Cold War Nuclear Depth Bombs

23

Submarine nuclear explosion, Domenic project, 1962 year

The years of the Cold War gave the world a large number of nuclear images weapons. This is not only a matter of strategic offensive arms and intercontinental ballistic missiles. During the confrontation between the USA and the USSR, a huge number of tactical nuclear weapons were developed in two countries, from conventional aerial bombs and artillery shells to deep nuclear bombs designed to combat enemy submarines. In the Soviet Union, the nuclear anti-submarine complex, which included the Be-12 amphibious aircraft, received the sonorous name “Scalp” and was adopted by the 55 years ago - in the 1964 year.

American depth charges


In the arms race, one of the parties has always tried to catch up with the other, developing similar or even more advanced models of weapons and military equipment. The first domestic deep-sea nuclear bomb created in the USSR in 1964, which became part of the anti-submarine aviation complex, was a response to the development of the American defense industry. The US military got its deep-sea atomic bomb in the 1950 years, launching another round of the arms race between the countries.



At the same time, the interest of Americans in the creation of such weapons was well-founded. The Soviet Union made a conscious bet on the creation and development of a powerful underwater fleet. Soviet submarines, which were armed with the first ballistic or cruise missiles, including those equipped with nuclear warheads, became a real threat to the coastal cities of the United States and Washington's European allies. Under these conditions, the Americans considered any possible methods of guaranteed destruction of Soviet submarines and quickly enough came to the idea of ​​creating a deep air bomb with a nuclear warhead.


Mark 101 Lulu U.S. Nuclear Depth Bomb Suspended Under AD Skyraider

A distinctive feature of the entire line of American nuclear depth charges were female names. The world's first anti-submarine aviation The bomb, which received a nuclear charge of the W-7 type with a capacity of about 5-10 ct, received the beautiful female name Betty. A variety of aircraft could use such ammunition, including outdated vehicles, which at that time included A-1 Skyraider piston attack aircraft and S-2 Tracker carrier-based anti-submarine aircraft. For the same purposes, the American P6M Seamaster turbojet amphibious aircraft could be used, which the US military rated as not the most successful aircraft in its class. The first American deep nuclear bombs did not last long in service, they decided to abandon them by 1960. It is estimated that 225 Betty nuclear bombs have been collected over the entire production period.

Despite the abandonment of Betty, interest in deep-sea nuclear bombs did not disappear, on the contrary, the threat from the Soviet submarine fleet only increased every year, and the naval command considered submarines with nuclear weapons on board as a real strategic threat. The Betty bomb was replaced by a much more sophisticated and powerful bomb, which received another female name, Lulu. The Mark 101 Lulu airborne depth bomb received a W34 nuclear warhead with a power of approximately 11 ct. This ammunition was produced in five different versions and remained in service with the U.S. Navy from 1958 to 1971 year. New weapons were stored not only at American bases; bombs of this type were also actively supplied to US allies in the NATO bloc. It is known that the Lulu bombs were stored at the British Cornwall air base, they could be armed with the Royal Air Force Avro Shackleton aircraft.

The deep-sea nuclear bomb Mark 101 Lulu reached a length of 229 cm, its diameter was 46 cm, and such a bomb weighed 540 kg. The carriers of weapons dangerous for any enemy submarine were not only the base patrol aircraft, which included the P-2 Neptune and P-3 Orion models, but also the A-3 Skywarrior and A-4 Skyhawk attack aircraft and even helicopters, for example SH-3 Sea King. At the same time, specialized patrol planes could take on board a couple of these bombs, which increased their ability to combat enemy submarines.


A submarine of the George Washington type, which was supposed to be the target of Soviet nuclear depth charges

The main disadvantages of the Lulu bombs, which the Americans themselves admitted, were the lack of sensors for fixing free fall. In simple terms, the bomb did not have an important element of the safety device that would activate the operation only after being dropped from the plane and freely falling from a certain height. For this reason, the bombs were quite dangerous to handle. If such a munition brought into a fighting position, rolled off the deck of an aircraft carrier and fell into the water, the bomb would simply explode when it reaches a predetermined depth.

Soviet answer. SC-1 Scalp Nuclear Depth Bomb


The Soviet response to the creation of deep-sea nuclear bombs by the Americans was the Soviet bomb SK-1, an 5F48 product, also known as the Scalp. For the first time, the task of creating a complex of bombs and aircraft that could effectively deal with enemy submarines was formulated in the USSR in 1960, then the first specifications of the future project approved by the Navy command came out. By that time, the Soviet military already knew that the enemy had similar weapons. At the same time, the Soviet nuclear depth bomb was also developed as a response to the emergence of new nuclear-powered strategic missile submarines of the George Washington type, armed with ballistic missiles. Such boats posed a huge threat to the fleet and infrastructure of the USSR in the event of a war moving from a cold stage to a hot one.

Work on the creation of new weapons was carried out quickly enough and already in 1961, the first samples of new depth charges were transferred for factory tests. Tests of new ammunition without nuclear charges on board were carried out at a special marine training ground located near the Crimea. The Soviet designers were planning to use the new bomb together with the successful Be-12 Chaika turboprop flying boat, created by Beriev Design Bureau specialists. A special modification of the seaplane was designated Be-12SK. In 1964, the joint tests of the nuclear depth charges and the Be-12 aircraft were completed, and the ammunition was officially adopted. The new Skalp aviation anti-submarine complex became for the time the most powerful anti-submarine weapon of Soviet naval aviation. In 1965-1970, the complex was equipped with three anti-submarine regiments of long-range aviation, as well as two marine anti-submarine squadrons.

Cold War Nuclear Depth Bombs

Soviet nuclear depth bomb "Scalp", 5Ф48

Workers of the VNII-1011 of the Ministry of Environment (directly, the Russian Federal Nuclear Center - Academician Zababakhin All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Technical Physics in Snezhinsk) were directly responsible for creating the bomb. The company, which is part of the Rosatom Group of Companies, today specializes in creating various types of nuclear munitions. It is not known how much the name of the work “Skalp” was associated with the project, but it can be said with certainty that the Soviet deep-sea bomb SK-1 could “scalp” any submarine of a potential enemy, effectively dealing with both the light and the sturdy hull of the boat .

The SK-1 bomb weighed about 1600 kg, another 78 kg fell on the weight of a special beam holder, which was installed in the Be-12 cargo compartment. In this case, the approximate ammunition power was estimated at 10 ct. The Be-12SK flying boat could take on board only one such bomb, while on the plane it was still possible to suspend conventional bombs, torpedoes and buoys. The SK-1 bomb (5Ф48) was intended for use from altitudes from 2 to 8 kilometers, and the munition detonation took place at a depth of 200 to 400 meters. In this case, air and contact fuses on the bomb were absent. To destroy submarines that were in shallow water, a delayed response in time was provided in addition to the already existing values ​​(20,4 and 44 seconds, respectively) equal to approximately 100 seconds from the moment of ammunition landing. This time was enough for the carrier to leave the danger zone. One of the features of the nuclear depth bomb and the complex was the need to maintain the air temperature in the compartment at 16-23 degrees Celsius, this was an important condition for the reliable operation of a nuclear charge. According to the results of the tests, the Scalp could hit any submarine that was located at a distance of 600-700 meters from the site of the bombing.


Be-12 "The Seagull"

Over time, new nuclear deep-sea munitions began to come to replace the Scalpam. By the 1970 year in the USSR, it was possible to establish the release of a new weapon - the ryu-2 bomb (8Ф59), which was included in history as “Skat” or, as it was affectionately called in the Navy, “ryushka”. The advantage of the new bomb was that it could be used not only from the Be-12 seaplane, but also from other domestic anti-submarine vehicles - Il-38 and Tu-142, and in the future also anti-submarine helicopters.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

23 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +13
    23 November 2019 05: 44
    Good, interesting article! Thanks to the author hi
    What only humans did not invent to kill each other - each other ... and at the same time all life on earth! Somehow I forgot about this type of nuclear weapons!
  2. +8
    23 November 2019 07: 25
    The difference in weight "Lulu" and SK-1 - three times, and the requirements for operation are indicative.
  3. +2
    23 November 2019 08: 34
    Thank you for the article! This topic has long been not for wide print! Shirokorada has a little about American nuclear GBs, but I haven’t come across our data
  4. -1
    23 November 2019 08: 36
    So much for Poseidon. - After it is discovered (and the United States has a deployed network of deep-sea tracking stations), it will not go anywhere else ...
    1. 0
      23 November 2019 09: 34
      There is little left to do - to find out! .. But if the Americans are in business, then you can not worry, everything is "captured" there ...
      1. 0
        24 November 2019 08: 40
        The only thing left is to discover! ..
        Yeah, is this at a declared speed of 200 km / h? - Learn physics and do not make people laugh ....
        1. +2
          24 November 2019 18: 31
          Do you understand the word sarcasm?
    2. The comment was deleted.
  5. 0
    23 November 2019 10: 00
    More good and different warheads
  6. +2
    23 November 2019 10: 28
    The world's first anti-submarine aircraft bomb, which received a nuclear charge of the W-7 type with a capacity of about 5-10 kt, received the beautiful female name Betty.

    Used a nuclear charge from tactical missiles "Honest John" and "Corporal".
  7. +7
    23 November 2019 10: 53

    hi .... Hardtack operations. Charge 8 Kt. shallow depth, underwater nuclear tests conducted on June 8, 1958.
  8. 0
    23 November 2019 13: 22
    Interesting stuff. Did the American bombs have the same radius of destruction (600-700 m)?
  9. +3
    23 November 2019 22: 17
    In this case, the approximate ammunition capacity was estimated at 10 kt.
    About 200 ct.
    Never written in the instructions is powerful. Only by a radius of 800 m. With P-0,95 can you evaluate the power. In the book of graphics, the ratio of depths, foreshortening, speed, choose the radius.
    After was Ryu-1, then Ryu-2, then Ryu-2-2. Then RN-35, then RN-38. No longer served.
    "SK" was not in service for long, it was very hefty.
    However, in my story I wrote about this.
    “Back in May, we carried out training on the suspension of the Ryu-2 special product on board.

    Ryu-1 and Ryu-2 are nuclear weapons designed to destroy submarines in the event of a nuclear war. These are the first versions of ammunition developed for anti-submarine aviation. The very first product was 'Scalp' 5F48. The Ryu-1 product was originally intended for the Be-12. Due to large errors in determining the location of the submarine using the Lilac PPS, the bomb was simply monstrous power. According to calculations, it turned out almost 200 kt. We deliberately interpolated the values ​​of the radius of damage and the height of the water column and came to such a value. In general, it should be noted that the equivalent of a nuclear charge was never indicated in instructions and manuals. Only the radius of destruction depending on the depth and speed of the submarine. Well, according to our calculations, it would not always be possible for the Be-12 to leave safely after being used. Depends on the drop height. The helicopter had no chance at all. And what they wrote in my time in various articles about 10 kt. 'Scalp' is complete nonsense. Weight 1600 kg and radius of destruction of submarines 800 m in water. The water column rises almost 6 kilometers.

    Our crew has been issued special access to the product. The bomb itself is brought by experts from the storage base, and to this day there is still no certainty that it brought a combat product, not a mock-up.

    The product itself is placed on a trolley in an accordion-tarpaulin coating, which develops when a bomb is rolled under a load. Next, a special team performs the suspension. It connects a KBU-code locking device and displays a product reset console in the cockpit. Particular attention is the temperature regime.

    Training in preparing the product for use. Everything in the training table and belt indicators for operation. Do as it is written, that’s all.

    The shelf is equipped with two sides for the use of nuclear charge.

    In general, a routine, of course, but they’ve come up with secrecy- Mama Don't Cry.
    Receiving a code, cryptographic subtraction. Code entry. Light bulbs
    After 85, they switched to new products RN-35, power up to 20 kt. Later, ammunition allows you to destroy boats under the ice. The nozzle on the bomb allowed her to break through the ice, go into the water and explode.

    Where are the Americans ahead of us? In electronics and physics, the calculation of a nuclear reaction, which made it possible to change the equivalent. That is, one charge could be used, for example, from 2-10-20 kt. equivalent. The power option was selected on board during flight. "
    1. +1
      23 November 2019 22: 32
      Why compliance with the temperature regime of 16-23 degrees? Germotsek on Be 12?
      Did not quite understand.
      1. +3
        24 November 2019 00: 45
        The plane is leaking. Temperature conditions for normal operation of explosive charges (implosive type product). The charges could be triggered out of sync, and the bomb would not deliver power. In the 70s, these requirements were removed. ...
    2. 0
      April 30 2023 05: 49
      What kind of attachment did the ice-piercing aerial bomb have?
  10. The comment was deleted.
  11. +1
    24 November 2019 04: 12
    Quote: whowhy
    So much for Poseidon. - After it is discovered (and the United States has a deployed network of deep-sea tracking stations), it will not go anywhere else ...

    E-my .. Yes, you already know about all the performance characteristics of "Poseidon" ?! Why were you silent? All the specialists of the country are puzzled, and you know "everything about everything" ... Well, come on, share with us, you are our omniscient ...
    1. +1
      24 November 2019 08: 36
      If not difficult, you can read here "A little reflection on the" earth shaker "
      http://samlib.ru/s/semenow_aleksandr_sergeewich333/poseidon.shtml
      And in the comments. There are links there. This was discussed a year ago by former officers of the Navy. In specialized forums.
      Comments are here.
      http://samlib.ru/comment/s/semenow_aleksandr_sergeewich333/poseidon
      The conclusions are clear-the introduction of the country's leadership astray, cut and colossal theft.
      1. 0
        9 December 2019 03: 31
        Here, the keywords are "former naval officers". They always have it like this, "if I am not in the ranks of the armed forces, then everything that will come up without me is all nonsense ..." I assure you that this is not so. I will even say more, this is far from the case.
        1. -1
          18 December 2019 15: 05
          There is nothing to be afraid of, especially if in another country like me. tongue
    2. 0
      28 November 2019 12: 11
      Nobody really breaks their heads, this thing is trivially miscalculated by measuring the sizes in the photo, Greiner's book on nuclear power plants, OCD on the conveyor car, OCD on the thermochemical stabilization system of the coolant (both were on public procurement) and Podobria book on torpedoes and schemes from Bocharov Stream.

      All who need to have already figured out this thing
  12. 0
    24 November 2019 21: 40
    and in the future, anti-submarine helicopters.


    Moreover, the helicopter did not manage to leave in any way ...
    1. 0
      28 November 2019 12: 00
      I’ll clarify. If you count on SC. But the helicopter will not pick it up. I did not specify it. And later charges are lighter and more powerful. less. I definitely won’t say it on helicopters, but Google is an ungrateful thing.))) For me it’s better to write my own, what was left in my memory is so honest.
      Flickered on the forums brother's kashnik, nickname KAMA. He flew all the service on the Ka-27 on the Kuz. He can clarify, well, if you meet.
  13. 0
    27 November 2019 22: 41
    Quote: timokhin-aa
    Moreover, the helicopter did not manage to leave in any way ...


    A little more years will pass and high-speed helicopters (and convertiplanes) will become full-fledged carriers for nuclear anti-submarine and other low-power weapons: Be-12 Chaika, maximum speed, km / h: 550, for the current time - experimental SB-1 Defiant - in the version of the demonstrator X2 - 463 km / h (82%). Apparently, the air refueling of helicopters from conventional air tankers, including, is just around the corner.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"