Military Review

ZVO anti-aircraft regiment completed rearmament at S-400 air defense system

43
ZVO anti-aircraft regiment completed rearmament at S-400 air defense system

The anti-aircraft missile regiment from the ZVO completed re-equipment with the S-400 anti-aircraft missile system, having received another set of equipment. This was reported by the press service of the district.


The anti-aircraft missile regiment of the Air Defense Division of the Air Force and Air Defense Division of the Western Military District, deployed in the Leningrad Region, received the next set and completed the re-equipment of the Triumph S-400 anti-aircraft missile system

- said in a statement.

The press service clarifies that the receipt of equipment took place at the Kapustin Yar training ground in the Astrakhan region, where the anti-aircraft gunners of the regiment conducted live firing on the “Favorite” hypersonic targets, which are of increased complexity for air defense units. The C-400 air defense missile systems were trained at the training center for the training of anti-aircraft missile troops in Gatchina, Leningrad Region.

Currently, the regiment has returned to the location where the equipment is being prepared for taking up combat duty. According to the plans of the command, the new regiment will enter the cover of the airspace of the north-west of the country from February 20 2020 of the year.

SAM S-400 "Triumph" is designed to destroy strategic and tactical aircraft aviation, ballistic missiles, hypersonic targets and other means of air attack in the conditions of electronic and other types of counteraction.
43 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Victor_B
    Victor_B 15 December 2019 15: 16
    +13
    Do not be shy about your complexes!
    More complexes - good and different!
    And we still have them!
    But they don’t have such sensible complexes.
    That's why they fly dumb.
    1. rufaqn
      rufaqn 15 December 2019 15: 34
      -28
      To whom and where is it dumb? of course it’s clear who you write about, but it seems that they fly without fear, and they have similar systems and they were tested by battle, unlike the c300 / 400, after that they have been modernized more than once, besides they have a stake on air defense aviation, which gives great opportunities, both in defense and in attack, our reliance on ground-based air defense only, from the poverty of our fleet, full-fledged air defense has long been replaced by local zones and in the event of a full-fledged conflict, its effectiveness is in question.
      1. Dart2027
        Dart2027 15 December 2019 15: 49
        +18
        Quote: rufaqn
        they have similar complexes and they are checked by battle

        That's just the result of the checks somehow not very.
        1. rufaqn
          rufaqn 15 December 2019 16: 03
          -28
          Patriot shot down most of the Soviet ballistic SCADS fired by Iraq against coalition forces and Israel in 1991, and SCAD is not your target at the Kapustin Yar training ground, it’s a ballistic missile if that.
          1. Dart2027
            Dart2027 15 December 2019 16: 09
            +14
            Quote: rufaqn
            shot down most of the Soviet ballistic SCADs fired by Iraq on coalition forces and Israel in 1991, and SCAD is

            SCAD - a Soviet complex adopted in 1962, which demonstrated the complete futility of the Patriots, which were adopted in 1982, and according to Israel, which in sympathy for the Soviet military-industrial complex is certainly not seen.
          2. alstr
            alstr 15 December 2019 16: 32
            +7
            Yeah, even Congress gave a completely different information
            "Anton Zheleznyak, expert on technical and engineering issues:
            "In total, during the first Gulf War, the Iraqi armed forces fired 88 Scud missiles. 12 of them were fired at Israel before the Patriot air defense system was deployed on its territory, of the 76 remaining 47 were fired at with 158 anti-aircraft missiles. According to the congressional commission, only 86 missiles were launched at real targets, and 72 at false targets, or at the wreckage of already shot down Scuds, mistaken for missiles.The exact number of downed Scuds is still disputed, as well as the calculation criteria. "

            Where even the majority here is also not clear. Especially if you consider that half of the SCUD has simply collapsed due to "modernization".
          3. Sky strike fighter
            Sky strike fighter 15 December 2019 17: 42
            +5
            Quote: rufaqn
            Patriot shot down most of the Soviet ballistic SCADS fired by Iraq against coalition forces and Israel in 1991, and SCAD is not your target at the Kapustin Yar training ground, it’s a ballistic missile if that.


            You do not own the information or knowingly lying?
            Almost immediately after being put on combat duty, the ideal system, from the point of view of immediate deployment, began to have “bugs” - software malfunctions that turn into hardware failures. The symptoms of desert fever, which caused equipment malfunctions, were unstable tracking of targets and increased missile consumption. Such data could not please the main customer, and the US military went to the trick - they simply did not report to the president about the real combat effectiveness of the new air defense system. As a result, the president of the country, George W. Bush, received ideal data on the work of American weapons not only at the frontline, but also on the territory of the allied military facilities. In his speech at Raytheon’s factory, Bush mentioned these reports and said: “The complex has shown amazing efficiency - out of 42 missiles, Scud 41 was intercepted.” Historians note that, in fact, the effectiveness of the Patriot complex, if it was not zero, could be “satisfactory” even by random coincidence - an independent analysis of a number of American experts, including the leading researcher at the Theodore Postol Massachusetts Institute of Technology, confirmed - in reality, the American air defense system was able to "process" less than 35% of all missiles launched by the Iraqi army.

            Source: https://m.fishki.net/2551427-otkaz-patriota-kak-ssha-skryli-realynuju-jeffektivnosty-kompleksov-pvo.html

            © M.fishki.net

            Details of Patriot Air Defense crashes from the link below.

            https://warhead.su/2018/01/21/ne-propatchili-kak-odin-malenkiy-bag-ugrobil-28-amerikantsev
          4. kapitan92
            kapitan92 15 December 2019 20: 57
            0
            rufaqn (Newbie)
            In the suffix of a noun, after the sibilant "CH" under stress, it is always written "O"!
            At school it was necessary to study better. laughing
      2. carstorm 11
        carstorm 11 15 December 2019 16: 00
        +19
        oh yes) how did they start to check with a desert storm in a battle so every time it’s cooler and cooler) to recall how they managed to catch 35 percent of Iraqi missiles? or how did a missile gobble up an American base in the city of Dahran? 28 corpses and 150 injured? and this despite the fact that they deployed 33 batteries of patriots there?) are you talking about this test by battle or the last one this year?) or maybe in the year 15 when more than 50 people from the UAE died because of this complex?) as they said there? .. due to the design features of the complex it seems. and the point at there kneading in full? you write about such checks in battle? rides on all topics smacks of all nonsense with a smart look)))
        1. figwam
          figwam 15 December 2019 16: 08
          +6
          Quote: carstorm 11
          rides on all topics smacks of all nonsense with a smart look)))

          For the first time an inadequate troll)))
        2. rufaqn
          rufaqn 15 December 2019 16: 19
          -22
          Recall how they destroyed two of the Shell in Syria? Neither the c300 nor c400 helped nor the Pantsiri themselves, Israel flies there as at home, as several planes in Khmeini burned Barmalean drones bought kit kits on aliexpress and assembled using wire and electrical tape.
          1. alstr
            alstr 15 December 2019 16: 34
            +7
            Any air defense system undergoes a glut of target channels.
            It should be noted that the main task is to defend the OBJECT, not yourself.
          2. carstorm 11
            carstorm 11 15 December 2019 16: 46
            +8
            and what does the shell have to do with it? ))) Well, they destroyed it. happens in battle and such. how does this cancel the fact that I wrote about air defense systems tested in battles?) I, unlike you, understand that there are no systems that can protect 100 percent. as for that attack, there were not UAVs but mortars. And these crafts with Ali get off regularly.
            1. rufaqn
              rufaqn 15 December 2019 16: 57
              -17
              And what does the Hussite drones and heavy air defense system? You’ll already decide which line you follow, and how the first channel is on the Malaysian Boeing.
              1. carstorm 11
                carstorm 11 15 December 2019 17: 01
                +6
                read carefully. I gave you examples not about UAVs)))
          3. Dart2027
            Dart2027 15 December 2019 17: 33
            +4
            Quote: rufaqn
            Recall how they destroyed two of the Shell in Syria?

            Filling a cloud of rockets?
            Quote: rufaqn
            how several planes in Khmeini burned Barmalean drones

            And who was burned there?
          4. Tusv
            Tusv 15 December 2019 18: 41
            +2
            Quote: rufaqn
            Recall how two Shells were destroyed in Syria
            ?
            Decrypt how much dough flew to that shell? At least three times more. from the cost of the Shell. But we are not at war with Israel. Not well, if they really want, then let them want to be the goal
        3. rufaqn
          rufaqn 15 December 2019 16: 34
          -17
          Well, yes, you have a division of labor "by topic" in the office by topic, only tables in one room are lol
          1. carstorm 11
            carstorm 11 15 December 2019 16: 51
            +5
            are you talking to the mirror now?)
      3. venik
        venik 15 December 2019 16: 18
        +8
        Quote: rufaqn
        and they have similar complexes and they are checked by battle, unlike c300 / 400

        ========
        Especially effective [i] was one of the last (well, or "extreme") checks by the "battle" of the American "Pariot" in Saudi Arabia, where a Houthi drone simply "gouged" him !!!! laughing
        A very "spectacular test", I can tell you! wassat
      4. Sky strike fighter
        Sky strike fighter 15 December 2019 18: 01
        +3
        Quote: rufaqn
        To whom and where is it dumb? of course it’s clear who you write about, but it seems that they fly without fear, and they have similar systems and they were tested by battle, unlike the c300 / 400, after that they have been modernized more than once, besides they have a stake on air defense aviation, which gives great opportunities, both in defense and in attack, our reliance on ground-based air defense only, from the poverty of our fleet, full-fledged air defense has long been replaced by local zones and in the event of a full-fledged conflict, its effectiveness is in question.

        Dimly the same Pompeo, who is not surprised by the news that the Patriot is junk, but was forced to make excuses to the same Saudis for the failure of Patriot's air defense. Checking the battles in Saudi Arabia took place "for Glory." ". Commodity face so to speak. This is how the Americans with their Patriots behaved in front of the whole world, and you are trying to tell us some fairy tales.
        Tell me the composition of the American air defense aircraft. Do you know what you are talking about? Advantages? How will air defense aircraft intercept the infantry air defense system or ICBMs?

        WASHINGTON, Sep 18 - RIA News. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo is not surprised that Saudi air defense systems, including the American Patriot missile defense systems, were unable to repel a missile attack on oil fields.
        According to the diplomat, such systems work "with varying degrees of success."

        https://ria.ru/20190918/1558829840.html
      5. Nyrobsky
        Nyrobsky 15 December 2019 18: 43
        0
        Quote: rufaqn
        and they have similar complexes and they were checked by battle, unlike c300 / 400, after that they were modernized more than once ...

        Yeah. It is for this reason that, after repeated "flying hats" from the Houthis and "poorly vigilant Patriots", Saudi Arabia thought about buying the S-400 complex from Russia. yes
    2. Thrifty
      Thrifty 15 December 2019 17: 00
      +2
      Here, some members of the forum almost wanted to throw a komputor at me, claiming that we do not have hypersonic targets bully What will these characters say about the official MO statement in the article? ?? negative am
  2. rocket757
    rocket757 15 December 2019 15: 24
    +6
    This news is from the NADO category. There is nothing to discuss.
    1. cniza
      cniza 15 December 2019 15: 29
      +4
      Quote: rocket757
      This news is from the NADO category. There is nothing to discuss.



      And you need more ... Greetings! hi
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 15 December 2019 17: 39
        +2
        Hi soldier
        Quote: cniza
        And you need more

        In this matter, it is important not just more, but a clear systematic approach. Intelligence, control, interaction and duplication!
        In short, a shield and a smashing spear!
        Something like this.
        1. cniza
          cniza 15 December 2019 18: 13
          +2
          Yes, but there should be a reserve ... there is someone to think and do without us. yes
          1. rocket757
            rocket757 15 December 2019 18: 55
            +1
            Quote: cniza
            Yes, but there should be a reserve ... there is someone to think and do without us. yes

            We are still far from reserves. Very much, our country is huge ... to our delight, to the envy of our enemies!
  3. Dmitry Donskoy
    Dmitry Donskoy 15 December 2019 15: 39
    +2
    Who served in the air defense, do not explain why the cars were put with a cable from the tow bar to the rack in front of them? We also had such MAZs on Topolye, but we had the cables on the bumper in the stowed position. It’s not convenient to fasten the cable to the bumper when folding and changing the position request
    1. svd-xnumx
      svd-xnumx 15 December 2019 15: 48
      0
      put the cable from the tow bar to the rack in front?
      Can additional grounding?
    2. svp67
      svp67 15 December 2019 15: 49
      +4
      Quote: Dmitry Donskoy
      Who served in the air defense, do not explain why the cars were put with a cable from the tow bar to the rack in front of them?

      Usually, this is how the cable is laid when it is necessary at some point to remove this equipment from this place with outside help, in the same fire ... but it itself cannot move on its own. So as not to waste time deploying cables
      1. Dmitry Donskoy
        Dmitry Donskoy 15 December 2019 15: 50
        +2
        Thank you. Now it’s clear
  4. Terenin
    Terenin 15 December 2019 15: 41
    +5
    Anti-aircraft missile regiment from the ZVO completed re-equipment on the S-400 anti-aircraft missile system

    Well, winked now, for someone, in the expert group of the leading American "warrior-intellectual" General G.R. McMaster, vacations are slowed down until the report on the new Russian threat is polished crying
  5. _Ugene_
    _Ugene_ 15 December 2019 16: 41
    0
    Favorite is a serious target, if you use them to the full extent, then the S-400 can not cope with it. Apparently not fully used. Favorite missiles have maximum overloads of 25-30 units. in the troposphere, for their interception, the interceptor missile should have an available overload of about 55-60 units, and 48N6DM capable of maneuvering with overloads of 25-35 units. Apparently the flight mission was loaded, providing for maneuvering with overloads of not more than 12-15 units.
  6. Saboteur Holuy
    Saboteur Holuy 15 December 2019 17: 15
    -5
    We have only Moscow covered
    1. Thrifty
      Thrifty 15 December 2019 17: 40
      +1
      Holway, you are a complete antagonism to Vitali -Starperu 777 wassat ! You shout how bad everything is, he’s a moron, claims that we are always the best! !! lol (Jews just do not give him life, for some reason belay )! Get Starter's website patriotism lessons! !! hi
      1. Saboteur Holuy
        Saboteur Holuy 15 December 2019 18: 13
        -3
        What good are we doing? Since everywhere it’s either blat or nepotism ... and by the way in Science, too, terry apparatchiks settled in the Graduate Schools, who need only personal gain ...
        Jews? They are the most adequate users here, sometimes it brings me in, but our comrades from Israel are always objective ... and I'm not Jewish, I'm Russian ...
        1. Sky strike fighter
          Sky strike fighter 15 December 2019 18: 27
          +1
          What good are we doing? Since everywhere it’s either blat or nepotism ... and by the way in Science, too, terry apparatchiks settled in the Graduate Schools, who need only personal gain ...

          Try yourself as a speaker for grandmothers on the bench closest to you. There you will appreciate your talent. Just grab the seeds with you.

          but our comrades from Israel are always objective ... and I am not a Jew, I am Russian ...

          "We gussies do not deceive each other."
          This is a classic.
          1. Saboteur Holuy
            Saboteur Holuy 15 December 2019 18: 47
            -2
            Why are you writing this to me? This is not interesting to me, your prototypes lived from Ilyich to Ilyich without a stroke and paralysis, and then they served faithfully to Gorbachev and Yeltsin ...Classic! You are totally rotten
          2. rocket757
            rocket757 15 December 2019 18: 54
            0
            OBJECTIVITY is not a nationality, it is a state .... payment for labor!
            1. Saboteur Holuy
              Saboteur Holuy 15 December 2019 19: 11
              -1
              The fact is that they live there in Israel, and when the user here supports the opinion of terrorists about the destruction of Israel as a state, then they are naturally against it, moreover, they will perceive these users with hostility, and rightly so!
  7. Shahno
    Shahno 15 December 2019 17: 38
    -1
    Quote: Dart2027
    Quote: rufaqn
    Recall how they destroyed two of the Shell in Syria?

    Filling a cloud of rockets?
    Quote: rufaqn
    how several planes in Khmeini burned Barmalean drones

    And who was burned there?

    Well, sorry. And you would like on the exercises.
    When our very complex on the border with Gaza conducts 10-20 missiles and misses 2-3, here, after all, the question of efficiency is raised. They say that it’s like this ...
  8. Al Asad
    Al Asad 15 December 2019 18: 34
    0
    Quote: rufaqn
    Patriot shot down most of the Soviet ballistic SCADS fired by Iraq against coalition forces and Israel in 1991, and SCAD is not your target at the Kapustin Yar training ground, it’s a ballistic missile if that.

    And it hit the ground instead of air targets in Yemen. In general, one Patriot complex was destroyed in Saudi Arabia by a Hussite missile