Why the economy of Russia is not traveling


Why is the Russian economy not traveling? The economic stagnation and degradation of Russia is a response to the extremely unsatisfactory management of socio-economic processes in the country. When one liberal group, retaining its positions since the 1990's, fulfilling the economic principles and theories of the West for developing (semi-colonial) countries that have already destroyed the economies of Chile, Argentina and Venezuela, is stubbornly dragging Russia to the bottom.


Now liberals, after the frank failure of “perestroika”, “reforms”, “innovations”, “modernizations”, “optimizations”, “import substitutions” and “2020 strategies”, promise us a digital era, drawing Russia another bright future.

Country of contrasts


Russia is a real country of contrasts. The Russians occupied and mastered the largest and most resource-rich territory in the world. According to the rating from 149 countries of the world, we take the first place in oil production and 96-in quality of life. Russia is a leader in gas exports, but at the 90 place in the quality of medicine. By social stratification and social injustice we are in the world leaders. The number of dollar billionaires and millionaires is constantly growing in Russia, and 85 — 90% of the country's total wealth is concentrated in the hands of about 3% of the richest Russians. Rich people go wild with fat - they buy super-expensive yachts (Russia is the second most expensive yachts bought), private planes, works of art, jewelry, have a feast during the plague - extremely expensive shows, receptions and weddings, inviting Russian and foreign superstars, throwing millions into the wind dollars and euros.

At the same time, incomes have been falling for five years in a row, and the army of the poor continues to grow. According to Rosstat, this year the number of people with incomes below the subsistence level has grown to almost 21 million people. More than half of families with children live below the poverty line. The vast majority of Russians (59%) are forced to save on food and clothing. In addition, the "reformers" worked so hard on the Russian economy that Russia's GDP is comparable to that of one of the Chinese provinces of Guangdong. And one US state of California surpasses the entire Russian economy.

Obviously, the government is not interested in developing the country's economy in the interests of the people. The treasury is full of money: 17 trillion are dead weight. rubles. According to the data published on the website of the Russian Ministry of Finance, in January-October of 2019, the federal budget of the Russian Federation was executed with a surplus of 3,071 trillion. rubles. Revenues in the reporting period reached 16 trillion. 670 billion rubles, and expenses - 13 trillion. 598 billion rubles. Russia has a chronic budget surplus, and the liberal bloc gives it out as an example of an effective and wise government policy. In fact, money is sterilized, “stored” in various “stashes”, and the economy is degrading. The government deliberately “dries” the economy, drowning it, so that, God forbid, not to disperse inflation. Government debt, both state and corporate, is minimal, as is inflation. The dollar, after the devaluation of the ruble at the end of 2014, the withdrawal of Russian assets of US government debt and the transfer of foreign trade to the euro and the yuan, is no longer a threat to the CBR. Russian rich brought offshore (England, Switzerland, Cyprus, etc.) 1,5 trillion. dollars. And the growth of the Russian economy is at the level of statistical error. At the same time, after the transfer of Rosstat to the Ministry of Economic Development, the figures of Russian statistics raise serious doubts, since they meet the needs of the stronghold of liberals - the Ministry of Economic Development.

At the same time, the government, apparently moving to the economic strategy “people are new oil”, is punching ever new antisocial decisions with enormous speed, introducing new taxes and taxes. The predatory pension reform has been carried out, the issue of a new pension reform is being worked out (for the same purpose), tariffs and gas prices are rising. The state, in fact, refuses social policy, moving to the position of “night watchman” of capital.

Colonial economy


The problem of the Russian economy is that, starting with 1991 — 1993. and ending with our days, it is a colonial and peripheral economy with respect to the West. Gorbachev and Yeltsin surrendered the USSR-Russia to the West. The coup d'etat of August 1991 completely changed the socio-economic formation of Russia, transferring state property to private. The forceful dispersal of the Congress of People's Deputies and the Supreme Council of the Russian Federation in October 1993 and the December constitution of 1993 were carried out in the interests of the United States and the financial capital of the Old and New Worlds. Russian oligarchs received loans to purchase major state assets. This was followed by an offshore offshore of Russian assets and the complete approval of global, supranational financial institutions: the IMF and the World Bank in the Russian Federation. All this up to the present day determines not only the financial and economic policy of Moscow, but also the internal life of the country (in particular, the poverty of the people).

All recommendations of Western financial institutions, in particular the IMF, are of a priority nature for the liberal-economic bloc of the government of the Russian Federation and especially the Central Bank. Hence the antisocial policies of Gaidar, Chubais, Kudrin, Gref, Siluanov, Nabiullina, Medvedev, etc. Judging by the current situation, all the recommendations of the West were aimed at strangling the industrial, technological, scientific and educational potential of Russia, turning the country into a semi-colonial appendage - “ pipe ”, an exporter of natural resources to the countries of the West and the East. Also, Russia has become a market for global "factories".

Thus, privatization, which the government regularly refuses to review, has led all Russian subsoil and enterprises to become Western property. The fact is that in the 90 years we entered the dollar system and its capitalization became a key element of any enterprise, and it is in dollars and it is made in the West. Western agencies can at any time lower the sovereign rating of Russia and all its enterprises. That is, the Russian economy lives within the framework of an external system, we have become part of the global world, which is controlled by the financial capital of the Old and New Worlds. Violation of Western rules, IMF and WTO guidelines, and sacredly performed by the Russian financial and economic authorities, will inevitably lead to punishment and heavy losses.

In 2006 — 2007 Russia paid off on IMF loans and it seemed that now it is possible to build an independent economic course. Fortunately, the economic situation was extremely favorable. In the 2000 "fat years" the budget was choked with money for the sale of raw materials. The Munich speech of V.V. Putin (February 2007) gave hope for a departure from the Yeltsin policy and for the strengthening of independence, including economic. In 2008, the “2020 Strategy,” developed by the IMF and the HSE by order of the president, was approved. 12 years have passed. What are the results? They are sad. The TV shows a picture of Russia's foreign policy “power” in the Middle East, Africa and Europe. However, behind the front facade and fake splendor hides economic ruin, the terrifying poverty of the people, industrial, scientific, technological and social degradation. Actions and words in the foreign arena are not supported by internal content.

The course towards a great-power policy and the creation of the world's best armed forces is impossible without reliance on a powerful economy, an independent scientific and technological base, a healthy and prosperous society. Such duality leads Russia and the people to disaster.

What is the solution?


The liberal bloc believes that the main problem is the incompleteness of the “reforms”. Also a problem in the people, its “inefficiency”. So, recently Chubais called the majority of the population of the USSR (that is, Russia) “loafers and parasites.” True, I forgot that these "loafers" overwhelmed the most efficient economy of the West - the Third Reich, built the second economy of the world. And almost put the USA checkmate. That the United States was on the verge of collapse in the 80 years, and only “perestroika” and the surrender of the USSR to Gorbachev and his accomplices saved the States from a geopolitical catastrophe.

Liberals continue their mantras that the development of Russia should be based on foreign investment, a decrease in state regulation, a decrease in the state’s share in the economy, and further privatization of state assets (especially in the fuel and energy sector and communications, Russian Railways, Aeroflot, etc.) . It is also necessary to use widespread labor migration to make up for the replacement of the dying and rapidly aging indigenous population.

However, in fact, attracting foreign investment has led to a wide outflow of capital, offshore business and assets of statehood, to the accumulation of a huge mountain of money that are dead weight. In the context of the global crisis, we simply won’t see these riches; they are being brought to the West. The demographic situation is getting worse and worse. The Russian people - the core of Russian civilization and power, are rapidly dying. The population is becoming increasingly incapacitated even at a young age due to digital insanity, increased mental stress, which inevitably causes a rapid increase in chronic sores, the collapse of mass physical culture and the health care system. Migrant workers replenished the services market, but caused an increase in crime, created the ground for the development of radical “black” Islam and migration riots. There is also a gradual replacement of the indigenous peoples of Russia with more obedient and managed workers. This is against the backdrop of the oppression of the Russian language and culture, the decomposition of society and morality, the agony of science, education and art, which has been replaced by pop surrogate and decadence.

The formula for breaking this deadlock is simple. This is a refusal to follow the disastrous course that the West prescribed to us in the 90 years. The world politics of Russia should be a reflection of the domestic, as it was under Stalin. In today's Russia, domestic policy demonstrates the principle of the triumph of private capital and its dependence on international financial institutions, whose rating allows Russian business to be credited abroad. This has already led to the fact that Russians, as during the Napoleonic wars, began to be used as cannon fodder to achieve the goals of Washington, London, Paris, Ankara, etc. For this, the West allows Moscow to trade the country's natural resources.

Inside the country, it is necessary to abandon indulgence to big business, the interests of the people are higher than a handful of “responsible businessmen”, the priority of foreign investment, and the attraction of labor migrants. Refuse to follow the rules of the IMF and WTO, strengthen the role of the state in regulating the domestic and foreign markets, create and develop large state-owned companies, review privatization results, nationalize land, mineral resources, water and forests, develop a financial system under the tight control of the re-established State Bank, which should deal with the creation of conditions for the development of the country's economy, the wide use of domestic investments (tens of trillions of rubles have been accumulated, enormous resources are available in the area of ​​confiscation of corruption, Itel element). All this will quickly give positive shoots in the form of restoration and growth of the economy, the welfare of the people. A strong, popular (truly democratic) Russia will be able to successfully confront the West and balance the East.

Thus, the continuation of the liberal course is the death of Russia. Salvation in democracy, social justice. Return to the sources - truth, justice and conscience. When the spiritual is above the material, and the general is higher than the particular.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

294 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Grandfather 19 November 2019 06: 00 New
    • 27
    • 5
    +22
    Why the economy of Russia is not traveling
    and why does not the “time machine" work? - yes no, neither one nor the other.
    1. Ross xnumx 19 November 2019 06: 27 New
      • 33
      • 8
      +25
      I don’t know about the time machine, but the RV&A Day began with a social rock opera.
      Вчера:
      At the Levada Center: Russians' sympathy for Putin reached the 2011 mark of the year
      Today:
      Why the economy of Russia is not traveling
      And here she is - social rock opera:

      Industry is the blood of the economy. Why are enterprises being destroyed? So remember who the grave digger of capital .. True, the proletariat! Where to get it?
      There have not been in history and there will be no strikes of bank employees, insurrections of effective managers, pickets of municipal officials and hunger strikes of deputies of the State Duma and the Federation Council. The cynical and greedy national servants “lost the edge”, “shook the banks”, but did not change the essence of the management of the masses “according to concepts” ...
      ================================================== =====================
      Happy Rocket Forces and Artillery Day!
      1. vladimirZ 19 November 2019 08: 04 New
        • 32
        • 4
        +28
        The formula for breaking this deadlock is simple. This is a refusal to follow the disastrous course that the West prescribed to us back in the 90s. - from article

        That's right. That's only under the current liberal government, praying to the West, this is impossible.
        To change the course, a shift of many years of those in power is needed, but the elective mechanism for replacing power does not work. All attempts to power with calls for fair elections remain unanswered.
        Which exit? Nothing. Until the socio-political boil ripens, and the people massively take to the streets because of the inability to simply survive in increasingly worsening conditions.
        There are political forces ready to lead the protest process, and God forbid that these were not destructive forces, and that everything would go without a lot of blood and the collapse of the state.
        1. Per se. 19 November 2019 08: 27 New
          • 34
          • 3
          +31
          Quote: vladimirZ
          To change the course, a shift of many years of those in power is needed, but the elective mechanism for replacing power does not work.
          Unfortunately, it is thought that only war, or something close to a dashing test, will force the untenable power to leave. Being in capitalism they cannot solve serious problems, they will certainly screw up, scare. Actually, their suitcases have long been collected, all of their values ​​in the West. It is less likely that the “Praetorians,” the army itself, will change the social system without waiting for the country's disaster. One does not have to rely on the elections anymore, more and more this seems like a scam, the same as all lotteries in Russia have become.
          1. Theorists of Marxism-Leninism, for various reasons, as a rule, were far from spiritual issues. Although, when ,, roasted rooster pecked ,, then the main thing was remembered. And dedushka Lenin, getting into a “lonely” head, began to baptize the head, and comrade Stalin, standing at the mausoleum on November 7, 1941, urged all his compatriots to remember the Russian saints Alessandr Nevsky and Dmitry Donskoy.
            The spiritual component is DETERMINING in any significant issues of human existence. What is commonly called capitalism has its own spiritual foundation, its own spiritual basis, and it’s with the same principle. The main mistake of the novice researchers of this OPF is that they are OF HUMAN VALUES , with the filing of famous swindlers, is credited with ,, capitalism ,,. From here and about and with to and, present, and, correct, capitalism. No discussion needed. Need to know. Capitalism - these are the rules of operation of the state machine that allow you to provide
            all COMPLETE POWER ,, ordinary people. It's time to get to know them. Not all homo sapiens are PEOPLE. There are people, and there are, - “bad people.” And there is ,, ordinary nonhumans ,,. External haste should not mislead you. Two Absolute Categories - Good and Evil. Personal categories. The average MAN serves approximately 80% of the Good. ,, Bad man ,, - 40-45 percent,, ordinary nonhumans ,, - 5-10%. And there is no need to trick ... Not only Heaven knows the price of this or that homo sapiens. Any adult adequate person sooner or later begins to understand - who is in front of him.
            Nonhumans organized their dream, the State of Dreams, on the territory of Europe, controlled by Nazi Germany in the period 1939-1945. ,, Ideal ,, relations of nonhumans with people. Numbered, depersonalized in the second, only for meager food, shockly work on ,, first ,,. Creating including and high-tech products - jet planes, rockets ... The bodies of people whose ,, resource is exhausted, went to the production of soap, fertilizers, leather goods ... A dream, an effective owner,! And what kind of profit! Just yesterday in the USA was The Great Depression, and today they can already spend billions (!) on the development of the production of the B-29's .... And impose their will on the world.
            It was literally YESTERDAY, people! After Shakespeare, Dostoevsky, Tolstoy, Goethe, Schiller, Jack London ...
            Inhumans, do not have a nationality, and they do not care about state borders and the political system. This, if you like - ,, vocation ,,. Darkness called, he responded. They are strong and organized. Without the help of the Creator, they cannot be defeated. ,, To be, or not to be (MAN) - that is the question ,,. Man is the creation of God. And he should hold fast to the Creator. Then there will be help. Heaven did not leave Russia and will not leave (by the way, Gundyaev is not a Church, don’t, “stumble,” on this one.
            It is necessary to stop the nonhumans, perfectly settled in the Russian Empire? There was some Lenin, with comrades, and wherever, excuse me, they were squeezing, the then Russian-speaking sleek degenerates. Does he look like a Hero of people? Fat-assed, burry, red-headed .... But did the Lord give him longevity? ,, Moor has done his job .... ,,. Another outstanding Russian revolutionary is Dzhugashvili (!) ....
            One must be worthy of people. The author of the commentary must be worthy, you, the reader, must be worthy ... And Heaven DOES NOT SLOW. Evil, even having won at the operational level, will certainly LOSE at the strategic level. Here on such an optimistic note and we will finish.
            The article is sensible, bold, honest. What is typical for this author
        2. Chit 19 November 2019 10: 59 New
          • 34
          • 17
          +17
          Without a lot of blood and the collapse of the state, it may no longer work.
          And only the current government will be to blame for this.
          After all, elections (real, not fake) were invented in order to let off steam, to show the people that the Constitution is working. Elections are an evolutionary, gradual, and safe path for a country's development.
          But if a political clearing is carefully mowing its roots, if all real political rivals are removed, if only bearded lured political parties that people are already laughing at are afloat, then this is bad.
          This means that the people have only one way - the revolutionary one.
          A revolution is always a lot of blood, the collapse of the state, devastation ...
          1. sniperino 19 November 2019 23: 39 New
            • 1
            • 8
            -7
            Quote: Chit
            political clearing carefully coughs under the root
            Who else have the satraps mowed down? If Alexei, then this is a bereavement, but if Paul is irreplaceable, purely according to grandmothers, because Alexey has strangers, and Paul’s own, as he thought
          2. sniperino 20 November 2019 00: 02 New
            • 1
            • 11
            -10
            Quote: Chit
            the people have only one way - the revolutionary one. And revolution is always big blood
            Something topic has been actively awakening recently. How many people are you planning to put?
            1. NEOZ 21 November 2019 11: 55 New
              • 1
              • 2
              -1
              Quote: sniperino
              Something topic has been actively awakening recently. How many people are you planning to put?

              definitely! custom article!
              comments remind me of comments under articles on the echo of Moscow.
              cyber operation of divan troops?
              1. sniperino 22 November 2019 09: 10 New
                • 0
                • 1
                -1
                Quote: NEOZ
                comments remind me of comments under articles on Moscow echo
                Right The rhetoric of the Communist Party, if they do not talk about the USSR, is no different from the Party of People’s Freedom (PARNAS). It seems that the liberals are given the same training manual as the Communist Party, but in an abridged version. The Communist Party of the Russian Federation has two parts: 1) belching of blasphemy in the Russian Federation and 2) ascension of praise of the USSR, while the liberals have only the first. So they spit out the choir, you can’t figure out xy from xy.
            2. TokarevT 22 November 2019 07: 57 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Your suggestions?
              1. sniperino 22 November 2019 09: 21 New
                • 0
                • 1
                -1
                Quote: TokarevT
                Your suggestions?
                Soak in the toilet, definitely. Information terrorists ("depressants") line the way for shahids and other shaitans so that the actions of the latter have a greater effect.
                1. TokarevT 22 November 2019 09: 45 New
                  • 0
                  • 1
                  -1
                  It’s quite worthy, if, of course, I understand you correctly.
                  Previously, you did not seem to be prone to radical decisions.
                  As I understand it, you are a supporter of quiet, well-planned special operations, following the results of which you can continue to scale up other work in public space, no?
                  1. sniperino 22 November 2019 09: 57 New
                    • 1
                    • 1
                    0
                    Quote: TokarevT
                    Previously, you did not seem to be prone to radical decisions.
                    Soak in a good sense - in the information, so that they dry out for a long time. But for the most rabid, there is the Criminal Code.
                    1. sniperino 22 November 2019 10: 13 New
                      • 0
                      • 0
                      0
                      Quote: sniperino
                      Watering in a good way - in the information
                      Three times I lied (“made a mistake”) - a ban, “made a mistake” and further - deprivation of a cardboard title. Skulls also looked normal. Why pour floods of lies on everyone’s head. Swear words - worse than a lie?
        3. Victor N 19 November 2019 11: 25 New
          • 4
          • 25
          -21
          "Change of course" is a simple matter. But where to lay the new route? If it is unclear - go to a drift and collect offers. But where are they? Restore old businesses? And who needs their products now? The former captains did not know, there was no hope for them. And where are the new ones - oooo! Scared off ......
          1. New Year day 19 November 2019 11: 42 New
            • 36
            • 2
            +34
            Quote: Victor N
            Restore old businesses? And who needs their products now?

            Today I bought light bulbs for cars: China, Poland, Germany. Imagine how many bulbs the country needs! Question: can't we do it ourselves? The plant "Svetlana" (in the name could be mistaken) by the bulbs in Saransk why they ditched, could these bulbs do
            1. Van 16 19 November 2019 14: 45 New
              • 16
              • 0
              +16
              The Ufa Electric Lamp Plant "Svet" is the same fate.
            2. Tomich3 19 November 2019 16: 49 New
              • 14
              • 0
              +14
              Why are there bulbs, Chinese NAILS that bend in different directions from one hit.
            3. Victor N 20 November 2019 11: 00 New
              • 2
              • 12
              -10
              Who ditched? Maybe the one who failed to produce competitive products - the production team?
              1. Fan-fan 20 November 2019 17: 00 New
                • 6
                • 6
                0
                He blamed the collective. Does the collective decide what to produce and how to produce. You are mistaken, managers decide this.
                1. Victor N 20 November 2019 17: 15 New
                  • 1
                  • 5
                  -4
                  Managers are only part of the team. All together the goods were produced. In such cases, no one is involved, no matter how you hide.
                  1. Fan-fan 20 November 2019 17: 20 New
                    • 3
                    • 4
                    -1
                    But it is the managers who decide what to produce and how to produce, the workers have no relation to planning. And if at the top they decided to produce non-competitive products, then the workers are not to blame.
                  2. New Year day 21 November 2019 12: 17 New
                    • 3
                    • 2
                    +1
                    Quote: Victor N
                    Managers are only part of the team. All together the goods were produced. In such cases, no one is involved, no matter how you hide.

                    So Medvedev is a manager, and Oreshkin is the result where?
              2. Viktor77 24 November 2019 11: 08 New
                • 3
                • 0
                +3
                Who ditched? Maybe the one who failed to produce competitive products - the production team?

                But these are always the team to blame!
                You know, I work in a large Russian company (do not think, not a fuel and energy complex) as one of the "cogs".
                I can’t say that people are happy with everything, where the employer sometimes is greedy, but .... about the collapse, “the fish rots from the head”, in order to develop the economy, you need not only desire but also competent people in leadership.
                some parallels beg:
                Our company, for example, sets certain goals, plans, indicators, and is systematically fulfilled. Managers at different levels are RESPONSIBLE for implementation, and with them simple employees. I have not completed the task, everything, you are no longer working, the conversation is short ...
                Why in the government sit mediocrity for decades? Engaged only in verbiage.
                And no responsibility ...
                Only ordinary people are always to blame.
            4. NEOZ 21 November 2019 12: 01 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Quote: Silvestr
              could do these bulbs

              maybe these bulbs are not competitive?
              maybe people who should produce these bulbs, now engaged in the production of more advanced products?
              1. New Year day 21 November 2019 12: 20 New
                • 2
                • 1
                +1
                Quote: NEOZ
                maybe these bulbs are not competitive?

                Tagoda had to do automobiles. The demand is huge
        4. Sergey1987 19 November 2019 13: 19 New
          • 8
          • 25
          -17
          Quote: vladimirZ
          That's only under the current liberal government

          ))))) Where did you find the liberal power? You read the meaning of the word liberalism.
          Quote: vladimirZ
          but the elected mechanism of replacing power does not work. All attempts to power with calls for fair elections remain unanswered.

          What are you? Is that what you decided?
          Quote: vladimirZ
          due to the inability to simply survive in increasingly deteriorating conditions.

          Only your brain is getting worse.
          1. Fan-fan 20 November 2019 17: 01 New
            • 4
            • 5
            -1
            Sergei is completely lost or the coast has beguiled.
            1. Sergey1987 21 November 2019 14: 17 New
              • 2
              • 2
              0
              Quote: Fan-Fan
              Sergei is completely lost or the coast has beguiled.

              Oh wow, what a slang.)))) I didn’t get lost, I’ve been at VO since 2011, it’s only a pity that people like you have gathered here only to learn the alphabet and engage in delusional criticism, but not wanting to read anything else.
          2. NEOZ 21 November 2019 12: 02 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: Sergey1987
            Only your brain is getting worse.

            totally agree with you!
          3. TokarevT 22 November 2019 08: 01 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Ser gay, are you insulting the people again? Few with you a bit? Are you holding your broomstick again without proper attention? For a long time did not run to the mother to complain?
            1. Sergey1987 22 November 2019 13: 19 New
              • 0
              • 1
              -1
              Quote: TokarevT
              Ser gay, are you insulting the people again?

              No, I state a fact.
              Quote: TokarevT
              Few with you a bit?

              That's it, that you can only talk and insult to nothing. For this, the administration deleted your comments in the last communication.
              Quote: TokarevT
              For a long time did not run to the mother to complain?

              )))) A very long time, at the wrong age. And you on the topic of the article, can you write something, or as usual, there wasn’t anything to think about for a couple of lines?
              1. TokarevT 22 November 2019 14: 13 New
                • 0
                • 2
                -2
                Dash and chat different things. Do you know why you are pushing into a fool?
                With birds, especially loose-knit people, people do not keep an explanation.
                I rub questions with others on the topic of the article, and neither they, nor I, stoop to the foolishness shown by you.
                But, their status is different ......
        5. Alexey LK 28 November 2019 13: 01 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: vladimirZ
          so that these were not destructive forces, and everything went without a lot of blood

          This does not happen, alas. Especially when they really want to help from outside ...
          Quote: vladimirZ
          That's right.

          There is little correct in the article, because the author greatly simplified the picture, right up to the loss of many meanings.
      2. APES 19 November 2019 09: 04 New
        • 19
        • 2
        +17
        Obviously, the government is interested in developing the country's economy in the interests of the people.

        I haven’t laughed like that for a long time .....
        1. Fan-fan 20 November 2019 17: 12 New
          • 5
          • 5
          0
          According to some experts, the Russian economy has adapted to the level of professionalism and competence of the prime minister and the Russian government.
          And stop laughing at Medvedev! The boy is not to blame for the fact that Putin sees him as the prime minister ...
        2. Revival 21 November 2019 01: 07 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          This is awesome!
          This is obvious, so obvious!
          ))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
      3. Boris55 19 November 2019 09: 16 New
        • 5
        • 18
        -13
        Quote: ROSS 42
        Вчера:
        At the Levada Center: Russians' sympathy for Putin reached the 2011 mark of the year
        Today:
        Why the economy of Russia is not traveling

        Because one is square and the other is green. To whom they gave money, he goes.


        The country's budget is Medvedev, appointed to his post with the permission of his party members in the Duma (EP), of which he is the chairman of the party. The Duma (EP) after three readings approves the decision of its leader.
        1. Svarog 19 November 2019 09: 27 New
          • 50
          • 5
          +45
          Quote: Boris55
          The country's budget is Medvedev, appointed to his post with the permission of his party members

          Boris enough already, about bad Medvedev and clever Putin .. This is one team, one liberal team .. where Medvedev is a lightning rod .. and Putin makes the final decisions ..
          1. Boris55 19 November 2019 09: 50 New
            • 6
            • 40
            -34
            Quote: Svarog
            This is one team, one liberal team.

            Putin represents the clan of the security forces. Medvedev - the bourgeois clan.
            Sometimes their interests coincide.



            What happened to Libya when Medvedev was president?
            It was Medvedev who banned the unloading of our ships, which are on a raid in Libya, with air defense systems, which ensured that the West could bomb Libya with impunity and left workers who produced this equipment without coexistence, and the plant, which took credit for its production, almost went bankrupt. ..
            What happened to Syria when President Putin - everyone knows.
            Can't you see the difference?
            1. Svarog 19 November 2019 09: 58 New
              • 23
              • 5
              +18
              Quote: Boris55
              Can't you see the difference?

              No, I don’t see, Libya was sacrificed, for political reasons, well, economic ..
              Quote: Boris55
              What happened to Syria when President Putin - everyone knows.

              And with Georgia, when was Medvedev? Following your logic, he should not have taken decisive action ..
              1. Boris55 19 November 2019 09: 59 New
                • 3
                • 11
                -8
                Quote: Svarog
                Well, and economic ..

                Economic - is it when our defense industry is destroyed?

                Quote: Svarog
                Following your logic, he should not have taken decisive action ..

                He did not undertake.
                1. Boris55 19 November 2019 10: 30 New
                  • 5
                  • 22
                  -17
                  Quote: Boris55
                  He did not undertake.

                  More:
                  The General Staff moved to a new building (confusion, mess).
                  Putin abroad (at the Beijing Olympics).
                  They could not find Medvedev. It was because of Medvedev that there was a delay in the response. Half the victims of that war are on his hands ...
                  Only thanks to the security forces (Putin) did Saakashvili chew his tie.
                  1. NKT
                    NKT 19 November 2019 18: 57 New
                    • 11
                    • 0
                    +11
                    You want to say that when the General Staff moved from building to building, control of the troops was lost?
                  2. 2 Level Advisor 19 November 2019 19: 12 New
                    • 16
                    • 0
                    +16
                    Boris, are you, as always, about the Constitution and Medvedev, the main villain preventing the President from reaching Stalin’s level ... The General Staff’s relocation interfered, are you serious? But on the phone, skype and government communications with Putin and Medvedev can not be contacted? or is it necessary to make a decision in the Russian Federation?
                2. nils 19 November 2019 11: 28 New
                  • 38
                  • 3
                  +35
                  Russians are divided into two categories: those who believe that Russia lives thanks to Putin, and those who believe that - contrary.

                  On our spaceship, we discovered an unplanned hole made by a drill. Apparently they tried to hang a portrait of Vladimir Vladimirovich, but something went wrong.

                  “Kum, what would you call a president going to a second term?”
                  - The recidivist.

                  Putin’s nomination for the next term in 2024 will be held under the slogan: "Please treat this with understanding."

                  To prevent Putin from being called a working pensioner, the retirement age in Russia must be raised to 70 years.

                  The hereditary committee of the Russian Federation .........

                  - So you say that our people are uncultured. Meanwhile, more and more people are waiting, when finally they will show "Swan Lake" on all channels. People missed the classics.
                  1. Svarog 19 November 2019 11: 45 New
                    • 29
                    • 6
                    +23
                    Quote: nils
                    - So you say that our people are uncultured. Meanwhile, more and more people are waiting, when finally they will show "Swan Lake" on all channels. People missed the classics.

                    Indeed, and now the cooperative "lake" has occupied all the key channels of Russian life .. (politics, economics, social sphere, television)
                    Your interesting comment turned out good hi
              2. businessv 19 November 2019 11: 00 New
                • 20
                • 1
                +19
                Quote: Svarog
                And with Georgia, when was Medvedev? Following your logic, he should not have taken decisive action ..

                And what, in your opinion, to protect your peacekeeping contingent - decisive action ?! Drop it, colleague! Decisive actions are to enter Tbilisi, arrest the wonder-president, and again bring Georgia into its circle of interests. Then Ukraine would not be what it is today. hi
            2. New Year day 19 November 2019 11: 47 New
              • 19
              • 3
              +16
              Quote: Boris55
              Can't you see the difference?


              There is no difference, since it is not about Putin or Medvedev: if it had not been for Syria, then Gazprom and Transneft would have sucked their paws. Assad with his unwillingness to let someone else’s pipe - saving the budget of the Russian Federation
              1. Boris55 19 November 2019 12: 07 New
                • 4
                • 16
                -12
                Quote: Silvestr
                There is no difference, since it is not Putin or Medvedev

                Sarkozy did not run after Medvedev, but after Putin, persuading him not to take Tbilisi. They don’t persuade Medvedev’s west - he orders him, but he obeys everything ...

                What dialogue happened between Putin and Sarkozy (version of the Nouvel Observateur)
                "Putin: I will hang this Saakashvili for eggs
                Sarkozy: Will you hang?
                Putin: Why not. The Americans hanged Saddam Hussein. "
                1. New Year day 19 November 2019 14: 45 New
                  • 23
                  • 2
                  +21
                  Quote: Boris55
                  Sarkozy did not run after Medvedev, but after Putin, persuading him not to take Tbilisi. They don’t persuade Medvedev’s west - he orders him, but he obeys everything ...

                  Why do I need about the West! Why are 6 years of income in the country falling?
              2. NEOZ 21 November 2019 12: 09 New
                • 2
                • 1
                +1
                Quote: Silvestr
                saving the budget of the Russian Federation

                why should they save the budget if they can go live in England? like a humpback, for example.
            3. spirit 19 November 2019 13: 05 New
              • 23
              • 2
              +21
              These siloviki? laughing


              Here he is the personnel officer of the year with GDP)
            4. sniperino 20 November 2019 00: 27 New
              • 1
              • 8
              -7
              Quote: Boris55
              It was Medvedev who banned the unloading of our ships standing on the roads in Libya, with air defense systems, which ensured the West with impunity to bomb Libya
              And why didn’t he want to help Georgia in 2008, the West would have been pleased, and if he had quickly removed the peacekeepers, they would have rarely recalled here. Those who write that it is necessary to leave Syria would write about Ossetia, "but what did we do there."
            5. pin_code 20 November 2019 07: 53 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              conclusion. lead and green. or vice versa. minus gentlemen comrades.
            6. Revival 21 November 2019 01: 10 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Do not see!
              What happened after that with Medvedev, after such a move !?
              It'S Nothing!
              So we don’t see the difference!
              And, I remembered, he wants, but can’t ....
          2. nils 19 November 2019 11: 41 New
            • 27
            • 2
            +25
            Quote: Svarog
            well enough already, about bad Medvedev and clever Putin .. This is one team, one liberal team ..


            - But I consider the actions of the president and the government absolutely logical, because the Russians have been kneeling for how many years. It is not surprising that the head raised the bar for retirement age.
            - It would be better if they raised the standard of living.

            At a government meeting:
            - Our situation in Russia is good, but not hopeless.

            - You know, Vladimir Vladimirovich, it seems that Dmitry Anatolyevich is still fond of Zionism!
            - Ay, quit! Now in the government, many are addicted.

            The State Duma and the government are organizations with low social responsibility.

            If you put your ear to the House of the Government of the Russian Federation, you can hear how rustling money is in it.

            Public patriotism in Russia is the last attempt of the authorities to protect the stolen goods with the hands of the robbed people.

            - Why are tattoos so popularized?
            - A good owner has always branded cattle!
            1. pin_code 20 November 2019 07: 56 New
              • 5
              • 0
              +5
              with low social responsibility. I applaud you, dear.
            2. NEOZ 21 November 2019 12: 16 New
              • 1
              • 1
              0
              Quote: nils
              It would be better if they raised the standard of living.

              since 2000, the bar has skyrocketed!
              Quote: nils
              organizations with low social responsibility.

              social protection in the Russian Federation at a global level, above only the Western countries.
              Quote: nils
              Public patriotism in Russia is the last attempt of the authorities to protect the stolen goods with the hands of the robbed people.

              exactly the same patriotism in the USA and China, why do they need it?
              What are the successful countries in which the government is poor?
    2. Uncle lee 19 November 2019 06: 34 New
      • 31
      • 9
      +22
      Explanatory, analytical article .... Everything is laid out on the shelves. It remains to begin execution .... It is a pity that under the current rulers this is impossible!
      PS Strong Samsonov liberals attached!
      1. atalef 19 November 2019 08: 12 New
        • 17
        • 23
        -6
        Quote: Uncle Lee
        Explanatory, analytical article .... Everything is laid out on the shelves.

        after this paragraph, you can not read
        True, I forgot that these "loafers" overwhelmed the most efficient economy of the West - the Third Reich, built the second economy of the world. And almost put the USA checkmate. That the United States was on the verge of collapse in the 80 years, and only “perestroika” and the surrender of the USSR to Gorbachev and his accomplices saved the States from a geopolitical catastrophe.

        no analytics, populism and distortion of facts.
        1. Sergey1987 19 November 2019 13: 24 New
          • 5
          • 18
          -13
          Quote: atalef
          no analytics, populism and distortion of facts.

          Exactly, only these clowns beyond Samson’s as a mantra can only repeat the word liberals and are not even able to read what liberalism is and what conservatism is.
          1. Fan-fan 20 November 2019 17: 31 New
            • 5
            • 5
            0
            Who is the clown still need to figure out. In the meantime, read:

            “Russia's economy will remain market-oriented and liberal with a combined movement of capital,” Vladimir Putin said at the investment forum in Moscow.

            Russian President Vladimir Putin in an interview with Russian and foreign journalists in Krasnaya Polyana confirmed that he is "a true liberal and holds liberal views."
            https://www.rbc.ru/politics/19/01/2014/570416189a794761c0ce5bf4
            1. Sergey1987 21 November 2019 14: 55 New
              • 2
              • 2
              0
              Quote: Fan-Fan
              Who is the clown yet to figure out

              )))) Personally, for me it’s just understandable.
              Quote: Fan-Fan
              In the meantime, read:

              As usual, they are only able to quote a couple of statements by the president, and you cannot even think with your head that he said what investors wanted to hear, but this does not mean that the Russian economy is liberal. I am already silent about what the president recently told Western reporters that the liberal idea has outlived itself.
              But all is not important to you. You don’t need to think a head, he said and said, so it is. And why read what a liberal economy is. Why think about the fact that in a liberal economy there can be no state corporations, that a free market is a market free from any outside interference (including government regulation). It is not necessary to think that, as such, a market economy has long been gone or where there are few, and almost all have a mixed economy.
              And even more so, you don’t have to think and read what conservatism and conservatism in the economy are like you. But you try, albeit a lot of letters.
              Conservatives in domestic politics emphasize the value of the existing state and public order and reject radical reforms that they regard as extremism. In foreign policy, conservatives rely on strengthening security, allow the use of military force, try to support traditional allies, and uphold protectionism in foreign economic relations.
              Does it remind you of anything? Maybe finally think about it? Let’s clarify.
              To achieve the general goals of economic policy, protectionism uses a combination of restrictive measures, for example:
              administrative barriers: bureaucratic bans, approvals, customs procedures;
              import quotas and trade embargoes;
              subsidies for manufacturers involved in the export of goods and services: preferential lending, compensation for a number of expenses, preferential taxation;
              the provision of grants and other forms of encouraging exporters;
              supporting a start-up industry or product at an early stage in the product’s life cycle, gaining respite during the period of industry modernization
              national security: preservation of sectors related to national defense (MIC);
              government spending supporting local producers and government procurement only from domestic producers;

              Again, doesn’t it remind one state or all the same you will begin to reflect?
        2. NEOZ 21 November 2019 12: 17 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: atalef
          no analytics, populism and distortion of facts.

          definitely!
      2. Stas157 19 November 2019 09: 52 New
        • 17
        • 4
        +13
        I liked the article very much. Reading it was like the author describes my thoughts. Thanks to the author.
      3. Doctor 19 November 2019 10: 05 New
        • 18
        • 4
        +14
        Explanatory, analytical article.


        Government debt, both state and corporate, is minimal,


        This is according to the TV.
        And according to official data from the Central Bank, the picture is slightly different.

        As of January 1, 2019, Russia's total external debt amounted to $ 453,749 billion.

        Including:
        government bodies $ 44,084 billion.

        corporate debt of domestic companies, 312,301 billion dollars.

        In addition, there is an internal debt that is traditionally not taken into account in Russia (because if something happens, you can not give it back).
        As of January 1, 2020, it should be no more than 176,889 billion US dollars.

        Total we have:
        453,749 + 176,889 =
        630,638 billion US dollars

        At the same time, the revenue side of the budget for 2019
        304,179 billion US dollars,

        So there is nothing to gloat over the US public debt, in order for us to repay our public debt, we need to work 2,2 years (this is if you do not eat anything).
        1. Stas157 19 November 2019 11: 27 New
          • 16
          • 3
          +13
          Quote: Arzt
          corporate debt of domestic companies, 312,301 billion dollars.

          I just don’t understand why the debt of firms and companies, many of which are private, is considered to be the total debt of Russia. Is Russia supposed to pay for firms?
          This is not a complaint to you, it's just a question. And I put you a plus.
          1. Doctor 19 November 2019 12: 56 New
            • 18
            • 3
            +15
            I just don’t understand why the debt of firms and companies, many of which are private, is considered to be the total debt of Russia. Is Russia supposed to pay for firms?


            So, capitalism is with us now, all of us are both private traders and statesmen. Our “National Treasure” is Gazprom, all in debt, total debt more than market capitalization, i.e. owes more than it costs. If foreign creditors suddenly and immediately demand a return of debts, they will have to pay with assets. Through the debts of the country and turn into colonies. And people are slaves.
            1. Sergey1987 21 November 2019 15: 06 New
              • 2
              • 2
              0
              Quote: Arzt
              total debt more than market capitalization

              I see you not only like to carry nonsense, but also to lie.
              Gazprom capitalization of 6 trillion. rubles, and $ 2,6.
              Quote: Arzt
              If foreign creditors suddenly and instantly demand a repayment of debts

              Suddenly, a meteorite may fall, and not all at the same time in violation of contracts demand unreasonable debt.
              Quote: Arzt
              will have to pay with assets

              What are you? And we directly took and gave assets and foreign companies their percentage of Gazprom, too.
              1. Doctor 21 November 2019 19: 56 New
                • 1
                • 1
                0
                I see you not only like to carry nonsense, but also to lie.
                Gazprom capitalization of 6 trillion. rubles, and $ 2,6.


                Yes, you’re right, for some reason Gazprom’s capitalization has jumped for some reason. Twice right away.
                I am not a financial analyst, I do not specifically monitor the situation, at the beginning of the year I listened to RBC, we discussed the situation with an increase in debt above capitalization.

                According to Gazprom's annual report, debt amounted to 3 billion rubles.

                https://www.gazprom.ru/f/posts/01/851439/gazprom-annual-report-2018-ru.pdf
                (138 page)

                And the capitalization for 2018 was 3 billion rubles.
                For example from here.

                https://smart-lab.ru/q/GAZP/f/y/MSFO/market_cap/

                So according to the data for 2018, I did not lie.

                But in general, here, for example, an article on the basis of the scandalous affair with Alex Feck (whose report was lost tightly on the Internet), showing the situation in Gazprom quite objectively.

                https://argumenti.ru/society/2018/06/577038

                And it’s not a matter of tanning beds for horses, but the fact that, according to analysts, Turkish Stream "will not reach breakeven for almost 50 years, and Nord Stream 2, when using capacity, will not pay off by 60% within 20 years, and the costs of the Power of Siberia will never pay off, even according to Gazprom’s own calculations ..
                1. Sergey1987 22 November 2019 16: 24 New
                  • 1
                  • 2
                  -1
                  Quote: Arzt
                  But in general, here, for example, an article on the basis of the scandalous affair with Alex Feck (whose report was lost tightly on the Internet), showing the situation in Gazprom quite objectively.

                  https://argumenti.ru/society/2018/06/577038

                  You seem to be a competent person and call the report of Faek objective? In the link below, the author actually takes his report. I started reading, but after the first moments I didn’t even want to read it. Lies and illiterate analysis. I have no desire not to read the time of every pseudo analyst’s letter. We can only begin to make out.
                  It is planned to spend more than $ 2 billion on the creation of a new export infrastructure (Nord Stream-75, Turkish Stream, and Power of Siberia).
                  Lies. The total value of 34 billion dollars, not 75.
                  At the same time, recently in the analytical reports of the largest banks, and then in the media, there is information that investments in projects carried out by Gazprom are overstated, as a result of which the projects cease to be profitable
                  Moreover, the author does not name the banks and does not provide links to reports. Why do you think so?
                  There are really many questions for Gazprom management. Why, for example, to export gas to China, the company decided to build the “Power of Siberia” for $ 55 billion, instead of investing in a pipe construction project in the Altai Republic, which would cost about five times cheaper?
                  1. The power of Siberia costs a little more than 17 billion dollars, and not 55.
                  2. The author at least looked at the map where the Chayandinskoye field is located. With the naked eye you can see that the distances are almost the same. Is he a design engineer or chief engineer of Stroytransgaz? How did he such a wise guy decide that at the same distance through the Altai Mountains the pipeline would be 5 times cheaper? Complete nonsense.
                  3. If this pseudo-analyst would have thought with his head, he realized that the PRC is needed in the east of the country where the majority of the population lives and almost all industry is located, and not in the west where there is only one small Urumqi by Chinese standards.
                  4. And if he had even taken an interest in something, he would have been aware of why they were pulling east. Partially, the pipeline will run inside the integrated corridor along with the second part of the East Siberia-Pacific Ocean oil pipeline. Together, these pipelines will fill the projected liquefied natural gas station, which will produce LNG for export to Japan and supply raw materials for the projected petrochemical complex in the Primorsky Territory.
                  Why is the cost of building Nord Stream 2 (22 billion euros) three times higher than investments in Nord Stream 1 (7 billion euros). What can this be connected with if a new pipeline is laid parallel to the old?
                  Probably connected either with the lack of brains of the author, or with the lack of an objective assessment.
                  1. The cost of Nord Stream-2 is 10 billion dollars, not 22.
                  2. The author would have thought that probably in 10 years the cost of work and materials probably increased.
                  3. The founder of Nord Stream 2 AG is Gazprom. The project is financed by European companies Engie, OMV, Shell, Uniper and Wintershall. According to the author, do European corporations sit who throw money for an unprofitable project?
                  Why is the construction of the Turkish Stream more expensive than the construction of a comparable Blue Stream ($ 3 billion) by more than five times.
                  And here again, the lack of logic. An elementary desire to fool everything from the author.
                  1. These projects are completely incompatible.
                  2. The difference in their construction is almost 20 years old !!!! Again, an increase in the cost of work and materials over 20 years.
                  3. The Turkish stream almost all goes along the bottom of the Black Sea, the Blue Stream is only 400 km.
                  4. The cost of the Turkish stream is 7 billion, and the Blue 3,2. So about what five times the author lies?

                  In general, it makes no sense to read further the tales of this scribbler. Accordingly, the figures taken from the payback ceiling do not see any reason to discuss.
                  As for the long payback periods for Gazprom transit projects, this is a characteristic feature of strategic government programs around the world, since no private company considers projects with a payback period of more than 10 years. Say, in the global Chinese project “One belt - one road”, which involves the creation of land and sea transport routes around the globe, nothing is said about payback.
              2. Doctor 21 November 2019 20: 10 New
                • 1
                • 1
                0
                Suddenly, a meteorite may fall, and not all at the same time in violation of contracts demand unreasonable debt.


                Well, I agree, though not a demand for debts, but simply a withdrawal of funds from foreign investors.

                In 2007, Gazprom's capitalization exceeded $ 360 billion and it was one of the three world leaders in this indicator. Miller said that in 8 years, Gazprom would cost a trillion dollars. And what is the result?
                Now the capitalization is 53 billion, in 10 years it has fallen by 7 times.

                And the company that makes the world's best smartphones yes, a trillion.
                One Apple costs 20 Gazprom.

                This is how foreign investors believe in our "National Treasure" and our "managers".
                1. Sergey1987 22 November 2019 18: 09 New
                  • 1
                  • 2
                  -1
                  Quote: Arzt
                  but simply withdrawing funds from foreign investors.

                  You probably don’t understand what investments and their types are.
                  Let's take the same Gazprom. We are talking about corporate debt. A controlling stake in Gazprom is held by the state. As the holder of a controlling stake, the state decides where to direct the net profit of the corporation and how much to give dividends to shareholders. So no investor can withdraw funds from Gazprom as it does not have control over the corporation’s current account. All he can do is get dividends or sell his shares.
                  Quote: Arzt
                  Gazprom capitalization exceeded $ 2007 billion in 360

                  Yes, and then there was an economic crisis, and after a while hydrocarbons became cheaper.
                  Quote: Arzt
                  Now the capitalization of 53 billion

                  Already 94. And the main indicator of any company is its net profit.
                  Quote: Arzt
                  And the company that makes the world's best smartphones yes, a trillion.

                  You are fixated on capitalization. High market value is good, but it’s a pretty arbitrary indicator. The most important thing is different. Why does Huawei or CNPC have a small capitalization compared to Apple, but no one is tearing their hair out of the PRC from it? Why is ExxonMobil 3 times smaller than Apple has capitalization, but the board does not want to shoot the head of the board? But we only hear crying about how bad everything is. The company has a very good net profit, but what difference does it make? The main thing is to criticize.
                  Quote: Arzt
                  This is how foreign investors believe in our "National Treasure" and our "managers".

                  If someone had allowed them, they would have bought it with great pleasure and for much more money than the capitalization of Gazprom.
          2. spirit 19 November 2019 13: 17 New
            • 15
            • 2
            +13
            So the Russian economy is 90% state-owned or quasi-state-owned companies. Private large and medium-sized businesses are more likely dead than alive. Proof of this The St. Petersburg Economic Forum, which has already become just a show, has no big private business there. Some Sberbanks and Rosneft are sitting hi
            1. Private89 20 November 2019 20: 33 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              And thank you, gentlemen, for the capitalists, for us all the enterprises in the monopoly are already bored, it remains to come and socialize these enterprises and put them at the service of the people.
              1. Sergey1987 21 November 2019 15: 10 New
                • 2
                • 2
                0
                Quote: Private 89
                left to come and socialize

                ))) I wonder what that means?
                1. Private89 21 November 2019 16: 21 New
                  • 0
                  • 1
                  -1
                  Public ownership of the means of production. What is it possible to google, read.
                  1. Sergey1987 22 November 2019 09: 40 New
                    • 1
                    • 2
                    -1
                    Quote: Private 89
                    Public ownership of the means of production. What is it possible to google, read.

                    How do you imagine an oil producing or metallurgical corporation in public ownership? This is not real.
                    1. Private89 24 November 2019 18: 04 New
                      • 0
                      • 1
                      -1
                      Why?
                      1. Sergey1987 26 November 2019 14: 55 New
                        • 1
                        • 1
                        0
                        Quote: Private 89
                        Why?

                        And how do you imagine this? Public property - property owned, owned and used by a company acting as a collective entity. And how will this society, for example, decide who to appoint to the post of director of a metallurgical plant? And there are thousands of factories across the country, how to decide whom to appoint? By referendum?)))) There are hundreds of posts. For example, you live in Volgograd, and the plant in Yekaterinburg, how do you know who is best suited to a particular position in a city 1000 km from you? This is just utopia.
            2. Sergey1987 21 November 2019 15: 08 New
              • 3
              • 2
              +1
              Quote: spirit
              Private large and medium business is rather dead than alive

              Is big business dead? Severstal, Mechel, Norilsk Nickel, Lukoil, Rusal, Surgutneftegas, Yandex, TMK, Novatek?
        2. Disant 19 November 2019 12: 33 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          can link to
          And according to the official data of the Central Bank, the picture is a little different.
          ?

          I see there only data for 2012-2014.
          there have been no new data for five years.
          and on top of the postscript is an analytical presentation.
          here is the Ministry of Finance:
          Government domestic debt of the Russian Federation, expressed in government securities

          (million rubles)

          November 1, 2019



          9 284 149,602



          The volume of state domestic debt of the Russian Federation



          thousand rubles

          As of 01.11.2019



          State domestic debt of the Russian Federation, total 10 678 064 755,7

          including:

          State guarantees of the Russian Federation in the currency of the Russian Federation 1 393 915 017,2
          1. sniperino 20 November 2019 11: 04 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: Disant
            can link to
            Tables would be better to take a screenshot and upload an image rather than text
        3. Sergey1987 19 November 2019 13: 37 New
          • 2
          • 7
          -5
          Quote: Arzt
          corporate debt of domestic companies, 312,301 billion dollars.

          And corporate debt to public debt?
          1. Doctor 19 November 2019 14: 52 New
            • 8
            • 3
            +5
            And corporate debt to public debt?

            Total 453, including corporate 312. They also do not like to show it, like this is not the state should, but private firms. But in the States, everyone thinks.
            1. Sergey1987 19 November 2019 15: 03 New
              • 4
              • 11
              -7
              Quote: Arzt
              They also do not like to show him, like this is not a state should, but private firms. But in the States, everyone thinks.

              Nothing in the states count. Flies separately cutlets separately. The state debt has nothing to do with corporate debt; the state pays nothing for it.
        4. Disant 19 November 2019 13: 50 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2

          The total external debt of Russia on January 1, 2019 amounted to $ 453,749 billion.

          https://cbr.ru/statistics/macro_itm/svs/ 454,680. и он за 2019 год вырос на 25 миллиардов долларов.!
          yeah, there is something to discuss
        5. sniperino 20 November 2019 00: 49 New
          • 1
          • 3
          -2
          Quote: Arzt
          Total we have:
          But an intelligent accountant could have come out of you! I used to see such complex formulas only in MMM advertising. They didn’t consider how many years the United States needed to settle accounts with creditors, if nothing was eaten?
          1. Doctor 20 November 2019 07: 52 New
            • 3
            • 3
            0
            They didn’t consider how many years the United States needed to pay its creditors, if you didn’t eat anything?


            A lot of. Until the printing press breaks.
            I didn’t write about our debts in order to shake the dirty laundry, but so that those who believe in telebikes are not surprised when our leaders come up with some new tax to save Rosneft.
            1. Sergey1987 21 November 2019 15: 13 New
              • 1
              • 2
              -1
              Quote: Arzt
              I didn’t write about our debts

              You wrote nonsense. Government debt is the amount of government debt to external and internal creditors. The public debt of Russia does not include debts of people and companies.
              Quote: Arzt
              when our leaders come up with some new tax to save Rosneft.

              To save the company with a net profit of $ 10 billion?)))) But do not tell me what tax has already been introduced and to save which company?
              1. Doctor 21 November 2019 20: 24 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                The public debt of Russia does not include debts of people and companies.


                You are right, they are not formally related. But in reality they will be saved, because, as you correctly noted above:
                What are you? And we directly took and gave assets and foreign companies their percentage of Gazprom, too.


                And do not tell me what tax has already been introduced and to save which company?


                And give them money from the capsules into which they come from our taxes, including, as in 2008.
                https://www.gazeta.ru/column/mikhailov/3449529.shtml?updated
                1. Golovan Jack 21 November 2019 20: 55 New
                  • 4
                  • 4
                  0
                  Quote: Arzt
                  https://www.gazeta.ru/column/mikhailov/3449529.shtml?updated

                  Sorry, but it seems that you only read the title from the article you are linking to. Well, maybe this is it:

                  The state came to the aid of the rich, nationalized their losses, leaving them profits. So it was all over the world. And in Russia too

                  A familiar mantra, our press loves her very much. Raises Circulations wink

                  If you read more closely, it becomes clear that no gratuitous help. More and more buying stocks, but loans ...

                  Quote: Arzt
                  give them money from the capsules into which they come from our taxes with you, including

                  "Our taxes" there is a minuscule. In the bulk - the budget is filled with taxes from those organizations that save. Still just ... buddy yes
                2. Sergey1987 22 November 2019 18: 18 New
                  • 1
                  • 2
                  -1
                  Quote: Arzt
                  But in reality they will be saved, because, as you correctly noted above:
                  What are you? And we directly took and gave assets and foreign companies their percentage of Gazprom, too.

                  Do you even understand what kind of paradox you are writing?
                  1. No one will give away assets on account of debts. Moreover, state-owned companies with high net profit.
                  2. There is no need to save them either, because no one will demand debt just like that today. There is a contract. According to it, the company pays a loan. While she pays and does not violate the contract, everything is fine, but if someone wanted to get all the borrowed money at one time and then it's his personal problems.
                  Quote: Arzt
                  And give them money from the capsules into which they come from our taxes

                  )))))))))))) Smiled so smiled. Read comrade in general due to what the Gold and foreign exchange reserve or the National Status Fund are formed. I will probably surprise you, but even a budget is not formed for our taxes. The main fillers of the budget are customs duties, corporate tax and mineral extraction tax.
      4. businessv 19 November 2019 11: 01 New
        • 9
        • 1
        +8
        Quote: Uncle Lee
        Strong Samsonov liberals attached!

        I agree with everything, colleague! Great article and the conclusions are correct! drinks
        1. Fan-fan 20 November 2019 17: 36 New
          • 3
          • 4
          -1
          And I read the article and realized that there are still not stupid people in Russia who are worried about Russia. But why aren't people with such qualities in the country's leadership?
      5. Sergey1987 19 November 2019 13: 22 New
        • 6
        • 16
        -10
        Quote: Uncle Lee
        Explanatory, analytical article

        Where did you see analytics there and in what? Samsonov once again wrote an empty article.
        Quote: Uncle Lee
        Strong Samsonov liberals attached!

        Yes, finally read the clowns, what is liberalism and especially liberalism in the economy.
        1. Fan-fan 20 November 2019 17: 36 New
          • 3
          • 5
          -2
          You yourself are a clown.
          1. Sergey1987 21 November 2019 15: 14 New
            • 1
            • 3
            -2
            Quote: Fan-Fan
            You yourself are a clown.

            Wow, this is what you probably tensed to write three words.
        2. Revival 21 November 2019 02: 55 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          1. Clowns are tough.
          2. You are right, liberalism has nothing to do with it, what a person means in a comment it has become customary to call Liberasti (liberal + fascism).
          It has nothing to do with the original term liberalism, but only hide behind it, mimicking it.
          1. Sergey1987 21 November 2019 15: 49 New
            • 1
            • 2
            -1
            Quote: Revival
            1. Clowns are tough.

            But truthfully.
            Quote: Revival
            2. You are right, liberalism has nothing to do with it

            Now you understand this and wrote everything correctly above, but can you explain to me why the author and some members of the forum who are bothering him do not want to understand this? Why can't they read and read what a liberal economic model, a free market, and protectionism are? Why are they only capable of barking at power using, in relation to its terms, the meanings of which they don’t even understand and passing it off as analytics?
            1. Revival 22 November 2019 00: 54 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Here I would point out from a slightly different angle:
              from what “they” are doing wrong, it’s just and only that the terms are used incorrectly.
    3. Svarog 19 November 2019 07: 41 New
      • 22
      • 9
      +13
      Thus, the continuation of the liberal course is the death of Russia. Salvation in democracy, social justice. Return to the sources - truth, justice and conscience. When the spiritual is above the material, and the general is higher than the particular.

      Great conclusion! Wonderful article ..
    4. Civil 19 November 2019 07: 47 New
      • 4
      • 15
      -11
      1. Yes, in general, never, except for small periods under Stalin, Kosygin, Stolypin and Peter 1, did the economy go.
      2. You can change everything again and carry out reforms. This will lead to complete impoverishment again. You are ready?
      3. Well and most importantly, "the sucker is not a mammoth - the sucker will not die out. Mavrodi"
      1. Svarog 19 November 2019 09: 35 New
        • 22
        • 8
        +14
        Quote: Civil
        . You can change everything again and carry out reforms. This will lead to complete impoverishment again. You are ready?

        What nonsense .. And in general, from the word "reform" begins to fumble .. At the first stage, the state needs to take under its full and total control, mining, alcohol production, and all large-scale industry (which still remains), only this measure, according to some experts, it can give from 15 to 20 trillion .. Next, the introduction of a progressive tax, this is another 8 trillion, then a ban on the export of capital .. more precisely, not a ban, but to develop a mechanism in which it will not be profitable .. well or very costly ..
        After carrying out these measures, it is necessary to return to the planned economy, the plan, first of all, should be regarding the development of industry, electronics, pharmacology and other priority areas that are vital .. Further implementation, with total control ..
        And where do you see impoverishment here? Poverty is what has been happening for 5 years now!
        1. Civil 19 November 2019 10: 06 New
          • 6
          • 7
          -1
          At the first stage, the state needs to take under its full and total control, mining, alcohol production, and the entire large industry (which still remains), only this measure, according to some experts, can give from 15 to 20 trillion .. Next, the introduction of progressive tax, this is another 8 trillion, then a ban on the export of capital .. more precisely, not a ban, but to develop a mechanism by which it will not be profitable .. well, or very expensive ..

          1. And who is this brave, will take control? Deputies of all levels are representatives or owners of these enterprises themselves.
          2. Do you think someone will give for being healthy?
          3.
          Further implementation, with total control.
          And who are the controllers? The most equal of equal?

          Without the consolidation of society, nothing is feasible. Neither capitalist nor socialist nor feudal oligarchic breakthrough in the economy. And in our heads, Civilian is not over. Not a contractual society. There is no respect for each other. And it won’t) because the ability to think positively and make common decisions together is not about us. Only conflict, war, zeal, walking on their heads.
      2. nils 19 November 2019 11: 43 New
        • 22
        • 0
        +22
        We were convinced that the USSR was hopelessly ill. Those who said this were self-appointed in his healers. He cured the state to a sudden death, after which it turned out that all the property of the patient passed into the dexterous and completely disinterested arms of the doctors.
        This was the first truly large-scale case of paid medicine, and this successful experience was later instilled in healthcare, education and many more ...
    5. Victor N 19 November 2019 10: 51 New
      • 2
      • 26
      -24
      The author deliberately cheated the whole of Russia and did not offer ANYTHING.
      1. bessmertniy 19 November 2019 11: 29 New
        • 20
        • 2
        +18
        The author very analytically and clearly showed our shame. And the errors that need to be corrected are quite clearly named. It is clear that the current team in power has exhausted itself. It is up to her replacement. hi
      2. New Year day 19 November 2019 11: 50 New
        • 23
        • 3
        +20
        Quote: Victor N

        The author deliberately cheated the whole of Russia and did not offer ANYTHING.


        So Putin offers nothing but an increase in taxes and a cut in the social sphere.
        1. Sergey1987 21 November 2019 15: 16 New
          • 0
          • 2
          -2
          Quote: Silvestr
          cuts in the social sphere.

          What kind of social sphere did he want to cut back?
          1. New Year day 21 November 2019 15: 23 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            Quote: Sergey1987
            What kind of social sphere did he want to cut back?

            I didn’t want to, but already ...
            The budget for the 20th year
            1. Sergey1987 21 November 2019 16: 03 New
              • 0
              • 2
              -2
              Quote: Silvestr
              I didn’t want to, but already ...
              The budget for the 20th year

              And what does this table show? Budget spending for next year, and where for this year? That would be possible to compare.
      3. Revival 22 November 2019 00: 58 New
        • 0
        • 1
        -1
        You would be right if the authorities and the country were identical concepts.
        But in any country in the world, power is not identical with the concept of the country as a whole, but only one of its "parts".
        And the "parts" are different ...
    6. iouris 21 November 2019 17: 41 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Dead Day
      and why does not the “time machine" work? - yes no, neither one nor the other.

      Yes, everything "rides" for them and everything "works." Well, take at least the Vostochny spaceport ...
  2. Fevralsk. Morev 19 November 2019 06: 19 New
    • 54
    • 13
    +41
    The author said A (the liberal bloc is to blame), but did not say B (who leads this liberal bloc). Afraid to mention Putin's name in vain? The degradation of the economy, the poorer population, the increase in the number of billionaires and corrupt officials lies entirely on Putin. And do not yell "Raised the Army / Crimea Departed," "Wanna like the 90s?", "Wanna like the Ukraine", about the difficult legacy of WWII and the Mongol-Tatar yoke. What did Stalin get? Illiteracy of the population alone is worth what !!! Two wars !!! How long did it take to run through what was spent in Europe for 50-100 years? Only 11 years old. Read the Orthodox Nazi anti-Semite philosopher Ilyin. Everything according to his training manual develops the country.
    Minus me kremleboty and complain to the administrator sayia. I insulted Putin.
    1. parusnik 19 November 2019 06: 56 New
      • 14
      • 4
      +10
      Read the Orthodox Nazi anti-Semite philosopher Ilyin. Everything according to his training manual develops the country.
      ... I won’t be surprised if Ilyin appears instead of the word Lenin at the mausoleum laughing ... by the way, Ilyin’s brains have been rinsed since the end of the 80s
    2. Svarog 19 November 2019 07: 43 New
      • 23
      • 8
      +15
      Quote: Fevralsk. Morev
      The author said A (the liberal bloc is to blame), but did not say B (who leads this liberal bloc). Afraid to mention Putin's name in vain?

      And so everything is clear to everyone ..
    3. atalef 19 November 2019 08: 14 New
      • 11
      • 11
      0
      Quote: Fevralsk. Morev
      Afraid to mention Putin's name in vain?

      soot.
      laughing
      analyst wink
    4. garrett 19 November 2019 09: 19 New
      • 1
      • 12
      -11
      Minus me kremleboty and complain to the administrator sayia. I insulted Putin.

      and I'm all in white, with a burning gaze (s) laughing I put a plus, so that you will not be dragged away by a short-cut gebnya to Lubyanka)))
  3. Obi-Wan Kenobi 19 November 2019 06: 21 New
    • 29
    • 9
    +20
    because
    that the government is not interested in developing the country's economy in the interests of the people.

    And he is engaged only in theft on an industrial scale, led by a guarantor.
    Then all the loot is exported abroad with families and other relatives, away from sin, since they remember very well 1917.
  4. vomag 19 November 2019 06: 26 New
    • 17
    • 8
    +9
    Capitalism is impossible in Russia, that's where all the trouble comes from! .. we must again create socialism and drive the damned capitalists into the neck!
    1. atalef 19 November 2019 08: 15 New
      • 6
      • 25
      -19
      Quote: vomag
      It is necessary to create socialism again and to drive the damned capitalists into the neck!

      Chavez applauds. fellow
      1. Gerneton 19 November 2019 10: 05 New
        • 5
        • 20
        -15
        Quote: atalef
        Quote: vomag
        It is necessary to create socialism again and to drive the damned capitalists into the neck!

        Chavez applauds. fellow

        Kym Jong-un will not let you lie; laughing
        1. Fan-fan 20 November 2019 17: 47 New
          • 2
          • 4
          -2
          In Norway, Sweden, Finland, too, it seems like capitalism, but for some reason the standard of living is higher than Russia.
      2. DEDPIHTO 19 November 2019 18: 22 New
        • 12
        • 2
        +10
        Quote: atalef
        Quote: vomag
        It is necessary to create socialism again and to drive the damned capitalists into the neck!

        Chavez applauds. fellow

        You can’t understand a Russian Jew who has a sense of justice in his genes (well, how about you ... uh ... entrepreneurship wink ) and that is why capitalism in our country has no future, because this system is unfair. And the state-forming people, that is, the majority in Russia, are we Russians! In addition, we have something to compare with — there is a lot of experience of socialism as a more just system than capitalism, and simply forgetting it is no longer possible, no matter how hard the current powerful people try ... And they won’t hold their bayonets, they’ve already passed ... huckster unhappy prospects in our country.
        1. Gerneton 19 November 2019 20: 13 New
          • 0
          • 12
          -12
          Quote: DEPHIHTO
          Russian, whose sense of justice in the genes is inherent (

          there was one weirdo with a racial theory about the Aryans, poorly finished by the way.

          Quote: DEPHIHTO
          that is why capitalism in our country has no future, for this system is unfair.

          as the practice showed, the communists are not competitive in international markets, and you won’t be fed up with propaganda, even if you introduce cheburnet 10 times. China does not propose as an example what is not communism there right now, and their success is entirely the merit of Western corporations.
          I don’t even want to remember the last tsar, something jelly-like is not even subject to discussion.
          1. Private89 20 November 2019 20: 56 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            From the point of view of whom are not competitors?
            From the point of view of the capitalist? so it’s understandable his task is to maximize profit, and not benefit people to do.

            Here's an example.
            There was a factory in the USSR, naturally it was in public ownership. And 10 thousand workers worked there and he brought a profit of 1 billion rubles. Other times came, a private trader came, cut the floor of the plant along with equipment for needles, drove 5000 workers out into the street, and the remaining 5000 cut salaries by 50%. And lo and behold, the plant began to make profit of 1,5 billion rubles. From the perspective of the owner of the plant, the plant has become more competitive. But from the point of view of those 5000 that were kicked out to the street, or those 5000 to whom the zp was cut in two, is it better? This is your rotten capitalism.

            And socialism just puts the benefit of those 10000 workers higher than the profits of this parasite alone.
  5. parusnik 19 November 2019 06: 29 New
    • 14
    • 3
    +11
    Inside the country, it is necessary to abandon indulgence to big business, the interests of the people are higher than a handful of “responsible businessmen”, the priority of foreign investment, and the attraction of labor migrants. Refuse to follow the rules of the IMF and WTO, strengthen the role of the state in regulating the domestic and foreign markets, create and develop large state-owned companies, review privatization results, nationalize land, mineral resources, water and forests, develop a financial system under the tight control of the re-established State Bank, which should deal with the creation of conditions for the development of the country's economy, the wide use of domestic investments (tens of trillions of rubles have been accumulated, enormous resources are available in the area of ​​confiscation of corruption, Itel element). All this will quickly give positive shoots in the form of restoration and growth of the economy, the welfare of the people. A strong, popular (truly democratic) Russia will be able to successfully confront the West and balance the East.
    .... There is no party in the country that has begun to do this ....
    1. Phil77 19 November 2019 06: 47 New
      • 9
      • 3
      +6
      Quote: parusnik
      .No in the country, such a party that began to do this ....

      And there is no man who could lead it. Good morning all! And happy artillery day! All the best and success!
      1. bessmertniy 19 November 2019 11: 32 New
        • 1
        • 9
        -8
        Organize and lead! Why waste time searching! wink
        1. parusnik 19 November 2019 19: 35 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          Salaries are not enough for the organization .... and steal .. laughing There are many such parties ... laughing
        2. Phil77 19 November 2019 19: 59 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: bessmertniy
          Organize and lead! Why waste time searching!

          Old me, my friend! And you think in the right direction! Good luck !!! good
        3. New Year day 20 November 2019 01: 27 New
          • 5
          • 1
          +4
          Quote: bessmertniy
          Organize and lead! Why waste time looking

          In the classification of the so-called series of revolution, radical groups can be attributed to the second row. After the “first row” - peaceful passionaries, intellectuals, freelancers and other representatives of the middle class receives a portion of their batons, a “second row” arises - radicals who, in a healthy social situation, are in moral opposition to the “first row” and the security forces.
          Radical elements do not go to peaceful meetings, they are waiting for the moment. They are waiting for sufficient mass, which is fuel for chaos.
          The political radical realizes that he is committing a crime. Rather, what is a crime in terms of the existing legal system. The only guarantee that he will not be held accountable in the future is considered to be a quick force radical change of the entire system, the beneficiaries of which may be interested in punishing him in principle.
          Subsequently, the radical elements of coups never become the beneficiaries of the new political system. Behind them comes the “third row” - organized political structures that can offer people who are able to exercise authority in the new state bureaucracy.
          https://zen.yandex.ru/media/discoursio/palochnaia-sistema-i-politicheskii-radikalizm-kogda-poletit-pervyi-kokteil-molotova-5d7d49ca98930900c94c35a3
  6. Mcar 19 November 2019 06: 55 New
    • 22
    • 8
    +14
    Refuse to follow the rules of the IMF and the WTO, strengthen the role of the state in regulating the domestic and foreign markets, create and develop large state-owned companies, review privatization results, nationalize land, mineral resources, water and forests, develop a financial system under the tight control of the re-established State Bank, which should deal with creating conditions for the development of the country's economy, make extensive use of domestic investment

    This is, if you add a bit - public ownership of the means of production, the socialist revolution.

    The economy does not travel, because the conditions and environment are not suitable for it in Russia. Can I grow pineapples in the Arctic? Can. Only will be gold. In modern language - uncompetitive. Similarly, with production, which is the essence of the economy. No production of high redistribution is elementary disadvantageous. So it will not be production. In the current, current conditions.

    For the economy to work, Russia needs other laws based on other principles, preferences, power, and order. Until we achieve a change of system from capitalist to socialist, where the main value in society will not be money, but people, the economy will not just go — it will continue to die.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Fibrizio 19 November 2019 10: 50 New
      • 7
      • 2
      +5
      First of all, laws must be respected and there must be clear and transparent rules of the game. When they try to plant the largest foreign investors, and squeeze out the business - it’s a bell for all sober-minded people that it’s better not to carry money in the Russian Federation, and if you already have a business here, you need to arrange everything in Cypriot. They will trivially take away.
      Second moment. How can we talk about serious investments if it is not clear what will happen in 10 years? In the Russian Federation it is impossible to plan ahead.
      Therefore, the economy slows down. We do not have our own competitive ones; we need impressive technologies and investments. Our government crossed out this direction.
      They don’t especially visit us at the economic forum.
      There was talk of an amnesty of capital. The guarantor gave a guarantee that they would not be imprisoned.
      Bottom line: Those who returned - they sat down. The word in the end is not restrained.

      And about the somewhat naive conclusions of the author of the article regarding egg capsules, and why they are not spent by the government, there is sound logic. Money in the storehouse is kept for a number of reasons, ranging from overheating of the economy to the fact that our ruble has a market rate, and if our country spends its reserves, speculators will bring down the ruble.
      Not everything is as simple as it seems.
      1. Glory1974 19 November 2019 12: 34 New
        • 11
        • 0
        +11
        Money in the storehouse is kept for a number of reasons, ranging from overheating of the economy to the fact that our ruble has a market rate, and if our country spends its reserves, speculators will bring down the ruble.

        The ruble was dropped 2 times in the 2014 year artificially. According to the Big Mac or Borsch index, a dollar costs 24 rubles.
        This situation is beneficial for exporters. Thus, all economic policy is built to please exporters. And in such conditions it is not profitable to develop production.
        The mass of cash in the country is 30 times less than electronic. Therefore, we can’t talk about any overheating. it all depends on political decisions.
    3. vitmih 19 November 2019 13: 32 New
      • 4
      • 4
      0
      Similarly, with production, which is the essence of the economy.

      Taki trade motor economy)
      To live with production, manufacturers need to sell what they stamp. That is, you need a market. Preferably external.
      There is another option that we have already passed. A command-and-control economy, when someone in the General Plan decides how many radios and toilets are needed to produce a particular call. At the same time, it is hard to restrict imports. But this translates into "sausage trains." And the owners of life are saleswomen with stores.
      1. Alf
        Alf 19 November 2019 21: 11 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        Quote: vitmih
        Taki trade motor economy)

        Now shopping centers are like dirt, they are standing on every corner, but the economy, for some reason, is not moving. The paradox, however ..
        1. Mcar 20 November 2019 03: 06 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          Quote: Alf
          Quote: vitmih
          Taki trade motor economy)

          Now shopping centers are like dirt, they are standing on every corner, but the economy, for some reason, is not moving. The paradox, however ..

          The man was joking. Just somehow not funny.
          1. vitmih 20 November 2019 11: 39 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Yes, no laughing matter here.
            To ask any local commentator who advocates mythical production: “So, by pike, you have the opportunity to produce. Well, how are you going to feed your family with this production?” Two groups will crystallize from them. The first will say that they see themselves as political instructors, correspondents and other beauty bloggers. They are for all the good. But production is good, etc. The second will say that it is the state’s concern to provide them with a sales market. A clarifying question, why exactly you, and not the same plant from a neighboring district center, will confuse them. For in their picture of the world the same state must protect them from competition.
            But you have to, in reality, you want, if you don’t want to, become a trader. Search for markets, And so the hated shopping centers will suddenly become urgently needed. Yes, more, more ...
            1. Alf
              Alf 20 November 2019 18: 48 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Quote: vitmih
              But you have to, in reality, you want, if you don’t want to, become a trader.

              So, at least now, shoot at packs of merchants, but the economy still does not go. Explain why?
              1. vitmih 20 November 2019 20: 27 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                The answer to the banal is simple. Oil needle and dull power.
                1. vitmih 20 November 2019 20: 30 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  well, still a population, all the time longing to shoot someone
  7. Ross xnumx 19 November 2019 06: 57 New
    • 9
    • 9
    0
    I hasten to take this opportunity to express my deep gratitude to the Mias-Mebel enterprise! good
    Are there any representatives from this city on the site? Furniture, high quality and wide scope.
    The only production in Russia that did not cause any complaints from me.
    That is, in the Urals, life is still warming. We are going to a lot here. Let's - tell us if there are enterprises in your cities whose products are worthy of attention.
    In our city, "Nitrogen" remained from the entire industry (but fertilizers are not relevant for me), and the view of the territory is as if the Second World War ended recently. There is a "Coke-chemical industry." The remains of Khimmash sheltered on Tereshkova St. Something is mined at Butovka. There are leftovers ZZHBK. Dairy and meat processing plants. At Kuznetsk - flour milling. State district power station. I don’t remember anymore. All the former land of factories and factories (including the well-known confectionery with the Zimnaya Vishnaya shopping center built in its building) is occupied either by trading enterprises or by some other tenants. Actually there is no wide choice of occupations (professions), and as for salaries, here:

    hi
    1. Eskobar 19 November 2019 07: 25 New
      • 3
      • 2
      +1
      In the Kirov region, the Nanolek LLC plant (pharmaceuticals) began to be built in 2011, it has been helping the products for 2 years now, it’s higher than the average
    2. Eskobar 19 November 2019 07: 30 New
      • 7
      • 1
      +6
      But the Belokholunitsky Machine-Building Plant also bent down - it worked with the 2nd and a half centuries, the Pulp and Paper Mill in the village of Kosino did not start the plant for the production of drugs from human blood (Rosplazma) - the walls were built, and things are still there. The Red Toolmaker factory closed - it produced precision tools, they almost closed the Vyatka-Polyansk arms factory Hammer
  8. samarin1969 19 November 2019 06: 58 New
    • 16
    • 5
    +11
    Samsonov’s manifesto, according to the facts, is good ... Except for that ... "details": ... "the interests of the people are higher than a handful of" responsible businessmen. "In reality, the author again reduces everything to a class struggle with popcorn behind the scenes of the USA.
    May be enough?! And among liberals, business and the "red" is full of bastards. But among liberals there are competent specialists, among business there are organizers, and among communists there are “statesmen”. We must look for unifying principles. There are, after all, the military. Which literally perceive the concepts of "national interests" and "adversary." There are spiritual and scientific authorities that can put tight control on the path of "world values" and the "international division of labor." Russia should be, first of all, for its citizens and compatriots. Everything else (international organizations) is “don't give a damn and forget”.
  9. savage1976 19 November 2019 07: 21 New
    • 15
    • 8
    +7
    Now, how do we take it, how do we overthrow the bad king and bad boyars, and how do we live. We wake up in the morning, and around the milk rivers, keselnye shores, Zhinka brings a glass of vodka sandwiched between the breasts, while the very figure 90x60x90 and the house are all new, repaired, and there is no corruption and only competent specialists and pensioners get a new pension and immediately run for trips to the tour. Firms, and workers rent their Toyota, Fords, BMWs for scrap and buy UAZs, and officials are all at odds. And the bananas with coconuts bloomed. HEY! Get up, take a shovel, send the door to refuse! Snow covered the roof ......
    1. krops777 19 November 2019 07: 34 New
      • 9
      • 3
      +6
      HEY! Get up, take a shovel, send the door to refuse! Snow covered the roof ......


      Well, here, the paradise in the country depends on each of us, and no one will bring it on a silver platter.
      1. Svarog 19 November 2019 09: 46 New
        • 16
        • 7
        +9
        Quote: krops777
        Now, here, heaven in the country depends on each of us

        This is not a correct conclusion, it cannot be realized if the individual lives in the state and according to the rules that the state establishes .. Your statement will work only if you live in the taiga, one .. there yes, happiness is in your hands ..
        1. krops777 19 November 2019 14: 35 New
          • 0
          • 1
          -1
          This is not a correct conclusion, it cannot be realized if the individual lives in the state and according to the rules that the state establishes .. Your statement will work only if you live in the taiga, one .. there yes, happiness is in your hands ..



          You are wrong, here is an example of which there are hundreds of https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HalZhcg1VDI
      2. New Year day 19 November 2019 11: 53 New
        • 8
        • 3
        +5
        Quote: krops777
        Well, here, the paradise in the country depends on each of us, and no one will bring it on a silver platter.


        So would not hurt! And what will the guardsmen live on?
    2. Mikhail Zarokov 19 November 2019 08: 16 New
      • 7
      • 5
      +2
      And what exactly should an ordinary resident of Russia do for its prosperity, even if nothing depends on Putin himself?
      1. New Year day 19 November 2019 11: 55 New
        • 18
        • 4
        +14
        Quote: Mikhail Zarokov
        And what exactly should an ordinary resident of Russia do for its prosperity,


        A senior citizen - die quickly, a state employee - refuse a salary, a security officer - rob further, Putin - do nothing
    3. Ross xnumx 19 November 2019 08: 39 New
      • 19
      • 7
      +12
      Quote: savage1976
      Now, how do we take it, how do we overthrow the bad king and bad boyars, and how do we live.

      Right now, we will not overthrow anyone, we won’t even re-elect - even if together with gangs boyars consisting of: Usss, whites, Khoroshavins, Arashukovs, Ulyukaevs, snowdrifts, Zakharchenko, Serdyukovs and others are doing their “righteous” deeds. In the morning we wake up, and our head is in the nightstand on which there is a Doshirak and a packet of kefir. And on TV, the head with dimensions of 90x60x90 broadcasts, as well as in the native land taiga burns, floods wash away settlements, dams break out, money allocated to the spaceport is stolen, and how poorly the citizens of Africa and Ukraine live. About how it is “noble” to bring the children of ISIS gang members and how “vile” it is to collect Russian money for an operation using sms-ok and what you need to eat to live longer.
      We will watch programs with carefree guys who travel the world and are forced to live in whatever hotels. Let's see how people are shy of their body, but not shy of their capital. Let us see how vegetables grow on the lands rented by the Chinese, we listen to sellers who do not advise them to buy, because "they never take it themselves."
      What kind of snow? What a shovel? Get up - go look for your work that will be with you until your death, but it will not bring you joy or happiness ...
      How is this option?
      hi
      1. savage1976 19 November 2019 09: 10 New
        • 3
        • 12
        -9
        For you, apparently normal. But I like work and joy, and I love to cultivate the land, and I don’t watch my head on TV. But you go on, look. The more people aching at the mailbox, the easier it is to build their lives, however, the competition is less.
        1. Ross xnumx 19 November 2019 10: 34 New
          • 18
          • 5
          +13
          I’m not whining at a box (which I don’t advise you to whine about longed for happiness), but I’m talking about those who interfere with normal living and building. You will live to see my age, see if you will cultivate the land in joy. But I rarely watch TV, regarding me ...
          1. savage1976 19 November 2019 11: 19 New
            • 3
            • 8
            -5
            And that all of you interfere with your life. Why are you so attracted to them? Nobody bothers me to live. Life is Beautiful. Well, and age, so he will come to everyone regardless of power.
        2. New Year day 20 November 2019 01: 33 New
          • 7
          • 1
          +6
          Quote: savage1976
          eat more people at the drawer aching,

          I don’t want to howl with such, but never turn on this box
          , what I am doing
  10. UserGun 19 November 2019 07: 39 New
    • 7
    • 11
    -4
    “All this will quickly give positive shoots in the form of economic recovery and growth, the welfare of the people. A strong, popular (truly democratic) Russia will be able to successfully confront the West and balance the East.

    Thus, the continuation of the liberal course is the death of Russia. Salvation in democracy, social justice. Return to the sources - truth, justice and conscience. When the spiritual is higher than the material, and the general is higher than the particular. "


    This is how the well-being of the people can grow when the spiritual is higher than the material ?! Virtually what ?! lol What game just do not read on VO ... RenTV just nervously smokes on the sidelines laughing
    1. savage1976 19 November 2019 07: 41 New
      • 8
      • 11
      -3
      And this is when I can’t do everything in manure, but rightly so.
    2. Ross xnumx 19 November 2019 08: 42 New
      • 5
      • 7
      -2
      Quote: UserGun
      RenTV just nervously smokes on the sidelines

      RenTV is not the worst channel, especially in terms of:
      "Send SMS with the amount of 100, 200, etc. to the number 8888" ... On Wednesdays, as a rule. But, if the amount is large - even on Thursday ... There has never been a case so that they do not collect.
      hi
    3. Glory1974 19 November 2019 12: 39 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      This is how the well-being of the people can grow when the spiritual is higher than the material ?!

      when a daughter (son) orders the murder of her parents in order to take possession of the apartment and money, then the material is higher than the spiritual.
      And if they work together to improve the well-being of the family, then the spiritual is higher than the material.
  11. Fuse angel 19 November 2019 07: 55 New
    • 9
    • 9
    0
    True, I forgot that these "loafers" overwhelmed the most efficient economy of the West - the Third Reich, built the second economy of the world. And almost put the USA checkmate. That the United States was on the verge of collapse in the 80 years, and only “perestroika” and the surrender of the USSR to Gorbachev and his accomplices saved the States from a geopolitical catastrophe.


    The controversial moment, the collapse of the USSR was caused in many respects due to the economic and political crisis, it was the leadership of the USSR that was unable to create an effective economy, unlike the United States, it was just that they were competitive and were definitely not on the verge of collapse. The author seems to live in the past, where there is still a struggle between "sworn friends."

    As for the reluctance of the current liberal government to take the economy out of stagnation and raise the standard of living, then the author’s accusations of working against the people of the people look childish like a typical oppositionist who is guilty of all the sins that he himself defines. In my opinion, everything is much simpler. In this case, fear is to blame, the liberal elite’s fear of a change in the economy, they simply do not want to take any risks, fearing to cause an economic crisis again and lose everything. Power is like an old grandmother who once experienced hunger in her youth, now has been saving money all her life and is afraid to take risks, I am afraid of the recurrence of hunger. As a result, both the Power and the headstock became hostages of their own experience.
    PS This is my opinion, I do not impose on anyone.
    1. savage1976 19 November 2019 09: 13 New
      • 3
      • 2
      +1
      So I have about the same opinion. They are afraid and do not know, but losing is even worse. Here we go in horror without end.
    2. atalef 19 November 2019 11: 54 New
      • 2
      • 3
      -1
      Quote: Guardian Angel
      As for the reluctance of the current liberal government to take the economy out of stagnation and raise living standards

      yes they want, simply in their special economy, invented in the Kremlin - this does not work and will not work.
      Quote: Guardian Angel
      In this case, fear is to blame, the liberal elite’s fear of a change in the economy

      liberal? What does the liberal have to do with it.
      Economic liberalism is an ideology that is an integral part of classical liberalism. [1] In economic philosophy, economic liberalism supports and promotes the laissez-faire economy. Followers of economic liberalism believe that political freedom and social justice are inseparable from economic freedom and use philosophical arguments in support of economic liberalism and the free market. Ideology rejects government intervention in the free market and supports maximum freedom of trade and competition, unlike mercantilism, Keynesianism and fascism

      What disagreements do you have with this?
      Are you against economic freedom and social justice?
      Are you against the free market, but advocate for the supremacy of monopolies and concerns?
      Are you against free trade in favor of restrictions and embargoes?
      Understand the terms.
      1. Foul skeptic 19 November 2019 15: 28 New
        • 3
        • 1
        +2
        Ideology rejects government interference in the free market and supports maximum freedom of trade and competition

        in some country "A", the company produces a medical product for a fatal disease with a cost of "D". In the country "C" for a medical preparation give "2D". And since the market is free and the state does not control it, the entire volume of the drug goes to country “C”. And in country “A” people die without medicine, or they buy it by re-export already for “3D”. The example is simplified, but its essence is unchanged for any scheme with a "free, uncontrolled" market.
        You are against the free market, but advocate for the supremacy of monopolies and concerns

        without state control, the emergence of a monopoly in the "free market" is only a matter of time
        1. atalef 19 November 2019 16: 44 New
          • 1
          • 4
          -3
          Quote: A vile skeptic
          in some country "A", the company produces a medical product for a fatal disease with a cost of "D". In country “C” they give “2Д” for the medical preparation. And since the market is free and the state does not control it, the entire volume of the drug goes to country “C”. And in country “A” people die without a medicine, or they buy it by re-export already for “3D”. The example is simplified,

          it is not just simplified, it is not a priori correct.
          What prevents country A from buying this drug from the manufacturer at the price of D?
          Why is country C paid 2D?
          How is the sale of medicines different from the sale of sausages?
          1. Foul skeptic 19 November 2019 17: 06 New
            • 1
            • 1
            0
            What prevents country A from buying this drug from the manufacturer at the price of D

            1) because the manufacturer will not sell it to country “a”, if it is more profitable for country “c” to sell it.
            2) because in country “c” it costs “2,5d” at the local producer, since the general price level in the country is higher.
            3) As applied to our case, the absence of one is more fraught than the absence of the other, and the principle is the same.
            1. atalef 19 November 2019 17: 22 New
              • 1
              • 4
              -3
              Quote: A vile skeptic
              1) because the manufacturer will not sell it to country “a”, if it is more profitable for country “c” to sell it.

              Then it’s completely not clear where the price of 2d comes from?
              if this is the initial selling price? What prevents the manufacturer from selling to country A, at the same primary price that you designated 2D?
              Quote: A vile skeptic
              because in country “c” it costs “2,5д” at the local manufacturer, since the general price level in the country is higher.

              so in country C is there a local producer?
              OK . then again it is not clear why he cannot sell to the country, but if he is the only one in it?
              Quote: A vile skeptic
              As applied to our case, the absence of one is more fraught than the absence of the other, and the principle is the same.

              and why the absence? You yourself said. that there are other manufacturers.
              therefore, as your explanation does not pull. especially in paragraph
              Quote: A vile skeptic
              . And in country “A” people die without a medicine, or they buy it by re-export already for “3D”.
              1. Foul skeptic 19 November 2019 17: 52 New
                • 1
                • 1
                0
                1) formed by the market of the country "c"
                2) the impossibility of the population in the country "a" to buy at "2d" prevents.
                3) why it can’t, maybe I wrote that the population of the country “a”, in addition to dying, will be left with export / re-export for “3D”. Instead of buying from your manufacturer for "d".
                4) it was about the consequences of such "sales" - the lack of sausage due to its overflow to where more is offered for it does not bear such consequences as lack of medicine.
          2. savage1976 20 November 2019 08: 58 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            It will be more profitable for a company in country A to sell in country A for 2D, and they will also receive income by reducing the cost of transportation to country C. So it’s bad for the opponent with economics and mathematics.
  12. Semurg 19 November 2019 08: 17 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    The author calls for the confiscation and return of the withdrawn funds as a resource for a breakthrough in the economy, in connection with this I remembered the film "Do not be afraid I am with you", it seemed to be called where one brother tells the hero of the film about his golden tooth - this is not your tooth and not even mine, it’s a tooth over that brother; I lost your tooth to him. laughing I started to read, thought Skomorokhov-Banshee wrote, it turned out that Samsonov was the author, something has long been written by the Banshee on the site, have they blocked oxygen, or what?
    1. atalef 19 November 2019 11: 58 New
      • 3
      • 4
      -1
      Quote: Semurg
      The author calls for the confiscation and return of withdrawn funds as a resource for a breakthrough in the economy

      The author, I don’t understand what the hell the state should be in my pocket?
      If I earned money and paid taxes from them, then I have the right to do what I want with them.
      I want to buy a house in Spain, I want to invest in apple stocks, I want to buy a hectare in a viper.
      This is my money and no one has the right to dictate what to do with them.
      Quote: Semurg
      about his golden tooth - it’s not your tooth and not even mine, it’s that brother’s tooth over there; I lost his tooth to him in cards

      so long as the state behaves this way with citizens - nothing will happen - neither investment nor money in pension funds
      1. Glory1974 19 November 2019 12: 45 New
        • 9
        • 1
        +8
        What the hell should the state go into my pocket?
        If I earned money and paid taxes from them, then I have the right to do what I want with them.

        I totally agree with you. But the problem is that taxes are not paid, profits disappear in offshore zones, the state compensates oligarchs for loss of income and exempts them from taxes. And to ordinary people, he constantly gets into his pocket, declaring at the same time that we have a single tax for all - 13%.
        1. atalef 19 November 2019 14: 02 New
          • 3
          • 3
          0
          Quote: glory1974
          But the problem is that taxes are not paid, profits disappear in offshore

          Are offshores a problem only of the Russian Federation or the whole world?
          I don’t think that offshore companies are created exclusively for Russia.
          all countries are struggling with offshore companies, and the USA and the EU, etc. etc.
          nevertheless, their economy is functioning, offshore is a problem, but not the main one.
          The main thing is the investment climate.
          In developed countries, money is taken offshore so as not to pay high taxes.
          In Russia, the tax is -13%, just laughter compared to developed countries, money is not withdrawn from the Russian Federation because of taxes, but because they will squeeze them out at any time and have nowhere to invest in the long run.
          1. Victor N 19 November 2019 18: 02 New
            • 2
            • 4
            -2
            In VO, it happens, they offer not only to squeeze, but also to shoot. And then they are perplexed: why do the money leave the country? The Zampolitans ....
          2. shtatsov 19 November 2019 21: 53 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            13% is not the only tax! The acquaintance of the head of the enterprise was wondering if it really paid 50-60% on all taxes and fees from the enterprise. And he seems to be right. Count your personal taxes!
  13. rocket757 19 November 2019 08: 31 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Now liberals, after the frank failure of “perestroika”, “reforms”, “innovations”, “modernizations”, “optimizations”, “import substitutions” and “2020 strategies”, promise us a digital era, drawing Russia another bright future.

    Here is a surviving tribe and absolutely without honor and conscience!
    These only uproot or "roundup" process, so that finally and without turning.
  14. Antares 19 November 2019 08: 56 New
    • 11
    • 3
    +8
    slogans are good
    streamlined accused of "reformers and liberals" (apparently the laws do not allow criticizing targeted)
    in general, like agitation for all good versus all bad
    the economy can work in the Russian Federation and capitalism can also. (if the "Lada" as always do not go)
    the economy is people + climate.
    joke
    Lee Kuan Yew: “I had two ways: to steal and put friends and relatives on the Forbes lists, while leaving my people on bare earth. Second: to serve my people and bring the country to the top ten best countries in the world. I chose second ... "
    Petro Poroshenko: “I also had two ways, but the second one has already chosen Lee Kuan Yu”
    Vladimir Putin: "Please treat with understanding."
    1. atalef 19 November 2019 14: 07 New
      • 1
      • 2
      -1
      Quote: Antares
      Lee Kuan Yew: “I had two ways: to steal and put friends and relatives on the Forbes lists, while leaving my people on bare earth. Second: to serve my people and bring the country to the top ten best countries in the world. I chose second ... "

      are these his words exactly?
      Can I link to the original?
  15. Million 19 November 2019 08: 58 New
    • 9
    • 0
    +9
    The economy doesn’t go, because the driver’s rights are bought and the car service consists of stupid but greedy locksmiths
  16. Esaul 19 November 2019 09: 00 New
    • 3
    • 4
    -1
    That's right, the liberals are just robbing Russia, sending all the wealth to the west. It is necessary to prohibit the withdrawal of money in offshore, firmly fix the dollar and euro (for example, 50 and 60 rubles), expel all unskilled migrant workers (because of them the salary level, quality decreases, and the difference between rich and poor, if you think about it, grows) as well as not storing money in dubious places, but spending it on education, infrastructure, science, and developing industry.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. Glory1974 19 November 2019 12: 49 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        The state has already shown what an effective manager it is. Everything public in the ass or on dates. If you also drive out private traders - even taxes will no longer be collected, maybe everything will rise.

        How does efficiency depend on ownership? If the manager is interested in the final result, there is no difference. A bad director can also ruin a private company and a state one with equal success.
        1. vitmih 19 November 2019 13: 46 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          How does efficiency depend on ownership?

          When the state has many forms of ownership, then yes, there is no difference. The same China. Chery’s automotive company is fully state-owned, and Geelly’s fully private company. And compete on an equal footing. They stay afloat and even buy all sorts of Volvo only thanks to their managers.

          But there was another option in our history. When the sole owner was the state. And that none of the car factories, no matter what marriage he released, was ditched.
    2. atalef 19 November 2019 12: 02 New
      • 5
      • 5
      0
      Quote: Esaul
      That's right, liberals just rob Russia, sending all the wealth to the west

      the climate in the country is such that it’s scary to keep money.
      Tomorrow they will take away and it does not matter whether you are a millionaire or a simple hard worker.
      Quote: Esaul
      firmly fix the dollar and euro (for example, 50 and 60 rubles)

      new joke.
      if the dollar is fixed, then salaries will begin to be recalculated by this ratio.
      wink
      there is a two-way track
      Quote: Esaul
      to expel all unskilled migrant workers (because of them the salary level, quality decreases, and the difference between rich and poor also grows

      well, yes, starting to pay locals 5 times more than Gaster - prices of course for the final products will remain the same - only in your parallel universe.
      Quote: Esaul
      and also not to store money in dubious places, but to spend it on education, infrastructure, science, develop industry.

      where do you keep your money?
      1. Esaul 20 November 2019 09: 45 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        1. If it’s scary to keep money, emigrate to another country where it’s not scary.
        2. Why when the ruble fell several times s / n was not counted?
        3. Where do these numbers come from - 5 times ??? Prices, if they rise, are very slightly (within the margin of error). Now the excess profit from the use of unskilled labor goes to the pockets of units, and then to offshore. And if they still raise prices, they will not buy.
    3. New Year day 20 November 2019 01: 35 New
      • 5
      • 2
      +3
      Quote: Esaul
      That's right, the liberals are just robbing Russia, sending all the wealth to the west.

      and who is the main liberal in Russia?
  17. mbebebe 19 November 2019 09: 03 New
    • 7
    • 3
    +4
    Why did they decide that the authorities are now / after the collapse, or have there ever been liberals? Our government has never put the interests of an individual person above the state. In our country, the Chekists, as they were in power before and after the collapse of the union, remained with it, becoming much stronger (the facts are that the lard is being taken from the FSB generals who are guilty and subtly hinted to us who the elite are in this country)
    1. maden.usmanow 19 November 2019 11: 05 New
      • 4
      • 2
      +2
      Do not tear patterns to citizens, please.
      There are no Chekists, that's all Liberals !!!
    2. vitmih 19 November 2019 11: 05 New
      • 4
      • 3
      +1
      Well, you need to fervent patriots at least someone to blame, except for the king.
    3. Fibrizio 19 November 2019 11: 06 New
      • 9
      • 2
      +7
      I agree, the cries about the liberals are already getting ridiculous. The whole elite is either the former Cheka, or the former party members (or their descendants).
      If people bother to see what liberal ideas are, they might be very surprised, because there’s nothing to do with what is attributed to them.
      And the implementation on the ground is like that.

      And by the way, does anyone really think that in our country you can come to power and move your course without looking at the security forces and other groups? Does the Central Bank carry out a cannibalistic policy by one person? Do you believe that?
      Or are bad liberals strangling the social sphere? Tightening the nuts is not the goal, but a consequence of the governance of our country, not just liberals, but former members of the Communist Party and security forces over the past 30 years.
      To write off everything on the echo of the nineties is mildly ridiculous.
      We have "stability since 2000. Count 20 years already.
  18. Van 16 19 November 2019 09: 52 New
    • 5
    • 1
    +4
    Good article, that's right. The economy is not traveling, why argue with the obvious. Prices are rising? Are growing. Petrol? And how. Housing and communal services, VAT, fines, retirement age? Are growing. The salary? Oops And here it’s somehow not very. In two years, it has grown by exactly two percent. Recently I drove through shopping centers, so there a third of the boutiques are closed, the signs hang "for rent." People just don’t have money to buy. By the way, Castorama in the city closed. Something like this.
    1. DNS-a42 19 November 2019 10: 31 New
      • 6
      • 5
      +1
      And why is she good? The source of the problem is not indicated, the ways out of the crisis are not indicated, only good wishes are given. Just another whining about the wrong capitalism.
      1. shtatsov 19 November 2019 22: 10 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        I agree. But unfortunately, even economists have no idea what to do. Now it looks like a mess around the world is happening! Yellow vests in France, Hong Kong, Bolivia and Chile, etc. There are not only factors from the economy, but also from politics. Mattresses, of course, stir up water somewhere. But the population simply cannot be taken out onto the streets either. In well-fed France, what yellow vests could be before? And now they are pinned!
        My opinion is that there is a change in world order, the current capitalist system has come to an end. The accumulated errors of this system hinder further development. But what will we come to? I do not know! We were taught history there. Tops can’t, bottoms do not want to! The revolutionary situation however!
  19. GRIGORIY76 19 November 2019 09: 59 New
    • 4
    • 4
    0
    She does not go because the authorities are stupid Chekists. And the liberals, led by Medvedev, with all my hatred for them, more or less keep the economy afloat and pay for multi-trip adventures. Read Zubarevich.
  20. Stalnov I.P. 19 November 2019 10: 04 New
    • 15
    • 3
    +12
    When he came to power in early 2000, could the president begin to create and create a socially just state - MTF, and even MUST have done, DID NOT DO. No one has canceled the role of personality in history, and the example of IVAN III, IVAN IV, PETER I, ALEXANDER III, LENIN, STALIN, ROOSEVELT, LEE KUAN YU only confirms if a person in power in the country is loyal to his MOTHERLAND, to his PEOPLE, if First of all, the welfare of the PEOPLE, its security, external and internal, social, criminal procedural, judicial justice, is put at the forefront, then the country makes a sharp breakthrough in its development, moving forward to the forefront in world politics and economics. The US does not have all of this, corruption has penetrated even to the upper echelons of power, nepotism, lack of respect, the principle of being close to the body, the lack of professionalism assigned to high posts, their unprincipledness, cynicism, a complete lack of discipline, the implementation of decisions only emphasizes the failure of all domestic politics in particular economics, personnel. An example is more than 20 million. CITIZENS OF RUSSIA live below the poverty line, 26% of children can’t buy shoes, this is only a small part of the examples, and about projects, fairy tales, promises that have not been fulfilled and nothing to say. And this is in a country that has the largest natural reserves in the world, according to various sources from 30 to 50 %% of the world. High education, science. It’s a shame !!!
    1. DNS-a42 19 November 2019 10: 30 New
      • 6
      • 2
      +4
      Nobody owes you anything. At the head of the bourgeois state simply stood another bourgeois leader who needed to protect the interests of the ruling class. He does this. And he is devoted to his capitalist homeland. The rest is your naive dreams.
      1. New Year day 20 November 2019 01: 42 New
        • 7
        • 0
        +7
        Quote: DNS-a42
        Nobody owes you anything.



        then the opposite question arises: do we owe something to such a state? They themselves are so, but then they themselves too. As a result of a shucher, such a state will cease to exist. Then the question is whether the statesman Putin?
    2. Mcar 19 November 2019 11: 49 New
      • 5
      • 3
      +2
      Quotation: I.P.
      When he came to power in early 2000, could the president begin to create and create a socially just state - MTF, and even MUST have done, DID NOT DO.

      Unfortunately, I couldn’t. Not for that official put No. 1.

      After the New Year’s “I’m leaving ...”, a FAMILY guard was put on this post. Well, and in combination, as in the burden of scarce goods, the duties of the president. Well, we don’t expect the bank’s guards to open the door and hand out money to passers-by. That's right - not for that they are put there. So it is here.

      Anyway, that’s not the point. Ruling bourgeois class voluntarily will not let anyone change the status quo. Just do not allow this, in extreme cases, eliminate it. Are there few examples in history?
      1. shtatsov 19 November 2019 22: 14 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Any ruling class will not give anything voluntarily! There are examples in our recent history!
    3. atalef 19 November 2019 12: 05 New
      • 2
      • 5
      -3
      Quotation: I.P.
      The US does not have all of this, corruption has penetrated even to the upper echelons of power, nepotism, lack of respect, the principle of being close to the body, lack of professionalism in senior posts, their lack of principle, cynicism, complete lack of discipline, and the implementation of decisions only emphasizes the failure of all domestic politics in particular economics, personnel

      liberals are to blame laughing
  21. d.olegov44 19 November 2019 10: 08 New
    • 4
    • 6
    -2
    Why the economy of Russia is not traveling

    Steal from
  22. DNS-a42 19 November 2019 10: 26 New
    • 4
    • 2
    +2
    Another passage article, incriminating some mythical liberals, but not affecting the essence of the economic system of the Russian Federation - capitalism. Sovereignty and independence for the capitalist state is an opportunity for the domestic bourgeoisie and oligarchs to rob their workers without sharing surplus value with foreign bourgeoisie.

    The essence of the article is the same - Russian capitalism is bad, wrong, let's do good, but we will not touch the system itself. Guard raving for naive fools.
    1. vitmih 19 November 2019 10: 55 New
      • 3
      • 6
      -3
      Give North Korea! Just north
      1. DNS-a42 19 November 2019 10: 56 New
        • 3
        • 3
        0
        Give Haiti. The most free and honest capitalism.
        1. vitmih 19 November 2019 11: 00 New
          • 1
          • 6
          -5
          Only now there are no options for socialism, acre of Sevkorea today, and not only Haiti, countries where there are no full steam over isisms. Why is Finland not cited as an example? Or some Czech Republic, at least Estonia and Latvia?
          1. Glory1974 19 November 2019 12: 53 New
            • 1
            • 2
            -1
            Only here are the options for socialism, Acre Sevkorey now no

            Well, why not? In Sweden, they call it “Swedish socialism”.
            1. vitmih 19 November 2019 13: 00 New
              • 1
              • 1
              0
              Is that just what the Swedish People’s Socialist Republic is called? What is the difference between Swedish socialism and Norwegian capitalism? Can I briefly?
            2. shtatsov 19 November 2019 22: 18 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              In these Sweden and Norway there are enough excesses! When children from a family are taken away just for giving a belt for a job! Fuck me such role models!
              1. vitmih 20 November 2019 11: 44 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Are we comparing the economies of socialist North Korea and capitalist Norway?
                Or the juvenile justice of these countries?
    2. atalef 19 November 2019 12: 09 New
      • 2
      • 5
      -3
      Quote: DNS-a42
      Sovereignty and independence for the capitalist state is an opportunity for the domestic bourgeoisie and oligarchs to rob their workers without sharing surplus value with foreign bourgeoisie.

      you just have a special capitalism.
      I want to remind
      Luxembourg, Sweden, Switzerland, all European countries, Singapore, Japan, etc. etc. --- THIS IS ALL CAPITALIST COUNTRIES --- capitalist !!!!

      Plurinational State of Bolivia
      Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
      Socialist Republic of Vietnam
      People's Republic of China
      Korea, Democratic People's Republic of
      Republic of Cuba
      Lao People's Democratic Republic
      Federal Democratic Republic of Nepal

      this is all socialism - whoever wants to live in socialism --- the road is open, there your companions will meet you with a warm heart and a blazing gaze.
      1. Altona 19 November 2019 14: 32 New
        • 10
        • 3
        +7
        Quote: atalef
        you just have a special capitalism.

        -------------------------
        The most common is marginal, peripheral, raw in type, even African. The budget is made up as a policeman, in it the costs of the security forces are equal to the costs of the entire economy and industry. Under the USSR, they spent 25-30 times less on militia than on industry and the economy.
        1. atalef 19 November 2019 14: 58 New
          • 0
          • 5
          -5
          Quote: Altona
          The most common-marginal, peripheral, raw materials of the type of even African

          Nobody has yet canceled the stages of development of capitalism.
          You are at its lowest stage
          - barbaric capital accumulation.
          Quote: Altona
          . The budget is made up as a policeman, in it the costs of the security forces are equal to the costs of the entire economy and industry

          Well, someone must protect the top from the internal enemy.
          and of course shake the neighbors with a club.
          1. Altona 19 November 2019 15: 00 New
            • 3
            • 6
            -3
            Quote: atalef
            Nobody has yet canceled the stages of development of capitalism.
            You are at its lowest stage
            - barbaric capital accumulation.

            -------------------
            Whatever stages there were, only on these conditions our "elite" merged into a "fraternal" family, sorry for the flock of "developed states."
            1. atalef 19 November 2019 16: 40 New
              • 2
              • 3
              -1
              Quote: Altona
              only on these conditions did our "elite" merge into a "brotherly" family

              What are the conditions?
              Quote: Altona
              sorry to the pack of "developed states."

              well, without shaking your souls - you probably yourself wanted to live, well, at least as in Sweden or Norway, or at worst let even Finland.
              1. Altona 19 November 2019 16: 53 New
                • 3
                • 2
                +1
                Quote: atalef
                well, without shaking your souls - you probably yourself wanted to live, well, at least as in Sweden or Norway, or at worst let even Finland.

                -----------------------
                I do not need to poke. And here I can live quite for myself. I could get a Finland passport as a child. Finland had a special program on the Finno-Ugric peoples during the times of the Brezhnev USSR, about the same as you have with Israel.
                1. atalef 19 November 2019 17: 09 New
                  • 0
                  • 2
                  -2
                  Quote: Altona
                  And here I can live quite for myself. .

                  Well, the question was different

                  Quote: Altona
                  I could get a Finland passport as a child. Finland had a special program on the Finno-Ugric peoples during the times of the Brezhnev USSR, about the same as you have with Israel.

                  So what ?
                  I will not explain the difference between could and have.
                  The question was extremely clear.
                  Quote: atalef
                  well, without shaking your souls - you probably yourself wanted to live, well, at least as in Sweden or Norway, or at worst let even Finland.

                  I would like to live at such a standard of living as in the above countries or not?
              2. New Year day 20 November 2019 01: 46 New
                • 2
                • 1
                +1
                Quote: atalef
                ... probably I myself wanted to live, well, at least in Finland or, at worst, let alone Finland.

                By the way, were you there? Very good people live there, you can learn how to work and live like that.
  23. mark_rod 19 November 2019 10: 32 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    Quote: Uncle Lee
    Explanatory, analytical article .... Everything is laid out on the shelves. It remains to begin execution .... It is a pity that under the current rulers this is impossible!
    PS Strong Samsonov liberals attached!

    So all went to the polls! Why sit on the sofas and reason? Edro - in a bucket! We bring the left forces to power through elections, only then everything will change. In the meantime, the continuation of the pension reform is being prepared, at least this is already being discussed in the government.
    1. DNS-a42 19 November 2019 10: 37 New
      • 8
      • 3
      +5
      “Only villains or fools can think that the proletariat must first win the majority in the elections held under the yoke of the bourgeoisie, under the yoke of wage slavery, and then it must win power. This is the height of stupidity or hypocrisy, this is the replacement of the class struggle and revolution by the old-style ballot under the old regime. " IN AND. Lenin.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. shtatsov 19 November 2019 22: 28 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      The hell is that with him! Do you want to bring the left-wing forces to power, along with Maksakova and her late scammer? Former deputies from the Communists! Those are patriots! And these are those about which we now know! And how many more nits are there in lots?
      It seems that the problem with us is that according to the results of the cases on the cap no one gets! Fucked up, be kind, answer! Free up space, or according to the results of activities on the bunks or Canaries! Maybe the next one will be sensible! Social elevators do not work! Last 20 years, the same people in government and politics!
      1. Edmond dantes 22 November 2019 17: 06 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        All parties represented in the State Duma are essentially the same people, just with different badges on their jackets. Therefore, for anyone there vote nothing will change.
  24. vitmih 19 November 2019 10: 33 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    The recipe for giving a kick to the economy is simple. It is necessary that in the bowels of Russia run out of oil and other hydrocarbons with metals. Now take and stop mining. And then the people may stir. And he will begin to live his best education in the world. But alas, this is fantastic.
    1. Fibrizio 19 November 2019 14: 13 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Rather, with the current approach, the standard of living will slide even more.
      And sensible education in individual universities. I'm not talking about the humanitarian. It is only for the domestic market.
  25. Lexus 19 November 2019 10: 34 New
    • 13
    • 12
    +1
    Come on. The commodity economy of Russia is also driving. At an unprecedented pace, convoys and huge vessels, and also through pipes, resources flow abroad, and the finances received for them fly after them. There, where it is better, if only people would not get it.
    1. Golovan Jack 19 November 2019 10: 45 New
      • 11
      • 16
      -5
      Man, you somehow get everything according to Goebbels:

      A lie repeated a thousand times becomes true

      Only you do not get it request

      Quote: lexus
      Commodity economy of Russia

      It's a lie.

      Quote: lexus
      followed by the finances received for them

      This is also a lie. Buddy wink
      1. businessv 19 November 2019 11: 08 New
        • 10
        • 6
        +4
        Quote: Golovan Jack
        This is also a lie. Buddy

        And where do you think the truth is, buddy ?! Although, "just to say something," is also a position hi !
        1. Golovan Jack 19 November 2019 11: 17 New
          • 13
          • 12
          +1
          Quote: businessv
          "just to say something," also a position

          This is for the "Lexus", please, this is his style just.

          Quote: businessv
          Where do you think the truth is

          Well, for example, the truth is that you have nothing to say. And I really want to say something laughing
          1. businessv 19 November 2019 18: 29 New
            • 4
            • 3
            +1
            Quote: Golovan Jack
            Well, for example, the truth is that you have nothing to say. And I really want to say something

            laughing Sorry, I forgot who I'm dealing with! You are Captain Demagogue yourself! drinks
            1. Golovan Jack 19 November 2019 18: 32 New
              • 7
              • 7
              0
              Quote: businessv
              You are Captain Demagogue yourself!

              Glue labels - no need to mind. You asked an empty question:

              Quote: businessv
              And where do you think the truth is, buddy ?!

              Received an appropriate response. What are you unhappy with? I do not understand.
              1. businessv 19 November 2019 23: 35 New
                • 1
                • 2
                -1
                Quote: Golovan Jack
                Received an appropriate response. What are you unhappy with? I do not understand.

                I am satisfied with absolutely everything! You accused a colleague (Lexus) of lying twice, without substantiating your accusations, didn’t even bother to explain this position, my question is also an excuse for a youngster, so I'm really pleased that you confirmed my opinion about you: a demagogue and a troll! hi
      2. Altona 19 November 2019 14: 28 New
        • 10
        • 8
        +2
        Quote: Golovan Jack
        Man, you somehow get everything according to Goebbels:

        --------------------
        By the way, "buddy", endless tirades about the corrupt opposition, foreign agents of the West, was first used by none other than Adolf Aloizovich. And finally stop being rude to people whom you personally do not know.
        https://ehrte.livejournal.com/29878.html
        1. Golovan Jack 19 November 2019 14: 55 New
          • 11
          • 9
          +2
          Quote: Altona
          By the way ...

          ... about the birds. The priest had popped up from the belfry just now - he hadn’t even tweeted.

          Pass by, you are not interested in me ... blocher negative
          1. Mouse 19 November 2019 16: 05 New
            • 11
            • 5
            +6
            Quote: Golovan Jack
            Pop just now from the belfry came up - did not even tweet

            put on a barrel of gunpowder .... Let’s fix it ... laughing
          2. Altona 19 November 2019 17: 03 New
            • 7
            • 9
            -2
            Quote: Golovan Jack
            Pass by, you are not interested in me ... blocher

            ---------------------
            I see, rudeness is still your business card and the administration favorably looks at it. However, the Nazis are always respected and respected. They will still be rude to me in PM as usual.
            1. Golovan Jack 19 November 2019 17: 07 New
              • 9
              • 7
              +2
              Quote: Altona
              rudeness is still your business card and administration favorably looks at it

              Kohl climbed to teach others without asking - do not be offended that you are not welcome.

              I do not discuss the actions of the administration. And you, um ... I do not recommend it.

              Quote: Altona
              fascists here are always respected and respected

              It's a slap laughing

              Quote: Altona
              They’ll give me a naughty thing as usual

              You fascists rude in PM? How scary to live (to you), my condolences request
              1. Rusland 19 November 2019 17: 21 New
                • 11
                • 6
                +5
                It seems the guy went with his mind, he is looking for fascists in VO. belay
    2. Masha 19 November 2019 16: 18 New
      • 9
      • 5
      +4
      analyst? Ali expert ???? recourse
  26. businessv 19 November 2019 11: 05 New
    • 5
    • 3
    +2
    the continuation of the liberal course is the death of Russia.

    Thanks for the article, Alexander! The conclusions are accurate, the article is thought out and written perfectly! Happy Missile Forces Day and the artillery of all! soldier good drinks
  27. Dobroslav2015 19 November 2019 11: 57 New
    • 4
    • 2
    +2
    Everything is correctly noticed by the author. Only somehow he modestly kept silent about the role of the incumbent president (about his actions or inactions, all the same for almost 20 years at the helm).
    1. NordUral 6 December 2019 12: 39 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      What inaction ?! It was under him that most of the industry and forestry were destroyed or finished off.
  28. vanavatny 19 November 2019 12: 03 New
    • 12
    • 2
    +10
    and here’s what amused me the other day: the president has been driving us some nonsense about economic growth for several years, and yesterday I suddenly drilled that supposedly we managed to avoid a recession (this is also nonsense) Well, who needs to be in order to claim that Putin is something Does it control here? Demography, economics, but where not to rush, it’s obvious that the entourage simply do not have adequate information about the state of affairs in the country. How does this herd of well-fed bastards make plans for an offensive without having maps of the area? for so many years they have reformed (destroyed) medicine and you, like this one, said from the Kremlin, problems in the primary care, get fucked up, and how quickly will you fix it? how many years does it take to educate a doctor if even now the personnel shortage is not even in the thousands? At the same time, things are much worse in education, and the guarantor didn’t even open his mouth about it, why? Fursenko’s education corpse controls everything ...
  29. Fevralsk. Morev 19 November 2019 12: 24 New
    • 7
    • 6
    +1
    Quote: McAr
    Unfortunately, I couldn’t. Not for that official put No. 1.

    Stalin clearly received power not by inheritance. The officials also set. But he was able to create a team of like-minded people, get rid of opponents (Trotsky did not immediately hit the head with an ice ax, he asked for it himself) and achieved RESULTS. And Putin has been beaten for 20 years. What kind of nonsense?
    1. Fibrizio 19 November 2019 14: 17 New
      • 1
      • 5
      -4
      I would advise anyone who has not read to read Orwell’s Animal Farm book.
      You will not read anything new in it, but with respect to leftist ideas, communism, socialism and similar regimes, you will have a more harmonious picture, a puzzle will develop. It will help to realize what you already know.
      And if you look at what year the book was written, then in general you will be stunned.
      ps the fact that the author of the book anti-adviser I know, but the product does not detract from the interestingness.
      1. Foul skeptic 19 November 2019 15: 51 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        and what puzzle did you have?
      2. businessv 19 November 2019 19: 19 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: Fibrizio
        but regarding leftist ideas, communism, socialism and similar regimes

        Dear, this is not a regime, this is a system! I like the more modern literature of domestic authors. For example, Andrei Ilyin, the cycle "Vow of silence" http://a-ilin.com/. It will teach you how to think, understand what is really happening, how to survive and not worship the western lights of democracy. hi
    2. shtatsov 19 November 2019 22: 46 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      I agree! But got rid of opponents do not remember what methods? Repression 30-37 years! Little did not seem! The other day I was reading a biography about the Great Intelligence of the time, Kim Roman. Middle name is now forgotten. Sorge level, but not so famous! He worked all his life in the NKVD and the Cheka.
      I noticed that not a well-known leader, writer, constructor, almost everyone spent time in the camps! Not everyone survived! What I do not want such methods of dealing with opponents! Now, too, landings have been going on for the last few years! Although kaneshno still need to be finalized in this matter)) If only they had not gone too far!
      1. Private89 20 November 2019 21: 58 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        I would also advise you to read the transcript of Yezhov’s interrogation. It's like about 37 years old.
        An interesting thing to say is reading.
        https://hystory.mediasole.ru/protokol_doprosa_ezhova
  30. Altona 19 November 2019 14: 24 New
    • 9
    • 7
    +2
    Russia has a chronic budget surplus, and the liberal bloc gives it out as an example of an effective and wise government policy. In fact, money is sterilized, “stored” in various “stashes”, and the economy is degrading.
    ----------------------------------
    In fact, the casket of our "economy" opens very simply. All money is stored, including "welfare funds" only for the work of state corporations where very "respected people" work - Sechin, Miller, Chubais, Chemezov, Rotenberg and other friends you know who. And all this accumulates for the turn of 2024. EVERYTHING! You don’t need to know anything more about our “economy”. Plus, the export of capital to the EU and the USA is a kind of tribute to respected partners. That is, "lazy Russians" work for the whole world, now even for blacks in Africa.
    1. Victor N 19 November 2019 18: 15 New
      • 0
      • 3
      -3
      WHERE and TO WHOM to "give" money for development? None of those offended by the stinginess of the state speaks about this. Secret? Or no ideas? Rather, the last. But why?!!
  31. Karen 19 November 2019 14: 36 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    Well, since the economy does not go to Russia, then the Russians go to the economy (brain drain there, second, third ...)
  32. Tektor 19 November 2019 14: 48 New
    • 3
    • 3
    0
    I share everything except the last three paragraphs. No democracy and mythical social justice will help in solving economic problems. The current paradigm is the power of money, realized through "profit at all costs." And you need to make sure that there is no profit at the forefront, but development and progress in various fields. And this is more complicated than Goethe's Faust. And it takes time to prepare and implement.
    1. Victor N 19 November 2019 18: 29 New
      • 1
      • 3
      -2
      "Social justice" is an indefinite substance. But from the first states it is customary to distribute PUBLIC GOODS from the state - from water supply for irrigation to bread and circuses. Proceeds from seizure of income and redistribution in favor of the poor. But in Russia, they hide a lot of incomes, do not pay taxes and contributions, but they like to pretend to be poor! Even miserable. Yes, and aggressive.
      ADVANTAGE - do not take handouts!
      I saw incredibly ragged and very hungry Afghans who behaved in such a way that it was impossible to doubt their dignity .....
  33. faterdom 19 November 2019 15: 45 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: Arzt
    At the same time, the revenue side of the budget for 2019
    304,179 billion US dollars,

    Is it a big secret for you that the budget gets about half of the money earned by the country? And there is another half, and if oil prices go up, so will another 1,5-2 half.
  34. Fevralsk. Morev 19 November 2019 16: 16 New
    • 2
    • 7
    -5
    Quote: Sergey1987
    Where did you find liberal power? You read the meaning of the word liberalism.

    Liberalism in Russia is confused with compradorism
  35. Sapsan136 19 November 2019 18: 25 New
    • 7
    • 4
    +3
    The steam locomotive in the Kremlin is not the same ... Normal leaders rob the foreign countries and take the loot to their country ... Lousy leaders rob the country and take the loot abroad ...
    1. Ronald Reagan 19 November 2019 20: 18 New
      • 1
      • 4
      -3
      Why "rob and take out" that which already belongs to you?
      1. Sapsan136 19 November 2019 20: 59 New
        • 3
        • 4
        -1
        A normal person does not need to rob Russia and take it out of it, but it’s normal ... and not for those who hate Russia and its people and are afraid of rebellion against their arbitrariness ... Kyrgyzstan wrote off $ 2018 million of public debt in 240, and the population of Russia ready to remove 7 skins ... Russian patriots do not behave like that ...
        1. Oyo Sarkazmi 19 November 2019 23: 20 New
          • 0
          • 1
          -1
          Every Russian from this public debt would receive one and a half dollars over 20 years. It will take more accountants a day.
          1. Sapsan136 20 November 2019 09: 21 New
            • 1
            • 1
            0
            With this money, one could do a lot of useful things in the Russian Federation, and not give them to the Basmachi patients with Russophobia, which is a crime in itself ... GDP is shouting at the fleet there is no money, so the new corvette 20380 costs $ 240-250 million ... First, they rob Russia, and then increase the retirement age in the Russian Federation, such as no money ... Not money, conscience and no mind! For retirement, for the resignation of such leaders as leaders, and pseudo-effective managers, for the Nazis, such as Chubais, for whom ditching 30 million citizens of the Russian Federation is a trifle!
    2. Oyo Sarkazmi 19 November 2019 23: 24 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      Quote: Sapsan136
      Normal leaders rob foreign countries and take the loot to their country.
      Only, robbing a foreign country, the "normal leader" is lucky for himself and his friends. The occupation of Iraq is carried out at state expense, and oil profits are made to Bush’s closest friends.
      So do not flatter yourself - in any country you will be charged taxes on bread and butter in the ruling Codle.
      1. Sapsan136 20 November 2019 09: 22 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        The United States has 75 destroyers ... and the Russian Federation collapses what remains of the USSR ... So it’s going to friends that it’s excessively much like GDP, not Bush ...
        1. Oyo Sarkazmi 20 November 2019 11: 45 New
          • 0
          • 1
          -1
          The USA spends $ 4 billion a year on the maintenance of Israel, and $ 500 million on the maintenance of Georgia. All salaries of government officials in these countries come from the US budget.
          So do not blah blah, every American, including infants, annually gives 10-15 dollars for the maintenance of satellites.
          1. Sapsan136 20 November 2019 15: 15 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            And in what place are Russophobia countries of the former USSR satellite of the Russian Federation ?! Lukashenko set you up as clowns, calling Russia an occupier who imposed his wars on Belarus ... Among my acquaintances are Russian refugees from Alma-Ata, who had all the local Basmachi taken away from them ... Satellites from the USA, who always take more than they give abroad and in the USA all these Georgia are afraid to open their mouths, and every local buyer spits on you ... They take money from you, but as Russia needs something, they send you away, starting to scream about their independence and make you clowns all over the world. ..
            1. Oyo Sarkazmi 20 November 2019 19: 04 New
              • 0
              • 1
              -1
              Quote: Sapsan136
              And in what place are Russophobia countries of the former USSR

              If our "elita" is sick with Russophobia even now, what do you want from the Papuans? Well, he called the Azeri Jews the Russian language cloacal, "cloacligenia" rose to his defense all as one. Ksyusha Sobchak constantly says that we don’t give up the Kuril Islands, it’s hard for Georgians without a Finnish border, Ukrainians have the right to roll tanks around Moscow ... And she is always on horseback, she is trusted to manage funds and manage television channels.
              A funny picture, all the "national minorities" of the former USSR identify themselves with the upper strata of the Anglo-Saxons, and the Russian elite feels like a guilty Papuan.
              And further. Russia has not been falling apart for 11 years. And it infuriates Azeri Jews more than its own economy flying downhill. Laudatory articles about Latvia, Georgia, Ukraine, stuck in the 90s of the last century - from a sense of their own inferiority of inferior thinkers. With which the state does not submit cookies to bed.
              1. Sapsan136 20 November 2019 20: 08 New
                • 1
                • 1
                0
                Well, then where is the point to feed foreign Russophobia patients (Papuans), as you called them, if you can’t expect anything from them apart from harm and if it’s senility, worse than what Brezhnev had in recent years ?!
  36. bandabas 19 November 2019 18: 51 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Do we have a government? Personally, I see ... Yes, I see nothing good. Only- "Give me some money, give me some money. Give me love. My poor !!!"
  37. Gerneton 19 November 2019 19: 33 New
    • 4
    • 3
    +1
    Why the economy of Russia is not traveling

    and when did it go at all? And who needs it to ride? A competent and affluent population can also demand fair elections and surrender such problems? ...
    1. Oyo Sarkazmi 19 November 2019 23: 18 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Do you live in a garbage dump, in a sort of sad reality?
  38. Knell wardenheart 19 November 2019 20: 16 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Choate, it all looks like a hybrid from "Ask for advice from an old wise Jew and do it the other way round" and flamboyant balabolstvo "for all good versus all bad" with traditional glorifications to all "good" from the 20th century and all "bad" world-eaters like Chubais etc

    The problem of our country is that although we have LOTS of resources and oil, which in theory are rich, we also have extremely acidic natural conditions that complicate the extraction of all this, the largest (and it is huge) territory of our country is in the belt of these very acidic conditions, which affects oh what kind of hemorrhoids for transportation, processing - in general, everything that we want to do with the extracted. And as the third stake in our desire to "live not to press on resources" is the volume and distraction of the population of our country, within the same extremely acidic natural conditions. People are really fucked up for a comfortable living on $$$ from the sale of resources, and of this amount, a significant proportion lives in places where it is difficult to maintain an adequate level of amenities / infrastructure / medicine / education, etc. - it is commonplace because of the shitty crowding of the population, sour natural conditions and horse distances. Everyone wants to eat normally and so that they don’t have to cut to the nearest Pyaterochka for days and on normal roads - but any sober economic laws break into rubbish about the vigorous combination of foul climate, large (as a whole) population with its low (and uneven) density within a single system.

    Those who, like a church choir, sing an ode to certain forms of socialism in our country, see all of the above through pink glasses, preferring not to think about it. However, this is a very harsh truth of ergonomics - if a person is given a sufficient level of education and means (and he lives and works in mud) - in a modern society saturated with information and temptations - he will VERY soon pull this education and dough to where the nights are warmer and there is where to have fun. Those minorities that remain - will give offspring, which will also do the most part - as a result, the imbalance will increase, which will not fail to affect the habitability, quality of infrastructure of a significant part of our regions (and territory) in the most sad way (sadder than even now).

    The ideology of rights and freedoms, the prevalence of the Internet and information, the openness of our society, is extremely detrimental to what has been kept in the frame of our country for centuries. So the problem with our economy is for the most part in all of this.
  39. _Ugene_ 19 November 2019 22: 14 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    Why the economy of Russia is not traveling
    Because they are used to trading in natural resources, why invent, produce something? download, dig out of the earth, cut down and sell to neighbors, sometimes it seems that our natural wealth is our curse
  40. Alexander Petrov1632 19 November 2019 22: 22 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    I can’t understand one thing. How, now, the late E.M. Primakov, for the short time that he was the head of the government, he was able to save the country from the impending economic chaos? True, he had to remove from the government Nabiulina, Chubais and some other "successful" "leaders from the economy" !! I recall how in 2009-2010, all the warehouses of official "killers" from VAZ cars were clogged with products of this plant. All media squealed about the closure of the car factory. But it was worth giving the population 50 for utilization, making 000/1 of the loan from state subsidies and voila !! I have been waiting for my new car for three months !! They just crushed like hot cakes! This suggests that the population was not able to pay! But it was worth introducing recycling and subsidizing by the state and the machines went off with a bang. Those. the factory worked at full capacity. The same can be said of other products. Consequently, the economy began to work. Right now, everything seems to be in stores. But. That's all to see. Even the products of "torture" and those not everyone can afford. Especially for those who are retired, needy. By the way, there are 45 million such people in the country. Is it not that consumer who will give the development and updating of the same food industry ?? One gets the impression that the population is specially kept on a starvation diet. Otherwise, everything will be swept away and in a moment all that "abundance" glorified by our grief by the reformists whom they so boast about will disappear! Moreover, 90% of them are unlikely to buy in supermarkets. Because the products do not stand up to criticism !!! Because as soon as we, new successful managers from the meat processing industry, can make 1-15 kg of meat for us, prepare for you 20 kg of selected sausage !!!!! After all, the development of the food industry is the development of agriculture that has not been completely ruined, it is product independence. And so in everything. Having a budget surplus, we do not invest in the development of mechanical engineering, machine tool industry, and in the construction of new modern plants and factories. Textile and other industry. Our economic unit is all complaining about the lack and small investment in our economy !! That I beg you !! If you have a plot of land on 1-5 hectares, what are you going to sit on the “opera” and wait for a neighbor to come and begin to develop your piece of land for you, build a house for you in a couple of floors, etc. ?? Then I assure you, in a year, he will master your wife in bed, because she will simply kick you out !! It was funny to read the screech in the media !!! HOORAY!!! We have opened a new factory for the production of cars "Mercedes" !!! Already 500 jobs !! Did they collapse there from the oak? Show me at least one full-cycle plant as many as 500 employees ??? But we were hanged from the “blue thorn” on the ears with noodles that a good uncle investor would come and bring us his latest technologies !!! Yes Yes!! He just lacks in the market of competitors except Koreans, China !! The naive is complete. But after all on all this, some of them had and not a little on the accounts. For the collapse and not the development of their own factories. And the amounts there were certainly not small. But our "partners" knew what they were spending money on. They needed a market and they got it. As they say - This is a business baby. And nothing personal !!!
  41. Oyo Sarkazmi 19 November 2019 23: 13 New
    • 0
    • 3
    -3
    What kind of text is this? Where does the author get a set of condo stamps from Brooklyn Basement System? Redesigned the night shift?
    Trump wants to turn his country into a Sino-European gas station - a puppy joy from the successes of globalization. We sell - rednecks, we drive oil to coffins. The Americans have tens of thousands of empty houses - an excess of supply. We have a waste of resources and the enslavement of a mortgage.
    Comrade When you personally feel really bad, well, sit for four years without money (for so many years Navalny did not give wages to the workers of Kirovles) - then you will get the right to whine. And now whining from overeating.
  42. fif21 20 November 2019 12: 56 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The problem is voiced, the culprits are named. What's next? Re-election? Demonstrations? Rebellion of the military? "Maidan"? The revolution? .... Or will we still knock on the "clavs"? hi
  43. Roman070280 20 November 2019 14: 29 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    85–90% of the country's total wealth is concentrated in the hands of about 3% of the richest Russians.

    The Russian rich brought offshore (England, Switzerland, Cyprus, etc.) 1,5 trillion. dollars.


    And what questions after that can be ??
    The Russian economy has left for other countries ..
  44. Maks1995 20 November 2019 14: 50 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    And hurray, journalists say they are going, and how ....
    That the GDP and the KREMLIN are Patriots, and the Liberals are somewhere there ... in the 5th column ... they are in the Central Bank and in the Ministry of Economy ... and so - everywhere patriots are statesmen ....

    Commercials and sites "made by us" and schoolchildren - winners of robotics Olympiads ...
    A robot Fedya already knows how to shoot .....

    So that goes .... to whom it is necessary .... and the rest is also promised paradise, but after life ....
  45. itarnmag 20 November 2019 18: 26 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    And in our Duma, they solve such crucial problems as the use of plastic bags, limiting the time for the sale of alcoholic beverages, and the minimum price for tobacco products. And earlier they decided such a crucial issue as the renaming of the police into the police. What to talk about
  46. Private89 20 November 2019 20: 11 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    These parasites will not leave voluntarily, it’s too sweet to enrich themselves at someone else’s expense. Do not shift them by election.
    Lenin also wrote about the bourgeois elections:

    “Once every few years, to decide which member of the ruling class will suppress, crush the people in parliament - this is the real essence of bourgeois parliamentarism, not only in parliamentary-constitutional monarchies, but also in the most democratic republics”

    So it’s unlikely that the elections will be able to change the situation, but when the authorities bring the country to a revolutionary situation, and it brings it, because even a patient people like ours will not endure forever. And then what kind of power is more united, more organized, will put forward the correct slogans and take power over the masses. For the good, we would now engage in self-organization, create trade unions, read the right books for the worst, so that when all this happens not to be pawns.
  47. Stalnov I.P. 21 November 2019 10: 15 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Why the Russian economy is not traveling, it's just that the drivers are shitty. It no longer depends on sanctions, demographic failures, crises, etc. .. And everyone knows that, with the exception of the drivers themselves.
  48. sayeret Matkal 21 November 2019 21: 43 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    damned liberals
  49. Thomas the Unbelieving 21 November 2019 21: 45 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    We live outdated representations. This world is not the same even compared to the 90s. And revolutions and wars are already different. Capitalism went through 2 stages, at the first due to colonies and slavery. It was canceled in England in 1833. in France in 1848, in the USA in 1865, in Spain in 1851, in Brazil in 1888, in China in 1851, in Egypt in 1895, etc. At the second stage, by the end of the 19th century, capitalists retired and passed laws on the bureaucratic registration of property by shares, that is, they created a bureaucratic system, and declaring the shares a commodity is a speculative system of the economy. By the middle of the last century, they had withdrawn precious metals from circulation, replacing money with paper and digital. But greed is insatiable and the ruling strata of the so-called The "West" must have something, and therefore they are constantly destroying the nation-states, turning them into colonies with the help of a local organized crime group.
    This is happening with our country. Foreign capital for the years 1995-2018 bought our enterprises at $ 645 billion .. During the same time, he brought out income of 620 billion .. In order to receive such income in their “West”, they would have to invest at least 12400 billion .. (data not of Rosstat, but banking statistics). Our authorities continue to “privatize” more and more, selling off the remnants of wealth on the cheap.
    What to do? Besides words, you also need strength. Marx thought that the proletariat would overthrow capitalism. Under a certain set of circumstances, our workers and peasants came to power. But to destroy and build are two big differences. There is another power for the poor in spirit - money. “United Russia” in 2018 received from the federal budget 4 billion 225 million rubles., Communist Party-2 billion 383 million rubles. In addition, the “communist” deputies did not deprive themselves of salaries and benefits. So there is no one to hope for, except themselves.
    The Soviet economy was free from ownership of paper goods. Now rulers want to replace paper documents with electronic ones. Who and what can prevent the erasure of all title deeds of fat-bellied shareholders? Is it impossible to block all channels of translation of the so-called money outside the country? We need to think and work - the digital economy can be used both to the detriment of us and to the advantage.
    1. Minato2020 23 November 2019 01: 46 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: Thomas the Unbelieving
      We live outdated representations. This world is not the same even compared to the 90s ...
      ... Who and what can prevent them from erasing all records of ownership of fat-bellied shareholders? Is it impossible to block all channels of translation of the so-called money outside the country? We need to think and work - the digital economy can be used both to the detriment of us and to the advantage.



      So the opposite is also true - who and what can prevent the forgery of property rights in favor of financial oligarchs and bankers? An electronic money transfer is very difficult to block - you need a steel curtain.
  50. Alexey Sommer 21 November 2019 22: 17 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Great article. just read a couple of phrases in each paragraph and the essence becomes clear.