Military Review

Environmentally Friendly Third World War

67

You can call it semi-science fiction, but it’s exactly what is “semi”. Moreover, in our science fiction there is something that gives us the opportunity to think that everything may well happen.


But nevertheless, this is nothing more than a futuristic forecast like this, based, however, on real calculations of very smart people. That is just science fiction.

Now military conflicts are under the pretext of religions, contesting territories and political views. Although we know that resources and geopolitical superiority are behind everything, oil has long been synonymous with currency.

They say: "Enough for our century." But no. Will not be enough. And when it’s not enough, the last war will begin. And it will be without nuclear and chemical weapons, and therefore especially cruel and cynical, to destroy a person, but without special effects such as a nuclear winter. No competitors will be needed on the territory suitable for living, but the territory - yes.

Well, here we agree with something. In our opinion, the war will really be without the use of nuclear, chemical and other "dirty" types of weapons. Because it will be conducted not even for resources. More precisely, for slightly different resources.


From our point of view, the war will go beyond the territories on which the further living of the human population will be possible. On the one hand, it is also a kind of resource, on the other hand, not quite.

Therefore, the war will not be exactly the same as we imagine. Do you know why? Because there will be no sense in taming each other with nuclear missiles. Nobody will go to heaven, everyone will simply die, contrary to Vladimir Vladimirovich’s forecasts (albeit humorous).

But the start is not with tactics and strategy, but with a different definition.

Geoecology is a term from which a modern person's face is crooked, saying that you are poking at me with these problems, you have enough of your smut.

However, these problems have drawn attention relatively recently by the standards of the world. In the 1972 year, the UN meeting approved the concept of "environmental monitoring" and the need to monitor the state of the environmental situation.

At present, the environmental situation looks doubtful, even despite the passing period of generalized industrialization and industrial growth. However, the amount of resource extraction increases, as their processing increases, which entails an increase in heavy emissions.

We are preparing separate material on heavy emissions, because, firstly, this is a new business for Russia, and secondly, heavy emissions are no less effective than gamma radiation in terms of utility to the human body.

So here. Why will this war be the last for the world that we are seeing now? She may not be the third or even the fourth. But she will be the last ... and scary. Although what war, if it is a world war, is not terrible?

Let's look at the main areas of impact, the oceans, and more precisely, its level and temperature.

A little help. The oceans and their physical indicators - the main factor in climate change on the planet.


As we can see, the level of the world's oceans is rising. As you know, this happens due to the melting of glaciers at the poles (the so-called global warming).

Environmentally Friendly Third World War

However, no one canceled the physical laws. Along with the water level, the need to increase the amount of energy needed to heat this water or lower the temperature of the energy source increases. Yes, this is not so much about the Sun as about the earth's crust, and more precisely, about the core that heats this crust.

Here in general it is necessary to make such a small digression. Likbez.

The fact that the glaciers are melting, and the level of the world's oceans is growing steadily, is half an orange. There is more water (yes, of course, hello Japan and the UK, the Netherlands ... hey, where is Holland?), And it is getting colder.

This is logical, all according to the laws of physics. The fact that this water must be heated is also logical. If nature does not, the most important component of weather formation in the world, evaporation, will be disrupted.

If the cooled water does not evaporate, then the formation of clouds and precipitation will stop. That is, somewhere in Central China there will be a drought, and Japan will be immersed in water.

Plus, cooled water will move worse with currents. There will be no convection of water masses (Europe, greetings from the Gulf Stream), respectively, again everything will start to freeze.

Earth surface:


Signs of the same global warming concern not only the world vessel with water (it is no secret that the seas and oceans are one reservoir, right?), But also the earth's surface.

2018 year is recognized as one of the hottest. NASA recorded an increase in average surface temperature at 1 ° C. This happens for various reasons, primarily due to heating by solar energy. So, the shift of the angle of inclination of the “Earth axis” by 10 cm annually leads to a change in the trajectory of rotation in the system. And, as a rule, to a change in temperature conditions.

For a very long time you can talk about warming, the oceans, the atmosphere and the ecological situation. In general, the theory of temperature conditions and climate formation is very similar in its attempt to explain the theory of the formation of dark matter.


Changes in climatic zones will lead to the fact that a certain part of the planet will become unsuitable for living. And we ourselves will spoil a certain part so that it will be impossible to live there without a gas mask. Comrades from Chinese cities would definitely agree with us.

And the people who now live in such territories, what? .. That's right, they will be resettled. Yes, this is the long-forgotten word “migration”.

And here I want to recall right away that in the same China, the bulk of the inhabitants exist right on the coast. Because the central areas, to put it mildly, are not a cake. Either mountains or deserts. Not a very comfortable living environment, is it?

And here stands not just a ghost. Ghost. Mass migration, in comparison with which the recent exodus of refugees do not understand from whom to Europe from Africa will seem an innocent joke.

But it’s quite and easily.

At the first stages of a civilized society in a state of environmental disaster, other territories will receive refugees. Well, how could it be otherwise, we are a civilized society, and all that ...

That's just a catastrophe - it is a catastrophe, and the further you go, the more this civilization will simply dissolve. In surging problems.

When the territories of some states suitable for living have reached a critical mass in terms of population, they (both peoples and states) will look with hunger and evil eyes at neighboring ones with a larger territory or less population.

We recall that all this happens in conditions of a limited amount of resources, since these resources are either already depleted or are located on the territory unsuitable for production.

In a state of economic crisis and environmental disaster, that very last war will begin.

And where, excuse me, to go?


Let's take the mass movement as an example ... no, not the Chinese. Here are the inhabitants of China brought up by the Communist Party, who also still know how to work - this is not the worst thing in migration. And if you take, for example, the Indians? A billion (well, less, not everyone will run, of course) who decided to migrate ... But what if the pluses are those who are nearby and whose coastline is populated? China, Vietnam, Myanmar, Thailand? Two Koreas?

Almost three billion people ... This is without taking into account Japan, which is definitely a khan.

Africa and our part of Eurasia will be easier, the altitude is quite decent. But the rest ... It will not seem enough.

Who will decide the fate of these people who just want to live? UN? Excuse me, who will listen to them, besides being on the other side of the world, in North America? Europe? And there their problems will be higher than the roof.

Something tells us that no one will decide anything from the moment it becomes clear that everything, the Apocalypse has begun. And that will be fine.

As well as a normal scenario, according to which no one will ask anything from anyone, it will not be normal. Everyone will try to take it themselves, because you have to live somewhere.

And here yes, no nuclear strikes, because it will be necessary to live there, on the territory of the former neighbor, who at one moment became an adversary on the basis of the height above the level of the World Ocean.

No chemistry or biology. No radiation. Absolutely clean ecological war world.

By the way, the fact that it will quickly spread around the world - do not go to a fortuneteller here, in the Second (and the First) in the same South America, despite the remoteness from all theaters of military operations, such showdowns were going on ...

Yes, when solving such a complex of problems (how to squeeze out a suitable territory, without spoiling it with military products), everyone who wants to move will have to break their heads very badly.

It’s good that the military’s heads are breaking very badly. They will probably come up with how.


Another question is that here the attacker is bound hand and foot by the impossibility of using all the most thorough of his arsenal. For the reasons mentioned above. You have to live there, and not play "Stalker" on the radioactive ashes.

But on the other side, where the feet of the migrating columns will be directed, something quite sort of ... preventive can fly to itself.

Moreover, this will not necessarily be wild and barbaric Russia, no. On the contrary, even taking into account that they will rush to us in the first place (we recall the eternal dissatisfaction of the West with the fact that we have too much territory and too few people), just such a line of behavior will be more characteristic of European countries. That will survive the flood.

Everyone perfectly sees what Germany has turned into today, and hardly anyone wants such a perspective. So in Europe we can see all the charms of a democratic world.

But most importantly, the division of the world, which will be “tomorrow” for everyone, will again be in the hands of several countries. But this time, they do not own mythical voting and veto rights, do not control cash flows and printing presses, but own more trivial, but no less valuable wealth: territories and human reserves.

That is, whoever has more truth is stronger.

Of course, only one reassures: we will not see this. But the fact that such a situation is quite probable does not even follow from our semi-fantastic thoughts, but from observing the weather and temperature of the oceans.

And as follows from the graphs, anything is possible. Accordingly, the option described by us is also possible.
Author:
67 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Sloavaros
    Sloavaros 1 December 2019 05: 48
    +6
    Well? What are the suggestions and conclusions from this article? To move to Siberia?
    1. Pessimist22
      Pessimist22 1 December 2019 06: 04
      +6
      Soon a global flood, the boat must be bought and the supply of provisions for two months smile
      1. The leader of the Redskins
        The leader of the Redskins 1 December 2019 09: 17
        +7
        Personally, the article did not impress me. What a fantasy - not a fantasy. Not in the sense of plausible everything, but stated uninteresting. And you can assume everything. I’d better wait for the alien invasion.
      2. opus
        opus 1 December 2019 11: 48
        +8
        Quote: Pessimist22
        Soon a global flood, the boat must be bought and the supply of provisions for two months

        Yeah. Get ready for the dive!


        who wants to indulge in sea level and decide on flooding / flooding here:
        http://flood.firetree.net/
      3. To be or not to be
        To be or not to be 1 December 2019 12: 20
        0
        1. And to Stalin, in the REPORTING REPORT OF THE XVII CONGRESS OF THE PARTY ON THE WORKERS OF THE CPSU (B.) January 26, 1934, he said: "As you can see, the matter is going to a new imperialist war, as a way out of the current situation.
        Of course, there is no reason to believe that war can provide a real solution. On the contrary, it should confuse the situation even more. Moreover, it will surely unleash a revolution and call into question the very existence of capitalism in a number of countries, as was the case during the first imperialist war. "Hh. . that there will be a world war and will be against the Soviet Union, and that the USSR will triumph in it and a number of socialist states will be formed in Europe (World Socialism System)
        “There can hardly be any doubt that the second war against the USSR will lead to the complete defeat of the attackers, to a revolution in a number of countries in Europe and Asia and to the defeat of the bourgeois-landlord governments of these countries.”
        2. The collapse of the MSS and the USSR — this is a new form of world war without the use of armed forces. Nuclear and other weapons. Weapons affecting the psychology of the masses, changing this psychology in favor of the attacker and thereby achieving their goals in this war. The West realized that even during the world nuclear war it would not achieve victory without destroying their own counterparts.
        As a result of the so-called perestroika (creeping counter-revolution in the country and the MCC countries), with the most active support and help from the West, there is NO MCC. VD and the USSR That is, what happened after the Second World War was defeated in the Third World

        https://zergulio.livejournal.com/5021479.html
        https://tvzvezda.ru/news/vstrane_i_mire/content/201704111544-47yk.htm
        3. Why, now, the collective West has gone to a new place. The war against Russia. although it has long been transferred to capitalist rails, and here the Russian Federation does not have ideological differences with the capitalist west
        At the same congress, YV Stalin said that in the general crisis of capitalism, the strong countries of the capitalist world come out of the crisis at the expense of the weak countries of the same capital of the world .. ”The result of the protracted economic crisis was an unprecedented aggravation of the political situation of the capitalist countries both within these countries and between them.
        The intensification of the struggle for foreign markets, the destruction of the last vestiges of free trade, prohibitive customs duties, trade war, currency war, dumping and many other similar events, demonstrating extreme nationalism in economic policy, have sharpened relations between countries to the extreme, created the ground for military clashes and set up "the turn of the war, as a means of redividing the world and spheres of influence in favor of more powerful states."
        The world is entering a general crisis of the cap system. And this crisis will be more abrupt and will be superimposed on climatic changes on earth.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. To be or not to be
            To be or not to be 1 December 2019 17: 59
            0
            There is a link to the reports from the past - read - then he said, but as of today - everything too!
            I wanted to hear now such an analysis from the First Person of the State. But not a mask of the show with answers to questions

            "Environmentally friendly third world war" - an ecological bath day of NATURE itself with its cyclical nature .. Nothing more. .But. the movement of peoples will generate inapplicable!
            But Tunbergenization problems are a way of fighting some on earth against others to weaken their economies and their growth rates. Nothing more than a double-edged sword.
    2. Uncle lee
      Uncle lee 1 December 2019 06: 04
      +3
      Quote: Sloavaros
      To move to Siberia?

      Americans and arrogant Saxons have long been staring at Siberia .... And the Japanese and the Chinese say that before the Urals this is their territory! And how to live further and where?
      1. carstorm 11
        carstorm 11 1 December 2019 06: 47
        -2
        yeah. exactly to the Urals. but at the same time populate the southern coast)
      2. bar
        bar 1 December 2019 09: 44
        +8
        Americans and arrogant Saxons have long been staring at Siberia ..

        They stare at the resources. And the territory of Siberia with the warming and thawing of permafrost will become a huge swamp. An example is Vasyugan swamps that are already growing.
        1. Fan-fan
          Fan-fan 1 December 2019 19: 12
          -2
          The West Siberian lowland, where these Vasyugan swamps are located, will be flooded in the first place and the water along the Turgai lowland will reach the Caspian, where it will also flood the Astrakhan region and part of Kazakhstan. Sorry, but Peter will flood too. That’s true, and the rest of the article is not true - it’s more convenient for Americans to dump in Australia, since they won’t definitely bomb Australia. But we cannot hope that special ammunition will not be used in Russia, it will certainly be used. But you shouldn’t be afraid of radiation; Hiroshima and Nagasaki are blooming cities with a million inhabitants.
          1. Greenwood
            Greenwood 2 December 2019 14: 23
            +2
            Quote: Fan-Fan
            But you shouldn’t be afraid of radiation; Hiroshima and Nagasaki are blooming cities with a million inhabitants.
            Now the situation is different. In many countries, including Russia, a huge number of nuclear power plants, the bombing of which will cause catastrophic emissions of radioactive particles, which will be spaced thousands of kilometers away. Chernobyl will seem like a kindergarten.
          2. michael2000
            michael2000 6 December 2019 12: 37
            +1
            The West Siberian lowland, where these Vasyugan swamps are located, will be flooded in the first place and the water along the Turgai lowland will reach the Caspian, where it will also flood the Astrakhan region and part of Kazakhstan. Sorry, but Peter will flood too. That’s true, and the rest of the article is not true - it’s more convenient for Americans to dump in Australia, since they won’t definitely bomb Australia. But we cannot hope that special ammunition will not be used in Russia, it will certainly be used. But you shouldn’t be afraid of radiation; Hiroshima and Nagasaki are blooming cities with a million inhabitants.

            You are such a joker. The average altitude in the West Siberian Lowland is 100-120 meters. I declare this to you responsibly, as a person with a total station and level has traveled more than one hundred kilometers along this lowland.
    3. Blacksmith 55
      Blacksmith 55 1 December 2019 11: 32
      +4
      One note: the refugees who currently want to go to Europe are economic refugees, they are fleeing poverty.
      You can understand them, you can understand the Europeans who want to prevent this migration.

      Now about that conclusion from the article that I did: Earth is overpopulated, it is urgent to reduce the population of the Earth.
      The author did not say this directly, but made it clear.
      How ? Yes, there are many options, only who will decide?
  2. Ross xnumx
    Ross xnumx 1 December 2019 06: 06
    +12
    Therefore, the war will not be exactly the same as we imagine. Do you know why?

    Of course we know. Because at school and at school some knowledge was gained. And the first thing I would like to note is that the cities will be the most vulnerable in this regard. Especially Russian. Mostly “millionaires” and especially during the heating season. To do this, it is enough to deprive them of the power supply, with the disappearance of which the water supply will disappear with all the consequences arising from this (from the person too). Something similar to the plot of "The Day After Tomorrow."
    And here stands not just a ghost. Ghost. Mass migration, in comparison with which the recent exodus of refugees do not understand from whom to Europe from Africa will seem an innocent joke.

    Exactly! Exodus from Siberia and other places with the presence of snow, frost and the absence of bananas growing on palm trees ...
    One question: "Where?"
    Let's take the mass movement as an example ... no, not the Chinese.

    Really. Why look for the promised land for the Chinese, if their shirt was frozen to the body ... Previously, you could go to villages and villages. I will do so (probably), since there are still relatives in the village and walking close - 30 km.
    And as follows from the graphs, anything is possible. Accordingly, the option described by us is also possible.

    Available. Only according to the theory of probability people (tribes) will survive with a natural form of management (in unity with nature, with a way of life primitive at the sight: without gadgets, but with a cellar, with a bathhouse, a cow and other domestic animals) ... And also, bums ...
    hi
    1. region58
      region58 1 December 2019 18: 06
      +2
      Quote: ROSS 42
      And also - homeless people ...

      There will be no cities - the homeless will not survive. yes
      1. depressant
        depressant 1 December 2019 18: 51
        +3
        ROSS 42, you all seem to be saying the right thing, but on the other hand ...
        So I do not live in a metropolis or even in a city. And my apartment is in Khrushchev. There are no private houses in my village, all are multi-unit. In the same way as in a megalopolis, they will turn off electricity, water, gas - what should I do? Exactly the same problem. Next door is a cottage village, private households. Great, huh? And how will the peasants, who are furious from hunger and cold, rush from my village, but into that cottage? To those who have food in the basements, firewood, coal, candles, kerosene lamps, fireplaces, Russian stoves, baths, wells and even tanks with water supplies, as well as gasoline and diesel fuel for the generator. And the weapons are in both. I know that the whole arsenal.
        Here the government would have to think in advance how to solve this kind of problem in the event of an environmental disaster, or an invasion of "peaceful" refugees in the event of a climatic one. I am very afraid of the loss of general control over the situation. The light went out recently. And again it was in our three Khrushchevs. And so from year to year. Conclusion: the equipment is decrepit, from Soviet times, it is necessary to change. Do not change! In the event of a tense climatic situation, all old equipment may fail. They say it is 90%. I understand that I have mixed two problems into one - an ecological disaster and refugees because of the climate. But life practice has shown me that trouble does not come alone, but trouble has come - open the gate.
    2. your1970
      your1970 2 December 2019 20: 31
      +2
      Quote: ROSS 42
      And the first thing I would like to note is that the cities will be the most vulnerable in this regard. Especially Russian.
      -that is, if you hammer on the electrical nodes of Germany, the rest of Europe will not notice this ???? Here on the VO, like 3-4 years ago, electricians - our and Israeli ones feel the topic of the consequences of the nuclear weapons strike on power plants. They agreed in a common opinion (despite all the abuse in the process of discussing the level "yes, I will pump a 220v glass in the morning and forward" ...) that in the event of such a blow, the entire energy system of Europe will be covered with a copper basin instantly. Overload, blocking, drop in loads / increase in loads.
      And they still didn’t remember that we from city to city there may be 100 and 200 km .....
      But in Europe you can shoot at any place (+ - three bast shoes on the map) - there the industrial city will be
      So our cities are much more sustainable to such blows
    3. max702
      max702 2 December 2019 22: 41
      0
      Quote: ROSS 42
      Only according to the theory of probability will people (tribes) survive with a natural form of management (in unity with nature, with a primitive way of life at the glance: without gadgets, but with a cellar, with a bathhouse, a cow and other pets)

      And you look not for a year after the disaster, but for 20-50 years .. That's when it will be interesting! The main problem of all global cataclysms loss of knowledge! And with this, the loss of technology, the fall of medicine, and much more that humanity will roll back to the Middle Ages, and maybe to the Stone Age .. Today's banal appendicitis will become an unsolvable problem, pneumonia guaranteed death, and even as child mortality will surprise everyone .. And yet, a radical The difference from the fall of civilization in earlier times (Rome, Egypt, Babylon) is that civilization today gobbled up all easily accessible resources and it is possible to extract them only with the help of very developed and complex technologies that will be necessarily lost, and how Gadfly recovery? Where to get metal, oil, coal and much more? Everything that was lying nearby has long been eaten .. So we should not think about the crisis problems for several years, but what will happen after tens of years later .. Then the picture is very gloomy ..
  3. Far B
    Far B 1 December 2019 06: 11
    +5
    It seems to me that we are on the eve of a grandiose schucher (c) (joke).
    But in fact, it seems to me that the authors greatly exaggerate. According to some estimates, the share of the anthropogenic factor in global warming is somewhere much less than one percent. Well, the fact that warming takes place is the way it always takes place, or warming, or cooling. In the past millennium, there were several such pieces. And neither the humans nor the squirrels have any relation to the ice age. So the card went down. Normal temperature fluctuation. Although hell knows, I'm not a climatologist)))
  4. _Sergei_
    _Sergei_ 1 December 2019 06: 18
    +3
    semi-fantastic reflection
    - not semi-fantastic, but even fabulous reflections. Article plus. In the morning I made a mood. I’ll go buy a bow and arrow and teach my grandchildren how to shoot. laughing laughing
    1. PSih2097
      PSih2097 1 December 2019 10: 58
      0
      Quote: _Sergey_
      I’ll go buy a bow and arrow and teach my grandchildren how to shoot.

      then a crossbow, it will be easier. And on the other hand, why? on our mob. there are so many weapons depots and power supplies to it that you can shoot a couple of world wars from the belly
  5. andrewkor
    andrewkor 1 December 2019 06: 59
    +4
    The author brought the horror. Probably at the Alternativeathistory he became cramped? There is a shortage of comments.
  6. parusnik
    parusnik 1 December 2019 07: 52
    +4
    Yes ... Global consumption society ... A globalized economy, in order to make a profit in the future, you just need to draw the ranks of mankind ... Natural resources are not infinite ... The whole essence of capitalism ...
    1. SovAr238A
      SovAr238A 1 December 2019 11: 21
      +4
      Quote: parusnik
      Yes ... Global consumption society ... A globalized economy, in order to make a profit in the future, you just need to draw the ranks of mankind ... Natural resources are not infinite ... The whole essence of capitalism ...

      You write mutually exclusive things.
      some unrelated cliches.
      logic in your words = 0
      And you still put pluses for it.

      Consumption growth follows the growth in the number of consumers.
      And you want to thin out the ranks of humanity - i.e. reduce by a multiple the number of consumers.
    2. Ross xnumx
      Ross xnumx 1 December 2019 19: 10
      +1
      Quote: parusnik
      The whole essence of capitalism ...

      I don’t know what is the specific purpose of capitalism under construction in Russia, but what is this?
  7. knn54
    knn54 1 December 2019 08: 41
    +2
    Genetic weapons of mass destruction.
    https://vz.ru/society/2017/11/3/893832.html
    1. Gost2012
      Gost2012 1 December 2019 11: 33
      +1
      +
      Future wars will be fought not with tanks and guns, with or without nuclear weapons, but with the help of bioengineering and nanotechnology. The party that is the first to receive an instrument ready for actual use will immediately apply it. The other side may not notice this, or notice when it is too late. In the second case, there is still hope to have time to use nuclear weapons, just to catch someone with you.
  8. Naval
    Naval 1 December 2019 09: 20
    +3
    Therefore, the war will not be exactly the same as we imagine. Do you know why? Because there will be no sense in taming each other with nuclear missiles.

    What is nonsense, but why were they invented and produced nuclear weapons? Which strategists decided that the threat of extermination of the people, nation and state is not worth a retaliatory strike "on decision-making centers" and launcher bases? Looks like Friday was too rough for the author.
  9. Dimy4
    Dimy4 1 December 2019 09: 34
    0
    I like the first picture. The flag is just not enough.
    1. shtatsov
      shtatsov 1 December 2019 13: 58
      +1
      Everything is clear without a flag there. Dreams !!!))
  10. samarin1969
    samarin1969 1 December 2019 09: 49
    0
    The saddest thing is that the peoples of Russia do not determine their fate. Whether the territory of the Russian Federation will be a reserve for the "elite" or a "settler for" surplus labor resources "- strangers decide.

    What to do? ... Well, maybe get ready for the Catalaunian Fields.
  11. ycuce234-san
    ycuce234-san 1 December 2019 10: 46
    +2
    When the territories of some states suitable for living have reached a critical mass in terms of population, they (both peoples and states) will look with hunger and evil eyes at neighboring ones with a larger territory or less population.

    Generally speaking, if we use the situation wisely, this will lead not to another war, but to another industrial and post-information revolution, and to a jump in raising the standard of living in the world, since it will give rise to a huge source of cheap labor: for this it’s enough not to let the situation go by itself but to manage migration processes. The processes in nature are developing slowly and therefore it is necessary to intensively fight to ensure that the migrations are mainly not transcontinental but regional, within the ethno-cultural area (for example, moving to a neighboring city will be sufficient to solve the problems of the current generation and their children will move again). It is necessary to concentrate the population in cities, to engage in industrial and economic development of territories, urban planning and state building - in order to absorb these labor resources, to train the population in relevant professions in the industrial field of economy. For example, for Africans, this is perhaps the last chance to catch up with the rest of civilization, and for some sparsely populated countries and places, such as Australia or Greenland, this is a chance to replenish their population by moving close cultural groups to their territory.
  12. jkl09
    jkl09 1 December 2019 11: 10
    +1
    The forecast is quite possible. Then there are two ways - to structure the population into "positive" - ​​adaptation to the situation with the help of economic + agitation methods (apple trees will bloom on Mars) or "negative" - ​​a decrease in the population size (habitat disturbance, bad habits, a change in biology from GMO? To genetically -selective viruses, which is probably the same mechanism of action).
    And hto going to fly to Mars?
  13. Alexander Klimanov
    Alexander Klimanov 1 December 2019 11: 33
    +2
    The author should read the book: http://biblio-globus.ru/search/catalog/details/10603044…
    Then I would not have guessed over the coffee grounds. Everything is clearly painted: what to be in the next decade. According to the prophecies of the prophets from the Bible. Not fiction, so the future is shocking.
  14. Nestorych
    Nestorych 1 December 2019 11: 45
    +1
    It is first necessary to decide whether it will continue to warm and melt, or cooling will come, otherwise trends can be infinitely drawn as witnesses to the sect of late tsarism in the Republic of Ingushetia, who took the rebound after a long crisis and recession for stable growth for decades.))
  15. Good_Anonymous
    Good_Anonymous 1 December 2019 12: 01
    +2
    Water gets bigger [...] and it gets colder.


    Well, yes, yes ... the world is warming, and the water is getting colder.
    1. Andrey83
      Andrey83 1 December 2019 23: 26
      0
      And it gets bigger because it's warmer ...
  16. opus
    opus 1 December 2019 12: 12
    +3
    Quote: Roman Skomorokhov, Roman Krivov
    Along with the water level, the need to increase the amount of energy needed to heat this water or lower the temperature of the energy source increases .... The fact that this water must be heated is also logical.

    1. And who needs it?
    A colossal natural machine "works" on the globe, the main engines of which are: the atmosphere, the ocean, land and glaciation. The interaction of the individual parts of this machine forms the Earth's climate and glaciation, causes their fluctuations.
    The entire planetary system is in thermal disequilibrium. It experiences large self-oscillations with great inertia, which is facilitated by the ocean and continental glaciers.
    in the interglacial period (110–140 thousand years ago), the average temperature near the Earth’s surface was 2 ° C higher than the modern one, and the carbon dioxide concentration was much lower therefore, the discrepancy between the current relatively low temperature and a very high level of carbon dioxide concentration is quite obvious.
    Almost 20 years ago, a Russian geographic scientist Corr. RAS Andrei Kapitsa said that global warming does not exist, this is a myth. On the contrary, since 1975 there has been a slow cooling.

    Quote: Roman Skomorokhov, Roman Krivov
    Yes, this is not so much about the Sun as about the earth's crust, and more precisely, about the core that heats this crust.

    2. The authors are weak in physics: little is spent to "heat" the energy, but the phase transitions of "water" are yes ..
    A third of the total balance of the Earth’s external heat circulation spent on phase transformations of ice. Think: the whole nature of the earth requires heat only twice as much as it leaves for melting snow and ice or is released when water freezes.

    3. "there is something to warm"

    The solar activity graph correlates very well with the authors' graph "based on fashtok observations" (it is necessary to write so fushtok, half-wrapped-not right)
    Due to the low heat capacity, ice cannot accumulate thermal energy, what is characteristic of water. Поэтому water retains the same amount of heat for a very long timewhile snow loses it in minutes.
    what about the albedo?
    A significant part of the solar radiation coming to the glacier is reflected in the atmosphere. There is no glacier / snow, there is no reflection, the water is warming, and the authors are concerned
    =====================

    Quote: Roman Skomorokhov, Roman Krivov
    Environmentally Friendly Third World War

    Mr opinion would be:
    1. cut off the network (information flows), disrupt communications to block control systems, physicians, firefighters and the launch of nuclear loaves.
    2. Genetic / biological weapons / infection. maybe even earlier than item 1.
    Our health care can not cope with a cold, what a war ....
    3. Cleaning the results of the blow of claim 2 and some disasters according to claim 1.
    4. After 5-10 years, the settlement of the victorious people
  17. lucul
    lucul 1 December 2019 12: 17
    0
    Here in general it is necessary to make such a small digression. Likbez.

    The fact that the glaciers are melting, and the level of the world's oceans is growing steadily, is half an orange. There is more water (yes, of course, hello Japan and the UK, the Netherlands ... hey, where is Holland?), And it is getting colder.

    This is logical, all according to the laws of physics. The fact that this water must be heated is also logical

    Something to me this logic is incomprehensible ....
    "There is more water - and it gets colder." Why does it get colder ?? If the water got colder, then the glaciers would stop melting, no?
    Moreover, on the first chart, the level of the world ocean for 150 years rose by only 20 cm. That is, for the water level to rise by 1 meter, it takes almost 1 years. This time is more than enough to redistribute people on the surface of the planet ....
  18. Knell wardenheart
    Knell wardenheart 1 December 2019 12: 47
    +4
    I understood one thing - the author VERY wants to imagine how it would be without nuclear weapons. But I will note that in the case of a war for territory, the task of destroying the enemy's industrial and demographic potential comes to the fore. As you can imagine, in the modern world these are quite separated things from fertile lands - cities with a large population and industrial facilities (a significant part) - in one basket, territories producing the lion's share of food - in another basket. In this situation, it is obvious to me that the use of tactical modern nuclear weapons in large cities and industrial. centers - it will be like. On the one hand, in the First World War, people learned what a "trench war" is - that it is for attrition, that practically entire rear areas and powerful weapons from both sides - paralyzes active military operations, money is spent, time passes = the result is postponed. During World War II, people realized that all this could be reversed - methodically mowing down the enemy's demographic potential, his industrial potential and, as a result, his morality and will to win. However, realizing this, significant funds have been invested in defense against aircraft / missiles. However, the factor of nuclear weapons and its brute power remained. Even pinpoint strikes of nuclear weapons can cause the same effect as an avalanche of stratobombers in BB2, if not much greater (taking into account also the horror of the population with this topic). There is a great expression - they don't cry through their hair. It is worth the "ecological" war to stall somewhat - they will use nuclear weapons, even how they will use them. To get a piece of relatively dirty territory is different in any way better than as Adolf Aloizovich and then shoot-poison himself in the bunker.
  19. Nick Russ
    Nick Russ 1 December 2019 13: 26
    +2
    That humanity is moving toward self-destruction is a fact. And how it will be (third world war, warming to hell, poisoning nature, etc.) in my opinion is not important. But this is inevitable, and it is hardly possible to stop it.
  20. Operator
    Operator 1 December 2019 14: 08
    +3
    Sleep well, dear comrades Skomorokhov and Krivov - in case of mass migrations, the Russian Federation has a technology for the production of environmentally friendly NPV "Novichek" bully
  21. General D
    General D 1 December 2019 15: 42
    +1
    It is not just about flooding the coastal territories. Many factors will add up to one piggy bank. This and chemical pollution and drought biblical scale. Territories from the equator 3-4K kilometers will become unsuitable for life. And the northern territories, as well as the lands close to the South Pole, on the contrary, will perk up. This is where the flood of refugees floods. And this forecast is quite real. The point of no return has already been passed. And even if all production in the world stopped, nothing could be changed. The forests of the Amazon are destroyed, the African savannah has almost ceased to exist and a lot of other useful things man has done for the planet. But this process will not be similar to what we are shown in the cinema. The great overpopulation of peoples will stretch for many decades. So no world wars are foreseen. But the world will become tougher than it is now, it’s obvious
  22. depressant
    depressant 1 December 2019 16: 50
    +1
    Authors who have more truth are stronger?
    Oh ... Do you know Degtyarev’s law? Who has a machine gun is right. Well, that's right, by the way))
    Regarding the tilt of the earth's axis. Yes, I noticed. I did not know the fact, but I felt: something was wrong. Once she mentioned this in a conversation of ladder politeness with an advanced neighbor, he made fun of me. It was a few years ago. Since then I am silent, watching how in the summer the sun at night stopped setting at all and rises where the attempt to set over the horizon made. And this is not Peter, this is the middle lane of Russia! For six months now, as from various sources - scientific and pseudoscientific - I know that the inclination of the earth's axis is changing.
    How did nature respond? Bad she responded. If the year before last overcast, rainy summer, the trees and grasses rejoiced at the abundance of moisture and grew wildly, then by the current, dry and cloudy, everything around was oppressed and looked faded. If this goes further, it is unlikely that climatic oppression will withstand middle-fruit trees. Local fruits will have to be forgotten.
    And now, please: 16:35, and outside the window - the winter night of late December. With absolutely clear sky. And today is only the first.
    Well, that is so, observisms. That is, the problem is observed at the household level, but cannot be solved at any. One of the problems.
  23. sevtrash
    sevtrash 1 December 2019 17: 05
    +1
    It seems that there are still certain points. The economy is developing, there are more and more diverse emissions into the atmosphere, water, soil, and temperature is rising. The European Parliament seems to have recently declared a critical climate situation. It would be strange to think that imbalance will be a blessing. So the apocalypse is coming, whether and which one will come depends on the powers that be.
  24. Eroma
    Eroma 1 December 2019 18: 53
    +1
    Thanks to the author for the educational program on the climate! ... but he either doesn’t know or has lost sight of such moments as the lowlands on our planet!
    Only one variant of the flood is indicated: the water rises, everyone drowns, but at a certain sea level, the water will begin to flood the sparsely populated, but very vast areas, such as the Amazon lowland, in the Sahara it seems, too, half the area the bottom of the dried sea fellow etc. how many quadrillion water will go there is not known, perhaps enough so that Japan does not drown completely. what
    The glaciers melt due to the warm water of the ocean, but the author himself says that the more water, the colder it means that the melting of the ice will stop at a certain ocean temperature.

    And as indicated above, the processes in nature are slow, if the sea advances, the desert areas will recede, so people can calmly gradually move a little to the depths of the continents and a new coastline
  25. dgonni
    dgonni 1 December 2019 19: 07
    +1
    For the author or authors! Look at the area of ​​the Netherlands 100 years ago and at the moment! With an increase in ocean level, it increased by 30%! So Europeans will not go east. But the Chinese? Yes! Given the population and the emptiness and outflow of the population of Siberia, they will still go, but in fact they have pressed the south along the Amur.
    1. depressant
      depressant 1 December 2019 20: 12
      +1
      dgonni, add to your comment.
      Under Federal Law 473-FZ "On Priority Development Areas", foreigners have the right to rent and operate up to 60% of the RF territory, divided into 99 zones. The lease term is 70 years or more. Zones are the best pieces of Russian territory, and they are everywhere. So, the Chinese are still ahead, not only the Amur region. And they will occupy these lands by law, and then fuck them out of there then. They will take over even before the flooding of their coastline begins. Taking into account climatic changes, the Chinese "rent" the most favorable zones in this respect. I'm not sure that in case of trouble the Chinese will let us into these same territories.
  26. A_2010
    A_2010 1 December 2019 22: 38
    +3
    I don’t want to comment on this nonsense,
    I’d better leave a link to Latynina here, I know that it’s a harmful aunt, but it's hard to argue with her
    1. Just a Traveler
      Just a Traveler 2 December 2019 12: 39
      +1
      Thank you for Latynina! Just a balm for the brain, listen to a smart person.
  27. Proton
    Proton 1 December 2019 22: 53
    0
    After the phrase “more energy from the core to heat the earth’s crust” I realized that it was not Burroughs who didn’t even read laughing
  28. 7,62x54
    7,62x54 2 December 2019 07: 18
    0
    Our commander in chief will not allow the capture of Russia.
  29. Maks1995
    Maks1995 2 December 2019 09: 23
    0
    In general, Voronezh and Ufa will not be lucky again.
    Judging by the news, it is there that they are experiencing new ways of war.
    And the pictures are good.
  30. bk316
    bk316 2 December 2019 12: 53
    +1
    If Gridasov wrote this article I would read and laugh. But seriously it’s better not to write it. Continuous fantastic speculation, the only thought on real facts is the following logical chain.

    Due to the greenhouse effect, air temperature rises - this causes ice caps to melt - melt water enters the world ocean - its volume rises and temperature drops - evaporation decreases - the climate on the continents becomes very dry - there is a famine.
    That's the whole point of the article; everything else is blah blah.

    And everything would be fine, but DO NOT AGREE TO THE FACTS - TEMPERATURE ON THE SURFACE OF THE WORLD OCEAN DOES NOT FALL AND RISES. Of course, I can write where there are mistakes in Roman’s arguments, in reality there are several of them, but I suggest you find them yourself.

    Tip # 1 The heat transfer model (see the heat equation in a liquid medium, a special case - sources at the edges) works quite not as the authors present.

    Tip # 2 The geometry of the coastal zone statistically has a specific form, which cancels some logical conclusions in the chain.

    Hint No. 3 People often make mistakes when comparing large quantities, for a simple reason this is expressed in a proverb for him that more than a hundred are already a million laughing
  31. smaug78
    smaug78 2 December 2019 15: 15
    0
    Now the authors are left to think about the damage to the environment as a result of the hostilities and admit that they wrote without thinking ...
  32. tatarin1972
    tatarin1972 2 December 2019 15: 52
    0
    Sounds like a joke. Bush senior calls Gorbachev and threatens - you won't sign OSV-2, we'll drop a neutron bomb. Gorby calls the specialists and asks: "What is a neutron bomb?" They say: "This is when the living force disappears, but material values ​​remain." He picks up the direct telephone to Washington and says to Bush: "If you threaten with your bonboy, we will drop the ensign platoon."
    Bush calls the specialists and asks: "What is a platoon of warrant officers?" They roll their eyes in horror and say: "This is when the living force remains, and material values ​​disappear."
  33. 1970mk
    1970mk 2 December 2019 19: 55
    0
    Nonsense what a set of words ..... ocean level rises))) Global warming .... places of residence "sink into summer" ..... What are you talking about? Yes, just 18.000 years ago, the sea level was 100 meters lower than the present .... ocean level fluctuations occur at 400-500 meters. And it will be the end ... what wars ...
  34. Bobrick
    Bobrick 2 December 2019 19: 57
    +1
    Strange article, very strange, especially climate educational program.
    But there is only one question: maybe I have a little understanding in climatology, but MZHG seemed to read why convection processes on the planet cease? The temperature difference still remains, the supply of mechanical (a person certainly affects the planet’s rotation weakly - a couple of dozen satellites launched into solar orbits does not count) and thermal energy to the planet’s surface anyway (the sun shines also), and the supply is uneven in latitude planets (at the poles several times smaller), i.e. temperature inhomogeneities should be formed, hence pressure inhomogeneities.
    The main mechanism for aligning these inhomogeneities is convection, the very sea currents and air cyclones and anticyclones.
    1. Ehanatone
      Ehanatone 2 December 2019 21: 30
      +2
      "Strange article, very strange"
      The article is not strange, but not literate, to put it simply, it's just guano! ...
      Read the comments of Opus, he explains there quite well what yes how! ...
  35. sabakina
    sabakina 2 December 2019 21: 01
    +1
    They say: "Enough for our century." But no. Will not be enough.
    To the campaign, Soviet science fiction writers knew about the future more than modern politicians and all general staffs combined ...
  36. Ehanatone
    Ehanatone 2 December 2019 21: 28
    +2
    Quote: Roman Skomorokhov, Roman Krivov
    "Yes, this is not so much about the Sun, but about the earth's crust, or rather, about the core that heats this crust."
    opus
    "2. The authors are weak in physics: little energy is spent" heating "energy, but the phase transitions of" water "is yes ..
    One third of the entire balance of the Earth's external heat turnover is spent on phase transformations of ice. Think about it: the entire nature of the Earth requires only twice as much heat as it takes to melt snow and ice or is released when water freezes "
    This I did not explain the whole comment of the respected Opus ...!
    , unlike the completely unreputable co-author of the novel Krivov, who, having written an unwise article, was offended by the fact that she was called unwise and ran to complain to the moderators! ...
    PYSY: if you pee something there ...
    I didn’t mean only to bed ...
    , you become a public person and get ready to be criticized! ...
    therefore, you should not be so nervous that you just have to run to the moderators right away ...
    don't run around ...!
    PYSY2: and carefully read the comments of Opus, because after that your illiteracy may become clear even to such a highly educated disrespectful author as a novel of crooked ones! ...
    ... it seems I couldn’t manage to call you, however, as in the first comment, ...
    I’m leaving for a sim ...
    with disrespect! ..
  37. akarfoxhound
    akarfoxhound 2 December 2019 23: 09
    0
    What I liked about the article was the pictures! Especially the first one! A smoking global garbage can against the background of the remains of a white dome - do not take your eyes off!
  38. Indifferent
    Indifferent 3 December 2019 15: 57
    0
    A rare article in its incompetence! Why publish such? There is no climate warming. These are cyclical changes that cannot but occur. The United States, which is located by the way south of the southernmost regions of Russia, has been freezing for years in a row. In California, temperatures drop to 40 degrees below zero. Crocodiles in rivers freeze before they can get out on land. What kind of warming? Second, the economic crisis is approaching. Already in the world, complete stagnation of the economy. The gains that all countries "draw" are caused only by banking capital. And the industry has not been growing for a long time. Do the authors know this? Even China is growing symbolically and teetering on the brink of bankruptcy. It's a matter of time when this whole system will collapse. The capitalism we see now is living out its last years. He has nowhere else to expand geographically and energetically. Neo-colonialism will not pass either. It is impossible due to the presence of AK assault rifles instead of sticks in the natives and the decrepitude of the colonialists as such. As soon as this crisis begins, everyone will forget about the warming and about the shift of "axes" and other nonsense, just as they forgot about the "Ozone holes" of incinerating people. And the most important thing. Who will think about ecosystem-saving technologies in the war? This is a complete absurdity. And most importantly why? There are tasks and they are achieved in any way. An example is the bombing of Dresden and Hanoi with Haiphong and the "sowing" of uranium rods throughout Serbia and Iraq as well. Nobody stood on ceremony with anyone. And the authors do not know another important thing, that after a nuclear bombing, in a month you can live in these territories without much harm to health. The short-lived isotopes all decay, while the long-lived and dangerous ones remain. an example of that "Heroshima" and Nagasaki. There people immediately stayed to live and still live ..
  39. Nikolai Fursov
    Nikolai Fursov 5 December 2019 12: 07
    0
    Nuclear physicists have one great tradition: Every 16 billion years they all come together and launch the Large Hadron Collider ... :-)
  40. xomaNN
    xomaNN 5 December 2019 13: 37
    0
    What a horror! Hollywood disaster movies will lap this plot wassat

    But seriously: there can be many potential threats, then we need a strong army and navy of the Russian Federation to repulse them.
  41. KJIETyc
    KJIETyc 6 December 2019 00: 54
    0
    And Rent TV is inappropriately.
  42. NordOst16
    NordOst16 6 December 2019 20: 24
    0
    Where did the author come from?
  43. The comment was deleted.