Did the Strela-2 MANPADS work? Shows the destruction of the MiG-23 in Libya

76

In Libya, the MiG-23 fighter was destroyed, which was at the disposal of the troops of Khalifa Haftar, who is trying to establish cooperation with Moscow. The plane was shot down by the forces of the Government of National Unity (PNS) stationed in Tripoli. This was reported by Defense Arabic.

MiG-23 carried out an intelligence mission in the area of ​​al-Zawiya. The machine, released in the 1984 year, belongs to the MiG-23MLAE-2 model. As a means of destruction, an anti-aircraft complex of medium range Hisar of Turkish development is indicated, which gives target designation on the infrared channel. There is evidence that the entire PNS has 12 complexes of this type, supplied by Ankara.



However, a number of media claim that the Strela-2 portable air defense system (it appears on the video posted on the Web) played the role of the strike weapon. It was adopted in the armies of the Soviet Union in 1968 and was widely used in foreign armies.

Judging by the video below, the pilot Amer Yusuf Gadban successfully ejected, but was captured. As can be understood from the materials presented, there was no physical reprisal, however, the pilot went through moral bullying. Earlier, he himself promised to deal with the enemy, which was captured in a number of videos on social networks.

Did the Strela-2 MANPADS work? Shows the destruction of the MiG-23 in Libya




  • https://www.facebook.com/Faraj.Shitaw.Official/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

76 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. SAG
    +17
    8 December 2019 02: 55
    It was adopted by the Soviet Union in 1968 and was widely used in foreign armies.

    How much quality weapons did the USSR produce, that they were successfully fighting after 50 years, and both sides of the conflict ?! soldier
    1. +9
      8 December 2019 04: 10
      "As a means of destruction, the medium-range Hisar anti-aircraft complex of Turkish design is indicated, issuing infrared target designation"
      IR target designation ?! Mobile phone technology on guard of the sky! Oh, journalism.
      And yes, I read about Strela.
      1. 0
        8 December 2019 10: 16
        IR GOS works on the principle of capturing infrared waves, according to the simple thermal background of the target.
        1. +1
          8 December 2019 10: 31
          The article does not contain a word, not just about the ICG seeker;
          1. 0
            8 December 2019 14: 19
            You yourself wrote about the infrared channel - IR GOS.
            1. +4
              8 December 2019 14: 40
              Quote: Vladimir_2U
              infrared target designation

              Points to send you? Infrared target designation! Do you understand what is TARGET? Not Homing, but TARGET?
      2. +17
        8 December 2019 10: 28
        In the photo are real monkeys! )))
      3. -1
        8 December 2019 21: 23
        Quote: Vladimir_2U
        IR target designation ?! Mobile phone technology on guard of the sky! Oh, journalism.

        NSC “Sura” and its modifications are intended for operational guidance of guided weapons (missiles with infrared seeker)
        target designation, in this case, goes on the Ik-channel: helmet (position of view) - two receivers


        than you don’t
        Mobile phone technology

        but the author was wrong ..
        HISAR-A short-range air defense systems and at the end of infrared guidance.

        as well
        The concept of data transmission based on the use of infrared (IR) channels has been developed for many years and interest in it is currently only expanding due to the increasing demand for high-speed wireless communication channels.

        Back in the late 60s, data transmission tests were conducted in Moscow on the basis of the Russian equipment for wireless infrared communication, which was installed between Moscow State University and Zubovskaya Square. Then a number of experiments were conducted in the early 70s in various regions of the country. In general, the tests were successful, but at that time the experts had a rather cool opinion about this technology and it boiled down to the fact that bad weather conditions make the use of wireless infrared channels an unacceptable and unpromising direction.
        1. +1
          9 December 2019 03: 24
          Quote: opus
          NSC “Sura” and its modifications are intended for operational guidance of guided weapons

          What does our helmet-mounted target designation system have to do with the Turkish air defense system? In addition, you have mixed up the TARGET, with tracking the position of the helmet, which is why IR LEDs in the example you use are for. Well, at least some kind of attitude can be traced, at least some kind of truth, which is not close in the article.
          1. -2
            9 December 2019 10: 54
            Quote: Vladimir_2U
            What does our helmet-mounted target designation system have to do with the Turkish air defense system?

            nor what. and who claimed these things?
            Not who Vladimir_2U wrote
            Quote: Vladimir_2U
            IR target designation ?! Mobile phone technology on guard of the sky!

            Quote: Vladimir_2U
            Do you understand what is TARGET?

            I brought the NSCU "Sura", which works via the infrared channel.
            1. Target designation is the ability to quickly and correctly indicate goals, landmarks and other objects
            2. Infrared channel - a data transmission channel that does not require wired connections for its operation.
            1 + 2 = 3 Surah.
            I explained.
            and nonsense about the TV remote

            Quote: opus
            The concept of data transmission based on the use of infrared (IR) channels was developed


            I do not like this.
            take an infrared laser

            and tell how much you fit

            Quote: Vladimir_2U
            In addition, you confused the TARGET, with tracking the position of the helmet,

            besides, I didn’t mix anything up.
            What is target designation, see item 1 above
            Just the position of the head, the eye indicates the location of the target in space (by 2m coordinates), "Sura" transfers target data to a missile / or other weapon
            1. 0
              9 December 2019 11: 49
              Quote: opus
              "Sura" transfers target data to a missile / or other weapon

              Sura does NOT transmit target designation to the missile via infrared
              Quote: opus
              and nonsense about the TV remote
              about the TV remote, please quote from my commentary, otherwise it’s easier to write nonsense and debunk it yourself. In an article about the Turkish air defense system, what does the domestic helmet-mounted system "Sura" have to do with it? Which, using IR, is carried out only the positioning of the pilot's head, the initial data on target acquisition in the missile seeker is not transmitted using IR. After the launch, the rocket has nothing to do with either the aircraft or the Sura.
              1. -2
                9 December 2019 12: 05
                Quote: Vladimir_2U
                Sura does NOT transmit target designation to the missile via infrared

                Yes Yes

                the position (sight) of the head to the target is transmitted through the IR channel.
                So Ik target designation is.
                Do not be so jammed on the radar and missiles
                Quote: Vladimir_2U
                about the TV remote please quote from my comment,

                well
                Quote: Vladimir_2U
                Mobile phone technology on guard of the sky!

                who cares? Excuse me. called remotes what you called phones

                IrDA mobile phone:
                Protocol Specifications Irlap, IrLMP, IrCOMM, Tiny TP, IrOBEX, IrLAN, IrSimple and IrFM (under development).
                SIR (HPSIR) - Serial InfraRed - up to 115200 bps
                MIR - Medium InfraRed - up to 1.152 Mbps
                FIR - Fast InfraRed - up to 4 Mbps
                VFIR - Very Fast InfraRed - up to 16 Mbps
                UFIR - Ultra Fast InfraRed - Up to 96 Mbps
                Giga-IR - up to 1 Gb / s

                The IrDA TV is based on the architecture of the PC COM COM port, which uses the Universal Asynchronous Receiver Transmitter (UART) and operates at a data rate of 2400–115200 bps.
                IrDA includes a protocol stack of three agreed mandatory levels: IrPL (Physical Layer), Irlap (Link Access Protocol) and Irlmp (Link Management Protocol).
                1. +3
                  9 December 2019 12: 20
                  Are you screwed or what? In the article about the SAM, you are talking about the "Sura". In "Sura" IK is involved only in determining the position of the head, you mean the transfer of data via the IR channel to the rocket. Wake up.
                  1. +1
                    9 December 2019 12: 42
                    Quote: Vladimir_2U
                    Are you screwed or what? In the article about the SAM, you are talking about the "Sura".

                    Well, don’t be so rude.
                    I'm chewing
                    1. I'm not talking about an article gu-gu.
                    Someone "Vladimir_2U" hinted that target designation could not be given via the IR channel. I refute it
                    2. It doesn’t matter where it takes part. Sura is a helmet-mounted target designation system.
                    IR sensors transmit the positioning data of the pilot’s head, then to the systems, which means that the target designation is transmitted via the IR channel.
                    Quote: Vladimir_2U
                    , you're talking about transmitting data on the IR channel to a rocket.

                    and IR is not involved in the chain:
                    target-head / eyes of the pilot, BTsVM -AKU- rocket
                    fool

                    / it is impossible to be on so little deductible logic?
                    well do not like surah, take KOLS

                    What is so special about IR radiation that it cannot be used in target designation?
                    IR is also EM radiation.
                    you can tell about "inferiority":
                    TerraLink 1000, 2000, 3000, FiRLAN ET3XX; MT3XX; TR5XX; FT 0150, 0400, 1200, 2500
                    CableFree 500, 1000, Lite, Cell Link
                    What about the PAV Data Systems Ltd IR system?
                    Due to the highest beam power ratio, the original technology for producing a circular beam cross-section and balanced parameters, systems are now mass-produced at 155 Mbps with a range of up to 4 km with a high availability factor for the conditions of central Russia.

                    Quote: Vladimir_2U
                    Wake up.


                    Well, what can I say. this argument
                    1. +1
                      9 December 2019 12: 48
                      Quote: Vladimir_2U
                      As a means of destruction, the Turkish-developed Hisar medium-range anti-aircraft complex is indicated, which issues target designation via the infrared channel "

                      None of your comments have a single word about transmitting data to ROCKET over the IR channel. BCVM how does it transmit data to a rocket? Aviation ejection device HOW TO TRANSFER DATA TO ROCKET? Answer me.
                      1. -2
                        9 December 2019 16: 20
                        Quote: Vladimir_2U
                        Answer me.

                        I don’t understand, you, that there are difficulties with a causal relationship.
                        what does it ONLY
                        Quote: Vladimir_2U
                        HOW DOES THE DATA TRANSFER ON THE ROCKET?

                        Do you have a rocket in a spherical vacuum?

                        sort out
                        Multi-Band Laser Spot Tracker (MBLST)

                        / tired of everything
                      2. +2
                        9 December 2019 16: 30
                        You have difficulties, and they are very difficult. And I’m afraid that I’m not even talking about logic.
                        Quote: Vladimir_2U
                        None of your comments have a single word about transmitting data to ROCKET over the IR channel. BCVM how does it transmit data to a rocket? Aviation ejection device HOW TO TRANSFER DATA TO ROCKET? Answer me.

                        Is it difficult for you to directly answer these simple questions, the number two in all? Although what to demand from a tired, and very likely mournful.
                        By the way about "Sura", the fact that target designation gives out the PILOT with a glance escapes you! IR diodes are just elements of the executive system. To think that they give out target designation is like thinking that target designation is given by the flywheels of the gun guidance mechanism, for example.
    2. 0
      8 December 2019 07: 19
      Quote: SAG
      How much quality weapons did the USSR produce, that they were successfully fighting after 50 years, and both sides of the conflict ?!

      In this case, the MiG-23 cannot be called "successful"
      1. Maz
        +2
        8 December 2019 10: 51
        Yeah, when did the moment, and when the arrow 2? That's the same
        1. 0
          8 December 2019 21: 59
          Exactly. Arrow staffing in the amount of 2 units were equipped with any BMP, BMD, and armored personnel carrier of the Soviet Army
      2. +10
        8 December 2019 11: 41
        Quote: svp67
        Quote: SAG
        How much quality weapons did the USSR produce, that they were successfully fighting after 50 years, and both sides of the conflict ?!

        In this case, the MiG-23 cannot be called "successful"

        The fact that the MiG 23 still flies and performs combat functions from scratch for so many years without modernization is already a success.
      3. +10
        8 December 2019 16: 48
        for 30 years he performed successfully, but then he was shot down and immediately "you can't call it successful" ...
        it was the faithful pilots and the use of outdated aviation that allowed Assad to keep Syria.
        Look at the map of forces in Syria in the 14th, everything was kept there at airfields alone.
        and if you look at what junk (you cannot name it otherwise), the 'Syrian falcons' flew, then their courage, diva, is given.
        barrels from the 21st! For a moment the babahs fell asleep!
        survived.
        very successful technique!
        I think that there is no longer such a successful technology in the world, there is no evidence that 40-year-old jet aircraft were successfully used.
        1. 0
          9 December 2019 03: 19
          Quote: patron
          there is no evidence that jet 40 year aviation was successfully used

          No doubt, Soviet technology is the best. But by analogy, the F-15, and especially the F-16, is in service, I don't even know how many dozen countries. And the development, the same of the late 60s, though of a different generation, but the age of some aircraft is comparable .. By the way, Israel regularly uses the F-16 in combat operations, just like Turkey. And many others. In Iran, Phantoms are still flying. If you dig around, it turns out that there are a lot of outdated weapons in the world, and a lot is still fighting. I generally keep quiet about tanks.
      4. +1
        8 December 2019 22: 51
        A lot depends on who is at the helm or at the sight :).
        Although the pilot will defeat everyone on the Internet :)
    3. +1
      8 December 2019 07: 38
      Quote: SAG
      How much quality weapons did the USSR produce, that they were successfully fighting after 50 years, and both sides of the conflict ?!

      You can’t argue with that! The most interesting thing is that the USA and others cannot boast of it ..
      1. +2
        8 December 2019 12: 22
        Quote: Starper-777
        The most interesting thing is that the USA and others cannot boast of it ..

        Oh oh And how old is the B-52, F-15 and F-16?
        1. 0
          8 December 2019 16: 51
          and in which country are the peers of the 21st and 23rd months actually used ?!
          21 in syria so far so then fly
          1. -1
            8 December 2019 17: 30
            The phantom still flies in Israel, Japan, Iran and Turkey.
    4. 0
      8 December 2019 10: 10
      The video clearly shows what kind of reconnaissance flight he made
      1. 0
        8 December 2019 16: 51
        "Samostiynyk" - what can you see on this video stub?
    5. +1
      8 December 2019 16: 01
      in the role of the percussion instrument was a portable air defense system "Strela-2"

      Judging by the video, it’s going low. Did the Haftar specialists not know about the existence of such complexes in their adversary?
      MiG-23 carried out a reconnaissance mission in the area of ​​al-Zawiya.

      Sent the pilot for slaughter! Are there UAVs?
  2. -22
    8 December 2019 03: 36


    The pilot with a sour mine stands, and the locals have fun. That's kind of like savages.
    But I’ll imagine for a second that each of them and their families could be torn apart by a rocket or bomb from a downed plane. I don’t know how I would behave myself, I don’t know if I thought about killing a pilot in any cruel way. And with the rest of him take a selfie. I probably would have been at least not funny. And they - nothing, laugh.
    1. +5
      8 December 2019 04: 16
      A prisoner of war is a prisoner of war. No one has canceled the Convention. True barmaley and others like them do not care different conventions
      1. -17
        8 December 2019 10: 49
        Who cares - a big question.
        I remind you that it was the USSR that did not recognize the Hague Convention of 1907 and refused to accede to the Geneva Convention on Prisoners of War, which completed and put together the provisions of the Hague Rules.
        1. +14
          8 December 2019 15: 12
          Quote: Neznaika
          Who cares - a big question.
          I remind you that it was the USSR that did not recognize the Hague Convention of 1907 and refused to accede to the Geneva Convention on Prisoners of War, which completed and put together the provisions of the Hague Rules.
          Yes Yes Yes Yes!!!
          Only now Germany has signed and MANDATORY comply with this convention (and out depending on whether the other party signed it or not) - it was exactly the same as the provisions of the Convention
          There are no formulas in the text of the Conventions "English pilots and Soviet commissars should not be taken prisoner" ... there is no talk about death camps at all, just like about slave labor in Reich factories
          This is quite enough:
          "The maintenance of prisoners of war is entrusted to the government in whose power they are.
          If there is no special agreement between the belligerents, then prisoners of war shall use the same food room and clothes like troops the government that took them prisoner. "
        2. +3
          8 December 2019 22: 08
          Quote: Neznaika
          I remember,

          and I
          At the International Conference in Geneva on July 27, 1929, the Conventions on the Treatment of Prisoners of War were adopted. and “On improving the fate of the wounded and sick in the army”
          The convention "On improving the fate of the wounded and sick in active armies" by the leadership of the USSR It was recognized and entered into force for the Soviet Union on March 26, 1932.. The Convention on the Treatment of Prisoners of War, until the signing of the new convention in 1949, the leaders of the USSR did not recognize.

          1th Hague Convention October 18, 1907 "On the laws and customs of war."
          The chairman of the conference is the “First Commissioner” of the Russian delegation, the Russian ambassador in Paris, Doctor of Technical Sciences A. I. Nelidov., This USSR recognized
          2. On March 19, 1931, the CEC and the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR adopted the “Regulations on Prisoners of War,” which generally repeated the Convention, but which also had a number of differences. The Soviet government did not consider it necessary to sign the Convention because she joined the Hague conference containing all the most important provisions, as Geneva

          3. “On the treatment of prisoners of war”
          The provisions of this convention must be respected by the high contracting parties in all circumstances.
          If in case of war one of the belligerents does not appear to be a party to the convention, however, its provisions remain binding on all belligerents who have signed the convention

          As Adolf observed it, we all know
    2. +3
      8 December 2019 05: 05
      Was intelligence, and so can destroy all the pilots on earth?
    3. +9
      8 December 2019 05: 09
      Savages anyway
      1. +24
        8 December 2019 10: 13
        Yes. only stupid savages can exchange Gaddafi’s country of time for what they now have. Like we were thirty years ago.
        1. +9
          8 December 2019 11: 36
          . Yes. only stupid savages can exchange Gaddafi’s country of time for what they now have. Like we were thirty years ago.


          Everything is relative. I consider the ban on exit a big mistake of the Soviets. He had to be made free. Wishing very soon would be many times less. But strictly restrict entry back
    4. +7
      8 December 2019 05: 30
      Ever since WWII, American pilots had a memo where it was recommended in case the plane was shot down trying to eject as far as possible from the place of the bombing.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +6
        8 December 2019 11: 36
        And also the sewn "phrasebook":
        1. +4
          8 December 2019 12: 02
          laughing In vain they are in Russian. laughing For ours, this is actually an aggravating circumstance. It’s the same as alcohol.
        2. +2
          8 December 2019 14: 06
          Wow! Even in Korean there! Well, there he will be taken where necessary)
        3. +8
          8 December 2019 14: 16
          I’m trying to remember where I have the nearest American military unit for a similar case ... Something doesn’t come to my mind. However, it’s far to lead, maybe just a pipe in the dark?
          1. 0
            8 December 2019 18: 26
            Quote: Deathmaker
            I’m trying to remember where I have the nearest American military unit for a similar case ... Something doesn’t come to my mind.

            Send a parcel
            1. 0
              8 December 2019 19: 44
              Better in parts.
      3. -2
        8 December 2019 13: 47
        Quote: YOUR
        Ever since WWII, American pilots had a memo where it was recommended in case the plane was shot down trying to eject as far as possible from the place of the bombing.

        Exactly. And in the pilot’s eyes it is read that he doesn’t consider them for people, and they have fun. No matter how Islamist they are, everyone has their own truth. But behave like that with a man who was ready to bomb their village. With these antics, they are examples of humanism compared to what comes to my mind. They behave as if they have come to terms with the fact that today they are standing around a captive pilot, and tomorrow they will die from another bomb or shootout, and they only have to and now to laugh at all this and their lives. Looks like life there is completely worthless.
        1. -1
          8 December 2019 18: 28
          Quote: superman
          They act like they’ve humbled themselves

          They behave as if they have no brain. Well, sobsno, it all fits together
    5. 0
      8 December 2019 07: 21
      Quote: superman
      That's kind of like savages.

      Yes, you, what ... "they do" as you can
      Quote: superman
      And they - nothing, laugh.

      Well, "onizhedeti" ...
      1. -3
        8 December 2019 14: 08
        Judging by the video below, the pilot Amer Yusuf Gadban successfully ejected, but was captured. As can be understood from the materials presented, there was no physical reprisal, however, the pilot went through moral bullying. Earlier, he himself promised to deal with the enemy, which was captured in a number of videos on social networks.

        If for him the war is a reason to troll those who were flying to bomb on the net, then I would not be surprised if he deserved not these so-called. "moral bullying", and castration from the villagers that he bombed, whoever they were. If he behaved like that, then, IMHO, they still treated him humanely.
    6. 0
      8 December 2019 16: 18
      Quote: superman
      A sour mine pilot stands

      When the "Haftarites" took the pilot of the shot down fighter, and he turned out to be a mercenary from Portugal, his physiognomy, except for fear and fear, also expressed nothing.
    7. -2
      9 December 2019 16: 02
      Die bad
  3. +4
    8 December 2019 06: 53
    It is possible that the Strela-2 MANPADS began to appear in the media precisely for the reason that Khalif Haftar is really trying to establish cooperation with Moscow. They say we are your plane and from the Soviet MANPADS. The pilot may be exchanged, although not a fact, since crazy there above the roof.
    1. Kaw
      -1
      8 December 2019 16: 27
      Or maybe because apparently they are shooting at an airplane from Strela-2
  4. +1
    8 December 2019 07: 09
    From this civil war, only the United States benefits, for instability in the world is their strong point.
    1. -3
      8 December 2019 14: 13
      Quote: Thrifty
      This civil war only benefits
      Russia supporting Haftar with money, weapons and mercenaries
      Quote: Thrifty
      for instability in the world is their hobby.
      hi
      1. 0
        8 December 2019 21: 26
        Not only Russia.
  5. +2
    8 December 2019 07: 43
    Rather, the pilot’s fault. Arabs Che take. From MANPADS on MIG-23? And at what altitude did the Arabian deer fly?
    1. -1
      8 December 2019 10: 12
      I agree, in general, "Birch" should have yelled at him when he was just captured.
      1. +6
        8 December 2019 11: 37
        Quote: tatarin1972
        I agree, in general, "Birch" should have yelled at him when he was just captured.

        Birch "does not yell" when launching MANPADS)
  6. +3
    8 December 2019 08: 58
    Twenty years later, their tribal showdowns will collapse when resources run out. In the meantime - black military humor.
    In the photo are typical revolutionaries. laughing
  7. +2
    8 December 2019 09: 46
    Again, everything about nothing, where is it filmed, when, who was standing on whom? The only thing seems to be clear, someone, once, on someone started up Arrow. And something is burning on the earth. And everywhere everyone yells. That's it, point.
    1. 0
      8 December 2019 16: 20
      I agree with you, it painfully sounds like filming from Syria with a downed Su-25 of the Russian airborne forces ...
  8. 0
    8 December 2019 09: 48
    Tell me, from which game is the screenshot in the picture in the headline of the news?
  9. 0
    8 December 2019 10: 15
    These guys in the photo behave inappropriately disgusting either drug addicts or problem orientation What kind of support audience do they expect by publishing such a photo?
  10. DRM
    +2
    8 December 2019 11: 38
    As can be understood from the materials presented, there was no physical reprisal, but the pilot went through moral bullying. Earlier, he himself promised to deal with the enemy, which was captured in a number of videos on social networks.

    Do not boast about going to the army. And they boasted when walking with rati.
  11. +3
    8 December 2019 11: 48
    Here is the photo above ... I see a lot of wild monkeys and one person.
    {Guys, I'm serious}.
  12. +2
    8 December 2019 11: 56
    Some kind of monkey around the prisoner. It is doubtful that these clowns are related to the attack. sad But in vain they so recklessly glow in the photo. The general will precisely open the primary genitals to them at the first opportunity.
    1. 0
      8 December 2019 17: 15
      or they general sand deserts ...
      there is such a mess slurred
      the grandmother in two said hto whom, why, and why.
      and the general’s offensive on tripoli, it’s kind of drowned
  13. +2
    8 December 2019 15: 10
    It is unlikely that the "Strela-2" worked the plane! In the video, she flew in his direction ... but most likely - did not catch up! fool
  14. -1
    8 December 2019 17: 26
    Most likely, news with picks from Lock On from the same author. laughing
    Good sim.
  15. 0
    8 December 2019 18: 59
    The pilot's horror lurked in his eyes. I thought high and fly fast, they won’t get it. But no .... landed.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  16. 0
    9 December 2019 19: 26
    Strange as it is, the noise of a receding aircraft is heard until the end of the video
  17. 0
    14 February 2020 15: 43
    Fools teach life ..... I'm talking about the pilot.
  18. 0
    14 February 2020 15: 44
    Quote: From Siberia we
    The pilot's horror lurked in his eyes. I thought high and fly fast, they won’t get it. But no .... landed.


    Fools and posers life quickly teaches ...

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"