Military Review

The Ministry of Defense announced the display of new equipment at the Victory Parade

121
The Ministry of Defense announced the display of new equipment at the Victory Parade

In the military parade on Red Square in Moscow on 9 on May 2020 in honor of the 75 anniversary of Victory in the Great Patriotic War, 14 of thousands of troops, about 300 units of weapons and military equipment, more than 100 planes and helicopters will be involved. This was told by Russian Minister of Defense Sergei Shoigu.


Speaking at a collegium of the Ministry of Defense on Wednesday, the head of the Russian military department spoke about plans to hold a military parade in Moscow on May 9 2020 of the year. He also reported on new types of military equipment, previously not shown to the general public, and which will take part in the main parade. According to Shoigu, we are talking about more than 20 types of equipment.

These are the Armata and Kurganets-25 infantry fighting vehicles with the new Dagger and Epoch combat modules, the S-300В4 and С-350 anti-aircraft missile systems, the Derivation-Air Defense anti-aircraft artillery system, the remote mining engineering system, Typhoon protected car family and much more

- the minister said.

According to Shoigu, units of the armed forces of foreign states will take part in the parade, the exact number is not currently known, since coordination is still underway.

In total, on 9 of May 2020 of the year in 29 cities of Russia more than 155 thousand people will take part in military parades and processions, about 3 thousand pieces of equipment will be involved there.
121 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Saboteur Holuy
    Saboteur Holuy 21 November 2019 15: 45 New
    -79
    What's the use? The troops will continue to be taught the AKMS-47. And there haven’t been, and still aren’t, any new F-22 aircraft ...
    1. vvvjak
      vvvjak 21 November 2019 15: 59 New
      +53
      Quote: Diversant Holuy
      The troops will continue to be taught AKMS-47

      Which troops and who prefers it? And what kind of "beast" is this AKMS-47?
      Quote: Diversant Holuy
      And there were no new F-22 comparable aircraft ...

      Well, thank God. But there are much better planes in the Russian Aerospace Forces.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. vvvjak
          vvvjak 21 November 2019 16: 11 New
          +16
          So AKMS or AK-47, and maybe AK-74 (AK-74m). You already decide what to eat AKMS - 47, so preferred in some kind of troops.
          1. Saboteur Holuy
            Saboteur Holuy 21 November 2019 16: 18 New
            -31


            7,62-MM KALASHNIKOV AUTOMATED MODERNIZED WITH FOLDING BUTT AKMS
            1. vvvjak
              vvvjak 21 November 2019 16: 28 New
              +9
              Quote: Diversant Holuy
              AKMS

              So AKMS or AKMS - 47. You do not see the difference point blank? AKM was adopted in 1959, AK -47 in 1947, how can AKM-47 be (even with C even without)?
              1. Saboteur Holuy
                Saboteur Holuy 21 November 2019 16: 32 New
                -50
                Not in what year it was adopted, but what year is the BASIC SAMPLE? With cartridge 7, 62 SAMPLE 1947

                Shotguns have only one concept — what year the SAMPLE is! I do not know the 1959 sample, because it is not! Gee ... well, the fighters ...
                1. Sentinel-vs
                  Sentinel-vs 21 November 2019 20: 19 New
                  +17
                  Maybe it's time to ban accounts with a rating of less than -10000? Are these absolutely useless influence agents for the site?
                  1. vargo
                    vargo 21 November 2019 20: 49 New
                    +3
                    It generally surprises me. There are services where the commented comment is either hidden or made translucent. And I am silent about the very negative profile rating. It’s time to cover such a profile.
                  2. Astronaut
                    Astronaut 21 November 2019 23: 08 New
                    +2
                    I support, because these are provocateurs or trolls, and look below how many people are being led to this!
            2. Prisoner
              Prisoner 21 November 2019 16: 33 New
              +36
              laughing But this is just AKMS. AKMS-47 does not exist. There is none and never has been. Lodged so recognize and learn materiel. hi
              1. Saboteur Holuy
                Saboteur Holuy 21 November 2019 16: 37 New
                -45
                Yes, then I’m a fick, but AKMS is of the 1947 model ... The next sample is already from 1974
                1. Piramidon
                  Piramidon 21 November 2019 16: 44 New
                  +19
                  Quote: Diversant Holuy
                  AKMS he sample 1947

                  Again by. AKMS was adopted in 1959.
                  1. Saboteur Holuy
                    Saboteur Holuy 21 November 2019 16: 53 New
                    -37
                    Another talent ... Sample and adopted for service is different ... about the 1959 Abrazets I have not heard ...
                    1. Piramidon
                      Piramidon 21 November 2019 17: 27 New
                      +16
                      Quote: Diversant Holuy
                      Another talent ... Sample and adopted for service is different ... about the 1959 Abrazets I have not heard ...

                      Well, here it’s more talented not to find anyone. I also have not heard about AKMS of 1947. AKMS, like AKM (its basic model) was created in 1956
                      1. Saboteur Holuy
                        Saboteur Holuy 21 November 2019 20: 38 New
                        -17
                        Read above, I have a word there SAMPLE BASIC I'm talking about AKMS as the base model of 1947 and wrote! The next basic sample is already in 1974 ... and there are even more modifications
                        And you rub me here about MODIFICATIONS! But you don’t know the words of such a concept ... that’s the question ...There are many modifications, yes, then write the word MODIFICATION !!!

                        You ... and how everything here about weapons you know superficially ...
                    2. Stas 2rep
                      Stas 2rep 21 November 2019 19: 23 New
                      +9
                      You are a complete zero in both weapons and ammunition.
                      1 AKMS 47 does not exist.
                      2 cartridge 7,62x39 sample 1943
                      3 in the troops of AK 74 (5,45 X 39)
                2. kit88
                  kit88 21 November 2019 20: 40 New
                  +13
                  Dear lackey. We all understand that you are here for trolling, without such as you would be bored. But you were noisy.
                  Anyone here knows that the AK assault rifle that you name AK-47 is from 1949 (not 1947) and the AKM assault rifle from 1959 are completely different things.
                  It’s like to confuse Pele and Maradona on the football resource. And that, and that footballer, and another footballer, and that South American and the other, and besides, both strikers also played at about the same time - in the 20th century ... Adno, too, is a "fix".
                  This is no longer trolling, this is laughter in the audience. love
                  1. Saboteur Holuy
                    Saboteur Holuy 21 November 2019 20: 59 New
                    -15
                    Everything is sad again. I'm talking about Samples, you tell me about Modifications ... Sample is when it was designed in 1947 .Everything else that comes next is a modification of the SAMPLE!We have different schools, I was taught more accurately and deeply ... A little higher and lower there are explanations where the colored lines are ... Fill the gap in knowledge
                    It is a pity again that we have to chew, fill in the gaps in our army ...
                    And the bad thing is that our ordinary soldiers and other officers here write without even basic knowledge ... Alo-teachers of military schools!
                    1. kit88
                      kit88 21 November 2019 21: 07 New
                      +9
                      Dear, I understand that you were taught by the pros, “deeply and precisely” (where to us with a Soviet education), and made you a guru, as They and you yourself think.
                      But forgive my frankness:
                      YOU IN THE WORD OF THREE LETTERS MAKE FOUR MISTAKES.
                      laughing
                      1. Saboteur Holuy
                        Saboteur Holuy 21 November 2019 21: 19 New
                        -15
                        It doesn’t matter about grammatical errors, I don’t pretend to be a philologist, but I was well taught knowledge about weapons, and you aren’t there, that’s the whole difference, but many here don’t know anything else except personal ambitions and good spelling ... You don’t cling to mistakes, you answer in essence, I, unlike you, professionally studied the mat part, and did not sit in the Lenin rooms in watered classes ... instead of them, I crawled more often at the training ground, I have a school in the USSR, but a rare school where they taught analytics and not propaganda ...
                        Where I served as philologists, they usually didn’t go through health ...
                        with propaganda not to me
                      2. kit88
                        kit88 21 November 2019 21: 35 New
                        +8
                        Dear lackey. How to "essentially" talk with you? You are so far from the topic that not only the characteristics, you do not know the names.
                        It will not be difficult for you to explain your position. Who brought to you that the AKM is a modification of the AK, and the AK-74 is a completely new model? I hope it is not you yourself who advanced this theory, but this is the position of the Kalashnikov concern, the GRAU, or whom?
                      3. Saboteur Holuy
                        Saboteur Holuy 21 November 2019 21: 38 New
                        -12
                        You run in circles ... it’s not funny anymore ...Is it difficult to remember the word BASIC SAMPLE constructed in 1947?... the report does not come from adoption ... Everything for now, to your teachers at a military school COL!
                        If you want to specify, then write about the MODIFICATIONS of the base model!
                      4. kit88
                        kit88 21 November 2019 22: 00 New
                        +9
                        Dear lackey. The answer to this question, as expected, in principle, did not follow from you.
                        Understand that the military is mostly “sitting” here. And you apparently did not hold anything heavier than a smartphone in your hands.
                        Tales about how you heroically crawled along a secret training ground, leave your girls to beauties, they love it.
                        Well, dear graduated from a "rare" military school, at our headquarters any clerk knows that there is no such AKMS-47 assault rifle, and you pretend to be a special forces soldier on the VO website. Laugh.
                        All your knowledge voiced in your many posts is ONE phrase:

                        1947 BASIC SAMPLE The next basic sample is already in 1974 ...

                        In short, do not tell my slippers. Say something smart or something.
                        Something like "This AKM is the same AK, because ...... But the AK-74 is a completely different matter ... as Mikhail Timofeevich explained to us over a glass of tea ... and we are in that made sure when in the jungle of Vietnam ..... "
                        This will be a comment of a real warrior, not a young button-presser.
                        OK?
                  2. brr1
                    brr1 21 November 2019 22: 22 New
                    +3
                    Quote: Diversant Holuy
                    It doesn’t matter about grammatical errors, I don’t pretend to be a philologist, but I was well taught knowledge about weapons, and you aren’t there, that’s the whole difference, but many here don’t know anything else except personal ambitions and good spelling ... You don’t cling to mistakes, you answer in essence, I, unlike you, professionally studied the mat part, and did not sit in the Lenin rooms in watered classes ... instead of them, I crawled more often at the training ground, I have a school in the USSR, but a rare school where they taught analytics and not propaganda ...
                    Where I served as philologists, they usually didn’t go through health ...
                    with propaganda not to me


                    I figured it out, it’s a network sadomasochist, it rushes from dislikes. Do not respond to it, do not let the disease progress. Without cons, he will die, do not react to him at all. Not minus not plus. Who does not believe me, go into it, and read his comments. They are all masochistic.
                  3. Vasyan1971
                    Vasyan1971 24 November 2019 02: 30 New
                    0
                    Quote: brr1
                    Without cons, he will die, do not react to him at all.

          2. Paranoid50
            Paranoid50 22 November 2019 00: 34 New
            +2
            Quote: kit88
            It’s like to confuse Pele and Maradona on the football resource. And that, and that footballer, and another footballer, and that South American and the other, and besides, both strikers also played at about the same time - in the 20th century ...

            There is a significant difference in their preferences for tonic products: one has coffee, the other has coke. fellow Something tells us that our Vasya from Samara (Kholuay is a backup nickname) is also not alien to some drugs. wassat
  • Potato
    Potato 21 November 2019 16: 14 New
    -23
    Loool)))) this is a good old AK47 with a folding butt. And in the Russian Aerospace Forces there is nothing better than the su-35 for many years)
    1. vvvjak
      vvvjak 21 November 2019 16: 21 New
      +15
      Quote: Potato
      Loool))))

      AKM was adopted in 1959, as it can be AK-47. I don’t understand who the loool is.
      1. Potato
        Potato 21 November 2019 16: 41 New
        -27
        The same akm with a folding butt. Differences ak-47 from akm insignificant. You all understand perfectly, looking at the weapons of our most elite troops in Syria, and deliberately distort and cling to the words)))
        1. vvvjak
          vvvjak 21 November 2019 16: 59 New
          +10
          Quote: Potato
          looking at the weapons of our most elite troops in Syria

          The most elite troops of Russia (guard of honor company) are armed with SKS carbines (see photo in the article), which was adopted in 1949. Why don’t you shout “horror, horror what a nightmare”.
        2. Catfish
          Catfish 21 November 2019 19: 00 New
          +9
          Differences between AKM and AK-47:

          1/. Increased stability in the horizontal plane by transferring the point of impact of the bolt in the front position from the right to the left.
          2 /. Added trigger retarder to increase stability and increase the accuracy of the battle.
          3 /. The angle of attachment of the stock was changed, which brought the stop point closer to the firing line.
          4 /. And, as a result, the aiming range has been increased.
          5/. The mass of the machine was reduced due to the manufacture of the receiver by stamping.
          6 /. Compensator introduced for shooting from unstable positions.
          7 / .New, aluminum store instead of steel.
          8 / .New bayonet-knife.

          So AKM is a practically new weapon in relation to the AK-47. On the AKMS, instead of a stock of pressed plywood, a folding metal shoulder rest is installed, there are no other differences from the AKM.
          He served with AKMS for all three years and I consider him one of the best machines of our time, since there was nothing to compare.
    2. Piramidon
      Piramidon 21 November 2019 16: 47 New
      +8
      Quote: Potato
      This is a good old AK47 with a folding butt.

      To be precise, this is an AKM with a folding butt.
      1. Potato
        Potato 21 November 2019 16: 57 New
        -27
        Oh oh oh, the exact you are ours. The difference between ak47 and akm is minimal
        1. 210ox
          210ox 21 November 2019 17: 43 New
          +12
          He is relieved. Another bayonet-knife is applied and a compensator is installed
        2. Piramidon
          Piramidon 23 November 2019 14: 54 New
          0
          Quote: Potato
          Oh oh oh,

          Well, why did you get it loose, did you pinch your tail, or what? laughing
      2. The comment was deleted.
    3. 30hgsa
      30hgsa 21 November 2019 16: 58 New
      +7
      Not .... This is AKMS - the good old AKM with a folding butt.
      And what is AKMS-47?
    4. Voyager
      Voyager 21 November 2019 17: 33 New
      +10
      How many years is this? Su-35 entered service 5 years ago. The latest, most effective fighter capable of repelling any other enemy fighter.
    5. Stas 2rep
      Stas 2rep 21 November 2019 19: 26 New
      +1
      Nothing is better than the Su-35 for many years around the world.
  • 210ox
    210ox 21 November 2019 17: 21 New
    +8
    Miracle, how do you relate to Makar as saboteurs? AKMS was created on the basis of AKM, which was developed in the 50s, and with whom I served for two years. His number is ET295. And you, apparently, are either a book warrior, or at best at the headquarters they were hanging around. The divasant is called .. Ugh!
    1. vvvjak
      vvvjak 21 November 2019 17: 41 New
      +3
      I’m here on my own and I don’t have a relationship either with Makar or with the deversants, especially with a miracle.
      1. 210ox
        210ox 21 November 2019 17: 44 New
        +6
        I apologize. This is to lackey ..
    2. Saboteur Holuy
      Saboteur Holuy 21 November 2019 20: 50 New
      -13
      The sad thing is that you have not been taught the basis during your service...None of you and including you even wrote two keywords: SAMPLE and MODIFICATION
      I'm here about SAMPLE wrote and not about its modifications ...
      But this is normal, unlike you, they gave me basic knowledge more deep, superficial to you... from here you behave incorrectly and behave ...
      Therefore you will never understand me I am able to think analytically, but you are not, I soberly assess ... and do not take offense at you ...
  • Aristarkh Lyudvigovich
    Aristarkh Lyudvigovich 21 November 2019 15: 59 New
    +12
    The first fifth-generation production aircraft in assembly at KnAAZ. The first deliveries of the Su-57 to the troops will begin in 2020.
    1. Saboteur Holuy
      Saboteur Holuy 21 November 2019 16: 11 New
      -23
      Og ... And here’s what the Defense Ministry says: Deputy Minister of Defense Krivoruchko: serial Su-57s begin to enter the troops.
      In 2019, 1 aircraft will arrive.
      In 2020, another 1 aircraft will arrive.
      So 1 plane per year is, according to the Ministry of Defense, a mass production.
      Perhaps even a large-scale one.
      1. Aristarkh Lyudvigovich
        Aristarkh Lyudvigovich 21 November 2019 16: 25 New
        +20
        The aircraft launched into serial production. And this year there will be one aircraft, according to the approved schedule. Next, they will produce 10 aircraft per year with the possibility of increasing to 20. The entire production cycle of the Su-57 from scratch so far takes more than 2 years, compared to 8-10 months for the Su-35. For a clear comparison, it’s enough to recall how much time it took KnAAZ to deploy serial production of the Su-35, starting from the moment the first contract was concluded in 2009. I would like to note that in the first 9 years from the first flight of the F-35, 5 were released. And the first serial arrived in 2011, 11 years later, after the first flight. F-35 is produced with the participation and co-financing of a number of (so-called) "leading world powers". And the 57th solely by Russia, in conditions of sanctions. What none of the "leading world powers" alone can not repeat, in principle.
        1. Vlad.by
          Vlad.by 21 November 2019 18: 11 New
          +6
          Yes, you do not feed the troll. to ignore him.
          As in the joke:
          - These geese (trolls), dogs, the whole garden (forum) trampled like pigs!
      2. Tusv
        Tusv 21 November 2019 16: 41 New
        +3
        Og ... And here’s what the Defense Ministry says: Deputy Minister of Defense Krivoruchko: serial Su-57s begin to enter the troops.
        In 2019, 1 aircraft will arrive.
        In 2020, another 1 aircraft will arrive.
        So 1 plane per year is, according to the Ministry of Defense, a mass production.
        Perhaps even a large-scale one.

        Are we fighting someone, acre of barmalei? A plane is not easy to build. It is still a trained pilot to plant in it, and capable of withstanding 9-11 gravitations of the earth. Have you been on a merry-go-round for a long time?
        I can only 3.5 same
        1. VeteranVSSSR
          VeteranVSSSR 21 November 2019 22: 33 New
          0
          And what is ONE gravity of the Earth, explain to the dark ??? Well, please !!!
      3. Voyager
        Voyager 21 November 2019 17: 34 New
        +2
        So you will learn to read further, where they say that after 2020, the pace of production will begin to meet the deadline to meet the contract of 76 fighters.
    2. Potato
      Potato 21 November 2019 16: 16 New
      -9
      1 production aircraft in 2020m, 2 at 2021m. 72 aircraft until 2028. Mdaaa ... laughing
      1. Voyager
        Voyager 21 November 2019 17: 36 New
        0
        How much do you need?
        This is the largest fighter aircraft contract in Russian history.
      2. Nastia makarova
        Nastia makarova 22 November 2019 08: 00 New
        +1
        it's time to chop potatoes
    3. Thrifty
      Thrifty 21 November 2019 16: 17 New
      -3
      Stop! !! Previously, they called the number of 78 aircraft, until 2020, here the number 72 of the aircraft is also called until 2020, who to believe ???
      1. Prisoner
        Prisoner 21 November 2019 16: 36 New
        +2
        You can believe anyone, but don’t believe the Saboteur Holloway. The other dreamer laughing
      2. Voyager
        Voyager 21 November 2019 17: 37 New
        0
        76 fighters, to be exact.
  • Tusv
    Tusv 21 November 2019 16: 11 New
    0
    Quote: Diversant Holuy
    What's the use? The troops will continue to be taught the AKMS-47. And there haven’t been, and still aren’t, any new F-22 aircraft ...

    And you fight without the AK-47. And the Penguin and Dinosaur differ not at all in flight qualities, but at a high price.
  • ltc35
    ltc35 21 November 2019 16: 22 New
    +2
    Well, at you, my friend, they wrapped such a squiggle that I even doubted my knowledge of weapons. You definitely surprised me. I’ve taken a picture with AK-12 recently, but I couldn’t shoot from it ... crying
    1. Tusv
      Tusv 21 November 2019 17: 03 New
      0
      I just shot from AK twice. The first shot to the ground, the second and third to the center of the target. and so twice
      Probably the first shot I was enrolled in the paramilitary organization with a guard bias fellow
  • shark
    shark 21 November 2019 16: 26 New
    0
    Why are you writing nonsense? What is F22 good at, and what kind of beast is AKMS? When you don’t know what to write, just read
    1. Tusv
      Tusv 21 November 2019 17: 55 New
      0
      Quote: shark
      Why are you writing nonsense? What is F22 good at, and what kind of beast is AKMS?

      AKM is AK76. Like be. And F-22 is an expensive dinosaur of 210 apiece and there are exactly the same number of them left
    2. Polite Moose
      Polite Moose 21 November 2019 18: 16 New
      +6
      Quote: shark
      Why are you writing nonsense?

      He does not write nonsense. He just cf spread to the whole site. And instead of discussing technology at the parade, everyone moved out to AKMS-47 and F-22.
      Moget.
      1. Igorpl
        Igorpl 22 November 2019 03: 38 New
        +1
        I agree with you. Barely flipped through to the comments on the case.
  • Piramidon
    Piramidon 21 November 2019 16: 40 New
    +2
    Quote: Diversant Holuy
    And there were no new F-22 comparable aircraft ...

    And who, with what and when did they compare them in real databases?
  • 30hgsa
    30hgsa 21 November 2019 16: 56 New
    0
    AKMS-47 is not five, it's six!
  • Ratmir_Ryazan
    Ratmir_Ryazan 21 November 2019 17: 00 New
    0
    Not noah, troll.

    The troops do not prefer anything, they use what they put into service and, in addition to AKMS, the Russian troops are full of other types and weapons systems.

    A plane similar to the F-22, we do not need, we have a better Su-57.
  • Incvizitor
    Incvizitor 21 November 2019 18: 04 New
    0
    With such comparability, price-quality as in f 22 we do not need.
  • senima56
    senima56 21 November 2019 16: 00 New
    +12
    It would be nice to see all this technique in the parade! And then again the cameras will show the wheels, boots or the pavement of Red Square!
    Previously, there was one camera and it broadcast what the speaker was talking about (and vice versa). And now a bunch of "flying", "creeping" and some other cameras. And showing everything except the technique! A disgusting sight on TV the past few years! fool
    1. Vadmir
      Vadmir 21 November 2019 16: 30 New
      0
      It would be nice to see all this technique in the parade!
      I completely agree with you, but it’s very difficult to mount on the fly, the parade is also an officialdom - you need to show the first persons and their guests, veterans. Option one is to make a film about the parade. Once something similar was shown on the Star, in the evening on the day of the parade. It really didn’t work out very well, but the idea is very good. All these:
      a bunch of "flying", "creeping" and some other cameras
      They shoot continuously and from these records you can mount an excellent film, specifically about soldiers printing step, tanks, infantry fighting vehicles, airplanes, helicopters and other military equipment.
      Rђ RІRѕS,
      Previously, there was one camera, and it broadcast what the speaker was talking about
      She showed a little dull and too far away.
    2. Sentinel-vs
      Sentinel-vs 22 November 2019 06: 16 New
      0
      Absolutely! I just can’t find censored words when watching broadcasts of parades for the last three years. There is a technique, and the "ingenious" director of the broadcast shows a close-up of the face of the commander of the car, who took him under the visor. After that, the camera switches to spinning wheels, then a change of plan and shows the retreating cars that have already passed over the area, then the general plan of the parade from a bird's eye view. Meanwhile, the announcer says that such and such a complex has passed along Red Square.
  • rudolff
    rudolff 21 November 2019 16: 04 New
    +8
    Isn’t it time in Russia to create a separate ceremonial military branch? Except in parades, such a technique is nowhere else to be seen. Half for sure.
    1. Tusv
      Tusv 21 November 2019 16: 17 New
      +1
      Quote: rudolff
      Isn’t it time in Russia to create a separate ceremonial military branch?

      So created before the Great Patriotic War. The main goal of the parade? To bourgeois poke in his pants before approaching the border
      1. pogis
        pogis 21 November 2019 18: 52 New
        +3
        The Germans did not show off in the 41, although the T-1 and KV drove for the first time at the May 34 parade in Kiev, but the Germans allegedly found out about them only after the start of World War II!
        Military parades on Red Square. M .: Military Publishing House, 1980. C. 108; Order of Lenin Moscow Military District. M .: Military Publishing House, 1985. C. 179
    2. eckons
      eckons 21 November 2019 17: 02 New
      0
      And you enlist in the army, there they will give you a lot of things to see and even touch. And from the sofa is not enough to see.
      1. rudolff
        rudolff 21 November 2019 17: 05 New
        +2
        Will they shoot?
        1. eckons
          eckons 21 November 2019 17: 07 New
          0
          And more than once, and if you are lucky even give cartridges.
      2. Tusv
        Tusv 21 November 2019 17: 24 New
        0
        Quote: eckons
        And you enlist in the army,

        Uncle. Whose will you be? I have over two hundred and fifty excellent combat duty on the border and in me for half a century. I run across half of the local contingent. I beg you. Liberoids just enrage
        1. eckons
          eckons 22 November 2019 09: 39 New
          +1
          Oh how. Authority decided to give. And why so few merits have been listed, but where about participation in the club of philatelists, and lovers of botany.? And with what fright you have christened me a liberal. Liberoids are whining for any reason, That nobody saw the equipment from the parades in the troops, And the army is only for parades. And it will be in the army to so whine that the old is not fashionable. And so on. So if anyone doesn’t see the equipment in the parade, the road to the army is not closed to them.
    3. Gerneton
      Gerneton 22 November 2019 08: 09 New
      -2
      only monuments can conquer half of Europe, which can be made parade troops is difficult to even imagine ... fellow
  • rudolff
    rudolff 21 November 2019 16: 06 New
    +7
    Will Fedor's robots on motorcycles be?
    1. Tusv
      Tusv 21 November 2019 16: 30 New
      0
      Quote: rudolff
      Will Fedor's robots on motorcycles be?

      "And the unclean chimney sweeps Shame and Shame" - We must honor Korney Our Chukovsky. Or at least read negative
  • Prisoner
    Prisoner 21 November 2019 16: 07 New
    +7
    laughing So the opinion of the Specialist was not long in coming. AKMS-47 is enchanting! laughing laughing
  • Thrifty
    Thrifty 21 November 2019 16: 14 New
    0
    Sergei Kozhugetovich, we still need to live up to Porad, otherwise tomorrow ukroina will declare war on us, and by Sunday she will take and conquer all of Russia crying lol (a joke for the slow-witted, and excessively boring yes )!
  • Politruk-m
    Politruk-m 21 November 2019 16: 26 New
    +2
    Well, let's see, remember and remember our grandfathers and great-grandfathers of steel soldiers! As one veteran of the Second World War spoke to his grandson, "Forget this terrible war, get ready for a new even more bloody .."
    And here's what I liked
    units of the armed forces of foreign states will take part in the parade, the exact number is not currently known,

    Need to unite alone Russia will be difficult to resist the imperialism of the West ..
    1. Alf
      Alf 21 November 2019 21: 37 New
      -3
      Quote: Politruk-M
      And here's what I liked
      units of the armed forces of foreign states will take part in the parade, the exact number is not currently known,

      Another Day of Shame, as in 2010. Once again we will see the troops of the invaders on Red Square.
  • G. Georgiev
    G. Georgiev 21 November 2019 16: 26 New
    -5
    This laser "Relight", they show? Or is it also a lie?
    1. Thrifty
      Thrifty 21 November 2019 16: 30 New
      +7
      Georgiev, they will show not only the Peresvet laser, but also its export version of "Mankind" !!! lol
      1. voyaka uh
        voyaka uh 21 November 2019 16: 45 New
        -1
        And the mobile version of "Alyosha Popovich." smile
        1. Voyager
          Voyager 21 November 2019 17: 38 New
          0
          Alexei, in vain you laugh, your experts in the forefront and will look for Alyosha and Dobrynya and other Gorynycha drinks
          1. voyaka uh
            voyaka uh 21 November 2019 17: 40 New
            +1
            Duc ... we already wore glasses on long noses. Everywhere we look for the hero of this. drinks
            1. Polite Moose
              Polite Moose 21 November 2019 18: 28 New
              +1
              Quote: voyaka uh
              Duc ... we already wore glasses on long noses. Everywhere we look for the hero of this.

              Alexey! hi Rinse glasses immediately. I tell you for sure: you are not looking there. Gentlemen with the surnames Popovich, Gorynych, (well, and where without him?) Rabinovich is not even Belarusians. laughing
    2. 30hgsa
      30hgsa 21 November 2019 17: 33 New
      0
      Have you been banned in Google? He (Peresvet) was already not shown anywhere.
  • Pavel57
    Pavel57 21 November 2019 16: 57 New
    0
    I want everything at once, but a new one appears, is it bad?
  • eckons
    eckons 21 November 2019 16: 58 New
    0
    Quote: Potato
    Loool)))) this is a good old AK47 with a folding butt. And in the Russian Aerospace Forces there is nothing better than the su-35 for many years)

    Did you freaking out? This is for you slippers, new every year. It was put into operation in 2014.
    1. Potato
      Potato 21 November 2019 17: 23 New
      -7
      It was developed back in 90. began to arrive 5 years ago. FIVE. And this has long been by modern standards.
      1. eckons
        eckons 21 November 2019 17: 24 New
        -1
        Tell the Americans about it with their B-52 /
      2. 30hgsa
        30hgsa 21 November 2019 17: 29 New
        +2
        Su-27M - “Su-35” (because it was a commercial name) of the 1990s and Su-35S of 2014 (officially assigned index) are different machines if with different engines, gliders and avionics.
        You need to be a complete layman and an idiot to confuse them.
      3. Voyager
        Voyager 21 November 2019 17: 42 New
        +3
        Stop lying, it was developed in 2000, at the end of the first decade. By your In logic, your vaunted Raptor, in comparison with it, is already an ancient 30-year-old log, which was first developed for 15 years, just from the 90s, and then produced for 15 years.
        1. 30hgsa
          30hgsa 21 November 2019 17: 49 New
          +1
          This scarecrow simply confuses the Su-35 and Su-35S.
          There was a modification of the Su-27 in the 90s, which was pushed at the air show under the name Su-35. But they did not accept it, as did the Su-37. A purely commercial sample.
          Then they made the Su-35S with a modified glider, avionics, engine already in the 2000s, now it is being produced. A completely different plane.
          1. Voyager
            Voyager 21 November 2019 17: 50 New
            0
            Yes, I remember, the factory code of T-10M is Su-35 and Su-37 at its base with UVT engines. And then from scratch the practically created Su-35S, in general, you wrote everything correctly.
    2. St Petrov
      St Petrov 21 November 2019 18: 56 New
      -1
      Did you freaking out?


      no, he’s just Svidomo from Ukraine - now the whole herd is writing this abbreviation "LOL" in all social networks and forums - we died out in 2006.

      Outskirts, what to do. All is ten years late
  • 30hgsa
    30hgsa 21 November 2019 17: 03 New
    0
    Barberry with a Dagger, Kurganets from the Epoch, BMP-3 with Derivation, Vityaz, It’s not bad ...
    And gorse, lotus, sock?
    1. Flooding
      Flooding 21 November 2019 17: 33 New
      +1
      They are still fresh, unfinished.
      And you need to demonstrate at the parade a batch of no less than six cars.
      The right decision was made to postpone.
      After all, the Boomerang was rolled out two or three years ago to the parade.
      Something I do not see him among those listed in the text.
      Or, indeed, problems with the project, or so far decided to cut funding for the light platform in the presence of numerous modernized armored personnel carriers in favor of the more relevant Kurganets and Fragrances.
      1. 30hgsa
        30hgsa 21 November 2019 17: 42 New
        -1
        By boomerang, it’s incomprehensible just the niche of this pepelats.
        If you need a highly protected armored personnel carrier - transporting infantry to the battlefield, then typhoons decide the ICE. They are cheaper, better protected and in series.
        If you need an infantry fighting vehicle to accompany tanks with motorized rifles, then there is Kurganets and Barberry. Both have better security and armament and cross-country travel faster.
        Here and now there is the BTR-82.
        The concept of using an armored personnel carrier - a barn is incomprehensible. We do not have air strikes.
        1. Flooding
          Flooding 21 November 2019 18: 06 New
          0
          Of course, MRAP is not for delivering infantry to the battlefield.
          They have never been armored personnel carriers.
          Of course, the boomerang niche is the same as that of the BTR-82.
          That is, with the current application, there are no questions.
          The question is the changing demands of the conflicts of the future.
          Here, so far most likely they have not decided on the place of the light platform on the battlefield and TTZ.
          And there is a sufficient number of armored personnel carriers. I think the final appearance of the Boomerang is not clear.
          And about some problems, rumors have been circulating for a long time. But then they are rumors.
          1. 30hgsa
            30hgsa 21 November 2019 18: 24 New
            -1
            It is MRAP that is engaged in the movement of safe infantry - this is an armored bus, which was originally intended by the BTR. And the same Typhoon is cheaper, luckier, better protected. In fact, MRAPs perform the function of armored personnel carriers better than the armored personnel carriers themselves, especially in local conflicts.

            An armored personnel carrier can simply be used as an ersatz BMP - to support infantry on the battlefield. But MRAP cannot do this. Well, due to the 8 by 8 armored personnel carrier it can somehow accompany the tanks ... again on the battlefield, again like an ersatz BMP That's the whole difference.

            But the Kurganese does not occupy the BTR-82 niche. The BTR-82 is a cheap, mass vehicle that combines the functions of an armored personnel carrier and an ersatz BMP. Kurgan is a huge expensive shed, it is impossible to solve the task of saturating troops with equipment for transportation and support with it.
            1. Flooding
              Flooding 21 November 2019 18: 34 New
              0
              Quote: 30hgsa
              It is MRAP that is engaged in the movement of safe infantry - this is an armored bus, which was originally intended by the BTR. And the same Typhoon is cheaper, luckier, better protected. In fact, MRAPs perform the function of armored personnel carriers better than the armored personnel carriers themselves, especially in local conflicts.

              What is this? And better protected. And cheaper. A stupid military industrial complex rivets armored personnel carriers.
              Maybe the requirements for them still vary?
              Quote: 30hgsa
              But the Kurganese does not occupy the BTR-82 niche. The BTR-82 is a cheap, mass vehicle that combines the functions of an armored personnel carrier and an ersatz BMP. Kurganets - a huge expensive barn

              What does Kurgan have to do with it?
              And what does the size have to do with it?
              1. 30hgsa
                30hgsa 21 November 2019 18: 43 New
                -1
                1. The requirements for BTR and MRAP are different, but in fact they perform the same function. If you do not release MRAP on the battlefield and leave the BMP on the battlefield.

                2. As for the stupid military-industrial complex .. The military-industrial complex is smart, it does not rivet Boomerangs, it rivets cheap BTR-82s, which are more mobile, cheaper, better armed than MRAP, and even swim, but they have protection so-so, which is actually secondary for the mass army.

                3. Dimensions - this is to the requirements of the military, presented to the APC. MRAP may be a grenade launcher's dream, but an armored personnel carrier may not. The boomerang is an armored personnel carrier protected at the MRAP level, as a result, it incorporates not only the advantages of both classes, but also the disadvantages - including dimensions. Yes, and the price received space.

                Kurgan is a typo - it's about Boomerang.
                1. Flooding
                  Flooding 21 November 2019 18: 57 New
                  0
                  Quote: 30hgsa
                  The requirements for BTR and MRAP are different, but in fact they perform the same function.

                  If we talk about local conflicts, police operations, convoys, then yes.
                  Apparently, your vision of the tasks facing army armored vehicles is limited to this list.
                  BTR-82 is the brainchild of the Soviet military industry for high-intensity conflicts.
                  MRAP is a product of civil wars and the struggle against various rebels.
                  Quote: 30hgsa
                  Dimensions - this is to the requirements of the military, presented to the armored personnel carrier. MRAP may be a grenade launcher's dream, but an armored personnel carrier may not.

                  Why are you writing me obvious things? Is it really possible for half a year that I was not here, the readership is so stupid that such explanations are required?
                  I wrote otherwise. The niche of technology on the battlefield is not determined primarily by its size. A set of characteristics. Therefore, the question is what does “a huge shed” have to do with it, if in fact the Boomerang can perform the same tasks as the BTR-82.
                  Quote: 30hgsa
                  The boomerang is an armored personnel carrier protected at the MRAP level, as a result, it incorporates not only the advantages of both classes, but also the disadvantages - including dimensions. Yes, and the price received space.

                  Seriously? And what do you know about Boomerang?
                  How many kg of explosive can withstand undermining under the bottom?
                  What is its purchase value?
                  It is impossible not to understand that a light platform cannot be expensive.
                  Because it must be mass.
                  1. 30hgsa
                    30hgsa 21 November 2019 19: 18 New
                    0
                    The layout of the Boomerang clearly indicates that it has a serious anti-mine defense - from this its height has grown. How much KG is the tenth question, the fact is that the layout solutions are similar to those used on MRAP.

                    In a high-intensity conflict, such decisions do not make sense - losses on mines and IEDs are negligible compared to losses from other factors. A large hull height makes the APC vulnerable specifically for other factors. Therefore, yes, Boomerang may occupy the BTR-82 niche, but the BTR-82 will feel much better in this niche, including due to price / quantity.

                    In conditions of local conflict, the ability to swim is excessive and the boomerang weapons complex (BM Boomerang) is not optimal. As a result, he will lose the MRAP, which are cheaper and more capacious in terms of the effectiveness of the safe transfer of troops along the roads under the conditions of sabotage groups.

                    As for the cheapness ... Boxer CRV the boomerang brother is worth as much as two tanks :) Even if ours is much cheaper ...
                    1. Flooding
                      Flooding 21 November 2019 19: 26 New
                      +2
                      Quote: 30hgsa
                      In conditions of local conflict, the ability to swim is excessive and the boomerang weapons complex (BM Boomerang) is not optimal.

                      The conversation was about armored personnel carriers.
                      Quote: 30hgsa
                      As a result, he will lose the MRAPs, which are cheaper and more capacious in terms of the effectiveness of the safe transfer of troops along the roads under the conditions of sabotage groups.

                      This is one of the tasks of MRAP, in contrast to the above.
                      It is only necessary to clarify: the delivery of small units in local conflicts.
                      As for the rest, I already wrote above.
                      Quote: Flood
                      The question is the changing demands of the conflicts of the future.
                      Here, so far, most likely they have not decided on the place of the light platform on the battlefield and TTZ ... I think the final appearance of the Boomerang is not clear.
    2. Voyager
      Voyager 21 November 2019 17: 50 New
      0
      We are waiting for the era with joy!
    3. Paranoid50
      Paranoid50 22 November 2019 00: 43 New
      +1
      Quote: 30hgsa
      gorse, lotus, tosochka?

      It is possible that
      These are the Armata and Kurganets-25 infantry fighting vehicles with the new Dagger and Epoch combat modules, the S-300B4 and S-350 anti-aircraft missile systems, the Derivation-Air Defense artillery system, the remote mining engineering system, Typhoon protected car family and more - the minister said.
      Here is the "much more." yes
  • G. Georgiev
    G. Georgiev 21 November 2019 17: 10 New
    -12
    A new weapon .. Where is it? ... And so, this Peresvet laser does not work. Why, then, Putin said: “Listen, we have new missiles in our country, we have a new laser ... This is not fiction ..” .. and he showed animation in front of the whole world.
    1. 30hgsa
      30hgsa 21 November 2019 17: 24 New
      +3
      Have you got out of the shor? The very overexposure of pictures in metal and in the army is a bunch.
    2. Paranoid50
      Paranoid50 22 November 2019 00: 47 New
      +1
      Quote: G. Georgiev
      showed animation in front of the whole world.

      Animation is a mattress dancing, satellites like Poland, Bulgaria and other Romania. They inflate, puff up, as if they mean something in this world, but in fact - zilch, a dummy. request
  • Dmitry Donskoy
    Dmitry Donskoy 21 November 2019 17: 20 New
    +2
    Quote: rudolff
    Isn’t it time in Russia to create a separate ceremonial military branch? Except in parades, such a technique is nowhere else to be seen. Half for sure.

    Well, why? When I served on Topol-M, we all went to combat parade with the entire division in Moscow yes hi
    1. pogis
      pogis 21 November 2019 18: 56 New
      -1
      What about rockets? Really with you ?! what
      1. Dmitry Donskoy
        Dmitry Donskoy 21 November 2019 19: 39 New
        +1
        No, they were unloaded at the place of permanent deployment hi
  • serg.shishkov2015
    serg.shishkov2015 22 November 2019 08: 56 New
    0
    I’m writing what was recently written in * TiV- * AK-47, when it never happened, the AK-74 first appeared on a digital index, and the first Kalashnikov assault rifle had the designations AK and AKS for the version with a folding butt
  • Old26
    Old26 22 November 2019 10: 58 New
    +3
    Quote: Diversant Holuy
    What's the use? The troops will continue to be taught the AKMS-47. And there haven’t been, and still aren’t, any new F-22 aircraft ...

    Respected! Where did you see AKMS-47 in the army? Such a machine simply never existed.

    Quote: Diversant Holuy
    Not in what year it was adopted, but what year is the BASIC SAMPLE? With cartridge 7, 62 SAMPLE 1947

    Do not pull the owl on the globe. And no one ever laid stress on the base model. For between the basic sample and the extreme - sometimes a significant difference. And in the Moscow Region, in the ordering department, apparently suckers are sitting, and they don’t know such basic things as you broadcast. Therefore, their AKU-47 assault rifle has an index of 55-A212, and the modernized Kalashnikov assault rifle of 1959 has an index of 6P1. Expert, damn it

    Quote: Diversant Holuy
    I do not know the 1959 sample, because it is not!

    How's the gopher? If you do not know, this does not mean that he is not.

    Quote: Sentinel-vs
    Maybe it's time to ban accounts with a rating of less than -10000? Are these absolutely useless influence agents for the site?

    The "saboteur" this rating is almost "minus 60." Now, characters with a minus rating simply do not have epaulettes, but before there were epaulets with skulls, “Who is who” was immediately visible

    Quote: G. Georgiev
    This laser "Relight", they show? Or is it also a lie?

    What for? Too many cars in the complex. Yes, and drag on the area of ​​the installation itself with a laser is not necessary. Her only lazy did not show on the network

    Quote: Thrifty
    Georgiev, they will show not only the Peresvet laser, but also its export version of "Mankind" !!! lol

    good
  • Berg berg
    Berg berg 23 November 2019 14: 19 New
    0

    Here are some more pictures!)