The developer called the start date of state testing of the armored car "Athlete"

47
The developer called the start date of state testing of the armored car "Athlete"

State trials of the armored car "Athlete", which is a further development of the line of armored vehicles "Tiger", are scheduled for next spring. This was reported by TASS with reference to the press service of the company "VPK".

According to the general director of the Military-Industrial Company Alexander Krasovitsky, the armored car is currently completing preliminary tests, which should end this year, after which preparations for the state will begin. Two variants of the armored car were proposed for testing - a three-door special-purpose vehicle (ASN) and a five-door multi-purpose vehicle (AMN-2).



The athlete is completing preliminary tests, next spring he plans to enter the state testing phase. Now one sample is in disassembly, it will probably go to power. The second sample will be tested for shelling and undermining in December

- said in a statement.

As previously reported, the preliminary testing program of Russian armored vehicles "Athlete" began on August 5.

The new generation of armored vehicles "Athlete" was developed by the "Military Industrial Company" by order of the Ministry of Defense of Russia as part of the development work of the same name. For the first time, the Athlete was presented at the Army-2019 International Military-Technical Forum at the end of June.

The armored car received a more powerful engine - YaMZ-5347-24 (240 horsepower versus 215 in the Tiger), the lifting capacity of the Athlete increased to 1600 kg. The maximum speed is 120 km / h. Wheel formula - 4x4.

As standard, the level of ballistic protection corresponds to the second class of OTT, air conditioning is installed in the cabin. It is stated that the "Athlete" will be able to withstand a detonation of 2 kg of TNT, but the protection class can be increased. Also, the cars will receive special seats, which should protect the crew from the consequences of detonation.

The armored car received an infrared spotlight and a special spotlight-seeker. Installed a system of circular video review.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    47 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. -12
      4 December 2019 09: 22
      Well, the obvious SUV!
      1. +12
        4 December 2019 09: 33
        From a raznosortitsa armored cars already ripples in the eyes, can anyone make an article even with an approximate description?
        1. -2
          4 December 2019 11: 32
          Quote: Civil
          From a raznosortitsa armored cars already ripples in the eyes, can anyone make an article even with an approximate description?

          As it is clear from the article, the "Athlete" is not an assortment, but an improved version of the "Tiger". In your opinion, there is no need to improve the existing technique?
          1. +4
            4 December 2019 12: 55
            Do you think Tiger-1, Tiger-2, Tiger-9 is not a solution? Tiger, Athlete, Nerd, Camel are confusing.
            1. 0
              4 December 2019 12: 57
              If the shortened version of the Gazelle was called Sobol, and not Gazelle-1,5, are you already confused?
              Quote: yfast
              Do you think Tiger-1, Tiger-2, Tiger-9 is not a solution? Tiger, Athlete, Nerd, Camel are confusing.
              1. 0
                4 December 2019 19: 00
                These are civilian versions, there you can. If the thing is good, then its new version and PR is not necessary.
            2. +1
              4 December 2019 17: 47
              Well, yes, I agree, if they destroyed, you need to know that they destroyed, I suggest that the Aussie and the mice ride on t34 and bt7, why bred a different grader here ...
              1. 0
                5 December 2019 03: 10
                Well, yes, on the 9-ton two-axle shaft, the very thing is to drive along the swivel shafts, but, it's a pity, it’s far to go behind the tractor.
          2. 0
            4 December 2019 13: 06
            but in my opinion it looks like junk of the 30s of the shaggy years of the 20th century, the muzzle is straight from the 30s movie
            1. 0
              4 December 2019 19: 03
              And what kind of movie are you watching? Normal, modern design
      2. -1
        4 December 2019 16: 56
        How can a car with nine tons and only two axles not be a SUV? Au minusers, explain !!
        1. +1
          4 December 2019 19: 04
          Well, after all, the cars of your American idols are even worse
          1. 0
            5 December 2019 03: 08
            For me, the BTR-40 is more sympathetic and more than one and a half times lighter, do you know about this, an expert on my preferences?
            1. +2
              6 December 2019 18: 51
              I certainly apologize, Vladimir, but composite armor, as it were, is slightly lighter) I had the opportunity to climb the mountains in old clothes, and then in a new vest, the 5th category, if it tells you something. And the convenience and weight have a very strong effect on the load and on many things, so yes, it may well be not a good "SUV"
              1. -1
                6 December 2019 18: 55
                As if 9 and a half tons for just 4 wheels, this is a lot for an all-terrain vehicle, but what’s there, tvaron or cast iron, a ton doesn’t matter, it still has 1000 kg in it.
                1. +2
                  6 December 2019 19: 05
                  Now, I will try to explain to you, from the engineer’s side, intelligibly. Do you have a leg, suppose it falls, not a ton, but 100 kg of steel, I hope you do not need to describe the consequences? And now Repin’s picture, it’s falling on your foot, the same 100 kg, but you, on your foot, have a protection that dampens the blow and your leg only feels 100 grams of weight per toe. Weight seems to be one, but the consequences are different
                  1. 0
                    6 December 2019 19: 23
                    I have no doubt that you are an excellent engineer, maybe even the level of Shukhov, for example. But you have problems with mindfulness. What protection ?! What a shock and damper ?! This is about wheel load!!! More than 2 tons per wheel!
                  2. 0
                    7 December 2019 04: 39
                    I think this Vladimir is one of those non-brothers who infuriates everything Russian
    2. +3
      4 December 2019 09: 23
      Have a good test! Nice design and good features.
      1. +5
        4 December 2019 10: 00
        armored car "Athlete"
    3. +2
      4 December 2019 09: 27
      I want to say that you can’t stop there, but I want to add that the excessive variety of military equipment is also a big problem in servicing and repairing it.
      Everything is important in the army, overloading MTS structures is different, but essentially the same, not a gut.
    4. +6
      4 December 2019 09: 27
      And I still can't understand the saying "tiger ruler".
      "Athlete" is almost three tons heavier, is produced by another company and not GAZ ... What functions are different from the "tiger" assigned to him?
      1. +1
        4 December 2019 09: 34
        It's like a lynx roulette, just a ruler!
      2. +3
        4 December 2019 09: 44
        And I still can't understand the saying "tiger ruler".
        "Athlete" is heavier by almost three tons, produced by another company and not GAZ ... What are the different functions from "tiger"

        Well, do you remember the expression - a Golf class car? ))) So here.
      3. +2
        4 December 2019 12: 07
        The tiger has not been produced by GAZ for a long time either, they are all from the military-industrial complex
      4. 0
        4 December 2019 19: 27
        Athlete and Tiger are completely different cars. The first complements the second. Just more than half. In all more. And if you pay extra in defense it will also be better.
    5. 0
      4 December 2019 09: 41
      Something is in no hurry with us to test and introduce new technology into the troops! Years go by, while the technology starts to become obsolete by that time! If Korolev, Ilyushin, Tupolev and others worked at such a pace, we would still be launching Belka and Strelka into space!
      1. +1
        6 December 2019 18: 55
        Well, maybe they learned to value people, not technology? It is better to get a good product at the exit than to quickly rivet a raw product, and then redo it?
        1. +1
          6 December 2019 18: 58
          We are not states, we do not need flying penguins, he needs normal products. Judging by Syria, even the current one has to be finished; jambs when used on a field in another country are cheaper to calculate than on their own
    6. +1
      4 December 2019 09: 56
      What kind of cable on the sides of the hood, why?
      1. +6
        4 December 2019 10: 10
        What not to let knots, branches, etc. to the windshield. They are used in jipping.
      2. +9
        4 December 2019 12: 21
        What kind of cable on the sides of the hood, why?

        Ordinary wind cutters, and then suddenly a branch will break the bulletproof glass)))
        1. +1
          5 December 2019 12: 19
          Ahah, yes, it’s aptly said about bulletproof glass))) but the hunter looks great!
      3. The comment was deleted.
    7. +7
      4 December 2019 10: 09
      During the Second World War, the Germans clutched their heads because of the variety of brands and models in the Wehrmacht's fleet - it was impossible to find the necessary spare parts for repairs.
      No need to repeat the mistakes of the enemy. Unification is a useful thing!
      1. 0
        4 December 2019 10: 21
        We do not need to repeat the mistakes of the enemy. We make them ourselves. Remember how many duplicate systems we have to this day.
        1. +2
          4 December 2019 10: 40
          So that's what they are duplicating .. In the output, one is out of order, the other replaces. Already verified.
          1. +1
            4 December 2019 17: 51
            Well, that you, dear from obscurely retired pensioners, take money, not Lzez, but not humanly)
          2. 0
            4 December 2019 19: 33
            Will KAMAZ fail, will it be replaced by MAZ instead of repair?
    8. -1
      4 December 2019 10: 35
      Another TIN
      1. +2
        4 December 2019 10: 48
        I would gladly ride on such a "trough" in Kiev on the district ... so that society rulevertil would get stuck with envy ..
        1. 0
          4 December 2019 12: 19
          as they say about tastes do not argue. well, very bulky.
          1. +1
            4 December 2019 12: 43
            Quote: george
            as they say about tastes do not argue. well, very bulky.

            ===
            perhaps because of all these protrusions, corners and bevels, is this a necessity, a flaw or a trend ?! UAZ in the background - aerodynamics top.
        2. +1
          4 December 2019 17: 53
          Well, you know that there, but we have some all the buckets that are being released ...)
    9. +1
      4 December 2019 15: 52
      The new iteration of the Tiger has already surpassed the weight of the Lynx (Iveco LMV), and the resistance to undermining is still much lower. Even if you do not take on faith the data on the resistance of Iveco to undermining 6 kg under the bottom (there are doubts), and taking more realistic 4 kg is still twice as much.
      1. 0
        4 December 2019 19: 49
        This parameter is purely optional. 2 kg with proper use, a similar machine can be halved.
    10. 0
      4 December 2019 20: 44
      Anyway, better than "Tiger", although this is a different class, they are not afraid of big MRAPs, this is a global trend, if only the fighters are saved.
    11. 0
      5 December 2019 01: 23
      the design of all such machines is standard and the same.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"