"Caliber" dispersed to hypersonic speed ": the most stupid military fakes of the week

84

In the “Weekend Fiction” section, “VO” presents a new selection of the most stupid fakes of the week. Recall that last week “Military Review” told its readers about the UNIQUE military expertise, when certain resources (let's not point a finger ...) announced how the S-400 air defense missile system shot down the Israeli Jericho rocket during the tests, and about as the Su-35 "dispersed", again Israeli, the F-35 in the sky over Syria.

In the new issue - new "heights". Last week, the Zvezda channel was noted for the launch of the Caliber naval cruise missiles. The report was originally called “More than 250 km in 137 seconds: a video of target destruction by Caliber was published.



You do not need to be a mathematician at the Perelman level in order to calculate the speed of the rocket that was discussed in the report based on the voiced data. This speed is more than 6,5 thousand km / h! It turns out that during the firing, the "Caliber" was somehow dispersed to hypersonic speed. Suppose ... But then - more.


The report (again, initially) stated that the "Caliber" was accompanied by fighters. It turns out that if the "Caliber" suddenly became hypersonic, then the fighters - too. Otherwise, how would they “accompany a hypersonic missile”?

Realizing that there was “something wrong” with the characteristics of the rocket in the report, the correspondents decided to correct the headline: instead of “250 km in 137 seconds”, “250 km in a few tens of seconds” appeared. As they say, "let it be". At the same time, it was stated that the defeat of the target was recorded Drones. But in the report itself there was a phrase: "The sailors worked out an algorithm of actions to defeat a mock enemy surface ship with the Caliber missile system with electronic launches." How can these statements be reconciled? Have drones recorded hits from electronic launches? And what, in this case, was accompanied by fighters?

The Avia.pro resource distinguished itself during the week. Title: “A second reconnaissance aircraft escorting an American aircraft carrier was shot down.”

How is the second? That is, the “first” was also shot down ... Why neither the Pentagon nor the Hussites know about it, on which two reconnaissance aircraft were “hung” at once? In the same materials, the authors suddenly ask themselves whether it was a reconnaissance plane, or was it an unmanned aerial vehicle ... And in the end, an “information bomb”: “Hussites may well attack both the aircraft carrier and the entire strike group.”

Completed the week "News"From the series" We Didn’t Even Know "the Free News portal, coming out with the material under the heading:" US military threat of use weapons stopped the Russian patrol. " The material was published with reference to some political experts, who themselves, of course, did not see anything like this, but apparently heard from other "political experts" ...

Such was the week of military “sensations”: either hypersonic “Caliber”, then Hussites, shooting down American planes literally one after another.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    84 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +1
      December 14 2019
      "Caliber" dispersed to "hypersonic speed": the most stupid military fakes ....
      Why fakes? IMHO, this is an information war :) Let the adversary scratch his turnips.
      1. +9
        December 14 2019
        In vain weed was allowed. :-)
        1. +11
          December 14 2019
          Quote: GoldMoskit
          In vain weed was allowed. :-)

          In vain removed censorship and proofreaders!
      2. 0
        December 14 2019
        Why fakes? IMHO, this is an information war :) Let the adversary scratch his turnips.


        They have their own fakes. Or maybe NOT fakes.

        Retired US Army Lieutenant General Stephen Quast said the United States has technology that can deliver a person anywhere in the world in less than an hour.
        About this, according to The Drive, he said at Hillsdale College.
        Quast previously served as head of the Training Aviation Command at the base in San Antonio.
        According to him, such a technology can be created "today, and independently, not as the development of existing developments."
        “It will allow anyone to be delivered from anywhere in the world to any other place in less than an hour,” he said.
        The former military did not provide details about the technology.


        https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/31445/recently-retired-usaf-general-makes-eyebrow-raising-claims-about-advanced-space-technology
        1. +10
          December 14 2019
          At the end of this article, it was necessary to voice the names of particularly distinguished scribblers. Let the country know its characters in person Yes
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. +1
            December 14 2019
            Quote: Dmitry Donskoy
            At the end of this article, it was necessary to voice the names of particularly distinguished scribblers. Let the country know its characters in person

            These "heroes" who do not know the basics of hydrodynamics (and other subjects) should simply be excluded from .....
          3. 0
            December 14 2019
            Quote: Dmitry Donskoy
            At the end of this article, it was necessary to voice the names of particularly distinguished scribblers. Let the country know its characters in person Yes


            What a modest young man. Just Dmitry Donskoy. Why not Alexander the Great? Today is Saturday. Can.
          4. +6
            December 15 2019
            most stupid war fakes of the week

            And here is our winner in this nomination good
          5. 0
            December 15 2019
            And in what form it was delivered. Preferably with a photo.
        2. +4
          December 15 2019
          And it just might not be fake
          He talked about technology, not about the finished device
          Actually, this is a suborbital flight, like the first American astronauts
          There’s no sense why it’s necessary to deliver one person so quickly somewhere
          1. +2
            December 15 2019
            Naturally there are such technologies, and you and I know which ones. These are ballistic missiles.
            1. +1
              December 15 2019
              The first space flights were actually carried out on ballistic missiles adapted for LV
              So theoretically, technology is, or at least possible
              Only it makes no sense
        3. +4
          December 15 2019
          So there really is such a technology. The person will be delivered. But he is unlikely to survive this delivery :)
        4. +10
          December 15 2019
          They have their own fakes. Or maybe NOT fakes.


          It’s not their fakes, but we have * diodes as translators. The phrase is taken out of context. Specially followed the link and read the article. A former general in a private lecture said that more money needs to be invested in Space Command to confront China. Further literally: for 33 years I met many scientists. I assure you today technologies already exist that could deliver a person anywhere in the world in an hour. That is, with proper funding, this can be done. This phrase was just an example, but it was all about something else.
          1. 0
            December 15 2019
            Quote: Choi
            I assure you today there are already technologies that could deliver a person to anywhere in the world in an hour. That is, with proper funding, this can be done.

            What is the idiocy?
            1. +1
              December 15 2019
              What is the idiocy?


              Is this an intentionally incorrect translation with an emphasis on one sentence in a large lecture? Not?
              1. -1
                December 15 2019
                I already answered your comment
                They have technologies and that it’s possible in principle is not the same thing
                In Ushakov's Explanatory Dictionary of 1940, technology is “a set of sciences, information about the methods of processing one or another raw material into a manufactured product, into a finished product; a set of processes for such processing ”. "in principle possible" is not a science, but a fantasy.
                1. 0
                  December 15 2019
                  Quote: WIKI
                  In Ushakov's Explanatory Dictionary of 1940, technology is “a set of sciences, information about the methods of processing one or another raw material into a manufactured product, into a finished product; a set of processes for such processing ”. "in principle possible" is not a science, but a fantasy.


                  I have already answered you too. And here and there I don't understand what does the definition of the word "technology" have to do with it? It is about the incompetence of the translator, and not about something else.
        5. +2
          December 15 2019
          theoretically, you can transfer a person by phone. but the technical difficulties that arise at the moment are not surmountable

          T.A. Edison
      3. 0
        December 15 2019
        And the drones that track the hit of hypersonic Caliber also come out, were hypersonic ???
        1. 0
          December 15 2019
          Well, the caliber itself is also essentially a drone. Amerikoses have the option of a tomahawk performed by a reconnaissance drone, when instead of warheads they put all kinds of cameras in it.
    2. -3
      December 14 2019
      About Calibers ... I get up and take off my hat ...
      1. +6
        December 14 2019
        Quote: Leader of the Redskins
        About Calibers ... I get up and take off my hat ...

        And do not forget to hand over the coat to the wardrobe! Yes
        Sorry of course - but your comment was very amusing! lol
        You need to check the information in advance, and do not give a refutation after the fact! Serious media - do just that! hi
        1. 0
          December 14 2019
          Quote: Hunter 2
          Serious media - do just that


          Those. Are you bluntly saying that the Zvezda TV channel from which many people here crow, bluntly, ordinary bullshit? Sorry - frivolous media wink
          1. +5
            December 14 2019
            Channel management should take a closer look at the outgoing editor. And the news department of the site is to check the news received. Especially on the Internet immediately after the release of the report, his refutation appeared.
            And what is the syllable of your comment ... (crow) ??? You are not at the poultry farm! laughing
            1. 0
              December 14 2019
              Quote: Hunter 2
              And what is the syllable of your comment ... (crow) ???


              Well, how did I manage to wrap laughing By the way, it is very intelligible. In fact, everything is much worse. Even if the first person of the first channel is also slurred wink I’m silent about Rush Tudey. jelly tivi and others like them. But the most tsimus is not even in them, but in the fact that they pick up and carry such nonsense. This is especially noticeable on this resource. Is even common sense finally left the like, or something else? What do you think ?
              1. +9
                December 14 2019
                Mostly try to think Head! what
                Understand ... now the Century of Information, mistakes are All - regardless of the channel and Country! You read the Chinese or see (if you know the language) - I guarantee you at least Nervous Tick! Well, infallible Western media, think Better? There are more fakes on the Order! All in pursuit of sensations forget about elementary logic and professionalism. Need for this - to punish! angry
                The site has lost ground somewhat ... it took a lot of competent Forum users, but ... I hope Everything is fixable! hi
                1. 0
                  December 15 2019
                  Eeeee, wait a minute! We are Dartanyans !!! We can’t have fakes by definition !!! For we (and only WE !!!) are Dartanyans, and all the rest (well, except for some, which are vanishingly few laughing , but nevertheless, like druganov, until the next pay) forgive my syllable, rot or simply falling. geyropiruyut wink
                2. +3
                  December 15 2019
                  Not the explanation chosen. Why watch how they lie and become like.
                  Unfortunately, especially recently, all dregs have appeared very often here.
                  I can recall how vehemently discussed the flight of the Tu-160 over the Sea of ​​Japan where he left the F-35. It turned out a fake taken from Chinese Yandex Zen, which is Sohu. And obviously it didn’t work to think because you’re right -
                  Quote: Hunter 2
                  The site has somewhat lost ground ... it took a lot of literate members of the forum

                  Many unfortunately there are those who are chasing the pluses, absolutely not understanding the topic.
                  1. +3
                    December 15 2019
                    If about the Tu-160 fake toy I seduced. For max. its speed is 2200km.h. and f-35 1950km.ch. But of course I agree, reading the press I want to believe what is written and not to wonder if they are fooling me.
                    1. 0
                      December 15 2019
                      On paper it is. But realities per minute burns one ton of fuel at maximum speed, engines consume motor resources faster, and there is no engine for Tu-160. And most importantly, why is this needed? Show off. None of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation knows about this in Japan
                      1. +1
                        December 15 2019
                        Could of course show off, know our pier. But I do not dispute your words if there is nowhere to be confirmed apparently and the deceiver has indeed turned out.
                3. 0
                  December 15 2019
                  Unfortunately, I am far from young and because of this I remember the work of the Soviet media in the Brezhnev era. Of course, ideology prevailed, many facts were hushed up, something was presented in a distorted light, citizens of the USSR were convinced that their country was not only in the field of ballet “ahead of all Europe”. But the fighters of the ideological front of that time were incomparably smarter, more educated and more professional than their current Russian colleagues. There are no such political observers as V. Zorin, A. Bovin, I. Fesunenko, A. Kaveznev today, and the Kiselev-Nightingale's are pitiful mediocrities.
          2. +6
            December 14 2019
            Quote: UserGun
            Those. Are you bluntly saying that the Zvezda TV channel from which many people here crow, bluntly, ordinary bullshit?

            Eeeee ... and what, is this news for you? :))))
            1. +1
              December 15 2019
              Clap! Clap! Those. Do you also consider this FEDERAL channel fake? No, well, of course, thanks for the directness)))
            2. +1
              December 15 2019
              Eeeee ... and what, is this news for you? :))))

              This cannot be. Oh, priests, you can't trust anyone in our time, even the most honest channel - "Zvezda".
    3. +10
      December 14 2019
      It's good that VO opens our eyes ... but after the fact! It would be nice if it was the other way around or such materials were not dragged to the site. Otherwise, there was no respite from the Amsk "National Interest". And there not everything was true and objectively balanced ... However.
      1. +3
        December 15 2019
        Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
        And then from the AM "National Interest"


        Only he is not quite American. They have an immigrant for the main.
    4. +1
      December 14 2019
      I am glad that critically thinking authors remained at VO. Respect, Respect.
      1. 0
        December 14 2019
        I agree. This is valuable.
    5. +3
      December 14 2019
      "" The material was published with reference to some political experts who, of course, have not seen anything like this themselves, but apparently heard from other "political experts" ... "" This is how we live, dear friends)) Today, the main news agency in the world, this is OBS)))
      1. +7
        December 14 2019
        Today, the main news agency in the world is OBS

        1. -1
          December 14 2019
          Mach 5,4 for the Caliber anti-submarine missile? for export performance - Mach 2,5 per 50 km ...
          It reminded me of an old joke
          Sarah comes up from the bazaar upset and says Abrashhe, she gave a mole she bought 5 rubles for chicken, and they each had 3 rubles. What does Abram ask: “What is Mach a big man?” ;)
          1. +3
            December 14 2019

            Rostislav Bely: ... mole gave a blow ...

            Good evening, Glory hi
            Have you decided to take part in this nomination "war fakes of the week" too? smile
            They won’t buy it. Moth does not fly at such a speed Yes
            1. +3
              December 15 2019
              We are adults
              Who will believe it?
              How the mole looks and how Mach
              How would she give it to him? smile
              hi
            2. +2
              December 15 2019
              here the moth is different, as in Bobruisk on tour of the Jewish theater - they gave Boris Godunov, Tsar Boris comes on the scene and the phone rings suddenly, the actor, not bewildered, answers the call from the stage: - Tsar, what, well, I repeat the letters of Tsilya, Abram Reuben, the end is soft ...
    6. 0
      December 14 2019
      Good night, did anyone see the news: In the USA, they announced the possibility of delivering a person in an hour to anywhere .....
      Do you think the Department of Defense Advanced Research Projects of the US Department of Defense projects really did something, or so the air is cracking ...
      1. +16
        December 14 2019
        Quote: Isk1984
        Good night, did anyone see the news: In the USA, they announced the possibility of delivering a person in an hour to anywhere .....
        Do you think the Department of Defense Advanced Research Projects of the US Department of Defense projects really did something, or so the air is cracking ...

        At least - send a man ... anywhere in the world and not only, it is possible in a couple of seconds! feel only a person can be upset! crying
      2. +2
        December 15 2019
        Gagarin took less than two hours to fly around the planet
        So theoretically it cannot be excluded that the technology is
        And practically, nobody needs such a delivery
    7. -3
      December 14 2019
      You do not need to be a mathematician at the Perelman level in order to calculate the speed of the rocket that was discussed in the report based on the voiced data. This speed is more than 6,5 thousand km / h!

      hi
      250/137 = 1,84 km / s = 5,4 Ma - I'm just an auditor, not "Perelmanovich", so I don't do complicated calculations, but I use a table from the Internet.
      Most likely this is not a fake, but a banal mistake, they threw it from miles to km - they shot from 140 km, not miles, but up to 3 machs for the caliber, the real speed in the export version, or maybe they really caught up to 5 mach, since this is not an export version anti-submarine missiles 91RE2 ("Caliber-NKE") and 91RE1 ("Caliber-PLE"))
      I have the impression that the author has, so to speak, "bear disease" on fakes
      1. +1
        December 15 2019
        The subsonic caliber, theoretically up to 2 max, the second stage of the RCC variant can be accelerated in the last forty kilometers
        1. -4
          December 15 2019
          on the latter in the export version 3M-54E up to 2,9 Ma ... you at least open Wikipedia, this is not the data of the Russian Defense Ministry
          1. +4
            December 15 2019
            Let's do it again-
            Subsonic caliber, supersonic only the last stage, shoots back after detecting a target
            Caliber itself on the march section can not accelerate to 3 m, nor to 5, nor to 2
            1. -5
              December 15 2019
              Subsonic - you confuse with axes ...
              1. +4
                December 15 2019
                This is what you are confused with
                All Gauges are subsonic, the supersonic stage in the last section is only one of the versions of the anti-ship missiles
                1. 0
                  December 15 2019
                  I'm not talking about the yacht (onyx) - we have roughened characteristics in the export version (a dead-end branch is given for analysis, that is, not for a hike (improvement) in the future)
                  and you are buzzing from the export version - what do you think we stupid people make decisions by illuminating technologies for export?
                  The talker is a godsend for the spy - remember the joke about the sniper - And who speaks to me - I laughing
            2. +3
              December 15 2019
              Gospidya! Yes, explain to the people clearly that you mean anti-ship versions of "Calibers" with a range, somewhere, up to 300 km ...!
        2. +1
          December 15 2019
          Quote: Avior
          theoretically, the second stage of the RCC variant in the last forty kilometers can accelerate to 2 max

          ... in the last 20 km ...
    8. +6
      December 14 2019
      a good deed, but one can hardly cope with the murky shaft of journalistic delirium, powerfully backed by the idiocy of political scientists in uniform from the head office, then they have our brand of nuclear-powered steamboat, the Malaysian Boeing have been knocked down, then Stalin flew around with an icon around Moscow ...
      1. +2
        December 15 2019
        About rook- this is not journalists, this is the official version of TFR
      2. +5
        December 15 2019
        Well, I would not say that this is "journalistic nonsense". This is ts, in a fashionable word, TREND, with a hand of water))) Vaughn, the mouthpiece itself, called the other day the Russian Federation "an island of stability in the ocean of turbulence" ... I somehow just jumped up and remembered 2008 and how the dollar has already doubled in price ...
        1. -7
          December 15 2019
          what is 5,4 Ma - 1,84 km / s - Iskander has a starting speed of 2,1 km / s
          and since they fired at a distance of 250 km (up to 500 km), the anti-submarine version of the Caliber could be brought up to 5,4 Ma (there is no need to fly for 1,5 thousand miles)
          1. 0
            December 15 2019
            The caliber in the RCC version has a range of 600 km, it has no 1500
            1. -1
              December 15 2019
              I DO NOT CONSIDER WHY (anti-ship 600, and the land more), I give a hint for the ship - you can’t hide behind the folds of the terrain, so you need more speed, not a glider ...
              1. +2
                December 15 2019
                Your clues are far from reality
                Caliber - subsonic rocket
                1. -4
                  December 15 2019
                  You want to say that the people with stupid people, whose granite is changed to a caliber of 2,5 Ma?
    9. 0
      December 15 2019
      Well, so what?) Author, did you have a beer over?) Well, they escorted, well, shot down, well, magazine sticks, so what?) 50 and all things) drinks
    10. +1
      December 15 2019
      Confused minutes with seconds IMHO. 250 km in 13,7 minutes is more like the truth. It turns out that the speed is slightly more than 1000 km / h, even less than 1 mach. At this speed, fighters fly easily.
    11. -2
      December 15 2019
      The truth is not true, let them scratch their turnips overseas. Why should we know the truth! This is Uncle Sam's headache. It's politics and strategy. It's not our business. Clients are shitty.
    12. +1
      December 15 2019
      Aviation .pro generally reminds me of the degree of garbage speed info
    13. -3
      December 15 2019
      But the fake is not really stupid. Caliber can fly far - can. At the final stage, it can develop hypersound - probably (zircon knows how). Naturally, fighters can accompany a subsonic flight, and a drone usually always hangs over a target. Another thing screwed up with electronic start
      1. 0
        December 15 2019
        And why is everyone so obsessed with Caliber. Zircon is quite capable of developing such speed and there is the possibility of launching from this ship.
    14. 0
      December 15 2019
      Come on you! What is this ?! And before Zhirinovsky they still still grow and grow, because tomorrow our scientists will slightly change the magnetic field of the Earth! 24 hours and the whole country (USA) under water!
    15. 0
      December 15 2019
      Quote: sergo1914
      Quote: Dmitry Donskoy
      At the end of this article, it was necessary to voice the names of particularly distinguished scribblers. Let the country know its characters in person Yes


      What a modest young man. Just Dmitry Donskoy. Why not Alexander the Great? Today is Saturday. Can.

      hi Unlike you colleague, my nickname is more in VO and is written in Russian letters on the Russian website. tongue
    16. 0
      December 15 2019
      The publication is not bad. But! Fakes are usually hidden behind anonymous articles (sources) or fake shots. After all, once the one who lied, there is no more trust. And judging by the non-signature of your article, and in your fight against fakes, not everything has been "overcome".

      In addition, so that it would be good and would emphasize your high intellectual level, if you would also note the explicit written nonsense such as: "pass through a diffraction grating like a prism" (article on VO "On the threshold. Americans are ready to deploy directed energy systems").
    17. 0
      December 15 2019
      So short videos are called, for example, "Construction of the Crimean bridge in five minutes", if they were shooting with calibers for 1000 km, they would be called the same, and db would begin to count and calculate the first space velocity or something else.
    18. 0
      December 15 2019
      Even if dispersed or dispersed, what is the catch? This is a matter of designers, but for the army there will only be a plus. Once the planes just turned around pancake, and now?
    19. 0
      December 15 2019
      Great selection!
      "I demand the continuation of the banquet ...." (c)
    20. +1
      December 15 2019
      In the “Weekend Fiction” section, “VO” presents a new selection of the most stupid fakes of the week.

      Well fakes fakes, but I like this one hehe

      Or else the Talmud shows ..

      something suffered me in the wrong steppe again .. hi
    21. -3
      December 15 2019
      In the new issue - new "heights". Last week, the Zvezda channel was noted for the launch of the Caliber naval cruise missiles. The report was originally called “More than 250 km in 137 seconds: a video of target destruction by Caliber was published.


      You do not need to be a mathematician at the Perelman level in order to calculate the speed of the rocket that was discussed in the report based on the voiced data. This speed is more than 6,5 thousand km / h! It turns out that during the firing, the "Caliber" was somehow dispersed to hypersonic speed. Suppose ... But then - more.


      The report (again, initially) stated that the "Caliber" was accompanied by fighters. It turns out that if the "Caliber" suddenly became hypersonic, then the fighters - too. Otherwise, how would they “accompany a hypersonic missile”?

      Realizing that there was “something wrong” with the characteristics of the rocket in the report, the correspondents decided to correct the headline: instead of “250 km in 137 seconds”, “250 km in several tens of seconds” appeared. As the saying goes, "let it be." At the same time, it was stated that drones recorded the defeat of the target. But the phrase was present in the report itself: "The sailors worked out an algorithm of actions to defeat a conditional enemy surface ship with the Caliber missile system with electronic launches." How can these statements be docked? Have drones recorded hits from electronic launches? And what in this case was accompanied by fighters?

      You see, girl, this is only in a special kind of female logic “housewife-copywriter” that sailors could not first perform electronic launches, training to defeat surface targets, and then perform a real missile launch at a target at the training ground. In real life, you will probably be surprised, but this is possible. Amazing, right?

      Fighters could accompany the rocket on a short segment of the trajectory, then escort them with radars. Amazingly, this is not the same when you and your girlfriend accompany a stroller with her child, walking at the same speed nearby. It is clear that in your everyday logic something is not consistent, but it happens, you won’t believe it, and in a different way.

      And where in your “exposure” suddenly a “uncomfortable” piece of text disappeared?

      “To escort the Caliber to the goal is the task of supersonic fighters. While the rocket is gaining speed, they fly almost equal. Drones are responsible for fixing the hit. The speed of defeat is calculated per second ”(https://tvzvezda.ru/news/forces/content/20191211627-TZbH4.html)

      In other words, the fighters accompanied the rocket, being physically close, in the initial section of its trajectory, there were no “hypersonic fighters”. But the awkward text in your note, of course, did not get. Purely by chance you did not notice him.

      What kind of golem fakes are you scribbling under the guise of supposedly revelations?

      WHERE, where are you going?
      1. -3
        December 15 2019
        Topwar has long smacked of Libertous
    22. -2
      December 15 2019
      in the article there are no words about the hypersonic speed "Caliber" got a little confused with the distances. according to the information, the target was 137 km away, and was hit in 250 seconds. But about hyperspeed, here the author has already poured his slag into our ears ...
    23. +2
      December 15 2019
      Quote: GABALIS
      "Caliber" dispersed to "hypersonic speed": the most stupid military fakes ....
      Why fakes? IMHO, this is an information war :) Let the adversary scratch his turnips.

      They will not scratch turnips. Laughter - yes. The information war is an information war, but frank nonsense is also not worth writing. It only causes laughter

      Quote: Avior
      The subsonic caliber, theoretically up to 2 max, the second stage of the RCC variant can be accelerated in the last forty kilometers

      Up to 2,9M in the last 20 km

      Quote: Rostislav White
      on the latter in the export version 3M-54E up to 2,9 Ma ... you at least open Wikipedia, this is not the data of the Russian Defense Ministry

      You're not right. Only one of the variants of the anti-ship caliber, regardless of whether it is export or not, has a supersonic stage. Which starts working on the last 20 km. Prior to that, the flight of any "Caliber" family 3M54, as well as 3M14 - subsonic
    24. +2
      December 15 2019
      Quote: Alex Fox
      in the article there are no words about the hypersonic speed "Caliber" got a little confused with the distances. according to the information, the target was 137 km away, and was hit in 250 seconds. But about hyperspeed, here the author has already poured his slag into our ears ...

      That on the forehead, that on the forehead. And in this case, the cruise speed of the "Caliber" must be supersonic. We divide 137000 meters by 250 seconds and we get 548 m / s, which is equal to 1,7M applied
      Hyper speed is calculated from the figures given in the article and this is not the fault of the author of the article on VO.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"