Lithuanian "democracy" against Russia

53

Members of the European Parliament called on Russia to end the politically motivated prosecution of Lithuanian judges and prosecutors in the Vilnius case. The European Parliament condemned the actions of Russia as "politically motivated" and "unacceptable external influence."

Decision of the European Parliament


On November 28 of November 2019, the European Parliament approved a resolution regarding the prosecution by Russia of Lithuanian judges, prosecutors and investigators involved in the investigation of the events of Vilnius on 13 of January 1991 of the year.



In the document notedthat “the actions of the Russian authorities against Lithuanian judges and prosecutors violate fundamental legal values, in particular the independence of the judiciary”. The European Parliament claims that this “politically motivated criminal prosecution” that Moscow initiated could lead to “attempts to abuse the Interpol system, as well as other bilateral and multilateral cooperation agreements,” with the aim of restricting the rights of investigating prosecutors and judges in the case of 13 on January 1991 years during searches, interrogations and arrests. Strasbourg also notes that Russia may request international arrest warrants for Lithuanian officials who are involved in this case. Therefore, the European Parliament called on Interpol to ignore all RF requests for warrants related to the January 13 case, and countries to ignore all international arrest warrants against accused Lithuanian officials. The EP also believes that Russia cannot transfer materials that can be used in a criminal case against Lithuanian officials.

Events in Vilnius


In the process of the collapse of the USSR, a large role was played by various national movements, which during the "perestroika" were given the "green light", helped with organization and financing. At the same time, the USSR security organs were paralyzed by the betrayal of part of the Soviet elite, which relied on the collapse of the Union, in order to transfer the wreckage of the USSR to capitalist “rails” and become new masters of life, large owners and part of the global elite.

Like mushrooms after rain, various national movements and parties appeared. In October 1988, the “Movement for Perestroika” (“Sajudis”) was created in Lithuania, which advocated the republic’s secession from the USSR. In the elections to the Supreme Council of Lithuania in February 1990, the candidates supported by this movement received a majority. Sayudis leader Vytautas Landsbergis was elected chairman of the Supreme Council. As a result, dual power arose in the republic: there were state and party structures that lived according to Soviet laws, and at the same time republican authorities were formed that did not submit to Moscow. The population of the republic, which skillfully processed information, split. Nobody then knew that the collapse of the USSR and the policy of the new “independent” Lithuanian authorities would lead to the extinction of the people (in 1991 - 3,7 million people, in 2019 - 2,7 million people; in addition, the tendency to depopulation and migration youth and active population persists), and pretty soon historically Lithuania will simply disappear.

In February - May 1990, the deputies voted for the Act on the Restoration of the Independent Lithuanian State and the Declaration on State Sovereignty of Lithuania. On the night of March 11 1990, the Supreme Council of the Lithuanian SSR, headed by Vytautas Landsbergis, declared independence of Lithuania. Lithuania was the first of the union republics to declare independence. This caused dissatisfaction with the Soviet government. Moreover, the situation in the republic, as a whole in the Union, continued to heat up. Forces interested in the collapse of the USSR, more and more actively "rocked the boat." The anti-Soviet government of Lithuania carried out “price liberalization”, which led to a sharp increase in retail food prices.

Lithuanian nationalists called for "to protect the authorities" to establish round-the-clock duty at the parliament, radio center and Vilnius TV tower. Anti-Soviet propaganda intensified on television and radio. On 10 of January 1991, Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev demanded the abolition of unconstitutional acts and the restoration of the Union Constitution. In order to maintain control over the situation, on 11 of January 1991 of the year, the Central Committee of the Lithuanian Communist Party formed the National Salvation Committee (acted until the end of January), which assumed responsibility for resolving the crisis. After several attempts to convince the leaders of the Lithuanian nationalists to stop anti-Soviet propaganda and escalate tensions, the committee turned to the leadership of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the Ministry of Defense of the USSR for help in controlling television and radio. The troops of the special forces "Alpha" and units of the Airborne Forces (76-I Pskov Division) were sent to Lithuania. 11 - On 12 on January, Soviet troops took control of a number of facilities, including the Press House in Vilnius, a television relay station in Nemenchin, and other public buildings in Vilnius, Alytus, and Šiauliai.

According to the press, several thousand people were on duty at the Vilnius TV Tower, including armed personnel of the republic’s security service. The roads to the telecentre were blocked by heavy equipment. On the night of January 13 of 1991, the Alpha group stormed the television center and held it until the approach of the internal troops. During the operation, 14 people were killed, including an Alpha officer Viktor Shatsky (mortally wounded by a shot in the back). According to various sources, from 500 to 700 people suffered. Most of them were the result of a crush that arose after warning shots (they were idle) of armored vehicles that arrived at the television center building.

Subsequently, President of the USSR Mikhail Gorbachev, Minister of Defense Dmitry Yazov and other officials declared their non-involvement in the actions of the Soviet military. In fact, the top of the USSR "leaked" the military, who simply did their duty to defend the homeland.

In fact, the events in Lithuania went along the same lines as the events in other republics. At first, part of the Soviet elite, which relied on the collapse of the USSR and the appropriation of public, state property, encouraged the national separatists, did nothing for prevention, sabotaged the actions of law enforcement agencies, which sent signals about a dangerous situation and suggested measures. Negative events were allowed to grow, gain momentum, attract the attention of the "world public", and then threw insufficient forces to suppress them, which only fueled passions, and did not lead to suppression of the rebellion. Then they tried to apply tough measures to those responsible for the events, both genuine and innocent, which exacerbated the situation. As a result, Moscow retreated, and the new republican elites (mostly composed of the former Soviet and communist local elites) entered the new world order. Peoples became consumers-slaves of the capitalist system, and the elite became part of the global (but as a dependent periphery).

Case of Vilnius events


The events in Vilnius, obviously, as planned, caused a lot of noise in the world. The leading world media outlets, as according to a previously set installation, reported the same thing: Russian special forces and Pskov paratroopers staged a massacre in the center of the Lithuanian capital. Gorbachev immediately surrendered our military, saying that he did not know anything about this action. A case was opened in Lithuania on the articles of the Criminal Code on sabotage, coup attempts, the creation of anti-state organizations, intentional murder under aggravating circumstances. The Lithuanian investigation concluded that people died at the hands of soldiers of the Soviet army.

However, these conclusions contradict objective facts. From the materials of the preliminary investigation of the State Commission headed by the Prosecutor General of the USSR Nikolai Trubin, which were handed over to the Lithuanian side in October 1991, it is known that not one of the 14 victims fell at the hands of Soviet soldiers. A ballistic examination of bullet wounds in the dead and wounded clearly shows that the deadly shots were fired not from the front, but from top to bottom. It was not the military who were on the ground who fired, but the unknown shooters who were stationed on the roofs and windows of nearby houses. Witnesses reported the same thing, talking about shots from the forest, shooting from windows and balconies. According to the recollections of the Alpha fighters, only idle cartridges were used during the assault, and fire was fired from the roofs of houses (similar methods would later be used during the coup in Moscow in October 1993).

It’s also known that some people died from car collisions, while others weapons, which was no longer in service with the Soviet army. In addition, there is information that the militants of “Sayudis” shot at the assembled people from the roofs of neighboring houses. The leader of the Lithuanian Communists, M. Burokevicius, also reported that “Butkevicius’ provocateurs ”, a close associate of Landsbergis (head of the Lithuanian Territory Protection Department, actually the Minister of Defense), as well as American specialists who arrived from Poland, worked in the crowd.

In June 1996, the criminal case against which 48 persons were charged was transferred to the Vilnius Regional Court. In August 1999, the former first secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Lithuania, Mykolas Burokevicius, was sentenced to 12 years of imprisonment, the former head of the ideological department of the Central Committee, Juozas Ermalavicius, was sentenced to 8 years, four more defendants received sentences ranging from 3 to 6 years. In respect of the remaining 42 people, an investigation was continued. In the 2010 year, laws were passed in Lithuania, according to which for “denying the Soviet occupation” in the 1940-1990 years and “denying the Soviet aggression of the 1991 year” there is a penalty in the form of a fine or imprisonment up to 2 years. In the same year, the acts incriminated by the accused were reclassified as crimes against humanity and war crimes, for which the statute of limitations does not apply. When in 2011, the leader of the Socialist Popular Front Algirdas Paleckis publicly spoke out about the ambiguity of the events of January 13, suggesting that "they shot their own people then," in 2012, he was the first person convicted of "denying Soviet aggression."

In mid-November of 2014, the Lithuanian Prosecutor General's Office announced the completion of the investigation. Court hearings began on 27 on January 2016. This became the largest case in Lithuania both in terms of documents (over 700 volumes) and the number of defendants (67 people). The accused are mostly former Soviet leaders, military, and KGB officers. Ministry of Internal Affairs, officials. Now they are citizens of the Russian Federation. Among them are former Minister of Defense of the USSR Dmitry Yazov, head of the Vilnius garrison of the Soviet army Vladimir Uskhopchik, as well as former KGB officer Mikhail Golovatov, who commanded the Alpha group during the assault on the television tower. Almost all the accused were tried in absentia; they were put on the international wanted list. The exception is two Russian citizens. These are reserve colonel Yuri Mel (a resident of Kaliningrad), who was detained in Lithuania in 2014, and retired military Gennady Ivanov (a resident of Vilnius).

On 27 of March 2019 of the year, the Vilnius Regional Court announced the verdict in the case. Yu. Mel was sentenced to 7 years of imprisonment, G. Ivanov - to 4 years, the remaining 65 people were sentenced in absentia from 4 to 14 years. At the same time, the court declared the events of 1991 of the year a continuation of the aggression of the USSR against the Republic of Lithuania, which began in 1940.

Russia has repeatedly stated that the trial in Lithuania is in violation of international law, charges are brought under articles that did not exist during the events themselves. On November 9 on November 2016, the State Duma of the Russian Federation adopted a statement in which it called the process a “politically motivated trial”. In July 2018 of the year, the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation opened a criminal case against Lithuanian officials, whose actions “show signs of a crime”, as provided for in paragraph 2 of Article 299 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (“Criminalization of knowingly innocent”). The UK points out that "the events in Vilnius took place during the period when Lithuania became part of the USSR, and the military units performed their official duties, acting in accordance with the legislation of the USSR."

Thus, it is obvious that the Vilnius affair is only one of the events used by the “world community” to create the image of the “evil empire” (Russia-USSR). Traitors from the top of the USSR and local nationalists organized a provocation, framed the Soviet Army and special services for their further decomposition, misinformation and disorientation. The military and the Alpha fighters simply honestly fulfilled their duty to defend the socialist Fatherland, they were set up, and then “leaked”, made extreme. A high-profile rally in Lithuania, as in other national suburbs, was used to break up the USSR in the interests of the West and part of the Soviet “elite”, which was completely decomposed and surrendered the Union in its personal and narrow group interests.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

53 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +18
    7 December 2019 05: 54
    "In July 2018, the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation opened a criminal case against Lithuanian officials, in whose actions there are" signs of a crime "provided for in part 2 of Article 299 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (" Bringing a knowingly innocent person to criminal responsibility "" I was not aware of the current government small, but a plus sign.
    1. +5
      7 December 2019 06: 09
      Um, a plus sign .. what In my opinion, this is some kind of bifurcation of a personality of anti-Soviet power. request Another PR move for domestic consumption.
      1. +8
        7 December 2019 06: 21
        This dichotomy only ten years ago began to manifest itself, before that "nature" was integral, anti-Soviet, Russophobic.
        1. +4
          7 December 2019 07: 12
          In the EU and the United States, lawyers or those who call themselves so heaps. As a result, excitement first * opinions * then attempts at criminal prosecution, while the justification * Hailie Likely * became sort of mundane.
          Regimes that are established in the EU or in the USA for some reason consider themselves to be * navel of the earth * Apparently confident in the impunity of any created meanness?
          It is time for the EU to prosecute states with Nazi ideology and practice. In addition, criminal proceedings should be instituted against the EU for crimes in the colonies of some countries members of this EU.
          1. +19
            7 December 2019 08: 57
            Poor military ... How we felt sorry for them then! And how they hated the Lithuanians! But there was no understanding of the technology for letting the country go. Everyone believed that Gorbachev was weak and frightened by the military power of the West, Yakovlev was a traitor by conviction, because both betray the USSR, and Yeltsin is strong and is trying to save him, just in a new capacity. The backstage of politics was not obvious. Technology in the form of a color revolution came to light much later. Like the betrayal of Yeltsin. And if somewhere it was announced that the betrayal is orange or the color of tulips or roses, then in general everything was smeared with gray mud. Those military are still a pity - not only the dead.
            1. +19
              7 December 2019 10: 56
              Russia bought the lands of the tribal Baltic. You can put an end to this.
              These are Russian lands.
              Humpbacked - gni_da.
              It is necessary to suppress the army any incitement to partition our homeland.

              Everyone who wants to tear a piece to the count!
              1. -14
                7 December 2019 11: 36
                Quote: Vladimir16
                These are Russian lands.
                Humpbacked - gni_da.
                It is necessary to suppress the army any incitement to partition our homeland.

                This is called violent Russification.
                1. The comment was deleted.
                  1. The comment was deleted.
                    1. The comment was deleted.
                      1. -7
                        7 December 2019 16: 38
                        Quote: Camel
                        You do not understand a normal relationship.

                        Nobody invited you to Lithuania. Lithuanians as well as Russians have the right to self-determination and live in an independent state.
                      2. +1
                        8 December 2019 00: 18
                        Only under the Soviet regime did Lithuania begin to resemble the state of Latysh before the conquest of Riga by Peter did not have the right to come to Riga. Unless to clean the toilets. And Estonians have always been cannon fodder for the Germans. One word is Chukhon ..
                      3. -7
                        8 December 2019 00: 44
                        Quote: Aleksey Alekseev_2
                        Only under the Soviet regime did Lithuania begin to resemble the state of Latysh before the conquest of Riga by Peter did not have the right to come to Riga. Unless to clean the toilets. And Estonians have always been cannon fodder for the Germans. One word is Chukhon ..

                        Only the standard of living in the Baltic was much higher than the standard of living of the liberators in 1940. The Soviet Union brought with it the horror of fear of the NKVD and poverty. The Balts will never forgive him for this.
                      4. +1
                        8 December 2019 20: 22
                        Quote: kiril1246
                        Quote: Aleksey Alekseev_2
                        Only under the Soviet regime did Lithuania begin to resemble the state of Latysh before the conquest of Riga by Peter did not have the right to come to Riga. Unless to clean the toilets. And Estonians have always been cannon fodder for the Germans. One word is Chukhon ..

                        Only the standard of living in the Baltic was much higher than the standard of living of the liberators in 1940. The Soviet Union brought with it the horror of fear of the NKVD and poverty. The Balts will never forgive him for this.

                        ===
                        for 40 years in terms of the specific GDP (English data of that time), Lithuania is at 42nd place, the USSR is at 36m
                      5. +4
                        8 December 2019 00: 24
                        Quote: kiril1246
                        Quote: Camel
                        You do not understand a normal relationship.

                        Nobody invited you to Lithuania. Lithuanians as well as Russians have the right to self-determination and live in an independent state.

                        ---
                        if not in the tank, then the topic is somewhat different, namely: the lie, which has become one of the pillars of the new ideology of the new Lithuanian state.
                      6. -3
                        8 December 2019 00: 45
                        Quote: Victorio
                        if not in the tank, then the topic is somewhat different, namely: the lie, which has become one of the pillars of the new ideology of the new Lithuanian state.

                        And what is it expressed in?
                      7. 0
                        8 December 2019 19: 54
                        Quote: kiril1246
                        Quote: Victorio
                        if not in the tank, then the topic is somewhat different, namely: the lie, which has become one of the pillars of the new ideology of the new Lithuanian state.

                        And what is it expressed in?

                        ===
                        read the article. and in short - it's shooting - provocation of their own
                      8. +1
                        8 December 2019 23: 16
                        Yes, that's just what was invited! Who greeted the Red Army troops with joy? And then knives in the back ...? I personally have no complaints about you, but for the "forest brothers" the expense is big!
                      9. 0
                        8 December 2019 23: 19
                        Well, about the purchase of the Baltic states by Peter only the lazy did not remember ... How do you like the independence?
              2. +4
                7 December 2019 13: 15
                2 million relics (when you consider that the annual budget of Peter's Russia was about 5 million) today is about 2 trillion. rubles, 30 billion dollars.
                SNIPERS:
                -Vilnius Telecentre
                -Russian parliament.
                Kiev Maidan.
                And it works.
                1. -2
                  7 December 2019 13: 52
                  Quote: knn54
                  And it works.

                  Why reinvent the wheel?
              3. NKT
                +7
                7 December 2019 13: 31
                No need to suppress the army, it is absolutely not for this. Enough of substituting it for tasks unusual for her. It is for external threats, for internal there are explosives, or as they are now called - the Russian Guard.
                1. 0
                  8 December 2019 00: 36
                  Quote: NKT
                  No need to suppress the army, it is absolutely not for this. Stop it substitute it for tasks unusual for her. It is for external threats, for internal there are explosives, or as they are now called - the Russian Guard.

                  ===
                  learn yourself and learn it well
              4. +3
                8 December 2019 00: 54
                Quote: Vladimir16
                Humpbacked - gni_da. It is necessary to suppress by the army any attempts to divide our homeland

                And he had done such a thing that when the critical moment came in Riga, no one gave the command to use the units sitting in readiness. The neighbors of the Pskov paratroopers were raised and prepared for the exit, but there was no command. Then the Riga OMON was "leaked", and the EBN allowed the Latvian prosecutors to arrest former fighters on the territory of the Russian Federation.
                You are right, it was necessary to peel on the heels ..
                1. +2
                  8 December 2019 01: 29
                  Quote: Pete Mitchell
                  And he managed so much that when a critical moment arrived in Riga, no one gave instructions for use to the units that were in readiness.

                  This ........., got even worse when the pogroms began in Baku in January 1990. Introduce a state of emergency a week earlier than January 11-13, there would not have been so many casualties among the civilian population, and "order" could have been restored by the forces of the Baku garrison.
                  1. +3
                    8 December 2019 01: 57
                    Quote: kapitan92
                    pogroms in Baku in January 1990 Introduce a state of emergency a week earlier than January 11-13, there would not be so many victims

                    I still remember the block post at the entrance to Baku from the Salyan barracks and the marine falling apart on the barrel of the BTR machine gun ... There for the first time I saw patrols in armored cars and with AKs, roadblocks, cadets from all over the Union, there were a lot of things for the first time, a cruel time .. .
                    1. +2
                      8 December 2019 12: 37
                      Quote: Pete Mitchell
                      I still remember the block post at the entrance to Baku from the Salyan barracks

                      Been in the division, before and after January. drinks
                      1. +3
                        8 December 2019 13: 04
                        hi We drove south through Baku in both ´89 and '90. This is then one of our garrisons captured, Adzhikabul. Much was then seen for the first time, and now our Ukrainians do not communicate with us ...
                      2. +1
                        8 December 2019 13: 08
                        Quote: Pete Mitchell
                        hi We drove south through Baku in both ´89 and '90. This is then one of our garrisons captured, Adzhikabul. Much was then seen for the first time, and now our Ukrainians do not communicate with us ...

                        My battalion was located in Baku. between Neftchilar and Ahmedlam, the outskirts of those times.


                        Quote: Pete Mitchell
                        Much was then seen for the first time, and now our Ukrainians do not communicate with us ...

                        Similarly! hi
                      3. +3
                        8 December 2019 13: 25
                        Quote: kapitan92
                        Quote: Pete Mitchell
                        Much then saw for the first time.
                        Similarly! hi

                        I’ll add that we didn’t really understand anything either: in the spring of summer ´90 we went to Baku for a walk and of course the famous caps with an airfield to order, they were sewn to order there in the area of ​​Azneft Square. We still returned normally, and in '92 we weren’t allowed to go there, the regiments flew away and landed for refueling in Khankala, where they were squeezed out .... My classmates then hollowed them in '94 ....
                      4. +1
                        8 December 2019 13: 41
                        Quote: Pete Mitchell
                        at that time we didn’t really understand anything: in the spring and summer of ´90 we went for a walk in Baku

                        In February 88 the battalion was transferred to Siberia, Sumgait was in the spring. In November they returned and for the first time in the village saw a demonstration under green flags, tried not to go out of town in uniform, then an order was issued in parts.
                        Yes, it was hard to comprehend.
                        Quote: Pete Mitchell
                        and in '92 our people weren’t allowed there

                        All right! At the end of the 90th, the stage of withdrawal of the garrison troops from Baku began.
                        EMNIP airdrome was in Pumping, 30-40 km from Sumgait.
                      5. +3
                        8 December 2019 13: 45
                        There was a MiG-25 regiment in Pumping, it seems to be wholly and squeezed.
                        What is the trial of Gorbachev: the traitor does not cast lots ...
                      6. +2
                        8 December 2019 13: 47
                        Quote: Pete Mitchell
                        What is the trial of Gorbachev: the traitor does not cast lots ...

                        I agree.
                        Good luck, I'll go to the garage, put things in order. drinks hi
                      7. +3
                        8 December 2019 13: 58
                        Good luck, I have a garage for two days as it appeared, completely empty, a blunder.
                        Have a nice day drinks
          2. +7
            7 December 2019 09: 04
            I remember well the events of that time and the speeches of the Baltic deputies - Nazi demagogues - at the 1st Congress of People's Deputies of the USSR (March 1989).

            In a perverted Marxist-Leninist form - namely from the position of a supposedly CLASSless decision to realize the right of a nation to self-determination under socialism - demands for the separation of the Soviet republics were voiced from the lips of the USSR people's deputies immediately at the 1st Congress of People's Deputies of the USSR (March 1989): 1) from the Šiauliai Territory. constituency of the Lithuanian SSR K.D.P. Prunskene; 2) from the Tallinn Institute of the Estonian SSR K.S. Khallik, 3) from the Panevezys City IO of the Lithuanian SSR V.V. Landsbergis et al.
            Why is it in a distorted theoretical Leninist formulation?
            Yes, because Lenin, justifying the national policy of the Bolsheviks in the question of determining the priority of solving the problems of building socialism over the self-determination of the nation, wrote that
            “... not a single Marxist, not breaking with the foundations of Marxism and socialism in general, can deny that the interests of socialism ABOVE the right of a nation to self-determination". Lenin V.I. To the history of the issue of an unhappy world. - Full. Sobr. Op., vol. 35, p. 251.
            But in 1989, socialism was already built in the USSR, and the Leninist definition of the right of a nation to self-determination referred precisely to the BOURGEOISE system!
            Moreover, in theory, perverted dusting of the brains of the people and ordinary communists, the "perestroika" did everything allegedly from a Leninist position!

            All this once again makes the decision of the Bolsheviks to divide administratively the territory of the world's first Soviet state building socialism, on a national basis, strange, illogical, internally logically contradictory. And you need to understand this.
            The legitimate question is: why was this done? Namely: 1. The interests of whose national bourgeoisie were realized in this case both within the country and abroad (since any state is a system not isolated from the international community)? 2. Whose nationalizing bourgeoisie was it profitable to lay under the world's first socialist state a mine of national separatism? 3. Whose nationalizing bourgeoisie benefited most from this?
            And when, in answering these questions, we consider that the same
            Landsbergis has been a member of the European Parliament since June 2004 and was a member of the largest faction of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats (European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats). He was re-elected from the Union of the Fatherland - Christian Democrats of Lithuania to the European Parliament at the elections held in Lithuania on June 7, 2009.
            it becomes clear which of the "jurists" is stirring up water in the West against Russia.
            Namely, the same bourgeois European parliament is fighting against Russia!
  2. +6
    7 December 2019 06: 00
    When will we finally see the trial of Gorbohert !? When will he be responsible for the collapse of our great country !? The highest measure to him! and his accomplices!
    1. +4
      7 December 2019 06: 56
      Do not forget posthumously am to punish Yeltsin. It is still unknown whether Gorbi or he was more involved with the USSR and the independence of its outskirts.
      1. +3
        7 December 2019 08: 18
        And what about the “guarantor” of the jurisdiction of EBN and Gorbi at the same time? But how do you, from a legal point of view, call such a “guarantor?” But doesn’t it seem to you that the situation of “jurisdiction” described in the article is very consonant with my questions?
    2. -4
      7 December 2019 07: 02
      well, well, a great country ruined Gobochert? What is his greatness more than country? or maybe the country was not so big? The false assumptions of the collapse of the USSR, like Gorbachev or Yeltsin, specifically impose on society hiding the true reasons, leaving people blind. Well, if not a short unbiased court pleads guilty, and if there is a custom-made process, it will not make your life easier. this is a war with the mills.
    3. +4
      7 December 2019 08: 09
      Totally agree with you. The traitor must be judged in Russia, so that it would be disagreeable to others ... He brought a lot of grief to the inhabitants of the USSR!
      1. +8
        7 December 2019 09: 36
        And I agree! Gorbachev to judge in Russia! Need boils ...
        Do you know what it looked like? The steps taken by the authorities to suppress separatism in Vilnius or Tbilisi seemed awkward, ill-considered and even stupid. There were none at all in Baku. Everyone was indignant: "Why is Gorbachev calving? Why is he so indecisive?" Attributed to character traits. And he, playing with indecision and perfectly aware of what he was doing, stupidly and very decisively betrayed. Betrayed not just the state system, but the people of the country. And then...
        A couple of hundreds of millions of broken people's hopes for a decent future can certainly be counted. Hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of those killed in local civil wars, ethnic cleansing, gang warfare - for sure! Millions have left the country forever, tens of millions deprived of the opportunity to return to Russia as an ethnic homeland - until now! ... And the destruction of industry, education, science, culture as the basis of a citizen's proud self-esteem? Where are our foundations of civic self-esteem?!?
        ... The scale of the disaster is monstrous. Memory is alive everywhere. The time of the Last Judgment over the main Judas of all times and peoples has come.
  3. +8
    7 December 2019 07: 11
    That's how they and the Kiev Maidan will not be allowed to investigate and bring the perpetrators to justice.
  4. +5
    7 December 2019 07: 58
    In 1996, they didn’t protest ..... Now they are worried .. remembered international law ..
    1. +2
      8 December 2019 01: 01
      Quote: parusnik
      In 1996, they didn’t protest ..... Now they are worried .. remembered international law ..

      Very clumsy attempts. They were "dunked" in 2011 when they tried to grab Golovatov, but they did not understand that any "good" / democratic / act will not go unpunished.
      Well, if you allow the poem, pure plagiarism is sinful:

      Gavrila Pravdorub

      Austrian trick

      We live almost crying, suddenly here it is - good luck!
      The Austrian Themis pleased us:
      Like, at half past four they caught Golovatov,
      Enemy of Lithuania sworn, gone to the reserve!

      And the responsible persons began to move,
      To make the extradition of the colonel here.
      Lithuanian justice began to dream at night:
      We will condemn this bird for many years!

      Retribution was planned, but then Moscow intervened,
      The result is a completely different alignment.
      They said there: guys, why sculpt a hunchback?
      Do not touch Golovatov, because he is not to blame!

      And the Austrians are pathetic, with a guilty smile
      (And even skis with sticks left him!)
      Not tormented by doubts, and even with apologies
      The villain Golovaty was sent to Moscow!

      Here we have great sorrow, and he giggles in Moscow,
      He says: they shot themselves, they say, look among your own!
      Although we are in the EU and NATO, but Misha Golovatova
      How we get a donut hole from them!

      Do not expect forgiveness from us, we are full of indignation.
      And we write petitions of the guilty to condemn,
      And we will break relations with Austria the traitor
      For the vile decision - let the villain go!
  5. +5
    7 December 2019 10: 50
    And all the same, Gorbohert needs to be pulled out in Russia and put on trial! Demanding capital punishment!
    1. +4
      8 December 2019 12: 34
      Quote: FORCE 38RUS
      And all the same, Gorbohert needs to be pulled out in Russia and put on trial! Demanding capital punishment!

      Your idea is very sound, but you don’t need to raise the bastard to the forefront of the struggle of all democrats, liberals and other state-sorovskie riffraff. If the Russian Federation rigidly suppressed the controlled howl of this rubbish, then yes. But in the current situation, it is scary to imagine what forces will rush to court to defend this traitor. For the west, this agronomist is just a gift and they will always remember his deeds; we also need to remember ..
  6. +2
    7 December 2019 11: 34

    In fact, the top of the USSR "leaked" the military, who simply did their duty to defend the homeland.


    Everything you need to know by the Russian military abroad in Syria, Libya and other countries.
    1. 0
      7 December 2019 23: 54
      the military knows all this. work like that. Do you think such a rarity?) we are not romantic young men, but most of them all understand pragmatists. at all times, states have exchanged their soldiers for the victories they need, or defending themselves so many times that it makes no sense to be offended by such things)
  7. +4
    7 December 2019 11: 38
    One would like to ask: "Who are the judges?" What kind of objectivity can we talk about when the goal of all he spoke about the events of those years is to pour out as much dirt as possible on Russia.
  8. +3
    7 December 2019 11: 41
    When from time to time you come across Gorbachev's opuses in the media, you come to the conclusion that this miracle does not even realize what he has done. It seems that he still believes that someday he will be called to the presidency again and that he will continue the process of "perestroika".
    Only a splash in Tomsk from an unemployed engineer in the early 90s sobered him up for a couple of years ...
  9. +1
    7 December 2019 11: 42
    Lithuanian democracy ??? - no thanks, not Saturday morning ........)))
  10. +4
    7 December 2019 12: 04
    Lithuania is the EU. The EU is a pricing scissor complot. The convicted soldiers were used for provocation, as a result of which the USSR was dissolved. Responsibility for the "events" rests entirely with Gorby.
    1. +2
      7 December 2019 13: 54
      Quote: iouris
      Lithuania is the EU. -

      And NATO.
      1. +2
        7 December 2019 18: 12
        NATO is a military organization, and the EU acts as a "democratic" superstate.
  11. +1
    7 December 2019 14: 19
    I alone did not understand in terms of international law? We either recognize him or not. And something like this here we recognize and there we do not recognize.
    1. +2
      7 December 2019 16: 25
      There is an answer to your question - in the Constitution of the Russian Federation.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"