С-300 ПМ-2 “Favorite” was tested with the help of front-line bombers Su-34

November 28, 2019

The S-300ПМ-2 “Favorite” anti-aircraft missile system deployed near Voronezh was checked with the help of Su-34 front-line bombers. This was reported by the press service of the Western Military District.

Crews of Su-34 bombers tested the mobile control system of the deeply modernized S-300ПМ-2 Favorite air defense system, interfering with jamming the operation of radio systems and communications. In turn, the calculations of anti-aircraft systems were trained in targeting and tracking targets in conditions of radio interference. In addition, the settings of the air defense system and the operation of the friend-or-foe identification system were checked. Tests recognized successful.

In the conditions of electronic countermeasures, Favorit successfully completed the tasks and confirmed the claimed characteristics.

- said in a statement.

The press service added that the testing of the complex will continue until it enters combat duty, which is scheduled for December 1 this year.

Earlier it was reported that the anti-aircraft missile regiment of the Leningrad Army Air Force and Air Defense completed rearmament on the S-300ПМ-2 Favorit air defense system. Located near Voronezh, it covers a nuclear power plant, two military airfields, two civilian airports and industrial enterprises of the region.

Military Reviewin Yandex News

Military Reviewin Yandex Zen

askort154 28 November 2019 12: 58
+5

5

0
An interesting confrontation, and who won? Electronic warfare Su-34 or "counter-electronic warfare" "Favorite"?
1. Pixy 28 November 2019 13: 02
  -4
  
  1
  
  5
  In general, there have already been cases that the Su-34 broke through the defense of the S-300.
  http://avia.pro/news/rossiyskie-su-34-obmanuli-s-300-no-u-specialistov-poyavilis-somneniya
  1. Hunter 2 28 November 2019 13: 06
    
    +10
    
    10
    
    0
    
    Normal work! Let both Flyers and ZRS Calculations study!
2. Wedmak 28 November 2019 13: 04
  -1
  
  1
  
  2
  It is doubtful that the electronic warfare of the aircraft is able to withstand ground-based means. Catch up with interference, reduce the detection radius, knock the missile off course, but no more. SAMs are destroyed by entire outfits of forces by attack from different sides.
  1. voyaka uh 28 November 2019 13: 25
    
    +4
    
    5
    
    1
    
    "it will be able to knock the missile off course, but no more" ////
    ----
    And more is not required.
    If the missiles are off course (missed), then the plane flies closer. And ... it's clear what will happen.
    1. Locksmith 28 November 2019 13: 51
      
      +1
      
      2
      
      1
      
      Quote: voyaka uh
      If the missiles are off course (missed), then the plane flies closer. And ... it's clear what will happen.
      
      If the target is important and behaves inappropriately, the SAM will apply the full range of measures to it, including a "call to a friend" , such as to a neighboring air defense system, possibly another system that will ignore the plane’s appearance and succeed
      1. voyaka uh 28 November 2019 15: 24
        
        +1
        
        2
        
        1
        
        "If the goal is important and behaves inappropriately -" ///
        ---
        Important or not, the complex operator does not know this. Aircraft or a flying target - KR simulating an airplane? Or a small plane pulling a towing target that imitates a large bomber using lenses? And there is no time for thought.
        But if you shoot the ammunition, you will remain unarmed ... Oh, the air defense operator’s work is not easy today.
    2. Amurets 28 November 2019 14: 20
      
      +1
      
      1
      
      0
      
      Quote: voyaka uh
      If the missiles are off course (missed), then the plane flies closer. And ... it's clear what will happen.
      
      If missiles with radio command guidance, then yes.
3. Nikolaevich I 28 November 2019 13: 29
  +3
  
  3
  
  0
  Exactly...! And I about the same ... Tests recognized successful. For whom ? For aviators or anti-aircraft gunners?
  1. bessmertniy 28 November 2019 13: 32
    
    +2
    
    2
    
    0
    
    Well, let's say friendship won. Both have gained new experience. Perhaps this is the success.
  2. askort154 28 November 2019 13: 34
    
    +4
    
    4
    
    0
    
    Nikolaevich I ......Exactly...! And I’m talking about the same ... The tests are recognized as successful. For whom ? For aviators or anti-aircraft gunners?
    
    There are two options:
    - either thrown on the fingers,
    - either "today you", and "tomorrow I".
    And then together - a friendly, invincible family!
  3. Polite Moose 28 November 2019 13: 36
    
    +5
    
    5
    
    0
    
    Quote: Nikolaevich I
    Tests recognized successful. For whom ? what For aviators or anti-aircraft gunners?
    
    It all depends on what we are going to sell in the near future in the first place. Airplanes or air defense.
    1. novel66 28 November 2019 14: 00
      
      +5
      
      5
      
      0
      
      by that. to whom we say one thing. and to whom the planes are different. nobody will leave offended
  4. figwam 28 November 2019 15: 45
    
    0
    
    1
    
    1
    
    Maybe the first won, but the second certainly did not lose!)
  5. Flooding 28 November 2019 16: 26
    
    -1
    
    0
    
    1
    
    Quote: Nikolaevich I
    Tests recognized successful. For whom ?
    
    It is logical that for the air defense regiment, which was recently rearmament.
4. YOUR 28 November 2019 13: 39
  +4
  
  4
  
  0
  Neither one nor the other. The standard procedure, flying around the positions, identifying failures in the affected areas, and naturally, counteracting the electronic warfare systems of aircraft.
5. novel66 28 November 2019 13: 59
  +4
  
  4
  
  0
  conditional opponent conditionally shot down!
  1. Mouse 30 November 2019 18: 34
    
    +4
    
    5
    
    1
    
    I like it, I ...
    1. Mouse 30 November 2019 23: 57
      
      +3
      
      5
      
      2
      
      and someone doesn’t like it .... not our man!
      1. novel66 1 December 2019 09: 47
        
        +3
        
        3
        
        0
        
        We will not spit on ours with a clear conscience
asura 28 November 2019 13: 05
-2

2

4
There must be an old joke about "cover, but not protect")
1. The Little Humpbacked Horse 28 November 2019 14: 50
  0
  
  0
  
  0
  Quote: asura
  There must be an old joke about "cover, but not protect"
  
  No, there should be a joke about the bombing of Voronezh
Patriot statesman 28 November 2019 13: 30
0

1

1
Quote: asura
There must be an old joke about "cover, but not protect")

Why is this a joke? It means that if they cover, then they will protect?
The S-300 complex is a 6-channel complex, that is, one air defense missile system can (has the technical capability) simultaneously track 6 targets and direct up to 12 missiles at them at an angle of 90 degrees, that is, a bomber unit armed with Vozdukh- land ", and even coming from both sides, quite breaks through the defense of one division. And under the current conditions, more than two divisions are not kept in the regiment, while only one is on combat duty.
1. YOUR 28 November 2019 13: 45
  +1
  
  1
  
  0
  About
  Quote: Patriot Sovereign
  90 degree angle
  
  What does that mean? Explain how you understand it.
  The affected area of the S-300PM-2 is 120 degrees. In these aisles and can fire.
Thunderbolt 28 November 2019 13: 34
+2

2

0
A useful workout for both "teams". But, 100% to find out who won is possible only by shooting at targets / with a certain degree of convention, of course / with real rockets. And near Voronezh, the launches are "electronic". Captured, clicked and go smoke, the task is completed. But then the pilot can make some evolutions.
rocket757 28 November 2019 13: 44
+4

4

0
Learns, learns .... improve, modernize, experience, learn and be prepared to the maximum!
Patriot statesman 28 November 2019 13: 50
0

0

0
Quote: YOUR
The affected area of the S-300PM-2 is 120 degrees.

The on-load tap-changer 30N6 horizontally 90 degrees.
Pavel57 28 November 2019 15: 03
+1

1

0
What is stronger sword or shield?