Military Review

The possible use of KAB-1500 against an object of fighters in Idlib fell on the video

83

A video appeared on the network with the destruction of a militant stronghold in Idlib province. It is alleged that this is the result of the actions of the Russian military aviation. At the same time, no data are published on when exactly the bombing of the terrorist object was carried out.


It is reported that the militant facility was located on the outskirts of the village of Maaret-Nasan. The affiliation of one of the terrorist groups affiliated with Jebhat al-Nusra (banned in Russia) was confirmed during the reconnaissance of the territory.

The frames show how the used ammunition leads to a powerful explosion. As a result of the air strike, the infrastructure of the militants was completely destroyed. It is clearly seen how the shock wave propagates in the horizontal direction, leading to the liquidation of the facility used by terrorists in Idlib province. It has been suggested that KAB-1500, an adjustable bombs capable of penetrating up to 3 m of reinforced concrete, can be used. Such ammunition, according to some reports, was used by the Russian Air Force in 2015 and 2017 years against militant objects. The power of the explosion in frames can confirm this kind of assumption.

Recall that the province of Idlib at the moment remains one of the “hot spots” on the map of Syria. Several thousand militants are concentrated in it, who at one time moved to the province from other Syrian regions, including from the south of the SAR, during the successful offensive of the Syrian government forces. Terrorists in Idlib have repeatedly tried to attack (including with the help of UAVs) the Russian airborne base Hmeimim, located in Latakia.

Possible use of KAB-1500 on video:

83 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Hunter 2
    Hunter 2 25 November 2019 10: 54 New
    +29
    One and a half tons of fun! Yeah, seriously shied! belay
    1. Vol4ara
      Vol4ara 25 November 2019 11: 00 New
      +3
      Norm, that's just the video is not a shock wave, as stated in the article.
      And, what kind of mod is it, to shoot an object that will be hit, are they shooting all the buildings there or are they informed that they will bomb?
      1. Rwmos
        Rwmos 25 November 2019 11: 08 New
        +22
        And I think that it is not in vain that there is such a specialization as PAN - an advanced aircraft manufacturer wink
        1. Vol4ara
          Vol4ara 25 November 2019 11: 11 New
          0
          Quote: RWMos
          And I think that it is not in vain that there is such a specialization as PAN - an advanced aircraft manufacturer wink

          In the last video, where another object was bombed, shooting was carried out from the side of the highway from a tripod, there was a pickup truck with an open door, behind the camera Alah Akbar. Not very similar to the work of the rear gunner
          1. Same lech
            Same lech 25 November 2019 11: 15 New
            +19
            Behind the camera Alah Akbar. Not very similar to the work of the rear gunner


            Yes, yes, the airman on the mission should be in full dress of Russia ... like a Russian and shout at all smile .
            The result of the airstrike is certainly impressive ... the funnel at the site should be decent.
            1. voyaka uh
              voyaka uh 25 November 2019 11: 29 New
              -14
              "the funnel at the site must be decent." ////
              ----
              Not at the site of the object, but near.
              The bomb did not hit the building. It collapsed from the shock wave.
              1. Same lech
                Same lech 25 November 2019 11: 34 New
                +6
                The bomb did not hit the building. It collapsed from the shock wave.

                Oh how belay where are the details from? ... put the photo on the table ... smile again, shpienit there ... and then the object does not have to be a building ... it could be a bunker disguised next to the building.
                It would be nice to study aerial photographs of this place before and after getting the KAB-1500.
                1. voyaka uh
                  voyaka uh 25 November 2019 11: 44 New
                  -7
                  1) read the article. It is useful to read not only headings, but also text smile
                  "It can be clearly seen how the shock wave propagates in the horizontal direction, leading to the liquidation of the object,"
                  2) watch the video
                  1. Same lech
                    Same lech 25 November 2019 11: 49 New
                    +1
                    1) read the article. It is useful to read not only headings, but also text
                    "It can be clearly seen how the shock wave propagates in the horizontal direction, leading to the liquidation of the object,"
                    2) watch the video

                    smile And I read and looked ... they showed us and wrote what a simple average man should see and read.
                    And as a person with a nasty character and curiosity, I would like to know more ...
                    What is this object? ... its geographical coordinates,
                    who or what was there?
                    What caused the need to strike such a powerful bomb.
                    What plane and at what time struck ... the time of approach, the height of the ammunition drop and many other issues. hi
                    Maybe our friends or partners hehe Israelis will share information.
                    1. Geo⁣
                      Geo⁣ 25 November 2019 13: 49 New
                      +6
                      Quote: The same Lech
                      Maybe our friends or partners hehe Israelis will share information.

                      Local representatives mostly share the "information" that they themselves invent. Why do you need this?))
                      1. krot
                        krot 25 November 2019 14: 15 New
                        +1
                        Norm, that's just the video is not a shock wave, as stated in the article.

                        The video shows how a charge gets into one structure, and the second structure is closer to the camera, which, it is the shock wave that blows!
                        And by the way you can see how black from the trenches in the foreground climb out, as if waiting for a blow ..
                      2. Nyrobsky
                        Nyrobsky 25 November 2019 14: 48 New
                        +1
                        Quote: krot
                        And by the way you can see how black from the trenches in the foregroundas if waiting for a blow ..

                        According to the version of the mattresses there are some peaceful shepherds. Over there and a flock near the road is grazing, which along the way has become so accustomed to the broads that it did not even scatter.
                  2. max702
                    max702 25 November 2019 22: 30 New
                    0
                    Quote: The same Lech
                    Maybe our friends or partners hehe Israelis will share information.

                    It was just an Israeli object .. Therefore, such accurate information ..
                    What is the Israeli object of business in the heart of the barmalei's viper? Of course I fought with these terrorists! How else is that?
              2. Terentich
                Terentich 25 November 2019 12: 29 New
                -11
                Quote: The same Lech
                where are the details from? ... put the photo on the table.

                It’s funny ... in yesterday’s “news” about the allegedly shot down American and some Buk drone there, the truth of which at least raises doubts, details and evidence for some reason no one demanded, everyone together shouted “Hooray, we defeated everyone again”. However, just observation wassat
                1. loki565
                  loki565 25 November 2019 12: 42 New
                  +11
                  supposedly shot down by the American and parallel universe there is some kind of drone Buk

                  Beech? either you live in a parallel universe, or you have "Ukrainian Syndrome")))
                2. Nyrobsky
                  Nyrobsky 25 November 2019 14: 52 New
                  +11
                  Quote: Terentich
                  Quote: The same Lech
                  where are the details from? ... put the photo on the table.

                  It’s funny ... in yesterday’s “news” about the allegedly shot down American and some Buk drone there, the truth of which at least raises doubts, details and evidence for some reason no one demanded, everyone together shouted “Hooray, we defeated everyone again”. However, just observation wassat

                  About the "Shell" was, about the "Buk" is not, and not in Syria, but in Libya, and not by our forces, but by the forces of Haftar, to whom we did not even put the Shell, but the United Arab Emirates. So you, my friend, with your "checker" galloped past.
            2. Rwmos
              Rwmos 25 November 2019 11: 51 New
              +3
              Chumadan does not need to get into the window; he is not a bullet.
              1. voyaka uh
                voyaka uh 25 November 2019 11: 55 New
                -14
                The FAB bomb - a free-falling bomb - is not needed.
                And the KAB - a guided bomb - must be "almost hit the window".
                Therefore, it is not clear why they placed the video with a miss on the target.
                Apparently, a tip on an inertial, with a large CVO.
                1. Rwmos
                  Rwmos 25 November 2019 12: 05 New
                  +6
                  If the bunker is fortified, or there are many goals, then in any case there should be more power. And once again, getting into the window - these are all fairy tales:

                  Racca, Syria, August 19, 2017 / Zohra Bensemra / Reuters
                  This is what the fucking? By the windows ... In Afghanistan, they switched to carpet bombing as early as 2001: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/925662
                  And once again, for the tight - the target is DESTROYED - there is NO miss. Rotten work
                  1. voyaka uh
                    voyaka uh 25 November 2019 12: 11 New
                    -8
                    "once again, getting into the window - these are all fairy tales" ///
                    ----
                    This is a pure truth. The head of the Islamic Jihad in Gaza was killed by a direct hit of a rocket flying into the bedroom window.
                    First, a tiny quadrocopter flew into the bedroom to make sure that the head of the militants was in bed.
                    And a minute later, UR flew there.
                    ----
                    Precise aerial bombs have less accuracy than rockets but in the middle of the roof of a building, plus or minus two meters fall quietly. There are many such videos.
                    1. Rwmos
                      Rwmos 25 November 2019 12: 26 New
                      +4
                      Once again - you described the SPECIAL operation to eliminate the leader. It is justified and understandable. And ours does not need to be taught this:

                      And then a military operation, then YOU are talking about possible bunkers. Well, for the bunker you definitely need a control - so that in the window, what a bunker without the window! Like the submarine ...
                      And so - namely, that the United States has practically abandoned controllers - it’s too expensive to hammer a martyr with a manager. The fortified object for the control room is not the goal - there is less explosive in it, because a lot of it is occupied by guidance and adjustment tools. A sniper in a city building is not a goal for a manager, that's why Racca looks like
                    2. Dude
                      Dude 25 November 2019 13: 14 New
                      +1
                      Once again - you described the SPECIAL operation to eliminate the leader. It is justified and understandable.

                      And then a military operation, then YOU are talking about possible bunkers. Well, for the bunker you definitely need a control - so that in the window, what a bunker without the window! Like the submarine ...

                      Racca and looks


                      Everything is correctly said. Bravo! You really differentiated situations.
                      Support!
                  2. Professor
                    Professor 25 November 2019 13: 56 New
                    -4
                    Quote: voyaka uh
                    Precise aerial bombs have less accuracy than rockets but in the middle of the roof of a building, plus or minus two meters fall quietly. There are many such videos.

                    This bomb could not get into the roof because the illumination was carried out from the ground. They could shine maximum on the wall and the bomb fell near the wall. Everything is normal.
                2. Dude
                  Dude 25 November 2019 12: 54 New
                  +2
                  If the bunker is fortified, or there are many goals, then in any case there should be more power. And once again, getting into the window - these are all fairy tales:
                  If they work on a buried protected bunker, then they use not only, and not primarily KAB-1500. The Armed Forces of the Russian Aerospace Forces have more specialized ammunition. You are right, and Warrior is right, just talk about different situations.
                  And by the way, about getting into the window - the truth.
                  1. Rwmos
                    Rwmos 25 November 2019 14: 32 New
                    +1
                    C'mon, this is ISIS, not the Armed Forces, what level bunker will they build for your command personnel? What they COULD build ... One and a half tons will be carried away precisely by its good effect - there the soil creeps. This is one and a half tons ...
                  2. Dude
                    Dude 26 November 2019 09: 37 New
                    +1
                    Do not underestimate the enemy))
                    In addition, we all know that gentlemen in suits from Langley are behind the guys in slippers. winked
            3. Tusv
              Tusv 25 November 2019 13: 13 New
              +2
              It's about the bunker. If the building is old. Then the bunker is definitely not under the roof
            4. okko077
              okko077 25 November 2019 13: 20 New
              -3
              What inertial? The target laser sight of the aircraft was highlighted. And it’s bad ... An airplane on a combat course, it’s impossible to maneuver, an outdated algorithm of the complex’s operation, worse than an ordinary bomb ...It would be better if they were silent with this CAB ... They wanted the best, but it turned out, as always...Up to 9 km range of this miracle nedobombi called KAB! Funny to tears ... Read my post below.
          2. Dude
            Dude 25 November 2019 12: 42 New
            +3
            Quote: RWMos
            Chumadan does not need to get into the window; he is not a bullet.

            In this case, “Chumadan”, just exactly where I got it! With excellent accuracy.
        2. Dude
          Dude 25 November 2019 12: 11 New
          +3
          Quote: voyaka uh
          "the funnel at the site must be decent." ////
          ----
          Not at the site of the object, but near.
          The bomb did not hit the building. It collapsed from the shock wave.

          Colleague, welcome!
          For the sake of truth - from the video given in the article, it is not clear where the funnel is 3 meters from the load-bearing wall, or exactly at its base. winked
          The main thing is the result, but it is yes
          1. voyaka uh
            voyaka uh 25 November 2019 12: 17 New
            -8
            "The main thing is the result, but it is" ///
            ----
            Not a fact, unfortunately. Under buildings, militants usually dig bunkers, bomb shelters, and weapons depots.
            In this case, such a bunker will simply be littered with fragments of walls and roof. The wreckage will be taken apart and the bunker will be dug up.
            The hit should be in the center of the building, and the explosion of explosives should only be when the bomb penetrates the entire building to the basement with a recess.
            Only then can the target be defeated.
            1. Dude
              Dude 25 November 2019 12: 35 New
              +8
              Not a fact, unfortunately. Under buildings, militants usually dig bunkers.
              wink
              The classic case when we watch the same video, and we draw conclusions almost diametrically opposite)))
              I will explain my vision, and allow myself to criticize your position:

              It’s stupid to argue that the hit was not in the center of the building - everything is visible on the video. But, as you absolutely rightly noticed, the critical infrastructure of the barmalei, as a rule, is buried and buried. So what's the point of hitting heavy ammunition in the center of the house, overcoming concrete floors, spending on this overcoming, the energy of the ammunition?
              Maybe it’s better to climb under the wall of the building - it will develop from the blast wave, but the penetration of warheads will be just deeper, just into the cellars and the snouts accumulated by the broads? wink
              In my opinion, everything is just rightly done, which, if you look carefully, the distribution of soil emissions from the action of the shock wave, confirms hi
              Sorry for some of the confusion of the presentation))
              1. voyaka uh
                voyaka uh 25 November 2019 12: 41 New
                +3
                You expressed your opinion very sensibly. good I understood right away.
                If the hit was planned "under the wall", then you are right.
                1. Dude
                  Dude 25 November 2019 12: 47 New
                  +3
                  Well, if I were planning a hit, I would play
                  exactly in this game laughing
                  I hope it was))
                  Alexey, Respect, it’s always nice to talk with you!
                2. twviewer
                  twviewer 25 November 2019 14: 54 New
                  +3
                  what games? accuracy cab1500 4 meters, funnel 20, taking into account the response time, with an angle of attack of 60g, taking into account the height of the building, it came exactly where it needed - almost in the center, with a slight offset (taking into account accuracy) to the outer edge
                3. Dude
                  Dude 26 November 2019 09: 41 New
                  0
                  That's right! Did I say anything else?))
          2. Muvka
            Muvka 25 November 2019 15: 18 New
            0
            Quote: Dude
            Not a fact, unfortunately. Under buildings, militants usually dig bunkers.
            wink
            The classic case when we watch the same video, and we draw conclusions almost diametrically opposite)))
            I will explain my vision, and allow myself to criticize your position:

            It’s stupid to argue that the hit was not in the center of the building - everything is visible on the video. But, as you absolutely rightly noticed, the critical infrastructure of the barmalei, as a rule, is buried and buried. So what's the point of hitting heavy ammunition in the center of the house, overcoming concrete floors, spending on this overcoming, the energy of the ammunition?
            Maybe it’s better to climb under the wall of the building - it will develop from the blast wave, but the penetration of warheads will be just deeper, just into the cellars and the snouts accumulated by the broads? wink
            In my opinion, everything is just rightly done, which, if you look carefully, the distribution of soil emissions from the action of the shock wave, confirms hi
            Sorry for some of the confusion of the presentation))

            No, not stupid. Straight to the center. Just the building is different. Take a close look. I stuck the screen below.
        3. Tusv
          Tusv 25 November 2019 16: 19 New
          0
          Quote: voyaka uh
          Not a fact, unfortunately. Under buildings, militants usually dig bunkers, bomb shelters, and weapons depots.

          Alexei. Far from the fact that under the building they dig a bunker. This building can be demolished nafig without any bombs. Entrance to the building, and the bunker is most likely behind the facade. Because it is far from the fact that they missed
    2. venik
      venik 25 November 2019 12: 24 New
      0
      Quote: voyaka uh
      Not at the site of the object, but near.
      The bomb did not hit the building. It collapsed from the shock wave.

      =======
      And WHAT a difference on a fig ??? Is the object destroyed? DESTROYED !!! And what exactly did he (the object) “cover” with - “shock wave” or “direct impact” - to those who were INSIDE - EVERYTHING IS EQUAL (they already communicate with Allah, well, or who is standing at the entrance!) .... Mission accomplished? DONE!
      Well, malice - it’s certainly possible .... but somehow you "does not paint" hi
      1. voyaka uh
        voyaka uh 25 November 2019 12: 30 New
        -4
        Read my post above, the answer to the user "Dude". I answered why the shock wave does not guarantee, unfortunately, the death of the militants.
        1. venik
          venik 25 November 2019 12: 54 New
          +1
          Quote: voyaka uh
          Read my post above, the answer to the user "Dude". I answered why the shock wave does not guarantee, unfortunately, the death of the militants.

          =========
          Alas! When I wrote a comment - Your "post" has not yet been "highlighted"! request
        2. Dude
          Dude 25 November 2019 13: 02 New
          +2
          Quote: voyaka uh
          Read my post above, the answer to the user "Dude". I answered why the shock wave does not guarantee, unfortunately, the death of the militants.

          SchA write me in the Zionists)))
          My opinion:
          KAB-1500 is not the most “penetrating” bomb from the VKS nomenclature. But its explosiveness - God forbid, and the penetrating ability is quite decent, not outstanding (it was not created for this), but sufficient.
          Exclusively IMHO, but in my opinion, on the video we observe the exceptionally competent and successful use of our ammunition.
        3. Maz
          Maz 25 November 2019 15: 47 New
          0
          You know the warrior, I once wound up in Sderot, to the city center, well, there’s a siren, an alarm. And I'm in the middle of the street in a car. Since this is not a glorious city by the sea, the probability of getting was higher, but much higher than home. She had not been at the training ground for a long time with tank and artillery fire. So, about five hundred meters from me, a Katyusha gas exploded behind the houses. At 122mm it seems, nda. I was so shocked not even by the blast wave, but by the sound, as if the guts wanted to change places with other organs, I immediately remembered the field classes at the school, a flash on the left, on the right, etc. And what about Katyusha centuries, 8 kg? And there are 1500 kg of explosives. Militants will not be operational for at least a week if they do not become crippled.
    3. Muvka
      Muvka 25 November 2019 14: 35 New
      +7
      Quote: voyaka uh
      "the funnel at the site must be decent." ////
      ----
      Not at the site of the object, but near.
      The bomb did not hit the building. It collapsed from the shock wave.

      And in my opinion it’s even hit right in the center of the building.
      1. Dude
        Dude 26 November 2019 09: 45 New
        0
        Yes, the screen is good! wink yes
        Exhaustively. Actually, there’s nothing to argue about.
  2. Vol4ara
    Vol4ara 25 November 2019 13: 15 New
    -1
    Quote: The same Lech
    Behind the camera Alah Akbar. Not very similar to the work of the rear gunner


    Yes, yes, the airman on the mission should be in full dress of Russia ... like a Russian and shout at all smile .
    The result of the airstrike is certainly impressive ... the funnel at the site should be decent.

    No, he should ride a Toyota pickup truck with bearded men, then suddenly “so guys stop, I have a hunch, stop over there on the side of the road in the name of Allah!”, Takes out a tripod, a camera, starts to take off a detached building and here - broads, there’s no building and in the background "alla i'm in a bar alla i'm in a bar, as you guessed? So you imagine the work of an airman?
  • Lopatov
    Lopatov 25 November 2019 11: 56 New
    +9
    Quote: Vol4ara
    In the last video, where another object was bombed, shooting was carried out from the side of the highway from a tripod, there was a pickup truck with an open door, behind the camera Alah Akbar. Not very similar to the work of the rear gunner

    Do you think that if the target is illuminated by a non-Russian aircraft carrier (for example, a Syrian), then the bomb will fundamentally refuse to hit it?
  • brr1
    brr1 25 November 2019 21: 15 New
    +1
    Quote: Vol4ara
    Quote: RWMos
    And I think that it is not in vain that there is such a specialization as PAN - an advanced aircraft manufacturer wink

    In the last video, where another object was bombed, shooting was carried out from the side of the highway from a tripod, there was a pickup truck with an open door, behind the camera Alah Akbar. Not very similar to the work of the rear gunner

    This accredited airman was
  • okko077
    okko077 25 November 2019 12: 47 New
    -4
    They used an outdated type of bomb from a new aircraft against partisans without air defense. What joy ?!
    In conclusion, it can be noted that it is rather foolish and useless to directly compare modern Russian and American KAB directly. Too different is the device. The American SDB KAB is, in fact, a rocket-projectile without an engine, which is able to cover a considerable distance through planning. Its main purpose is to defeat bunkers, command posts, buildings, by breaking through walls and an internal explosion. In turn, Russian ammunition is traditionally cheaper and more to the usual air bombs. At the same time, they have a significantly greater warhead weight and a significantly smaller radius of use (US SDB to 110 km. From target, Russian KAB-500 to 9 km.).

    https://topwar.ru/6792-sovremennye-korrektiruemye-aviabomby-kab-ssha-i-rossii.html
    1. okko077
      okko077 25 November 2019 13: 01 New
      -2
      For Dummies!
      In this case, the range of its dropping to the target can reach up to 110 km. Such a range is designed to minimize the risk of meeting monstrously expensive aircraft (fighters, bombers) with an enemy air defense system. The farther the aircraft are from air defense systems, the more efficiently the stealth technology incorporated in their design is realized, and you won’t get under the fire of ordinary air defense artillery, which is visually induced.

      https://topwar.ru/6792-sovremennye-korrektiruemye-aviabomby-kab-ssha-i-rossii.html

      What kind of ground-based spotter can be discussed, if the range of the laser target designation system of an aircraft is more than 9 km, I do not want to recall the capabilities of optoelectronic systems. Why the hell are KABs needed if the Su-24M was bombed with the same accuracy with simple bombs?
      1. bober1982
        bober1982 25 November 2019 13: 45 New
        0
        Quote: okko077
        if the Su-24M is bombed with the same precision with the same accuracy?

        By the way, the QABs are also bombing no worse than our Israeli friends, the bomb starts elegantly in the window.
        Quote: okko077
        I don’t want to remember the possibilities of optoelectronic systems

        The so-called optics sunk along with the Su-24, on the Su-24M it was no longer there.
        Quote: okko077
        Why the hell are you

        The type of guidance is different - laser, television, satellite.
        It is important to conduct military tests in combat conditions.
        1. The comment was deleted.
  • Ka-52
    Ka-52 25 November 2019 11: 19 New
    +5
    Norm, that's just the video is not a shock wave, as stated in the article.

    just shock
    And, what kind of mod is it, to shoot an object that will be hit, are they shooting all the buildings there or are they informed that they will bomb?

    what a naivety. It's simple: they saw ammunition on the TP - there is plenty of time to get the phone.
    1. Dude
      Dude 25 November 2019 12: 00 New
      +1
      what a naivety. It's simple: they saw ammunition on the TP - there is plenty of time to get the phone.
      It is a very real option.
  • venik
    venik 25 November 2019 12: 15 New
    +3
    Quote: Vol4ara
    Do they rent all the buildings there or are they informed that they will bomb?

    =========
    Intelligence, my friend, Intelligence !!! Ever since the time of “King Pea” it was customary to record the results of strikes !!! Clear pepper: THAT who shot - KNEW !!! request soldier
  • Piramidon
    Piramidon 25 November 2019 12: 15 New
    +1
    Quote: Vol4ara
    they are there all buildings being rented or they are informed that they will bomb?

    Who are they"? Do you know who this videographer is? Maybe he highlighted the target and shot at the same time.
  • Alexander Petrov1
    Alexander Petrov1 25 November 2019 11: 28 New
    0
    Yeah, 1,5 tons and 3 m of concrete is cool, you won’t envy Barmaley, it’s good that we didn’t drop our 10 tons most powerful bomb in the World, which penetrates 60 meters and would even get them in an underground bunker ...
    1. Dude
      Dude 27 November 2019 13: 14 New
      0
      60 meters what breaks through? laughing 10 ton ?! Damn, I'm delighted !!
      Lord, there are many pioneers in VO)))
      On the other hand, it’s good that young people come to the site, are interested))) laughing
  • Alex Justice
    Alex Justice 26 November 2019 09: 19 New
    0
    I do not see. Only a black square instead of a video.
  • Evil echo
    Evil echo 25 November 2019 10: 59 New
    +1
    Deliciously imprinted, ochucheniya probably unforgettable !!
    1. bessmertniy
      bessmertniy 25 November 2019 11: 11 New
      -1
      He didn’t have time to pick out someone who had imprinted him — he just croaked out in an instant. what
    2. Hagalaz
      Hagalaz 25 November 2019 11: 43 New
      0
      When far from the most powerful bombs are dropped and missiles are launched at the Aviadarts, the sound pressure is noticeable in a kilometer (where the audience is) and you won’t envy anyone who could be there. And here one and a half tons! I can imagine!
    3. venik
      venik 25 November 2019 12: 28 New
      0
      Quote: Evil Echo
      Deliciously imprinted, ochucheniya probably unforgettable !!

      =======
      Alas!!! The one who them experienced - hardly "will share his impressions".... request
  • Whisper
    Whisper 25 November 2019 11: 03 New
    +5
    The sheep that graze along the road just flinched. laughing
    Ordinary would seem to have scattered, but these are accustomed!
  • Alien From
    Alien From 25 November 2019 11: 14 New
    0
    Well, not only the mattresses bomb bullets))
  • Dmitry Donskoy
    Dmitry Donskoy 25 November 2019 11: 18 New
    -2
    And the city thought, the teachings are coming yes
  • Vkd dvk
    Vkd dvk 25 November 2019 11: 21 New
    0
    Quote: Vol4ara
    Quote: RWMos
    And I think that it is not in vain that there is such a specialization as PAN - an advanced aircraft manufacturer wink

    In the last video, where another object was bombed, shooting was carried out from the side of the highway from a tripod, there was a pickup truck with an open door, behind the camera Alah Akbar. Not very similar to the work of the rear gunner

    And what, the airman should certainly be wrapped in a camouflage suit dug up by the throat, and speak only in a whisper in Russian?
  • 30hgsa
    30hgsa 25 November 2019 11: 25 New
    0
    Probably indescribable sensations of those who were near and saw :)
    Interestingly, after such "desert" mass desertion from the ranks of the Baboons didn’t happen?
    1. The leader of the Redskins
      The leader of the Redskins 25 November 2019 11: 43 New
      +1
      Rather, the opposite! laughing They begin to feel "enlightened", everyone in life has seen and immortal!)))
  • Sky strike fighter
    Sky strike fighter 25 November 2019 11: 27 New
    +1
    Another good news with regards to the Tu-160M ​​(formerly known as Tu-160M2).
    “The construction of the Tu-160M ​​party for the Ministry of Defense has already begun. The first contract delivery is scheduled for the end of 2021, ”said Konyukhov.

    Earlier, the head of the Ministry of Industry and Trade of Russia Denis Manturov said that the first built from scratch Tu-160M ​​(previously also called Tu-160M2) will be tested at the end of 2020.

    He noted that at the same time, a deep modernization of the “White Swans” combat line is underway in the shape of the Tu-160M ​​- “this work will be completed within the time frame set by the military department”. The military announced plans to modernize all 16 "strategists" in service with the Russian Aerospace Forces.

    http://in24.org/technology/37910
  • The leader of the Redskins
    The leader of the Redskins 25 November 2019 11: 28 New
    +1
    I would not want to be even close to such a "pleasure" ....
  • iouris
    iouris 25 November 2019 11: 32 New
    +1
    So it’s clear that this is KAB-1500. I examined it well. Where did she go?
  • Ravil_Asnafovich
    Ravil_Asnafovich 25 November 2019 11: 53 New
    +1
    Now, don’t go barmalei to Syria for a walk.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Ross xnumx
    Ross xnumx 25 November 2019 12: 05 New
    +5
    Possible use of KAB-1500 on video:

    Quote: iouris
    So it’s clear that this is KAB-1500. I examined it well. Where did she go?


    Wow ... A possible bomb silhouette in the photo:
  • Zaurbek
    Zaurbek 25 November 2019 12: 13 New
    +1
    It could have been just a 1500 kg bomb .... where did they get that correctable?
    1. iouris
      iouris 26 November 2019 14: 21 New
      0
      Exactly. Moreover, according to some statements by the heads of the SVP-24, it allows you to "fall into the stalk of a shovel." The main thing here is to put the shovel vertically in the center of the object of action. But if they tried to hit the light Toyota, then they probably used an adjustable bomb.
  • Klingon
    Klingon 25 November 2019 12: 31 New
    +3
    Quote: voyaka uh
    "The main thing is the result, but it is" ///
    ----
    Not a fact, unfortunately. Under buildings, militants usually dig bunkers, bomb shelters, and weapons depots.
    In this case, such a bunker will simply be littered with fragments of walls and roof. The wreckage will be taken apart and the bunker will be dug up.
    The hit should be in the center of the building, and the explosion of explosives should only be when the bomb penetrates the entire building to the basement with a recess.
    Only then can the target be defeated.

    Well, of course, this is a Russian bomb, its bear was slimming from a slingshot, what accuracy is there, or is it Israeli * gifts * really? each sandpiper praises its swamp and poop into someone else's.
    oh how! and as soon as it concerns the loss of an Israeli rocket, then immediately silence wassat
    1. Mestny
      Mestny 25 November 2019 13: 29 New
      0
      Yes, all waders do it.
      And only Jewish waders do it exclusively in the Russian swamp. And of course, only they know how to do this from around the corner, so that they would not break the tool.
  • The comment was deleted.
    1. bober1982
      bober1982 25 November 2019 13: 08 New
      +1
      Quote: Alexey Lobov
      1,5 tons of explosives

      Caliber air bombs do not mean the amount of explosives.
      1. Zaurbek
        Zaurbek 26 November 2019 15: 17 New
        0
        It depends. This is her weight. And in ODAB, FAB, Betab, of course, the hulls are different and the explosives are of different numbers.
    2. Altai72
      Altai72 25 November 2019 13: 27 New
      -3
      And the Syrian children did not go beyond the kindergarten ...
    3. Geo⁣
      Geo⁣ 25 November 2019 14: 10 New
      +4
      Quote: Alexey Lobov
      americos are right

      Do you think that Art suits you better? 17.10 Administrative Code, or breeding frank dirt from an account that uses the coat of arms of the Russian Federation as an avatar - this is an abuse of the state. symbolism and pulls a criminal case under art. 329 of the Criminal Code?

      I recall the position of the Supreme Court:
      ordinary citizens and their associations are forbidden to use not only the image of the State Emblem directly, but also other images that are confusingly similar (Review of the judicial practice of the RF Armed Forces for the third quarter of 2012 (approved by the Presidium of the RF Armed Forces on December 26, 2012)
  • Lena Petrova
    Lena Petrova 25 November 2019 14: 00 New
    +5
    Shooting from the side, nothing really can be seen there - why did they get the idea that the goal was a white building? They wandered into the courtyard, in the center of the object - everything else will turn out that way.
  • Dude
    Dude 27 November 2019 13: 16 New
    0
    Quote: Alexander Petrov1
    Yeah, 1,5 tons and 3 m of concrete is cool, you won’t envy Barmaley, it’s good that we didn’t drop our 10 tons most powerful bomb in the World, which penetrates 60 meters and would even get them in an underground bunker ...

    Laughed a lot)) True, the old man was amused