Ukraine was left without lawyers at the hearings on the case of the Kerch provocation

49
Ukraine was left without lawyers at the hearings on the case of the Kerch provocation

At the upcoming hearings this spring on the provocation in the Kerch Strait, which will be held as part of an international public tribunal, Ukraine may be left without defenders. According to the head of the working group on international legal issues of the Permanent Mission of Crimea under the President of Russia, Alexander Molokhov, lawyers refuse to represent the interests of Kiev.

Unexpectedly, they encountered difficulties: none of the lawyers known for their sympathies for Ukraine has yet to agree to defend the Kiev authorities during public hearings scheduled for next spring

- he said.



According to Molokhov, lawyers refuse to participate in the process on the side of Ukraine "even for money", among the "refuseniks" was also the lawyer of the former President of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko Ilya Novikov.

This can only indicate one thing: it is almost impossible to justify the provocative actions of the Kiev authorities, which sent their sailors to slaughter a year ago, in the face of an independent court of the public, consisting of authoritative representatives of the West and the Third World

- leads RIA News the words of Molokhov.

At the same time, the organizers do not lose hope of finding lawyers to participate in the process on the side of Ukraine and hope that an international public tribunal will be held in the spring of this year on schedule.

It was previously reported that a public provocation tribunal was scheduled for next spring in the Kerch Strait. At the process, it is planned, with the help of invited international experts in the law of the sea, to thoroughly analyze the situation with Ukrainian violating ships.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    49 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +11
      11 December 2019 10: 05
      Zadolbali with their international court-gossip!
      The bolt we put on them with a left tapered thread!
      Poroshenko needed the death of sailors! For the introduction of martial law and the abolition of presidential elections.
      But death didn’t work out ... Pichalka ...
      And then he lost the election with a bang.
      1. +5
        11 December 2019 10: 13
        Eh, early Mark Feigin was deprived of his lawyer's license ... That he would have turned around smile
        1. +1
          11 December 2019 10: 17
          Quote: Thrall
          Eh, early Mark Feigin was deprived of a lawyer's license ...

          And where does this stuffed animal, having lost all the processes?
          In Russia, are they going to carry out the process?
          Well, let Feigin be at home in 404!
          1. -3
            11 December 2019 12: 58
            A normal lawyer takes care of his reputation.
            Reputation is the money of future customers.
            And to get something today, in order to lose customers tomorrow - there are no fools.
            Although, if the lawyer is little known, participation in a loud, albeit lost, process will be a plus for reputation. So they will find someone. Only little known.
            1. -1
              11 December 2019 13: 28
              This can only indicate one thing: it is almost impossible to justify the provocative actions of the Kiev authorities, which sent their sailors to slaughter a year ago, in the face of an independent court of the public, consisting of authoritative representatives of the West and the Third World
              - RIA Novosti quotes the words of Molokhov.
              Lawyers in a democratic court in the West will have to extradite Poroshenko (and the security forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine) in his crime with their heads, and then in "democratic" Bandera Ukraine, the same lawyer will be hanged in a forest somewhere near Kiev.
              In this case, smart lawyers for protecting Kiev in court do not need any money!

              In general, there are no fools among lawyers to defend Kiev yet!
            2. 0
              11 December 2019 13: 55
              Quote: Shurik70
              Although, if the lawyer is little known, participation in a loud, albeit lost, process will be a plus for reputation. So they will find someone. Only little known.
              And deaf-deaf. what
            3. DRM
              -1
              11 December 2019 19: 07
              Quote: Shurik70
              A normal lawyer takes care of his reputation.
              Reputation is the money of future customers.
              And to get something today, in order to lose customers tomorrow - there are no fools.
              Although, if the lawyer is little known, participation in a loud, albeit lost, process will be a plus for reputation. So they will find someone. Only little known.

              I am amazed at how politicians and journalists present "news". If you indicate in the text that the "public tribunal" was initiated by the Crimean authorities and will be held in Crimea, then everything falls into place. None of the Ukrainians will go there. Unless they will hire some kind of clown, the type of those whom the Russian Central Television hires for public ridicule. No reputable lawyer would agree to this.
              1. 0
                11 December 2019 22: 59
                In general, there are no fools among lawyers to defend Kiev yet!

          2. 0
            11 December 2019 14: 02
            Quote: Victor_B
            And where does this stuffed animal, having lost all the processes?

            This scarecrow did not play the trials, but purposefully stamped "victims of the regime".
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. 0
          11 December 2019 17: 35
          Nothing, for the good grandmother - they will find. Maybe even the right nationality.
        4. 0
          12 December 2019 03: 29
          What normal lawyer besides Fekin will fit into this pile of Poroshenko's feces?
      2. +13
        11 December 2019 10: 16
        You seem to have misunderstood
        Molokhov speaks not about the International Court of the Law of the Sea, in which the case is being heard, but about some public Action that they want to hold in Kerch, and laments that no one even wants to participate in it for money
        I think they will still find some sort of Tryukhan from the show
      3. NKT
        +3
        11 December 2019 10: 17
        It is a public tribunal, as it were, the "Right to vote" in an expanded composition wink
        1. 0
          11 December 2019 10: 18
          Quote: NKT
          This is a public tribunal, like the "Right to Vote" in an expanded composition

          So is it our right / left-wing advocates to hold a meeting?
          1. NKT
            +1
            11 December 2019 10: 26
            The process is planned using invited international experts in the law of the sea to thoroughly understand the situation with Ukrainian intruder ships


            Something like this. This is a platform to show - Ukraine has violated the rules of passage from the Black Sea to the Sea of ​​Azov, in an open discussion.
      4. +1
        11 December 2019 10: 19
        And what kind of international public tribunal?
        1. +8
          11 December 2019 10: 46
          A show that people want to feed instead of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea
          1. -1
            11 December 2019 11: 15
            Quote: Avior
            A show that people want to feed instead of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea

            I already long ago read about these plans to arrange a circus tent to the delight of spectators of federal TV. channels. And everyone was waiting for VO to discuss this news. But he did not expect that she would be served in such a light. Namely, without any clarification, that this is a filkin letter, which has no legal grounds and consequences. So, we gathered to talk about what is known, but who is not known. But the name of this legal absurdity was invented by hoo: international public tribunal.
            It’s public, but at least five times a day arrange it, no one bothers, but like no one is obliged to execute decisions. Here rzhaka in Ukraine, regarding such a public tribunal, will be notable.
            And all just for what would then be the further brainwashing of the population to propagandists such as Solovyov, Kiselev, Skabeeva and Co. Apparently, the cases of the Russian Federation at the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea are so awful that they decided to sweeten the pill in this way.

            PS You can call it a show, but to mine, all the same, it is already starting to look like a circus tent, in an attempt to wrap political failures into victories. Well, if only the population of the Russian Federation believed this, they are trying for it. However, I think that many will understand and understand what kind of get along they are trying to pass off as real successes in economics and politics. hi
            1. +4
              11 December 2019 11: 18
              Well, you see from the comments, many either did not understand, or they did not want to understand request
      5. +1
        11 December 2019 10: 26
        Quote: Victor_B
        Zadolbali with their international court-gossip!

        It is not for nothing that they say in Ukraine "he is getting richer"
        1. +4
          11 December 2019 11: 11
          If there is a circus, then clowns for him will certainly be found. The question is different - for whom is this performance !? hi
          1. +1
            11 December 2019 11: 19
            Quote: bessmertniy
            The question is different - for whom is this performance !?

            Well, of course, for the people, not for the same ones in the photo who laugh like stallions from our 32 stud farm.
          2. -2
            11 December 2019 14: 43
            And also at whose expense?
    2. -1
      11 December 2019 10: 09
      The former guarantor, he is the initiator, Pyotr Alekseevich, why did he become quiet?
      1. +4
        11 December 2019 10: 15
        You do not follow the news? He is cheerful, active, it is true it is not clear sober or not what At the next mini Maidan, the people threw him (well or into him) eggs fellow
        1. 0
          11 December 2019 10: 22
          Sasha, read carefully, the question to the initiator of the "campaign".
          1. +4
            11 December 2019 10: 36
            I understood you, and yes it was irony. Why should Petya be worried? This is a public initiative that does not carry any legal consequences. He has good reason to worry about the redistribution of spheres of influence in the independent one, which Benya began, but apparently he has some guarantees, otherwise we would have watched the story of "Saakashvili-2" request
    3. -2
      11 December 2019 10: 11
      Unexpectedly, they encountered difficulties: none of the lawyers known for their sympathies for Ukraine has yet to agree to defend the Kiev authorities during public hearings scheduled for next spring

      This is a problem when you want a freebie! And so, for babosiki, in line.
      1. +2
        11 December 2019 10: 15
        [quote = rocket757] And so, for the babosiki, they will line up in a queue. [/ quote]
        Maybe all the same article carefully will you read?
        [quote] lawyers refuse to participate in the process on the side of Ukraine "even for money", [/ Quote]
        1. +2
          11 December 2019 10: 25
          Quote: Lipchanin (Sergey)
          lawyers refuse to participate in the process on the side of Ukraine "even for money"

          Amounts of money are also different and it is not a fact that they will refuse large sums. Not all fundamental.
        2. +5
          11 December 2019 10: 27
          This article is not about the International Tribunal in The Hague, but about a public court in Crimea. Ukraine does not pay attention to this process. They are waiting for a decision in The Hague, about there we have problems with good lawyers.
        3. -2
          11 December 2019 10: 29
          Quote: Lipchanin
          lawyers refuse to participate in the process on the side of Ukraine "even for money",

          According to Stanislavsky ... I DO NOT BELIEVE !!! because this does not happen.
          already answered, the question of the size of the fee, nothing more!
          In short, we'll see.
    4. +1
      11 December 2019 10: 28
      UKRAINE THREATENED KAZAKHSTAN FOR TOKAYEV'S WORDS ABOUT CRIMEA
      Ukraine will take diplomatic measures against Kazakhstan because of the statement made by the country's president Kassym-Zhomart Tokayev about Crimea, official Kiev reports. As Ukrainian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Yekaterina Zelenko said, they are deeply concerned about media reports about the statements by Kazakh President Kassym-Zhomart Tokayev for denying the annexation of the Ukrainian Crimea by Russia.

      According to the Ukrainian side, the statement of the President of Kazakhstan contradicts the "prevailing principles of relations between the two countries and the internationally recognized position on Crimea, as recorded in the resolution of the UN General Assembly."

      Earlier, Tokayev in an interview with Deutsche Welle media company said that the republic did not call the reunification of Crimea with Russia annexation.
      1. +1
        11 December 2019 11: 02
        It’s just that Kazakhstan made a choice with whom it is more profitable to be friends with them, all the more they have no common border with Ukraine, but Lukashenko is forced to maneuver, all the same, Ukraine is an important trading partner for Belarus ...
        1. +1
          11 December 2019 11: 52
          Zelensky is also "maneuvering", five years ago Zelensky said thank you to those who kill peaceful Donetsk residents. Judging by the Normandy meeting, nothing has changed in his words in relation to the republics.
          1. -1
            11 December 2019 12: 22
            Quote: Guards turn
            nothing has changed in relation to the republics.
            Reply

            But what should have changed if he is afraid of the Nazi minority? But he is afraid, because those 73% of those who voted for him are afraid of the same minority in the hope that he will bring peace. The army, which also consists of those same 73%, is afraid of the same minority. those who voted for him. The police are afraid of the same minority. Rather, even they are not afraid, but pretend that they are afraid, but in fact they think that they will sit quietly like that, will assent to the Natsiks, and they will lead them into a full, European future. And the fact that they are oppressed by linguistic and other signs, well, after all, Russian-speaking people in any country try to mimic, adapt to local conditions, if only they would be warm ... But those brave who do not want or did not want to adapt are burned in Odessa, or with weapons in their hands defend their rights in the Donbass ...
        2. 0
          11 December 2019 13: 05
          I made a choice, only Crimea’s affiliation to Russia did not recognize
          Here is a choice
    5. -2
      11 December 2019 10: 29
      It seems that Ukraine is simply greedy and does not set aside lawyers. Is there no money?
      1. +3
        11 December 2019 10: 44
        There's no point
        Yes, and show organizers must pay
    6. +4
      11 December 2019 10: 42
      Quote: Victor_B
      Zadolbali with their international court-gossip!

      Quote: Civil
      And what kind of international public tribunal?

      The article is written so that no one understood anything.
      The international public tribunal, which should assess the provocation of Ukraine in the Kerch Strait, can be convened in the spring of 2020. It is proposed by the international association "Tavrida" TASS was told on Monday by its participant, the head of the working group on international legal issues at the Permanent Mission of Crimea to the President of the Russian Federation, Alexander Molokhov.

      https://tass.ru/obschestvo/7191731
      1. 0
        11 December 2019 13: 46
        Yes, the authors are true "headline sharks", foolish heads who are not able to critically read the text of the article itself. And the organizers of this "event", it seems to me, do not even know what to do with it?
    7. The comment was deleted.
    8. -4
      11 December 2019 10: 52
      lawyers refuse to represent the interests of Kiev.
      Even lawyers refuse to contact litigants on this issue, incl. Novikov, who became odious after his statements. Interesting, the so-called. "International public tribunal" will approach the examination of the case without bias and in compliance with all the rules of law?
      1. +1
        11 December 2019 11: 04
        Quote: rotmistr60
        odious after his statements Novikov.

        For this, it doesn’t matter at all who to protect, the main thing is to pay well, and in this case, apparently, a large fee is not expected ...
    9. -1
      11 December 2019 11: 04
      Unexpectedly, they encountered difficulties: none of the lawyers known for their sympathies for Ukraine has yet to agree to defend the Kiev authorities during public hearings scheduled for next spring
      Decent lawyers naturally will not undertake to defend provocateurs, but Kiev can find some stub that will take on this "dead" case for a decent amount (in $ or euros, of course).
      1. +3
        11 December 2019 12: 33
        Quote: Lelek
        Unexpectedly, they encountered difficulties: none of the lawyers known for their sympathies for Ukraine has yet to agree to defend the Kiev authorities during public hearings scheduled for next spring
        Decent lawyers naturally will not undertake to defend provocateurs, but Kiev can find some stub that will take on this "dead" case for a decent amount (in $ or euros, of course).

        Decent lawyers do not want to play the role of the amusing Petrushka in the big top circus. Of course, they will find someone of the level of Kovtun. You at least ask what kind of international public tribunal. Such tribunals in the programs of Soloviev and Co. go every evening. Well, there will be a couple of Ukrainians, a couple of Moldovans, a couple of Poles and Kazakhs willing to take part in the show. And what, from this show acquires the status of an international, and even a tribunal ?! By whom, by what organizations is this "tribunal" recognized as such? How does this differ from the program - Evening with V. Solovyov?
        Or you really do not understand that this is a laughing stock, not a tribunal. And Kiev will not look for lawyers (its lawyers are involved in the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea), but will laugh like a horse will. This is a shame, not an initiative. What are you happy about?
      2. +3
        11 December 2019 13: 32
        You don't seem to understand what this is about. None of Kiev has anything to do with this extremely strange "event", and of course it will not participate in it.
    10. -2
      11 December 2019 11: 07
      Lawyers are certainly a cunning sort, but even they do not want to risk their reputation ..... in a case where justice (crooked justice) will clearly see the guilt of the "former brothers" .......
    11. +2
      11 December 2019 11: 57
      . According to the head of the working group on international legal issues of the Permanent Mission of Crimea under the President of Russia, Alexander Molokhov, lawyers refuse to represent the interests of Kiev.

      Was there a provocation? It was! Is the hearing task set? Delivered!
      So decide how head Wg this question request
    12. +3
      11 December 2019 13: 29
      This is about that strange "public initiative" announced recently. It is clear that none of the serious lawyers wants to participate in this "tribunal".

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"