Why the British contingent in the Baltic states will be destroyed by Russia: report of the London Institute

95

The Royal London Defense and Security Research Institute (founded in 1831) published a report entitled Future Conflicts: Maximizing UK Tactical and Operational Firepower. The authorship of the report belongs to expert Jack Watling. And in his work, Watling considers in fact the need to improve British artillery and other "traditional" types of weapons in connection with the "threats emanating from Russia."

The report says that the Russian Armed Forces are armed with various artillery mounts, including self-propelled guns of calibers 152 and 203 mm, as well as MLRS with calibers up to 300 mm. The author notes that in terms of equipping artillery, the British army is significantly inferior to the Russian.



From the report:

In the 2020 year, the armed forces of the United Kingdom will have only two artillery regiments with 24-x self-propelled howitzers AS-90 caliber 155 mm and 42-launchers MLRS with ammunition caliber 270 mm.

The author further claims that it is very unlikely that British artillery can be deployed in the Baltic if necessary to carry out “deterrent operations,” since the British army has fixed a lack of vehicles for transporting such heavy equipment over long distances in a short time.

From the London report:

The 16-I airborne brigade and the 3-I commando brigade have only two batteries of six towed light cannons L118 model 1972 year.

Jack Watling recalls that many British Army rocket launchers target ammunition via GPS, "but the ammunition will become vulnerable if Russian electronic warfare systems are used, and jamming is carried out."

Watling summarizes by stating why the British contingent in eastern NATO will be destroyed by Russia:

Today the situation is such that the Russian army, having an impressive advantage in artillery weapons, in the event of a direct conflict (and the option of the Baltic is being considered, approx. “VO”), will be able to deliver fire attacks virtually unhindered, and the British contingent will be destroyed.

According to Watling, even aviation NATO countries will not help in such a situation, since air support, at least at the first stage of possible military operations, will be practically inaccessible for NATO in the east due to the activity of Russian electronic warfare and air defense.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    95 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. 0
        30 November 2019 09: 18
        For humor plus. For caps minus. Total Zero.
        1. +6
          30 November 2019 11: 16
          what a cool name the Watling report is
          “Future Conflicts: Maximizing UK Tactical and Operational Firepower.”

          report summary
          the British contingent will be destroyed.

          Why does he have such a peppy name with such a gloomy report ending? Nonsense winked
          1. +6
            30 November 2019 12: 17
            They beg for money.
            1. +5
              30 November 2019 19: 02
              Quote: Sancho_SP
              They beg for money.

              The best guarantee that the British military contingent will not be destroyed in the Baltics is that it will be in England. Judging by the "powerful analytics" contained in the report, everything is aimed at one thing - "Give Babosov!"
          2. +5
            30 November 2019 17: 49
            Quote: Rich
            Why does he have such a peppy name with such a gloomy report ending?

            This is because you did not take into account the diagnosis of the drafters of the report: they started writing the report alone, but the orderlies came running and twisted everyone :: another scribing team began to complete the writing, but their orderlies also tied at the end of the work ...
            "Royal Institute for Defense and Security Research" is the open name of an institution with a special regime of attendance, built exclusively for employees of the United Kingdom, who received brain damage during the execution of government duties. The diagnosis of this disease of the majority of statesmen in Britain is a split consciousness - and how many of them have passed before our eyes over the past 10 years! laughing
        2. 0
          2 December 2019 07: 14
          One rocket Iskander and the heirs of the British Empire will scatter through the air ... laughing
    2. +12
      30 November 2019 08: 50
      will be able to deliver fire attacks virtually unhindered, and the British contingent will be destroyed.

      Surprisingly, sometimes British experts make absolutely correct conclusions !.
      1. -7
        30 November 2019 09: 07
        ... the British contingent in the Baltic states will be destroyed by Russia.

        But first, you need to remove relatives and friends from England, students, money earned by honest labor and sell all the property. winked
        1. +4
          30 November 2019 09: 19
          That is, you want to say that Russia does not attack the Baltic states only because in Europe money is such?
          1. +2
            30 November 2019 09: 41
            Europe money isn’t like that?

            Why do they have permanent residence and permanent residence in NATO countries?
            1. 0
              30 November 2019 10: 01
              Weird question. They want and have. They can afford it. What money is another question. I am not involved in counting other people's assets, a stupid occupation.
            2. +6
              30 November 2019 10: 14
              Do you think that those who live in Russia, in case of war, will not shoot at the EU, the USA, or England, because there are relatives of some sort of alcoholic, such as Sobchak ... Blessed is he who believes ... Because people buy smarter real estate if not in the Russian Federation, then in South America, where it is calmer, and not in the NATO countries, making enemies at the Stakhanov pace
            3. +2
              30 November 2019 16: 10
              They were forced to do this in order to exclude the possibility of an attack by Russia! And so, children and family are the key to a further quiet life laughing
          2. +15
            30 November 2019 10: 11
            why should Russia attack the Baltic states? from a word in general?
            1. +1
              30 November 2019 10: 52
              Quote: pin_code
              why should Russia attack the Baltic states? from a word in general?

              The West is in full swing preparing for this event and I think sooner or later it will happen, because Kaliningrad.
              1. +1
                30 November 2019 10: 58
                so this is a completely different alignment, there is a difference, though. either you are an aggressor, or you are carrying out an operation to free your territory.
                1. +1
                  30 November 2019 11: 09
                  Quote: pin_code
                  so this is a completely different alignment

                  Well, you understand that in the West they will start this war with provocation and accuse us of aggression, but in any case we will be to blame.
                  1. 0
                    30 November 2019 12: 25
                    there are many options in case of provocation.
                2. +3
                  30 November 2019 11: 31
                  The question is to whom this difference is important. And in fact, a certain propaganda "information bubble" is being created in which the concepts of aggressor and defender change places: aggression in Iraq, Syria, Libya is an example of this. Saddam, Assad, Muammar are "cruel tyrants and dictators", and the countries of the West are "liberators". Here, the aggressor only cares about the opinion of the people of their own countries (elections are "democracy"), they don't give a damn about everyone else.
                  1. +3
                    30 November 2019 12: 31
                    if you immediately get the answer in the face (conditionally, of course), then the opinion of not only the people (the aggressor country) can change, but also the humidity of the pants of the leaders of these same peoples. Libya, Syria and Russia are in different categories. and if, let’s say, Poland will begin a provocation ... then the whole further campaign of conditional NATO will be built on the quality and speed of response to it ...
                    1. 0
                      30 November 2019 15: 36
                      Do you count on an open conflict with NATO? Do they need it?
                      Their "trick" in recent decades is a war with the help of semi-guerrilla formations, preferably on foreign territory, locally, with a large number of civilian casualties, and a terrorist nature.
                      At the same time, no one intervenes, only "supplies of humanitarian aid"
              2. +2
                30 November 2019 18: 13
                Quote: figvam
                because Kaliningrad.

                Kaliningrad is a convenient occasion, no more. Among other things, NATO now has another reason - the Crimea, supposedly to liberate the occupied territories.
                In reality, I believe, the reasons for the future war are economic, America in the last century already solved its economic and domestic political problems with the help of the world war - what prevents penguins from unleashing a world war again?
              3. 0
                1 December 2019 11: 31
                Only now we will not attack, but on us. At any level of patriotism of the upper classes of Russia, we do not need this at all. Neither under the current authorities of the organized criminal group, nor under the future, really popular.
            2. +4
              30 November 2019 11: 07
              Because it is planned by NATO headquarters. After all, it does not matter who fires the first salvo! The surviving media will write that the Russians.
              1. 0
                30 November 2019 11: 08
                write a little, you still have to prove to the Russians when they take them as a causal place))
              2. 0
                30 November 2019 12: 36
                Quote: meandr51
                The surviving media will write that the Russians.

                Are you sure that in the territory where the media will write all heresies about Russians, will anyone read or watch this scribble? And where did you get the idea that it is the enemy media that will survive? What are your ideas about the desired outcome?
                1. +1
                  30 November 2019 18: 44
                  Unfortunately, the pro-Russian media once and twice got a miscalculation. They will write as it should.
          3. -2
            30 November 2019 13: 49
            Quote: Sydor Amenpospestovich
            That is, you want to say that Russia does not attack the Baltic states only because in Europe money is such?

            In this situation, it is very doubtful that the current rulers will decide.
            1. +1
              1 December 2019 11: 33
              These are yes! It’s time for the people to understand that the wrong people are sitting at the top.
        2. +9
          30 November 2019 10: 50
          Quote: dorz
          ... the British contingent in the Baltic states will be destroyed by Russia.

          But first, you need to remove relatives and friends from England, students, money earned by honest labor and sell all the property. winked

          To begin with, neither the Balts, nor the British contingent ran into our hell. let the Britons sit quietly in the Baltic states at least until the end of time. But if, God forbid, the Baltic states and Britons want to fight with us, and they will begin the first, tady oh! And for relatives, acquaintances, students and earned by honest labor money and real estate in Europe, our army and the government will be spoiled from a high tower! Otherwise, this government will not sit still. IMHO.
          1. 0
            30 November 2019 11: 12
            hard to believe ... but everything can be ...
        3. +4
          30 November 2019 12: 45
          Quote: dorz
          ... the British contingent in the Baltic states will be destroyed by Russia.

          But first, you need to remove relatives and friends from England, students, money earned by honest labor and sell all the property. winked

          I believe that Shoigu and Putin do not care about "relatives, acquaintances, students, etc." in the event of a conflict. After all, the Russian Federation and their own lives are at stake. In case of defeat, there will be no Russia, no Putin, no Shoigu. By the way, instead of the names Putin and Shoigu, you can put any names except Gorbachev. You understand what I am hinting at.
        4. +2
          30 November 2019 13: 26
          these are Chichvarkin’s problems ... but not ours ....
        5. 0
          30 November 2019 14: 47
          What for?! Do you think that "relatives and students" after returning to Russia will immediately rush to the military registration and enlistment office and sign up as volunteers ?! Most likely they will run further to the west.
        6. +8
          30 November 2019 14: 48
          Dorz. Learn the story of Nicholas 2 was a cousin of the English king. And they had a German Kaiser uncle. Native uncle. And what? The First World War was the war of two brothers with an uncle, and this did not prevent the ruin of millions of British, the collapse of the empire and the betrayal of brother Nicholas. And believe me, then there were many more Russians in Europe. And property and just rich kids. And all this did not prevent a big massacre. So that. And now this is not a hindrance.
          1. 0
            1 December 2019 11: 41
            As for the millions of dead British, it is not entirely accurate. Never interested in this, but climbed up to look and found a tablet

            So the islanders suffered the least (of the main participants), as always, however.
      2. 0
        30 November 2019 09: 22
        Quote: Amateur
        Surprisingly, sometimes British experts make absolutely correct conclusions!

        The conclusion is correct. A thick hint of the need to build up military power is read without glasses. The British military and military are waiting for new arms purchases. Almost a joke.
        In fact, Britain is much more important to survive any security conflict on its island than to bind it on the continent. Navy, Air Force, Air Defense.
        1. +2
          30 November 2019 22: 46
          Quote: Flood
          Britain is much more important to survive any security conflict on its island

          Vladimir, speak the truth! Boryts are great inventors in terms of pushing their enemies with their foreheads. They now have a super task - to drive a wedge between Russia and China.
      3. +7
        30 November 2019 10: 16
        Quote: Amateur
        Surprisingly, sometimes British experts make absolutely correct conclusions !.

        It is a pity that the Balts do not draw conclusions that correspond to reality
      4. +2
        30 November 2019 13: 19
        Remember Andrei Balonsky from "War and Peace": "Victory will go to the one who will fight angrily and feel sorry for himself less."
        1. 0
          1 December 2019 00: 51
          Isn't it "Bolkonsky" ??? Or am I old for the modern interpretation?
          1. 0
            1 December 2019 17: 18
            You are absolutely right, Bolkonsky, I made a typo.
    3. +2
      30 November 2019 08: 59
      Yes, the high manufacturability of weapons can turn into a downside. "Turn off" navigation, and how to prepare data for firing? wassat It remains only to surrender!
      1. +2
        30 November 2019 09: 19
        Quote: Mountain Shooter
        and how to prepare data for shooting?

        A leaf in a box and multiplication by "column" laughing
        Particularly gifted give out calculators laughing
        1. +4
          30 November 2019 10: 13
          still need to be able to count a column ..
        2. +1
          1 December 2019 17: 25
          My father fought near Leningrad, having the rank of antiquity, and he often had to work as a corrector of long-range artillery fire, the only tool he had for calculating was his own head, and he immediately sent the calculated data in real time by phone.
          1. 0
            1 December 2019 17: 26
            Foreman chin
    4. +10
      30 November 2019 09: 03
      And the main question: why are the British going to fight there? They didn’t ask?
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. +1
          30 November 2019 09: 09
          I’m afraid that in such a situation everyone will already be in the camp, and the accounts will be nationalized .....
      2. +5
        30 November 2019 14: 53
        Quote: Zaurbek
        And the main question: why are the British going to fight there? They didn’t ask?

        The logical question. They believe that wars should be waged somewhere far away, and they will watch them on TV.
        But do gentlemen want the British to fight on their territory?
        Or such an option for them from the realm of science fiction - "What about us?"
        However, in 2045 it is not known what will happen.
      3. 0
        2 December 2019 11: 50
        They themselves want to make the Baltic colonies.
        1. 0
          2 December 2019 13: 11
          What for? What will it give them?
    5. +6
      30 November 2019 09: 05
      in terms of equipping artillery, the British army is significantly inferior to the Russian
      Judging by the fact that the British "expert" was concerned about the state of the British artillery, it can be concluded that this "expert" presupposes a military conflict between Britain and Russia, moreover, on our (Russian) territory. Where is Britain, where is Russia and where is the artillery. Oh, but I forgot about Clause 5 of the NATO Charter. But the question immediately arises to the Saxons: "" And the courage is enough to climb to Russia? "
    6. +4
      30 November 2019 09: 17
      It is dangerous in Mali, dangerous in Afghanistan. Now the Baltic states. "Poor" Tommy seems to have nowhere to hide.
    7. +4
      30 November 2019 09: 18
      in the event of a direct conflict (and it is the Baltic option that is being considered, note "VO"), it will be able to deliver fire strikes virtually unhindered, and the British contingent will be destroyed.

      And what is this contingent doing there?
      How can the Russian Armed Forces threaten small Britain?
      Sit at home in your "my house is my fortress" and for nothing we will not need you
    8. +7
      30 November 2019 09: 25
      Cannons-shmushki, peveo-shmeveo ... There is nothing to roam about in Kemsky volosts, otherwise it’s not even an hour, and it will sound in the vicinity: "Do not hush, let me come." laughing
    9. +3
      30 November 2019 09: 39
      The conclusion is correct with an incorrect initial premise. And a bunch of questions. The main one, on which
      X surrendered to us the Baltic states?
    10. +5
      30 November 2019 09: 44
      Just do not tell the Baltics, they will be upset.))
      1. 0
        30 November 2019 09: 50
        Quote: Retvizan 8
        Just do not tell the Baltics, they will be upset.))

        Well type
        - Help, rape ...
        - Be quiet the fool, I can handle it myself ....
    11. +1
      30 November 2019 09: 47
      They won’t have time to argue or fart - there will be no Britons in the Baltic already, and they should be destroyed first and for the sweetest reason. They better thought how not to completely lose their island ... two waves - from both sides and will wash everything away ...
      1. +2
        30 November 2019 10: 16
        the British with their tolerance and so will not be in 50 years ...
        1. 0
          30 November 2019 12: 29
          Quote: pin_code
          the British with their tolerance and so will not be in 50 years

          50, not 50 ... but the chance that the Scots and Irish can leave London much earlier is high enough ... and whether they will remain British ...
    12. +1
      30 November 2019 09: 54
      Yes ... few guns at Tommy in the Baltic states!
      It's time to evacuate London and Birmingham ...
    13. 0
      30 November 2019 10: 00
      This is a long-standing feature - exactly what they said for a long time that the artillery support of the ground forces of the Russian Federation hides the capabilities of almost any NATO country like a bull turtle)
    14. 0
      30 November 2019 10: 09
      so the second stage of the use of aviation may not be, not a fact, of course, but everything is possible ...
    15. +2
      30 November 2019 10: 12
      . Why the British contingent in the Baltic states will be destroyed by Russia: report of the London Institute

      The question is, why and why do we need it?
      1. +2
        30 November 2019 11: 05
        NATO will then need to be dissolved if there is no threat. And so, they come up with threats to themselves and under these threats, imaginary ones knock out real and considerable amounts from the budgets of their countries.
        1. 0
          30 November 2019 11: 13
          Quote: IGOR ANTONOF
          NATO will then need to be dissolved if there is no threat. And so, they come up with a threat to themselves and under these threats the imaginary knock out real and considerable amounts from the budgets of their countries.

          About the budget, even talking ... tired, everything is clear there.
          Nervous, from the islands, inventors are still those. If somewhere, some guano is kneading, look for British ears, you will not miss!
    16. +4
      30 November 2019 10: 22
      Russia will attack the Baltic states, what would then engage in catching herring in the coastal strip? laughing lol
      1. -2
        30 November 2019 10: 55
        Russia will attack the Baltic states ...

        He does not attack, but returns his own. As with the Crimea.
    17. +1
      30 November 2019 10: 23
      Why the British contingent in the Baltic states will be destroyed by Russia: report of the london institute

      In Russia, grannies on benches have long known this, and a whole English institute
      just figured it out. You gentlemen, sir, sort it out with your "Brexit", and you will retire old Elizabeth with dignity, and only then, transfer your killed artillery to protect the Balts.
    18. +6
      30 November 2019 10: 53
      Because the Baltic states are Russian land.
      Peter the Great bought it from the Swedes.
      And the documentation is available. Yes
    19. 0
      30 November 2019 10: 54
      The reasoning is correct, but there is no action. The conclusion is schizophrenia.
    20. 0
      30 November 2019 11: 01
      But the restless Anglo-Saxons cannot live a day without the thought of war. The Russian military doctrine deals with the defense of the state, and the Anglo-Saxons are all about the Taldych attack. The Americans are also not far behind them and everyone wonders what kind of war will be in the 2020-30s.
    21. 0
      30 November 2019 11: 04
      They end in any case.
    22. 0
      30 November 2019 11: 25
      attack the Baltic states to fight the British wassat
      yeah, they’ve been dreaming all their lives. naive, why such difficulties? throw your unsinkable albion with missiles, and forget
    23. +1
      30 November 2019 11: 37
      Nothing unusual. I read it - I remembered the classics. "Den-gi come on, come on den-gi"
    24. +1
      30 November 2019 11: 57
      In addition to British scientists, there are also British experts.
    25. 0
      30 November 2019 12: 09
      Perhaps British experts are right. For so many years, oh how shaved are tired
    26. +3
      30 November 2019 13: 45
      Why the British contingent in the Baltic states will be destroyed by Russia

      Well ... not only in the Baltic states. You will laugh, but if you jerk, we will not tolerate the British contingent in the British Isles either.
    27. -4
      30 November 2019 14: 02
      Quote: Chaldon48
      Remember Andrei Balonsky from "War and Peace"

      And Natasha Rostov, with whom he spoke through the hollow on the subject of fathers and children. The results of the exam will be visible to everyone.
      1. 0
        1 December 2019 06: 51
        Remember Andrei Balonsky from "War and Peace"

        Dear gentlemen, minus players! Never was in "War and Peace" Andrey Balonskogo. And there was Prince Andrei Bolkonsky.
        I understand that reading Leo Tolstoy is still a pleasure. So do not even refer to it, especially with such errors.
    28. +1
      30 November 2019 15: 18
      Air support will not be possible not only at the first stages of the conflict, but also at the last. Initially, due to the strong counteraction of air defense, and subsequently, from the defeat of Russian tactical weapons.
    29. +1
      30 November 2019 15: 36
      British contingent in eastern NATO will be destroyed by Russia
      Without any doubt. Everything goes to that. As it was said in the famous work, the English author "to pull the tiger by the mustache". In this case, you don't need to tease the bear.
    30. +2
      30 November 2019 16: 16
      Quote: maidan.izrailovich
      Because the Baltic states are Russian land.
      Peter the Great bought it from the Swedes.
      And the documentation is available. Yes

      Here and thrust the documents under the nose of the head of Sweden with claims for failure to fulfill their obligations. laughing
    31. 0
      30 November 2019 17: 39
      Quote: pin_code
      why should Russia attack the Baltic states? from a word in general?

      The time will come, they themselves will come to Russia with a bow!
    32. 0
      30 November 2019 18: 11
      Quote: Krasnoyarsk
      Quote: dorz
      ... the British contingent in the Baltic states will be destroyed by Russia.

      But first, you need to remove relatives and friends from England, students, money earned by honest labor and sell all the property. winked

      I believe that Shoigu and Putin do not care about "relatives, acquaintances, students, etc." in the event of a conflict. After all, the Russian Federation and their own lives are at stake. In case of defeat, there will be no Russia, no Putin, no Shoigu. By the way, instead of the names Putin and Shoigu, you can put any names except Gorbachev. You understand what I am hinting at.

      What to talk about! Gorbachev was the first to have a hand in the collapse of the Union, while Putin and Shoigu are doing everything so that Russia is strong and independent of Anglo-Saxon pressure. And those who live in England, let them better go to other countries or back to Russia. Usually in England there live all those who robbed the Russian treasury and fled to the Anglo-Saxons with their capitals. fool
    33. -1
      30 November 2019 19: 30
      This island trash raves about the past imperial greatness, forgetting that from Great Britain (for real), there is a miserable stub. Therefore, you must sit on your islands and silently sniff into two holes!
    34. 0
      30 November 2019 20: 38
      The Meta library has published a book by Mikhail Nikolaev "The Professionals". I recommend that it describes in detail the consequences of the Third World War, in particular about Great Britain. Very informative. True, the plot is fiction, but still, the tale is a lie and there is a hint in it.
    35. xax
      +1
      1 December 2019 02: 15
      in terms of equipping artillery, the British army is significantly inferior to the Russian

      It sometimes seems to me that today even a five-quarter private security company with regular means is capable of waging a victorious war with the British. But the British, such a feeling, believe that everything is at their level, and the only problem, you see, is in art. Nda
    36. 0
      1 December 2019 09: 44
      There is an iron remedy to avoid the destruction of the British contingent on the territory of any other states, not only in the Baltic states.
      No need to go where no one calls you.
      Then everyone will be safe and sound.
      This is a note to the wise men from the London Royal Institute for Defense and Security Studies, which, due to a number of attitudes from the founders, already since 1831, will not understand who the aggressor is on this ball.
    37. 0
      1 December 2019 09: 52
      A voice crying in the wilderness - give DeneH, "the Russians are coming."
    38. vmo
      0
      1 December 2019 10: 33
      who would doubt it !.
    39. +1
      1 December 2019 12: 11
      Lemongrass will sit quietly on their islands, and not climb into the Russian Estland and Livonian provinces - they will remain intact! And so - "call uncle!". And they will be strongly vyzhivayutsya as it was calculated back in the 50s of the 20th century, twice 50 Mgt, and Ireland will become the western coast of the English Channel! And the name "English Channel" will die off naturally due to the absence of carriers of this name!
    40. 0
      27 December 2019 10: 47
      In ourselves and in our heads of the inhabitants of Russia, there are more enemies than in Poland itself. Various bulk shamans at the moment excite people.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"