The Ministry of Defense has decided on the date of laying two more APRKSN "Borey-A"

58
The Ministry of Defense has decided on the date of laying two more APRKSN "Borey-A"

The Russian Ministry of Defense decided on the laying of two more nuclear submarines of the 955A project (Borey-A). As RIA reports News with reference to a source in the military-industrial complex, the ninth and tenth submarines were laid down on the 9 of May 2020 of the year.

According to the news agency, received from a source in the defense industry complex, two more nuclear strategic submarine missile cruisers (APRKSN) of the 955A project (Borey-A) are planned to be laid down in one day - May 9 2020 of the year. According to the plans of the Ministry of Defense, the new submarines should be part of the Navy in 2026 and 2027, respectively, thereby increasing the number of Boreans from eight to ten. Names for new submarines have not yet been selected.



The bookmark of the ninth and tenth "Borea" is scheduled for May 9, 2020. Naval Transmission the fleet - in 2026 and 2027

- the agency quotes the words of the interlocutor.

Earlier, the Russian military department reported that the Ministry of Defense plans to lay two additional nuclear submarines of the 885M project (Yasen-M) and two nuclear missile carriers 955A (Borey-A). However, the date of a possible bookmark was not reported.

Currently, the Russian Navy is serving three nuclear missile submarines of the 955 (Borey) project of the 4 generation — the strategic missile cruisers Yuri Dolgoruky, Alexander Nevsky and Vladimir Monomakh. He graduated from state tests and is preparing to join the fleet of the APKSN "Prince Vladimir" of the modernized project "Borey-A".

Four more serial ARPKSN of the 955 project are under construction - “Prince Oleg” (officially laid down on 27 of July 2014 of the year), “Generalissimo Suvorov” (laid on 26 of December 2014 of the year), “Emperor Alexander III” (laid down on 18 of December 2015 of the year) and “ Prince Pozharsky "(laid down December 23 2016 years).
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    58 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +21
      29 November 2019 11: 34
      Great news! And the date is selected Excellent! May 9 - Victory Day! Will wait! good
      1. 0
        29 November 2019 11: 49
        It is planned to lay in one day - May 9, 2020. According to the plans of the Ministry of Defense, new submarines should be included in the Navy in 2026 and 2027, respectively

        And why will one boat be built for a year longer? request
        1. +5
          29 November 2019 12: 10
          Quote: Vladimir16
          It is planned to lay in one day - May 9, 2020. According to the plans of the Ministry of Defense, new submarines should be included in the Navy in 2026 and 2027, respectively

          And why will one boat be built for a year longer? request

          Apparently, because some work can only be carried out in a "wet" dock ... it's me, as a "non-specialist" in watercraft, I think so hi those. consistently
          1. +3
            29 November 2019 12: 24
            "K-551 Vladimir Monomakh" in the "PD-50". Today PD-50 remains at the bottom of the Kola Bay at a depth of 40 meters.
        2. +7
          29 November 2019 12: 12
          Apparently, it depends on the work schedule of suppliers. For example, the manufacturer of the same reactor, whose production is planned for years to come
          1. +6
            29 November 2019 12: 56
            The laying of the ninth and tenth "Boreas" is scheduled for May 9, 2020. Transfer to the Navy - in 2026 and 2027

            News is a huge plus !!! good drinks
            1. +2
              29 November 2019 17: 44
              Quote: Sky Strike fighter
              News is a huge plus !!!

              hi
              And at the "Admiralty Shipyards":
          2. +10
            29 November 2019 15: 03
            Quote: Eugene-Eugene
            For example, the manufacturer of the same reactor, the production of which is planned for years to come.

            There were no disruptions, shifts to the right in nuclear engineering, especially in the manufacture of nuclear reactors. Schedules for military orders are not advertised, but there are no delays there either. For example, for the floating nuclear power plant "Akademik Lomonosov" 2 RU KLT-40S were shipped in the year 13-14. All questions to shipbuilders or other suppliers, ours do everything on time.
            1. +5
              29 November 2019 17: 11
              That's right. Rosatom is one of the few who fulfill the state defense order at 100%, from year to year.
      2. +2
        29 November 2019 14: 40
        and if Trump arrives on Victory Day and takes him to the Borea bookmark, asses in America will blaze
    2. +7
      29 November 2019 11: 35
      Symbolic bookmark.
      On the day of the 75th anniversary of the Victory.
    3. 0
      29 November 2019 11: 42
      Wow, how long, I just didn’t know for 6-7 years, well it’s understandable tests, commissioning, etc ....
    4. 0
      29 November 2019 11: 44
      Submarines are our way, our projection of force on the sea. There is no time or opportunity to build a surface ocean fleet, we all the same as the Germans will be driven into the water in the Second World War.
      1. 0
        29 November 2019 11: 54
        That is yes. But somehow alarming for a long construction period.
        1. 0
          29 November 2019 12: 15
          Normal deadlines for construction, factory testing, acceptance and commissioning. This is not a boat after all.
        2. -1
          29 November 2019 13: 03
          Yankees "Virginia" are built in 60 ... 63 months, but 8 pieces at once.
          The matter is in the dock, and in the supply of components. Well, and sanctions by itself.
          1. +2
            29 November 2019 13: 23
            Quote: knn54
            Yankees "Virginia" are built in 60 ... 63 months, but 8 pieces at once.
            The matter is in the dock, and in the supply of components. Well, and sanctions by itself.

            The Americans are also far from in perfect condition, although no one has imposed sanctions on them.
            All six nuclear-powered aircraft carriers deployed at the Norfolk base on the East Coast of the United States are not able to go on a long voyage, follows from open data from the US Navy.

            They are either in lengthy repair or in multi-month scheduled maintenance. The only combat-ready nuclear-powered aircraft carrier Harry Truman, which was supposed to go on a campaign in the Middle East last month, returned to base due to serious malfunctions in electric networks, Interfax reports.

            http://in24.org/world/37928
          2. -1
            29 November 2019 15: 21
            Quote: knn54
            Yankees "Virginia" are built in 60 ... 63 months, but 8 pieces at once.

            Virginia is a SSNN, not an SSBN. We have 636.3 with Caliber, in my opinion, build faster than the Virginia.
    5. +4
      29 November 2019 11: 45
      Perhaps on this day the eighth ash tree is still laid. 9th promised in 21
      Also in the 20th year, Tass said two more 22350 were pledged
      1. +14
        29 November 2019 12: 29
        Well, for the head Borey-A "Prince Vladimir" you can rejoice, they will manage to turn in under the Christmas tree. Compared to the original project, the fence of the retractable devices has become longer, and the lightweight body - smooth. Design thought does not stand still, the project is gradually being improved.
        1. +10
          29 November 2019 14: 08
          Designs of such complexity, and even with modernization during production, inspire my deepest respect! I wish the factory workers success, and most importantly, that the change grows!
          1. +3
            29 November 2019 17: 20
            Quote: Alien From
            Designs of such complexity, and even with modernization during production, inspire my deepest respect!

            And not in vain, because it is not in vain that such submarines are much more complicated even than spaceships hi
    6. +1
      29 November 2019 11: 45
      “The laying of the ninth and tenth Borea is scheduled for May 9, 2020. Transfer to the Navy - in 2026 and 2027, ”the publication quotes the words of its source in the Russian military-industrial complex.

      To protect the Boreevs, “sea hunters” will be created on the basis of small missile ships (RTOs) of project 22800 Karakurt, which will be guarded by submarines and their bases in the Baltic, Japanese, Black, Barents and Okhotsk seas.

      Recall that it became known earlier that Russia plans to build six more fourth-generation nuclear submarines of the Borey project, in addition to eight laid down in the early 2010s, of which three submarines have already been adopted for service - Yuri Dolgoruky, Alexander Nevsky "and" Vladimir Monomakh "(pictured) - and another ship (" Prince Vladimir ") is ready for adoption.
      Interestingly, the Pacific Fleet will get something, or again according to the residual principle.
      1. +5
        29 November 2019 11: 48
        Pacific Fleet will get the second serial Borey-A
      2. +3
        29 November 2019 13: 15
        The last squid on the Pacific Fleet will be changed at least. In general, they talked about 4 strategists at the Pacific Fleet. 2 Borea is already in the Pacific Fleet, including 2 more under construction there should go. Well, those that are pledged next year already to replace the Dolphins in the SF. request
        1. +2
          29 November 2019 13: 26
          If so, then it remains to be happy, and even in recent years the Pacific Fleet remains deprived, although, in my opinion, after the Northern Fleet it is more important than, for example, the Black Sea Fleet. hi
          1. 0
            29 November 2019 14: 16
            The Black Sea Fleet is of strategic importance. The Russian Navy base in Tartus (Syria) is not empty. The Russian Air Force base in Khmeinim is not empty. The Mediterranean Sea is the snake den of NATO, the Enemy is best beaten near its den.
            1. 0
              29 November 2019 16: 14
              There have never been and never will be nuclear submarines on the Black Sea.
              Neither multipurpose, nor SSBN.
              As, however, in the Baltic.
              1. +3
                29 November 2019 18: 31
                Quote: Flood
                There have never been and never will be nuclear submarines on the Black Sea.
                Neither multipurpose, nor SSBN.
                As, however, in the Baltic.

                And I did not write about nuclear boats on the Black Sea Fleet. They are not needed here. And he spoke of the strategic importance of the Black Sea Fleet. However, like any of our fleets.
          2. +8
            29 November 2019 15: 20
            Well, then he received two corvettes. The third one at the beginning of the next will receive. By the year 23 will receive the entire six corvettes. Further, again, 4 Ash trees are being built for him.
            Well, in fact, in the near future, the priority fleet is the Black Sea Fleet. Given that Ukraine forbade ships and ships to be changed there under the threat of exile, then he became at the time of joining a bunch of old people. And do not forget that this is the fleet located closest to all possible hot spots. Again, he managed to clash with Georgia and Ukraine. Once again, the main expeditionary forces should be based there, since military forces should be laid just for the Black Sea Fleet next year. The Northern Fleet and Pacific Fleet are the main strike fleets in the event of a major war with NATO, which is nevertheless unlikely. And the Black Sea Fleet is just close to all current conflicts and local TVDs. Unlike large fleets, he will surely have to fight. And that means that he must have forces and means for this.
    7. +1
      29 November 2019 12: 10
      Quote: bessmertniy
      But somehow alarming for a long construction period.

      For ships of this size and complexity - fine.
    8. 0
      29 November 2019 12: 23
      Names for new submarines have not yet been selected.


      One must be called Victory!
      1. +2
        29 November 2019 14: 09
        Quote: cniza
        Names for new submarines have not yet been selected.

        One must be called Victory!

        Russia had many victories. I would suggest the title "Prince Svyatoslav"
        1. +6
          29 November 2019 14: 23
          Quote: Vladimir_6
          Quote: cniza
          Names for new submarines have not yet been selected.

          One must be called Victory!

          Russia had many victories. I would suggest the title "Prince Svyatoslav"

          In my opinion, there are already enough "princes" in the series.
          Why, given the bookmarking date (the 75th anniversary of the Victory Day in World War II), not to name one of the ships in the name of the Commander-in-Chief, under whose leadership our people came to this victory, in the name of Generalissimo Stalin?
          1. +3
            29 November 2019 14: 32
            Quote: Dude
            Quote: Vladimir_6
            Quote: cniza
            Names for new submarines have not yet been selected.

            One must be called Victory!

            Russia had many victories. I would suggest the title "Prince Svyatoslav"

            In my opinion, there are already enough "princes" in the series.
            Why, given the bookmarking date (the 75th anniversary of the Victory Day in World War II), not to name one of the ships in the name of the Commander-in-Chief, under whose leadership our people came to this victory, in the name of Generalissimo Stalin?

            This topic has already been discussed. I am in favor with both hands
          2. -7
            29 November 2019 18: 33
            Quote: Dude
            In my opinion, there are already enough "princes" in the series.
            Why, given the bookmarking date (the 75th anniversary of the Victory Day in World War II), not to name one of the ships in the name of the Commander-in-Chief, under whose leadership our people came to this victory, in the name of Generalissimo Stalin?

            And also Beria, Yezhov ... am
            1. 0
              29 November 2019 22: 26
              And also Beria, Yezhov ... am
              Why are you distorting?
              There is no boat "Konstantin Pobedonostsev", here I am did not offer to name the ship "Lavrenty Beria".
              "Alexander III" - yes. So why not be "Generalissimo Stalin"?

              If a warship was named after the leader of a country in which no major war was waged, then why not name the same ship in the name of the leader in which the country came to victory in the worst war in history?
              It seems to me that this would be logical and correct.
            2. 0
              18 December 2019 23: 13
              Beria created the atomic project for you from scratch, and such thanks. On a par with hedgehog. Korotich read it ???
        2. -1
          29 November 2019 18: 21
          Since the strategist, then Weakening or Relight.
          1. +2
            29 November 2019 22: 36
            Quote: K-612-O
            Since the strategist, then Weakening or Relight.

            Maybe, after all, "Oslyabya"? wink And then "Weakened", somehow sounds ambiguous winked
            (I understand that a typo, but funny laughing . I immediately remembered one notorious Internet character hanging out on military sites feel )
    9. -5
      29 November 2019 12: 26
      And it's all about him, about weapons!
      I do not criticize, I admit the need ... but when I wrote, I was happy for the opening of a new factory, production and other things, quite peaceful, I was happy FROM THE SOUL!
      1. +3
        29 November 2019 13: 14
        Quote: rocket757
        And it's all about him, about weapons!
        I do not criticize, I admit the need ... but when I wrote, I was happy for the opening of a new factory, production and other things, quite peaceful, I was happy FROM THE SOUL!

        Are you copying the same posts in all articles?
        And so they became a marshal?)
        1. 0
          29 November 2019 13: 53
          Two \ three are the same, is it EVERYWHERE?
          the theme is the same, in my opinion, the opinion was expressed, therefore, exactly the same.
          1. +2
            29 November 2019 13: 54
            Are you for money, or something?
            1. +2
              29 November 2019 14: 20
              And what about zhezh, they send "cookies" straight to the soap.
              1. +3
                29 November 2019 16: 54
                Quote: Alexey Sommer
                Are you for money, or something?



                And what is possible, please tell me how it is ...
                1. +2
                  29 November 2019 18: 42
                  Quote: cniza
                  And what is it possible, please tell me how it is.

                  We don’t give up cookie places! These are we sweet tooth!
                  1. +2
                    29 November 2019 18: 45
                    It’s a pity, otherwise I would work as an identity. lol
                    1. +1
                      29 November 2019 18: 49
                      Cookies contain a lot of sugar, margarine and, God forbid, palm oil .... I'm baking about the health of my colleagues! I myself will be "poisoned"!
                      1. +3
                        29 November 2019 21: 10
                        As always, everyone is ready for self-sacrifice ...
      2. +1
        29 November 2019 15: 08
        Quote: rocket757
        rejoiced from the SOUL!

        And do you see how it turned out?)
        And I think 2 new APRKSN princely series, this is very good. Much better than 2 aircraft carriers even.
        Do not overtake. Maybe your pension will fly from taxes for these ships.)
        1. +1
          29 November 2019 15: 15
          Do you think my pension is direct, direct, for such peaceful acts? Most of my service, and then work, are not so peaceful!
          We live in a society, a country, global militarism ....
          1. +1
            29 November 2019 15: 33
            Quote: rocket757
            Do you think my pension is direct, direct, for such peaceful acts?

            I don’t understand why you thought so.
            Quote: rocket757
            We live in a society, a country, global militarism ....

            We live not only in a society / country but also in a world of global neo-imperialism. And this is informational neo-imperialism.
            Did you catch the difference?
            And you are a soldier of this war.) But we are most likely on different sides.)
            1. +1
              29 November 2019 18: 44
              I am always on the side of MY PEOPLE! So it was, is and will be.
              1. 0
                30 November 2019 00: 23
                Quote: rocket757
                I am always on the side of MY PEOPLE! So it was, is and will be.

                Loud words. And nothing more.
                1. 0
                  30 November 2019 09: 11
                  Quote: Alexey Sommer
                  Loud words. And nothing more

                  Does not matter.
    10. +2
      29 November 2019 15: 42
      All the same, Russia is focusing on the nuclear submarine fleet .. Well, I agree that in the current situation it’s difficult, it’s the only main option to contain the impudent west .. So far the story goes against Russia, it’s straight ears
    11. +1
      29 November 2019 19: 38
      Charik, dear, and for nothing we do not need this happiness! And so the city will be in a traffic jam in any situation - even official delegations on the M-8 to Sevmash will go from Talagi airport, even if they fly by helicopters. It is necessary to plan from May 08 to May 10, 2020 from the city to the country or to the forest - as the weather allows ...

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"