Military Review

NATO Secretary General broadcasts US idea on militarization of space

28

It has long been no surprise that the Secretary General of NATO voiced ideas that are consistent with Washington’s interests. This time, the Secretary General of the Western military bloc expressed the hope that outer space would be recognized by the international community as "the sphere of military activity."


Recall that at the moment there is an agreement from 1967 of the year that governs the activities of countries in space. In particular, under the agreement, the participating States have committed themselves to supporting the ban on the placement in outer space of any weapons mass destruction.

The United States decided that it was time to terminate this agreement. And in order for the initiative to look like it came from a “broad team”, they decided to connect a “talking head” to the case, which Jens Stoltenberg once again made for himself.

From a statement by the NATO Secretary General:

I expect that the ministers will decide on the recognition of outer space as a sphere of military activity at the level of air and ground spheres and cyberspace.

It is important to note that the 1967 treaty of the year, to which the USA, Great Britain and Russia are parties (as the successor of the USSR), does not actually prohibit the deployment of “conventional” weapons in outer space. If the United States promotes the idea of ​​recognizing outer space as a sphere of military activity, then this can mean virtually one thing: use the opportunity to bring weapons of mass destruction to new, in the literal sense of the word, heights.

Russia previously proposed to begin negotiations on the possible expansion of the parties to the agreement on space activities. This is relevant when you consider that today a number of countries (in addition to the original signatories to the treaty) are engaged in space exploration: France, China, Israel, India.

The United States, through the NATO Secretary General, is broadcasting the idea of ​​militarizing outer space without attention to other representatives of the international community and global security issues.
28 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Dikson
    Dikson 20 November 2019 06: 42
    +5
    ... They carried Mitya's sandals ... :( No wonder their boat hung in space for years .. Something was remembered by Ronald Reagan with his Star Wars program ..
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. SETSET
      SETSET 20 November 2019 07: 07
      +3
      Under Reagan, the United States was tortured to make a nuclear-pumped X-ray laser for SOI and will not digest its ambitions now.
      1. Dikson
        Dikson 20 November 2019 07: 10
        +2
        Yes, I don’t argue that the navel was torn .. But the plans themselves were huge! Now, after all, science has galloped forward .. and the materials and technology are different .. Unless the laws of physics have remained unchanged ..
        1. The comment was deleted.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. Andrei Nikolaevich
        Andrei Nikolaevich 20 November 2019 07: 27
        -5
        Quite controversial is your statement. Just how ,, digest ,,! They have ,, brothers ,, - no. But the dollar is. We have the opposite. So we feed all those wretchedly independent ones, and then we collect money for defense from the last pensions.
      4. Leeds
        Leeds 20 November 2019 08: 35
        -2
        The launch of the second star wars. In the first part, the Jedi lost, in the second they are again in the minority, although on the bright side.
    3. cost
      cost 20 November 2019 07: 13
      +1
      This time, the Secretary General of the Western military bloc expressed the hope that outer space would be recognized by the international community as "the sphere of military activity."

      “The hopes of young men feed,
      The elders are given joy ”
      But still gradually melting.
      And finally, on the slope of days
      Suddenly understands man
      The vanity of hope, the futility of ideas ...
      "There are no others, but those farther away,"
  2. Spartanez300
    Spartanez300 20 November 2019 06: 44
    +1
    The United States continues to look for adventures on its ass, then as if not to regret such a decision.
    1. Spartanez300
      Spartanez300 20 November 2019 06: 56
      +2
      It should be clear to everyone who is escalating the military threat in the world after the "talking head" statement.
    2. bessmertniy
      bessmertniy 20 November 2019 07: 02
      0
      The USA from space today looks like a big target in the form of this very ass with an apple. wassat And we note that not only Russia can fall into this bullseye, but also other cosmic powers that want it. feel
  3. dirk182
    dirk182 20 November 2019 07: 41
    0
    The United States is calculating the risks in space, the NATO secretary general declares space as a sphere of military activity. Well, only one conclusion suggests itself: missile defense elements and anti-satellite systems will be carried into space. And possibly shock systems. Everything goes to the creation of a combat space station. There were such projects in the USSR. Today, with modern technology, this is much more realistic. Yet we have heard Trump's claims that the US is developing "fantastic" weapons. The role of the X-37 is likely to be in the implementation of intelligence functions. In this way, the United States is implementing its strategy of a rapid global strike.
    1. Dikson
      Dikson 20 November 2019 07: 56
      +1
      The X-37 is simply a vigorous loaf brought to the database in space .. At the right time it will fall where it is necessary, decapitating the country of the enemy. Type the last argument.
      1. dirk182
        dirk182 20 November 2019 08: 03
        +1
        Well, yes, yes ... it was for this that he was taught to maneuver and change orbits. To then fall on the head of the adversary. For this, the United States has enough ICBMs and B61 bombs.
        1. slipped
          slipped 20 November 2019 14: 47
          +1
          Quote: dirk182
          Well, yes, yes ... it was for this that he was taught to maneuver and change orbits.


          I’ll tell you one secret - any spaceship can do this. laughing It all depends on its engine. For example, communication satellites maneuver on the GSO by changing the inclination of their orbits thanks to the EPP. And our "Soyuz" with the "Progress" on the LPRE get to the station. Yes, even the upper stage "Fregat" can simultaneously put the payload during launch into three different orbits with different inclination.
          1. dirk182
            dirk182 20 November 2019 15: 13
            0
            and do they all do this for a year? And how are we going to shoot him down?
            1. slipped
              slipped 20 November 2019 16: 57
              +1
              Quote: dirk182
              and do they all do this for a year?


              They do this at any time during the year. laughing

              Quote: dirk182
              And how are we going to shoot him down?


              we have ILV 14A042
              1. dirk182
                dirk182 20 November 2019 17: 14
                -2
                laughing enchanting! Use the Nudol complex to shoot down a maneuvering orbital ship. Based on your logic, then we shoot down the Vanguard. Information on the height of the defeat of the complex "Nudol" (realistic) -120 km. In the future, 500 km. On X-37, altitudes up to 750 km
                1. slipped
                  slipped 20 November 2019 17: 30
                  0
                  Quote: dirk182
                  laughing enchanting! Complex Nudol shoot down a maneuvering orbital ship.


                  Are you against? lol

                  Quote: dirk182
                  Based on your logic, then the Vanguard is knocked down.


                  You are out of your logic. Comparing orange to soft.

                  Quote: dirk182
                  Information on the height of the defeat by the "Nudol" complex (realistic) -120 km. In the future, 500 km.


                  Is it written on the fence? Believe the fence. lol

                  Quote: dirk182
                  By X-37, altitudes up to 750 km


                  Just? laughing ILV, by the way, stands for space rocket, that is, a launch vehicle. But what he carries there ....
                  1. dirk182
                    dirk182 20 November 2019 17: 43
                    0
                    I used to operate with facts, and not like you, speculation ... I did not see a clear answer. With the same success can be said about the X-37. Like: "who told you that he flies at altitudes up to 750 km wink Do you know what he's carrying inside?) Didn't you know that he has a defensive laser system? "
                    1. slipped
                      slipped 20 November 2019 17: 56
                      +1
                      Quote: dirk182
                      I’m used to operating with facts, and not like you, speculation ... I did not see a clear answer.


                      "Maybe you also have the key to the apartment where the money is?" © not mine

                      Quote: dirk182
                      With the same success can be said about the X-37. Like: "who told you that he flies at altitudes up to 750 km wink


                      Why? lol If it is perfectly monitored at this altitude by radar and optical means of the Russian Aerospace Forces, then why not? It is even monitored by amateur means, through a 10-inch telescope:



                      Quote: dirk182
                      Do you know what he carries inside?)


                      Judging by its orbital photo - a technological platform. laughing

                      Quote: dirk182
                      Didn't you know that it has a defensive laser system? "


                      Nuclear-pumped? Harrows enemy computers? laughing Probably about this, too, read on the fence. laughing
                      1. dirk182
                        dirk182 20 November 2019 19: 55
                        -2
                        There is no desire to argue with you. The platform, which has been in space for a year, already raises a lot of questions. Regarding "knocking down the ILV". Compare the defense budgets of the Russian Federation and the United States. Next, look at the number of THAAD missiles in the US. Draw conclusions about the cost of the Nudol complex and guess its amount. Then open the article on VO about US missile defense. Carefully! read the comments on the article. Determine for yourself the percentage of successful destruction of ICBM warheads. Collect all the data obtained in a heap, do a little analysis and answer yourself: "can the ILV be able to hit an object maneuvering at altitudes up to 750 km?" And in addition, read about the A-925 missile, which is positioned as a long-range intercept missile. In addition, the constellation of satellites:
                        USA-400
                        RF-140
                        Modestly keep silent about the number of GLONASS satellites. We will use them during the database? Do not forget about the ICBMs that need to be shot down.
                      2. slipped
                        slipped 20 November 2019 21: 18
                        0
                        Quote: dirk182
                        There is no desire to argue with you.


                        and no one argues, you just carry a blizzard laughing

                        Quote: dirk182
                        The platform, which has been in space for a year, already raises a lot of questions.


                        And why do other military satellites, which have been in space for many years, not cause your questions?

                        Quote: dirk182
                        Regarding "knocking down the ILV". Compare the defense budgets of the Russian Federation and the United States. Next, look at the number of THAAD missiles in the United States. Draw conclusions about the cost of the "Nudol" complex and guess its amount .....


                        Are you going to fight? laughing

                        Quote: dirk182
                        In addition, the satellite constellation:
                        USA-400
                        RF-140


                        Russia has more than 160, and most Americans are small-handed. What does it have to do with it?

                        Quote: dirk182
                        Modestly keep silent about the number of GLONASS satellites.


                        Why - 27 devices in orbit, of which 21 devices are currently involved in the system, three for temporary maintenance. Three weeks later, another one flies to replace one of them, another one at the beginning of next year.

                        Quote: dirk182
                        We will use them during the database? Do not forget about the ICBMs that need to be shot down.


                        We will be. The main thing is do not be nervous. laughing
                      3. dirk182
                        dirk182 21 November 2019 00: 29
                        0
                        By your reaction it is clear that you understand everything. Well, fine. And ... more than half of the GLONASS spacecraft work beyond the deadlines. Simply put, there is no substitute for them. Why, guess yourself. Nervous?))) I’m just wonderingly wondering how you will shoot this Boeing with Nudole. This is not a problem for you. Although, according to your comments, you can knock him off with a hat.
  4. rocket757
    rocket757 20 November 2019 08: 04
    0
    NATO Secretary General broadcasts US idea on militarization of space

    Secretary General of NATO He is also in Africa Secretary General ... why in space should it be otherwise?
  5. Potato
    Potato 20 November 2019 09: 17
    0
    NATO Secretary General fucking moron maniac. Because of such idiots, orbital nuclear bombs will fly into fashion again, flying at an altitude of hundreds of kilometers above cities, and ready to suddenly hit a target in a matter of minutes.

    Stoltenberg nerd. Only the demented can stoke for the militarization of space!
  6. G. Georgiev
    G. Georgiev 20 November 2019 09: 25
    -3
    Will this Russian Peresvet laser be able to destroy satellites? Or in Russia there is only the Tirad 2C REB system, for this purpose
    1. dirk182
      dirk182 20 November 2019 15: 22
      0
      we will revive "Skif" and "Cascade" wink and .... as it were, the Americans declared that if their satellite was destroyed by us, then war. If there was such a statement, then we can assume that Russia has not only electronic warfare equipment to combat the alleged enemy (not X-37) satellite
  7. Fedorov
    Fedorov 20 November 2019 09: 34
    0
    In short, the United States needs to be hijacked, and only Russia and China can do it, I think India will make a fuss. And the end of all problems. wink True, then others will begin ..
  8. Operator
    Operator 20 November 2019 10: 39
    +8
    Russia is ready for leadership in the strategic nuclear forces also in space - the Sarmat ICBM is de facto an orbital missile.

    Stoltenberg is an agent of Moscow, however bully