British government plans to lease aircraft carrier to another country

The British press has published information about the plans of the Government of the United Kingdom to go to reduce the size of the army and fleet. The Sunday Times stated that plans of this nature are reflected in the Conservative’s special election manifesto. This manifesto is represented today by the leader of the Conservative Party, the head of the British government, Boris Johnson.

Noteworthy is the statement that one of the two British newest aircraft carriers Johnson is going to lease. The material says that the aircraft carrier is planning to transfer as a rental military property of "one of the NATO countries." The possibility of transferring a warship to the US Navy is being considered.

Earlier, the head of the British defense department Ben Wallace announced his readiness to lease the aircraft carrier.

Comments on the possible lease of a British aircraft carrier from US officials at the moment have not been published.

To date, the number of armed forces in the UK is about 73 thousand people. According to the plan of Boris Johnson, the number should decrease to 60-65 thousand people. It is argued that the funding options for the British army will not be reduced, remaining at approximately 2% of GDP. The material says that this approach will increase the "specific funding" - for example, increase the level of monetary allowance of military personnel.

Comments

[Honest Citizen]

Why transfer to "one of the NATO countries"? You lease it to Belarus, they also need to protect their sea with something from the 6th US Navy

[Selxozotdel]

British government plans to lease aircraft carrier to another country

To the Hindus obviously .. That's what it is happening Mikhalych. he he
AUGs are starting to throw off .. and they are doing the right thing. We in Russia are starting to preserve the "killers of the Avians" with new weapons and other nishtyaks ...

[Tersky]

Quote: Selxozotdel

Hindus obviously ..

Either skis do not go, or there is no snow ... , Meehan, when did India become a member of NATO? Do not read the news text diagonally, from bottom to top and from right to left. Quote from the news:

The material says that the aircraft carrier is planning to transfer as a rental military property of "one of the NATO countries."

[krot]

Initially, they somehow strangely built and tested their aircraft carriers .. For a very long time ..

[Svarog51]

Iskander I pricked my ears. I have not heard this for a long time. I will closely monitor. Interesting, however.

[Andrey VOV]

Are you specially registered today to throw this on the fan? The meaning of your message is clear, but has nothing to do with the site and the note, stop your verbiage and go to your Lieberasts for echo and rain

[Xnumx vis]

Quote: Iskander of Alexandria

the supply of 300 Bentley cars to Russia this year is a good sign on the development of bilateral relations.

So what ? Someone bought expensive cars .. Or the toad rushes you, or envy crushes .. I ... like violet, who drives what ... Generally I do not like cars!

[Sky strike fighter]

Let them give Ukraine a lease. After the lease, legs and horns will remain from it.

[Honest Citizen]

Let Ukraine be leased.

Ukraine is not allowed, they will sell it to the Chinese. They have experience.

[loki565]

or make toilet bowls, who then needs an aircraft carrier without toilet bowls)))

[paul3390]

First of all, toilets and sockets will be twisted from it ..

[Proxima]

Quote: Sky Strike fighter

Let Ukraine be leased.

And what? This is an idea! Here is what the Ukrainian "expert" who escaped from Crimea offers:According to the expert, while new ships will be built at the Ukrainian shipyards, the gap in the Navy must be filled up with rental vessels.
“We have no choice but to now, until we restore our fleet, turn to the practice of Lend-Lease and rent some ships as aid. In parallel, build what we can, ships and boats, and in parallel lay new corvettes and frigates. But all this period, when we are building, it needs to be closed.
Even renting according to the old well-known Lend-Lease principle is also a problem, because it is an international agreement, budgets, this ship needs to be prepared. And this time, while this issue is being resolved, we need to ask the allies to ensure naval deterrence by the presence of ships in the Black Sea, ”said Klimenko

[churka]

Yeah, all the toilets will make.

[bouncyhunter]

Quote: Honest Citizen

You lease it to Belarus

Haha! Haha! They cannot find us all year long.
As for the "Mistress of the Seas", stop ... I've already got excited about the title: the sovereigns do not lease theirs ...

[cniza]

pasha , and if with the right to sublease, then you can also earn extra money.

[bouncyhunter]

Victor, hi!

Quote: cniza

if with the right to sublease, then you can also earn extra money

I will not speak for everyone - I speak for myself: from the saucy-sax, I have enough books from the classics. And their aviki - definitely nafig!

[cniza]

I am touched by something else, why build, what would then be rented out?

[bouncyhunter]

Quote: cniza

Why build, what would then be leased?

Schaub Bulo?

[cniza]

The harmful influence of our southern neighbors is already showing itself - "I will put it in the barn and I will not know my grief."

[bouncyhunter]

Quote: cniza

I’ll put in the barn and I will not know grief

They sound different (translate into Russian):
"Quiet Ukrainian night, but the bacon must be hidden!" ...

[cniza]

And I thought that this was the work of N. Fomenko ...

[bouncyhunter]

Famous people often repeat what was said long before their appearance. And appropriating other people's sayings among them is enough masters ...

[Piramidon]

Quote: bouncyhunter

Quote: cniza

Why build, what would then be leased?

Schaub Bulo?

That's the way our guardians for the construction of aircraft carriers argue. And what the construction and operation of these devices will cost, they do not care.

[bouncyhunter]

Quote: Piramidon

what will the construction and operation of these devices cost, they don’t care

This, unfortunately, concerns not only aircraft carriers.

[cniza]

It happens, they do it at first, then they think, unfortunately ...

[Sergey39]

Do they have a choice? They just got an offer that you can’t refuse.

[Andrei from Chelyabinsk]

Everything is very simple here. Admirals need a fleet, because they fight on it if something happens. Their lordships do not need a fleet, give them optimization. And aircraft carriers are being built for a long time. So it turns out that even if at some point the admirals sell theirs, then they will again repel the government’s attacks.

[Alexey RA]

Quote: cniza

I am touched by something else, why build, what would then be rented out?

With these AVs in general, a funny story came out. Their lordships from the Admiralty, mindful of the fate of the previous "Queen Elizabeth", destroyed by the Treasury right on the slipway, included in the contract for the construction of new ABs fines for refusal to build, exceeding the cost of AB itself. Plus, pre-election problems were superimposed - the refusal to complete the "Prince" meant the loss of a total of about 50 jobs, and in the most important constituencies. And against the prime minister with his plans "enough for the fleet and one AB"its own party came out. As a result, both ABs had to be completed.
But the thrifty parliamentarians did not calm down - and already in 2010, even before the first AB was launched, they wanted to leave RN only one AB, and sell or lease the other. In one form or another, these plans regularly surface to this day - for the "white elephants", taking into account the cost of the air group, turned out to be a rather expensive toy.

[cniza]

Have played enough without starting , it happens...

[Fraracol_2]

Nice clip, but this clip of "Accident" I like better
https://youtu.be/KNlS4YwlUEQ

[Lopatov]

Quote: bouncyhunter

As for the "Lady of the Seas"

The threat from Russia has grown so much that Britain is forced to reduce its armed forces ...
One thing is interesting to me: do the British themselves have no cognitive dissonance due to their native propaganda?

[bouncyhunter]

Quote: Spade

do the British themselves have no cognitive dissonance due to their native propaganda?

This question interests not only you and the British.

[Svarog51]

pasha I just thought, what if Trump comes to the same conclusion? Will start leasing its aircraft carriers - and what will happen? "It's cooler than Goethe's Faust"

[NF68]

Quote: Honest Citizen

Why transfer to "one of the NATO countries"? You lease it to Belarus, they also need to protect their sea with something from the 6th US Navy

It is better to let the aircraft carrier pass to the Ukrainians. Present-day Ukraine wants to become one of the NATO lackeys anyway.

[Piramidon]

Quote: NF68

It is better to let the aircraft carrier pass to the Ukrainians.

If only by train can deliver

[NF68]

Quote: Piramidon

Quote: NF68

It is better to let the aircraft carrier pass to the Ukrainians.

If only by train can deliver

For the descendants of the great ancient ukrov, digging a channel for the delivery of an aircraft carrier in a couple of nights is no more difficult than blowing your nose.

[Dmitry Donskoy]

Balts for rent, let them go broke at the end

[NF68]

Quote: Dmitry Donskoy

Balts for rent, let them go broke at the end

The Baltic states will quickly adapt the aircraft carrier to catch sprats.

[Shelest2000]

Khokhlam will give

[NF68]

Quote: Shelest2000

Khokhlam will give

Together with nuclear weapons

it will be something.

And the underwater fleet should not be forgotten either:

[Shelest2000]

They also fly into space!

[Thunderbolt]

They are not going to "transfer" anything.
British Prime Minister Boris Johnson during his speech in Telford denied the Sunday Times publication about plans to reduce the number of ground forces. He announced this on November 24 live on Sky News.https: //iz.ru/946872/2019-11-24/jonson-oproverg-informatciiu-o-sokrashchenii-chislennosti-britanskoi-armii

[NEXUS]

When the USSR was such a saying, do you want to ruin a small country? Give her an atomic cruiser.

[Rostislav Prokopenko]

It seems that in the original it was about an armadillo ...
But at current prices and the appetites of the mattress defense industry, an aircraft carrier will become a stone on the neck even in a not-so-small country

[Vladimir_2U]

There was no such saying under the USSR, you are telling a lie.

[Amateur]

Quote: Honest Citizen

Ukraine is not allowed, they will sell it to the Chinese. They have experience.

Then the Georgians!

[SERGEY SERGEEVICS]

Survived that they are already going to rent military equipment, that's what the long flirting with whales leads to.

[Pivot]

Well, we then rent the submarine to the Indians and nothing.

[SERGEY SERGEEVICS]

Well, we don’t rent it out for rent, but for rent (and by installments). And they were just going to rent it out.

[Pivot]

We just gave the Indians a rental.

[SERGEY SERGEEVICS]

Did not hear about it and what is the monthly rent?

[sabakina]

Personally, I do not know. It is necessary to ask the cat Matroskin ...

[loki565]

Only not in Ukraine, and then all the toilets have to recount)))

[Thrifty]

Why fence the garden, sell it to or India, go Brazil!

[sabakina]

Quote: Thrifty

Why fence the garden, sell it to or India, go Brazil!

I know India, I know Brazil, Until ... I don’t know. What kind of country is this?

[Svarog51]

Glory What is so strange here? Built an aircraft carrier in the country Before. People do not serve on it - they leased it. Now the country is called - After. They will check what they returned.

[Wedmak]

And think about it, they will be leased to someone from the Baltic states ... or Poland .... Here we laugh from the heart. I even represent newspaper headlines in arshin letters "LATVIA has an aircraft carrier!", "Poland has increased the power of its fleet 10 times!" ...

[NEXUS]

Quote: Wedmak

Poland has increased the power of its fleet 10 times! "

And the standard of living has fallen by the same amount, since all Poland will have to contain this vessel.

[Igorpl]

Latvia will have enough money only for the New Year holidays to withdraw.

[Sahalinets]

What are the weird numbers in the article. 74 thousand - this is only the size of the army! And in total in the armed forces (Air Force + Navy) - 146 500 people!

[Lord of the Sith]

They built a huge barn, but there is no denyuzhk for maintenance?) Countries for rent))

Then only the Yankees will pull, it is quite possible for them to build.

[awg75]

you have to be a complete "D" with a capital letter to buy a British aircraft carrier))))

[knn54]

No money (or willing) for the crew.

[arhPavel]

Tin;) really throw off AUGi)))
Even if you are just considering this option, this is already a significant indicator.
1. The United States is easier to rent than to build.
2. The British have no opportunity to contain.

[bars1]

Quote: arhPavel

1. The United States is easier to rent than to build.

Why does the US need this pre-carrier?

[From Siberia we]

Yeah, see more rents. There they will promise you an expeditious surrender of NATO to you.

[Vkd dvk]

Poland will be the first candidate. Do they need to prove to Moscow their terrible power and desire to build the Great and not yet Dead from sea to sea?

[RideMaster]

This is their mistake. They increase everyone’s contentment and salaries, and everything else rolls in w.

[rocket757]

On the one hand, strange, on the other hand even weirder!
However, there your entertainer steers, named Boris !!! I was not surprised at anything.

[Vodrak]

In Russia, too, one got it ....

[rocket757]

Quote: Vodrak

In Russia, too, one got it ....

Unfortunately not one.

[Vodrak]

Unfortunately...

[Prisoner]

Boil the Baltic states. They on one content all three will precipitate.

[Vodrak]

In Ukraine!

[Prisoner]

They only take used boats. Fundamentally.

[Yaro Polk]

Hucksters, you would have rented your Korolev for rent ......... preferably in Hell

[From Siberia we]

In the UK, an absolute monarchy. The queen owns half the world, and her grandchildren fought. And the children and grandchildren of your power?

[Vodrak]

Oh, they didn’t fight, but mostly deceived and intrigued.

[Vodrak]

And by the way, the monarchy is constitutional there

[From Siberia we]

is there a constitution?

[Yaro Polk]

Stalin had 2 sons at war, and even the current politicians have every 2 officer ranks.

[From Siberia we]

did he understand what he said? "ranks are available" and fought. there is no difference at all?

[Andrey VOV]

Did you study at school? Is it not a victim of the exam, there is no absolute monarchy in Great Britain, fear God !!

[From Siberia we]

V. - parliamentary monarchy. It does not have a single constitutional act; V.'s unwritten constitution took shape over the course of several centuries and consists of parliamentary laws (the so-called statutory law), judicial precedents, and constitutional agreements or customs. The statutory basis of the constitution of V. consists of several important acts: Magna Carta 1215, Petition for Law 1628, Habeas Corps Act 1679, “Bill of Rights” 1689, Westminster Statute 1931, Act on People's Representation 1948, Act on the Reform of the House of Lords 1968, Act on the national representation of 1969 and other supreme bodies of state power. The head of state is the king (queen).

This is a quote from the Great Soviet Encyclopedia. you are the victim of education and television.

[Pavel57]

Really India?

[bbtcs]

Something incomprehensible to them. When compared with England, with the level of militarism that prevails in Russia, we all must already starve to death. But nothing like that!
Strange.

[From Siberia we]

Saxons, as always, are brilliant in their politics, to rent a ship consuming a lot of money to RENT! And in the case of experiments, they will be taken back and all affairs! With Turkey in WWI, it swept.

[Vladimir_2U]

The Turks fought with the Turks, and EMNIP with German teams.

[From Siberia we]

and the UK promised to build the latest cruisers before the war, and even took the money for this business. that's just the transfer of ships delayed until the end of the war.

[From Siberia we]

But this is the genius of German politics. how not wanting to fight a country, drag into a war!

[Vladimir_2U]

By supplying 2 cruisers, albeit with teams? Not that premise.

Quote: From Siberia we

and the UK promised to build the latest cruisers before the PMV

Everyone, who is this? Everyone before everyone? By the way, the ship that is being leased may not be returned to Britashka.

[AU Ivanov.]

Guys! Nobody is going to fishing? Rent a boat, huh?

[Vodrak]

I’m here, if I’m in Tribaltica!

[iouris]

Ukraine. For swimming under the famous bridge.

[voyaka uh]

Spain or what?
What other country is NATO?

[Avior]

There are few options.
Spain, Italy, USA.
Those who have f-35V is or will be.

[Svarog51]

Alexey if they will offer Israel-do not agree. Expensive.

[earthling]

In the event of a conflict between Saudi Arabia and Iran, it can be well welded.

[cat Rusich]

Britain can lease its aircraft carrier: the choice of Hungary, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Luxembourg.

[Astronaut]

And these descendants of the "mistress of the seas"? Where is the world heading?

[Overko]

Quote: Selxozotdel

British government plans to lease aircraft carrier to another country

To the Hindus obviously .. That's what it is happening Mikhalych. he he
AUGs are starting to throw off .. and they are doing the right thing. We in Russia are starting to preserve the "killers of the Avians" with new weapons and other nishtyaks ...

And do you think India is a member of NATO?

[Evil 55]

))) It's funny ... And which aircraft carrier? The "grandmother" herself or her son Charles (Karl)?
And best of all, the state of India, whose people have been bullied by the people of the Russians for almost a hundred years. Let them serve faithfully for all the deaths, humiliation and tears of the Indians.

[mmk]

The contents of this cost a lot here is not very cheap, and they are leasing. This is a pure commercial move and, in addition to everything, they will also supply spare parts for pieces of paper.

[Maxwrx]

Of all NATO countries, only large countries can be considered:
The United States probably won’t take it, because there are enough normal aircraft carriers in their numbers, purely to support an ally they can pay
Canada I think there is not enough money, but they from NATO really need all
Germany is likely to be of no interest, they have more serious problems
Spain definitely will not pull for the money
France will not take, because there is a degol
Italy has a 20 year old Cavour, will not change
All other countries will not pull in any way.

From non-NATO:
Japan, I think, will be given to her as a result
India, build their own
Brazil is not enough money
Persian oil monarchies, most likely they will not be sold

[Metallurg_2]

Tell ukroruine.