The latest 20385 “Thundering” corvette completed tests in the White Sea

The latest “Thundering” corvette of project 20385 completed a series of tests in the White Sea and proceeded to the interbase transition to the main base of the North fleet Severomorsk. This was reported by the press service of the fleet.

According to a popular report, the final stage of testing in the White Sea was the development by the crew of the ship of interaction with aviation Northern Fleet. The overflight of radio systems and complexes of the ship was made by the crews of Ka-27 helicopters. Earlier, the corvette fired on Caliber and Onyx cruise missiles at the surface and another Caliber at the ground target. The crews of ships and vessels of the White Sea Naval Base in cooperation with the aviation of the Air Force and Air Defense of the Northern Fleet were engaged in the provision of firing

In total, the ship’s tests took a month, the “Thundering” corvette arrived at the Belomorsk naval base on November 13 after the inter-naval transition from the Baltic Sea.

After visiting Severomorsk, the corvette must make another inter-fleet transition and return to the Severnaya Verf shipyard, where the ship and all its systems will be revised.

If nothing has changed, then the raising of the Andreevsky flag and the transfer of the ship to the Pacific Fleet are planned for the beginning of the 2020 year.

The 20385 Project “Thundering” is the lead ship of the series. Laid down in February 2012, launched in June 2017. Construction was delayed due to the non-delivery of German MTU power plants. The corvette was completed with Russian diesel engines 1DDA-12000 of the Kolomensky plant. The unit consists of two 16D49 engines with 6000 horsepower.

It is a further development of the 20380 project. Designed to detect and destroy surface enemy ships or submarines, organize landing, guard the coastal zone, escort other ships.

Corvette displacement - 2200 tons, length - 104 m, width - 13 m, speed - up to 27 knots, cruising range - 3500 miles, autonomy - 15 days crew - 99 people.

The armament includes the universal naval rifle complex (UKSK) for the Caliber, Onyx and possibly Zircon, Redut air defense systems, the 100-mm A-190-01 artillery system, two AK-30-mm anti-aircraft artillery systems 630M, as well as anti-submarine complex "Package".

Comments

[Boris00]

Seven feet under the keel!

[Borik]

Now we are waiting for the flag to be raised and we wish you a long service.

[NEXUS]

Quote: Borik

Now we are waiting for the flag to be raised and we wish you a long service.

Long service is Atlanta for 40 years ... but long service is good when the loss of old ships is less than the arrival of new equivalent ones. And here, unfortunately, throughout ALL of modern Russian history, the rate of decline is many times greater.
But wherever you look, in all ratings we have the most powerful fleet after mattresses. Although looking at the Japanese fleet, for example, we will see that in the first place it is much younger than ours (the service life of ships), more numerous and better developing. And the backbone of our fleets is the tears that remained from the USSR.

[Seaflame]

Sad but true ...

[Catfish]

... after mattresses we have the most powerful fleet.

But China is not considered? There is a fleet stronger than the Japanese.

[opus]

Quote: NEXUS

But wherever you look, in all ratings we have the most powerful fleet after mattresses.

what do you think?
tonnage, by head, age?

here is also 3rd

 Show / Hide text

https://most-beauty.ru/nauka-i-tehnika/10-moshhnyh-voenno-morskih-sil.html

/ if the SSBN (SSBN) is "removed", it will be generally sad
even NI gives us the 3rd

[NEXUS]

Quote: opus

what do you think?
tonnage, by head, age?

And what? Has it become easier from this? Well, the third, and not the second ... then what? Then, at the time, weep with flaming jets of tears, since 25 years ago, China and the concept of an ocean power in one sentence could only be met in full beaten dreamer.

[opus]

Quote: NEXUS

And what? It became easier from this? Well, the third, and not the second ... then what?

1.No "what"
2.I got sad
3. "what" - a horse in a coat.
---what's the matter? such a reaction is like PMS.
"no need to pull by the ears", that's all

Quote: NEXUS

since 25 years ago, China and the concept of ocean power

1. This has nothing to do with the corvette.
2. In 25 years it only got worse (on graph 15, but that's not the point?)

I'm even afraid to imagine what will happen after another 25 years

[NEXUS]

Quote: opus

I felt sad

Caution, they’ll throw you here about - it’s all gone, that you burst into tears and in general will conquer us.

Quote: opus

"what" is a horse in a coat.
---what's the matter? such a reaction is like PMS.
"no need to pull by the ears", that's all

PMS respected by our helmsmen, and already for 91 years. Slogans, PR, mock-ups, assurances and speeches about not having analogues and on new physical principles. So what about PMS is in Sportloto, and not to me.
And to engage in literary studies, it is certainly fun ... not the second, but the third. Wrong. It’s even worse than what he said, but this didn’t increase the number of new ships.
And I don’t attract by the ears, but I say that you yourself know something. I don’t post the numbers and statistics on purpose, flaunting them ... those who are smart will ask themselves the question and figure out why. And your fool and my numbers, like a woman with a climax of a turbo dildo with sanding paper at 60.

Quote: opus

.This has nothing to do with the corvette.

It doesn’t, since the corvette is essentially not a ship of the ocean zone, but only a sea one.

Quote: opus

I'm even afraid to imagine what will happen after another 25 years

Here I am talking about too ... and they tell me about the Super-duper Gorshkovs. And almost every day about the new BDK articles and aircraft carriers. There is no sadness, here is a howl of hunting.

[opus]

Quote: NEXUS

There is no sadness, here is a howl of hunting.

well yes...
One pleases ..
the pole of cold in our country (in the village of Oymyakon)

World warming will come; we will organize tours in the cold

[NEXUS]

Quote: opus

One pleases ..
the pole of cold in our country (in the village of Oymyakon)

Nitsche ... judging by the assurances of the eggheads, soon Hawaii will be there with umbrellas, sunbeds and beer, which the Haitians will bring.
Sometimes I think I’d better not know.

[opus]

It will be difficult for the Americans, who will definitely be left without Washington, New York, Boston, San Francisco, Los Angeles and many other large coastal cities.

[NEXUS]

Quote: opus

It will be difficult for the Americans, who will definitely be left without Washington, New York, Boston, San Francisco, Los Angeles and many other large coastal cities.

Chu ... there will be a new migration of peoples. And all the chiefs will settle somewhere in Zimbabwe. And Zimbabwe will become the new world gendarme. Just frost on the skin from such a perspective.

[eagle owl]

To Canada And then they gathered in due time to build a country - but no one came (s)

[NEXUS]

Quote: Uhu

To Canada And then they gathered in due time to build a country - but no one came (s)

As Aunt Tsilya said, this Kama Sutra is there ... if the women hadn’t resisted, there would have been one page.

[Olgovich]

Quote: NEXUS

Long service is Atlanta for 40 years.

long service is the ship "VOLKHOV" -107 years Service in the Russian Navy - survived three authorities!

[NEXUS]

Quote: Olgovich

long service is the ship "VOLKHOV" -107 years of service in the Russian Navy, survived three powers!

Yes, there is such a thing ... the truth is that there was nothing left of the superstructures of the original ship, only a hull made of the steel that rusts on the drum.

[Alexey RA]

Quote: Olgovich

long service is the ship "VOLKHOV" -107 years of service in the Russian Navy, survived three powers!

Well, the Volkhov is still an auxiliary fleet.
But at the same KChF there is the Smetlivy TFR - 50 years in the ranks. The last of the "singing frigates" pr. 61.

[Hunter 2]

That's great! Have a good ship service! To the Commander and the Crew - Congratulations, Well done!

[awdrgy]

I'm afraid not in our lifetime (

[svp67]

Quote: NEXUS

When there will be news not about one corvette for the fleet, but about the party of new destroyers then?

Look at the size of modern ships and you start to wonder what happiness is not in "names"
Project 956 destroyers, these are the latest Soviet ships, the project code - “Sarych” - Displacement: Buildings No. 1-11:6500 t (standard)7904 t (full). Hull number 12-19:6600 t (standard), about 8000 t (full)
Length 145,0 m (on design basis)156,5 m (largest)
Width 16,8 m (on design basis) 17,2 m (largest)
Draft 5,96 m, 8,2 m (overall)

“Admiral of the Fleet of the Soviet Union Gorshkov” - frigate, project 22350.
Displacement: 4500 t (standard) 5400 t (full)
Length 135 m (largest)
Width 16 m
Precipitation 4,5 m
And soon they will start to build "Super Gorshkovs", and they will be larger, but the same frigates ... That is, now the destroyer, in size, is what used to be called a cruiser, but how many of them did we have?

[Chaldon48]

A displacement of 2200 tons is not enough for a ship in the ocean zone, as it will reach the Pacific Fleet.

[svp67]

Quote: Chaldon48

A displacement of 2200 tons is not enough for a ship in the ocean zone, as it will reach the Pacific Fleet.

Yes, I agree that for the open Ocean is not enough. But there are a lot of islands, the coast is indented with bays, and the fleet's basing places must be protected by something. So, I think he will find work. Although it would be better to leave it in the Baltic or send it to the Black Sea

[Kote Pan Kokhanka]

Quote: Chaldon48

A displacement of 2200 tons is not enough for a ship in the ocean zone, as it will reach the Pacific Fleet.

2200 tons of displacement - this is the tonnage of the improved seven times of the Great Patriotic War! As far as I remember, there were problems with them when crossing the Pacific Ocean, but only for the first time! And so from the Pacific to Murmansk during the war, they even drove them along the northern sea route! And with theirs problem buildings !!!

[NEXUS]

Quote: svp67

And soon they will start to build "Super Gorshkovs", and they will be larger, but the same frigates ... That is, now the destroyer, in size, is what used to be called a cruiser, but how many of them did we have?

Seriously? Yes, with your mouth drink honey in tanks. Even while Super-Gorshkov is not in the project, it’s not that at least something is laid there. How many frigates of project 22350 do we have? One, de facto! How many Ashes do we have? One! How many new-built cruisers do we have? Zero! How many years have we given birth to a power plant for frigates?
So do not tell me about the Super-Gorshkovs and a bright future.
Here you at least eat lazy people who find it easier to crow URA than to look at what kind of ass we have with the fleets. Here you can pour oil as much as you like, people hawala, as well as the show of our helmsmen.
You look from the side, at the enthusiastic squeals about Karakurt, yes we have them, yes we have Caliber ... funny, by God. As small children, God forgive me.
Could you tell us how much we are upgrading Nakhimov? No? What is it?
Or tell us about the modernization of Schuk-B? Not a shame no, after your Super-Potty and a brighter future?
I don’t give a damn about minuses and ranks ... I’ve been here too long, and therefore I understand and know that there is a real gap between -we dream and between -we have.
They talk a lot about the Russian aircraft carrier, but for 20 years they did not even try to start building a shipyard for this business. And here you are telling me about the Super-Gorshkovs?

[svp67]

Quote: NEXUS

Yes, with your mouth drink honey in tanks. Even while Super-Gorshkov is not in the project, it’s not that at least something is laid there.

You do not follow the news well, apparently your ardor prevents this ...

The designers of the Northern Design Bureau have completed the preliminary design of the project 22350M ship - an enlarged version of the Admiral Gorshkov-class frigates. An informed industry source told Mil.Press FlotProm about this. The work was completed on time, the preliminary design was prepared by the end of autumn, he added.

News from November 2019 ...

[NEXUS]

Quote: svp67

You do not follow the news well, apparently your ardor prevents this ...
The designers of the Northern Design Bureau have completed the preliminary design of the project 22350M ship - an enlarged version of the Admiral Gorshkov-class frigates. An informed industry source told Mil.Press FlotProm about this. The work was completed on time, the preliminary design was prepared by the end of autumn, he added.
News from November 2019 ...

Seriously? Directly completed? Have you completed the sketch of the aircraft carrier or the new BDK? And how much time does it take between sketch and layout before bookmarking, and how much time do we build ships? I will help you ... Corvette class ship we are building 7! years old. For comparison, during this time the same US is building two full-fledged destroyers.
They drew a sketch ... Hallelujah!
My ardor has nothing to do with the word at all. I follow the news no worse than yours ... but between WANTING to build, pay, test and pass, and HAVE in our far-off state decades pass.
Let's talk about the destroyer Leader ... yeah. What PR, what slogans and promises. Where is the leader, dear?
You still have not answered my question, but what about Nakhimov, Shchuky-B, BDK, and new cruisers with destroyers? Tell us about Karakurt and corvettes? Seriously?

[Astronaut]

Yes, calm down you, all h.renovo with us and the Chinese and Americans will soon conquer us))

[NEXUS]

Quote: Astronaut

Yes, calm down you, all h.renovo with us and the Chinese and Americans will soon conquer us))

Here is a typical hurray-troll who does not care, he came here pluses and title stupidly gather and neighing from the heart, although he didn’t run into his passport for 30 years, but at the same time he considers himself very smart.
And about your vyser about everything shitty, I’ll answer, yes (idiomatic expression, with a story about a certain sexual journey to the sunset), is still worse than hrenovo. They may not conquer us, (we all kneel together, with praise to God with the name of the Strategic Missile Forces), but we have not been an ocean power for 20 years.

[Astronaut]

Yes, I’m not a hysterical schoolgirl, just like some people don’t shout that "everything is lost, the client is leaving." You can be seen very far from understanding the real affairs in the military-industrial complex and take your information from the Internet.

[NEXUS]

Quote: Astronaut

Yes, I’m not a hysterical schoolgirl, just like some people don’t shout that "everything is lost, the client is leaving." You can be seen very far from understanding the real affairs in the military-industrial complex and take your information from the Internet.

Oh ... not an institute, and a knowledgeable (three ha ha) person who clearly and most importantly reliably knows what is happening in our defense industry.
Well, enlighten the dark, oh wise one, why do we have the loss of old warships ten times more than the arrival of new ones. Well, sooo interesting to listen to. What does it all started not yesterday, but immediately after the collapse of the USSR, that is, from the age of 91. Well, I'm full of attention, wise one.

[svp67]

Quote: NEXUS

Seriously?

"Here is a gentleman, hot as Vesuvius ..." Truffaldino from Bergamo
It's great that you are so rooting for this business, but please a little less emotion, otherwise "the traffic jams won't stand" ... go change them later.

[ZAV69]

From a conceptual design to working drawings for a very long time ....

[svp67]

Quote: ZAV69

From a conceptual design to working drawings for a very long time ....

But nevertheless, they are still fulfilling the plan, even slightly overwhelming, since this item was supposed to be completed by December 31.

[ZAV69]

Supergorshkov is not Novik Putilovsky, here they will draw working drawings for a year, then draw a contract for a year. The leaders of the USC and the Ministry of Defense are not the work of the People’s Commissariat under Stalin; they don’t know how to work quickly. And we get the laying of the frigate by the year 30.

[Alexey RA]

Quote: ZAV69

The leaders of the USC and the Ministry of Defense are not the work of the People’s Commissariat under Stalin; they don’t know how to work quickly.

It is not worth so idealizing the times of the IVS. Poor "Leningrad" was built right up to 1938. And the speed of design and construction of etc. 7, etc. 26 was due to you know whose help.
Or you can recall how, after the war, the NKSP generally refused to build ships of new projects, pushing instead the construction of slightly pre-war pre-war pr. 30K and pr. 68K.

[ZAV69]

With an IVS, a bureaucrat who failed to work easily changed his office to a cutting area. Now also changing the cabinet, but changing the cabinet to a more spacious one. Say Leningrad was built for 6 years? And Gorshkov generally built 12 .....
And if you count how many new ships (destroyers, leaders, cruisers) the USSR commissioned before the war and compare it with our time, it becomes very sad

[Alexey RA]

Quote: ZAV69

With an IVS, a bureaucrat who failed to work easily changed his office to a cutting area.

Tell about this to the directors of aircraft plants, which before the war were removed for a littered plan and ... sent to another plant.
Or tell about this to Comrade Zaltsman, who, after all the forgeries in the documents, financial fraud and the surrender of the army of obviously unfit tanks, moved from the chair of the factory director to the chair of the people's commissar.

[Alexey RA]

Quote: NEXUS

How many years have we given birth to a power plant for frigates?

Five years. Because they give birth not to a power plant, but to a full-cycle ship-type gas turbine engine plant (including a turbocompressor and gearbox) and its own test bench for a gas turbine engine. In short, everything that was built by the USSR in Nikolaev and remained in Ukraine.

[NEXUS]

Quote: Alexey RA

Five years. Because they give birth not to a power plant, but to a full-cycle ship-type gas turbine engine plant (including a turbocompressor and gearbox) and its own test bench for a gas turbine engine. In short, everything that was built by the USSR in Nikolaev and remained in Ukraine.

Add to these 5 years at least another 5 years of refinement and corrections. As for Ukraine, it remains to blame only our elite, who surrendered part of our land, and now proudly declares that there is a sovereign state, and we are very noble, therefore did not intervene when the State Department tore these lands away from us with meat and the people.

[Alexey RA]

Quote: NEXUS

As for Ukraine, it remains to blame only our elite, who surrendered part of our land, and now proudly declares that there is a sovereign state, and we are very noble, therefore did not intervene when the State Department tore these lands away from us with meat and the people.

Yes, yes ... all the Ukrainian people were for Russia, but a bunch of agents of the State Department on the Maidan tore off the fraternal people.
How many pro-Russian protests in Ukraine were there during this time? How many anti-war demonstrations? Come on, the people of Ukraine are satisfied with both Gunpowder and Ze - the same "Russian Kharkov" is ready to work in unheated workshops with salary delays, repairing equipment for the ATO with shock work and paying the ATO tax.
Russia's interference in Ukrainian affairs is like telling at a pro-Yeltsin rally in 1990 that the idol of millions of Russians will ruin and plunder everything and everyone, that the protesters will lose their jobs, that engineers will, at best, sell second-hand goods, that no "Western investors" will come invest, and that in five years their children will go to war. And what - will people believe in everything said?

[bk316]

we need to blame only our elite, who surrendered part of our land,

Well, go to the cemetery, blame, spit something on the grave or something.
You yourself were probably happy in 91 and 93, or at least watched with interest, but now the top is to blame.
Have you read the charter of the CPSU? There is a collective responsibility, so that every ordinary member of the CPSU is responsible for the actions of the party, as you wrote, "top". And if we whine again and we are "privates" .... then there was nothing to join the "ranks".
Damn the years go by and nothing changes, always someone else is to blame.

[Alien From]

Sure for the corvette! For the weapons component too! Seven feet under the keel! I hope the Kolomna engine will show its best! As practice has shown, you have to rely only on your own strengths.

[Valery Valery]

The Northern Fleet is waiting !!!

[faterdom]

Quote: NEXUS

And the backbone of our fleets is the tears that remained from the USSR.

Unfortunately, you are right.
But, as the classic ML wrote: "Less is better."
And here, nevertheless, the leading ship in the series has been tested, ready and heading for service. Very balanced for its size and displacement, quite a combat unit. A unit in hand is better than an aircraft carrier under repair.
Indeed, for the next war we are never completely ready, and we will fight with what we have, and not what we may someday be ....

[Dikson]

Well, and many who he would catch up with on this move, with his 27 knots?

[Wolf]

Corvette was completed with Russian diesel engines 1DDA-12000 of the Kolomna plant

,


The most important thing here! As the 1DDA-12000 of the Kolomna plant will show!

[Ugolek]

Well, and how many in the series are these 20385 supposed to be?

[Rusj]

Article 39 of the Fundamentals of Russia's state policy in the field of naval activities for the period up to 2030, approved two years ago, states: “The Russian Federation will not allow significant superiority of the naval forces of other states over the Navy and will seek to consolidate it in second place in the world in combat capabilities. " That's right - not in terms of displacement, but in terms of combat capabilities, with which, in general, everything is fine with us.

To begin with, the combat effectiveness of the tightly classified Chinese nuclear submarine forces is a big question. Both aircraft carriers of the PLA Navy (one in service, the other on sea trials) will continue to perform training functions for a long time due to problems with the main carrier-based aircraft - the J-15 fighter (Su-27K remake). But the main thing is not even that, but that the Chinese have nothing like the Granit and Volcano anti-ship missiles created back in the USSR. Their most massive anti-ship missile YJ-83 (based on Exoset) is subsonic, and the newest YJ-18 and not yet adopted by the CX-1 are pale shadows of the latest Russian modifications 3M54 (Caliber) and 3M55 (Onyx) )

Considering that the United States does not possess shock missiles that are close in combination of combat capabilities to our heavy supersonic (and soon hypersonic) anti-ship missiles, the United States does not have any significant superiority over anyone in the Russian Navy. The main problem of the domestic navy is the need for speedy updating and some buildup of the naval staff - carriers of the world's best naval weapons.

In other words, we need to have at our disposal not only crushing and unbreakable (difficult to break) means of destruction, but also at least one million tons of a sufficiently young displacement in which these means could be placed. It is thought that by 2050 this task will be largely resolved.

[Rusj]

The Navy is a complex system that can hardly be characterized by a single numerical indicator. Even in the era of armor and steam, when sea power was, in fact, the equivalent of the total mass of the airborne volley, there were nuances: the initial velocity of the projectile, determined by the length of the barrel and the power of the charge; gun elevation angle; mass and type of explosive; thickness, grade and location of the armor.

Nowadays, when the title of the main strike force in the war at sea in the situation of “fleet against fleet” passed to anti-ship cruise missiles, the nuances and uncertainties became even greater. Launch range, marching and final speed of anti-ship missiles, flight pattern, warhead mass, homing head perfection, anti-aircraft maneuver and jamming ability, level of target visibility, effectiveness of its air defense and electronic warfare. The development of a method for comparing the striking power of fleets that takes into account these factors is possible only if reliable source data are available, many of which are classified for obvious reasons.

[faterdom]

Quote: Dikson

Well, and many who he would catch up with on this move, with his 27 knots?

Missiles with a range of hundreds of kilometers? At least someone who didn't hide ... And the submarine too. And chasing the "Kawasaki" of Japanese poachers is not his task.

[musorg]

Like right again. And it is unlikely to surrender in the 1st quarter. But let's see. BDK also pulled back to 2020.

[Connor MacLeod]

06 x destroyers ave. 23560
12 x Frigates Project 22350
24 x Corvette Ave. 20380 and 20385

06 x atomic sublite pr 885
12 x nuclear submarines "Husky" aka "Laika"
24 x diesel submarines pr. 677

Eh, such a fleet would be like us now ...

[petrol cutter]

Thank. Finally, my wishes were heard to voice the names of the power plants of the surrendering ships.