Rostec has calculated the number of cases of illegal copying of Russian weapons and equipment

158
Rostec has calculated the number of cases of illegal copying of Russian weapons and equipment

J-15 carrier-based fighter - illegal Chinese clone Su-33

Over the past 17 years, more than 500 cases of unauthorized copying of Russian weapons and military equipment have been identified. This was told by the head of intellectual property projects at Rostec Evgeny Livadny.

Russian experts have identified more than 500 cases of unauthorized copying of Russian weapons and military equipment. Especially China has succeeded in this, where Russian aircraft engines, fighter jets, anti-aircraft systems and much more have already been copied.



The difficult situation with unauthorized copying of our equipment abroad: over the past 17 years [recorded] more than 500 cases of such copying. Only in China: aviation engines, Sukhoi aircraft, carrier-based fighters, air defense systems, MANPADS, analogues of the "Shell" - all this is copied

- explained Livadny.

According to him, Russian specialists work abroad who identify cases of illegal copying of Russian weapons and military equipment. However, even when such cases are identified, Russia cannot bring anything to the “copyists” through the court, since there are no patents registered for Russian weapons abroad. At the same time, foreign companies at a high level are engaged in the protection of intellectual property by registering their patents abroad.

If we look at foreign customers, such as Raytheon, BAE Systems, we will see that leading corporations have up to 5 thousand patents abroad (...) They disclose their intellectual property, not seeing this as any threat. We neither the Ministry of Defense have patents registered abroad, nor defense industry enterprises

- he stressed.

In October, it was announced that Rosoboronexport was creating a consultative group to protect the rights to the results of intellectual activity in the framework of military-technical cooperation.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    158 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +15
      December 14 2019
      Well then, we are waiting for the publication of an unlicensed Chinese copy of the S-400.
      1. -3
        December 14 2019
        They have already made their own system on the basis of C 300, there is an opinion that they surpass C300 and C400 in some parameters, now having received C400 they will take some developments from there, and given that China has its own elemental base, huge production potential and does not have In the asset of sanctions like the Russian ones, the expulsion of Russia from the air defense market and, in general, high-tech and not very weapons, is a matter of time, and a short one. There will be another "breakthrough"
        1. +21
          December 14 2019
          It is not clear why we see analogs of our developments in everything from China, but at the same time we buy everything there, starting from engines at the Buyan-M MRK, cars, microcircuits, chips, processors, nails, buttons, and practically everything. The Chinese have long ceased to be "copiers". If we recall their "trick with the ears" with enticing the personnel of the Antonov Design Bureau, then the presence of a very intelligible program for the development of their own science and production is evident. And if you remember from whom the Russian Federation now buys CNC machines, it will become completely sad.
          1. -10
            December 14 2019
            Let’s say, the Chinese have not been copying anything for a long time in the literal sense, but certain developments are taken from everywhere like all the other participants, but in the USSR, copying of weapons, manufactured goods, machine tools and equipment was put in the rank of state policy, so to speak import substitution in the Soviet Union, moreover, they copied not only in the capitalist countries, but also in the fraternal socialist countries, nevertheless, the lag in most sectors was obvious, and with the collapse of the USSR they stopped copying and flew away to the tartars completely.
            1. +9
              December 14 2019
              Only here in the metropolitan area, the Chinese placed precisely the SU-35 and S-400 and not their clones. Clones do not reach the original in combat capabilities and resources.
              1. +7
                December 14 2019
                of course, to protect the capital is the best .. but when the market will be for sale equipment-analogue of ours, albeit inferior to us by 20-25 percent in quality / capabilities, but at a price 2 times cheaper .. what do you think, what most buyers with a limited purchase budget?
                1. +3
                  December 14 2019
                  Weapons and household appliances, this is a different category of goods, the price does not roll! It affects the characteristics, if a Chinese copy of the C300 with truncated characteristics for half the price will withstand for example Mig21, this is a reasonable choice, bully but if they have to fight against Rafales and cruise missiles, then the copy is money thrown out and failure in defense, then the C400 is without options. For different systems, different markets, we need to respond to a copy of the C300 Buk M2,5 laughing for example, for the same money, but with different features!

                  What you can copy must be patented without options
                2. +3
                  December 14 2019
                  You, too, can choose to buy milk, and "milk containing product", and butter and margarine in palm oil in the store. And here, too, there is a difference in price. This is the market.
              2. +2
                December 15 2019
                Quote: Amin_Vivec
                Only here in the metropolitan area, the Chinese placed precisely the SU-35 and S-400 and not their clones. Clones do not reach the original in combat capabilities and resources.

                Maybe, of course, I don’t know what, and I would be very grateful if you would consider it possible to share at which Chinese air base the Su-35SK and the coordinators of the S-400 air defense positions are located?
                1. +1
                  December 15 2019
                  Quote: Bongo
                  Maybe of course I don’t know what.

                  I’m sick of you listing what you don’t know Yes Therefore I will not request drinks laughing
                  1. +4
                    December 15 2019
                    Quote: Ruslan67
                    Quote: Bongo
                    Maybe of course I don’t know what.

                    I’m sick of you listing what you don’t know Yes Therefore I will not request drinks laughing

                    Hello! So it's impossible to know everything, but why the heck write what you can't answer for? Let's just say that not all S-400s are located in the "capital region". And about the Su-35SK is a separate conversation.
                    1. +4
                      December 15 2019
                      Quote: Bongo
                      why the hell to write something for which you can not answer?

                      90% of posts on our site sad
                      Quote: Bongo
                      Let's just say that not all S-400s are located in the "capital region".

                      Well, not only everything .... Otherwise, we both talked not only here bully
                      1. +4
                        December 15 2019
                        Quote: Ruslan67
                        90% of posts on our site

                        Unfortunately... sad
                        Quote: Ruslan67
                        Well, not only everything .... Otherwise, we both talked not only here

                        For Chinese S-400 and Su-35SK information is publicly available, but in English wink
                        1. +4
                          December 15 2019
                          Quote: Bongo
                          but in English

                          Same France and a little deutsche + Spanish mate in swear-And if you don’t go to the vagina of an immaculate girl with low social responsibility, in the girlhood of Mary what
                        2. +4
                          December 15 2019
                          Quote: Ruslan67
                          Quote: Bongo
                          but in English

                          Same France and a little deutsche + Spanish mate in swear-And if you don’t go to the vagina of an immaculate girl with low social responsibility, in the girlhood of Mary what

                          laughing You made me laugh, morning succeeded! good
                          Okay, I’ll continue to serve. Be healthy!
                        3. +2
                          December 15 2019
                          Quote: Bongo
                          Okay, I’ll continue to serve.

                          drinks soldier
                          Or vice versa? what laughing
                        4. +4
                          December 15 2019
                          Quote: Ruslan67
                          Or vice versa?

                          stop No, it's too early to endure me! laughing drinks Yes and no one, the doors are closed from the inside. wink
                        5. +2
                          December 15 2019
                          Quote: Bongo
                          It's too early to endure me!

                          Quote: Bongo
                          the doors are closed inside.

                          Then i'm calm Yes You won’t break out for ideological reasons tongue
                        6. +4
                          December 15 2019
                          Quote: Ruslan67
                          Then i'm calm

                          Previously, only my wife was worried about me when I went to the taiga for hunting and fishing. Now you also began to worry, do you need it? belay
                          Quote: Ruslan67
                          You won’t break out for ideological reasons

                          I will break free, with the guard in good relations. tongue
                          That's it, I’ll go to the girls to the knot, I’m having tea for bread, I need to get ready for dinner ... smile
                        7. +3
                          December 15 2019
                          Quote: Bongo
                          Now you also started to worry, do you need it?

                          As I began to worry about Honduras with 77 g of the last century, I can’t stop
                          Quote: Bongo
                          I’ll go to the girls to the knot,

                          Explicit communication winked
                          Quote: Bongo
                          tea for bread,
                          a couple of glasses
                          Quote: Bongo
                          need to get ready for dinner ...

                          have a bite Yes
            2. +3
              December 14 2019
              "Let's just say that the Chinese have not been copying anything in the literal sense for a long time." You were joking, they are engaged in hybridization and copying to this day of everything that the whole world produces and creates - there is almost nothing purely of their own Chinese, all production is created on a foreign basis.
            3. -2
              December 14 2019
              Quote: rufaqn
              Well, in the Soviet Union at the time, the copying of weapons, manufactured goods, machine tools and equipment was put in the rank of state policy,

              Very interesting! Can you see the list of copied products?
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. +9
            December 14 2019
            Quote: Aristarkh Ludwigovich
            The Chinese are no longer "copiers"

            Just still Xeroxes, and Xeroxes for a very long time.
            Quote: Aristarkh Ludwigovich
            If we recall their "trick with the ears" with enticing the personnel of the Antonov Design Bureau, then the presence of a very intelligible program for the development of their own science and production is evident.

            There is a program. There are no results. In fact, today the Chinese results in the aviation industry are precisely the copying of certain components and assemblies with varying degrees of success
            Quote: Aristarkh Ludwigovich
            And if you recall from whom the Russian Federation is currently purchasing CNC machines, it will become completely sad.

            So they are not only copying from the Russian Federation .... And the situation with the machines in our country is a pain.
            1. +4
              December 14 2019
              Andrei, as far as I know, the only thing in aviation technology is that they don’t have any good yet, the engines .. they’re doing the rest quite normal .. and the idea is that the plane going on a combat course will do in its future operation (if it survives) 2 times fewer departures before repairs than for example ours .. well, let's say .. it’s not important at the time of the battle ..
              1. +2
                December 14 2019
                Quote: Level 2 Advisor
                the only thing in aircraft is that they don’t normally get out-engines yet .. the rest is already quite normal ..

                Yes, DO NOT, but COPY :))) They can tear off the same radar station. To create on its basis its improved - no longer.
                Even with all the copy-paste ... look at their main MFI, J-10. They were helped by ours, they were given "lavi", but they did not reach the F-16
                Quote: Level 2 Advisor
                and the idea is that a plane going on a combat course - in its future operation (if it survives) will make 2 times less sorties before repair than for example ours .. well, let's say .. it will not matter at the time of the battle ..

                Yes, it will be more important, because the flying time of our pilots will be twice as high :)))) With the corresponding difference in skill
                1. -2
                  December 15 2019
                  where does the raid? it’s just that their planes have MOT more often, you don’t think that if the plane was taken for MOT, then the pilot sits and waits for it?
                  1. +2
                    December 15 2019
                    Quote: Level 2 Advisor
                    where does the raid? just then their planes more often

                    Yes, what MOT? :))) The resource of their aircraft is less, so you will fly as much - you will have to upgrade the fleet twice as fast. And for engines, in general, they will need to be changed almost annually.
                    1. -1
                      December 15 2019
                      glider resource? slightly worse, I don’t remember something that the planes in flight fell apart combat .. avionics resource? Yes, she generally always experiences the plane for everyone as a rule .. engine resource? Replacing a maximum of a week in a regiment ... why should the park be updated? Resource pilots? it’s like they’re cooking .. they don’t send engines to the plant for replacement .. but at least they’re getting worse (I still think it’s worse) at least a third .. it’s just an increased maintenance of the aircraft .. it doesn’t affect the battle .. affects the cost maintenance and the fact that let the device stay in remrot for a week or two a year, and that’s it!
                      1. 0
                        December 15 2019
                        by the way they copy and do .. hmm .. yes it’s ugly and bad to steal ideas, especially when they themselves sold the original to them .. but the plane will not disappear from this .. it flies and can launch missiles / bombs .. we could learn from places
                      2. +3
                        December 15 2019
                        Quote: Level 2 Advisor
                        glider resource? slightly worse, I don’t remember something that the planes in flight fell apart fighting ..

                        In the USSR, the airframe resource was inferior to the American one and the airplanes did not fall apart. Just because upon reaching this resource no one took off planes into the air.
                        In general, we have recently made a big leap. The airframe resource of the Su-27 in 1991 reached 2000 hours, while the Su-35 had 6000 hours.
                        Quote: Level 2 Advisor
                        engine life? Replacing a maximum of a week in a regiment ...

                        Yeah. Do you imagine the cost of the engine? Even the Chinese economy does not pull such feats
                        1. -1
                          December 15 2019
                          You all the time about money .. yes! an important component .. but in case of war - do not care how expensive / cheap to operate the aircraft will sprinkle bombs on your head .. and anyway they will bring it down for a month at maximum with a real mess .. does the Chinese Defense Ministry have enough money to operate? it means enough time to fly .. where does it? Fu 35,22 is generally very expensive to operate (many times more expensive than the Su-35), and after all, they are being repaired .. scum fly ..
                          unfortunately, we primarily have the cost now, not the combat effectiveness ..
                        2. +1
                          December 15 2019
                          cons can be seen from those who think that the enemy’s planes don’t fly, tanks don’t go and generally the shells fall after a shot .. it’s strange that they still didn’t give up to us ...
                        3. +1
                          December 15 2019
                          Quote: Level 2 Advisor
                          who thinks that the enemies ... in general, shells fall after a shot ..

                          ... if "at all" - then the shells do fall after the shot. Is always. Both friends and enemies ... physics request

                          This is a banter, do not focus hi
          4. -3
            December 14 2019
            "And if you remember from whom the Russian Federation now buys CNC machines, it will become completely sad." - Certainly not Chinese - German, Czech, American, Swiss, Belgian, Japanese - almost all of these manufacturers have already localized the production of their equipment in Russia.
        2. +5
          December 14 2019
          Quote: rufaqn
          there is an opinion that they surpass C300 and C400 in some parameters,

          Opinion and facts are quite different things.
          It is impossible to achieve higher characteristics than the original with banal copying.
        3. 0
          December 15 2019
          Quote: rufaqn
          own elemental base, huge production potential

          All this is good of course, but the elemental base itself does not work. In air defense systems, the most important thing is the search algorithms, and signal processing of the identified targets. And this is encrypted so that simply copying the iron, you will not achieve anything.
      2. 0
        December 14 2019
        Not a copy of the S-400 but a new Type-xxx development, for some reason similar to the S-400
      3. -12
        December 14 2019
        Quote: IGOR GORDEEV
        Well then, we are waiting for the publication of an unlicensed Chinese copy of the S-400.

        Let them copy, do not have time for us all the same hi
        And there is such a thing as control over our weapons ..
        Remember our Strela MANPADS, they do not shoot down their own and the system is very difficult to hack
        1. +9
          December 14 2019
          Arrows made in the USSR successfully shot down planes and helicopters made in the USSR; in the Donbass there is no need to project cinematic fiction into reality.
          1. -3
            December 14 2019
            Quote: rufaqn
            Arrows made in the USSR successfully shot down planes and helicopters made in the USSR; in the Donbass there is no need to project cinematic fiction into reality.

            Well, maybe you're right .. heh heh But still, the latest MANPADS have stopped using the devils .. They put in a lock, even with an explosion .. hi
        2. +7
          December 14 2019
          The "friend or foe" identification system is secret and for export that MANPADS, that SAM, that helicopter planes are supplied without it. So our own weapons are quite capable of shooting down our helicopter planes. An illustration of this is the war on 08.08.08, when the Ukrainians in Georgia shot down several Russian planes with Soviet air defense systems.
          1. +4
            December 14 2019
            There is no interrogator on missiles; this is ground-based equipment that can block missile launch. Because at the MANPADS, the interrogator is not provided, it will shoot down anything.
            As for 080808, the division of countries has occurred and the recognition system has been changed.
            1. 0
              December 14 2019
              Quote: YOUR
              As for 080808, the division of countries has occurred and the recognition system has been changed.

              And essentially .. You're right! hi
            2. 0
              December 14 2019
              As for modern air defense systems, I don't know, maybe there is a hardware launch lock, and on the old ones in the combat control cabin, a marker was displayed on the indicator at the mark from "its" target and the operator simply did not process it. I think it's the same on modern ones. A banal hijacking of an airplane is always possible, as a MIG-25 was once hijacked ...
              1. -1
                December 14 2019
                Quote: at84432384
                As for modern air defense systems, I don’t know, maybe there is a hardware start-up lock, but on old ones

                And on the S-400 there is a total .. You can turn it off, but you can turn on another level ..
                1. -1
                  December 14 2019
                  The second batch of S-400s for Turkey is supposed to be delivered with the "friendly target" option. winked
              2. +1
                December 15 2019
                MIG25 was impossible to shoot down. Firstly, Belenko knew the location of our air defense systems and chose a route that significantly reduced their capabilities, and secondly, it took time to find a target and launch a missile system, but it wasn’t. And thirdly, who could have imagined that he would do that. The pilot performed the next training task, there was simply no reaction time to his actions.
            3. 0
              December 15 2019
              On PZRK the requestor also happens
              1. 0
                December 15 2019
                Not the MANPADS themselves, but additional equipment, for example Dzhigit, Strelets. Here they are equipped with a system of external preliminary target designation "friend or foe". Those. not these settings themselves, but the control center for the target comes from outside with information about the location of the target, its parameters, including the identification of "friend or foe."
                The equipment is complex and dimensional. An interrogator is a radar station that sends a signal to a target if it has its own aircraft, it has a transceiver on it, the signal is processed and sent back.
                1. 0
                  December 15 2019
                  ... equipping the combat means of MANPADS with "friend or foe" interrogators, which ensured the blocking of the missile launch at their aircraft if the anti-aircraft gunner made an erroneous aiming;

                  Features of the "Strela-3" complex:

                  - the use of a cooled photodetector in the homing head;

                  - protection from background interference;

                  - the use of an autonomous interrogator "friend or foe";

                  http://www.rusarmy.com/pvo/pvo_vsk/pzrk_strela.html
        3. The comment was deleted.
    2. +2
      December 14 2019
      Maybe it’s time to start thinking when a Chinese printer is sold as a model for a batch of modern Russian weapons?
      Maybe it's time to start counting how many potential buyers of the original are lost? Those who later acquire a Chinese copy.
      1. -2
        December 14 2019
        The capitalist only thinks about profit here and now. The state of the Russian Federation protects exclusively the rights of large capital. So who will think? No one.
        1. Fat
          +1
          December 14 2019
          Quote: at84432384
          The capitalist only thinks about profit here and now. The state of the Russian Federation protects exclusively the rights of large capital. So who will think? No one.

          So the thief thinks, the stolen goods come true. The capitalist thinks how to earn and continue to earn further in the long run. Actually this is the main difference between the capitalist and the thief.
    3. +2
      December 14 2019
      The main reason for the refusal of inventors and patent holders to protect and defend their rights is the complexity of the procedure for obtaining a patent and the process of protecting patent rights due to the imperfection of Russian legislation.


      More here
      https://research-journal.org/law/nekotorye-problemy-rossijskogo-patentnogo-prava/
    4. +2
      December 14 2019
      Over the past 17 years, more than 500 cases of unauthorized copying of Russian weapons and military equipment have been identified. This was told by the head of intellectual property projects at Rostec Evgeny Livadny.


      And they tried to do something or silently ...
    5. -1
      December 14 2019
      Well, so start patenting everything totally, and the Chinese need to hint that for the theft of our technology, ideas, appearance, we will spread rot through the courts totally, all over the world. And stop looking into their mouths, the Chinese are making bullshit, similar to our equipment, and in the accident of the Chinese military counterfact, this is a blow to the image of Russia, such as poor-quality equipment! Better let your design schools and directions develop!
      1. 0
        December 14 2019
        China, in many civilian technologies, is isolated from us as the British from the Zulus. And it is not shameful for a resident of the celestial Empire to take anything from the savages; this is not a theft. And in recent years, we have somehow not been working with international courts.
        1. -3
          December 14 2019
          "China is in isolation from us in many civil technologies" - What kind of "civil technologies" is it in isolation from Russia?
          1. 0
            December 15 2019
            Microelectronics, computers, smartphones, marine diesel engines ...
            1. 0
              December 15 2019
              Microelectronics, computers, smartphones - all this is produced on foreign equipment and components - created at foreign factories in China. Purely Chinese there is nothing in all segments of the household and other things.
              1. 0
                December 15 2019
                Quote: Vadim237
                Microelectronics, computers, smartphones - all this is produced on foreign equipment and components - created at foreign factories in China. Purely Chinese there is nothing in all segments of the household and other things.

                Another 5+ years? back the Chinese developed their own processor ...
              2. 0
                December 16 2019
                Quote: Vadim237
                Purely Chinese there is nothing in all segments of the household and other things.

                And this, in my opinion, is not buzzing ... I, now, have the last suitcase with Chinese (and Indian) cotton ... bed linen there, all kinds of towels ... My parents bought in Moscow from the 66th year ... All wardrobes and closets were packed with suitcases with their cotton products ...
          2. -2
            December 15 2019
            Quote: Vadim237
            China is in isolation from us in many civil technologies "- What kind of civil technologies is it in isolation from Russia?

            Vadim, and you from a computer of what production write? I am from Chinese, for example. And my phone is Chinese ...
            1. 0
              December 15 2019
              Honestly - in terms of household appliances, I don’t have a single appliance made in China. Yes, from the belongings, neither of which is from China.
              1. 0
                December 15 2019
                Quote: Vadim237
                Honestly - in terms of household appliances, I don’t have a single appliance made in China.

                If something is not with you, then with others - in bulk. hi Starting from condoms. laughing By the way, in the USSR they released ... Verified by electronics. It was possible instead of passics to stick into the tape recorder. Yes
      2. +1
        December 14 2019
        Patenting is a double-edged sword. When patenting (if it does not concern appearance), sometimes you have to reveal the secrets of the technology, which is not great - you can attach some insignificant "bow" and bypass your patent .., and you will hardly be able to control a third-party manufacturer. If the AK barrel alloy had been patented, then all the replicas would be of the same quality as the Russian ones. Yes, there is still such a moment, who is engaged in copying, he does not develop his science and technology and always loses. The Chinese copied the Russian aircraft engine, but the copy's resource is ridiculous. They do not have the technology for manufacturing turbine blades. Everything rests on scientific schools which they do not have.
      3. +1
        December 14 2019
        You can give a hint, but something cannot be claimed. Gas .... Billionth project.
        1. -3
          December 14 2019
          And that gas - without gas, the Chinese economy can not survive coal for 67% of all energy in any way; it will not work out for a long time due to environmental problems. A new gas pipeline to China will start soon.
    6. +7
      December 14 2019
      We neither the Ministry of Defense have patents registered abroad, nor defense industry enterprises
      Then what kind of illegal copying is the author trying to rub? Copy completely legally.
      1. +4
        December 14 2019
        it is illegal in terms of our law. and our patents. I personally faintly imagine how the latest developments someone will trample patenting abroad. it’s easier then to put everything in open access)
        1. +8
          December 14 2019
          Another swallow on the topic of “let's all be European” ... Our people won’t understand that Europe and the Americans do not treat us as equals.
        2. +11
          December 14 2019
          That's just the point, to apply for a patent on a "closed topic" abroad is practically the disclosure of military secrets.
          The Yankees also copy the Chinese (as I wrote about the reverse engineering method). And in the USA they just shrug.
          Although there are options (and without patenting), NOBODY will do it. otherwise the "friends" will be offended.
          1. +5
            December 14 2019
            Quote: knn54
            Although there are options (and without patenting), NOBODY will do it. otherwise the "friends" will be offended.

            Well, as it happened request . And not only with us. Until the problem becomes a threat, solve it listlessly. However, as the saying goes winked a decision made on time is more important than two right ones bully
      2. 0
        December 14 2019
        Quote: Corn
        We neither the Ministry of Defense have patents registered abroad, nor defense industry enterprises
        Then what kind of illegal copying is the author trying to rub? Copy completely legally.

        Moreover, the validity of a patent depends on the country of patenting, the subject of patenting and ranges from 5 to 35 years.
    7. +11
      December 14 2019
      Well, counted. But what's the point, if it’s not patented? Water in a mortar to crush yes s / n to receive? Class
    8. +9
      December 14 2019
      Consider do not consider, the Chinese are sending everyone the forest! New things to do, not whining!
    9. +3
      December 14 2019
      That's why the magicians of what is PATENTED in RUSSIA appear.
      In the US, it is legally allowed to steal what is popular in other countries. Moreover, they steal any intellectual property from inventions to cinema.
      By the way, in relation to the RUSSIAN EMPIRE, the attitude was exactly the same.
      I saw with my own eyes the famous periodic table in Germany under the name of a German chemist, in England under the name of an English chemist.
      1. +2
        December 14 2019
        I don’t know how we do, but in the states any patent can be taken away by the state if it recognizes it as something to ensure state security. NSA checks all patents completely. and who will get there patents?) This is a vicious circle)
      2. +5
        December 14 2019
        Quote: Vasily50
        In the US, it is legally allowed to steal what is popular in other countries.

        Lying. I personally have a patent registered in the USA. I would like to see a daredevil who decided to ignore him in the United States.
        1. 0
          December 15 2019
          So this is something else, mattresses are allowed to steal your patent registered in Israel or Russia, Ukraine ...
    10. +2
      December 14 2019
      It was high time that we began to protect the products of our military-industrial complex from copying.

      Better late than never, well, conclusions also need to be done. Is it really necessary to sell something to China for the extra 5 billion dollars when our gold reserves exceeded 540 billion ?!
      1. +5
        December 14 2019
        for sure) we will patent the Americans there, the CIA can be dissolved as unnecessary) they will bring everything themselves)
      2. -2
        December 14 2019
        Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
        It was high time that we began to protect the products of our military-industrial complex from copying.

        Without copying, we would not have a TU-4 bomber, a KS tank, a BT-2 tank, a T-26 tank, a PPD machine gun, etc., and not to mention copies of civilian equipment.
        1. 0
          December 14 2019
          Without copying, we would not have a TU-4 bomber, a KS tank, a BT-2 tank, a T-26 tank, a PPD machine gun, etc.


          And from whom did Degtyarev copy the PPD?
          1. -2
            December 14 2019
            Quote: Borik


            And from whom did Degtyarev copy the PPD?

            I did not copy it, but in 1940 I brought into my design borrowings from the Finnish PP Suomi.
            1. 0
              December 15 2019
              Cars, tanks, engines, machine tools in the USSR were licensed copies. In some cases, with the development of production and the involvement of its own specialists by the manufacturer when creating the initial samples, and sometimes building enterprises. Tu-4 differed engines immediately. Tank Christie and BT-2 were already noticeably different from each other at the beginning of production. Moreover, what came into the country illegally, like the B-29, like trophies, then ALREADY you can use your own thing at your own discretion.
          2. 0
            December 15 2019
            I do not know about the application, but one Bulgarian before the Second World War presented the USSR with the construction of his machine gun, for which the British were ready to give him 1,5 million f.s.
    11. +6
      December 14 2019
      What country in the world would disdain to take the best in quiet from strangers. And for export versions these "Achievements"may not be lit.
    12. +3
      December 14 2019
      Russian specialists work abroad to identify cases of illegal copying of Russian weapons and military equipment. However...
      Then what is the point of paying for the work of these specialists?
    13. +2
      December 14 2019
      Everything is enshrined in the Constitution, there is nothing to whine empty, rule the reason ...
    14. +2
      December 14 2019
      We neither the Ministry of Defense have patents registered abroad, nor defense industry enterprises


      This is the flip side of secrecy. Why hide, and so they buy and copy everything.
    15. +3
      December 14 2019
      It is mainly necessary to obtain foreign patents not for inventions (which may not exist or their description will reveal the essence of the technical solution), but for utility models - i.e. on layout solutions (which is simpler, faster and cheaper for legal protection).

      Why few people do this from Russian arms manufacturers is a mystery.
    16. 0
      December 14 2019
      And who cares? Rostec needs to do the same.
      1. 0
        December 14 2019
        What is the same thing - copying foreign weapons?
    17. -1
      December 14 2019
      Rostec calculated
      And what?..
      Here is the statement of one high person,
      Let us wait until the Americans spend money on new technologies for the production of shale oil, and then we have them - a scratch-dag!

      and here is another statement by the same person.
      “I don’t know, I’m probably not going to reveal a big secret, it will become clear anyway: we are now helping our Chinese partners to create an SPRN system ... This is a very serious thing that will fundamentally and radically increase the defense capability of the People’s Republic of China. Because now only the USA and Russia have such a system. ”

      So what is the discussion about?
      1. +2
        December 14 2019
        Quote: Gardamir
        So what is the discussion about?

        Wow. I carefully read what you wrote, and did not understand - what are you talking about?

        Am I a fool, or ... no? wink laughing
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
    18. +2
      December 14 2019
      it was reported that Rosoboronexport had set up a consulting group for the protection of rights to the results of intellectual activity within the framework of military-technical cooperation.

      And that will be? The Chinese don't care. They act on the principle - "Poop, let them lag behind"
    19. 0
      December 14 2019
      Woke up?
    20. 0
      December 14 2019
      Here you need to see an opinion from two sides ..
      DARPA also has the ability to do research.
      But the fact that Rostec appreciated the power of marketing is already a plus.
    21. 0
      December 14 2019
      Relevant services ceased to keep KB secrets. Or at some (?!?) Management level, they are corny trading technologies.
      It is rather difficult to copy the composition of materials and manufacturing technologies. These secrets are protected by corporations without any democracy. Even for a simple interest, they can tear their heads off. Which would be appropriate for Rostec to do.
      1. +2
        December 14 2019
        Quote: samarin1969
        Copying the composition of materials ... quite difficult

        Easily Yes

        Quote: samarin1969
        Copy ... manufacturing technology is quite difficult

        Impossible, as a rule.

        I love amateurs laughing

        Quote: samarin1969
        Relevant services ceased to keep KB secrets. Or...

        Trepidation.
      2. -2
        December 14 2019
        Access to secrets became open back in the late Gorbachev era and continued on a large scale in the Yeltsin era, when hordes of CIA officers disguised as "privatizers" were admitted to all the "holy of holies". Then they did not even hide their affiliation with the CIA. And now we have nothing special to steal from us - all research institutes and design bureaus are either closed, or drag out a miserable existence. Now all over the world, and Russia is no exception, science is in the pen.
        1. 0
          December 14 2019
          Quote: at84432384
          Access to secrets became open back in the late Gorbachev era and continued on a large scale in the Yeltsin era, when hordes of CIA officers disguised as "privatizers" were admitted to all the "holy of holies". Then they did not even hide their affiliation with the CIA. And now we have nothing special to steal from us - all research institutes and design bureaus are either closed, or drag out a miserable existence. Now all over the world, and Russia is no exception, science is in the pen.


          It’s hard not to believe your words. (I believe that there is no true information even under the heading of chipboard). ...
          Mr. Chemezov's department should not complain about the "plagiarists", but initiate a judicial investigation against the persons who allowed the secrets to be "open". They have heirs, property. ... The state could well cover some of the damage and arrange a show trial with confiscations against the perpetrators and their families.
    22. +1
      December 14 2019
      Quote: samarin1969
      Relevant services ceased to keep KB secrets. Or at some (?!?) Management level, they are corny trading technologies.
      It is rather difficult to copy the composition of materials and manufacturing technologies. These secrets are protected by corporations without any democracy. Even for a simple interest, they can tear their heads off. Which would be appropriate for Rostec to do.

      Again. No one will tear anything.
      Missed, then missed. Copying is not difficult. It is necessary to offer a worthy reward. ..
    23. +6
      December 14 2019
      In the 80s, I had to participate in organizing the production of our MiG-23 fighter in India. For this fighter, I and two of my colleagues had two patents that were incorporated into this aircraft. So for six years I received remuneration from India for 6 thousand dollars. USA annually. I received the funds in the form of checks at the bank on Kutuzovsky Prospekt. My wife spent them on buying things in the Beryozka stores (remember these were in Moscow). I remember always there were Georgians near the bank who wanted to buy up these checks. But I don’t remember that anyone gave them checks and received rubles.
    24. +4
      December 14 2019
      How many copies were in the USSR of foreign technology - B-29, sights, aircraft engines, depth charges, air-to-air missiles.
      And how many borrowings were without direct copying.
      This is normal in the world of weapons. But no one counted.
    25. +2
      December 14 2019
      There are no patents for Russian weapons registered abroad.

      Well, who is to blame and who is the evil Pinocchio?
    26. +6
      December 14 2019
      We neither the Ministry of Defense have patents registered abroad, nor defense industry enterprises

      Accordingly, the phrase
      Rostec counted the number of cases illegal copying Russian weapons and equipment

      wrong. All copy ABSOLUTELY legally.
      1. +1
        December 14 2019
        Well, our officials do not want to admit that the Chinese simply steal our ideas, development, technology from us. ...
        1. +4
          December 14 2019
          Quote: Thrifty
          Well, our officials do not want to admit that the Chinese simply steal our ideas, development, technology from us. ...

          Do not steal. Do you understand? They don’t steal at all. What is put into public use is universal property. What patent did the Chinese steal? Well, at least one? request
          1. +11
            December 14 2019
            I can’t say for the Chinese, but Israel has taken one professor away. And maybe not one. recourse
            1. +2
              December 14 2019
              Quote: Svarog51
              Israel took one professor

              If you are about that professor who has an ava with his tongue sticking out - I’ll say - and glory ... the work that he took away ... if he would have taken such more laughing
              1. +9
                December 14 2019
                And the patent ... sorry, where was the metric issued to him? Brazenly slammed wink
              2. -4
                December 14 2019
                Quote: Golovan Jack
                Quote: Svarog51
                Israel took one professor

                If you are about that professor who has an ava with his tongue sticking out - I’ll say - and glory ... the work that he took away ... if he would have taken such more laughing

                That's for sure. and you will heal happily then. Why do you need all sorts of honors? After all, the diploma should be blue, and the face red. You do not need scientific articles and patents. request
                Here we are happy to accept such.
                1. 0
                  December 14 2019
                  Quote: professor
                  After all, the diploma should be blue, and the face red

                  Are you fit? Well, that's nice. Happy for you.
                  1. -1
                    December 14 2019
                    Quote: Golovan Jack
                    Quote: professor
                    After all, the diploma should be blue, and the face red

                    Are you fit? Well, that's nice. Happy for you.

                    No, I do not match. I have a red diploma.
                    1. +4
                      December 14 2019
                      Quote: professor
                      No, I do not match. I have a red diploma.

                      So the face is blue? laughing Oleg request Well, at that age recourse drinks
                      1. 0
                        December 14 2019
                        Quote: Ruslan67
                        So the face is blue?

                        Took off the tongue laughing

                        Ruslan, hi
                        1. 0
                          December 15 2019
                          Quote: Golovan Jack
                          Quote: Ruslan67
                          So the face is blue?

                          Took off the tongue laughing

                          Ruslan, hi

                          Toenails are blue. I'm a marathon runner. hi
                    2. 0
                      December 15 2019
                      We have a very smart Jew living in Yerevan, Kechek (I think, 1956) ... So after the matolypiad they came for him from Moscow and took him home ...
                      1. 0
                        December 15 2019
                        Quote: Karen
                        We have a very smart Jew living in Yerevan, Kechek (I think, 1956) ... So after the matolypiad they came for him from Moscow and took him home ...

                        Aliens taken away? wink Jews were not admitted to mehmat in Moscow.

                        Quote: Ruslan67
                        So the face is blue? Oleg Well, at that age

                        Normal face. I am an athlete, a marathon runner. hi
                        1. The comment was deleted.
                        2. 0
                          December 15 2019
                          Quote: professor
                          Quote: Karen
                          We have a very smart Jew living in Yerevan, Kechek (I think, 1956) ... So after the matolypiad they came for him from Moscow and took him home ...

                          Aliens taken away? wink Jews were not admitted to mehmat in Moscow.

                          Once taken to Moscow, then taken where necessary ...
    27. +4
      December 14 2019
      The Chinese have concluded an agreement with us to supply AK-176 gun mounts. They installed a tower on their ship, it doesn’t work, our specialists arrived, it was specially disabled, but they made chewing gum friendship. After a couple of months again ... after another couple of months again ... and then the Chinese rolled out the claim - they delivered you poor-quality equipment, we demand that our representative control the manufacturing process. And lo and behold, from the very top came an order to admit. The Chinese filmed documented the manufacturing process and, after receiving 3 samples, terminated the contract. After some time, the H / PJ-26 installation appeared in China.
      Almost the same for the Su-27. They signed a contract for the supply of 200 fighters received 100 and broke the contract. They began to release themselves.
      Examples can be given a lot, but to sense.
      1. +1
        December 14 2019
        Following up. That's how it works like a Russian but still a Chinese installation https://strangernn.livejournal.com/1812627.html
      2. +1
        December 14 2019
        In Chinese tricks more often the fault of our side. And what they got through third parties is their right. We delivered to third countries and understood the possibility of losing them in any direction.
    28. 0
      December 14 2019
      Quote: at84432384
      Patenting is a double-edged sword. When patenting (if it does not concern appearance), sometimes you have to reveal the secrets of the technology, which is not great - you can attach some insignificant "bow" and bypass your patent .., and you will hardly be able to control a third-party manufacturer. If the AK barrel alloy had been patented, then all the replicas would be of the same quality as the Russian ones. Yes, there is still such a moment, who is engaged in copying, he does not develop his science and technology and always loses. The Chinese copied the Russian aircraft engine, but the copy's resource is ridiculous. They do not have the technology for manufacturing turbine blades. Everything rests on scientific schools which they do not have.

      My dear, if they find out that there are specialists. .. This has nothing to do with science schools ...
    29. +2
      December 14 2019
      Can even sell more weapons to the Chinese? In small batches, purely for copy?
      1. ZVS
        +1
        December 14 2019
        It is necessary to draw up the rights to development in time, as was done in the USSR. At that time, China ONLY licensed to produce aircraft and other military equipment. And as patents began to be sold (AK-47, Tu-16, MiG-21, etc.), so the Chinese began to sculpt their hybrids. And with that, they started stealing technology and frankly ripping off projects from other countries. On theft and not on intelligence, China has risen.
        1. 0
          December 14 2019
          Arms patents were not transferred to the Chinese, this is a delusion. At best, drawings were transmitted. In rare cases, technology. For this reason, all their replicas are complete d. In the theatrical world there is such a word "props". Here are all the Chinese "copies" of Soviet / Russian weapons and there are props.
        2. -1
          December 15 2019
          Automatic AK, like AKM, like Ak74, have never been patented
          There is only a patent for some solutions of the Ak-XNUMXth series
    30. ZVS
      +2
      December 14 2019
      This once again confirms that the Chinese are intellectual property thieves. They are not capable of creating anything of their own in the high-tech sector.
    31. +1
      December 14 2019
      Everyone who works in this market copies weapons. The fact that China is the main copier has not been a sensation for a long time. The question is how much our developers can keep the "distance" in the development of those positions in which we are leading. And the second - to what extent we are able to create our own research and production base without the "help" of potential competitors (I mean components, machine tools, chemical components, etc.)
    32. -3
      December 14 2019
      Quote: Shahno
      Copying is not difficult. It is necessary to offer a worthy reward. ..


      Wonderful! If it's easy to copy .... Boeings, AMD and Intel processors, the Japanese car industry are quite common throughout the Russian Federation. We copy, stop the production of "domestic bicycles", make and reset the import of "machinery and equipment".
      1. -2
        December 14 2019
        Quote: samarin1969
        If it's easy to copy .... Boeings, AMD and Intel processors, the Japanese car industry are quite common throughout the Russian Federation. We copy, stop the production of "domestic bicycles

        Are you really that hard, or just pretending to be? Teacher? negative
    33. 0
      December 14 2019
      Tell us, do "such as Raytheon, BAE Systems" have many patents in Russia out of these 5000? Maybe 2? Or 1? Or none at all?
    34. +1
      December 14 2019
      Ours, as they were in terms of protecting the intellectual and technical property of Lokhs, have remained
    35. +1
      December 14 2019
      Quote: rufaqn
      They have already made their system on the basis of C 300, it is believed that they surpass C300 and C400 in some parameters

      There is an opinion that you are nonsense. Please provide links to these "opinions and options."

      now having received the C400 they will take some groundwork from there, and given that China has its own element base, huge production potential and does not have sanctions like the Russian ones, the expulsion of Russia from the air defense market and in general high-tech and not very weapons is a matter of time, and it is short ... There will be another "breakthrough"

      Catching up (copying) will never be in front. For short, long or generally any periods of time. To do this, you need to create your own advanced.
    36. +3
      December 14 2019
      Quote: Aristarkh Lyudvigovich
      It is not clear why we see analogs of our developments in everything from China, but at the same time we buy everything there, starting from engines at Buyan-M MRCs, cars, microcircuits, chips, processors, nails, buttons, and practically everything.

      We buy "everything" because China produces it cheaply. And if you give yourself a job and figure out what “engines, chips, microcircuits” are, you will find that these are licensed or not copies of German engines and Western chips. There are several main reasons: a) many “chips, microcircuits” simply will not be sold to us differently; b) from savings. The Americans were also engaged in this, though they poured the difference into their own pockets. Check out the scandals of substituting military-accepted microcircuits for Chinese copies.
      By the way, what kind of cars do we buy in China? Did you figure out what exactly they are? Obviously not.

      The Chinese are no longer "copiers" for a long time.

      The Chinese have made some progress. But the copier there still represents the technological basis. Why engage in self-deception?
      In addition, without any photocopiers, the West continues to supply China with the most advanced means of production and instructions on production processes. To extract high profits, for the sake of which Western corporations did not care and rubbed everything else.

      If we recall their "trick with the ears" with enticing the personnel of the Antonov Design Bureau, then the presence of a very intelligible program for the development of their own science and production is evident. And if you remember from whom the Russian Federation now buys CNC machines, it will become completely sad.

      We begin to manufacture CNC machines ourselves under German licenses. In China, what is urgently needed and can be purchased profitably is bought. Or is China the only place where Russia can get something from the modern, because in the West they just don’t sell it to us.
      1. +1
        December 14 2019
        Germany has all the latest machines, Russia buys without any problems.
    37. +2
      December 14 2019
      In my opinion, in the concluded contracts there should be a section that provides for the possibility or impossibility of copying the product. The product itself must have a device at the level of unchecked circuits, etc. elements with a self-destruction system, which is included for cases of unauthorized access or when selling weapons, or remotely (from space). And no fawning in front of violators. Traitors to shoot without trial.
    38. +2
      December 14 2019
      This tramp drags on for a long time .... the costs of ill-conceived secrecy and inner constriction of inventors!
      Now, a long time ago it began to come out SIDE! Both people / inventors and industry / country!
    39. 0
      December 14 2019
      Remarkably simple laughing "Evgeny Livadny, head of intellectual property projects at Rostec," suggests that our achievements be made public immediately. Indeed, why make spies work, look for information when you can just put it out in the public domain. But there will be "copyright protection". Does anyone else believe in the rule of law on our planet?
    40. +2
      December 14 2019
      Quote: at84432384
      Patenting is a double-edged sword. When patenting (if it does not concern appearance), sometimes you have to reveal the secrets of the technology, which is not great - you can attach some insignificant "bow" and bypass your patent .., and you will hardly be able to control a third-party manufacturer. If the AK barrel alloy had been patented, then all the replicas would be of the same quality as the Russian ones. Yes, there is still such a moment, who is engaged in copying, he does not develop his science and technology and always loses. The Chinese copied the Russian aircraft engine, but the copy's resource is ridiculous. They do not have the technology for manufacturing turbine blades. Everything rests on scientific schools which they do not have.

      For the vast majority of examples, you are wrong. There are probably isolated and rare cases in which certain secrets of production are contained in a patent. But this is an exception. And such patents are not published in the open press.

      In order for us not to be stolen, we need to carry out the most active patent work. Only then can there be a chance of suppression when you have in your hands a universally recognized patent document. If it is not, go and sniff it in a rag.
      But for that. First of all, it is necessary to change the domestic legislation regarding the rules for maintaining state secrets. The fact is that there are documents on the basis of which secrecy stamps are assigned. And this is not just a decision of some official. These are methods for calculating economic damage in the event of disclosure. Thus, under the stamp, will never be eligible for patenting. This is the mistake. The fact is that the patent formulas, ALWAYS (or almost always) do not contain an accurate and specific description of the device, principles, recipes. This is done intentionally. If EXACTLY and in detail described, then the slightest change from the patent formula gives the rogue the right to circumvent the patent and make his own. A more extensive and approximate description, extremely expands the scope of the patent. and complicates the work of a rogue. He already needs to look for super-sophisticated methods, and there are few such talents simultaneously in technology and law.
      And, since the patent formula does not contain accuracy, then you should not be afraid of disclosure.
      Further. China has long been considered the future adversary of the USSR. And his outright theft was not stopped, because it was believed that this would raise military power and the USSR would threaten it. The USSR, on the contrary, was punished, very severely, and systematically.
      An example with the Belarus tractor. Found a borrowing from the French in the distribution box. To avoid the largest fine, the USSR supplied (according to a previously drawn up agreement) to some African country 300 tractors completely free of charge. Since there is no financial benefit, it is not possible to calculate the amount of the fine. Now the situation is improving. China is already considered an economic rival. When they are considered a military rival, China will be chased like a sidor goat, as they chased us. And we need to eliminate our own stupidity. And you can pick secrets faster and more reliably directly from samples, and not from patents.
    41. exo
      +1
      December 14 2019
      In my opinion, the Chinese "experts" send both Russian and Western copying experts far and for a long time. And they live by the principle: we will steal and steal!
    42. 0
      December 14 2019
      Quote: exo
      In my opinion, the Chinese "experts" send both Russian and Western copying experts far and for a long time. And they live by the principle: we will steal and steal!

      Any thief steals while they allow him. When necessary, they will cover it on all sides, and there will be all attempts to punish the dough. Catastrophically large. It will be cheaper to work by law. And everyone will become like everyone else.

      If you pay a bribe of an enormous amount in excess of the normal payment, by law, what will you choose?
    43. +3
      December 14 2019
      Fools-officials, it is necessary not to consider cases, but to issue patents and to collect billions through the courts. How much did you lose on one AK?
    44. -1
      December 14 2019
      Hit the copiers with concern!
    45. 0
      December 14 2019
      Well so deal with it
    46. +1
      December 14 2019
      Long. och has long been known ...
      But money was not needed for patents, but for hacienda in Italy ...
    47. 0
      December 14 2019
      Quote: mag nit
      Hit the copiers with concern!

      Duplicators are best hit with rejects in designs.
    48. DPN
      +1
      December 15 2019
      Yes, the little things are all this. Chinese friends are permissible for them, and without their electronics we will get their own lid that is normal and in all probability is not expected. In the Soviet Union, we supplied them all, only their Sneakers bought there was such a period, now we buy everything from them without China to us.
    49. 0
      December 15 2019
      They are still afraid that bourgeois thieves are stealing, and most of them are "allies" (they even steal, it is strongly said - we sell them freely, in small batches)
      Yeah, it’s not a nightmare for one’s own country - a head is needed beyond the hillock and not horns)
    50. +1
      December 15 2019
      Quote: RUSS
      Without copying, we would not have a TU-4 bomber, a KS tank, a BT-2 tank, a T-26 tank, a PPD machine gun, etc., and not to mention copies of civilian equipment.

      Well, all this is an easy life ....
      For tanks "Vickers 6 tons" and "Christie's chassis" licenses were purchased with the right to manufacture!
      About PPD - Rezun's tales!
      By the way, the engine was not purchased from the Christie chassis, it is our aviation engine!
    51. 0
      December 15 2019
      Quote: Amin_Vivec
      Only here in the metropolitan area, the Chinese placed precisely the SU-35 and S-400 and not their clones. Clones do not reach the original in combat capabilities and resources.

      AND THEY WILL NEVER REACH!!! Because they were made by Russian hands “with the help of a sledgehammer and some kind of mother” (c) The Chinese will never live up to this.
    52. 0
      December 15 2019
      By the way, the author of the article himself answered his own question about patents. Overseas, patents are owned by companies, not the US Department of Defense.
      In our country, the Ministry of Defense is trying to grab everything for itself, but they are not really succeeding, since the technicians who are in enterprises, and not in the chairs of the Ministry of Defense, are well versed in all this. And enterprises are not very interested in patents, because... For them, having a patent is more of a minus than a plus.
    53. -1
      December 15 2019
      Quote: Tersky
      Quote: rufaqn
      there is an opinion that they surpass C300 and C400 in some parameters,

      Opinion and facts are quite different things.
      It is impossible to achieve higher characteristics than the original with banal copying.

      It's elementary, Watson! Man is created in the image and likeness of the Heavenly Father. But how much worse and more disgusting did it turn out? And the Creator himself could not do it better, so what can we say about products created by man?
    54. 0
      December 16 2019
      licensing beyond the hill of the military-industrial complex.... absolutely crazy!? for profit? I don’t care what they copy... they still won’t give it away... they don’t know why a lot has been done!
    55. 0
      December 16 2019
      This whole patent system has slowed down technological development on the planet.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"