Destroyed drones of militants who tried to attack the base "Khmeimim"

From Syria, reports have come that Syrian terrorists have once again attempted to carry out an attack on the Russian Air Force base, Khmeimim, located in Latakia province.

Illegal armed groups, according to the Center for Reconciliation of Warring Parties, used Drones. This is not the first time when it comes to the use of UAVs to break through the Khmeimim air defense system.

The militants used unmanned aerial vehicles in the dark. It is noted that Russian air defense systems recorded the approach to the air base of two UAVs. As a result, both drones were destroyed. About exactly what air defense systems were used to destroy the UAV, not reported.

According to a representative of the Center for the Reconciliation of the warring parties, the air base operates as usual: there are no casualties and destruction.
The militants clearly tried to influence the air base and inflict damage. But these plans were ultimately frustrated by Russian troops.

At the moment, the Syrian government army continues active offensive operations in the province of Idlib. It was from the territory of this province of the SAR that the militants most often sent their UAVs to attempt to attack the base of the Russian airborne forces.

Comments

[eagle owl]

We are waiting for sanctions due to the fact that "they again interfere with selling the world's best models of almost working Patriot air defense systems"

[bessmertniy]

The sooner the snake nest Idlib is finished, the faster these attacks by drones at the base will be over.

[Tzar]

An amazing feature: as soon as the SAA begins the next phase of the offensive on Idlib, an Israeli strike immediately follows and a swarm of Barmaley’s crafts is pulled up behind it. Therefore, for each phase it is necessary to occupy as much territory as possible.

[Piramidon]

Quote: Tzar

Therefore, for each phase it is necessary to occupy as much territory as possible.

And tough to clean them up, and not to arrange "bus tours" for the barmaley.

[Nyrobsky]

Quote: Tzar

An amazing feature: as soon as the SAA begins the next phase of the offensive on Idlib, an Israeli strike immediately follows and a swarm of Barmaley’s crafts is pulled up behind it. Therefore, for each phase it is necessary to occupy as much territory as possible.

Idlib is in the Turkish zone of responsibility, but Edik failed to calm down the motley wards and the bearded fired at the adjacent territories. The SAA launched a successful offensive. Worried Erdogan has initiated negotiations on the Idlib issue, which is due to take place in Moscow today. Against this background, two UAVs flew in, were shot down and strengthened our negotiating positions in the sense that they say - "We would be happy, but they are asking for themselves." Thus, the attack will continue.

[valeryb]

Quote: Nyrobsky

Idlib is in the Turkish zone of responsibility

But the anti-Semites do not care

[rocket757]

The militants clearly tried to influence the air base and inflict damage.

On the one hand, the expenses of BC, on the other hand, the training of calculations and verification of equipment.

[Mar.Tirah]

In Syria, we repel attacks and fall at home ourselves. I understand that we are not safe from anything but still take anger. The Ministry of Emergencies reported the fall of the SU-57 in the Khabarovsk Territory. God forbid that this was not true, and health pilots.

[Victor_B]

Quote: Mar. Tira

The Ministry of Emergencies reported the fall of SU-57 in the Khabarovsk Territory

Don’t share the source?

[Lipchanin]

Quote: Mar. Tira

In Syria, we repel attacks and we fall at home ourselves.

Is it somehow interconnected?
Or not a "dung-free day"
At least have a conscience, do not put on one plate your waste and everything else.

[DenZ]

Quote: Mar. Tira

reported the fall of the SU-57 in the Khabarovsk Territory. God forbid that this was not true, and health pilots.

The pilot is alive (by the way there are two pilotss and it’s not supposed yet) The factory car fell during the tests, but it is annoying.

[Lipchanin]

Quote: rocket757

On the one hand, expenses

Well, they were taken for this. Nobody expected that they’ll bring them back

on the other hand, training calculations and testing equipment.

At what not at the training ground, but in real combat conditions

[novel66]

great, Seryoz! the trouble is that the target is cheaper than the means of destruction, and it can spoil, it’s necessary to hrenak something at the source

[Lipchanin]

Quote: novel xnumx

great, Seryoz!

Hi
So when you are attacked, it seems like there is no time to think how to answer. It seems like something came to hand. But they didn’t say what. May knocked out of a slingshot
And since I think everything is already provided as and how
Duc like a source sits behind a puddle until we can

[novel66]

wait global goals to set, first on bearded men

[Lipchanin]

Quote: novel xnumx

wait global goals to set, first on bearded men

So while there will be sponsors from behind puddles, bearded men will not be transferred
In one place you will slam, they will immediately appear nearby.

[rocket757]

Hello Roman

Quote: novel xnumx

the target is cheaper than weapons,

The option with cheap drones will have to be worked out. After all, this is not only "the weapon of the poor, all sorts of barmaley, it has already been adopted by EVERYONE!"
It seems like the opposition should be the most "budgetary", but this, so that for sure, while NOBODY can boast! Everything is very rough.
And there can be a lot of drones, from different directions and with "cover" for electronic warfare equipment!
So, we will see who and what will achieve in the field of counteracting precisely such an attack.

[novel66]

Hello Vit! and what’s there to think - guns are against this best

[rocket757]

Quote: novel xnumx

guns against this is best

You have to get there. It is not in vain that the bird is beaten with a small fraction, although it used to be beaten with an arrow with a blunt end ...
Accuracy is needed, sniper or a continuous cloud of small elements.
An artillery shell with remote detonation, self-detonation, the thing is not cheap .... it's not a remote tube, as before. We need industry, plants that will produce such ammunition massively and cheaply.
The Yankees, multi-barrel, has such goals, but very point blank! If the goal has gone aside, it is not a fact that they can bring it down. Those. protect a specific piglet from a convenient angle.

[novel66]

Twist, so, a quick-fire gun, there’s practically a cloud of shells

[rocket757]

The scattering cone with distance grows, for objective reasons. The smaller the caliber, the stronger the scattering. The ammunition is not sniper, of special purity / accuracy of processing, it is not provided there. You can get into focus, on such a small object as a drone, but a little to the side, the view is uncomfortable, the gusty wind and many other factors .... A ballistic computer improves accuracy, but not absolutely.

[Errr]

For this bastard it would be nice from shotgun bursts!

[rocket757]

Quote: Herrr

For this bastard it would be nice from shotgun bursts!

So multi-barreled gatling, like a card case. A lot of bullets in a short amount of time.
Anyway, the distance is very limited.

[Errr]

That's right. At a great distance, the fraction is ineffective. The small fry can be riddled only on approach. But given that the speed of the kamikaze drone is not very high, it can be effectively used by a cloud of buckshot on approaching it, almost at point blank range. Only you need to take her ahead of time to accompany. And fly by, and let him fly. The impossible is still impossible.

[rocket757]

Quote: Herrr

And fly by, and let him fly.

This is while the barmalei are launching cheap drones, serious guys will equip drones seriously too. One must think, do, study, be prepared for any surprises.

[Errr]

Learn, learn and learn military art in a real way. ) But seriously, for serious purposes it is necessary to use serious means. Rockets. There is no time for the economy. The Carapace configuration is very good, but I would add a shotgun to it just in case. Especially for "barmalets". )

[rocket757]

The assumption is an anti-aircraft gun with "smart" ammunition.
The range is longer, and the effectiveness depends on the "cleverness" (price) of the ammunition.
Not a panacea, as an option. After all, we have lasers on the way, so such an option is quite possible.
Anyway, this is against a small number of "stupid" drones, if there is a swarm or attack in different directions, heights, intensively maneuvering objects, you need a lot of automated anti-aircraft systems ... although the most reliable, as always, is to extinguish / level the control / launch center all this infection!
The quantity can be interrupted only by the quantity or volume of the impact, in some cases.

[saigon]

But the budget option will not work. It's like with pirates - how many ships do not destroy
no sense.
It's time to make round eyes - we have nothing to do with it and erase Idlib from the face of the earth.

[rocket757]

Quote: saigon

to erase Idlib from the face of the earth.

The resources of the Syrian government are limited, and the losses of the most, most, persistent, motivated were great, which they can and do.

[saigon]

Actually, we are not talking about Arabs, our answer is our base. It's time to drive into the minds a simple thought, like a pine, - an attack on the base - death.
Moreover, with the calculation on all the resources of Tyrnet, he attacked and died with a photo with a pig thigh in his teeth

[rocket757]

Greetings Sergey

Quote: Lipchanin

Nobody expected that they’ll bring them back

No questions! This is a real preparation ... just in case of emergency.
The only question is, what exactly did they "work" with?

[Lipchanin]

Quote: rocket757

The only question is, what exactly did they "work" with?

Hi
Yes, I think that if they could say, they would say.
They simply did not advertise. Who needs to understand what and how and from whom what to buy

[rocket757]

The rules, the secrets of all are similar, this is understandable.
Empty, unreasonable "advertising" does not lead to anything good.

[Monar]

But what brought down, very interesting.

[Lipchanin]

Quote: Monar

But what brought down, very interesting.

Who?
Those who launched them?

[Monar]

To me. Well, is it possible for the Carapace to bring down an UAV of this size with guns or is it necessary to launch missiles.

[novel66]

can an armor drop an UAV of this size with guns

why not? low-speed and not very maneuverable target

[Monar]

That's it. On this, questions arise.
A projectile requires a direct hit. For rocket + - meter is about nothing. The fragments fly further.

[Piramidon]

Quote: Monar

For the projectile requires a direct hit

It depends on which shell.

[Lipchanin]

Quote: Monar

Well, is it possible for the Carapace to bring down an UAV of this size with guns or is it necessary to launch missiles.

Why "Pantsir" and not "S-400" at once?
Fantasy is not enough?
And what do you think, there are no other means of destruction?
Well, yes, they forgot to tell EVERYONE how else the air base is protected

[Monar]

Why "Pantsir" and not "S-400" at once?

By the fact that for the S-400 goals are different.

[Lipchanin]

Quote: Monar

By the fact that for the S-400 goals are different.

So I mean, why "Shell"?
There are no other means?

[Monar]

MANPADS require line of sight, and were shot down at night. From "Kalash" or ZU-23? The same problem. It makes no sense to use more powerful air defense systems. So there is only one option left - "Shell". Moreover, it is precisely for such situations and is intended.

[Lipchanin]

Quote: Monar

MANPADS require line of sight, and were shot down at night. From "Kalash" or ZU-23? The same problem. It makes no sense to use more powerful air defense systems. So there is only one option left - "Shell".

Didn’t you think about EW tools?
Or the word "shot down" rested?

[Monar]

EW is a good thing. But only if there is external drone control. An elementary device based on a micromechanical gyroscope, Arduinka and a shielded case will nullify everything. Accuracy is certainly not the same. But a kilo of TNT with a keel of chopped nails is not a flounder bay.

[rocket757]

Quote: Monar

To me. Well, is it possible for the Carapace to bring down an UAV of this size with guns or is it necessary to launch missiles.

No one can boast that it can bring down drones in the cheapest way efficiently! Everything is very approximately ... although due to the fragility of the structure, it is enough for her one, successful, hit even with a fragment / bullet.

[Lipchanin]

Quote: rocket757

No one can boast that they can fly drones in the cheapest way.

And who will be able to calculate the damage if the drone hits the target?
In the same "Drying", or in the warehouse?
And to the barracks?

[Monar]

Yes, even strategic nuclear against one drone. The life of our soldiers is more important.
This is not the question. And in the efficiency of the work of 30 "Pantsir" for such purposes.

[Machete]

Militants thought they won’t see at night?
Just like in a joke about flying on the Sun at night.

[novel66]

I think the idea is to not notice the launch site, and not send allaverds there any nito

[Lipchanin]

The desert is nearby. We arrived by car, pulled this homemade product, and dumped. She is on the program and flew. Time for everything about all the minutes. Elementary time is not enough to answer.

[Monar]

How to notice? The drone is programmed for (say) 20 minutes of flight in a circle at the minimum allowable height. Between the dunes. And what is the start place to catch?

[Lipchanin]

Quote: Machete

Just like in a joke about flying on the Sun at night.

“Man, what are you looking for under the lantern?”
- Wallet lost
- And exactly here?
- No, but lighter here

[Professor]

The militants clearly tried to influence the air base and inflict damage. But these plans were ultimately frustrated by Russian troops.

Economic damage the militia still bring. A drone costs about $ 200, and a Shell rocket costs $ 265. About the same as the 000 Porsche Cayenne. Missiles of longer-range systems are even more expensive.

[Lipchanin]

Quote: professor

Nonetheless, the militias bring economic damage. A drone costs about $ 200, and a Shell rocket costs $ 265. About the same as the 000 Porsche Cayenne.

It's disgusting to read
Calculate the "economic damage" if you get such a room where our military lives.
You are fighting for the corpses of your soldiers, but here our shells count.
Calculate your costs.
Or do you upload a video when your military used firearms against people with stones?
Something there no one considered the damage

[Professor]

Quote: Lipchanin

It's disgusting to read
Calculate the "economic damage" if you get such a room where our military lives.
You are fighting for the corpses of your soldiers, but here our shells count.
Calculate your costs.

Schiteam.

Quote: Lipchanin

Or do you upload a video when your military used firearms against people with stones?

Do not lay out. There is no such video.

Quote: Lipchanin

Something there no one considered the damage

I did not consider it since there was no such event.

Nevertheless, economic damage was inflicted. Whether he is justified or not is a completely different matter.

[Lipchanin]

Quote: professor

Do not lay out. There is no such video.

Not tired of lying?

Still lay out how you did not admit the wounded doctors?

YouTube is clogged with such videos

[Professor]

Quote: Lipchanin

Quote: professor

Do not lay out. There is no such video.

Not tired of lying?

Still lay out how you did not admit the wounded doctors?

YouTube is clogged with such videos

I congratulate you, Mr. You threatened "video to lay out when your military used firearms against people with stones". In the first video, the" brave "Fylystyn girl threateningly waves her fist in front of the soldiers' noses, knowing that no one will touch her with a finger, in the second video the fylystyn is given a pendel. And where is"military against people with stones used fire weapon"?

[Lipchanin]

Forgot when they broke your wall?

And this

It seems like they proved here that this is a fake

[Professor]

Quote: Lipchanin

It seems like they proved here that this is a fake

And where did the "military use against people with stones fire weapon"? Well, at least one video?

[Lipchanin]

Quote: professor

Nevertheless, economic damage was inflicted.

Economic and political damage would be caused to your masters when their "petriots" missed EVERYTHING in a row

Drones were used to attack the largest refineries in Saudi Arabia. As a result, on September 14, fires occurred at the Saudi Aramco fields in Abkayk and Khurais.

https://habr.com/ru/news/t/467469/
Hello to your uncle and his weapons.

[Monar]

Well, if the economy is pure, then calculate how much it costs to repair damaged Drying. I won’t remind you about people. Not yours.
By the way, why did you decide that it was hit by a missile and where did you find the price for it?

[Professor]

Quote: Monar

Well, if the economy is pure, then calculate how much it costs to repair damaged Drying. I won’t remind you about people. Not yours.
By the way, why did you decide that it was hit by a missile and where did you find the price for it?

Again. I am not saying that there was no need to intercept. I am not saying that the potential damage would not exceed the price of 2-4 Shell shells. I argue that the event was not free and in this case the militia spent 3 orders of magnitude less than your MO.

I don’t understand about people.

2 drones are 4 rockets. No one would take the risk and let the enemy drones at a distance of a cannon shot. 4 rockets is a lemon of American rubles.
Calculate how much the Shell rocket costs
https://www.belrynok.by/2018/05/24/zenitnye-kompleksy-maloj-dalnosti-zashhiti-sebya-sam/

[Meckajiuhe]

Obdrochentsy.A not militias.

[Monar]

Thank you for the article. It was interesting to read. I will skip many "not confirmed". They don't report to me. As well as the author of the article. Let's just take what is not a military secret. In no time is it in open sources.
"The essence of which is that the KAMAZ-6560 chassis (like the entire family to which it belongs) was originally created for conventional transport operations for the transportation of goods, and not according to the technical requirements of the military. Therefore, their key requirement was not met - the ability to move the chassis ( and, consequently, air defense missile systems based on them) on all types of roads and terrain. "
It's in the article. And then the opa-dritsa-obana. Even on the wiki - "heavy off-road chassis introduced in summer 2005"
Well or - This car with an 8x8 wheel arrangement and a single-pitch tire tire is capable of moving around any kind of road and natural landscape.
Source: https://trucksreview.ru/kamaz/kamaz-6560-tehnicheskie-harakteristiki.html
If the author of the article frankly lies even in this, then all the more complete tryndezh in everything else.

[Professor]

I posted a link to compare the prices of the rocket and the drone.

Quote: Monar

Well or - This car with an 8x8 wheel arrangement and a single-pitch tire tire is capable of moving around any kind of road and natural landscape.

Not true. Not by anyone. This is called "off-road".

[Monar]

Thank you for your clarification in terminology. Does this somehow change the open lies of the article?

[Professor]

Quote: Monar

Thank you for your clarification in terminology. Does this somehow change the open lies of the article?

The cost of the Syrian contract was announced in other articles.

[Monar]

Yes. So what? How does the value of the contract relate to Russian rocket prices internally? Only the order is the same.
Again, where did you get information about 4 missiles? I haven’t found any information about what they brought down.
Well, even if this is true. And it took not even 4, but 6 missiles, it’s even good. This is a real workout. Not at the training ground, where even drivers know every bump, but the operators characteristics of all training goals. A task with a bunch of unknowns. And after all they failed the adversary. And, as far as I know, this is not the first time.

[Professor]

Quote: Monar

Yes. So what? How does the value of the contract relate to Russian rocket prices internally? Only the order is the same.

Who cares? Judging by the Indian contract, prices are comparable.

Quote: Monar

Again, where did you get information about 4 missiles? I haven’t found any information about what they brought down.

I’m never a Pvoshnik, but as far as I remember, at least 2 missiles are fired for the real purpose. Previously, 3 missiles were fired at 12 drones.
https://warspot.ru/13312-pantsir-podvergsya-kritike

Quote: Monar

Well, even if this is true. And it took not even 4, but 6 missiles, it’s even good. This is a real workout. Not at the training ground, where even drivers know every bump, but the operators characteristics of all training goals. A task with a bunch of unknowns. And after all they failed the adversary. And, as far as I know, this is not the first time.

"Good" is when the militias don't try to attack your base. Everything else is bad.

[Monar]

And from the article you cited -
"the effectiveness of hitting a target may be low due to the phenomenon of ricocheting of the striking elements of the warhead,"
A natural question immediately arises - "What? The same drones have already begun to make armor from armor?"

[Lipchanin]

Quote: Monar

By the way, why did you decide that it was hit by a missile and where did you find the price for it?

They FSE know about us, but about themselves and their curators "I see nothing, I hear nothing"
Typical Israeli policy

[Lesorub]

The militants used unmanned aerial vehicles in the dark. It is noted that Russian air defense systems recorded the approach to the air base of two UAVs. As a result, both drones were destroyed.

I think the UAV data was not controlled (like last time) from the NATO Orion airplane! )

[Chaldon48]

Well done, ruffles do not sleep at the post!