, before the takeover by Airbass. But here you are right about our planes, the wave of feces rises immediately.

        Moreover, the Fokker 100 is a direct competitor to the superjet.
        1. Simargl 27 December 2019 07: 57 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          Quote: loki565
          Moreover, the Fokker 100 is a direct competitor to the superjet.
          Aircraft with this arrangement of engines are no longer produced. Not a competitor. If only the Tu-134 ...
          1. loki565 27 December 2019 08: 06 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Since it is still being exploited, it means a competitor, they could buy SSJ instead
            1. Simargl 27 December 2019 08: 37 New
              • 0
              • 2
              -2
              Quote: loki565
              instead they could buy SSJ
              Eh ... no. If you need a new one, you need to look among the new ones. They are not competitors. Absolutely.
  8. Pecheneg 27 December 2019 07: 07 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    Imanda Bolsyn.
    1. aszzz888 27 December 2019 07: 28 New
      • 8
      • 0
      +8
      Pecheneg (Beck) Today, 07:07 AM
      0
      Imanda Bolsyn.

      What is translated into Russian - Let it find peace in the next world!
    2. Semurg 27 December 2019 07: 32 New
      • 8
      • 0
      +8
      Quote: Pecheneg
      Imanda Bolsyn.

      Imanda Bolsyn
      1. rich 27 December 2019 09: 48 New
        • 7
        • 0
        +7
        Great sorrow. Condolences
  9. Vladimir_2U 27 December 2019 07: 20 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    "At the same time, the plane turned into a heap of metal, the structure is partially destroyed."As we have in Buryatia, the disaster with the An-24, only it rolled out during landing. Uncontrolled construction of all rubbish, greetings from the 90s bloc. Condolences. (((
  10. Errr 27 December 2019 08: 15 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    This article is surprising in this article:
    The plane can be called new. It began to be operated in 2013.
    Actually, the last Fokker 100 was released in 1997 ...
    1. AlexVas44 27 December 2019 08: 32 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Herrr
      Actually, the last Fokker 100 was released in 1997 ...

      So it is. Maybe he has been with the company since 2013.
      "The plane crashed in Alma-Ata was 23 years old, according to the Flightradar24 web service, which allows you to monitor the position of aircraft"
      "A preliminary cause of the disaster is the Fokker engine failure."
      https://59.ru/text/incidents/66421819/
      1. Errr 27 December 2019 08: 37 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Perhaps the way it is, as you described. Only after all, the plane is still no longer new, although, apparently, it is one of the last ones released.
    2. K-612-O 27 December 2019 09: 44 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      A plane cannot be new, not old. Flying or unfit.
  11. Barmaleyka 27 December 2019 09: 10 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    some kind of strange disaster, a lot of survivors to fall from 800 meters during take-off, there was no fire
    1. brr1 27 December 2019 09: 56 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Quote: Barmaleyka
      some kind of strange disaster, a lot of survivors to fall from 800 meters during take-off, there was no fire

      He did not even come off the ground, or came off, but literally a few meters.
      1. Barmaleyka 27 December 2019 10: 09 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        Quote: brr1
        He didn’t even take off the earth

        Who told you such nonsense?

        about 1 km from the runway of the Red Field
        1. brr1 27 December 2019 11: 49 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          They didn’t tell me stupidity, try connecting other sources of information, look at the map you posted yourself and measure the distance from the edge of the runway to the place of collision.
          1. Barmaleyka 27 December 2019 12: 05 New
            • 0
            • 1
            -1
            firstly, I know this territory as a child there they were tying magnesium from old planes
            secondly, I brought you data from radars
            thirdly, from 800 meters to km on the map
            1. brr1 27 December 2019 12: 18 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              There is now a lot of eyewitness accounts pop up, so everyone says that he took off from the ground and immediately began technical problems, and he could not fly away, he could not get far, not gain height. Immediately after the separation, he began to fall and go right to the right.
              1. Barmaleyka 27 December 2019 12: 19 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Quote: brr1
                do not gain height

                again, see radar data
                1. brr1 27 December 2019 12: 28 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Well, this is not entirely from the radar, this is information from the aircraft. In the picture, the maximum height is 2200ft ??????, at such a distance as he so quickly gained such height, afterburner?
                  1. Barmaleyka 27 December 2019 13: 39 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    the plane took off, it’s a fact, it fell well not in a kilometer but 600 meters from the take-off point, what does it change?
                2. brr1 27 December 2019 13: 13 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Quote: Barmaleyka
                  Quote: brr1
                  do not gain height

                  again, see radar data

                  https://www.nur.kz/1833864-razbivsijsa-v-almaty-samolet-dvazdy-zacepil-hvostom-vpp-pered-vzletom.html
                  1. Barmaleyka 27 December 2019 13: 40 New
                    • 0
                    • 1
                    -1
                    caught with a tail twice so what? !!!!!
                    1. brr1 27 December 2019 13: 41 New
                      • 0
                      • 0
                      0
                      The fact that your radar is faulty
      2. Barmaleyka 27 December 2019 10: 17 New
        • 0
        • 1
        -1
        the plane fell into three parts
    2. Mavrikiy 27 December 2019 10: 48 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Barmaleyka
      some kind of strange disaster, a lot of survivors to fall from 800 meters during take-off, there was no fire

      Did you plan? Yes, surprisingly, fell and fell apart without a flash. He was refueled for the flight, five tons of kerosene.
      VIKI: In general, there were 16 disasters with Fokker, 183 people died. Relatively safe aircraft.
      1. Barmaleyka 27 December 2019 11: 21 New
        • 0
        • 1
        -1
        Quote: Mavrikiy
        Did you plan?

        what?
        Quote: Mavrikiy
        In general, with Fokker there were 16 disasters

        so they were released with a gulkin nose
        1. Mavrikiy 27 December 2019 11: 44 New
          • 0
          • 1
          -1
          hi Not what, but who. The plane descended from 800 m without diving. Managed was, it seems, without engines.
          Released 283, 1 disaster in a combat situation. 5% for 30 years.
          1. Barmaleyka 27 December 2019 12: 06 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: Mavrikiy
            Released 283, 1 disaster in a combat situation. 5% for 30 years.

            20 serious during operations 3 including this one in the Republic of Kazakhstan
          2. Barmaleyka 27 December 2019 12: 10 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: Mavrikiy
            Plane descended from 800 m

            in 10-20 seconds, it's almost free fall
          3. Barmaleyka 27 December 2019 12: 17 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: Mavrikiy
            Not what, but who.

            Who?!
            1. Mavrikiy 27 December 2019 21: 14 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Quote: Barmaleyka
              Quote: Mavrikiy
              Not what, but who.

              Who?!

              repeat Well, the plane. The plane is a living creature, you entrust your life to a stone? request
      2. Barmaleyka 27 December 2019 12: 05 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Mavrikiy
        Relatively safe aircraft.

        on 283 issued aircraft 20 serious accidents
        1. Mavrikiy 27 December 2019 12: 14 New
          • 0
          • 1
          -1
          "Yes, I do not agree!" WIKI: KR 1 accident and 1 disaster. There were only 3 "serious disasters" in 30 years of flight.
          1. Barmaleyka 27 December 2019 12: 16 New
            • 1
            • 1
            0
            again
            there were 20, 3 accidents in the Republic of Kazakhstan
            https://mix.tn.kz/mixnews/vzletyi-padeniya-fokker-100-kakie-intsidentyi-proishodili-387541/
  12. marshes 27 December 2019 18: 00 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Imanda Bolsyn.