Military Review

Do you think you pay for the roof? America demands money for its military bases

34

The US wants to monetize its military presence in other countries of the world. The plan is simple and bold: to force those states on whose territory the US military bases and military continents are located to pay Washington for protection. However, the allies and now the maintenance of American troops is expensive.


Where are US military bases located?


Today, the United States leads among all countries of the world in the number of foreign military bases and military units deployed in other states. American soldiers are present in Asia, Africa, Europe, Oceania, Latin America. About 190 of thousands of American soldiers and officers are located outside the United States and are serving in foreign countries.

The total number of US military bases in foreign countries has long exceeded seven hundred. Fleet, aviation, marine corps, ground forces - outside the "American homeland" are representatives of all types of armed forces and military branches. Thus, the US Air Force facilities and bases are located in Bahrain, Qatar, the UAE, Oman, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South Korea, Japan, Turkey, Niger, Australia, Guam, Honduras, Greenland, Belgium, Bulgaria, Great Britain, Germany , Spain, Italy, Netherlands, Portugal.

The US Navy is based in Bahrain, Cuba, Italy, Spain, Greece, South Korea, Japan, not to mention the possibility of using ports and naval bases of numerous US allies in the North Atlantic Alliance. US warships also use the ports of third countries, including the same Ukraine, where the US Navy is now frequent with visits to its ships.


American troops are also based abroad. Their bases are located in Germany, Italy, Kosovo, Japan, South Korea, Kuwait, Israel and Afghanistan. In addition, US troops are located in Syria and Iraq. In the Djibouti, Brazil and Cuba, as well as in the UAE, Japan, Germany and Afghanistan, the US Marine Corps is also stationed.

In Eastern Europe, US military facilities are located in Poland, Romania, and in the Baltic republics, US troops are located at NATO bases. In addition, the US military is a frequent guest in Georgia and Ukraine, in the republics of Central Asia.

Koreans and Japanese pay for US military bases


Naturally, such a significant list of military bases outside the country requires very substantial funding from the US budget. For Washington, one of the main tasks has always been to achieve the maximum reduction in spending on foreign military infrastructure. But after the election of Donald Trump as the country's president, this task became just a fix idea. The American leadership demands that the countries in whose territory American military bases are located not only pay certain amounts, but also increase funding.

Do you think you pay for the roof? America demands money for its military bases

At the same time, foreign states are entrusted with obligations not only to finance the provision of military bases and contingents, but also simply “pay for the roof”. Washington believes that the presence of American troops alone must already be paid for, since foreign states, through American soldiers, protect their own territory and their national interests.

However, for some states, the American military presence is indeed quite significant, as it appears to be a kind of guarantee against hostile actions by strong neighboring states. For example, in the presence of the American army, they are interested in Japan and South Korea, since the proximity to China and North Korea is seen in Tokyo and Seoul as a potential danger. American military bases in this vein act as a guarantee against attack or even just force pressure from the PRC and DPRK.

Recently, during talks with representatives of the South Korean leadership, American diplomats announced an increase in fees for the deployment of American troops to 4,76 billion dollars. Thus, the Department of State has demonstrated that it is ready to fulfill President Trump’s task of levying fees on the presence of US forces on their territory from foreign states.

South Korea has no choice but to pay the Americans. By the way, US troops in this country are from 1953 year. America stationed its contingent after the Korean War and for a very long time did not take money for its presence. South Korea did not have them in the middle of the 20th century - it was still a backward country with an agricultural economy. But then the situation changed and the United States from the beginning of the 1990's began to receive the first deductions.

But in the 1990-2000-e years, payments were spent on supporting the activities of the bases in South Korea - on the construction and repair of infrastructure, salaries of hired personnel, base and military maintenance services. Now this seemed a little to the American administration and it wants to force the South Korean authorities to pay for the very fact of the presence of the American military on the Korean peninsula.

By the way, about 25 of thousands of American troops are currently deployed in South Korea - one of the largest contingents of the US armed forces abroad is stationed here. In neighboring Japan, there are 40 more thousands of American soldiers who have been present in the Land of the Rising Sun since the end of the 1940's. Since the 1976 year, when Washington and Tokyo entered into a contract for the deployment of American troops in Japanese territory, the cost of military presence fees has regularly increased. But now it is declining.

In Japan, unlike South Korea, the public, and many political figures are very negative about the presence of American troops. It should be understood that for a long time Japan was not even a regional, but a world-class power, and although it suffered a brutal defeat in the Second World War, and the fighting spirit of the Japanese, as is often said, is no longer the same, but the presence of the American military is perceived by many as a humiliation of the country, as a national shame.

But the Americans themselves are disgusting on Japanese soil. So, in Okinawa, where the American contingent is deployed, US Army personnel have committed a lot of common crimes - from robberies to rape of minors. The Japanese are also concerned about the harm that the US military presence is causing to the island state’s environment. Mass protests against the US military presence are regularly held in the country.

Under these conditions, the United States itself understands that raising the fee for the presence of its troops is inappropriate — it’s possible to create a situation where the question of military bases in Japan will be raised and they will have to be removed, which is also unprofitable for the Americans themselves. Therefore, even Donald Trump, who is hard on financial matters, understands: the Japanese authorities will not agree to increase the cost of the presence of American troops, and it is useless to persuade them.

Controversial situation in Europe


The second largest and most powerful American military contingent after Japan and South Korea is based on the territory of European countries - US allies in NATO. American military bases and military units are located in almost all European countries from Portugal and Spain to Latvia and Poland, from Denmark to Greece. In a number of European countries, the American nuclear weapon.


The total number of US troops stationed in Europe varies between 65-70 thousands of troops. More than half of them - about 35 thousand people - are located in Germany. The Americans have been here since the victory over the Third Reich. Moreover, if Russia withdrew its troops from Germany a long time ago, then the Americans never liberated German lands from its presence.

By deploying its troops in Germany, the United States is pursuing two main tasks at once. The first task is a demonstration: Germany is the center of Europe and the strongest European country, so the presence of American troops underlines the general dominance of the United States in Europe. Well, the confrontation of Russia should also not be discounted.

The second task is logistic. It is in Germany that the most convenient and effective from the point of view of combat use American military bases are equipped, which make it possible to operate successfully in the Middle East and North Africa. Without German bases, it would be much more difficult for Americans to act in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria or Libya. The key role in American military logistics is played by the famous Ramstein air base, through which the United States transferred its military contingents and military equipment to Syria.

If the American army leaves Germany, then Washington will have to create from scratch a similar military infrastructure in some other state. For the United States it will be very expensive, and most importantly - time consuming. For some period, the American armed forces will lose considerably in combat effectiveness and mobility due to withdrawal from German territory. Therefore, Washington is forced to turn a blind eye to the position of the German leadership, who does not want to spend more than 1 billion dollars on the maintenance of the American contingent. After all, if the Americans leave Germany, then it will be worse for them, and not for the Germans.

In addition to Germany, 12 of thousands of American soldiers is in Italy, 8 of thousands in Great Britain, 3 of thousands in Spain, and the rest in Portugal, Belgium, the Netherlands, Greece and a number of other states. From these European countries, the United States receives about 1,5 billion dollars in total for the maintenance of its military facilities. In Washington, they consider this amount to be quite small, and therefore require Europe to increase its military spending.


Perhaps, only Poland unequivocally agrees with the American position. The pathological Russophobes in power in this country are ready to pay Washington even 2 billion dollars, if only the American administration would go on to further increase the military presence in Poland. Warsaw believes that Russia is very threatening the national security of the Polish state and see in the US troops as intercessors before possible Russian aggression.

However, the Polish leadership certainly wants to receive certain preferences from the presence of US troops on its territory. Firstly, it is an opportunity to launder good amounts from the country's budget. Secondly, the US military bases are all the same jobs for Polish citizens, this is the possibility of building new infrastructure, opening businesses. That is, the American military presence is likely to be more profitable for the Polish economy, and there is no need to talk about national pride under the current system of “external control”.

However, Trump's blackmail by the withdrawal of American troops and bases from other states should not be taken seriously. In fact, the United States will never volunteer to remove its troops from Europe and Asia. Indeed, in this case, they will lose the ability to control the situation in almost all the most important regions of the world, and the cost of withdrawing troops and infrastructure will not be so low.
Author:
Photos used:
inosmi.ru, russian.rt.com
34 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Hunter 2
    Hunter 2 22 November 2019 05: 37 New
    +12
    I’m wondering ... if someone does not pay, Mattresses will be offended and will leave ??? request laughing
    Or is the country a non-payer - automatically become "undemocratic"? bully with the corresponding "arrival" of democracy ??? recourse
    1. Uncle lee
      Uncle lee 22 November 2019 05: 48 New
      +3
      Do you think you pay for the roof?

      "All because of attendants! Everything is like in the zone!"
      M. Zadornov
      1. novel66
        novel66 22 November 2019 07: 44 New
        +5
        or something like that
        1. Masha
          Masha 22 November 2019 08: 59 New
          +5
          Hello, Roman! love
          but I remembered a joke ... one in one about Poland ...
          If in the autumn, grease the roof with condensed milk, then in the spring licking icicles will be more pleasant ... laughing
          1. novel66
            novel66 22 November 2019 10: 13 New
            +2
            Eradenki, Masha! but if you shove the base without getting into it - you can lick it
            1. Masha
              Masha 22 November 2019 11: 07 New
              +5
              but if you shove the base without getting into it - you can lick it

              Do you think neither a proctologist nor a venereologist will help? belay
              1. novel66
                novel66 22 November 2019 11: 14 New
                +3
                they need a body ... alive ..
                1. Masha
                  Masha 22 November 2019 11: 18 New
                  +5
                  Bloodsuckers ... as is ...
    2. Rurikovich
      Rurikovich 22 November 2019 06: 36 New
      +3
      Quote: Hunter 2
      I’m wondering ... if someone does not pay, Mattresses will be offended and will leave ???

      Me too.. what smile
    3. Aerodrome
      Aerodrome 22 November 2019 06: 55 New
      +1
      Quote: Hunter 2
      I’m wondering ... if someone does not pay

      when in the 90s, someone on the market did not pay "for the roof", then the "lads" of this "client" drove to the forest .... wassat
    4. Shkworen
      Shkworen 22 November 2019 08: 35 New
      +1
      It seems to me that the last option will be :)
      they won’t leave and the color revolution will accidentally flare up, but of course it depends on the value of the bridgehead :)
  2. bessmertniy
    bessmertniy 22 November 2019 05: 49 New
    +4
    They survived, called partners. Previously, on the contrary, they were paid for the deployment of bases, for the services to the contingent, but now, on the contrary, they themselves have to pay for the called and uninvited American army and its expenses. It is correctly said that if you save on your army, you have to keep someone else's. hi
    1. Greg Miller
      Greg Miller 22 November 2019 11: 47 New
      +1
      This is the occupation. Trump was just the first to say this openly.
  3. Nitarius
    Nitarius 22 November 2019 05: 49 New
    -1
    oh and it starts right now .. like kuraship))) will TRUMP)))
  4. nikvic46
    nikvic46 22 November 2019 06: 15 New
    0
    I think, nevertheless, the USA pays to heralds who frighten with a threat from China and Russia.
  5. Thrifty
    Thrifty 22 November 2019 06: 21 New
    0
    That's right, slaves are required to pay taxes for alleged freedom! Otherwise, the United States should change the power of weapons to a more loyal one. And in general, to fix in the constitutions of the litter countries their slave status, indicating the rates of their pseudo-freedom ....
  6. parusnik
    parusnik 22 November 2019 06: 31 New
    +1
    In essence, what’s the problem? ... What nasty Americans, not only have the bases around the world placed so much money for the "roof" they demand? So these are our partners, those that others ... These are their own bourgeois ... What concern should the Russian Foreign Ministry express? We are supposed to be our own, but have you overlaid Russia with bases? And take the money? laughing
    1. Aerodrome
      Aerodrome 22 November 2019 06: 58 New
      +1
      Quote: parusnik
      In essence, the problem is what? ... What nasty Americans

      but in general we should not care! in Russia, everything is funnier! even over Ukraine is no longer so funny. What a "show" with "medical certificates" they turned out! rzhaka! right now, Putin’s rating will take off like five years ago ... they began to work roughly, clumsyly simply! fellow
  7. rocket757
    rocket757 22 November 2019 06: 54 New
    +1
    Do you think you pay for the roof? America demands money for its military bases

    They stuck to the "hens" the corresponding faces ... or the symbols of the most "protected", the picture was more fun!
    1. Nyrobsky
      Nyrobsky 22 November 2019 11: 52 New
      +3
      Quote: rocket757
      Do you think you pay for the roof? America demands money for its military bases

      They stuck to the "hens" the corresponding faces ... or the symbols of the most "protected", the picture was more fun!
      Here and this picture will be relevant
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 22 November 2019 13: 36 New
        +2
        Quote: Nyrobsky
        Here and this picture will be relevant

        If Red Bestia has learned to climb trees !!! Ravens and other birds came kirdyk!
        1. Nyrobsky
          Nyrobsky 22 November 2019 13: 41 New
          +4
          Quote: rocket757
          If Red Bestia has learned to climb trees !!! Ravens and other birds came kirdyk!

          Well, technology doesn’t stand still
          1. rocket757
            rocket757 22 November 2019 13: 43 New
            +1
            Quote: Nyrobsky
            Well, technology doesn’t stand still

            Technology, technology, and the old method, proven, never fails!
  8. Air force
    Air force 22 November 2019 07: 49 New
    0
    Standard occupation and tribute payments, the news is.
  9. Angrybeard
    Angrybeard 22 November 2019 08: 18 New
    0
    Occupants are free to demand any contributions.
    Natsik generally billed families for the disposal of their members with the wrong nationality. Inventory, invoice, pay, sign.
  10. Esaul
    Esaul 22 November 2019 08: 41 New
    0
    In fact, this is an American-fascist IGO.
  11. Ross xnumx
    Ross xnumx 22 November 2019 08: 44 New
    +2
    In fact, the United States will never volunteer to remove its troops from Europe and Asia. Indeed, in this case, they will lose the ability to control the situation in almost all the most important regions of the world, and the cost of withdrawing troops and infrastructure will not be so low.

    In connection with this phenomenon (an increase in the number of US military bases, especially around Russia), do not rush to sign various memorandums with this country that infringe on Russian national interests? It is more logical to think about how to implement a mirror response.
    Yes! stop
    US military bases in this vein act as a guarantee against attack or even just pressure from the PRC and DPRK.

    I can’t give a weighty argument for the DPRK, but if the PRC decides to answer Japan or South Korea, then the entire American contingent will go to feed the fish, even if all 140 of these “guarantors” led by Trump “rise” ... It’s not to bomb Yugoslavia under cheerful laughter and hooting, and not according to Syria, at the request of Ivanka, to slap a hundred Tomahawks. Here the specific rags will be ...
    Hence the conclusion: all these bases are props. And the Germans are generally suckers. Who broke them through the knee? USA? The winners withdrew the troops, and these jackals remained ... lol
  12. Andrei Nikolaevich
    Andrei Nikolaevich 22 November 2019 09: 18 New
    +4
    And the woman of easy virtue, Gorbachev, sold all Soviet bases, infrastructure .. The soldier also drove the families out onto the street. When is his funeral? ..
    1. Nyrobsky
      Nyrobsky 22 November 2019 11: 51 New
      +1
      Quote: Andrey Nikolaevich
      A woman of easy virtue- Gorbachev- sold all Soviet bases, infrastructure .. Also, the soldier drove the families out onto the street. When is his funeral? ..

      He didn’t even sell them, but simply left them to those who, in words, promised not to expand NATO to the East.
  13. Li17
    Li17 22 November 2019 10: 25 New
    0
    I won’t be surprised that soon they will demand money from us (like Ukrainians) in the style we owe them for the fact that the Americans are forced ...!
  14. NF68
    NF68 22 November 2019 16: 22 New
    0
    Continuation of the Marlezon ballet. New episodes. Something the United States in general is already losing and the coast and a sense of proportion.
  15. Antares
    Antares 22 November 2019 23: 25 New
    +1
    They didn’t just come in and stay there.
    Everyone knows history in exchange for security and confrontation of the 2 largest military-political blocs.
    The US has taken on all the pros and cons of the situation. Influence, world currency, control over half the planet, and at the same time responsibility for security anywhere in the world.
    Today, when the poles have shifted, it's expensive.
    The United States has long been unwilling to engage in charitable security! For security is expensive today. And since the EU more and more often does not want to unconditionally carry out all that is necessary, the exchange of money for protection looks justified.
    Who does not feed his army-feeds someone else's.
    It was beneficial when the American guarded and nothing was spent except loyalty.
    Now it seems to everyone that it’s cheaper not to pay and not to support because there is no danger.
    The US needs control over key points on the planet. And the "European bespectacled man" wants to be the 3rd center. Well then, you have to pay for it - including the creation of your own army. And let's see what is cheaper.
    Entirely on the US side, the army today is expensive. The budget is not rubber. Either yourself or yours.
    Besides key points, which in themselves have value.
    It is very strange that several generations of people have already lost the habit of mass wars ...
    really think that oxytocin in Europe will defeat testosterone in Asia? Even here, technology will not help ... the gap in demography and technology diffusion is too much.
  16. Mikhail3
    Mikhail3 23 November 2019 13: 10 New
    0
    Warsaw believes that Russia is very threatening the national security of the Polish state and see in the US troops as intercessors before possible Russian aggression.
    Of course, the Poles do not think so even when drunk. They think that when the United States finally begins to erase Russia from the face of the earth, they, as the most faithful and close, will have the sweet opportunity to kill and rob the damned Russians most of all. What they dream is not the first century. They themselves have long ceased to succeed, but with American help ...
  17. The comment was deleted.
  18. duchy
    duchy 26 November 2019 13: 57 New
    0
    In truth: Do not want to feed your army, you will feed someone else's.
    It turns out that our country is going the right way, comrades.