Trump: We will do whatever we want with Syrian oil

122
Trump: We will do whatever we want with Syrian oil

The United States has recaptured the oil fields in Syria from the Islamic State (banned in Russia) and can now do whatever it wants with this oil. This statement was made by US President Donald Trump after a meeting with NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg in London.

The IG tried to maintain control of oil, and now we are completely in control of it. Frankly, we enjoy significant support from a large number of different people. By and large, our only military men who remain in this territory are those who guard the oil. We have oil, and we can do with it what we want

- he said.



The expansion of the US military mission to ensure the safety of oil fields in eastern Syria became known in early November this year after its approval by Donald Trump. This decision implies the presence on the Syrian territory of hundreds of American military personnel, who, together with the Kurdish military units, will patrol a large territory from Deir ez-Zor to Al-Hasaki.

Later it became known about the concentration of US military armored vehicles in the oil field in the Rumeilan region of Al-Hasake province, where the richest oil fields in Syria are located. .

Earlier, US Secretary of Defense Mark Esper said the US army would “protect oil fields” from “Islamic state terrorists” (banned in Russia) and would respond by force to any attempts to seize the fields. At the same time, the United States does not intend to admit to them either Syrians or Russians. At the same time, the head of the Pentagon emphasized that the American military contingent will strike at all who encroached on oil production, the proceeds from the sale of which "goes exclusively to the development of local communities."

According to the Russian Ministry of Defense, the United States illegally extracts Syrian oil and exports it to neighboring countries for refining, having a monthly income of more than 30 million dollars.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    122 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +39
      3 December 2019 19: 13
      It sometimes seems to me that Trump is abnormally honest in phrases for a politician ..
      1. +12
        3 December 2019 19: 20
        It is necessary for the Syrians to arrange a second Vietnam ...
        1. +15
          3 December 2019 19: 23
          you won’t be especially comfortable in the desert .. but if there was a jungle, it would be a very complex theater for the database
          1. +13
            3 December 2019 19: 25
            Over in Yemen they give the Saudis like heat, and there is also a desert ...
            1. +13
              3 December 2019 19: 29
              Good idea. Also with their drones to attack tank farms. It is necessary to wage a guerrilla war against the invaders.
              1. +3
                3 December 2019 20: 50
                Whatever Trump says, he does not try to reduce American troops in the SAR, and indeed in the BV.
                It is noteworthy at the same time that such a country as BV covers terrorism The United States, which constantly manipulates the whole world about its alleged successful struggle against terrorism! And the United States does this with complete impunity for the sack of national wealth from other countries and peoples. In this case, the robbery of oil from Syria.

                How the US helps terrorists in Syria and what does oil have to do with it. Published: December 2, 2019
            2. -1
              3 December 2019 20: 18
              US Saudis sells weapons ...
          2. +13
            3 December 2019 19: 44
            Quote: Level 2 Advisor
            you won’t be very comfortable in the desert .. but there would be a jungle

            Or maybe it’s the Vietnamese themselves? wink
            1. +4
              3 December 2019 20: 03
              Quote: Dym71
              Quote: Level 2 Advisor
              you won’t be very comfortable in the desert .. but there would be a jungle

              Or maybe it’s the Vietnamese themselves? wink

              In them too
              But if Vietnam were a desert - with full Amer superiority in aviation, artillery, etc. Army of the Army would not shine anything good
              1. +2
                3 December 2019 20: 37
                Quote: Krasnodar
                But if Vietnam were a desert

                Coffins in the states, to the general indignation of ordinary American taxpayers, would go just as well. hi
                1. +1
                  3 December 2019 21: 06
                  Quote: Dym71
                  Quote: Krasnodar
                  But if Vietnam were a desert

                  Coffins in the states, to the general indignation of ordinary American taxpayers, would go just as well. hi

                  Far from the quantities
                  Yes, and would finish everything quickly
                  But the end would have been the same - guerrilla warfare would have been dumped from there in the same way as from Iraq
                  And, most likely, the union of two Vietnam under the flag of Starks. In the sense of the northerners.
              2. +4
                3 December 2019 22: 10
                Quote: Krasnodar
                Quote: Dym71
                Quote: Level 2 Advisor
                you won’t be very comfortable in the desert .. but there would be a jungle

                Or maybe it’s the Vietnamese themselves? wink

                In them too
                But if Vietnam was a desert - with full Amer superiority in aviation, artillery, etc. Army of the Army would not shine anything good

                It would have long been necessary to move away from "if only", because every nation has adapted to live in the conditions that exist, and accordingly tries to use them to the maximum. “If” is just a convenient formula for whatever justifies anyone’s failure. A Houthi fighter costs the treasury $ 2,5 per day, but the damage that he inflicts on the occupation troops of the Saudis is estimated at tens of thousands of dollars, while his effectiveness is calculated not by content, but by the belief that he defends his land, as it were pathetic it didn't sound. Mattresses, on the contrary, try to evaluate or measure any of their actions with money, since they cannot think differently, but as you know, not everything is measured by money, on which they are stable and pierced.
          3. +3
            3 December 2019 21: 19
            Normal or not normal is his business. But the fact that he honestly said that all interested people already know that this cannot be taken away. Another question is how long the Americans will continue to control it and whether it is time to ask them for a way out. By brute force, they don’t understand otherwise. Otherwise, when we ripen there may already be a drought. Fuel trucks can set fire to them regularly - there is already experience.
        2. +18
          3 December 2019 19: 32
          Trump, as always honest. He said that he would steal oil - that he was stealing. No camouflage, everything honorable Yes
          1. +9
            3 December 2019 19: 39
            They try to steal just so that it is not noticeable and no one knows, and the United States is simply brazenly robbing the country.
            1. -4
              3 December 2019 21: 57
              Well, who doesn’t steal her there))) Syria is robbed of all that she has now
            2. Fat
              -1
              4 December 2019 01: 56
              Quote: Andrei Gurov
              They try to steal just so that it is not noticeable and no one knows, and the United States is simply brazenly robbing the country.

              70 oil tankers a day - 30 million greens a month. Just the American contingent and the "Local Community" for beer and cigarettes. :)))) In general, what they want is what they do. No more - you slept ... Trump, Judas, laid it down, it's not for nothing that Democrats do not like him. :)))))
          2. -2
            3 December 2019 20: 25
            "Winners (IG)" are not judged
          3. -1
            4 December 2019 00: 17
            It is very easy to stop this business. It is necessary to quietly deliver the Tornado-S under the guise of testing with new corrected extended-range missiles, which accurately hit the target at known coordinates. Reconnaissance, volley, change of position immediately with the inclusion of all means of camouflage and electronic warfare ... And methodically destroy the entire infrastructure on behalf of the Syrians, let them carry oil in buckets to the border with Iraq ... We will check the new weapon and "they do not cough" ... Hello pi_ndos ..
            1. +2
              4 December 2019 01: 45
              Quote: Volkof
              And methodically destroy the entire infrastructure on behalf of the Syrians, let them carry oil in buckets to the border with Iraq ... We will check the new weapons and "they do not cough" ... Hello pi_ndos ..

              You probably forgot that on the other side there will no longer be barmaley with "Kalash". And what will come in response is not yet known. And the guys there are quite brave and think that they are the coolest.
              Once they’ve already tried to recapture the deposits ... Now it’s believed that the G-based on the S-130 is a very good thing ...
              1. 0
                4 December 2019 17: 53
                I was for Ganshipy already 2-3 years ago, lost several thousand ratings on this from snotlets, but it is used, though rarely, but how efficiently and effectively !!
                What is important here is to understand: to ensure the autonomy of oil production and pumping, it is necessary to have mobile power plants and they must be supplied with diesel fuel (or jet fuel (depending on the type of drive) - this is the weak point of these fields: mobile power plants must be destroyed.
                Both the Su-25 and helicopters with long-range ATGM can handle this, but how to set up reconnaissance ...
        3. +3
          3 December 2019 19: 40
          Quote: Alexander Petrov1
          It is necessary for the Syrians to arrange a second Vietnam ...

          To do this, restore the USSR
        4. +4
          3 December 2019 19: 49
          Quote: Alexander Petrov1
          It is necessary for the Syrians to arrange a second Vietnam.

          In one (a month or so ago) of the first discussions, someone suggested remote mining of export routes. Probably not a bad yield with regular use
        5. +1
          3 December 2019 22: 50
          Our warhead commander told us like this: "I'll arrange a little Vietnam for you!"
          1. +1
            3 December 2019 23: 42
            And there is also such an expression - "I will arrange Pearl Harbor for you" ... smile
      2. +6
        3 December 2019 19: 34
        This is not from honesty. These bandits lost their sense of self-preservation and became insolent. Too long turned their affairs with impunity. hi
        1. +6
          3 December 2019 20: 14
          Yes Moreover, with what words, Trump admitted that ISIS is the same gangster pseudo-state as the United States. In short
          ISIS = USA
      3. +9
        3 December 2019 20: 26
        Quote: Level 2 Advisor
        It sometimes seems to me that Trump is abnormally honest

        Extremely cynical: at first they hired abominations for cannon fodder, seized someone else's territory with oil, something went wrong to the Turks and the rest. Now rabble is no longer needed. Someone was thrown to the north of Afghanistan, the rest will be wet and squeezed towards Damascus. All for science.
        1. +1
          4 December 2019 11: 18
          seized someone else’s territory with oil, something crossed the Turks and the rest. Now rabble is no longer needed. Someone was thrown to the north of Afghanistan, the rest will be wet and squeezed towards Damascus. All for science.

          Can Russia send troops to the Donbass to protect coal from the IGL?
      4. +14
        3 December 2019 21: 20
        It sometimes seems to me that Trump is abnormally honest in phrases for a politician ..

        No, he just doesn’t know that you shouldn’t do this and say !!! He here recently said that Ancient Rome and the USA had long been friends !!! How did the old woman get mad at the translator? Understatements are rushing into power! Trump thinks that if something is captured by force of arms, then it can be robbed! Like a primitive savage! He is not embarrassed by this, because he considers it normal, that’s all. The savages thought it was okay to eat each other, and Trump thought it was okay to rob each other! He’s not honest, he’s just a jerk, but when you have such sea power as that of Amers, then everything is possible! You can hang the legitimate president of Saddam, you can bomb Serbia, you can torture prisoners in Guantanamo, you can throw out our Russian ambassadors! Send them so to speak! And the only salvation here is to embed the mattresses in the balls and then into the chin !! By the forces of the Syrians or better to support some sort of rebels, moderate but offended by amers! give them mini drones with bombs and send them to captured oil rigs! Let everything burn there !!! Give them sniper rifles with the ability to shoot for 3 km and let them beat the brains of Amers! Give them mines and let them tear them. In the desert or not in the desert do not care!
        We are passive and this is our problem! We want everything honestly, but you cannot win against a sharpie in cards honestly! This is not possible in principle.
        1. 0
          3 December 2019 22: 26
          Quote: Alexey G
          We are passive and this is our problem! We want everything honestly, but you cannot win against a sharpie in cards honestly! This is not possible in principle.

          -Trump, are you a sharpie?
          -What happened?
        2. +3
          4 December 2019 02: 06
          Quote: Alexey G
          By the forces of the Syrians or better to support some sort of rebels, moderate but offended by amers! give them mini drones with bombs and send them to captured oil rigs! Let everything burn there !!! Give them sniper rifles with the ability to shoot for 3 km and let them beat the brains of Amers! Give them mines and let them tear them. In the desert or not in the desert do not care!

          And also mine roads along the path of the Americans, place land mines on the roads along which the nalivnya go, carry out attacks on small patrols. In general, to tear up everything that concerns the Americans, so that the ground under their feet burns. And publicly hang accomplices with signs on the chest "Enemy of the Syrian people."
      5. 0
        3 December 2019 21: 55
        our top authorities still need to learn honesty from Trump and learn
      6. 0
        3 December 2019 22: 15
        Normal Trump or not, the lip-sealing machine is simply necessary for him !!!
      7. 0
        3 December 2019 23: 00
        I don't know if this is good or bad, but sometimes I remember Gedevan's words from the movie "Kin-dza-dza": "That's because you say what you don't think and think what you don't think, so you are sitting in your cages .... "
      8. +1
        3 December 2019 23: 10
        But it seems to me. that he really is our agent. laughing A politician should never speak like him. Even if everyone knows that they need oil, then all the same he should have driven a mullet about democracy and tolerance. And here is the complete discredit of the United States.
        1. +1
          4 December 2019 00: 11
          The Americans have two parties: one lies and understands this, since it is necessary to hide their thieves' plans so that they can be sworn for good, and the other believes that it’s bad to lie, it’s better to honestly admit that they are a nation of criminals and thieves, but the Lord will hear and may forgive them for their sincerity!
          The first probably does not believe in anything, the second is probably somewhat religious.
      9. +1
        3 December 2019 23: 30
        Quote: Level 2 Advisor
        It sometimes seems to me that Trump is abnormally honest in phrases for a politician ..

        he just has nothing and no reason to hide obvious things.
        After all, it is obvious that the war in Syria is not for \ against Assad, but for \ against the production of hydrocarbons.
    2. +16
      3 December 2019 19: 13
      We have oil, and we can do with it what we want
      Once again I am convinced that Trump is NOT A POLITICIAN, he says what he thinks ...
      Although for the whole world it’s not a secret for a long time ...

      1. +5
        3 December 2019 19: 30
        Quote: svp67
        Although for the whole world it’s not a secret for a long time ...

        the US army will "defend the oil fields

        This is how much time must pass for the United States to call the obvious behavior by their proper names. winked
        1. +7
          3 December 2019 19: 32
          Quote: Terenin
          This is how much time must pass for the United States to call the obvious behavior by their proper names.

          Exactly how much is needed for the fall of the American empire
        2. 0
          3 December 2019 21: 11
          Quote: Terenin
          This is how much time must pass for the United States to call the obvious behavior by their proper names.

          In the photo - it seems to be a decent person, but in reality a villain, a looter, a thief and a lying.
          1. 0
            4 December 2019 11: 25
            America does everything rightfully strong. So it was and it will be so. That is human nature.
            Russia is perhaps the most successful empire in the world. All empires collapsed, Russia still holds.
    3. -8
      3 December 2019 19: 14
      repair of heels of berets also costs money - we amers agreed to use oil
      1. 0
        3 December 2019 21: 13
        DO YOU GIVE !?
        And on what basis did you do this?
        And who authorized you to do this?
        1. -1
          3 December 2019 22: 34
          Quote: hydrox
          DO YOU GIVE !?
          And on what basis did you do this?
          And who authorized you to do this?

          It would be better if he died when he was little. am
          1. 0
            4 December 2019 08: 00
            sad clowns are also needed
    4. +3
      3 December 2019 19: 15
      Sucked like a tick.
    5. +15
      3 December 2019 19: 16
      Live hack how to squeeze out oil: first you hire baboons, supply them with weapons, intelligence and other military assistance, and after they capture the oil area, heroically defeat them (transport them to another country) and now you can do whatever you want with oil) )))
      1. +2
        3 December 2019 19: 35
        The free democratic forces of Antarctica, and specifically their leader, the penguin Lolo, declared the readiness of all the progressive forces of the continent to fight for democracy and the triumph of freedom ...
        1. +5
          3 December 2019 19: 56
          Pin, do you have any oil?
          1. +1
            3 December 2019 21: 27
            Pin, do you have any oil?

            1. 0
              3 December 2019 21: 43
              Quote: Rich
              Pin, do you have any oil?

              . The US Geological Survey claims that vast reserves of oil (7 billion tons) and natural gas (more than 4 trillion cubic meters) are stored here. The extraction of these resources causes great difficulties due to the remoteness of the region from the main consumers.
              But first of all, this is the place where 70 percent of all fresh water on the planet is concentrated.
              In 1991, the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty prohibited until 2048 any extraction of resources in Antarctica
              1. +1
                3 December 2019 22: 02
                Quote: Earth

                Quote: Rich
                Pin, do you have any oil ?.

                Be careful. This is not my quote, but kit88 (Alexander) smile
              2. +1
                4 December 2019 02: 10
                Quote: Earth
                In 1991, the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty prohibited until 2048 any extraction of resources in Antarctica

                Antarctica from democracy so far is saved only by the absence of the American embassy in it.
    6. +10
      3 December 2019 19: 17
      It reads between the lines: "ISIS was unable to maintain control over the oil, and now we have to do it ourselves."
      1. +3
        3 December 2019 19: 51
        Quote: Vladimir_6
        It reads between the lines: "ISIS was unable to maintain control over the oil, and now we have to do it ourselves."

        Why between the lines. Already work insolently, openly.
        Terror groups are created and financed (ISIS, Al Qaeda, bin Laden, Poroshenko (Yarosh) ...) these are Afghanistan, Iraq, Chechnya, Libya, Syria, Ukraine ... and they solve the most important geopolitical tasks in their interests. And their population (USA) was shut up (by threats of terrorist attacks) and the notorious fight against terrorism.
        1. +2
          3 December 2019 20: 05
          Quote: Terenin
          Already work insolently, openly.

          Act, yes, openly.
          But they nevertheless declare the fight against ISIS.
          "We won in Syria, we won in Iraq, but they are being distributed to other areas. And we are pursuing them as quickly as they spread," Trump said, speaking at the White House at the defense budget signing ceremony.
      2. +3
        3 December 2019 19: 52
        Quote: Vladimir_6
        It reads between the lines: "ISIS was unable to maintain control over the oil, and now we have to do it ourselves."

        If so. Earlier, ISIS directly earned money from the sale of Syrian oil, but, in view of the negative reaction of the international community to ISIS itself and its activities, now the United States will raise funds from the sale of Syrian oil and spend it at its discretion ...
        1. +3
          3 December 2019 21: 18
          Quote: ROSS 42
          If so. Earlier, ISIS directly made money from the sale of Syrian oil, but, due to the negative reaction of the international community to ISIS itself ...

          For the "international community", the negative reaction was voiced by the expression: "Assad must leave." And ISIS itself had a name for them - "moderate opposition".
          The owner of the cash desk from the sale of oil has not changed. Remember how we were not allowed to force the Euphrates. ISIS didn’t stop the advance of the army.
          The Yankees settled there in advance.
    7. +15
      3 December 2019 19: 18
      And despite such frankness, there are millions and millions of hamsters who are ready to give praise to the shining City that brings freedom and happiness to all peoples on the Hill.
    8. wow
      +1
      3 December 2019 19: 22
      Yeah .... to "local community development" !? Wait .....
      1. +1
        3 December 2019 19: 44
        Soon, a new Abu Dhabi will appear in Syria, however.
        1. +1
          3 December 2019 19: 55
          Soon, a new Abu Dhabi will appear in Syria, however.


          At 30 lyam per month?
          There, apparently, a cat cried for oil.
          1. -1
            3 December 2019 21: 28
            I think our understatement! To not be so offensive!
    9. +6
      3 December 2019 19: 35
      Still, Trump is ours! Not gu-gu about human rights and other things ... democracy! Everything is simple and clear: we like oil, then this is for us! We like Bolivian Lithium - we too!
      But for a hundred years ahead, there will be enough for the new "Gorbachevs" not to be mistaken, after all, such an open text no traitor-elite can go astray, no Dmitry Bykov with Ulitskaya and Akhedzhakova
    10. +3
      3 December 2019 19: 36
      We have oil, and we can do with it what we want

      Immediacy is awesome) There’s nothing to say) The territory of a sovereign state, there is legal authority, there is no mandate for the Security Council, the mattresses do what they want and everyone is silent. We live in an interesting world ...
    11. +2
      3 December 2019 19: 39
      Can cut logistics
      1. 0
        3 December 2019 21: 19
        But it’s possible to cut the throat (especially an arshinny one like Trump’s) - and it’s still not known what there will be more for it :: mothers or thanks ... laughing
        1. 0
          3 December 2019 21: 34
          There, one way or another, oil must be transported to the sea and trucks, most likely. And not the Americans mine it. And all this can be done, if you wish, to complicate or direct through controlled territories. And take from this $ excise tax.
    12. +1
      3 December 2019 19: 41
      so who would doubt it, I just can’t understand one thing at all how could the SAA allow this scenario and miss the oil? Yes, deposits long ago had to be taken under control for what a short-sighted policy was, and if they couldn’t be taken under control, it was necessary to scribble the air with the Curls right in front of the striped vultures (not without reason they have a vulture on the coat of arms, it's a pity that just a beautiful bird rather than a smelly neck) it's a shame
      1. +4
        4 December 2019 03: 33
        Quote: Klingon
        so who would doubt it, I just can’t understand one thing at all how could the SAA allow this scenario and miss the oil? Yes, a long time ago it was necessary to take deposits under control for what a short-sighted policy was, and if they could not take control, it was necessary to scatter the air with the Curls right in front of the nose of striped vultures

        This situation began to be seen already when the SAA broke with the battles in Diz Ez-Zora. Then the Kurds quickly (obviously on the advice of staff members) rushed across the SAA along the Euphrates to seize fields and oil fields, oil refineries and oil pumping enterprises. The CAA clearly had no strength to stop them. But these forces were with us. Ours could help with technology, advisers in the landing of troops on the path of the Kurds and the capture of the main facilities behind the Euphrates. And they themselves could have trained and carried out such a fast operation. There were practically no Americans at that time, it was just necessary to slow down the Kurds. But we, along with the Syrians, got it all done.
      2. +1
        4 December 2019 11: 25
        Quote: Klingon
        so who would doubt it, I just can’t understand one thing at all how could the SAA allow this scenario and miss the oil? Yes, deposits long ago had to be taken under control for what a short-sighted policy was, and if they couldn’t be taken under control, it was necessary to scribble the air with the Curls right in front of the striped vultures (not without reason they have a vulture on the coat of arms, it's a pity that just a beautiful bird rather than a smelly neck) it's a shame

        You probably forgot that almost only Damascus remained under the control of the CAA for 2015. Our embassy was fired from mortars.
        Not to the oil-bearing areas was Bashar al-Assad. And CAA aviation was simply not allowed into those areas.
    13. +1
      3 December 2019 19: 41
      The Syrians need to invite Haussis from Yemen to fight the Americans! So that the Haussites, as the Yankees themselves like to say, "kick their asses" !!!
    14. +3
      3 December 2019 19: 43
      It turns out that you can. ... And where else is the "democratic" oil suffering from imperfect politics? In Nigeria, Saudi Kingdom, Mexico? ... The States have written out a privateer patent for themselves.
      1. +4
        3 December 2019 21: 06
        The US president was surprised to find some Syria over American oil ... © (I don’t remember who said)
    15. +2
      3 December 2019 19: 44
      Trump: We will do whatever we want with Syrian oil ...
      At the same time, the United States does not intend to admit either Syrians or Russians to them. At the same time, the head of the Pentagon stressed that the American military contingent will strike at everyone who encroached on oil production, the proceeds from the sale of which "goes exclusively to the development of local communities."

      In light of the foregoing, I would like to clarify how, with all this, the presence of the Russian Aerospace Forces in Syria is indicated, who is Assad in it and what to do with this American hemorrhoids?
      Logically: either to arm someone and send them towards the "controllers", or to launch missile and bomb strikes at the "terrorists", or ???
    16. +2
      3 December 2019 19: 48
      Then what are the questions in Crimea?
      1. 0
        4 December 2019 11: 30
        Quote: sergo1914
        Then what are the questions in Crimea?

        Comrade Trump in the Crimea has no questions:
        "US President Donald Trump told the G7 leaders that Crimea is Russian, as the inhabitants of the peninsula speak Russian," BuzzFeed reported, citing sources.
    17. +1
      3 December 2019 20: 02
      Trying to save face before leaving Syria, then he will say that America gives the Syrians oil and fly away on their business to do good around the world and fight evil.
      1. +1
        4 December 2019 03: 38
        Quote: Petr1
        Trying to save face before leaving Syria, then he will say that America gives the Syrians oil and fly away on their business to do good around the world and fight evil.

        Where did you see that the Americans went away from oil? There are no bees against honey.
        1. 0
          4 December 2019 19: 46
          are you going to argue?
    18. 0
      3 December 2019 20: 11
      (Earlier, US Secretary of Defense Mark Esper said that the US Army would "protect the oil fields") Protect from those who own the oil, from the owners, who own these territories and appropriate, give to terrorists, this is how to fight terrorism and bring democracy to everything the world. This is the American way.
    19. 0
      3 December 2019 20: 23
      I don’t understand why so far Syria hasn’t sent several special forces with ATGMs and mortars and hasn’t sent all the Americans in coffins to the USA ?!

      There are only a few hundred of them, and the attack can be passed off as ISIS.
      1. +3
        3 December 2019 20: 31
        Several hundred, well-armed soldiers, with heavy armored vehicles, air support, and even Kurds.
        No special forces will do anything there.
        1. 0
          3 December 2019 21: 51
          Several hundred, well-armed soldiers, with heavy armored vehicles, air support, and even Kurds.
          No special forces will do anything there.



          Yes, at least a thousand, approached the range of the use of anti-tank systems and mortars, hit and withdrew, and so on, until the last American soldier to get out of Syria himself or in a coffin.
        2. +1
          4 December 2019 03: 40
          Quote: maden.usmanow
          Several hundred, well-armed soldiers, with heavy armored vehicles, air support, and even Kurds.

          Behind Dair-ez-Zor, not the Kurds live, but the Arabs. The Kurds rushed in with weapons. So there is public support.
      2. +6
        3 December 2019 20: 38
        Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
        I don’t understand why so far Syria hasn’t sent several special forces with ATGMs and mortars.

        What is there to understand? Assad will send several special forces groups - dozens of tomahawks in return (under the neighing of the allied S-400). Assad’s special forces will quickly end, but there’s no tomahawk.
        1. 0
          3 December 2019 21: 55
          The United States hit 60 Tomahawks (60-90 million dollars) at the airfield in Syria, the airfield continued to function the next day.

          To tear to pieces the US base in Syria is possible, and milking this does not need huge costs. You need not count dozens of brave guys, but you can work them out under the guise of ISIS using captured American weapons.

          US impudence crosses all borders.
    20. 0
      3 December 2019 20: 29
      Quote: sergo1914
      Then what are the questions in Crimea?


      Is the United States annexed the north of Syria?
      Simply, your vague comparison in different planes.
    21. 0
      3 December 2019 20: 41
      And several special forces do not send because Russia has a very thin back.
      1. +2
        3 December 2019 21: 10
        Quote: Saitarvi
        And several special forces do not send because Russia has a very thin back.

        Are you ready to start a war with the States over Syrian money?
      2. +4
        3 December 2019 21: 57
        Russia turned the tide of the war in Syria, so that about the liquid back was wrong address.

        And Russia should not fight for Syria at all, the Syrians themselves must do this.
    22. +5
      3 December 2019 20: 47
      We have oil, and we can do with it what we want

      All the same, Trump is a marginal. Clear text cuts the truth-uterus. This immediacy can cost him victory in the election. But that is his problem and that of the Americans. I am interested in another question. The fifth year we are in Syria. Under the control of the Americans, almost all of Syrian oil. What is under the control of the Russian Federation?
      1. -2
        3 December 2019 20: 59
        FIU ... and others like him !?
      2. +2
        3 December 2019 21: 10
        Quote: Karabin
        We have oil, and we can do with it what we want

        All the same, Trump is a marginal. Clear text cuts the truth-uterus. This immediacy can cost him victory in the election. But that is his problem and that of the Americans. I am interested in another question. The fifth year we are in Syria. Under the control of the Americans, almost all of Syrian oil. What is under the control of the Russian Federation?

        Exactly what they wanted. Bases in the Eastern Mediterranean.
      3. +2
        4 December 2019 03: 42
        Quote: Karabin
        What is under the control of the Russian Federation?

        Refugees and hungry people in a ruined country. Americans know their business well.
    23. +1
      3 December 2019 20: 52
      Honestly, but .... If at the head of the state a bandit was nestled from the highway, then the state, in fact, is ....
      That’s their whole philosophy.
      1. +1
        3 December 2019 21: 10
        It seems that the United States can only drive out the Turks from there if the issue is ripe before this point. The Russian nuclear power and confrontation with the United States will lead to a nuclear war. And the Turks are not nuclear and take off will only have to butt without nuclear weapons. And this is expensive, not convenient for the USA with an incomprehensible, harmful outcome. And threatening nuclear weapons against the Turks will be even more shameful, they say they could not otherwise.
        1. +1
          3 December 2019 21: 27
          Quote: Oquzyurd
          It seems that only the Turks can drive the United States out of there

          The question is of course interesting. While the Kurds are kuralesyat there, the Turks are a serious argument in the dispute.
          Let's see how it goes.
        2. +3
          3 December 2019 21: 32
          Quote: Oquzyurd
          And threatening nuclear weapons against the Turks will be even more shameful, they say they could not otherwise.

          The Japanese Hiroshima and Nagasaki will not agree with you.
          1. 0
            3 December 2019 23: 56
            Wrong place and wrong place
        3. +2
          3 December 2019 22: 55
          Quote: Oquzyurd
          It seems that the United States can only drive out the Turks from there if the issue is ripe before this point. The Russian nuclear power and confrontation with the United States will lead to a nuclear war. And the Turks are not nuclear and take off will only have to butt without nuclear weapons. And this is expensive, not convenient for the USA with an incomprehensible, harmful outcome. And threatening nuclear weapons against the Turks will be even more shameful, they say they could not otherwise.

          The U.S. Navy and aviation are stronger, and at times. They won’t go to a ground operation, but they will destroy the Turkish fleet, air force and army infrastructure from the air and sea, and very quickly. lose access to the Black Sea, etc.
          1. +1
            3 December 2019 23: 56
            Therefore, he wrote that "And this is expensive for the United States, not convenient with an incomprehensible, harmful result."
            1. +4
              4 December 2019 00: 21
              In this I agree. I just wanted to write that there would be no threat of nuclear weapons, not that case.
    24. +6
      3 December 2019 21: 05
      Syrian Oil Fields LLC - founders of the United States - 51% of shares + security; 40% - Rosneft + Air Defense; 10% - Turkey, Iran, Kurds and Barmaley. Trump should be understood as follows - I will not give the controlling stake to anyone angry (this is JUNE - but even in every JUNE there is someone's share ...)
    25. 0
      3 December 2019 21: 38
      Unprincipled, immoral, inglorious u..b..l..y..d..ki! It is easy to be an adult dylda the strongest among first-graders ... Someday they will wait until they are all piled up all over them in the faces and kicks. Then let's look at their show off.
    26. 0
      3 December 2019 22: 14
      Shaggy Gopnik
    27. +1
      3 December 2019 22: 24
      Quote: ROSS 42
      Trump: We will do whatever we want with Syrian oil ...
      At the same time, the United States does not intend to admit either Syrians or Russians to them. At the same time, the head of the Pentagon stressed that the American military contingent will strike at everyone who encroached on oil production, the proceeds from the sale of which "goes exclusively to the development of local communities."

      In light of the foregoing, I would like to clarify how, with all this, the presence of the Russian Aerospace Forces in Syria is indicated, who is Assad in it and what to do with this American hemorrhoids?
      Logically: either to arm someone and send them towards the "controllers", or to launch missile and bomb strikes at the "terrorists", or ???

      I am inclined to arm any "Hussits" and set them on the striped ones, or use the services of PMCs. you yourself cannot get your hands dirty because they will raise a howl and you can provoke a big war, and you can throw MLRS on the Hussites and the CD, even old hailstones will go, there are mortars, all sorts of Vienna-Nons, etc. the list is long and so that striped hyenas nightmare day and night without giving a break am
    28. 0
      3 December 2019 22: 26
      Zoologists would call this species of fauna "an ordinary bandit of a worldwide scale"
    29. +1
      3 December 2019 22: 34
      Outrageous cynicism.
      The question is how to pick them out from there now?
      The only option is to make it impossible to export and sell stolen Syrian oil.
    30. 0
      3 December 2019 23: 00
      Now who has power - that is all ...
      1. 0
        4 December 2019 03: 14
        And when was it different?
    31. +2
      3 December 2019 23: 07
      Keep it up! Krasava Trump
    32. 0
      3 December 2019 23: 40
      In general, of course, this is strange, for the sake of 30 million USD per month, so substitute. Well this is not money for the United States. Whatever the minus, keeping troops in another country is also not cheap. In general, it looks more like nonsense. Well, or like, it's a challenge. That's what we want to do, then we do it and you won’t do anything with us. Very similar to the offer to swap! You tell us this, and we will leave Syria.
    33. +1
      3 December 2019 23: 47
      Well done! Frankly, honestly and instructively. Nothing changes in this mortal world ... who is stronger is right. Now all talk of justice, democracy and freedom must be stopped, a new world order has already been determined and we need to end this era of impunity and permissiveness.
    34. 0
      4 December 2019 00: 18
      Well, 30 megabytes is not much what a huge income. They will have no less expenses, anyway.
    35. 0
      4 December 2019 05: 59
      Quote: 2 level advisor
      you won’t be especially comfortable in the desert .. but if there was a jungle, it would be a very complex theater for the database

      so don't "arrange a second Vietnam" you need to arrange striped hyenas Second Afghanistan laughing
    36. -1
      4 December 2019 07: 50
      Peace in Syria will come when the United States, Russia, Iran, Turkey withdraw their troops from Syria. The people of Syria must be the master of their territory.
    37. 0
      4 December 2019 08: 40
      Well, yes, everything is in accordance with American laws - a thief has stolen a baton from a thief with a right of the strong.
      I don’t give a damn about everything else.
    38. 0
      4 December 2019 11: 35
      Quote: Vladimir_6
      Quote: Klingon
      so who would doubt it, I just can’t understand one thing at all how could the SAA allow this scenario and miss the oil? Yes, deposits long ago had to be taken under control for what a short-sighted policy was, and if they couldn’t be taken under control, it was necessary to scribble the air with the Curls right in front of the striped vultures (not without reason they have a vulture on the coat of arms, it's a pity that just a beautiful bird rather than a smelly neck) it's a shame

      You probably forgot that almost only Damascus remained under the control of the CAA for 2015. Our embassy was fired from mortars.
      Not to the oil-bearing areas was Bashar al-Assad. And CAA aviation was simply not allowed into those areas.

      since 2015, as if 5 years had passed, could it have been a bit of a fuss for 5 years, or? already our VKS are flying with might and main, it was necessary to launch PMCs there, but to see ours or their strategies missed
    39. +1
      5 December 2019 02: 00
      Is Syria part of the USA? In this case, the Yankees recognize the occupation of Syria and the United States as the country of the aggressor ...

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"