To replace the "Solntsepek": For the first time captured the flamethrower system "Tosochka"

89

The first sketch images of a new development of the domestic defense industry complex were published on the Web, presumably capturing the TOS-2 system, which could replace the Solntsepek.

They appear in a patent for a new product. Apparently, the TOS-2 heavy flamethrower system is presented. Previously, she received the designation "Sock". According to the developer, the new weapon will have some advantages over previous samples of similar products.



Previous systems were located on a tracked platform. In a military campaign, they were accompanied by transport-loading vehicles designed to replenish ammunition. In the new version, they are no longer required, since TOS-2 are able to cope with this task on their own. This is achieved thanks to the installation of a special crane. As a result, the cost of operating the system is reduced and its mobility increases.

Apparently, the base is a three-axle off-road vehicle Tornado-U, manufactured at the facilities of the Ural Automobile Plant. It is assumed that the development of the new system will be completed in the first half of the 2020 year, and at the Victory Parade the general public will be able to see it.


  • https://vk.com/shultz_arm
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

89 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +12
    16 November 2019 10: 04
    Judging by the "fig" used, this is an image from the patent. It does not necessarily correspond to the real appearance of the future weapon model, according to the same "Coalition" one can judge
    1. +13
      16 November 2019 10: 09
      hi
      Quote: Spade
      It does not necessarily correspond to the real appearance of the future weapon model, according to the same "Coalition" one can judge

      I agree . Only half a year is left before the Victory Parade - then we will see the appearance of "Toosochka".
      1. +7
        16 November 2019 11: 03
        Quote: bouncyhunter
        I agree . Only half a year is left before the Victory Parade - then we will see the appearance of "Toosochka".

        And in the army it will get a more sounding name "Toska" and among the enemies it is natural "longing" sadness.
        1. +11
          16 November 2019 12: 26
          tihonmarine And in the army it will get a more sounding name "Toska" and the enemies naturally have "longing" sadness.

          Definitely, for them it will be "sorrow" - "sorrow"!
          Because, as they have in their language there are no such affectionate ones.
          therefore Russian language - great and mighty ! hi
          1. +6
            16 November 2019 12: 37
            Quote: askort154
            Definitely, for them it will be "sorrow" - "sorrow"!
            Because, as they have in their language there are no such affectionate ones.
            Therefore, the Russian language is great and powerful!

            "Toska" quickly teach "the great and mighty". The Germans also quickly learned Katyusha and Hitler Kaput.
            1. +12
              16 November 2019 17: 44
              That "Tosochka" that "Solntsepek" should come very close to the enemy. And booking in this case is not superfluous.
              So "Solntsepёk" is more reliable in this respect than "three-axle car".
        2. -2
          16 November 2019 15: 21
          Quote: tihonmarine
          And in the army it will get a more sounding name "Toska" and among the enemies it is natural "longing" sadness.

          Judging by its base (a lightly armored truck, and not a tank, like Solntsepek), despite the fact that the launch range is far from that of at least Grad and therefore it will have to be used at the forefront ...
          I'm afraid everything will be exactly the opposite: Tosca is in the troops, Tosca is in the enemy.
          Well, but cheap, yes.
        3. 0
          16 November 2019 19: 59
          Quote: tihonmarine
          And in the army it will get a more sounding name "Toska"

          Or maybe "Stop". Who knows...
      2. -1
        16 November 2019 16: 03
        Pasha, hello, the scope of the new TOC, as I understand it, is limited. 3-5 km. And what prevents the mortar calculation of a potential enemy to cover this car? Zilch turns out. I am not special in land weapons. But, it’s obvious, one salvo of Israeli CARDOM mortars, firing at 6-7 km, levels the entire effectiveness of TOS-2.
        1. +1
          16 November 2019 19: 23
          Do not think up: deployment - 5 minutes, a full salvo takes half a minute, another 5 minutes to leave the firing line for the same 3-5 km - where and with what you were going to cover the installation, if the mortar calculations are already 5 minutes old, how are they fried?
          So after all, the deployment does not go in the open field under the looks from the binoculars!
          1. -1
            17 November 2019 04: 40
            Volley for 5 m ??? It's not Shoigu to fight the barmaley in Syria. And what to do with the heat traces from the volley, from the engine of the installation.? Stop doing "hat shading". The system, in my opinion, is suitable, only applicable in punishing barmaley, and countries that do not have modern means of detection. And by the way, you don't have to sit in an open field to find a target. As a specialist I am telling you this. Over-the-horizon radar "Volna" my place of service
            1. +1
              17 November 2019 07: 33
              But who will be interested in the traces of the installation, which has already changed its position?
              Yes, unes, I see, they do not want to form at all ... crying
            2. 0
              14 December 2019 14: 55
              Quote: st2st
              Volley for 5 m ??? It's not Shoigu to fight the barmaley in Syria. And what to do with the heat traces from the volley, from the engine of the installation.? Stop doing "hat shading". The system, in my opinion, is suitable, only applicable in punishing barmaley, and countries that do not have modern means of detection. And by the way, you don't have to sit in an open field to find a target. As a specialist I am telling you this. Over-the-horizon radar "Volna" my place of service

              But where did you get so many Zeon sectarians from? Another sect of witnesses Pletdator, Nagmachon, Azharit, Nammer, SPAKE NLOS, CARDOM, UPAB Popete launched from foreign air lines?
              1. You can think of the brave genocidtschiki of the Arabs, ALL their lives are at war not with lazy shepherds of sheep, who have obsolete equipment, homemade SRZO, TRK from the stages of anti-aircraft missiles "Kub" and "Kvadrat". Like, they selflessly repel the strikes, the drivers of operational tactical missiles with SBS, the shepherds of powerful shock UAVs sitting thousands of kilometers away. from Israel, at sea they are cut on equal terms, with armada of hypersonic bombers and squadrons of submarine cruisers with supersonic CRBD! Well, I have not seen such false and pretentious propaganda even during the time of Leonid Ilyich Brezhnev in the early 1980s .-))))
              2a. For "sworn friends" with their own detection and Iron Kumpol, there are other delivery vehicles. There are NURS, KMB, UAB / UPAB, KRBD. Including with cluster warheads and ODBCH. We can also check the effectiveness, as in the CA. Yes, I'm afraid the world famous lobby will immediately pull on holokost.
              2b. The whole trouble of this country is in the small size of the eastern theater. If someone had carried out the campaign competently, then within 24 hours he would have fettered the actions of the enemy and that would either go to neighboring Arab countries or surrender. This is if there is no SBS on the MRBM, which is not "but if necessary, we will launch them." We know that the types of weapons supplied by the USSR to the countries of the Middle East theater of operations were often redundant for such a theater of operations. An example of the Tu-22R or MiG-25, S-200D.
        2. 0
          17 November 2019 09: 04
          You would have left the tactics to the higher command, otherwise the sofa was thoroughly perforated ... they probably know better where the mortars are better to suppress using the Su-34, and where it is better to use the Acacia for this
          1. -3
            17 November 2019 13: 36
            In general, I was interested in the opinion of a specialist, not a paid MEMBER of "United Russia". Calm down, shitty false patriot
    2. -1
      16 November 2019 10: 18
      yes there actually aren’t particularly other variations))) wheeled chassis and launcher) outwardly most likely this will happen. the whole intrigue is only in the charging system and how it will actually look)
    3. Maz
      +3
      16 November 2019 11: 04
      Well, we’re not standing still, and it’s already good, but we'll see, it won’t be worse and the system is excellent!
      1. 0
        17 November 2019 07: 39
        And no one argues, but they are very interested in the time of preparation for the next salvo ... what can you say about this?
  2. -33
    16 November 2019 10: 05
    Enemies -so here-are going to a bunch, flocks-herds-burn, they say, we .....
    1. +23
      16 November 2019 10: 27
      Mind you can’t shine, but you must shine with a boot. This is about you. And at the headquarters they will figure out who and when, to burn ...
      1. -25
        16 November 2019 12: 15
        At the headquarters, I understand, YOU did not sit, but the craftsman betray and plunder the warehouses ..
      2. -24
        16 November 2019 12: 20
        Ensign, apparently, an army. Are you?
        1. +4
          16 November 2019 21: 31
          Quote: GTYCBJYTH2021
          Ensign, apparently, an army. Are you?

          I also started as a midshipman of the Marine Corps, the commander of the DRG group. According to you, I robbed the fighters, and I myself ate them in the same mug.
        2. 0
          14 December 2019 15: 05
          Another fan of wargame, C&C General Zero & Tiberium War and Warhammer 40000 series, Commpani of Hero. And all the good people ...
        3. 0
          14 December 2019 15: 07
          What have you not ensigns ensigns? On them, that the whole SA held that the Russian Defense Ministry is holding on now. In fact, most of all in the 1990s, TAM rifled underground, colonels and generals / admirals. How do I know: do not ask. I think your rudeness is inappropriate and shameful, for the employee of the Ministry of Defense. So indiscriminately accuse everyone of theft. so you can add that all the flyers are mugs and pasta.
    2. +25
      16 November 2019 10: 51
      Quote: GTYCBJYTH2021
      Enemies -so here-are going to a bunch, flocks-herds-burn, they say, we ....

      Strange as it may seem, this is the case. Enemies are simply forced to "gather in a heap" to complete their tasks.
      "Units" evenly dispersed in space will have no chance of winning.
      1. 0
        16 November 2019 11: 54
        Quote: Spade
        Quote: GTYCBJYTH2021
        Enemies -so here-are going to a bunch, flocks-herds-burn, they say, we ....

        Strange as it may seem, this is the case. Enemies are simply forced to "gather in a heap" to complete their tasks.
        "Units" evenly dispersed in space will have no chance of winning.

        Yes I agree with you Lopatov. So it is. It remains to be hoped that the headquarters will be the one who understands how to use all this happiness.
      2. -26
        16 November 2019 12: 32
        So they burned out the enemies with "units", "punits" or else there, with your help, or so, for the balabolism, are you here, citizen? Allow me not to answer my question.
        1. +14
          16 November 2019 12: 39
          Quote: GTYCBJYTH2021
          So they burned out the enemies with "units", "punits" or else there, with your help, or so, for the balabolism, are you here, citizen? Allow me not to answer my question.

          And this is a question, not a stream of consciousness?
          If so, try to formulate it again. To make it understandable not only to you.
          1. 0
            14 December 2019 15: 15
            So he swells (Andrey), from his own pathos and arrogance. Lopatov, please write your opinion about the possibilities of such a SRZO and, in general, the need for a wheelbase for delivery of the "package to the point". It seems to me risky to put PU guides and launch equipment "on wheels". After all, the speed of travel on the highway is not the main thing even for the European theater of operations, with a radius of destruction of only 10-15 km.! It would be better to focus on accuracy, equipping with two-way coded communication channels and real-time control centers, a portable weather station, active protection of the launcher, and masking the launcher.
      3. +4
        16 November 2019 19: 08
        Quote: Spade
        Sprayed evenly in space "units"

        good This, more like the consequences of using a nuclear bomb ...
    3. +3
      16 November 2019 15: 33
      Quote: GTYCBJYTH2021
      Enemies, such here are gathering in a heap, flocks, herds, burn, they say, us.

      And how, of course, a crowd of gorilochki are going to drink, have a bite of lard, and then "Toska" to the "point" and Hitler kaput.
    4. +1
      16 November 2019 16: 15
      And in a bunch, and flocks. Especially if there is one shelter for the whole district. Then they will be burned.
    5. -11
      16 November 2019 16: 47
      Right. Article by sofa Ikspert. The wonderful words "supposed", "apparently". Do not pay attention to the minus of urYa-Putriots.
  3. -2
    16 November 2019 10: 05
    Barmaley convenient to drive on a wheeled chassis. The system does not channel against another adversary.
    1. +7
      16 November 2019 10: 38
      What seriously does not channel? Because armor doesn’t break through, or are there a lot of hit points? laughing

      Your conclusions are strange.
      1. -9
        16 November 2019 12: 16
        Quote: Lord of the Sith
        What seriously does not channel? Because armor doesn’t break through, or are there a lot of hit points? laughing

        Your conclusions are strange.

        Do you understand what this is all about? Or do you climb sites for it and don’t pay for smart mowing? The site did not confuse? At least once about a gun which for the sake of visibility what printed. laughing
        1. +7
          16 November 2019 13: 13
          Listen, Observer, I'm all the same from the LPR, so do not confuse))

          I would say where he served, once an avatar with the DNI.
          Or just an observer?
          1. -11
            16 November 2019 13: 16
            Quote: Lord of the Sith
            Listen, Observer, I'm all the same from the LPR, so do not confuse))

            laughing Ага. Yes Tell me straight from Alpha Centauri. laughing
          2. +8
            16 November 2019 13: 40
            Quote: Lord of the Sith
            I would say where he served, once an avatar with the DNI

            Nowhere did he serve. This is a gaster from Ukraine, lives in Sochi. All the rest is show off.

            I answer for the words, if that Yes
            1. +4
              16 November 2019 14: 28
              Well then everything is clear with him, and with his unfounded claims))
            2. +2
              16 November 2019 18: 06
              why don't they ban him ...!? rushing because of him, not childish ...!?)
            3. +2
              16 November 2019 18: 17
              and you're right ... I found it on the "reporter" ...
              Observer 2014 (Sergey) Today, 15:26
              -1
              And when did you live in Europe? In order to compare with Europe it was possible.
        2. +2
          16 November 2019 13: 49
          It seems that you’ve messed up sites! At least once ............. at least you held the gun in your hands.
      2. The comment was deleted.
    2. 0
      16 November 2019 11: 22
      As for the wheeled chassis, the Saudis did not really like the "Solntsepek" after operating the tracked chassis in the desert.
      And one more feature of "Tosochka" is the presence of AI.
      1. +2
        16 November 2019 12: 41
        Quote: knn54
        the Saudis did not really like the Solntsepek after operating the tracked chassis in the desert.

        Saudis are not an indicator. They are on the drum, what kind of base- and wheeled and tracked equipment do they use disgustingly
  4. +3
    16 November 2019 10: 37
    But the range is 3 km? Only from closed positions then, and even with them from the mortar can not be protected. The machine must enter the position very quickly, immediately discharge and tick. And in the cockpit are harsh samurai.
    1. +8
      16 November 2019 10: 49
      Quote: Angrybeard
      But the range is 3 km? Only from closed positions then, and even with them from the mortar can not be protected.

      It is from the closed. And the mortar can not be afraid.

      Quote: Angrybeard
      The machine must enter the position very quickly, immediately discharge and tick.

      Actually, this is true for any existing artillery gun. mortar or installation.
      Not more than a minute and leave the fire. Otherwise they’ll cover it.
      1. +2
        16 November 2019 11: 23
        Quote: Spade
        And the mortar can not be afraid.

        No, I still get goosebumps from this "lyalka".
        1. +10
          16 November 2019 11: 34
          Before the opening of fire, the car is safe, after opening, it leaves the position. Therefore, the mortar is not a danger.
          Of course, if safety conditions are met. Combating UAVs, obstructing the operation of reconnaissance stations for moving ground targets, etc. In short, "wash your hands before eating"
    2. +4
      16 November 2019 13: 52
      3.6 range minimum and up to 6 km, and this is the oldest missiles. we teach a part
  5. 0
    16 November 2019 10: 46
    Deliveries of the new Tosochka TOS are planned from 2018 of the year
    https://topwar.ru/121068-postavki-novoy-tos-tosochka-zaplanirovany-s-2018-goda.html
    Something went wrong? Since the 17th year, neither video nor photo is just a sketch. And for half a year at the parade they will show, it is doubtful.
    1. +3
      16 November 2019 11: 19
      Quote: Alex_You
      Something went wrong?

      Yeah. No money.
      There is technically nothing complicated at all. Install the existing multiple launch rocket system on the available base chassis. It is available even to Syriac to terrorists rebels. And Ukraine.
  6. +1
    16 November 2019 11: 03
    Beautifully bum. The whole world is certainly not in pieces, but the barmaley fries nobly.
  7. -2
    16 November 2019 11: 48
    The equipment of the launch vehicle and the charging devices looks doubtful. What the hell, autonomy, if without the transportation of shells, Tosochka is a simple cart that is not suitable for anything. To complicate a combat unit, to hang things on it, damage in battle of which makes the installation of the same cart, in my opinion, stupidity. The use of transport-charging equipment is the right decision. It is doubtful to transport shells with ANY mode of transport, the shells are too specific to be safely transported by a steam locomotive.
    1. +5
      16 November 2019 11: 54
      Quote: Vkd dvk
      The equipment of the launch vehicle and the charging devices looks doubtful. What the hell, autonomy

      Americans have been using such a system for 35 years, and it seems they don’t complain.

      Quote: Vkd dvk
      the shells are too specific to be safely transported by a steam locomotive.

      Strictly speaking, TZM are not intended for the supply of ammunition.
    2. 0
      17 November 2019 08: 01
      TZM is the engineering equipment of the near rear: it was fired back and ran to reload and wait for the order to enter the position. And there’s absolutely no reason to drag TZU to the front line!
  8. 0
    16 November 2019 12: 41
    The most important thing in "Tosochka" is to solve the problem with the firing range. It is very small for such a powerful weapon.
  9. 0
    16 November 2019 13: 20
    Quote: carstorm 11
    yes there actually aren’t particularly other variations))) wheeled chassis and launcher) outwardly most likely this will happen. the whole intrigue is only in the charging system and how it will actually look)

    + maybe a little more ammunition flight range will increase))
  10. +1
    16 November 2019 13: 25
    Quote: Spade
    Quote: Vkd dvk
    The equipment of the launch vehicle and the charging devices looks doubtful. What the hell, autonomy

    Americans have been using such a system for 35 years, and it seems they don’t complain.

    Quote: Vkd dvk
    the shells are too specific to be safely transported by a steam locomotive.

    Strictly speaking, TZM are not intended for the supply of ammunition.

    The main thing in any business is not an example of others. An example can be used to prove anything and disprove anything. System building logic. Sober calculation. Knowledge of the combat situation. And from the many conflicting requirements (I am a designer, and I experienced the hard way that there are no easy solutions found on the pages of books and magazines). Only the hardest choice out of a million "no". The ideal car is one that doesn't exist.
  11. +2
    16 November 2019 13: 27
    sooo useful thing recommended video views in poland preferably daily very good potion for Russophobia
  12. 0
    16 November 2019 13: 48
    This idea is doubtful and senseless. Is that for export for the Arabs, who like to travel to war in comfort and not leave the asphalt highway. There are several questions: 1) Where will this Tosochka go on a wheelbase? Its firing range does not exceed 5 km, it is necessary to sneak up closer to the enemy and fire a volley. And if there is only a swamp or a forest on that side, or there is only one road, but it is mined or shot with mortars? 2) Working with 5 km is the distance of launching an ATGM or firing an 82 mm mortar, the Toosochek battery can be easily covered. To work on the enemy at close range, you only need armor. 3) During the operation of the Grad, the machine sways noticeably, especially when the guide block is directed away from the longitudinal axis. The weight of the TOC shot is much greater, how stable will the wheeled chassis be and how will this affect accuracy? The second salvo after a miss will no longer be allowed to be made ... For melee weapons, TOS on a wheeled chassis is a good thing if it is a mistake, and not a deliberate "use" of the budget. Little in Russia left in storage of the T-72? Take their hulls and do TOS-1A. If you set a task to the designers, I am sure they will be able to install a telescopic crane boom or other equipment for reloading on a tank chassis.
    1. +2
      16 November 2019 19: 14
      Quote: Slon1978
      ... and not deliberate "use" of the budget

      Deripaska makes "Urals", comments are unnecessary.
      1. 0
        17 November 2019 08: 06
        Ну и что?
        An extra reason for reprivatization in the state concern. laughing
  13. 0
    16 November 2019 13: 55
    Wheel system assumes a significant range
    1. 0
      16 November 2019 14: 03
      I would like to hope so. But there are no miracles. If only our research institutes have not invented a more energy-efficient gunpowder for charging TOC, then the range can be increased only by reducing the weight of the warhead.
  14. +1
    16 November 2019 14: 11
    Quote: GTYCBJYTH2021
    Enemies -so here-are going to a bunch, flocks-herds-burn, they say, we .....

    Sprayed enemies will be burned by other means.
    1. 0
      17 November 2019 08: 08
      No need to burn widespread enemies, this prey for sonderkommand and filters ...
  15. 0
    16 November 2019 15: 37
    And again for a replacement. What kind of replacement can we talk about? In addition, most likely. An unarmored and impenetrable vehicle will not replace a tank platform.
  16. 0
    16 November 2019 17: 53
    The wheel is the speed, in comparison with the caterpillar platforms. But on off-road and snow, sands and wetlands this is not "ice". And the shells do not fly far. But, we will assume that the shell goes 7-10 km, which is already good, However, the car itself will not recharge from nothing, will the delivery be on what? Or will the trailer still be carried by the same launcher? feel
  17. 0
    16 November 2019 20: 08
    For amers, the SZO is charged with a package. We (today) have single shots.
    Humble opinion. Automatic loader for such a system, and will be generally incomparable.
    1. +2
      16 November 2019 23: 26
      Quote: Monar
      For amers, the SZO is charged with a package

      Salvo? For American systems, it’s somehow ... tense ...
      By the end of the second world artillery detection system, they could be detected within a few minutes after the opening of fire. Therefore, the artillery systems moved to a self-propelled chassis .. fired five shells and gas. For RSOs, this is the time to shoot one package and then bring down .., and what kind of reloading after that .. so important?
      1. 0
        17 November 2019 06: 59
        Yes. MLRS M270 MLRS. Here the article was recently.
        https://topwar.ru/163292-amerikanskij-grad-rszo-m270-mlrs.html
        It's just that, in my amateurish opinion, loading with a package seems more convenient than one "pencil" at a time.
        and what kind of recharge after that .. so important?
        Why not? The package is gone. Piled up. 9 minutes to go. Minute to recharge. And another package is gone. Yes, at least for those who tried to fight back.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  18. 0
    16 November 2019 22: 09
    But flamethrowers, like snipers, were not taken prisoner ... sad
  19. 0
    17 November 2019 01: 10
    Allah Akbar ..... as the Middle Eastern barmalei would say :))))))))))))))
  20. 0
    17 November 2019 01: 12
    Quote: Monar
    For amers, the SZO is charged with a package. We (today) have single shots.
    Humble opinion. Automatic loader for such a system, and will be generally incomparable.

    What are you talking about, LOSER ?? :))))))
  21. +2
    17 November 2019 03: 23
    The "Solntsepёk" system includes transport-loading vehicles (TZM) ... they are not part of the TOS-2 ... But all the same, ammunition carriers will be needed in one form or another! In general, the main "benefit" will be lies in the fact that for TOS-2 it will be possible to use different non-specialized (and therefore cheaper ...) transport vehicles that can be "taken out of the state" of the system (complex) ...
  22. -3
    17 November 2019 03: 54
    Quote: tihonmarine
    So that "Toska" made the "Daesh barmaley"

    What barmalei now? For the fourth time they report victory in Syria. A train even with trophies travels around the country.
    1. 0
      18 November 2019 00: 56
      What barmalei now?

      In Syria, there, barmaleis of different varieties of some have now reduced the pro-American Kurds there, and the Central Asian republics on the border with Afghanistan have been established in the CIS. There recently, sometimes some kind of movement began to occur. Barmalei mattresses were taken to Afghanistan. So, help with technology to the former republics is quite possible.
  23. 0
    17 November 2019 11: 18
    Quote: Monar
    For amers, the SZO is charged with a package. We (today) have single shots.
    Humble opinion. Automatic loader for such a system, and will be generally incomparable.

    Right And carry the ammunition pack with you, the size of a train. wagon and carrying capacity of a hundred tons. True, it will be difficult to provide difficulties for the accurate positioning of shells in the cartridge. The manipulator will not catch the devil knows where the projectile is thrust. In the tank, although this is all a single design, and the ammunition is not on a trailer or hinges. And given the small distance at which shells can be thrown, this is just a gift to the enemy. So much gasp at once with such simple means.
  24. 0
    17 November 2019 11: 43
    Quote: hydrox
    You would have left the tactics to the higher command, otherwise the sofa was thoroughly perforated ... they probably know better where the mortars are better to suppress using the Su-34, and where it is better to use the Acacia for this

    If the front was ironed by SUSHKI, then what will these irons do? Who to iron?
    And you can track not a hot track AFTER shooting, but BEFORE shooting.
    Exactly, you are building strategies on the couch, not in the field.
  25. 0
    17 November 2019 11: 50
    Quote: Nikolaevich I
    The "Solntsepёk" system includes transport-loading vehicles (TZM) ... they are not part of the TOS-2 ... But all the same, ammunition carriers will be needed in one form or another! In general, the main "benefit" will be lies in the fact that for TOS-2 it will be possible to use different non-specialized (and therefore cheaper ...) transport vehicles that can be "taken out of the state" of the system (complex) ...

    At the same time, it’s easy to organize the supply of waste vehicles to the ADVANCED (?), I agree. And you can mobilize everything, up to civilian Niv cars. But, here's to fiddle with reloading under fire, being in the trenches of the front line - what's that like? And if it's still risky, and having shot, you need to tear the claws to the rear, then what the hell, you ask, drag these hydraulic pribluda on the hump? They, after all, are already waiting there, in the rear, and are ready to quickly throw new ammunition on (relatively) light, small-sized, and easy-to-operate shooting vehicles. Agree, all this nonsense, only adds something that is absolutely not needed in the trench? And finally, with the hydraulics not protected in any way, the car becomes more vulnerable, doesn't it? The slightest splinter in the hydraulic rack, and ...
  26. 0
    17 November 2019 12: 06
    Quote: Maxim V.
    Quote: Monar
    For amers, the SZO is charged with a package. We (today) have single shots.
    Humble opinion. Automatic loader for such a system, and will be generally incomparable.

    What are you talking about, LOSER ?? :))))))

    He does not understand that. The automatic loader for a meter-long projectile is one thing, and for a six-meter projectile, it’s far, another. That the machine knows exactly where he has, in which cassette lies what is needed, and he knows where this cassette is. accurate to a fraction of a millimeter (this is all a single structure), then the trailer with shells can not be placed so exactly in the position needed for the machine, it is impossible even on the concrete floor in the workshop, and, especially, in the trench.
  27. 0
    14 December 2019 14: 59
    Quote: st2st
    Volley for 5 m ??? It's not Shoigu to fight the barmaley in Syria. And what to do with the heat traces from the volley, from the engine of the installation.? Stop doing "hat shading". The system, in my opinion, is suitable, only applicable in punishing barmaley, and countries that do not have modern means of detection. And by the way, you don't have to sit in an open field to find a target. As a specialist I am telling you this. Over-the-horizon radar "Volna" my place of service

    2. Aha: "The unknown submarine deliberately, treacherously and rudely entered the territorial waters of Izrail! After the destroyer discovered her actions, the submarine retreated to the West!" - this recent comment from izrailskih media - well made my evening. I whinnied like a pedal horse. He laughed so hard that he tore out his stomach and fell to the floor from the couch. :) Let them at least check their editors for sexual concerns, why and where would she return? East into the desert?
    Zadolbali banned the names of some countries with a robot. So we get to the tolerant spelling "black people" instead of negroids.
  28. 0
    14 December 2019 15: 24
    Quote: Lord of the Sith
    Listen, Observer, I'm all the same from the LPR, so do not confuse))

    I would say where he served, once an avatar with the DNI.
    Or just an observer?

    Would you read about the NTR wheeled tanks or read for scrap? Or about the wheeled SPG "Rhino" in South Africa (the only one in the world). In fact, TOS-1A is not a sample of weapons (unexpectedly), but in some places a mobile and more secure replacement and addition to the UR-77 "Gorynych". This is not really an SRZO, but an engineering vehicle for passing highly echeloned enemy defenses, extended minefields, zones of continuous chemical and biological contamination. This is not a "smart weapon" - this is a forced weapon! If other means of delivery did not fit. And the regional conflicts of the 1990s and 2000s proved it.
  29. 0
    14 December 2019 15: 31
    Quote: Serge Siberian
    The wheel is the speed, in comparison with the caterpillar platforms. But on off-road and snow, sands and wetlands this is not "ice". And the shells do not fly far. But, we will assume that the shell goes 7-10 km, which is already good, However, the car itself will not recharge from nothing, will the delivery be on what? Or will the trailer still be carried by the same launcher? feel

    Speed ​​is only among Arabs and Europeans with their autobahns. and who needs a scorched ODBC city with entire autobahns, before it? Is that to the Eurogames themselves.
  30. 0
    14 December 2019 15: 35
    Quote: wkd dvk
    Quote: Monar
    For amers, the SZO is charged with a package. We (today) have single shots.
    Humble opinion. Automatic loader for such a system, and will be generally incomparable.

    Right And carry the ammunition pack with you, the size of a train. wagon and carrying capacity of a hundred tons. True, it will be difficult to provide difficulties for the accurate positioning of shells in the cartridge. The manipulator will not catch the devil knows where the projectile is thrust. In the tank, although this is all a single design, and the ammunition is not on a trailer or hinges. And given the small distance at which shells can be thrown, this is just a gift to the enemy. So much gasp at once with such simple means.
    But did the Swedes of VK really load the cassette of five rounds with separate shells, and didn’t the rack-mounted self-propelled gun load on the PZh2000? Isn’t it cooler at Carus-Maffei, one at a time to overload from a drum in the TZM or the same at the Swedish Archer?
  31. 0
    14 December 2019 15: 38
    Quote: Monar
    Yes. MLRS M270 MLRS. Here the article was recently.
    https://topwar.ru/163292-amerikanskij-grad-rszo-m270-mlrs.html
    It's just that, in my amateurish opinion, loading with a package seems more convenient than one "pencil" at a time.
    and what kind of recharge after that .. so important?
    Why not? The package is gone. Piled up. 9 minutes to go. Minute to recharge. And another package is gone. Yes, at least for those who tried to fight back.

    There accuracy is worse. and amers on figs, where to lay out the shot containers in the desert. In addition, the weight of the container with such a container increases. Optimally, this is a Swedish or German system with automatic loader and TZM.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"