South Korea demonstrated in a video how it will destroy the enemy

73

The Armed Forces of South Korea demonstrated in an inspiring video how specifically they intend to smash the enemy. The video is posted on the channel "War World", affiliated with the South Korean army.

The footage presented to the public demonstrates how combat aviation The Republic of Korea, including the F-15 and F-35, strikes bombs and cruise missiles at targets reminiscent of North Korean buildings with symbols and stylistics. In addition, the work of ground units, air defense forces and other specialties was shown.



Obviously, cadres of this kind have been selected for a long time, but they ventured to put them in such a defiant form right now, when negotiations on the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula came to a standstill. We can assume that we are talking not only about the propaganda fervor for our own South Korean citizens, but also about the message of Kim Jong-un.

Experts have repeatedly noted that if a military option of eliminating the DPRK’s missile and nuclear programs is chosen in Washington, the South will be involved in it. Participation in the conflict of China, Russia or Japan in one role or another was considered in scenarios depending on the circumstances and configuration of the conflict.

73 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +11
    12 December 2019 18: 24
    South Korea demonstrated in a video how it will destroy the enemy

    "In their theatrical dreams, they will be caught by a young fireman in a chimney with dumbbells in a string bag."
    This is a diagnosis. wink
    1. +7
      12 December 2019 18: 30
      Quote: bouncyhunter
      "In their theatrical dreams, they will be caught by a young fireman in a chimney with dumbbells in a string bag."
      This is a diagnosis

      The United States probably beat them with a whip for weak aggression against the DPRK ..
      Eun then the United States spat in the face (Trump))))
      All the Augs were immediately taken away and shut up. And in "our media" also abruptly silence came .. heh heh
      In Korea, I remember the tails of Amers in the 50s. They want to repeat it?
      1. +5
        12 December 2019 18: 57
        Quote: Starper-777
        In Korea, I remember the tails of Amers in the 50s. They want to repeat it?

        The Chinese have kicked
        1. +3
          12 December 2019 19: 16
          Quote: Spade
          Quote: Starper-777
          In Korea, I remember the tails of Amers in the 50s. They want to repeat it?

          The Chinese have kicked

          It’s also true, but we trained the Chinese and made sorties ourselves .. (read the memoirs of those times, they are already declassified)))
          Americans at first piracy in the sky bombed everything in a row with carpets (like Dresden, Japan, etc.), but then Li Si Tseiny Asy hehe
          1. +6
            12 December 2019 19: 53
            Quote: Starper-777
            It’s also true, but we trained the Chinese and made sorties ourselves ..

            And here departures?
            The Chinese in that war officially lost about 150 thousand people, including the son of Mao Zedong, killed, died from wounds and diseases. In general, it is believed that about three million Chinese passed through the Korean War as volunteers
            1. +4
              12 December 2019 21: 22
              Quote: Spade
              The Chinese have kicked

              Yes, with the help of the Chinese and ours! But, to understand which of the Koreans will win, you can just read the results of the destruction / detention (capture) of North Korean special forces in South Korea and South Korean in S. Korea, and everything will be clear. Who fought and died for their ideals to the end, and who immediately surrendered. hi
      2. +9
        12 December 2019 19: 08
        on the presented video, the faces of Korean pilots are not quite Korean
      3. +1
        12 December 2019 23: 09
        The high-tech army of South Korea inflates S. Korea, just as Israel bends the Arabs to B.V. ... Just like the Americans destroyed the armored armada of Hussein in Iraq.
        Our Urikalki hope for nuclear weapons of Kim .. Nothing will fly anywhere. If South Korea does not have enough intelligence to target tactical missiles, then the United States will help with intelligence and indeed destroy them themselves.
        1. +1
          13 December 2019 05: 56
          Quote: Skubudu
          High-tech army of South Korea inflates S. Korea, just as Israel bends Arabs
          Yeah yeah. It’s not the technology that wins, but the highly motivated army. And with this, the North Koreans are completely in order. But whether the Americans want to die in a foreign war, like in the 50s, is a very big question. And without them all these gallant flyers land, for three to four flights
        2. 5-9
          0
          13 December 2019 09: 54
          No, in that terrain and with their geography, technology is sideways ... mountains (all dug up by the Juche people) and the reach of Seoul with barrel artillery.
    2. +6
      12 December 2019 19: 58
      ... demonstrates how combat aircraft of the Republic of Korea, including the F-15 and F-35, strike bombs and cruise missiles at targets, symbols and stylistics that resemble North Korean buildings

      Yes, it’s clear that you
      Quote: bouncyhunter
      inspiringly

      Quote: bouncyhunter
      intend to smash the enemy
      only it’s not clear, will you, with inspiration, be back at some such airfields? crying
      Although winked there will be plenty of even, gray-black space Yes
      1. +3
        12 December 2019 20: 02
        Gene, hello! hi
        What kind of quotes are not mine? request
        1. +4
          12 December 2019 20: 29
          Quote: bouncyhunter
          Gene, hello! hi
          What kind of quotes are not mine? request

          Hello Pasha.
          request conscientiously selected from the text of the article and on ... "quote". Nothing to do with you laughing It happens.
    3. +5
      12 December 2019 20: 29
      Quote: bouncyhunter
      This is a diagnosis.

      Rather, addiction, Paul. Yes hi Dependence on an external factor - it is one, but large and striped. Then this morning on one of the branches I saw a sign:

      These are the results of country surveys regarding which country their citizens consider the main threat, as a percentage of respondents. South Korea has a very interesting result there - try to find Kim among their threats. Yes laughing
      1. +3
        12 December 2019 21: 39
        Sasha, be healthy! hi
        Quote: Paranoid50
        Dependence on an external factor - it is one, but large and striped

        That is true! The most interesting thing is that many are happy to get rid of this factor, but it's like a leech or a parasite ...
      2. -2
        12 December 2019 22: 44
        I had to google the original study.

        4% of Koreans consider DPRK the main threat.

        It seems that in Russia they are worried about Seoul and the artillery threatening to smash it into pieces, and the loafs are vigorous are much more dramatic and emotional than the Seouls themselves. laughing
        1. +2
          12 December 2019 23: 21
          Quote: Vyacheslav Viktorovich
          It seems that Russia is worried about Seoul

          Not for Seoul. There are a number of "kind, but poorly informed" organisms screaming about the general famine in the DPRK, which was brought about by totalitarianism, imposed by a bloody dictator, shooting people from memory and threatening all mankind with his nuclear weapons. am wassat Yes, even here there are similar originals, repeating about "a bowl of rice and a bunch of grass." However, don't bother - storytellers, they are so funny ... laughing
          4% of Koreans consider DPRK the main threat.
          Wow ... Yes And mattresses - as much as 13%. Thus, mattresses are four times more dangerous for them. Therefore, this warlike video is addressed ... well, nafig, it can’t be ... wassat
    4. +1
      13 December 2019 05: 07
      North Korea will come in handy a technique from the roller after the reunion ... wink
    5. 0
      13 December 2019 05: 49
      Quote: bouncyhunter
      This is a diagnosis
      Mdaaa forgot to see the 50s. soldier
    6. +1
      13 December 2019 10: 46
      Hello Pasha hi
      Quote: bouncyhunter
      This is a diagnosis.

      good Thanks ridiculed
    7. DRM
      -1
      14 December 2019 22: 51
      Quote: bouncyhunter
      South Korea demonstrated in a video how it will destroy the enemy

      "In their theatrical dreams, they will be caught by a young fireman in a chimney with dumbbells in a string bag."
      This is a diagnosis. wink

      I remember the program "I Serve the Soviet Union". Every Sunday, in the mornings, we were shown the same videos that are now haut here? And even now the Zvezda channel does not disdain this. Double standarts?
  2. +2
    12 December 2019 18: 28
    Eun has a vigorous bonba, let the Koreans sleep peacefully)))
    1. 0
      12 December 2019 19: 30
      Quote: Alien From
      Eun has a vigorous bonba, let the Koreans sleep peacefully)))

      So yes, but the USA cannot sleep something hehe heh ..
      After all, South Korea, Japan is their main cash cow .. A couple of trillions of these countries are kept in US securities ..
      What if permanent transactions stop? How to pay with Israel? lol It’s already impossible to rob Russia especially (they are threatening with supersonic missiles)))
      Here is the situation bully
  3. +9
    12 December 2019 18: 33
    one part of the people destroys another part of the people ... it is so in Anglo-Saxon ....
    1. -7
      12 December 2019 19: 27
      in Anglo-Saxon? Why not Soviet?
  4. +4
    12 December 2019 18: 33
    We are waiting for the "return" video from the DPRK.
    1. +1
      12 December 2019 19: 33
      Quote: knn54
      We are waiting for the "return" video from the DPRK.

      They just laugh and take pity on their Korean brothers, who are colonially dependent on the United States .. They live richer, but this is fattening "pigs" for slaughter ... hi
      1. -1
        12 December 2019 22: 39
        Yeah, the deserters from the North also run across to laugh and look at the lost South Korean brothers. Heh heh))
    2. +5
      12 December 2019 20: 32
      Quote: knn54
      We are waiting for the "return" video from the DPRK.

      Kimovtsy are not exchanging trifles for details, especially since their video got its views a year ago. And there, the goals were not South Korean cities. Yes
    3. +5
      12 December 2019 21: 12
      knn54 (Nikolai)
      Please ...

  5. +2
    12 December 2019 18: 39
    Well, it’s very beautiful, well, just like in a movie, but in life it won’t work, the northern brother Eun will not.
  6. +3
    12 December 2019 18: 51
    there are simply no words for these naive narrow-eyed youths))) in case of war they will have an infected zone. and those who survive will not be fun at all. and that is to say the least.
  7. +3
    12 December 2019 18: 55
    In response, Kim will show a vigorous loaf - and keep it simple, South Korea wink
    1. +5
      12 December 2019 21: 01
      Sorry. Samsung etc. ..
      1. -4
        12 December 2019 23: 00
        Nothing terrible will happen to South Korea. Even if a couple of nuclear bombs reach the capital.

        But North Korea will be smeared with a thin layer on bread
        1. +6
          12 December 2019 23: 03
          It is precisely that for the South this is a critical drop in the quality of life, and for the North it’s no stranger to live in shit - humanitarian aid will go from all sides - what is bad? )))
  8. +6
    12 December 2019 18: 56
    I look, in terms of propaganda, the two Koreas are not very different from each other
  9. +10
    12 December 2019 18: 56
    interesting .. after the raid a couple of dozen Tehpodonov, comrade Eun. what picture will remain from South Korea. no need to anger Comrade Un!
  10. +9
    12 December 2019 19: 09
    A beautiful film ... Filmed on a grand scale ... only despite the fact that the DPRK army is not so beautiful and armed with the wrong weapons, I’ll wang it, it will demolish Seoul to the ground in a very short time. Long-range artillery and MLRS. Well, there, consider the whole city, on the border. Then it will be later, and a third of the population ... Even without taking into account nuclear weapons, which, it turns out, are ...
  11. +2
    12 December 2019 19: 26
    They are much more likely to shoot videos, but they will be scattered if Eun only sneezes. After all, their American masters were enraged with all their carrier groups.
  12. +4
    12 December 2019 19: 31
    South Korea demonstrated in a video how it will destroy the enemy

    How everyone (not only Korea) wants to shoot ... How everyone wants to kill more people ... How everyone wants to destroy the planet - their home ...

    Yes, any duck, gopher or ant is more reasonable than homo sapiens. And if this is not so, if humanity has more brains than chicken, it is vitally necessary to admit - how we live, how the whole world lives is a dead end. Nuclear.
    1. +3
      12 December 2019 19: 42
      If you draw too general conclusions on the news on the weapons website, it will always seem like everyone wants to shoot. Because this is a site about weapons, themed news is selected, and the sample is obtained, ahem, biased. And the vast majority of Koreans, meanwhile, listen to cape, eat kimchi, drink soju and have never heard of this video.
      1. 0
        12 December 2019 19: 59
        Quote: Vyacheslav Viktorovich
        If you draw too general conclusions on the news on the weapons website, it will always seem like everyone wants to shoot. Because this is a site about weapons, themed news is selected, and the sample is obtained, ahem, biased.

        I understand it. Nevertheless, the whole world is convulsively arming itself. Type reflect aggression. Not otherwise Martians, yeah.

        Everyone knows a slightly overshadowed Chekhovian expression - if in the first act a gun hangs on the wall, then in the third act it should shoot. There is such a rifle on planet Earth that when it fires little remains of the theater. And yes - this is not the second act, not even the beginning of the third - it’s already a curtain.
        1. -2
          12 December 2019 21: 41
          Throughout history, all states have had armies. This is a function of states.
          All armies were always armed. This is the army, they have such a job.
          Nothing special happens, in short, unless you specifically neurotize yourself.
  13. +2
    12 December 2019 19: 37
    Drawn beautifully, his name is "Paper Tiger"))

    Are you going to fight against someone, woe-warriors? Exactly the booty does not sit still, or did the owner decide for them to stir up a small victorious howl until the last Korean?
    1. 0
      12 December 2019 20: 10
      Quote: Lord of the Sith
      Drawn beautifully

      It was smooth on paper.
      Oppa always pops up from where you don't expect.
      1. +1
        12 December 2019 20: 56
        This is usually true.

        Therefore, gunpowder should always be kept dry))
        hi
  14. 0
    12 December 2019 19: 48
    I would like to see these warriors after the first nuclear explosions in Seoul, etc. the faces of brave soldiers thinking about the Amer’s concept of battle only from the air, in order to conquer it is necessary to go down to earth from heaven and you may have to mourn only the ashes of your relatives and all this bravery will dissolve.
  15. +2
    12 December 2019 20: 24
    M-dya :)))) Of course, the Juche teaching is invincible, because it is eternal, but I do not envy the North Koreans if they nevertheless get in touch with the army of South Korea. The South is now really stronger in all respects, except for quantity - but absolute superiority in the Air Force, qualitative - in the materiel of ground forces and, apparently, no less high-quality - in control systems and combat training will not leave the guys from the north a chance. Only partisans, perhaps ...
    And if the DPRK uses nuclear weapons, they’ll just bury it
    1. +3
      12 December 2019 21: 02
      The guys from the north have nuclear weapons, which in the event of a mess, they do not hesitate to use.

      All mountains in fortified areas. A bunch of sub.

      You are tormented to list. Even the Yankees openly vigilant at the mention of North Korea, even in the media.
      1. +3
        12 December 2019 21: 35
        Quote: Lord of the Sith
        The guys from the north have nuclear weapons, which in the event of a mess, they do not hesitate to use.

        If they are not shy, they will be erased from the face of the earth. The same nuclear weapons.
        Quote: Lord of the Sith
        All mountains in fortified areas.

        In the years of the Second World War, an excellent way to capture them was worked out. Fortified areas are not taken, but blocked, after which the garrisons capitulate sooner or later. In the good old days, the DPRK did not defeat the fortified areas, but the maneuver of the tank troops, which our people taught them. Today they are unable to repeat this.
        Quote: Lord of the Sith
        A bunch of sub.

        Well, maybe a couple of southerners corvettes and sink. And what will it help?
        Quote: Lord of the Sith
        You are tormented to list.

        Let's help. Prehistoric military equipment (T-62 as the best tank), outdated and practically incapable aircraft, air defense based on the S-75 and S-200 air defense systems, but most importantly, the lack of funds for adequate training of the armed forces + the need to save the resource of equipment that the DPRK cannot renew.
        The DPRK has people, there is determination, but they are poorly trained and do not have modern equipment.
        Quote: Lord of the Sith
        Even the Yankees openly vigilant at the mention of North Korea, even in the media.

        Alas, only in our fantasies
        1. -3
          12 December 2019 23: 19
          Alas, but in reality. The Yankees couldn’t even take a fragmented Vietnam, but what about North Korea, armed to the teeth?

          No offense, but learn a little ways to wage war, a lot will open))
          1. +1
            12 December 2019 23: 52
            Quote: Lord of the Sith
            The Yankees could not even take the fragmented Vietnam


            The Americans were forbidden to "take" North Vietnam.

            Quote: Lord of the Sith
            what about North Korea armed to the teeth?


            New equipment was constantly supplied to Vietnam and people were taught. Unlike North Korea.
          2. +1
            13 December 2019 18: 11
            Quote: Lord of the Sith
            No offense, but learn a little ways to wage war, a lot will open))

            No offense, but if you had at least a little knowledge of the issue that you recommend studying for me, you would never have written what you wrote.
            Quote: Lord of the Sith
            Alas, but in reality. The Yankees couldn’t even take a fragmented Vietnam, but what about North Korea, armed to the teeth?

            First, the term "failed" is completely incorrect here, because the Americans, for political reasons, could not invade North Vietnam. They captured the southern one, but they could do nothing about the constant flow of partisans coming from the north. So we got a fairy tale about a white bull.
            The parallel, as we see, is completely wrong. Should a war happen, the Americans may well invade the DPRK, they do not have to sit in South Korea, the DPRK today is not protected by anything other than its own armed forces, and this is not enough. As well as the North Vietnamese Armed Forces, it would not be enough to resist the Americans if they invaded North Vietnam.
            Secondly, the Vietnamese received huge technical assistance from the USSR. About 2000 tanks, 700 aircraft, 7000 guns, etc. were delivered. North Korea no one will supply military equipment
            Thirdly, the Vietnamese got first-class military experts from the USSR at their disposal - the Second World War ended relatively recently, so no one has yet forgotten how to fight. North Korea will boil in its own juice - no one will train their army.
            Fourthly, the very analogy of "an American lost in Vietnam means they will lose everywhere" is a little erroneous. In 1905, our ancestors lost the RYV with a crash, but 40 years later they sent the strongest army in Europe (Hitler) into oblivion. By your standard, the USSR should have fallen by the end of the third week of the war - after all, it lost to Japan, didn't it?
            Enough, or continue? :)
            1. xax
              +2
              13 December 2019 22: 29
              Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
              for political reasons, the Americans could not invade North Vietnam. They captured the south, but could not do anything with the constant stream of partisans coming from the north

              +
              Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
              North Korea no one will supply military equipment

              You forget about China, which today unequivocally assumes the role of "world leader", albeit "for a long time." Considering the history of the relationship of the whole trinity: the United States, the DPRK, China - a lot is possible here.

              Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
              Vietnamese got first-class military experts from the USSR at their disposal - relatively recently the Great Patriotic War ended


              I will throw 2 more factors on the scales:
              1. So the Americans at that time recently finished the Second World War. And the current ones - it may turn out that they are not at all.
              2. North Korea is now ready for war much more than Vietnam at one time: here is ideology, and armaments at the beginning of the conflict, and the development of their own all (their fitness, completeness, level of organization), and the level of statehood, etc. d. etc..

              In general - I do not see many obvious factors on your scales. Bias?
              1. -1
                14 December 2019 11: 23
                You forget about China, which today is unequivocally assuming the role of "world leader", albeit "for a long time."
                - China will remain on the sidelines. What for him to help the poor DPRK to fight against the main trading partner (USA) and another important trading partner (Republic of Korea)?

                Quote: xax
                1. So the Americans at that time recently finished the Second World War. And the current ones - it may turn out that they are not at all.
                - After the Second World War, the United States does what they fight. They have more than enough specialists.

                here there is ideology, and armament at the beginning of the conflict, and the development of our own everything (their fitness, completeness, level of organization), and the level of statehood, etc. etc..
                - and all this is useless without a powerful economy, which the DPRK simply does not have.
                1. xax
                  +1
                  14 December 2019 13: 14
                  Quote: Kirill Dou
                  What for him to help the poor DPRK to fight against the main trading partner (USA) and another important trading partner (Republic of Korea)?

                  And what for are they now involved in a trade war with the United States? It is foolish to think that "trading partners" do not use the given chance to bend each other.

                  Quote: Kirill Dou
                  after the Second World War, the United States does what they fight. They have more than enough specialists

                  But less, much less than after the Second World War.

                  Quote: Kirill Dou
                  and all this is useless without a powerful economy, which the DPRK simply does not have

                  Yeah, the gun at the low economic performance of the host country - refuses to shoot.
                  1. -1
                    14 December 2019 13: 22
                    1. A trade war is not the same as a real war. This is a way to knock out more favorable terms of the transaction for yourself, without losing much in the existing ones. A real war will break China’s relations with the United States completely.

                    2. Why less? The Americans participated in a huge number of military conflicts after the Second World War. Even if compared to it, these conflicts were less intense, the United States currently has the most complete experience in conducting real hostilities than all other countries (maybe, with the exception of Israel).

                    3. The gun refuses to shoot when it runs out of shells. And the production of shells is an economy, yes. And the economy is food for the military, and traditionally, food in the DPRK is not very good.
              2. +1
                14 December 2019 16: 26
                Quote: xax
                In general - I do not see many obvious factors on your scales.

                let's get a look
                Quote: xax
                You forget about China

                I do not forget. And I remind you that after the Korean War, China rolled out the territorial claims of the DPRK, and it came to hassles of the armed forces, and the Chinese did not get what they wanted. And in the future, although China trades with the DPRK, it does not supply there any somewhat complicated military equipment (refusal to supply fighter aircraft). Moreover, China is extremely dissatisfied with the appearance of nuclear weapons at the DPRK and has deployed large forces near the Korean-Chinese border.
                In other words, the Chinese do not need a "monkey with a nuclear grenade" at their borders at all, and why they would suddenly climb to defend it is not very clear. The United States will not at all gain a foothold in the region, they have nothing to do in the DPRK, and China, IMHO, will prefer a united Korea under the South Korean leadership.
                Quote: xax
                . So the Americans at that time recently finished the Second World War. And the current ones - it may turn out that they are not at all.

                But their experience of driving the ground forces after that did not lie next to the Soviet one. It is impossible to look at their operations by ground forces even in 1944 without sadness. But since then they have managed to draw some conclusions.
                The wrong Americans quite well dealt with Saddam (rumors about the low morale of the national guard which is greatly exaggerated) and defeated Yugoslavia. That is, they have demonstrated their ability to smash relatively small and relatively underdeveloped countries, including the DPRK.
                Quote: xax
                North Korea is now ready for war much more than Vietnam at one time: here there is ideology, and armaments at the beginning of the conflict, and the development of their own all (their fitness, completeness, level of organization),

                You EXTREMELY exaggerate the combat effectiveness of the DPRK army. Those people who beat southerners and Americans in the 50s had long since rested in the Bose, they were replaced by wedding generals who fit aprons to the uniform to fit all the orders. At the same time, the DPRK does not have the means to adequately maintain the army. There are no serious maneuvers, there is no constant training, the materiel is neglected, because it is impossible to spend a resource on training, because there will be nowhere to buy a new one. The military is boiling in its own juice, and the lessons that we taught them are already outdated (nevertheless, with the Second World War, military thought took a step forward)
                Quote: xax
                In general - I do not see many obvious factors on your scales. Bias?

                No. It's just that these facts are far from being as obvious as you think
    2. -2
      12 December 2019 22: 43
      Finally, at least one sensible comment.
  16. +1
    12 December 2019 21: 18
    A symbolic video, everyone takes off somewhere, but not a single return to the base is shown. And the work of missile defense and air defense systems of South Korea remained behind the scenes. But the army of the Dear Leader will not sit and wait ....
  17. +1
    12 December 2019 21: 31
    Well done, of course, so small, and the economy at the level of Russia
  18. 0
    12 December 2019 22: 38
    Somehow they printed the comments of the South Koreans discussing a possible war with the DPRK. One girl spoke out: God forbid, after all, North Korea will capture South Korea in 3 days. The South Koreans every second soldier with glasses. And officers without a smartphone cannot control the soldiers. South Korean generals asked the government to postpone the transfer of command of the combined forces in the event of war to the South Korean command. Therefore, an agreement is still in effect on the management of Americans by South Korean troops during the war !!!
    1. 5-9
      +2
      13 December 2019 10: 20
      There is a consensus among the samsungs - the Jucheans will easily conquer us ...
  19. +1
    13 December 2019 06: 59
    When events turn into real from cartoons, everything changes dramatically and becomes .... different and not fun.
  20. 5-9
    +2
    13 December 2019 09: 52
    Jucheis nuclear weapons against the Samsung do not need. The Seoul industrial zone under the gun of 700 guns from 155 mm and higher on protected positions in the mountains, they will deprive the Samsung of their industry in hours. Fy-35 is good, but almost the entire northern part of the peninsula is in the mountains in which the Juche people dug burrows for 65 years. Plus a myriad of thousands of MZA and MANPADS. Those. bombing from high altitude and without nuclear weapons to their stupid and technological superiority of Samsung will not help them much. Everyone there understands that from a military point of view, the Juche people will unite the Samsung, and not vice versa ....
    I don’t consider the option of a friendly rebellion of the Juche warriors (with 7-12 years of urgency) for the sake of freedom and kim-chi, because it is impossible to calculate it.
    1. xax
      0
      13 December 2019 22: 40
      Quote: 5-9
      The Seoul industrial zone under the gun of 700 guns from 155 mm and higher on protected positions in the mountains, they will deprive the Samsung of their industry in hours.

      Apple will clap her hands.

      Quote: 5-9
      kim chi

      DPRK doesn't have kim-chi?
  21. +1
    13 December 2019 11: 51
    What is the problem? Here is the answer
  22. xax
    0
    13 December 2019 22: 39
    Experts have repeatedly noted that if a military option of eliminating the DPRK’s missile and nuclear programs is chosen in Washington, the South will be involved in it.

    Mandatory. At the very least, it will catch the blow of the old, but still good, heap of artillery systems that from the DPRK completely reach Seoul, and as the main dish - nuclear weapons strikes.
    1. -2
      14 December 2019 17: 58
      Quote: xax
      and as the main dish - nuclear weapons strikes.


      What a cruel suicide.
      1. xax
        +1
        14 December 2019 23: 39
        Quote: Good_Anonymous
        What a cruel suicide.

        The DPRK regime cornered does not blink an eye
        1. -1
          15 December 2019 12: 08
          Quote: xax
          The DPRK regime cornered does not blink an eye


          Or the "cornered regime" may prefer life to the gallows.
  23. 0
    14 December 2019 21: 58
    Why do they need tankers? The radius of their aircraft within the boundaries declared by them. Maybe hinting at China and us? So this is a different weight category.
    And interestingly, they showed all their three F-35s?