Nuclear offshore. Are Ukrainian NPPs up for sale?

54

In Kiev, under the windows of the Verkhovna Rada, a gambling scuffle again took place for the right to be called a "rich patriot." “Suddenly and unexpectedly” the agitated crowd curses the nominally new power in betraying the interests of Ukraine and in the sale of land. The fact that this event was exclusively custom-made, there is no doubt even clinical optimists. This is clear, if only for the reason that, in addition to land, hundreds and hundreds of enterprises, including those generating profit, will go under the hammer. However, this fact is in the shadow of media drilling.

At the same time, the sale of some enterprises preparing for privatization threatens to immerse Ukrainians in the darkness of the Middle Ages. And this is by no means an exaggeration. Indeed, in the package for sale are Ternopoleloblenergo, Cherkasyoblenergo, Zaporizhiaoblenergo, Odessaoblenergo, Kharkivoblenergo, Khmelnitskoblenergo, Turboatom and even Energoatom, which manages the entire Soviet atomic legacy. And, most interestingly, the ringing of bells on the sale from that side was heard for a long time.



Poroshenko and the first steps


2014 year. Ukraine is in drug euphoria from the solemn “Maidan” and at the same time it is agonizing from the Crimea, which has gone forever and has taken the defense of Donbass. In general, the average person is extremely busy with the picture on the TV screen and periodic patriotic chants, which are heard outside the window.

Taking advantage of an extremely convenient situation, the new comprador power, led by Petro Poroshenko, began a new round of privatization. "New" for the reason that the sweeping privatization spit before the "Maidan" went well on state assets. They started famously, however, in this they were not alone. Continued in the same vein.

On August 22, 2014, the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine introduced bill No. 4541a to BP. This document provided for the partial privatization of thousands of state enterprises in Ukraine. These enterprises included Turboatom (production of turbines for nuclear power plants, thermal power plants, hydroelectric power stations, etc.), Lviv Armored Plant, Kharkov Armored Plant, and even the Ukrainian Energoatom, i.e. operator of all nuclear power plants in the country, except for Chernobyl. However, the last tragic nuclear power plant, oddly enough, was also put up for auction, as it were, in a separate lot. Privatization involved the redemption by private individuals of not more than 40% of shares minus one share.

The piquancy of the situation was that Poroshenko’s cabinet of ministers, ready to open the sale of such iconic and once-advanced enterprises, stood for preserving in state orbit such companies as Naftogaz, Ukrtransgaz, Ukrgazvydobuvannya and Ukrspetstransgaz. Apparently, gas for the new authorities is something like a totem fetish ...

But it was the first ball, trial. In 2015, part of the enterprises subject to privatization was nevertheless deleted from the list, including Energoatom. But so simply the leaders of the "Maidan" did not want to retreat. Not for the same reason they made a "revolution".

Nuclear offshore. Are Ukrainian NPPs up for sale?

Already in 2016, they began to discuss the issue of corporatization of Energoatom, i.e. turning it into a joint stock company. At the same time, the head of Energoatom Yuriy Nedashkovsky played a significant role in lobbying the first step towards the privatization of Ukraine’s nuclear industry. He argued that the industry, falling apart before our eyes, instantly overwhelmed by a wave of investment. Yuri left his post only in November of this year, i.e. already under Zelensky.

On the eve of the coming of the "Ze"


At the end of 2018, when the rating of Poroshenko catastrophically dived to the bottom, the restless Cabinet of Ministers again published a list of enterprises that needed to be immediately put on the market. The list was impressive: Zaporizhiaoblenergo, Ternopolpoblenergo, Kharkivoblenergo, Khmelnitskoblenergo, Nikolaevoblenergo, Kherson TPP, Dneprovskaya TPP, United Mining Engineering Company Minenergougol, etc.

And again, Turboatom was on the list for sale. At the same time, the long-suffering Turboatom, the former Kharkov Turbogenerator Plant, does not hang a weight on the neck of the state, but generates income even in a state of economic and industrial crisis in Ukraine. Where does such a manic desire of Ukrainian officials to get rid of Turboatom come from? The question is, indeed, a rhetorical one.

But have you really forgotten about Energoatom? Not at all. The pace of corporatization has only been increased. The number of lobbyists for this idea has increased. At the same time at the highest level. The Energy and Coal Industry Minister Vladimir Demchishin himself spoke in favor of privatizing Energoatom with all his hands. His successor, Igor Nasalik, continued the course towards corporatization. Moreover, a full audit of Energoatom assets has already been conducted. And the old rhetoric about the inviolability of the state block of shares of 60% was quickly changed. And now we are talking about a package in the best case of 50% plus one share.

Meet the new boss, the same as the old


And Zelensky came to power. Using the groundless hopes of the layman, Vladimir Alexandrovich switched to a “turbo mode” for the implementation of all the same software installations of Peter Alekseevich. And, of course, in the "turbo mode" the question began to be solved not only about the corporatization of Energoatom, but also about creating the optimal environment for attracting "investors", or rather, potential buyers.


Zelensky in Pripyat on the background of the infamous Ferris wheel

Already in November of this year, President of Ukraine Zelensky signed Decree No. 837/2019. It provides for corporatization by December 31, 2020, i.e. the issue is resolved. Moreover, attempts to attract “investors” give a special piquancy to the situation. As you know, the nuclear industry of Ukraine is in a frightening state. The number of emergencies is increasing year by year, the ranks of professional personnel are thinning, and politics is destructively interfering in the process.

So who would venture to invest hundreds of millions of dollars in such an economy? Moreover, against the background of the fact that the debts of energy consumers losing their solvency are growing by leaps and bounds.

Given the situation, a benign investor turns into a hardened businessman who will enrich himself with all his strength and at the same time bankrupt the country's nuclear industry in order to transfer Euro-oriented Ukraine to purchase electricity in the West. The main thing is that the corporatization of the atom opens such a wide window of opportunity that it is scary to imagine in Ukrainian realities. Is there even the slightest guarantee that Ukraine, being weapons offshore, does not turn into an offshore nuclear with all the ensuing consequences?

There is no answer to all these questions. At the moment, there is not even a clear answer to the question of which particular block of shares may go to private individuals.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

54 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
  2. +2
    26 December 2019 15: 14
    The current "Ze-vlada" will continue the course of "Po-Vlada", the goal of the whole "razderbaneniya" destruction of the industry previously associated with Russia.
    1. +11
      26 December 2019 16: 31
      Quote: svp67
      The current "Ze-vlada" will continue the course of "Po-Vlada", the goal of the whole "razderbaneniya" destruction of the industry previously associated with Russia.

      Sergey. hi
      Remember Russia in the 90s! The same "razderbanivanie" and destruction of industry. Scenario one.
      The Russian government approved a plan for privatizing federal property for the next three years. This was reported on December 25 in the press service of the Cabinet.
      On October 23, the Accounts Chamber of Russia supported the privatization plan. The draft new program involves the sale of part of the state-owned RusHydro, Sovcomflot, Transneft, Rostelecom, Rossetei and OZK shares until 2022.
      On December 16, Izvestia announced that companies such as Dom.RF, Russian Post, Rosgeology, Zarubezhneft, Sheremetyevo Airport and several others could also enter the privatization plan.

      https://iz.ru/958214/2019-12-25/pravitelstvo-rossii-odobrilo-plan-privatizatcii-na-2020-2022-gody
      1. +3
        26 December 2019 18: 46
        Quote: kapitan92
        Remember Russia in the 90s! The same "razderbanivanie" and destruction of industry. Scenario one.

        No doubt about it. And we are also waiting for if we again "sell for bananas"
        1. +4
          26 December 2019 22: 40
          Quote: svp67
          No doubt about it. And we are also waiting for if we again "sell for bananas"

          The privatization is planned by the government of the "God-chosen", Who will ask us? Bananas in the past, and now "palm oil" is held in high esteem. hi
          1. +3
            27 December 2019 07: 11
            That, yes.
            Volodin with palm oil steers.
            He will make a noise with whom it is necessary for a congregation and will contribute to the supply of palm oil to Russia for airplanes.
            Look how the duck has gone, you see, it’s profitable and safe to mock the Russians under Fofkin’s wing, after all, it’s Allah himself, in Kadyrov’s interpretation.
      2. +7
        27 December 2019 01: 46
        Quote: kapitan92
        . The draft new program involves the sale of part of the state-owned RusHydro, Sovcomflot, Transneft, Rostelecom, Rossetei and OZK shares until 2022.

        RusHydro should be privatized, they were completely completely overwhelmed in state-owned companies (like Millers, Sechins, Chemezovs) - statecapitalists, but under the guise of the FSO, FSB, Ministry of Internal Affairs, for our taxes

        Shareholders as of June 30, 2018: Federal Property Management Agency (60,6%), VTB Bank (13,3%), Aviatrans LLC (6,1%, owned by VSMPO-Avisma) Capitalization - 266,3 billion rubles.
        Yes, RusHydro is a VIC, but it is not a state company, it is a screen for a state company, in fact.

        Sovcomflot:
        On April 23.04.2018, 8, the Dorogomilovsky Court of Moscow issued a verdict in absentia in the case of embezzlement of 12 billion rubles. from funds of OAO Sovkomflot. Former general director of the company Dmitry Skarga, ex-president of Novoship OJSC Tagir Izmailov and entrepreneur Yuri Nikitin were found guilty of organizing a criminal community and participation in it, numerous episodes of embezzlement and legalization of criminal proceeds and received 11, 15 and 2006 years in prison, respectively. Since all the defendants have been on the international wanted list since XNUMX, but live in the UK after the entry into force of the sentence will be sent for execution to this country.

        State-owned company?

        And so on, let's recall Miller’s last New Year’s gift of $ 3 billion
        (he will not pay, I will pay, and the same boobies electorate like me)
        2019 for a population of 6279.83 rub / 1000m ^ 3
        2010 for the population in my opinion 2650 rub / 1000m ^ 3 (you need to raise a receipt, everything is cleared on the Internet)

        how much% growth? and how much% of annual inflation does Frau Sahipzadovna hang us?

        Dom.RF-CHO?
        The Central Bank announced the completion of the rehabilitation of the black hole - Bank Dom.RF. Former Russian capital has been sanitized for ten years and the cost of saving the bank cost the state 164,4 billion rubles. Of course, there was no point in sanitizing the bank for that kind of money.

        read here

        Russian Post ... Yes, we all remember how Dimon (who is not Dimon at all, because it is not Dimon) graduated in 2016 (sixteenth !!! The ruble collapsed 3a too much, the country is deep in opera)
        The head of the loss-making enterprise at the end of the year became the owner of a premium of 95 million rubles
        .

        yeah and the postman’s aunts, receiving 7500-12000 rubles each

        Is it a state? Yes, do not care private owner or state. Han astronomer will not pay himself so much if the enterprise is unprofitable, he will not have enough tugriks for the next year, for work

        Sheremetyevo airport belay
        The largest shareholder of the airport is the company Sheremetyevo Holding: it owns 66% of the shares. Sheremetyevo Holding is 100% owned by the Cypriot TPS Avia Holding. TPS Avia Holding is 65,22% owned by the trust of the Ponomarenko and Alexander Skorobogatko families and 34,78% by Arkady Rotenberg. In addition, the Federal Property Management Agency owns a 30,43% stake in Sheremetyevo.
        ...
        What is there to privatize?
        Captain,captain smile- ... What kind of information do you use?
        It is said by smart people:

        Quote: kapitan92
        Remember Russia of the 90s!

        Zadolbala this mantra of "the saviors of Rassey"
        What to remember that it was 30 years ago, and even the AP of Russia is lying about the 90s by 50%, this is 100%, because I then lived in my right mind and in my memory.
        1. -1
          27 December 2019 13: 01
          Quote: opus

          Sovcomflot:
          On April 23.04.2018, 8, the Dorogomilovsky Court of Moscow issued a verdict in absentia in the case of embezzlement of 12 billion rubles. from funds of OAO Sovkomflot. Former general director of the company Dmitry Skarga, ex-president of Novoship OJSC Tagir Izmailov and entrepreneur Yuri Nikitin were found guilty of organizing a criminal community and participation in it, numerous episodes of embezzlement and legalization of criminal proceeds and received 11, 15 and 2006 years in prison, respectively. Since all the defendants have been on the international wanted list since XNUMX, and live in the UK, after the entry into force the sentence will be sent for execution to this country.

          State-owned company?

          State-owned company! 100% of the company's shares are owned by the state. (Federal Property Management Agency).
          The deal on the privatization of a stake in Sovcomflot was planned to be carried out in 2019-2020, the new terms are 2020-22.
          The reduction of the state's stake in Sovcomflot to 25% + 1 share is envisaged by the privatization plan. The first stage involved the sale of a 25% stake - 1 share. China's Cosco Shipping was among potential buyers. However, the government would prefer a financial investor, such as the China Silk Road Fund, rather than an industry buyer.

          https://www.vestifinance.ru/articles/124418
          1. 0
            27 December 2019 13: 23
            Quote: kapitan92
            State-owned company! 100% of the company's shares are owned by the state. (Federal Property Management Agency).

            I did not say that it is private!
            Will it be worse if it is privatized, that's the promise.
            I think it will be better, maybe this will not happen
            [quote2] about the theft of 8 billion rubles. from funds of OAO Sovkomflot. Former CEO of the company Dmitry Skarga, [/ quote]

            Quote: kapitan92
            Reducing the state share in Sovcomflot to 25% + 1 share

            well right
    2. +5
      26 December 2019 18: 05
      And they probably have no other choice. Of the 15 power units in Ukraine, 10 should already be written off. They made an extension, but in fact it is fake. It is one thing when the power units are operated in normal mode, repaired and inspected by specialists. And another thing - when the power units do not climb out of repairs. Moreover, the SBU has already stated that repairs are carried out using counterfeit and used parts. And the story of a forgotten swab in the system and constant breakdowns after repairs say that the repair staff is not very professional. For Ukraine, fusing a nuclear power plant for someone may be beneficial. But who will buy it? NPP for decommissioning and in conditions when normal interaction with ROSTATOM is impossible? So, the nuclear power plants will live out their lives in constant breakdowns. True, it is still cheap electricity AND WITH THE DEATH OF A NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, ELECTRICITY WILL GO WHERE MORE EXPENSIVE. But nuclear power is mostly needed by industry. No industry - they will not need a nuclear power station either. Hydroelectric power station and thermal power plant will be enough for an agricultural country. request
      1. +2
        27 December 2019 21: 49
        Quote: g1v2
        And they probably have no other choice.

        to be honest, this is not my competence.
        Ukraine-let him live as he wants, I would have to "equip Russia" in my country.
        And all the problems of Ukrainian NPPs are the problem of Europe, thanks to the wind rose
    3. 0
      30 December 2019 09: 56
      Quote: svp67
      The current "Ze-vlada" will continue the course of "Po-Vlada", the goal of the whole "razderbaneniya" destruction of the industry previously associated with Russia.

      They just repeat our path
  3. +12
    26 December 2019 15: 14
    Only this morning in the news I heard about the fact that the Russian government approved the list of state enterprises, companies, banks, etc., subject to privatization (that is, "for sale") in the next 2020 - something, about 215 ... ... And I am already, I am silent about outsourcing, which is flourishing in all Russian energy companies, and indeed in the Russian economy ... "Ukraine", again, you say? ... well, well .... wink
    1. 0
      26 December 2019 17: 54
      A controlling stake remains with the state. 50 percent plus one share. Privatization consists in the sale of shares. Ukraine is talking about the sale of the stations themselves.
      1. +4
        26 December 2019 22: 10
        Quote: g1v2
        Privatization consists in the sale of shares.

        here it is more cunning ... the controlling stake remains with the state, effective managers set their wages at 90 percent of the profit, and the state covers 90 percent of the costs, as a result, the enterprise, the state and the people are milked, because the services of a "state" enterprise are paid
        1. 0
          27 December 2019 02: 26
          But these state-owned corporations bring so much money to the treasury that they can keep such low taxes for this very people. If they stop bringing this money, then taxes will increase 2 times at least. These are cows that feed this same layman, he just does not understand this. hi
          1. -1
            27 December 2019 07: 58
            Do you mean gas and oil production?wassat
            Quote: g1v2
            These are cows that feed this same layman, he just does not understand this.

            God forbid from such breadwinners! they suck out the last resources and our children will curse us
            1. +1
              27 December 2019 14: 30
              Well, if they grow up fools - maybe they will damn it. But I'm more optimistic about youth. As for the latest resources - this is complete nonsense. In the next couple of decades, the transition from oil and coal to gas will seriously accelerate. Almost all TPPs and CHPPs have already switched to gas. Only coal remained in Siberia and one in the Far East, but there is just coal nearby. There is definitely enough gas for 200-300 years. Most likely by that time they will switch to something else. Tc definitely not worth crying. In the 19th century, the blood of the world economy was coal, in the 20th century - oil, in 21 - gas. At 22- there will be something else. request
              1. -1
                27 December 2019 14: 41
                Quote: g1v2
                There is definitely enough gas for 200-300 years.

                When Moscow was gasified in 1955, gas was led from the Saratov field. Now transported from Yamal. In Yamal, the reserves seem to be larger, but now consumers are Europe, China, Turkey ... Where did you get information about gas reserves? no one gives more than 70 years.
                1. +2
                  27 December 2019 16: 08
                  Information from specialists from our St. Petersburg Mining Institute. Moreover, new deposits are constantly being discovered. Almost all of our production for export is from Yamal. Novatek supplies its liquefied gas from another field, the development of which has been started recently. The power of Siberia is already from a completely new field - Kovyktinsky. Before the contract with China, it was not even developed - there was no need. A little to the north are two more large deposits that have not even begun to be developed. There are still vast reserves in the Arctic on the shelf. Work on the development of new deposits - for another year.
                  200-300 years is a minimum. With an increase in consumption and production. Specialists talk about 300-400 years. But since we cannot accurately predict how much consumption will increase, we will take it to a minimum of 200 years. After 200 years, most likely there will be something else.
                  1. -1
                    28 December 2019 07: 14
                    Quote: g1v2
                    200-300 years is a minimum. With an increase in consumption and production.

                    thanks for the detailed answer + however, this means 200-300 years of oligarchy, the cult of consumption, and the decline of education, scientific progress sad
                  2. -2
                    29 December 2019 13: 08
                    Quote: g1v2
                    Information from specialists from our St. Petersburg Mining Institute.

                    I do not want to offend you in your best feelings for your specialists, but for the last 30 years in science, we have been guarding money from those who have it. I read, analyzed and concluded that under the guise of science, Someone reassures concerned citizens to prevent manifestations of a social explosion. I am very skeptical about your 200-300 years Yes
          2. -1
            29 December 2019 15: 44
            This is in fact not a state corporation, but an ordinary feeder.
    2. +2
      26 December 2019 18: 20
      And, according to the old, Ukrainian tradition, they will sue us for the fact that we built these stations for them ...
  4. 0
    26 December 2019 15: 18
    It becomes scary from such an undertaking, this is already more terrible than "a monkey with a grenade."
    1. 0
      26 December 2019 17: 36
      And what's so bad? We ourselves went through this .. We know, swam .. However, the rider is still going on.
      1. 0
        26 December 2019 17: 47
        Quote: 210ox

        And what's so bad? We ourselves went through this.

        Well, the radiation of borders does not know.
  5. +6
    26 December 2019 15: 35
    Our pipes burst.
    Shhh. It’s better to rejoice that a neighbor’s cat has fallen from the balcony.

    But somewhere, in a parallel universe, people rejoice at their successes, are sad from their failures. And they do not wish harm to anyone just because they stumbled and broke their knee.
    1. +8
      26 December 2019 16: 41
      In-in: it would be better to write how Novorossiysk (a whole city!) Has been sitting without water for several days - the Trinity water supply pipeline has rotted, and the only one ... but in Ukraine, after all, it's much worse, yeah ... well, or would write something "funny" to raise the "New Year mood" of Russians, for example, this:
      "The largest yachts in the world gather in one place during the New Year holidays - off the island of Saint Barthélemy in the Caribbean. This year the yachts docked earlier than usual. By mid-December there were more than 50 large pleasure boats here, and there was no greater increase anywhere in the world. The longest of the yachts - 162,5 meters - belongs to the main owner of Evraz, Roman Abramovich, and is also the largest among the yachts of Russian billionaires.

      Opened by Columbus, Saint-Barthelemy (overseas territory of France) gained popularity among millionaires after David Rockefeller bought a plot of land here in 1957, and descendants of other eminent families like Fords and Rothschilds were already reaching for it.

      Roman Abramovich also has his own villa here: in 2009, he purchased David Rockefeller's villa for $ 90 million.

      The second largest yacht on the island also belongs to the Russian - this is the 140-meter Ocean Victory, the main owner of the MMK, Victor Rashnikov. The third - to American producer David Geffen - 456 feet (138,9 m).

      Many will celebrate Christmas on the island of Antigua and then take part in the New Years celebrations with traditional fireworks at Saint Barth. One of the favorite places among the guests of the island is the Nikki Beach Beach Club. On New Year's Eve, for example, superstar DJ Kygo will perform there. "
      1. +1
        26 December 2019 17: 51
        Quote: Snail N9
        to raise the "New Year mood" of Russians, for example, this:

        Someone doesn’t have enough for a bottle and a piece of black pudding, and someone has another super yacht.
    2. -7
      26 December 2019 17: 00
      In addition to you, no one in the comments called for joy in the neighbors' failures. And in the article not a word of gloating.
      On this resource there are no less critical articles on economic, social and other troubles in Russia than on Ukrainian ones.
      But you, as I understand it, think that until our own problems are resolved all to one, do you need to strictly forbid posting materials about strangers?
  6. 0
    26 December 2019 15: 49
    In time they will come to this, and I suppose.
  7. -3
    26 December 2019 15: 53
    Next time there will be a sale of national interests for a penny
  8. 0
    26 December 2019 15: 57
    What do they want to say with spread fingers in the photo?
  9. +3
    26 December 2019 16: 03
    Private nuclear power plant will be abruptly candle factory. The work of Fyodor’s father lives.
    1. 0
      27 December 2019 02: 09
      Quote: sergo1914
      Private nuclear power plant will be abruptly candle factory. The work of Fyodor’s father lives.

      In the USA, over 70% of generating capacities (approximately 30% belong to the government, municipalities and other organizations) and over 75% of distribution networks are privately owned. RESULT:

      To the topic (send) of the article:
      Three Mile Island Accident was, Chernobyl was gone, there is no sense in comparing these accidents
      Local government owns in
      Austria (100% of networks and 85% of generation), Canada (main networks - 99%, generation and distribution networks - 80% each) and the Netherlands (100% of networks and 85% of generation). In Norway, the state owns about 30% of generating capacities and 75% of main networks, in Sweden 100% of main networks, half of generating capacities and distribution networks.
      To the topic (message) of the article: Private traders own the generation = no problems

      Electricity completely privatized Great Britain, Japan (about 15% of generating capacities are concentrated in the ownership of end consumers) and Belgium (5% of generating capacities are in the ownership of municipalities and end consumers, and approximately 20% of distribution networks are in municipal ownership).
      To the topic (send) of the article: / Japan and Fukushima let us down, but, again, it was not Chernobyl at all /
      in our country, a private trader owns Nornickel (one) and the second owns all aluminum, and some who own all steel.
      What kind of a "backwater"
      Shl.
      It was planned that 49% in the project company "Akkuyu Nuclear" Rosatom will sell Turkish private investors, retaining 51%. In June 2017, a term sheet agreement was signed with three private Turkish companies - Cengiz Holding, Kolin Insaat and Kalyon Insaat, which were supposed to receive 49%.
      1. 0
        1 January 2020 10: 53
        Japan and Fukushima gave up, yes, but again it was not Chernobyl at all / ....... of course it wasn’t Chernobyl, the Chernobyl accident was eliminated in six months, and Fukushima still pours tens of tons per second of radioactive ... well, how 9 years have passed, and things are still there, why do you think why did Yapi so tear the topic of smoking and Sakhalin, but because there’s nothing to eat, there’s an interesting map
  10. +12
    26 December 2019 16: 25
    ... For the rest of the post-Soviet space, we don’t worry how much we worry about Ukraine .. Yes, the small-town bourgeoisie spread rot there ... They try to fill their pockets ... We have quite the opposite, our bourgeois carry everything and carry their money to the treasury to make life easier for the people .. They support free medical facilities for their money, build schools, pay huge amounts of money out of their pocket to state employees, raise space, how much they invested in the construction of the cosmodrome, etc ... laughing
    1. -1
      27 December 2019 11: 49
      for their money contain free medical ....---- for your loved ones,
      build schools----- for your children,
      pay extra huge bucks from your pocket .....--- This is you, dear Alexey, bully hinting at bribes, corruption? laughing
  11. +4
    26 December 2019 19: 26
    This is not the first time that the author for his turbine propaganda articles uses topics in which, to put it mildly, he does not understand much. This time, a “scary topic” in the form of “corporatization” of Energoatom caught my eye. ”According to the author,“ attempts to attract investors ”should give the process a special horror.
    To begin with, we will understand what corporatization is.
    Corporatization is the transformation of state-owned enterprises and closed joint-stock companies in which more than 75% of the statutory fund is owned by the state into a corporation.
    What is a corporation? A corporation is a legal form of business. The result of corporatization of state enterprises is the creation of a state corporation, i.e. corporations in which a controlling stake is retained by the state. The form is determined by the legislation of a particular country. In relation to Ukraine, it is a joint-stock company in which the state retains a controlling stake.
    A classic example is the Kalashnikov concern. 51% of the concern's shares belong to the state, 49% - to private investors.
    Or "Russian Helicopters". 87,5% of the shares are held by the state, 12,5% ​​by Mubadala from the Emirates. Last year, a 49% stake in RT-Khimkompozit was put up for sale. These are all defense enterprises included in Rostec.
    Therefore, the author's forecasts about the arrival of "hardened businessmen" in order to bankrupt the nuclear industry of Ukraine and transfer it to the supply of electricity from Europe look, how to say it, is unwise, or something.
    Europe today is intensely "greening" and plans to liquidate nuclear power plants and thermal power plants on coal. Why does Europe need to supply Ukraine with electricity?
    Well, the phrase "The main thing is that the corporatization of the atom opens up such a wide window of opportunities that it is scary to imagine in Ukrainian realities." Here is a man in the street who presented the Ukrainian "organized atom". must, obviously, scream in horror and run to the closet for a gas mask.
    Such agitation has the exact opposite effect. Does the author really not understand this?
  12. +2
    26 December 2019 20: 23
    They say that out of nothing a woman can create a salad, hat and scandal.
    But, as it turned out, with due skill, an article can be made out of nothing.
    For if the question is in the title
    . Nuclear offshore. Are Ukrainian NPPs up for sale?

    It is clear and simple to answer- No, Ukrainian nuclear power plants are not for sale.
    That article does not work.
    But if heaps of all kinds of statements, add horrors like
    As you know, the nuclear industry of Ukraine is in a frightening state. The number of emergencies is increasing year by year, the ranks of professional personnel are thinning, and politics is destructively interfering in the process.

    And do not bother yourself with any figures or facts, but confine yourself to the killer and irresistible argument "as you know," and at the same time mix everything into an unimaginable mess, then you can sprinkle an article, you can’t understand anything from it.
    But the article, here it is, ready!
    Let the reader himself finish, who is in what much, just business ....
    hi
  13. +4
    26 December 2019 20: 25
    In the 80s in Ukraine there were 19 enterprises and research institutes of the Ministry of Radio Industry. More than 90 thousand specialists worked there. These were the enterprises of my GU and 4 GU. All enterprises were liquidated.
  14. 0
    26 December 2019 21: 47
    And I disagree, Germany is killing its nuclear power plants, and even the "green" Gretta muddies the waters, it is easier for them to buy electricity from abroad, although Ukraine has greatly spoiled its nuclear power plants with purchases of American TVELs, but apparently they tried to adjust the base for privatization.
    Something not one reactor did not shandarah, probably adapted.
    1. 0
      1 January 2020 11: 14
      American fuel rods, ... correctly print not fuel rods but fuel assemblies (heat-absorbing assemblies), Westinghouse fuel assemblies have higher fuel purification, therefore reactivity is higher and WWR-500 reactors simply do not have time to respond to heat generation, therefore emergency stops to Ukrainian nuclear power plants this is the norm, just think about it, the Zaparozh NPP out of 6 units stopped for technical emergency repairs 5 times, emergency situations separately for the units for a hundred cases ....
      . Something not one reactor did not shandarahnul, probably adapted ........ yeah, well. pour aviation gas into the VAZ 2101 and you will see what will happen in twenty seconds, a guaranteed fist of friendship
      1. 0
        1 January 2020 16: 35
        In the 131st flooded, pulls shitty, but nothing, then went.
        1. +1
          1 January 2020 17: 23
          In the 131st flooded, pulls shitty, but nothing, I traveled .... yeah, after replacing the engines
  15. 0
    26 December 2019 23: 13
    The Ukrainian authorities and groups of fascist youths controlling their behavior are not only sick with hatred for us - they are very sick with it. Loss in the struggle for territory sharply intensified the disease, giving hatred a special glow, which removes any suspicion of the naturalness of this product. And, as you know, the West greatly appreciates natural products, the demand is stable, even if it is a disease. Apparently, hatred for us is all that Ukraine is going to live on after the sale of the country's body.
  16. +3
    26 December 2019 23: 56
    We are not much better. Read government plans for Privatization for 2020.
  17. 0
    27 December 2019 09: 01
    Under capitalism, there is only one scenario: what we have in Russia, what in Ukraine, what in England is the nationalization of unprofitable enterprises with the transfer of debts to taxpayers and the privatization of profitable ones with the transfer of profits to new owners. Do you think that unprofitable enterprises are being privatized in Russia? Only Ukraine is needed for noise, whatever we hear about our own.
  18. -1
    27 December 2019 13: 47
    One gets the impression that Ukraine is an African country where, with a wave of the hand, they harvest three times a year, bananas and dates, figs and coconuts just grow. All this can be chewed, eaten, and you will not be able to die of hunger with all the desire. Or is it some kind of Baltic "tiger", where all the specialists are counted, from artists to plumbers, and every Briton, Frenchman or German has their business card with contact numbers and addresses. Or do programmers and IT specialists live in Ukraine, as in Singapore or Hong Kong, serving computers and networks around the world?
    But this is all good, let them live as they know. But the nuclear power plant is not only Ukrainian business. Where is the IAEA looking, for example? Or should we expect soon sanctions against Russia from this organization for "the unsatisfactory state of Ukrainian nuclear power plants"? With sports passed, why the same cannot go through with nuclear energy, and it will finally be possible, to the joy of all "progressive mankind", to expel Russians from the market for building new nuclear power plants, enriching uranium, generating electricity, scientific research in the field of the atomic nucleus, medical research with use of atomic technologies, etc.
    Is it really so difficult to understand in the government that this is an offensive against our country on all fronts (another in succession, like the Nazis near Moscow in 1941)? In the end, we must counterattack, do something, even in the absence of a blizzard on the street and snow on the ground and to the accompaniment of well-known music "Everything is fine, beautiful marquise, and we are doing well!" , "but men don't know"?
    1. 0
      29 December 2019 08: 32
      This is surprising. Power units are repaired almost monthly, and the IAEA is silent. Apparently there is an order from the USA ...
  19. -1
    27 December 2019 15: 40
    Nevertheless, Ukraine is a merry country. Something new to further destroy the country will always come up.
  20. -1
    28 December 2019 19: 28
    Experiments will continue with deliveries of Westinghouse fuel assemblies to Ukrainian NPPs, which are actually similar to TVEL products, but differing in quality for the worse, which has already led to the premise of accidents at a number of Ukrainian power units. So it will be fun for everyone. To us too
  21. 0
    29 December 2019 08: 29
    I feel that they will give us raguli to the Stockholm arbitration and demand that they repair the nuclear power plants and give them fuel rods for free. Well, what? With a gas ride, though. Due to the dire economic situation ...
  22. 0
    4 January 2020 16: 42
    These are USSR assets for sale. Good buy, Soviet people, you stayed with a nose.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"