Ten days before Paris. Napoleon’s last chance

27

In just ten days, the Napoleonic soldiers will no longer be masters of Paris

Where are you, old hussar?


12 failures by Napoleon Bonaparte. On March 14, the Allies ’headquarters in Troyes, where the Russian emperor Alexander and the Prussian king arrived from Chaumont, received a message about the Laon victory. It was no longer possible to postpone a trip to Paris.

The departure of the Austrian monarch to Dijon, closer to the Southern Army, which was still threatened by Marshal Augereau, only contributed to the determination of his two most august cousins. Schwarzenberg continued to insist on defense, circled his troops, carefully avoiding meeting with the sovereigns. However, he had to shift the main forces of the army to the right to prevent Napoleon from striking the flank.



Ten days before Paris. Napoleon’s last chance

Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec is by no means a battalist, brighter than many managed to reflect the spirit of the company in 1814

And although Napoleon, who was not given a victory at Laon, managed for some time to get rid of the annoying Blucher, the Allied Main Army was hardly worth fearing his blow. Nevertheless, Napoleon, with his unshootled conscripts, already recognizing the taste of victory, again attacked Schwarzenberg.

The emperor believed or, in any case, constantly stated that he had enough infantry and cavalry. But he understood that now he had almost no artillery left, and besides, the old gunner Marmont, his old comrade, so mediocre allowed the Russians and Prussians to recapture their guns at night near Laon.

The position of Arsi across the Ob River for the emperor was long ago selected by his punctual Berthier, comparing it with last year’s positions at Dresden. Napoleon did not forget that there the French core defeated General Moreau, his old enemy. However, under Arsi, the French commander no longer had the opportunity to act so freely along the internal operational lines, taking advantage of the passivity of the allies.




The positions at Dresden and Arsi only on the map are similar to each other.

No, the Austrian field marshal Schwarzenberg, like a year ago, commanding, in addition to the Austrians, Bavarians, Prussians, also Russians, did not differ in zeal and desire to attack. He was quite happy that Napoleon now had to lead an exhausted army against three times the enemy’s forces. Even with Druot under his command, an excellent artilleryman, who was sorely lacking not only cannons, but also experienced gunners.

The French were in a hurry, suggesting that the Silesian army would certainly try to hit them in the rear. In this case, Napoleon left behind the rearguard from the MacDonald corps, and without the artillery park, which tied him hand and foot. This marshal, to whom Blucher did not want to submit to the preparation of the Russian campaign, was a real master of maneuver, and could give Napoleon the most necessary - time to strike at the main army.

In addition, Blucher after the victorious Laon suddenly disappeared somewhere. For several days, little was known about the movements of the Silesian Army even in the Allies' Headquarters - couriers with dispatches were very late because of the difficulties of moving around France with a hostile population.

Vorwärts! To Paris!


But the old hussar already, as they say, bit the bit. He was attracted only by the French capital, close to which Blucher had once approached. He understood that only from Paris can dictate the conditions of the world. And it is not necessary to dictate them to the Emperor Napoleon.

At this time in Arsi-sur-Ob, the Allies had only the Bavarians Wrede, who clearly did not want a one-on-one confrontation with Napoleon, as near Ganau. The Russian corps of Wirtemberg and Rayevsky hastened to Proven to prevent MacDonald from playing the role of a rearguard against Blucher. Tom was practically untied, since MacDonald moved to Maison Rouge, which the Prussian soon took advantage of.


And Napoleon once again set his sights on the main army of Schwarzenberg, knowing that she again began to scatter her forces. After Laon, he gave the army, which had retreated and stopped at Soissons, a day of rest. One of Blucher's subordinates, the Russian general Saint-Prix, on his own initiative, moved from Chalon to Reims, believing that the French had not yet come to their senses after the Laon fiasco.

Napoleon had to postpone the offensive against Schwarzenberg. In order to protect the city, in which all his predecessors were crowned on the French throne, the emperor brought down the power of his entire army at Saint-Prix. Napoleon hid from the Blucher’s army, and Mortier hid himself, and attacked the Russian corps that settled in Reims almost completely by surprise, since the soldiers had already been disbanded by his commander.

The Russians have not received such a cruel lesson for a long time. General Saint-Prix himself was mortally wounded, and his corps lost almost four thousand people and 10 guns. The Reims defeat pretty confused Schwarzenberg, who immediately recalled the corps of Raevsky and Wirtemberg, and along with them the Hungarian corps of Giulai.

On March 17, Napoleon was already advancing against the Allied Main Army, choosing its right flank as an object for attack, with a threat to communications. The emperor knew very well how anxiously their Austrian field marshal took care. He planned to cross the Ob River just at Arsi.

A day later, Schwarzenberg received a message about the movement of Napoleon and that his vanguard, passing Fer-Champenoise, was sent to Herbiss. It is only 7 kilometers from Arsi, where at that time the headquarters of the Austrian field marshal was located. The main apartment with the sovereigns the day before wisely moved to Troyes.

The scattered corps of the Main Army was also planned to be assembled at Troyes, but Napoleon paused, not reaching Herbiss in order to join the MacDonald corps. The emperor decided either to fall on the right flank of the Allies, or to cut off the corps that could advance to the banks of the Both in support of the Bavarians of Wrede.


Napoleon’s far-reaching goal was to drop Schwarzenberg’s army and annex 30 fortress garrisons already in eastern France. Marshal Marmont was supposed to bring another 20 thousand draftees from under Paris, and then Napoleon could practically equalize the forces with the Main Army of the Allies.

However, such ambitious but controversial plans were a salvation for Schwarzenberg. During March 18 and 19, he was able to concentrate significant forces - almost 80 thousand, and not at Troyes, but in front - between Arsi and Plansi, in order to attack the French when crossing Ob. But in the meantime, the Napoleonic vanguards had already crossed the river at Plansy. Harma, who had departed with the Bavarians towards Brienne, feeling the support of other corps, headed back to the ferries at Arsi.

Over the river, in the shade of trees


The French managed to advance to the bridges on the Ob even faster, and almost 20 thousand people with several batteries managed to force the river during the night of March 20. On three roads, they advanced to the villages of Torsi and Vilet, and immediately began to strengthen them. At about one in the afternoon, the Bavarian infantry attacked both villages, starting the battle of Arsi-sur-Ob.


Schwarzenberg, not without reason, feared for crossing in another place, at Plansi, from where he was threatened with a blow to the flank. There were immediately three allied corps. Therefore, against the French, who after the arrival of Napoleon was already 26 thousand, Schwarzenberg was able to expose only 40 thousand people. However, he had a very significant superiority in artillery - more than 300 guns and howitzers against 180 from the French.

The entire first day of the battle of Arsie Napoleon literally climbed into the thick of it. Many contemporaries believed that he was openly seeking death. Worthy of death.


"1814. Emperor." Batalist J.-L. E. Masonier in all the paintings tried to compliment the emperor, it did not always work out

Four and a half thousand experienced MacDonald fighters and guns, no less than fifty, were soon to approach Napoleon. The seven thousandth division of General Lefebvre-Denuet was already lining up behind Ob. But the reinforcements to the allies, which almost continuously attacked the French position, pulled up much faster.

Napoleon could count on no more than 32 thousand of his soldiers. At the same time, by the evening of March 20, at least Schwarzenberg had at least 90 thousand people at hand, who covered the French positions in a semicircle. Their depth was much less than under Dresden, individual kernels fired by the Russian gunners reached the cities and even before crossing the Ob.

The Allies lined up in front of the French already in the dark, but their enormous superiority in forces was still noticeable. The French historian, future Prime Minister and President of the Third Republic A. Thiers found somewhere a record of the conversation between the emperor and General Sebastiani:

“Well then, general, what can you say about what is happening?”
“I will say that Your Majesty undoubtedly has new resources that we do not know.”
- Only those that you see, and no other.
“But then, why does your Majesty not think about raising a nation?”
- Chimeras! Chimeras from the memories of the revolution and of Spain. A nation has been raised in a country where the revolution destroyed the nobility and the clergy, and where I myself destroyed the revolution!



With the loss of four thousand people, no more and no less than the allies, Napoleon did not dare to continue the battle the next day. Russians and Prussians managed to take the city of Arsi only after the French blew up the bridge and secured themselves on the right bank.

The Bavarians crossed Ob at the town of Lemon and carefully followed the retreating French. Napoleon will once again try to outwit the allies with the help of a false workaround, but he will not have time for Blucher. Only ten days remained before the fall of Paris and renunciation.
27 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    24 December 2019 05: 59
    An interesting type in the first illustration in an overcoat and a white visor with a red border, is this exactly a Frenchman?
    1. +4
      24 December 2019 07: 12
      No, this is the Russian infantry, and the Frenchman on the left on crutches is "doing Christlike". smile
      1. +1
        24 December 2019 08: 33
        ATP, as I thought, just the signature on the illustration suggests that now Napoleonic troops in Paris.
        1. +3
          24 December 2019 08: 55
          Quote: Vladimir_2U
          just a signature on the illustration suggests that now the Napoleonic troops in Paris.

          This signature can be understood in different ways. And the picture is Bohdan Villevalde, a Russian battle painter.
          1. +1
            24 December 2019 09: 05
            Quote: Mordvin 3
            This signature can be understood in different ways.

            I understood as I understood. Thank you for the artist; in the meantime, I will admire his work (in Yandex, of course).
    2. +1
      24 December 2019 09: 21
      Read the signature carefully - the French are no longer the masters of Paris, these are ours! Horse Guardsman, and that same character in a peak
      1. +3
        24 December 2019 09: 48
        In just ten days, the Napoleonic soldiers will no longer be masters of Paris Sorry! ".. there will be no longer Napoleonic ..." means NOW Napoleonic!
  2. +3
    24 December 2019 07: 10
    Thank you Alexey, the morning meeting with people like Napoleon and Blucher is always impressive. hi
    And what kind of "Russian" General Saint-Prix, for the first time I hear what is famous for apart from the defeat at Reims?
    1. +9
      24 December 2019 11: 10
      Quote: Sea Cat
      And what kind of "Russian" General Saint-Prix

      Guillaume Emmanuel Guignard de Saint-Prix, or Immanuel Frantsevich Saint-Prix. Nineteen years old he entered the Russian service with the rank of lieutenant, rose to the rank of general, was repeatedly awarded for personal courage, in general, a sort of hussar from infantry. smile
      I liked his joke in Koblenz, whose commandant he was in 1814.
      There stood and still stands a monument-fountain of basalt slabs, on which was an inscription dedicated to Napoleon's campaign of 1812 to Russia:
      MDCCCXII In memory of the campaign against Russia

      When the Russians entered Koblenz, they offered to demolish the monument, but Immanuel Frantsevich decided differently - he made a small appendix to the inscription on the monument:
      Inspected, approved. Russian commandant of the city of Koblenz. January 1, 1814

      It is a pity that the second inscription is made in French, and not in Russian. smile Although, maybe for the better - these Basurmans understood that better ... laughing
      Two weeks after being wounded near Reims, he died, was awarded posthumously George 2nd degree.
      1. +2
        24 December 2019 11: 58
        a sort of hussar from infantry.

        Yeah, foreigners (well, how are foreigners? let's say - "people by birth of a different nationality", but the Russian military) in the ranks of the Russian army generally showed themselves worthy. Recently I reread about Figner - this figaro suited the French in general to thrash. laughing And the most unique grave monument in Russia, for example, stands on the grave of an ethnic German - General Bistrom. hi
        1. +3
          24 December 2019 20: 30
          I was in Sevastopol at the Bratsk cemetery, there are many monuments on the graves in German. Buried there are officers, "Russian Germans" who died in the defense of Sevastopol in the nineteenth century, monuments with Latin text are found in almost every alley. By the way, during the occupation, the cemetery, all the monuments, were looked after by the Germans themselves on the orders of the city commandant, I was told about this already in the Chersonesos Museum.
  3. +1
    24 December 2019 09: 10
    Thanks to the author of the article! And Bonnie let a sense of proportion.
  4. 0
    24 December 2019 09: 14
    Napoleon with his unsecured scripts

    The bastard, in his agony, dragged tens of thousands of young men
    1. +4
      24 December 2019 11: 20
      Quote: Olgovich
      Bastard,

      Not to a greater extent than any historical character. The story itself is a story about how some ambitions were paid for by the blood of others.
      How, for example, does Napoleon in this situation differ significantly from Baron Wrangel in 1920?
      1. -3
        24 December 2019 11: 50
        Quote: Trilobite Master
        Not to a greater extent than any historical character.

        no, many others in such an awful situation are looking for a way out in negotiations and replacement with a successor.
        Quote: Trilobite Master
        How, for example, does Napoleon in this situation differ significantly from Baron Wrangel in 1920?

        belay Yes, absolutely everything: for example, Napoleon fought for his personal power (nothing threatened France),
        Wrangel fought for Russia, which was threatened with death (which happened) and then it was necessary to fight to the end
        1. +7
          24 December 2019 14: 13
          Quote: Olgovich
          Napoleon fought for his personal power

          Quote: Olgovich
          Wrangel fought for Russia

          I thought that your answer would be from the "one bad, the other good" category. laughing
          And why not vice versa - Wrangel, known from the memoirs of his contemporaries as a power-hungry man and intriguer, satisfied his own ambitions at the expense of people who trusted him, and until the last Napoleon fought for France against foreign invaders?
          Quote: Olgovich
          France was not in danger

          Do you really think so? I did not expect such naivety. She was threatened by all the worst that could happen to the state, and just what happened to her. Almost forty years in the margins of world politics.
          Quote: Olgovich
          Wrangel fought for Russia, which threatened death

          It is believed that the death would threaten Russia precisely in the event of the victory of Wrangel, that is, those circles that he represented. And this point of view personally seems to me more reasonable than yours.
          1. -4
            24 December 2019 14: 55
            Quote: Trilobite Master
            And why not vice versa - Wrangel, known from the memoirs of his contemporaries as a power-hungry man and intriguer, satisfied his own ambitions at the expense of people who trusted him, and until the last Napoleon fought for France against foreign invaders?

            Yes, because it is not.
            The invader of all Europe ... fought ... against the invaders? belay I remember. in 1941-45 another such "defense" from the "invaders" in Berlin was ...
            Quote: Trilobite Master
            Do you really think so? I did not expect such naivety. She was threatened by all the worst that could happen to the state, and just what happened to her. Almost forty years in the margins of world politics.

            Say nonsense: the rapid growth of cities, industry, the number of workers and the bourgeoisie, the growth of the economy and wealth of the country. France is one of the main economies in Europe.
            Quote: Trilobite Master
            It is believed that the death would threaten Russia precisely in the event of the victory of Wrangel, that is, those circles that he represented. And this point of view personally seems to me more reasonable than yours.

            It’s just that one needs to face facts: Russia Wrangel lived, continuously grew territorially and numerically for THOUSAND years, the next system brought the country to the borders of the 17th century and the extinction of the population. In a few years.
            That's all, actually hi
            1. +4
              24 December 2019 16: 07
              I'm too lazy to argue with you. You see only what you want to see, and only the way you want. And beyond the trees you can’t see the forest, which sometimes, as, for example, today, amuses me, but does not last long.
              Try to learn how to generalize and ask yourself the question at least once, "Am I right, and if not, then why." Life will become more difficult, but more interesting. smile
              1. -4
                25 December 2019 09: 26
                Quote: Trilobite Master
                I'm too lazy to argue with you. You see only what you want to see, and only the way you want.

                There is no one to argue with, because you see only what you want to see and only the way you want request lol
                Quote: Trilobite Master
                And beyond the trees you can’t see the forest,

                Moreover, you can’t see the forest behind the trees. lol
                Quote: Trilobite Master
                which sometimes, like today, for example, amuses me, but does not last long.

                And it amuses me. Yes
                Quote: Trilobite Master
                Try to learn how to generalize and ask yourself the question at least once, "Am I right, and if not, then why." Life will get harder, but more interesting

                And by the way, yes: Try to learn how to generalize and ask yourself the question at least once, "Am I right, and if not, why." Life will get harder, but more interesting Yes

                And still less snobbery and lipstick hi
          2. -1
            24 December 2019 16: 05
            Trilobite Master (Michael)
            Do you really think so? I did not expect such naivety.
            Michael hi my regards. Do you know olgovich? This is a medical only place, so you are more likely to be naive, believing that your vis-a-vis is adequate.
            And so I agree with you, Napoleon, although an adventurer, but no more than others. Let's just say that if Napoleon was able to fully agree with Alexander on a complete blockade of Britain, then perhaps the world map would look a bit different. That's just the history of the subjunctive moods does not know, maybe this is unfortunately.
            1. +3
              24 December 2019 16: 15
              Quote: Alexander Suvorov
              Do you know olgovich?

              Welcome.
              I just wanted to test some of my hypotheses for attitudes in thinking. In general, they were confirmed. I am close to learning how to manipulate Olgovich. But why the hell do I need it? laughing
              1. 0
                24 December 2019 16: 21
                Trilobite Master (Michael)
                I am close to learning how to manipulate Olgovich.
                In principle, I am a colleague with you in this regard! drinks
                By the way, there will be time and desire, ask him a question, how his love for Nicholas No. 2 coexists in his head and at the same time for the deposed generals, by God you will see a funny sight ... laughing
                1. +4
                  24 December 2019 17: 08
                  Quote: Alexander Suvorov
                  ask him a question

                  But you must? laughing His conviction lies in the field of the irrational, logic is powerless here. "I am an artist, as I see it." smile
                2. -1
                  24 December 2019 22: 00
                  This banter on your part is more likely to negatively characterize you than your opponent. And also “Suvorov” ... if this is not your real name, then the nickname Yakir or Tukhachevsky is more likely to be close to you.
                  Before demanding anything, first try to explain for yourself how criticized serf-kutuzov and suvorov feuds (see the officialdom of Pokrovsky) followed by a flattering admonition to their names in the Soviet Deputies. How can you combine the explosion of the Cathedral of Christ the Savior in Moscow, built as a monument in honor of the victory of 1812, with the subsequent cult of Borodin? Just do not about the "insight." The soldiers simply did not want to die for rotten internationalism and communism, so they had to look for other slogans.

                  Although among the immoral, by definition, the Bolsheviks, this was called the vile word "dialectics." However, they are still in power today, “dialectically”, under a different name, “there used to be a boss, but now he has become a tsar,” and the Russians are fools again.
              2. -4
                25 December 2019 09: 42
                Quote: Trilobite Master
                I am close to learning how to manipulate Olgovich.

                Some lifting their nose, do not at all take into account the fact that it can be in the area of ​​someone . (WITH) Yes hi
  5. +2
    24 December 2019 10: 59
    Therefore, against the French, who after the arrival of Napoleon was already 26 thousand, Schwarzenberg was able to expose only 40 thousand people
    -----------------------------
    sounds good - only 40 thousand against 26 tons
  6. +3
    24 December 2019 21: 37
    Quote: sivuch
    Therefore, against the French, who after the arrival of Napoleon was already 26 thousand, Schwarzenberg was able to expose only 40 thousand people
    -----------------------------
    sounds good - only 40 thousand against 26 tons

    It’s funny to you, and any modern commander Napoleon, at least, was very afraid of him, ceteris paribus ...
    In addition, the deceased already at that time, Suvorov. Who never acted stereotyped (To surprise means to win!), And the spirit of the Suvorov soldiers created the impossible.
    But, after Suvorov, there was no other Suvorov, and may not be. Then there was Skobelev, there was Slashchev, there were Chernyakhovsky and Rokossovsky - commanders of a more or less Suvorov warehouse and good luck.