Lukashenko wanted to get a squadron of Russian Su-30СМ for free

208
Lukashenko wanted to get a squadron of Russian Su-30СМ for free

President of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko wanted to get Russian Su-30СМ fighter jets for free, but Russia didn’t agree to this because of differences. The newspaper writes about this. "Vedomosti" with reference to a statement by a senior source.

A few days ago, the Belarusian leader, speaking in connection with the arrival of the first Su-30СМ fighters to Baranavichy, reproached Russia for allegedly unwillingness to supply Belarus with modern weapon. According to him, Minsk bought these fighters with its own money, while it protects Moscow from the western direction.



Recently, Belarus bought Su-30СМ aircraft from Russia for its money. But we also carry out the protection functions in this direction of the people of Russia. So why not help us? We know how to use it no worse than the Russians, but we pay huge amounts of money for it.

- Belarusian editions cite Lukashenko’s statement.

According to a senior source of Vedomosti, this statement only means that Lukashenko hoped to get the Su-30СM squadron for free, and not for money, even if Minsk receives the equipment at domestic prices, and not at export prices.

According to another source from the Ministry of Defense, this statement by Lukashenko is due to disagreements between Moscow and Minsk regarding the deployment of Russian fighters at the 61 airbase. Agreements on this were reached in the 2013 year. In December of that year, a link from four Russian Su-27СМ3 took up joint combat duty with fighters of the Belarusian Air Force, but soon left the republic at the request of Lukashenko. He later stated that he would not allow the deployment of foreign military facilities on the territory of Belarus.

After Lukashenko’s statement, there was no longer any talk about the free transfer of military equipment, the newspaper writes.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    208 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +72
      15 November 2019 15: 30
      Chota Batyan ofigel)) I'm from Belarus if that
      1. +25
        15 November 2019 15: 34
        Before Alexei Nikolaevich Botyan your "stepfather" is like the moon ...
        1. +79
          15 November 2019 15: 45
          Lukashenko’s greyhound and arrogance just rolls over, the further the more. He will not accidentally remind you from whom he defended us with what he is hiding, in fact, it’s Russia protecting the Belarusians and under the threat of this, nobody will raise their tail to Belarus. The benefactor was found, there are no words only mats.
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. +7
            15 November 2019 16: 34
            For free and sweet vinegar.
            1. +10
              15 November 2019 20: 51
              Yes, just Dad - Curcul.
              Such a good curcule.
              He keeps his farm in order. And he tries to avoid conflicts with neighbors (with everyone, regardless of their moral qualities).
              But sometimes how to soak something, hoping for a holy freebie for him ...
              laughing
              Do not be angry with him.
              However, in no case should he be given a freebie. Once you give it, then you will be offended all your life that you will not give it anymore.
          3. -4
            15 November 2019 20: 21
            Lukashenko’s greyhound and arrogance just rolls over, the further the more. He will not accidentally remind you from whom he defended us. With what words he is hiding.

            I do not agree with you.
            Firstly, the journalists wrote it. I have no faith in them for a long time.
            Secondly, Lukashenko said the following:
            Recently, Belarus bought Su-30СМ aircraft from Russia for its money. But we also carry out the protection functions in this direction of the people of Russia. So why not help us? We know how to use it no worse than the Russians, but we pay huge amounts of money for it.

            Well, in the third. And why is Belarus worse than the same Serbia, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, etc. with which Russia gave weapons.
            Well and fifthly. So to speak cherry on the cake. Explain how Belarus differs from the countries listed below. Only reasonably please.
            Here is the link:
            https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Список_государственных_долгов,_списанных_Россией

            In June 1999, Russia signed the so-called Cologne agreement within the framework of the Paris Club of creditors, according to which Russia wrote off 2000-2003% of debts in 60-90 - more than $ 15-20 billion of the following countries: Tanzania, Benin, Mali, Guinea Bissau, Madagascar, Guinea, Chad, Yemen, Mozambique, Burkina Faso and Sierra Leone. For the remaining parts of the debt, these countries received installments up to 30 years [7] [4].
            In September 2000, Russia wrote off $ 9,53 billion of Vietnam’s $ 11,03 billion debt. The payment of the remaining amount is deferred for 2016-2022 [3].
            In 2001, Russia wrote off Ethiopia $ 4,8 billion (out of $ 6 billion), according to other sources $ 3,8 billion (out of $ 4,8 billion) [7].
            In 2003, Russia wrote off $ 11,1 billion to Mongolia (a total of $ 11,4 billion). Mongolia returned the remaining $ 300 million of debt immediately after cancellation [7].
            In 2003, Russia wrote off $ 960 million of Laos debt from Laos to $ 1,3 billion [7].
            In 2004, Russia completely wrote off the balance of Nicaragua's debt of $ 344 million [7].
            In 2004, Russia wrote off $ 9,5-9,8 billion of debt to Iraq (a total of $ 10,5 billion). President Vladimir Putin expressed the hope that the new leadership would take into account the interests of Russian companies in Iraq in response [4].
            In 2005, Russia wrote off $ 9,782 billion (out of $ 13,4 billion) of debt to the USSR by Syria [7]. In turn, this country undertook to purchase Russian weapons and modernize the armored vehicles delivered in Soviet times. A number of construction contracts in the oil and gas sector were also signed [9].
            In the same year, Russia wrote off Ethiopia $ 1,104 billion (of $ 1,268 billion) of the debt remaining after 2001 [7].
            In 2006, Russia wrote off Algeria $ 4,7 billion in debt to the USSR [7] [3].
            In 2007, Russia wrote off $ 11,1 billion of debt to Afghanistan [7].
            In the same year, Russia wrote off $ 4,5 billion of debt to Libya [7] [5]. Libya then had a gold reserve of about 143-156 tons [10] [11]. Some financial experts estimated Libya's gold and foreign exchange reserves at 200 billion [12]. At this point, Libya produced oil (in the amount of about 1.6 million barrels per day [13]) with an average price of a barrel of Brent oil from $ 100 to $ 110 [14]. At the same time, Russian companies were ordered to build a railway line and share in oil and gas fields [15].
            In 2008, Russia wrote off $ 12 billion to Iraq (out of $ 12,9 billion). Moreover, it was already a new debt, for loans obtained after the forgiveness of the previous debt in 2004 [7] [16].
            In 2010, Russia wrote off $ 891 million of debt to Afghanistan, after which the entire amount of Afghan debts written off by Russia reached $ 12 billion [17]. In the same year, American scientists and the military discovered huge deposits of mineral minerals in Afghanistan - one of the largest in the world, tentatively estimated at $ 1 trillion [18]. Among them are huge deposits of iron ore, copper, cobalt, gold and lithium [19].
            In 2010, Russia wrote off $ 180 million of debt to Mongolia [20].
            In 2012, Russia wrote off $ 11 billion of debt to the DPRK. Russia provided the country with an initial discount of 90% of the debt. The remaining debt in the amount of more than $ 1 billion will be used under the “debt for help” scheme in the field of education, healthcare and energy in the implementation of projects in the DPRK [7].
            In April 2013, Russia wrote off $ 500 million of debt to Kyrgyzstan. Of these, $ 188,9 million was written off immediately, debt in the amount of $ 300 million will be written off in equal installments over ten years [7].
            In 2014, Russia wrote off $ 31,7 billion (or 90% of $ 35,2 billion) of debt to the USSR to Cuba. The remaining 10% of the debt (about $ 3,5 billion) will be repaid by Cuba over the next ten years in equal semi-annual payments. It should be noted - this write-off has become the largest in the entire history of Russia. Prior to this, the largest write-off of debt was to write off $ 12 billion at a time to Iraq [21] [22].
            In 2014, Russia wrote off $ 865 million (out of $ 890 million) of debt to Uzbekistan [23] [24] [25].
            In 2018, Russia wrote off $ 240 million dollars of debt to Kyrgyzstan [30].
            In 2019, it was announced that the total accumulated amount of debt cancellations from 1991 to 2019 in favor of Africa from Russia amounted to more than $ 20 billion [31].
            1. +11
              15 November 2019 20: 42
              What is the difference? This is very bright "batska" in an interview with Kazakhs answered. In 1812, in 1941 Belarusians "got" for the Russians. They were just like that, they just stood next to ... And in any fight they support only those who are for you, and not those who “turned out to be near.” First there was a word, it is said in the Scripture, but it’s better not to wait for things, it’s clear for a long time, will sell, bald bastard.
              1. +10
                15 November 2019 21: 47
                The logic of iron)))))
                I gave my wife a ring, mistress - earrings))))
                Why didn’t I give anything to my neighbor?)))) I get what she needs, too)))))
                1. -2
                  16 November 2019 14: 27
                  then there’s nothing for ,, neighbor, to roam))
                  1. 0
                    16 November 2019 15: 38
                    to her only hangover))))))))))))))
                    1. -2
                      16 November 2019 18: 44
                      So there is mutual interest ...
              2. +1
                15 November 2019 22: 07
                nda, so that brother Byalorus dressed up in a reptile ...
                what grounds do you have?
                I believe in father, as in a faithful ally, just a little fisted.
                Well, then the little things.
                and about betrayal - it’s a sin to blame in vain on the one whom we consider a relative, especially
                1. +2
                  17 November 2019 13: 12
                  Enemies do not sell, but relatives often. Looking for examples? Please, "brotherly" Ukraine.
              3. -3
                16 November 2019 06: 28
                What is the difference? This is very bright "batska" in an interview with Kazakhs answered. In 1812, in 1941 Belarusians "got" for the Russians.

                Well, what do you want from him?
                Old Man is an elderly man. Who, moreover, has long been "driving" the country. All this affects the worldview, with all the ensuing consequences.
                You look at our guarantor that he periodically makes.
                One notorious pension reform is worth and against its background, parting of debts to all who can, about which I wrote above.
                1. +1
                  18 November 2019 13: 15
                  Well, yes, 4,1 trillion rubles forgiven to their citizens for 2 years .. apparently did not notice)
            2. +5
              15 November 2019 20: 42
              but can you find out what Minsk is ready to do in return? For all the years, Lukashenko has only done what he cut down the loot, if anything, then the missiles that are launched in Syria by Syrians and Russian-Belarusian production ..
              1. +3
                15 November 2019 21: 15
                And at this point can you read more?
                1. +7
                  15 November 2019 22: 04
                  Russia supposedly Belarus should pay for protection beyond the western borders of the Union. By this logic, then Belarus should pay Russia for the eastern borders of the Union, and “east of Belarus” borders with Finland, Norway, NSR (there are also coastal forces) Japan, Korea, China, Mongolia and Kazakhstan ... When Belarus pays for “its” eastern borders ???
                2. 0
                  16 November 2019 12: 30
                  stocks of Belarusian-made missiles were discovered in Syria, when they began to disassemble, it turned out that they were bought in bulk from the Republic of Belarus by NATO and Minsk did not particularly hide that they knew where these missiles would go
                  1. 0
                    16 November 2019 13: 59
                    And where did this information slip through? Every day I read about Syria and I could not miss this, and some on this site even more so.
                    1. 0
                      18 November 2019 13: 13
                      it was an investigation 2 years ago, But they hushed up the topic, because there is no need to swear with the Allies .. It's like with Belarusian shrimp or with the supply of fuel and lubricants from Belarus to Ukraine ... Everyone was silent, and now Lukashenko uncovered, he said yesterday that he hadn’t military alliance with Russia does not exist and will not exist
                      1. -1
                        18 November 2019 21: 17
                        Or maybe there are some links? And then I can’t find anything in Google. And about (Belarusian shrimp) and petroleum products for Ukraine, take out a log in your own eye! And with (our) UG (with a whiskered generalisimus) they themselves are to blame, they cut the soldering and you need to feed the pack ...
                        1. -1
                          20 November 2019 16: 24
                          I'm too lazy to look, believe it or not .. Regarding "it's their own fault" .. I remind you that he began to supply long before cutting the "ration", in order to gain additional benefits .. Moreover, Lukashenka fundamentally does not fulfill his obligations .. what is this an ally who has never supported Russia to his own detriment?
              2. -2
                15 November 2019 22: 08
                Well, sho for "in return", some kind of Kurkul relationship, not like a brother ...
                Kanesh Bashar Assad and other Ethiopians with Venezuelans and Vietnamese are much more dear to us.
                with our grandfathers, then their grandfathers, and not the Bialarus brothers, shed shelter, did not spare their stomachs.
                Belarusians are brothers.
                with brothers it’s not necessary for the market, but for the relative
                point
                1. +6
                  15 November 2019 23: 27
                  I agree. But dad something recently completely forgot about it. All he has one claim and Russia should Belarus is not good everywhere!
                2. -1
                  18 November 2019 13: 14
                  and then in a relative way put the wheels in the wheels of the same Kamaz and not let it into the market of Belarus?
          4. +5
            15 November 2019 20: 40
            the most interesting thing is another ... that no matter how much equipment is put to him and how many loans are not given, he will not defend Russia anyway ...
            1. +1
              15 November 2019 22: 11
              wow applications, but maybe there is reason to accuse the brothers of violating allied debt like this ???
              1. +1
                16 November 2019 12: 29
                Well, at least the fact that Lukashenko refused to create a single air defense command of the Union countries with a single command .. Simply put, if someone violates the state border, they will first ask Minsk for permission to shoot down or not ... That is. if NATO bombers fly, then Lukashenko will decide to shoot them or not .. question .. why did he knock it out, although any military man will explain that you always need a single command .. well, and yes, we will not forget his proposal to deploy peacekeepers in the Donbass .. on the former state border, and not on the demarcation line .. don’t remind .. for whom is this a benefit?
          5. 0
            15 November 2019 21: 43
            from good - do not seek good.
          6. +2
            16 November 2019 01: 16
            It turns out wonderfully ... Recently there was news about the joint exercises of Serbia and the Russian Federation. So the commentators eagerly vied to offer the Serbs (who gathered in NATO) to leave the S-400 as a gift. And as Belarus (the only country except the Russian Federation that speaks Russian) a couple of airplanes "give" so they raised the howl ... and still reproach the amers for double standards ...
          7. +6
            16 November 2019 04: 16
            We are brothers for free for $ 1 billion 12 Su-30 aircraft with weapons, and you give us your trucks Maz and Belaz, buses Maz and tractors Belarus for $ 1 billion for free too. smile
            1. -1
              16 November 2019 10: 55
              Quote: Alexander Petrov1
              We are brothers for free for $ 1 billion 12 Su-30 aircraft with weapons, and you give us your trucks Maz and Belaz, buses Maz and tractors Belarus for $ 1 billion for free too. smile

              In my opinion it was always called not "free", but "barter" (exchange)
          8. The comment was deleted.
      2. SSR
        +19
        15 November 2019 15: 56
        Quote: KJIETyc
        Chota Batyan ofigel)) I'm from Belarus if that

        Some kind of delusional element is obtained.
        Recently, Belarus bought Su-30SM aircraft from Russia for its money.

        But he does not specify what he bought at domestic rather than commercial prices.

        But we also carry out the protection functions in this direction of the people of Russia. So why not help us?

        And again, he did not "specify".
        He is not going to defend Belarus, there is only strength to defend Russia from the west, and if from the south or east he will not help. wassat
        We know how to use it no worse than the Russians, but we pay huge amounts of money for it.

        Generally pearl.
        Russia defends Belarus from the East and pays a lot of money for the creation and purchase of these weapons.
        PS.
        Do not kick hard, but Batka's "offenses" can be understandable if he already considers himself integrated into a union state with a single currency and the General Staff at least.
        1. 0
          15 November 2019 17: 07
          All right, you say - the prices are for the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation and paid in rubles ...
        2. +1
          16 November 2019 22: 40
          That's the whole thing Belarus bought at domestic prices of Russia, since a member of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), and it would have been 2 times exported, everything is not enough for him, like you need a gift for beautiful eyes, it will be a gift when they want to join the Russian Federation as an autonomous republic Federations, by the way, would benefit and would not have to survive without money and fear war, would be under our nuclear umbrella and at our gratuitous oil and gas pipe. smile
      3. +6
        15 November 2019 16: 07
        But we we also carry out the protection functions in this area of ​​the people of Russia. So why not help us? We know how to use it no worse than the Russians
        Lukashenko hoped to get a Su-30SM squadron for free

        Now, if so, but really, why not give it. Defender, then! But, provided that the words do not diverge, let him protect the Russians in the Donbass. Then you can throw up tanks.
      4. +8
        15 November 2019 16: 11
        “For the sake of maintaining calm in the country, I am ready to sacrifice my own mind.” A. Lukashenko.
      5. +28
        15 November 2019 16: 42
        So why not help us?

        Belarusians can be helped, but this goat after: "WWII was not our war"
      6. +15
        15 November 2019 17: 00
        Quote: KJIETyc
        Chota Batyan ofigel)) I'm from Belarus if that


        So he was always like that, he did not grow and will not grow above the chairman, there is not enough convolutions to play big games. I do not want to offend anyone, so purely in fact.
        1. -20
          15 November 2019 17: 43
          Quote: Wolverine
          Quote: KJIETyc
          Chota Batyan ofigel)) I'm from Belarus if that


          So he was always like that, he did not grow and will not grow above the chairman, there is not enough convolutions to play big games. I do not want to offend anyone, so purely in fact.

          In fact, I try to buy only Belarusian products. Already just for this opportunity not to eat the crap that is produced in the Russian Federation, I am very grateful to Lukashenka! I would be satisfied with such a chairman here who does not play "big games", but does business.
          1. -7
            15 November 2019 20: 27
            Quote: Doliva63
            Quote: Wolverine
            Quote: KJIETyc
            Chota Batyan ofigel)) I'm from Belarus if that


            So he was always like that, he did not grow and will not grow above the chairman, there is not enough convolutions to play big games. I do not want to offend anyone, so purely in fact.

            In fact, I try to buy only Belarusian products. Already just for this opportunity not to eat the crap that is produced in the Russian Federation, I am very grateful to Lukashenka! I would be satisfied with such a chairman here who does not play "big games", but does business.

            "Great Order" Belarusian medal. Also patriots of Russia to me negativeBreak off
          2. +6
            15 November 2019 20: 44
            "doing business" .. is it every year begging for loans and selling petroleum products?
        2. 0
          15 November 2019 17: 47
          convolutions are not enough to play large games.

          In fact, he has been playing big games, as you put it, for 25 years now. And then 25 years it is only in the presidential chair sitting.
        3. +9
          15 November 2019 19: 39
          In recent years, he began to bear the blizzard. How Russia began to worsen with the West.
          1. -1
            15 November 2019 21: 13
            I honestly don’t really want to argue with you (the Great Russian People), but if you want, I will expose you from your comment, well, let's say not a patriot at all.
            Well, now, a certain Vadik said that: `` ... Russia began to experience exacerbations ... '', although the diagnosis has not been made ...
            That's about zhurnalyugi and write ...
      7. +25
        15 November 2019 17: 26
        Yeah. Here, their regions take loans within Russia for development, and he does not want to be part of the Russian Federation, he wants everything for free and a lot. This is at least ugly, but at the very least, arrogance. Workers and engineers of the defense plants will not receive the salary for the fathers of the Wishlist.
        1. +5
          15 November 2019 19: 05
          Quote: ltc35
          Yeah. Here, their regions take loans within Russia for development, and he does not want to be part of the Russian Federation, he wants everything for free and a lot. This is at least ugly, but at the very least, arrogance. Workers and engineers of the defense plants will not receive the salary for the fathers of the Wishlist.

          maybe even a potato pay ... chips ... belay laughing
    2. +13
      15 November 2019 15: 30
      Is free? But the face will not crack?
      1. +14
        15 November 2019 15: 42
        Blackmail the old man! Wanted freebies, even did not offer bulbs in return ?! laughing
        1. +6
          15 November 2019 15: 52
          He needs to buy binoculars, otherwise he sees the coast worse and worse.
      2. +30
        15 November 2019 16: 28
        Quote: Dinich
        Is free? But the face will not crack?

        There are two GREAT defenders: Europe from Russia is "protected" by Ukraine, and Russia from Europe by Belarus.
        1. +6
          15 November 2019 17: 46
          Do you think they have a joint business for distributing suckers?
        2. SSR
          +4
          15 November 2019 19: 26
          Quote: Cut Samshitov
          Quote: Dinich
          Is free? But the face will not crack?

          There are two GREAT defenders: Europe from Russia is "protected" by Ukraine, and Russia from Europe by Belarus.

          And I think, why are the Poles at the fifth point tearing their wool and spraying foam ?! So they claimed to be the main defender of Europe from Russia.)))
    3. +4
      15 November 2019 15: 31
      "Later he said that he would not allow the deployment of foreign military facilities on the territory of Belarus."
      And then why be offended?
      1. +38
        15 November 2019 15: 33
        Quote: Andrey Chistyakov
        "Later he said that he would not allow the deployment of foreign military facilities on the territory of Belarus."
        And then why be offended?

        Since we are foreigners to him, then the prices should be the same as for export.
        1. +1
          15 November 2019 16: 09
          Quote: 1976AG
          prices should be as for export.

          This is the F-35 and the air base with personnel from the country of manufacture, and it will also be pleased. And he could hide behind an air base, and get airplanes at the expense of rent.
    4. -10
      15 November 2019 15: 31
      Well, this is clearly twisted! The words "sources" were given out as the desire of Alexander Grigorievich!
      1. +7
        15 November 2019 15: 35
        Quote: Leader of the Redskins
        Well, this is clearly twisted! The words "sources" were given out as the desire of Alexander Grigorievich!

        Are you talking about Russia's refusal in the Air Force base?
        1. -7
          15 November 2019 15: 36
          I'm talking about "free".
      2. +11
        15 November 2019 15: 48
        It was ... RB has a desire to receive equipment from the budget of the Russian Federation .... as for the Russian VKS
      3. +5
        15 November 2019 15: 50
        Quote: Leader of the Redskins
        Well, this is clearly twisted! The words "sources" were given out as the desire of Alexander Grigorievich!

        Here Vedomosti writes, how to say, supposedly neutral but more "democratic", sometimes they even surprise.
        This is about translating the Kazakh language into the Latin alphabet, there amazing experts are drawn with a reproach - Mol Vovan you don’t see the infringement of the Russian language, because the Kazakhs translate their language into the Latin alphabet that we don’t flare. It’s practically provocative. It’s also to Echo, independent, etc. I read it to the press.
      4. +1
        15 November 2019 16: 04
        You still do not see what Yandex places in Zen in the territory of Belarus.
      5. +4
        15 November 2019 20: 46
        Well, actually, he said earlier: Russian planes are not needed in Belarus, they say it’s too close to the border ... Let’s better give us the planes so, for free, we’ll protect ... only if, by his logic, it makes no sense to place any planes, because that the border is close ... Except if he gets the planes, but he won’t fight
    5. +5
      15 November 2019 15: 32
      Well, what a sly-witted father’s ... without washing so much by skating ... well, as much as you can ... well, if we are broadcasting a union state within its framework or within the framework of the CSTO, place our aviation regiment or you want tank crews or something else .. .and protection and rent money, but honestly everything ...
      1. +14
        15 November 2019 15: 51
        By the way, Crimea was not recognized as Russian.
        Ally.
        1. -7
          15 November 2019 15: 56
          By the way, Crimea was not recognized as Russian.
          Ally.

          Have Russian banks, airlines and mobile operators recognized?
          1. -1
            15 November 2019 15: 59
            Does Russian mobile operators also control Lukashenko? What a twist!
            What does it have to do with it? Are you there, pay a salary in every news shouting about power?
            1. The comment was deleted.
            2. +3
              15 November 2019 16: 22
              He is young and not experienced. Yes
            3. 0
              15 November 2019 16: 44
              Quote: Mestny
              Does Russian mobile operators also control Lukashenko?

              Since December 1, the MTS has ceased to sell its SIM cards in the Crimea. Now you have to go to the mainland for a sim card? Who controls the MTS?
          2. +1
            15 November 2019 20: 47
            banks and airlines, by the way, work through local representative offices, this is standard practice when there is a high probability of incurring large losses
          3. +3
            15 November 2019 21: 58
            And there are no Russian banks or airlines? No one has canceled the sanctions. There were created their own - neither worse nor better, they are already leaving the Crimea and competing with those who are not in the Crimea))))
    6. +2
      15 November 2019 15: 32
      Like this ... duck tired ...
    7. The comment was deleted.
    8. +15
      15 November 2019 15: 38
      But we also carry out the protection functions in this direction of the people of Russia. So why not help us?
      And in all other areas, Russia protects the Belarusian people. So why not help us, Alexander G., why not start supplying milk and sour cream to Russia for free?)))
      1. 0
        15 November 2019 15: 43
        Quote: Thunderbolt
        supply milk and sour cream to Russia for free

        Not very bad quality!
        1. +3
          15 November 2019 15: 52
          They have 2 different qualities. One for sebe, another for Russian.
          1. -1
            15 November 2019 20: 01
            Have you tried that Melesch language? Our milk in Russia is cheaper than at home. So eat your health. We don’t feel sorry. And the quality is the same. I know what I’m saying. And if for me, then I don’t need any base here
            1. +4
              15 November 2019 22: 01
              I didn’t see any milk in Komi from the Republic of Belarus, but there is meat production - it will be a little expensive, Yoshkarolinskaya and Kirovskaya are better and cheaper, and our local one is no (((
      2. +3
        15 November 2019 15: 44
        Well, or Minsk polyaxial vehicles. Nuclear / air defense shield and above it after all.
        1. +4
          15 November 2019 16: 31
          ... millipedes have already made their own - he refused to sell the MZKT of Russia ..
          1. +3
            15 November 2019 16: 41
            Sells products, the factory does not. What is so strange about this?
            1. +1
              16 November 2019 10: 41
              Quote: AlexGa
              Sells products, the factory does not. What is so strange about this?

              + bull's-eye! Only Lukashenka himself "complains" in vain that the planes are not free, because what is so strange about that, and even at domestic prices.
              The factory sells products and does not distribute.
              PS.
              In general, he is brisk in language, voicing his thoughts forgetting that he is a politician and the media beat phrases as they prefer.
              Until now, here some members of the forum mention about "I killed the first Russian at the age of 16" although this is my one-time vyser, Latynina never confirmed it, but only once did a stuffing on the fan and the parrots picked it up without checking it.
              This is me as a whole about the media.
    9. +1
      15 November 2019 15: 39
      I’ve been looking at this guy for a long time, he doesn’t know what he wants.
      1. +12
        15 November 2019 15: 43
        Yes, he wants to perform an unprecedented trick, not on two, but at least three chairs at once .. and ours and yours and not ours and others and this and that ... but it just won’t work out .. the fart isn’t rubber and the pants will break
      2. +6
        15 November 2019 15: 51
        We know how to use it no worse than the Russians, but we pay huge amounts of money for it.

        With such uniforms, and such logic. No.
      3. +5
        15 November 2019 17: 01
        Quote: G. Georgiev
        I’ve been looking at this guy for a long time, he doesn’t know what he wants.

        He just knows what he wants: to rule forever, and so that Russia gives money, raw materials and goods, but does not require anything in return. For they give money to the fraternal people, but they demand it — from a sovereign state. smile
    10. -3
      15 November 2019 15: 41
      This is the sweet word "freebie"!
      1. -12
        15 November 2019 16: 24
        Colleague hi
        The trouble is that we have no real friends and allies except Belarusians. Lukashenka is a politician - one of the oldest professions obliges him to "spin". And the brotherly Belarusian people are with us, do not hesitate. Local "horses" are chased worse than we are ours.
        1. +4
          15 November 2019 16: 30
          Quote: lexus
          than we are our

          And he caught up a lot, on his horse? belay
        2. +13
          15 November 2019 16: 39
          Quote: lexus
          And the brotherly Belarusian people are with us, do not hesitate.

          Ukrainians have also recently been known as fraternal people. So, I wouldn’t promise ... We now know how the media can turn a brother into a blood enemy for several years.
          1. +3
            15 November 2019 17: 21
            Quote: Gritsa
            Quote: lexus
            And the brotherly Belarusian people are with us, do not hesitate.

            Ukrainians have also recently been known as fraternal people. So, I wouldn’t promise ... We now know how the media can turn a brother into a blood enemy for several years.

            C'mon to explain to you, the guy lives one day. Yes
        3. +2
          15 November 2019 17: 02
          Lukashenko is a friend ?! God have mercy!
        4. -1
          15 November 2019 17: 54
          Quote: lexus
          Colleague
          The trouble is that

          Man, what trouble is it for you personally?belay God forbid you to capture her. I suppose you have sleepless nights, and look less at the box with Solovyov, and ignore the newspapers, this is my advice to you. sad
          1. -6
            15 November 2019 20: 49
            Quote: Not bad
            Quote: lexus
            Colleague
            The trouble is that

            Man, what trouble is it for you personally?belay God forbid you to capture her. I suppose you have sleepless nights, and look less at the box with Solovyov, and ignore the newspapers, this is my advice to you. sad

            Wow. Fluffy, did you give this to the mountain? laughing Ha ha ha wassat
            1. +2
              15 November 2019 20: 54
              Serena, absolutely freaking out belay Yes, you got into the wrong pocket. laughing Well, to remind you of your combat "path" to Russia? Where to begin? From the Major of the Wehrmacht or as before Aibolit lebizil laughing wink
              1. +4
                15 November 2019 20: 56
                Well, have you quieted down? "Sochinets" wink
                1. -1
                  15 November 2019 21: 35
                  Quote: Not bad
                  Sochi

                  This is from the word SOCH?
            2. -1
              15 November 2019 21: 35
              Quote: Observer2014
              Quote: Not bad
              Quote: lexus
              Colleague
              The trouble is that

              Man, what trouble is it for you personally?belay God forbid you to capture her. I suppose you have sleepless nights, and look less at the box with Solovyov, and ignore the newspapers, this is my advice to you. sad

              Wow. Fluffy, did you give this to the mountain? laughing Ha ha ha wassat

              At the chameleon, let them see with what thoughts he came to us and how you poison the atmosphere with your verbiage on VO. negative
              https://topwar.ru/152156-rekordnoe-chislo-amerikancev-hochet-uehat-iz-ssha-navsegda.html#comment-id-8940302
              The question is, who are you a werewolf? How long is the restless?
              1. -5
                15 November 2019 21: 53
                Quote: Not bad
                At the chameleon, let them see with what thoughts he came to us and how you poison the atmosphere with your verbiage on VO.
                https://topwar.ru/152156-rekordnoe-chislo-amerikancev-hochet-uehat-iz-ssha-navsegda.html#comment-id-8940302
                The question is, who are you a werewolf? How long is the restless?
                Reply

                Oh. How many verbiage strange. They will probably fulfill us here. Their genius is stupid wonderful comments. And the anger of the paradoxes is slag. laughing This is for you personally from me negative tongue laughing
                1. +1
                  15 November 2019 21: 58
                  Quote: Observer2014
                  Quote: Not bad
                  At the chameleon, let them see with what thoughts he came to us and how you poison the atmosphere with your verbiage on VO.
                  https://topwar.ru/152156-rekordnoe-chislo-amerikancev-hochet-uehat-iz-ssha-navsegda.html#comment-id-8940302
                  The question is, who are you a werewolf? How long is the restless?
                  Reply

                  Oh. How many wonderful verbiage. They will probably fulfill us here. Their genius is stupid wonderful comments. And the anger of the paradoxes is slag. laughing This is for you personally from me negative

                  Serena, I’m glad that I adjusted to Pushkin. Question: How long did you intend to smoke heaven here, ungrateful? laughing
        5. +5
          15 November 2019 20: 50
          the problem is the inertia of the Slavic peoples ... in other words, if Lukashenka says "the war between Russia and NATO does not concern us, then no one will go to fight, except for the units who will be imprisoned for mercenarism upon their arrival. Donbass has shown that Lukashenka will go for that's all ... He suggested placing the same peacekeepers not on the demarcation line, but on the former Russian-Ukrainian border ... For whom is this a plus? right for Kiev ... by the way, when planting Donbass militias, he did not plant a single Nazi, except for one and that for old sins ... but he did not attribute new ones to him ... if anything, then a solarium at the Minsk Armed Forces ..
    11. +8
      15 November 2019 15: 42
      "Without-who-mez-bottom ... Ie for free" (c)
      But Butska said that Russia should pay Belarus for covering up the western border of Russia. Here I measured the eastern and southern borders, which Russia covers in the name of Belarus - all sorts of NATO, barmalei, predatory China, etc. I propose to arrange netting. And whoever covers up more is to pay extra.
      Russia, apparently, has learned to make reverse square thread with burrs for exclusive fraternal nuts.
      1. +2
        15 November 2019 15: 46
        “I measured the eastern and southern borders here, which Russia covers in the name of Belarus - all kinds of NATO, barmaley, predatory China, etc.”.
        And "squid with lobster" from the "Belarusian sea-ocean" was forgotten ...
        1. +2
          15 November 2019 16: 08
          Quote: Andrey Chistyakov
          And "squid with lobster" from the "Belarusian sea-ocean" was forgotten ...

          How do you forget them? The first time that this miracle fell into my hands, neighing like a horse, the people standing next to me in the market got shy, but bought Yes
        2. +4
          15 November 2019 17: 36
          Quote: Andrey Chistyakov
          And the "squid with lobster" from the "Belarusian sea-ocean" was forgotten.

          Squid is still understandable, but where did the lobster come from in Belarus?
      2. 0
        15 November 2019 22: 18
        By this logic, then Belarus should pay Russia for the eastern borders of the Union, and “east of Belarus” borders with Finland, Norway, the Northern Sea Route (after the coastal forces there) Japan, Korea, China, Mongolia and Kazakhstan ...
    12. +2
      15 November 2019 15: 49
      First he kissed Bolton, by the way, why did Bolton come:
      The task of the Belarusian front was made even more precise by the former US Ambassador to Ukraine John Herbst. America simply demonstrates its readiness to talk and even somewhat support the Belarusian president "who is trying to cope with the Russian threat." That is, we are talking about the fact that Belarus is not just somewhere not far from the place of the collision of two leading geopolitical opponents, it is perceived in Washington solely as a resource for waging war with Russia.

      Then you fighters? For free? Will the erysipelas not crack?
      Once again - friendship - only prepaid, for the sake of new SU-nets and other things, the United States can help them, as well as Ukraine. And judging by the fact that Luke wiggled from side to side, like Yanyk in his time - this is real
    13. +1
      15 November 2019 15: 51
      The father lies in bed between the woman-Russia and the homosexual-West. It seems that she doesn’t know who to turn her back on.
    14. +1
      15 November 2019 15: 53
      But father of Polish apples and sanction prawns had a bite ......
    15. +4
      15 November 2019 15: 57
      According to this logic, Belarusians should help Russia for free, as It (Russia) covers them from all sides! It's time to end this. Belarus should be part of the Russian Federation! We are Russians, God is with us!
      1. +3
        15 November 2019 16: 17
        Quote: cheburator
        Belarus should be part of the Russian Federation! We are Russians, God is with us!

        That is our strength.
    16. +5
      15 November 2019 15: 59
      "We are protecting you from the east," shouted daddy to the Europeans, demanding free graipens and eurofighters from them
    17. +6
      15 November 2019 16: 02
      President of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko wanted to get Russian Su-30SM fighters for free, but Russia did not agree to this because of the differences.

      Just like a bearded joke:
      Madame, I can’t do what this Russian wants!
      Margo, how many times have I told you: the client’s desire is the law!
      Madame, but he wants it for free!
    18. +2
      15 November 2019 16: 02
      dad, Crimea didn’t recognize
    19. +2
      15 November 2019 16: 02
      Dear, read the source. There is no word about free. Talking about help in ACQUISITION of airplanes, because the Air Force of the Republic of Belarus also performs tasks to protect the western borders of the Russian Federation. What’s upsetting here? And someone Safronov in his article distorted the events. I think that the propaganda campaign began in anticipation of the meeting of the Presidents on December 8. I am disturbed by the references to some high-ranking sources. What is the secret? Indeed, the network contains specific words of Lukashenka, Zasya, and the military with border guards. But Lukashenko, in the intrigues of this kind of Master, while he had no defeats. Even when the Russian Federation turned off the gas supply on the night of JUNE 22 due to debts of $ 200 million (with its debts of 760 million), money for the night was found in Azerbaijan is interest free. It seems 2010. So let's look at the development of events.
      1. -1
        15 November 2019 16: 42
        Is this to whom Russia owed? Belarus? And you naively think that Baku gave something for nothing ?? well, I’ll pay you
        1. -4
          15 November 2019 16: 44
          I do not think, but I know.
          1. -1
            15 November 2019 16: 45
            Well, yes, well, yes, personally read the documents ..
            1. -2
              15 November 2019 16: 47
              Do you have opposite data or, simply, "it can't be"?
              1. -1
                15 November 2019 16: 52
                In the modern world, nothing is being done in relations between states for SIMPLY SUCH, well, it just so happened ... but they didn’t answer the second question .. well, maybe you yourself Kolya Lukashenko and know what your father was doing there.
                1. -3
                  15 November 2019 16: 53
                  Well, you think so, and politicians look to the future.
                  1. 0
                    15 November 2019 16: 55
                    Only each of them has their own future and someone has a very short one, but someone doesn’t have it ... but with throwings like Mr. Lukashenko, some kind of future is not very attractive, and he shouldn’t take tricks, but you shouldn’t curl time is right to make an accurate and unambiguous choice, that's all
              2. +3
                15 November 2019 16: 55
                Quote: AlexGa
                Do you have opposing data or simply

                Man, to demand to refute his (unfounded, note) statements, some documents - this is hutspa request

                Quote: AlexGa
                I do not think, but I know

                I'm talking about this statement, if that Yes
                1. -3
                  15 November 2019 16: 59
                  I did not speak about documents, I spoke about data. I am in the habit of saying only what I know 100% about.
                  1. +4
                    15 November 2019 17: 15
                    Quote: AlexGa
                    I did not speak about documents, I spoke about data

                    In words. But in refutation of your words you require documents. This, I repeat, is hutspa.

                    Quote: AlexGa
                    I am in the habit of saying only what I know 100%

                    This is also only yours. words, no more.
                    1. 0
                      15 November 2019 18: 55
                      Your logic is strange. They threw fakenews, it didn’t raise any questions for you, although read the Media Law and listen to Simonyan on this subject. She explained it well. Documents on this topic from the author of this opus you also do not need. And from me you want something. You know, I have been living in this world for many years. So, I'm sorry, but I won’t play in children's games. I have the honor!
                  2. +1
                    15 November 2019 20: 58
                    But Russia should have 700 million before giving Minsk a loan of 7,5 billion dollars or after?
        2. -1
          15 November 2019 18: 51
          Well, if Gazprom is not Russia ...
        3. 0
          15 November 2019 19: 15
          Специально искал в сети.Цифры российские, по белорусским они в три раза больше долг показывали исходя из своих тарифов на транзит, но это сути не меняет. https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%B9%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%BE-%D0%B1%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%83%D1%81%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D1%8D%D0%BD%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B3%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B8%D1%87%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BD%D1%84%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BA%D1%82%D1%8B. Посмотрите за 2010 год.
    20. +1
      15 November 2019 16: 12
      He later stated that he would not allow the deployment of foreign military facilities on the territory of Belarus.
      Trying to wring your hands. But very unsuccessful. Really need to think Shura.
      1. +6
        15 November 2019 16: 17
        Russians are foreigners to him, so he then needs foreigners help and understanding. Actually, the Russian Ministry of Defense also buys these planes at the rates offered by Belarusians. Sometimes behaves like a capricious woman. They mean buy dairy products at the full price and don’t tweet, even if their quality is not up to standard, and if Russia reproaches them for this quality, then Lukashenko will immediately have a tantrum with pouring dirt on bad Russians.
    21. -10
      15 November 2019 16: 18
      - Why not ... Nigram billions forgiven? Forgiven ... We could have leased them.
      1. +3
        15 November 2019 20: 59
        and in the ass not to kiss him?
        1. 0
          16 November 2019 19: 33
          - Well, if you like such a thing ...
    22. +1
      15 November 2019 16: 19
      We already heard this from the "non-brothers" from UKRALINA, that they are the ones who protect Gay-roba from the Asian barbarians .. But father, you see, the wrong text was captured before the performance ..))
    23. +7
      15 November 2019 16: 20
      Some have been fighting the Russian Federation for five years, others are defending. But everyone wants to do it for money.
    24. -4
      15 November 2019 16: 41
      Old Man in statements is freer than all officials / politicians combined ...
    25. +4
      15 November 2019 16: 42
      Is Belarus costing us too much?
    26. +5
      15 November 2019 16: 42
      Recently, Belarus bought Su-30СМ aircraft from Russia for its money. But we also carry out the protection functions in this direction of the people of Russia. So why not help us? We know how to use it no worse than the Russians, but we pay huge amounts of money for it.

      - Belarusian editions cite Lukashenko’s statement.


      And when it was proposed to create the idea of ​​creating a base of Russian VKS, what did we hear?
      Do not be this!
      Then we would protect not only ourselves, but also Belarus and its people for our huge money.
      You are strange, Grigorievich.
    27. -2
      15 November 2019 16: 45
      Tired already this hohlosabr wassat
    28. -8
      15 November 2019 16: 56
      The zombies in the swamp groaned and whined. "Dad is bad, bad dad, greedy, our oligarchic clowns are yeah, and the Chinese are our best friends, and the Ukrainians are enemies." Everything is correct Lukashenka demands. But the oligarchy does not need allies, the oligarchy needs loot, and nothing else.
      1. +4
        15 November 2019 17: 24
        And here are the adherents of the sect "Father, bring order to order" are indignant
      2. +6
        15 November 2019 18: 58
        Quote: Old Fuck
        That's right, everything requires Lukashenko. Only after all, the oligarchy does not need allies, the oligarchy needs loot, and nothing more.

        That's just not the money of the oligarchs that are spent on Lukashenko’s support, but funds from the Russian budget.
        And yet - you need an "ally" who asks for money, but since 2008 has refused any reciprocal request?
      3. +2
        15 November 2019 22: 24
        We have oligarchs then under the heel, a step to the left - a step to the right - London and a scarf in the shower))))
        And you have one oligarch, only his manners are not oligarchic, but royal))))
    29. +1
      15 November 2019 16: 57
      Well, Luka, well, a collective farmer, but all Ukrainians-ensign against him are miserable dwarfs-idiots.
    30. +2
      15 November 2019 17: 12
      A long tradition of comrade Lukashenko sitting on two chairs, so to speak, a big hunt and eat fish and dance on a pole.
    31. +4
      15 November 2019 17: 16
      Again, the Old Man is trading like in a bazaar. Not tired?
    32. -2
      15 November 2019 17: 27
      And why not help the fraternal people. .
      1. +3
        15 November 2019 19: 00
        Quote: Prahlad
        And why not help the fraternal people. .

        Indeed, let Old Man help the fraternal people. For example, recognizes the entry of Crimea.
        And how to receive 6 billion evergreens a year from the budget of Russia - so he is a brotherly people. And as a matter of Crimea - so immediately a sovereign state.
        And I still don’t remember about the Old Man’s position regarding Abkhazia and Ossetia.
      2. +1
        15 November 2019 22: 28
        Why shouldn't the Fraternal Belarusian people help the Fraternal Russian? Put us something too, a free thread))) at least in exchange for a free Sushka)))

        Barter - such a word is called))))
    33. +1
      15 November 2019 17: 28
      Not freeloaders, but partners.
    34. 0
      15 November 2019 17: 30
      Recently, Belarus bought Su-30СМ aircraft from Russia for its money. But we also carry out the protection functions in this direction of the people of Russia. So why not help us? We know how to use it no worse than the Russians, but we pay huge amounts of money for it.
      And Russia performs the functions of protecting Belarus from the Asian direction, so why do Belarusians sell their products to Russia and not give it away?
    35. 0
      15 November 2019 17: 44
      President of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko wanted to get Russian Su-30SM fighters for free,
      Why did everyone decide that he wanted to get them for free? No matter how free, he wanted Russia to pay him as well for the fact that he bought them from us ...
    36. +1
      15 November 2019 17: 55
      Quote: demo
      Recently, Belarus bought Su-30SM aircraft from Russia for its money.

      Would buy for strangers.
    37. +2
      15 November 2019 18: 11
      Does this whiskered clown with billions of dollars in debt still require free fighters?
      Bulba will not crack?
    38. -3
      15 November 2019 18: 19
      I read the comments - how I visited the Land of Fools: money, money, money! Is it okay that we are one people? Is it okay that they are there, if anything, they risk being the first to get for us? They generally need to be armed free of charge, so that they do not put French equipment on airplanes, so that they are in the same "network" with us, so that much more. And yet - if we pump Belarus, as first the Union, and then Ukraine, then the collapse of the remnants of Russia is inevitable. Father must be cherished! His requests, in fact, are penny, but then the losses cannot be won back. At the same time, all the political games are geared towards the interest of the Russian oligarchs in the Republic of Belarus, there is still something to fuck, so they are crushing Old Man. Well, and the Union on the terms of Moscow, too. In a word, the capitalists decide their own, and the people assent to them. Yakovlev's 500 days weren't enough for you? Where is the prosperity? So far - just an ass for almost 30 years. Remember, the Bolsheviks built a new state in 20 years, which first entered space? And the local "patriots" stupidly support those who still eat up the Soviet. Ugh, damn it.
      1. -4
        15 November 2019 18: 38
        Most likely a kindergarten in the country of fools. They threw a bone and everyone bite it together. But nobody wants to look into the essence of the event. Strategies are sofa! And then they will be unitedly indignant, they again deceived us. This has already passed!
        1. 0
          15 November 2019 21: 39
          Why think? Spitting is easier, but more interesting against the wind.
          It is a pity, of course, that the comments are written only by the Plibei, but this is apparently what you have in Russia, `` se lyavukha. '' As the classics used to say, being determines consciousness.
          1. 0
            15 November 2019 22: 02
            Passed by guidnost, and the monitor pacified with fat ...
      2. +8
        15 November 2019 19: 05
        Quote: Doliva63
        Nothing that we are one people?

        And what does the people have to do with it? This is not the people asking for a dai-dai-dai, but a concrete mustachioed face.
        Quote: Doliva63
        Is it okay that they are there, if anything, they risk being the first to get for us? They generally need to be armed free of charge, so that they do not put French equipment on airplanes, so that they are in the same "network" with us, so that much more.

        Yeah ... and then Mackey will meet the bearers of democracy going to Russia with bread and salt - and he will show them the way. He already laid a wreath at Tskhinvali killers in Tbilisi - officially, on behalf of Belarus.
        And for Belarus it will be the next "not our war".
        Quote: Doliva63
        His requests, in fact, are cheap, but then the losses can not be won back later.

        6 billion green a year. And this is not enough for him.
        Quote: Doliva63
        Well, the Union on Moscow terms, too.

        You suggest Russia will enter into an alliance with Belarus on the terms of Belarus: You feed us, and we will teach you?
      3. +1
        15 November 2019 21: 03
        Do you really believe that Lukashenka, who for a quarter of a century has done nothing to help Russia, but will suddenly decide to harm Belarus in the event of a conflict to enter the war? 7 times ha-ha..And yes, why should Russia collapse? For how many years has he hated Russia with its entire composition, and what? Something will not fall apart, and then suddenly, due to the fact that the Republic of Belarus decides to completely repaint, it will suddenly fall apart ... yeah, the maximum that will happen is to build a couple of factories to replace Minsk components .. And yes .. shouting about "the Bolsheviks in 20 years" .. Something I don't see that you go ahead of everyone to build the country ..
      4. 0
        16 November 2019 12: 22
        Anything they are there, if that, risk being the first to get for us?


        The Kaliningrad region will be the first to receive military aggression against us, but I’m not sure that Belarus will fight on our side under Lukashenko.

        Did Lukashenko help Russia greatly in Syria?

        At least symbolically, he could send several groups of sappers, commandos, and pilots, purely even for gaining experience for the Armed Forces of Belarus, but he did not. He didn’t even send any demining platoon to work in the rear for mine clearance.

        And I’m not sure that if NATO or China attacks Russia tomorrow, Belarus, led by Lukashenko, will come out on our side.

        But just no one climbs into Belarus for the reason that Russia is nearby and this is Russia a guarantee of security for Belarus, and not vice versa.

        Lukashenko's impudence has simply crossed all borders !!! Lukashenko earns on Russia, receives resources, equipment and technologies from Russia right up to the nuclear power plant, so we should stay with him. Parasite.
    39. +4
      15 November 2019 18: 58
      So in Kazakhstan no one says that they protect us from the south request ... Bought "drying" for your own, and no complaints to you ..
      1. +6
        15 November 2019 19: 37
        Quote: anfreezer
        So in Kazakhstan no one says that they protect us from the south

        We must not forget that Kazakhstan borders not only with Russia, but also with China. At the same time, these neighbors occupy one of the last places in terms of investments in Kazakhstan. I think it's not difficult to guess who takes the lead. Secondly, almost 5% of Kazakhstan's GDP goes to protect against internal threats, and less than 1% from external ones. The situation is similar with the Belarusian regime of Lukashenka. But most importantly, in the military educational institutions of Kazakhstan, they have been training on the cards for a long time to defend the northern borders of the state, and Russia is seen as a potential aggressor. More than once there have been attempts to "wag the tail" in front of NATO according to the Georgian or Ukrainian scenario. Suffice it to recall the participation of the Kazbat in the NATO operation in Iraq. At the same time, neither Kazakhstan nor Belarus is going to participate in peacekeeping operations with the participation of Russia within the framework of the CSTO agreement in principle. In fact, the only merit of the political leadership of Kazakhstan and Belarus is the absence of permanent NATO bases on their territories. Although the presence of a US biological laboratory in Kazakhstan, Georgia and Ukraine makes the presence of US military bases irrelevant. Why would they expose their soldiers to biological or chemical weapons.
    40. +2
      15 November 2019 19: 11
      Everyone in Russia cares about one question: will there be a coup d'etat in Belarus like the Ukrainian 2014 of the year in Belarus? Without a Russian military base, it is definitely impossible to answer. Poland grew too strong and unbelted, and the Germans became insolent under the leadership of the Americans.
    41. +1
      15 November 2019 19: 34
      No need to swear. Belarusians are the most adequate people. The fact that they have snickering dad so-called. Like Old Man Makhno)))) They are not to blame, as we are what we have in power. Although ...... here you can argue who is to blame))
      1. +4
        15 November 2019 21: 05
        and it’s not about Belarusians, it’s about Lukashenko
    42. +3
      15 November 2019 20: 09
      Does Russia make them not for free, but for Belarus for free?
    43. 0
      15 November 2019 21: 02
      Not long he had left, to see ... Not that he says. Not that...
    44. DPN
      0
      15 November 2019 21: 51
      Belarus is a buffer for Russia, and without a buffer, it is not far from the Ural Mountains.
    45. +3
      15 November 2019 22: 19
      Quote: Obi Wan Kenobi
      And what is worse than Belarus

      After Lukashenko’s well-known statements about World War II, it’s not an hour that he uses planes, to put it mildly, not quite for his intended purpose. We encountered this in Ukraine, and he is also the top commander.
    46. +1
      15 November 2019 22: 38
      RB is the only country from the "so-called CSTO" that will actually fight hand in hand with the Russian Federation. But, if you are closer to Madura with Amorales and Pook Jong-un, then ... My condolences ... crying feel sad
      1. 0
        18 November 2019 12: 21
        Quote: Nycomed
        RB is the only country from the "so-called CSTO" that will actually fight hand in hand with the Russian Federation.

        Sure?
        But the most important thing is Belarus, and even Kazakhstan, because they have always been under someone's whip, as I often say. Someone urged us, someone tried to kneel. Especially in Belarus. All these wars are not our wars. The Patriotic War of 1812, Napoleon walked to Moscow and returned through Belarus. Everything was plundered, everything was destroyed. Then the First World War. We got to the point that only a narrow strip remained from Belarus - a part of the eastern provinces was left to Russia, and to Minsk it was transferred to Poland under the Riga Treaty. Then World War II, we have the Great Patriotic War. Belarus was completely wiped off the face of the earth. These were not our wars. Nevertheless, we took a sip of grief. In the last war, we lost a third of our population. Mostly civilians. What were the children, old people to blame?
        And now we are faced with the fact and have the opportunity to determine our fate ourselveswithout causing any harm to our neighbors.
        © President of Belarus
    47. +5
      15 November 2019 23: 12
      The neighbors went completely crazy: some think that they are fighting with Russia for the whole planet, others are the only defenders of the Russian land. Some bayonets to the east, others to the west. And they stand shoulder to shoulder. Some kind of sur! The truth is related one thing - to compromise something for free, and to profit from something to preferential fuck. Three years ago, everything became clear to me with Old Man, when the Immortal Regiment began to be divided into Russian and Belarusian: rotten roots — there shouldn’t be a tree.
    48. DPN
      +4
      15 November 2019 23: 33
      Yes, the three of us will not have a future until we unite again, bleed the Slavs among themselves, and that’s all. If 3 villains have gathered and collapsed, then it’s time in the Bible to collect while there is something to collect.
    49. +3
      16 November 2019 00: 37
      he defends Moscow from the west

      And Moscow defends Minsk from the east. We're even.
      1. The comment was deleted.
    50. -2
      16 November 2019 00: 55
      Quote: Givi_49
      he defends Moscow from the west

      And Moscow defends Minsk from the east. We're even.

      From whom, let me know? Who is threatening Belarus from the east?
      1. -1
        16 November 2019 19: 12
        Quote: CheGuevara
        Quote: Givi_49
        he defends Moscow from the west

        And Moscow defends Minsk from the east. We're even.

        From whom, let me know? Who is threatening Belarus from the east?

        What is incomprehensible? It protects from itself. Till. But after the merger - options are possible: complete privatization, for example, etc. Do people need it? Here I agree with Lukashenko.
    51. The comment was deleted.
    52. 0
      16 November 2019 12: 15
      Recently, Belarus purchased Su-30SM aircraft from Russia with its own money. But we also perform the functions of protecting the people of Russia in this direction. So why don't we help?


      Lukashenko's impudence knows no bounds.

      Russia supplies Belarus not only with weapons and resources (oil, gas, metals), has given Belarusian goods access to its market to the detriment of its producers and population, but also equipment and technology and at prices much lower than market prices!!! And this scoundrel shouts that Russia still owes him...

      There are no words, the parasite has stuck and you can’t tear it off.
    53. -5
      16 November 2019 14: 39
      Another “knife in the back” of our “multi-move” and “cunning planner”?
    54. +1
      16 November 2019 15: 30
      Lukashenko wanted to get a squadron of Russian Su-30СМ for free

      Wanting a little.
      It is also necessary to give the opportunity to Russian oligarchs and friends of the guarantor to earn money on Belarusian assets and it is advisable to be black.
    55. 0
      16 November 2019 16: 30
      Why not team up with Russia and get the planes for free?
    56. -3
      16 November 2019 17: 40
      Gentlemen, well, the overall picture is clear, Luka is not a good person and so on, the Belarusian people are fraternal for the majority. And who can name the benefits of the Russian Federation from the accession of the Republic of Belarus?
      1. -2
        16 November 2019 19: 05
        Quote: AlexGa
        Gentlemen, well, the overall picture is clear, Luka is not a good person and so on, the Belarusian people are fraternal for the majority. And who can name the benefits of the Russian Federation from the accession of the Republic of Belarus?

        Citizen, learn Russian, then you will ask “smart” questions. Or are there only bots left at VO? hi
        1. +2
          16 November 2019 19: 18
          Quote: Doliva63
          Quote: AlexGa
          Gentlemen, well, the overall picture is clear, Luka is not a good person and so on, the Belarusian people are fraternal for the majority. And who can name the benefits of the Russian Federation from the accession of the Republic of Belarus?

          Citizen, learn Russian, then you will ask “smart” questions. Or are there only bots left at VO? hi

          Um.. buddy, please clearly indicate what you were not so pleased with in the phrase written quite in Russian.

          Zhdems, Valya wassat
          1. -1
            16 November 2019 22: 34
            Probably confused by the lack of a comma after NU
          2. 0
            19 November 2019 18: 51
            Quote: Golovan Jack
            Quote: Doliva63
            Quote: AlexGa
            Gentlemen, well, the overall picture is clear, Luka is not a good person and so on, the Belarusian people are fraternal for the majority. And who can name the benefits of the Russian Federation from the accession of the Republic of Belarus?

            Citizen, learn Russian, then you will ask “smart” questions. Or are there only bots left at VO? hi

            Um.. buddy, please clearly indicate what you were not so pleased with in the phrase written quite in Russian.

            Zhdems, Valya wassat

            Mistakes, my friend, mistakes. If you don’t notice them, you are also from the cohort of those who started smoking before they could speak.
            And one more thing: I am Valya only for my wife. Are you applying for her place? laughing Joke. But it’s worth watching your speech. You are, after all, in a public place.
        2. -2
          17 November 2019 10: 04
          You don't have to teach me Russian.
          1. 0
            19 November 2019 18: 55
            Quote: AlexGa
            You don't have to teach me Russian.

            It seems there is no point in teaching you at all. Whatever it is.
            1. -1
              19 November 2019 19: 00
              Is rudeness your distinctive feature? Or explain your position?
    57. -1
      17 November 2019 06: 18
      “Batko” has gone completely crazy in his old age.
    58. -1
      17 November 2019 06: 28
      Lukashenko should be understood solely from the position that he says exclusively what, in his reasoning, should please the current interlocutor, well, so that good things will break off, and others should not listen; never. But he’s somehow mistaken, because the presidents of countries are always listened to. What he carries in the public sphere. This is what puzzled Russian subscribers, albeit indirect ones. laughing laughing
    59. The comment was deleted.
    60. -1
      17 November 2019 11: 19
      We are defending Dad from Kaliningrad from Lithuania, Latvia and Poland, and from the east from Japan........it's time for him to fork out for a couple of submarines......
    61. -1
      17 November 2019 12: 34
      And lastly: “November 17, Minsk /Mikhail Matievsky - BELTA/. President of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko told reporters today that he will not sign any of the documents on deepening integration with Russia if it contradicts the Belarusian Constitution, BELTA correspondent reports.

      “Not a single document will be approved or signed by me if it contradicts the Constitution and the fundamental principles of the life of our society. And the most important principles are the sovereignty, independence of our state,” said Alexander Lukashenko. “Therefore, there is no need for any conspiracy theories, everything is carried out here openly. The Prime Minister has already said, this is an established position: if our fundamental issues are not resolved (on the supply of hydrocarbons, properly opening markets for our goods, removing barriers, etc.), no road maps can be signed."

      The President emphasized that Belarus is not a freeloader and does not want to be one. He cited the example of the United States, which started a trade war with China “due to a trade deficit of hundreds of billions of dollars.” “Do you know what a trade deficit we have with Russia? About nine billion dollars annually. Where can I get these nine billion to pay Russia for the goods that we buy? This money must be earned on the Russian market. But they have built barriers for us and they are not allowed there for certain types of goods. Is this correct? No. Of course, we will not fight with Russia, like America with China. But this is wrong,” the head of state is convinced.

      According to Alexander Lukashenko, when countries join associations, they expect to gradually improve their economy. “What’s happening here? Every year they give us new conditions. And as a result, we are constantly losing something in the economy. Who needs such a union? - he asked. - This is our position. The President of Russia knows about this. We are with him friends, I can tell him this openly, and even worse. He can tell me."

      If trade with Russia were more or less equal, Belarus could attract other markets and become richer, the head of state noted. “What kind of union is this if we are losing every year and conditions are getting worse? This is not normal. Therefore, if we talk about the economy, we do not pretend to anything and do not ask for anything. We demand, as we once agreed, equal conditions for the subjects management, just people. This will be an alliance. And then you will never throw a stone at Russia, and we will always welcome such an alliance. Therefore, don’t worry: I’m no less a patriot than you,” summed up Alexander Lukashenko.”
      And where is Lukashenko wrong? I agree with him.
      1. 0
        29 November 2019 21: 49
        Listen, come here and live here. Then agree.
        1. 0
          29 November 2019 22: 11
          I live here, don't worry
    62. 0
      17 November 2019 16: 41
      Everything must be given to him for free. Or maybe you’ll have to pay extra for it, but he won’t take it for free. Dad, you are a real Ukrainian.
      1. 0
        29 November 2019 21: 47
        finally a gypsy.
    63. 0
      17 November 2019 19: 18
      Closer to Lukashenko’s election as president for a new term, I feel that we will hear something different from him. laughing laughing
    64. -1
      17 November 2019 19: 33
      It’s not easy to be a small neighbor of a big country... Especially if the language of the president of such a small country is frankly full of holes. laughing
    65. 0
      19 November 2019 03: 15
      And Lukashenko could recognize Crimea as part of the Russian Federation and not be friends with Ukraine and not smuggle Polish apples into the Russian Federation, and finance the budget of the union state with the Russian Federation by 50%, since he wants equal rights with the Russian Federation, and not by 1 third, as is the case today do not call Russia an occupier who allegedly imposed its wars on the Republic of Belarus and Kazakhstan... In general, behave like a friend and ally, and not a lady with low social responsibility...
    66. 0
      29 November 2019 21: 47
      and this is always not enough. No matter what.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"