Flawless shooting from the Belarusian T-72B hit the video

Belarusian armed forces publish footage of main combat tank T-72B for several purposes during the military exercises in the area of ​​the city of Borisov, at the 227th training ground.

The video posted on the Web demonstrates the joint work of tankers with engineering units. The task of the latter includes laying a passage through a minefield. Most likely, the UR-77 Meteorite self-propelled rocket launcher was used for these purposes.

After the track has been cleared, T-72B come into play. The video shows how a massive combat vehicle moves at a speed of about 10 km / h and, in the course of its movement, fires, delivering direct attacks on targets, one after another. Flawless hits on targets are recorded.

The Russians are well known for their skill when it comes to armored vehicles - after all, it was this country that created the Tank Biathlon! Neighboring Belarus, however, is also a big fan of these military vehicles and demonstrates similar skills during military exercises.

- writes the publication Sputnik.

Recently, Moscow has passed to Minsk the modern modification of the Urals - T-72Б3. Their visual difference from previous versions is the placement of additional protection - the so-called "soft armor" - in removable units on the sides of the equipment.

Comments

[Magic archer]

Well, to put it mildly, the movie is not about anything. The Star takes such a dozen per week. More show-offs and propaganda. I still don’t understand why ours are competing in the tank biathlon on the T-72. Okay, Belarusians, they don’t have their own tanks. But are we that ?! I’m silent about Armata, but the T-90 of the latest modifications, the same MS where !? The Chinese are constantly bringing new equipment! And we only see by the Star and in the parade ....

[Pessimist22]

A video on how to shoot accurately from a T72B with the appropriate skills and experience.

[Magic archer]

Well, you can also learn to shoot accurately from older cars, but this does not mean that new equipment is not needed Belarusians will get off the T-72 B, they don’t conflict with anyone. And we still have how much to go on old stuff ???! You can upgrade old cars as much as you like, but like the Mig-29 (35) will not be the fifth generation, the T-72 will not be able to withstand more advanced Western cars. We are marking time. At what in almost all military branches. The backlog will soon be calculated not by years, but by generations !!!! Mattresses are thinking about the sixth generation of fighters, but we still cannot finish the fifth one !!!! And this is just the tip of the iceberg! Of course, you can write me down as a scribbler, in alarmists, but. If you turn on your head and look at the real situation, but it will become completely sad. Believe me, I know what I'm talking about. And so yes, the T-72 is super, duper and Khan in Abramsam ....

[Pessimist22]

Write to the RF Ministry of Defense what is bothering you.

[Thrall]

This year, at the Borisov training ground, it was almost impossible to pick mushrooms and berries - classes and exercises with shooting were constantly going on. And the inhabitants of the surrounding neighborhoods had to get used to falling asleep under the cannonade. Maybe war is coming soon?)

[PalBor]

It bothers me that Belarus is negotiating with NATO on joint exercises. But, I think, the MO knows about this.
Is Russia teasing again?

[Svetlana]

Quote: PalBor

It bothers me that Belarus is negotiating with NATO on joint exercises. But, I think, the MO knows about this.
Is Russia teasing again?

Negotiations, in themselves, mean nothing. Important arrangements. What are they and what about. Russia also did not announce a boycott to them and periodically talk to and exchange information with them about something.

[Same lech]

so the T-72 will not be able to withstand more advanced Western vehicles.

Let me disagree with you.
We must first see how these old men are planned to be used in battle ... just like in the first Chechen company and how in Syria they will be quickly knocked out.
If you use tanks in conjunction or in conjunction with attached auxiliary equipment ... helicopters, artillery, drones, reconnaissance, and other things with specific tasks that are realistically feasible, the T-72 is quite capable of winning a battle ... much depends on the commander in battle. .. how much he realistically assesses the situation and correctly positions his forces ... I would not consider separately using the T-72.
Modern battle is no longer a duel of knights of past centuries, one on one ... this is a multidimensional task.

[tracer]

And what is the disagreement then? In what you need to do intellectually?

[Same lech]

And what is the disagreement

The fact that the T-72 can not withstand more advanced Western cars ...
heh heh ... it’s like if from around the corner you scrape a bandit with a gun with a crowbar for crowning, then nothing will happen to him.

[tracer]

As for the scrap, you are right the caliber T 72 in 125 mm is worse than scrap. But your judgments about technology are very simple like a shovel. Everything is much more complicated. T 34 was also far from perfect in comparison with the latest German tanks. But in the aggregate of all the characteristics, he became the best tank of the great Russian and the winner.

[VO3A]

Such a child’s positive analysis! You have been told for 20 years that tanks have ceased to be the main striking force and are used in the 3rd echelon of combat operations to clean up the remaining centers of resistance ... Modern anti-tank weapons have a range of up to 18-24 km from helicopters and UAVs (aircraft), respectively. .. Tanks can guard operational control points and missile and artillery-type destruction systems ... T e perform auxiliary functions .... If tanks are included in network-centric systems, their capabilities are weak here too, the firing range for external target designation is extremely small, however such an opportunity to obtain external information about the enemy in real time would significantly increase their capabilities ...
Tales are touched by serial experience in this regard ... So there’s a war against partisans, and the first and second echelon of hostilities are absent .... There’s a third echelon and tanks there, but this is an uncharacteristic experience .... rather anti-terrorism ...

[carstorm 11]

lagging behind what?))) from widely advertised and 7 of which 10 aren't even there?))) do not invent a problem from scratch) our fleet of cars is estimated in thousands. replacing them is decades. 72 as the main machine, it fully corresponds to the tasks that are set before them) and at the same time there is a re-equipment with new machines, which is quite usual.

[Warthog]

Quote: carstorm 11

lagging behind what?

From the same m1a2sep. From the main criteria "security, firepower, mobility" we win only by mobility. And if we add an LMS, then we are lagging behind. Only the T-90m can perform on an equal footing in the technical part, and then only on condition that 2a82 is installed.

[carstorm 11]

tanks do not fight tanks) given our theater, all these advantages are worthless. and for lokalka at our borders 72 will quite cope with all tasks. at the moment of course. re-equipment with new types of equipment will still occur gradually.

[Crimean partisan 1974]

and the T-72 will not be able to withstand more advanced Western vehicles .......... and what are these modern military vehicles in the west? these are the ones that blacks still charge with unitars. are those those who still do not have tank KUV? these are those who can’t walk on bridges more than 00 tons of weight, do not tell

[svp67]

Quote: Pessimist22

A video on how to shoot accurately from a T72B with the appropriate skills and experience.

Fair? A very strange video. "Serpent Gorynych" made a passage for ONE TANK? No, he does it for the unit. This means that they should have shown the actions of at least a platoon. Further, the tank shoots at targets, they are scattered into chips "in smoke and flames", again, they don’t do this during normal shooting, it’s impossible to assess whether the crew hit, or destroyed the target by a close gap, usually undershot.
Here the targets are very close along the front, that is, if the tank is shot at this range in advance, there is no particular difficulty in hitting these targets.
conclusion - the video is purely propaganda.

[aws4]

yes yes but where is the distance to the goals? without this it’s not clear whether they shoot well or not

[carstorm 11]

because 72 is the main tank. plus by exposing all the participants the same cars almost equal conditions are made.

[seregin-s1]

Qualifiers are held throughout the country. T-72 is everywhere. There should be equal conditions from the beginning. And the Chinese are still behind us with their modern tanks.

[Bar2]

Belarus has good aiming systems, hence the result, but t72 is of course the last century, we need a new tank.

[Warthog]

Quote: Bar2

Belarus has good aiming systems, hence the result

The Belarusians on the t-72B suddenly sighting complex 1A40-1. Soviet.
On t-72b3m (which is just on the roller) is Pine-U. Is it necessary to say that mainly B3 / m are in service with the NE of the RF, and not Belarusians?

[Bar2]

Quote: Warthog

Quote: Bar2

Belarus has good aiming systems, hence the result

The Belarusians on the t-72B suddenly sighting complex 1A40-1. Soviet.
On t-72b3m (which is just on the roller) is Pine-U. Is it necessary to say that mainly B3 / m are in service with the NE of the RF, and not Belarusians?

there was this sight, now there is a modernized Pine.

Belarusians modernized their T72 and set a sight for the PNK-4S-01 commander
so that with the guidance they have everything in order.

[venik]

Quote: Magic Archer

I still don’t understand why our tank biathlon competes on the T-72

========
Well, probably because the ESSENCE of "tank biathlon" is not in the demonstration of the NEWEST equipment, but in the demonstration of the TRAINING and SKILLS of the crews! And - on STANDARD and SAME equipment! And for this it is difficult to find anything more suitable than the T-72, which is in service with the armies of almost half of the world (well, or at least about fifty countries!) ...
Well, WHO WANTS (the Chinese there, the Indians) bring their own "novelties" too ..... True, so far, they have not distinguished themselves in anything special .......

[Siberia55]

[media = http: // https: //www.youtube.com/watch? v = 9ipUc-DYCis]

[tracer]

There were many articles on V.O. about this decent car. She will still serve the Russian army. I think the stock of modernization is far from being exhausted. Although he is already a "serving" age, he is still the same dangerous fighter, even against the background of the most modern armored giants from other countries. One moment worries. A handful of "zmagars" in the power structures of Belarus would not have deployed the trunks of these machines in our direction. Once, too, it was not at all believed that the landing party "that" and "this" would not at all at the same table on the second of August, near the DPR and LPR, would converge.

[Vladimir_2U]

Like a tank, the T-72 is already on the verge, only KAZ and the latest electronic filling will help him somehow, BUT the dressing sheepskin may not be worth it! Optics, electronics and even KAZ will cost much more, possibly at times the iron itself. In my opinion, the remaining T-72s must be depopulated, made from ultra-toothy drones.

[tracer]

I think more outdated equipment will be filed for this business. The benefits of this are obvious. Only here "but what about ETI? You need to wash more often." Tobish with reloading systems? They'll probably come up with something.

[Vladimir_2U]

More obsolete equipment does not have an automatic machine (mechanism) of loading. The main firing argument of the tank in this case is excluded.

Quote: tracer

Tobish with reloading systems?

Some kind of dancing over the finished AZ sharply increase the cost.

[tracer]

With reloading, it’s easier. I mean the pre-rotary era.

[Vladimir_2U]

The pre-rotary era is T-62, T-54/55, they are already absurd to translate into robots, even without taking into account the impossibility of using a gun.

[tracer]

Let's see, in my opinion, accepting a new AK 12 instead of AKM 74 is also an absurdity that is practically no different. So the little things.

[timeout]

Quote: tracer

A handful of "zmagars" in the power structures of Belarus would not have deployed the barrels of these machines in our direction.

Where is this? Towards Canada? Again you, the "tracer" side beguiled ... Yours are all in Canada.

[Mountain shooter]

Masters, you can’t say anything. These can be done on any technique, and on a good one ...

[evgen1221]

The old one is not old but in competent hands and a toothpick is a deadly weapon, a fork in general is a weapon of mass destruction, judging by the statistics of domestic killings)))

[Warthog]

The video rides t-72B3m or b3 for 16 years - you can clearly see the side screens with a relic, the hump of a pine tree on the tower, the pressure sensor on the roof of the tower, the airborne remote control units on the tower.
As for the "super accuracy", even the 2e42-2 on the "old T-72b" did an excellent job with stabilization at 10 km / h. And not knowing the distance to the target and in general the question.

- Their visual difference from previous versions is the placement of additional protection - the so-called "soft armor" - in removable units on the sides of the equipment.

The main visual difference between b3m and b3 is a relic quite "solid" along the sides, DZ along the sides of the tower and an additional contact block to the left of the gun in the direction of travel.
And "soft armor" is a universal set of remote sensing devices, which is also hung on the BMPT to counter tandems. And not at all the b3m indicator.

[Warthog]

Quote: venik

And - on the STANDARD and SAME equipment!

Yeah. Standard. Therefore, the "standard biathlon T-72b3" developed the maximum speed higher than the T-80U with the GTD-1250 could?