ZVO anti-aircraft regiment completed rearmament at S-400 air defense system

The anti-aircraft missile regiment from the ZVO completed re-equipment with the S-400 anti-aircraft missile system, having received another set of equipment. This was reported by the press service of the district.

The anti-aircraft missile regiment of the Air Defense Division of the Air Force and Air Defense Division of the Western Military District, deployed in the Leningrad Region, received the next set and completed the re-equipment of the Triumph S-400 anti-aircraft missile system

- said in a statement.

The press service clarifies that the receipt of equipment took place at the Kapustin Yar training ground in the Astrakhan region, where the anti-aircraft gunners of the regiment conducted live firing on the “Favorite” hypersonic targets, which are of increased complexity for air defense units. The C-400 air defense missile systems were trained at the training center for the training of anti-aircraft missile troops in Gatchina, Leningrad Region.

Currently, the regiment has returned to the location where the equipment is being prepared for taking up combat duty. According to the plans of the command, the new regiment will enter the cover of the airspace of the north-west of the country from February 20 2020 of the year.

SAM S-400 "Triumph" is designed to destroy strategic and tactical aircraft aviation, ballistic missiles, hypersonic targets and other means of air attack in the conditions of electronic and other types of counteraction.

Comments

[Victor_B]

Do not be shy about your complexes!
More complexes - good and different!
And we still have them!
But they don’t have such sensible complexes.
That's why they fly dumb.

[rufaqn]

To whom and where is it dumb? of course it’s clear who you write about, but it seems that they fly without fear, and they have similar systems and they were tested by battle, unlike the c300 / 400, after that they have been modernized more than once, besides they have a stake on air defense aviation, which gives great opportunities, both in defense and in attack, our reliance on ground-based air defense only, from the poverty of our fleet, full-fledged air defense has long been replaced by local zones and in the event of a full-fledged conflict, its effectiveness is in question.

[Dart2027]

Quote: rufaqn

they have similar complexes and they are checked by battle

That's just the result of the checks somehow not very.

[rufaqn]

Patriot shot down most of the Soviet ballistic SCADS fired by Iraq against coalition forces and Israel in 1991, and SCAD is not your target at the Kapustin Yar training ground, it’s a ballistic missile if that.

[Dart2027]

Quote: rufaqn

shot down most of the Soviet ballistic SCADs fired by Iraq on coalition forces and Israel in 1991, and SCAD is

SCAD - a Soviet complex adopted in 1962, which demonstrated the complete futility of the Patriots, which were adopted in 1982, and according to Israel, which in sympathy for the Soviet military-industrial complex is certainly not seen.

[alstr]

Yeah, even Congress gave a completely different information
"Anton Zheleznyak, expert on technical and engineering issues:
"In total, during the first Gulf War, the Iraqi armed forces fired 88 Scud missiles. 12 of them were fired at Israel before the Patriot air defense system was deployed on its territory, of the 76 remaining 47 were fired at with 158 anti-aircraft missiles. According to the congressional commission, only 86 missiles were launched at real targets, and 72 at false targets, or at the wreckage of already shot down Scuds, mistaken for missiles.The exact number of downed Scuds is still disputed, as well as the calculation criteria. "

Where even the majority here is also not clear. Especially if you consider that half of the SCUD has simply collapsed due to "modernization".

[Sky strike fighter]

Quote: rufaqn

Patriot shot down most of the Soviet ballistic SCADS fired by Iraq against coalition forces and Israel in 1991, and SCAD is not your target at the Kapustin Yar training ground, it’s a ballistic missile if that.

You do not own the information or knowingly lying?

Almost immediately after being put on combat duty, the ideal system, from the point of view of immediate deployment, began to have “bugs” - software malfunctions that turn into hardware failures. The symptoms of desert fever, which caused equipment malfunctions, were unstable tracking of targets and increased missile consumption. Such data could not please the main customer, and the US military went to the trick - they simply did not report to the president about the real combat effectiveness of the new air defense system. As a result, the president of the country, George W. Bush, received ideal data on the work of American weapons not only at the frontline, but also on the territory of the allied military facilities. In his speech at Raytheon’s factory, Bush mentioned these reports and said: “The complex has shown amazing efficiency - out of 42 missiles, Scud 41 was intercepted.” Historians note that, in fact, the effectiveness of the Patriot complex, if it was not zero, could be “satisfactory” even by random coincidence - an independent analysis of a number of American experts, including the leading researcher at the Theodore Postol Massachusetts Institute of Technology, confirmed - in reality, the American air defense system was able to "process" less than 35% of all missiles launched by the Iraqi army.

Source: https://m.fishki.net/2551427-otkaz-patriota-kak-ssha-skryli-realynuju-jeffektivnosty-kompleksov-pvo.html

© M.fishki.net

Details of Patriot Air Defense crashes from the link below.

https://warhead.su/2018/01/21/ne-propatchili-kak-odin-malenkiy-bag-ugrobil-28-amerikantsev

[kapitan92]

rufaqn (Newbie)
In the suffix of a noun, after the sibilant "CH" under stress, it is always written "O"!
At school it was necessary to study better.

[carstorm 11]

oh yes) how did they start to check with a desert storm in a battle so every time it’s cooler and cooler) to recall how they managed to catch 35 percent of Iraqi missiles? or how did a missile gobble up an American base in the city of Dahran? 28 corpses and 150 injured? and this despite the fact that they deployed 33 batteries of patriots there?) are you talking about this test by battle or the last one this year?) or maybe in the year 15 when more than 50 people from the UAE died because of this complex?) as they said there? .. due to the design features of the complex it seems. and the point at there kneading in full? you write about such checks in battle? rides on all topics smacks of all nonsense with a smart look)))

[figwam]

Quote: carstorm 11

rides on all topics smacks of all nonsense with a smart look)))

For the first time an inadequate troll)))

[rufaqn]

Recall how they destroyed two of the Shell in Syria? Neither the c300 nor c400 helped nor the Pantsiri themselves, Israel flies there as at home, as several planes in Khmeini burned Barmalean drones bought kit kits on aliexpress and assembled using wire and electrical tape.

[alstr]

Any air defense system undergoes a glut of target channels.
It should be noted that the main task is to defend the OBJECT, not yourself.

[carstorm 11]

and what does the shell have to do with it? ))) Well, they destroyed it. happens in battle and such. how does this cancel the fact that I wrote about air defense systems tested in battles?) I, unlike you, understand that there are no systems that can protect 100 percent. as for that attack, there were not UAVs but mortars. And these crafts with Ali get off regularly.

[rufaqn]

And what does the Hussite drones and heavy air defense system? You’ll already decide which line you follow, and how the first channel is on the Malaysian Boeing.

[carstorm 11]

read carefully. I gave you examples not about UAVs)))

[Dart2027]

Quote: rufaqn

Recall how they destroyed two of the Shell in Syria?

Filling a cloud of rockets?

Quote: rufaqn

how several planes in Khmeini burned Barmalean drones

And who was burned there?

[Tusv]

Quote: rufaqn

Recall how two Shells were destroyed in Syria

?
Decrypt how much dough flew to that shell? At least three times more. from the cost of the Shell. But we are not at war with Israel. Not well, if they really want, then let them want to be the goal

[rufaqn]

Well, yes, you have a division of labor "by topic" in the office by topic, only tables in one room are

[carstorm 11]

are you talking to the mirror now?)

[venik]

Quote: rufaqn

and they have similar complexes and they are checked by battle, unlike c300 / 400

========
Especially effective [i] was one of the last (well, or "extreme") checks by the "battle" of the American "Pariot" in Saudi Arabia, where a Houthi drone simply "gouged" him !!!!
A very "spectacular test", I can tell you!

[Sky strike fighter]

Quote: rufaqn

To whom and where is it dumb? of course it’s clear who you write about, but it seems that they fly without fear, and they have similar systems and they were tested by battle, unlike the c300 / 400, after that they have been modernized more than once, besides they have a stake on air defense aviation, which gives great opportunities, both in defense and in attack, our reliance on ground-based air defense only, from the poverty of our fleet, full-fledged air defense has long been replaced by local zones and in the event of a full-fledged conflict, its effectiveness is in question.

Dimly the same Pompeo, who is not surprised by the news that the Patriot is junk, but was forced to make excuses to the same Saudis for the failure of Patriot's air defense. Checking the battles in Saudi Arabia took place "for Glory." ". Commodity face so to speak. This is how the Americans with their Patriots behaved in front of the whole world, and you are trying to tell us some fairy tales.
Tell me the composition of the American air defense aircraft. Do you know what you are talking about? Advantages? How will air defense aircraft intercept the infantry air defense system or ICBMs?

WASHINGTON, Sep 18 - RIA News. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo is not surprised that Saudi air defense systems, including the American Patriot missile defense systems, were unable to repel a missile attack on oil fields.
According to the diplomat, such systems work "with varying degrees of success."

https://ria.ru/20190918/1558829840.html

[Nyrobsky]

Quote: rufaqn

and they have similar complexes and they were checked by battle, unlike c300 / 400, after that they were modernized more than once ...

Yeah. It is for this reason that, after repeated "flying hats" from the Houthis and "poorly vigilant Patriots", Saudi Arabia thought about buying the S-400 complex from Russia.

[Thrifty]

Here, some members of the forum almost wanted to throw a komputor at me, claiming that we do not have hypersonic targets What will these characters say about the official MO statement in the article? ??

[rocket757]

This news is from the NADO category. There is nothing to discuss.

[cniza]

Quote: rocket757

This news is from the NADO category. There is nothing to discuss.

And you need more ... Greetings!

[rocket757]

Hi

Quote: cniza

And you need more

In this matter, it is important not just more, but a clear systematic approach. Intelligence, control, interaction and duplication!
In short, a shield and a smashing spear!
Something like this.

[cniza]

Yes, but there should be a reserve ... there is someone to think and do without us.

[rocket757]

Quote: cniza

Yes, but there should be a reserve ... there is someone to think and do without us.

We are still far from reserves. Very much, our country is huge ... to our delight, to the envy of our enemies!

[Dmitry Donskoy]

Who served in the air defense, do not explain why the cars were put with a cable from the tow bar to the rack in front of them? We also had such MAZs on Topolye, but we had the cables on the bumper in the stowed position. It’s not convenient to fasten the cable to the bumper when folding and changing the position

[svd-xnumx]

put the cable from the tow bar to the rack in front?

Can additional grounding?

[svp67]

Quote: Dmitry Donskoy

Who served in the air defense, do not explain why the cars were put with a cable from the tow bar to the rack in front of them?

Usually, this is how the cable is laid when it is necessary at some point to remove this equipment from this place with outside help, in the same fire ... but it itself cannot move on its own. So as not to waste time deploying cables

[Dmitry Donskoy]

Thank you. Now it’s clear

[Terenin]

Anti-aircraft missile regiment from the ZVO completed re-equipment on the S-400 anti-aircraft missile system

Well, now, for someone, in the expert group of the leading American "warrior-intellectual" General G.R. McMaster, vacations are slowed down until the report on the new Russian threat is polished

[_Ugene_]

Favorite is a serious target, if you use them to the full extent, then the S-400 can not cope with it. Apparently not fully used. Favorite missiles have maximum overloads of 25-30 units. in the troposphere, for their interception, the interceptor missile should have an available overload of about 55-60 units, and 48N6DM capable of maneuvering with overloads of 25-35 units. Apparently the flight mission was loaded, providing for maneuvering with overloads of not more than 12-15 units.

[Saboteur Holuy]

We have only Moscow covered

[Thrifty]

Holway, you are a complete antagonism to Vitali -Starperu 777 ! You shout how bad everything is, he’s a moron, claims that we are always the best! !! (Jews just do not give him life, for some reason )! Get Starter's website patriotism lessons! !!

[Saboteur Holuy]

What good are we doing? Since everywhere it’s either blat or nepotism ... and by the way in Science, too, terry apparatchiks settled in the Graduate Schools, who need only personal gain ...
Jews? They are the most adequate users here, sometimes it brings me in, but our comrades from Israel are always objective ... and I'm not Jewish, I'm Russian ...

[Sky strike fighter]

What good are we doing? Since everywhere it’s either blat or nepotism ... and by the way in Science, too, terry apparatchiks settled in the Graduate Schools, who need only personal gain ...

Try yourself as a speaker for grandmothers on the bench closest to you. There you will appreciate your talent. Just grab the seeds with you.

but our comrades from Israel are always objective ... and I am not a Jew, I am Russian ...

"We gussies do not deceive each other."
This is a classic.

[Saboteur Holuy]

Why are you writing this to me? This is not interesting to me, your prototypes lived from Ilyich to Ilyich without a stroke and paralysis, and then they served faithfully to Gorbachev and Yeltsin ...Classic! You are totally rotten

[rocket757]

OBJECTIVITY is not a nationality, it is a state .... payment for labor!

[Saboteur Holuy]

The fact is that they live there in Israel, and when the user here supports the opinion of terrorists about the destruction of Israel as a state, then they are naturally against it, moreover, they will perceive these users with hostility, and rightly so!

[Shahno]

Quote: Dart2027

Quote: rufaqn

Recall how they destroyed two of the Shell in Syria?

Filling a cloud of rockets?

Quote: rufaqn

how several planes in Khmeini burned Barmalean drones

And who was burned there?

Well, sorry. And you would like on the exercises.
When our very complex on the border with Gaza conducts 10-20 missiles and misses 2-3, here, after all, the question of efficiency is raised. They say that it’s like this ...

[Al Asad]

Quote: rufaqn

Patriot shot down most of the Soviet ballistic SCADS fired by Iraq against coalition forces and Israel in 1991, and SCAD is not your target at the Kapustin Yar training ground, it’s a ballistic missile if that.

And it hit the ground instead of air targets in Yemen. In general, one Patriot complex was destroyed in Saudi Arabia by a Hussite missile