"Rosatom" called the timing of the receipt of three nuclear icebreakers "Leader"

The first nuclear icebreaker of the new project 10510 "Leader" will go into operation in 2027. In total, the Rosatom corporation will receive three icebreakers of this project by 2033, Zvezda reports.

The newest Russian icebreakers of the project 10510 Leader will be designed for year-round escort of large-capacity cargo ships along the Northern Sea Route. The construction of all three vessels will be carried out at the Far Eastern shipbuilding complex Zvezda. Russian President Vladimir Putin gave his consent to determine Zvezda as the executor of the order for the construction of nuclear powered ships.

As Deputy Prime Minister Yuri Borisov said earlier, the construction of icebreakers will be carried out in cooperation with Russian shipbuilders, including the Baltic Shipyard, where universal project 22220 icebreakers are being built today. The subcontractors will manufacture individual components and assemblies. The issue of financing the construction of icebreakers has already been resolved; ships will be built at the expense of Rosneft.

It is assumed that the construction of the first icebreaker "Leader" will begin in 2020.

According to the project, the total displacement of the Leader will be 71,4 thousand tons with a length of 209 meters, a width of 47,7 meters and a height of 20,3 meters. The ship will receive two RITM-400 nuclear reactors with a capacity of 120 megawatts on propellers and a thermal capacity of 315 megawatts each.

According to estimates, the Leader icebreaker will be able to reach speeds of up to 24 knots in clean water and up to 12 knots on ice up to 2 meters thick. The maximum overcome ice thickness is 4 meters. The service life of such an icebreaker is designed for 40 years. The crew is 127 people. The autonomy of the icebreaker in terms of provisions will be 8 months.

The technical project for the atomic icebreaker of project 10510 was released in 2017, the developer is Iceberg Central Design Bureau (Petersburg).

Comments

[Advisor to the Council of Advisers]

The Leader project is very necessary and timely. Rosatom is a serious structure.
I would like to meet the deadlines without any adventures.

[NEXUS]

Quote: Advisor to the Council of Advisors

I would like to meet the deadlines without any adventures.

Stay tuned, do not even be surprised if ahead of schedule. These are living profits for our nouveau riche. That is why we are building new icebreakers as people, and destroyers and cruisers, like the Papuans of New Guinea (I'm talking about timing and financing). There, the money then goes smoothly to the construction of icebreakers, unlike shipyards, where ships are built for our navy.

[Stirbjorn]

Quote: NEXUS

Stay tuned, do not even be surprised if ahead of schedule. These are living profits for our nouveau riche. That is why we are building new icebreakers as people, and destroyers and cruisers, like the Papuans of New Guinea (I'm talking about timing and financing).

The Arctic was supposed to be commissioned two years ago. The production of nuclear-powered icebreakers is complex, funding alone is not enough, hands are needed and competent management. And with this, the nouveau riche is bad, only the budget can be cut according to plan

[Advisor to the Council of Advisers]

Do you have something against Rosatom? I can still understand for a tooth, for example - against Roscosmos.
Serious people are working in Rosatom. My respect to all these people.

[maidan.izrailovich]

Stay tuned, do not even be surprised if ahead of schedule.

Not a fact.
The plant was built in the Union for the repair of nuclear submarines. And spawn did not build anything meaningful. The production now being created is experiencing an acute shortage of specialized personnel. Particularly acute problem with housing.

[Dikson]

The Chinese will obviously build .. Under the roof of the Star .. There is no experience in building such ships except the Baltic people in any country .. So, after launching, they will be distilled along the NSR to the Baltic Sea to install reactors .. Something like that ..

[K-612-O]

Or maybe the North Koreans ?! Did Likhachev personally tell you this? You don’t know how Rosatom works, for this project it is planned to train almost 1,5 personnel for Zvezda together with the Balt.zavod only, the entire production cycle will go to the Far East. And the star only laid the Arc6 tanker, 68 thousand tons displacement, do not worry, there will be another platform for Arctic ships, and there you will see conversations about the continuation of atomic lighters.

[Dikson]

Conversations can and will go .. And there will certainly be projects. An example of Norilsk Nickel is that the fleet itself built for its own needs .. But the catch is that there were already steamers needed by the country .. And they sailed safely abroad .. in due time .. Nuclear ships of course will not sail away .. But I don't really believe in the "full cycle" .. Reactors are still not a set of frames and not an assembly of a rudder stock ..

[Dikson]

Can Koreans .. just not northern, but southern .. Why are you so excited? We are talking about the availability of specialists .. To compose such a steamer is not a river-sea trough to be welded from roofing iron ... Here, real specialists also need technologies. If there were such ones on the Far East, the Pacific Pacific Fleet would not be in a rather poor state .. It’s not even about atomic operating time, but about high-quality welding of the hull kit .. Well, that gave work to the enterprise, it means there will be development. Or do you not like Chinese shipbuilding, at their pace? Are you racist?

[maidan.izrailovich]

The Chinese will build obviously ..

The USC went the other way. Yes, the Chinese are also involved. But for the construction of shipyard facilities. For the construction of ships directly, experts from other shipyards are involved. On a business trip and on temporary contracts. Parallel recruited young people learn from them. Naturally, the process of educating one's staff is not long. Therefore, it is surprising that such a significant project for the country is given to this plant.

[Piramidon]

Quote: maidan.izrailovich

Therefore, it is surprising that such a significant project for the country is given to this plant.

And who else? The rest of the shipyards that are able to build this are already loaded with orders for many years.

[cherkas.oe]

It seems to me that the speed of icebreaker construction will directly depend on the growth rate of the profitability of the NSR. And nothing more. If our hucksters see that the same Chinese, Japanese, Indians, Europeans and all the rest of the "progressive" marketing are not in a hurry to move along the NSR, then they will invest in the construction of "Leaders" out of hand, and this will not be quick.

[maidan.izrailovich]

It seems to me that the speed of construction of icebreakers will directly depend on the growth rate of profitability of the NSR. And nothing more.

Foreign policy fuss around the Arctic and the ambitions of some countries also affect icebreaker construction speed.

[Lone gunman]

As for the "Leader", the Russians do something, but they know how to build icebreakers, they will build all three and on time, despite the sanctions "from hell", you see, then the "hellish" sanctions themselves will be driven ...

[Lord of the Sith]

Serious plans for the Arctic, and rightly so. Everything is ours, along the Lomonosov Ridge.
For this, icebreakers are needed.

[Piramidon]

Rosatom plans to get three nuclear icebreakers "Leader" Until 2033 year

Eh, it's a pity I won't live, apparently (all the same, I changed my eighth decade). And I would very much like to see how all these "contenders" to our part of the Arctic will be driven from there with cca rags.

[Vadim237]

They are needed primarily by Russia, as a means of year-round operation of the Northern Sea Route.

[Nikolay87]

The newest Russian icebreakers of Project 10510 "Leader" will be designed for year-round pilotage of large-capacity cargo ships along the Northern Sea Route.

why is Rosatom responsible for this?

[Brturin]

probably because a law has been adopted (No. 525-FZ) under which Rosatom is responsible for the NSR (is its infrastructure operator)
The development of the infrastructure of the Northern Sea Route, including the development of the infrastructure of seaports located on the coast of the water area of ​​the Northern Sea Route, is carried out by the State Atomic Energy Corporation "Rosatom" in accordance with the plan for the development of the infrastructure of the Northern Sea Route, which is being developed by the State Atomic Energy Corporation "Rosatom" agreement with the federal executive body in the field of transport and approved by the Government of the Russian Federation.
The federal executive body authorized by the Government of the Russian Federation, in agreement with the State Atomic Energy Corporation "Rosatom", approves: 1) rules for icebreaker assistance of ships in the water area of ​​the Northern Sea Route; 2) rules for ice pilotage of ships in the water area of ​​the Northern Sea Route; 3) rules for escorting ships along routes in the water area of ​​the Northern Sea Route; 4) regulations on hydrometeorological support of navigation of ships in the water area of ​​the Northern Sea Route. ";

[Nikolay87]

Quote: BrTurin

probably because a law has been adopted (No. 525-FZ) under which Rosatom is responsible for the NSR (is its infrastructure operator)

Clear. So all the commercial benefits from using the SVP will go to Rosatom’s profit.

[Piramidon]

Quote: Nikolay87

why is Rosatom responsible for this?

Does anyone else have such icebreakers?

[Sergey Valov]

Because everything related to nuclear energy is very tightly controlled by the state.

[K-612-O]

Because no one except us operates nuclear icebreakers or develops its "heart" and turbines.

[Igor Borisov_2]

It’s sad that we can build such icebreakers, and "The United Shipbuilding Corporation (USC) can design and build in another 1,5-2 years a Russian pipe-laying vessel capable of carrying out such work as laying the Nord Stream 3 gas pipeline in 4-2 years," said the head of the corporation, Alexei Rakhmanov. So they stuck to a dead end because of ALLSEAS .....

[lev1759]

Korea will build a super-spreader for us. Infa from a person in
Gazprom ...

[Mityay65]

And why now a "super-manager"?
Offshore pipelines were built: Blue Stream, 2 Turkish Streams, 2 Nordic Streams, the last largest in the world.
Are new submarine pipelines planned yet? No, nothing else is planned, there is already redundancy of pipeline transport to Europe, all pipes will go to China by land. Export is planned to increase due to LNG.
Now the "super manager" is not needed.

[Brturin]

Quote: Mityai65

Are new submarine pipelines planned yet?

But maybe it comes to the Shtokman field, and there Murmansk ...

[lev1759]

Now the "super manager" is not needed.

It is necessary.
1) Nord Stream - 3
2) South Stream (through Bulgaria so that the Turks do not show off a lot)
3) Via Sakhalin to Japan
This is so offhand ...

[Cetron]

To lay a couple of large pipes from Abkhazia to the Crimea and run their mountain rivers, which uselessly merge into the sea, for the needs of Crimeans. The outskirts would have strangled themselves.

[Marconi41]

Quote: Mityai65

Are new submarine pipelines planned yet?

The plans, in fact, are huge! There is a project for Japan, there is a SP-3. And in the north of our country there are also projects. Wait and see.

[Mityay65]

Yeah, I remembered that there is still a project, or rather an idea, of building a gas pipeline from Sakhalin to Japan. But the Japanese do not yet agree.

[lev1759]

But the Japanese do not yet agree.

The key word here is YET ... The Chinas didn’t want to either until they locked it.

[Amateur]

The construction of all three vessels will be carried out at the Zvezda shipbuilding complex in the Far East.

Such ships have never been built there. There are no specialists or technologies. Are they going to build before the "carrot plots"?

[kapitan281271]

71,4 thousand tons of displacement, there is no mistake, "Nimitz" if I'm not mistaken 75 and 127 people, there are 5 thousand, and what space will everyone be occupied with, if there are people who are knowledgeable, it would be interesting, in more detail

[Vladimir_2U]

Quote: kapitan281271

Nimitz "if I'm not mistaken 75

You are wrong, "Nimitz" is about 100 kilotons.

[Alexy]

The VLCC crew of about 25 people and nothing, somehow cope

[Dimka75]

Also doubt the data. The width of the lkdokol in the article is stated as 48 m, and the height is 20 m. I can't even imagine this "basin". Somewhere there is a mistake.

[cniza]

A clear error in height, it seems to be the height of the side.

[Dikson]

Do you know why the USSR failed to implement this idea? Because cargo ships, ro-ro ships, tankers and ore carriers turned out to be wider than our super-strong nuclear-powered ships of that time .. The Arctic beats a canal in the ice6 and a dry cargo ship does not "fit" into it .. I had to go through each section TWICE, expanding the canal .. And this - time .. And the ice moves, the channel is compressed ... Therefore, a series of wider, shallow-draft Finnish-built diesel-electric ships appeared .. Then the Taimyr and Vaigach nuclear-powered ships appeared .. that's why icebreakers flat like frying pans are needed on the NSR .. because the paradox! -Our atomic icebreakers could not navigate our nuclear-powered ship "Sevmorput" along the Northern Sea Route, because it is wider amidships! ... these are the kittens ...

[Hog]

An icebreaker needs a large mass to overcome thick ice (full displacement also implies ballast water taken on board).

[Yuyuka]

possible for dual use - for the transport of "containers"

[Robertocalos]

Zircon will not be in UVP?)

[Nuclear_winter]

As far as I understand, the community has split into two opposite camps, one is needed, the other does not need a "Leader".
I wish I could hear all the pros and cons.

[Brturin]

Quote: K-612-O

And the star only laid the tanker Arc6,

The maximum length of the tanker will be 257 meters, width - 34 meters. But they are followed by Arc7 gas carriers. Larger vessels are more profitable. If at first they wrote about the width of 50 m, then - "Besides, the new ship may be a little narrower than the old one - 46 m wide instead of 50 m." Then they fixed it "44 meters wide instead of 46 meters." The size of one vessel determines the size of the other.

[bk316]

RHYTHM-400

Two rhythms of 400 is some kind of overkill ....
25 km / h on ice is something fantastic ...
I understand correctly that neither in the Russian Federation nor in the USSR have ships of such tonnage been built before?

[K-612-O]

Never and no one. The New Arctic is the largest and most powerful icebreaker ever built.

[Dikson]

Well, again, depending on the ice ... it’s not just the thickness. The perennial ice pack has a completely different structure than usual .. It's like comparing ordinary piece of iron with damask steel ..

[cniza]

"Rosatom" called the timing of the receipt of three nuclear icebreakers "Leader"

A very symbolic and speaking project name ...

[Xenofont]

It is curious, but USC, following the example of sworn partners, is creating special training centers for training specialists, bearing in mind the number of ships and submarines planned for launching in the coming years? Or whoever gets involved in the construction?

[Falcon5555]

Strange design. I wonder if it will need to be towed, for example, to the port to the pier or from the port, as is usually done with large ships, how the tugs will feed it to the tank? If his engine fails in the ocean, how will the tug take him in tow if there is nothing to cling to? Towing backwards? And the storm? How from the dock he or he will feed the mooring lines from the bow to the dock? What will they be tied to on his nose? If there is no tank as such? And a person will not be able to get out there, and there is nothing to tie the cable to? From my sofa it seems to me that the "tanks" of the ships are not for beauty, but they are needed for these and all sorts of other purposes. For example, so that you can simply walk along the deck to the side on the bow, hang down, and see what is down there, already under the side or close on the course - an iceberg, a polar bear, a man on an ice floe, a hole in the hull, a rock, you never know what yet. Avant-garde design, but something has not been thought out. Probably not the sailors who drew it, and not the engineers, but "effective managers" or "lawyers". Another strange moment is the huge pipe at the atomic icebreaker.

[Dikson]

So this is a model! With such a design, it’s very convenient to run it in the pools .. And a huge pipe - in order to draw a flag on it.

[prodi]

it also seems that the height, weight and volume of the bow should be much larger, and the underwater part of the front quarter of the body, much narrower

[Marconi41]

Quote: Falcon5555

If there is no tank, as such?

Everything is there, just a little lower. This is done to combat freezing. Norway has long been building that way. And our border guards also have such a scheme on new ships. Do not worry.

[region58]

Quote: Marconi41

Norway has been building this way for a long time

Think it seems?

And with the fact that the picture in the initial stage will be something like this:

Or maybe like this:

[Dikson]

I just wanted to write - a poor boatswain with a deck crew .. under this lid on the tank it will constantly blow tons of snow .. and ice .. but will it be necessary to chip and throw it overboard through small payols? )))

[Marconi41]

You yourself posted a photo of Norway. Look carefully at her. All tank entrances are closed. There are no rails and bulwarks on top, as well as rigging parts. It will freeze, but not critical.

[Old26]

Quote: Falcon5555

Strange design. I wonder if it will need to be towed, for example, to the port to the pier or from the port, as is usually done with large ships, how the tugs will feed it to the tank? If his engine fails in the ocean, how will the tug take him in tow if there is nothing to cling to? Towing backwards? And the storm? How from the dock he or he will feed the mooring lines from the bow to the dock? What will they be tied to on his nose? If there is no tank as such? And a person will not be able to get out there, and there is nothing to tie the cable to? From my sofa it seems to me that the "tanks" of the ships are not for beauty, but they are needed for these and all sorts of other purposes. For example, so that you can simply walk along the deck to the side on the bow, hang down, and see what is down there, already under the side or close on the course - an iceberg, a polar bear, a man on an ice floe, a hole in the hull, a rock, you never know what yet. Avant-garde design, but something has not been thought out. Probably not the sailors who drew it, and not the engineers, but "effective managers" or "lawyers". Another strange moment is the huge pipe at the atomic icebreaker.

Well, this is a model, not a finished ship. Therefore, there are no "holes" on it and everything else ...

[awg75]

That the very funny USA will unambiguously announce the sanctions of the Northern Sea Route and it will be the same as with the Nord Stream 2. We will be all in shit, but with a funny face. Until we answer, we are doomed.

[Dikson]

What are the sanctions on the NSR? What are you speaking about? In the place of our powers that be, the most correct move would be to shut up the Suez Canal .. And then everyone will rush to pay money for ice pipelines through the NSR .. for it will become much shorter ..) Until then, all the squeals about free passage in our Arctic - This is a shot with an eye on other people's oil and gas production platforms and developments practically under our nose.

[awg75]

and the sanctions are very very simple. anyone who takes advantage of the sanctions and seizure of accounts in the Western world. and believe me no one will go, even ours.

[Connor MacLeod]

Before building icebreakers, it would be nice to begin to find out whether the Northern Sea Route will actually be in demand - for this you need to establish contact with large sea carriers such as Maersk, MSC, CMA-CGM, Hapag-Lloyd and find out if they are interested or not. In theory, they should be interested if the way to Europe through the Arctic is two times shorter. Although there are difficulties with this route ...

[dauria]

First, find out whether the Northern Sea Route will actually be in demand

Spit on commerce. Yes, there a year passes in less than a week through
Suez or Panama. But for transferring from Pacific Fleet to North and vice versa so as not to repeat this in case of need -

[Connor MacLeod]

If the "case of need" means a hypothetical conflict with the United States, then the Americans will do their best to block the Bering Strait.

[dauria]

then the Americans will do everything to block the Bering Strait.

I'm afraid if it comes to this, the strait will be from California to the statue of liberty, and polar bears will walk along the ice of the Panama Canal in an embrace with penguins ..

[DMB-2020]

Wow, and a great time awaits us! New nuclear icebreakers simultaneously with the landing on Mars and bases on the Moon, against the backdrop of nuclear aircraft carriers with a super-heavy "Angara" and hundreds of Superjets, and even an elevator to the Moon! It is a pity that only waste from Germany will be able to start recycling already in 2080, but we can hold out and tighten our belts, the main thing is to have a good mood.

[ultra]

Well, one-time, feel better?

[DMB-2020]

Why did you decide this, darned?

[A fruit]

What a handsome man !!
I wish they were quick to see, and next to the Arctic)))))

[Archivist Vasya]

The ship is interesting, but the nose is clearly spoiled - How can you stand on it leaning against the railing with arms outstretched and admiring breaking ice ?!

[samaravega]

The decision to build these ships in the Far East is at best stupid, at worst - another stupid multibillion "withdrawal" of funds from our (taxpayers') pockets in favor of "friends", "innocently affected by the sanctions."
First: the plant in Komsomolsk-on-Amur in the period "after Stalin" built EXCLUSIVELY nuclear-powered submarines, KTOF and this plant were unable to provide even competent service for large surface ships, incl. two nuclear-powered cruisers pr. 1144. An example in front of us: located much closer and much better equipped with both personnel and equipment, but focused on the submarine "SevMash" as it thwarted the timing and quality of the rework of "Admiral Gorshkov" (45000 tons), and now disrupts the terms and quality of the repair of "Kuznetsov" (58000 tons) and re-equipment of "Nakhimov" (28000 tons). Well, this niche is not theirs - large surface ships. It is impossible to demand from the service of washing machines a quick and high-quality repair of the TV. After that, plans to build a 71000-ton ATOMIC icebreaker in Komsomolsk-on-Amur (much more than Kuznetsov, by the way) look as real as Rogozin's "bases on the moon". Not to mention the multitude of "minor" technical problems, for example: how can this "kid" be "dragged" along the Amur from the factory to the sea?
Second: the ONLY plant that manufactures nuclear power plants for surface ships and vessels (even combat ones, albeit civilians) is located in St. Petersburg. I propose to place bets: nuclear power plants will be dragged across the country (these are not only reactors and systems for their protection, cooling, etc., it is also steam turbines, steam generators, gearboxes, etc., a lot of complicated, expensive, heavy and bulky equipment that NOBODY IS ABLE to assemble and assemble on site), or will a "boat" of 71000 tons (remember, almost 1,5 times more than "Kuznetsov") will be "taken" from the Far East to St. Petersburg by tugboats? Knowing the desire of our government to "use the funds", I personally put 10000 rubles right now. to the second option.
Conclusion: multibillion-dollar expenses "to nowhere", while in my district polyclinic (1,5 million city, 280 thousand registered residents in the area, excluding visitors from villages and migrants), the endocrinologist was reduced - well, the state does not have 40000 rubles. per month (this is not a doctor's salary, this is a salary + 43% of taxes). I am very happy for "Vova's friend", whose LNG tankers, thanks to new icebreakers, will carry our gas from Sabetta without hindrance at any time of the year (this is where the 21st century is real!) To "decaying Europe" and beyond. But "Gazprom is a national treasure!" Or is the advertisement lying?