China announced a “breakthrough” in creating an engine for the J-20 fighter

101

China announced a “breakthrough” in creating engines for the new generation of J-20 fighters. We are talking about power plants marked Xian WS-15.

It is noted that the days when all Chinese J-20 fighters (and not only them) will be equipped exclusively with Chinese engines, "just around the corner". At the same time, the PRC reminds that at the moment the mentioned fighters, which were part of the PLA air force, are equipped with engines of Russian production (the AL-31 family).

On Chinese TV, it is stated that during the tests, the engine of local manufacturers WS-15 (Turbofan) "surpassed the AL-31F in a number of key parameters."



Meanwhile, an article appeared in the American weekly Jane's Defense Weekly that stated literally the following:

Chinese manufacturers did not have time to prepare their own engines, and therefore, J-70 fighters with Russian aircraft engines were used at a military parade in honor of the 20 anniversary of the founding of the PRC. This disappointed China's military experts.

In China, evidence has previously emerged that three prototypes of WS-15 engines under the code designation XX15 have so far been created. For him, as indicated, a transforming nozzle is used. This is a double zigzag edge, which is largely borrowed from foreign manufacturers of aircraft engines.

According to the plan, WS-15 turbojet engines should provide thrust at the level of 14,5 thousand kgf at a turbine temperature of 1400 degrees Celsius. At the moment, Chinese engine manufacturers for fighter aircraft aviation encounter such a problem as a sharp decrease in the thrust of the power plant when the turbine temperature reaches the operating parameters to ensure the above thrust level. In other words, instead of providing the engine thrust record-breaking for the Chinese military engine building, temperature increases bring thrust indicators to values ​​that are inferior, for example, to the same AL-31F (its afterburner thrust is 12,5 kgf). In this regard, it is not entirely clear by what "key parameters" during the tests the Chinese engine surpassed the Russian one. The “breakthrough” is considered to be the selection of metals resistant to high temperatures and their difference.
101 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +20
    17 November 2019 08: 41
    Well, sooner or later, anyway, its own school of engine building should be formed.
    Why not do something really outstanding?
    But what is really hiding behind victorious reports? This mystery is great ...
    First of all, the Chinese with the resource had pain.
    Maybe they managed to bring the resource to an acceptable level.
    1. +7
      17 November 2019 08: 54
      Quote: Victor_B
      Well, sooner or later, anyway, its own school of engine building should be formed.

      Only less expensive, as we have in the USSR .. We actually started from scratch!
      The Chinese people are hardworking, but very cunning .. As if they had not outwitted themselves .. hehe
      The main thing is to remember that they owe all this to Stalin and the USSR ..
      And then they would be sitting there in slums opium smoking English .. hi
      1. +21
        17 November 2019 09: 12
        Greetings, my friend! We also did not start from scratch. First there were trophy BMWs and YuMOs, then English ones: Rolls-Royce, Nin and Derwent. Hehe ... hi
        1. +4
          17 November 2019 09: 56
          Yes, for any engine passes as a secret. And secrets in China are treated as they should.
          So for "surpassed in many respects" both real achievement and misinformation can be hidden.
          Very soon, the real performance characteristics of Chinese engines will appear in the media.
        2. +2
          17 November 2019 12: 05
          On the Nord Stream 1 stand the Rolls Royce compressor (I saw it myself and even have a photo of the box), but on the second thread?
          And it’s better to keep silent about the fifth generation of mattresses - the restriction on 50 seconds overhead ...
        3. +6
          17 November 2019 14: 12
          Quote: Nycomed
          Greetings, my friend! We also did not start from scratch. First there were trophy BMWs and YuMOs, then English ones: Rolls-Royce, Nin and Derwent. Hehe ... hi

          And also "my Jewish friend" was Fau German (the Americans took von Braun to their place)))
          they studied them specifically and found out that there are only metal alloys there, about 1500, which are not produced in the USSR .. They scratched their heads and began to invent their own (while Stalin gave the order ..)))
          In short, we "dreamed" that we were the first in space in everything !!!!
          And even now, our missiles are manned. The most reliable hi
          So nycomed, look so that you are not being drilled there, your comrades? Greyhound you look too hehe
          1. -1
            17 November 2019 14: 20
            My friend! Make a slight difference between rocket and turbojet engines. At least in terms of self-education. Does your name Frank Whittle say nothing?
            1. -1
              17 November 2019 14: 45
              Quote: Nycomed
              My friend!

              I'm not your friend .. hi
              Quote: Nycomed
              Make a slight difference between rocket and turbojet engines. At least in terms of self-education. Does your name Frank Whittle say nothing?

              I have Korolev and Gagarin in priority hi
              Catch you on the oil rig, in sight .. (joke ..)))) laughing
              1. -1
                17 November 2019 15: 02
                My dear! You are my friend! And, by the way, regarding the question of self-education, there are no "oil rigs". There are drilling rigs, and they are already classified differently. I could be wrong, I am 52 years old and I am already a pensioner, I may be, somewhere, not in the subject. My friend!
                1. +1
                  17 November 2019 17: 11
                  Quote: Nycomed
                  I could be wrong, I’m 52 a year old and I’m already a pensioner, maybe somewhere, not in the subject. My friend!

                  But sho is not allowed into Israel? Or do you expect a pension from Russia (northern))) and then to the promised land it’s profitable yet hehe
                  1. -1
                    17 November 2019 19: 09
                    Why should I wait for her (pension)? She waited for me herself. And I honestly earned it. And, yes, he worked there "where it's cold in a coat even in summer." But, in Israel it won't work. He-he.
          2. +2
            17 November 2019 14: 25
            Quote: Provincial-M
            they studied them specifically and found out that there are only metal alloys there, about 1500, which are not produced in the USSR .. They scratched their heads and began to invent their own (while Stalin gave the order ..)))

            Did the Japanese produce it? The Germans seem to have given them the documentation for the production of the FAU-1. Operation "Shadows of Yamato", if Bogachev is not lying.
            1. +4
              17 November 2019 14: 51
              Quote: Mordvin 3
              Did the Japanese produce it? The Germans seem to have given them the documentation for the production of the FAU-1. Operation "Shadows of Yamato", if Bogachev is not lying.

              DID NOT KNOW ! But nothing would have saved the Japanese ... from the evil Russians! The Chinese owe us their lives .. How many Japanese people specifically cut them there They say millions of 50 at a time .. bloodthirsty pads hi Well, Quantuns, we have gouged a millionth army in a month! It was necessary to land on the island to them, but they had already stopped. Stop fighting! soldier
              1. 0
                9 May 2020 10: 38
                In fact...
                [/ quote] However, the main part of military equipment (artillery, tanks, aircraft) was developed in the 1930s and by the end of World War II it was significantly outdated, and due to the limited human resources of Japan, up to 50% of the personnel of the ground units were recruited of younger recruits who did not have sufficient military training, and of limited eligible reservists in connection with the transfer of well-trained units, which were considered the best in the Japanese army, to conduct military operations in the Pacific against the United States. With the start of the Manchurian operation, on August 16, 1945, the commander of the Kwantung Army, General Yamada Otzo, ordered his army to surrender, after Emperor Hirohito announced the surrender of Japan on August 14, 1945. Some Japanese divisions refused to surrender, and hostilities continued for the next few days. . [quote]
        4. +1
          18 November 2019 12: 52
          Quote: Nycomed
          Greetings, my friend! We also did not start from scratch. First there were trophy BMWs and YuMOs, then English ones: Rolls-Royce, Nin and Derwent. Hehe ... hi

          Google at your leisure RD-1 A. Lyulki. 1940th year. What are Nin and Derwent? hi
        5. 0
          18 November 2019 19: 58
          Even before the start of World War II, Arkhip Lyulka created the first technical project in the USSR for the RD-1 aircraft turbojet engine. The war made adjustments: work on the RD-1 with the outbreak of hostilities was suspended. And he was also the first to propose a dual-circuit jet engine.
          1. 0
            9 May 2020 10: 31
            Well, a very small clarification.
            [/ quote] For the first time, a double-circuit turbojet engine was proposed by the creator of the first efficient turbojet engine, Frank Whittle, in the early 1930s. Since 1937, the Soviet scientist and designer A.M. Lyulka investigated this principle and submitted an application for the invention of a dual-circuit turbojet engine (copyright certificate on April 22, 1941). The first samples of turbojet engines with afterburners were created at Rolls-Royce in the second half of the 1940s, and Conway became the first serial. [Quote]

            But who actually needs the truth in our time.
      2. +1
        17 November 2019 09: 22
        They will "forget" as soon as they decide that they have reached the same level with Russia in technology.
      3. -5
        17 November 2019 11: 47
        In fact, it was under Stalin and the USSR that China was sitting in slums, smoking opium. The bumbling of Mao did not bring any benefits to the economy.
        A steady take-off of the Chinese economy began in the 90's.
        It is possible that it was the collapse of the USSR that prompted China how to "DO NOT".
        As a result, China did as "SHOULD".
        And he did it.
        1. 0
          17 November 2019 11: 54
          Quote: Chit
          A steady take-off of the Chinese economy began in the 90's.
          It is possible that it was the collapse of the USSR that prompted China how to "DO NOT".

          Our sidekick went to China in 86, and then we were already shocked by his story about the path of China ...
        2. +1
          17 November 2019 12: 02
          Quite the contrary, successful reforms in China took place at the end of the 70x, in 80x an economic take-off began, and it was China that equaled the political elite of the Union when it tried to reorganize on the path of capitalism. This is easy to trace by the chronology of events, and many politicians of that time directly stated this.
          But in the end, it didn’t go according to plan and it turned out as usual.
          1. -8
            17 November 2019 15: 33
            Who and what was equal - no matter.
            The result is important.
            And he is like this: China today occupies the second (or first?) Place in the world in economic development, and the USSR has disappeared from the political map of the world.
            And China occupies this place, including for the reason that it spied on the USSR how to do it. He made the right conclusions and is still thriving today.
            What can not be said about the USSR.
            1. -11
              17 November 2019 15: 51
              What does it mean no matter? Due to the permanent regime of repressions and genocides, the Soviet ruling elite has degenerated so much that there was simply no one to reform the country following the example of China. Does it make sense to pour tears over the collapse of such a state? I do not even know. In terms of economic development (GDP per capita), China lags behind modern Russia, to second place it is like ... cancer.
              And China occupies this place, including for the reason that it spied on the USSR how to do it.
              that's for sure, the 20 Chinese had enough years of “successes” in the planned economy to completely disappoint the communist model of the state, the Russians didn’t give up so easily and for 60 years they tried to make candy out of feces ...
              1. 0
                18 November 2019 13: 35
                Quote: Corn
                Due to the permanent regime of repressions and genocides, the Soviet ruling elite has degenerated so much that there was simply no one to reform the country following the example of China.

                But in Russian it’s already no way to say ... there is a very correct word - continuous ... this time ...
                Just the elite really began to degenerate after the 50s and not at all due to repression:

                corn is butter, it is bread and sausage ... laughing
            2. 0
              18 November 2019 15: 38
              that spied on the USSR, how to do it is not necessary.

              You mixed everything in a heap, it was the other way around, read something about the Kissinger triangle!
              The Americans opened factories in China as a counterweight to the USSR, to strengthen influence.
              But business is business, and when the enterprises opened in China began to receive 100% of profits, the State Department could not keep the rest and they threw a ramp to China for easy money ...
              hi Read it ...
          2. 0
            18 November 2019 20: 59
            They were not equal to China from the word "absolutely". Although they could not be attached to the topic. The ideal was Europe and the United States, for many - to this day. That there is only one grimy argument about the refusal to increase the money supply in order to avoid inflation. Despite the fact that China has increased the volume of the national currency 10 times in 20 years - and inflation at the same time remained within acceptable limits. But who is interested in the example of China, in fact ...
        3. +10
          17 November 2019 14: 35
          Quote: Chit
          In fact, it was under Stalin and the USSR that China was sitting in slums, smoking opium.

          Under Stalin, Soviet engineers built the First Automobile Plant in China, a copy of ZiS.


          That's what they are releasing now, after 65 years. 4,5 million cars a year, with the bulk of the Chinese auto industry selling domestically. One hundred twenty thousand people work there. State-owned enterprise. Where is our ZIL?
          1. +1
            17 November 2019 18: 03
            Excuse me, first, what's in this blue Chinese suitcase?
            Platform? Design? Engine?
            Secondly, exactly it is produced by 4,5 million?
            1. +1
              17 November 2019 18: 20
              Quote: Vlad.by
              Secondly, exactly it is produced by 4,5 million?

              No, they produce a wide variety of cars, both cars and trucks.
              Currently, FAW produces cars of six categories, including light, medium and heavy trucks, SUVs, cars, buses, and small cars. FAW produces cars under its own brands:

              Xiali
              Hongqi
              Jiaxing
              Besturn B50 and B70. The structure of First Automotive Works includes FAW Bus and Coach, which produces intercity and tourist models of buses with its own chassis and engines (capacity from 150 to 241 hp) at its two plants. Buses are offered in various lengths: 8,6 m, 10,4 m, 11,4 m, with the number of seats from 26 to 51.
              https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Automotive_Works
              Also licensed by Toyota.
              1. 0
                19 November 2019 00: 11
                And which of the following is developed, and not licked by the Chinese ???
                1. 0
                  19 November 2019 09: 36
                  Quote: Vlad.by
                  And which of the following is developed, and not licked by the Chinese ???

                  Who cares? The USSR did not disdain to completely copy planes and produce cars under license.
                  1. 0
                    19 November 2019 23: 50
                    So, with the domestic market in 1,5 billion people, it is not a sin to produce. There are no problems with labor, and with finances, whose legs are growing from there. Objective laws of economics. And after the domestic market, export also appears.
                    In Russia, sorry, the market is at least 10 times smaller.
                    Question as a product.
                    From my experience, the Germans in Shanghai built a plant for the production of special alloys.
                    Now the plant is in free swimming, no longer under the Germans.
                    Those alloys that were produced under German control still come in excellent quality and at a very good price. For example, Stellit 6 alloy. We tried to order them a similar alloy.
                    Also Stellit, but according to GOST - В3К
                    The difference is a couple of percent in chemistry.
                    Alas...
                    and when I discuss with their engineer
                    Special alloy part drawing
                    I get the question - what is h16, H16? etc. (For non-mechanics - designation of standard allowances / tolerances for accuracy)
                    Like this! Accordingly, if you want to order something - be nice, teach the Chinese comrades, and then 10 again check the process and be sure! Ready to ship products. And not because they are cheating (although there is one) - they simply do not know how!
                    But it will be super polished! Externally - well, just like new)))
    2. -5
      17 November 2019 10: 22
      it should, of course, only it doesn’t form. Pin_dosnia, too, everyone wants their real engine to fly to the ISS, but they can’t do anything, and they still have engines from von Braun and they can think of nothing else except the Holivut f1. In short, if in the near future will again be the purchase of our AL-31, it will be clear what these stories are worth.
    3. +1
      18 November 2019 01: 18
      Probably, they bought Ukrainian engineers again and they helped them for good money. laughing
    4. 0
      18 November 2019 19: 06
      To have a school, we need our own developments. The Chinese mentality is designed to follow instructions and rules, to elementary cramming, where there is no place for creativity. As soon as the opportunity for copying ends, they simply stop, because they can create nothing purely Chinese.
  2. +14
    17 November 2019 08: 42
    В China announced a “breakthrough” in the creation of engines for new generation fighters

    In which fuel line did it break today? laughing

    Well, if in essence, then the eastern neighbors do not stand still and who knows how many years later they will catch up with our current school of engine building .... We need to keep a distance and conduct our developments.
    1. +5
      17 November 2019 08: 50
      You need to keep your distance, conduct your development.

      But who knows what our people are working on ....
      The Germans won, at one time, a bolt was scored on Me.109, and all forces were thrown on Me.262 ....
      1. +7
        17 November 2019 09: 00
        Really burst!
        However, nothing can last forever ... about China, so this is actually expected.
        And now what? Nothing new. We need to move our science forward and strive for new achievements!
        1. +7
          17 November 2019 09: 43
          Victor, hi! soldier
          A breakthrough among the Chinese is, of course, a plus for them. Let's see what happens next .... wink
          1. +3
            17 November 2019 09: 48
            Hello pasha soldier
            Quote: bouncyhunter
            . Let's see what will happen next

            We’ll look, but the most important thing is to move forward! While there is an opportunity .... and if the opportunities are tight, we must create them, look for them!
            1. +9
              17 November 2019 09: 52
              Quote: rocket757
              need to move forward!

              Who would argue. bully
              Quote: rocket757
              to search!

              Do you remember "Two Captains" Averin?
              "Fight and seek, find and not give up!"

              soldier
              1. +2
                17 November 2019 10: 01
                Kaverin wrote ...
                Fight, do not give up, it turns out .... We can also look, especially if in the fight! We still have to use and save, so that in a normal way, without too much stress!
                Going into the mode of just normal, calm work and life! People just get tired, all the time somewhere to rub and something to overcome!
      2. +4
        17 November 2019 09: 18
        Quote: lucul
        But who knows what our people are working on ....

        Declassified the new engine of the Su-57
        https://utro.ru/army/2019/03/13/1393263.shtml
    2. -3
      17 November 2019 12: 16
      I have already erased my language, saying that we need to buy Motor Sich in any way, for any money!
      1. +3
        17 November 2019 14: 47
        Quote: Nycomed
        I have already erased my language, saying that we need to buy Motor Sich in any way, for any money!

        What for? Better Lockheed Martin, Boeing and Airbus. Well, on the delivery of Apple with Google
        1. 0
          17 November 2019 15: 05
          It’s funny for you, but I’m serious.
          1. +3
            17 November 2019 15: 10
            They will be sold to us with the same probability.
            1. -1
              17 November 2019 15: 18
              It is necessary to interrupt, in any way, to drag time, to bargain, etc. etc. But would it be better if it all went to the States or China?
              1. 0
                17 November 2019 16: 07
                Us lousy automaker (if I'm not mistaken Chevrolet) was not sold in the best years. And here is the key defense enterprise. If you haven’t managed to sell it to China yet, then the states will not allow it and simply fall apart. Russia can offer at least half the budget, nothing will break off for us.
                1. +1
                  17 November 2019 16: 26
                  Wrong Opel
      2. 0
        18 November 2019 10: 59
        Ruslan Ishchenko says that already)))

        https://rueconomics.ru/407405-ukrainskii-politolog-obyasnil-kak-rossiya-operedila-kitai-i-ssha-v-pokupke-motor-sich
  3. +11
    17 November 2019 09: 01
    "Armenian Radio" remembered something
    There will be no communism in Armenia ...
    Why???
    Leonid Ilyich said that communism is not far off, and Armenia is just around the corner.
  4. +10
    17 November 2019 09: 15
    China announced a “breakthrough” in creating engines for the new generation of J-20 fighters.

    I’m just sure that the military development of Russia shouldn’t just become the property of anyone. As for this breakthrough, this is another step towards weakening the PLA's dependence on Russian production. Of course, a question arose (not from scratch and not from the kondachka):
    WHAT WILL HAPPEN TO THE RUSSIAN-CHINESE RELATIONS WHEN THE ONLY HYDROCARBON DEPENDENCE ON THE FORGOTTEN PEOPLE WILL REMAIN?
    belay
    The life of generations of Soviet people is simply thrown into the furnace so that someone on this Earth becomes warmer, and we are surprised every week either by the scale of theft, or by blatant cynicism and cruelty, and we want new Gagarins, Kalashnikovs, Tupolevs, Korolevs ... So that in life there was joy, not a bitter sediment.
    1. +4
      17 November 2019 12: 52
      While an estate society is being rapidly built in the country, only the appearance of Matvienoks, Rogozins and Patrushevs is possible. And these are accustomed only to the "royal" ways, which, as is known since ancient times, are not in science. But any development contrary to historical logic is doomed to failure, and this abomination will end too. The only pity is the loss of three decades and the millions of compatriots who could not bear such humiliation.
      1. 0
        17 November 2019 13: 03
        Quote: at84432384
        It is a pity only the loss of three decades and millions of compatriots who could not stand such humiliation.

        Look, impressive:
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=40Nzl0ZNexs
        I expect absolutely nothing from the successor of the traitor ... Nothing useful for the country and society ... He was exhausted before the start ... Pay attention to the words of EBN to Clinton about his protege ...
  5. +9
    17 November 2019 09: 25
    In which I completely agree with the Amerans, that we can not send us not to transfer modern technology, not to help in their creation. Let them create everything from scratch. Sooner or later, but our kindness towards the Chinese military-industrial complex will come to our side. ..
    1. 0
      17 November 2019 12: 58
      This is not "kindness", but incompetence and venality.
  6. +5
    17 November 2019 09: 34
    A whistle is an artistic ... Chinese ... GTE blade technology for 5 generation engines DEMANDS equipment that is NOT being sold to China. Neither we, nor Americans, nor Germans. And without these VACUUM installations and technology for applying heat-resistant and thermo-barrier layers, the lifetime of turbine blades at high temperatures drops sharply. The result is an engine resource! And dozens of times ... And technology, technology ...
    1. -1
      17 November 2019 10: 38
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      GTE blade technology for 5 generation engines REQUIRES equipment that DOES NOT SELL to China. Neither we, nor Americans, nor Germans.


      And the Chinese do not mind selling the production technology of these same blades to the Germans smile
      1. +2
        17 November 2019 10: 43
        Quote: Good_Anonymous

        And the Chinese do not mind selling the production technology of these same blades to the Germans

        What is it like? We bought the ALD installation for applying a "thermal barrier" at the time of "warming" and managed to master it. But this one was not sold to China ... laughing
        1. 0
          17 November 2019 10: 45
          Quote: Mountain Shooter

          And the Chinese do not mind selling the production technology of these same blades to the Germans

          How's that?


          This is it: https://www.scmp.com/news/china/society/article/2127796/china-talks-sale-jet-engine-technology-germany

          Quote: Mountain Shooter
          We bought the ALD installation for applying a "thermal barrier" at the time of "warming" and managed to master it. But this one was not sold to China ... laughing


          And the Chinese went quietly to cry in the corner.
          1. +1
            17 November 2019 11: 01
            Quote: Good_Anonymous
            And the Chinese went quietly to cry in the corner

            There is no word in the article about coating installations. Machines for laser drilling holes in the blades - I saw this. One does not replace the other. And the Chinese comrades clearly indicated that the United States will block this deal, since Germany and the United States are allies ...
            In short, there is an article, it is not about what I mentioned, there are no real engines. Protocol of Intent.
            1. -3
              17 November 2019 11: 12
              Quote: Mountain Shooter
              There is no word in the article about coating installations.


              Quote: Mountain Shooter
              In short, there is an article, it’s not about what I mentioned,


              So at first you just talked about "GTE blade technology".

              Quote: Mountain Shooter
              Protocol of Intent.


              That is yes. But the article shows that at least part of the technology for the production of GTE blades in China is.
              1. +3
                17 November 2019 11: 26
                Quote: Good_Anonymous
                That is yes. But the article shows that at least part of the technology for the production of GTE blades in China is.

                Of course there is. Part. They came to Germany for the missing parts - coating plants. Offering installation of drilling holes - "for exchange" ... It did not work out.
                I'm a little up to date, doing these technologies ... The key technology is coating technology. Laser drilling machines - well, everyone has them. More or less productive. But not everyone has coating installations ... How did the Germans sell such a coating to Russia? For me is a mystery laughing
    2. +5
      17 November 2019 10: 49
      Somehow I got a shovel from a friend from the Aviation Engineering School, I don’t know why, but he studied at IL-76. Centimeters 8-m. I thought I would make myself a specific keychain. He broke three drills on a drilling machine, and it was at a paramilitary plant, they didn’t give them anymore, they sent ... a young student student. So the hole-hole did not. Now after so many years - the bottle opener is eternal - it does not rust and does not require special care. wink
      1. 0
        17 November 2019 15: 01
        Quote: Fedorov
        Friends from the Aviation Engineering School dragged a shovel

        Interestingly, emery takes? You can try cutting muddy
  7. +2
    17 November 2019 09: 35
    Fuel efficiency compared to ours or mastering previously inaccessible technologies in your engine - isn't it considered a breakthrough? We have + 0.00% of GDP or the new school bus is considered a breakthrough by the universal scale.)))
    1. -1
      17 November 2019 12: 15
      This is not to be taken away from us, the stop with such a pomp is opened .... wassat
      1. +4
        17 November 2019 13: 10
        Quote: Popuas
        This is not to be taken away from us, the stop with such a pomp is opened ...

        I did not see such fraud in the USSR, such boundless servility and servility, such unprecedented hypocritical display, as in modern times. Take a look:
        1. +1
          17 November 2019 13: 28
          I already see everything! In Chelyabinsk, before the arrival, I will plant trees fool at subzero temperature! On fences, to enclose the facades of buildings, allocated 220mln r, on fences .... recourse
          1. 0
            18 November 2019 20: 17
            I live in Krasnodar, Putin often came, why didn’t they plant trees, do not put asphalt on the snow, stop lying.
            1. 0
              19 November 2019 00: 18
              Come to Chelyabinsk.
  8. +3
    17 November 2019 09: 39
    As I understand the "breakthrough" in
    double zigzag edge, which is largely borrowed from foreign manufacturers of aircraft engines

    But
    instead of providing a record engine thrust for the Chinese military engine industry, temperature increases bring thrust indicators to values ​​that are inferior, for example, to the same AL-31F

    The circle closed in a zigzag fashion. recourse
    What can wave with ripples now stir up?
  9. -1
    17 November 2019 09: 42
    China has the most successful fighter is the one that was made for Pakistan ...
  10. +3
    17 November 2019 09: 43
    That the Chinese .... Known to all, Baba Yaga generally flew on a broomstick, and the woman lived to an advanced age.
    Let them say what they want. All the same, they will fly on what is, and not on what they are talking about.
    1. 0
      17 November 2019 15: 07
      Quote: prior
      That the Chinese .... Known to all, Baba Yaga generally flew on a broomstick, and the woman lived to an advanced age.

      good
  11. +2
    17 November 2019 09: 44
    for example, the same AL-31F (its afterburner traction is 12,5 kgf).
    well, after all, thousands!
  12. +2
    17 November 2019 10: 21
    I really want the Chinese to surpass Russia, so they ran ahead of the engine.
    1. +1
      17 November 2019 13: 31
      Quote: bratchanin3
      I really want the Chinese to surpass Russia, so they ran ahead of the engine.

      And you will deny that this did not happen? We were also told for a long time about the linearity of the characteristics of the radio tubes and their protection against electromagnetic radiation in comparison with transistors. Now in Russia almost all electronics are from China, and we have learned how to make LED lamps ... belay
      I am amazed at the intensity, the scrupulousness with which Chinese scientists and engineers (and this is welcomed by the Chinese authorities) are looking for breakthrough technologies, are exploring various possibilities (even if simply by copying), BUT !!!
      How long ago did the first Chinese cosmonaut fly into space on the Soyuz? And what is today? But our, the first to step into space, the power at the level of the president is discussing the theft of billions during the construction of the cosmodrome ...
      What are we building up? Which system? Why do we still with some kind of grin perceive the real successes of the PRC, and rejoice at our worthless projects with a puppy screech, hitting the world not so much with projects (many know about them), but with projects - unrealizable, fantastic and ... super expensive?
      Quote: askort154
      In the photo there are strange nozzle flaps with UVT, huge massive in comparison with ours. Is it their "know-how", or could not make a copy

      The increase ... feel Let's look at the Russian Chubais textbook (black and white) and ask (???)

      Maybe we’ll laugh together after (four years) ten years and summarize ... If we survive ... feel
      1. +1
        17 November 2019 15: 42
        Quote: ROSS 42
        I am amazed at the intensity, the scrupulousness with which Chinese scientists and engineers (and this is welcomed by the Chinese authorities) are looking for breakthrough technologies, are exploring various possibilities (even if simply by copying), BUT !!!

        Chinese intelligence services are actively using in their work citizens traveling to the United States for permanent residence, students to study and businessmen. This tactic was called "thousands of grains of sand." She was adopted from the Japanese. In the 50 years, every Japanese from a foreign tourist trip brought photographs of cars or household appliances, up to the design of toilets. This made it possible to quickly restore the country's economy, which suffered during the war.

        Chinese intelligence agencies are tracking citizens traveling abroad, whether they are tourists, businessmen, or students. Only the latter annually there are more than 100 thousand. They are interviewed, both before departure and upon return. An amateur spy who brings valuable information receives a number of privileges.
        Chinese intelligence in the United States is not only interested in military secrets. A certain Piny Kashu sent to China technology for the production of organic pest control products. It was a trade secret and was valued at no less than 350 million dollars. This technology can be used to produce chemical weapons.

        https://zen.yandex.ru/media/spy/razvedka-kitaia-v-ssha-kak-rabotaiut-tam-specslujby-podnebesnoi-i-chto-dobyvaiut-5c9c77367825b400af148fa5
        We would be so. And study the Chinese work of Tai Gong "Six Secret Teachings". In general, this work should be read by all hands.
        https://e-libra.ru/read/503425-shest-sekretnyh-ucheniy-nastavleniya-dlya-effektivnogo-sverzheniya-dinastii.html
        1. +2
          17 November 2019 16: 12
          Quote: Mordvin 3
          In general, this work should be read by all the leaders.

          To read? What is this? Rather, they will look like that Ukrainian deputy, only with the sound turned off:
          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bkt7oi9dIeE
          But in general, this highest level of power is more concerned with their own personalities. Here is the old video, but I don’t think that something in the activities of these people has changed for the better:
          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I6RX36YA_3k
          I was struck by the born law on walking dogs, which does not give a citizen the right to use a weapon, or to hit a dog with something that did not bite him ... And the fines are so "serious" that only fines imposed on pedestrians can be funnier. and cyclists, the most aggressive road users.
          As for our leaders, they are simply shocked:
          1. +1
            17 November 2019 16: 48
            Quote: ROSS 42
            To read? What is this? Rather, they will look like that Ukrainian deputy, only with the sound turned off:

            Better yet, introduce it into the school curriculum, but this is unrealistic. "Six Secret Teachings. Instructions for Effectively Overthrowing a Dynasty."
            1. 0
              17 November 2019 18: 36
              Quote: Mordvin 3
              Better yet, introduce it into the school curriculum, but this is unrealistic. "Six Secret Teachings. Instructions for Effectively Overthrowing a Dynasty."

              I accidentally stumbled upon two clips from Poltoranin. Look - you will not regret it:
              https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HsDEYe8QQkg
              https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AqvMJiDwd6I
  13. 0
    17 November 2019 10: 21
    In the photo there are strange nozzle flaps with UHT, hugely massive in comparison with ours. Is that their "know-how", or could you not make a copy? No.
  14. +1
    17 November 2019 10: 32
    Yes, everyone knows how China makes all its "breakthroughs", most of the Soviet and Russian technologies. A huge amount of resources were thrown into the processing of "borrowed" technologies, but the output is still worse in quality.
  15. -2
    17 November 2019 10: 41
    surpassed AL-31F in a number of key parameters


    If this is not a stuffing, then the level of Chinese engine building is so-so.
  16. +8
    17 November 2019 11: 35
    Thrust WS-15 14,5 kgf - and take-off weight J20, therefore, 30 kg? laughing
    1. +2
      17 November 2019 13: 17
      Quote: Operator
      and the take-off weight of the J20, therefore, 30 kg?

      Well, taking off weight through the latest technology is also a breakthrough laughing
  17. +1
    17 November 2019 12: 39
    Well, J-20 is equipped with variations of WS-10, and these words about the breakthrough are a means of propaganda and rather an expression of dissatisfaction with the lack of a similar one where they could buy it
  18. +1
    17 November 2019 14: 29
    WS-15 is the P-79 that the Chinese received from Russia. For 20 years, they couldn’t do anything sensible. Their entire breakthrough is the nozzle from Salyut, developed by Esche under Eliseev. Problems with the degree of increase in pressure, problems with the transition from idle to full-speed mode, problems of engine stability in a wide range of heights and speeds.
  19. +1
    17 November 2019 14: 38
    Ukraine helps with materials
  20. 0
    17 November 2019 14: 43
    Well, if the Chinese have solved the riddle of the 1984 of the year, then here’s the next riddle for them: Create an afterburner engine for the 5 generation aircraft. For, by the joy of the Chinese, it is still possible to understand that they have finally come nearer to 4. Whatever they say about their next team hodgepodge J-20.
  21. +1
    17 November 2019 20: 03
    China announced a “breakthrough” in creating an engine for the J-20 fighter
    I would not want to quote Zadorny, but it begs itself .. Well, stupid ... Even in the age of industrialization, in the USA there weren’t so many resources, technologies and dough concentrated in one place and at the same time .. Amazing .. Like the Chinese they still haven’t sent a manned expedition to Jupiter ..
  22. 0
    17 November 2019 21: 07
    According to the plan, WS-15 turbojet engines should provide thrust at the level of 14,5 kgf

    The first time is an accident!
    AL-31F (its afterburner traction - 12,5 kgf).

    The second is a coincidence!
  23. -1
    18 November 2019 04: 38
    I know how readers relate to NI, and specifically to Dave Majumdar, there is a lot of skepticism among the audience, but I read his articles calmly, because There are dozens of magazines like NI in the US and there are plenty to choose from and compare. So, in September, NI published his article called
    “The Chinese J-20 Stealth Fighter has a fatal error (which may be fixed soon)
    https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/chinas-j-20-stealth-fighter-has-fatal-flaw-might-soon-be-fixed-30912
    “The WS-15 is expected to be ready for widespread installation on the J-20 by the end of this year,” said a Chinese military source, South China Morning Post. The same source noted that the WS-15 still has “minor problems” that must be resolved after more intensive engine operation on the plane.
    “Sources disagree with the exact WS-15 traction rating, with ratings ranging from a minimum of 30 000 pounds of afterburning to a figure in 44 000 pounds of afterburning. It is known that the WS-15 prototype, which has been developed since the 1990's, created thrust in 36 000 pounds, and at that time forecasts predicted that the operational version of the engine would produce thrust in 40 340 pounds - and this would have three-dimensional vector thrust.
    “The South China Morning Post reports that the WS-15 has a thrust-to-weight ratio of over ten to one, which, if true, is comparable to the F119 and F135 Pratt & Whitney that power the Lockheed Martin F-22. Raptor and F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, respectively. However, while the Chinese engine can generate thrust levels comparable to American engines, the WS-15 falls short of durability in less than half the time to overhaul.
    “However, the issue of WS-15 remains unresolved. While the Chinese have demonstrated the ability to create sophisticated jet engines with single-crystal turbine blades under laboratory conditions, Beijing's efforts to mass-produce reliable jet engines are extremely unsuccessful. WS-15 had a particularly difficult pregnancy, and it remains to be seen how well the engine works when flight tests begin in earnest.
    “All the Chinese J-20 observed in this way were equipped with either the Russian AL-31FN salute or the WS-10B. “The use of WS-10B engines is only a temporary and expedient stage in the development of the J-20 engine ... in the future, the aircraft may use another new engine, a version of WS-10 with improved engine performance (IPE), WS-10 IPE, while the development of WS-15 will not be successful, ”a Chinese military source told SCMP earlier this year. “Several times it’s so awkward to change engines for such an important aviation project ... only because of the unreliability of existing WS-15 engines. This is a long-standing main problem among domestic aircraft. ”
    1. -1
      18 November 2019 21: 14
      Quote: eklmn
      afterburning


      On the fast and the furious.

      Quote: eklmn
      three-dimensional vector traction


      Three-dimensional thrust vector control.
      1. 0
        18 November 2019 21: 28
        In fact, I always apologize for my comment on the Google translation - I do not know the correct terminology, and there is no time for editing. Thank you very much, but in the future the translations will be the same, but with my apology in the beginning.
  24. +1
    18 November 2019 06: 33
    Well done, what else can I say! hi
  25. 0
    18 November 2019 07: 40
    Breakthroughs?
    Striding wide, trousers tore ...
  26. 0
    18 November 2019 08: 44
    All the same, the secrets were stolen
  27. 0
    18 November 2019 20: 23
    "On Chinese TV it is stated that during the tests conducted, the engine of local manufacturers WS-15 (Turbofan)" surpassed the AL-31F in a number of key parameters. "

    One of them I already know, it is cheaper.
  28. 0
    18 November 2019 22: 47
    Having looked at the chronology of the creation of military equipment in China, we can say with confidence that the "celestial" did not do anything of its own, a continuous copy and paste. I myself am Tulyak, my father worked all his life as an engineer at TOZ and we often talked with him about the global military industry. So, he constantly said that 90% of success is metals (alloys). You can copy anything you want Literally everything!, But it will not ride or fly for one simple reason: the lack of the necessary alloys. That is why we easily sell them small (relatively of course) lots of weapons without fear of copying. We know that they will not do anything good anyway ...