Destroyed drones of militants who tried to attack the base "Khmeimim"

74

From Syria, reports have come that Syrian terrorists have once again attempted to carry out an attack on the Russian Air Force base, Khmeimim, located in Latakia province.

Illegal armed groups, according to the Center for Reconciliation of Warring Parties, used Drones. This is not the first time when it comes to the use of UAVs to break through the Khmeimim air defense system.



The militants used unmanned aerial vehicles in the dark. It is noted that Russian air defense systems recorded the approach to the air base of two UAVs. As a result, both drones were destroyed. About exactly what air defense systems were used to destroy the UAV, not reported.

According to a representative of the Center for the Reconciliation of the warring parties, the air base operates as usual: there are no casualties and destruction.
The militants clearly tried to influence the air base and inflict damage. But these plans were ultimately frustrated by Russian troops.

At the moment, the Syrian government army continues active offensive operations in the province of Idlib. It was from the territory of this province of the SAR that the militants most often sent their UAVs to attempt to attack the base of the Russian airborne forces.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    74 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +2
      December 24 2019
      We are waiting for sanctions due to the fact that "they again interfere with selling the world's best models of almost working Patriot air defense systems" wink
    2. +6
      December 24 2019
      The sooner the snake nest Idlib is finished, the faster these attacks by drones at the base will be over.
      1. +9
        December 24 2019
        An amazing feature: as soon as the SAA begins the next phase of the offensive on Idlib, an Israeli strike immediately follows and a swarm of Barmaley’s crafts is pulled up behind it. Therefore, for each phase it is necessary to occupy as much territory as possible.
        1. +2
          December 24 2019
          Quote: Tzar
          Therefore, for each phase it is necessary to occupy as much territory as possible.

          And tough to clean them up, and not to arrange "bus tours" for the barmaley.
        2. +2
          December 24 2019
          Quote: Tzar
          An amazing feature: as soon as the SAA begins the next phase of the offensive on Idlib, an Israeli strike immediately follows and a swarm of Barmaley’s crafts is pulled up behind it. Therefore, for each phase it is necessary to occupy as much territory as possible.
          Idlib is in the Turkish zone of responsibility, but Edik failed to calm down the motley wards and the bearded fired at the adjacent territories. The SAA launched a successful offensive. Worried Erdogan has initiated negotiations on the Idlib issue, which is due to take place in Moscow today. Against this background, two UAVs flew in, were shot down and strengthened our negotiating positions in the sense that they say - "We would be happy, but they are asking for themselves." Thus, the attack will continue.
          1. -1
            December 24 2019
            Quote: Nyrobsky
            Idlib is in the Turkish zone of responsibility
            But the anti-Semites do not care
    3. 0
      December 24 2019
      The militants clearly tried to influence the air base and inflict damage.

      On the one hand, the expenses of BC, on the other hand, the training of calculations and verification of equipment.
      1. -18
        December 24 2019
        In Syria, we repel attacks and fall at home ourselves. I understand that we are not safe from anything but still take anger. The Ministry of Emergencies reported the fall of the SU-57 in the Khabarovsk Territory. God forbid that this was not true, and health pilots.
        1. 0
          December 24 2019
          Quote: Mar. Tira
          The Ministry of Emergencies reported the fall of SU-57 in the Khabarovsk Territory

          Don’t share the source?
        2. +10
          December 24 2019
          Quote: Mar. Tira
          In Syria, we repel attacks and we fall at home ourselves.

          Is it somehow interconnected?
          Or not a "dung-free day"
          At least have a conscience, do not put on one plate your waste and everything else.
        3. +2
          December 24 2019
          Quote: Mar. Tira
          reported the fall of the SU-57 in the Khabarovsk Territory. God forbid that this was not true, and health pilots.

          The pilot is alive (by the way there are two pilotss and it’s not supposed yet) The factory car fell during the tests, but it is annoying.
      2. +2
        December 24 2019
        Quote: rocket757
        On the one hand, expenses

        Well, they were taken for this. Nobody expected that they’ll bring them back
        on the other hand, training calculations and testing equipment.

        At what not at the training ground, but in real combat conditions
        1. +2
          December 24 2019
          great, Seryoz! hi the trouble is that the target is cheaper than the means of destruction, and it can spoil, it’s necessary to hrenak something at the source
          1. +1
            December 24 2019
            Quote: novel xnumx
            great, Seryoz!

            Hi hi
            So when you are attacked, it seems like there is no time to think how to answer. It seems like something came to hand. But they didn’t say what. May knocked out of a slingshot laughing
            And since I think everything is already provided as and how
            Duc like a source sits behind a puddle until we can request No.
            1. +1
              December 24 2019
              wait global goals to set, first on bearded men
              1. +2
                December 24 2019
                Quote: novel xnumx
                wait global goals to set, first on bearded men

                So while there will be sponsors from behind puddles, bearded men will not be transferred
                In one place you will slam, they will immediately appear nearby.
          2. 0
            December 24 2019
            Hello Roman soldier
            Quote: novel xnumx
            the target is cheaper than weapons,

            The option with cheap drones will have to be worked out. After all, this is not only "the weapon of the poor, all sorts of barmaley, it has already been adopted by EVERYONE!"
            It seems like the opposition should be the most "budgetary", but this, so that for sure, while NOBODY can boast! Everything is very rough.
            And there can be a lot of drones, from different directions and with "cover" for electronic warfare equipment!
            So, we will see who and what will achieve in the field of counteracting precisely such an attack.
            1. +3
              December 24 2019
              Hello Vit! and what’s there to think - guns are against this best
              1. 0
                December 24 2019
                Quote: novel xnumx
                guns against this is best

                You have to get there. It is not in vain that the bird is beaten with a small fraction, although it used to be beaten with an arrow with a blunt end ...
                Accuracy is needed, sniper or a continuous cloud of small elements.
                An artillery shell with remote detonation, self-detonation, the thing is not cheap .... it's not a remote tube, as before. We need industry, plants that will produce such ammunition massively and cheaply.
                The Yankees, multi-barrel, has such goals, but very point blank! If the goal has gone aside, it is not a fact that they can bring it down. Those. protect a specific piglet from a convenient angle.
                1. +2
                  December 24 2019
                  Twist, so, a quick-fire gun, there’s practically a cloud of shells
                  1. 0
                    December 24 2019
                    The scattering cone with distance grows, for objective reasons. The smaller the caliber, the stronger the scattering. The ammunition is not sniper, of special purity / accuracy of processing, it is not provided there. You can get into focus, on such a small object as a drone, but a little to the side, the view is uncomfortable, the gusty wind and many other factors .... A ballistic computer improves accuracy, but not absolutely.
                    1. 0
                      December 24 2019
                      For this bastard it would be nice from shotgun bursts! laughing
                      1. 0
                        December 24 2019
                        Quote: Herrr
                        For this bastard it would be nice from shotgun bursts! laughing

                        So multi-barreled gatling, like a card case. A lot of bullets in a short amount of time.
                        Anyway, the distance is very limited.
                        1. 0
                          December 24 2019
                          That's right. At a great distance, the fraction is ineffective. The small fry can be riddled only on approach. But given that the speed of the kamikaze drone is not very high, it can be effectively used by a cloud of buckshot on approaching it, almost at point blank range. Only you need to take her ahead of time to accompany. And fly by, and let him fly. The impossible is still impossible.
                        2. 0
                          December 24 2019
                          Quote: Herrr
                          And fly by, and let him fly.

                          This is while the barmalei are launching cheap drones, serious guys will equip drones seriously too. One must think, do, study, be prepared for any surprises.
                        3. 0
                          December 24 2019
                          Learn, learn and learn military art in a real way. ) But seriously, for serious purposes it is necessary to use serious means. Rockets. There is no time for the economy. The Carapace configuration is very good, but I would add a shotgun to it just in case. Especially for "barmalets". )
                        4. 0
                          December 24 2019
                          The assumption is an anti-aircraft gun with "smart" ammunition.
                          The range is longer, and the effectiveness depends on the "cleverness" (price) of the ammunition.
                          Not a panacea, as an option. After all, we have lasers on the way, so such an option is quite possible.
                          Anyway, this is against a small number of "stupid" drones, if there is a swarm or attack in different directions, heights, intensively maneuvering objects, you need a lot of automated anti-aircraft systems ... although the most reliable, as always, is to extinguish / level the control / launch center all this infection!
                          The quantity can be interrupted only by the quantity or volume of the impact, in some cases.
            2. 0
              December 24 2019
              But the budget option will not work. It's like with pirates - how many ships do not destroy
              no sense.
              It's time to make round eyes - we have nothing to do with it and erase Idlib from the face of the earth.
              1. 0
                December 24 2019
                Quote: saigon
                to erase Idlib from the face of the earth.

                The resources of the Syrian government are limited, and the losses of the most, most, persistent, motivated were great, which they can and do.
                1. 0
                  December 24 2019
                  Actually, we are not talking about Arabs, our answer is our base. It's time to drive into the minds a simple thought, like a pine, - an attack on the base - death.
                  Moreover, with the calculation on all the resources of Tyrnet, he attacked and died with a photo with a pig thigh in his teeth
        2. 0
          December 24 2019
          Greetings Sergey soldier
          Quote: Lipchanin
          Nobody expected that they’ll bring them back

          No questions! This is a real preparation ... just in case of emergency.
          The only question is, what exactly did they "work" with?
          1. +1
            December 24 2019
            Quote: rocket757
            The only question is, what exactly did they "work" with?

            Hi soldier
            Yes, I think that if they could say, they would say.
            They simply did not advertise. Who needs to understand what and how and from whom what to buy
            1. +1
              December 24 2019
              The rules, the secrets of all are similar, this is understandable.
              Empty, unreasonable "advertising" does not lead to anything good.
    4. -3
      December 24 2019
      But what brought down, very interesting.
      1. 0
        December 24 2019
        Quote: Monar
        But what brought down, very interesting.

        Who?
        Those who launched them?
        1. 0
          December 24 2019
          To me. Well, is it possible for the Carapace to bring down an UAV of this size with guns or is it necessary to launch missiles.
          1. +1
            December 24 2019
            can an armor drop an UAV of this size with guns
            why not? low-speed and not very maneuverable target
            1. -2
              December 24 2019
              That's it. On this, questions arise.
              A projectile requires a direct hit. For rocket + - meter is about nothing. The fragments fly further.
              1. 0
                December 24 2019
                Quote: Monar
                For the projectile requires a direct hit

                It depends on which shell.
          2. 0
            December 24 2019
            Quote: Monar
            Well, is it possible for the Carapace to bring down an UAV of this size with guns or is it necessary to launch missiles.

            Why "Pantsir" and not "S-400" at once?
            Fantasy is not enough?
            And what do you think, there are no other means of destruction?
            Well, yes, they forgot to tell EVERYONE how else the air base is protected request
            1. 0
              December 24 2019
              Why "Pantsir" and not "S-400" at once?
              By the fact that for the S-400 goals are different.
              1. 0
                December 24 2019
                Quote: Monar
                By the fact that for the S-400 goals are different.

                So I mean, why "Shell"?
                There are no other means?
                1. 0
                  December 24 2019
                  MANPADS require line of sight, and were shot down at night. From "Kalash" or ZU-23? The same problem. It makes no sense to use more powerful air defense systems. So there is only one option left - "Shell". Moreover, it is precisely for such situations and is intended.
                  1. 0
                    December 24 2019
                    Quote: Monar
                    MANPADS require line of sight, and were shot down at night. From "Kalash" or ZU-23? The same problem. It makes no sense to use more powerful air defense systems. So there is only one option left - "Shell".

                    Didn’t you think about EW tools?
                    Or the word "shot down" rested?
                    1. 0
                      December 24 2019
                      EW is a good thing. But only if there is external drone control. An elementary device based on a micromechanical gyroscope, Arduinka and a shielded case will nullify everything. Accuracy is certainly not the same. But a kilo of TNT with a keel of chopped nails is not a flounder bay.
          3. 0
            December 24 2019
            Quote: Monar
            To me. Well, is it possible for the Carapace to bring down an UAV of this size with guns or is it necessary to launch missiles.

            No one can boast that it can bring down drones in the cheapest way efficiently! Everything is very approximately ... although due to the fragility of the structure, it is enough for her one, successful, hit even with a fragment / bullet.
            1. 0
              December 24 2019
              Quote: rocket757
              No one can boast that they can fly drones in the cheapest way.

              And who will be able to calculate the damage if the drone hits the target?
              In the same "Drying", or in the warehouse?
              And to the barracks?
              1. +1
                December 24 2019
                Yes, even strategic nuclear against one drone. The life of our soldiers is more important.
                This is not the question. And in the efficiency of the work of 30 "Pantsir" for such purposes.
    5. +1
      December 24 2019
      Militants thought they won’t see at night?
      Just like in a joke about flying on the Sun at night.
      1. +2
        December 24 2019
        I think the idea is to not notice the launch site, and not send allaverds there any nito
        1. 0
          December 24 2019
          The desert is nearby. We arrived by car, pulled this homemade product, and dumped. She is on the program and flew. Time for everything about all the minutes. Elementary time is not enough to answer.
        2. 0
          December 24 2019
          How to notice? The drone is programmed for (say) 20 minutes of flight in a circle at the minimum allowable height. Between the dunes. And what is the start place to catch?
      2. 0
        December 24 2019
        Quote: Machete
        Just like in a joke about flying on the Sun at night.

        “Man, what are you looking for under the lantern?”
        - Wallet lost
        - And exactly here?
        - No, but lighter here
    6. -11
      December 24 2019
      The militants clearly tried to influence the air base and inflict damage. But these plans were ultimately frustrated by Russian troops.

      Economic damage the militia still bring. A drone costs about $ 200, and a Shell rocket costs $ 265. About the same as the 000 Porsche Cayenne. Missiles of longer-range systems are even more expensive.
      1. +4
        December 24 2019
        Quote: professor
        Nonetheless, the militias bring economic damage. A drone costs about $ 200, and a Shell rocket costs $ 265. About the same as the 000 Porsche Cayenne.

        It's disgusting to read
        Calculate the "economic damage" if you get such a room where our military lives.
        You are fighting for the corpses of your soldiers, but here our shells count.
        Calculate your costs.
        Or do you upload a video when your military used firearms against people with stones?
        Something there no one considered the damage
        1. -2
          December 24 2019
          Quote: Lipchanin
          It's disgusting to read
          Calculate the "economic damage" if you get such a room where our military lives.
          You are fighting for the corpses of your soldiers, but here our shells count.
          Calculate your costs.

          Schiteam.

          Quote: Lipchanin
          Or do you upload a video when your military used firearms against people with stones?

          Do not lay out. There is no such video.

          Quote: Lipchanin
          Something there no one considered the damage

          I did not consider it since there was no such event.

          Nevertheless, economic damage was inflicted. Whether he is justified or not is a completely different matter.
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. 0
            December 24 2019
            Quote: professor
            Do not lay out. There is no such video.

            Not tired of lying?

            Still lay out how you did not admit the wounded doctors?

            YouTube is clogged with such videos
            1. +1
              December 24 2019
              Quote: Lipchanin
              Quote: professor
              Do not lay out. There is no such video.

              Not tired of lying?

              Still lay out how you did not admit the wounded doctors?

              YouTube is clogged with such videos

              I congratulate you, Mr. You threatened "video to lay out when your military used firearms against people with stones". In the first video, the" brave "Fylystyn girl threateningly waves her fist in front of the soldiers' noses, knowing that no one will touch her with a finger, in the second video the fylystyn is given a pendel. And where is"military against people with stones used fire weapon"?
              1. 0
                December 24 2019
                Forgot when they broke your wall?

                And this

                It seems like they proved here that this is a fake
                1. +1
                  December 24 2019
                  Quote: Lipchanin
                  It seems like they proved here that this is a fake

                  And where did the "military use against people with stones fire weapon"? Well, at least one video? wassat
          3. -2
            December 24 2019
            Quote: professor
            Nevertheless, economic damage was inflicted.

            Economic and political damage would be caused to your masters when their "petriots" missed EVERYTHING in a row
            Drones were used to attack the largest refineries in Saudi Arabia. As a result, on September 14, fires occurred at the Saudi Aramco fields in Abkayk and Khurais.

            https://habr.com/ru/news/t/467469/
            Hello to your uncle and his weapons. Yes
      2. +1
        December 24 2019
        Well, if the economy is pure, then calculate how much it costs to repair damaged Drying. I won’t remind you about people. Not yours.
        By the way, why did you decide that it was hit by a missile and where did you find the price for it?
        1. -1
          December 24 2019
          Quote: Monar
          Well, if the economy is pure, then calculate how much it costs to repair damaged Drying. I won’t remind you about people. Not yours.
          By the way, why did you decide that it was hit by a missile and where did you find the price for it?

          Again. I am not saying that there was no need to intercept. I am not saying that the potential damage would not exceed the price of 2-4 Shell shells. I argue that the event was not free and in this case the militia spent 3 orders of magnitude less than your MO.

          I don’t understand about people. request

          2 drones are 4 rockets. No one would take the risk and let the enemy drones at a distance of a cannon shot. 4 rockets is a lemon of American rubles.
          Calculate how much the Shell rocket costs
          https://www.belrynok.by/2018/05/24/zenitnye-kompleksy-maloj-dalnosti-zashhiti-sebya-sam/
          1. 0
            December 24 2019
            Obdrochentsy.A not militias.
          2. 0
            December 24 2019
            Thank you for the article. It was interesting to read. I will skip many "not confirmed". They don't report to me. As well as the author of the article. Let's just take what is not a military secret. In no time is it in open sources.
            "The essence of which is that the KAMAZ-6560 chassis (like the entire family to which it belongs) was originally created for conventional transport operations for the transportation of goods, and not according to the technical requirements of the military. Therefore, their key requirement was not met - the ability to move the chassis ( and, consequently, air defense missile systems based on them) on all types of roads and terrain. "
            It's in the article. And then the opa-dritsa-obana. Even on the wiki - "heavy off-road chassis introduced in summer 2005"
            Well or - This car with an 8x8 wheel arrangement and a single-pitch tire tire is capable of moving around any kind of road and natural landscape.
            Source: https://trucksreview.ru/kamaz/kamaz-6560-tehnicheskie-harakteristiki.html
            If the author of the article frankly lies even in this, then all the more complete tryndezh in everything else.
            1. 0
              December 24 2019
              I posted a link to compare the prices of the rocket and the drone.

              Quote: Monar
              Well or - This car with an 8x8 wheel arrangement and a single-pitch tire tire is capable of moving around any kind of road and natural landscape.

              Not true. Not by anyone. This is called "off-road".
              1. 0
                December 24 2019
                Thank you for your clarification in terminology. Does this somehow change the open lies of the article?
                1. -1
                  December 24 2019
                  Quote: Monar
                  Thank you for your clarification in terminology. Does this somehow change the open lies of the article?

                  The cost of the Syrian contract was announced in other articles.
                  1. 0
                    December 24 2019
                    Yes. So what? How does the value of the contract relate to Russian rocket prices internally? Only the order is the same.
                    Again, where did you get information about 4 missiles? I haven’t found any information about what they brought down.
                    Well, even if this is true. And it took not even 4, but 6 missiles, it’s even good. This is a real workout. Not at the training ground, where even drivers know every bump, but the operators characteristics of all training goals. A task with a bunch of unknowns. And after all they failed the adversary. And, as far as I know, this is not the first time.
                    1. 0
                      December 24 2019
                      Quote: Monar
                      Yes. So what? How does the value of the contract relate to Russian rocket prices internally? Only the order is the same.

                      Who cares? Judging by the Indian contract, prices are comparable.

                      Quote: Monar
                      Again, where did you get information about 4 missiles? I haven’t found any information about what they brought down.

                      I’m never a Pvoshnik, but as far as I remember, at least 2 missiles are fired for the real purpose. Previously, 3 missiles were fired at 12 drones.
                      https://warspot.ru/13312-pantsir-podvergsya-kritike

                      Quote: Monar
                      Well, even if this is true. And it took not even 4, but 6 missiles, it’s even good. This is a real workout. Not at the training ground, where even drivers know every bump, but the operators characteristics of all training goals. A task with a bunch of unknowns. And after all they failed the adversary. And, as far as I know, this is not the first time.

                      "Good" is when the militias don't try to attack your base. Everything else is bad.
          3. 0
            December 24 2019
            And from the article you cited -
            "the effectiveness of hitting a target may be low due to the phenomenon of ricocheting of the striking elements of the warhead,"
            A natural question immediately arises - "What? The same drones have already begun to make armor from armor?"
          4. The comment was deleted.
        2. -1
          December 24 2019
          Quote: Monar
          By the way, why did you decide that it was hit by a missile and where did you find the price for it?

          They FSE know about us, but about themselves and their curators "I see nothing, I hear nothing"
          Typical Israeli policy
      3. The comment was deleted.
    7. +1
      December 24 2019
      The militants used unmanned aerial vehicles in the dark. It is noted that Russian air defense systems recorded the approach to the air base of two UAVs. As a result, both drones were destroyed.

      I think the UAV data was not controlled (like last time) from the NATO Orion airplane! )
    8. +1
      December 24 2019
      Well done, ruffles do not sleep at the post!

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"