The Ministry of Defense called the timing of the transfer of the first Navy "Varshavyanka" for the Pacific Fleet

The Ministry of Defense called the timing of the transfer of the first Navy "Varshavyanka" for the Pacific Fleet

The first "Varshavyanka" for the Pacific fleet Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky diesel-electric submarine will be transferred to the Russian Navy on November 25. The ceremony of raising the St. Andrew’s flag will be held at the manufacturing plant Admiralty Shipyards in St. Petersburg.


According to the Ministry of Defense, the submarine Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky successfully passed state tests, confirming the characteristics laid down in it. The crew took a full course in the development of ship systems, units and weapon systems based on one of the leading training centers of the Navy.

Currently, the submarine is at the factory, it completed the revision and finished. The submarine is fully ready for admission to the Russian fleet.

The contract for the construction of a series of six “Varshavyanka” for the Pacific Fleet was signed by the Russian Defense Ministry and the Admiralty Shipyards in September 2016. DEPL "Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky" is the seventh submarine of this type, built for the Russian Navy and the first in a series for the Pacific Fleet. It was laid down on 28 of July 2017 of the year, launched on 28 of March 2019 of the year. Belongs to the third generation of diesel-electric submarines.

The length of the submarine is 73 meters, width - 10 meters, the maximum immersion depth - 300 meters, underwater speed - 20 knots, autonomy - 45 days. Crew - 52 person. The submarines are armed with six 533 mm caliber torpedo tubes, mines and Caliber rocket launchers.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

51 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Spartanez300 21 November 2019 13: 12 New
    • 14
    • 3
    +11
    As the saying goes, happy sailing.
    1. Borik 21 November 2019 13: 18 New
      • 9
      • 2
      +7
      As the saying goes, happy sailing.


      As the saying goes, happy sailing And seven feet under the keel. - The first one went, we are waiting for the rest.
    2. bouncyhunter 21 November 2019 13: 26 New
      • 7
      • 6
      +1
      Quote: Spartanez300
      As they say, happy sailing

      Do not think that I am pushing, but the ships and vessels "go" and not "float". hi
      1. Berkut24 21 November 2019 13: 32 New
        • 7
        • 1
        +6
        Suggest wish you joyful adventures?
        1. bouncyhunter 21 November 2019 13: 35 New
          • 7
          • 6
          +1
          Quote: Berkut24
          Suggest wish you joyful adventures?

          good Quite. Maybe someone from the adventures of "Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky" will experience nervous diarrhea? lol
        2. Flooding 21 November 2019 13: 44 New
          • 5
          • 1
          +4
          Submariners want the number of dives equal to the number of floats.
      2. Spartanez300 21 November 2019 13: 43 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        Be that as it may, the bottom line is that there is a submarine and a successful service. hi
      3. Alexey RA 21 November 2019 15: 10 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        Quote: bouncyhunter
        Do not think that I am pushing, but the ships and vessels "go" and not "float".

        It is above water.
        Submarines 146% are swimming - they have an underwater school swimming: smile
        1. Winnie76 21 November 2019 18: 16 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: Alexey RA
          It is above water.
          Submarines 146% sail - they have a diving school too

          Those. an underwater missile cruiser is floating, but just a missile cruiser is walking. And I remember the explanation, the ships go because the screw has a step. And here already submarines do not fit in any way. I also remember shit ...

          Sailors with their jargon themselves have already become confused and confuse the rest with their teachings. Maybe it’s worth dropping this foppishness and just speaking Russian?
          1. Alexey RA 22 November 2019 11: 51 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: Winnie76
            Those. an underwater missile cruiser is floating, but just a missile cruiser is walking. And I remember the explanation, the ships go because the screw has a step.

            And you can remember about the captains of the sea and navigators of the sea. smile
      4. Alexander Petrov1 21 November 2019 21: 38 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Eh, if modern Project 677 boats (code “Lada”) were built at the same speed, it would be wonderful, but you can be proud of our Glorious shipbuilders for this news.good
      5. Brylevsky 22 November 2019 03: 38 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        People walk on the ground and sailors on the deck. Ships and vessels float precisely: “buoyancy equation”, “buoyancy margin”.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. smart ass 21 November 2019 16: 51 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      How many calibers are on board?
      1. Alexander Petrov1 21 November 2019 22: 33 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Everywhere they write that these boats have 4 Caliber rockets ...
  2. GKS 2111 21 November 2019 13: 22 New
    • 12
    • 0
    +12
    Let the number of dives equal the number of ascent!
  3. Bykov. 21 November 2019 13: 23 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    How will they get from Peter to the home port? By SMP?
    1. Dmitry Donskoy 21 November 2019 13: 28 New
      • 3
      • 3
      0
      At the same time, they will monitor the NSR yes
    2. urik62 21 November 2019 14: 04 New
      • 5
      • 1
      +4
      As an option, through Middle-earth, at the same time, calibers in Syria will shoot back, so to speak, exercises in a combat situation, and at the Pacific Fleet already with experience in military operations.
    3. seregin-s1 21 November 2019 14: 49 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Rolldock Star was transported to Vietnam by ship dock. Does it make sense to waste boat life?
    4. alexmach 21 November 2019 16: 14 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Well, I suppose not bypassing Africa.
  4. The leader of the Redskins 21 November 2019 13: 24 New
    • 5
    • 3
    +2
    Although there was an article today about the critical condition and lag in the submarine fleet, but against this background, I think this news is positive!) wink
    1. lis-ik 21 November 2019 13: 33 New
      • 6
      • 6
      0
      Quote: Leader of the Redskins
      Although there was an article today about the critical condition and lag in the submarine fleet, but against this background, I think this news is positive!) wink

      Absolutely positive, but what will we do then i.e. When will the Soviet backlog completely end? Soviet designers rested in a Bose, and the new all-time Unified State Examination basically, with rare exceptions, the whole world switched to new non-volatile installations, and we still have it!
      1. dvina71 21 November 2019 13: 41 New
        • 6
        • 4
        +2
        Quote: lis-ik
        Absolutely positive, but what will we do then i.e. When will the Soviet backlog completely end? Soviet designers rested in a Bose, and the new all-time Unified State Examination basically, with rare exceptions, the whole world switched to new non-volatile installations, and we still have it!

        Yes, yes .. it’s all so .. Let's remember the time when the human backlog of the USSR was in its prime .. how industry bloomed with flowers, roads, bridges fell apart ..
        Where did the whole world switch to VNO? When? And those that crossed .. what advantage did you get in the usual activity zone of such submarines? In the ocean, they will merge the nuclear submarines anyway .., in the end, the VNU will end and it will be necessary to come up to the trickle .., and soon the VNU will not be able to provide the appropriate recharge of AB at large junctions .. and again to emerge ...
        1. lis-ik 21 November 2019 14: 10 New
          • 1
          • 6
          -5
          Quote: dvina71
          the corresponding battery charge at large junctions .. and again pop up ...

          I mean that there is nothing new and is not expected from the word at all, all the gallant statements about having no analogues, this is all to the USSR. What are we proud of? Supply development from the empire? In addition, the current government has no reason to trade resources.
          1. dvina71 21 November 2019 14: 11 New
            • 5
            • 1
            +4
            Quote: lis-ik
            What are we proud of?

            I have a question for you .. What is the list of members of the LK RKKF during the war (Linkorov) ..?
            1. lis-ik 21 November 2019 14: 15 New
              • 0
              • 5
              -5
              Quote: dvina71
              Quote: lis-ik
              What are we proud of?

              I have a question for you .. What is the list of members of the LK RKKF during the war (Linkorov) ..?

              I have a question accordingly. What war? If RKKF, then I think the civilian or the beginning of the Second World War. And where does the battleships of that period?
              1. dvina71 21 November 2019 14: 17 New
                • 5
                • 0
                +5
                Quote: lis-ik
                And where does the battleships of that period?

                LK is the pinnacle of military shipbuilding technology .. here I ask .. What battleships did the USSR have at the beginning of World War II?
                If RKKF, then I think the civilian or the beginning of the Second World War.

                I suspect you don’t know ..
                1. lis-ik 21 November 2019 14: 19 New
                  • 0
                  • 4
                  -4
                  Quote: dvina71
                  Quote: lis-ik
                  And where does the battleships of that period?

                  LK is the pinnacle of military shipbuilding technology .. here I ask .. What battleships did the USSR have at the beginning of World War II?

                  What are you leading to, anology is in my opinion not appropriate. By the way, if you read VO, then in the weapons section there was a whole cycle about battleships of the USSR.
                  1. dvina71 21 November 2019 14: 30 New
                    • 4
                    • 1
                    +3
                    Quote: lis-ik
                    anology in my opinion is not appropriate.

                    Why so? That is, when the USSR used technology, human potential and the product of RI, this is natural and does not raise any questions.
                    The fact that the Russian Federation uses the legacy of the USSR is directly some kind of trouble .. dishonest and wrong .. Schizophrenia .. not?
                    For reference .. all the battleships of the USSR were built during the time of RI .., they never built their own ..
                  2. Serg65 21 November 2019 14: 39 New
                    • 3
                    • 0
                    +3
                    Quote: lis-ik
                    anology is in my opinion not appropriate

                    Well, how is it not appropriate? Imperial battleships, part of destroyers and cruisers are also imperial ..... belay imperial factories ...
                    Quote: lis-ik
                    The Soviet backlog will end completely?

                    By your logic, the whole Soviet backlog should have been destroyed and the bourgeoisie only produced capitalist weapons?
                    1. Nikolai Grek 21 November 2019 19: 20 New
                      • 3
                      • 0
                      +3
                      Quote: Serg65
                      By your logic, the whole Soviet backlog should have been destroyed and the bourgeoisie only produced capitalist weapons?

                      about the Unified State Exam something bays, but the knowledge itself has trouble ... elementary things do not know that the basis of the USSR was Russia .... however, in a strange way, the predecessor of the USSR was called RUSSIAN Empire!!!! what wassat wassat lol lol lol
          2. Serg65 21 November 2019 14: 34 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            Quote: lis-ik
            I mean that there is nothing new and is not expected from the word at all

            what Share the source?
            1. lis-ik 21 November 2019 14: 41 New
              • 1
              • 5
              -4
              Quote: Serg65
              Quote: lis-ik
              I mean that there is nothing new and is not expected from the word at all

              what Share the source?

              I can’t substitute a person, but everything is really bad. Only on TV everything is fine. Source from the FSB special forces.
              1. Serg65 21 November 2019 14: 48 New
                • 5
                • 1
                +4
                Quote: lis-ik
                Source from the FSB special forces.

                belay Do I look dumb?
                what And this source is not accidental buffoons?
                1. The comment was deleted.
                2. Golovan Jack 21 November 2019 15: 19 New
                  • 6
                  • 4
                  +2
                  The client was shy and deleted the written comment. Here is a photo:


                  There are no words request laughing
                  1. Serg65 22 November 2019 06: 56 New
                    • 2
                    • 0
                    +2
                    Quote: Golovan Jack
                    Customer was shy

                    laughing And so the FSB colonels are scorching !!!!!!
                3. Nikolai Grek 21 November 2019 19: 09 New
                  • 2
                  • 0
                  +2
                  Quote: Serg65
                  And this source is not accidental buffoons?

                  laughing laughing laughing patstalom !!! good good good
              2. Golovan Jack 21 November 2019 14: 49 New
                • 7
                • 3
                +4
                Quote: lis-ik
                Source from FSB Special Forces

                You pushed it powerfully, buddy.

                Quote: Classics of the genre
                No buoys - (whatever you want) beat
                1. novel66 21 November 2019 15: 14 New
                  • 2
                  • 0
                  +2
                  in my opinion sounded "no move - go with a buoy"
              3. Nikolai Grek 21 November 2019 19: 10 New
                • 2
                • 0
                +2
                Quote: lis-ik
                I can’t substitute a person, but everything is really bad. Only on TV everything is fine. Source from the FSB special forces.

                voice the data !!! your "source" will be quickly "packed" by the FSB itself !!! wink wassat wassat lol lol lol
          3. Nikolai Grek 21 November 2019 19: 15 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            Quote: lis-ik
            it's all to the USSR.

            unbreakable countries have some breakthroughs ??? recourse laughing laughing laughing
      2. Serg65 21 November 2019 14: 32 New
        • 5
        • 1
        +4
        Quote: lis-ik
        then we will do then i.e. when the Soviet backlog will end completely?

        laughing Will we give up? Or not? Stalin didn’t give up on the imperial backlog wink
        1. lis-ik 21 November 2019 14: 39 New
          • 2
          • 6
          -4
          Quote: Serg65
          Quote: lis-ik
          then we will do then i.e. when the Soviet backlog will end completely?

          laughing Will we give up? Or not? Stalin didn’t give up on the imperial backlog wink

          Let's not shout cheers and sing along to Solovyov. And don’t do it, just trade resources !!!.
          1. Serg65 21 November 2019 14: 42 New
            • 6
            • 1
            +5
            Quote: lis-ik
            And don’t do it, just trade resources !!!.

            laughing Nah, we’ll cry and be glad, be glad for any mistake, as socialist students rejoiced at the Japanese attack on Russia wink
            1. novel66 21 November 2019 15: 15 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              treacherous attack ??? lol
              1. Serg65 22 November 2019 06: 59 New
                • 2
                • 0
                +2
                smile Well, the same treacherous as in the forty-first wink
  5. Flooding 21 November 2019 13: 30 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    The right thing for the lack of more modern projects.
    A page from the history of the Pacific Fleet (Report of the command of the Pacific Fleet on the reception of the US Asian squadron in Vladivostok July 28 - August 1, 1937)
    "1. The main purpose of the visit of the American squadron - to get acquainted with the power of the Pacific Fleet - was achieved. Not knowing exactly the number of submarines, the Americans were convinced that in the Far East the USSR had a powerful submarine fleet, including several types of submarines and a powerful coastal defense of Vladivostok. The personnel are disciplined and Looks great.
    The Pacific Fleet aviation made an equally powerful impression: fighter flights, day and night flights of heavy bombers showed that the Pacific Fleet lives a never-ending full-blooded life and is ready to complete tasks at any time of the day.
    The city has order, the population looks good, the mood is cheerful, the party and the government enjoy unshakable authority.
    2. The Pacific Fleet’s personnel made a special impression: the Red Navy’s great consciousness, their cultural appearance, the absence of drunken people, their restraint, all this made an exceptionally vivid impression, which the officers repeatedly expressed during the squadron’s station in Vladivostok and Admiral Yarnel emphasized separately during the farewell visit ... "


    The full text can be found at http://militera.lib.ru/h/shtal/07.html
  6. Berkut24 21 November 2019 13: 34 New
    • 4
    • 3
    +1
    ... and here it is not necessary about backwardness and VNEU. He’ll cover the bases, he will make happy with “Caliber”.
  7. senima56 21 November 2019 13: 59 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    Give more new boats !!!! drinks
  8. Adimius38 21 November 2019 17: 25 New
    • 1
    • 3
    -2
    Without VNEU this is yesterday, a submarine with such a limited time spent in underwater position significantly loses to the same German submarines with VNEU
  9. Petrol cutter 21 November 2019 20: 29 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    Congratulations!
    Both the Navy and shipbuilding. Although it’s only (or yesterday, I don’t remember ...) I read the article (and, for the BF) that there was a conversation that diesels were "full hat". CB "Rubin" seems ... Also the "hat" is complete ... Come on bathyscaphe with VNEU and other "squiggle".
    It seems, if an atomic motor was stuck in a certain torpedo, probably sticking a similar one into the DEPL building would not be titanic work?! ..
    And there will be autonomy (without surfacing) not a month as the author claimed there, but how much food the team has enough.