Russian global project and the restoration of the Russian empire

236

Until recently, Russia was one of the two world superpowers and is slowly reviving its power. At its core, it is an imperial power and cannot exist otherwise. All story Russian states - these are cycles of expansion and contraction along their borders. The increment of the territories was carried out not by capturing colonies on distant continents, but by integration processes along the border with other peoples without assimilation and the desire to preserve the identity and lifestyle of the peoples attached to the empire.

The principles of the formation of the Russian empire


Russia has always been a kind of empire, the metropolis did not plunder its provinces, but on the contrary developed them using the resources of the metropolis. This allowed the formation of a powerful Russian civilization, fundamentally different from the western one, which was based on completely different mental values.



The basis of Russian civilization was Orthodoxy, and this is no accident. The way of life and lifestyle of the Russian people was communal in nature on the basis of collectivism, contributing to the unification of individuals in the development of the principles of their living arrangements. Orthodoxy responded to the collectivist aspirations of the population and contributed to the consolidation of society, in which public interests prevailed over the interests of the individual.

The customs and traditions of the peoples of Western civilization were based on individualism and the priority of personal goals. The mentality of these peoples was different, they were characterized by a cult of personal wealth, and the peoples of Russian civilization - a cult of prosperity. Accordingly, the basis of Western civilization was Catholicism, professing the cult of personality over society.

So, over time, two Christian civilizations have developed with different fundamental principles and aspirations, the Western became the heiress of the Roman Empire with Roman law, individualism and the desire to conquer and assimilate other peoples, and the Russian accepted the legacy of the Byzantine Empire with a communal system and the desire not to conquer, but incorporate others peoples with the preservation of their traditions, culture, religion and way of life. Attempts by the Russian elite in different historical periods to integrate Russia into Western civilization did not receive support in society and ended in failure. We are too different to live together.

In connection with the fundamentally different civilizational codes and civilizational values, between the two civilizations there has always been a rivalry for influence in the world and a tough confrontation, often resulting in bloody wars, hence the desire of the West to subdue an obstinate opponent by any means.

Soviet imperial project


The rivalry sharply tightened with the creation of the Soviet empire, the basis of the state ideology of which was put communism, which did not take root in the West. Communism was based on collectivism, not perceived by individualistic Western society, and found fertile ground in Russian society, which offered the peoples a more attractive alternative to the world order.

With the collapse of the Union, the outlying peoples of the empire began to scatter in their national corners. Instead of the imperial ideology of communism, all suburbs were swept by local wretched nationalism, which everywhere led to the degradation of small-town statehood and the impoverishment of peoples. In Russia, no matter how they tried to impose nationalism, he did not take root, since the Russian people are imperial in their spirit, nationalism is too small for him and limits his desire for scope and space.

Russian civilization entered a protracted contraction cycle, the society was not offered a new imperial idea, and Russian statehood also began to degrade and lost attractiveness for its former suburbs. With the assertion of a Putin team with clearly imperial views and interests, Russia began to gradually revive and regain its strength. Western rivals didn’t like it right away and they started a war to discredit Russia and limit its development and expansion opportunities. This was especially evident after the Sochi Olympics, the coup d'état in Kiev and the Skripal case, when they no longer even looked for reasons to accuse Russia of hegemonism and extremism.

After the collapse of the Soviet empire, Russia's forces were seriously undermined, it lost significant territories, and imperial power and influence can be restored only with the return of these territories. Return them by force weapons no one is going to, although Russia has sufficient military power for this, but such actions are fraught with serious complications and international isolation. Former Soviet suburbs themselves should want to return to the fold of Russian civilization, and for this it should become attractive to them in the political, economic, military and humanitarian aspects. All this only confirms that Russia will have to implement its integration project to return the former Soviet republics.

The revival of the Russian imperial project


Russia simply cannot fail to have such a project, since four centers of power have now formed in the world: the USA, the European Union, China and Russia. All of them are implementing their integration projects competing with each other. Moreover, all the projects of Russian competitors cover the territories of the former Soviet republics, which are the sphere of Russian national interests. In this regard, Russia's delay in promoting its integration projects on previously lost territories may lead to the development of them by other centers of power and their integration into other, it is possible that hostile integration associations. In this case, Russia may lose the opportunity to return them in the future, and, weakened, will itself become the prey of other centers of power in the form of a raw materials appendage.

For the successful implementation of the Russian integration project, first of all, it is necessary to return to Russia the status of an economically powerful power and ensure industrial, financial and commercial expansion into neighboring territories, without which there can be no question of imperial power.

In recent years, Russia has been working hard in this direction in Russia, financial resources are accumulating, large-scale infrastructure and industrial construction has been launched, and the country's economy is starting to move away from raw material dependence. Russia is slowly getting up from its knees and is preparing for a tough defense of its national interests. I would like more, but even in the Russian elite, the pro-Western liberal wing resists the integration of post-Soviet countries and seeks to draw Russia into Western civilization in its selfish interests. Western countries are doing everything possible to restrain Russian integration processes, arranging provocations and coups in post-Soviet countries and imposing their puppets in power there.

Integration of Ukraine and Belarus


It should be noted that two post-Soviet Slavic states, Ukraine and Belarus, play a dominant role in the Russian global project, and without their return there can be no question of a revival of Russian civilization. Their loss inflicted tremendous damage to Russia and actually destroyed Russian civilization.

The West has advanced farthest in Ukraine, with the help of the comprador Ukrainian elite, it has led Ukraine out of Russia's sphere of influence, created an anti-Russian foothold on its territory, provoked a civil war in the Donbass and, by imposing large-scale sanctions against Russia, is trying to weaken and isolate it.

The Russian leadership, having lost to the West the first round of the struggle for Ukraine, is now trying, with the help of the Minsk agreements, to prevent Ukraine from finally leaving for Western civilization. In this regard, Russia does not recognize the independence of Donbass, it is needed as a Trojan horse for the destruction of the neo-Nazi regime in Ukraine from the inside and as a locomotive for the return of Ukrainian society to its native land.

Donbass will never enter Ukraine under the terms of agreements. With the help of the Minsk agreements, it will only be possible to recognize its international subjectivity, and it should become the second alternative Ukraine, which will seek to eliminate the neo-Nazi Kiev regime and unite most regions under Donbass banners with further reintegration into Russian civilization.

Not everything is simple with Belarus either, the Belarusian elite led by Lukashenko is against integration, because he is afraid of losing his power. In order to “admonish” Babich was sent to them, who lucidly explained to them what was expected of them and how the resistance to integration could end. They were given a little time to think, after which, apparently, it was not persuasion that would begin, but real integration processes.

The return of the entire post-Soviet space


In addition to the Slavic republics, the integration of Transcaucasia, Central Asia and Moldova should be solved, but this is the next stage of integration, first of all, the problems of the return of Ukraine and Belarus should be solved. Russia did not recognize the independence of Abkhazia, South Ossetia, Transnistria and Donbass; in the long run, it does not need the scribbles of premature states, but the entire post-Soviet space. This is a difficult and long journey full of trials and tragedies for the inhabitants of these regions, but it will have to be completed.

Russia is approaching the next expansion cycle, and the process of reintegrating the post-Soviet space and implementing the global Russian project requires long-term strategic actions to prepare the former Soviet republics for integration into Russian civilization. You can’t do without a radical upswing in the Russian economy and the creation of an attractive image of Russia, as well as targeted actions in the international arena to justify and promote Russian national interests in the territory of the post-Soviet space.
236 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +36
    27 November 2019 05: 41
    The author of Maidan tea accidentally did not drink? Sorry, but Putin is liberal to the core, it’s ridiculous to talk about an empire with him! It's like talking to the governor about how and when he will voluntarily resign. Restoring an empire based on Russia with this power is simply utopia! !!
    1. +19
      27 November 2019 06: 09
      Quote: Thrifty
      The author of Maidan tea accidentally did not drink? Sorry, but Putin is liberal to the core, it’s ridiculous to talk about an empire with him! It's like talking to the governor about how and when he will voluntarily resign. Restoring an empire based on Russia with this power is simply utopia! !!

      I agree, plus everything, with the commodity economy ...
      1. +26
        27 November 2019 07: 34
        The author writes that Russia did not recognize the independence of Abkhazia and South Ossetia ... I guess I don’t know something.
      2. +11
        27 November 2019 10: 04
        I agree, sheer fantasy and imperial utopia. Neighbors near and far, perhaps, would want again together, but for a good life, and not for the sake of ideology, and even less so forcibly.
        Here is a rating of the standard of living by country. Russia is at 59th place, after Jordan, Lebanon, Indonesia. So why reunite? Fish is looking where deeper, people - where better.

        https://basetop.ru/uroven-zhizni-v-stranah-mira-rejting-2019-goda/
        1. +17
          27 November 2019 10: 41
          Quote: However, Dear
          Neighbors near and far, perhaps, would want again together, but for a good life, and not for the sake of ideology, and even less so forcibly.

          --------------------
          Yes, now only the standard of living attracts, but modern Russia does not offer it. Only "spiritual bonds" of the decayed top. And now nobody needs it, in bulk. The socialist project of the USSR offered many times more equality, the development of national industry and social infrastructure, and so on. In this regard, the US and the EU always know how to slip a beautiful picture with sausage and jeans.
        2. +2
          27 November 2019 10: 55
          Quote: However, Dear
          Here is a rating of the standard of living by country. Russia at 59th place, after Jordan, Lebanon, Indonesia

          Yeah, but Estonia is there at .... 11th place: paradise, it turns out, on earth!

          You at least look at the CRITERIA for determining the standard of living in this "survey": the cost of TIME for travel around the country and the CLIMATE, including .. And where can Russia be?

          As for the imperial project, then. I think that too much was destroyed .....
          1. +2
            27 November 2019 16: 09
            Quote: Olgovich
            As for the imperial project, then. I think that too much was destroyed .....

            And you continue to destroy the sworn communal legacy. You look there and Russia rises to the level of Ukraine going this way.
            1. -3
              28 November 2019 10: 07
              Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
              And you continue to destroy the sworn communal legacy. You look there and Russia rises to the level of Ukraine going this way.

              Komunyachye's legacy is a catastrophe of 91 g and the Russian Cross.
              1. +3
                28 November 2019 18: 14
                Quote: Olgovich
                Komunyachye's legacy is a catastrophe of 91 g and the Russian Cross.

                But nuclear missiles and other reactors, medicine, education, science, space and other equipment is apparently the merit of the monarchists 70 years in the underground who fought against komunyaki?
                Quote: Olgovich
                Komunyachye's legacy is a catastrophe of 91 g and the Russian Cross.

                Go demolish the communist regime of Putin, because he’s just following the course of 91 years. And even the Yeltsyntsentr fought off. The demagogue is petty-bourgeois.
                1. -3
                  29 November 2019 09: 45
                  Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                  But nuclear missiles and other reactors, medicine, education, science, space and other equipment is apparently the merit of the monarchists 70 years in the underground who fought against komunyaki?

                  Certainly: ALL atom, airplanes, space were created by RUSSIAN scientists and their students, studied at the IMPERIAL Universities of Russia: these are Vernadsky, Ioffe, Khlopin, Mysovsky, Tupolev, etc., and their students, Kurchatov, etc.

                  Or did you bring MSU, MVTU and Vernadsky from Switzerland? Maybe you brought hundreds of thousands of schools and hundreds of thousands of teachers, a talker?

                  But Russia of the 17th century and the R. cross is purely YOUR merit.
                  Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                  Go demolish the communist regime of Putin, because he’s just following the course of 91 years. .

                  He saved Russia, which you also cut into a million "nat" countries.
                  1. +1
                    29 November 2019 15: 59
                    Quote: Olgovich
                    Certainly: ALL atom, airplanes, space were created by RUSSIAN scientists and their students, studied at the IMPERIAL Universities of Russia: these are Vernadsky, Ioffe, Khlopin, Mysovsky, Tupolev, etc., and their students, Kurchatov, etc.

                    Yes Yes. I already heard this nonsense. Korolev and Kurchatov also studied at imperial universities? Olgovich take the pill. Feel better. laughing
                    Quote: Olgovich
                    He saved Russia, which you also cut into a million "nat" countries.

                    Schizophrenia grew stronger. Well, look at the same Ukraine. Donbass is what would happen to your lost Russia if Lenin did not create the Union of Republics in time by highlighting individual national republics.
                    1. -7
                      30 November 2019 09: 52
                      Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                      Yes Yes. I already heard this nonsense. Korolev and Kurchatov also studied at imperial universities? Olgovich take the pill. Feel better

                      Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                      Korolev and Kurchatov also studied at imperial universities?

                      And in whose, ignoramus?

                      Korolev entered Kiev Polytechnic Institute of Emperor Alexander II graduated Imperial Higher Technical School (MVTU)

                      Kurchatov took a course at the University of Tavrichesk, which was opened due to Imperial Kiev University of St. Vladimir, who in May 1918 opened his department in Yalta and sent a large group of professors here. Among them were M. V. Dovnar-Zapolsky, R. I. Gelvig, S. M. Bogdanov, L. I. Kordysh, V. G. Korenchevsky, E. A. Meyer, S. O. Kolyandyk, G. A Semeka-Maksimovich. Have you brought these scientists from the Swiss, "teachers"? lol

                      Kurchatov graduated and Imperial St. Petersburg Polytechnic Institute (40% of scientists' "owls") -from

                      he is a student of the IMPERIAL scholars Khlopin and Mysovsky, like his brother
                      Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                      Schizophrenia grew stronger. Well, look at the same Ukraine. Donbass is what would happen to your lost Russia if Lenin did not create the Union of Republics in time by highlighting individual national republics.

                      You know why don't shoot in in Taganrog, Azov, no? Of course not.

                      Because their inhabitants with great difficulty pulled themselves from the owl created by your tabs. Ukraine in 1925, where they were raped by the Bolsheviks in 1918.

                      But Yuzovka and Lugansk your scoundrels, after all, ripped out of Russia and forcibly shoved into the so-called. "! owls Ukraine.

                      They were in Russia and- there WASN’T any war there!

                      Got it? Hardly.....No.
                      1. -1
                        30 November 2019 21: 45
                        Quote: Olgovich
                        And in whose, ignoramus?

                        Did he build them himself? Wore bricks, nailed boards? Why monarchists are so wooden. Nothing of them in their stupidity will not catch.laughing So, there are popular universities, because by that time there couldn’t be any imperial universities because your emperor was given a pendal and expelled, which is interesting, by no means the Bolsheviks, but the same one to know. laughing
                        Quote: Olgovich
                        Do you know why they don’t shoot in Taganrog, Azov, no? Of course not.

                        Of course not, the reasons are only known to inappropriate monarchists. Which, in dialectical materialism, are not a snout, but at the same time they believe that they have in their head the least subjective picture of the world.
                        Quote: Olgovich
                        But Yuzovka and Lugansk your scoundrels, after all, ripped out of Russia and forcibly shoved into the so-called. "! owls Ukraine.

                        Come on, you won’t stutter about it at all. And then I remind you of the limits of democracy under the monarchy.
                      2. -6
                        1 December 2019 09: 21
                        Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                        Did he build them himself? Wore bricks, nailed boards? Why monarchists are so wooden. Nothing of them in their stupidity will not catch. So the universities are folk, the benefit is that by then no imperial universities could not be for they gave your emperor a pendal and drove out, which is interesting, by no means the Bolsheviks, but the same nobility.

                        1. At universities do not wear bricks, find out, finally. LEARN IN THEM.

                        2. Where did they go? They WAS and TEACHED, despite the fact that you almost destroyed them in 1917-22.
                        Or did you bring their scientists from Switzerland? Or what a tebeel who came from Switzerland ..... turned out to be a scientist ?! belay lol laughing

                        Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                        Of course not, the reasons are only known to inappropriate monarchists. Which, in dialectical materialism, are not a snout, but at the same time they believe that they have in their head the least subjective picture of the world.

                        Objective reality: in Yuzovka they shoot and kill Russians, in SAME Taganrog-NO.
                        Will not reach in any way?
                        Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                        Come on, you won’t stutter about it at all. And then I remind you of the limits of democracy under the monarchy.

                        Come on, with your advice, go there to your Councils.
                      3. -2
                        1 December 2019 21: 14
                        Quote: Olgovich
                        1. At universities do not wear bricks, find out, finally. LEARN IN THEM.

                        Well, that is, he did not build.
                        Quote: Olgovich
                        Where did they go? They WAS and TEACHED, despite the fact that you almost destroyed them in 1917-22.
                        Or did you bring their scientists from Switzerland? Or what a tebeel who came from Switzerland ..... turned out to be a scientist ?!

                        According to your logic, now everyone is studying in Soviet universities. But what am I talking about. Logic and monarchists are incompatible things.
                        Quote: Olgovich
                        Objective reality: in Yuzovka they shoot and kill Russians, in SAME Taganrog-NO.

                        Is this why monarchists hate logic so much? Nothing that there and there Russian? Only in the first case are Russians in a multinational federal state, and in the second in the Ukrainian national-chauvinistic.
                        Quote: Olgovich
                        Come on, with your advice, go there to your Councils.

                        So how is it with democracy under the monarchy?
                      4. -4
                        2 December 2019 10: 37
                        Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                        Well, that is, he did not build.

                        and who built? lol
                        Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                        According to your logic, now everyone is studying in Soviet universities. But what am I talking about. Logic and monarchists are incompatible things.

                        in IMPERIAL, ignoramus: IMTU (mvtu). IsbPI, IMGU and so on. Got it?
                        Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                        Is this why monarchists hate logic so much? Nothing that there and there Russian? Only in the first case are Russians in a multinational federal state, and in the second in the Ukrainian national-chauvinistic.

                        In the first, the Russians, at their homeland, and in the second, the same Russians with their homeland, were raped and given to the MONSTER of owls to Ukraine.

                        And the first ones were saved by MIRACLE in 1925, having hardly escaped from there, so they would have been killed the same way today
                        Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                        So how is it with democracy under the monarchy?

                        Perfectly against the background of the wild MEDIEVAL 1930s
                      5. 0
                        3 December 2019 19: 33
                        Quote: Olgovich
                        and who built?

                        Like who? You're kind of weird. Of course, the people.
                        Quote: Olgovich
                        in IMPERIAL, ignoramus: IMTU (mvtu). IsbPI, IMGU and so on. Got it?

                        NSTU, MIPT, MGIMO, TRTI are also IMPERIAL? laughing
                        Quote: Olgovich
                        In the first, the Russians, at their homeland, and in the second, the same Russians with their homeland, were raped and given to the MONSTER of owls to Ukraine.

                        Well, how is it when Putin forces the troops to defend?
                        Quote: Olgovich
                        Perfectly against the background of the wild MEDIEVAL 1930s

                        Maybe you can, yes. Slaves always need a master. But we are not slaves. By the way, your king has abdicated, leaving the country to the mercy of fate. And somehow the monarchists did not stand up as one to defend him. So you are to blame for all the monarchists. laughing
              2. -1
                2 December 2019 16: 11
                Well, yes, the acquisition of the relics of the Romanovs is a great achievement, albeit the only one. Apparently, we should all repeat the mantra "Win Sim" ..
                1. -4
                  3 December 2019 07: 38
                  Quote: andrew42
                  Well yesfor gaining

                  Or write in Russian, or nothing.
          2. Fat
            +5
            27 November 2019 16: 29
            Quote: Olgovich
            You at least look at the CRITERIA for determining the standard of living in this "survey": the cost of TIME for travel around the country and the CLIMATE, including .. And where can Russia be?

            A resident of Texas tells a resident of Maine.
            - In order to get from the northern border of my ranch, to the South it takes 2 days.
            - I also used to have a very bad car, after some thought, a resident of Maine answers.
            )))
          3. +3
            27 November 2019 18: 57
            Quote: Olgovich
            As for the imperial project, then. think too much has been destroyed
            And if you call the main? An integration project may not be imperial if it is not built on the basis of expansion.
          4. 0
            30 November 2019 10: 02
            not for nothing goes a joke about French students at the Moscow station, before the train Moscow-Vladivostok (40 years on the road), they cried)).
        3. +9
          27 November 2019 14: 11
          Quote: However, Dear
          Neighbors near and far, perhaps, would want again together, but for a good life, and not for the sake of ideology, and even less so forcibly.

          I am afraid that the union based on the principles of the "good life" is not very strong. Life has worsened - and there is no union. I think that in times of trial we have always been stronger together ..
          1. +4
            27 November 2019 18: 35
            Quote: AlexGa
            I think that in the year of trials we were always stronger together ..

            socialism is inevitable, because it is an ideology of joint survival.
            1. +2
              27 November 2019 18: 42
              And our history has confirmed this!
              1. 0
                27 November 2019 19: 54
                who is studying history now?
              2. 0
                28 November 2019 21: 23
                True, not everyone realized this.
          2. 0
            27 November 2019 21: 52
            I am afraid that the union based on the principles of the "good life" is not very strong. Life has deteriorated - and there is no union. I think that in times of trial we have always been stronger together.


            But Russia claims to be the imperial center of this union. If we discard the option of taking and holding by force the provinces, then the center must be attractive to be sought. And what can Russia attract now? Protection from America? So it does not pretend on anyone's territory by military means. Buy - yes, sometimes he wants to. But the sale is voluntary. After World War II, it did not take away territories from the defeated countries, unlike the USSR, but it helped them recover, attracted economically, prosperity, and gained allies in their person. Protection from China? Yes, one and a half billion Chinese, and with the Communist Party at the head, is a danger. But not for Russia's neighbors, but for Russia itself. The Chinese, yes, unlike America, want territories: Siberia, the Far East. But the Chinese also prefer to gain new territories without fighting, for now, at least. The huge and growing military potential of China is primarily a threat to Russia, and not to distant America. Here are such pies.
            1. 0
              2 December 2019 11: 24
              Quote: However, Dear
              then the center must be attractive in order to be sought. And what can Russia attract now?

              In my opinion, the highlighted thesis is that you started well, but not quite successfully.
              Why do you consider "Russia", the whole of Russia, as a new center?
              1. It has regions, and the fact that Moscow is not at all Smolensk or Astrakhan is a no brainer. Moreover, the concept of "center" is very flexible.
              2. Why Russia? Old Man is trying with all his might not to get off the rope and maybe he will come. And why / why, something new needs to be built on the basis of the old region?
              Quote: However, Dear
              Yes, one and a half billion Chinese, and with the Communist Party at the head, is a danger. But not for Russia's neighbors, but for Russia itself.

              Thousands of owners of medium-sized enterprises and millions of workers around the world and especially in Europe who have lost their jobs after the transfer of production to China disagree with this thesis.

              The author of the article, on purpose, or through misunderstanding, made one fundamental mistake. Russia was developing the periphery not at the expense of the metropolis, but at the expense of the redistribution of funds between the subjects, trying to intervene minimally in the "souls" of the subjects. This is hell's work, the most unrewarding in the world - balancing between hundreds of nations that do not understand each other, and trying to be an arbiter over them.
              States, with their smelter, are trying to raise the chance of their ideology. But! Even the appearance of only two alien components in the mother country (Latins and Africans) is already embarrassing the system.
              1. 0
                2 December 2019 21: 38
                Here, maybe not directly on the topic:
                About 1,1 million HIV-infected people are registered in Russia, but less than half of them receive treatment

                More details: https://www.newsru.com/russia/01dec2019/hiv_rus.html

                These are the indicators of Africa! So, what should attract neighbors to the new Russian empire, even with Lukashenko on board?
                1. 0
                  3 December 2019 10: 01
                  Quote: However, Dear
                  About 1,1 million HIV-infected people are registered in Russia, but less than half of them receive treatment

                  All on the topic.
                  Only the topic must be understood.
        4. 0
          30 November 2019 23: 38
          “We, old men, may not live to see the decisive battles of the coming revolution.” P.
      3. +4
        27 November 2019 14: 56
        Russian global project and the restoration of the Russian empire "" "
        .
        Is there a struggle between two or three projects?
        Duma deputy Fedorov speaks of Anglo-Saxons for 20 years.
        Soloviev on the first channel about another project ....
        .. "Russian project" would sound:
        “Here the Russian spirit, here it smells of Rus ...”
      4. 0
        29 November 2019 16: 24
        Still and again he is silent about the place of Russians in this whole empire. In one face, pulling this whole zoo is tired.
      5. 0
        1 December 2019 18: 22
        Thrifty is right. The tasks set for the text were not given to the grabbing mafia, which now has too many representatives in power. And which in the 90s finally seized power, having torn apart the superpower. It is good that some patriots did not let the country be killed in trash, but we are unlikely to hear about them soon. As during the occupation by the enemy, now many patriots hide in order not to be discovered and "disarmed" - and the more they hide the more they do. But there must also be normal public "leaders" around whom the people gather!
    2. +31
      27 November 2019 08: 08
      Quote: Thrifty
      The author of Maidan tea accidentally did not drink?

      Well no. The author has good thoughts - to wake up the asleep imperial spirit of a Russian person, to rally him around the leader, etc. But no matter how strong the spirit of a Russian person is, only this will not help today. Rather, the unification around a rotten bunch of rulers. Which of them you will not look at, everyone who should be responsible for the development of the country does not just steal, but steal tons of currency and gold. Here's how to revive the power of the country with such? Even if we completely abandon pensions, agree to a 90% income tax, they will steal all these funds and take them abroad. The problem of today's Russia is not that we cannot feed the poor, but that the rich cannot get drunk in any way.
      Author, your proposals to the people of Russia - to concentrate, gather with the last forces and unite around Putin and his oligarch friends for the revival of the Empire - is a crime against our people. It is absolutely impossible to achieve anything with the current thieves, except for boltology, but we will take away the last strength and faith that remained with the people from the mighty USSR. What has prevented the current thieves from raising the country for 20 years? As you know, the country had not just a lot of free money, but a lot, hundreds of billions of dollars. It was high time, ten years ago, to admit that, as the people say: "it is not the wallpaper that needs to be changed in the brothel, but the girls."
      1. -3
        27 November 2019 13: 36
        Ugly country, and even less so Russia, is equated with a brothel. It’s wrong to blame everyone for theft. It is more correct to compare a country with a family, as Engels did. And in a family they tolerate shortcomings (they do not shout publicly about misconduct), protect dignity, including all members. Simple rules of good form .......
        The most important integration tool is culture - that’s what you need to take care of, to cultivate not show business, but Czech, Dostoevsky, Sholokhov, Mussorg and Aivaz ....
        1. +3
          27 November 2019 18: 42
          Quote: Victor N
          The most important integration tool is culture

          +++ I will continue your thought - culture is a system of internal restrictions. Who today is preoccupied with any restrictions to instill in the young generation? only church! But the Church is one of the instruments of power calling for humility and rejecting progress! The state still has a whole Ministry of Culture preoccupied with the development of national shows, amateur performances, but not with Culture.
    3. +6
      27 November 2019 09: 25
      Quote: Thrifty
      The author of Maidan tea accidentally did not drink?

      The author is a candidate of technical sciences, leading designer of the Kharkov Design Bureau of Mechanical Engineering named after Morozov, has inventions in the field of tank control systems.
      After the Nazi coup in Kiev - one of the leaders of the Kharkov resistance.
      In 2014, the ukronazists was arrested.
      1. +9
        27 November 2019 12: 51
        Whatever the Author, his propaganda in favor of Russia as an empire does not stand up to criticism in the light of the economic and political realities of our country.
        Let's look at these realities. The empire in its composition is obliged to have a prosperous metropolis, by today's standards - a humane, paternalistic orientation. That was the USSR. He could not stand the moral or material burden, the leadership decomposed, betrayed his people.
        What do we have now? Stunning, altruistic humanism towards the former "brothers", still generously feeding from our table through migrants. And absolutely cruel, spiteful attitude towards the people of the "metropolis" on the part of its authorities.
        Is it an empire?
        Moreover, an unprecedentedly generous offer of its own territory to anyone - I don't want to take it! According to the federal law of 2015 473-FZ "On territories of advanced development" 60% of the Russian territory is divided into 99 of its most tasty pieces, each of which is leased to foreigners for a period of 70 years or more indefinitely with the ability to extract any minerals, export them, catch clean fish, kill animals without paying anything to the budget of the Russian Federation, alienate plots and real estate on them, compensating for the owner's losses arbitrarily.
        And is it an empire?
        And now half of the export-oriented private companies in Russia are completely owned by foreigners who, according to the "imperial" law, take out everything, giving the local population nothing but a few, poorly paid jobs, difficult working conditions and a poisoned desert around - and this is an empire?
        Little of!
        In the 90s, a foreigner could not have more than 20% of the shares of a Russian enterprise, and now everything is corporatized with a sale on foreign exchanges. Since 2005, a foreigner has the right to buy up 49% of the shares of a state enterprise and 100% of a private one. And since Putin has set the task of transferring the remnants of state property to private hands, taking into account the current trend, the time is not far off when 100% of Russian enterprises turn out to be foreign. And given the upcoming sale of vast land ...
        This is not an empire or even a ghost of it. And not even occupation - it is a slow crowding out of the local population into the promised paradise without the use of an atomic bomb. And only a few of the most viable will find refuge in foreign lands.
        1. -1
          27 November 2019 13: 03
          Quote: depressant
          his propaganda in favor of Russia as an empire does not hold water in the light of the economic and political realities of our country

          This is his point of view, he has every right - by the way, nothing new has been said, I personally liked the article.
          Quote: depressant
          The empire in its composition is obliged to have a prosperous metropolis, by today's standards - a humane, paternalistic orientation. That was the USSR.

          The RSFSR was the most impoverished republic within the USSR, such was the Soviet empire.
          Quote: depressant
          leadership decayed, betrayed its people.

          The people themselves have decomposed, and for a long time, long before the USSR, and now this very people is no better than the present decomposed so-called elite.
        2. 0
          27 November 2019 19: 15
          Quote: depressant
          The empire in its composition is obliged to have a prosperous metropolis, by today's standards - a humane, paternalistic orientation. That was the USSR.
          Excuse me, what was the metropolis like in 1922? Thriving after the Civil War and with the humane red terror of the RSFSR?
        3. +1
          28 November 2019 02: 41
          It seems that we can’t see an empire and decisive changes in life, until the blood has been shed
          1. -2
            28 November 2019 10: 42
            Quote: Chaldon48
            It seems that we can’t see an empire and decisive changes in life, until the blood has been shed
            In your place, I would write like this:
            It seems that we can’t see the bars and the prison prison in life, until the blood has been shed
            Ready for a drastic change? If not yet - learn the flaring, suddenly it will come in handy to portray a pantomime somewhere.
            1. -2
              28 November 2019 11: 01
              Quote: sniperino
              pantomime
              Error: Understand
      2. +3
        27 November 2019 13: 04
        The author is a candidate of technical sciences, leading designer of the Kharkov Design Bureau of Mechanical Engineering named after Morozov, has inventions in the field of tank control systems.
        After the Nazi coup in Kiev - one of the leaders of the Kharkov resistance.
        In 2014, the ukronazists was arrested.

        So what? How do the degrees of candidate of technical sciences and an employee of KMDB, listed by you, bring him closer to understanding the issue described? And how the author led the resistance in Kharkov, especially in the field of commerce, so he strenuously hides it and does not tell anywhere. Overlaps with how he was arrested by the "Ukronazis".
        So do not tear the shirt on your chest for an individual that you will learn about exclusively from the network and do not print propaganda stamps for hamsters.
        1. -1
          27 November 2019 13: 12
          Quote: Undecim
          So do not tear the shirt on your chest for an individual that you will learn about exclusively from the network and do not print propaganda stamps for hamsters.

          You see, information about him on the network is posted, but who you are (frankly) is unknown, or maybe you are an agent of the SBU (and who knows)
          1. +3
            27 November 2019 13: 23
            You see, information about him has been posted on the network, but it’s not known who you are (frankly), or maybe you are an agent of the SBU (and who knows).
            Your comment allows you to be confidently attributed to those for which the stamps. There are a lot of things "superimposed" on the network and about many. The question is - who "put" and for what purpose? Or have you checked and guarantee that everything is true and did not hide anything?
            The basis for hysterical sobbing like your comment, this "overlay" is only for a certain part of the audience that I have designated.
            Actually, I did not write my commentary for you and did not write for a discussion with you about the author, whom I know not from the information "superimposed" on the network.
            It was written for those who, unlike you, still retained the ability to independently use the thinking apparatus.
            All the best.
            1. +2
              27 November 2019 13: 24
              Quote: Undecim
              All the best.

              And all the best to you.
    4. +4
      27 November 2019 13: 02
      The time of Empires went back to the 20th century
      1. 0
        27 November 2019 19: 19
        Heard, heard. "It's time to end the imperial manners." No words, only letters.
        1. 0
          27 November 2019 19: 20
          For some reason, you thought purely about Russia, but I talked about any
    5. -10
      27 November 2019 13: 22
      The fifth column, which is constantly pouring mud on the country, is actively preventing Russia from recovering - who might like it? Pride for the country is not observed at all!
      1. +6
        27 November 2019 18: 41
        Quote: Victor N
        the fifth column is actively interfering
        Are you talking about members of United Russia with residence permits in Europe?
    6. 0
      28 November 2019 14: 50
      Quote: Thrifty
      but Putin is liberal to the bone

      Normally. One more. You can finally bother to read what liberalism, a liberal economy, a free market, conservatism, conservatism in the economy (protectionism) are, or will you continue to carry nonsense?
  2. +14
    27 November 2019 05: 43
    I am afraid of Ukraine. We have lost for a long time ... It would not have happened again with Belarus too!
    The author is right in the Main - Restoration of the economy, Problem number 1.
    Problem number 2 - Reintegration of Russians who found themselves after the collapse of the USSR, outside of Russia!
    1. +17
      27 November 2019 06: 12
      Quote: Hunter 2
      The author is right in the Main - Restoration of the economy, Problem number 1.

      who has a task? many have been "restored" in twenty years? compare twenty post-war years and the last twenty.
      1. +1
        27 November 2019 09: 36
        Quote: Aerodrome
        ... compare twenty post-war years and the last twenty.

        Do you think this comparison is correct?

        Today the whole country is occupied - then only a small part of it (to the Volga).
        Today in the management "Who is in the US, who is in the EU, who else is where" - then there was a monolith.

        At the beginning of the century, the country was cracking at the seams. The elites tore it to pieces. Tasks to be solved:
        - prevent the collapse of the country;
        - fulfill the social obligations of the state to citizens - fill the budget;
        - taking into account the previous experience of Stolypin and Stalin, to ensure the country's defense, for subsequent actions aimed at restoring sovereignty;
        - feed people, ensure food security.

        All these tasks were completed and it is in the sequence in which they are stated that it is pointless to make repairs in the apartment if the house is demolished in a week. Everything has its time. It will reach democrats from the economy.
        1. +7
          27 November 2019 11: 27
          Dear Boris. We know the transformations in Russia with outstanding and outstanding personalities who managed to carry out reforms in Russia. These were independent subjects: Ivan the Terrible, Peter the First, J.V. Stalin. In all cases, the reforms began with the removal of the old elite ("old guard") and the approach of young poor nobles. The president is already well over 60 and has over 20 years of experience in the highest positions in the State apparatus. He will be in the office of President until 2024, will there be enough time for reforms? Where is the removal of old cadres? Hence the questions: Is the President a subject or an object? Where are the forces that will carry out reforms? In what closed structures are plans for reforms prepared? Whom will Vladimir Putin rely on when carrying out reforms, if he decides on this: big business or small and medium-sized. and maybe after apologizing, all the same to ordinary citizens of Russia with the words: “Comrades! Citizens! Brothers and sisters! Soldiers of our army and navy! I appeal to you, my friends! .... "
          Questions, solid questions. I think that the current President is not like the Reformer. Let me be a pessimist in this matter. "It is better to be a pessimist than an optimist. Because life sometimes presents a pessimist with pleasant surprises, and an optimist - only unpleasant ones." (C)
          1. +1
            27 November 2019 19: 53
            Quote: AA17
            until 2024, is there enough time for reforms? Where is the removal of old frames? Hence the questions: President - subject or object?
            You can also ask the last question, otherwise after the first two questions you do not have a logical transition to the third, but some kind of monkey jump to the side is obtained. Is it possible on this basis to conclude that you are an object - a clockwork monkey?
        2. -3
          27 November 2019 12: 04
          Today the whole country is occupied

          Yah. And by whom is she occupied?
          1. -2
            27 November 2019 12: 34
            Not a country - but some guys are occupied by a schiz.
            1. 0
              28 November 2019 11: 43
              Quote: Vadim237
              Not a country - but some guys are occupied by a schiz.
              For this, including, from the battle control system, they made a conflict management system in information / hybrid wars and presented it to the world as a civilian Internet, actively developing methods in our segment from the 90s.
          2. +3
            27 November 2019 13: 03
            Capitalists
          3. +5
            27 November 2019 13: 06
            View from the bottom Recently, I have not given way to steep wheelbarrows if the rules allow it (it will end badly for me) There was an idea why I do it? Envy? -It was always to some extent. No longer hatred, and it has appeared since the 90s. Hatred and fear of possible serious problems. And who is driving them now breaking the rules, cutting under pressure, etc.? These are representatives of the authorities, their relatives and successful (it’s not so simple) businessmen. Who am I to them, no one and they are power for whom I am nobody Question how do people call power, who are nobody for it? - in different ways) It turns out at the moment there is such an opinion and there is reasons for its existence
            1. -1
              27 November 2019 20: 38
              Quote: awdrgy
              Recently, I have not given way to steep wheelbarrows if the rules allow it (it will end badly for me) There was an idea why I do it? Envy? -It was always to some extent. There is no longer hatred, and it has appeared since the 90s. Hatred and fear of possible serious problems.
              Live 30 years in hatred and fight fears, a borzoi in the framework of traffic rules? During such a time, the whistle can fly out and the lid can be demolished ... And someone suggested to you that you would have lived in the USSR, but you haven’t bothered him, but Putin adjusted it all, right?
              1. +1
                27 November 2019 22: 30
                There are no words a man on a cheap car does not give way to pepper to expensive if the rules allow it, he greets in the framework of traffic rules In general, it seems logical that traffic rules install pepper
                from dear What should have been proved))) In short, who blew the cover?
                1. +2
                  27 November 2019 22: 35
                  Quote: awdrgy
                  man on a cheap car does not give way to pepper in dear
                  I will give way to anyone who is trying to overtake me if we are not in traffic or on the track competing. Why at the same time evaluate the car overtaking, I can not even imagine.
                  1. 0
                    27 November 2019 22: 37
                    Yes, we just talked with men in the garage
    2. +3
      27 November 2019 14: 15
      Quote: Hunter 2
      Problem number 2 - Reintegration of Russians who found themselves after the collapse of the USSR, outside of Russia!

      Bravo, with both hands "FOR"!
  3. +10
    27 November 2019 05: 44
    Frozen in a loyal stupor ... yes ... this is a blizzard ....
    Russia has never been, as the saying goes, a superpower. There is no need to confuse it with the USSR. Yes, there is no doubt a major regional power. They could get their hands on what’s bad and what’s such. everyone looked back at Europe. yes and sometimes served their interests.
    Of course, in Russia there was an object called a superpower, it is the USSR, but it is a supranational state of a new type. It had its own ideology that was different from everyone. It also had an economy that was different from everyone. It had healthy ambitions and strength and means to realize them. But it seemed to the Russians not kosher Communism kills the Russian spirit. And the Soviet project was sent to hell ...
    1. +2
      27 November 2019 21: 02
      Quote: apro
      Frozen in a loyal stupor ... yes ... this is a blizzard ....
      Sorry, I have a problem with your grammar. The word "blizzard" must be followed by a colon, not an ellipsis, and all subsequent text is enclosed in quotation marks.
  4. +23
    27 November 2019 05: 48
    I’m wondering, with whom are you going to restore the Russian empire ?! Here with them chtoli?

    These of course will build the Russian world, patriots even wherever, one is better than the other. fool
    1. +22
      27 November 2019 06: 14
      Quote: Greenwood
      These of course will build the Russian world, patriots even wherever, one is better than the other.

      Shuvalov burns with napalm! wassat Russia is certainly united, within United Russia.
      1. +9
        27 November 2019 07: 06
        Quote: Aerodrome
        Shuvalov burns with napalm
        I was also "pleased" by his pearls; they would certainly tighten their belts in the State Duma and the Government and rally around the "national leader." Here it is unambiguous. soldier
      2. +1
        27 November 2019 11: 21
        Abyzov, if my memory serves me right, is currently under arrest. Zheleznyak is still in the State Duma, but already as an ordinary deputy, he left the leading posts in the EP and in the chamber in protest against raising the retirement age.
      3. +10
        27 November 2019 14: 53
        Quote: Aerodrome
        ... shuvalov burns with napalm!

        so he’s a patriot! laughing
    2. -12
      27 November 2019 09: 19
      Quote: Greenwood
      I'm wondering

      Keyword, BULK LIVE, what kind of intelligence are you working on?
      1. +9
        27 November 2019 15: 00
        Quote: bober1982
        Keyword, BULK LIVE, what kind of intelligence are you working on?

        possible without Bulk ...

        laughing
        1. -3
          27 November 2019 15: 05
          Quote: Silvestr
          possible without Bulk ...

          So I’m talking about the same thing, because it’s not a liberal site, patriotic comrades have gathered here, why advertise the mentioned gentleman, a fighter for the happiness of the masses of the people.
          1. +10
            27 November 2019 15: 32
            Quote: bober1982
            patriotic comrades gathered here, why advertise the mentioned gentleman, a fighter for the happiness of the broad masses of the people.

            advertise not worth it, say it right. Just now, many dishonest people have privatized patriotism and speak of it in their understanding, although there is another opinion ..
            1. -2
              27 November 2019 17: 17
              This is commendable (good quote), I mean, you had the mind not to quote the notorious ...... patriotism as a refuge of villains
              But I do not advise quoting American presidents (good advice) - a freemason sits on a freemason, and drives a freemason (that is, a Satanist).
          2. +1
            27 November 2019 18: 47
            Quote: bober1982
            patriotic comrades
            Patriotic comrades do not mean "admirers of the corrupt Putin regime." Remember at last.
            Communist Bondarenko spoke quite well about this:

            In general, you are not looking for the enemy there.
      2. +3
        27 November 2019 18: 42
        Quote: bober1982
        Keyword, BULK LIVE, what kind of intelligence are you working on?
        Is this the only thing you saw in the whole video? As I understand it, the plot and the message is not interesting to you? What did you want to say? lol
    3. +2
      27 November 2019 12: 37
      No one will restore any Russian empire - Belarus, Donbass, South Ossetia and Abkhazia want to join Russia - there will be a referendum; they will not want a referendum; no one will pull anyone by force, Russia is now full of other problems, the most important of which is growth economics.
      1. -1
        27 November 2019 13: 16
        You are a very sane person.
        It’s a pity that your post is invisible against the background of screams and cries
    4. +1
      27 November 2019 13: 25
      Quote: Greenwood
      I’m wondering, with whom are you going to restore the Russian empire ?! Here with them chtoli?

      And how many houses in Europe did Russian nobles have?
      Quote: Greenwood
      These of course will build the Russian world, patriots even wherever, one is better than the other.

      And who were the two richest women in Europe at the beginning of the 20th century? Or are the Great Russian princes not patriots?
      And railway the station near Nizhny Tagil, the Demidov patrimony, is called San Morino, why?
      1. +3
        27 November 2019 14: 20
        Quote: AllXVahhaB
        And railway the station near Nizhny Tagil, the Demidov patrimony, is called San Morino, why?

        Isn't it San Donato. In any case, in 1983 I was there and there was such a name. By the name of a descendant of Demidov, who bought land in Italy and received the title of "San Donato".
        1. +1
          27 November 2019 14: 56
          Quote: AlexGa
          Isn't it San Donato. In any case, in 1983 I was there and there was such a name. By the name of a descendant of Demidov, who bought land in Italy and received the title of "San Donato".

          It's to blame, a typo happened, I was thinking about something else. Of course, San Donato !!! By the name of the Demidian possessions in Italy ...
          1. +1
            27 November 2019 14: 58
            It happens, the namesake! Good luck
  5. +4
    27 November 2019 06: 01
    here recently a video about Rogozin was released, I watched him and thought, yes, and these people controlled space in our country, then you remember Korolev, and “what we have, we don’t store it, when we lose it, we cry”
    1. +3
      27 November 2019 09: 27
      Korolev did not control space. He was the General Designer, and one of them. Ministers of general engineering ruled the space: Afanasyev, Ustinov, Baklanov. It is unlikely that you know these names, except for Ustinov.
      1. -1
        27 November 2019 11: 22
        I know, I just didn’t want to paint for a long time
      2. 0
        27 November 2019 21: 17
        somehow, before, designers were held in high esteem, nobody knew managers — officials, but now officials are held in high esteem, and nobody knows designers.
        The result is obvious.
        1. +1
          27 November 2019 23: 52
          The Queen, too, until his death, no one knew. As the public neither Glushko nor Chelomei knew. Their names were not mentioned in the media. Privacy mode.
          1. -1
            28 November 2019 00: 03
            In the USSR they were mentioned and were held in high esteem.
            I confirm as a witness.
            Wiki to help me
            Chelomey, Vladimir Nikolaevich // Biographical Dictionary of the Figures of Natural Sciences and Technology: In 2 volumes / Otv. ed. A.A. Zvorykin; Ed. col .: N.N. Anichkov, I.P. Bardin, A.A. Blagonravov and others; Institute of the History of Natural Science and Technology of the USSR Academy of Sciences. - M .: State. scientific publishing house "Great Soviet Encyclopedia", 1959. - T. 2 (M — Y); Additions and changes. - S. 441. - 468 s

            Especially loud was Korolev, of course
            But no one knew Afanasyev or Baklanov.
            Yes, and Ustinov only as Minister of Defense.
            1. +2
              28 November 2019 00: 06
              Ustinov was known as the People's Commissar of Arms of the USSR. People's Commissar at 33 years old.
              1. 0
                28 November 2019 00: 54
                as a citizen of the USSR I can testify, as they knew the Minister of Defense, and as a member of the Politburo.
                the fact that he was once the People’s Commissar of Arms was never advertised or exalted anywhere, like the names of designers or astronauts.
                Although it was not hiding, of course, if you really wanted to, it was possible to read in TSB.
                1. 0
                  28 November 2019 02: 30
                  As a citizen of the USSR, I can also testify: they knew without TSB ... From childhood ...
                  1. 0
                    28 November 2019 10: 43
                    Exactly what they knew if they accidentally read
                    But in the media or books about this, if there were any mention, it is extremely rare
                    Well, not all children well-read geeks were like Armenian

                    And in the media they wrote about the Queen very often, Chelomeya and Glushkorezhe, but they also wrote about Baklanov, Ustinov or Afanasyev as managers, if they wrote, then in a rare random way, but I don’t remember this
                    And just now I found out, for example, that Baklanov is alive and working.
                    Now you will know
                    1. 0
                      28 November 2019 10: 51
                      No, it’s no coincidence ... Everyone then read ... From childhood, I remember that Ustinov was already at the age of 26 at significant posts (I don’t remember which one, but I remember my age) ...
                      1. +1
                        29 November 2019 00: 38
                        Ustinov was known as Minister of Defense and one of the important members of the Politburo, always listed on the list.
                        Not an indicator.
                        The general public did not know Baklanov and Afanasev.
                        The Queen was remembered very often.
                        What are you arguing about?
  6. -8
    27 November 2019 06: 06
    Frankly fascist article, even for patriots too - not a single comment.
    1. Fat
      0
      27 November 2019 16: 57
      Quote: eklmn
      Frankly fascist article, even for patriots too - not a single comment.

      You have not read the materials of the "Asgardian school" :)))) and you will read it now.
      The article is quite correct, a bit naive and romantic, yes ..
      But this is the same opinion of the author
      1. -6
        27 November 2019 17: 07
        I compared the idea of ​​the author with the idea of ​​the Anschluss with Austria and the gathering of the lands of the Czech Republic and Poland. The ideas are exactly the same, only one of them ended in a world war. If this is a “naive romantic idea”, then for Russia it’s scary ....
        1. Fat
          +2
          27 November 2019 17: 17
          Quote: eklmn
          If this is a “naive-romantic idea,” then it’s scary for Russia ...

          Not an idea, but an article. And try to translate "Anschluss" into Russian. Omsk Inglism is much worse.
  7. +18
    27 November 2019 06: 12
    The author fantasizes, because everything goes in the opposite direction. Ukraine is lost through our fault and the process is aggravated. Now there is a lull on the Ukrainian front. Obviously, the elite of Ukraine reads such forecasts and acts contrary to them. Belarus is slowly drifting in the same direction.
    1. +6
      27 November 2019 14: 24
      Quote: Silvestr
      Belarus is slowly drifting in the same direction.

      Guys, do not believe, Belarus stands in its place. And it will stand while the generation of the Soviet Union is alive. And here in 10-15 years a question. It is necessary to work with youth, and not only with the help of money.
  8. 0
    27 November 2019 06: 17
    Article in the opinion section. Those. This is IMHO author?
    1. Fat
      0
      27 November 2019 17: 08
      Quote: Hazarov
      Article in the opinion section. Those. This is IMHO author?

      I am sure that this is a personal opinion, not the opinion of a part of the political elite.
  9. +1
    27 November 2019 06: 39
    With the collapse of the Union, the outlying peoples of the empire began to scatter in their national corners.

    But didn’t they ruin the Union? with the participation of the center
  10. +15
    27 November 2019 06: 50
    Until recently, Russia was one of the two world superpowers and is slowly reviving its power.

    What other power? Is the loss of Ukraine "slowly reviving its power"?
    I'm not talking about the Baltic states, Georgia, etc.
    Former Soviet suburbs themselves should want to return to the fold of Russian civilization, and for this it should become attractive to them in the political, economic, military and humanitarian aspects.

    Downright "should" and certainly? And the "debtors" are at least aware of this, or just a statement of fact?
    The author, I did not understand something. You decide. First up is:
    With the assertion of a Putin team with clearly imperial views and interests, Russia began to gradually revive and regain its strength.

    Then this one:
    I would like more, but even in the Russian elite, the pro-Western liberal wing resists the integration of post-Soviet countries and seeks to draw Russia into Western civilization in its selfish interests.

    And where did this notorious
    pro-Western liberal wing
    в
    Russian top
    ? How could the guarantor allow this disgrace? Aah, he probably doesn’t know.
    The Russian leadership, having lost to the West the first round of the struggle for Ukraine, is now trying, with the help of the Minsk agreements, to prevent Ukraine from finally leaving for Western civilization. In this regard, Russia does not recognize the independence of Donbass, it is needed as a Trojan horse for the destruction of the neo-Nazi regime in Ukraine from the inside and as a locomotive for the return of Ukrainian society to its native land.

    That’s it, Sabbath. I can’t read further ...
  11. +6
    27 November 2019 07: 11
    Expansion for expansion is not an idea followed by the peoples. First, an idea should appear, an ideology in a different way, and then the economy and so on will follow. Why bother and spend energy on building factories if you don't understand what they are for and how this will help your family specifically? Idea, i.e. ideology is the image of the future. We must form an idea about how we want to live, by what rules, what we want to leave to our descendants. This idea should be clear and accessible as the 7 commandments. The Americans have an "American dream" and a "melting pot", we must have something like that, something like a "Russian ark", as an antipode to the "melting pot".
    1. +7
      27 November 2019 07: 53
      The Russian people can have only one unifying ideology (idea) - justice expressed in a fair state system. This is what can unite the majority, but it is contrary to the wishes of the ruling minority, and therefore we are in complete prostration. hi
      1. +3
        27 November 2019 09: 31
        Justice and equality are utopias. There will always be one who is more equal than others. The idea should be different: a rich citizen is a strong power. Also, of course, utopian, but still more real.
        1. +6
          27 November 2019 10: 44
          Quote: AS Ivanov.
          a rich citizen is a strong power. Also, of course, utopian, but still more real.

          -------------------------
          The paradigm today is usually a little different. A strong state comes for the money of a wealthy citizen.
          1. +2
            27 November 2019 11: 21
            A rich citizen is not always honest and law-abiding. Most get rich at the expense of others, and this is contrary to general justice.
      2. +1
        27 November 2019 11: 18
        justice expressed in a fair state system

        I translate into Russian - for all good versus all bad. Everyone has their own truth and understanding about it. Need a common truth.
        1. +2
          27 November 2019 21: 02
          Quote: RusKosTen
          I translate into Russian - for all good versus all bad. Everyone has their own truth and understanding about it. Need a common truth.

          the general truth will not work, but the truth of the majority is quite real.
      3. 0
        27 November 2019 14: 12
        Today the idea is the construction of a civil society, a social state, and the improvement of Russia. There is progress in this direction and is being carried out by the current authorities.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +5
      27 November 2019 09: 06
      There is no idea in the expansion of empires, except for one - resources and enrichment))) So all the sweet words about the restoration of RI are just sweet words. Is there a crisis? We are starting to "expand"))) Is there no crisis? No one takes risks and sits quietly within their borders. Expansion - appropriation of other people's resources, land and labor. It's clear why)) Not for the sake of not raising the retirement age laughing laughing laughing laughing

      The main thing is to come up with a beautiful fairy tale. Some carry "democracy", others "Russian world", the third like Islamization, the crusaders liked to baptize everyone ...

      And only the power of the working people, after 91 years, no one wants to expand something. But in vain)))
      1. +4
        27 November 2019 09: 16
        There is no idea in expanding empires, except for one - resources and enrichment)))

        There is one more - stability and safety. Both economic and military.
        1. 0
          27 November 2019 21: 03
          Quote: Pavel57
          There is one more - stability and safety.

          stability is equal - stagnation turning into recession
          1. +2
            27 November 2019 21: 25
            It is your opinion. The stability of a large system is the ability to adequately fend off perturbations, but does not deny development.
            1. 0
              27 November 2019 22: 16
              Quote: Pavel57
              It is your opinion. The stability of a large system is the ability to adequately fend off perturbations, but does not deny development.

              when you go, you take the body out of a steady state by taking a step forward.
              small and large systems are subject to the same laws of physics.
              putting sustainability in the category of ideas, society is not able to advance ahead because this process carries with it danger.
              moving away from risk come to the phase of protection achieved. which is stagnation.
              is your opinion different?
              1. +1
                28 November 2019 08: 33
                Stability is not static, but movement, without shaking vibrations.
      2. +5
        27 November 2019 10: 46
        The power of the working people never existed. There was the power of party nomenclature.
    4. 0
      27 November 2019 18: 17
      Ark of traditional values. True, it should be recognized, somewhat leaky.
  12. +4
    27 November 2019 07: 36
    "... the problem of integration of Transcaucasia, Central Asia and Moldova should be solved, but this is already the next stage of integration, first of all, the problems of the return of Ukraine and Belarus should be solved. Russia did not recognize the independence of Abkhazia, South Ossetia, Transnistria and Donbass; the future does not need scraps of premature states, but the entire post-Soviet space. "

    The author, with all due respect, do not try on the image of Sergius of Radonezh. Now there is neither Dmitry Donskoy nor Ambush Regiment. And the Horde impostor in Kiev is doing well and is demanding a "gas tribute." There is no one to collect Russian lands, to restore the power of the Empire. ...

    But Central Asia and the Caucasus are already a very distant alien world.
  13. +5
    27 November 2019 07: 47
    "and the Russian adopted the heritage of the Byzantine Empire with a communal structure and a desire not to conquer, but to incorporate other peoples while preserving their traditions, culture, religion and way of life" - you need to know the history, at least a little. Byzantium was not so "fluffy" at all. There was everything that was in Rome, if not worse. RESOURCES WERE LESS, that's why the appetites have diminished, and the "savages" began to smile more often.
    1. +1
      27 November 2019 18: 24
      Byzantium was pretty fluffy at the time. Take the Jewish question. In Byzantium, Jews were offered to either accept Orthodoxy or leave voluntarily. In Western Europe - they took property, drove out without talking, killed ... There is some difference. Just like the light raid of domestic anti-Semitism in Russia can not be compared with what happened under Hitler in Germany.
  14. +13
    27 November 2019 07: 49
    Removed the ability to minus articles. In vain, in my opinion.
  15. +2
    27 November 2019 07: 53
    Quote: Silvestr
    The author fantasizes, because everything goes in the opposite direction. Ukraine is lost through our fault and the process is aggravated. Now there is a lull on the Ukrainian front. Obviously, the elite of Ukraine reads such forecasts and acts contrary to them. Belarus is slowly drifting in the same direction.

    Back in the 80s, a number of sociologists announced that the disintegration of large state formations and the intensification of nationalism in all directions awaited us. That is, people want to run away to their national apartments, regardless of whether it is the USSR or the USA. That they live badly in Canada? But there, too, there is the Quebec Liberation Army, there is the "Flemish Army" ... there is ... there is ... and EVERYONE IS STANDING FOR SEPARATION. In Catalonia, almost every house has a striped flag. And the city of Girona completely broke with Madrid. Before writing such a thing, one should read the modern SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE on such a complex issue.
    1. 0
      27 November 2019 18: 31
      Passed in the 18th year. Soviet republic of such and such a county. The Bolsheviks, God grant them health, somehow coped with this. An interim government would be powerless in this regard. It required an ideologized international element in large quantities, on which the Bolsheviks relied. Up to the Red Chinese. Then this element gradually resolved, and by the Great Patriotic War was almost completely absent. Although he managed to twitch for quite some time. Europe is furious with fat, the same sting. Will.
  16. +12
    27 November 2019 07: 59
    Russia is approaching the next expansion cycle, and the process of reintegrating the post-Soviet space and implementing the global Russian project requires long-term strategic actions to prepare the former Soviet republics for integration into Russian civilization. You can’t do without a radical upswing in the Russian economy and the creation of an attractive image of Russia, as well as targeted actions in the international arena to justify and promote Russian national interests in the territory of the post-Soviet space.
    Meanwhile, somewhere in expanding Russia:
    Levada Center: 53% of young Russians want to leave the country
    The Levada Center presented the data of a survey of Russians about their emigration moods: 53% of respondents aged 18 to 24 would like to leave Russia. This is a record for the last 10 years.

    On average, 21% reported a desire to leave Russia. Among the main reasons are concern for the future of children (45%), as well as the economic situation (40%) and the political situation (33%). Among those who would like to leave, there are fewer supporters of President Vladimir Putin than among those who do not think about emigration (54% versus 73%). Also, those who think about leaving are more ready to take part in protests (33% versus 17%). Moreover, among those who do not think about emigration, 36% believe that things are going in the wrong direction in the country.

    request
    1. -10
      27 November 2019 09: 41
      Quote: Greenwood
      Levada Center: 53% of young Russians want to leave the country

      Statistics are frankly false, like this center itself.
      And where to go? unless in North Korea - to study the ideas of Juche.
      1. +7
        27 November 2019 10: 57
        Denial is an extremely easy to understand defense. Its name speaks for itself - the person who uses it, in fact, denies events or information that it cannot accept.
        1. -10
          27 November 2019 11: 07
          Navalny, Levada Center, let's further "light up" on the "patriotic" site, you can add something from MK
          Sad gentlemen, clumsy work.
          1. +7
            27 November 2019 11: 14
            Splitting is a psychological process related to psychological defense mechanisms, which can be briefly described as thinking “in black and white”, in other words in terms of extremes: “good” or “bad”, “omnipotent” or “helpless”, etc.
            1. -6
              27 November 2019 11: 26
              Difficult and confused expressed.
              The real political opportunity of our day is the Antichrist, and this is beyond doubt.
              And you are interpreting something about psychological processes.
          2. +6
            27 November 2019 15: 02
            Quote: bober1982
            ... let's continue to "light" on the "patriotic" site,

            with these igniters?
            1. +1
              27 November 2019 15: 08
              And here, the People's Commissar Chicherin - was a bugger, and Kalinin himself - a seducer of young ballerinas.
              There you have it, and class consciousness.
              All in one world are oiled.
          3. +2
            27 November 2019 18: 37
            And why is Navalny worse than Kremlin hypocrites with British citizenships? At least he does not rub about the evil West, does not occupy government posts and does not have British citizenship. And then our patriots have continuous mutually exclusive paragraphs.
      2. 0
        28 November 2019 19: 24
        The essence of liberal politics, as of the previous period, is reflected in the speech of the messenger of God on earth from the Chabad Lubavitch sect available on the Internet. So it just says that these Jewish fascists and super-fascists will bring the population of Russia to 40-50 million and drive into the reservation to the north. Politics leads to this. Read, be surprised, and therefore draw a conclusion.
    2. +4
      27 November 2019 14: 14
      Think about why in the USSR, there was an exit visa? Apparently those wishing to blame were unmeasured.
    3. 0
      27 November 2019 18: 33
      It would be nice to evaluate the methodology of the Levada Center. Is it he, she, or it?
      1. 0
        28 November 2019 19: 26
        One of the offices, apparently, these = The essence of liberal politics, as well as the previous period, is reflected in the speech of the envoy of God on earth from the Chabad sect of Lubavitch, available on the Internet. So it just says that these Jewish fascists and super-fascists will bring the population of Russia to 40-50 million and drive into the reservation to the north. Politics leads to this. Read, be surprised, and therefore draw a conclusion.
  17. +1
    27 November 2019 08: 06
    Russia is approaching the next expansion cycle,

    Extensions or recovery though ??? Everything is very precarious, at this historical stage of the existence of the RUSSIAN state!
    1. +2
      27 November 2019 12: 34
      We would first strengthen.
      1. +1
        27 November 2019 13: 26
        Quote: cniza
        We would first strengthen.

        Do not stagger, do not hang there and there! It’s not even an over task, just to strengthen the BASIS!
        1. +2
          27 November 2019 14: 10
          And on a good basis, you can build something ...
          1. +1
            27 November 2019 14: 44
            Quote: cniza
            And on a good basis, you can build something ...

            I know! That's when he poured the foundation of his house 40 tons, stood it right, and the house now stands, does not crack, does not stagger!
            Fundamentalism, in a word!
  18. -12
    27 November 2019 08: 09
    the author .. is not quite right! ... The Russian Empire consisted of all of Europe! ... you need to know the real story! and not the one that was imposed on us in Soviet times!
    Second Patriotic
    The last Russian emperor did not know then that this day would only be a prologue to future bloody events. The collective West, seeing that the empire is still strong, brings to logical resolution a long work aimed at forming an internal enemy in the Russian Empire. And this is not just the “fifth column”, but in fact the western outpost of the empire, part of it, is Germany.

    At first glance, this statement may seem absurd, but I will explain my point of view. The fact is that today few people remember how they actually called that war in Russia, which was later called the “First World War”. Less and less remains open access to material evidence of the same age as the events of 1914. Here is just one of them:

    Tartaria twentieth century kadykchanskiy

    On the one hand, questions do not arise why it is “Second World War”, but if you remember the First Patriotic War, which happened a century earlier, and the conclusions made, that “Patriotic” is a synonym for the word “civil”, then questions arise. Is it possible that the German Empire attacked the Russian Empire, and we are talking about a likely war within the same fatherland? Maybe!

    Yes, formally, at the time the war started (July 24, 1914), there were four empires in Europe: - Russian, German, Austro-Hungarian and British. But we have more than once already had occasion to make sure that states often exist only for their citizens and subjects, and genuine borders dividing the spheres of influence of the monarchs are in no way connected with the drawn lines on political maps. Now we turn to the full title of the Russian emperor:

    “By God's mercy, Nicholas II, emperor and autocrat of All-Russian, Moscow, Kiev, Vladimir, Novgorod; king of Kazan, king of Astrakhan, king of Poland, king of Siberia, king of Tauric Chersonesos, king of Georgia; Sovereign Pskov and Grand Duke Smolensky, Lithuanian, Volyn, Podolsky and Finland; Prince of Estland, Livonia, Courland and Semigalsky, Samogitsky, Bialystok, Korelsky, Tver, Ugra, Perm, Vyatka, Bulgaria and others; the sovereign and the Grand Duke of Novgorod of the lower lands, Chernigov, Ryazan, Polotsky, Rostov, Yaroslavl, Belozersky, Udora, Obdorsky, Kondia, Vitebsk, Mstislavsky and all the Northern countries; and sovereign of Iversky, Kartalinsky and Kabardinsky lands and areas of Armenians; Cherkasy and Mountain Princes and other hereditary sovereign and possessor, sovereign of Turkestan; the Norwegian heir, the Duke of Schleswig-Holstein, Stormarn, Ditmarsensky and Oldenburg and the like, and the other. ”

    Firstly, the presence of Tartar titles such as Udora and Obdorsk attracts attention. Secondly, we see that Nicholas then, it turns out, "the Duke of Schleswig-Holstein, Stormarn, Ditmarsensky and Oldenburg and others, and ...". All these are principalities located on the territory of modern Germany, Austria and Denmark. And the “other” includes the Principality of Luxembourg, where German troops invaded, declaring war on Russia on August 1, 1914.

    And this is the moment of truth. Precisely because Luxembourg was part of the Russian Empire, and it was attacked by a country that formally, like England was friendly, because in Britain and Russia, the ruling monarchies were connected by family ties, they all came from the kind of Oldenburgs, Nikolai called World War II. What did the British do? They used this circumstance to draw Russia into the Entente, and at the same time set the German and Austro-Hungarian empires against Russia. And even then everything was predetermined: - the collapse of the Russian Empire, with the transfer of its rights and territories to legal, in accordance with the Maritime (international) law of the heirs - Saxe-Coburg-Goth, which are now called the Windsor.

    Everyone knows the result. As in the previous episode, during the Revolution of 1905, the same mechanisms worked, and in the wake of the people's discontent with the “fratricidal” war (ordinary soldiers of the Russian and German armies still knew perfectly well that they were the only people in the past), they began to systematically roll country into the abyss of another revolution. Like little devils from a snuffbox, people with leather Mausers jumped up everywhere and began to do everything possible for the military defeat of the Russian Empire, with the subsequent looting of the country, and crushing it into parts for division between the former allies of the Entente - the interventionists. These were the Mensheviks and Socialist-Revolutionaries, who did not even plan to lead the country. They didn’t need an empire, they only wanted profit.

    In contrast to this “raven”, the Bolsheviks, although they received a bribe from the west to organize the revolution, but their plans still included the preservation of most of the state. Therefore, I consider it a great success that the Socialist-Revolutionaries and Mensheviks failed to stay in power and for a year. Having taken it in February 1917, they quickly showed their complete failure, and already in October of that year, their rivals, the Bolsheviks and the "middle peasants" (Trotskyists), seized control and began to take emergency measures to prevent the final defeat of the country. So the Great Tartaria died a second time.
    1. +1
      27 November 2019 12: 50
      Nitarius (Nikolaevich) Today, 08:09
      First, attention is drawn to the presence of tartar titles such as Udorsky and Obdorsky.

      That is, you admit that "Tartars" are Nenets, Khanty and Mansi - and not "Slavic-Aryans" ?!
      wassat
      By the way:
      Andrey Viktorovich Golubev (Kadykchansky) - writer, historian, expert of alternative research communities.
      Since the early 2000s he has been writing articles and books in popular science and science fiction genres.
      More details on livelib.ru:
      https://www.livelib.ru/author/1164376-andrej-golubev-kadykchanskij
    2. 0
      28 November 2019 19: 33
      Does history now lead to revival?
  19. +11
    27 November 2019 08: 21
    I read how I saw enough of the first channel laughing laughing laughing
    Even commenting is ridiculous. The author, not Russia was the second world power))) It was a different state, with people of a completely different uprising, with a different socio-economic and political structure.

    What is going on in VO? And here the TV came hi
    1. +3
      27 November 2019 08: 47
      * education (not rebellion)) I apologize. I didn’t see AutoCorrect)
  20. +1
    27 November 2019 08: 51
    Can we recognize at the state level the wrong policy of Yeltsin? No. Otherwise, a thread will be drawn to Bialowieza. And if we do not recognize it, we will question the independence of other states that have split from the USSR. So for now it remains just to dream.
  21. BAI
    +8
    27 November 2019 08: 51
    Another author followed in the footsteps of Samsonov. That is why the dissertation methodology is not applicable here ::
    "The author does not possess the topic at the conceptual level, so the work is returned without consideration."
    Already discussing the term "Soviet empire" is the first step towards the legalization and recognition of this term.
  22. +6
    27 November 2019 08: 51
    The purpose of the article is to raise the bottom rating of Vova with dimas?
    1. -4
      27 November 2019 09: 27
      Quote: Llur
      Wow with dimas?

      Serge, where were you brought up? in the gateway?
      1. +1
        27 November 2019 18: 39
        I wasn’t from exquisite salons; I knew etiquette from the gates.
    2. +3
      27 November 2019 10: 54
      It is unlikely that the author is too small for this, there are specially trained people of a larger caliber, such as jelly and nightingale.
      Rather cowardice, for recognition of reality entails sooo unpleasant conclusions.)
      1. -4
        27 November 2019 12: 40
        Nobody is listening to them - so by.
        1. +3
          27 November 2019 13: 03
          How not ?! But you constantly retell them to me, as if your thoughts were allegedly.))))
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. -4
            27 November 2019 15: 55
            "How not? You constantly retell them to me, as if your thoughts." - Congratulations, you have schizophrenia. "Constantly" - How many times? "You retell them" That is, you listen to them - since you came to this conclusion?
  23. +6
    27 November 2019 09: 20
    Another story 5 years after the "Russian world" ...

    The truth is that the local oligarchs and officials do not want to share either money or power, already under 30, and they do not care about all sorts of "Russian worlds" of the common people ...

    It was necessary / will be-and support strangers / their nationalists .... both in Armenia and Ukraine ...
  24. +4
    27 November 2019 09: 32
    Yuri Apukhtin: Russia is approaching the next expansion cycle

    Sorry for my "English", which cycle?
    After the 2000s, the authorities of the Russian Federation assigned to the "partners" a piece of Russian territory in the Norwegian Sea, a piece to China, and now they are crumpled with the Kurils.
    Abkhazia, Transnistria, South Ossetia, Donbass have long been asking to be part of the Russian Federation and? At the same time, everyone understands perfectly well at the expense of whom these republics live, but .... And what will the "partners" say? Is this not the main question of the current capitalist policy of the Russian Federation?
    It is more appropriate here to talk about the ongoing cycle of the policy of "optimization" of territories under an "effective owner".
  25. +2
    27 November 2019 09: 54
    the only reason for turning Russia into an empire is demography - the phenomenal increase in the number of Russians under the Romanovs. accordingly, talking about the revival of the empire in a declining population is rather strange.
  26. +7
    27 November 2019 10: 09
    Immediately I remembered the rude expression: "What, did you fall from the moon?" Indeed, the impression is that the author lives on another planet, sees everything through a telescope with a poor resolution and knows nothing about the real state of Russia: neither economic, nor demographic, nor political.
  27. +5
    27 November 2019 10: 21
    Quote: Thrifty
    The author of Maidan tea accidentally did not drink?

    He just fulfills his rations. This can be written only in pink glasses or intentionally fulfilling someone's order!
  28. +3
    27 November 2019 10: 25
    The comprador elite, living according to the scheme: "get raw materials - sell abroad - leave the money there" and the Empire are two things that are not compatible. Empire, I mean the USSR. Putin should not be called a liberal. This is completely different. While he, Putin, is in power, forget about the Empire.
  29. +1
    27 November 2019 10: 48
    Until recently, Russia was one of the two world superpowers and is slowly reviving its power.

    It restores only on TV!)) And so the raw country of the 3rd world, with a crumbling education, medicine, social sphere, which by chance got artifacts of a more developed civilization ...
    Russia has always been a kind of empire, the metropolis did not plunder its provinces, but on the contrary developed them using the resources of the metropolis. This allowed the formation of a powerful Russian civilization, fundamentally different from the western one, which was based on completely different mental values.

    And what is the advantage here ?! To undermine the vitality of the state-forming Russian people, to destroy the country ?! There is no "power" here, just all sorts of primitive foreigners imagining themselves to be someone, pushing aside a "feeding trough" like a pig with a snout, destroying the country, as if not an achievement.
    The basis of Russian civilization was Orthodoxy, and this is no accident. The way of life and lifestyle of the Russian people was communal in nature on the basis of collectivism, contributing to the unification of individuals in the development of the principles of their living arrangements. Orthodoxy responded to the collectivist aspirations of the population and contributed to the consolidation of society, in which public interests prevailed over the interests of the individual.

    The customs and traditions of the peoples of Western civilization were based on individualism and the priority of personal goals. The mentality of these peoples was different, they were characterized by a cult of personal wealth, and the peoples of Russian civilization - a cult of prosperity. Accordingly, the basis of Western civilization was Catholicism, professing the cult of personality over society.

    Another blunder, Orthodoxy only organically fell on the character of the people formed by the geo-climate, where it was impossible to survive alone, and the most severe punishment was an outcast. More favorable natural conditions contributed to the development of personality in the West, this is only a mechanism of adaptation to the natural environment.
    For the successful implementation of the Russian integration project, first of all, it is necessary to return to Russia the status of an economically powerful power and ensure industrial, financial and commercial expansion into neighboring territories, without which there can be no question of imperial power.


    In recent years, Russia has been working hard in this direction in Russia, financial resources are accumulating, large-scale infrastructure and industrial construction has been launched, and the country's economy is starting to move away from raw material dependence. Russia is slowly rising from its knees ...

    Today's RF does not and cannot have any conceptual project !! The author lives in captivity of his illusions, there is no "large-scale infrastructural and industrial construction", but there is de-industrialization, degradation, impoverishment of the population, and an increase in raw materials dependence not only on the West, but also on the East.))
    1. -7
      27 November 2019 12: 48
      "The author lives in captivity of his illusions, there is no" large-scale infrastructural and industrial construction "You are here https: ruxpert.ru - large-scale infrastructural and industrial projects in Russia under construction and planned for construction until 2030.
      1. +3
        27 November 2019 13: 01
        Children need fairy tales, read them yourself!))
        1. -4
          27 November 2019 15: 44
          Here you are just in a fairy tale and live - and on the site that I brought up real projects that have already been implemented, are now being built and will be implemented in the near future and if you do not participate in them and do not see them, this does not mean that they are not - but to deny reality idiocy.
      2. 0
        27 November 2019 18: 44
        Thanks for the link!
      3. +2
        27 November 2019 18: 45
        The British lion is angry.
  30. +2
    27 November 2019 11: 05
    Strange and abstracted from the reality of intellect. Utopian fiction.
  31. +15
    27 November 2019 11: 43
    The Russians do not need a multinational empire - at the moment the number of the titular nation in the Russian Federation is over 80%, after reunification with Ukraine, Belarus and Northern Kazakhstan, the number of Great Russians, Little Russians and Belarusians in the united state will exceed 90% and will reach the level of the Japanese in Japan and the Germans in Germany .

    Those. the project of the future of our country is clearly not imperial, but mono-ethnic - the formation of a single linguistic and cultural community (which the USSR could not do with the project of forming the Soviet people, but for some reason divided into national republics).

    As the historical experience of the Roman, Byzantine, Mongolian, Ottoman, British, Spanish, German, Austro-Hungarian and Russian empires proper shows, a multinational state has an inalienable property of disintegrating. And mono-ethnic countries (China, Persia, Germany, Poland, Japan, Serbia, Greece, Bulgaria, etc.) repeatedly experience even those periods when they are part of empires, after which they restore the lost status of sovereign states.

    Another thing is that you have to pay for sovereignty - in the form of maintaining an appropriate level of the Armed Forces and the military-industrial complex, but with this, the Russians are at the highest level (we are not some kind of tea) bully

    Plus, we must take into account the objective trend in the composition of the population of our North American geopolitical rival - an increase in interethnic contradictions due to an increase in the share of blacks and Latinos, the number of which in 30 years will exceed the number of Euro-Americans, after which the accelerated process of Latinization of the United States will begin.
    1. +1
      27 November 2019 18: 47
      I completely agree. With a little correction. Moldavians are also mainly our people.
      1. +8
        27 November 2019 19: 13
        I fully support about Moldovans (culturally close to Russians) and Transnistrians (most of whom consist of Great Russians and Little Russians).

        Moreover, in connection with the massive departure of natural Balts to work in Western Europe, the proportion of Russian-speaking residents (some of whom are alien in general) in the Baltic countries has risen sharply to a maximum of 40% in Latvia. And if we also take into account that the overwhelming majority of the Balts are genetically Mestizos of the Slavs and Finns, then the population of these countries naturally gravitates to the Russians.
  32. +4
    27 November 2019 12: 18
    And I thought Samsonov .... laughing

    The author, while you are expanding the empire, the Poles in 2020 receive a minimum salary of 925 euros. bully

    I don’t understand why you need the integration of more countries? What is already the population of the existing country yachts oligarchs do not keep up to build?
    1. +3
      27 November 2019 18: 00
      Welcome hi Similarly thought about authorship laughing
  33. +1
    27 November 2019 12: 20
    Well, which one of the four centers of power, which is ten times smaller in economics than the other three separately? In addition to the rusty swords of the ancestors, what can be considered a sign of the CENTER in general here? Education? Culture? Medicine? Technologies? Standard of living? The attractiveness of the political and economic model?
    1. +1
      27 November 2019 18: 51
      We are wild, uneducated people, we live in the forest, we pray to the wheel. We bask in a fire, shave with an ax. Otkudov, we have some kind of education, culture, medicine, technology, and the standard of living there too, to push him into a swing? You, my dear, ate onion, ali so stupid?
  34. +1
    27 November 2019 12: 30
    You can’t do without a radical upswing in the Russian economy and creating an attractive image of Russia


    But this is not very good.
    1. +2
      27 November 2019 19: 13
      There are positive facts, although, indeed, not very many. But, in any case, the production of electricity exceeded the level of 1990, the installed capacity of power plants - 243 MW compared to 212 MW in 1992, appeared power plants on solar panels - 200 MW. Not much, but still there. There are interesting developments to increase their efficiency. This is the prospect of restoring the semiconductor industry, for a start, at least silicon. More or less modern installations in single copies are available. On bare nanotechnology you will not go far. In general, another quarter century - and as in the 70s everyone compared with 1913, it will be possible to compare everything with 1992. For clarity, however, better since 1999.
      1. +1
        27 November 2019 21: 00
        Of course there is, but 1913 is better not to remember.
  35. -1
    27 November 2019 13: 04
    Quote: Greenwood
    Russia is approaching the next expansion cycle, and the process of reintegrating the post-Soviet space and implementing the global Russian project requires long-term strategic actions to prepare the former Soviet republics for integration into Russian civilization. You can’t do without a radical upswing in the Russian economy and the creation of an attractive image of Russia, as well as targeted actions in the international arena to justify and promote Russian national interests in the territory of the post-Soviet space.
    Meanwhile, somewhere in expanding Russia:
    Levada Center: 53% of young Russians want to leave the country
    The Levada Center presented the data of a survey of Russians about their emigration moods: 53% of respondents aged 18 to 24 would like to leave Russia. This is a record for the last 10 years.

    On average, 21% reported a desire to leave Russia. Among the main reasons are concern for the future of children (45%), as well as the economic situation (40%) and the political situation (33%). Among those who would like to leave, there are fewer supporters of President Vladimir Putin than among those who do not think about emigration (54% versus 73%). Also, those who think about leaving are more ready to take part in protests (33% versus 17%). Moreover, among those who do not think about emigration, 36% believe that things are going in the wrong direction in the country.

    request

    Levada Center - did not master further, please provide more truthful information.
  36. +1
    27 November 2019 13: 12
    The project is closed. Come back tomorrow.
  37. -3
    27 November 2019 13: 15
    Quote: Keyser Soze
    And I thought Samsonov .... laughing

    The author, while you are expanding the empire, the Poles in 2020 receive a minimum salary of 925 euros. bully

    I don’t understand why you need the integration of more countries? What is already the population of the existing country yachts oligarchs do not keep up to build?

    Well, and the Bulgarians generally receive the minimum old-age pension - 207 leva, 7800 rubles. laughing According to data for 2017, the average salary was about 800 leva, which is more than 30 thousand rubles with our money. laughing
    1. -1
      28 November 2019 19: 52
      Probably because there society is not divided into traders and? Therefore, the government thinks about the people, and not about Western goods?
  38. +2
    27 November 2019 13: 19
    Does Russia generally need such "brutal peoples" in some kind of "empire", to put a bunch of idlers around its neck?
    1. +3
      27 November 2019 14: 11
      In the USSR, no one "sat on the neck", but after 1991 they do. In any empire, nationalities do not exist as an essential factor in politics. An empire is a product of the expansion of the state to its natural limits. If the empire is driven into unnatural limits, then the state will come kirdyk in the sense that it will be replaced by another state. The existing world order is a product of the expansion of the United States to its natural limits.
      1. 0
        28 November 2019 22: 51
        For this, the USSR was sitting on its neck - 120 states of rogue people, starting from the 60s.
  39. +2
    27 November 2019 14: 03
    Not everything is simple with Belarus either, the Belarusian elite led by Lukashenko is against integration, because he is afraid of losing his power. In order to “admonish” Babich was sent to them, who lucidly explained to them what was expected of them and how the resistance to integration could end. They were given a little time to think, after which, apparently, it was not persuasion that would begin, but real integration processes.

    The author is not in the subject at all! What, nafig, the Belarusian elite, headed by Lukashenko ?! There are no elites, there are Lukashenko, the rest are appointed clerks without their opinion. If your opinion appears, then this clerk is removed. Everything is simple. Is this good or bad? Difficult to say. Well, this is that the mess in the state is less. The bad news is that appointments are made on the basis of their devotion. For Belarus, in my opinion, this situation is more or less favorable.
  40. The comment was deleted.
  41. +1
    27 November 2019 14: 26
    For me, the collapse of the USSR is the lack of leadership among the leadership.
  42. -1
    27 November 2019 14: 30
    Quote: iouris
    In the USSR, no one "sat on the neck", but after 1991 they do. In any empire, nationalities do not exist as an essential factor in politics. An empire is a product of the expansion of the state to its natural limits. If the empire is driven into unnatural limits, then the state will come kirdyk in the sense that it will be replaced by another state. The existing world order is a product of the expansion of the United States to its natural limits.
    Again to tear with a Russian peasant? Russia lived because of every three rubles she earned, she kept only two for herself. And she gave the third ruble to her brothers in the Union. laughing If GDP per capita in Armenia in the USSR was 2,5 times higher than in Russia, today it is only 33% of it. Azerbaijanis in the USSR lived 1,4 times richer than Russians. And now they barely reach 70% of the standard of living in the Russian Federation. Georgia has slipped even deeper. In the USSR, in terms of consumption, it was the richest of the republics - 3,5 times higher than the Russian figure. Today this figure is equal to only 37,9% of it. In Moldova, things are even sadder - it was 113,5% of the level of Russia. Now it is 19,6%. Do the "former Soviet" republics understand what they have lost? Apparently - yes. That's why they are so desperate to manipulate numbers. For example, the nominal indicators of GDP are compared "then" and "now". Let's say, Lithuania "had" 34,5 billion dollars a year under the USSR, and it became 82,4 billion. It seems like growth. Almost 2,5 times. But if we take the ratio of the size of the Lithuanian economy to the Russian one as a starting point, the picture of the world appears in a completely different light. Lithuania is developing much more slowly than Russia. And if she did not leave the USSR, her growth would certainly be much higher. Do we need it? laughing
    1. -1
      27 November 2019 15: 02
      In general, Georgia lives better than Russia
      1. +2
        28 November 2019 16: 41
        Georgia is an all-Union health resort, granary and smithy, you know, a resort, and 75% of "Russia" is non-black earth, swamps and permafrost. In this sense, yes. Question: why did Georgia itself ask to come to Russia at the end of the 18th century, and have the factors that prompted Georgia to allow Russia to "occupy" Georgia disappeared?
        1. 0
          28 November 2019 16: 50
          Geopolitics location between countries that wanted to devour it
    2. -2
      27 November 2019 18: 59
      Again to tear from the Russian peasant? Russia lived because of every three rubles she earned, she kept only two for herself. And she gave the third ruble to her brothers in the Union. laughing If the GDP per capita in Armenia in the USSR was 2,5 times higher than in Russia, today it is only 33% of it. Azerbaijanis in the USSR lived 1,4 times richer than Russians. And now they barely reach 70% of the standard of living in the Russian Federation. Georgia has slipped even deeper. In the USSR, in terms of consumption, it was the richest of the republics - 3,5 times higher than the Russian figure. Today this figure is equal to only 37,9% of it. In Moldova, things are even sadder - it was 113,5% of the level of Russia. Now it is 19,6%. Do the "former Soviet" republics understand what they have lost? Apparently - yes. That’s why they are so desperately trying to manipulate numbers.

      Aren't you doing this? More precisely, those who deduce such tsiferki? You just saw it and happily relay it. Just remember - there can be no GDP figures for the USSR in nature, there can be no comparison in dollars within the USSR in nature. And in order not to be led into a blizzard about two rubles for themselves, the third - for them, it is enough to look at the list of the USSR budget. And about the "wealth" of those and "poverty" of us - in any yearbook of retail trade in the USSR, look at the implementation of consumer goods through the retail network in per capita terms for the republics. The wealth of Georgia is the ostentatious wealth of the guild workers after 85, when they began to supply the entire Union with all sorts of counterfeit nonsense, like ordinary plastic colorful bags for 2 (!!!) rubles apiece.
    3. +1
      27 November 2019 19: 34
      Quote: Gennady Fomkin
      Do the "former Soviet" republics understand what they have lost? Apparently - yes. That's why they are so desperate to manipulate numbers.

      everyone understands, and modern bablonavts especially. That is why the ideology of consumption and individualism is manipulated by numbers and inculcated so that a return to ideas is not possible. I mean the political and financial tycoons of the former Soviet and Russia.
    4. 0
      28 November 2019 16: 33
      Quote: Gennady Fomkin
      And she gave the third ruble to her brothers in the Union.

      By your logic, Moscow should immediately get rid of 90% of the regions of the Russian Federation and the "subjects of the federation". And all together they "sit on the neck" of the Siberian oil and gas emirates, where an ordinary citizen of the Russian Federation must still obtain permission to visit.
  43. -1
    27 November 2019 14: 42
    One famous economist was invited to give a lecture on the globalization of the global economy.
    - How is it easier for you to explain the essence of this process? - the lecturer began thoughtfully. - Just imagine that in our country clay whistles are produced, which are delivered to Mongolia for local shepherds. Shepherds breed sheep, whose skins are supplied ...
    - To us? - a voice came from a place.
    - No. That is the meaning of globalization, that the Mongols deliver these skins to Greece, where they are appropriately dressed, get excellent fur and supply it ...
    - To us? - a voice came from a place.
    - No. Furs are delivered to France, where the best Parisian fashion designers sew magnificent coats from them and deliver them ...
    - To us? - a voice came from a place.
    - Well, you, all "us" and "us", - the economist got angry. - You have no global thinking. Fur coats are supplied to the United States and sold in stores in New York.
    - And to us?
    - And we are supplied from Belarus with clay, from which we make whistles for the Mongolian shepherds. laughing : All the countries of the social camp did receive nishtyaki, but it was the USSR that only the notorious clay. So it goes. laughing
    1. 0
      28 November 2019 16: 37
      Quote: Gennady Fomkin
      All the countries of the social camp did receive nishtyaki, but it was the USSR that only the notorious clay.

      And the Russian Federation privatized the production of clay whistles, the owners turned the enterprises into joint-stock companies, managed from nowhere, and left to itself only the receipt of "nishtyaks"?
  44. +2
    27 November 2019 15: 02
    The USSR did not give the CMEA countries assembly, as Western countries do, but complete production. Even the USSR bought spare parts for the Mi-2 helicopter from Poland. The world has not created better aircraft for processing farmland than the An-2 plane and the Mi-2 helicopter. In addition, they were made in the passenger version for local airlines, as well as in sanitary and other types. Russia is currently forced to use more expensive heavy helicopters in operation to transport a small number of people and cargo instead of the eight helicopter designed for eight passengers and 800 kg -2. Unfortunately, at present, the countries of Eastern Europe have forgotten that the bulk of production (including food industries), transport and energy capacities currently operating in the countries of the former CMEA It was created with the help of the USSR or exclusively by the Soviet Union. Will we continue to build, supply, supply to the detriment of ourselves?
  45. -2
    27 November 2019 15: 12
    Quote: Kronos
    In general, Georgia lives better than Russia

    In other international rankings, Georgia has taken the following positions:

    The ranking of the best countries for Forbes magazine business is 44th out of 161 (up 8 positions).
    The prosperity rating of the Legatum Institute analytical center is 80th (up 5 places).
    The Global Competitiveness Index is 66th out of 140 (up 1 position).
    The Fraser Institute's economic freedom rating is 7th out of 162 (up 2 places).
    The rating of the level of economic freedom of the Heritage Fund Center is 16th out of 180. laughing
  46. -1
    27 November 2019 15: 27
    Georgia: Among the elements not related to agriculture, we note:

    Ore mining and metallurgy (the Chiatura manganese deposit is used by the Chiaturmarganets joint-stock company, then it sells it to the Zestafon ferroalloy plant, which in turn processes and exports ferrous alloys). True, now these largest enterprises belong to British owners) (Madneuli deposit with polymer ores is used by the Madneuli combine and also produces exported gold and copper concentrate. Madneuli, however, also belongs to foreign owners (this time Russian).
    Materials for construction (in principle, cement, silicate brick is created on the basis of local resources in Georgia) that can also be exported or used for construction within the country, thereby increasing its GDP.
    Chemical industry ("Azot" Combine in the city of Rustavi) Georgia has 3 thermal and 6 hydroelectric power plants, while during seasonal fluctuations it is forced to import electricity.
    Georgia is 100% importing oil and gas (due to disagreements with Russia, mainly from neighboring Azerbaijan). $ 0.89002 Georgia
    Government debt for today. Russia is Russia's external debt as of January 1, 2019. amounted to 454,68 billion dollars.
  47. +2
    27 November 2019 17: 35
    Such an epigraph would not hurt this article: it is dedicated to the 19th Congress of EP ... laughing
  48. +3
    27 November 2019 18: 18
    author and visionary have already integrated with Asia and the Caucasus
  49. +2
    27 November 2019 18: 44
    To the author - Manilov Prize laughing
  50. 0
    27 November 2019 19: 26
    To develop all kinds of camps at the expense of Russia, why do we need it!?
    I’ll tell you so, Empire, this is not a territory, not an influence on someone .... Empire is people's smiles, beautiful and high-quality housing, healthy food and clean water, these are breakthroughs in the sciences, this is education, this is the happiness of people!
    This is what the Empire should be.
    And you propose to hang on the neck of Russia 100 million do not understand anyone.
  51. -1
    27 November 2019 21: 04
    Why not? I like.
  52. +1
    27 November 2019 21: 08
    Russia until recently was one of the world's two superpowers


    You don't have to read any further. "One of the world's two superpowers" was the Soviet Union. Russia is 2 times smaller than it (in terms of population, not territory) and has neither the Warsaw Pact nor the CMEA on its side.
  53. -3
    27 November 2019 21: 15
    Quote: BAI
    Already discussing the term "Soviet empire" is the first step towards the legalization and recognition of this term.

    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  54. -3
    27 November 2019 21: 20
    Quote: Nikolai Korovin
    In Western Europe, they took away their property, expelled them without talking, and killed them.

    Not always, not everywhere, not all the time... not at the same time.
  55. +2
    28 November 2019 16: 41
    Quote: Aerodrome
    Quote: Thrifty
    The author of Maidan tea accidentally did not drink? Sorry, but Putin is liberal to the core, it’s ridiculous to talk about an empire with him! It's like talking to the governor about how and when he will voluntarily resign. Restoring an empire based on Russia with this power is simply utopia! !!

    I agree, plus everything, with the commodity economy ...

    You try to create an economy - without raw materials laughing
  56. 0
    28 November 2019 16: 44
    Quote: aybolyt678
    Quote: Gennady Fomkin
    Do the "former Soviet" republics understand what they have lost? Apparently - yes. That's why they are so desperate to manipulate numbers.

    everyone understands, and modern bablonavts especially. That is why the ideology of consumption and individualism is manipulated by numbers and inculcated so that a return to ideas is not possible. I mean the political and financial tycoons of the former Soviet and Russia.

    We'll just buy them later as we did before. laughingAfter reminding creditors about the need to pay for the banquet, one cloudless day a plane with representatives of a collection agency will land at Riga airport, who will announce to the natives that the good guys are tired of waiting, and from tomorrow a special regime for managing worthless debtors will be introduced, within the framework of which the entire local population, led by local deputies, ministers, and other politicians, having their own entrenching tool in their hands, are obliged to report to the house of the Chief Collector (Governor General) at 5:00 for assignment to physical work in the fresh air, where they, and also their children and grandchildren will remain from now on and forever and ever to pay off at least the interest...
  57. 0
    28 November 2019 18: 44
    Quote: AU Ivanov.
    The idea should be different: a rich citizen is a strong power.
    - Are you talking about yourself...beloved? lol
  58. +1
    28 November 2019 19: 55
    Quote: iouris
    Quote: Gennady Fomkin
    All the countries of the social camp did receive nishtyaki, but it was the USSR that only the notorious clay.

    And the Russian Federation privatized the production of clay whistles, the owners turned the enterprises into joint-stock companies, managed from nowhere, and left to itself only the receipt of "nishtyaks"?

    We will each live on our own laughing
  59. 0
    28 November 2019 21: 40
    Integrate Gabunistan? Or Central Asians and Azerbaijan, where in the 90s Russians were robbed, expelled, killed?! Why do we need these representatives of the “titular nations”??? We will invest money in them again, and they will have nothing in their pocket and a knife behind their back??? I prefer to feel like a “white sahib” when I walk along the street of a Russian city, and a representative of the “titular nation” from some Bantustan sweeps it and steps aside when I approach. This is a lesson to the “title” for their lawlessness in the early 90s in their bantustans in relation to the Russians, who were then abandoned by the drunkard!
  60. DRM
    -1
    28 November 2019 21: 42
    From the article:
    The expansion of territories was not carried out by seizing colonies on distant continents, but through integration processes along the borderlands with other peoples without their assimilation and the desire to preserve the identity and way of life of the peoples annexed to the empire.

    And here is a striking example of a “peaceful” “integration process”:

    "Conquest of Siberia by Ermak" V.I. Surikov. Russian Museum.
    1. 0
      29 November 2019 11: 28
      This is the same example as Grozny’s murder of his son. However, where did the increase in the territories of countries occur without war? But only in our history have conquered or peacefully joined peoples not been turned into a kind of cattle and not exterminated.
  61. -1
    28 November 2019 21: 51
    If the article and comments, as they say, are quite informative in terms of information, then in terms of analysis and conclusions it is rather weak.
    If we talk about the Russian empire, then its ideological core was the subjective ideological Christian system of the Western sense. At the same time, it was argued that the Slavs, in the absence of this religion, were barbarians and looked with envy at the prosperous West, vegetating in poverty, lawlessness and disorder. And so it happened, some rogues passing by brought them the alphabet, religion and law, which allowed them to begin human life. This is the version of the West, supported by Westerners - called the fifth column. Representatives of the Slavs cite facts of higher development in relation to newcomers. And the example, oddly enough, of the history of the New World can confirm this, because if the colonialists claimed that they brought the light of knowledge and Christian faith to the wild society of the aborigines, now the history of the material culture of the Indians says the opposite. Therefore, you must have your own opinion regarding the statements of the crooks. And it comes from the following.
    As has now been proven, the Slavs had their own rather highly developed culture and religion. The basis of religion was conscience, because translated from Latin, religion is a conscientious attitude towards someone or something, that is, towards people and nature. Therefore, young adherents of religion were called the youths of God, which indicated that religion is the material heritage of their ancestors, which allowed them to live safely in a given territory, ensuring their free well-being with their free and creative labor. Therefore, people united in such a society created labor collectives and, based on available technologies, produced everything necessary to ensure their existence. This is the essence and characteristic of Orthodoxy - defining and ensuring social equality and justice of all members of society.
    It's different in Christianity. Here the adherent of the Christian faith receives social status - a servant of God. And if we remember that the Pope claims to be a global ruler who rules Christians in the name of God in the interests of his clergy, then this shows: whose slaves the adherents become. And if we talk about the relationship between the Orthodox Slavs and Christians striving for world domination and the appropriation of foreign territories and the aborigines living on them, then this will be an indicator of the relationship between the Slavs and Christians. And, oddly enough, the very crucifixion of Jesus Christ on the cross, who came to admonish the pagans who worshiped the golden calf and invented faith in something supernatural, and whom he called the children of the devil, precisely shows the essence of the relations and tasks of the crooks. That is why the Slavs called Christians pagans who did not understand the language of nature and human relations. It’s another matter that after some cataclysm the Slavs found themselves under the yoke of these pagans. And if, as the history of Christianity says, it was introduced by bloody methods, then this suggests that even this did not lead to its acceptance of Christianity in its pure form. Therefore, we had to resort to a forgery - to dilute true Christianity, where the very status of being a servant of God speaks volumes, with Orthodoxy in order to deceive the Slavs and impose this slave religion on free workers. And if the Bolsheviks rejected this ideology, replacing it with true religion, without suspecting this, which led to the progressive development of the USSR, then the emasculation of Marxism, the perversion of socialism and the replacement of the dictatorship of the proletariat with the dictatorship of the bureaucracy, which led to brutal repressions, led precisely to this , which is what we have now received. Therefore, if we talk about the revival of the country, the liberation of our Motherland from the latest parasites that have climbed onto our necks, then we need to start with ideology, and on its basis unite both Russians and Slavs, and other peoples.
  62. 0
    28 November 2019 22: 06
    I agree with Apukhtin. Yes, it's time to start collecting stones. And, most importantly in the comments, no one is against it, everyone is for it! So it will work!
  63. -1
    29 November 2019 11: 23
    With this and these - only the global fifth point. It’s time to understand that only socialism is the future of the country.
  64. 0
    29 November 2019 13: 14
    As for rebirth, brothers/non-brothers, etc., we should take into account everything that is written here:
    https://aftershock.news/?q=node/800696&full
    and don't forget.
  65. -1
    29 November 2019 15: 29
    When simplifying a task, do not reach complete simplicity! Orthodoxy as the basis of the Russian project... The cradle of Orthodoxy is the Byzantine Empire. The state and public education is so terrible that God forbid you dream about it at night - you will turn gray! Apart from Russia, Orthodoxy has not ensured the development of successful structures anywhere. So Orthodoxy plays some role. But to put it mildly, it is not decisive! But what actually is the basis of the Russian project... We need to think about this much deeper than the author does.
  66. +1
    29 November 2019 23: 34
    “The closer the collapse of the empire, the crazier its laws” Marcus Tullius Cicero
  67. 0
    1 December 2019 12: 22
    I will express a seditious thought. We need to annex Belarus and Ukraine to Russia. Because these are our ancestral lands. But if Belarus can be annexed entirely, as a single federal district. Then Ukraine should be divided into two federal districts: New Russia (Tiraspol, Odessa, Nikolaev, Kherson, possibly Crimea, Zaporozhye, Elisavetgrad, Yekaterinoslav, Donetsk, Lugansk, Kharkov and Sumy), according to the brilliant proposal of the publicist Oleg Fedorov - Old Russia (Chernigov, Poltava, Kiev, Zhitomir, Lutsk, Rivne, Cherkasy, Vinnitsa, Proskurov, Ternopil, Stanislav, Lvov) and the confederal Rus' Minor - Transcarpathia (with a zone of responsibility in the autonomies of Romania, Ukrainian-speaking Bukovina and Russian-speaking Southern Bessarabia). In Belarus, Old Russia and New Russia, apply the Norwegian experience in language policy. Newspapers are published in Belarusian and Ukrainian, TV and radio programs are broadcast, etc. You can get a secondary education. But for higher education, use only Russian. The exception is teaching the native language. This is not chauvinism. This is a measure to prevent possible misunderstandings among specialists in critical situations. But in Ukraine there are less than 10% of ideological nationalists and banditry “Banderlogs”. There is a similar public in Belarus, the so-called Litvins and Zmagars. What to do with them? Where should I put them? After all, as they say, you can’t cook porridge with them.
    In this case, I have a seditious option. It is very difficult for us to defend Kaliningrad. It is like a bone in the throat of the West, and its population may find itself hostage in a critical political and military situation. We need to exchange the loyal population of the Baltic states for the “great ukrov”. It will look something like this. The population from the Baltic states loyal to us should be settled in Old Russia and New Russia. In Estonia, in the east, organize autonomy for Russian-speaking “Banderlogs” with a center in Yuryev-Tartu. Let's call it Ida-Rotala. In the east of Latvia there is autonomy for Ukrainian speakers and, possibly, and/or Russian speakers with a center in Dvinsk-Daugavpils, Selonia and Latgale. Let's call the region Inflants. Militant Belarusian Litvins and Zmagars - to the Lithuanian Vilejshchina or Podlasie. Mejlis Crimean Tatars - to Podlasie or Vileyshchyna. These autonomies will be located in the zone of responsibility of the New Ukraine in Kaliningrad-Krulevets. That is, in this Krulevets Ukraine there will be rich Ukrainians. All those suffering from lace panties will end up in Europe. Tribaltika will replenish the population. We will annex Belarus and the former Ukraine. Everyone is happy. The new Ukrainians will not be able to abandon our military base, since there will be constant attempts to capture Krulevets from the Poles and Lithuanians. And close cooperation on population exchange (and this is not a one-day process) will force Krulevets Ukraine to join the Rus confederation. And there will again be a triune Rus': Russia, Little Rus' and Ukraine. Let's send the "poroshit" with a team to the Baltic, and Makei, and maybe Lukashenko to the Carpathians.
    Am I lying? But how beautiful!
  68. -1
    7 December 2019 16: 18
    Who has this? Do Medvedev, Chuubais, Gref, Kudrin, Nabiuloy have “imperial thinking”? Yes, these are direct agents of world capital. And they don’t care about the country where they get their money. And they don’t care about the people who live on 9 thousand rubles a month and have to retire after death...
    However... it really is imperial. Everyone called Peter the Great “Antichrist.” Under Catherine there was a Pugachev rebellion of gigantic proportions. Fell - They banged. 1825 - the Guard (Decembrists) rebelled. Nicholas the First was almost the Terrible to death, but he squandered Crimea. And so it went further with the Ampirators: Alexander the Second’s legs were torn off by an explosion, and donations for the construction of the Church of the Savior on Spilled Blood were successfully stolen by the Tsar’s closest relatives. And what about Nicholas II, who was betrayed by everyone: allies, relatives, army, people?
    Well, if the Kremlin has become “imperial”, then let it continue to drape the Mausoe on May 9...
  69. 0
    11 December 2019 11: 14
    Yuri Apukhtin, where did you see the revival of RUSSIA? With these we can only die!
  70. 0
    17 December 2019 00: 21
    What kind of ignoramus writes “to his native lands”??
  71. 0
    15 February 2020 12: 12
    Ukraine and Georgia cannot be returned without decisive action, with Belarus everything hangs in the balance and the West, represented by the United States and its allies, is constantly tugging at this thread; the situation with Kazakhstan is even more incomprehensible. There is nothing to say about the other former republics.