Ukrainian Su-27 escorted a Neptune cruise missile

81

In Ukraine, a video was published showing the testing of the P-360 cruise missile.

We are talking about the cruise missile RK-360МЦ "Neptune". The military department of Ukraine announced that during the tests the rocket "made a flight of several hundred kilometers."



From the report:

The R-360 missile flew along a given route at given altitudes, confirming its flight characteristics.

About what specific distance the cruise missile of the Neptune complex has covered, the Ukrainian command does not report.

The ground-based Ukrainian Neptune complex is equipped with anti-ship missiles, which are said to be capable of hitting and sinking ships up to the cruising class.

Even a cruiser will amaze

The manufacturer RK-360MC “Neptune” claims that armament is capable of hitting individual ships and even strike naval groups in any meteorological conditions, as well as when interfering with the use of electronic warfare by the enemy.


The P-360 rocket itself is actually a development of the Soviet X-35 rocket. It is subsonic. Initially, it was reported that a cruise anti-ship missile is designed to destroy ships with a displacement of not more than 5 thousand tons. During the April tests this year, the rocket covered a distance of approximately 220 km.

The video shows footage of launching an anti-ship missile and shooting its flight from the side of a fighter. It is seen how the Su-27 flies at about the same speed as the P-360, including at a fairly low altitude above the sea.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    81 comment
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +45
      7 December 2019 09: 09
      So what?
      Normal Soviet anti-ship missile.
      Sawed by never stupid "Ukrainian" engineers. Certainly not all ethnic Ukrainians.
      1. +8
        7 December 2019 09: 23
        Quote: Victor_B
        So what?
        Normal Soviet anti-ship missile.

        So it’s nothing, but if you take into account geopolitics, then you can unleash the world war war Slavs destroy the Slavs, to the applause of the Pentagon After all, how can all this be understood?
        1. +8
          7 December 2019 09: 24
          Quote: Starper-777
          After all, so can all this be understood?

          That's exactly what you need to understand!
          1. +1
            7 December 2019 10: 48
            Quote: Victor_B
            Quote: Starper-777
            After all, so can all this be understood?

            That's exactly what you need to understand!

            We understood each other correctly Petrovich .. But the rest hehe hi
        2. +11
          7 December 2019 09: 49
          Quote: Starper-777
          Quote: Victor_B
          So what?
          Normal Soviet anti-ship missile.

          So it’s nothing, but if you take into account geopolitics, then you can unleash the world war war Slavs destroy the Slavs, to the applause of the Pentagon After all, how can all this be understood?

          It’s even clear who will destroy someone. Our X-35U has long been in the series, not to mention the fact that we have more massive missiles.
          Will the Zircon anti-ship missile ship change the balance of power at sea? Of course - yes, since its characteristics actually end the dominance of aircraft carrier strike groups (AUG) for several reasons. Firstly, multifunctional integrated radars of modern ships and radars of naval air defense systems of a potential enemy will not be able to provide target designation to means of fire destruction due to temporary restrictions on the operation of the "radar - fire weapon" pair in cases of hypersonic anti-ship missiles detected at a distance of 20-25 km (visible radio horizon ). Zircon will cover this distance in less than 10 seconds.
          Secondly, if the Zircon is detected by the radar of ships and the radars of AWACS aircraft advanced 150 nautical miles, then the newest anti-aircraft missile RIM-174 SM-6 ERAM with an active homing head (GOS) flying to the target at a speed of 3,5, released to intercept 1,5 Mach number, the interception task will not be performed either on a head-on course (the oncoming speeds must be equal), or by a maneuver to hit the target in pursuit (the speed of the catching missile must be 174 times higher). At the same time, active maneuvering of the Zircon at hypersonic speed will constantly disrupt the capture of the seeker RIM-XNUMX. Therefore, to intercept one Zircon, a dozen anti-aircraft missiles will be required, but even with this expense, the interception of our anti-ship missiles is not guaranteed. In addition, the "Zircon" rocket is a flock - several dozen anti-ship missiles will fly to destroy the AUG, the interception of which will become a real nightmare for the ship's radars and air defense systems guarding the AUG's flagship aircraft carrier.

          https://rg.ru/2019/12/06/nepredskazuemyj-cirkon-osporit-dominirovanie-avianosnyh-udarnyh-grupp.html
          1. +8
            7 December 2019 13: 15
            It’s even clear who will destroy someone. Our X-35U has long been in the series, not to mention the fact that we have more massive missiles.

            And it will not help here, because Ukraine does not have a fleet.
            But we must plan for the case of which the suppression of air defense, but dill still have it, and a massive air strike.
        3. +2
          7 December 2019 10: 06
          Perfect "off top"!
          Where did you see "Slavs against Slavs" in the text?
          Please do not be like filthy races!
          1. +7
            7 December 2019 10: 21
            Quote: hydrox
            Where did you see "Slavs against Slavs" in the text?

            After all, we are pitted and do not spare money on this.?
            Well, let's admit it .. hi
            Quote: hydrox
            Please do not be like filthy races!

            Maybe I'm tough, but all too often they close my mouth here ..
            Just to not offend anyone, such a tactic in Russia .. And we constantly make excuses .. Have you noticed this? angry
            1. +5
              7 December 2019 11: 31
              We are pitted, with our connivance.
        4. +5
          7 December 2019 12: 07
          Quote: Starper-777
          Slavs destroy the Slavs

          Soviet people. This is a civil war in the USSR, which Gorby "managed to avoid": the USSR "collapsed without blood." And you believed it?
          1. -1
            7 December 2019 12: 16
            Quote: iouris
            Soviet people.

            There are no more Soviet people .. Have already suffered more than
            Quote: iouris
            This is a civil war in the USSR, which Gorby "managed to avoid": the USSR "collapsed without blood." And you believed it?

            Now everything will be at the level of the Russian Empire ..!
            Wanted this, so get hi
          2. +1
            7 December 2019 22: 19
            Without blood? But Moldova, Abkhazia with Ossetia, Karabakh, Chechnya, Tajikistan?
      2. +1
        7 December 2019 09: 29
        The question is who will fire this super Svido missile at the cruiser Moskva! I am sure the installation, together with the one who gave the order, will be destroyed earlier!
        1. +6
          7 December 2019 09: 31
          Quote: 30 vis
          The question is who will fire this super Svido missile at the cruiser Moskva! I am sure the installation, together with the one who gave the order, will be destroyed earlier!

          That's why they won’t shoot.
          But watch out.
          Dry gunpowder. Periodically.
          And this is the cost.
        2. -5
          7 December 2019 10: 55
          Quote: 30 vis
          The question is who will fire this super Svido missile at the cruiser Moskva! I am sure the installation, together with the one who gave the order, will be destroyed earlier!

          You don’t know how many "tricky ones on the salary" are sitting in our General Staff ..
          Remember the nuclear submarine "Kursk" ..?
          This rocket will be launched (towards Russia), even hooohly will not be aware hehe heh
          We will remain silent, of course .. negative
          1. +6
            7 December 2019 11: 13
            Quote: Starper-777
            Quote: 30 vis
            The question is who will fire this super Svido missile at the cruiser Moskva! I am sure the installation, together with the one who gave the order, will be destroyed earlier!

            You don’t know how many "tricky ones on the salary" are sitting in our General Staff ..
            Remember the nuclear submarine "Kursk" ..?
            This rocket will be launched (towards Russia), even hooohly will not be aware hehe heh
            We will remain silent, of course .. negative

            A torpedo exploded in Kursk if you aren’t in the know. No need to compose any rubbish. Is it like believing in a rumor that our submarine sank an American 3 months ago. Does the Americans say nothing too? :) This is just not serious. To believe that they will launch, and we will not. If the Americans believed in this, we would not be there for a long time. There would be no deterrent. So do not la.
            1. -5
              7 December 2019 11: 41
              Quote: Sky Strike fighter
              A torpedo exploded near Kursk if you are not in the know. No need to compose any rubbish

              Well, someone has to do it all the same ..? And then forget hehe
              Quote: Sky Strike fighter
              It's like believing in a rumor about the fact that 3 months ago our submarine sank an American submarine. Does it mean that the Americans were silent too? :) It's just not serious

              On wikis there is no ha ha ha .. and even google hehe
              Quote: Sky Strike fighter
              This is just not serious. Believe that they

              We in Russia have long lost faith in everything .. We would have to kill someone .. and take the capital again. soldier
              Quote: Sky Strike fighter
              So do not la la.

              Tel-Aviv would be first and foremost a la la, judging by the impudence and anger against Russia and the world hehe
              P / S / and Chaim machine gunner laughing drinks
              1. +2
                7 December 2019 14: 19
                Quote: Starper-777
                We would have to kill someone .. and take another capital.

                Uuuuuuu ... What a bloodthirsty you are !!! lol
                So I want to remind the classic:
                "In the enchanted swamps
                Kikimors live there
                Tickle to hiccups
                And they’ll drag you to the bottom .....
                Scary, already terrible!))))) laughing
                1. -1
                  7 December 2019 14: 47
                  Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
                  Uuuuuuu ... What a bloodthirsty you are !!!

                  Who knows, they are not afraid hehe heh
          2. 0
            7 December 2019 15: 57
            No, we will show restraint and composure.
        3. +1
          7 December 2019 13: 18
          I am sure that the installation together with the one who ordered it will be destroyed sooner!

          And here it’s not at all a fact. You still need to be able to do this.
        4. -1
          7 December 2019 17: 04
          The question is who will fire this super svido missile at the cruiser "Moskva"

          They won’t ask you for sure.
          The presence of a missile is a potential threat that must be seriously considered, and the question in this situation should not be raised "who will give a shot" and "knock or not knock".
          Yes, and not everything is so smooth here, you are absolutizing the capabilities of the systems (in this case, air defense), completely deleting from attention such issues as "tactics of using the VT model" and "human factor and crew coherence."
          And if you are sure that
          "The installation, together with the person who gave the order, will be destroyed earlier!"

          then at least intelligibly explain it to the Ukrainian side, otherwise their servicemen may not even suspect it and act differently than you painted it in your head, because alager com alager.
          1. 0
            7 December 2019 20: 09
            It is not my role to explain either to the Ukrainian side. There are heads, they get salaries. Some heads of evidence let them think about the consequences, others clearly explain their heads ... But they say that they say that they’re kidding Neptun and who gave the order .. I have no doubt for a second I’ll peck and do not ask for a surname! ...
          2. 0
            8 December 2019 23: 53
            Quote: Bshkaus
            ... because alager com alager.

            Probably "À la guerre comme à la guerre"? hi
      3. +5
        7 December 2019 10: 02
        Is it like the response of the Russian Federation with its flight of the Su-57 together with the UAV "Hunter"?)))
        How many more years can the old Soviet su-27s that were transferred there in the last months of the life of Soviet power in 1989-1990 fly? what
        Wear glider, engine life, avionics? Soviet engineers, of course, well done.
        In general, I was always interested in what they thought at the General Staff of the USSR when in 1989-1990 they gave military equipment to other republics? It was clear that centrifugal tendencies in the Union were gaining strength, and perhaps there was no point in driving new planes to the border military districts of other republics, which, without 5 minutes, raised other flags!
        1. +4
          7 December 2019 11: 11
          Wear glider, engine life, avionics?

          This is normal here, since cars that have been standing for 30 years have no wear. Another thing is that they could have taken for parts and sold - here I agree, again, in what conditions they were - the question. They still have one Su-27, they have demonstrated it. And so, the car, of course, is old, but ukroreykh, probably, hopes that they will be given the Tornado and Eurofighters being removed from service, as the decommissioned American boats are transferred to the Navy.
          1. 0
            7 December 2019 11: 40
            Quote: Aviator_
            but ukroreykh, probably, hopes that they will be given the "Tornado" and "Eurofighter" being removed from service

            In Ukraine, in the future, they plan to purchase relatively inexpensive modern turboprop vehicles A-29 with a good optoelectronic complex for reconnaissance, observation and target designation, plus a good set of guided weapons suitable for use from high altitudes (UAB) and ranges (Hellfire). When loitering at some distance from the line of contact with the enemy, such a platform is practically invulnerable from massive short-range air defense systems (MANPADS, ZPU, ZA), forcing the enemy to use full-fledged short / medium-range air defense systems - which a) the number is limited; b) which cannot be pulled too close to the front line because of their vulnerability - from the same artillery and MLRS; c) the deployment of which in the Donbas near the front line is politically limited. At the same time, there are essentially no restrictions for firing with the A-29 Hellfires from a distance of several kilometers. On the A-29, you can, if you wish, install the Hellfire, which has a range of up to 11 km at the moment. For example, in Iraq, the Cessna AC-208B Combat Caravan turboprop carried the main burden of the aircraft defeat of ISIS units before the United States intervened in the matter. Hellfires were leaving by the hundreds. A-29s can be very effective against all sorts of paramilitary groups, and in the air they can successfully fight against UAVs and combat helicopters. Head and shoulders above the latter in the rate of climb, the established rate of turn and maximum flight speed.
            1. +3
              7 December 2019 13: 47
              Clear. They do not need serious cars; they need those that will perform police functions - to drive rebels. Will be hired somewhere in Latin America. And after 5 years they will be deducted from the flight work of the last pilot who once went to supersonic.
        2. -1
          7 December 2019 12: 23
          Well, stop whining already and so sick, here
          Quote: Nevsky_ZU
          How many more years can the old Soviet su-27s that were transferred there in the last months of the life of Soviet power in 1989-1990 fly?

          Katz offers to give up? ..I already agree .. got ALL!
          And whining and whining .. We all give RUSSIA nafig and that all shut up bastards! negative
          I went to dig a trench and I dig up Maxim ..
      4. +3
        7 December 2019 14: 25
        Indeed, what is it? 4th-generation Soviet multi-purpose heavy fighter Su-27 escorted a modified Soviet X-35 subsonic anti-ship missile
      5. +1
        7 December 2019 14: 51
        It’s somehow not kosher to accompany a Ukrainian rocket on Moskal letak!
      6. 0
        7 December 2019 17: 58
        Quote: Victor_B
        Sawed by never stupid "Ukrainian" engineers.

        Well, for Ukraine, this is akin to the appearance of the USSR Tu-4. True, the matter is small - to show an efficient GOS, and so well, well done. KB "Luch" is apparently one of the few who does something
    2. +1
      7 December 2019 09: 13
      I am not an artilleryman, much less a rocket officer. But the frequency and abundance of information about this "Neptune" is already beginning to bore ...
      What did I see and what did I learn from the flow of information?
      The rocket, as I understand it, is a "classmate" of a "harpoon", an "exoset" and, apparently, some of ours. Subsonic, low-flying, maneuvering. What makes it stand out from those listed? Why is she so much attention?
      1. +6
        7 December 2019 09: 23
        Quote: Leader of the Redskins
        What stands out from the above? Why does she need so much attention?

        Well, about something new zhurnalyugi should write?
        And then ROCKET!
        Big!
        Flies!
        Presidents and all superiors personally watch / praise!
        1. +3
          7 December 2019 10: 33
          Well, about something new zhurnalyugi should write?
          And then ROCKET!
          Big!
          Flies!
          Presidents and all superiors personally watch / praise!

          And the smoke is not coming from behind wink
          1. 0
            7 December 2019 12: 15
            Quote: Alex Justice
            And the smoke is not coming from behind

            Cartoon, definitely! wassat
      2. -6
        7 December 2019 09: 30
        Quote: Leader of the Redskins
        Why does she need so much attention?

        So it was argued that "these pots themselves do not know how", but here
        Quote: Leader of the Redskins
        "classmate" "harpoon", "exoset" and, apparently, some of our
        ... Pichalka and bewilderment.
        1. +2
          7 December 2019 11: 45
          They launched the old Soviet rocket from the old Soviet complex and escorted on the old Soviet plane, that's power))))
        2. 0
          7 December 2019 17: 34
          Quote: revnagan
          So it was argued that "these pots themselves do not know how", but here

          An old Soviet rocket is accompanied by an old Soviet plane ...
          So can something "pots" or what?
          1. -2
            11 December 2019 19: 13
            Quote: Albert1988
            Old soviet rocket

            Made entirely in Ukraine, without any all-Union cooperation.
            Quote: Albert1988
            old soviet plane.

            Nevertheless, it flies, is being modernized, and so on, all by ourselves. But 5 years ago this was not close. So
            Quote: Albert1988
            do something "pots" or what?
      3. +9
        7 December 2019 09: 40
        Quote: Leader of the Redskins
        What stands out from the above? Why does she need so much attention?

        Apparently for the fact that the presence in the hands of huntik of everything that flies and explodes is potentially dangerous for everyone around. They shoot down civilian planes, let alone the fact that some "hijacker" under alcoholic steam may be tempted to fry on the ship. And again, not the fact that the military.
        1. +3
          7 December 2019 10: 33
          Quote: Leader of the Redskins
          I am not an artilleryman, much less a rocket officer. But the frequency and abundance of information about this "Neptune" is already beginning to bore ...
          What did I see and what did I learn from the flow of information?
          The rocket, as I understand it, is a "classmate" of a "harpoon", an "exoset" and, apparently, some of ours. Subsonic, low-flying, maneuvering. What makes it stand out from those listed? Why is she so much attention?

          Well, you understand very well why there is so much attention to the Ukrainian rocket. You asked the question very well, because. everything else is a hater's attempt to throw a hat. Observe, these "marshls" migrate from article to article and their words are .. the simplest, the main thing is to take the first cell, and there you can flood endlessly.
          So, to your fears.
          Quote: Leader of the Redskins
          Why does she need so much attention?

          Ukrainians can launch good rockets. In addition to engines, Ukrainians have two catalog companies where they can ship from. This is their profitable budget item. It is clear why Russian media are silent about this.
          1. +3
            7 December 2019 11: 04
            Yes, and judging by the volume of the "minuses" I understand that these "marshals" also walked for me))) laughing
      4. NKT
        +4
        7 December 2019 10: 40
        Not a rocket stands out, but its owner, who professes Russophobia and Nazism and who can arrange a provocation, is emphasized.
      5. -1
        7 December 2019 12: 14
        Quote: Leader of the Redskins
        What stands out from the above? Why does she need so much attention?

        Well, Duc, I’ve overcome ....
    3. +2
      7 December 2019 09: 15
      It was necessary to put Poroshenko on it and leave it for the rest.
    4. +7
      7 December 2019 09: 23
      Pain ... constant pain - Crimean bridge. They won't let you swim up, they won't let you organize a sabotage ... And this wunderwolf can at least be threatened. From the Azov coast ... Low-flying, on a radio-contrast target - it can hit. True, then they can hurt! But when "Onizhedeti" thought about the consequences ...
      1. +3
        7 December 2019 09: 39
        It is necessary to educate cubs so that they do not even appear in their thoughts that it is possible to do some kind of dirty trick.
    5. +4
      7 December 2019 09: 25
      If only a volley of at least 5 rockets is fired, then maybe the cruiser will hit! With its warhead, only if there will be a nuclear charge, and the usual even rusty ukroinu not sink! Let them practice on it instead of cats. ..Moreover, for their economy, this cruiser is also a real parasite. ...
    6. +2
      7 December 2019 09: 36
      On the Su-27 of the Ukrainian Air Force, the old avionics, that is, there is no way to integrate the "Neptune" in FULL. And without receiving information from the on-board radar, the carrier aircraft will have to approach the "cruiser" almost at the distance of visual detection. And it becomes an easy prey for the ship's air defense.
      1. 0
        7 December 2019 11: 29
        Quote: knn54
        carrier aircraft

        will bring to the aviation version?
      2. -1
        7 December 2019 14: 42
        In fact, it was announced that they would be suspended under the Su 24. And they started modernizing the bomber. So we can expect more "wonderful discoveries". About "Neptune" two years ago they wrote that they had cut and only ....
    7. +3
      7 December 2019 09: 37
      Started with civilian aircraft, ending with civilian courts.
    8. +2
      7 December 2019 09: 42
      Yes, it was boring today on the site, without a magic word on U. about this Neptune with different sauce twice a week, there were already articles and shots from politicians, and they tried on it at least two years to the Crimean bridge. what can you discuss on entoy rocket? winked
    9. 0
      7 December 2019 09: 48
      I have not seen a single defeat of the target with this missile.
      1. +1
        7 December 2019 10: 52
        Ryazan ...I have not seen a single defeat of the target with this missile.

        And did not show how she drowned. Apparently left in search of a target.
    10. +3
      7 December 2019 10: 02
      The Pentagon is preparing a fratricidal massacre. Israeli experience in dealing with dangerous crazy ringleaders is irreplaceable.
    11. The comment was deleted.
    12. -1
      7 December 2019 11: 02
      Well, now the questions.
      1. Does this rocket have a guidance head? No. They promise only.
      2. Before launching, the missile must be aimed at the target. How will this provide Ukraine? There are no AWACS aircraft, there are no over-the-air radars, and satellite target designation is also absent. There are no helicopters with powerful radars. (Although Russia has it all)
      3. Is there an economic basis for output? According to Turchinov, one division is 72 missiles (at launchers and military vehicles + transport vehicles). How many will they produce BK for one division?
      4. Well, even if all the questions above are resolved, the main thing remains. This is combat stability. Wherever the Neptune missile defense system is located, it will always be in the zone of destruction of Iskander, Kalibrov and of course Russian aviation. Covering the complexes from the air is a very difficult task for them. Old S-300 missiles with expired missiles and the same Buki will be quickly neutralized.
      1. -1
        7 December 2019 12: 32
        1. Does this rocket have a guidance head? No./////
        -----
        There is. Turkey supplies Ukraine with the necessary electronics and components.
        Therefore, all of Ukraine’s missiles of the last two years have GOS.
        1. +3
          7 December 2019 13: 06

          GOS that is ... But I haven’t heard anything about Turkey.
      2. 0
        7 December 2019 13: 13
        1) There, by the way, the advanced GOS from Aselsan. Approximately identical to the Turkish version - Atmaca.

        In response, by the way, KB Ray sends cone rockets for 120mm guns.
        "During the first stage of the contract implementation, it is envisaged to supply 120 mm Konus guided missiles and guidance devices for their integration into Turkish main battle tanks. Subsequently, as a result of a partial technology transfer, Ukrainian guided missiles will be produced at MKEK facilities," Spetstechnoeksport said. ...

        2) What are the problems. In theory, from UAVs or peacefully flying AWACS in neutral waters. Even if not, emphasis on media. For land on 200 km they will give TSU. Here in the sea, yes, nothing.

        3) They will find money for it. Pensions will not be paid, but they will do rockets against the damned and will be shown on TV with pathos. Moreover, KB Luch now has the largest salary and income in the entire defense industry. They have a bunch of export contracts (in Ethiopia, they plan to fend off Egyptian MiGs / Rafales with the updated S-125 with a new radar, increased ductility and new / modernized missiles).

        4) The affected area is a circle. However, where exactly is the mobile soil rocket complex? Philosophy quickly decomposed - it became ostentatious and dump the same. That is, in theory, you can hit him with Iskander - but in practice they will find out in practice whether he is in the exercises, or according to us. Moscow gives good or not. He’s already dumping. This is the best option - with deployment fixation. In fact, there will be a reaction only to fixing the launch - here, at best, only an empty complex can be screwed up.

        Well, or the American version. That is, a ban on advancement in the XX km - and the unconditional destruction of any military forces and equipment in the zone of the XX km, without any additional approvals. But this will not happen.
      3. 0
        7 December 2019 14: 46
        Here also, three years ago, everyone together listed that:
        There are no specialists in Ukroin ...
        There is no factory capable of manufacturing a rocket ...
        Kraz will not be able to put the chassis ...
        And so on and so forth...
    13. 0
      7 December 2019 11: 14
      Of course not special in this matter, but those who know, explain to the deletant, isn’t the speed small for a rocket? It looks to fly at the speed of a passenger plane. This is a direct ideal target for any air defense.
      1. +3
        7 December 2019 12: 31
        It looks to fly at the speed of a passenger plane.

        In fact, too. Subsonic anti-ship missiles, up to 300 km destruction range. This is the same X-35, slightly modified.
        This is a direct ideal target for any air defense.

        Well, not always. If you release them in a flock to a target such as frigate / transport / BDK, then there is a great chance of hitting 1-2 missiles. Alternatively, it can be used to oversaturate the enemy’s radar with targets during a mass attack of a group of ships together with supersonic anti-ship missiles.
      2. -1
        7 December 2019 12: 36
        Transonic velocity 0.8 - 0.9 MAX
        All cruise missiles fly like that. Both Caliber and Tomahawk.
        And Russian anti-ship too.
        Fighters shoot them down with ease.
        There are supersonic cruise missiles. But they cross over
        to supersonic just before the goal itself. And the whole flight is flying like this
        Ukrainian. And to make the entire flight supersonic - there is not enough fuel for the engine.
        1. +1
          7 December 2019 17: 21
          Some modifications of the caliber just turn into supersonic in the final section
      3. 0
        7 December 2019 13: 30
        Isn't speed small for a rocket?

        Well, the same subsonic missile. As for example, the X-35 ... as well as the Caliber .. like the strategic aviation X-55 and X-101 - the main weapon of the Tu-160.
        It looks to fly at the speed of a passenger plane

        Still, it’s difficult to judge by sight, well, somewhere it’s like that according to performance characteristics and flies.
        This is a direct ideal target for any air defense.

        Well, firstly, any air defense still needs to be deployed and combat-ready. First of all, a missile for hitting small porous targets, do they have such air defense exactly?
        Secondly, it flies low-low, hiding behind the radio horizon, like all subsonic rockets, the rocket itself is not large. If you discover it in advance and a single flying one, then you can direct the fighter and flip the anti-aircraft missile. But you still have to find out.
      4. 0
        7 December 2019 20: 18
        Quote: USSR
        Of course not special in this matter, but those who know, explain to the deletant, isn’t the speed small for a rocket? It looks to fly at the speed of a passenger plane. This is a direct ideal target for any air defense.
        There are different concepts, for example, the latest American LRASM is also subsonic, has a stealth configuration and flies low above the water, which makes it difficult to detect. Ultrasonic and hypersonic ones are difficult to bring down, they fly fast, but they are forced to fly at high altitude for most of the site, since there is less air resistance, which in turn makes them very noticeable for radars.
    14. -2
      7 December 2019 11: 17
      A simple question arises ....... what gas Ukrainians sniffed ????
    15. 0
      7 December 2019 12: 14
      Is the given route a straight line with a gradual decrease to a fall?
      1. +1
        7 December 2019 12: 46
        No, well, it’s visible on the video that at least twice turned to the left.
    16. +1
      7 December 2019 12: 38
      Are you afraid that you will come back? laughing
    17. 0
      7 December 2019 13: 59
      Quote: USSR
      Of course not special in this matter, but those who know, explain to the deletant, isn’t the speed small for a rocket? It looks to fly at the speed of a passenger plane. This is a direct ideal target for any air defense.

      This is a dangerous target for a ship from the Black Sea Fleet, well, except for "Moscow". And it depends on the real situation - how good the "Fort" will be, the ammunition, the calculation has been prepared. Fort at lunchtime is the same as in Moscow. The rest of the Black Sea Fleet air defense systems with command guidance throughout the entire flight phase, except for Shtil-1 - never fired at those targets during the exercises. At the KVVMU SUZRK department, teachers speak very respectfully about the goals of the "Gaprpun" class. This is a difficult goal. "Neptune" (X35) is our answer to the harpoon, well, in terms of weight, the warhead is really much inferior. And so yes - a very low RCS, very low flight altitude.
    18. -5
      7 December 2019 14: 04
      Remember the nuclear submarine "Kursk" ..?
      This rocket will be launched (towards Russia), even hooohly will not be aware hehe heh
      We will remain silent, of course .. negative[/ Quote]
      A torpedo exploded in Kursk if you are not in the know. No need to compose any rubbish. [/ Quote]
      That is, the part of the external cortus that is concave inward during the internal explosion, is this normal in your opinion?
    19. +1
      7 December 2019 14: 07
      [quote = sannyomd] Remember the Kursk nuclear submarine ..?
      This rocket will be launched (towards Russia), even hooohly will not be aware hehe heh
      We will remain silent, of course .. negative[/ Quote]
      A torpedo exploded in Kursk if you are not in the know. No need to compose any rubbish. [/ Quote]
      That is, the part of the external cortus that is concave inward during the internal explosion, is this normal in your opinion? [/ Quote]
      If this is about the famous photo with a technological hole in Kursk near the first "P-700" launcher, then look for the second photo, in which the solid body is intact from the inside. And now we will again talk about torpedoes with an armor-piercing warhead made of depleted uranium, which is what all discussions of this hole lead to. At the same time, see the photos of the holes after the torpedo detonation. With an area of ​​30 sq. M minimum.
    20. +2
      7 December 2019 15: 07
      The video presents frames of the launch of an anti-ship missile


      non-brothers need to come up with a thread, otherwise every time you get a lid on the pan, the brain will float, or the cabin will break
    21. 0
      7 December 2019 15: 13
      Well then, in \ on there were still not sawn planes and pilots who didn’t retire after the war.
    22. +2
      7 December 2019 17: 06
      Cool video. It is a pity there is no moment of target destruction.
    23. 0
      7 December 2019 19: 54
      Quote: bobba94
      Indeed, what is it? 4th-generation Soviet multi-purpose heavy fighter Su-27 escorted a modified Soviet X-35 subsonic anti-ship missile

      So they accompanied a couple! It turns out all the Air Force raised into the air!
    24. 0
      8 December 2019 10: 46
      Quote: Starper-777
      On wikis there is no ha ha ha .. and even google hehe

      still to study history and politics from this pedovikii)))
      there is no Pythagorean table, if cho))))
      and judging by pedovikia, it was the Russians who destroyed the dinosaurs, and the Americans saved Hiroshima and Nagasaki from the Stalin Falcons with their air defense
    25. -1
      8 December 2019 19: 26
      Is it permissible to indulge? It is necessary to convey to the self-made ones that matches for children are not a toy ... How? Ask BIBI, he knows how.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"