Bonnet ZIL-131: history and search for the ideal

71 977 51

Panoramic windows and bonnet layout


As mentioned in the first part of the storyOne of the most characteristic and paradoxical signs of a military truck was a curved panoramic windshield. At first, the Ministry of Defense rather restrainedly expressed dissatisfaction with this fact, but during the Afghan conflict the question arose very sharply. In July 1982, in a joint decision of the Ministry of the Automotive Industry and the Central Automotive Department of the USSR Ministry of Defense, it was said:
“Many years of experience in operating the ZIL-130 and ZIL-131 automobiles in the military have shown that the current design of the cabin with a panoramic windshield significantly complicates car repair, as well as transportation and storage of this type of glass. The drawback of the glazing of the cabs of ZIL automobiles is especially acute when convoying in mountain conditions under conditions of fire ”.


In accordance with these conclusions, the factory workers conducted a test cycle of the modernized ZIL-4334 machines equipped with flat windshields. By the way, in addition to simplifying operation, flat multi-component glass allowed solving the problem of the insulating glazing of trucks in the "northern" version. However, flat glass was actually an unsolvable task for the Moscow Automobile Plant - this entailed both a complication of the cab structure and serious financial costs. So, according to the calculations of 1982 of the year, the development of a new cabin and glazing required some fantastic costs in 1 550 000 rubles, as well as additional 700 square meters. meters of production space. Actually, the financial side of the issue allowed to reverse the will of the Ministry of Defense in this matter.











ZIL-4334, developed taking into account the Afghan operating experience

In an effort to unify the army truck with the civil ZIL-130, the designers left the hood layout of the car unchanged. This was done primarily in order to maximize the speed of production of machines of both modifications on the production lines of the plant. The country was sorely lacking cars of this class, and, for example, the army was only able to get enough of 131 mi ZILs by the middle of the 70 years. One of the most important advantages of the ZIL-131 triaxial bonnet truck in this regard is its resistance to undermining under the wheels of anti-vehicle mines. Below I offer a selection of photographs illustrating this thesis.






Bonnet ZIL-131: history and search for the ideal

History Afghan war and conflict in the Donbass is closely intertwined with machines of the 131 series

Triumph and unfulfilled hopes


In the Soviet Army, the ZIL-131 truck by the mid-70's had already gained fame as a reliable, unpretentious and all-terrain vehicle. In many ways, this was the reason for the assignment in April 1974 of the Year of the Quality Mark to the entire line of Moscow all-wheel drives. We were also satisfied in the national economy - since 1971, a simplified version of the machine without expensive shielded equipment under the name ZIL-131A was put on the conveyor. A little earlier, in the 1968 year, a tractor unit with a shortened 131B frame appeared, capable of pulling a single-axle semi-trailer with a gross weight of 12 tons.






Around the same time, they designed and adopted a largely unique ZIL-137 tractor with a hydrostatic drive of the wheels of the semi-trailer. An additional hydraulic pump was mounted on the machine with a drive from the power take-off, allowing oil to be supplied to the hydraulic motor of the semi-trailer with a pressure of 150 kgf / cm2. In the late 60s, the assembly of the unique vehicle was transferred to the Bryansk Automobile Plant, where they assembled an average of 30 similar vehicles per month. They were mainly transported in such ZILs missiles (for example, the 2K11 Krug air defense missile system), but it was not uncommon to see the 137th vehicle with a long AKhB-2,5 bread-baking unit. This plant on wheels was capable of baking at least 2,5 tons of bread per day, even while moving on the march. However, the capricious and complex hydraulic motor of the semi-trailer forced engineers to develop a more reliable and technologically advanced mechanical drive. This is how the 60091 road train with a ZIL-4401 tractor with a BAZ-99511 semi-trailer appeared, produced from 1982 to 1994. The road train consumed 53 liters of gasoline per 100 kilometers, allowed loading more than 7 tons and found its application in the missile forces, Defense and on the bakery path. With the beginning of the 80s, the Chita Automobile Assembly Plant began mass production of "northern" versions of the ZIL-131S, which were supposed to withstand temperatures down to -60ºС. Since 1986, the assembly of such frost-resistant vehicles has been transferred to the native Moscow Automobile Plant.







ZIL-131В

Due to the long commissioning, the machine quickly became obsolete and required modernization. The delay in mastering the car was due to the protracted reconstruction of the enterprise, as well as chronic shortages of units from the Bryansk Automobile Plant. The normal assembly of ZIL-131 was only possible in the second half of the 1967 year, that is, twelve years after the assembly of the first prototypes! One of the attempts to improve the truck was the development of the ZIL-1976-131 in 77, in which the main emphasis was on improving the working conditions of the driver. The object of unification was the KAMAZ car - a wheel, a combination of instruments and a seat were borrowed from it. In addition, the loading platform was lowered a little, however, the kinematics of the suspension were not taken into account and the body was often touched on the diagonal suspension of the wheel. As a result, nothing good came of this idea - the experimental car was modified for a very long time and eventually abandoned.









"Heat Resistant" ZIL-131X. The car was equipped with air conditioning, a protective heat shield on the roof of the cab, a sealed tent, the thermostat was removed on the car

If you ask anyone who operated ZIL-131 about the main drawback of the car, then most often you can hear a complaint about excessive fuel consumption. Of course, one could put up with this in the army (although nobody canceled the power reserve as one of the most important parameters), but in the civilian sphere and in export markets, diesel was required from the very beginning. Only ten years after the start of production, they tried to deliver a V-shaped diesel engine YaMZ-642, and in 1979 the Finnish Valmer-411BS, but, as in the case of ZIL-131-77, the experimental cars were left without a series. But in the 78 year, the ZIL-131M appeared, equipped with a self-developed diesel engine ZIL-6451 with eight cylinders, a volume of 8,74 liters and a capacity of 170 liters. from. What is not an ideal truck? Moreover, outwardly it was very slightly different from the serial car - the hood was slightly lengthened (by the way, the development topic was called “The Hood”) and additional headlights were installed. And with the tanks fully filled, the power reserve of the ZIL-131M diesel engine was giant 1180 km! Around the same time, another version of a truck with a ZIL-375 gasoline engine with a capacity of 170 l appeared. from. In this version, engineers at a comparable fuel consumption significantly increased engine power and torque.

Truck "N"


On December 5 on December 1986, the well-deserved truck nevertheless waited for serial modernization and appeared in an updated form with the letter "N". A new economical 150-strong ZIL-5081 motor was installed as a novelty, characterized by a block head with a screw inlet and a compression ratio increased to 7,1. An important innovation was the increased carrying capacity in 3,75 tons, which closely brought the truck closer to the niche of 5 and 6-ton KamAZ trucks. By the way, from cars from Naberezhnye Chelny to the modernized ZIL, the tent was transferred from new synthetic materials. Simultaneously with the onboard version, the ZIL-131NV truck tractor (together with the "northern" 131НВС) was developed.


ZIL-131NV

The appearance of the renewed ZIL in the army did not meet much enthusiasm - firstly, disarmament was underway, and secondly, the diesel KAMAZ and Urals perfectly performed many of the functions of a gasoline truck. In addition, in the 1990 year at ZIL, the “N” series car was discontinued and started preparing facilities for the new model. The modernized ZIL from the 1987 of the year was assembled in parallel with Moscow in Novouralsk (Sverdlovsk Region) at the Ural Automotive Plant. We have known him since the 2004 of the year as the Amur enterprise - it brought together an extremely motley collection of trucks based on ZILs with various types of drive and a wide range of motors. In 2010, the plant in the Urals was closed due to bankruptcy, and three years later, production was permanently stopped at one of the oldest enterprises in the automotive industry - the Likhachev plant. You can argue for a long time about the causes of the death of the once legendary plant, but for you and me it will be largely associated with the ZIL-131 military model. In total, the plant assembled 998 429 copies of unpretentious army vehicles, and from 1987 to 2006, along with Amur, 52 349 trucks entered the market. A typical representative of the 131 family in the Soviet Army was an onboard tilt truck that accommodates 18-24 personnel, often with a small or medium caliber attached gun. However, the universal “caliber” ZIL-131 made it possible to set up just countless bodies on its basis and to develop a lot of options. But this is the topic of a separate story.

The ending should ...
51 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +17
    26 November 2019 05: 48
    I read it with pleasure. Thanks to the author. I remembered the army, the march, the harvest. Surely a lot of employees, this car evokes memories of the service.
    1. +10
      26 November 2019 07: 36
      I join your words. Very good, objectively filed article. Sample for many other authors.
    2. +4
      26 November 2019 08: 12
      I join and look forward to continuing. good
  2. The comment was deleted.
    1. +6
      26 November 2019 09: 33
      Unfortunately, the extremely weak engine-building industry was the Achilles heel of the USSR automobile industry. It was the lack of normal engines that led to the lack of competitiveness of our equipment as a whole. I wonder what damage was caused to the development of the USSR by inefficient engines on equipment throughout the country? High fuel consumption is only one of the factors, low reliability, and with it downtime and repair costs leading to failure to complete certain tasks, all this was a powerful brake on the development of the state. For some reason, we did not spare money on aircraft engines, rocket, nuclear technologies, but automobile engines were not considered something important, especially small-capacity ones, which led to a serious lag and this is happening to this day.
      1. +4
        26 November 2019 11: 02
        Quote: max702
        Alas, the extremely weak engine industry was the Achilles heel of the automotive industry of the USSR ..

        Hard to say. I do not know. In the 30s, motor plants, to the detriment of the automobile and tractor industries, were transferred to the NKAP, immediately after the Second World War, the construction started, the automobile plants were transferred to rocketry. Well, the fact that there was a lack of quality materials also plays a negative role. Before the collapse of the USSR, the "Gigant" Plant in Yartsevo was not brought to mind. Iron casting and motor production for the AMO-ZIL plant. Kostanay "Plant of Diesel and Combine Engines" is the same. High-quality fuel equipment, for some reason, had to be produced in Czechoslovakia "PAL" or "Friedman Mayer" in Austria. It was not possible to agree with the Bosch firm on the construction of a fuel equipment plant.
        1. +3
          26 November 2019 11: 27
          So I’m talking about this, in principle, all this was decided by a trivial injection of funds, but for some reason they always saved on it .. The engine in all other areas (air, space, rocket science, atom) is quite at our level, and in some places we leaders, but the internal combustion engine by the residual principle, although this is the most important industry as a whole .. It seems to me that this is the shortsightedness of the country's leadership resulting from incompetence .. Think of some kind of motors for delivery trucks or chainsaws, there is nothing to invest heavily in it, expensive, then we will finalize but the fact that each non-competitive motor slows down the development process and incurs losses while lowering the competitive ability of the economy as a whole was not understood ..
          1. +7
            26 November 2019 12: 24
            Quote: max702
            So I’m talking about this, in principle, all this was decided by a banal injection of funds, but for some reason they always saved on this ..

            The most unpleasant thing is to save on petrochemicals and high-quality fuel and lubricants. In fact, we did not have high-quality additives, and imported ones were not purchased. There were many problems, but chemical and petrochemical plants worked only for the defense industry. And I must say thanks to VAZ, thanks to him we started to produce high-quality oils and greases, and then they were not enough.
            1. +2
              26 November 2019 12: 32
              I agree! What surprises me most is the lack of understanding of this global problem among the country's top leadership.
            2. +4
              26 November 2019 14: 21
              Quote: Amurets
              The most unpleasant thing is to save on petrochemistry and high-quality fuel and lubricants

              And this despite the fact that petrochemicals and engine building are two sides of the same coin. There will be no powerful motor without high-quality fuel.
              Need to increase the power of an automobile motor and make a tank of it? We'll have to abandon the B-59, only B / KB-70 aviation gasoline.
              1. +4
                26 November 2019 14: 55
                Quote: Alexey RA
                And this despite the fact that petrochemicals and engine building are two sides of the same coin. There will be no powerful motor without high-quality fuel.

                This is one side of the coin. The other is oils, lubricants, coolants. Water as a coolant, with all its advantages, still has many disadvantages, primarily a low freezing point and scale deposits. With poor quality oils, wear of parts and the service life of engines and units increases. However, this is not so bad, the Russian oil base from sulfur oils is considered one of the best in the world, but additives in oils that improve many performance parameters of oil had to and have to be purchased abroad. Well, oil-resistant rubber is cuffs, oil seals, seals. For V-shaped engines ZIL-130/375/508 - the most painful place is the seals on the intake manifold or spider, which is placed on rubber gaskets.
          2. +2
            26 November 2019 18: 14
            In 70, the ZIL 130/131 engine was very, very good. Low compression ratio and low-octane gasoline are interconnected. The country produced low-octane gasoline and an engine for it. A liter of gasoline cost as much as a glass of soda. Drivers poured gasoline into ravines to avoid fines.
            In the winter cold, the process of starting a gasoline car was better than a diesel one...
            All problems with diesel fuel fell away: nozzles, fuel injection pumps, injection advance, plunger, etc. A carburetor is a simple device, for rough tuning you do not need any devices.
            With diesel, the issue became relevant only when these same zills began to be written off en masse from the Ministry of Defense. For private traders, the issue of diesel was solved by the usual installation of HBO.
  3. +9
    26 November 2019 06: 37
    I am not indifferent to the ZIL plant. I worked on it for three years 1978-81 in the State Central Committee of Religious and Political Culture. I took the time to rush through the shops for the sake of curiosity. Particularly struck
    complexes for processing engine blocks and crankshafts. Another inter-workshop conveyor of cabins from the workshop to the assembly line through the entire factory also surprised.
    Well, the foundry is remarkable in that all the most advanced equipment was imported.
    Almost simultaneously, ZIL shared the fate of my dear TAPOiCh!
    1. 0
      28 May 2020 13: 24
      ANDREY, now at TAPOiCH they produce all sorts of junk, screwdriver assembly of cars, door locks, this is pride! They broke the FOX, they are remodeling the airfield...
  4. +6
    26 November 2019 07: 43
    Zil hard worker ... traveled a lot on them!
    1. +5
      26 November 2019 14: 02
      Quote: rocket757
      Zil hard worker ... traveled a lot on them!

      hi ... Shipment of round timber:
      1. +5
        26 November 2019 14: 06
        Quote: san4es
        ... Shipment of round timber:

        This ZIL has outlived itself ... however PULLS!
      2. +1
        30 November 2019 00: 26
        I’ve seen such people in the mountains of Karachay-Cherkessia when they went to the mountain recreation center Damkhurts. They drove from the asphalt in the Urals for about 2,5 hours on a half-primer-heater along the river. When we parted with an oncoming timber truck, our side of the body and one wheel hung for a while over a cliff of a river. And the height is 60-70 meters ... I felt very strong discomfort ...
  5. +1
    26 November 2019 07: 45
    Many years of experience in operating the ZIL-130 and ZIL-131 vehicles in the military have shown that the current cab design with a panoramic windshield significantly complicates car repair

    No, well, what are the advantages of flat, in terms of installation?
    1. +6
      26 November 2019 08: 38
      Probably, with a single lumbar of a panoramic one it is necessary to change it completely, and in the case of a flat one it is possible to do only with a shot through part.
      1. +3
        26 November 2019 08: 40
        Quote: Aviator_
        Probably, with a single lumbago of a panoramic, you need to change it completely,

        There were panoramic halves from the two halves (top photos with undermined).
        1. +4
          26 November 2019 10: 24
          Quote: Mordvin 3
          There were panoramic halves from the two halves (top photos with undermined).


          Such units were only supplied to combat group units, I always only had such (battery., Division).
    2. +1
      26 November 2019 09: 49
      In which case, cut out the size of window or organic glass and pasted.
      1. 0
        26 November 2019 09: 59
        Quote: UAndrey
        In which case, cut out the size of window or organic glass and pasted.

        From organics, and you can bend. The truth is such a big piece and in the USSR you will find FIG. And about:
        the current cab design with a panoramic windshield significantly complicates car repair

        it’s easier to put one whole on ZIL than two halves, or 4. IMHO.
        1. 0
          26 November 2019 14: 40
          It seems to me easier to replace one broken half than all the glass (with the same impact on the car).
          1. +2
            26 November 2019 14: 49
            Quote: UAndrey
            It seems easier to replace one broken half

            To customize the half - that hemorrhoids.
    3. +2
      26 November 2019 17: 27
      Quote: mordvin xnumx
      Many years of experience in operating the ZIL-130 and ZIL-131 vehicles in the military have shown that the current cab design with a panoramic windshield significantly complicates car repair

      No, well, what are the advantages of flat, in terms of installation?

      As I understood it, the Moscow Region required flat glasses for 2 reasons:
      1. Easier to transport. The flat glass box is obviously smaller in size than the panoramic glass box. In addition, for flat glass there is no difference in the installation side.
      2. Possibility of installing bulletproof glass. I'm not an expert in glass, but I think that making curved glass bulletproof is much more difficult and expensive than flat glass.
      T.ch. MO requirements were quite reasonable.
      1. +1
        26 November 2019 18: 32
        Quote: tolancop
        1. Easier transportation. The box of flat glasses is clearly smaller in size of the box panoramic. In addition, for flat glass there is no difference in the installation side.

        In this I completely agree.
        Quote: tolancop
        but I think that making bent glass bulletproof is much more difficult and more expensive than flat glass.

        Perhaps I won’t argue, I just don’t know.
        the current cab design with a panoramic windshield significantly complicates car repair

        But in this paragraph I do not agree. Personally, I was pleased when asked to replace the broken half-piece whole.
  6. Naz
    +4
    26 November 2019 08: 19
    The first car I was driving. True feet to the pedals did not reach. Army truck. As I remember now, it remains in my memory.
  7. +1
    26 November 2019 08: 47
    So after all, they still ride in the army, they cannot change how, but how many of them are still in stock soldier
  8. BAI
    +1
    26 November 2019 09: 29
    the financial side of the issue and allowed to reverse the will of the Ministry of Defense in this matter.

    A vivid example of the fact that money is more expensive than a person. And it was necessary just a little bit: to put the directorate of the plant and designers in the cabs and send under bullets to Afghanistan.
  9. +3
    26 November 2019 09: 42
    Ride 131 in the army and harvest. It was a great car. I had a ZIL-131 with a winch in front. The winch often came to the rescue, especially during harvesting in Northern Kazakhstan.
  10. +5
    26 November 2019 10: 09
    The 131st was not the best option for the liaison officers, the weight of many control rooms was over 10 tons, on marches through the "mountainous-hilly" terrain, the columns did not always represent a single monolith, but moved a little into a muddy field, then you can safely go to the collective farm for tractor ... Kaazy and Urady are much preferable for signalmen
    1. +1
      26 November 2019 16: 11
      + 100500!
      For war, the 131st, lousy machine. Only in Europe + autobahns ride.
  11. +1
    26 November 2019 13: 06
    And now what is going to the army instead of him?
    1. +3
      26 November 2019 15: 11
      Quote: bk0010
      And now what is going to the army instead of him?

      KAMAZ-4326 and GAZ-3307


  12. +6
    26 November 2019 16: 00
    "Universal fighter", did not read further.
    He served just on the S-75 complex, where the 131st were the main transport vehicle (ZIL-131NV, from the last picture). What kind of fighter is he? He can only drive on a highway or a dry dirt road. There was a winter exercise, before which we reactivated the old / new 157 bams from the NZ warehouse. This is a car! She only lacked the power steering. In winter, in the field, snow is almost a meter, with our long trailers with products, all 131s immediately sat down and in none. You just give the gas a little, it flips the wheels and on the belly. And an old bams sneeze, puff, slowly, little by little, but creeps up a centimeter and also drags this "fighter" along.
    In short .. I didn’t drive, I served as the operator of the SEC, but what I saw with my own eyes and felt with my own lessons, I say so. The Urals - yes, Kamaz the raptor is a beast in general, we caterpillar artillery tractors pulled it in the cold, the old 157-yes. Even shishiga is also beautiful, albeit jumping. But not this SUV with a high-revving engine and through the anus selected gears.
    In short - BEMS is a bang! not just because he was nicknamed the king of impassability.
    But yes, he lacked the power steering.
    1. 0
      27 November 2019 17: 34
      ... we canned old / new 157th bams from the warehouse of NZ. This is a car !.

      In the wild 90s, a beekeeper friend of mine bought a 157th from a military unit. He officially installed a Japanese diesel engine from Hino on it through the State Traffic Inspectorate. It had no equal off-road. Neither KAMAZ, nor URAL, not to mention the rest, could compare with the 157th. I don’t understand at all why it was necessary to replace an excellent machine (157) with a defect (131)? All the 157th needed was a hydraulic booster and a newer engine. And it would have easily survived to this day.
      1. 0
        28 November 2019 03: 24
        Quote: maidan.izrailovich
        I don’t understand why it was necessary to replace a great car.

        For me, this is also a mystery. Those. compared head-on during exercises and literally the whole division scratched turnips.
        The only thing that can be explained is a serious simplification and cheapening of the gearbox, after which the zilas lost patency in difficult conditions, and turned into SUVs, with the comfort of a Lada.

        The engine .. what's the point? Recent modifications came with 101ls engines (early 89, if memory serves). But its trump card is at low revs and high torque. Everything (well, not everything, everything, but almost) the further development of car engines went to increase power through an increase in speed, to the detriment of the twisting (shift of the peak to high speed), which in the context of such a truck is 100% evil.
        If it made sense to modify it, it was adaptation to better gasoline, due to which it was possible and could increase power and / or reduce consumption. In general, that power was quite enough for the tasks for which it was created.
        But ergonomics were worth the work. Improve the cabin, noise / heat insulation, seats, stove, wipers, etc. It is better to think over a cooling system for severe frosts (I had to close it with a blanket). Well, the power steering, of course ...
        1. 0
          28 November 2019 03: 44
          The only thing that can be explained ...

          Still easier.
          The 131 is practically a four-wheel drive (+ one more axle) 130. There is a high degree of unification. It is clear that this is good for production. There are even 130s with the same cabin as the 131.
          1. +1
            28 November 2019 03: 53
            It goes without saying. Instead of two different cars, for war and for Narkhza, they got two of the same. Unification and universalization played a bad joke.
        2. 0
          28 November 2019 03: 54
          If at the beginning of the video the fans of the 131st still had some hopes, then in the thirteenth minute everything fell into place.
          131st is a car for bad roads.
          157th is a car for the bad directions.
          1. 0
            28 November 2019 04: 00
            Well yes. The commentator said exactly what I voiced several posts earlier, regarding the characteristics of the engine, etc.
          2. +1
            29 November 2019 13: 26
            Quote: maidan.izrailovich
            If at the beginning of the video the fans of the 131st still had some hopes, then in the thirteenth minute everything fell into place.

            It’s strange to show this video as evidence. Two minutes earlier than the thirteenth minute, 131 he himself went where 157 was pulled by a winch. In the next video, returning after 3 days with 2 broken wheels, 131 went by himself in the same place where 157 again went on a winch. And is it a bad cross?
            And the fact that 131 was planted on an iron channel walled up in a swamp is not the car's fault ... request
  13. +1
    26 November 2019 21: 04
    It's strange, the photo shows a ZIL-131 NV in the TZM version. It seems to me that the trailer has a missile for the S-25M1 Berkut. At that time, the S-25 regiments were already living out their last months before being decommissioned. It seems that they could not supply new tractors there. If this is a TZM from the S-75, it is even stranger.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +2
      26 November 2019 23: 23
      Quote: IL-64
      Strange, in the photo ZIL-131 HB in the version TZM. It seems to me that on a trailer a missile to the S-25M1 Berkut.

      No! Look, even outwardly they are different. Rockets from the S-25M1 "Berkut."
      And this is the S-75 "Volkhov"

      1. +1
        27 November 2019 21: 26
        Yes, thank you. Refreshed my memory. What's interesting is that I couldn't find out when the S-75s, in their many guises, were removed from service. While the S-25 still existed in separate regiments in the late 80s and was even sometimes deployed in combat.
        1. 0
          27 November 2019 23: 11
          Quote: IL-64
          Whereas the S-25 in the late 80s still existed in separate regiments and even sometimes stood on the database

          According to Bongo, they are still in service in some places abroad, the Volga variant is still in service abroad. https://topwar.ru/90322-zrk-s-75-v-xxi-veke.html
  14. +1
    27 November 2019 19: 32
    I honestly didn't think about how much it "ate". I just took it when and where it was needed. I don't remember any special technical problems. In any case, it lasted a month in our camps, both in winter and in summer. There was such a case - autumn, a swamp, a corduroy road. There were 3 Urals on the corduroy road, it was already dilapidated, the first Ural "died". I suggested to the driver an option - to go back. Since the Ural "died", what should we do? He objects: we can try stupidly through the swamp, because if the Ural is so cool, there are still 2 more there, they will pull us out, if necessary. We tried. The people from the infantry looked at us with bewilderment. But we passed them, climbed onto the corduroy road and rushed on. Since then I fell in love with ZIL. If I needed somewhere reliable and fast, I ordered it. And cross-country, and on the highway 105 km / h. In half of all cases, I moved the fighter-driver to the right seat and drove myself - either around the city or along the "route". It was a good car.
  15. 0
    29 November 2019 05: 28
    I still saw a single Zil with a new 6x6 square cab.
  16. 0
    29 November 2019 08: 45
    I don’t know, I don’t know, it is too laudatory. In the Red Army since 1977, 131 in the troops have always been disliked, especially with the advent of the diesel Urals. They did not like for the weakness and relatively poor cross-country ability, which with the failure of the front axle (which was a fairly common event) turned into generally no
  17. 0
    11 December 2019 10: 45
    Beautiful, brutal car. I join the rest of the commentators, thanks for the article. Very interesting.